Open Access
1 June 2023 Topological Landau–Zener nanophotonic circuits
Bing-Cong Xu, Bi-Ye Xie, Li-Hua Xu, Ming Deng, Weijin Chen, Heng Wei, Fengliang Dong, Jian Wang, Cheng-Wei Qiu, Shuang Zhang, Lin Chen
Author Affiliations +

Topological edge states (TESs), arising from topologically nontrivial phases, provide a powerful toolkit for the architecture design of photonic integrated circuits, since they are highly robust and strongly localized at the boundaries of topological insulators. It is highly desirable to be able to control TES transport in photonic implementations. Enhancing the coupling between the TESs in a finite-size optical lattice is capable of exchanging light energy between the boundaries of a topological lattice, hence facilitating the flexible control of TES transport. However, existing strategies have paid little attention to enhancing the coupling effects between the TESs through the finite-size effect. Here, we establish a bridge linking the interaction between the TESs in a finite-size optical lattice using the Landau–Zener model so as to provide an alternative way to modulate/control the transport of topological modes. We experimentally demonstrate an edge-to-edge topological transport with high efficiency at telecommunication wavelengths in silicon waveguide lattices. Our results may power up various potential applications for integrated topological photonics.



Topological insulators exhibit many intriguing effects and phenomena in various physical disciplines,14 including electronics, acoustics, and photonics. Topological edge states (TESs), protected by topologically nontrivial phases, have captured wide attention due to their robustness against disorders and imperfections. TES transport has led to many exotic optical effects and applications, such as robust directional couplers,5 one-way waveguides,6 mode-locked waveguides,7 and pseudospin propagation in ring resonator arrays,8 which are of fundamental importance for groundbreaking technologies. TESs are promising for developing energy and information routers in nanophotonic circuits, benefiting from their robust transport and strong localization at the boundaries of topological insulators. Recent works have expanded the research on manipulating TESs, including the adiabatic modulation,911 the nonlinear effect,12 and the complicated braiding.13 A variety of intriguing physical phenomena have been demonstrated in optical systems, such as the edge-to-edge topological transport,5,10,1416 the topological states with tunable localization,17,18 the higher-order topological protection,19,20 the nonlinear excitation of topological modes,21,22 and the non-Abelian process.23,24 These unique phenomena may facilitate the development of many important technologies and applications, including routing energy and information,25 quantized transport,9 nonlinear photonics,26 and quantum computing.27 Though these phenomena have been extensively studied in photonic systems, little work has been focusing on enhancing the coupling effects between TESs under the topological protection through the finite-size effect. Enhancing the interaction between the TESs may provide a way of exchanging light energy between the boundaries of topological lattices, beneficial to the flexible control of TES transport.

The Landau–Zener (LZ) model, initially established to study the dynamics in a two-level quantum system,28,29 can be employed to predict the probability of nonadiabatic tunneling between two energy levels.30,31 This model has been widely applied to investigate the tunneling effect in condensed matter physics,32,33 multi-particle systems,34,35 optical structures,3638 and acoustics.39 The LZ model provides an easy yet effective way to modulate/control the light transport due to its flexible and convenient realization in 2D optical circuits. More recently, researchers have combined the LZ model and the nonparaxiality model to achieve spoof surface plasmon channel conversion in the microwave region.38 However, the previous studies on the LZ model in optical systems were merely focused on its tunneling effects, such as LZ Bloch oscillations36 and Rabi oscillations,37 while its counterpart, the LZ single-band evolution process in optical systems, has been rarely studied to date.

In this paper, we report edge-to-edge channel conversion in a four-level waveguide lattice with the LZ model. We show that it is able to link up the coupling between TESs by the finite-size effect in a two-unit-cell optical lattice to provide an alternative, effective, and dynamic paradigm to modulate/control the transport of topological modes. The waveguide lattice corresponds to an interval of an entire modulation period. The underlying mechanism of such a waveguide lattice is equivalent to a 2D Chern insulator, and the existence of TESs is predicted. The TESs are dynamically controlled with the LZ single-band evolution principle, and a near-unity-efficiency edge-to-edge channel conversion is experimentally demonstrated in the silicon photonic platform at 1550 nm.


