Translator Disclaimer
1 April 2021 Far-field super-resolution imaging by nonlinearly excited evanescent waves
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Abbe’s resolution limit, one of the best-known physical limitations, poses a great challenge for any wave system in imaging, wave transport, and dynamics. Originally formulated in linear optics, the Abbe limit can be broken using nonlinear optical interactions. We extend the Abbe theory into a nonlinear regime and experimentally demonstrate a far-field, label-free, and scan-free super-resolution imaging technique based on nonlinear four-wave mixing to retrieve near-field scattered evanescent waves, achieving a sub-wavelength resolution of λ  /  5.6. This method paves the way for numerous new applications in biomedical imaging, semiconductor metrology, and photolithography.

1.

Introduction

The spatial resolution of an imaging system is limited by the Abbe theory,1 posing a great challenge for many areas such as biomedical imaging, astronomy, and photolithography. For example, direct live images are crucial to understanding biological processes at the subcellular level, e.g., virus behaviors;2,3 nanofabrication by photolithography on semiconductor chips is also limited by diffraction. According to Abbe’s theory, sub-wavelength image features are usually associated with near-field evanescent waves, which decay exponentially with distance similar to electron wavefunctions in quantum tunneling.4 Insufficient far-field detection of these evanescent fields in conventional optics with finite numerical apertures (NAs) ultimately precludes imaging resolution better than λ/2. Like scanning tunneling electron techniques in condensed-matter physics converting tunneling currents into conducting ones,5 a near-field scanning optical microscope (NSOM)6 can improve the resolution by converting evanescent waves into propagating ones but requires near-field, nanometer-scale scanning. Similarly, configurations involving evanescent-wave illuminations such as total internal reflection (TIR),7 waveguide,8,9 and surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs)10 also permit enhanced imaging resolution. Recent advancements in metamaterials manipulate near-field evanescent waves using superlens11 and hyperlens,12,13 achieving super-resolution imaging but demanding nanofabrication. On the other hand, x-ray and electron microscopes, even with nanometer resolution, may be potentially harmful in biomedical applications, and it is still highly desirable to break the Abbe limit and realize super-resolution imaging for optical waves.

Nonlinear optics may offer an alternative way to beat the Abbe limit, which is originally formulated for linear waves.1416 By introducing nonlinear spatial wave mixing into an imaging system, it becomes possible to retrieve those undetected waves in the far field and reconstruct them to improve the resolution,15 effectively generalizing the Abbe theory into a nonlinear optics regime. However, evanescent waves are absent in prior works; the imaging resolutions have not reached the wavelength scale yet until this work. Meanwhile, evanescent waves can be manipulated through nonlinear wave mixings1618 based on surface phase-matching conditions, e.g., free-space coupling of SPP19,20 and dark-field imaging.21 These works show a unique way to nonlinearly couple non-propagating evanescent waves with propagating ones into the far field, addressing the key issue for the aforementioned super-resolution imaging problem in the framework of nonlinear Abbe theory. Moreover, it may enable a fluorophore-label-free imaging method in contrast to the existing techniques such as stimulated emission depletion microscopy,22 stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy,3 structured illumination microscopy (SIM),23,24 where label-free imaging techniques are highly desirable not only in biomedical imaging25 but also in other areas such as semiconductor metrology processes.

In this work, we experimentally show nonlinear wave mixings, including evanescent waves in the framework of nonlinear Abbe theory, and demonstrate a far-field, label-free, and scan-free super-resolution imaging scheme to resolve sub-wavelength structures on a semiconductor silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafer. To break the Abbe resolution limit, a nonlinear four-wave mixing (FWM) technique is implemented to excite localized near-field evanescent-wave illumination with large spatial wave vectors such that near-field waves containing the finest sub-wavelength image features can be converted into propagating ones for far-field detection, effectively enlarging the NAs. Combined with an iterative Fourier ptychography (FP) method,26,27 the reconstructed images can reach a resolution limit down to λ/5.6 with respect to the input probe’s wavelength. Moreover, this FWM imaging scheme can also cooperate with nano-slit grating structures, which theoretically can provide additional resolution enhancement. This technique may offer a new way for critical imaging tasks sensitive to fluorescent labels such as biomedical applications, semiconductor processes, and photolithography.

2.

