Fiber-optic communication has become an important fundamental facility in the communication development of every country because it provides effective broadband integration communication service. To satisfy the increasing demand for broadband, the fiber-optic network has to be constantly improved.1 With the development of receiving FTTx technology for an optical fiber, which is characterized by wide bandwidth, zero electromagnetic radiation, and low energy loss, such a fiber has become the most critical transportation medium in the wired communication field.23.–4 In addition, because wireless communication provides a way for people to retrieve messages and updates anytime and anywhere, it has become vital for daily life. However, meeting the rapid development of message technology generates an increased demand for high speed and wide bandwidth of indoor wired/wireless broadband access networks [e.g., plastic fiber-optic transmission system or visible light communication (VLC)]. A network structure built with a single-mode fiber (SMF) is well known to be capable of providing users high-quality transmission service. Such an advantage is more remarkable when it is utilized in long-distance and huge data transmissions. However, SMF may not be the best choice in a last mile indoor wired broadband access due to its installation cost and low convenience. To overcome such issues, a new development is required for the new indoor wired broadband access scenario. Achievements in research on gradient index-plastic optical fibers (GI-POF) and VLC have been widely proposed;126.96.36.199.–10 specifically, the optimum path to the last mile’s solution. GI-POF not only has the same characteristics of SMF, as mentioned above, but also has the advantages of a large core diameter, excellent bending radius, and easy cutting and coupling for users. In addition, VLC has several strong points compared with traditional microwave radio communication in the field of indoor wireless broadband access. Among these strong points, it provides a free, license-free electromagnetic spectrum communication channel and no electromagnetic interference. Thus, it can be utilized in specific zones where radio frequency (RF) communication is prohibited (e.g., hospitals, oil refinery, and so on) to compensate for the inconvenience of RF communication. GI-POF and VLC may be used in the integration of a fiber backbone and an indoor broadband access network. The feasibility of SMF integrating with GI-POF to transmit a CATV/OFDM signal has been verified.6 Transmission possibility through the integration of SMF and photonic crystal fiber through a mixed CATV/16-QAM-Digital CATV/16-QAM-OFDM signal that introduces light injection/optoelectronic feedback has also been verified.11 The possibility of transmitting 40-km SMF and 30-cm VLC by integrating a passive optical network (PON) and a VLC structure through the use of LED to transmit a 500 Mbps signal for VLC has also been proposed.7 However, neither integrating the mixed CATV/16-QAM-Digital CATV/16-QAM-OFDM with a PON of 13 wavelengths nor the GI-POF/VLC indoor broadband transmission has been proposed by any research team. Compared with the research proposed regarding mixed the optical fiber transmission system and VLC, the mixed CATV/16-QAM-Digital CATV/16-QAM-OFDM integrated with a PON of 13 wavelengths and the GI-POF/ VLC indoor broadband transmission has relatively bigger challenges to overcome. In this study, the system’s transmission capability is increased through the application of an external injection technology with the addition of an optoelectronic feedback that raises the resonance frequency of the laser diode (LD). As far as we know, this study is the first to use external injection and optoelectronic feedback technology to integrate both plastic fiber and visible laser communication in a fiber transmission system. We expect a successful direct modulation of the CATV/Digital CATV/16-QAM-OFDM multifrequency signal and to receive good carrier-to-noise ratio (CNR), composite second-order (CSO), and composite triple-beat (CTB) status in CATV portion. A fairly low error rate and a beautiful horoscope chart in the 16-QAM-OFDM portion after transmission via 40 km of SMF, 10 m free space, and 30 m plastic fiber are also expected. The system offers complete broadband service for cable TV, telecom, and the Internet. It not only provides an integration of optical fiber backbone and indoor access, but also reveals its convenient last-mile application for final users, making it very appealing for advanced fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) application.