Results and Discussion


Landau–Zener Model in Harper Waveguide Lattices

A silicon optical waveguide lattice with the presence of nearest-neighbor coupling is shown in Fig. 1(a), and it is constructed to demonstrate the four-level Harper model.40 The bulk Hamiltonian of the waveguide lattice is

Eq. (1)

where the number sets {m|1,2,3,,M} and {n|1,2,3,4} denote the external and internal degrees of freedom, respectively. In this case, |m,n labels the states on the nth waveguide in the mth unit cell, and M is the number of unit cells. The hopping strength Cn,(nmod4)+1 corresponds to the coupling coefficient whose estimation can be found in Sec. 1 in the Supplementary Material and kn is the propagation constant of the fundamental mode in the nth waveguide [Fig. 1(b)]. The waveguide lattice can be regarded as a four-level Harper model, if the waveguide propagation constant is modulated as kn(βx)=kb+Δkcos(βx+πn/2), with the coupling coefficient Cn,(nmod4)+1 equal to a constant c, where c is the coupling coefficient in Harper model. For the specific configuration studied, we set kb=2.030k0, Δk=0.087k0, and c=0.1k0. The corresponding geometric parameters of the designed waveguide lattice will be provided in detail in the following section. It should be noted that the practical waveguide widths are varied along the propagation direction. As a result, the coupling coefficients are thus slightly different from the values used in the above model. Figure 1(c) shows the propagation constant spectral flow of the four-level Harper model with M=10. The bands are degenerated at the crossing points βx=0.25π and βx=0.75π. The finite-size effect requires employing a limited number of unit cells M. A minimum M=2 is found more suitable to open the gap [Fig. 1(d)]. Interestingly, how the finite-size effect affects the energy bandgap has been studied in the platform of condensed matter physics, and the coupling strength can be characterized by the Berry connection.41

Fig. 1

LZ model in Harper waveguide lattices. (a) Conceptual map of silicon optical waveguide lattice with M unit cells for demonstrating four-level Harper model. The width of the nth waveguide is Wn, determining the propagation constant kn of the fundamental TE waveguide mode, and each waveguide has a height of h=220  nm, and length of l corresponding to the modulation period. The gn,(nmod4)+1 is the separation distance between the nth and ((nmod4)+1)th waveguides, which is closely related to the coupling coefficient Cn,(nmod4)+1. (b) Propagation constant of fundamental TE mode kn versus Wn. The propagation constant spectral flow of Harper model with (c) M=10 and (d) M=2, where βx is the evolution parameter normalized to 2π along the propagation direction. (e) LZ model near βx=0.75π with different coupling coefficients c. All the propagation constant spectra are normalized to the free space wavenumber of light, k0=2π/λ (λ=1.55  μm).


To analyze the evolution of the states around minimum bandgap points, a widely used method is to characterize the band with an approximate two-level model, i.e., the LZ model,31,39

Eq. (2)


Here α is the slope of the band near minimum bandgap points, and δk is the minimum gap size. This model corresponds to a certain modulation interval within an entire period. In the following, we will study the evolution of the state near βx=0.75π.

As the coupling strength is very small, the band is gapless [see the left panel of Fig. 1(e) with c=0.01k0]. The model supports LZ tunneling process only, represented by the dashed blue line in Fig. 1(e), and the state can hop to the nearest band. As the coupling strength is increased to c=0.1k0 [see the middle panel of Fig. 1(e)], both of the LZ tunneling and single-band evolution contribute to the state evolution. The LZ single-band evolution, represented by the solid red line in Fig. 1(e), occurs in the same band.

We have calculated the probability of LZ tunneling and LZ single-band evolution (Sec. 2 in the Supplementary Material). The βx parameter is projected over the propagation distance x with βx=2πx/l, and the equal-probability distance is xc=4αδβxln(2)/[π(δk)2], at which the LZ tunneling and LZ single-band evolution share equal probability. l is the length of the modulation period, affecting the evolution speed. It is worth noticing that a recent study on topological pumps has shown that the evolution speed will influence the final states after traveling an entire cycle.42 With a definition of the evolution speed as δβx/L (L is the actual device length affecting the evolution speed), the tunneling probability is enhanced, associated with weakened adiabaticity (see more details in Sec. 2 in the Supplementary Material). It should be mentioned that the equal-probability distance is not equivalent to the adiabatic limit in quantum mechanics and condensed matter physics.42 The adiabatic approximation condition can be guaranteed with Lxc. As the coupling strength is sharply increased to c=0.5k0 [see the right panel of Fig. 1(e)], the bands are flat near βx=0.75π, allowing LZ single-band evolution. However, it is hard to obtain such strong coupling strength in coupled waveguides. For the waveguide lattice [Fig. 1(a)], the nearest-neighbor coupling coefficient between waveguides approaches 0.221k0 as gn,(nmod4)+1 is close to zero, associated with the upper limit of the energy gap of 0.071k0.