Principles and Methods

According to Abbe’s theory, a target with sub-wavelength structures illuminated by a coherent wave with wave vector k will cause scattering waves to radiate over a wide-angle into the far field. Meanwhile, a portion of scattered light with large wave vectors becomes evanescent and confined only to the target’s surface in the near field. Such evanescent components correspond to portions of large wave-vector magnitude in Fourier space, carrying the finest feature information of the target. How to retrieve these near-field evanescent waves in the far field is the key to beating the Abbe diffraction limit.28

Many prior attempts in the linear case have been implemented to tackle this problem. For example, NSOM,6 a nano-aperture with extreme confinement of light, can excite localized evanescent waves to illuminate sub-wavelength features. Consequently, the evanescent waves will be scattered from the imaging target and converted into propagating ones carrying sub-wavelength information for far-field detection; however, much demanding near-field scanning is always required. Other approaches such as using TIR,7 waveguides,8,9 and SPPs10 for evanescent-wave illumination have to deeply rely on specific material permittivity; as a result, their maximum resolution is limited. Moreover, fluorescent labeling is usually accompanied in these techniques to help distinguish the signal from background for a better-contrasted image.

On the other hand, recent work of nonlinear wave mixing at the interfaces allows nonlinear wavelength conversion under partial-phase-matching conditions between propagating waves and near-field evanescent waves,19,20,29 paving the way for this proposed super-resolution imaging purpose. In this configuration [Fig. 1(a)], a near-field evanescent wave with wave vector k3,eva at frequency ω3 can be excited through nonlinear FWM by the far-field pump ω1 and probe ω2. The evanescent wave will be scattered off by the sub-wavelength target into radiating ones at various angles into the far field. With an appropriate imaging reconstruction, the sub-wavelength information can be retrieved from these converted evanescent waves for super-resolution imaging. This technique does not require fluorescent labeling, near-field scanning, or fabricated structures, which are highly demanded in the linear case.

Fig. 1

The working principle of far-field super-resolution imaging based on nonlinearly excited evanescent waves. (a) Schematic of the far-field super-resolution imaging process with localized evanescent-wave illumination excited by the FWM process at the interface. The zoomed inset shows that the FWM process takes place on nonlinear medium’s interface. (b) Mechanism illustrated in Fourier space. NA and k3,0 represent numerical aperture and the free-space wavenumber of the FWM signal beam, respectively. NA×k3,0 determines the cutoff frequency of the imaging system; correspondingly, the blue-circled area represents the system’s passband. Striped-shadow regions represent evanescent fields, which carry sub-wavelength details of the imaging target. In the current experiment, we introduce evanescent wave vector k3,eva along kx as illumination light, which can map evanescent fields into propagating ones and extend the accessible region of the target’s spectrum on dimension kx.

AP_3_2_025001_f001.png

In the spatial-frequency domain, i.e., k-space [Fig. 1(b)], this scattering process can be described by in-plane momentum conservation:30

Eq. (1)

|k3,x|=|k3,eva2π/Λ|<n3k3,0,
where k3,0 is the free-space wavenumber of FWM and Λ represents various spatial features of the target. In reality, a generic imaging target contains a wide spectrum of spatial modes, extending to a broad region in k-space. Under a normally incident illumination, these spatial modes collected in the far field by an imaging lens with a limited NA lie within the range of |2π/Λ|<NA×k3,0 in k-space [Fig. 1(b)]. In contrast, if illuminated by the nonlinearly excited evanescent wave, the effective passband in k-space of the same imaging system will be shifted by k3,eva [Fig. 1(b)], meaning that most of the passband lies within the evanescent field of the target’s spectrum, which stores the sub-wavelength information. In this manner, these evanescent waves with large wave vectors carrying sub-wavelength details can be retrieved in the far field with a conventional objective lens. If 2D wave-vector-space illumination is adopted, the final accessible region in Fourier space can be extended to the utmost dashed circle [Fig. 1(b)]. Combined with certain reconstruction methods, evanescent fields with different orientations in Fourier space can be replenished like SIM does,24 which effectively enlarges the NA to include these components and far-field super-resolution imaging can be realized.