The experimental setup of our proposed hybrid CATV/16-QAM-Digital CATV/16-QAM-OFDM in-building network over a combination of 40-km SMF and 30-m GI-POF/10-m VLC transport is shown in Fig. 1. A total of 77 carriers (CH 2 to 40; and CH 41 to 78; ) generated from a multiple-signal generator (Matrix SX-16) are employed to provide the CATV and 16-QAM-Digital CATV signals. The 16-QAM-OFDM data signal (; ) is generated offline via MATLAB and uploaded into an arbitrary waveform generator. To avoid intercarrier interference, the peak to average power ratio of the OFDM signal is limited to 8 dB. Such a 16-QAM-OFDM signal is represented by a 512 FFT size (including 128 data subcarriers, 64 cyclic prefixes, and 16 training symbols), 5G samples per second, and 1.175-GHz intermediate frequency. The CATV (CH 2 to 40), 16-QAM-Digital CATV (CH 41 to 78) signals, and the 16-QAM-OFDM data signal are combined by using a RF combiner with a 2-GHz bandwidth. The distributed feedback LD (DFB LD1) with a central wavelength of 1312.46 nm () is directly modulated by CATV (CH 2 to 40), 16-QAM-Digital CATV (CH 41 to 78), and 16-QAM-OFDM () signals. The optical output of DFB LD1 was injected into the DFB LD2 via an optical circulator (OC) with an injection power level of 4.8 dBm. The OC placed between the DFB LD1 and DFB LD2 prevents the return of laser light, ensuring that the injection light is completely injected into the DFB LD2. The output of DFB LD1 is coupled with port 1 of the OC, and the injection-locked DFB LD2 is coupled with port 2 of the OC. Port 3 of the OC was separated by a optical splitter. One part of the laser output is used for feedback through an optoelectronic feedback loop, and the other part is used for optical signal transmission. In the optoelectronic feedback loop, the fiber span between the OC and broadband photodetector (PD) is a fiber patch cord. The broadband PD converts laser light into a baseband, and RF combines signals to directly modulate DFB LD2. Over a 40-km fiber link, the optical signal is separated off by a optical splitter. One of the optical signals passes through a 30-m GI-POF that has a core diameter of and a total power loss of 6 dB. The optical signal is then detected by a photodiode with a 3-dB BW of 2.5 GHz, split by a RF splitter, filtered by two separate RF band-pass filters (BPFs) (50 to 550 MHz and 550 MHz to 2 GHz) to remove the spurious, amplified by two separate amplifiers [push-pull amplifier and low-noise amplifier (LNA)], and finally applied to a CATV analyzer and an OFDM analyzer. The push-pull amplifier has a 3-dB BW of 550 MHz, a signal gain of 22 dB, and a low noise figure (NF) of about 6 dB. Also, the LNA has a 3-dB BW of 2 GHz, a small signal gain of 24 dB, and a low NF of approximately 3.8 dB. All the CATV RF parameters (CNR, CSO, and CTB) are measured by a CATV analyzer, and the 16-QAM-OFDM signal is analyzed by an OFDM analyzer for bit error rate (BER) performance analysis. Another optical signal is detected by a PD, and the detected RF signal is supplied to the vertical cavity surface emitting laser (VCSEL)-based VLC subsystem. The VCSEL, with a 3-dB modulation BW/wavelength range/color of to , is directly modulated by the detected RF signal. The output power and bias current of the VCSEL are 5.2 mW (conforming to the FDA Class IIIa mandatory limit) and 14 mA, respectively. After emission from the VCSEL, the light is diverged, launched into the convex lens, delivered in the free space, and then concentrated on a PD. The PD has a detection wavelength range of 350 to 1100 nm with a response of . Such a VLC subsystem has a total power loss (transmission loss + coupling loss) of about 4.5 dB. The distance between the VCSEL and PD is 10 m. After PD detection, the detected RF signal is split by a RF splitter, passed through two separate RF BPFs, boosted by two separate amplifiers (push-pull amplifier and LNA), and eventually supplied to a CATV analyzer and an OFDM analyzer.
Experimental Results and Discussion
The rate equations for LD with light injection and optoelectronic feedback techniques are given by1213 Figure 2 shows the frequency response measured respectively for free running, 4.8 dBm external injection, and both 4.8 dBm external injection and optoelectronic feedback. Among which, the DFB LD’s frequency response is about 5 GHz under a free-running condition and 1.85 GHz for 4.8 dBm under an external injection condition, while it increased to 25.2 GHz under the conditions of both external injection and optoelectronic feedback. The 4.8-dBm external injection increased the frequency response of the laser by 3.7 times (), while it increased the laser’s frequency response by 5 times () under the conditions of both external injection and optoelectronic feedback.