Dynamic Manipulation of Topological Edge States

To demonstrate the LZ single-band evolution, we have designed practical silicon waveguide lattices [Fig. 2(a)] with the spectral flow near βx=0.75π, as shown by the middle panel of Fig. 1(e). Different from a topological pump on the three-level Harper model where periodical modulation potential is required,9,10 our waveguide lattice is described by the four-level Harper model, corresponding to an interval within an entire modulation period, associated with the region bounded by the dashed black frame in Fig. 1(a). In contrast to a topological pump that has gapless spectrum flow, we have used the finite-size effect to open the spectrum flow, which enables us to manipulate TESs through the LZ single-band evolution. For practical experimental implementation, we have employed a linear variation of waveguide widths (see the detailed structural parameters in Sec. 3 in the Supplementary Material), instead of the variation described by a cosine function, as in Fig. 1(a). We first focus on the three cross sections at βx=0.67π, βx=0.75π, and βx=0.83π, and each cross section can be regarded as a 1D four-level near-neighbor hopping chain with bulk momentum-space Hamiltonian,43

Eq. (3)

where C12=0.097k0 (0.096k0 and 0.103k0), C23=0.103k0, C34=0.103k0 (0.096k0 and 0.097k0), C41=0.105k0, k1=2.011k0 (1.969k0 and 1.926k0), k2=2.092k0, k3=2.092k0, and k4=1.926k0 (1.969k0 and 2.011k0) in the cross section at βx=0.67π (0.75π and 0.83π). By solving the eigenstates μn(βy) of the Hamiltonian, the Zak phase of four bands can be calculated as ΦZ,n=iFBZμn(βy)|βy|μn(βy)dβ (see more details in Sec. 4 in the Supplementary Material). Figure 2(b) shows the Zak phases at three different cross sections, indicating that both the first and second bands support nonzero Zak phases corresponding to nontrivial topological phases. The Zak phases of the other two bands are close to zero, corresponding to a trivial topological phase. According to the bulk-boundary correspondence,43 there exist two TESs in the first bandgap. As shown in Fig. 2(c), the two TESs are chiral at the cross sections when βx=0.67π and 0.83π, while their field intensities |E|2 are symmetrical when βx=0.75π.

Fig. 2

Topological phase and edge states of the Harper waveguide lattice. (a) Silicon eight-waveguide lattice with length L, near βx=0.75π. This structure refers to the region bounded by the dashed black frame in Fig. 1(a). (b) The Zak phase of 1D finite chain model corresponding to three different cross sections with βx=0.67π, βx=0.75π, and βx=0.83π. The red and blue dots represent the Zak phase of the first band and fourth band, respectively. The orange and purple rhombus denote the Zak phase of the second band and third band, respectively. (c) The cross-sectional field intensity distributions of |E|2 with βx=0.67π, βx=0.75π, and βx=0.83π. The upper (lower) three figures correspond to TES1 (TES2). (d) The Bloch bands of the waveguide lattice shown in Fig. 1(a) in 2D parameter space βxβy under periodical boundary condition. βy is the Bloch vector in the reciprocal space along the y direction. The Chern numbers of four bands are labeled by the white characters.


The above theoretical analysis on TES is limited to 1D insulators and does not involve dynamic modulation during propagation. Through Fourier transformation and by solving for eigenvalues of the bulk momentum-space Hamiltonian associated with the Harper waveguide lattices in Fig. 1(a), the eigenvalue spectrum k(βx,βy) in the 2D parameter space is presented in Fig. 2(d) (see more details in Sec. 5 in the Supplementary Material). The Chern numbers of the bands are calculated using the Wilson loop method (see more details in Sec. 4 in the Supplementary Material). It should be emphasized that the coupling coefficients used in the Harper waveguide lattice in Fig. 1(a) are slightly different from those used in the actual linear waveguide lattice in Fig. 2(a). However, the difference in coupling coefficients is negligible and hence will not change the nontrivial topological phase. Thus, the TESs are protected by the nonzero Chern numbers within the entire modulation interval. If the adiabatic limit is satisfied (Lxc), the associated TESs will follow the LZ single-band evolution, and the optical field will be transferred from one boundary across the bulk waveguides to another side, i.e., adiabatic edge-to-edge channel conversion. If L is below xc, the TESs will tunnel and the optical field will stay at one boundary.