The key mechanism to excite near-field evanescent waves through FWM can be understood from nonlinear phase-matching conditions at the interface. In linear optics, the laws of reflection and refraction at an interface can be directly deduced from electromagnetic boundary conditions laid out by Fresnel formalism.31 Under the same framework, the well-known linear Snell’s law can be generalized into a nonlinear regime where light waves are incident onto a nonlinear medium boundary by satisfying boundary conditions for all individual frequencies during nonlinear conversions.32 For the case of FWMs, the resulting equations governing reflection and refraction have been developed in Refs. 17 and 29 as well as our prior work,16 where the nonlinear reflection law reads

Eq. (2)

k3sin(θ3)=2k1sin(θ1)k2sin(θ2),
where ki=niωi/c (i=1,2,3) are wavenumbers of the pump, probe, and FWM signal beams, respectively; ni are refractive indices of the ambient medium; θi represent their incident/output angles. Effectively, the relations of these transverse wave vectors represent in-plane momentum conservation laws as shown in Fig. 2(a). Such a partial-phase-matching condition only manifests itself near surfaces21,33 and can be enhanced by thin-film structures.29 More importantly, this reduced-dimension requirement of phase matching can lead to intriguing results where the transverse component of the FWM wave k3,x (denoted by k3,eva for evanescent waves later) can exceed its free-space magnitude k3, i.e., propagating waves. As a consequence, its corresponding vertical component becomes purely imaginary according to k3,z=ik3,x2k32, making the wave evanescent. Ideally, the maximum wavenumber of evanescent-wave illumination can be as large as 2k1+k2 (if the pump/probe beams’ incident angles are 90  deg). The nonlinearly excited evanescent waves are bound at the interface, but with large in-plane wave vectors, which is crucial for the aforementioned scattering imaging process.

Fig. 2

Demonstration of wave vector control in surface FWM and local excitation of evanescent waves. (a) Illustration of the FWM process takes place at the interface and the partial-phase-matching condition. (b), (c) Fourier space images of reflected pump/probe beams λ1, λ2, and signal beam λ3 taken by EMCCD, characterizing incident angles, and output angle, respectively. (d) Dependence of FWM output angle θ3 on probe incident angle θ2 under different pump angles θ1. (e) Numerical simulation result of FWM signal field distribution, which is the case of an evanescent wave with a large transverse wave vector k3,eva localized at the top film of SOI. The inset shows the signal’s amplitude variation along with the interface, where the scale bar represents the wavelength of FWM.

AP_3_2_025001_f002.png

Experimentally, we first verify Eq. (2) in a reflection configuration by synchronously launching a pump and a probe beam onto a flat SOI wafer to excite near-field FWM as shown in Fig. 2(a). Here, two pump photons λ1=532  nm from a frequency-doubled fiber femtosecond laser and a probe photon λ2=780  nm from a customized optical parametric oscillator interact together, exciting one FWM signal photon λ3=403  nm (details in the Supplementary Material and Refs. 34 and 35). Both the incident and output beams are collected at the back focal plane [Figs. 2(b) and 2(c)], which vividly reveals the wave vector distributions in Fourier space. The measured reflection angles of FWM waves θ3 exhibit an upward trend with increasing incident angles of the probe θ2 for a given angle θ1 [Fig. 2(d)], well fitted to the theoretical curves predicted by Eq. (2). Furthermore, this reflection angle θ3 can exceed 90 deg, making the FWM evanescent. Specifically, for the incident angle θ1=30.7  deg (blue curve), the FWM waves become evanescent above the angle θ2=25.9  deg (the maximum collected angle of FWM here is limited to 58.9  deg due to the NA) denoted by a gray region in Fig. 2(d), which is the region of interest to explore our evanescent wave-based sub-wavelength imaging. Also, such nonlinearly excited evanescent waves have been previously demonstrated for surface plasmon coupling19,20 and dark-field imaging.21

To illustrate the case of evanescent wave excitation, we perform a numerical simulation of surface FWM by the finite-difference time-domain method. The calculated |E|2 distribution of the FWM signal shows that the signal wave is localized near the focal spot inside the top silicon layer of the SOI wafer [Fig. 2(e)]. This is a sharp contrast to the nonlinearly excited surface plasmon mode near a metal–dielectric interface,20,36 where surface plasmons can further propagate under certain phase-matching conditions. Such nonlinearly excited FWM waves serve as localized evanescent light sources for sub-wavelength imaging purposes later. According to the aforementioned discussions on imaging resolution, it is essential to obtain large transverse wave vectors for excited evanescent waves. As shown in the inset of Fig. 2(e), the effective wavelength of such an evanescent wave has been reduced to 200  nm, half of its free-space wavelength (403  nm), leading to the relation of wave vectors as k3,eva=2k3,0, which is the same result according to Eq. (2) for given input angles in the simulation (θ1,θ2=40  deg). Effectively, by varying the input angles of the pump and probe beams, we manage to locally excite evanescent waves with variable wave vectors. Such an FWM process enables an active, flexible manner to control the signal beam’s wave vector for the imaging process later.

