Open Access
18 September 2024 Chip-scale nonlinear bandwidth enhancement via birefringent mode hybridization
Tingge Yuan, Jiangwei Wu, Xueyi Wang, Chengyu Chen, Hao Li, Bo Wang, Yuping Chen, Xianfeng Chen
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

On-chip quantum information network requires qubit transfer between different wavelengths while preserving quantum coherence and entanglement, which requires the availability of broadband upconversion. Herein, we demonstrate a mode-hybridization-based broadband nonlinear frequency conversion on X-cut thin film lithium niobate. With the spontaneous quasi-phase matching and quasi-group-velocity matching being simultaneously satisfied, broadband second-harmonic generation with a 3-dB bandwidth up to 13 nm has been achieved in a micro-racetrack resonator. The same mechanism can work on the frequency conversion of the ultrashort pulse in the bent waveguide structure. This work will be beneficial to on-chip tunable frequency conversion and quantum light source generation on integrated photonic platforms and further enable on-chip large-capacity multiplexing, multichannel optical information processing, and large quantum information networks.

1.

Introduction

An efficient second-order nonlinear process with widely tunable pump bandwidth has always been a pursued goal, owing to extensive applications in wavelength division multiplexing networks,1 ultrashort pulse nonlinearity,2 quantum key distribution,35 and broadband single-photon source generation.6,7 In general, broad nonlinear bandwidth requires the phase-matching condition to be satisfied over a wide spectral range, which is equivalent to the simultaneous matching of both the group-velocity and phase-velocity of the interacting waves in the time domain.810

Lithium niobate has been acknowledged as an excellent platform for nonlinear application. Highly efficient second-harmonic generation (SHG)11 and broadband SHG9 have been demonstrated on periodically poled lithium niobate (PPLN). In the last decade, thin-film lithium niobate (TFLN) has emerged as an ideal platform to manipulate and investigate the nonlinear interaction in the wavelength-scale,1216 where the compact optical structures could not only enable the huge enhancement of the conversion efficiency by tightly confining the optical field1719 but also provide degrees of freedom to tailor the group velocity, as well as the group-velocity dispersion through the structural geometry.20 As a result, broadband SHG under the waveguide configuration on TFLN has been extensively studied in recent years.2125 Using the quasi-phase matching (QPM) technique,26,27 broadband SHG bandwidth over hundreds of nanometers has been demonstrated in the dispersion-engineered periodically poled ridged waveguide on TFLN,23 where the fundamental wave (FW) and second-harmonic (SH) wave have the same group velocity and stable overlap over the whole propagation distance, as the diagram in Fig. 1(a) has illustrated. Other methods that introduce the nonuniformity to broaden the bandwidth have also been reported,2830 while these conversion efficiencies are relatively low due to the limited interaction length.

Fig. 1

Schematics of the (a) direct GVM,23 (b) QGVM realized by TDL,32 and (c) anomalous GVMM in the phase-matched SHG process, where δ=VgSH1VgFW1.

AP_6_5_056012_f001.png

In addition to direct group-velocity matching (GVM) by dispersion engineering or material nature, another alternative method of quasi-group-velocity matching (QGVM) has been used to achieve broadband nonlinear frequency conversion. This idea was first proposed by Fejer31 [see Fig. 1(b)], which introduced a wavelength-selected time-delay line (TDL) in periodically poled bulk LN32 and latter applied to fiber optics.3335 In this scheme, group velocities of interacting waves are no longer required to be always matched along the propagation direction, but rather the structure geometry is required to satisfy a certain ratio depending on the accumulated group-velocity mismatch. However, TDL-based devices typically suffer from a relatively large footprint, which puts forward an urgent need to realize the chip-scale integration for QGVM-based broadband nonlinearity.

Recently, anisotropic properties of the X-cut TFLN have been widely studied and applied to electro-optic modulation,36,37 polarization manipulation,38,39 sensing resolution enhancement,40 and poling-free QPM with the spontaneously inverted nonlinear coefficient.41,42 To tailor the dispersion as well as the group velocity, such anisotropy also provides a potential path through birefringence-induced mode hybridization,43,44 which can introduce the anomalous group-velocity mismatch (GVMM) and compensate for the temporal walk-off between FW and SH waves in a single waveguide, as Fig. 1(c) has illustrated. Based on the two routes, this paper demonstrates the greatly improved nonlinear bandwidth in the micronanophotonic structures on X-cut TFLN. Our experimental results show that broadband SHG can be found in a racetrack resonator or bent waveguide with a specific geometrical structure, in which the spontaneous quasi-phase-matching (SQPM) and QGVM are proven to be simultaneously satisfied in our simulation. Our study will open a new avenue toward broadband nonlinear functional devices on the anisotropic materials-based on-chip photonic platform.

