Translator Disclaimer
29 April 2021 Taking silicon photonics modulators to a higher performance level: state-of-the-art and a review of new technologies
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Optical links are moving to higher and higher transmission speeds while shrinking to shorter and shorter ranges where optical links are envisaged even at the chip scale. The scaling in data speed and span of the optical links demands modulators to be concurrently performant and cost-effective. Silicon photonics (SiPh), a photonic integrated circuit technology that leverages the fabrication sophistication of complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor technology, is well-positioned to deliver the performance, price, and manufacturing volume for the high-speed modulators of future optical communication links. SiPh has relied on the plasma dispersion effect, either in injection, depletion, or accumulation mode, to demonstrate efficient high-speed modulators. The high-speed plasma dispersion silicon modulators have been commercially deployed and have demonstrated excellent performance. Recent years have seen a paradigm shift where the integration of various electro-refractive and electro-absorptive materials has opened up additional routes toward performant SiPh modulators. These modulators are in the early years of their development. They promise to extend the performance beyond the limits set by the physical properties of silicon. The focus of our study is to provide a comprehensive review of contemporary (i.e., plasma dispersion modulators) and new modulator implementations that involve the integration of novel materials with SiPh.

1.

Introduction

High-speed transceivers for short-reach (few cm to few tens of km) and long-haul optical communication links require high-performance modulators in their transmitter optical subassembly.13 The key performance parameters for an efficient modulator are (a) high modulation efficiency49 in amplitude or phase by a drive signal that is compliant with the complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) circuitry5,6 [for phase modulators, the modulation efficiency is defined as the product of voltage Vπ applied to the phase shifter to achieve π phase shift and the length L of the phase shifter—a smaller Vπ·L represents higher modulation efficiency; for amplitude modulation, the ratio of extinction ratio (ER) to an applied voltage for a given length of the modulator represents the modulation efficiency and large values are desired]; (b) low insertion loss (IL),1013 both low loss in the active and passive parts of the modulator; (c) tens of gigabits per second (Gb/s)1417 modulation speed to support the future capacity demands of the optical communication networks; (d) energy consumption to be as low as a few tens of fJ/bit;1820 (e) large ER—typically 4  dB for 2  km transmission links and 8  dB for tens of km long transmission links—to ensure high optical signal-to-noise ratio for maintaining a low bit error rate;2125 (f) low chirp2628 to realize higher-order modulation schemes2729 and to enhance dispersion tolerance of transmission links;26,30 and (g) compact size9,12,3133 to enable high-integration density.1,2,21,3436

Generally, the modulator figure of merit (FoM) captures the performance of a modulator. In the literature, a variety of definitions for modulator FoM exist.1,2,21,37,38 In its simplest form, Vπ·L represents the FoM for a phase modulator. Vπ·L·α is a phase modulator FoM that takes the phase shifter loss α into account. A phase modulator FoM given as fc·[CL·(Vπ·L)2·α/8]1, where fc represents the phase shifter cutoff frequency and CL represents the phase shifter capacitance, relates the FoM in terms of modulator bandwidth, loss, and energy per bit.2,4,21 The ratio ER/IL gives the FoM for amplitude modulators.20,38 Dynamic optical modulation amplitude is a dynamic FoM of a modulator, as it takes modulator parameters and the modulation format into account.37

High-index-contrast silicon photonics (SiPh) provides dense integration of complex photonic functionalities, such as high-speed modulators, using technology and process toolsets from CMOS electronics.39 Other photonic integrated circuit (PIC) platforms such as indium phosphide,4042 which typically relies on 100 mm wafers, and lithium niobate (LiNbO3),43 which commonly relies on 150 mm wafers, are fabricated in customized fabs. SiPh integrated circuits are typically fabricated on 200 or 300 mm wafers. The large wafer size allows for a large number of compact dies per wafer at low-cost scaling to large commercial volumes in existing CMOS commercial fabs and R&D pilot lines.39,4448 SiPh modulators promise to provide the best price-performance ratio and possible routes for monolithic integration of electronics and photonics.2,21,22,39,49 The commercial launch of SiPh-enabled transceivers is a testament to the promise of SiPh as a photonic integration technology to deliver efficient high-speed modulators.3,4448,5052

The push for performant high-speed modulators stems from the ever booming growth of internet traffic. This growth has driven the modern data centers (DCs) into the so-called “Zettabyte Era,” where the annual global traffic is expected to exceed 2.2 zettabytes/year. This value corresponds to a threefold increase in just five years. The biggest contribution to this huge traffic originates from data moving inside the DCs over inter-DC connections.53 Nonetheless, a remarkable increase in data exchanged between different DCs is also reported within the last few years (inter-DC connections). Future massive-scale DCs are expected to spread widely across the globe in order to meet the enormous bandwidth demands. An increase in baud rate imposes itself, yet at an even lower power consumption per bit. Consequently, crucial optimization of the intra- and inter-data center interconnects (DCIs)—where high-speed modulators are a key building block—is needed. More specifically:

  • The inter-DCI landscape is dominated by coherent dense wavelength division multiplexing optics for reaching high capacities per single wavelength, currently targeting up to 38.4  Tb/s aggregate capacity in a distance between 40 and 1000s of kilometers with data rates of currently 400  Gb/s to 600  Gb/s (64 Gbaud) per wavelength. By 2025, data rates are expected to double 54 with symbol rates exceeding 100 Gbaud. These values set strict requirements regarding the transmitter performance, primarily in terms of bandwidth. Regarding power consumption, pluggable modules such as C form factor pluggable (CFP) and CFP2 used for current inter-DCIs are limited to a maximum power consumption of around 20 W in total, and new form factors such as octal small form factor pluggable or quad small form factor pluggable-double density are specified to an even lower maximum power consumption. This means that the modulator and driver power consumption should be carefully optimized. The most widely used architecture for inter-DCIs is the Mach–Zehnder modulator (MZM) in in-phase, quadrature configuration, whereby MZMs are nested to modulate the in-phase and quadrature component of the signal.55,56 For demonstrating high-order quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM), it is extremely critical for the MZM to show a linear intensity dependence with voltage (low chirp) to minimize the error vector magnitude.27 Furthermore, the need for more bandwidth in wavelength division multiplexing systems requires broadband and tunable devices, increasing the need to optimize components for use in optical bands beyond the C-band (1.53 to 1.565  μm), i.e., L-band (1.565 to 1.625  μm) and/or S-band (1.46 to 1.53  μm).

  • Due to the shorter distance requirements of up to 2 km (FR) or up to 10 km (LR), the intra-DCI applications are mainly using multi-channel 56 Gbaud, four-level pulse amplitude modulation (PAM-4). As a result, the transmitter requirements in this case are more relaxed in terms of linearity, but a high dynamic ER (ER >4.5  dB57) is necessary in order to achieve multi-level modulation. In this case, QSFP form factors require a maximum total power consumption of 5.5 W. Mainly because of the very strict power consumption requirements, up to now, vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser (VCSEL)-based transceivers and parallel fiber transmission have been used inside DCs, especially on short reaches. However, with the massive increase of traffic, there has been a continuous interest to replace VCSELs with next generation ultra-compact devices that will provide even lower cost-energy consumption figures. With the next generations of intra-DCI transceivers aiming for data rates of 800  Gb/s and beyond, a potential move of coherent technology into the domain of intensity modulation and direct detection may be seen, as scaling of intensity modulated signals to higher capacity is increasingly challenging.58 However, to meet the stringent power consumption target for intra-DCI transceivers, lightweight digital signal processing, lower power consumption components, and potentially a reduced coherent system will be required.

For both intra- and inter-DCIs, SiPh appears to be a promising technology platform,59,60 mainly because of the dense integration of photonics59,60 while minimizing the overall cost-power efficiency budget.18,19,39 Currently, the plasma dispersion effect, which is based on the movement (injection,7,37,6167 accumulation,12,6870 or depletion9,13,14,16,22,32,33,7187) of carriers to induce a refractive index change in a silicon waveguide, is the most widely deployed phenomenon to implement high-speed modulators in SiPh.5,719,22,32,33,37,6169,6971,71121 Plasma dispersion modulators in SiPh have successfully demonstrated operations of 90 (Ref. 87) and 100  Gb/s122,123 for the on–off keying (OOK) modulation scheme. Furthermore, various plasma dispersion modulators implementations for advanced modulation schemes such as QPSK,55,56,124 QAM,125,126 PAM-4,29,52,127 and PAM-8115 also exist.

The plasma dispersion effect is a weak electro-refractive effect.128 A 1017  cm3 change in carrier concentration introduces an index change of Δn104. Furthermore, the phase modulation provided by the plasma dispersion effect is always associated with spurious amplitude modulation.21,26 Unlike Pockels modulators, plasma dispersion modulators do not have a linear dependence of voltage and refractive index change Δn (thus, they show chirp), which makes them a less promising candidate for cases that require pure phase modulation.26,55,56,124,125,129 Nevertheless, R&D efforts have resulted in the performance of SiPh plasma dispersion modulators that is comparable with other photonic integration technologies.27

Typically, plasma dispersion modulators rely on interferometric structures [such as the Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI)13,19,78,84,108,118 or optical cavities9,12,32,33,100,115] for the translation of phase modulation into amplitude modulation. The carrier depletion-based interferometric plasma dispersion modulators, such as MZMs, are large in size (typically a phase shifter length of a few mm).21,22 Injection or accumulation of carriers offers higher efficiency plasma dispersion effect phase shifters, enabling compact interferometric modulators.37,65 The implementations of plasma dispersion high-speed modulators involving optical cavities [such as ring resonators (RRs)] result in compact devices (typically a few hundreds of μm2).9,12,32,33 However, these RR-based devices suffer from high temperature and fabrication sensitivity.130,131 Literature reports solving these problems to a certain extent through smart design strategies and technological advancements.132 Nonetheless, the limited operational optical bandwidth of the ring modulator (RM) is intrinsic to them.

It is a daunting task to deliver the future demands for single lane 100 Gbaud and beyond data rates in an energy-efficient manner. Recently, there have been a growing number of efforts to integrate electro-optic materials with a strong Pockels effect on SiPh platforms. The integration of such electro-optic materials promises to provide additional routes to upscale the performance of SiPh modulators to deliver the future demands for single lane 100 Gbaud and beyond data rates in an energy-efficient manner. Table 1 shows a rich landscape of SiPh modulators, where SiPh is incorporating a variety of other materials for implementing performant high-speed modulators. Modulation of amplitude by the Franz–Keldysh (FK) effect,20,38,128,133140 quantum-confined Stark (QCS) effect,141152 and electrical gating, 153160 or the modulation of phase by employing the plasma dispersion effect,161166 Pockels effect,167192,192200 and inter-band transitions,201208 is feasible either directly in silicon20,31,38,133139,143 or by integrating a variety of efficient electro-optic materials with SiPh platforms.161,172,182,184,202 The integration of new materials into SiPh has to counter various challenges. Invariably, any new material integration requires new technology and process development that allows for low-loss integration with the SiPh platform. The integration process must ensure high material quality. The introduction of defects in the integration process downgrades the yield of the PIC manufacturing process. Consequently, the integration of new materials always adds to manufacturing costs. Materials allowing wafer-scale integration and the ones for which the fab can leverage from the existing learning curve of introduction into other platforms reduce the financial impact and technological complexities, and they are thus preferred.

Table 1

Prominent approaches for high-speed modulation in SiPh. The modulator implementations in SiPh use a variety of physical phenomenons, materials, optical architectures, and driver architectures.

The landscape of high-speed modulators in silicon photonics
ModulationOperating principlePlatformReported optical implementationReported driver implementation
PhasePlasma dispersion effect by carrierSiliconMZI, michelson, resonators (ring, disk, ph. crystal, Fabry–Perot), slow-light structure, Bragg reflectorsLumped, traveling wave (TW), segmented
(a) Injection
(b) Accumulation
(c) Depletion
Pockels effectLiNbO3 on siliconMZILumped, TW
Organics on siliconMZI, ring resonatorLumped, TW
BTO on siliconMZI, ring resonatorLumped, TW
PZT on siliconMZI, ring resonatorLumped
Interband transitions2D materials on siliconMZI, ring resonatorLumped, TW
Carrier accumulations/carrier depletion+Franz-Keldysh effectIII-V on siliconMZI, ring resonatorLumped, TW
AmplitudeFranz-Keldysh effectSilicon-germaniumWaveguide, MZILumped
Quantum confined Stark effectGe-Si-Ge quantum wellsWaveguide, Fabry–Perot cavityLumped
Electrical gating2D materials on siliconWaveguideLumped
Quantum confined Stark effectIII-V on siliconWaveguideLumped

The electrical driving of the modulator comprises an electrode configuration and the driving scheme (such as single-ended drive with dual-arm push-pull, differential drive with dual-arm push-pull, differential drive with dual-arm push-pull with shared drive, or dual-differential drive with dual-arm push-pull) to feed the electrodes.25 Generally, the length of the phase shifter determines the electrode configuration.209 Modulators with a short phase shifter length (phase shifter length <λRF/10)2,25 use lumped electrodes.209,210 Lumped driving is applicable to modulators comprising interferometric structures,65,210,211 as well as cavity-based structures9,12,62,70,115 and slow-light structures.112,113 With lumped electrodes, the applied voltage is approximately identical across the entire length of the phase shifter. Lumped driving does not necessarily require a matched termination of the driving electrodes. With unterminated lumped driving, the phase shifter’s capacitive load determines the energy consumption per bit (Ebit) for a modulator. Typically, the bandwidth of lumped electrode phase shifter driving is limited by its impedance (intrinsic, parasitic, and the one contributed by the driving circuitry) and the time taken by the photons to transit through the phase shifter. The latter effect is more pronounced for the slow-light modulators.113,114

The traveling wave (TW) is the most common driving scheme for carrier depletion plasma dispersion MZMs.2,4,25,210,212 In this scheme, a single driver drives the entire electrode of the phase shifter.25,212 The TW electrode typically comprises a coplanar waveguide transmission line. It terminates with a resistive impedance matched to the wave impedance of the electrode. The RF power applied to the TW electrode is consumed by the RF losses in the TW, capacitive loading by the phase shifter, and the matched termination. The matched resistance prevents electrical reflections and consequent interference with the electrical signal stream. But, it also increases the power consumption of the TW electrode as a fraction of the total input RF power is always consumed by the matched termination. Generally, TW driving schemes are six to eight times more energy-hungry than the lumped driving.2,4 The detrimental factors impacting the bandwidth of the modulators with TW driving are: (a) RC time constant of the phase shifter; (b) walk-off (phase mismatch due to mismatch between the propagation speed of the electrical signal in the transmission line and the optical signal in the waveguide) between the electrical and optical signals; and (c) RF-losses in the TW electrode.

The segmented topology with distributed driving comprises a series of short phase shifters, which are individually driven by lumped electrodes.6,22,66 Segmentation of the phase shifter with distributed driving avoids the RF attenuation due to a long transmission line while enabling the same voltage swing across the whole length of the phase shifter.212 As compared to the TW architecture, the segmented electrodes require smaller-size voltage drivers.25 The precise delivery of the electrical signal to a phase shifter segment requires time synchronization with the transit time of light in that segment, which requires timing control circuitry for precise delivery of the electrical signal to each segment. This additional overhead undermines the energy efficiency of the segmented drivers and adds to the driver complexity. The number of phase shifter segments and their length determine the modulator bandwidth and its power efficiency. Typically, segmented electrodes with distributed drivers require tighter connectivity between the electronic drivers and the phase shifter segments to preserve the signal integrity and prevent parasitic effects. Therefore, this driving scheme demands either monolithic integration of electronics and photonics or flip-chip bonding photonic and electronic chips through an array of microbumps. Electrical driving plays a crucial role in defining the performance (primarily the power consumption and bandwidth) of high-speed phase modulators.2,122,210 In the early years, most of the high-speed modulator demonstrations focused on the optimization of modulator performance in isolation from the driver design.122 Recent demonstrations of high-speed modulators have established that concurrent co-design and co-optimization of electrical driving and photonic phase shifter design25,52,122 are a key to extracting the best performance for all modulator performance attributes.52,213 This holds for modulators involving monolithic or hybrid integration with electronics.25,122,213

This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of the new technologies that provide additional, viable routes to enhance the performance of SiPh modulators. These new technologies involve the integration of materials with high electro-optic coefficients with SiPh platforms. As a result, they promise to deliver modulator performance that is required to meet the blistering surge in transmission rates for the optical links. This paper also compares these new technologies against the current mainstream SiPh modulator implementations. A comprehensive coverage in full detail is very challenging and difficult to be performed in a paper with a limited page number. Therefore, we will limit the discussion in this paper to some of the most important and relevant implementations of high-speed modulators in SiPh. It is important to note that the SiPh modulators have been used to modulate signals by means of advanced modulation schemes such as QPSK,55,56,124 QAM,125,126 PAM-4,29,52,127 and PAM-8.115 However, in this paper, the operating speed is quoted only for OOK. Furthermore, the discussion in this paper is limited to C-band and O-band implementations of SiPh modulators for telecommunication and data communication applications; though SiPh modulators are also reported for mid-infrared (mid-IR) wavelengths214,215 and for non-telecom/datacom applications.215

2.

State-of-the-Art of Contemporary Silicon Photonic High-Speed Modulators

Research to develop SiPh modulators dates back to the era when it was still a niche choice for photonic integration.61,64,8890,216 Unstrained silicon has a fundamentally zero linear electro-optic effect (the Pockels effect, used in traditional LiNbO3 modulators) due to its crystallographic structure (i.e., centrosymmetric crystal lattice), albeit strained silicon is investigated for high-speed all-silicon modulation.217219 This intrinsic property of Si directed the researchers to investigate other optical phenomenons, such as the plasma dispersion effect to realize high-performance modulators in SiPh. This section provides a summary of the plasma dispersion modulators to implement SiPh high-speed modulators.