3.

Results

To demonstrate evanescent wave-based sub-wavelength imaging, we compare image qualities under several illumination schemes in Fig. 3. Consider a double-slit with width w and center-to-center distance a [Fig. 3(j)] illuminated by an evanescent wave with wave vector k3,eva, the reflected far-field image through an NA-limited imaging system in the spatial domain can be formulated as8

Eq. (3)

I(x)=|s(x)+exp(ik3,evaa)s(xa)|2,
where s(x)=h(x)*[exp(ik3,evax)×rect(xw)] is the amplitude distribution of a single slit function centered at x=0, i.e., rect(xw), and h(x) is point spread function of the imaging system. The extra phase term induced by the illumination beam exp(ik3,evax) effectively shifts the angular spectrum of the images in k-space by k3,eva37 as shown in Fig. 3(b), which represents the finer portion of the image with better resolution. For example, the relative phase term exp(ik3,evaa) between the first s(x) and the second slit s(xa) can be out-of-phase in the regime of π2<k3,evaa<3π2, forming a dip in the far-field image [Figs. 3(e) and 3(h)]. In contrast, the same feature cannot be resolved under normal illumination when k2,x=0 [Figs. 3(d) and 3(g)].

Fig. 3

Demonstration of super-resolution imaging using FWM evanescent-wave illumination. Fourier space representation of (a) the probe beam at 780 nm with normal illumination, (b) FWM signal at 403 nm with k3,eva illumination, and (c) the complete imaging method (d)–(f). Simulated images of a pair of 90-nm-wide slits spaced 50 nm apart, corresponding to cases of (a)–(c). (g)–(i) Experimental results. Scale bar: 500 nm. (j) Scanning electron microscopy image of the two-slit target. (k) Inverse-intensity cross-section comparison of probe beam normal illumination image and proposed super-resolution method.

AP_3_2_025001_f003.png

Similar ideas have been realized by TIR,7 SPPs,10 and guided waves8,9 to achieve super-resolution along a single direction in k-space. For a complex target, coherent artifacts will occur and the key issue is to acquire multiple angle-resolved super-resolution images and combine them together to restore a complete super-resolution image. Here, we reconstruct sub-wavelength images using a computational imaging technique named FP26,27 by stacking multiple low-resolution images with pre-determined illumination wave vectors and iteratively reconstructing a final image with much-enhanced resolution as well as eliminated coherent defects (see Supplementary Material). Previously, this technique has shown great successes in wide-field, high-resolution imaging26 and fast live-cell imaging.27 In our case, we extend this technique into a nonlinear optics regime by including nonlinearly excited evanescent illumination, due to flexible control over k3. Using such an FP technique, a complete image of the double slits can be reconstructed by stacking three portions in k-space along the kx axis [Fig. 3(c)], which includes two evanescent waves at the frequency ω3 with opposite directions (k3,eva1=1.56k3,0, k3,eva2=1.58k3,0) and one near-normal illumination (k3,eva3=0.12k3,0). After the iteration converges, an intensity dip appears in the reconstructed image, making the two slits resolvable now [Fig. 3(i)]. Experimentally, a pair of 90-nm-width slits spaced 50 nm apart on SOI substrate [Fig. 3(j)] can be successfully resolved using this technique as shown in Figs. 3(i) and 3(k). The image resolution is sharply improved, in contrast, over those images formed under probe beam normal illumination [Fig. 3(g)] and solely signal illumination at k3,eva1=1.56k3,0 [Fig. 3(h)]. These results are also well confirmed by the numerical simulation [Figs. 3(d) and 3(e)]. Due to the current image system’s limitation, e.g., NA, the estimated image resolution is around 140 nm (center-to-center distance). To further shrink the gap distance and improve the system resolution, the wavenumber k3,eva must be increased accordingly.

