Open Access
22 April 2022 Modeling of oil palm phenology based on remote sensing data: opportunities and challenges
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Oil palm phenology has many advantages in managing the sustainability of oil palm plantations. The phenology of oil palms is a key issue in harvest estimation, fruit bunch production, estimating oil palm taxes, replanting, fertilization, and detecting oil palm disease. One of the recently developed methods of oil palm phenology involves the use of remote sensing technology. We evaluated and reviewed the current state of oil palm phenology based on remote sensing and conducted an optimized systematic review of recent scientific publications, specifically focusing on scientific peer-reviewed papers published between 1990 and 2021, comprising over 100 existing journal papers on remote sensing for oil palm phenology. The review includes a description of the state of the art and the mapping of oil palm phenology based on sensors, biophysical tree parameters, and classification techniques and also describes the state of the art in the development of regression models of oil palm phenology based on wavelength, biophysical tree parameters, and the type of regression model. Finally, the review provided an opportunity to develop suitable techniques for the identification, classification, and the construction of regression models of oil palm phenology. There is a lot of potential in combining multisensor approaches, suitable classification methods, and regression models for oil palm phenology. For future studies on oil palm phenology, we recommend integrating machine learning with oil palm biophysical parameters based on multisensor remote sensing technologies.

1.

Introduction

The oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) is a species of palm planted extensively in Southeast Asia, especially in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand.1 It is an industrial plant, used as a basic material for producing cooking oil, industrial oil, and fuel.2 Of the four main vegetable oils that account for more than 85% of world consumption, the most consumed is palm kernel oil. Palm kernel oil is extracted from the seeds or kernels of a hard mesocarp shell and contains about 80% saturated fatty acids (oleic). It is mostly utilized in the oleochemical sector to make soaps, detergents, and other products.3,4 Figure 1(a) shows the statistics of the oil palm consumption worldwide from 2015/2016 to 2020/2021. In 2019/2020, the palm oil usage amounted to over 73 million metric tons worldwide. That increased to 75.45 million metric tons in the following year. Figure 1(b) shows Indonesia and Malaysia produce the most palm oil in the world.

Fig. 1

(a) Production volume of palm oil worldwide and (b) countries that produce the most oil palm.5

JARS_16_2_021501_f001.png

Oil palm cultivation is rapidly expanding in tropical countries, based on the fact that oil palm production is a major economic factor.6 Oil palm is regarded as a major element of the economies of palm oil-producing nations, with the potential to accelerate regional economic growth in these countries.7

Currently, two methods are being used to improve the productivity of national oil palm plantations. The first step is to improve the productivity of existing oil palm plantations, specifically young and mature plants, and the second strategy involves replanting with the latest high-yielding varieties for existing oil palm plantations that are classified as old, because every year, there are fields that have reached the old phase and must be replaced.8 According to the Indonesian Oil Palm Research Institute (IOPRI), the quality of productivity obtained from an oil palm plantation is the result of a synergy between the genetic potential of the plant variety, the environment in which it grows, and the management of its cultivation.9 The main parameter derived from oil palm productivity data is the sustainability of oil palm development, in this case, the age or phenology parameters of oil palms.10

The phenology of an oil palm plantation has an impact on the physical and environmental conditions of the plantation.11 One of the key parameters influencing the growth of fruit bunches is the phenology of the oil palm, which is a crucial component in yield estimation,2,12 because the growth of oil palms occurs in a certain way, and their morphological characteristics may be utilized to determine their phenology.11 The oil palm can be economically cultivated up to the age of 20 to 25 years.13 The plant is tall and difficult to harvest at more than 25 years of age, and the quantity of fruit bunches is very limited, so it is no longer affordable to cultivate them beyond that age.14

According to Fig. 2, plantation age affects oil palm yield (in FFB), with black lines indicating average yield potential and red lines representing irrigation yield potential over a 25-year cycle.15 The first harvest occurs 5 years after planting, and peak production is attained at the age of 5 to 10 years after planting. With the number of trees around 128 to 148 trees per hectare, depending on plant material, soil, and climate, with a triangular spacing of 9  m×9  m, there are 143 trees per hectare13 [Fig. 3(a)]. An indication of the results’ variability due to weather variability can be seen in the band associated with it. Indicators of productivity are based on what can be achieved (blue line). It is possible to increase productivity on existing plantation lands by adopting good agronomic practices, which is defined as the difference between the actual yield and the achievable yield.15 According to Corley,16 the production of oil palm fruit bunches rises quickly and reaches a maximum at the age of 8 to 12 years, then gradually decreases as the plant ages up to the economic age limit of 25 years.17 Three stages can be used to characterize the age of oil palm plantations: the young immature phase (0 to 3 years), the young mature phase (4 to 8 years), and the mature phase (over 8 years).4 Oil palm plantations begin to produce fruit bunches in the young phase, 3 years after planting, and have a productive life in the mature phase up to 15 years after planting, then yields begin to decrease until the oil palm is replanted in the phase of old age, 25 to 30 years after planting [Fig. 3(b)].7,18 Understanding plant growth in oil palm plantations requires an understanding of the stages of flowering and fruit maturation. The purpose of phenological observations on oil palm trees is to identify the sex ratios of flowers, phases of flowering and fruit ripening, the age of each phase of flowering and fruit ripening, and to estimate yields.14 The phenology of an oil palm has a significant impact on yield estimations and is one of the key parameters affecting fruit bunch production.18 Furthermore, information on oil palm phenology is important for precision agriculture to identify variations within a typical phenology group within an oil palm plantation and to optimize planning and management solutions.19 In other cases, according to Darmawan et al.,7 phenology information is required for estimating oil palm taxes, replanting, and detecting oil palm diseases.7,20,21

Fig. 2

The relationship of palm age and yield.15

JARS_16_2_021501_f002.png

Fig. 3

(a) The oil palm planting pattern13 and (b) oil palm growth.

JARS_16_2_021501_f003.png

The physical and environmental conditions of oil palm plantations are affected by the age and productivity of the oil palms.10 According to Chong et al.,11 morphological characteristics can be used to predict the phenology of oil palms, since they are cultivated in specific ways. Previously, the phenology of oil palms was traditionally documented when the oil palms were first planted by labeling the land after the year of planting in standard management.11 This information, however, is not widely accessible and is generally too difficult to collect and verify, especially from smallholders. Remote sensing has been used to monitor oil palms since the 1990s.6 Researchers have widely utilized remote sensing technology, mostly for land cover classification in oil palm plantations. Oil palm plantations have a standard planting pattern, which includes grouping plants in blocks on a regular schedule based on plants with the same planting year. Remote sensing can be utilized to analyze the phenology of oil palm plantations.19

The aim of this study was to evaluate the current state of oil palm phenology based on remote sensing and conducted an optimized systematic review of recent scientific publications, specifically focusing on scientific peer-reviewed papers published between 1990 and 2021. This review is based on more than 100 existing journal papers on remote sensing for oil palm plantation phenology. The structure of this review is as follows:

  • 1. Introduction

  • 2. Methods for Reviewing the Literature on Oil Palm Phenology Based on Remote Sensing Data

  • 3. State of the Art of Identification and Mapping Methods for Oil Palm Phenology

    • 3.1. Based on sensors

    • 3.2. Based on biophysical tree parameters

    • 3.3. Based on classification techniques

  • 4. State of The Art of Developing Regression Models for Oil Palm Phenology

    • 4.1. Based on wavelength

    • 4.2. Based on biophysical tree parameters

    • 4.3. Based on the type of regression model

  • 5. Results

    • 5.1. Identification and Mapping of Oil Palm Phenology Based on Remote Sensing

    • 5.2. Developing Regression Models of Oil Palm Phenology Based on Remote Sensing

  • 6. Challenges and Future Directions

    • 6.1. Combining Multisensor Remote Sensing Data

    • 6.2. The Most Suitable Classification Method and Regression Model

    • 6.3. Future Direction in Oil Palm Phenology Based on Remote Sensing

  • 7. Conclusions

2.

