Translator Disclaimer
9 August 2019 Optimized design of single-pump fiber optical parametric amplifier with highly nonlinear fiber segments using a differential evolution algorithm
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Fiber optical parametric amplifiers (FOPAs) are regarded as one of the candidate optical amplifiers for future ultralong-distance, large-capacity, and high-speed optical fiber communication systems. FOPAs provide high signal gain and low noise figures compared with other optical amplifiers. However, they suffer from gain fluctuation, which restricts commercial application. Optimization of the dispersion parameters of highly nonlinear fibers (HNLFs) employed as gain media is essential because they have an immediate impact on the flatness of the amplifier. An optimization method for multiple HNLF segments using the differential evolution algorithm is proposed to minimize spectral gain variation. We theoretically yield an FOPA with an average signal gain of 20 dB and gain fluctuation <0.5  dB within 400 nm.

1.

Introduction

With the development of optical fiber communication systems, increasing demand has been placed on the performance of optical fiber amplifiers.1 However, currently available commercial optical fiber amplifiers, such as erbium-doped fiber amplifiers and Raman amplifiers, do not meet the requirements of higher gain, broader bandwidth, and lower noise figures (NFs) simultaneously due to the limitations of their amplification mechanism.2 As a well-known amplifier, fiber optical parametric amplifier (FOPA) has many attractive features, including large signal gain,3 broad bandwidth,4 and a low NF,5 especially noiseless amplification when it is operated in the phase-sensitive regime.6 Thus, it has been applied to many scenarios, such as linear optical signal amplification, transparent wavelength conversion, return-to-zero pulse generation, all-optical sampling, etc.7 It is also considered to be the most promising optical amplifier for next-generation high-capacity and long-distance optical fiber communication systems.8

For an ordinary FOPA, it is difficult to obtain all outstanding gain characteristics at the same time. Recently, it was demonstrated that a signal gain of 20 dB at 2-THz wavelength bandwidth could be achieved using a single-pump FOPA; however, the gain spectrum suffers from serious gain differences as large as 10 dB.9 Thus, a single-pump FOPA faces severe challenges in providing a high and flat gain spectrum over a broad wavelength range.10 To address this issue, many configurations have been designed to ensure low signal gain variation.1113 Among them, designs for the control of the dispersion characteristic of a nonlinear interacting media, such as highly nonlinear fiber (HNLF), have received the maximum attention. However, obtaining the best parameter sets of HNLFs is complicated and time-consuming, as a larger number of parameters needs to be determined. One may choose these parameters through several repetitive attempts; however, it is uncertain whether the best result can be obtained. It is obvious that this process will become more efficient if a method can dynamically optimize the parameters according to gain fluctuation. Some optimization algorithms based on the principle of biological evolution, such as genetic algorithm and differential evolution (DE) algorithm, are good choices in this regard. Compared with the genetic algorithm, the latter one usually exhibits better convergence properties and reduced complexity.14

In this paper, we propose a single-pump FOPA with multistage dispersion management of HNLFs, which can provide a high gain spectrum with reduced gain variation after optimization. Since several key parameters of the HNLFs of the multistage structure, which immediately affect the spectrum of the gain, need to be set, the DE algorithm is employed to control them effectively. First, we define a mathematical model for the multistage dispersion management of FOPA, which includes all the parameters to be calculated by DE optimization. Then, we analyze the impact of these parameters on the parametric gain spectrum and choose the gain fluctuation as the objective function for the DE algorithm. After applying DE algorithm, we theoretically achieve a single-pump FOPA with a gain spectrum of 20 dB and <0.5-dB fluctuation within 400-nm bandwidth.

The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the FOPA model and application of the DE algorithm, Sec. 3 presents and discusses the simulation results, and Sec. 4 summarizes the study.

2.

Methodology

2.1.

Fiber Optical Parametric Amplifiers Model

The single-pump FOPA with multistage structure is shown in Fig. 1. The multistage structure employs m-span HNLFs including different parameter sets, which are dynamically controlled by the DE algorithm. First, the amplification of a single-pump FOPA with 1-span HNLF by solving differential equations which involve three waves (that is, pump, signal, and idler) can be written as10

Eq. (1)

Gs=|Es(L)|2|Es(0)|2=1+[γPpgsinh(gL)]2,
where Es(0) and Es(L) represent the small signal field at the input and the output of the HNLF with length L, respectively, Pp is the power of the pump signal, and the nonlinear coefficient γ is relative to the HNLF. The parametric gain coefficient g is given by

Eq. (2)

g=[Δβ(Δβ4+γPp)]1/2,
where Δβ donates the linear phase mismatch between the propagation constant of the signal, idler, and pump, and expressed as

Eq. (3)

Δβ=βs+βi2βp.