2.1.

High-Speed Modulators Using the Plasma Dispersion Effect

The refractive index change by the plasma dispersion effect in silicon is larger than the change by the Kerr61,220 and FK effects.31,63,141 The plasma dispersion effect is broadband going all the way from telecom to mid-IR wavelengths221 and is relatively temperature independent.222225 Furthermore, its implementation is inherently simple, using standard CMOS processing technology.81 All of these factors made the plasma dispersion effect one of the current mainstream mechanisms to implement efficient high-speed modulators in SiPh.2,21,35,49 Years of development, led by both industry and academic players, have resulted in the demonstration of plasma dispersion effect-based phase modulators providing losses of <10  dB/cm,71,80,116,118,121 phase modulation efficiencies Vπ·L<0.3  V·cm,5,69,104 energy consumption as low as tens of fJ/bit,18,99,110,111,115 and data rates reaching 100  Gb/s 14,87,122,123 for OOK modulation with minimal influence of temperature on the performance of the plasma dispersion modulators (III–V modulators rely on the QCS effect and are influenced by temperature). It is important to note that all of these specs are not provided simultaneously by a single plasma dispersion modulation implementation.21

Plasma dispersion is an electro-refractive effect. The change of free carrier concentration by the movement of charge carriers into or out of a waveguide results in phase modulation of the optical signal.21,49,61 Phase modulation is translated into intensity modulation by embedding the phase modulator into MZIs,1517,77,79,108,109 RRs,18,32,33,62,110,111,119 Bragg reflectors,88 Michelson interferometers,8,121 photonic crystal cavities,98,112114 and Fabry–Perot cavities.100 The three prominent schemes to introduce change in the free carrier concentration are (a) the injection of minority carriers7,37,6167 by forward biasing a PIN junction; (b) the accumulation of majority carriers12,68,69,69,70 of opposing polarity across an insulating section in a waveguide; (c) the depletion of majority carriers9,13,14,16,22,32,33,71,7187 from a PN junction by reversely biasing it.

Carrier injection is the most efficient plasma dispersion-based modulation scheme.7,8,37,98 Most of the early demonstrations of high-speed modulators relied on carrier injection of minority carriers by forward biasing a PIN junction built along a waveguide.63,89,90,93,216,226 The carrier injection-based modulators provide a high modulation efficiency due to their large diffusion capacitance (typically 10  pF) when implemented on a waveguide with a small cross section with stronger confinement.7,37,6567,9194 Carrier injection-based modulators are reported using lateral PIN63,65,67,92 and vertical PIN configurations (see Fig. 1).63,89,93,216,226 Owing to the feasibility for a short phase shifter ( a few hundreds of μm), carrier injection modulators typically use lumped driving schemes.7,65,67 The use of pre-emphasized electrical signaling schemes, in which a fraction of the electrical driver signal has a voltage Vπ of the modulator, boosts the limited speeds of carrier injection-based modulators67,9597 with the obvious ramification of increased power consumption. Recent years have seen the development of passive equalization techniques to boost the high-speed operation of the carrier injection modulators.65,67 The studies have shown that the factors that limit the speed of the carrier injection-based modulation are (a) recombination time of the injected electron–hole pairs and (b) the sum of the electrical driver output resistance and the bulk resistance of the p- and n-doped regions.7,65,67 The slower of these two effects determines the speed limit of the carrier injection modulators.67 Practically, it is possible to improve the bandwidth of carrier injection modulators by embedding an RECE passive equalizer such that RECE=RFCF and CFCE, where RE,F and CE,F are the equalizer and the forward resistance and the capacitance, respectively.7,65,91 Current state-of-the-art carrier injection modulators use this passive equalization to demonstrate >20  Gb/s operation.7,65 Recently, 70 Gbaud operation of a carrier injection MZM was enabled by passive RC equalization.7 The modulator has a 37-GHz 3-dB bandwidth using a 0.25-mm long-phase shifter having 28  dB/cm loss and a Vπ·L of 2  V·cm.7 One of the best modulation efficiencies of 0.274  V·cm has been reported in Ref. 67, where a side-wall corrugated MZM with a bandwidth of 12.5 GHz is operated at 25  Gb/s using a finite impulse response filter for frequency compensation necessary for the broadband operation.67 The demonstrated modulator had a 250-μm-long phase shifter that exhibited a propagation loss of 5.3  dB/mm.

Fig. 1

(a) Baseline architecture of carrier injection, carrier depletion, and carrier accumulation plasma dispersion phase shifters. (b) Various configurations of plasma dispersion phase shifters.

AP_3_2_024003_f001.png

The carrier accumulation plasma dispersion phase shifter requires forward biasing of a metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS) capacitor.2,68,101,102 A typical implementation of an MOS (also known as silicon–insulator–silicon capacitor—SISCAP) modulator comprises a vertical slot waveguide with an overlapping stack of a sub-μm-sized thick p-type poly-silicon layer on top of a sub-μm-sized thick n-type c-silicon layer with a few nm (typically <20  nm) thick insulating gate oxide layer in the middle (i.e., p-Si/insulator/c-Si vertical slot waveguide)—see Fig. 1(a).69,101,102 Under accumulation conditions, in which a positive bias is applied to the p-type layer, the vertically confined optical mode overlaps strongly with the highly capacitive gate section.101,102 This enables <1  V·cm modulation efficiency for SISCAP modulators37 with state-of-the-art values as low as 0.2 and 0.16  V·cm.5,68,69 Owing to this higher modulation efficiency, typically 0.5-mm-long phase shifters with lumped electrical driving are implemented in SISCAP modulators.65,67,69,69,103 The higher capacitance, which leads to higher modulation efficiency, caps the modulation speed of SISCAP modulators.2,104 The modulation efficiency and speed can be traded-off in SISCAP modulators by adopting the capacitance to a value that can provide either an efficient modulator (i.e., high capacitance) with low Vπ·L or high-speed modulator (i.e., low capacitance) without any degradation of the loss parameter for the modulator (the increase or decrease in capacitance is independent of the doping level and is controlled by the thickness of gate oxide and the relative permitivity of the material used as the gate oxide).2,70,101,102,104 Typically, a vertical capacitor configuration is used in SISCAP modulators due to the ease of fabrication.5,68,69,69,70,104 It is straightforward to fabricate by the deposition of poly-Si.2,101 Techniques such as epitaxial lateral growth101,102 and laser-induced epitaxial growth crystallize the poly-silicon layer to overcome the higher scattering loss due to defects in the lattice.2,227 Recently, SISCAP modulators using a c-Si/insulator/c-Si in a vertical slot configuration70 and in a horizontal slot configuration103 without requiring any additional processing steps have been reported [see Fig. 1(b)]. One of the first 40  Gb/s Mach–Zehnder SISCAP modulators relied on a vertical capacitor configuration, and it delivered an ER of 9 dB.68 The design consisted of a 400-μm-long MOS capacitor with a 6.5-dB/mm loss delivering a Vπ·L of 0.2 cm for the O-band. The same MZM is driven by a CMOS driver to demonstrate its low-power operation for NRZ-OOK and for advanced modulation formats such as PAM-4 using a segmented driver.5 A recent demonstration reports high modulation efficiency of 0.16  V·cm for 25  Gb/s operation using a 60-μm-long phase shifter with a loss of 3.5  dB/mm.69 The MZM provided one of the best FoMs (α·Vπ·L) of <7  dB·V. A microdisk-based SISCAP modulator demonstrated 15  Gb/s operation on a small footprint of 30  μm2 consuming only 55  fJ/bit.70 In order to deliver >50  Gb/s operation using SISCAP modulators, a parametric study has been performed validating the trade-off between high-speed operation, modulation efficiency, and loss.104

Depletion of electrons and holes by reversely biasing a PN junction built in or around it is the most widely adopted scheme to implement the plasma dispersion-based phase modulator.811,1319,22,32,33,71,7187,106121 Depletion-based modulators were the first all-silicon modulator to reach speeds of 40106 and 50  Gb/s.16 The current highest reported data rates of 100  Gb/s using OOK modulation were also demonstrated in carrier depletion modulators.122,123 Carrier depletion phase shifters exhibit a relatively limited capacitance of 0.2 to 0.8  pF/mm21,91 and, hence, a limited modulation efficiency. In order to improve the modulation efficiency, the capacitance can be increased by either shrinking the mode size (determined by the waveguide geometry) or by reducing the width of the depletion region (higher transition capacitance).21 The latter requires higher doping concentrations, which leads to higher loss due to free carrier absorption. Over the years, a wide variety of PN junction designs are reported to solve this challenge of optimizing modulator speed, efficiency, and loss at the same time.13,15,17,18,22,7176,78,107109,116,117,119 Distinct categories of PN junction implementation are as follows:

  • (i) Vertical P(I)N junction, in which the PN junction is horizontally placed along the top and bottom surface of the waveguide18,107111 [see Fig. 1(b)]. These junctions are known to provide higher overlap between the optical mode and the depletion region to improve the modulation efficiency (higher capacitance) and reduced power consumption.18,107111

  • (ii) Horizontal or lateral PN junction, in which the PN junction is vertically placed side-by-side in the center of the waveguide (laterally symmetric design)17,116,117,119 [see Fig. 1(b)]. The horizontal PN junction is abundantly used in various adapted forms to improve the α·Vπ·L of the modulator. A few examples include (a) lateral PN junction with an offset from the center of the active region of the modulator,13,22,7176 and (b) lateral junction formed by placing a p-doped slit in the center of the waveguide78 while leaving the waveguide edges or corners un-doped.15,107 The rationale of (a) and (b) is to exploit the higher index change and lower loss provided by the dominantly p-doped active region.13,15,7175,78,107

  • (iii) Interleaved or interdigitated PN junction, which comprises an alignment tolerant junction implemented by alternating the p-type and n-type doping regions along the length of the waveguide81,83,84 [see Fig. 1(b)]. This type of junction is known to provide a good modulation efficiency by trading-off the speed and power efficiency for such a junction.32,8084

One of the first 40  Gb/s modulators relied on a vertical PIN junction and delivered a modulation efficiency of 4  V·cm and phase shifter loss of 18  dB/cm.106 Using a vertical P(I)N junction design, an athermal microdisk modulator with a high modulation efficiency of 250  pm/V consuming 0.9  fJ/bit while operating at 25  Gb/s using NRZ-OOK signaling has been reported.18 At 25  Gb/s, the modulator had an IL of 1  dB and an ER of 6 dB. One of the highest operating speeds of 60  Gb/s with 3.8 dB ER comprised a symmetric PN junction.17 In this case, the modulator operated in a series of push–pull modes by connecting back-to-back the phase shifter PN junction embedded on both arms of the MZI. The series connection of the two phase shifters halves the net capacitance, and the push–pull scheme limits the chirp of the modulator. The modulator shows 50 GHz bandwidth at 4 V reverse bias and an average modulation efficiency of 3.2  V·cm for a 4-mm-long PN junction.17 In another implementation, a symmetric carrier depletion MZM with sub-1 V drive signal operated at 20  Gb/s and delivered a power consumption as low as 200  fJ/bit.118 Yet another variant of the symmetric lateral PN junction used the doping compensating technique120 to demonstrate a 50-Gb/s MZM comprising a 3-mm-long phase shifter with a modulation efficiency of 1.85  V·cm and a loss of 3.9 dB. An RM relying on a symmetric phase shifter configuration delivered a modulation efficiency of 25  pm/V at 0 V119 to demonstrate 36  fJ/bit energy consumption for 40  Gb/s operation on a compact footprint of 0.5  mm2. A recent implementation demonstrates a 64-Gb/s MZM, in which the carrier depletion-based phase shifter is implemented through a 200-μm-long photonic crystal slow light structure.114 The modulator used a meandered RF electrode terminated with a 20  Ω resistor to provide a bandwidth of 38 GHz by preventing the velocity mismatch of the electrical and optical signals. The modulator required a voltage swing of 5.5 V to provide an energy consumption of 21  pJ/bit and provided 4.8 dB ER. The literature also reports various other demonstrations of asymmetric (where there is an offset of the PN junction from the waveguide center) carrier depletion-based phase shifters.8,16,72,74,76 For example, a Michelson interferometer with a partially shifted PN-junction provided one of the highest modulation efficiencies of 0.72  V·cm at 1 V reverse bias and 4.7 dB loss for a 500-μm-long PN junction with a lumped driving scheme to operate at 40  Gb/s through a bandwidth extension scheme involving a resistor parallel to the PN junction.8 The asymmetric PN diodes are also exploited by RRs72,76 to demonstrate low-power (sub-100  fJ/bit) and compact depletion modulators. The literature also reports fully shifted PN junctions, where a self-aligning process allows for the alignment of the n-doped region to the edge of the waveguide.16,74 In one implementation of a fully shifted PN junction, a 50-Gb/s MZM modulator provided a modulation efficiency of 2.8  V·cm and an IL of 4 dB for a 1-mm-long phase shifter.16 By further optimizing the implementation of self-aligned PN junctions,74 a demonstration provided an 1  dB/mm loss without compromising the speed of the modulator. The self-aligning process is further exploited to implement a PIPIN phase shifter with a modulation efficiency of 3.5  V·cm for a 0.95-mm-long phase shifter introducing 4.5 dB optical loss when operated at 40  Gb/s.79 Depletion-based modulators relying on an interleaved phase shifter design have also delivered high-speed operation. A modulator comprising a 3-mm-long interleaved phase shifter reported a high modulation efficiency of 0.62  V·cm with a static IL of 2.8 dB while delivering 40  Gb/s modulation speed.81 An RM comprising a ring resonator with a 100-μm radius, and an MZM with a 0.95-mm phase shifter length operated at 40  Gb/s speed using an interleaved phase shifter delivering a modulation efficiency and loss of 2.4  V·cm and 2.1  dB/mm, respectively.32 Apart from standalone implementations of high-speed phase shifters through these three baseline junction configurations and their adaptations, there are reports on junction implementations that rely on combining these three schemes in a single PN junction design.9,33,79,85,86 An example is the substrate-removed “zig-zag” phase shifter for an MZM delivering 1.6  V·cm modulation efficiency for a 2-mm-long phase shifter with 4.4 dB loss.14 The modulator provided 55 GHz bandwidth and modulation speed of 90  Gb/s.14,87 Another example includes a phase shifter for 40  Gb/s operation of a racetrack RM by combining horizontal, vertical, and interleaved approaches. This implementation delivered a modulation efficiency of 0.76  V·cm at 1  V reverse bias and a loss of 3.5  dB/mm.33 A recent result demonstrated an RM with a record low modulation efficiency of 0.52  V·cm by employing a phase shifter comprising a combination of horizontal and vertical junctions by wrapping the n-doped region over the intrinsic and the p-doped region.9 The modulator showed 50 GHz bandwidth and delivered 70  fJ/bit energy consumption for 64  Gb/s operation.

In the discussion presented above, we have provided a summary of the latest developments made for the improvement of plasma dispersion effect-based modulators. Figure 1(a) represents the three baseline plasma dispersion phase shifter architectures and their respective biasing configuration. Figure 1(b) gives an overview of a variety of other phase shifter configurations for carrier injection, carrier depletion, and carrier accumulation phase shifters.

Table 2 summarizes the typical performance for the injection, accumulation, and depletion-type plasma dispersion modulators. Table 2 also presents the best-reported results for the modulation efficiencies, losses, data rates, and energy consumption. There is an interplay of a vast pool of variables, such as junction type and its actuation mechanism, doping concentrations (typically ranging from 1017 to 1018  cm3) and their positions, the thickness of the slab waveguide (typically ranging from 1/3 to 1/4 of the guiding silicon thickness), the thickness of the guiding silicon layer (typically <1  μm), choice of the passive structure for the translation of phase modulation to amplitude modulation, and the design of the driving electrode (lumped, TW, and segmented), which can influence the performance of plasma dispersion modulators. In many cases, one performance parameter has to be delicately traded-off for another specification. This makes the design of a plasma dispersion modulator, which can meet all of the performance requirements concurrently, far from trivial. Operation of plasma dispersion modulators at speeds >70  Gb/s7,14,122 consuming tens of fJ/bit with high modulation efficiency enabling micrometer-sized footprints has been accomplished. Recent developments have resulted in a co-designed SiPh modulator-driver offering 100  Gb/s while preserving a good modulation efficiency122 and without any customized fabrication process development. The plasma dispersion modulators deliver sufficient linearity and ER to handle advanced coherent modulation schemes,3,55,56,124126 such as QAM, and amplitude modulation schemes,9,17,29,52,66,115,123 such as PAM. Furthermore, the plasma dispersion modulators have shown modest chirp-induced penalty for short- and long-haul links.3,26,30 The co-design and co-optimization of the driver–modulator design is the key to taking the performance of plasma dispersion modulators to a new level.122

Table 2

Typical and state-of-the-art performance matrix for the plasma dispersion high-speed phase modulators. The parentheses contain the best-reported result for a performance attribute. The matrix includes the results reported for O-band and C-band demonstrations.

PrincipleModulation efficiency Vπ·L (V·cm)Loss (dB/cm)Lengtha of phase shifter (mm)Data rateb(Gb/s)Energy/bit (fJ/bit)
Carrier injectionc<0.5 (0.0588)70 (287)0.1 to <0.3<40 (707)1000 for MZMs and RMs (0.1f,98)
Carrier accumulationd<0.3 (0.1669)50 to 80 (3569)0.540 (405)>200 for MZMs, <200 (3105) for SLMsg
Carrier depletione2 (0.529)10 to 30 (2.610)>1>40 (100122,123)200 for MZMs (32.419), <40 for RMs (0.918)

aThe phase shifter lengths are quoted for the non-resonant implementations.

bThe rates for an OOK modulation scheme. The data rates for the carrier injection scheme are presented for approaches that do not require pre-emphasis of the modulating signal.

cTypical performance for carrier-injection plasma dispersion phase modulators is based on Refs. 7, 8, 37, 61–67, and 88–100.

dTypical performance for the carrier-accumulation plasma dispersion modulators is based on Refs. 5, 12, 68, 69, 69, 70, and 101–105.

eTypical performance for the carrier-depletion plasma dispersion modulators is based on Refs. 8–11, 13–19, 22, 32, 33, 71–87, and 106–123.

fBased on 1D-SiPh crystal.

gFor photonic crystal cavity SLM.