Methods for Reviewing the Literature on Oil Palm Phenology Based on Remote Sensing Data

In this study, we evaluate the current state of oil palm phenology based on remote sensing. Oil palm phenology information is needed for harvesting, replanting, and determining the health of oil palm plantation that can be identified through remote sensing.7 We adopted an optimized systematic review approach of recent scientific publications.22 This technique closely follows a set of scientific procedures that expressly strive to reduce bias, primarily by attempting to discover, assess, and synthesize all relevant research to answer a specific question.23 Scopus and Google Scholar were used to perform literature searches. These two databases are the most comprehensive in the scientific discipline and are frequently utilized to conduct literature searches.22 The phrases used in Scopus were “TITLE-ABS-KEY (oil palm) AND (remote sensing) AND (“age” OR “phenology” OR “health”) AND PUBYEAR > 1990” and in Google Scholar, the terms “oil palm,” “remote sensing,” “age,” “phenology,” and “health” were used to search the databases. The sources were then chosen based on publications published in journals between 1990 and 2021.

The databases produced 392 papers, which were then whittled down by removing duplicates. Then, by reading the abstracts, this collection of articles was selected to select only papers that investigated oil palm phenology or age using classification approaches and identified oil palm phenology or age using a regression model. This produced 53 articles that were relevant to the issue. As a result, during the secondary filtering process, we removed several studies that did not directly related to oil palm phenology. Following that, we manually removed irrelevant articles by reviewing their whole text based on remote sensing systems, the data were then categorized as either issues or studies related to oil palm phenology, and a total of 39 papers were chosen. The database search and screening selection operations are shown in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

The process of database searching and screening.

JARS_16_2_021501_f004.png

We analyzed all papers and created a literature visualization based on the number of times each paper’s most important words were used from 1990 until 2021 (Fig. 5), with the highest numbers in 2019. Furthermore, based on Fig. 6, we used VOS Viewer to find the terms from the title and abstract of all papers that highlighted the present problem of oil palm phenology utilizing remote sensing from 1990 to 2021.

Fig. 5

Sources of articles in this study.

JARS_16_2_021501_f005.png

Fig. 6

Literature review based on keywords and time.

JARS_16_2_021501_f006.png

Most of the papers on oil palm were found in journal articles with 392 documents with the large frequently article from International Journal of Remote Sensing, Remote Sensing, Applied of Remote Sensing, and the Proceedings of IOP Earth and Environmental (Fig. 7). However, oil palm publications, particularly in remote sensing-based phenology, is still limited, and this will become a challenge in the future.

Fig. 7

Documents per year by source.

JARS_16_2_021501_f007.png

3.

State of the Art of the Identification and Mapping Methods for Oil Palm Phenology

Information about oil palm phenology is important for oil palm plantation management. For accurate information on trees, phenology is very important for scientific and practical reasons because it determines trees’ productivity.11 Based on passive and active sensors, biophysical tree parameters, and classification techniques, we reviewed the latest methods for identifying and mapping the spatial distribution of oil palm phenology.

3.1.

Based on Sensors

Remote sensing has the potential to provide significant support in oil palm monitoring and potential oil palm plantation predictions.7 Several studies in agriculture and plantations, particularly in oil palm plantations, have shown that remote sensing technology is capable of providing accurate performance estimates of the derivation of the relationship between spectral characteristics and vegetation indices in the form of canopy cover using the reflection of visual waves in red, green, blue, and infrared wavelengths.24 The interaction between sensors and the Earth’s surface can be categorized into two modes: passive sensors and active sensors.25

Passive sensors use solar radiation to reflect the Earth’s surface and detect surface reflections. They normally absorb electromagnetic waves in the visible (430 to 720 nm) and near-infrared (750 to 950 nm) ranges.26 Passive satellite sensors include those onboard Landsat, SPOT, Pléiades, EROS, GeoEye, WorldView, and other satellites.11 Active sensors depend on internal energy sources, whereas passive sensors rely on external energy source mainly sunlight.27 These utilize electromagnetic waves in the visible and near-infrared ranges (a laser rangefinder or a laser altimeter), as well as radar waves [synthetic aperture radar (SAR)].28 Because of their potential to penetrate clouds and collect data under all-weather day/night environments, active sensors have emerged as a promising technology in the field of remote sensing.29 TerraSAR-X, Sentinel-1A, ALOS PALSAR, RADARSAT, LiDAR, and other active sensors are examples. Passive and active sensors may be used to map oil palms based on the phenology or image characteristics of oil palm plantations30 by measuring and classifying reflected energy using spectral signatures.31

Several techniques have been established to map oil palm land cover throughout the tropics utilizing satellite remote sensing data.32 Oil palm mapping and change detection methods have been developed, with data sources derived from optical satellite Earth observations33,34 to microwave datasets,35,36 spatiotemporal resolutions from the regional to the national scale37 and from single to multidecadal mapping,6 interpretation methods ranging from manual to semiautomatic and fully automatic identification,6,3840 and products ranging from oil palm land cover maps to more detailed datasets on plantation structure. These include methods based on phenology for the classification of oil palm plantations,4144 tree counting,34,36,38,40,45 age estimation,10,21,46,47 yield estimation,4749 and a few studies have also focused on the detection of continuous oil palm changes,5052 allometric calculations of oil palm trees,5357 above-ground biomass estimation (AGB),54,5862 carbon estimation,55,6365 pest and disease detection.6668

Gutiérrez-Vélez and DeFries69 used Landsat to investigate the usage of spatial changes in vegetation greenness to detect deforestation caused by large-scale oil palm expansion in the Peruvian Amazon. McMorrow10 estimated oil palm age using Landsat by measuring the reflectance value and showing the relationship between oil palm age. Sitoms et al. 70 also used Landsat as well as Santos and Messina,71 Morel et al.,62 Vadivelu et al.,72 Lee et al.,33 Fitrianto et al.,73 Carolita et al.,21 Danylo et al.,74 Shaharum et al.,75 and Sarzynski et al.30