2.

Principles and Design

A schematic of the typical structure proposed in this work is shown in Fig. 2(a). Here, a general SHG process is considered in a microracetrack resonator on X-cut TFLN, which has a straight section length of L0 and a half-circle radius of R. The straight waveguide is aligned with the Y axis. As the TE-polarized FW and SH light circulate in the racetrack resonator, corresponding effective nonlinear coefficient deff varies with the direction of the wave vector k in the relationship of

Eq. (1)

deff(θ)=d22cos3θ+d31cos2θsinθ+d33sin3θ,
where θ is the propagation azimuthal angle. From the above equation, we can see that deff oscillates between the d33 and d33 in a 2π-period of θ, and it reaches the maximum and minimum values in two straight waveguides. The SHG process also depends on the phase mismatch between the FW and SH light. In the different sections of the racetrack resonator, the accumulated phase-mismatch can be calculated as follows:

Eq. (2)

Δϕ1=Δk1L0,Δϕ2=0πΔk2(θ)Rdθ=Δk2πR,
where Δk1 and Δk2(θ) are the vector mismatch in the straight waveguide and the birefringent half-circle waveguide, respectively, which have the expression of the Δk1(2)=4πΔn1(2)/λ with the FW wavelength λ and the effective refractive index difference Δn1(2) between the FW and SH. For simplicity, we use Δk2 as a reduced form of Δk2(θ) in the following analysis, which is defined by Δk2=1π0πΔk2(θ)dθ. Analogous to the common QPM process in the PPLN, the realization of the perfect SQPM requires Δϕ1=mπ and Δϕ2=2Nπ, where m is an odd number and N is an integer, corresponding to the QPM condition and continuation condition, respectively. In this case, the SH intensity will grow continuously in the poling-free racetrack resonator, as shown by the inset in Fig. 2(b). Furthermore, at the cost of some conversion efficiency, the above requirements can be further relaxed to the condition of

Eq. (3)

Δϕ1+Δϕ2=(2  N+m)π,Δϕ1mod2π0,
which means that the slight shift from the mπ in the Δϕ1 can be compensated by that in the Δϕ2, so that an overall phase relationship between the FW and SH in a period remains unchanged. Compared to the other phase-matching methods, the conversion efficiency of the SQPM depends mainly on the structure size and is therefore usually lower than that of the common PPLN-based QPM.

Fig. 2

(a) Schematic of the birefringent racetrack resonator on X-cut TFLN, where SH-band light experiences a mode-hybridization in the half-circle waveguide; (b) principle of SQPM [inset: varying SQPM SHG intensity with the periodically inverted efficient nonlinear coefficient (m=5), and a comparison among the SHG processes under the perfect phase-matching, QPM, SQPM, and phase mismatching]; (c) effective refractive indices of the hybrid mode in SH-band and TE0 mode in FW-band in the half-circle waveguide, and the vector mismatch dispersion between them; (d) average vector mismatch dispersion versus different FW wavelengths, which is positive in the straight waveguide and negative in the half-circle waveguide.

AP_6_5_056012_f002.png

Based on Eq. (3), we have the broadband SQPM condition, which requires at least the first-order derivative of Δϕ1+Δϕ2 to be equal to 0 at the central FW wavelength λ0, which satisfies SQPM. Combining Eqs. (2) and (3), it can be derived to an equation related to the racetrack structure and dispersion, in the form of

Eq. (4)

L0(dΔk1dλ)λ0=πR(dΔk2dλ)λ0.

In general, it is difficult to fulfill Eq. (4) in an isotropic platform because the sign of dΔk/dλ is hard to change due to the relatively consistent mode transition between the straight and half-circle waveguides. However, for a birefringent racetrack resonator, the potential mode-hybridization in the half-circle waveguide could provide another degree of freedom to manipulate the modal dispersion. For example, in a ridge waveguide with a top width of 1  μm and a height of 0.38  μm, the FW light with a wavelength of 1550 nm will maintain the single-mode condition during the intracavity propagation, while the SH light with the wavelength of 775 nm will experience a strong mode hybridization in the half-circle waveguide, as shown in Fig. 2(a). Therefore, its modal dispersion, as well as dΔk2/dλ can be significantly changed compared to dΔk1/dλ in the straight waveguide.