Simulation and Experimental Demonstration

Numerical simulations by finite-difference time-domain are conducted to verify the LZ dynamics between two TESs. The two TESs are the second and third eigenmodes in the eight-waveguide lattice, and the field intensity is mainly located in the eighth and first waveguides, respectively. We have adjusted the waveguide lengths to illustrate how the degree of adiabaticity affects LZ dynamics. When L=10  μm is below the equal-probability distance xc=16.9  μm, the tunneling process dominates and mode 3 (mode 2) converts to mode 2 (mode 3) in the upper (lower) panel of Fig. 3(a). To quantitively evaluate the percent of optical energy involved in LZ single-band evolution, we have defined the conversion efficiency as the energy ratio of the residual input mode at the output side to the total input mode. There is 74% optical energy tunneled to another mode at 1.55  μm with L=10  μm (see more simulated details in Sec. 6 in the Supplementary Material). When L is approaching xc, the tunneling probability is 50% [Fig. 3(b)]. Mode 2 (mode 3) is excited when mode 3 (mode 2) is injected from the left side. The excited mode and the injected mode undergo interference during propagation. As a result, the field energy is transferred between the first and eighth waveguides during propagation, and the ratio of their energies depends on the propagation distance. The percentage of tunneling to another mode reduces to 44%, while the percentage of adiabaticity is enhanced to 56%, as compared with L=10  μm. When L is further increased and exceeds xc, the LZ single-band evolution dominates and tunneling effect is suppressed, accompanied by edge-to-edge channel conversion with high efficiency [Fig. 3(c)]. The estimated conversion efficiencies of the two TESs all exceed 93% around 1.55  μm with L=100  μm and L=300  μm (see more simulated details in Sec. 6 in the Supplementary Material).

Fig. 3

Edge-to-edge channel converter with different device lengths. The field intensity distributions of |E|2 for edge-to-edge channel conversion of the two TESs in the waveguide lattice in Fig. 2(a). (a) L=10  μm, (b) L=20  μm, and (c) L=100  μm.


The edge-to-edge channel conversion with silicon waveguide lattices is experimentally demonstrated. Figure 4(a) shows the scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the fabricated devices. More fabrication process, structural parameters, and SEM details for sections A, B, and E can be found in Sec. 7 in the Supplementary Material. The amplified SEM image for the waveguide lattice in section C is presented in Fig. 4(b). A tapered waveguide array with 2  μm length is connected to waveguides 2–6 [Fig. 4(c)]. The width of each waveguide shrinks quickly to zero, and hence the bulk energy will be leaky. The resultant optical field energy of TESs is mainly localized at the boundary waveguides (waveguide 1 or waveguide 8), as indicated by the simulation results in Figs. 4(d) and 4(e). The localized optical energy in waveguides 1 and 8 finally outputs through ports 2 and 3, respectively, through two bending waveguides with a bend radius of 35  μm and a straight waveguide, as shown by section D in Fig. 4(a).

Fig. 4

Experimental demonstration. (a) SEM image of the device. The upper (lower) panel is used to test the edge-to-edge channel conversion effect of TES2 (TES1) with L=100  μm. Sections A and E are the grating couplers for coupling in and out of the waveguide energy, respectively. Section B corresponds to the adiabatic coupler for exciting the TESs, and section D represents output branch waveguides for testing the conversion effect. (b) The partially amplified SEM image for section C associated with Fig. 2(a). (c) The amplified SEM image for the region bounded by the dashed-line rectangle in section D. The simulated field intensity distributions of |E|2 with TES2 (d) and TES1 (e). The simulated and experimental power contrast ratio ρ23, ρ32 versus light wavelength with (f) L=100  μm and (g) L=300  μm. The red circles (lines) and blue circles (lines) represent the estimated ρ23 and ρ32 from the experiment (simulation), respectively.


The edge-to-edge channel conversion performance of the two TESs was evaluated by use of power contrast ratio ρ32 and ρ23, with ρ32=(I3I2)/(I2+I3) [see the upper panel in Fig. 4(a)] and ρ23=(I2I3)/(I2+I3) [see the lower panel in Fig. 4(a)]. The optical power at port 2 and port 3, marked as I2 and I3, respectively, is estimated by detecting the optical power with a spectrometer (see Sec. 7.3 in the Supplementary Material for the details of the measurement scheme). Figures 4(f) and 4(g) show the power contrast ratio of the output light with input from mode 2 (mode 3). Either ρ23 or ρ32 maintains a high value around 1.55  μm. It clearly indicates the optical field is transferred from one side to the other with high efficiency. The experimental results show some deviation from simulations, which can be attributed to the fabrication error arising from etching roughness precision and the residual smudges during the fabrication process.