High-resolution satellite datasets can also produce optimal performance in estimating the age of oil palm trees, as Chemura et al.1 demonstrated by integrating multispectral data with WorldView-2 and performing regression analysis to reveal the oil palm age with biophysical parameters. IKONOS was used by Thenkabail et al.55 and Agustin et al.41 Active sensors can also focus on the physics of scattering processes. This method has primarily been used for identification purposes and is capable of understanding backscatter value using SAR data. Nordin et al.76 used AIRSAR data in the classification of oil palm age based on biophysical parameters. Other imagery that is commonly used is ALOS PALSAR. For example, Darmawan et al.47 used ALOS PALSAR-2 to show a correlation between backscatter value and oil palm age. In another case study, Yayusman and Nagasawa77 classified young oil palms and mature oil palms for a smallholder plantation. Morel et al.61 estimated biophysical parameters to identify oil palm age, and Tan et al.49 estimated tree height and diameter at breast height. Furthermore, recent studies have investigated or made comparisons between sensors. For example, Avtar et al.78 investigated a model of oil palm age using ALOS PALSAR, RADARSAT, and TerraSAR-X data. Carolita et al.21 made the comparison between active sensor (Sentinel-1A) and passive sensor (Landsat-8). Darmawan et al.7 investigated an oil palm phenology scattering model based on TerraSAR-X, Sentinel-1A, and ALOS PALSAR-2 data.

Recent studies have combined passive and active sensors with the aim of obtaining high accuracy; for example, Lee and Bretschneider79 discovered that combining microwave and optical data could effectively map oil palm trees in a heterogeneous environment with an overall accuracy of 94%, relative to using Landsat (84%) and PALSAR (89%) data separately. Sarzynski et al.30 used Landsat-8 and ALOS PALSAR data for oil palm age classification. Danylo et al.80 mapped the extent and age of productive oil palm plantations using Landsat and Sentinel-1A data.

Aside from the radar–optical combination, the integration of light detection and ranging (LiDAR) and optical data has been used in oil palm mapping. LiDAR, which is recognized for its extremely high spatial resolution, can generate three-dimensional (3D) details (measuring canopy height and terrain elevation). It offers a 3D view of current oil palm plantation conditions when combined with an optical image, which is incredibly useful for plantation management and planning.45 For example, Avtar et al.81 used multispectral unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) LiDAR data for estimating biophysical parameters.

3.2.

Based on Biophysical Tree Parameters

In traditional management practices, oil palm phenology is documented when the oil palms are first planted in the field by labeling the field according to the year of planting.49 As oil palms grow, they demonstrate an allometric formation, in which various tree parts grow at different speeds.53 Individually, these biophysical structures of the oil palm may be calculated. They are classified as biophysical parameters, and some of them are known to be associated with the oil palms’ growth stages (young, mature, and old) and they may also be used to discriminate them into specific phenology categories. These biophysical parameters include the oil palms’ leaf area index (LAI), crown projection area (CPA), and height.53 Shadow, roughness, and spectral response are examples of how these parameters are manifested.10

The concept of LAI is based on the area of one-sided leaf tissue per unit of ground surface.82 The basic concept of LAI is to identify the structure of trees by calculating the density of the surface of the leaves in a canopy, which could result in the effective interception of light, air, and water.46,83 Phenology would increase the LAI, with more fronds and leaves around the crowns of the oil palms.84 This relationship thus makes LAI a valuable feature in the estimation of oil palm phenology.84 CPA is similar to the percentage of canopy cover but is expressed as the canopy area that is covered by an individual oil palm.10 To calculate the region of the oil palm’s crown, high-resolution satellite imagery is needed. Satellite data contain different responses in various spectral bands, which make it possible to distinguish, segment, and delineate an oil palm’s crown core, rachis edges, and background.1 For example, the crown core appears brighter than the edges and background. Oil palm crowns can be delineated using object-based image processing, allowing CPA to be determined. In this area, a positive linear relationship with age is observed with the projected oil palm crown area.1

The oil palm tree does not stop growing in height throughout its life. This feature of growth is very useful in estimating oil palm age.19 Throughout its life cycle, the height of the oil palm grows by 30 to 60 cm each year, depending on its physical condition and genetic factors.85 Different methods, such as interferometry synthetic aperture radar (InSAR), can be used to obtain information about height.86 Using only field-measured information, oil palm height showed a strong linear relationship with age.49 Tree height has proven to be a potentially useful indicator for estimating oil palm phenology.53 Another biophysical parameter, diameter at breast height, is insignificantly related to the phenology of oil palms since oil palm trunks do not grow after 2 years of maturity.85

Several studies have used biomass to estimate the phenology of oil palms. Thenkabail et al.55 used stem height to estimate the aboveground biomass of young oil palm trees (aged from 1 to 5 years). Khalid et al.87 used total height as a descriptive variable to estimate biomass for mid-mature (23-year-old) Malaysian oil palm plantations. SAR for oil palm plantations is an important parameter, extracted from normalized backscatter, that is related to AGB. Nordin et al.76 used a biomass index and created an empirical biomass model for oil palms. The results of SAR applications in tropical forests can be applied to oil palm plantations. Due to their standardized geometry, the use of the same plant species, and the identical ages of the trees planted in a single plantation, the resulting data are easy to interpret. Kee et al.44 investigated oil palm tree discrimination using three parameters—LAI, biomass, and height—to assess the backscattering value of oil palms using data from the C-band and L-band. Lazecky et al.88 also analyzed an oil palm plantation based on Sentinel 1 A (C-band) data.

3.3.

Based on Classification Techniques

A classification image algorithm can be used to sort an image into age categories to provide information regarding oil palm plantations.55 Oil palm identification has been used successfully in a variety of image classification approaches. Image classification involves categorizing pixels based on different features, such as spectral signatures, indices, contextual details, and many more.89 The techniques of image classification can be divided into supervised and unsupervised techniques.90 Supervised classification techniques include the use of support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), spectral angle mapper (SAM), fuzzy adaptive resonance theory supervised predictive mapping, Mahalanobis distance, radial basis function, decision tree (DT), multilayer perception, naive Bayes, maximum likelihood classifier (MLC), and fuzzy logic analyses.51

There are numerous classification techniques available, with MLC being the most common parametric classifier due to its good classification performance. Santos and Messina,71 MLC for the identification of oil palm yields. Tan et al. 49 separated the ages of oil palm trees, and Vadivelu et al.72 also performed oil palm age classifications. Yayusman and Nagasawa77 also classified young and mature oil palms. On the other hand, unsupervised classification techniques include the affinity propagation (AP) cluster algorithm, fuzzy C-means algorithms, the K-means algorithm, iterative self-organizing data (ISODATA), etc.91 Thenkabail et al.56 carried out unsupervised ISOCLASS classification. Tan et al.,50 Razali et al.,92 and Danylo et al.75 also used unsupervised classification (ISODATA) on a cloud computing Google Earth Engine (GEE) to reveal the age of oil palms in Southeast Asia. Other researchers have used a combination of classification methodologies to obtain the best level of accuracy. Morel et al.63 effectively distinguished between forest and oil palm areas based on Landsat data using unsupervised k-means and maximum likelihood methods with a DT, as well as calculating aboveground biomass using ALOS PALSAR. A recent study performed by Carolita et al.21 showed a possible method of mapping oil palm age based on a SPOT-6 normalized vegetation differential index (NDVI) pixel-based classifier.