For demonstration of super-resolution over a larger field-of-view, we implement this sub-wavelength imaging technique for a nano-slit array with 110-nm slit width and 400-nm period [Figs. 4(a)4(d)]. The fine features are clearly revealed using this technique [Figs. 4(d) and 4(e)] as compared to the blurred one under the probe normal illumination [Fig. 4(c)]. Image contrast has also been significantly improved as shown in Fig. 4(e) because such an FP technique helps to replenish the high spatial frequency parts of images that majorly contribute to a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Meanwhile, localized near-field evanescent waves serve as excellent dark-field illumination sources. After filtering out the pump/probe frequencies, they clear out background noises for the high SNR. In addition, this iterative reconstruction algorithm enables phase-retrieval ability in revealing sensitive information such as depth/height38 and has potential for topographic imaging applications in the future.

Fig. 4

Super-resolved nano-slit grating and evanescent wave excitation on the grating. (a) and (b) Simulated images of a slit array with 110-nm slit width and 400-nm period by probe beam illumination and our super-resolution method, respectively. (c) and (d) Experimental results. Scale bar: 1  μm. (e) Cross-section comparison of the two cases, showing a great improvement in resolution by our method. (f) Experimental demonstration of the modified partial-phase-matching condition mixed with grating modes when θ2=41  deg, solid lines are the theoretical prediction calculated from Eq. (4), and insets show typical k-space images used to estimate the signal’s output angles. (g) Partial-phase-matching condition mixed with grating modes G, making the FWM signal become propagating waves. (h) Partial-phase-matching condition mixed with G, resulting in a further increment of k3,eva.

AP_3_2_025001_f004.png

Interestingly, deposited grating structures can also provide a platform facilitating evanescent wave excitation. The grating introduces an additional in-plane momentum |G|=|±2π/D| (first-order), which is inversely proportional to the spatial period D, to the FWM process. These grating modes can be involved in the nonlinear process14,15 and affect the excited signal beam’s wave vector.29 Under this new scheme, the modified phase-matching condition should include the grating momentum term as

Eq. (4)

k3sin(θ3)=2k1sin(θ1)k2sin(θ2)±nG.

Accordingly, Fig. 4(f) exhibits the angle dependence of FWM on a grating with a period of 320 nm extracted from Fourier space. For a fixed input angle θ2=41  deg, the measured FWM angles are well-matched with theoretical results from Eq. (4) for both ±1st and 2nd grating orders. It is noteworthy that +1st grating mode tends to allow larger FWM output angles than the other two orders even for small input θ1, showing potential for promoting the FWM wavenumber. This can also be understood from in-plane momentum conservation laws [Figs. 4(g) and 4(h)], where the additional grating momentum of +1st order further enlarges the FWM wave vector into the evanescent regime. For instance, given the pump/probe incident angles at their NA’s maximum, the maximum wave vector of the FWM signal can be as large as 4.6k3,0. This implies that the image resolution can be further enhanced if the imaging target is placed on top of this grating, which requires future investigation.

4.

Discussions

In the current configuration, the resolution of our imaging technique can reach around 140 nm, λ/5.6 with respect to the probe’s wavelength. However, it can further be improved if the maximum evanescent wave vector 2k1+k2 is utilized, which requires that the pump/probe beams are illuminated perpendicularly to the direction of observation, similar to light-sheet microscopy.39 In the future, a UV laser source with wavelengths smaller than 300 nm and the assistance from the aforementioned nano-grating structures may finally put the resolution limit down to a few tens of nanometers, showing great potential in sub-wavelength imaging. We expect that this technique could be especially beneficial for semiconductor metrology, where UV absorption would not be an issue for semiconductor materials. As for biomedical imaging applications, our technique offers a label-free, scan-free, and far-field super-resolution capability, which is much demanded in this area. To avoid possible laser damage to the bioimaging samples, we may consider previous similar approaches using nonlinearly excited SPPs to separate laser focus and light-sensitive biosamples.36 But compared with fixed wavelength SPPs/LSPs illumination, our method allows continuous varying of wave vectors, which enables nonlinear FP reconstruction to produce better imaging qualities. Moreover, given the nonlinear nature of FWM, we also expect our method combined with the coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering technique25,40,41 together may offer chemical-specified, far-field super-resolution imaging by pairing pump/probe beams’ frequencies according to molecules’ vibrational energy. Last, in a reversed manner, such nonlinearly excited evanescent waves with large spatial wave vectors are capable of focusing light into tiny spots below the diffraction limit by constructively interfering with each other, showing promise for a new type of high-resolution photolithography mechanism.42

5.