Specifically, we have simulated the effective refractive indices of all possible modes in the SH and FW bands in the half-circle waveguide on the X-cut TFLN. The conformal transformation was used to deal with the effect of the waveguide bending. In the SH band, the imported TE0 mode in the straight waveguide gradually transforms to the TM1 mode and then to the TE1 mode, as the propagation direction has been rotated by 90 deg in the quarter-circle waveguide. In Fig. 2(c), the width of the blue and red lines represents the change of indices in the FW wavelength range from 1530 to 1570 nm, from which it is obvious to see the different dispersion property at three stages of SH. The dashed line shows the θ-dependent dΔk2/dλ at the FW wavelength of 1550 nm in the half-circle waveguide. When both the FW and SH are in the TE0 modes, dΔk2/dλ has a positive value as in the straight waveguide, while when the SH transfers to the higher-order modes, the sign of dΔk2/dλ rapidly changes to negative. The average vector-mismatch dispersion in the straight and half-circle waveguides has been calculated versus the FW wavelength in Fig. 2(d), which shows an opposite sign over a broadband from 1520 to 1570 nm. From a time-domain point of view, the temporal walk-off accumulated in the straight waveguide between the interacting pulses in the FW and SH bands can be reduced or even compensated if the racetrack geometry satisfies Eq. (4), which means that these two pulses will overlap again when they enter the next straight waveguide.

3.

Results

To experimentally demonstrate the mode-hybridization-induced broadband SQPM SHG, we have first designed a dual-resonant 111th-order perfect SQPM racetrack resonator with a straight waveguide length L0 of 245.4  μm and a half-circle radius R of 129.03  μm, corresponding to Δϕ1=111π and Δϕ2=2×91π at the FW wavelength of 1540 nm. Details of the design process can be found in Ref. 42. It is worth noting that the choice of geometric parameters is mainly determined by the fabrication process. By improving the machining process or using deep etching to suppress bending loss, the size of the microcavity can be further reduced if the above conditions are met. In this work, we focus on the dispersion property of this structure, as shown in Fig. 3(a). For the designed R and L0, Δϕ1 decreases for the longer FW wavelength and Δϕ2 vice versa, both of which have a close absolute value of the slope. Furthermore, we calculate the phase-mismatch summation in Fig. 3(b) and find it takes an extremum [d(Δϕ1+Δϕ2)/dλ=0] around the FW wavelength of 1560 nm, while the QPM condition (Δϕ1+Δϕ2=293π) is fulfilled at that of 1540 nm. By slightly tuning the temperature or the geometric parameter, the SQPM and QGVM conditions can be realized simultaneously. For example, as the temperature has risen by 10 K, and the L0 has been reduced by 100 nm, the zero points of Δϕ1+Δϕ2293π and its first-order dispersion may shift and eventually meet at the FW wavelength of about 1552 nm. A detailed comparison is shown in Fig. 3(c). At the central FW wavelength of the perfect SQPM condition, Δϕ1 is equal to 111π, indicating a theoretically highest SH intensity; when it is shifted to 110.6π under the broadband SQPM condition, the overall SH intensity will be slightly lower. However, since the absolute change of Δϕ1 is always within π, and in most cases less than π/2 as the FW wavelength is scanned from 1530 to 1570 nm, the conversion efficiency is not affected too much.

Fig. 3

(a) Calculated phase mismatch Δϕ1 in the straight waveguide and phase mismatch Δϕ2 in the half-circle waveguide of a perfect 111th-order SQPM racetrack resonator, and (b) their summation, presented by Δϕ1+Δϕ2293π. A detailed comparison between (c1), the perfect narrowband SQPM, and (c2), a phase-compensated broadband SQPM. The solid and dashed lines denote the absolute phase-mismatch summation |Δϕ1+Δϕ2293π| and its dispersion |d(Δϕ1+Δϕ2)/dλ|, respectively.