In nanophotonic circuits, waveguide couplers, such as directional/adiabatic couplers,44,45 are key components for routing energy and information. The practical device performance is highly sensitive to the cross-sectional geometry. The topological channel converter based on the LZ single-band evolution shows stronger cross-sectional tolerance, in contrast to these conventional couplers. We have theoretically analyzed the robustness against parameter perturbation by changing the gap separation gn,(nmod4)+1 given in Fig. 1(a). The topological phase transition point is calculated as the distances gn,(nmod4)+1 are varied. The theoretical results indicate the device shows certain robustness against all the gap distances gn,(nmod4)+1 (see more theoretical analysis in Sec. 8.1 in the Supplementary Material). As an example, the experimental results demonstrate that the gap distance g41 can tolerate the perturbation up to |Δg41/g41|=42% (see the experimental validation in Sec. 8.2 in the Supplementary Material). The structural parameters along the y direction are experimentally determined by electron-beam lithography (EBL), whose pattern resolution is much lower than the degree of tolerance for the sample. As for the z direction, the etching error arising from inductively coupled plasma (ICP) is typically below 10 nm. We can therefore ignore the fabrication error along this direction. In addition, we study how the level number N affects the topological phase transition point and find that the topological phase transition point approaches zero as N grows. Although we have only theoretically and experimentally studied a four-level system in our work, a system based on a higher-level Harper model promises even stronger robustness (see more details in Sec. 9 in the Supplementary Material). The presented topological LZ nanophotonic devices can be extended to study other optical fields in nanophotonics. For example, they can serve as wavelength-dependent switches by tuning the operating wavelength to govern whether or not the field jumps between edges, when the device length L is less than or comparable to xc (see the detailed discussions in Sec. 6 in the Supplementary Material). Introducing LZ dynamics into non-Hermitian systems may enable chiral channel conversion.46,47 The scheme may be further extended to non-Abelian adiabatic process on planar nanophotonic integration circuits with the proper design of waveguide lattices supporting higher-order degenerate eigenmodes.23,24



We have proposed LZ dynamics to dynamically manipulate the transport of topological states at optical frequencies. By constructing waveguide lattices with a finite size, LZ tunneling is suppressed. A high-efficiency edge-to-edge channel converter is theoretically designed based on LZ single-band evolution and experimentally verified at telecommunication wavelengths on a silicon platform. The topological LZ optical devices exhibit certain robustness to structural parameters. Theseresults provide an avenue to developing topological LZ nanophotonic devices and empower new opportunities for practical devices and applications. In the meantime, the edge-to-edge channel converter can function as a binary optical switching function unit in optical routing networks on chip.48 We can also use multiple cascaded edge-to-edge channel converters to serve as a multiplexer or demultiplexer through coupling or decoupling multiple channel signals into or out of a bus waveguide.4955


Appendix: Materials and Methods



The fabrication of the devices is combined with three-step EBL, ICP etching, electron-beam evaporation (EBE), and plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD). The first-step EBL and EBE aim to form the Au marks on a silicon-on-insulator wafer for alignment. The second-step EBL and ICP are used to define the grating couplers [sections A and E in Fig. 4(a)]. The adiabatic coupler, silicon waveguide lattices, and output branch waveguides [section B, C, and D in Fig. 4(a)] are fabricated by the third-step EBL and ICP. Finally, PECVD is applied to deposit a 2-μm-thick SiO2 cladding layer to cover the entire device. More details on structural parameters and fabrication are given in Secs. 3 and 7 in the Supplementary Material.



The near-infrared light is provided by an amplified spontaneous emission broadband light source (Amonics ALS-CL-15-B-FA, spectral range from 1528 to 1608 nm). The polarization beam splitter and polarization controller are used to adjust the polarization of the incident light for mode matching with the grating coupler. The optical field after passing through the waveguide array is coupled out of the silicon waveguide and then collected by the optical power meter (AV633 4D) and spectrometer (Yokogawa AQ6370). More details on the measurements have been shown in Sec. 7.3 in the Supplementary Material.

Code and Data Availability

Structural parameters and simulated and experimental data have been provided within the main text and Supplementary Material of this paper. All the other data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. The code that supports the plots within this paper is available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.


This work has been supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12074137 and 61875042); the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Nos. 2021YFB2801903 and 2020YFB1313700); the startup funding of the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen (Grant No. UDF01002563); the State Key Laboratory of Artificial Microstructure and Mesoscopic Physics (Peking University); the State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing (Wuhan University of Technology); and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (Grant No. Y201911). C.W.Q. acknowledges the support by Ministry of Education, Singapore (Grant No. A-8000708-00-00). We thank Pan Li and Jun Su in the Center of Micro-Fabrication and Characterization (CMFC) of WNLO for the support in PECVD; the Center for Nanoscale Characterization and Devices (CNCD), WNLO, HUST for the support in SEM measurement; and the Nanofabrication Laboratory of the National Center for Nanoscience and Technology for sample fabrication. B.-C.X. and L.C. conceived the idea and initiated the work. L.C. guided the project. B.-C.X. developed the theoretical framework and performed the numerical simulations. L.-H.X. and F.-L.D. fabricated the experimental devices. B.-C.X. developed the setup and performed the measurements. B.-Y.X., L.C., W.-J.C., C.-W.Q., and S.Z. discussed the results. B.-C.X., L.C., B.-Y.X., S.Z., W.-J.C., and C.-W.Q. wrote the manuscript and all authors reviewed the manuscript. Prof. Shuang Zhang is in the editorial board and the other authors declare that we have no competing interests.



