10 June 2016 Focusing vibrating targets in frequency-modulation continuous-wave-synthetic aperture radar with Doppler keystone transform
Author Affiliations +
Vibrating targets generally induce sinusoidal micro-Doppler modulation in high resolution synthetic aperture radar (SAR). They could cause defocused and ghost results by conventional imaging algorithms. This paper proposes a method on vibrating target imaging in frequency-modulation continuous-wave (FMCW) SAR systems. The continuous motion of sensor platform during pulse time is considered in the signal model. Based on Bessel series expansion of the signal in the azimuth direction, the influence of platform motion on the azimuth frequency is eliminated after dechirp and deskew. In addition, the range walk is compensated in the two-dimensional frequency domain by Doppler keystone transform. Next, using range cell migration correction, the azimuth quadratic phase compensation and the range curvature correction are made in range-Doppler domain for the focus of paired echoes. The residual video phase of paired echoes is eliminated, and vibration parameters are estimated to compensate in the sinusoidal modulation phase. Then the deghosted image of vibrating targets can be obtained. The proposed method is applicable to multiple targets with various vibrating states due to no need of



Vibration widely exists in ground targets of interest in radar sensing, such as the engine oscillation of vehicles and tanks, the dynamic response of railway bridges under oncoming trains, and so forth. It generally produces nonlinear frequency modulation, named micro-Doppler effect,1 in radar echoed signals and has attracted much attention in related research.23.4 Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is a well-established technique for high-resolution imaging of the earth’s surface. In the standard SAR imaging, the high-quality focus could be achieved for stationary objects but is no longer available for microdynamic ones. Nevertheless, the ability of SAR to remotely sense vibrating targets with high accuracy is essential in its practical applications. For example, focused images and vibration parameter estimation play an important role in feature analysis and recognition of SAR vibrating targets of interest. In past years, many contributions have been made to SAR and inverse SAR imaging of microdynamic targets, including micromotion signal parameter estimation, micromotion characteristic analysis,10,11 micromotion signal separation,1213. and SAR imaging of targets with rotating components.2021.22 Different from stationary targets, Doppler frequency of vibrating targets is sinusoidally time-varying. As a result, in conventional SAR imaging algorithms, unwanted paired echoes would occur, causing the defocus in the azimuth direction and the energy spread in the range direction. This phenomenon is defined as smearing of paired echoes.23 The specific reason of such degradation is that the range migration curves induced by vibration cannot fully be confined into one range gate. The keystone transform (KT) is a well-known algorithm for range cell migration correction without motion parameters. Although, the traditional KT algorithm has achieved the compensation of range walk in SAR imaging of moving targets,24 the range curvature cannot be corrected. To solve this defect, the Doppler keystone transform (DKT) algorithm25 is then proposed. It corrects range cell migration in the two-dimensional (2-D) frequency domain,26 indicating the feasibility of DKT for vibrating targets by Bessel series expansion of the vibration signal. In Ref. 27, a DKT-based method of vibrating target imaging in pulsed SAR, in particular, is proposed. Moreover, a nonlinear KT method is presented in Refs. 28 and 29 to correct the range migration of small maritime targets under polarimetric mode of ISAR. Comprehensive comparisons between several interpolation algorithms in different cases of polarized signatures are performed. It makes sense of its practical application in micromotion target imaging.

Most of the aforementioned studies and methods are developed in pulsed mode. However, in some practical situations, flight platforms need lightweight and cost-effective imaging sensors. For example, compact-size sensors are always required by unmanned aerial vehicles for frequent visits at low cost, and lightweight sensors are easy for deployment and maintenance on helicopters. Hence the frequency-modulation continuous-wave (FMCW) technology is introduced into SAR to produce lightweight and cost-effective imaging sensors with high resolution.30 Such FMCW-SAR is of great interest to civil application for their low-cost and to military use for their small size. But under the FMCW mode, the varying slant range during pulse transmission could result in different delay times of the pulse leading and trailing edges.31 This suggests that the conventional start/stop approximation is not valid in FMCW-SAR since the variation of delay time caused by the continuous motion of sensor platform within an individual pulse should be considered.