Object-based image analysis (OBIA) is another method of classifying oil palm phenology. Instead of analyzing individual pixels, OBIA of remote sensing data requires the grouping of pixels into homogeneous segments or objects.93 These segments provide additional information about individual pixels, such as the mean, variance, and mean ratio values per band.93 Accumulating pixels into segments further reduces the computing costs involved with working with finer-resolution satellite imagery, which is becoming more available as sensor quality improves. This type of image segmentation algorithm is classified into four categories: point-, edge-, and region-based, and combined algorithms.45 Oil palm mapping can be carried out by combining pixels with identical values, clustering areas, and categorizing them based on texture, context, and geometry.45 Rizeei et al.,46 for example, were able to estimated oil palm tree counts and perform age predictions using WorldView-3 imagery and LiDAR data, utilizing an optimized OBIA method. Chemura et al.1 used OBIA to estimate the age of oil palm plantations (years after planting) by integrating high-resolution multispectral remote sensing data and regression techniques.

In recent decades, machine learning classifiers have emerged as powerful classifiers and have been widely adopted for classification purposes due to their higher accuracy and performance compared to MLC.94 Analyses using artificial intelligence to identify oil palm land cover, such as SVM, RF, classification and regression tree (CART), deep learning (DL), artificial neural network (ANN), and other machine learning algorithms, have been used in an attempt to obtain significant improvements.95 Descals et al.96 used cloud computing and the RF classification approach to discriminate between young and mature oil palms based on Sentinel 1 and Sentinel 2 data. Ordway et al.39 also used RF models to classify imagery in 2000 and 2015 according to land cover types: forest, mature oil palms, immature monocultures, and other land cover, based on Landsat data. De Alban et al.97 combined Landsat and L-band SAR data to improve land cover classifications using the RF classification method in Google Earth Engine. Shaharum et al.75 also used GEE to characterize oil palm land cover for the first time across Peninsular Malaysia, using nonparametric machine learning algorithms such as SVM, CART, and RF, obtaining the best accuracy using SVM, at 93.16%.

To address automation issues, more recent works have used DL in computerized oil palm plantation analyses. For instance, the DL approach has been used in palm tree detection and counting.40 The convolutional neural network (CNN), a widely used DL model, has achieved great performance in many studies in the computer vision field, such as image classification. Li et al.38 proposed using DL to detect plants instead of manual detection methods. They used data from a manual count to train and improve the performance of a CNN system. Mubin et al.41 also used a CNN to distinguish between young and mature oil palm trees.

4.

State of the Art of Developing Regression Models of Oil Palm Phenology Based on Remote Sensing

Some other cases in the literature concern the identification of oil palm phenology using regression models. Regression models can be developed based on correlations between remote sensing data and the ages of oil palms derived from field surveys. We reviewed the existing studies on the use of regression models of oil palm phenology based on wavelength, biophysical tree parameters, and on the type of regression model.

4.1.

Based on Wavelength

Depending on the wavelength, electromagnetic radiation may be available from a natural source, or it must be transmitted by an instrument. Typical passive sensor systems on space platforms include panchromatic systems, multispectral systems, and hyperspectral systems. A multispectral sensor is a multichannel detector with a few spectral bands.25 Each channel is sensitive to radiation within a narrow wavelength band. Visible light refers to energy in the blue (0.4 to 0.5  μm), green (0.5 to 0.6  μm), and red (0.6 to 0.7  μm) bands of the electromagnetic spectrum.98 The middle-infrared region (often referred to as the short-wavelength infrared) includes energy with a wavelength of 1.3 to 3  μm. The thermal infrared region contains light at 3 to 5  μm and 8 to 14  μm. McMorrow10 used Landsat TM data to estimated age parameters by analyzing the spectral band and infrared index. Sitoms et al.71 analyzed a phenology model using the spectral index. Tan et al.50 performed comparisons using bands 1, 2, 3; NDVI; and surface reflectance data from Landsat and UK-DMC. For high spatial resolutions, Carolita et al.99 succeeded in estimating age using NDVI based on SPOT 6 data.

Active sensors use frequencies from 1 to 90 GHz. The wavelengths of active sensors are intrinsically linked to the penetration capabilities of the transmitted microwave signal, such that longer-wavelength signals can penetrate deeper into vegetation canopies and soils.100 An active sensor can obtain information in the electromagnetic spectrum bands K (1.1 to 1.7 cm), X (2.4 to 3.8 cm), C (3.8 to 7.5 cm), L (15 to 30 cm), and P (30 to 100 cm),101 with the polarization of horizontal-to-horizontal (HH), vertical-to-vertical (VV), horizontal-to-vertical (HV), or vertical-to-horizontal (VH), which have varying ranges and azimuth resolutions.101 SAR releases electromagnetic radiation in the microwave range of wavelengths and receives backscatter radiation when interacting with objects on the Earth’s surface.29 Backscattering has been used in many studies to describe vegetation dynamics, based on current microwave wavelengths in the X-, C-, and L- bands.27 For example, Tan et al.50 applied the gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) technique to ALOS PALSAR-2 data to determine the ages of oil palm trees. Carolita et al.21 developed a regression model based on the correlation backscattering value from SAR Sentinel-1A data (band C) and age information collected from oil palm age-block data. Okarda et al.21 discovered that the relationship between age and backscattering has a strong correlation for HH and HV polarized signals, and so the value of backscattering can be useful for analyzing the height and age of oil palm trees.

4.2.

Based on Biophysical Tree Parameters

Plant biophysical parameters can be used to determine the phenological characteristics of oil palms and are also recognized to be related to the growth stages of oil palms (young, mature, and old) and can be categorized into various age classes.10,11 Assessing and quantifying biophysical parameters of vegetation cover are extremely important problems when monitoring land cover and associated changes, identifying vegetation stress, and assessing yield. These parameters can be used to quantify the state of crops within agriculture monitoring tasks under the global agriculture monitoring initiative, and they have already proved to be efficient for crop yield and production predictions and estimates.102 Remote sensing data from space are the only source of information that enable the regular and consistent estimation of biophysical parameters at the regional, national, and global scales.103 Both optical and SAR imagery can be used to extract biophysical values.