J. E. Moore, “The birth of topological insulators,” Nature, 464 194 –198 (2010). Google Scholar


H. Xue, Y. Yang and B. Zhang, “Topological acoustics,” Nat. Rev. Mater., 7 974 –990 (2022). Google Scholar


Z. Chen and M. Segev, “Highlighting photonics: looking into the next decade,” eLight, 1 2 (2021). Google Scholar


M. Hafezi et al., “Imaging topological edge states in silicon photonics,” Nat. Photonics, 7 1001 –1005 (2013). Google Scholar


W. Song et al., “Robust and broadband optical coupling by topological waveguide arrays,” Laser Photonics Rev., 14 1900193 (2020). Google Scholar


G. J. Tang et al., “Topological photonic crystals: physics, designs, and applications,” Laser Photonics Rev., 16 (4), 2100300 (2022). Google Scholar


Y. Chen et al., “Topologically protected valley-dependent quantum photonic circuits,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 126 230503 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2021). Google Scholar


L. Xie, L. Jin and Z. Song, “Antihelical edge states in two-dimensional photonic topological metals,” Sci. Bull., 68 255 –258 (2023). Google Scholar


D. J. Thouless, “Quantization of particle transport,” Phys. Rev. B, 27 6083 –6087 (1983). Google Scholar


Y. E. Kraus et al., “Topological states and adiabatic pumping in quasicrystals,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 109 106402 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2012). Google Scholar


S. Longhi, “Topological pumping of edge states via adiabatic passage,” Phys. Rev. B, 99 155150 (2019). Google Scholar


R. Banerjee, S. Mandal and T. C. H. Liew, “Coupling between exciton-polariton corner modes through edge states,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 124 063901 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2020). Google Scholar


T. Iadecola, T. Schuster and C. Chamon, “Non-Abelian braiding of light,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 117 073901 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2016). Google Scholar


M. Verbin et al., “Topological pumping over a photonic Fibonacci quasicrystal,” Phys. Rev. B, 91 064201 (2015). Google Scholar


W. Liu et al., “Observation of edge-to-edge topological transport in a photonic lattice,” Phys. Rev. A, 105 L061502 (2022). Google Scholar


L. Sun et al., “Broadband and fabrication tolerant power coupling and mode-order conversion using Thouless pumping mechanism,” Laser Photonics Rev., 16 (11), 2200354 (2022). Google Scholar


L. J. Maczewsky et al., “Observation of photonic anomalous Floquet topological insulators,” Nat. Commun., 8 13756 NCAOBW 2041-1723 (2017). Google Scholar


E. Lustig et al., “Photonic topological insulator in synthetic dimensions,” Nature, 567 356 –360 (2019). Google Scholar


J. Noh et al., “Topological protection of photonic mid-gap defect modes,” Nat. Photonics, 12 408 –415 NPAHBY 1749-4885 (2018). Google Scholar


M. Li et al., “Higher-order topological states in photonic kagome crystals with long-range interactions,” Nat. Photonics, 14 89 –94 NPAHBY 1749-4885 (2019). Google Scholar


M. S. Kirsch et al., “Nonlinear second-order photonic topological insulators,” Nat. Phys., 17 995 –1000 NPAHAX 1745-2473 (2021). Google Scholar


Z. Hu et al., “Nonlinear control of photonic higher-order topological bound states in the continuum,” Light Sci. Appl., 10 164 (2021). Google Scholar


X.-L. Zhang et al., “Non-Abelian braiding on photonic chips,” Nat. Photonics, 16 390 –395 NPAHBY 1749-4885 (2022). Google Scholar


Y.-K. Sun et al., “Non-Abelian Thouless pumping in photonic waveguides,” Nat. Phys., 18 1080 –1085 NPAHAX 1745-2473 (2022). Google Scholar


T. Ozawa et al., “Topological photonics,” Rev. Mod. Phys., 91 015006 RMPHAT 0034-6861 (2019). Google Scholar


D. Smirnova et al., “Nonlinear topological photonics,” Appl. Phys. Rev., 7 021306 (2020). Google Scholar


C. Nayak et al., “Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation,” Rev. Mod. Phys., 80 1083 –1159 RMPHAT 0034-6861 (2008). Google Scholar