In this paper, we begin with a signal model, which accurately represents the effect of variation of the instantaneous slant range during the pulse time on transmitted and echoed signals. This variation is related to pulse time and flight velocity of sensor platform. Next, the imaging method is proposed through the following steps. First, the signal after dechirp and deskew is decomposed into the form of Bessel series in the azimuth direction. This is applicable to both stationary and vibrating targets and is key to their imaging. Second, the influence of continuous motion of sensor platform on the azimuth frequency is eliminated in 2-D frequency domain, and then the phase of each series meets the requirement of DKT. Because DKT makes the azimuth and the range frequency domain decoupling, the range walk is eliminated. Third, the azimuth quadratic phase compensation and the range curvature correction are performed in the range-Doppler domain. Even if there are several vibrating targets in the scene, the azimuth quadratic phase can be fully compensated. Moreover, after these three steps, paired echoes still have residual video phase (RVP) along the azimuth, which needs to be removed. By now, both the vibrating and the stationary target focusing can be accomplished simultaneously. On the basis of paired echo focusing, this paper further uses the method in Ref. 27 for suppression of paired echoes. Deghosted vibrating targets are then obtained. Since the focusing algorithm does not require a priori knowledge of vibrating targets, it is suitable for multiple targets with various vibrating states. It should be noted that the focusing algorithm proposed in this paper is based on FMCW signal mode and DKT. Hence, for simplification, we refer to it as the FMCW keystone transform algorithm (FMCW-KTA).

This paper is organized as follows. The signal model in FMCW system is derived in Sec. 2. The imaging algorithm is described in Sec. 3. Simulations are provided in Sec. 4. Finally, conclusions are presented in Sec. 5.


Signal Model

In this paper, we consider the FMCW-SAR geometry, as shown in Fig. 1. Let the time τp be the round-trip delay time for the wave propagation. The signal is transmitted at an arbitrary time t along a slant range R1 and returns back at time t+τp along another slant range R2 from the target to the radar.

Fig. 1

Geometry of the FMCW-SAR system.


A vibrating point target m oscillates in the plane xoz with o as the vibration center. The angle between the vibration direction om and axis oz is ϕ0. The coordinate system oxyz is obtained as follows: first, we translate the coordinate system OXYZ along the axis OX with distance x0. Then, we rotate the coordinate counterclockwise through an angle θ0 around the axis OZ.

The instantaneous vibration amplitude is


where Am is amplitude, fm is vibration frequency, and φm is initial phase. The slant range history of vibrating signal has been derived in Refs. 11 and 27. Thus, expressions of R1 and R2 could directly be given as




where ro is the closest range from the antenna to point o, v is the flight velocity, and to denotes the zero Doppler time at o. β=arctan(vat/x0) is usually only a few degrees. We consider that the look angle θL does not vary over slow time in a synthetic aperture. C=cos(β+θ0)sinθLsinϕ0cosθLcosϕ0 associated with the geometric angle is also constant.27 Obviously, we can express the round-way delay time as


where c denotes speed of light. Substituting Eqs. (2) and (3) into Eq. (4), we get


We define A=2CAm as the equivalent amplitude. By solving Eq. (5), we get


where ϵ=Asin(2πfmt+φm). The “Doppler factor” could be defined as



By using Eq. (6), the echoed signal can be expressed as


where rect(·) is the rectangular window function, and Tp is the pulse width, which equals 1/prf as a result of transmitted FMCW signal. Here “prf” denotes pulse repetition frequency. Ta is the synthetic aperture time, tc is the beam center crossing time, kr is the frequency modulation rate, f0 is the carrier frequency, and τ is fast time with pulse center as origin. Assume that the scattering coefficient is unit. We use the dechirp-on-receive technique to reduce the sampling requirements by mixing the received and transmitted signals.23 And the output of the mixer is then low-pass filtered before being sampled. Echoed signals from the scene of interest usually have high frequency resulting from the characteristics of FMCW system. In order to demodulate the frequency spectrum of echo signal to the baseband, the reference signal is delayed of τc as


where τc=2αrc/c is the time delay of reference signal, and rc is the reference slant range. The dechirped signal can be expressed as


where τd=ττc and τΔ=τpτc. s¯ref represents the complex conjugate of the reference signal.