3.

New Materials on Silicon for High-Speed Modulators

Recent years have seen growing efforts to integrate materials with strong electro-optic effects on SiPh platforms.153192,192208,228 The integration of new materials provides routes for optically broadband and energy-efficient high-speed modulation with little or no current flow.176,181,184,188,202 Furthermore, in some cases, these new materials provide an excellent decoupling between amplitude and phase modulation, which is difficult to achieve with contemporary all-silicon plasma dispersion modulation schemes.174,178,184

Through the wafer-scale integration of these new material systems with SiPh platforms, one can achieve impressive modulator performance, while at the same time preserving the benefits provided by the mature SiPh technology.181 These new materials can be broadly categorized into the following:

  • (silicon-)germanium,

  • ferroelectrics,

  • III–V semiconductors,

  • 2D materials, and

  • organic (electro-optic) materials.

Early results of high-speed modulators by integrating electro-optic materials with the SiPh platforms have shown a lot of promise. Many research teams are attempting to take their maturity and performance beyond the performance of plasma dispersion modulators. The sections below discuss the key modulator implementations by integrating these materials into SiPh platforms.

3.1.

(Silicon-)Germanium

The FK effect and the QCS effect provide possible routes to implement compact, low-power, and high-speed electro-absorption modulators (EAMs) in SiPh.31,143,144,146,149 Under the influence of an applied electric field, the band edge tilts to enhance the absorption coefficient for GeSi bulk material (FK effect) or Ge/SiGe quantum well (QW) structures (QCS effect).31,38,145,146 These effects are intrinsically fast through their sub-ps response time.34,229 The QCS effect is stronger than the FK effect134,230 due to the strong excitonic effect and discretized density of states. The integration of bulk GeSi or Ge/SiGe QW requires epitaxial growth on SiPh platforms. The FK effect is considered more attractive than the QCS effect in the context of integration feasibility. The latter requires a more complex epitaxial growth process for band alignment and strain balancing.152,230 A large change in the absorption coefficient (typically ranging from 100 to 1000  cm1 in the C-band146) enables the implementation of a compact and energy-efficient EAM using the FK effect and QCS effect.31,230 Both effects rely on band engineering. Therefore, they have limited optical bandwidth (30  nm for the FK effect and 20  nm for the QCS effect).134,149 In one of the first SiPh EAMs, the L-band absorption spectrum is shifted to the C-band by a tensiled 0.8% GeSi alloy.31 On a small footprint of only 30  μm, the EAM actuated by a vertical PIN diode provided an energy consumption of only 50  fJ/bit. This EAM could operate over a 14-nm bandwidth from 1539 to 1553 nm and delivered an efficiency (defined as Δα/αon, where Δα is the absorption difference between ON-state and OFF-state, and αon is the absorption for the ON-sate, in which no electric field is applied) of 2. Despite the limited bandwidth of 1 GHz, this promising demonstration triggered other demonstrations of EAMs.20,38,128,133139,231,232 An evanescently coupled 55  μm2 GeSi EAM has been reported on a thick SOI platform (silicon guiding layer thickness of 3  μm), actuated by a horizontal PIN junction.135 This EAM is butt-coupled to the thick SOI waveguide through an appropriately designed taper.135 The modulator has an efficiency of 1. This EAM operated in the C-band and provided 28  Gb/s operation with 60  fJ/bit energy consumption.135 Literature also reports an L-band Ge EAM and a GeSi C-band EAM with an electrical 3-dB bandwidth of 50  GHz for an optical bandwidth of 30 nm.136 In this case, the EAM is butt-coupled to a silicon waveguide through a tapered waveguide section. The Ge or GeSi alloy, which is grown on a silicon recess, has a lateral PIN diode. A highly doped contact on the silicon layer biases the EAM. The modulator consumed 12.8  fJ/bit energy at modulation speeds of 56  Gb/s and provided an FoM of <1. Using this GeSi EAM, a digital to analog converter-less and digital signal processing (DSP)-free 100  Gb/s transmission over a 500-m-long single-mode fiber using NRZ-OOK signaling has been reported.20,137

There are various reports on the implementation of the Ge/SiGe QCS effect-based modulators.141152 In one case, a Ge/SiGe QW modulator is butt-coupled to a thin SOI rib waveguide in such a way that the QWs and the rib waveguide are vertically aligned with each other to have maximum overlap.147 The active section of the modulator, which comprised 15 pairs of Ge/Si0.15Ge0.85 QWs, is driven by a vertical PIN diode. The 8-μm2 modulator showed 3.5 GHz bandwidth by using a 1-V voltage swing (5.5 to 6.5 V) to provide 3  dB of ER. In another implementation, Ge QWs are epitaxially grown at temperatures below 450°C on the silicon-rich Si1xGex low-loss waveguide platform.141 The x concentration is selected such that it simultaneously ensures low indirect bandgap absorption and a sufficiently small lattice mismatch with the QWs. The 400-μm2 modulator with 6.3 GHz bandwidth and 0 to 3 V swing provided 4  dB ER and 3 dB IL.

The FK effect or QCS effect electro-absorption amplitude modulators allow for the implementation of coherent I/Q231,232 and advanced amplitude modulation schemes such as PAM-4.233 These modulation schemes are a promising solution for short- and long-reach links because they are spectrally efficient while being tolerant of optical fiber transmission impairments.54,55,231 The implementation of an EAM-based I/Q or PAM-4 modulators relies on balanced MZIs with an EAM and a fixed phase-shift in the arms of the MZI.231233 Typically, an unequal splitting of the optical carrier is required by the splitter of the MZI to achieve the appropriate eye-opening for PAM-4 or constellation for the I/Q signal.233 Literature reports an EAM-based PAM-4 modulator by integrating an EAM in each arm of a two-port balanced MZI.231233 In this modulator, a fixed phase shift is provided by embedding a thermal phase shifter in one of the two arms of the MZI. The device modulated a 128-Gb/s PAM-4 signal without requiring any DSP. Furthermore, there are reports on the demonstrations of modulating QPSK and 16-QAM signals using EAM-based coherent modulators.231,232 The energy consumption of these modulators takes a hit due to the power-hungry thermo-optic effect required to provide a fixed phase shift in the arms of the MZIs.

Figure 2 represents the typical cross sections of FK EAMs and QCS effect-based EAMs in SiPh. This figure also summarizes the integration routes of these materials with SiPh. Table 3 summarizes the typical and the best-reported performance for the (silicon-)germanium modulators. This table covers the performance of the FK effect-based EAMs as well as QCS effect-based EAMs. The FoM for both FK and QCS effect-based EAMs is typically <2, although QCS effect-based modulators can potentially deliver better FoM due to their stronger excitonic absorption peaks.144,149,152 In most cases, FK-effect-based EAMs operate either in the L-band or C-band.150,152 It is possible to tune the operating wavelength of the QCS effect modulators by a bias voltage.150,152 Therefore, the QCS effect modulators can operate in the O-band as well. In terms of high-speed operation, FK effect-based EAMs have reached line rates of up to 100  Gb/s for OOK modulation schemes,137 whereas the QCS effect-based modulators have not yet demonstrated such a high speed of operation.

Fig. 2

Representative cross sections of (a) FK-based EAMs and (b) QCS effect-based EAMs in SiPh. This figure also highlights the integration route for the respective EAMs. The term monolithic refers to the integration of a material with an SOI substrate using wafer-scale epitaxial growth resulting in PICs made out of one substrate technology in mass on a wafer level.

AP_3_2_024003_f002.png

Table 3

Typical and state-of-the-art performance matrix for amplitude modulation by the FK effect and QCS effect. The best-reported performance attributes are mentioned in parentheses.

PrincipleFoM ER/ILLoss (dB)Modulator length (mm)Data ratea (Gb/s)Energy/bit (fJ/bit)
FK effectb<2 (231)<6 (4.8133)0.050>40 (100137)<50 (1320)
Quantum-confined Stark effectc<2 (7.9149)<6 (1.3149)<0.25<10 (7147)<100 (16148)

aThe data rate is for the OOK modulation scheme. The highest reported data rate with QCS effect modulators is 7 Gb/s. The highest modulation bandwidth has been reported to be 23 GHz.

bTypical performance for the FK EAMs is based on Refs. 20, 31, 38, 128, and 133–139.

cTypical performance for the QCS EAMs is based on Refs. 141–152.

3.2.

Ferroelectrics

Ferroelectrics are materials possessing spontaneous polarization that can be altered by the application of a sufficiently strong electric field.234 As ferroelectric materials are non-centrosymmetric, they exhibit a Pockels effect.234 Many ferroelectrics have large Pockels coefficients compared to non-ferroelectric inorganic materials. The dominant contribution to the Pockels coefficients in these ferroelectrics tends to come from lattice vibrations rather than electron movements.234,235 Because of their strong Pockels effect, the integration of ferroelectric materials such as LiNbO3,167174 barium titanate (BaTiO3),175182 and lead zirconate titanate (PZT)183185 with SiPh provides a promising route for the implementation of efficient, high-speed modulators.2,175,228 A variety of integration techniques have been explored, such as molecular beam epitaxy (MBE),176,178 pulsed laser deposition,236,237 chemical solution deposition (CSD),238 RF magnetron sputtering,239 metal organic chemical vapor deposition,240 and atomic layer deposition.241 The two key requirements for integrating ferroelectric materials with SiPh are to ensure a high electro-optic coefficient and low propagation loss.182 The following sections will review the latest developments to implement high-speed modulators by integrating ferroelectric materials with SiPh.

3.2.1.

LiNbO3 on silicon (nitride) high-speed modulators

LiNbO3 is a widely used material for modulators and provides high-speed devices with a bandwidth of >35  GHz.27,242,243 LiNbO3 modulators have been used for a long time in fiber-optic networks.242,244 These devices are based on low-index-contrast waveguides in bulk LiNbO3,242 in which the index contrast between the core and cladding of a LiNbO3 waveguide is provided by the diffusion of Ti or Li ions.242 The weak optical guiding resulting from the low-index-contrast requires the electrical contacts to be placed far away from the waveguides, resulting in typical Vπ·L of 10 to 20  V·cm.242 Recent demonstrations of high-index-contrast LiNbO3-on-insulator (LNOI) modulators have shown energy-efficient operation (a few tens of fJ/bit energy consumption) with 100-GHz bandwidth, 2  V·cm modulation efficiency, and <0.5  dB loss for a device that is a few millimeters long (typically 2 to 20 mm long).243,245247 These thin-film LNOI modulators rely on LiNbO3 layers of a few hundred nanometers thickness, which are bonded on top of SiO2.243 Several approaches have been reported in the last two decades to integrate LiNbO3 with silicon at room temperature245,248,249 and to demonstrate high-speed modulation by bonding LiNbO3 with silicon167169,250 or silicon nitride.170172 The Pockels coefficient of integrated LiNbO3 is comparable to that of bulk LiNbO3,249 but most of these integration attempts have resulted in modulator bandwidths that are smaller than the all-silicon modulator implementations.173 Recently, a tremendous boost in the speeds (not yet the overall performance) of such modulators has been reported.173,174 For example, for a 5-mm long TW-MZM that was realized by direct oxide bonding of thin-film LiNbO3 on top of a silicon waveguide, a bandwidth of 100 GHz and a loss of 7.6 dB have been reported.173 The modulator had a limited efficiency of 6.7  V·cm due to <100% vertical coupling of light into the unpatterned LiNbO3 membrane on top of the silicon waveguide. In another implementation, the complete coupling of light from a silicon waveguide to a patterned LiNbO3 rib waveguide through a vertical adiabatic coupler resulted in a modulation efficiency of 2.5  V·cm.174 With a 2.5-dB loss, the 5-mm-long LiNbO3 phase shifter embedded in an MZI and driven by a TW electrode in the push–pull configuration provided 70 GHz bandwidth and enabled single-lane 100  Gb/s NRZ-OOK transmission. Unlike the other reported implementation,173 the integration of LiNbO3 with the SiPh PIC was carried out using BCB-bonding. Monolithic integration of LiNbO3 with SiPh PICs has yet to be reported.

3.2.2.

BaTiO3 on silicon high-speed modulators

In recent years, there has been a lot of interest in the integration of BaTiO3 with SiPh.175182 BaTiO3 is a promising material for integration with SiPh because of (a) its high Pockels coefficient [in bulk form, LiNbO3 has a Pockels coefficient of 30  pm/V,27,175,249 whereas BTO offers one of the highest Pockels coefficients (>1000  pm/V) in bulk form176,251]; (b) feasibility of integration with a silicon substrate;252 (c) capability to offer high-speed modulation;253 (d) high chemical and thermal stability of BTO; and (e) feasibility of low-loss hybrid BTO-Si passive circuitry.178,179 The integration of BTO with SiPh relies on epitaxial growth enabling integration compatible with 200 and 300 mm silicon wafers.181 The large lattice mismatch (27%) between BTO and Si makes the integration of the two materials far from trivial.254 A SrTiO3 (STO) buffer layer of a couple of nanometers thickness reduces this lattice mismatch to <2%.228 Among the various possible routes to grow BTO on SiPh platforms, MBE is known to provide the highest (>900  pm/V) Pockels coefficient in BTO thin films.176 In one approach, the BTO growth is done directly on an SOI wafer.177 Afterward, an amorphous silicon layer with a thickness equal to the thickness of the c-Si layer of the SOI wafer is grown. The resulting heterostructure is patterned lithographically to form a horizontal slot waveguide. Stronger guiding of the optical signal in the low-index BTO layer (nBTO2.38) enhances the overlap of the optical and electrical field in the BTO layer. This approach provided a Pockels coefficient of 213±49  pm/V.177 A ring-based modulator with a modulation efficiency of 1.5  V·cm and a bandwidth of 4.9 GHz has been reported, where the limited bandwidth is associated with the parasitic electrical effects.177 A key challenge faced by the integration approach mentioned in Ref. 177 and other integration approaches176,178 is the high propagation loss (>40  dB/cm).176178,255 The origin of this high loss is attributed to the absorption of hydrogen by the STO seed layer during the fabrication of the slot waveguide.178 Furthermore, it has been shown that a loss of 6  dB/cm in a strip-loaded horizontal slot waveguide can be achieved by low-temperature annealing.178 Apart from the aforementioned approach, where BTO is grown directly on an SOI wafer,177 another possible approach entails the formation of a BTO/Si heterostructure by bonding an SOI wafer with a BTO layer grown on a host SOI wafer.176,179 For such a bonded BTO/Si heterostructure, a Pockels coefficient of 923  pm/V has been reported (30 times larger than that of a LiNbO3 structure).179 In one implementation, a plasmonic MZM with a 10-μm-long BTO/Si phase shifter with 25 dB loss delivered 72  Gb/s and required a Vπ of 14.5 V (modulation efficiency of 0.0145  V·cm).180 The modulator operated successfully for temperatures up to 130°C. Furthermore, a wafer-level bonding of Si/BTO heterostructures on the back-end-of-line (BEOL) dielectric layer of an advanced SiPh platform has been reported.181 This integration led to the demonstration of an MZM with a limited bandwidth of 2 GHz (mostly limited by the electrical bandwidth of the electrodes).181 The modulator had a modulation efficiency of 0.2  V·cm and loss of <6  dB for a 1-mm-long phase shifter.181,182

3.2.3.

PZT on silicon nitride high-speed modulators

PZT is an orthorhombic lead-containing ceramic ferroelectric material.256,257 Though BTO has a large Pockels coefficient, its use in SiPh requires complex and expensive integration technology.178,181,182,255 As compared to BTO, PZT has a smaller Pockels coefficient, but it can be deposited by a low-cost and simple CSD method.185,257 Ultra-thin lanthanide-based intermediate seed layers enable the deposition of high-quality thin (up to 200 nm) PZT layers on silicon,257 with Pockels coefficients up to 150  pm/V.228 PZT thin films have been integrated with silicon nitride photonic circuits. An RM with a bandwidth of 33 GHz and an MZM with a bandwidth of 27 GHz have been demonstrated,184 with a modulation efficiency of 3.2  V·cm and a loss of 1  dB/cm. The PZT layer was deposited on a planarized silicon nitride PIC (i.e., the PIC consisted of silicon nitride strip waveguides with oxide bottom and side cladding, while the top cladding was air). The PZT thin film was poled by applying a voltage of 60 to 80 V for 1 h.185

Figure 3 represents the typical cross sections of ferroelectric modulators in SiPh. This figure also summarizes the integration routes of the respective materials with SiPh. Table 4 presents a summary of the typical and the best-reported modulation efficiencies, losses, data rates, and energy consumption for the ferroelectric-based modulators in SiPh. For all three types (i.e., LiNbO3, BTO, and PZT), modulation speeds 40  Gb/s have been demonstrated. LiNbO3-based modulators are outstanding in terms of low-loss operation and have delivered speeds of 100  Gb/s. In terms of modulation efficiency, BTO-based modulators have shown a lot of promise with typical reported values of <0.5  V·cm.

Fig. 3

Representative cross sections of (a) LiNbO3, (b) BTO, (c) PZT, and (d) organics modulators in SiPh. This figure also highlights the integration route for each material. The term monolithic refers to the integration of a material with a SiPh substrate using wafer-scale epitaxial growth resulting in PICs made out of one substrate technology in mass on a wafer level.

