Translator Disclaimer
3 February 2021 Transient evolution of quasifree electrons of plasma in liquid water revealed by optical-pump terahertz-probe spectroscopy
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The fundamental properties of laser-induced plasma in liquid water, such as the ultrafast electron migration and solvation, have not yet been clarified. We use 1650-nm femtosecond laser pulses to induce the plasma in a stable free-flowing water film under the strong field ionization mechanism. Moreover, we adopt intense terahertz (THz) pulses to probe the ultrafast temporal evolution of quasifree electrons of the laser-induced plasma in water on the subpicosecond scale. For the first time, the THz wave absorption signal with a unique two-step decay characteristic in time domain is demonstrated, indicating the significance of electron solvation in water. We employ the Drude model combined with the multilevel intermediate model and particle-in-a-box model to simulate and analyze the key information of quasifree electrons, such as the frequency-domain absorption characteristics and solvation ratio. In particular, we observe that the solvation capacity of liquid water decreases with the increase of pumping energy. Up to ∼50  %   of quasifree electrons cannot be captured by traps associated with the bound states as the pumping energy increases to 90  μJ  /  pulse. The ultrafast electron evolution in liquid water revealed by the optical-pump/THz-probe experiment provides further insights into the formation and evolution mechanisms of liquid plasma.

1.

Introduction

Liquid water is the most common liquid on Earth, and its basic physical and chemical properties are of great significance.1,2 In particular, electron migration and solvation associated with photoionization in liquid water is a unique and complex process, which has attracted many researchers to explore various segments of the process. For example, Laenen et al.3 used midinfrared femtosecond probe pulses, and Birkedal et al.4 employed near-infrared/visible femtosecond probe pulses to observe the latter stage of the electron solvation process. Recently, Savolainen et al.5 studied the initial stage of this process by adopting terahertz (THz) probe pulses and revealed the initial delocalization length of the excited excess electrons in water. These previous studies constitute a motion picture of an excess electron, which first delocalizes in the conduction band and then is solvated within about 1 to 2 ps.413 This process is considered to include many transient and highly active intermediates, resulting in a large blueshift in the absorption spectrum, from the THz or gigahertz region to the visible range. Nonetheless, previous studies mainly investigated the behavior of low-density quasifree electrons excited by small pump power density, which is far from enough for further understanding the transient evolution of photoexcited plasma in liquid water.

Laser-induced plasma has attracted widespread attention due to its diverse physical phenomena. For example, plasma excited in the gaseous environment has been widely investigated and applied in many fields, such as femtosecond pulse compression,1416 broadband THz wave emission,1720 and self-healing of light spot.21 However, compared with the numerous studies of plasma in the gaseous environment, the properties of photoexcited plasma in the liquid environment have not been fully revealed, especially in water with large molecular density and strong molecular interactions. Theoretically, laser-induced plasma in liquid water will be accompanied by more complex and stronger nonlinear effects than those in gas, since water has a higher nonlinear coefficient,22 a lower excitation threshold, and a higher electron density.23,24 In the latest research, the femtosecond laser-induced plasma in water has been used to emit strong THz waves.2528 In these studies, the physical mechanism of plasma formation in liquid water is considered as an extension of the theory of gas plasma. However, the effect of water molecules on plasma is not fully unraveled. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, there are no reports on the electron migration and solvation process related to strong laser excited plasma in water, especially the initial stage of the interaction between the laser and water on the subpicosecond timescale.

In this paper, we use intense THz pulses (peak electric field strength of 14.9  MV/cm) and a stable free-flowing water film to probe the absorption characteristics of the plasma in liquid water. The femtosecond laser pulses at 1650 nm are used to excite the plasma in liquid water under the strong field mechanism. We observe that the absorption characteristics of the THz wave by plasma show a clear two-step decay process in the time domain, which can be explained by the partial quasifree electron solvation. We connect this THz wave absorption characteristic by plasma with the change of quasifree electron density through the Drude model and combine the multilevel intermediate model with the particle-in-a-box model to analyze the temporal evolution process of quasifree electrons. The absorption changes of THz waves and proportions of solvated electrons in water under various pumping energies are also revealed.

2.