Vibrating Target Focusing Algorithm

This section describes the focusing algorithm of vibrating targets in FMCW-SAR shown in Fig. 2. In Eq. (10), the last exponential term is well known as RVP. It could be eliminated by the deskew method, which comprises Fourier transform (FT), phase multiplication, and inverse FT.23,31 After the RVP removal, we get



Fig. 2

Block diagram of FMCW-KTA.


Performing the time–frequency substitution of krτdfr yields


where Br is the bandwidth of radar signal. Substituting Eq. (6) into Eq. (12), and approximating R1 with the quadratic polynomial in terms of t, we get



The last term of Eq. (13) is the phase induced by vibration and can be expanded into the Bessel series27


where Jn(z) is the n’th Bessel function, and z=4πα(f0+fr)A/c. Using the FT to Eq. (14) in azimuth time domain, the signal could be described as


where the symbol “*” denotes convolution operator, and









Normally the carrier frequency is much larger than the signal bandwidth. Equation (16) is approximately equal to the Doppler rate of the transmitted signal Ka=2v2/λr0. Equation (17) denotes the azimuth center frequency. Compared with the pulsed mode in Ref. 27, Eqs. (18) and (19) are the additional terms caused by continuous motion of platform. After convolution, Eq. (15) is expressed as


where Δ=nfm. In Eq. (18), when the flight speed is known, fv can be eliminated through shifting the signal along the azimuth direction in the 2-D frequency domain. Thus, performing the substitution of fafvfa yields


Substituting Eqs. (16) into (21), and after expansion of the quadratic phase in the last term of Eq. (21), we obtain


We define


Then substituting Eqs. (23) into (22) and using KT, we obtain



Although the range walk is eliminated, the range curvature in response to the term fa2 in Eq. (24) still exists. This means that the range curvature correction cannot be implemented in the 2-D frequency domain. In addition, a time-domain related item r0 in the coefficient of the term fa2 also needs to be compensated. Hence, we take inverse FT of Eq. (24) along the azimuth direction and then get the signal in range-Doppler domain as


where λ is the carrier wavelength. To remove the phase term of fa2 from Eq. (25), the interpolation method is utilized here. First, an interpolation kernel is created as


Then taking convolution of Eqs. (25) and (26), we get



We can see that the signal energy has been confined into a single range gate with the help of the range cell migration correction. Moreover, to process signal along the azimuth direction, we construct reference function


where R(τd)=c·τd/2 denotes slant range. Multiplying Eq. (27) by (28), the azimuth quadratic phase is compensated. We get



Note that there exists the RVP of paired echoes in Eq. (29) along the azimuth. The RVP will result in the displacement of frequency history between paired echoes over a coherent processing interval. The detailed removal process of the RVP of paired echo has been discussed in Ref. 27. After the RVP removal, the signal in 2-D time domain is expressed as


where tn=n·fm/Ka and n denotes the order of paired echoes. Particularly, n=0 indicates that the mainlobe is located in the vibration center, while n0 responds to paired echoes symmetrically located on both sides of the mainlobe. tn denotes the relative time between the n’th paired echo and the mainlobe. Equation (30) indicates that both range walk and range curvature have successfully been corrected along the azimuth direction, and the position of paired echoes is determined by the vibration frequency fm. Furthermore, it is obvious that the algorithm is suitable for imaging of both stationary and vibrating targets because no vibration parameter is required in the whole process.

Next, we continue to explore Eq. (30) to get its expression in range-Doppler domain. After taking the FT of Eq. (30), we get


where T=t+Δ/Ka. The integrand in Eq. (31) has significant magnitude only for 1/Ba+t0T1/Ba+t0. For any SAR with moderate or finer resolution, the time bandwidth product is numerically large enough to meet exp(jπKa/Ba2)1. Equation (31) is reasonably approximated as



After combination of series, the signal after RVP removal in range-Doppler domain is described as



It indicates the azimuth frequency of all paired echoes spans [Ba/2fac,Ba/2fac].