AP_6_5_056012_f003.png

In our experiment, 111th-order perfect and phase-compensated SQPM racetrack resonators have been fabricated and characterized; the fabrication process can be found in Ref. 42. A pulley-type bus waveguide is used for on-chip coupling of the resonator, which has a center angle of 30 deg, top width of 0.8  μm, and gap of 0.6  μm, respectively. Figure 4(a) shows the experimental setup. A pair of grating couplers is used to couple the light in and out of the chip. The transmission spectrum of the FW light is recorded by an OSC under the small signal condition, and that of the shorter racetrack resonator is shown in Fig. 4(b). A typical TE0 mode around the wavelength of 1550 nm is zoomed in and fitted by the Lorentzian function, which shows an intrinsic Q factor of 155,000. Measured SH intensities in two resonators at different resonant modes of FW are shown in Fig. 4(d), from which a relatively large SHG spectrum from 1540 to 1565 nm can be observed with a 3-dB bandwidth of about 13 nm under phase-compensated SQPM. Compared with the SH bandwidth, we obtained in the perfect SQPM resonator, the bandwidth is significantly enhanced over 10-fold. For the broadband SHG, the highest on-chip SH power of about 100 nW is measured at the FW wavelength of 1555 nm under an on-chip pump power of 20 mW. The relatively low conversion efficiency can be attributed to the large SQPM order number used here. By exploring the lower-order SQPM (see the Supplementary Material), broad bandwidth and improved conversion efficiency can be achieved simultaneously. In addition, we find the SH intensity has a relatively large fluctuation with the FW wavelength from 1548 to 1558 nm, which can be attributed to the different coupling conditions and resonant mode mismatch.

Fig. 4

(a) Experimental setup. EDFA, erbium-doped optical fiber amplifier; PC, polarization controller; TEC, thermal electronic cooler; WDM, wavelength division multiplexer; OSA, optical spectrum analyzer; PD, photodetector; OSC, oscilloscope; (b) transmission spectrum of the SQPM racetrack resonator in C-band and (c) Lorentzian fitting of the marked resonance dip; (d) SHG intensity obtained at each FW resonance mode.

AP_6_5_056012_f004.png

4.

Discussion

Furthermore, we show that the mode-hybridization-induced QGVM can be combined with the SQPM in the bent waveguide configuration, as the schematic shown in Fig. 5(a). Compared with the SQPM-based racetrack resonator, the SQPM bent waveguide breaks the restriction of resonance, and thus can be applied to generate the SH light in a continuous broadband spectrum instead of a series of discrete modes. By selecting different hybrid modes in the SH band, we have designed the first-order SQPM bent waveguide with the QGVM satisfied at the same time; a detailed theoretical analysis can be found in the Supplementary Material. As shown in Fig. 5(b), here the half-circle radius R is 75  μm, and the straight section length L0 is about 2.2  μm, corresponding to the coherent length of the SHG process involved in TE0 modes at the FW wavelength of 1550 nm. The total length L of the bent waveguide in the Z direction is about 15 mm, including 50 SQPM cycles. A fiber lens is used for coupling at the edge of the waveguide. The pump light for the FW is provided by a C-band femtosecond laser with a repetition frequency of 50 MHz and a pulse duration of about 500 fs. The spectrum of the pump light is shown in Fig. 5(c) with the red curve. In our experiment, with an on-chip average pump power of about 5.7 mW, a broadband upconversion spectrum at the 775 nm band is measured by the OSA at the output port as the blue curve shown in Fig. 5(c), which means that at least 16 nm 3 dB bandwidth has been achieved in the SQPM bent waveguide structure. According to the theoretical prediction, this bandwidth could be up to about 50 nm. It should be noted that the conversion efficiency of the bent waveguide in our experiment is mainly limited by the high insertion loss (>50  dB). By optimizing the structure parameters or improving the fabrication process, the conversion efficiency could be further increased.

Fig. 5

(a) Schematic of the SQPM bent-waveguide on the X-cut TFLN; (b) scanning electron microscopic image of the first-order SQPM waveguide; (c) pump light spectrum and measured nonlinear upconversion spectrum, corresponding to a 3-dB bandwidth of about 16 nm.