Phenology information is a good indicator for yield prediction as it influences the quality and quantity of the fresh fruit bunches.1 To determine the phenology, many researchers have investigated biophysical parameters. These parameters are used to identify the biophysical characteristics of oil palms. Oil palm phenology begins at the age of zero; in this stage young oil palms are not much affected by competition before the leaves start to overlap and yields per palm in the first few years may be more or less constant up to quite high densities.16 Thus, the optimum is very high when production starts, but this falls to below 150 palms/ha within 10 years.82 At any one age, quite a wide range of optimal densities has been recorded.16 Oil palm fruits can be harvested throughout the year. In oil palms older than about 10 years, leaf area does not change much, so the optimum might be expected to remain fairly constant after reaching a minimum 12 to 13 years after planting, and the optimum density increases slightly in later years.104 This has been attributed to better light distribution through the canopy as differences in palm height become more marked, and light penetration through the canopy was found to increase in year 13 from its minimum in years 9 to 11, with the variation in palm height increasing with age.105 Another factor may be that the LAI is maximal at about 10 years and then falls slightly.

An allometric equation is often used in forestry to relate the measurable parameters of plants (such as age, diameter at breast height, and tree height) to carbon stocks.54 An allometric equation can be developed based on a strong statistical relationship between the carbon stocks obtained from the plot-based measurement of certain parameters. Moreover, these parameters provide an important piece of information to complete the allometric equation for the estimation of biomass.49 This further indicates the carbon stock of oil palms and its environmental effects.19 In oil palms, parameters such as age and trunk height are applied in an allometric equation for determining carbon stocks.60 For example, Shashikant et al.60 used different allometric equations to investigate the relationship between radar backscattering and AGB data on age differences. Kanniah et al.106 estimated the LAI and fPAR values of an oil palm ecosystem in Malaysia using remote sensing. The data derived from near-infrared signals from UK-DMC 2 and LAI were computed on the basis of hemispherical photos. The model was used to increase the LAI from the plot to the region level. The results revealed a strong relationship between the LAI data and the validation data. The authors discovered that the LAI and fPAR values from UK-DMC 2 and MODIS matched well after comparing these results to MOD15A data.

4.3.

Based on the Type of Regression Model

A wide range of studies have been conducted using different remote sensing approaches to estimate the age of oil palms, which can be grouped into two main categories: radiative transfer models and statistical regression models. The most common method for estimating phenology is regression analysis.107 A regression analysis or other statistical technique is used to determine a correlation or relationship between two sets of information.10 Regression models are used to understand how changes in the predictor values are associated with changes in the response mean. There are a variety of regression methodologies based on the type of response variable, the type of model that is required to provide an adequate fit to the data and the estimation method, such as whether it is linear, multiple linear, or nonlinear.108 The most common models are simple linear and multiple linear models. Nonlinear regression analysis is commonly used for more complicated data sets in which the dependent and independent variables show a nonlinear relationship. There are three purposes for regression analysis: (1) prediction, (2) design of the model, and (3) assessment of parameters.109 This procedure has been specifically used to analyze the relationship between extracted features and ground-measured biophysical parameters.10

In the case of oil palm phenology, many studies have used linear and nonlinear regression approaches, such as Nordin et al.76 using AIRSAR; Tan et al.,50 Avtar et al.,79 Darmawan et al.,48 and Darmawan et al.7 using ALOS PALSAR, who found that the relationship between age and biophisycal parameters presented a nonlinear logarithmic equation, with R2 ranging from 0.4 to 0.8. McMorrow10 used Landsat data and Okarda et al.21 used ALOS PALSAR data, showing a linear regression relationship between age and spectral index equation, with R2=0.7. On the other hand, a nonlinear quadratic equation, with an average R2 value of 0.8 using optical and SAR data, has been demonstrated by Tan et al.,50 Carolita et al.,21 and Rizeei et al.,46 and Darmawan et al.,7 using Sentinel-1A data.

McMorrow19 using Landsat TM data showed a negative nonlinear correlation between the brightness of Landsat TM imagery and the age of the oil palms, meaning that a smaller reflectance value indicated a younger age oil palm. Carolita et al.21using SPOT showed that variations in NDVI can describe oil palm growth using the formula y=0.0004x2+0.0107x+0.3912, where x is the age of the oil palm and Y is the NDVI, with R2=0.657. Comparison of the utilization of Landsat 8 imagery with regression analysis techniques indicates that the age of oil palm plants can be analyzed using spectral index NDVI data with R2=0.85. Chemura et al.1 also estimated the age of oil palms in Ghana by integrating multispectral data generated from WorldView-2 high-resolution satellite imagery and regression analysis techniques. Correlations between age and CPA can be used to evaluate oil palm age models. According to the results of this study, there is a strong relationship between age and CPA in oil palms over the age of 13 years. Correlations with biomass parameters were observed by Nordin et al.77 using AIRSAR data. Different polarizations [horizontal (H) and vertical (V)] of radar remote sensing data were utilized to investigate the ages of oil palms.47 Both studies using the ALOS PALSAR series agreed that (1) HH was statistically related to the age of oil palms better than HV and (2) the backscattering value increased with age due to the increase in biomass.

Shashikant et al.59 tested the relationship between radar backscattering and AGB data with certain allometric equations in relation to age variants. Tan et al.50 used ALOS PALSAR-2 data to detect the age of oil palm trees using the GLCM technique. Pohl and Loong110 researched the application of InSAR topography and developed high-profile oil palms; this information was useful for mapping the age profile of oil palms. They analyzed the relationship between tree height and the ages of oil palms, applying a linear regression model. This relationship resulted in a height-to-age empirical model to form an equation that can derive age values from the heights of oil palm trees in Malaysia.

The relationship between age and backscattering on mineral soils and peatlands has a strong correlation for HH and HV, as found by Okarda et al.20 According to Okarda and colleagues, the importance of backscattering may be useful in analyzing the height and age of oil palm trees.20 Carolita et al.21 produced a regression model with a correlation between backscattering value from SAR Sentinel-1A data (band C) and age obtained from oil palm age-block data. In the C-band, the researchers found that tree cover pixels were considered oil palms if the VV/VH difference was greater than 7.4 dB and VH backscattering was less than 13  dB.111 However, smaller wavelengths such as the C-band have been used successfully to predict phenology.111 Darmawan et al.7 aimed to explore the potential analysis of phenology characteristics using SAR data with X-, C-, and L-band measurements. The results showed that the most promising region was the C band, with VV polarization, with R2=0.85.

5.

Results

5.1.

Identification and Mapping of Oil Palm Phenology Based on Remote Sensing

Previous researchers have investigated classification methods to distinguish between oil palm plantations and other land cover elements and have then used these classification methods to distinguish between age groups (Table 1).

Table 1

Oil palm phenology using classification methods.