Equation (33) is the signal in range-Doppler domain after FMCW-KTA processing. In the case of known flight speed, if vibration parameters are estimated, we can observe that the last term of Eq. (33), the vibration modulated phase error, could be compensated. The method on paired echo suppression in Ref. 27 can be used to estimate vibration parameters for the phase error compensation. After elimination of the vibration phase error, the signal in Eq. (33) could be transformed into 2-D time domain



Now it can be seen that the deghosted image of vibrating targets is ultimately obtained.



Table 1 lists the system parameters used in simulations. Three groups of simulations are presented herein. Section 4.1 is the paired echo focusing experiment. In this section, precise simulation and response analysis in time domain are performed. Comparison results with the conventional algorithm are also given to assess the focusing performance. Section 4.2 describes imaging results of multiple targets with various vibrating states. Section 4.3 presents imaging results of an extended scene with vibration.

Table 1

Simulation parameters.

Carrier frequency10 GHz
Azimuth nominal resolution0.3 m
Range nominal resolution0.25 m
Scene center range1000 m
Plane velocity80  m/s
Pulse duration1 ms
Pulse bandwidth500 MHz
Range sampling frequency600 MHz
Pulse repetition frequency1000 Hz


Focusing Quality Analysis

Figure 3 shows the experimental scene. We set three vibrating point targets T1, T2, and T3 on the ground. These targets have equal intervals of 1 m along the range direction. Another two stationary point targets are set as reference. The involved geometric angles ϕ0=80  deg and ϕ0=20  deg are considered (see Fig. 1). The real data experiments in Refs. 4 and 27 show that the vibration frequency of vehicle is close to 30 Hz, and the vibration amplitude is of the order of millimeter. Therefore, three vibrating targets are assumed to oscillate identically with vibration frequency of 30 Hz, amplitude of 0.003 m, and initial phase of π/4  rad. One of the three targets is selected to perform the focusing quality analysis.

Fig. 3

Imaging scene in simulations.


The range migration algorithm (RMA) is adopted for comparison with FMCW-KTA. Their imaging results are shown in Figs. 4 and 5, respectively. The 2-D images are unfavorable to observe their imaging difference by the naked eye. Thus, the impulse response analysis is performed. In particular, taking the paired echo of T1 as an example, we compare its power responses under RMA and FMCW-KTA in azimuth and range directions, respectively. Figures 6 and 7 show that the half-power width in azimuth is 0.33 m by RMA and 0.30 m by FMCW-KTA, while in the range direction, the half-power width is 0.32 m by RMA and 0.25 m by FMCW-KTA. For other paired echoes farther from mainlobe, half-power widths in RMA become worse, but the results of FMCW-KTA remain unchanged. Paired echoes using FMCW-KTA have better focus in both directions than those using RMA.

Fig. 4

Imaging result in 2-D time domain by RMA.


Fig. 5

Imaging result in 2-D time domain by FMCW-KTA.


Fig. 6

Paired echo responses using RMA and FMCW-KTA in azimuth.


Fig. 7

Paired echo responses using RMA and FMCW-KTA in range.


We also give the results of the two algorithms in range-Doppler domain, as shown in Figs. 8 and 9, respectively. It is obvious that the result of RMA still contains residual cell migration induced by vibration, while the range cell migration is corrected into a range gate by FMCW-KTA.

Fig. 8

Imaging result in range-Doppler domain by RMA.


Fig. 9

Imaging result in range-Doppler domain by FMCW-KTA.



Imaging of Multiple Targets with Various Vibrating States

In this section, two tanks T1 and T2 with different vibrating states are simulated using the ideal point scatterer model. The experiment scene is shown in Fig. 10. We set parameters of T1 and T2 as amplitudes of 0.003 and 0.002 m, and vibration frequencies of 40 and 20 Hz, respectively. Figure 11 shows the imaging result by FMCW-KTA, where both mainlobes and paired echoes of T1 and T2 are focused. It can be observed that higher vibration frequency results in greater distance between the mainlobe and paired echoes. This phenomenon is also consistent with the property of Eq. (30). Furthermore, we use the method of paired echo suppression in Ref. 27 to estimate the vibration parameters of two tanks, i.e., 0.0028 m and 40.7 Hz for amplitude and frequency, respectively, of T1, and 0.0016 m and 19.6 Hz for those of T2. Based on these estimates, the vibration modulated phase error can be compensated. Finally, deghosted results of T1 and T2 are achieved as shown in Fig. 12.