AP_3_2_024003_f003.png

Table 4

Typical and state-of-the-art performance matrix for the ferroelectric and organic high-speed phase modulators in SiPh.a The parentheses contain the best-reported result for a performance attribute.

SchemeModulation efficiency Vπ·L (V·cm)Loss (dB/cm)Length of phase shifter (mm)Data rateb(Gb/s)Energy/bit (fJ/bit)
LiNbO3 integrated with SiPhc<3 (2.2174)1 (0.98174)>1>70 (100174)>100 (170174)
BaTiO3 integrated with SiPhd<0.5 (0.2182)>40 (6182)>1>40 (72180)<100179
PZT integrated with SiPhe1 (1183)1 (1183)>240 (40184)-
Organics integrated with SiPhf<0.05 (0.032190)<45 (20228)<1.5>50 (100196)<100 (0.7192)

aPlasmonic modulators are not included in this table.

bThe data rates are reported for the OOK modulation scheme.

cTypical performance for LiNbO3 integrated with SiPh is based on Refs. 167–174 and 228.

dTypical performance for BaTiO3 integrated with SiPh is based on Refs. 175–182 and 228.

eTypical performance for PZT integrated with SiPh is based on Refs. 183–185 and 228.

fTypical performance for the organics integrated with SiPh is based on Refs. 186–192, 192–200, and 228.

3.3.

Organic Electro-Optic Materials

Organic electro-optic materials are typically based on π-conjugated molecules with strong electron donor and acceptor groups at the ends of the π-conjugated structure.188,258 The delocalized electrons associated with this π-conjugated structure are confined by a strongly asymmetric potential well, giving rise to large Pockels coefficients.188,258 In contrast to the ferroelectrics discussed above, the Pockels effect in these organic electro-optic materials is mostly electronic in nature and can thus provide an ultra-fast response.188,190,228,258 Organic electro-optic materials can be processed at room temperature using inexpensive solution-based techniques, whereas the growth of inorganic Pockels materials typically requires high temperatures and/or the use of vacuum equipment.177,182,188,255,258

A combination of organic materials with SiPh devices has resulted in the so-called silicon-organic hybrid (SOH) class of modulators.186188,197 The underlying organic materials in SOH modulators are designed to provide high electro-optic activity with experimentally demonstrated values of n3r>2000  pm/V.190 This results in modulators with a low-loss,194 a low-chirp parameter of α=0.02,193 and a high modulation efficiency (Vπ·L0.03  V·cm),190 along with a high modulation bandwidth (>100  GHz)191,259 and low-energy consumption of a few fJ/bit.192,228 With π-voltages below 1 V, SOH modulators may be directly driven by standard CMOS circuits without the need for any additional drive amplifiers,260 thereby opening a path toward greatly reduced power dissipation in highly integrated transceivers. For the fabrication of SOH devices, the organic electro-optic material is deposited onto fully processed SiPh chips in a postprocessing step, which requires removal of the BEOL layer stack of a standard SiPh process flow.228 SOH modulators rely on slot waveguides,188,191 which guarantees enhanced interaction between the highly confined optical mode in the slot waveguide and the organic electro-optic material filling the slot. To pole the electro-optic material after deposition, the devices are heated, and a DC voltage is applied across the slot waveguides. This non-volatile poling transforms the random orientation of the electro-optic chromophores in the slot into an acentric orientation, thereby leading to a non-zero Pockels coefficient. After cooling down the device to ambient temperature, the voltage can be removed, and the poled electro-optic material preserves its orientation. SOH modulators have shown exemplary performance over the years. Some key results are reported in Refs. 189190.191, 193, 196, and 261. The main skepticism faced by the SOH modulators comes from their long-term photochemical and photothermal stability. Recent research results reported in Refs. 195 and 262 have shown long-term stability of SOH devices following Telecordia standards. These early experiments have shown that in storing the SOH modulators at elevated temperatures of 85°C, the degradation of the electro-optic activity converges to a stable level where the Vπ·L-product increases by <15% after 2400 h.

The limitations of poled organic materials can be overcome by substituting them with crystalline organic materials, which are inherently resilient to higher temperatures with good photochemical stability and do not require any poling.199 The electro-optic coefficients of the organic crystals are smaller (typically n3r<500  pm/V)263 than those of the poled organic polymers.190 The integration of organic crystals requires growth to functionalize the silicon waveguides.198,199 An N-benzyl-2-methyl-4-nitroaniline crystal has been deposited on an SOI waveguide to demonstrate an MZM that could operate at 12.5  Gb/s with a modulation efficiency of 1.2  V·cm and a loss of 16 dB in the phase modulator with a 1.5 mm length.199

Typically, the analogue bandwidth of current SOH modulators is limited to 25  GHz by the finite conductivity of the doped silicon slabs that provide an electrical contact with the rails of the slot waveguide.190 These bandwidths may be improved to more than 100 GHz by exploiting optimized waveguide designs that rely on multi-step doping profiles.259 To that end, doped silicon slabs have also been replaced by BTO to feed the modulating RF signal to the EO material in the slot waveguide.200 This so-called capacitively coupled SOH MZM delivered a bandwidth of 65 GHz, which was sufficient to produce a 100-Gb/s OOK signal.200 The modulator had a modulation efficiency of 0.13  V·cm; the loss from the phase shifter section is not reported. Yet another variant of the SOH modulator is the plasmonic-organic hybrid (POH) modulator,258,264269 where the silicon slot waveguide is replaced by a metal plasmonic slot waveguide to provide even higher optical confinement.258,265 The deposition of an organic electro-optic material on the metal slot waveguide leads to compact high-speed devices with bandwidths of hundreds of gigahertz.266,270 POH modulators are compact with typical lengths of a few microns and offer a low-energy consumption of a few tens of fJ/bit along with ultra-low voltage-length products of typically 0.005  V·cm258—nearly an order of magnitude lower than those of classical SOH modulators. The obvious limitation of the POH modulators is the high propagation loss in the plasmonic slot-waveguide section with typical values of 200  dB/mm.200,258 Despite the high efficiencies, this leads to substantial π-voltage-loss-products of the order of 10  V·dB.188

Table 4 provides a summary of typical modulation efficiencies, losses, speeds, and energy consumption for organic electro-optic modulators in SiPh. When compared with the other Pockels modulators, the organic electro-optic modulators provide the best modulation efficiency with a reported value of 0.032  V·cm.190 Organic electro-optic modulators have shown up to 100  Gb/s196 operation and sub-fJ/bit energy consumption.192 Figure 3(d) represents the typical cross section of organics modulators in SiPh.

3.4.

III–V Semiconductors

The integration of III–V semiconductors with SiPh platforms is a well-established research field, as it provides a viable route for the integration of laser sources with SiPh PICs.271275 Direct bonding,272 BCB-aided adhesive bonding,271 III–V/Si flip-chip bonding,275 and transfer printing274 are some of the most established bonding mechanisms for III–V/Si integration. Demonstrations of III–V integration with advanced SiPh platforms have been reported.276,277 Demonstrations of epitaxial growth of III–V on Si have also been reported despite the large lattice mismatch between Si and III–V (for example, InP has 8% lattice mismatch with Si).278,279 The integration of III–V on silicon also provides a route for the implementation of efficient high-speed modulators because they provide (a) a large electron-induced refractive-index change, (b) a high electron mobility, and (c) a low carrier-plasma absorption.166

The reported implementations of III–V/Si modulators typically use a MOS (SISCAP) modulator architecture.161163 In these modulators, n-doped III–V material, for example, InGaAsP, is bonded to a p-doped Si layer with an insulating layer separating the two.161163 This results in a SISCAP architecture, where the insulating layer acts as a capacitor. A change in the refractive index takes place due to the charge accumulation due to the biasing of the doped silicon and III–V layer. According to Drude’s model, the plasma dispersion induced refractive index change Δn is inversely proportional to the effective masses of the electrons and holes.61,89 As compared to the electron mass of Si, the lighter electron mass of n-doped III–V results in a 17 times stronger electron-induced refractive index change.161 Furthermore, an n-doped III–V provides a larger ratio of Δn to Δk, where Δk is the change in the absorption coefficient,161 resulting in a phase modulator with reduced spurious intensity modulation (“pure-phase” modulation). Similarly, p-doped silicon provides larger Δn/Δk than p-doped III–Vs for carrier concentrations below 1019  cm3.161163 Therefore, a hybrid III–V/Si MOS modulator brings the best of III–V and Si together. Consequently, this approach offers modulators with a 3 to 5 times better modulation efficiency compared to all-silicon MOS modulators and a phase shifter loss that is significantly lower than in all-silicon MOS modulators.161,163

In one report, an InGaAsP/Al2O3/Si MOS structure provided a modulation efficiency of 0.047  V·cm and a phase shifter loss of 19.4  dB/cm.161 In another report, an InGaAsP/SiO2/Si MOS structure provided163 a modulation efficiency of 0.09  V·cm with an absorption loss of 26  dB/cm in the phase shifter. Both demonstrations show an impressive modulation efficiency. But, the electro-optic cut-off frequency is rather limited due to the large oxide capacitance in the carrier accumulation mode of operation.161,163

One possible approach to break the trade-off between the high-speed operation and high modulation efficiency banks on operating the III–V on Si MOS phase shifter in reverse bias.165,280 The III–V on Si MOS modulator that is operated in reverse bias is architecturally similar to the forward biased III–V on Si modulator.161,163,165,280 For a given thickness of the oxide layer, the reverse biased III–V on Si phase shifter has a reduced depletion capacitance as compared to the accumulation capacitance.165,280 The combined plasma dispersion effect and FK effect in the reverse biased III–V on Si MOS phase shifter ensure a modulation efficiency that is comparable to that in the accumulation mode while ensuring a low-loss operation due to the limited hole density in the n-doped InGaAsP layer of the modulator.165,280 A III–V on Si MOS modulator with a 250-μm-long phase shifter and a 9-nm-thick oxide layer has been reported with a modulation efficiency of 0.11  V·cm.165 As compared to the carrier accumulation MOS, the reverse biased MOS provides a 3.3× lower depletion capacitance, hence paving the way for a 3.3× improvement in modulation bandwidth and energy consumption per bit. The implementation of III–V on Si MOS modulators is not limited to MZIs only.164 By implementing a III–V on Si MOS modulator in a racetrack configuration (implementing III–V on Si MOS modulators in a ring is challenging due to the long taper length needed for the III–V on Si hybrid waveguide), the energy consumption of a 40-GHz (3-dB bandwidth) modulator has been improved by a factor of 3.7 as compared to the III–V on Si MZMs, while delivering a modulation efficiency of 0.064  V·cm.164 The 100-μm-long phase shifter section of the modulators comprised a thin aluminum oxide gate layer separating the n-type III–V and the p-doped Si layer. Recently, a proof-of-concept, taper-less integration of a few tens of nanometers thick III–V layer with Si has been demonstrated to reduce the footprint and loss of the device281 without compromising the modulation efficiency of the III–V on Si MOS capacitor.

Apart from phase modulators, EAMs have been reported by the bonding of III–V QWs with silicon.140,282 These EAMs use a PIN architecture, where the application of a bias voltage changes the optical absorption of the intrinsic multiple QWs due to the QCS effect.282 A segmented electrode, comprising a low-impedance active modulation section cascaded by a high-impedance passive section, provides high-bandwidth operation while ensuring low reflection and good modulation efficiency.140 A >67  GHz bandwidth hybrid III–V on silicon EAM has been demonstrated using this scheme.140 In the O-band, this modulator has an IL of 4.9 dB, and it shows >9  dB of dynamic ER for 50  Gb/s operation over a 16-km-long optical fiber link.

Figure 4 represents the typical cross sections of III–V on Si phase modulators and EAMs. This figure also summarizes the routes to integrate III–V on Si. Table 5 presents a summary of the typical and best-reported values for the modulation efficiencies, losses, data rates, and energy consumption for forward and reverse biased III–V on Si phase modulators as well as for III–V on Si EAMs. III–V on Si modulators have shown an impressive modulation efficiency and low-loss operation, but so far experimental demonstrations of high-speed operation (100  Gb/s) remain elusive.

Fig. 4

Representative cross sections of (a) III–V on Si phase modulator and (b) III–V on Si EAM.

AP_3_2_024003_f004.png

Table 5

Typical and state-of-the-art performance matrix for the III–V on Si high-speed modulators in SiPh. The parentheses contain the best-reported result for a performance attribute.

OperationModulation efficiency Vπ·L (V·cm)Loss (dB/cm)Length of phase shifter (mm)Data ratea(Gb/s)Energy/bit (fJ/bit)
Forward biased III–V on Si as a phase modulatord<0.1 (0.047161)<30 (19.4161)<0.5>30 (32163,b)100
Reverse biased III–V on Si as a phase modulatord<0.2 (0.11164)(28280)<0.5200c,280100280
OperationFoM ER/ILLoss (dB)Modulator length (mm)Data ratea (Gb/s)Energy/bit (fJ/bit)
III–V on Si as an amplitude modulatord2 (2140)(4.9140)0.150 (50)140-

aThe data rates are reported for the OOK modulation scheme.

bThe value represents the highest reported 3-dB bandwidth of 40 GHz for a racetrack resonator modulator in III–V on Si.

cThe value represents the theoretically predicted value for the 3-dB bandwidth in GHz.

dThe typical performance of III–V on Si high-speed modulators is based on Refs. 140, 161–166, and 282.

3.5.

2D Materials

Atomically thick 2D materials, the most prominent graphene, have received considerable interest in the last decade to implement efficient modulators by integration with Si/SiN PICs.1,153160,201208 The implementation of graphene-based modulators in SiPh involves the transfer of the graphene layer on a Si or SiN waveguide.1 Mature and wafer-scale chemical vapor deposition is the widely adopted scheme to deposit graphene on a variety of metallic and dielectric substrates.283285 The transfer of the graphene layer on a Si or SiN waveguide is performed after delaminating graphene from the substrate while adding a polymer carrier to handle the graphene film.154,159 Recently, microtransfer printing technology has shown promising results to transfer graphene to the target substrate in an automatic fashion.159 A single graphene layer, which is only a fraction of a nanometer thick, can absorb 2.3% of light286 with a wavelength ranging from the visible to THz wavelengths (graphene is a gapless material). Furthermore, graphene has a very high electron mobility of >100,000  cm2·V1·s1 (silicon has a carrier mobility of 1400  cm2·V1·s1).228,287,288 These two properties enable the implementation of high-speed electro-absorptive153 or electro-refractive201 modulators through the integration of graphene with SiPh ICs.

The two prominent types of graphene modulators in SiPh comprise a SiPh rib waveguide, which is either loaded with a single layer or a double layer of graphene153,156 (see Fig. 5). The operating principle of these modulators relies on the charging and discharging of a capacitor. A single-layer graphene modulator comprises a graphene loaded Si rib waveguide with a doped slab region.153 A few nm thick dielectric spacer, such as SiO2, Al2O3, or hBN, separates the waveguide and the graphene layer to form a capacitor.1 The first reported graphene modulator153 had a 4-dB ER and relied on a single-layer approach. The 25-μm2 EAM provided 1 GHz operation, limited by the RC time constant, and an electroabsorption modulation of 0.1  dB/μm.153 The absorption in graphene is dependent on the bias voltage.1 This voltage tunes the Fermi level of graphene to enable or inhibit the interband transitions by excitation of electrons through the incident photons.201,289 This change in absorption due to carrier accumulation in the graphene sheet results in modulation of light propagating in the waveguide. The doped Si waveguide in the single-layer graphene modulator is a source of loss, and it requires an implantation step.153,156 Double-layer graphene modulators remedy these limitations.156 They are separated by a dielectric layer that resides on top of a completely passive waveguide. (This architecture does not require any doping of the waveguide slab.)156 The first double-layer graphene modulator reported 1 GHz bandwidth and an electroabsorption modulation of 0.16  dB/μm.156 The 40-μm-long modulator provided a 6-dB ER and required a 5-V driving voltage. One of the first multi-Gb/s graphene-silicon modulators157 relied on a single-layer graphene architecture that provided a 5.2-dB ER for a 50-μm-long EAM operating at 2.5  V. At 10  Gb/s, the modulator provided a modulation efficiency of 1.5  dB/V. The ON state loss is 3.8 dB with a power consumption of about 350  fJ/bit. Another result reports a double-layer graphene RM158 using a critical coupling effect in a 40-μm SiN ring. In this implementation, a 50-nm thick Al2O3 layer separates the two graphene layers. By biasing, the change in the transparency of the graphene capacitor led to the modulation of the optical signal. The reduced capacitance resulting from the thick spacer between the graphene layers led to a modulator showing 30 GHz bandwidth with a modulation efficiency of 1.5  dB/V but required a 30-V DC bias and 7.5Vpp.158 The modulator could transmit 22  Gb/s while consuming 800  fJ/bit. A positive chirp of a graphene EAM is an interesting property.160 This feature is useful in compensating for the chromatic dispersion in an optical transmission link for the transmission of 10-Gb/s without any optical signal to noise ratio penalty.160

Fig. 5

Representative cross sections of (a) single-layer graphene phase/amplitude modulator and (b) double-layer graphene amplitude/phase modulator in SiPh.