Conclusions

We experimentally demonstrate a super-resolution imaging method based on surface nonlinear FWM-excited evanescent-wave illumination, which enables label-free, far-field imaging well beyond Abbe’s diffraction limit. Such locally excited evanescent waves may also be beneficial for other applications beyond imaging, such as photolithography.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (Grant Nos. 2016YFA0302500 and 2017YFA0303700); National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 92050113 and 11674228); Shanghai MEC Scientific Innovation Program (Grant No. E00075).

References

1. 

E. Abbe, “Beiträge zur Theorie des Mikroskops und der mikroskopischen Wahrnehmung,” Arch. für mikroskopische Anat., 9 (1), 413 –468 (1873). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02956173 0176-7364 Google Scholar

2. 

E. Betzig and J. K. Trautman, “Near-field optics: microscopy, spectroscopy, and surface modification beyond the diffraction limit,” Science, 257 (5067), 189 –195 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.257.5067.189 Google Scholar

3. 

M. J. Rust, M. Bates and X. Zhuang, “Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM),” Nat. Methods, 3 (10), 793 –795 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth929 1548-7091 Google Scholar

4. 

D. J. Griffiths and D. F. Schroeter, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge University Press(2018). Google Scholar

5. 

G. Binnig et al., “Tunneling through a controllable vacuum gap,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 40 (2), 178 –180 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.92999 APPLAB 0003-6951 Google Scholar

6. 

E. A. Ash and G. Nicholls, “Super-resolution aperture scanning microscope,” Nature, 237 (5357), 510 –512 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1038/237510a0 Google Scholar

7. 

P. von Olshausen and A. Rohrbach, “Coherent total internal reflection dark-field microscopy: label-free imaging beyond the diffraction limit,” Opt. Lett., 38 (20), 4066 –4069 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.38.004066 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

8. 

X. Liu et al., “Fluorescent nanowire ring illumination for wide-field far-field subdiffraction imaging,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 118 (7), 076101 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.076101 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

9. 

A. Archetti et al., “Waveguide-PAINT offers an open platform for large field-of-view super-resolution imaging,” Nat. Commun., 10 (1), 1267 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09247-1 NCAOBW 2041-1723 Google Scholar

10. 

F. Wei et al., “Wide field super-resolution surface imaging through plasmonic structured illumination microscopy,” Nano Lett., 14 (8), 4634 –4639 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl501695c NALEFD 1530-6984 Google Scholar

11. 

N. Fang et al., “Sub-diffraction-limited optical imaging with a silver superlens,” Science, 308 (5721), 534 –537 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1108759 Google Scholar

12. 

Z. Jacob, L. V. Alekseyev and E. Narimanov, “Optical hyperlens: far-field imaging beyond the diffraction limit,” Opt. Express, 14 (18), 8247 –8256 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.14.008247 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

13. 

Z. Liu et al., “Far-field optical hyperlens magnifying sub-diffraction-limited objects,” Science, 315 (5819), 1686 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137368 Google Scholar

14. 

C. Barsi, W. Wan and J. W. Fleischer, “Imaging through nonlinear media using digital holography,” Nat. Photonics, 3 (4), 211 –213 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2009.29 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

15. 

C. Barsi and J. W. Fleischer, “Nonlinear Abbe theory,” Nat. Photonics, 7 (8), 639 –643 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.171 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

16. 

J. Cao et al., “Metal-free flat lens using negative refraction by nonlinear four-wave mixing,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 113 (21), 217401 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.217401 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

17. 

S. Palomba et al., “Optical negative refraction by four-wave mixing in thin metallic nanostructures,” Nat. Mater., 11 (1), 34 –38 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3148 NMAACR 1476-1122 Google Scholar

18. 

J. Cao et al., “Nonlinear negative refraction by difference frequency generation,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 108 (19), 191101 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4948974 APPLAB 0003-6951 Google Scholar

19. 

S. Palomba and L. Novotny, “Nonlinear excitation of surface plasmon polaritons by four-wave mixing,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 101 (5), 056802 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.056802 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

20. 

J. Renger et al., “Free-space excitation of propagating surface plasmon polaritons by nonlinear four-wave mixing,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 103 (26), 266802 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.266802 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

21. 

H. Harutyunyan et al., “Nonlinear dark-field microscopy,” Nano Lett., 10 (12), 5076 –5079 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl1033304 NALEFD 1530-6984 Google Scholar

22. 

S. W. Hell and J. Wichmann, “Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated emission: stimulated-emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy,” Opt. Lett., 19 (11), 780 –782 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.19.000780 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

23. 