Fig. 10

Imaging scene of simulated tank targets.


Fig. 11

Imaging result by FMCW-KTA.


Fig. 12

Deghosted imaging result.



Imaging of an Extended Scene with Vibration

In most scenarios, SAR vibrating targets are not ideal scattering points but arbitrarily shaped objects with complicated scattering structure. To validate the proposed method on the extended scene, an experiment procedure, as shown in Fig. 13, is adopted. First, we extract the target data from the original SAR image. Then, using inverse imaging methods,32 the raw data of the target and background can be retrieved. Next, the synthetic data are produced by adding vibration into the raw data of target in frequency domain. Finally, FMCW-KTA and RMA are carried out to process the synthetic vibration data, respectively. In order to facilitate results comparison with the original image, the results of processed target are superposed on the background image.

Fig. 13

Flow chart of experiment on complex scattering targets.


The original images are released by Sandia Lab,33 as shown in Fig. 14. They are normal SAR data from stationary targets. According to the procedure mentioned above, we add vibration with frequency of 10 Hz and amplitude of 3 mm into the raw data of an airplane target. The similar process is also repeated to the raw data of a ship target. Then RMA is used, and its imaging results are shown in Fig. 15. We can see that vibrating targets blur SAR images significantly because of the time-varying Doppler frequency. In Ref. 7, vibration-induced artifacts are reduced by time-frequency analysis methods on the processed SAR images. In this paper, the analytical method is introduced to solve the vibration problem since it can avoid the influence of signal-to-clutter ratio to the largest extent. Finally, FMCW-KTA is applied to process the synthetic vibration data, as shown in Fig. 16. It is obvious that the paired echoes of vibrating targets are significantly suppressed and the focused results are close to the original images. Although the actual vibration of some ground targets is much more complicated, this experiment could still indicate the potential effectiveness of the proposed method on complex scattering targets. Moreover, it should be noted that only vibration problem is considered in the simulation of maritime targets while more factors in practice also have an influence on the imaging of such objects.

Fig. 14

Original scenes. (a) C-130 airplane and (b) a ship at sea.


Fig. 15

Imaging results by RMA on synthetic vibration data. (a) C-130 airplane with vibration and (b) ship at sea with vibration.


Fig. 16

Imaging results by FMCW-KTA on synthetic vibration data. (a) Focused result of C-130 airplane and (b) focused result of ship at sea.




This paper proposes a method on the FMCW-SAR imaging of vibrating targets. We develop a signal model of vibrating targets in FMCW-SAR and take into account continuous motion of platform during pulse time. Based on the signal model, the influence of platform motion is eliminated after dechirp and deskew processes in 2-D frequency domain. The DKT is employed to correct the range cell migration induced by vibration without a priori knowledge of vibrating targets. Then the azimuth quadratic phase compensation is skillfully eliminated in range-Doppler domain. Thus, the range cell migration curves of vibrating targets can be corrected into a range resolution cell, and the mainlobe and paired echoes of vibrating targets are focused in the nominal resolution unit. Moreover, the formula of the RVP of paired echoes is derived. After the RVP removal, we obtain the analytical formula of the vibration phase error in FMCW-SAR. Finally, vibration parameters of the target are estimated for the purpose of compensation of the vibration modulated phase error. Simulation results show that focused and deghosted images of vibrating targets can be obtained even with various vibrating states.


This study was cosupported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61471019 and 61501011) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. YWF-15-GJSYS-068).