Experimental Results and Analysis

The schematic diagram of the optical-pump THz probe spectroscopy system is shown in Fig. 1(a). The intense THz pulses are generated by the organic 4-N,N-dimethylamino-4′-N′-methyl-stilbazoliumtosylate (DAST) crystal under excitation with the femtosecond laser pulses (0.4 mJ per pulse, repetition rate of 1 kHz, and center wavelength of 1550 nm) from an optical parametric amplifier (OPA, Spectra Physics). To reach the diffraction limited focusing and allow for high field (peak electric field strength of 14.9  MV/cm), we use the THz bullet lambda cubic wave front correction scheme.29 The idler-wave output from the OPA is used as pump laser for photoionization (repetition rate of 1 kHz and center wavelength of 1650 nm) and focused onto the water film to excite the plasma by a lens with a focal length of 4 in. placed in front of parabolic mirror 1 (PM1). The linearly polarized THz pulses reflected from PM1 and linearly polarized optical pump pulses are transmitted collinearly through the liquid water. In order to efficiently record the evolution process on the subpicosecond time scale, we adjust the relative time delay between the THz probe and 1650 nm pump pulse with an accuracy of 10 fs. The residual NIR is filtered out using a set of low-pass filters (QMC Instruments Ltd.) with cut-off frequencies of 18 THz. The THz energy is controlled by two THz polarizers. The THz pulses passing through the water film are collected by two off-axis parabolic mirrors and collinearly focused with the probe pulses onto the 100-μm GaP crystal for electro-optical sampling. Since the measured broadband THz pulse will be additionally distorted by the frequency-dependent factors in the electro-optical detection crystal (such as phase matching, reflection, dispersive propagation, and absorption), we use the full complex response function of the GaP detector to reconstruct all of the spectral information collected in this work.3032 A wire-guided, gravity-driven apparatus is employed in this work, which can produce optically stable, flowing thin liquid film and avoid interference caused by a traditional cuvette.33,34 Two aluminum wires with diameters of 100  μm are separated by 5  mm to generate a stable free-flowing water film. The thickness of the water film is 90±4  μm by controlling the water flow rate of 20  mL/min. An optical second-harmonic intensity autocorrelator is used to measure and calibrate the thickness.27 Within the time interval of 1 ms between two adjacent pulses, the distance that the gravity-driven water film falls is about 740  μm, which is much larger than the pump spot size of 200  μm. Therefore, the adopted free-flowing water film in our study can effectively avoid the artifacts from cuvette windows and the heat accumulation effect in the excitation volume. All of the measurements were conducted at the room temperature of 22±1°C. For all of the measurements, the system was purged with dry nitrogen gas to improve the signal-to-noise ratio.

Fig. 1

(a) Diagram of the experimental system. TPs, THz polarizers; PM, parabolic mirror; EOS, electro-optical sampling. (b) The spectrums of THz pulses propagating through the water film and nitrogen gas (remove the water film) without an optical-pump, respectively.

AP_3_1_015002_f001.png

Figure 1(b) shows the frequency-domain amplitudes of the THz electric field pulses propagating through the water film and nitrogen gas with the optical pump beam blocked, and the black curves in Fig. 2(a) (and its inset) show the corresponding time-domain waveforms. Compared with the spectrum in nitrogen gas, the liquid water film has a very strong absorption effect for the high-frequency components of THz pulses. The THz spectrum transmitted through water film extends from 0.2 to 4  THz with the peak at 2.0  THz, and there is almost a flat phase for the entire measured spectrum. We fix the THz scanning time delay (tTHz) at the peak of the THz pulse and scan the pump–probe time delay (tpp) to obtain the transient temporal evolution of the THz wave absorption change (ΔE=ErefEpump) induced by the formed plasma in water on the subpicosecond time scale, as shown in Fig. 2(b). In comparison, the temporal evolution of THz wave absorption characteristics induced by the formed plasma in nitrogen gas (without the water film) is also presented in Fig. 2(b). The temporal characteristics and corresponding mechanism in the gas phase have been widely investigated.35,36 The results of nitrogen gas in our experiment are consistent with previous studies. The experimental evidence in Fig. 2 also shows that in the presence of photoexcited plasma, the THz wave is significantly absorbed in water with a peak modulation more than five times larger than that in nitrogen gas under the same optical pump power. The corresponding time-domain THz pulses under the maximal absorption by plasma in water and nitrogen gas are shown in Fig. 2(a) and its inset, respectively. Since the absorption of THz waves by plasma is isotropic, the change of polarization angles between the THz pulse and pump pulse has no effect on our results. Moreover, we find that the THz wave absorption by plasma in water rises rapidly within a few hundred femtoseconds and then exhibits a unique two-step decay characteristic, which is very different from the monotonic decay characteristic of nitrogen gas. The first step of decay for water is an ultrafast process within the subpicosecond scale, and the following is a relatively slow process with a decay time exceeding over hundreds of picoseconds [as shown in the inset of Fig. 2(b)]. We use a double exponential decay model11 to describe the above two-step decay process (A[1A1/τ1exp(t/τ1)A2/τ2exp(t/τ2)], where A1, A2 are derived from measured results of solvation rate [A1/(A1+A2)], which is closely related to the pump energy; here, A145%, A255% for the pump energy of 90  μJ/pulse). The fitted results, depicted by the orange line in Fig. 2(b) (and its inset), match the experimental data well, and the obtained time constants are 102  fs and 160  ps, respectively.