AP_3_2_024003_f005.png

Apart from amplitude modulation, it is also feasible to use graphene for phase modulation.201208 Phase modulation is more exciting for the encoding of complex modulation formats such as QPSK. A single-layer graphene architecture, in which the graphene layer is separated from the silicon waveguide by a thin dielectric spacer layer, acts as a phase modulator by shifting the Fermi level of graphene.201,205,207,290,291 A single-layer graphene phase modulator of 300  μm length is integrated on a Si MZI and showed a modulation efficiency of 0.28  V·cm. The modulator delivered an ER of 35 dB, an EO bandwidth of 5 GHz, and a loss of 236  dB/cm.201 With a 2-Vpp drive, the transmission of 10  Gb/s over a 50-km fiber span is demonstrated. The higher loss in the modulator is associated with the suboptimal transfer of graphene.201 The quality of graphene, which is typically determined by the scattering time and is related to the carrier mobility, plays a detrimental role in the performance of graphene modulators.1 Typically, scattering time of >100  fs is required to implement energy-efficient graphene modulators with a high ER.1 Achieving 10,000  cm2·V1·s1 graphene carrier mobility, which roughly corresponds to 300 fs scattering time, upon the complete modulator integration process would be ideal. Accomplishing this would lead to extremely low IL.289 In perspective, the combination of low IL in a dual-layer graphene structure, the high graphene electro-absorption, or electro-refractive efficiency would lead to a modulator with a good FoM.1 It is important to mention that graphene can be used for detection,1 and this makes graphene suitable for a telecommunication platform on a passive integrated circuit operating in several telecommunications bands.

Inspired by the promising results shown by graphene, other 2D materials such as tungsten disulfide (WS2) and molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) have also been integrated with SiPh. Results show phase change relative to the change in absorption for these materials at telecom wavelengths when integrated with SiN.204

Figure 5 represents typical cross sections of a single layer graphene modulator (a) and a double layer graphene modulator (b) in SiPh. Table 6 provides the current state of high-speed phase and amplitude modulators in SiPh by integrating 2D materials. The currently reported performances of 2D modulators, in particular graphene modulators, are mostly limited by technological immaturity and not by conceptual limits. Graphene requires more development to reach the best performances. More specifically, graphene needs to preserve the high carrier mobility after the integration in the photonic circuit. This preservation is not the case yet. By achieving a high level of technological maturity, graphene has the potential to provide devices that can work over a wide range of wavelengths due to its gapless band structure, miniaturized devices due to its large EO efficiency, feasibility for BEOL integration with the SiPh fabrication process, and a possibility to offer a complete platform for communication applications, as graphene possesses properties for efficient modulation and detection.

Table 6

Typical and state-of-the-art performance matrix for graphene on Si high-speed modulators in SiPh. The parentheses contain the best-reported result for a performance attribute.

OperationModulation efficiency Vπ·L (V·cm)Loss (dB/cm)Length of phase shifter (mm)Data ratea(Gb/s)Energy/bit (fJ/bit)
2D Materials on Si as phase modulatorb<0.5 (0.28201)>200 (236201)<0.5d10 (10201)1000 (600)1) for MZM; <500 for RM
OperationFoM ER/ILLoss (dB)Modulator Length (mm)Data ratea (Gb/s)Energy/bit (fJ/bit)
2D Materials on Si as amplitude modulatorc<3 (4.9155)<4 (0.9203)<0.15>10 (50154)100 (40202)

aThe data rates are reported for the OOK modulation scheme.

bThe typical performance for 2D materials-based SiPh phase modulators is based on Refs. 201–208.

cThe typical performance for 2D materials-based SiPh amplitude modulators is based on Refs. 153–160.

dThe high IL is the result of the graphene deterioration upon fabrication. This value can be dramatically reduced with a value >5000  cm2·V−1·s−1 for graphene carrier mobility at the end of the fabrication process.

4.

Summary and Outlook

Years of academic and industrial R&D have enabled a tremendous boost in the performance of plasma dispersion phase modulators. Operation at speeds of 100  Gb/s with high modulation efficiency is now feasible. Plasma dispersion modulators can operate with a sub-1-V drive signal consuming a few tens of fJ/bit in a μm-sized footprint. Demonstrations of advanced modulation schemes such as PAM-4, PAM-8, QPSK, 16-QAM, and 32-QAM have been reported in plasma dispersion modulators. The modulators have an insignificant chirp-induced penalty for long- and short-haul links. A closer synergy through co-design and co-optimization of electronic–photonic modulator design is the key to take plasma dispersion modulators beyond 100  Gb/s operation in an efficient manner. The last five years have seen a new paradigm in achieving higher speed and lower loss operations of SiPh modulators by integrating materials such as ferroelectrics, organics, SiGe alloys, III–Vs, and 2D materials. Unlike plasma dispersion modulators, which are commercially deployed and have a high manufacturing readiness level (MRL) of >8, these new modulators are still in the early R&D stage (MRL <7) and are currently not included in any commercial product.

Electro-absorption modulation by (silicon-)germanium FK or QCS devices allows for micrometer-sized footprints. FK-EA modulation provides 100  Gb/s operation, but these modulators have a limited ER as well as limited operating optical bandwidth. QCS-EA modulation has integration challenges with SiPh. Moreover, their operating speed is <10  Gb/s. LiNbO3, BaTiO3, PZT, graphene, and organic thin films on Si PICs offer high Pockels coefficients, paving the way for linear and chirp-free high-performance SiPh modulators. Early results reported in the literature indicate that promising performance is achievable by integrating thin-film LiNbO3, BaTiO3, or PZT materials on Si. The integration of organic materials on Si has also shown 100  Gb/s operation and impressive modulation efficiency. Progress has been reported to address the lifetime issues, but more development is necessary before the commercial launch of high-speed modulators relying on organic electro-optic materials. Bringing together III–V and Si brings the best out of III–V and Si to implement MOS-type phase modulators and EAMs. The product of Vπ and phase shifter loss is impressive for the III–V on Si phase modulators, but high-speed operation remains elusive. (Theoretically, they have shown impressive results.) Integrating 2D materials, in particular graphene, with SiPh has the potential to provide a complete solution for modulation and detection at high speed. Multi-Gb/s operation has been reported for the graphene phase and amplitude modulators. A technique to preserve the high carrier mobility after integration in the photonic circuit is essential to unleash the true potential of graphene modulators in SiPh.

To conclude, modulator schemes that rely on the integration of efficient electro-optic materials with SiPh are gaining rapid technological maturity. They provide an additional route to fulfill the compelling needs of bandwidth, loss, and linearity at low-power consumption and cost for future high-speed optical links. It is important to note that the modulators based on the integration of efficient electro-optic materials with SiPh will not necessarily cannibalize or replace the plasma dispersion modulators. It is a way to overcome bandwidth and loss limits that stem from the physics of the plasma dispersion effect. However they will come at the cost of a more complex fabrication process. For this reason, the optimized solution will depend on the application.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Prof. Christian Koos, Prof. Marco Romagnoli, Prof. Delphine Marris-Morini, and Ashwyn Srinivasan for their valuable comments. This research is partially funded by the ERC starting grant ELECTRIC.

References

1. 

M. Romagnoli et al., “Graphene-based integrated photonics for next-generation datacom and telecom,” Nat. Rev. Mater., 3 (10), 392 –414 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-018-0040-9 Google Scholar

2. 

J. Witzens, “High-speed silicon photonics modulators,” Proc. IEEE, 106 (12), 2158 –2182 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2018.2877636 IEEPAD 0018-9219 Google Scholar

3. 

B. Milivojevic et al., “112  Gb/s DP-QPSK transmission over 2427-km SSMF using small-size silicon photonic IQ modulator and low-power CMOS driver,” in Opt. Fiber Commun. Conf. and Exposition and Natl. Fiber Opt. Eng. Conf., (2013). Google Scholar

4. 

S. S. Azadeh et al., “Low Vπ silicon photonics modulators with highly linear epitaxially grown phase shifters,” Opt. Express, 23 (18), 23526 –23550 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.023526 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

5. 

M. Webster et al., “Low-power MOS-capacitor based silicon photonic modulators and CMOS drivers,” in Opt. Fiber Commun. Conf. and Exhib., (2015). Google Scholar

6. 

A. Narasimha et al., “A 40-Gb/s QSFP optoelectronic transceiver in a 0.13-μm CMOS silicon-on-insulator technology,” in Conf. Opt. Fiber Commun./Natl. Fiber Opt. Eng. Conf., OMK7 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/OFC.2008.4528356 Google Scholar

7. 

Y. Sobu et al., “70 Gbaud operation of all-silicon Mach–Zehnder modulator based on forward-biased PIN diodes and passive equalizer,” in 24th OptoElectron. and Commun. Conf. and Int. Conf. Photonics Switch. and Comput., MD2-2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.23919/PS.2019.8817889 Google Scholar

8. 

D. Patel et al., “High-speed compact silicon photonic Michelson interferometric modulator,” Opt. Express, 22 (22), 26788 –26802 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.026788 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

9. 

J. Sun et al., “A 128  Gb/s PAM4 silicon microring modulator with integrated thermo-optic resonance tuning,” J. Lightwave Technol., 37 (1), 110 –115 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2018.2878327 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

10. 

K. Goi et al., “Silicon Mach–Zehnder modulator using low-loss phase shifter with bottom PN junction formed by restricted-depth doping,” IEICE Electron. Express, 10 (17), 20130552 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1587/elex.10.20130552 Google Scholar

11. 

X. Tu et al., “Silicon optical modulator with shield coplanar waveguide electrodes,” Opt. Express, 22 (19), 23724 –23731 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.023724 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

12. 

J. Van Campenhout et al., “Low-voltage, low-loss, multi-Gb/s silicon micro-ring modulator based on a MOS capacitor,” in Opt. Fiber Commun. Conf., (2012). Google Scholar

13. 

X. Xiao et al., “High-speed, low-loss silicon Mach–Zehnder modulators with doping optimization,” Opt. Express, 21 (4), 4116 –4125 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.004116 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

14. 

M. Li et al., “Silicon intensity Mach–Zehnder modulator for single lane 100  Gb/s applications,” Photonics Res., 6 (2), 109 –116 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.6.000109 Google Scholar

15. 

X. Tu et al., “50-Gb/s silicon optical modulator with traveling-wave electrodes,” Opt. Express, 21 (10), 12776 –12782 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.012776 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

16. 

D. J. Thomson et al., “50-Gb/s silicon optical modulator,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 24 (4), 234 –236 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2011.2177081 IPTLEL 1041-1135 Google Scholar

17. 

D. Patel et al., “Design, analysis, and transmission system performance of a 41 GHz silicon photonic modulator,” Opt. Express, 23 (11), 14263 –14287 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.014263 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

18. 

E. Timurdogan et al., “An ultralow power athermal silicon modulator,” Nat. Commun., 5 (1), 4008 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5008 NCAOBW 2041-1723 Google Scholar

19. 

J. Ding et al., “Electro-optical response analysis of a 40  Gb/s silicon Mach-Zehnder optical modulator,” J. Lightwave Technol., 31 (14), 2434 –2440 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2013.2262522 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

20. 

S. A. Srinivasan et al., “50  Gb/s C-band GeSi waveguide electro-absorption modulator,” in Opt. Fiber Commun. Conf., (2016). Google Scholar

21. 

G. T. Reed et al., “Recent breakthroughs in carrier depletion based silicon optical modulators,” Nanophotonics, 3 (4-5), 229 –245 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2013-0016 Google Scholar

22. 

D. Petousi et al., “Monolithically integrated high-extinction-ratio MZM with a segmented driver in photonic BiCMOS,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 28 (24), 2866 –2869 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2016.2624700 IPTLEL 1041-1135 Google Scholar

23. 

A. Chen and E. E. Murphy, Broadband Optical Modulators: Science, Technology, and Applications, 1st ed.CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida (2012). Google Scholar

24. 

S. K. Kim et al., “Theoretical and experimental study of 10  Gb/s transmission performance using 1.55-μm LiNbO3-based transmitters with adjustable extinction ratio and chirp,” J. Lightwave Technol., 17 (8), 1320 –1325 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1109/50.779152 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

25. 

N. Qi et al., “Co-design and demonstration of a 25-Gb/s silicon-photonic Mach–Zehnder modulator with a CMOS-based high-swing driver,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 22 (6), 131 –140 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2016.2602102 IJSQEN 1077-260X Google Scholar

26. 

L. Chen, P. Dong and Y. Chen, “Chirp and dispersion tolerance of a single-drive push–pull silicon modulator at 28  Gb/s,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 24 (11), 936 –938 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2012.2191149 IPTLEL 1041-1135 Google Scholar

27. 

M. Jacques et al., “Modulator material impact on chirp, DSP, and performance in coherent digital links: comparison of the lithium niobate, indium phosphide, and silicon platforms,” Opt. Express, 26 (17), 22471 –22490 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.022471 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

28. 

K. Goi et al., “20-Gbps BPSK silicon Mach–Zehnder modulator with excellent chirp-free performance,” in 17th Opto-Electron. and Commun. Conf., 238 –239 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/OECC.2012.6276459 Google Scholar

29. 

R. Li et al., “High-speed low-chirp PAM-4 transmission based on push-pull silicon photonic microring modulators,” Opt. Express, 25 (12), 13222 –13229 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.013222 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

30. 

K. Goi et al., “11-Gb/s 80-km transmission performance of zero-chirp silicon Mach–Zehnder modulator,” Opt. Express, 20 (26), B350 –B356 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.00B350 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

31. 

J. Liu et al., “Waveguide-integrated, ultralow-energy GeSi electro-absorption modulators,” Nat. Photonics, 2 (7), 433 –437 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2008.99 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

32. 

D. Marris-Morini et al., “Low loss 40  Gbit/s silicon modulator based on interleaved junctions and fabricated on 300 mm SOI wafers,” Opt. Express, 21 (19), 22471 –22475 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.022471 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

33. 

J. C. Rosenberg et al., “A 25 Gbps silicon microring modulator based on an interleaved junction,” Opt. Express, 20 (24), 26411 –26423 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.026411 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

34. 

D. A. B. Miller, “Device requirements for optical interconnects to silicon chips,” Proc. IEEE, 97 (7), 1166 –1185 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2009.2014298 IEEPAD 0018-9219 Google Scholar

35. 

Q. Cheng et al., “Recent advances in optical technologies for data centers: a review,” Optica, 5 (11), 1354 –1370 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.5.001354 Google Scholar

36. 

M. Asghari and A. V. Krishnamoorthy, “Energy-efficient communication,” Nat. Photonics, 5 (5), 268 –270 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2011.68 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

37. 

F. Boeuf et al., “Benchmarking Si, SiGe, and III-V/Si hybrid SIS optical modulators for datacenter applications,” J. Lightwave Technol., 35 (18), 4047 –4055 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2017.2728365 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

38. 

N.-N. Feng et al., “30 GHz Ge electro-absorption modulator integrated with 3  μm silicon-on-insulator waveguide,” Opt. Express, 19 (8), 7062 –7067 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.007062 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

39. 

A. Rahim et al., “Open-access silicon photonics: current status and emerging initiatives,” Proc. IEEE, 106 (12), 2313 –2330 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2018.2878686 IEEPAD 0018-9219 Google Scholar

40. 

A. Meighan et al., “Design of 100 GHz-class Mach–Zehnder modulators in a generic indium phosphide platform,” in IEEE Photonics Conf., (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/IPC47351.2020.9252410 Google Scholar

41. 

S. Lange et al., “100 GBd intensity modulation and direct detection with an InP-based monolithic DFB laser Mach–Zehnder modulator,” J. Lightwave Technol., 36 (1), 97 –102 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2017.2743211 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

42. 

M. Smit, K. Williams and J. van der Tol, “Past, present, and future of InP-based photonic integration,” APL Photonics, 4 (5), 050901 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5087862 Google Scholar

43. 

K. Luke et al., “Wafer-scale low-loss lithium niobate photonic integrated circuits,” Opt. Express, 28 (17), 24452 –24458 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.401959 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

44. 

P. De Dobbelaere et al., “Advanced silicon photonics technology platform leveraging a semiconductor supply chain,” in IEEE Int. Electron Dev. Meeting, 34.1.1 –34.1.4 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEDM.2017.8268493 Google Scholar

45. 

D. J. Shin et al., “Integration of silicon photonics into DRAM process,” in Opt. Fiber Commun. Conf./Natl. Fiber Opt. Eng. Conf., (2013). Google Scholar

46. 

R. Meade et al., “TeraPHY: a high-density electronic-photonic Chiplet for optical I/O from a multi-chip module,” in Opt. Fiber Commun. Conf., (2019). Google Scholar

47. 

F. Boeuf et al., “Recent progress in silicon photonics R&D and manufacturing on 300 mm wafer platform,” in Opt. Fiber Commun. Conf., (2015). Google Scholar

48. 

S. Fathololoumi et al., “1.6Tbps silicon photonics integrated circuit for co-packaged optical-IO switch applications,” in Opt. Fiber Commun. Conf., (2020). Google Scholar

49. 

X. Chen et al., “The emergence of silicon photonics as a flexible technology platform,” Proc. IEEE, 106 (12), 2101 –2116 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2018.2854372 IEEPAD 0018-9219 Google Scholar

50. 

C. Doerr et al., “Single-chip silicon photonics 100-Gb/s coherent transceiver,” in Opt. Fiber Commun. Conf., (2014). Google Scholar

51. 

J. C. Rosenberg et al., “Low-power 30 Gbps silicon microring modulator,” in CLEO: Laser Appl. Photonic Appl., (2011). Google Scholar

52. 

C. Xiong et al., “Monolithic 56  Gb/s silicon photonic pulse-amplitude modulation transmitter,” Optica, 3 (10), 1060 –1065 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.3.001060 Google Scholar

54. 

P. J. Winzer, D. T. Neilson and A. R. Chraplyvy, ““Fiber-optic transmission and networking: the previous 20 and the next 20 years [Invited],” Opt. Express, 26 (18), 24190 –24239 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.024190 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

55. 

P. Dong et al., “50-Gb/s silicon quadrature phase-shift keying modulator,” Opt. Express, 20 (19), 21181 –21186 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.021181 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

56. 

P. Dong et al., “Experimental demonstration of microring quadrature phase-shift keying modulators,” Opt. Lett., 37 (7), 1178 –1180 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.37.001178 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

57. 