L. D. Landau, Zur Theorie der Energieubertragung II, Zeitschrift fur Physik, Sowjetunion (1932). Google Scholar


C. Zener, “Non-adiabatic crossing of energy levels,” Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 137 696 –702 PRLAAZ 1364-5021 (1932). Google Scholar


N. V. Vitanov and B. M. Garraway, “Landau-Zener model: effects of finite coupling duration,” Phys. Rev. A, 53 4288 –4304 (1996). Google Scholar


N. V. Vitanov, “Transition times in the Landau-Zener model,” Phys. Rev. A, 59 988 –994 (1999). Google Scholar


X. Xu, Z. Zhang and Z. Liang, “Nonequilibrium Landau-Zener tunneling in exciton-polariton condensates,” Phys. Rev. A, 102 033317 (2020). Google Scholar


C. M. Ekengoue et al., “Polariton condensate and Landau-Zener-Stückelberg interferometry transition in multilayer transition metal dichalcogenides,” Phys. Scr., 97 025801 PHSTBO 0031-8949 (2022). Google Scholar


S. S. Zhang et al., “Symmetry-breaking assisted Landau-Zener transitions in Rydberg atoms,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 120 063203 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2018). Google Scholar


A. Maroufian, M. Hosseini and F. Ahmadinouri, “Effect of the next-nearest-neighbor’s interaction on the population transfer in a four-particle Landau-Zener system,” OSA Contin., 4 290 –298 (2021). Google Scholar


Y. Sun et al., “Observation of valley Landau-Zener-Bloch oscillations and pseudospin imbalance in photonic grapheme,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 121 033904 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2018). Google Scholar


W.-X. Liu et al., “Time-domain Landau-Zener-Stückelberg-Majorana interference in an optical lattice clock,” Phys. Rev. A, 104 053318 (2021). Google Scholar


A. Xie et al., “Nonparaxiality-triggered Landau-Zener transition in spoof plasmonic waveguides,” Phys. Rev. B, 106 174301 (2022). Google Scholar


Z. G. Chen et al., “Landau-Zener transition in the dynamic transfer of acoustic topological states,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 126 054301 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2021). Google Scholar


P. G. Harper, “The general motion of conduction electrons in a uniform magnetic field, with application to the diamagnetism of metals,” Proc. Phys. Soc. A, 68 879 (1955). Google Scholar


G. J. Ferreira et al., “Zitterbewegung and bulk-edge Landau-Zener tunneling in topological insulators,” Phys. Rev. B, 98 165120 (2018). Google Scholar


L. Privitera et al., “Nonadiabatic breaking of topological pumping,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 120 106601 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2018). Google Scholar


J. K. Asbóth, L. Oroszlány and A. Pályi, A Short Course on Topological Insulators: Band Structure and Edge States in One and Two Dimensions, Springer, London (2015). Google Scholar


E. A. J. Marcatili, “Dielectric rectangular waveguide and directional coupler for integrated optics,” Bell Syst. Tech. J., 48 2059 BSTJAN 0005-8580 (1969). Google Scholar


T. A. Ramadan, R. Scarmozzino and Jr. R. M. Osgood, “Adiabatic couplers: design rules and optimization,” J. Lightwave Technol., 16 277 JLTEDG 0733-8724 (1998). Google Scholar


J. W. Yoon et al., “Time-asymmetric loop around an exceptional point over the full optical communications band,” Nature, 562 86 –90 (2018). Google Scholar


A. Li et al., “Hamiltonian hopping for efficient chiral mode switching in encircling exceptional points,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 125 187403 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2020). Google Scholar


Q. Chen et al., “Universal method for constructing N-port non-blocking optical router based on 2 × 2 optical switch for photonic networks-on-chip,” Opt. Express, 22 12614 –12627 OPEXFF 1094-4087 (2014). Google Scholar


H. Jia et al., “Microring modulator matrix integrated with mode multiplexer and de-multiplexer for on-chip optical interconnect,” Opt. Express, 25 422 –430 OPEXFF 1094-4087 (2017). Google Scholar


S. L. Chuang, “A coupled mode formulation by reciprocity and a variational principle,” J. Lightwave Technol., 5 5 –15 JLTEDG 0733-8724 (1987). Google Scholar


J. Zak, “Berry’s phase for energy bands in solids,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 62 2747 –2750 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (1989). Google Scholar


C. K. Chen, “Electron-beam lithography error sources,” Proc. SPIE, 471 2 –7 PSISDG 0277-786X (1984). Google Scholar


S. Yao and Z. Wang, “Edge states and topological invariants of non-Hermitian systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 121 086803 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2018). Google Scholar