AP_6_5_056012_f005.png

5.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we have demonstrated a new approach to achieve the QGVM SHG in the racetrack resonator and bent waveguide on X-cut TFLN. Based on the birefringence-induced mode transition of the SH light, the GVMM can flexibly change its sign from the half-circle to a straight waveguide during the light propagating for one cycle. SHG bandwidths of one and several 10-fold enhancements in the intracavity and bent waveguide have been achieved, which can be applied to other parametric processes, such as sum-frequency generation, difference-frequency generation, and optical parametric oscillation with the femtosecond laser pulse by further dispersion engineering and optimization of the structure. This work will significantly benefit chip-scale nonlinear frequency conversion between the ultrashort optical pulses and even the quantum states if the transmission loss is close to the intrinsic loss with the great progress in fabrication technology on a thin-film lithium niobate platform.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Code, Data, and Materials Availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12134009), the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2019YFB2203501), and SJTU (Grant No. 21X010200828). The authors would like to thank Prof. Wenjie Wan for his helpful discussion of our work.

References

1. 

S. J. B. Yoo, “Wavelength conversion technologies for WDM network applications,” J. Lightwave Technol., 14 (6), 955 –966 https://doi.org/10.1109/50.511595 (1996). Google Scholar

2. 

Q. Guo et al., “Femtojoule femtosecond all-optical switching in lithium niobate nanophotonics,” Nat. Photonics, 14 955 –966 https://doi.org/10.1109/50.511595 (2022). Google Scholar

3. 

Y. Adachi et al., “Simple and efficient quantum key distribution with parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 99 (18), 180503 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.180503 (2007). Google Scholar

4. 

J. Leach et al., “Quantum correlations in optical angle-orbital angular momentum variables,” Science, 329 662 –665 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1190523 SCIEAS 0036-8075 (2010). Google Scholar

5. 

H.-K. Lo, M. Curty and K. Tamaki, “Secure quantum key distribution,” Nat. Photonics, 8 (8), 595 –604 https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2014.149 (2014). Google Scholar

6. 

M. B. Nasr et al., “Ultrabroadband biphotons generated via chirped quasi-phase-matched optical parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 100 (18), 183601 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.183601 (2008). Google Scholar

7. 

U. A. Javid et al., “Ultrabroadband entangled photons on a nanophotonic chip,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 127 (18), 183601 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.183601 (2021). Google Scholar

8. 

N. E. Yu et al., “Broadband quasi-phase-matched second-harmonic generation in MgO-doped periodically poled LiNbO at the communications band,” Opt. Lett., 27 (12), 1046 –1048 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.27.001046 (2002). Google Scholar

9. 

J. Zhang et al., “Flexible wavelength conversion via cascaded second order nonlinearity using broadband SHG in MgO-doped PPLN,” Opt. Express, 16 (10), 6957 –6962 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.16.006957 (2008). Google Scholar

10. 

M. Gong et al., “All optical wavelength broadcast based on simultaneous type I QPM broadband SFG and SHG in MgO:PPLN,” Opt. Lett., 35 (16), 2672 –2674 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.35.002672 (2010). Google Scholar

11. 

Y. Chen et al., “3Type I quasi-phase-matched blue second harmonic generation with different polarizations in periodically poled LiNbO,” Opt. Laser Technol., 38 (1), 19 –22 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2004.11.001 (2006). Google Scholar

12. 

Y. Qi and Y. Li, “Integrated lithium niobate photonics,” Nanophotonics, 9 1287 –1320 https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2020-0013 (2020). Google Scholar

13. 

J. Lin et al., “Advances in on-chip photonic devices based on lithium niobate on insulator,” Photonics Res., 8 (12), 1910 –1936 https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.395305 (2020). Google Scholar

14. 

A. Boes et al., “Lithium niobate photonics: unlocking the electromagnetic spectrum,” Science, 379 eabj4396 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj439 (2023). Google Scholar

15. 

Z. Ma et al., “Ultrabright quantum photon sources on chip,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 125 (26), 263602 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.263602 (2020). Google Scholar

16. 

J.-Y. Chen et al., “Photon conversion and interaction in a quasi-phase-matched microresonator,” Phys. Rev. Appl., 16 (6), 064004 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.16.064004 (2021). Google Scholar

17. 

C. Wang et al., “Ultrahigh-efficiency wavelength conversion in nanophotonic periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides,” Optica, 5 (11), 1438 –1441 https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.5.001438 (2018). Google Scholar

18. 

J.-Y. Chen et al., “Efficient parametric frequency conversion in lithium niobate nanophotonic chips,” OSA Contin., 2 (10), 2914 –2924 https://doi.org/10.1364/OSAC.2.002914 (2019). Google Scholar

19. 