“802.3bs-2017—IEEE Standard for Ethernet Amendment 10: media access control parameters, physical layers, and management parameters for 200  Gb/s and 400  Gb/s operation,”,” https://standards.ieee.org/standard/802_3bs-2017.html Google Scholar

58. 

X. Zhou, R. Urata and H. Liu, “Beyond 1  Tb/s intra-data center interconnect technology: IM-DD OR coherent?,” J. Lightwave Technol., 38 (2), 475 –484 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2019.2956779 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

59. 

B. Jalali and S. Fathpour, “Silicon photonics,” J. Lightwave Technol., 24 (12), 4600 –4615 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2006.885782 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

60. 

W. Bogaerts et al., “Nanophotonic waveguides in silicon-on-insulator fabricated with CMOS technology,” J. Lightwave Technol., 23 (1), 401 –412 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2004.834471 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

61. 

R. Soref and B. Bennett, “Electrooptical effects in silicon,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 23 (1), 123 –129 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1109/JQE.1987.1073206 IEJQA7 0018-9197 Google Scholar

62. 

Q. Xu et al., “Micrometre-scale silicon electro-optic modulator,” Nature, 435 (7040), 325 –327 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03569 Google Scholar

63. 

G. T. Reed and C. J. Png, “Silicon optical modulators,” Mater. Today, 8 (1), 40 –50 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(04)00678-9 MATOBY 1369-7021 Google Scholar

64. 

C. K. Tang and G. T. Reed, “Highly efficient optical phase modulator in SOI waveguides,” Electron. Lett., 31 (6), 451 –452 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1049/el:19950328 ELLEAK 0013-5194 Google Scholar

65. 

T. Baba et al., “25-Gb/s broadband silicon modulator with 0.31-V·cm VπL based on forward-biased PIN diodes embedded with passive equalizer,” Opt. Express, 23 (26), 32950 –32960 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.032950 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

66. 

S. Tanaka et al., “Ultralow-power (1.59  mW/Gbps), 56-Gbps PAM4 operation of Si photonic transmitter integrating segmented PIN Mach–Zehnder modulator and 28-nm CMOS driver,” J. Lightwave Technol., 36 (5), 1275 –1280 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2018.2799965 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

67. 

S. Akiyama et al., “High-performance silicon modulator for integrated transceivers fabricated on 300-mm wafer,” in Eur. Conf. Opt. Commun., P.2.8 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/ECOC.2014.6963947 Google Scholar

68. 

M. Webster et al., “An efficient MOS-capacitor based silicon modulator and CMOS drivers for optical transmitters,” in 11th Int. Conf. Group IV Photonics, WB1 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/Group4.2014.6961998 Google Scholar

69. 

J. Fujikata et al., “High-performance MOS-capacitor-type Si optical modulator and surface-illumination-type Ge photodetector for optical interconnection,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 55 (4S), 04EC01 (2016). https://doi.org/10.7567/JJAP.55.04EC01 Google Scholar

70. 

M. Sodagar et al., “Compact, 15  Gb/s electro-optic modulator through carrier accumulation in a hybrid Si/SiO2/Si microdisk,” Opt. Express, 23 (22), 28306 –28315 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.028306 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

71. 

H. Yi et al., “Demonstration of low power penalty of silicon Mach–Zehnder modulator in long-haul transmission,” Opt. Express, 20 (25), 27562 –27568 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.027562 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

72. 

J.-B. You et al., “12.5 Gbps optical modulation of silicon racetrack resonator based on carrier-depletion in asymmetric P–N diode,” Opt. Express, 16 (22), 18340 –18344 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.16.018340 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

73. 

D. J. Thomson et al., “High speed silicon optical modulator with self aligned fabrication process,” Opt. Express, 18 (18), 19064 –19069 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.019064 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

74. 

D. J. Thomson et al., “High performance Mach–Zehnder-based silicon optical modulators,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 19 (6), 85 –94 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2013.2264799 IJSQEN 1077-260X Google Scholar

75. 

N.-N. Feng et al., “High speed carrier-depletion modulators with 1.4  V-cm VπL integrated on 0.25  μm silicon-on-insulator waveguides,” Opt. Express, 18 (8), 7994 –7999 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.007994 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

76. 

P. Dong et al., “Low Vpp, ultralow-energy, compact, high-speed silicon electro-optic modulator,” Opt. Express, 17 (25), 22484 –22490 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.022484 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

77. 

D. J. Thomson et al., “High contrast 40  Gbit/s optical modulation in silicon,” Opt. Express, 19 (12), 11507 –11516 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.011507 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

78. 

D. Marris-Morini et al., “Low loss and high speed silicon optical modulator based on a lateral carrier depletion structure,” Opt. Express, 16 (1), 334 –339 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.16.000334 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

79. 

M. Ziebell et al., “40  Gbit/s low-loss silicon optical modulator based on a pipin diode,” Opt. Express, 20 (10), 10591 –10596 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.010591 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

80. 

H. Xu et al., “High speed silicon Mach–Zehnder modulator based on interleaved PN junctions,” Opt. Express, 20 (14), 15093 –15099 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.015093 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

81. 

H. Yu, W. Bogaerts and A. De Keersgieter, “Optimization of ion implantation condition for depletion-type silicon optical modulators,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 46 (12), 1763 –1768 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/JQE.2010.2067206 IEJQA7 0018-9197 Google Scholar

82. 

H. Xu et al., “44  Gbit/s silicon Mach–Zehnder modulator based on interleaved PN junctions,” in 9th Int. Conf. Group IV Photonics, 201 –203 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/GROUP4.2012.6324133 Google Scholar

83. 

Z.-Y. Li et al., “Silicon waveguide modulator based on carrier depletion in periodically interleaved PN junctions,” Opt. Express, 17 (18), 15947 –15958 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.015947 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

84. 

M. Ziebell et al., “Ten Gbit/s ring resonator silicon modulator based on interdigitated PN junctions,” Opt. Express, 19 (15), 14690 –14695 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.014690 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

85. 

F. Y. Gardes et al., “40  Gb/s silicon photonics modulator for TE and TM polarisations,” Opt. Express, 19 (12), 11804 –11814 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.011804 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

86. 

X. Xiao et al., “44-Gb/s silicon microring modulators based on zigzag PN junctions,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 24 (19), 1712 –1714 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2012.2213244 IPTLEL 1041-1135 Google Scholar

87. 

X. Xiao et al., “High speed silicon photonic modulators,” in Opt. Fiber Commun. Conf., (2017). Google Scholar

88. 

A. Irace, G. Breglio and A. Cutolo, “All-silicon optoelectronic modulator with 1 GHz switching capability,” Electron. Lett., 39 (2), 232 –233 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1049/el:20030136 ELLEAK 0013-5194 Google Scholar

89. 

R. Soref and J. Larenzo, “All-silicon active and passive guided-wave components for λ=13 and 1.6  μm,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 22 (6), 873 –879 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1109/JQE.1986.1073057 IEJQA7 0018-9197 Google Scholar

90. 

A. Cutolo et al., “Silicon electro-optic modulator based on a three terminal device integrated in a low-loss single-mode SOI waveguide,” J. Lightwave Technol., 15 (3), 505 –518 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1109/50.557567 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

91. 

S. Akiyama et al., “Compact PIN-diode-based silicon modulator using side-wall-grating waveguide,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 19 (6), 74 –84 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2013.2278438 IJSQEN 1077-260X Google Scholar

92. 

S. J. Spector et al., “High-speed silicon electro-optical modulator that can be operated in carrier depletion or carrier injection mode,” in Conf. Lasers and Electro-Opt. and Conf. Quantum Electron. and Laser Sci., CFH4 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEO.2008.4550982 Google Scholar

93. 

A. Sciuto et al., “Design, fabrication, and testing of an integrated Si-based light modulator,” J. Lightwave Technol., 21 (1), 228 –235 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2003.808608 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

94. 

S. J. Spector et al., “Operation and optimization of silicon-diode-based optical modulators,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 16 (1), 165 –172 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2009.2027817 IJSQEN 1077-260X Google Scholar

95. 

J. C. Rosenberg et al., “Ultra-low-voltage micro-ring modulator integrated with a CMOS feed-forward equalization driver,” in Opt. Fiber Commun. Conf./Natl. Fiber Opt. Eng. Conf., (2011). Google Scholar

96. 

C. E. Png et al., “Optical phase modulators for MHz and GHz modulation in silicon-on-insulator (SOI),” J. Lightwave Technol., 22 (6), 1573 –1582 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2004.827655 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

97. 

Q. Xu et al., “12.5  Gbit/s carrier-injection-based silicon micro-ring silicon modulators,” Opt. Express, 15 (2), 430 –436 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.15.000430 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

98. 

A. Shakoor et al., “Compact 1D-silicon photonic crystal electro-optic modulator operating with ultra-low switching voltage and energy,” Opt. Express, 22 (23), 28623 –28634 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.028623 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

99. 

W. M. J. Green et al., “Ultra-compact, low RF power, 10  Gb/s silicon Mach-Zehnder modulator,” Opt. Express, 15 (25), 17106 –17113 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.15.017106 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

100. 

S. Meister et al., “High-speed Fabry–Pérot optical modulator in silicon with 3-μm diode,” J. Lightwave Technol., 33 (4), 878 –881 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2015.2390077 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

101. 

L. Liao et al., “High speed silicon Mach–Zehnder modulator,” Opt. Express, 13 (8), 3129 –3135 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPEX.13.003129 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

102. 

A. Liu et al., “A high-speed silicon optical modulator based on a metal–oxide–semiconductor capacitor,” Nature, 427 (6975), 615 –618 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02310 Google Scholar

103. 

K. Debnath et al., “All-silicon carrier accumulation modulator based on a lateral metal-oxide-semiconductor capacitor,” Photonics Res., 6 (5), 373 –379 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.6.000373 Google Scholar

104. 

A. Abraham et al., “Evaluation of the performances of a silicon optical modulator based on a silicon-oxide-silicon capacitor,” in 11th Int. Conf. Group IV Photonics, WB2 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/Group4.2014.6961999 Google Scholar

105. 

E. Li et al., “One-volt silicon photonic crystal nanocavity modulator with indium oxide gate,” Opt. Lett., 43 (18), 4429 –4432 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.43.004429 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

106. 

L. Liao et al., “40  Gbit/s silicon optical modulator for high-speed applications,” Electron. Lett., 43 (22), 1196 –1197 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1049/el:20072253 ELLEAK 0013-5194 Google Scholar

107. 

Y. Maegami et al., “High-efficiency strip-loaded waveguide based silicon Mach–Zehnder modulator with vertical p-n junction phase shifter,” Opt. Express, 25 (25), 31407 –31416 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.031407 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

108. 

A. Liu et al., “High-speed optical modulation based on carrier depletion in a silicon waveguide,” Opt. Express, 15 (2), 660 –668 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.15.000660 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

109. 

F. Y. Gardes et al., “A sub-micron depletion-type photonic modulator in silicon on insulator,” Opt. Express, 13 (22), 8845 –8854 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPEX.13.008845 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

110. 

M. R. Watts et al., “Low-voltage, compact, depletion-mode, silicon Mach-Zehnder modulator,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 16 (1), 159 –164 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2009.2035059 IJSQEN 1077-260X Google Scholar

111. 

M. R. Watts et al., “Vertical junction silicon microdisk modulators and switches,” Opt. Express, 19 (22), 21989 –22003 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.021989 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

112. 

H. C. Nguyen et al., “Compact and fast photonic crystal silicon optical modulators,” Opt. Express, 20 (20), 22465 –22474 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.022465 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

113. 

Y. Terada et al., “Full C-band Si photonic crystal waveguide modulator,” Opt. Lett., 42 (24), 5110 –5112 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.42.005110 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

114. 

Y. Hinakura, H. Arai and T. Baba, “64 Gbps Si photonic crystal slow light modulator by electro-optic phase matching,” Opt. Express, 27 (10), 14321 –14327 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.27.014321 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

115. 

R. Dubé-Demers, S. LaRochelle and W. Shi, “Ultrafast pulse-amplitude modulation with a femtojoule silicon photonic modulator,” Optica, 3 (6), 622 –627 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.3.000622 Google Scholar

116. 

P. Dong, L. Chen and Y. K. Chen, “High-speed low-voltage single-drive push-pull silicon Mach–Zehnder modulators,” Opt. Express, 20 (6), 6163 –6169 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.006163 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

117. 

M. Streshinsky et al., “Low power 50  Gb/s silicon traveling wave Mach–Zehnder modulator near 1300 nm,” Opt. Express, 21 (25), 30350 –30357 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.030350 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

118. 

T. Baehr-Jones et al., “Ultralow drive voltage silicon traveling-wave modulator,” Opt. Express, 20 (11), 12014 –12020 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.012014 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

119. 

R. Ding et al., “A compact low-power 320-Gb/s WDM transmitter based on silicon microrings,” IEEE Photonics J., 6 (3), 6600608 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOT.2014.2326656 Google Scholar

120. 

X. Tu et al., “Fabrication of low loss and high speed silicon optical modulator using doping compensation method,” Opt. Express, 19 (19), 18029 –18035 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.018029 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

121. 

X. Li et al., “Highly efficient silicon Michelson interferometer modulators,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 25 (5), 407 –409 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2013.2238625 IPTLEL 1041-1135 Google Scholar

122. 

K. Li et al., “Electronic–photonic convergence for silicon photonics transmitters beyond 100 Gbps on–off keying,” Optica, 7 (11), 1514 –1516 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.411122 Google Scholar

123. 

H. Zhang et al., “800  Gbit/s transmission over 1 km single-mode fiber using a four-channel silicon photonic transmitter,” Photonics Res., 8 (11), 1776 –1782 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.396815 Google Scholar

124. 

D. Pérez-Galacho et al., “QPSK modulation in the O-band using a single dual-drive Mach–Zehnder silicon modulator,” J. Lightwave Technol., 36 (18), 3935 –3940 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2018.2851370 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

125. 

F. Fresi et al., “Silicon photonics integrated 16-QAM modulator exploiting only binary driving electronics,” in Opt. Fiber Commun. Conf., (2016). Google Scholar

126. 

S. Zhalehpour et al., “All-silicon IQ modulator for 100 GBaud 32QAM transmissions,” in Opt. Fiber Commun. Conf. Postdeadline Papers, (2019). Google Scholar

127. 

L. Deniel et al., “DAC-less PAM-4 generation in the O-band using a silicon Mach-Zehnder modulator,” Opt. Express, 27 (7), 9740 –9748 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.27.009740 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

128. 

Y. Kim et al., “Strain-induced enhancement of plasma dispersion effect and free-carrier absorption in SiGe optical modulators,” Sci. Rep., 4 (1), 4683 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04683 Google Scholar

129. 

C. G. Bottenfield, V. A. Thomas and S. E. Ralph, “Silicon photonic modulator linearity and optimization for microwave photonic links,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 25 (5), 3400110 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2019.2908784 IJSQEN 1077-260X Google Scholar

130. 

L. Chrostowski et al., “Impact of fabrication non-uniformity on chip-scale silicon photonic integrated circuits,” in Opt. Fiber Commun. Conf., (2014). Google Scholar

131. 

W. Bogaerts et al., “Silicon microring resonators,” Laser Photonics Rev., 6 (1), 47 –73 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.201100017 Google Scholar

132. 

B. Guha, B. B. C. Kyotoku and M. Lipson, “CMOS-compatible athermal silicon microring resonators,” Opt. Express, 18 (4), 3487 –3493 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.003487 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

133. 

D. Feng et al., “High-speed GeSi electroabsorption modulator on the SOI waveguide platform,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 19 (6), 64 –73 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2013.2278881 IJSQEN 1077-260X Google Scholar

134. 

S. Gupta et al., “50-GHz Ge waveguide electro-absorption modulator integrated in a 220 nm SOI photonics platform,” in Opt. Fiber Commun. Conf., (2015). Google Scholar

135. 

D. Feng et al., “High speed GeSi electro-absorption modulator at 1550 nm wavelength on SOI waveguide,” Opt. Express, 20 (20), 22224 –22232 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.022224 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

136. 

S. A. Srinivasan et al., “56  Gb/s Germanium waveguide electro-absorption modulator,” J. Lightwave Technol., 34 (2), 419 –424 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2015.2478601 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

137. 

J. Verbist et al., “100  Gb/s DAC-less and DSP-free transmitters using GeSi EAMs for short-reach optical interconnects,” in Opt. Fiber Commun. Conf., (2018). Google Scholar

138. 

A. E.-J. Lim et al., “Novel evanescent-coupled germanium electro-absorption modulator featuring monolithic integration with germanium p–i–n photodetector,” Opt. Express, 19 (6), 5040 –5046 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.005040 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

139. 

L. Mastronardi et al., “High-speed Si/GeSi hetero-structure electro absorption modulator,” Opt. Express, 26 (6), 6663 –6673 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.006663 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

140. 

Y. Tang, J. D. Peters and J. E. Bowers, “Over 67 GHz bandwidth hybrid silicon electroabsorption modulator with asymmetric segmented electrode for 1.3  μm transmission,” Opt. Express, 20 (10), 11529 –11535 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.011529 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

141. 

P. Chaisakul et al., “Integrated germanium optical interconnects on silicon substrates,” Nat. Photonics, 8 (6), 482 –488 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2014.73 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

142. 

P. Chaisakul et al., “Recent progress in GeSi electro-absorption modulators,” J. Lightwave Technol., 15 (1), 014601 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/1468-6996/15/1/014601 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

143. 

J. Frigerio et al., “Giant electro-optic effect in Ge/SiGe coupled quantum wells,” Sci. Rep., 5 (1), 15398 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15398 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

144. 