Figure 3(a) shows the electrical spectrum of the hybrid CATV/16-QAM-Digital CATV/16-QAM OFDM data signal over a 40-km SMF PON transmission in point A of Fig. 1. CATV and 16-QAM-Digital CATV signals have lower frequencies of CH 2 to 40 at 55.25 to 319.25 MHz and of CH 41 to 78 at 325.25 to 547.25 MHz. A 16-QAM-OFDM has a bandwidth of 1.25 GHz, which denotes that the lowest frequency of a 16-QAM-OFDM signal is 550 MHz () while the highest frequency is 1.8 GHz (). The electrical spectrum of the hybrid CATV/16-QAM-Digital CATV/16-QAM-OFDM data signal after 40-km SMF PON transmission with a 1310-nm wave band light source is flatter than that with a 1550-nm wave band light source because nondispersion is absent in the 1310-nm wave band. The better the flat electrical spectrum is, the better the system transmission performance will be. Figures 3(b) and 3(c) show the electrical spectra of the hybrid CATV/16-QAM-Digital CATV/16-QAM OFDM signals over a combination of 40-km SMF and 30-m GI-POF/10 m VLC transport, respectively. Figure 3(b) clearly has a lower interference and better flat spectrum than Fig. 3(a), both of which result in better transmission performances. Increased transmission performances can be attributed to a lower total power loss of the VLC subsystem compared with that of the GI-POF one. A lower total power loss is related to a higher received optical power, which results in better transmission performances. Furthermore, although the mode dispersion tolerance of GI-POF is considerably higher than that of the multimode fiber, mode dispersion still exists in the GI-POF subsystem, resulting in greater performance degradation compared with the VLC one. The electrical spectrum is distorted by the spatial light beam expander and the transmission distance. Given that the digital signal is generally more robust than the analog signal with respect to noise and nonlinear distortion, the RF carrier level of the simulated 16-QAM digital CATV channel is approximately 10 dB, which is lower than that of the simulated analog CATV channel. As regards to the hybrid analog and digital transmission, a CATV signal is set to a high power level to maintain the quality of analog transmission and the 16-QAM/16-QAM-OFDM signal is set to a low power level because the digital signal has a better tolerance for transmission.
The plotted CNR/CSO/CTB values and the measured CATV signal over a 40-km SMF PON transmission at point A of Fig. 1 are presented in Fig. 4. For a CATV signal over a 40-km SMF PON transmission without using injection-locked and optoelectronic feedback techniques, the free-running CNR/CSO/CTB values are greater than 48, 59, and 59.1 dB, respectively. In contrast, with the use of injection-locked and optoelectronic feedback techniques, the CNR/CSO/CTB values are maintained at , 62, and 61.7 dB, respectively, thus improving the performances of CNR/CSO/CTB values by approximately 3.1, 3, and 2.6 dB, respectively. Injection-locking behavior occurs when an injection source laser is slightly detuned to a frequency lower than that of the injection-locked laser. The injection-locked laser can be stably locked depending on frequency detuning. The optimal injection-locking condition is found when the detuning between the two DFB LDs is 0.02 nm. Otherwise, for CSO and CTB performances, the CSO and CTB values ( and 61.7 dB, respectively) of systems with a 1310-nm nondispersion light source scheme are significantly improved. The improved results can be attributed to the use of a 1310 nm light source to achieve nondispersion in the SMF link. A system link with a transmission length of 40-km SMF has a positive dispersion of (), whereas a system link with a 1310 nm light source has zero dispersion. Combining the SMF and the nondispersion light source leads to zero total fiber dispersion. Low fiber dispersion results in low fiber-dispersion-induced distortions, which improve CSO and CTB performances.
The measured CNR values under NTSC channel number (CH 41–78) over a 40-km SMF PON transport for free running and with light injection and optoelectronic feedback cases are shown in Fig. 5. Clearly, the CNR value is increased as light injection and optoelectronic feedback techniques are employed. For the simulated digital 16-QAM signal transmission, the CNR values are about 38.6 dB (free running) and 41.1 dB (with light injection and optoelectronic feedback), respectively. Both values satisfy the minimum requirement of 30 dB for the 16-QAM signal with BER .