J. Zhao et al., “Shallow-etched thin-film lithium niobate waveguides for highly-efficient second-harmonic generation,” Opt. Express, 28 (13), 19669 –19682 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.395545 (2020). Google Scholar

20. 

C. Wang et al., “Monolithic lithium niobate photonic circuits for Kerr frequency comb generation and modulation,” Nat. Commun., 10 978 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08969-6 (2018). Google Scholar

21. 

G. Li et al., “Broadband sum-frequency generation using d33 in periodically poled LiNbO thin film in the telecommunications band,” Opt. Lett., 42 (5), 939 –942 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.42.000939 (2017). Google Scholar

22. 

L. Ge et al., “Broadband quasi-phase matching in a MgO:PPLN thin film,” Photonics Res., 6 (10), 954 –958 https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.6.000954 (2018). Google Scholar

23. 

M. Jankowski et al., “Ultrabroadband nonlinear optics in nanophotonic periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides,” Optica, 7 (1), 40 –46 https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.7.000040 (2020). Google Scholar

24. 

J. Mishra et al., “Ultra-broadband mid-infrared generation in dispersion-engineered thin-film lithium niobate,” Opt. Express, 30 32752 –32760 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.467580 (2022). Google Scholar

25. 

U. A. Javid et al., “Ultrabroadband entangled photons on a nanophotonic chip,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 127 (18), 183601 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.183601 (2021). Google Scholar

26. 

S. Zhu , “Quasi-phase-matched third-harmonic generation in a quasi-periodic optical superlattice,” Science, 278 843 –846 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.278.5339.843 (1997). Google Scholar

27. 

A. Paul et al., “Quasi-phase-matched generation of coherent extreme-ultraviolet light,” Nature, 421 51 –54 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01222 (2003). Google Scholar

28. 

B.-Q. Chen et al., “High-efficiency broadband high-harmonic generation from a single quasi-phase-matching nonlinear crystal,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 115 (8), 083902 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.083902 (2015). Google Scholar

29. 

K. Huang et al., “Wide-field mid-infrared single-photon upconversion imaging,” Nat. Commun., 13 1077 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28716-8 (2022). Google Scholar

30. 

C. Wang et al., “Metasurface-assisted phase-matching-free second harmonic generation in lithium niobate waveguides,” Nat. Commun., 8 2098 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02189-6 (2017). Google Scholar

31. 

J. Huang et al., “Quasi-group-velocity matching using integrated-optic structures,” Opt. Lett., 29 (21), 2482 –2484 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.29.002482 (2004). Google Scholar

32. 

X. Xie, J. Huang and M. M. Fejer, “Narrow-linewidth near-degenerate optical parametric generation achieved with quasi-group-velocity-matching in lithium niobate waveguides,” Opt. Lett., 31 (14), 2190 –2192 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.31.002190 (2006). Google Scholar

33. 

D. Mao et al., “Synchronized multi-wavelength soliton fiber laser via intracavity group delay modulation,” Nat. Commun., 12 6712 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26872-x (2021). Google Scholar

34. 

J. P. Lourdesamy et al., “Spectrally periodic pulses for enhancement of optical nonlinear effects,” Nat. Phys., 18 59 –66 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01400-2 (2021). Google Scholar

35. 

Y.-D. Cui et al., “Dichromatic ’breather molecules’ in a mode-locked fiber laser,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 130 (15), 153801 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.153801 (2023). Google Scholar

36. 

C. Wang et al., “Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators operating at CMOS-compatible voltages,” Nature, 562 (7725), 101 –104 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0551-y (2018). Google Scholar

37. 

M. Zhang et al., “Broadband electro-optic frequency comb generation in a lithium niobate microring resonator,” Nature, 568 (7752), 373 –377 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1008-7 (2019). Google Scholar

38. 

X. Han et al., “Mode and polarization-division multiplexing based on silicon nitride loaded lithium niobate on insulator platform,” Laser Photonics Rev., 16 2100529 https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.202100529 (2022). Google Scholar

39. 

J. Wang et al., “Polarization coupling of X-cut thin film lithium niobate based waveguides,” IEEE Photonics J., 12 (3), 2200310 https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOT.2020.2995317 (2020). Google Scholar

40. 

X. Wang et al., “Enhanced temperature sensing by multi-mode coupling in an on-chip microcavity system,” Laser Photonics Rev., 18 (4), 2300760 https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.202300760 (2024). Google Scholar

41. 