Fig. 1

Architecture of multistage single-pump FOPA.

OE_58_8_086104_f001.png

Expanding β(ω) in Taylor series to the fourth order near the pump, Δβ can be rewritten as

Eq. (4)

Δβ=β2(ωsωp)2+β412(ωsωp)4.
Then, for an m-stage architecture, the final signal gain at the output can be written as

Eq. (5)

Gm=k=1mGs,k.

In Eqs. (1)–(4), there are five main independent variables that affect the signal gain spectrum of the single-pump FOPA model, namely Pp, L, γ, β2, and β4. Equation (5) is used to calculate the total parametric gain in Sec. 3.

2.2.

Design of Differential Evolution Optimization Algorithm

As the number of parameters increases, it becomes inefficient for the random trial method to obtain optimal results quickly. Based on the DE optimization algorithm,1416 we designed an algorithm for the FOPA model, which mainly employs the difference between adjacent population vectors to update the subsequent stage, obtaining the final result. The main steps are outlined as follows in detail to clarify the concept.

  • Step 1: Initialize. Assume there are N segments of HNLF and a one-dimensional search space, D, which includes an initial population of M individuals. Then each generation vector is written as

    Eq. (6)

    Xi(0)=[xi1(0),xi2(0),xiN(0)],i=1,2,,M,
    where xi are individuals with L and β2 values. For the i’th individual, its j’th value is set as

    Eq. (7)

    Xi,j(0)=Lj_min+rand(0,1)(LjmaxLjmin).

  • Step 2: Mutate. Within the D search space, every three individuals are mutated. Then the differential vector of the three random individuals is computed, and the Fc factor collected. The differential vector can be written as

    Eq. (8)

    Hi(t)=Xv1(t)+Fc[Xv2(t)Xv3(t)],
    where t is the t’th generation, Xv1, Xv2, and Xv3 represent three different individuals of the t’th generation, and Fc is a factor that is used to control the DE. The mutation operator is written as

    Eq. (9)

    Vi(t)=Xv1(t)+Fci[Xv2(t)Xv3(t)].

  • Step 3: Crossover. The definition of crossover is as follows:

    Eq. (10)

    vi,j={hi,j(g),rand(0,1)crxi,j(g),else,
    where cr is called the crossover rate and is defined as

    Eq. (11)

    cri={crl+(crucrl)fifminfmaxfmin,if  fi>favcrl,else,
    and fi is the fitness of the Xi’th individual.

  • Step 4: Select. Here, we reproduce the new next-generation matrix according to the following definition:

    Eq. (12)

    Xi(t+1)={Vi(t),if  (f(Vi(t))<f(Xi(t)))Xi(t),else,
    where f() is the objective function that calculates the gain variation. To demonstrate this optimization algorithm clearly, its flowchart is shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

DE optimization algorithm flowchart.

OE_58_8_086104_f002.png

We also show the detailed pseudocode of the DE algorithm in Algorithm 1.

Algorithm 1

DE algorithm in the proposed FOPA architecture.

1. Define Dimensionality: D; Population: M; Generation: T; Segment No.: N; Desired gain variation: ε.
2. Initialize t=0;
3. Fori=1 to Mdo
4.  Forj=1 to Ndo
5.   xi,tj=xminj+rand(0,1)(xmaxjxminj);
6.  End
7. End
8. While (f(Δ)ε or (tT) do
9.  Fori=1 to Mdo
10.   (Mutation and crossover)
11.   Forj=1 to Ndo
12.    vi,tj=Mutation(xi,tj);
13.    ui,tj=Crossover(xi,tj);
14.   End
15.    (Selection)
16.   Iff(ui,t)<f(xi,t)then
17.    xi,t=ui,t;
18.    Iff(xi,t)<f(Δ)then
19.     Δ=xi,t;
20.    End
21.    Else
22.     xi,t=xi,t;
23.   End
24.  End
25.  t=t+1;
26. End
27. Return the best result;

3.

Simulation Results and Discussion

It is well known that the shape of the parametric gain spectrum is determined by the dispersion properties of the HNLF. It can be found that the β2 term is the main factor that acts on the linear phase mismatch variable Δβ and affects parametric gain fluctuation rather than β4. In practice, the β2 term can be precisely adjusted by controlling the dispersion slope of the HNLF. Thus, β4 can be assumed to be constant within a small wavelength range, and γ can be set to a constant value. Then, we study how the three main parameters (Pp, β2, and L) impact the gain characteristics. Table 1 illustrates the basic parameters of the HNLF.