To evaluate the transmitted 16-QAM-OFDM signal performance over 40-km PON transmission, the measured BER curves and constellation map at a data signal of are presented in Fig. 6. At a PON transmission distance of 40 km, without employing injection-locked and optoelectronic feedback techniques, the received optical power level at the BER of is . In comparison, with injection-locked and optoelectronic feedback techniques, the received optical power level at the BER of decreases to . The improved power penalty of 2 dB indicates that employing injection-locked and optoelectronic feedback techniques are important to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio of the proposed system.
Figure 7 presents the measured CNR/CSO/CTB values over a combination of 40-km SMF/30-m GI-POF transport. Owing to the insertion loss of the push-pull amplifier and RF BPF, the CNR value of systems with the push-pull amplifier is degraded by about 3 dB compared with that of systems without the push-pull amplifier and RF BPF. However, systems with the push-pull amplifier and RF BPF still meet the CATV CNR performance demand at the subscriber (). For CSO and CTB performances, the CSO and CTB values () of systems with the push-pull amplifier are obviously improved. Improved results are due to the use of the push-pull amplifier to suppress the distortions.14
The measured BER curves and constellation maps of 16-QAM-OFDM data signal over a combination of 40-km SMF/30-m GI-POF transport are shown in Fig. 8. At a BER of , a power penalty of 2.7 dB is obtained. At a received optical power level of , the proposed GI-POF-based in-building networks can clearly provide good BER performance and a clear constellation map. Error transmission is achieved to demonstrate the feasibility of establishing such a hybrid CATV/16-QAM-Digital CATV/16-QAM-OFDM in-building network over SMF and GI-POF transport.
Figure 9 shows the measured CNR/CSO/CTB values over a combination of 40-km SMF/10-m VLC transport. The CNR value of systems with the push-pull amplifier and RF BPF is degraded by about 3 dB compared with that of systems without the push-pull amplifier and RF BPF. Such CNR degradation is due to the insertion loss of the push-pull amplifier and RF BPF. Nevertheless, the CNR value of systems with the push-pull amplifier and RF BPF still satisfies the CATV CNR requirement (). In contrast, the CSO and CTB values of systems with the push-pull amplifier are clearly improved. The CSO and CTB values of systems with the push-pull amplifier are higher than 54 dB, which meets the CATV CSO/CTB performance demands at the subscriber (). These improvement results are attributed to the use of the push-pull amplifier to eliminate distortions. Moreover, in comparing the CNR/CSO/CTB performances of the GI-POF (Fig. 7) and VLC (Fig. 9) subsystems, the CNR/CSO/CTB performances of the GI-POF subsystem are obviously worse than those of the VLC one. The CNR/CSO/CTB degradations are due to high total power loss and mode dispersion of the GI-POF subsystem.
For the transmitted 16-QAM-OFDM signal over 40-km SMF and 10-m free-space VLC transmission, the measured BER curves and constellation map versus transmission distance are shown in Fig. 10. When the free-space VLC transmission distance is fixed at 10 m, without employing LNA and RF BPF, the received BER at a free-space distance of approximately 10 m is . In contrast, when LNA and RF BPF are employed, the received BER at a free-space distance of approximately 10 m is . The improved BER from to is observed in a free-space VLC system because of noise suppression by LNA and noise removal by RF BPF.
The measured CNR values under NTSC channel number (CH 41 to 78) over a 40-km SMF and a 30-m GI-POF/10 m VLC transport are presented in Fig. 11. As the injection and feedback are employed simultaneously, CNR performance is improved around 3 dB. For the simulated digital 16-QAM CATV signal transmission, the CNR values are about 29 dB (free running) and 32 dB (injection and feedback), respectively. Both values meet the minimum demand of 30 dB for the 16-QAM signal with BER .