Fig. 2

(a) THz time-domain waveforms in liquid water without an optical pump (black line) and under the maximal absorption caused by the formed plasma (red line); the corresponding results for nitrogen gas are shown in the inset. (b) Transient evolution curve of THz wave absorption by plasma in water (and nitrogen gas) under a subpicosecond observation window with the pump energy of 90  μJ/pulse, and the corresponding fitted results for water are shown with the orange line. The inset shows the experimental data and fitted results of the transient evolution process of THz wave absorption by plasma in water under the observation window of several hundred picoseconds.

AP_3_1_015002_f002.png

To explain the unique absorption characteristics in liquid water, particles produced or modified by photoionization, including ions, excited neutral molecules, and electrons in bound and quasifree states, need to be considered. The THz response may be influenced by the movement of electrons or the disturbance of the nuclear spectrum of the disturbed water network. Related to the charged nuclear response, for example, the change in the molar extinction coefficient of water caused by NaCl dissolution is 1×102  mM1cm1.37 For the plasma density with the order of 1023m3 in this work, the produced charged nuclear response contributes <0.002% to the THz wave absorption change, which is several orders of magnitude smaller than the measured peak modulation magnitude. In addition, the temperature increase due to photoionization in water is also a factor to be considered. In our experiment, the adopted stable free-flowing water film is constantly refreshed, which significantly limits the thermal accumulation. Considering the factors such as the heat capacity and absorption coefficient of liquid water, we estimate that each optical pulse (90  μJ) increases the temperature of the excited volume of water film by no more than 0.7°C, and the corresponding absorption change is <2%.38 However, the above reasons cannot explain the large THz wave absorption change with maximal value of nearly 50% in this work. Therefore, we believe that the measured modulation mainly originates from the strong interaction between low effective mass electrons and THz pulses.39 In liquid water, the electrons in the plasma induced by the ultrashort laser pulses exist in two states, which are solvated electrons and quasifree electrons. The solvated electrons are considered to be trapped in the bound state and do not contribute to the conductivity. They are generated from ionization within about 1 to 2 ps and have a long lifetime (∼hundreds of picoseconds) with the characteristic of an optical resonance centered at 720 nm (bandwidth of about 330 nm).5,13,23 We do not rule out the weak contribution of solvated electrons to THz wave absorption, but this obviously cannot explain the dramatic THz response in the initial stage from no pump beam to the maximal absorption on the subpicosecond scale in this work. Therefore, we mainly attribute the rapid rise of the modulation signal [as shown in Fig. 2(b)] associated with the THz wave absorption characteristics to the contribution of quasielectrons in the initial stage of plasma formation.

The decay process for quasifree electrons of plasma in liquid water includes geminate recombination, diffusion, and solvation processes. The solvation process dominates on the subpicosecond scale, and the decay time is at least three orders of magnitude faster than other processes.13,40,41 Therefore, we believe that the first step of decay in Fig. 2(b) is mainly caused by the solvation of partial quasifree electrons. This also explains the monotonic decay characteristic in nitrogen gas due to the absence of the solvation process. The second-step of decay is considered to be the result of the quasifree electrons being recaptured by the traps associated with the bound states during the demise of hydrated electrons, which mainly reflects the lifetime of hydrated electrons. In general, the formation of hydrated electrons from photoexcited plasma occurs on a time scale of 1 to 2 ps.5,13,23 In this work, the modulation signal rapidly decreases with the time constant of 102  fs in the first-step of decay. This can be explained by the multilevel intermediate model related to the solvation process.10 Specifically, some quasifree electrons transition to the first intermediates with weak THz wave absorption capacity on a time scale of 102  fs. Here, we use the Drude model to evaluate the scattering process for the quasifree electron transitioning into the first intermediate and analyze the THz wave absorption characteristics based on the quasifree electron density. First, Eq. (1) is adopted to establish the relationship between the alternation of the composite conductivity [Δσ(ω)] and the THz wave absorption change:

Eq. (1)

ΔE(ω)Eref(ω)=12iωε0n2[iωlcn2n1n2(n2+n1)+MR]Δσ(ω),
where l is the thickness of the water film (l=90  μm), ε0 is the dielectric constant in vacuum, and n1 and n2 are the THz refractive index in nitrogen gas and liquid water (n11 and n22.07), respectively. c represents the speed of light in vacuum. MR represents the contribution of multiple reflection terms,42 which is extremely weak for liquid water with a strong absorption coefficient in the THz range. Then, the relationship between the induced change in composite conductivity and the quasifree electron density is established, as shown in Eq. (2):

Eq. (2)

Δσ(ω)=iε0ωp2ω+iγ0,
where ωp=e2nf/(ε0m*) represents the plasma frequency, e represents elementary charge (e1.6×1019  C), m* denotes the effective mass of the electron (m*9.1×1031  kg), nf represents the quasifree electron density, and γ0=τf1 denotes the quasifree electron scattering rate, which is directly related to the lifetime of quasifree electrons (τf106  fs). Combining Eqs. (1) and (2), it can be concluded that the quasifree electron density in the plasma is proportional to the amplitude change of the THz electric field.

The experimental frequency-domain characteristics of THz wave absorption [ΔE(ω)/E(ω)] under maximal modulation by plasma in liquid water are shown in Fig. 3. The simulated results based on the above Drude model are also shown as the orange dotted line. An obvious absorption peak near 1.5  THz is demonstrated. The simulation results are basically consistent with the experimental data. Note that the measured absorption is slightly lower than the simulated value in the low-frequency range. This is mainly because the THz pulse tail carrying low-frequency components always lags behind the main pulse (tTHz=0) to pass through the plasma, and then the quasifree electron density has been partially attenuated. In addition, the absorption dip at 1  THz in the measurement is mainly derived from the characteristics of the DAST source itself. According to the Drude model, the lifetime of quasifree electrons is calculated to be 106  fs, which is approximately in agreement with the experimental measurement of 102  fs. In addition, the calculated maximum value of the quasifree electron density of the plasma excited in liquid water is 4.5×1022m3 with the adopted pump energy of 90  μJ/pulse.

Fig. 3

Experimental (orange solid line) and simulated (orange dotted line) frequency-domain characteristics of THz wave absorption under the maximal modulation by plasma in water. The black solid line and the black dotted line show the spectra of THz pulses with the 90-μJ pump pulse (under the maximal absorption) and without pump pulse, respectively.

AP_3_1_015002_f003.png

Furthermore, we measure the transient evolution processes of THz wave absorption by plasma in water with the excitation of different pumping energies and calculate the corresponding modulation degree at 1.5 THz under the maximal absorption [ΔE(1.5  THz)/E(1.5  THz)]. The results are shown in Fig. 4. We find that the laser-excited peak quasifree electron density has a linear relationship with the pumping energy in the range from 40 to 90  μJ/pulse, which can be explained by the mechanism of the strong field ionization.43 In our experiment, the peak quasifree electron density tends to saturate when the pumping energy is higher than 90  μJ/pulse.

Fig. 4

(a) Transient evolution curves of THz wave absorption by plasma in water induced by different pump pulse energies. The inset shows the corresponding normalized results from 0 ps. (b) The black points indicate the peak quasifree electron density with different pump pulse energies. The black line is the linear fitting results. The orange points show the relationship between the solvation ratio and the pump pulse energy at the equilibrium state.