M. G. L. Gustafsson, “Surpassing the lateral resolution limit by a factor of two using structured illumination microscopy,” J. Microsc., 198 (2), 82 –87 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2818.2000.00710.x JMICAR 0022-2720 Google Scholar

24. 

M. G. L. Gustafsson, “Nonlinear structured-illumination microscopy: wide-field fluorescence imaging with theoretically unlimited resolution,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 102 (37), 13081 –13086 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0406877102 Google Scholar

25. 

C. W. Freudiger et al., “Label-free biomedical imaging with high sensitivity by stimulated Raman scattering microscopy,” Science, 322 (5909), 1857 –1861 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165758 Google Scholar

26. 

G. Zheng, R. Horstmeyer and C. Yang, “Wide-field, high-resolution Fourier ptychographic microscopy,” Nat. Photonics, 7 (9), 739 –745 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.187 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

27. 

L. Tian et al., “Multiplexed coded illumination for Fourier ptychography with an LED array microscope,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 5 (7), 2376 –2389 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.5.002376 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

28. 

J. B. Pendry, “Negative refraction makes a perfect lens,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 85 (18), 3966 –3969 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3966 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

29. 

J. Renger et al., “Surface-enhanced nonlinear four-wave mixing,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 104 (4), 046803 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.046803 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

30. 

L. Novotny and B. Hecht, Principles of Nano-Optics, Cambridge University Press(2012). Google Scholar

31. 

M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light, Elsevier(2013). Google Scholar

32. 

N. Bloembergen and P. S. Pershan, “Light waves at the boundary of nonlinear media,” Phys. Rev., 128 (2), 606 –622 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.128.606 PHRVAO 0031-899X Google Scholar

33. 

X. Guo et al., “Nonreciprocal metasurface with space–time phase modulation,” Light Sci. Appl., 8 (1), 123 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-019-0225-z Google Scholar

34. 

J. Cao et al., “Femtosecond OPO based on MgO:PPLN synchronously pumped by a 532 nm fiber laser,” Laser Phys., 27 (5), 055402 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1555-6611/aa637b LAPHEJ 1054-660X Google Scholar

35. 

R. W. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics, Academic Press(2008). Google Scholar

36. 

B. Simkhovich and G. Bartal, “Plasmon-enhanced four-wave mixing for superresolution applications,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 112 (5), 056802 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.056802 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

37. 

J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics, Roberts and Company Publishers(2005). Google Scholar

38. 

Q. Liu et al., “Surface wave illumination Fourier ptychographic microscopy,” Opt. Lett., 41 (22), 5373 –5376 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.41.005373 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

39. 

H. U. Dodt et al., “Ultramicroscopy: three-dimensional visualization of neuronal networks in the whole mouse brain,” Nat. Methods, 4 (4), 331 –336 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth1036 1548-7091 Google Scholar

40. 

A. Zumbusch, G. R. Holtom and X. S. Xie, “Three-dimensional vibrational imaging by coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 82 (20), 4142 –4145 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.4142 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

41. 

L. Gong et al., “Higher-order coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy realizes label-free super-resolution vibrational imaging,” Nat. Photonics, 14 (2), 115 –122 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-019-0535-y NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

42. 

X. Luo and T. Ishihara, “Subwavelength photolithography based on surface-plasmon polariton resonance,” Opt. Express, 12 (14), 3055 –3065 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPEX.12.003055 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

Biography

Zhihao Zhou is currently a PhD student at Shanghai Jiao Tong University. He received his BS degree from the Department of Physics, East China Normal University in 2017. His current research interests include nonlinear optics and nanophotonics.

Wenjie Wan received his BE degree from the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and his PhD from Princeton University in 2010. After one-year postdoctoral training at Yale University, he joined the faculty of Shanghai Jiao Tong University in 2011, where he is currently an associate professor. His current research interests include nonlinear optics, nanophotonics, and optical microcavity.

Biographies of the other authors are not available.

© The Authors. Published by SPIE and CLP under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Zhihao Zhou, Wei Liu, Jiajing He, Lei Chen, Xin Luo, Dongyi Shen, Jianjun Cao, Yaping Dan, Xianfeng Chen, and Wenjie Wan "Far-field super-resolution imaging by nonlinearly excited evanescent waves," Advanced Photonics 3(2), 025001 (1 April 2021). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.AP.3.2.025001
Received: 23 December 2020; Accepted: 11 March 2021; Published: 1 April 2021
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back to Top