1. V. C. Chen et al., “Analysis of micro-Doppler signatures,” IEEE Proc. Radar Sonar Navig. 150, 271–276 (2003).IETPAK0018-926X http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ip-rsn:20030743 Google Scholar

2. V. C. Chen, “Analysis of radar micro-Doppler signature with time-frequency transform,” in Proc. of the Tenth IEEE Workshop on Statistical Signal and Array Processing, Pocono Manor, PA, pp. 463–466 (2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SSAP.2000.870167 Google Scholar

3. T. Thayaparan et al., “Analysis of radar micro-Doppler signatures from experimental helicopter and human data,” IET Radar Sonar Navig. 1, 289–299 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/iet-rsn:20060103 Google Scholar

4. M. Rüegg, E. Meier and D. Nüesch, “Vibration and rotation in millimeter-wave SAR,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 45, 293–304 (2007).IGRSD20196-2892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2006.887025 Google Scholar

5. Q. Wang et al., “SAR-based vibration estimation using the discrete fractional Fourier transform,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 50, 4145–4156 (2012).IGRSD20196-2892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2187665 Google Scholar

6. P. Lei et al., “Micromotion parameter estimation of free rigid targets based on radar micro-Doppler,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 50, 3776–3786 (2012).IGRSD20196-2892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2185244 Google Scholar

7. Q. Wang et al., “Reduction of vibration induced artifacts in synthetic aperture radar imagery,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 52, 3063–3073 (2014).IGRSD20196-2892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2013.2269138 Google Scholar

8. P. Setlur, M. Amin and T. Thayaparan, “Micro-Doppler signal estimation for vibrating and rotating targets,” in Proc. Int. Symp. Signal Processing Application, Sydney, Australia, pp. 639–642 (2005). Google Scholar

9. P. Molchanov et al., “On micro-Doppler period estimation,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Control System Computer Science, Bucharest, Romania, pp. 325–330 (2013). Google Scholar

10. X. Liu, H. Leung and G. A. Lampropoulos, “Effects of non-uniform motion in through-the-wall SAR imaging,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 57, 3539–3548 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2008.2009743 Google Scholar

11. X. Li et al., “The influence of target micromotion on SAR and GMTI,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 49, 2738–2751 (2011).IGRSD20196-2892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2104965 Google Scholar

12. C. Clemente et al., “Developments in target micro-Doppler signatures analysis: radar imaging, ultrasound and through-the-wall radar,” EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process. 1, 1–18 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1687-6180-2013-47 Google Scholar

13. C. Clemente and J. J. Soraghan, “Analysis of the effect of wind turbines in SAR images,” in IET Int. Conf. on Radar Systems (Radar 2012), Glasgow, UK, pp. 1–4 (2014). Google Scholar

14. C. Clemente and J. J. Soraghan, “Vibrating target micro-Doppler signature in bistatic SAR with a fixed receiver,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 50, 3219–3227 (2012).IGRSD20196-2892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2180394 Google Scholar

15. C. Clemente and J. J. Soraghan, “Vibrating micro-Doppler signature extraction from SAR data using singular value decomposition,” in Proc. EUSAR Conf., Nuremberg, Germany, pp. 191–194 (2012). Google Scholar

16. B. Yuan, Z. Chen and S. Xu, “Micro-Doppler analysis and separation based on complex local mean decomposition for aircraft with fast-rotating parts in ISAR imaging,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 52, 1285–1298 (2014).IGRSD20196-2892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2013.2249588 Google Scholar

17. L. Stankovic et al., “Micro-Doppler removal in the radar imaging analysis,” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 49, 1234–1250 (2013).IEARAX0018-9251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2013.6494410 Google Scholar

18. L. Stankovic, I. Djurovic and T. Thayaparan, “Separation of target rigid body and micro-Doppler effects in ISAR imaging,” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 42, 1496–1506 (2006).IEARAX0018-9251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2006.314590 Google Scholar

19. J. Li and H. Ling, “Application of adaptive chirplet representation for ISAR feature extraction from targets with rotating parts,” Proc. Inst. Elect. Eng. Radar Sonar Navig. 150, 284–291 (2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ip-rsn:20030729 Google Scholar

20. M. Adjrad and K. Woodbridge, “Imaging of micro motion targets with unknown number of rotating parts based on time-frequency analysis,” in Proc. IET Int. Conf. Radar System, Glasgow, UK, pp. 1–5 (2012). Google Scholar