AuthorClassification techniqueSensorAccuracyParameter
76Supervised classificationAIRSAR1 year = 73%Biomass
2 years = 99%
15 years = 96%
20 years = 63%
25 years = 82%
55ISOCLASSIKONOS74.5%Biomass
71MLCRADARSAT and Landsat ETM+83%Oil palm crops
112Supervised classification SAM algorithmAirborne hyperspectral93.33%The characteristics of a matured oil palm plantation
62K-means, MLC, and DTLandsat ETM+ ALOS-PALSAR97.0%Aboveground biomass
49ISODATA, MLC, and RFUK-DMC2 and ALOS PALSAR45.3% to 52.9%Radiance, vegetation indices, and fraction of shadow in response to the age of oil palm trees
69RFLandsat TM/ETM+ and ALOS-PALSARLandsat = 96.3%Vegetation indices
ALOS-PALSAR = 94%
113Vegetation index (NDVI, Simple ratio, and SAVI)UK-DMC2 and MODISR2=0.70LAI and fPAR
R2=0.66
72MLC, NN, and SVMLandsat TMMLC = 47.26%Phase II involves oil palm age classification
NN = 34.58%
SVM = 54.18%
92ISODATA and K-meansMODIS and ALOS94%Young oil palm
77MLCALOSMature = 92%Smallholders’ oil palm plantation
AVNIR-2Young = 64.44%
1OBIAWorldView-280.6%CPA
41Segmentation-based fractal texture analysisIKONOS panchromatic72.5%The extraction of fractal-based texture features
33CART and RFLandsat in Google Earth EngineCART = 93.6%Immature oil palm
RFT= 91.2%
99NDVISPOT 6R2=0.67Canopy
45SVM and OBIAWorldView-3 and LiDAR84.91%Tree crown and tree height
73Advanced vegetation index, bare soil index, shadow index, and thermal indexLandsat 5, 7, 885.71%FCD
40CNNWorldView-3Young = 95.11%Mature and young oil palms
Mature = 92.96%
96RFSentinel-1 and Sentinel-2Sentinel-1 = 93.5%Typology and age
Sentinel-2 = 90.2%
114DT and RFHyperspectralRF= 92.79% to 98.77%Chlorophyll
DT = 56.30% to 90.48%
74ISODATASentinel-1, Sentinel-2, Landsat 5, and 7Kalimantan = 80%Bare soil index (BSI)
Sumatra = 83%
Insular Malaysia = 82.78%
Peninsular Malaysia = 84.95%
Thailand = 80.33%
75SVM, CART, and RFLandsat 8SVM = 93.16%
CART = 80.08%
RF = 86.50%
30RFLandsat 8 and ALOS PALSAR 284%
81NDVI and NDREMultispectral sensors on UAVCanopy height and CPA

Many classification techniques in machine learning, such as RF, SVM, and ANN, have improved in terms of accuracy, with error levels around 80% to 90%. Hyperspectral imagery can provide improved levels of detail on oil palms for phenology analyses using biophysical parameters. However, all techniques should be applied when adopting methods for one location and applying them to other locations as there are various factors that affect the accuracy of the classification outcomes, such as scale, phenology, and variations in topography and background signals. There is no single type of data that is suitable for all oil palm areas.115

Machine learning with RF, SVM, and CNN techniques showed higher accuracy than other techniques. Gutiérrez-Vélez and DeFries69 used RF classification based on vegetation index with an accuracy of 96.3% using Landsat imagery data. Using the same technique, Lee et al.34 identified immature oil palms based on Landsat data with a cloud computing GEE, showing an accuracy of 91.2%. Amirruddin et al.114 made a comparison of RF and DT based on hyperspectral imagery with accuracies of 98.77% for RF and 90.48% for DT. Sarzynski et al.31 used RF based on a fusion of Landsat 8 and ALOS PALSAR-2 techniques, with an accuracy of 84%. A CNN method was developed by Mubin et al.41 based on WorldView-3 for the identification of young and mature oil palms, with an overall accuracy of 95.11% for young oil palms and 92.96% for mature oil palms. Furthermore, an SVM technique showed an average accuracy of 84.91% for Rizeei et al.45 and Shaharum et al.76 achieved 93.16% accuracy.

5.2.

Developing Regression Models of Oil Palm Phenology Based on Remote Sensing

Aside from classification methods, one approach to determining the ages of oil palms is through modeling algorithms that use regression to show the correlation between oil palm age parameters based on wavelength and biophysical parameters (Table 2).

Table 2

Oil palm phenology models.

AuthorPhenology modelR2ParameterSensor
76y=85.634Ln(x)+77.9930.80BiomassAIRSAR
y=68.51Ln(x)+62.3880.80
10y=1.8880.260x0.7Spectral BandLandsat TM
y=0.03746+0.07861x0.8Infrared index
70y=61.30.54x1+39.39x242.3x30.69Spectral indexLandsat TM
49y=  10.80ln(x)+123.400.76Band 1UK-DMC-2
y=  1.79ln(x)+24.080.20Band 2ALOS
y=  3.00ln(x)+24.580.40Band 3PALSAR
y=  0.001ln(x)+0.680.01NDVI
y=0.14ln(x)+5.360.02SR
y=0.01  ln(x)+1.010.01SAVI
y=0.13ln(x)+0.0130.80ShadowFraction
y=2.07ln(x)+15.540.79Band 1 GLCM
y=0.59ln(x)+2.230.43Band 2 GLCM
y=0.11ln(x)+20.360.19Band 3 GLCM
y=2.00ln(x)13.480.49LAI
y=1.05ln(x)15.650.27LAI
y=0.09ln(x)+0.880.26Tree height
y=0.000x30.030x2+0.714x0.8920.96DBH
y=0.492x0.90
y=0.002x+0.7040.02
78y=1.2598ln(x)18.5770.49HVPALSAR, RADARSAT, TerraSAR-X
y=1.144ln(x)9.81190.62HH
y=1.3666ln(x)17.4960.77HV
1Age(year)=0.59+0.15×CPA(m2)0.88CPAWorldView-2
47y=0.2783x+237520.23FFBALOS PALSAR 2
y=0.8845ln(x)13.6550.63HH
y=0.6445ln(x)20.4970.42HV
99y=0.0004x2+0.0107x+0.3912NDVISPOT 6
45y=1.2803x0.99510.88LRFWorldView and LiDAR
y=0.0404x2+0.4605x+1.98560.91PRF
y=2.8103e0.1218x0.90ERF
20y=213x+26.030.55Mineral soilALOS PALSAR-2
y=0.63x+16.550.37Mineral soil
y=0.46x+9.200.36HH and peatland
y=0.57x+14.740.28HV and peatland
21y=0.0003x2+0.0068x+0.43880.85NDVILandsat 8
y=0.0222x2+0.4579x17.3110.77HVSentinel 1
y=0.0219x2+0.4594x9.81910.68HH
116y=0.0003+0.0068x+0.4380.84NDVILandsat, SPOT, Pleiades, and Sentinel 2
y=0.00032+0.0055x+0.83930.81
y=0.0002+0.0071x+0.780.8
y=0.0002+0.0071x+0.43880.85
y=0.0002+0.0081x+0.82720.96
y=0.0008+0.0017x+0.7970.61
y=0.0005+0.0111x+0.8170.85
y=0.0002+0.0084x+0.7920.7
y=0.0002+0.0084x+0.7920.7
y=0.0002+0.0058x+0.8740.88
6y=0.2153x9.90860.66HHTerraSAR-X, Sentinel-1A, and ALOS PALSAR-2
y=0.0072x2+0.1787x9.07570.81VH
y=0.0046x2+0.1071x15.8580.85VV
y=1.756ln(x)22.0690.71HV
y=2.0916ln(x)19.3790.77HH