Table 1

Basic parameters of the HNLF.

ParameterValue
Pump wavelength1557 nm
Zero dispersion wavelength1556.5 nm
Nonlinear coefficient20  W1·km1
Second-order dispersion0.02  ps2·km1
Fourth-order dispersion0.02×104  ps4·km1

The impact of different pump powers on the parametric gain is shown in Fig. 3. It can be found that, with the increasing pump power from 0.5 to 1.5 W when the length of the HNLF is set to be 100 m, both the peak parametric gain and bandwidth increase. At the same time, the flatness worsens. Figure 4 shows the impact of different pump powers along the HNLF on the peak gain and gain fluctuation. It is observed that with higher pump power and longer HNLF, an FOPA obtains greater peak gain; however, the gain fluctuation increases as well.

Fig. 3

Parametric gain with different pump power (Pp).

OE_58_8_086104_f003.png

Fig. 4

(a) Peak gain and (b) gain fluctuation for different pump power (Pp) along HNLF (length).

OE_58_8_086104_f004.png

Figure 5 shows a set of parametric gain spectrum affected by different values of second-order dispersion (β2). The range of β2 in these calculations is from 0.04 to 0.04 and Pp and length are set to 1 W and 100 m, respectively. The parametric gain spectrum displays obvious distinct shapes with positive and negative values. A positive β2 results only in one peak of the parametric gain while a negative β2 shows two peaks. Moreover, the value of β2 has a significant effect on the parametric gain bandwidth: the smaller the absolute value of β2, the larger the bandwidth. This is because a small value of β2 will move the phase-matched wavelength far away from the pump wavelength and as a result, broader bandwidth is achieved. In addition, varying values of β2 do not influence the peak gain.

Fig. 5

Parametric gain with different second-order dispersion (β2).

OE_58_8_086104_f005.png

For the single-pump FOPA model with a different number of HNLF segments, we set the power of the pump at 1 W. Then, by assuming β4 to be constant (0.02×104  ps4·km1 in the simulation), our optimization method determines the values of L and β2 to achieve optimal results; when the number of HNLF segments is set to N, there will be 2(N1) parameters to optimize. After optimization, the signal gain spectrum and NF calculated after each HNLF segment are shown in Figs. 6(a) and 6(b), respectively. It can be seen that the gain and NF fluctuation decrease obviously after 4-span HNLFs optimization and finally, we obtain a flat parametric gain spectrum of 20 dB and fluctuation of <0.5  dB within 400-nm bandwidth. For this four-stage structure, the value of the parameter β2 and length of each HNLF optimized by the DE algorithm are listed in Table 2.

Fig. 6

(a) Simulated gain spectrum and (b) NF at the output of each HNLF segment.

OE_58_8_086104_f006.png

Table 2

Parameters of each HNLF optimized by the DE algorithm.

Segment
1234
Length (m)148735929
β2 (×102  ps2·km1)0.10.140.380.25

4.

Conclusions

In this paper, we propose an optimization method for a single-pump FOPA with multiple HNLF segments based on the DE algorithm. The influence of different parameters on the gain spectrum is also studied. When we set the number of HNLF segments to 4, good performance can be achieved by the proposed method. The results show that this method can effectively determine the optimal parameters of several HNLF segments needed for gain fluctuation minimization. The simulation suggests that the proposed method could offer a reference for the design of HNLF as a gain media for FOPAs.

Acknowledgments

This work was partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Nos. 61675033, 61425022, 61727817, 61835002, 61775237, and 61522501); the Beijing Nova Program (No. Z141101001814048); the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2014RC0203); and the Fund of State Key Laboratory of IPOC (BUPT).

References

1. 

J. Hansryd et al., “Fiber-based optical parametric amplifiers and their applications,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum. Electron., 8 (3), 506 –520 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2002.1016354 IJSQEN 1077-260X Google Scholar

2. 

J. Wang et al., “Broadband silica-based thulium doped fiber amplifier employing multiwavelength pumping,” Opt. Express, 24 (20), 23001 –23008 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.023001 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

3. 

M. E. Marhic et al., “Fiber optical parametric amplifiers in optical communication systems,” Laser Photonics Rev., 9 (1), 50 –74 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.201400087 Google Scholar

4. 