21. Q. Zhang et al., “Imaging of a moving target with rotating parts based on the Hough transform,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 46, 291–299 (2008).IGRSD20196-2892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2007.907105 Google Scholar

22. X. Bai et al., “Imaging of micro motion targets with rotating parts based on empirical-mode decomposition,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 46, 3514–3523 (2008).IGRSD20196-2892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2008.2002322 Google Scholar

23. W. G. Carrara, R. S. Goodman and R. M. Majewski, Spotlight Synthetic Aperture Radar: Signal Processing Algorithms, 1st ed., Artech House, London, UK, pp. 386–399 (1995). Google Scholar

24. R. P. Perry, R. C. Dipietro and R. L. Fante, “SAR imaging of moving targets,” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 35, 188–200 (1999).IEARAX0018-9251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/7.745691 Google Scholar

25. G. Li, X. Xia and Y. Peng, “Doppler keystone transform: an approach suitable for parallel implementation of SAR moving target imaging,” IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 5, 573–577 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2008.2000621 Google Scholar

26. B. Deng, “Research on synthetic aperture radar micro-motion target indication,” PhD Thesis, University Defense Technology (2011). Google Scholar

27. Y. Zhang et al., “SAR-based paired echo focusing and suppression of vibrating targets,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 52, 7593–7605 (2014).IGRSD20196-2892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2014.2314681 Google Scholar

28. F. Sadjadi, “New comparative experiments in range migration mitigation methods using polarimetric inverse synthetic aperture radar signatures of small boats,” in IEEE Radar Conf., pp. 613–616 (2014). Google Scholar

29. F. A. Sadjadi, “New experiments in inverse synthetic aperture radar image exploitation for maritime surveillance,” Proc. SPIE 9090, 909009 (2014).PSISDG0277-786X http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2053797 Google Scholar

30. A. F. Scannapieco, A. Renga and A. Moccia, “Preliminary study of a millimeterwave FMCW InSAR for UAS indoor navigation,” Sensors 15, 2309–2335 (2015).SNSRES0746-9462 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s150202309 Google Scholar

31. R. Wang et al., “Focus FMCW SAR data using the wavenumber domain algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 48, 2109–2118 (2010).IGRSD20196-2892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2009.2034368 Google Scholar

32. M. Martorella et al., “ISAR based technique for refocusing non-cooperative targets in SAR images,” IET Radar Sonar Navig. 6, 332–340 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/iet-rsn.2011.0310 Google Scholar


Yuxin Hu received his PhD from the Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, in 2007. Currently, he is an associate professor with the Key Laboratory of Technology in Geospatial Information Processing and Applied Systems, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the Institute of Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IECAS). His research interests include SAR data processing and implementation of SAR processing system.

Yuan Zhang received his BS and MSc degrees from Beihang University, Beijing, China, in 2004 and 2008, respectively. Currently, he is working toward a PhD in signal and information processing. He joined the IECAS in 2008. He has been a guest scientist at the German Aerospace Center and the Technical University of Munich since 2015. His research interests are SAR and modern signal processing for earth observation.

Jinping Sun received his MSc and PhD degrees from Beihang University (BUAA), Beijing, China, in 1998 and 2001, respectively. Currently, he is a professor with the School of Electronic and Information Engineering, BUAA. His research interests include high-resolution radar signal processing, image understanding, and robust beamforming.

Peng Lei received his BS and PhD degrees in electrical engineering from Beihang University (BUAA), Beijing, China, in 2006 and 2012, respectively. Currently, he is an assistant professor with the School of Electronic and Information Engineering, BUAA. His research interests include signal processing, especially in time-frequency analysis and spectral estimation, image processing, and target recognition. He was the recipient of the 2011 IEEE IGARSS Student Travel Grant.

© The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Yuxin Hu, Yuxin Hu, Yuan Zhang, Yuan Zhang, Jinping Sun, Jinping Sun, Peng Lei, Peng Lei, "Focusing vibrating targets in frequency-modulation continuous-wave-synthetic aperture radar with Doppler keystone transform," Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 10(2), 025019 (10 June 2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.10.025019 . Submission:

Back to Top