All remote sensing data can be applied in developing oil palm phenology models. The choice depends on the biophysical parameter used for estimating oil palm age. For passive sensors, Landsat imagery is commonly used to extract oil palm parameters using spectral indexes, such as NDVI and a quadratic nonlinear regression model. Furthermore, the use of WorldView imagery was applied by Chemura et al.,1 using the biophysical parameter CPA, with R2=0.88. Many studies have chosen L-band penetration in active sensors because it provides the ability to detect and measure biophysical parameters with moderate coefficient determination, using aboveground biomass, for example, and the model involves logarithmic nonlinear regression. Nordin et al.,77 for example, demonstrated a coefficient determination of 0.8 using AIRSAR data with biophysical parameters relating to biomass. This means that biomass has a strong correlation with standing age. Tan et al.50 analyzed the biophysical parameters of height tree and diameter at breast height of oil palms based on ALOS PALSAR data, with R2=0.9. On the other hand, comparisons of Sentinel-1A data with VV polarization conducted by Darmawan et al.7 showed quadratic linear regression with a higher R2 value of 0.85. Nonlinear regression was applied for the purpose of better coefficient determination (R2), with quadratic and logarithmic types giving R2 values ranging from 0.5 to 0.8, from moderate to strong correlations.

6.

Challenges and Future Directions

Remote sensing technology generates information for the purpose of describing oil palm conditions, as well as processing and reanalyzing the data using customized management practices.24 The use of active and passive sensors with a variety of wavelengths, biophysical tree parameters, and classification and regression methods can involve challenges, particularly in improving and developing suitable techniques for identification and classification, and developing regression models of oil palm phenology.

6.1.

Combining Multisensor Remote Sensing Data

The use of active and passive sensors has proven to be successful in classification applications and algorithm models with high accuracy have been developed. Passive sensors are generally used to analyze oil palm phenology simultaneously at the regional scale and can also be used to identify vegetation indices and biophysical parameters such as LAI and forest canopy density (FCD). Active sensors can also be used for identifying oil palm age using biophysical parameters, such as aboveground biomass, tree height, and canopy height.

Active sensors can only obtain complex data under various transmitting and receiving polarizations and biophysical parameters can only be extracted through regression models or machine learning.117 With the advancement of active sensors (SAR), multipolarization SAR methods are evolving, which involve adaptions to the shape and orientation of vegetation components. According to Izzawati et al.,118 the key variables influencing the accuracy of tree height estimations are canopy shape, tree density, and slope. According to Pohl et al.119 and Tan et al.,50 active sensors can provide important information on tree height to complete the list of biophysical parameters used to estimate the productivity of a plantations using polarimetry and interferometric techniques (PolInSAR). These techniques can be used to estimate tree height by subtracting a digital terrain model from an InSAR height estimate or using dual PolInSAR data generated from X-band, C-band, L-band, and P-band data.120 PolInSAR seems to be a very effective instrument for ecology and forestry because it can provide highly accurate estimations of canopy height and forest biomass,119 but it has not yet been implemented in oil palm phenology studies.

Furthermore, the use of passive and active data to identify oil palm plantations emphasizes the usefulness of multisensory and data fusion techniques, which combine various data features to improve accuracy.30 According to Rashid et al.,94 for oil palm classification, the fusion of data from multisensors is highly recommended. Mohd Najib et al.121 have also combined multisensor data using ALOS PALSAR-2 and Landsat TM to detect mature and young oil palms and their results showed an accuracy of 98.36% in Peninsular Malaysia. Sarzynski et al.31 evaluated the use of a semiautomated approach with an RF method as a classifier and combined optical and radar datasets to classify oil palm land-cover in 2015 in Sumatra, Indonesia, using Google Earth Engine with an overall accuracy of 84%. Danylo et al.18 used Sentinel 1 to generate an oil palm plantation map, and a Landsat time series was used to analyze an oil palm plantation, first detected using NDVI and BSI. In other plantations, the fusion of data from various remote sensing sources has already been undertaken; for example, optical and SAR analyses of paddy fields were effectively combined for rice identification and mapping,119 with high accuracy.

6.2.

Most Suitable Classification Method and Regression Model

Machine learning approaches have been shown to be able to utilize different kinds of remote sensing data. The recent evolution in artificial intelligence, such as development of DL, promises to bring remote sensing technology to new standards of performance, with improvements in detection and classification.122 This information is critical for determining crop health and productivity and serves as an essential measure for agriculture planning and management.123 In relation to oil palm management practices, recent studies have proposed the use of remote sensing technology using various data sources and advanced image processing methods based on machine learning and DL. According to Chong et al.,11 in a general sense, for the discrimination of oil palms and other plantations, classification is carried out by classifying pixels of similar attributes/values depending on the used classifier. Machine learning methods, based on RF classifiers, are very effective in the identification and mapping of oil palms. According to Sarzynski et al.,31 RF is a class of DTs that can increase the precision of classifying and detecting plantations, for example, in oil palms, depending on the data they collect. Furthermore, according to Shaharum et al.,76 the RF algorithm derived oil palm information better than the other classifier used, and the RF algorithm enhanced classification when the RF trees were ensembled into a forest.69 Moreover, according to Attarchi and Gloaguen,124 nonparametric RF models can accommodate a large number of correlated input variables and biased data, while avoiding overfitting. As a result, RF models are highly useful for mapping heterogeneous landscapes. In addition, incipient developments in deep machine learning approaches, such as CNNs, are gaining attention due to their promising capability for automatically extracting valuable contextual information from remote sensing data, with potential usefulness in large-scale classifications.97 Li et al.38 proposed using DL to detect plants instead of manual detection methods. According to Toh et al.,125 DL classification requires a large dataset for optimal classification training. In addition to being very accurate, according to Bonet et al.,126 the DL approach, such as the use of CNNs, is very flexible as it can be used straightforwardly to identify similar plants, or those of different varieties, decreasing the number of misclassified oil palms. All these classification techniques show improvements in accuracy up to 90%.

In one study, OBIA was found to be more accurate than pixel-based analysis. Chemura et al.1 adopted WorldView-2 data to investigate oil palm age using an OBIA classification method to identify the crown area, combined with a regression technique. Their results showed an overall accuracy of 72.8%, a segmentation goodness of fit of 0.69, and a correlation with field-measured crown area of 0.9, which indicated the successful delineation of individual tree crowns using OBIA.