AP_3_1_015002_f004.png

As the pumping energy increases, the plateau feature after the first step of decay shows an upward trend, as shown in the inset of Fig. 4(a). This is due to the decrease in the proportion of quasifree electrons that are solvated with the increase of pumping energy. For the excited low-density quasifree electrons (such as the condition of the pumping energy <50  μJ/pulse), the ratio of the quasifree electron density (nf) to the solvated electron density (nd) at the equilibrium state depends on the relative mobilities, i.e., nf/nd=μd/μf. μd and μf represent the mobility of solvated electrons and quasifree electrons, respectively. The electron mobility is related to the lifetime τ of the electron (μ=eτ/m*). Therefore, for quasifree electrons with a lifetime of 102  fs and solvated electrons with a lifetime of 160  ps, more than 99.8% of the quasifree electrons will be solvated at the equilibrium state. We believe that the low-density quasifree electrons will be completely solvated after 200  fs. However, the energy-dependent experimental data of Fig. 4(a) show that the modulation degree in the plateau region is about 0.8% at the pumping energy of 40  μJ/pulse, which comes from thermal effects. According to Ref. 38, the modulation degree of 0.8% is caused by a temperature difference of 0.29°C, which is basically consistent with the temperature estimation in our present setup. In addition, the temperature response will not be significant as the pumping energy increases. As shown in Fig. 4(a), as the pumping energy increases from 40 to 90  μJ/pulse, the modulation degree at the plateau stage increases significantly from 0.8% to 25%. However, even the thermal effect induced by 90  μJ/pulse (0.65°C) only causes a modulation degree of 2% in THz absorption. Therefore, considering the increase of the quasifree electron density in the plasma and the factor that the plasma will destroy the network structure of liquid water, we attribute the increase of the modulation degree at the plateau stage with increasing pump pulse energy [the inset of Fig. 4(a)] mainly to the saturation of the traps associated with the bound states. When the traps are saturated, more quasifree electrons cannot be relaxed through the solvation process. Excluding the thermal effect, we calculate the ratio of quasifree electrons solvated with different pumping energies [i.e., solvation rate A1/(A1+A2), as shown in Fig. 4(b)]. Specifically, the low-density quasifree electrons are almost all captured by the traps related to the bound state with the weak pump pulse excitation (<50  μJ/pulse). However, the traps gradually tend to be saturated, and the solvation ratio decreases as the pump pulse energy exceeds the threshold (60  μJ/pulse in this work). When the quasifree electron density in plasma is saturated, the ratio of quasifree electrons solvated drops to 50% with pumping energy higher than 90  μJ/pulse.

The size of the electron in the plasma after photoionization is also important information and can be regarded as the radius of gyration of the spin density. The particle-in-a-box model is adopted in our work, which describes the solvation of electrons as a continuously changing process.5,44 At the initial stage of plasma formation, electrons usually have a large radius of gyration, which is basically equal to their initial average ejection length. The electrons at this time can be regarded as quasifree electrons in an unbound state. Then, the water molecules solvate the electrons and form a cage in a bound state. The electron’s gyration radius gradually decreases until the quasifree electrons are solvated within a time scale of 1 to 2 ps. The relationship between the resonance absorption frequency (f) of electrons and the radius of gyration (rg) can be expressed as

Eq. (3)

f=a/hrg2,
where h is Planck constant, and a is a constant related to the first excitation energy and is about 10.5  eV2 in liquid water.5,44 Based on Eq. (3), we calculate the initial radius of gyration of quasifree electrons in liquid water at an absorption peak of 1.5 THz as 40   in our experiment, which is in agreement with the previously published results.5 As the radius of gyration continuously reduces by the restraint of the water molecule cage, the resonant absorption frequency continues to blueshift and leaves the THz observation window after 100  fs. Eventually, the resonant absorption frequency converges to the near visible spectrum at around 720 nm with the corresponding radius of gyration of about 2.5 Å.5

3.

Conclusion

THz time-domain spectroscopy can provide instantaneous information about the frequency-dependent conductivity of the medium excited by optical pump pulses. In this work, we explore the optical-pump/THz-probe experiment to investigate the transient dynamic evolution of quasifree electrons of plasma in water on the subpicosecond time scale. The time-resolved transient THz wave absorption measurements prove that the quasifree electrons in the laser-excited plasma in water will be solvated rapidly. The measured temporal transmittance data contain valuable information, which can be supported by a combination of the Drude model, the multilevel intermediate model, and the particle-in-a-box model. We conclude that the initial delocalization radius of gyration of quasifree electrons is 40  , the scattering time is 102  fs, and the residence time of electrons in the bound state is up to 160  ps. The peak quasifree electron density increases linearly, while the pumping energy increases from 40 to 90  μJ/pulse and tends to saturate with a value of 4.5×1022m3. In addition, we observe that as the quasifree electron density increases, the traps related to the bound states appear to saturate, resulting in a large number of quasifree electrons not being completely solvated. When the pump energy increases to 90  μJ/pulse, the proportion of solvated electrons gradually decreases to about 50%. This work can provide valuable insights on the fundamental aspects of the charge transport process in water and lay the foundation for further understanding the physicochemical properties and transient evolution of the femtosecond laser pulse excited plasma in water. We believe that the proposed method can also be applied to study the physical mechanisms of plasma deformation for the ionic aqueous solution and other liquids.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. JQ18015), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61935001, 61905271, 12074272), the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (Grant No. 2020A1515011083), and the Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Imaging Theory and Technology. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

1. 