A hybrid CATV/16-QAM-Digital CATV/16-QAM-OFDM in-building network based on a hybrid PON and GI-POF/VLC scenario is proposed and experimentally demonstrated. For a hybrid PON and GI-POF/VLC scenario, the combined CATV/16-QAM-Digital CATV/16-QAM-OFDM signals are broadcast to all subscribers after the signals are received by the PD. Thus not only do the CNR/CSO/CTB performances of the proposed in-building network satisfy the CATV requirements () at the subscriber, but their BER value meets the high-quality 16-QAM-Digital CATV/16-QAM-OFDM demand () as well. The system offers complete broadband service for cable TV, telecom, and the Internet. It not only provides an integration of optical fiber backbone and indoor access, but also reveals its convenient last-mile application for final users, making it very appealing for advanced FTTH application.
This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China, Taiwan, under Contract MOST 103-2218-E-027-001.
H. T. Huang et al., “100-GHz DD-OFDM-RoF system over 150-km fiber transmission employing pilot-aided phase noise suppression and bit-loading algorithm,” Opt. Express 22(4), 3938–3943 (2014).OPEXFF1094-4087http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.003938Google Scholar
R. Llorente et al., “On-the-field performance of quintuple-play long-reach OFDM-based WDM-PON optical access networks,” Opt. Express 22(6), 6203–6209 (2014).OPEXFF1094-4087http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.006203Google Scholar
P. Kanjanopas, R. Maneekut and P. Kaewplung, “FTTx with dynamic wavelength and bandwidth allocation,” in Int. Conf. Information Networking (ICOIN), Phuket, pp. 517–520, IEEE (2014).http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICOIN.2014.6799735Google Scholar
R. Llorente et al., “Fully converged optical, millimeter-wave wireless and cable provision in OFDM-PON FTTH networks,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Transparent Optical Networks ICTON, Tu.A4.6 (2013).Google Scholar
H. C. Peng et al., “Hybrid CATV/16-QAM OFDM in-building networks over SMF and GI-POF transport,” Opt. Express 19(10), 9575–9581 (2011).OPEXFF1094-4087http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.009575Google Scholar
C. H. Chang et al., “An integrated long-reach PON and GI-POF in-house network architecture for hybrid CATV/OFDM signals transmission,” J. Lightwave Technol. 30(20), 3247–3251 (2012).JLTEDG0733-8724http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2012.2213067Google Scholar
Y. Wang et al., “Integrated multilevel multiband passive optical network and indoor visible light communication system based on Nyquist single carrier frequency domain equalization modulation,” Opt. Lett. 39(9), 2576–2579 (2014).OPLEDP0146-9592http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.39.002576Google Scholar
M. Matsuura et al., “Evaluation of modal noise in graded-index silica and plastic optical fiber links for radio over multimode fiber systems,” Opt. Express 22(6), 6562–6568 (2014).OPEXFF1094-4087http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.006562Google Scholar
P. Saboureau, J. P. Foing and P. Schanne, “Injection-locked semiconductor lasers with delayed optoelectronic feedback,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 33(9), 1582–1591 (1997).IEJQA70018-9197http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/3.622640Google Scholar
W. I. Way, Broadband Hybrid Fiber/Coax Access System Technologies, Vol. 4, p. 122, Academic Press, San Diego (1998).Google Scholar
Chung-Yi Li received his MS and PhD degrees from the Institute of Electro-Optical Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan, in 2008 and 2012, respectively. From 2013 to 2014, he was an engineer with the Innovation & Product Development Department, FOCI Fiber Optic Communications, Inc., Hsinchu, Taiwan. In 2014, he joined the Department of Electro-Optical Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, as a research assistant professor. His research interests include visible light communication, hybrid lightwave subcarrier transmission systems, radio-over-fiber, and fiber optical CATV transport systems.
Cheng-Ling Ying received his MS and PhD degrees from the Institute of Electrical Engineering, Yuan-Ze University, Chungli, Taiwan, in 1995 and 2002, respectively. From 2002 to 2005, he was an assistant professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering, China Institute of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan. In 2005, he joined the Department of Electronic Engineering, Jinwen University of Science and Technology, New Taipei City, Taiwan, where he became an associate professor in 2011. His research interests include optical communication systems and the applications of radio-over-fiber systems.
Chun-Yu Lin received his MS degree from National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan, in 2005. He is currently working toward a PhD degree at the Department of Electro-Optical Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, since 2008. His current research interests include the applications of CATV and ROF transport systems.