M. Kremer et al., “A square-root topological insulator with non-quantized indices realized with photonic Aharonov-Bohm cages,” Nat. Commun., 11 907 NCAOBW 2041-1723 (2020). Google Scholar


A. L. C. Hayward et al., “Effect of disorder on topological charge pumping in the Rice-Mele model,” Phys. Rev. A, 103 043310 (2021). Google Scholar


Fengliang Dong received his PhD from the Department of Modern Mechanics at University of Science and Technology of China in 2007. He worked as a postdoc at INESC-MN, Portugal, during the period from 2008 to 2011. He is currently a professor at National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, China, with research interests that include nanofabrication, optical metasurfaces, pixelated polarizer arrays, etc.

Cheng-Wei Qiu was appointed Dean’s Chair Professor twice (2017-2020 and 2020-2023) in the College of Design and Engineering at National University of Singapore (NUS). He is a Fellow of SPIE, Optica, and the US Electromagnetics Academy. Well-known for his research in structured light and interfaces, he has published over 460 peer-reviewed journal papers. He was the recipient of the SUMMA Graduate Fellowship in Advanced Electromagnetics in 2005, the IEEE AP-S Graduate Research Award in 2006, the URSI Young Scientist Award in 2008, the NUS Young Investigator Award in 2011, the MIT TR35@Singapore Award in 2012, the Young Scientist Award from Singapore National Academy of Science in 2013, the NUS Faculty Young Researcher Award in 2013, the SPIE Rising Researcher Award in 2018, the 2018 Young Engineering Research Award and the 2021 Engineering Researcher Award from NUS, the 2021 World Scientific Medal from the Institute of Physics, Singapore, and the Achievement in Asia Award (Robert T. Poe Prize) from the International Organization of Chinese Physicists and Astronomers in 2022. He was listed by Web of Science among Highly Cited Researchers in 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022. He has been serving as Associate Editor for various journals such as JOSA B, PhotoniX, and Photonics Research, and as Editor-in-Chief for eLight. He serves on the Editorial Advisory Board for Laser and Photonics Review, Advanced Optical Materials, and ACS Photonics.

Shuang Zhang received BS and MS degrees in physics from Jilin University, China, in 1996; MS in physics from Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, in 1999; and PhD in Electrical Engineering from the University of New Mexico in 2005. In 2020, he joined the University of Hong Kong as Chair Professor. Prof. Zhang's research covers metamaterials, nanophotonics, topological photonics, and nonlinear optics. He currently serves as Co-Executive Editor-in-Chief for Light: Science & Applications, and editorial board member for Advanced Photonics. He has published more than 200 papers in journals including Science, Nature, Nature Physics, Nature Materials, and Physical Review Letters. He was the recipient of IUPAP award in Optics (2010), ERC consolidator grant (2015-2020), Royal Society Wolfson Research Award (2016-2021). He was elected OSA fellow in 2016, APS fellow in 2022, and has been on the list of highly cited researchers (by Clarivate) since 2018.

Lin Chen is currently a professor at Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST). He received his Bachelor in Physics from Wuhan University in 2005, PhD in photonics from the same University in 2010 under the supervision of Prof. Guoping Wang. Before joining HUST, he was a Postdoctoral Fellow at McMaster University, working with Profs. Weiping Huang and Xun Li. His current interests focus on plasmonics, metamaterials, topological photonics, silicon photonics, and their applications. Dr. Chen has authored and co-authored more than 60 research papers in such journals as Nature Nanotechnology, Nature Communications, and Physical Review Letters. He has been invited to give more than 30 invited talks in academic conferences. He was a recipient of the second prize Natural Science Award of Hubei province in 2020, and is currently a member of SPIE as well as Optica, IEEE, and the Chinese Optical Society. He currently serves as an associate editor for Optical Materials Express and as a youth editorial board member for China Science, Acta Photonica Sinica, and Frontiers of Optoelectronics.

Biographies of the other authors are not available.

CC BY: © The Authors. Published by SPIE and CLP under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Bing-Cong Xu, Bi-Ye Xie, Li-Hua Xu, Ming Deng, Weijin Chen, Heng Wei, Fengliang Dong, Jian Wang, Cheng-Wei Qiu, Shuang Zhang, and Lin Chen "Topological Landau–Zener nanophotonic circuits," Advanced Photonics 5(3), 036005 (1 June 2023).
Received: 1 February 2023; Accepted: 4 May 2023; Published: 1 June 2023 Logo
Cited by 2 scholarly publications.




Wave propagation


Quantum tunneling

Back to Top