Staring array infrared search and track performance with dither and stare step

Ronald G. Driggers; Carl E. Halford; Michael J. Theisen; David M. Gaudiosi; S. Craig Olson; Gene D. Tener

doi:10.1117/1.OE.57.5.053101

4 May 2018 Staring array infrared search and track performance with dither and stare step

Ronald G. Driggers, Carl E. Halford, Michael J. Theisen, David M. Gaudiosi, S. Craig Olson, Gene D. Tener

Author Affiliations +

Optical Engineering, Vol. 57, Issue 5, 053101 (May 2018). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.57.5.053101

Abstract

Operationally significant infrared search and track (IRST) systems have been primarily second-generation thermal imager technology with scanned time-delay-integration (TDI) detector operation. The benefit of the scanned technology provides for large aperture, gimbal-scanned sensors with extremely wide field of regard, but with low revisit rates. Dramatic progress in large format staring arrays has provided the possibility of higher performance systems with lower complexity. These large format infrared staring arrays may be able to provide systems with higher performance (due to detector count) with less complexity (fewer gimbal scan limitations). In fact, lower performance IRST systems may satisfy operational requirements without scanning or stare-step operation in a “strap-down” architecture. The first step in a full capability staring system IRST design requires a thorough knowledge of staring array IRST performance. This knowledge includes a basic understanding of signal to noise (SNR) in both undersampled and well-sampled systems, with and without a matched filter. For undersampled systems, unresolved targets result in low SNR in both the average case and worst-case scenarios. We assess (using SNR as our primary metric) how the staring IRST system benefits from typical staring operations, such as dither and stare step. We provide a comparison of staring IRST system performance in the midwave infrared (MWIR) and longwave infrared (LWIR) with three modes of operation: basic staring (no sensor movement), dither, and stare step. In addition, we introduce a metric that allows comparison of different types of IRST systems. We use this metric to compare the performance of MWIR and LWIR as well as staring, dither, and stare-step systems. In the future, we will compare scanned systems to staring IRST systems.

Citation Download Citation

Ronald G. Driggers, Carl E. Halford, Michael J. Theisen, David M. Gaudiosi, S. Craig Olson, and Gene D. Tener "Staring array infrared search and track performance with dither and stare step," Optical Engineering 57(5), 053101 (4 May 2018). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.57.5.053101

Received: 20 September 2017; Accepted: 9 February 2018; Published: 4 May 2018

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available