M. C. Bellissent-Funel et al., “Water determines the structure and dynamics of proteins,” Chem. Rev., 116 (13), 7673 –7697 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00664 CHREAY 0009-2665 Google Scholar

2. 

M. Heyden and D. J. Tobias, “Spatial dependence of protein-water collective hydrogen-bond dynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 111 (21), 218101 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.218101 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

3. 

R. Laenen, T. Roth and A. Laubereau, “Novel precursors of solvated electrons in water: evidence for a charge transfer process,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 85 (1), 50 –53 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.50 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

4. 

V. Birkedal et al., “Observation of a persistent infrared absorption following two photon ionization of liquid water,” Chem. Phys., 328 (1–3), 119 –124 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2006.06.017 CMPHC2 0301-0104 Google Scholar

5. 

J. Savolainen et al., “Direct observation of the collapse of the delocalized excess electron in water,” Nat. Chem., 6 (8), 697 –701 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1995 NCAHBB 1755-4330 Google Scholar

6. 

F. Perakis et al., “Vibrational spectroscopy and dynamics of water,” Chem. Rev., 116 (13), 7590 –7607 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00640 CHREAY 0009-2665 Google Scholar

7. 

R. M. Young and D. M. Neumark, “Dynamics of solvated electrons in clusters,” Chem. Rev., 112 (11), 5553 –5577 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr300042h CHREAY 0009-2665 Google Scholar

8. 

V. H. Vilchiz et al., “Map for the relaxation dynamics of hot photoelectrons injected into liquid water via anion threshold photodetachment and above threshold solvent ionization,” J. Phys. Chem. A, 105 (10), 1711 –1723 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp003974m JPCAFH 1089-5639 Google Scholar

9. 

E. Knoesel et al., “Charge transport and carrier dynamics in liquids probed by THz time-domain spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 86 (2), 340 –343 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.340 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

10. 

C. Pepin et al., “Observation of a continuous spectral shift in the solvation kinetics of electrons in neat liquid deuterated water,” J. Phys. Chem. A, 101 (24), 4351 –4360 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp970354l JPCAFH 1089-5639 Google Scholar

11. 

A. Migus, Y. Gauduel and J. L. Martin, “Excess electrons in liquid water: first evidence of a prehydrated state with femtosecond lifetime,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 58 (15), 1559 –1562 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1559 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

12. 

H. Iglev et al., “Hydrogen atom transfer from water or alcohols activated by presolvated electrons,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 6 (6), 986 –992 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00288 JPCLCD 1948-7185 Google Scholar

13. 

R. Lian, R. A. Crowell and I. A. Shkrob, “Solvation and thermalization of electrons generated by above-the-gap (12.4 eV) two-photon ionization of liquid H2O and D2O,” J. Phys. Chem. A, 109 (8), 1510 –1520 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp045657b JPCAFH 1089-5639 Google Scholar

14. 

S. Champeaux and L. Bergé, “Femtosecond pulse compression in pressure-gas cells filled with argon,” Phys. Rev. E, 68 (6), 066603 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.68.066603 Google Scholar

15. 

S. A. Skobelev, A. V. Kim and O. Willi, “Generation of high-energy few-cycle laser pulses by using the ionization-induced self-compression effect,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 108 (12), 123904 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.123904 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

16. 

G. Stibenz, N. Zhavoronkov and G. Steinmeyer, “Self-compression of millijoule pulses to 7.8 fs duration in a white-light filament,” Opt. Lett., 31 (2), 274 –276 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.31.000274 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

17. 

K. Y. Kim, J. H. Glownia and A. J. Taylor, “Terahertz emission from ultrafast ionizing air in symmetry-broken laser fields,” Opt. Express, 15 (8), 4577 –4584 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.15.004577 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

18. 

T. Wu et al., “Excitation-wavelength-dependent terahertz wave modulation via preformed air plasma,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 112 (17), 171106 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5022448 APPLAB 0003-6951 Google Scholar

19. 