Y.-H. Kuo et al., “Strong quantum-confined Stark effect in germanium quantum-well structures on silicon,” Nature, 437 (7063), 1334 –1336 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04204 Google Scholar

145. 

D. A. B. Miller et al., “Band-edge electroabsorption in quantum well structures: the quantum-confined Stark effect,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 53 (22), 2173 –2176 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.2173 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

146. 

D. A. B. Miller, “Attojoule optoelectronics for low-energy information processing and communications,” J. Lightwave Technol., 35 (3), 346 –396 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2017.2647779 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

147. 

S. Ren et al., “Ge/SiGe quantum well waveguide modulator monolithically integrated with SOI waveguides,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 24 (6), 461 –463 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2011.2181496 IPTLEL 1041-1135 Google Scholar

148. 

P. Chaisakul et al., “23 GHz Ge/SiGe multiple quantum well electro-absorption modulator,” Opt. Express, 20 (3), 3219 –3224 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.003219 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

149. 

R. M. Audet et al., “Surface-normal Ge/SiGe asymmetric Fabry–Perot optical modulators fabricated on silicon substrates,” J. Lightwave Technol., 31 (24), 3995 –4003 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2013.2279174 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

150. 

E. H. Edwards et al., “Ge/SiGe asymmetric Fabry–Perot quantum well electroabsorption modulators,” Opt. Express, 20 (28), 29164 –29173 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.029164 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

151. 

P. Chaisakul et al., “Recent progress on Ge/SiGe quantum well optical modulators, detectors, and emitters for optical interconnects,” Photonics, 6 (1), 24 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics6010024 Google Scholar

152. 

S. A. Srinivasan et al., “High absorption contrast quantum confined Stark effect in ultra-thin Ge/SiGe quantum well stacks grown on Si,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 56 (1), 5200207 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/JQE.2019.2949640 IEJQA7 0018-9197 Google Scholar

153. 

M. Liu et al., “A graphene-based broadband optical modulator,” Nature, 474 (7349), 64 –67 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10067 Google Scholar

154. 

M. A. Giambra et al., “High-speed double layer graphene electro-absorption modulator on SOI waveguide,” Opt. Express, 27 (15), 20145 –20155 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.27.020145 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

155. 

M. Mohsin et al., “Graphene based low insertion loss electro-absorption modulator on SOI waveguide,” Opt. Express, 22 (12), 15292 –15297 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.015292 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

156. 

M. Liu, X. Yin and X. Zhang, “Double-layer graphene optical modulator,” Nano Lett., 12 (3), 1482 –1485 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl204202k NALEFD 1530-6984 Google Scholar

157. 

Y. Hu et al., “Broadband 10  Gb/s operation of graphene electro-absorption modulator on silicon,” Laser Photonics Rev., 10 (2), 307 –316 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.201500250 Google Scholar

158. 

C. T. Phare et al., “Graphene electro-optic modulator with 30 GHz bandwidth,” Nat. Photonics, 9 (8), 511 –514 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2015.122 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

159. 

L. A. Shiramin et al., “High extinction ratio hybrid graphene-silicon photonic crystal switch,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 30 (2), 157 –160 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2017.2779178 IPTLEL 1041-1135 Google Scholar

160. 

V. Sorianello et al., “Chirp management in silicon-graphene electro absorption modulators,” Opt. Express, 25 (16), 19371 –19381 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.019371 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

161. 

J.-H. Han et al., “Efficient low-loss InGaAsP/Si hybrid MOS optical modulator,” Nat. Photonics, 11 (8), 486 –490 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2017.122 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

162. 

J. Witzens, “Modulators make efficiency leap,” Nat. Photonics, 11 (8), 459 –462 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2017.127 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

163. 

T. Hiraki et al., “Heterogeneously integrated III–V/Si MOS capacitor Mach–Zehnder modulator,” Nat. Photonics, 11 (8), 482 –485 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2017.120 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

164. 

Q. Li et al., “Si racetrack modulator with III-V/Si hybrid MOS optical phase shifter,” in 45th Eur. Conf. Opt. Commun., (2019). https://doi.org/10.1049/cp.2019.0827 Google Scholar

165. 

Q. Li et al., “Efficient optical modulator by reverse-biased III-V/Si hybrid MOS capacitor based on FK effect and carrier depletion,” in Opt. Fiber Commun. Conf., (2019). Google Scholar

166. 

T. Komljenovic et al., “Photonic integrated circuits using heterogeneous integration on silicon,” Proc. IEEE, 106 (12), 2246 –2257 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2018.2864668 IEEPAD 0018-9219 Google Scholar

167. 

L. Cao et al., “Hybrid amorphous silicon (a-Si:H)-LiNbO3 electro-optic modulator,” Opt. Commun., 330 40 –44 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2014.05.021 OPCOB8 0030-4018 Google Scholar

168. 

A. Rao et al., “Heterogeneous microring and Mach–Zehnder modulators based on lithium niobate and chalcogenide glasses on silicon,” Opt. Express, 23 (17), 22746 –22752 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.022746 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

169. 

L. Chen et al., “Hybrid silicon and lithium niobate electro-optical ring modulator,” Optica, 1 (2), 112 –118 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.1.000112 Google Scholar

170. 

S. Jin et al., “LiNbO3 thin-film modulators using silicon nitride surface ridge waveguides,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 28 (7), 736 –739 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2015.2507136 IPTLEL 1041-1135 Google Scholar

171. 

A. Rao et al., “High-performance and linear thin-film lithium niobate Mach–Zehnder modulators on silicon up to 50 GHz,” Opt. Lett., 41 (24), 5700 –5703 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.41.005700 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

172. 

N. Boynton et al., “A heterogeneously integrated silicon photonic/lithium niobate travelling wave electro-optic modulator,” Opt. Express, 28 (2), 1868 –1884 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.28.001868 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

173. 

P. O. Weigel et al., “Bonded thin film lithium niobate modulator on a silicon photonics platform exceeding 100 GHz 3-dB electrical modulation bandwidth,” Opt. Express, 26 (18), 23728 –23739 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.023728 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

174. 

M. He et al., “High-performance hybrid silicon and lithium niobate Mach–Zehnder modulators for 100  Gbit s1 and beyond,” Nat. Photonics, 13 (5), 359 –364 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-019-0378-6 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

175. 

M. Li and H. X. Tang, “Strong Pockels materials,” Nat. Mater., 18 (1), 9 –11 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-018-0259-2 NMAACR 1476-1122 Google Scholar

176. 

S. Abel et al., “A hybrid barium titanate-silicon photonics platform for ultraefficient electro-optic tuning,” J. Lightwave Technol., 34 (8), 1688 –1693 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2015.2510282 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

177. 

C. Xiong et al., “Active silicon integrated nanophotonics: ferroelectric BaTiO3 devices,” Nano Lett., 14 (3), 1419 –1425 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl404513p NALEFD 1530-6984 Google Scholar

178. 

F. Eltes et al., “Low-loss BaTiO3Si waveguides for nonlinear integrated photonics,” ACS Photonics, 3 (9), 1698 –1703 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00350 Google Scholar

179. 

S. Abel et al., “Large Pockels effect in micro- and nanostructured barium titanate integrated on silicon,” Nat. Mater., 18 (1), 42 –47 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-018-0208-0 NMAACR 1476-1122 Google Scholar

180. 

A. Messner et al., “Integrated ferroelectric BaTiO3/Si plasmonic modulator for 100  Gbit/s and beyond,” in Opt. Fiber Commun. Conf., (2018). Google Scholar

181. 

F. Eltes et al., “A novel 25 Gbps electro-optic Pockels modulator integrated on an advanced Si photonic platform,” in IEEE Int. Electron Dev. Meeting, 24.5.1 –24.5.4 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEDM.2017.8268454 Google Scholar

182. 

F. Eltes et al., “A BaTiO3-based electro-optic Pockels modulator monolithically integrated on an advanced silicon photonics platform,” J. Lightwave Technol., 37 (5), 1456 –1462 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2019.2893500 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

183. 

K. Alexander et al., “Broadband electro-optic modulation using low-loss PZT-on-silicon nitride integrated waveguides,” in Conf. Lasers and Electro-Opt., (2017). Google Scholar

184. 

K. Alexander et al., “Nanophotonic Pockels modulators on a silicon nitride platform,” Nat Commun, 9 (1), 3444 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05846-6 Google Scholar

185. 

K. Alexander, “Integrated silicon nitride photonics with highly nonlinear thin films and 2D materials: properties and devices,” Ghent University, (2018). Google Scholar

186. 

C. Koos et al., “All-optical high-speed signal processing with silicon–organic hybrid slot waveguides,” Nat. Photonics, 3 (4), 216 –219 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2009.25 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

187. 

D. Korn et al., “Lasing in silicon–organic hybrid waveguides,” Nat. Commun., 7 (1), 10864 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10864 NCAOBW 2041-1723 Google Scholar

188. 

C. Koos et al., “Silicon-organic hybrid (SOH) and plasmonic-organic hybrid (POH) integration,” J. Lightwave Technol., 34 (2), 256 –268 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2015.2499763 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

189. 

R. Palmer et al., “High-speed, low drive-voltage silicon-organic hybrid modulator based on a binary-chromophore electro-optic material,” J. Lightwave Technol., 32 (16), 2726 –2734 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2014.2321498 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

190. 

C. Kieninger et al., “Ultra-high electro-optic activity demonstrated in a silicon-organic hybrid modulator,” Optica, 5 (6), 739 –748 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.5.000739 Google Scholar

191. 

L. Alloatti et al., “100 GHz silicon–organic hybrid modulator,” Light Sci. Appl., 3 (5), e173 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2014.54 Google Scholar

192. 

S. Koeber et al., “Femtojoule electro-optic modulation using a silicon–organic hybrid device,” Light Sci. Appl., 4 (2), e255 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2015.28 Google Scholar

193. 

H. Zwickel et al., “Silicon-organic hybrid (SOH) modulators for intensity-modulation/direct-detection links with line rates of up to 120  Gbit/s,” Opt. Express, 25 (20), 23784 –23800 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.023784 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

194. 

C. Kieninger et al., “Silicon-organic hybrid (SOH) Mach–Zehnder modulators for 100 GBd PAM4 signaling with sub-1 dB phase-shifter loss,” Opt. Express, 28 (17), 24693 –24707 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.390315 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

195. 

C. Kieninger et al., “Demonstration of long-term thermally stable silicon-organic hybrid modulators at 85°C,” Opt. Express, 26 (21), 27955 –27964 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.027955 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

196. 

S. Wolf et al., “Silicon-organic hybrid (SOH) Mach–Zehnder modulators for 100  Gbit/s on-off keying,” Sci. Rep., 8 (1), 2598 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-19061-8 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

197. 

T. Baehr-Jones et al., “Optical modulation and detection in slotted Silicon waveguides,” Opt. Express, 13 (14), 5216 –5226 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPEX.13.005216 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

198. 

H. Figi et al., “Electro-optic modulation in horizontally slotted silicon/organic crystal hybrid devices,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 28 (9), 2291 –2300 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.28.002291 JOBPDE 0740-3224 Google Scholar

199. 

D. Korn et al., “Electro-optic organic crystal silicon high-speed modulator,” IEEE Photonics J., 6 (2), 2700109 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOT.2014.2314113 Google Scholar

200. 

S. Ummethala et al., “Capacitively coupled silicon-organic hybrid modulator for 200 Gbit/s PAM-4 signaling,” in Conf. Lasers and Electro-Opt., (2019). Google Scholar

201. 

V. Sorianello et al., “Graphene–silicon phase modulators with gigahertz bandwidth,” Nat. Photonics, 12 (1), 40 –44 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-017-0071-6 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

202. 

M. Midrio et al., “Graphene-based optical phase modulation of waveguide transverse electric modes,” Photonics Res., 2 (3), A34 –A40 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.2.000A34 Google Scholar

203. 

H. Dalir et al., “Athermal broadband graphene optical modulator with 35 GHz speed,” ACS Photonics, 3 (9), 1564 –1568 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00398 Google Scholar

204. 

I. Datta et al., “Low-loss composite photonic platform based on 2D semiconductor monolayers,” Nat. Photonics, 14 (4), 256 –262 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-020-0590-4 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

205. 

S. Ye et al., “High-speed optical phase modulator based on graphene-silicon waveguide,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 23 (1), 76 –80 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2016.2545238 IJSQEN 1077-260X Google Scholar

206. 

C. Xu et al., “Characteristics of electro-refractive modulating based on graphene-oxide-silicon waveguide,” Opt. Express, 20 (20), 22398 –22405 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.022398 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

207. 

M. Mohsin et al., “Experimental verification of electro-refractive phase modulation in graphene,” Sci. Rep., 5 (1), 10967 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10967 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

208. 

L. Yang et al., “Low-chirp high-extinction-ratio modulator based on graphene–silicon waveguide,” Opt. Lett., 38 (14), 2512 –2515 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.38.002512 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

209. 

J. Leuthold et al., “High-speed, low-power optical modulators in silicon,” in 15th Int. Conf. Transp. Opt. Networks, We.D2.1 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTON.2013.6603001 Google Scholar

210. 

A. Moscoso-Mártir et al., “Co-integration of a temperature tolerant low impedance resonantly enhanced silicon photonics modulator,” in IEEE 14th Int. Conf. Group IV Photonics, 101 –102 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/GROUP4.2017.8082216 Google Scholar

211. 

X. Li et al., “Single-drive high-speed lumped depletion-type modulators toward 10  fJ/bit energy consumption,” Photonics Res., 5 (2), 134 –142 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.5.000134 Google Scholar

212. 

A. Giuglea et al., “Comparison of segmented and traveling-wave electro-optical transmitters based on silicon photonics Mach–Zehnder modulators,” in Photonics Switching and Comput., (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/PS.2018.8751239 Google Scholar

213. 

S. Lin et al., “Electronic-photonic co-optimization of high-speed silicon photonic transmitters,” J. Lightwave Technol., 35 (21), 4766 –4780 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2017.2757945 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

214. 

D. J. Thomson et al., “Optical detection and modulation at 2  μm -2.5  μm in silicon,” Opt. Express, 22 (9), 10825 –10830 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.010825 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

215. 

M. Montesinos-Ballester et al., “Optical modulation in Ge-rich SiGe waveguides in the mid-infrared wavelength range up to 11  μm,” Commun. Mater., 1 (1), 6 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-019-0003-8 Google Scholar

216. 

J. P. Lorenzo and R. A. Soref, “1.3  μm electro-optic silicon switch,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 51 (1), 6 –8 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.98887 APPLAB 0003-6951 Google Scholar

217. 

B. Chmielak et al., “Pockels effect based fully integrated, strained silicon electro-optic modulator,” Opt. Express, 19 (18), 17212 –17219 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.017212 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

218. 

R. S. Jacobsen et al., “Strained silicon as a new electro-optic material,” Nature, 441 (7090), 199 –202 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04706 Google Scholar

219. 

P. Damas et al., “Wavelength dependence of Pockels effect in strained silicon waveguides,” Opt. Express, 22 (18), 22095 –22100 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.022095 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

220. 

Y. Shiraki et al., Silicon-Germanium (SiGe) Nanostructures, Woodhead Publishing(2011). Google Scholar

221. 

L. Vivien and L. E. Pavesi, Handbook of Silicon Photonics, 1st ed.CRC Press(2013). Google Scholar

222. 

M. Zeiler et al., “Radiation damage in silicon photonic Mach–Zehnder modulators and photodiodes,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 64 (11), 2794 –2801 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2017.2754948 IETNAE 0018-9499 Google Scholar

224. 

U. Chakraborty et al., “Cryogenic operation of silicon photonic modulators based on the DC Kerr effect,” Optica, 7 (10), 1385 –1390 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.403178 Google Scholar

225. 

M. Gehl et al., “Operation of high-speed silicon photonic micro-disk modulators at cryogenic temperatures,” Optica, 4 (3), 374 –382 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.4.000374 Google Scholar

226. 

S. M. Jackson et al., “A novel optical phase modulator design suitable for phased arrays,” J. Lightwave Technol., 16 (11), 2016 –2019 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1109/50.730364 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

227. 

J. Shin et al., “Epitaxial growth technology for optical interconnect based on bulk-Si platform,” in 10th Int. Conf. Group IV Photonics, (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/Group4.2013.6644461 Google Scholar

228. 

O. Marshall et al., “Heterogeneous integration on silicon photonics,” Proc. IEEE, 106 (12), 2258 –2269 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2018.2858542 IEEPAD 0018-9219 Google Scholar

229. 

S. Kodama, T. Yoshimatsu and H. Ito, “500  Gbit/s optical gate monolithically integrating photodiode and electroabsorption modulator,” Electron. Lett., 40 (9), 555 –556 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1049/el:20040391 ELLEAK 0013-5194 Google Scholar

230. 

S. A. Srinivasan, “Advanced Germanium devices for optical interconnects,” Ghent University, (2017). Google Scholar

231. 

A. Melikyan et al., “Differential drive I/Q modulator based on silicon photonic electro-absorption modulators,” J. Lightwave Technol., 38 (11), 2872 –2876 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2020.2978190 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

232. 

Y. Tong et al., “Integrated germanium-on-silicon Franz–Keldysh vector modulator used with a Kramers–Kronig receiver,” Opt. Lett., 43 (18), 4333 –4336 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.43.004333 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

233. 

J. Verbist et al., “Real-time and DSP-free 128  Gb/s PAM-4 link using a binary driven silicon photonic transmitter,” J. Lightwave Technol., 37 (2), 274 –280 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2018.2877461 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

234. 

K. M. Rabe et al., Modern Physics of Ferroelectrics: Essential Background, 1 –30 Springer(2007). Google Scholar

235. 

M. Veithen, X. Gonze and P. Ghosez, “Nonlinear optical susceptibilities, Raman efficiencies, and electro-optic tensors from first-principles density functional perturbation theory,” Phys. Rev. B, 71 (12), 125107 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.71.125107 Google Scholar

236. 