V. Gordienko et al., “Ultra-flat wideband single-pump Raman-enhanced parametric amplification,” Opt. Express, 25 (5), 4810 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.004810 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

5. 

V. Ribeiro et al., “Noise in phase-(in)sensitive dual-core fiber parametric amplification,” Opt. Express, 26 (4), 4050 –4059 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.004050 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

6. 

R. Malik et al., “Demonstration of ultra wideband phase-sensitive fiber optical parametric amplifier,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 28 (2), 175 –177 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2015.2488102 IPTLEL 1041-1135 Google Scholar

7. 

X. Zhang et al., “Scheme for multicast parametric synchronous optical sampling,” Opt. Eng., 53 (5), 056102 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.53.5.056102 Google Scholar

8. 

V. Cristofori et al., “Dynamic characterization and amplification of sub-picosecond pulses in fiber optical parametric chirped pulse amplifiers,” Opt. Express, 21 (22), 26044 –26051 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.026044 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

9. 

M. F. C. Stephens, V. Gordienko and N. J. Doran, “20 dB net-gain polarization-insensitive fiber optical parametric amplifier with >2  THz bandwidth,” Opt. Express, 25 (9), 10597 –10609 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.010597 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

10. 

M. E. Marhic et al., “Broadband fiber optical parametric amplifiers,” Opt. Lett., 21 573 –575 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.21.000573 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

11. 

R. Tang et al., “In-line phase-sensitive amplification of multi-channel CW signals based on frequency nondegenerate four-wave-mixing in fiber,” Opt. Express, 16 (12), 9046 –9053 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.16.009046 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

12. 

J. B. Coles et al., “Bandwidth-efficient phase modulation techniques for stimulated Brillouin scattering suppression in fiber optic parametric amplifiers,” Opt. Express, 18 (17), 18138 –18150 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.018138 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

13. 

Z. L. Dastjerdi et al., “Pump-to-signal intensity modulation transfer characteristics in FOPAs: modulation frequency and saturation effect,” J. Lightwave Technol., 30 (18), 3061 –3067 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2012.2211997 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

14. 

A. K. Qin, V. L. Huang and P. N. Suganthan, “Differential evolution algorithm with strategy adaptation for global numerical optimization,” IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 13 (2), 398 –417 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2008.927706 ITEVF5 1089-778X Google Scholar

15. 

E. Szlachcic and I. F. Kotowski, “Differential evolution for multi-objective optimization with self adaptation,” in Int. Conf. Intell. Eng. Syst., (2010). Google Scholar

16. 

M. Pourmahayabadi and S. M. Nejad, “Design of ultra-low and ultra-flattened dispersion single mode photonic crystal fiber by DE/EDA algorithm,” J. Mod. Opt., 56 (12), 1348 –1357 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340903094593 Google Scholar

Biography

Kai Wang is a PhD student at the School of Electric Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (BUPT). He received his BS degree in electrical and information engineering from Qingdao University in 2011. His current research interests include large-capacity optical communication and fiber optical amplifiers.

Qinghua Tian received her PhD from BUPT, Beijing, China. She is a lecturer at the School of Electric Engineering, BUPT. Her main research interests focus on optical communication and satellite communication.

Qi Zhang received her PhD from BUPT, Beijing, China, in 2005. Currently, she is an associate professor at the School of Electric Engineering and a member of the State Key Laboratory of Information Photonics and Optical Communications, BUPT. Her main research interests focus on optical communication and satellite communication.

Lijia Zhang is an associate professor at the School of Electric Engineering, BUPT. She obtained her PhD from BUPT, Beijing, China, in 2011. Her research areas include optical access networks, optical switching, and optical signal processing.

Xiangjun Xin received his PhD from the School of Electric Engineering, BUPT, Beijing, China, in 2004. Currently, he is a professor at the School of Electric Engineering and a member of the State Key Laboratory of Information Photonics and Optical Communications in BUPT. His main research interests focus on broadband optical transmission technologies, optical sensors, and all-optical networks. Within this area, he has published more than 60 science citation index papers.

© The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Kai Wang, Qinghua Tian, Qi Zhang, Lijia Zhang, and Xiangjun Xin "Optimized design of single-pump fiber optical parametric amplifier with highly nonlinear fiber segments using a differential evolution algorithm," Optical Engineering 58(8), 086104 (9 August 2019). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.58.8.086104
Received: 24 April 2019; Accepted: 18 July 2019; Published: 9 August 2019
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES


SHARE
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back to Top