A. Gorodetsky et al., “Physics of the conical broadband terahertz emission from two-color laser-induced plasma filaments,” Phys. Rev. A, 89 (3), 033838 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.89.033838 Google Scholar

20. 

L. Zhang et al., “Observation of terahertz radiation via the two-color laser scheme with uncommon frequency ratios,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 119 (23), 235001 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.235001 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

21. 

M. Kolesik and J. V. Moloney, “Self-healing femtosecond light filaments,” Opt. Lett., 29 (6), 590 –592 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.29.000590 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

22. 

R. W. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics, 2nd ed.Elsevier, Amsterdam (2003). Google Scholar

23. 

S. Minardi et al., “Time-resolved refractive index and absorption mapping of light-plasma filaments in water,” Opt. Lett., 33 (1), 86 –88 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.33.000086 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

24. 

A. Vogel, S. Busch and U. Parlitz, “Shock wave emission and cavitation bubble generation by picosecond and nanosecond optical breakdown in water,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 100 (1), 148 –165 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.415878 JASMAN 0001-4966 Google Scholar

25. 

L. Zhang et al., “Strong terahertz radiation from a liquid-water line,” Phys. Rev. Appl., 12 (1), 014005 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.014005 PRAHB2 2331-7019 Google Scholar

26. 

E. Yiwen et al., “Terahertz wave generation from liquid water films via laser-induced breakdown,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 113 (18), 181103 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5054599 APPLAB 0003-6951 Google Scholar

27. 

Q. Jin et al., “Observation of broadband terahertz wave generation from liquid water,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 111 (7), 071103 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4990824 APPLAB 0003-6951 Google Scholar

28. 

I. Dey et al., “Highly efficient broadband terahertz generation from ultrashort laser filamentation in liquids,” Nat. Commun., 8 (1), 1184 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01382-x NCAOBW 2041-1723 Google Scholar

29. 

M. Shalaby and C. P. Hauri, “Demonstration of a low-frequency three-dimensional terahertz bullet with extreme brightness,” Nat. Commun., 6 (1), 5976 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6976 NCAOBW 2041-1723 Google Scholar

30. 

A. Leitenstorfer et al., “Detectors and sources for ultrabroadband electro-optic sampling: experiment and theory,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 74 (11), 1516 –1518 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.123601 APPLAB 0003-6951 Google Scholar

31. 

Q. Wu and X. C. Zhang, “Free-space electro-optics sampling of mid-infrared pulses,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 71 (10), 1285 –1286 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.119873 APPLAB 0003-6951 Google Scholar

32. 

H. Zhao et al., “Ultrafast hydrogen bond dynamics of liquid water revealed by terahertz-induced transient birefringence,” Light Sci. Appl., 9 (1), 136 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-020-00370-z Google Scholar

33. 

M. J. Tauber et al., “Flowing liquid sample jet for resonance Raman and ultrafast optical spectroscopy,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 74 (11), 4958 –4960 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1614874 RSINAK 0034-6748 Google Scholar

34. 

T. Wang, P. Klarskov and P. U. Jepsen, “Ultrabroadband THz time-domain spectroscopy of a free-flowing water film,” IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol., 4 (4), 425 –431 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2014.2322757 Google Scholar

35. 

J. Das and M. Yamaguchi, “Terahertz wave excitation from preexisting air plasma,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 30 (6), 1595 –1600 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.30.001595 JOBPDE 0740-3224 Google Scholar

36. 

J. Zhao et al., “Wavelength scaling of terahertz wave absorption via preformed air plasma,” IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol., 6 (6), 846 –850 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2016.2607022 Google Scholar

37. 

J. Xu et al., “0.15–3.72 THz absorption of aqueous salts and saline solutions,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 90 (3), 031908 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2430781 APPLAB 0003-6951 Google Scholar

38. 

H. R. Zelsmann, “Temperature dependence of the optical constants for liquid H2O and D2O in the far IR region,” J. Mol. Struct., 350 (2), 95 –114 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2860(94)08471-S JMOSB4 0022-2860 Google Scholar

39. 

L. D. Siebbeles et al., “A subpicosecond pump-probe laser study of ionization and geminate charge recombination kinetics in alkane liquids,” J. Chem. Phys., 107 (22), 9339 –9347 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.475230 JCPSA6 0021-9606 Google Scholar

40. 