H. Buhay et al., “Pulsed laser deposition and ferroelectric characterization of bismuth titanate films,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 58 (14), 1470 –1472 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.105200 APPLAB 0003-6951 Google Scholar

237. 

D. J. R. Appleby et al., “Ferroelectric properties in thin film barium titanate grown using pulsed laser deposition,” J. Appl. Phys., 116 (12), 124105 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4895050 JAPIAU 0021-8979 Google Scholar

238. 

T. Kobayashi et al., “Effect of multi-coating process on the orientation and microstructure of lead zirconate titanate (PZT) thin films derived by chemical solution deposition,” Thin Solid Films, 489 (1), 74 –78 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2005.05.004 THSFAP 0040-6090 Google Scholar

239. 

Z. Bi, Z. Zhang and P. Fan, “Characterization of PZT ferroelectric thin films by RF-magnetron sputtering,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 61 120 –124 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/61/1/025 JPCSDZ 1742-6588 Google Scholar

240. 

T. Li et al., “Metalorganic chemical vapor deposition of ferroelectric SrBi2Ta2O9 thin films,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 68 (5), 616 –618 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.116486 APPLAB 0003-6951 Google Scholar

241. 

F. Zhang et al., “Atomic layer deposition of Pb(Zr,Ti)Ox on 4H-SiC for metal-ferroelectric-insulator-semiconductor diodes,” J. Appl. Phys., 109 (12), 124109 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3596574 JAPIAU 0021-8979 Google Scholar

242. 

E. L. Wooten et al., “A review of lithium niobate modulators for fiber-optic communications systems,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 6 (1), 69 –82 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1109/2944.826874 IJSQEN 1077-260X Google Scholar

243. 

M. Zhang et al., “Ultra-high bandwidth integrated lithium niobate modulators with record-low Vπ,” in Opt. Fiber Commun. Conf., (2018). Google Scholar

244. 

K. Noguchi, O. Mitomi and H. Miyazawa, “Millimeter-wave Ti:LiNbO3 optical modulators,” J. Lightwave Technol., 16 (4), 615 –619 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1109/50.664072 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

245. 

G. Poberaj et al., “Lithium niobate on insulator (LNOI) for micro-photonic devices,” Laser Photonics Rev., 6 (4), 488 –503 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.201100035 Google Scholar

246. 

A. J. Mercante et al., “Thin film lithium niobate electro-optic modulator with terahertz operating bandwidth,” Opt. Express, 26 (11), 14810 –14816 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.014810 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

247. 

C. Wang et al., “Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators operating at CMOS-compatible voltages,” Nature, 562 (7725), 101 –104 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0551-y Google Scholar

248. 

H. Takagi and R. Maeda, “Room temperature bonding of silicon and lithium niobate,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 89 (3), 031914 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2229262 APPLAB 0003-6951 Google Scholar

249. 

P. Rabiei et al., “Heterogeneous lithium niobate photonics on silicon substrates,” Opt. Express, 21 (21), 25573 –25581 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.025573 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

250. 

C. Wang et al., “Nanophotonic lithium niobate electro-optic modulators,” Opt. Express, 26 (2), 1547 –1555 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.001547 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

251. 

P. Bernasconi, M. Zgonik and P. Günter, “Temperature dependence and dispersion of electro-optic and elasto-optic effect in perovskite crystals,” J. Appl. Phys., 78 (4), 2651 –2658 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.360126 JAPIAU 0021-8979 Google Scholar

252. 

R. A. McKee et al., “Molecular beam epitaxy growth of epitaxial barium silicide, barium oxide, and barium titanate on silicon,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 59 (7), 782 –784 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.105341 APPLAB 0003-6951 Google Scholar

253. 

A. Petraru et al., “Ferroelectric BaTiO3 thin-film optical waveguide modulators,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 81 (8), 1375 –1377 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1498151 APPLAB 0003-6951 Google Scholar

254. 

A. A. Demkov and A. B. Posadas, Integration of Functional Oxides with Semiconductors, Springer, New York (2014). Google Scholar

255. 

M.-H. Hsu, “Monolithic integration of barium titanate on silicon for high-speed and power-efficient optical modulator applications,” Ghent University, (2016). Google Scholar

256. 

J. P. George et al., “Lanthanide-assisted deposition of strongly electro-optic PZT thin films on silicon: toward integrated active nanophotonic devices,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 7 (24), 13350 –13359 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b01781 AAMICK 1944-8244 Google Scholar

257. 

J. P. George, “Integration of ferroelectric thin films on silicon for electro-optic devices,” Ghent University, (2016). Google Scholar

258. 

W. Heni et al., “Silicon–organic and plasmonic–organic hybrid photonics,” ACS Photonics, 4 (7), 1576 –1590 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.7b00224 Google Scholar

259. 

H. Zwickel et al., “Verified equivalent-circuit model for slot-waveguide modulators,” Opt. Express, 28 (9), 12951 –12976 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.383120 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

260. 

S. Wolf et al., “DAC-less amplifier-less generation and transmission of QAM signals using sub-volt silicon-organic hybrid modulators,” J. Lightwave Technol., 33 (7), 1425 –1432 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2015.2394511 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

261. 

S. Wolf et al., “Coherent modulation up to 100 GBd 16QAM using silicon-organic hybrid (SOH) devices,” Opt. Express, 26 (1), 220 –232 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.000220 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

262. 

G.-W. Lu et al., “High-temperature-resistant silicon-polymer hybrid modulator operating at up to 200  Gbit s1 for energy-efficient datacentres and harsh-environment applications,” Nat. Commun., 11 (1), 4224 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18005-7 Google Scholar

263. 

M. Jazbinsek et al., “Organic electro-optic single crystalline films for integrated optics,” Proc. SPIE, 7774 77740Q (2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.860191 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

264. 

A. Melikyan et al., “High-speed plasmonic phase modulators,” Nat. Photonics, 8 (3), 229 –233 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2014.9 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

265. 

C. Haffner et al., “Plasmonic organic hybrid modulators-scaling highest speed photonics to the microscale,” Proc. IEEE, 104 (12), 2362 –2379 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2016.2547990 IEEPAD 0018-9219 Google Scholar

266. 

C. Hoessbacher et al., “Plasmonic modulator with 170 GHz bandwidth demonstrated at 100 GBd NRZ,” Opt. Express, 25 (3), 1762 –1768 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.001762 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

267. 

C. Uhl, H. Hettrich and M. Möller, “A 100  Gbit/s 2 Vpp power multiplexer in SiGe BiCMOS technology for directly driving a monolithically integrated plasmonic MZM in a silicon photonics transmitter,” in IEEE Bipolar/BiCMOS Circuits and Technol. Meeting, 106 –109 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/BCTM.2017.8112921 Google Scholar

268. 

W. Heni et al., “High speed plasmonic modulator array enabling dense optical interconnect solutions,” Opt. Express, 23 (23), 29746 –29757 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.029746 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

269. 

A. Melikyan et al., “Plasmonic-organic hybrid (POH) modulators for OOK and BPSK signaling at 40  Gbit/s,” Opt. Express, 23 (8), 9938 –9946 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.009938 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

270. 

S. Ummethala et al., “THz-to-optical conversion in wireless communications using an ultra-broadband plasmonic modulator,” Nat. Photonics, 13 (8), 519 –524 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-019-0475-6 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

271. 

G. Duan et al., “Hybrid III–V on silicon lasers for photonic integrated circuits on silicon,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 20 (4), 158 –170 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2013.2296752 IJSQEN 1077-260X Google Scholar

272. 

D. Liang and J. E. Bowers, “Recent progress in lasers on silicon,” Nat. Photonics, 4 (8), 511 –517 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2010.167 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

273. 

T. Shimizu et al., “High density hybrid integrated light source with a laser diode array on a silicon optical waveguide platform for inter-chip optical interconnection,” in 8th IEEE Int. Conf. Group IV Photonics, 181 –183 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/GROUP4.2011.6053756 Google Scholar

274. 

G. Roelkens et al., “III-V/Si PICs based on micro-transfer-printing,” in Opt. Fiber Commun. Conf., (2019). Google Scholar

275. 

A. J. Zilkie et al., “Multi-micron silicon photonics platform for highly manufacturable and versatile photonic integrated circuits,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 25 (5), 8200713 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2019.2911432 IJSQEN 1077-260X Google Scholar

276. 

B. Szelag et al., “Hybrid III-V/silicon technology for laser integration on a 200-mm fully CMOS-compatible silicon photonics platform,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 25 (5), 8201210 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2019.2904445 IJSQEN 1077-260X Google Scholar

277. 

A. Alduino, “Demonstration of a high speed 4-channel integrated silicon photonics WDM link with hybrid silicon lasers,” in IEEE Hot Chips 22 Symp., 1 –29 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/HOTCHIPS.2010.7480075 Google Scholar

278. 

S. Chen et al., “Electrically pumped continuous-wave III–V quantum dot lasers on silicon,” Nat. Photonics, 10 (5), 307 –311 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2016.21 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

279. 

Z. Wang et al., “Room-temperature InP distributed feedback laser array directly grown on silicon,” Nat. Photonics, 9 (12), 837 –842 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2015.199 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

280. 

Q. Li et al., “Optical phase modulators based on reverse-biased III-V/Si hybrid metal-oxide-semiconductor capacitors,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 32 (6), 345 –348 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2020.2973174 IPTLEL 1041-1135 Google Scholar

281. 

S. Ohno et al., “Taper-less III-V/Si hybrid MOS optical phase shifter using ultrathin InP membrane,” in Opt. Fiber Commun. Conf., (2020). Google Scholar

282. 

Y. Tang et al., “50  Gb/s hybrid silicon traveling-wave electroabsorption modulator,” Opt. Express, 19 (7), 5811 –5816 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.005811 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

283. 

C. Mattevi, H. Kim and M. Chhowalla, “A review of chemical vapour deposition of graphene on copper,” J. Mater. Chem., 21 (10), 3324 –3334 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/C0JM02126A JMACEP 0959-9428 Google Scholar

284. 

Y. S. Kim et al., “Direct growth of patterned graphene on SiO2 substrates without the use of catalysts or lithography,” Nanoscale, 6 (17), 10100 –10105 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4NR02001D NANOHL 2040-3364 Google Scholar

285. 

X. Li et al., “Large-area synthesis of high-quality and uniform graphene films on copper foils,” Science, 324 (5932), 1312 –1314 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1171245 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar

286. 

R. R. Nair et al., “Fine structure constant defines visual transparency of graphene,” Science, 320 (5881), 1308 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1156965 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar

287. 

K. I. Bolotin et al., “Ultrahigh electron mobility in suspended graphene,” Solid State Commun., 146 (9-10), 351 –355 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2008.02.024 SSCOA4 0038-1098 Google Scholar

288. 

A. S. Mayorov et al., “Micrometer-scale ballistic transport in encapsulated graphene at room temperature,” Nano Lett., 11 (6), 2396 –2399 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl200758b NALEFD 1530-6984 Google Scholar

289. 

V. Sorianello, M. Midrio and M. Romagnoli, “Design optimization of single and double layer graphene phase modulators in SOI,” Opt. Express, 23 (5), 6478 –6490 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.006478 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

290. 

F. Wang et al., “Gate-variable optical transitions in graphene,” Science, 320 (5873), 206 –209 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1152793 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar

291. 

L. A. Falkovsky, “Optical properties of graphene,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 129 012004 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/129/1/012004 JPCSDZ 1742-6588 Google Scholar

Biography

Abdul Rahim is currently working with Professor Roel Baets at the Photonics Research Group of Ghent University. He is the coordinator of ePIXfab, the European Silicon Photonics Alliance. From 2009 to 2014, he worked in the research group of Professor Klaus Petermann and was awarded a doctorate degree by Technische Universitaet Berlin for his work on investigating innovative silicon photonic integrated filters for optical communication systems. Prior to his doctoral work, he worked in various capacities at the R&D departments of numerous public and private sector organizations.

Artur Hermans received his BSc degree in engineering (electronics and information technology) from Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) in 2012, and the European MSc degree in photonics from VUB, Ghent University (UGent), and the University of St. Andrews in 2014. In 2019, he was awarded a PhD by Ghent University for his work on second-order nonlinear optical materials for silicon nitride photonic integrated circuits. Currently, he is working as a postdoctoral researcher in the Photonics Research Group at Ghent University–IMEC.

Benjamin Wohlfeil is currently a manager in the Advanced Technology Department at ADVA Optical Networking in Berlin and is involved in the photonic integration activities of ADVA. He received his Dipl.-Ing. degree in computer science from Technische Universität Berlin in 2008 and the Dr.-Ing. degree in electrical engineering also from Technische Universität Berlin in 2015. From 2014 to 2015, he worked as a postdoc in the Computational Nano-Optics Group at the Konrad-Zuse-Center for applied mathematics. He has authored more than a dozen papers and is inventor of several patents. He is an active contributor to OIF and COBO standardization groups regarding coherent optical transceivers and is principal investigator in several national and European research projects.

Despoina Petousi received her diploma in electrical and computer engineering from Aristotle University of Thessaloniki in 2009 where she received her master’s degree in nanosciences and nanotechnologies in 2011. From 2011 until 2019 she was a researcher in the silicon photonics group of IHP, Leibniz Institut fuer Innovative Mikroelektronik, Frankfurt (Oder). In 2017, she received her PhD from Technische Universitä Berlin under the supervision of Professor Klaus Petermann. Her PhD thesis was focused on the development of integrated silicon photonic modulators with application in future coherent systems for optical communications. Currently, she is a research and development engineer in ADVA mainly focused on the field of photonic integration and next generation transceivers for optical interconnects.

Bart Kuyken received his BSc degree in physics and his BSc and MSc degrees in electrical engineering from Ghent University in 2006 and 2008, respectively, and his additional MSc degree from Stanford University in 2009. After obtaining his PhD from Ghent University in 2013, he focused his postdoctoral work on integrated nonlinear circuits and comb generation and was a visiting worker at the Max Planck Institute for Quantum Optics in 2013 and 2014. Currently, he is an associate professor at Ghent University, where he is looking at electrically pumped comb sources on chip.

Dries Van Thourhout received his MSc degree in physical engineering and his PhD from Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, in 1995 and 2000, respectively. From October 2000 to September 2002, he was at Lucent Technologies, Bell Laboratories, New Jersey, USA, working on the design, processing, and characterization of InP/InGaAsP monolithically integrated devices. In October 2002, he joined the Department of Information Technology (INTEC), Ghent University, Belgium. Currently, he is a member of the permanent staff of the Photonics Group. Since 2008, he has had a position as a full time professor. He is a lecturer for four courses at Ghent University (Microphotonics, Advanced Photonics Laboratory, Photonic Semiconductor Components, and Technology). He coordinates the cleanroom activities of the research group and is coordinator of the NAMIFAB Center of Expertise. His research focuses on the design, fabrication, and characterization of integrated photonic devices. Main topics involve silicon nanophotonic devices and the integration of innovative materials (III–V, graphene, ferro-electrics, quantum dots, etc.) on these waveguides to expand their functionality. He is working on applications for telecom, diatom, optical interconnect, and sensing. He has submitted 14 patents, has authored and coauthored more than 220 journal papers, and has presented invited papers at all major conferences in the domain. He is a member of IEEE Photonics Society, OSA, and SPIE. He has coordinated several European Projects (FP6 PICMOS, FP7 WADIMOS, and FP7 SMARTFIBER), contributed in many more, and received an ERC Grant (ULPPIC). He received the prestigious “Laureaat van de Vlaamse Academie Van België” prize in 2012 and was a Clarivate highly cited researcher.

Roel Baets received his MSc degree in electrical engineering from UGent in 1980, his second MSc degree from Stanford in 1981, and his PhD from UGent in 1984. From 1984 to 1989, he held a postdoctoral position at IMEC. Since 1989, he has been a professor at the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of UGent where he founded the Photonics Research Group. He is a full professor at Ghent University (UGent) and is associated with IMEC. From 1990 to 1994, he was also a part-time professor at Delft University of Technology and, from 2004 to 2008, at Eindhoven University of Technology. He has mainly worked in the field of integrated photonics. He has made contributions to research on photonic integrated circuits, both in III-V semiconductors and in silicon, as well as their applications in telecom, datacom, sensing, and medicine. Web of Science reports more than 600 publications with an h-index more than 60. As part of a team of eight professors, he leads the Photonics Research Group. With about 90 researchers, this group is involved in numerous (inter)national research programs and has created four spin-off companies. The silicon photonics activities of the group are part of a joint research initiative with IMEC. He has led major research projects in silicon photonics in Europe. In 2006, he founded ePIXfab, the first Multi-Project-Wafer service for silicon photonics globally. Since then, ePIXfab has evolved to become the European Silicon Photonics Alliance. He is also a director of the multidisciplinary Center for Nano- and Biophotonics (NB Photonics) at UGent founded in 2010. He was a co-founder of the European MSc Program in photonics. He is an ERC grantee of the European Research Council and a Methusalem grantee of the Flemish Government. He is a fellow of the IEEE, European Optical Society (EOS), and Optical Society (OSA). He is also a member of the Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Sciences and the Arts.

© The Authors. Published by SPIE and CLP under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Abdul Rahim, Artur Hermans, Benjamin Wohlfeil, Despoina Petousi, Bart Kuyken, Dries Van Thourhout, and Roel G. Baets "Taking silicon photonics modulators to a higher performance level: state-of-the-art and a review of new technologies," Advanced Photonics 3(2), 024003 (29 April 2021). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.AP.3.2.024003
Received: 24 September 2020; Accepted: 10 March 2021; Published: 29 April 2021
JOURNAL ARTICLE
23 PAGES


SHARE
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back to Top