J. Lin et al., “Broadband quasi-phase-matched harmonic generation in an on-chip monocrystalline lithium niobate microdisk resonator,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 122 (17), 173903 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.173903 (2019). Google Scholar

42. 

T. Yuan et al., “Chip-scale spontaneous quasi-phase matched second harmonic generation in a micro-racetrack resonator,” Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron., 66 284211 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-023-2145-6 (2023). Google Scholar

43. 

A. Pan et al., “Fundamental mode hybridization in a thin film lithium niobate ridge waveguide,” Opt. Express, 27 35659 –35669 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.27.035659 (2019). Google Scholar

44. 

W.-C. Liu et al., “Modal analysis of arbitrary-oriented ridge waveguides in x-cut lithium niobate thin film,” J. Opt., 24 064002 https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8986/ac6598 (2022). Google Scholar

Biography

Tingge Yuan received her BS degree from Northwest University in 2019 and her PhD from Shanghai Jiao Tong University in 2024. Her research interests include nonlinear optics and optical microcavity on thin-film lithium niobate.

Jiangwei Wu is currently a PhD student at Shanghai Jiao Tong University. He received his BS degree from the School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, in 2020. His research interests include integrated photonics and nonlinear optics on thin-film lithium niobate.

Xueyi Wang is currently a PhD student at Yale University. She received her MS degree from the School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, in 2024, and her BS degree from the School of Physics, Xi’an Jiaotong University, in 2021. Her current research interests include nonlinear optics and integrated photonics.

Chengyu Chen is currently a PhD student at Shanghai Jiao Tong University. He received his honors bachelor’s degree from the Department of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, in 2021. His current research interests include optomechanics and optoelectronics.

Hao Li received his PhD from Shanghai Jiao Tong University in 2019. After two years of postdoctoral training at Shanghai Jiao Tong University, he joined the faculty of Shanghai Jiao Tong University in 2021, where he is currently an experimentalist. His current research interests include nanophotonics, nonlinear optics, integrated photonics, and quantum optics.

Bo Wang received his PhD from Peking University in 2017. After four-year postdoctoral research at Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, he joined Shanghai Jiao Tong University in 2021, where he is currently an associate professor. His research interests include nanophotonics, spin-orbit interactions of light, and photonic Ising machines.

Yuping Chen currently serves as a professor at the School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SJTU) in Shanghai, China. She received her PhD in optics from SJTU in 2002, and subsequently pursued a postdoctoral fellowship in Prof. R. W. Boyd’s group at the Institute of Optics, University of Rochester, starting in 2005. With over 100 published papers in refereed journals and more than 50 invited conference talks, her expertise lies in nonlinear and integrated optics. Her research focuses on on-chip nonlinear integrated photonic devices in thin-film lithium niobate and their applications.

Xianfeng Chen is a distinguished professor in the School of Physics and Astronomy at SJTU. He received his PhD in physics at SJTU in 1999. His current research focuses on nonlinear photonics, integrated photonics, biophotonics, and quantum information. In the past years, over 400 journal papers have been published in leading refereed journals and received more than 10,000 citations.

CC BY: © The Authors. Published by SPIE and CLP under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Tingge Yuan, Jiangwei Wu, Xueyi Wang, Chengyu Chen, Hao Li, Bo Wang, Yuping Chen, and Xianfeng Chen "Chip-scale nonlinear bandwidth enhancement via birefringent mode hybridization," Advanced Photonics 6(5), 056012 (18 September 2024). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.AP.6.5.056012
Received: 26 August 2024; Accepted: 30 August 2024; Published: 18 September 2024
Advertisement
Advertisement
KEYWORDS
Waveguides

Second harmonic generation

Resonators

Dispersion

Lithium niobate

Photonics

Quantum networks

RELATED CONTENT

Propagation of ultrashort pulses in single-mode fiber
Proceedings of SPIE (January 06 2015)
Chip integrated ultrafast pulse amplification
Proceedings of SPIE (January 01 1900)
Sub-wavelength waveguide structures
Proceedings of SPIE (May 06 2008)
Microfiber coil resonator and waveguide
Proceedings of SPIE (April 12 2005)
Numerical study of pulse width dependence of SHG in QPM...
Proceedings of SPIE (September 30 2005)

Back to Top