J. Noack and A. Vogel, “Laser-induced plasma formation in water at nanosecond to femtosecond time scales: calculation of thresholds, absorption coefficients, and energy density,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 35 (8), 1156 –1167 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1109/3.777215 IEJQA7 0018-9197 Google Scholar

41. 

F. Docchio, “Lifetimes of plasmas induced in liquids and ocular media by single Nd:YAG laser pulses of different duration,” Europhys. Lett., 6 (5), 407 –412 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/6/5/006 EULEEJ 0295-5075 Google Scholar

42. 

E. Knoesel et al., “Conductivity of solvated electrons in hexane investigated with terahertz time-domain spectroscopy,” J. Chem. Phys., 121 (1), 394 –404 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1757442 JCPSA6 0021-9606 Google Scholar

43. 

Z. Mics, F. Kadlec and P. Kužel, “Nonresonant ionization of oxygen molecules by femtosecond pulses: plasma dynamics studied by time-resolved terahertz spectroscopy,” J. Chem. Phys., 123 (10), 104310 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2032987 JCPSA6 0021-9606 Google Scholar

44. 

L. D. Jacobson and J. M. Herbert, “Theoretical characterization of four distinct isomer types in hydrated-electron clusters, and proposed assignments for photoelectron spectra of water cluster anions,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 133 (49), 19889 –19899 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja208024p JACSAT 0002-7863 Google Scholar

Biography

Yong Tan received his BS degree from Chang’an University, Xi’an, China, in 2016. He is currently pursuing his PhD in instrument science and technology at Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China. His research interests include instrument science and technology and terahertz emission. His research primarily concerns generation and detection of terahertz waves.

Hang Zhao received her BS degree from Shenyang University of technology, Shenyang, China, in 2014. She received her MS degree from Capital Normal University, Beijing, China, in 2017. She is currently pursuing her PhD in instrument science and technology at Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China. Her research primarily concerns generation and detection of terahertz waves.

Rui Zhang received his BEng degree in electronic information engineering from Xidian University, Xi’an, China, in 2010. He received his PhD in mechanics from Peking University, Beijing, China, in 2016. His research interests include terahertz spectroscopy and imaging, biomedical application of terahertz techniques, and terahertz wave generation. He is now an associate professor at Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology.

Yuejin Zhao received his PhD in optical engineering from Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China, in 1990. He is currently a professor with the School of Optoelectronics, Beijing Institute of Technology. He has disciplinary responsibility as a team leader of “Instrument Science and Technology” with Beijing Institute of Technology. His current research interests include terahertz imaging technology based on MEMS-infrared imaging technology, space-optical technology, and intelligent photoelectric instrument development.

Cunlin Zhang received his PhD in photoelectric engineering and optical engineering from Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China, in 1992. He is currently a professor with the Capital Normal University and also the director of Beijing Key Laboratory of Terahertz Spectrum and Imaging. He has disciplinary responsibility as a team leader of “Terahertz Spectrum and Imaging” with Beijing Institute of Technology. His current research interests include terahertz and infrared spectrum and imaging.

Xi-Cheng Zhang is the Parker Givens Chair and former director of the Institute of Optics, University of Rochester (UR), New York, USA. With his BS degree in 1982 from Peking University, he received his MS and PhD degrees in physics from Brown University, Rhode Island, in 1983 and 1986, respectively. He has been recognized with many honors and awards, including the Humboldt Prize, from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (2018); IRMMW-THz Kenneth Button Prize (2014); OSA William F. Meggers Award (2012); IEEE Photonics Society William Streifer Scientific Achievement Award (2011); and the Rensselaer William H. Wiley 1866 Award (2009), among others.

Liangliang Zhang received her PhD in instrument science and technology from Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China, in 2008. She is currently a professor with the Department of Physics, Capital Normal University. Her research interests include a wide variety of topics in the area of terahertz emission and terahertz detection.

© The Authors. Published by SPIE and CLP under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Yong Tan, Hang Zhao, Rui Zhang, Yuejin Zhao, Cunlin Zhang, Xi-Cheng Zhang, and Liangliang Zhang "Transient evolution of quasifree electrons of plasma in liquid water revealed by optical-pump terahertz-probe spectroscopy," Advanced Photonics 3(1), 015002 (3 February 2021). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.AP.3.1.015002
Received: 23 September 2020; Accepted: 31 December 2020; Published: 3 February 2021
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back to Top