The modeling of oil palm phenology based on regression models does not always display linear behavior. Oil palm phenology normally exhibits a nonlinear type of relationship.127 Nonlinear machine learning techniques are a type of highly efficient regression approaches that have been used successfully in the analysis of biophysical parameters. According to Frost,128 nonlinear regression also requires a continuous dependent variable, but it provides a greater flexibility in the fitting of curves than linear regression. According to Chong et al.,11 the biophysical characteristics of the tree have also proved to be potentially reliable indicators for the estimation of oil palm age. Most nonlinear models have one continuous independent variable, but it is possible to have more than one.129 According to Ali et al.,130 such techniques can learn and estimate even complicated nonlinear mappings, using advanced machine learning methods and the information contained in a series of comparison samples. ANNs are among the most frequently used techniques in the field of biophysical parameter retrieval, and these have been widely investigated in many application domains.

Recent studies have involved the use of ANNs in oil palm studies. Hilal et al.127 showed that ANN was a significant modeling instrument, showed terrific potential for the optimization of prediction models, with high precision in many related areas of study. All regression models can show improved coefficient determination (R2) values, ranging from moderate (0.4) to strong (0.9) relationships. Furthermore, machine learning techniques do not always produce high-precision results because good results depend on the machine-learning model set-up, the training samples, and the input parameters.127 In addition, in the case of paddy fields, the best classification methods are SVM and RF, and CNN and recurrent neural network techniques will require phenology and textural feature information to improve the accuracy of their data.126

6.3.

Future Direction in Oil Palm Phenology Based on Remote Sensing

According to Refs. 106 and 131, LAI can identify phenology based on optical sensor spectral values derived from NDVI. According to Refs. 45, 95, and 125, machine learning classifiers (RF, SVM, DT) have emerged as effective classifications and have been extensively utilized for classification applications due to their better accuracy and performance. According to Refs. 95, 127, and 132, machine learning-based regression algorithms such as RF, CNN, and SVR could be very useful for predicting oil palm production including phenology. Furthermore, rather than a single algorithm, an ensemble of numerous algorithms should be considered to improve the robustness of the prediction model. Sarzynski et al.30 demonstrated improved accuracy based on machine learning RF classification in the analysis of oil palm plantations using multisensor and data fusion techniques. Descals et al.133 used a DL CNN for semantic segmentation with 98% overall accuracy. According to Ref. 132, the detection and classification of oil palm trees using DL need to be performed using high-resolution images and requires field survey data to study the important biophysical characteristics of oil palm trees and to evaluate the reliability of the results.

According to Refs. 81, 103, 119, 125, 131, and 134, regression models of oil palm phenology must be created to be developed based on biophysical tree parameters, researchers can make estimates about oil palm phenology by analyzing the canopy layer, fruit bunch, and tree height using allometric techniques. Regression model is used to analyze the relationship between biophysical characteristics extracted from an image with data from measurements in the field. Regression model-based algorithms using machine learning could be very effective in making predictions about oil palm phenology.

In the oil palm industry, UAV-based imaging provides low cost flexible data acquisition with less weather constraints and higher spatial/temporal resolution, as compared with high-resolution satellite data.81 There are various applications of UAV, such as monitoring canopy structure and condition, mapping biomass, and precision agriculture.135 Yarak et al.132 applied high-resolution imagery from a UAV, combined with the DL approach, for the automatic detection and health classification of oil palm trees using three important biophysical characteristics: crown size, crown color, and crown density. According to Pohl,69 classification of polarimetric and interferometric (PolInSAR) data to estimate heights (biomass) information and to provide information on oil palm frond shapes and changes as well as moisture parameters of plants and soil.

In the future, remote sensing technology is expected to evolve into high-tech industries, in which systems are coupled with artificial intelligence and big data136 to examine the relationship between environmental and socioeconomic indicators.137 For future direction, we recommend some parameters, remote sensing data sources, and methods in Table 3. According to Table 3, we have recommendation for further studies on oil palm phenology based on remote sensing to identify, classify, and mapping can be use parameter such as LAI, canopy density, and NDVI derived from Landsat, high resolution images, and UAV LiDAR based on machine learning such as RF, SVM, DT, and OBIA method. For developing regression model can be use LAI, canopy height, biomass derived from SAR, PolInSAR, and UAV LiDAR based on nonlinear regression using machine learning method. This recommendation, we believe will be more accurate for identification, classification, and mapping, also developing regression model. However, the accuracy is influenced by testing and validation data, climate factors, precision errors, soil characteristics, spatial mixtures, and other external factors.

Table 3

Recommendation for further studies on oil palm phenology based on remote sensing.

TaskParameterRemote sensing dataMethod
Identification, classification, and mappingLAI, canopy density, NDVILandsat, high resolution images, UAV LiDARMachine learning (RF, SVM, DT), OBIA
Developing regression modelLAI, canopy height, biomassSAR, PolInSAR, UAV LiDARNonlinear regression using machine learning

7.

Conclusions

The results showed that the identification and mapping of oil palm phenology can be conducted based on sensors, including passive sensors, which estimate oil palm age by analyzing the spectral response, using data from MODIS, Landsat, SPOT, IKONOS, WorldView, etc. In active sensors, backscattering characteristics were analyzed, with the use of data from sources, such as TerraSAR-X, Sentinel-1A, ALOS PALSAR, LiDAR. Many studies used biophysical parameters approach such as LAI, CPA, and tree height were carried out through shadow, roughness, and spectral responses for estimating oil palm phenology. Machine learning (such as SVM, RF, and CNN) was used to identify images and predict oil palm phenology using a technique based on classification methods and regression models with the accuracy levels around 98%. Aside from that, OBIA offers an accuracy of more than 90% for a small area. However, the remaining challenge is the improvement of suitable techniques for the identification, classification, and development of regression models for oil palm phenology. This challenge can be suggested for future studies by integrating machine learning with oil palm biophysical parameters using multisensor remote sensing technologies, and CNN machine learning can be further developed for classification and regression models with a large number of parameters.

Acknowledgments

This research was part of dissertation research of Rika Hernawati funded by The Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture with the scheme basic research scheme of doctoral program. Also the authors would like thank to Agency Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP), Program Kompetisi Kampus Merdeka (PKKM), Doctoral Program of Geodesy and Geomatics ITB, LPPM Itenas Bandung, and Geodetic Engineering Itenas Bandung. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. 

A. Chemura, I. van Duren and L. M. van Leeuwen, “Determination of the age of oil palm from crown projection area detected from WorldView-2 multispectral remote sensing data: the case of Ejisu-Juaben district, Ghana,” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 100 118 –127 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.07.013 IRSEE9 0924-2716 Google Scholar

2. 

Y. Basiron, “Palm oil production through sustainable plantations,” Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol., 109 (4), 289 –295 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.200600223 Google Scholar

3. 

Y. Basiron and C. K. Weng, “The oil palm and its sustainability,” J. Oil Palm Res., 16 (1), 1 –10 (2004). Google Scholar

4. 

R. Härdter, W. Y. Chow and O. S. Hock, “Intensive plantation cropping a source of sustainable food and energy production in the tropical rain forest areas in southeast Asia,” For. Ecol. Manage., 91 (1), 93 –102 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03880-7 FECMDW 0378-1127 Google Scholar

5. 

M. Shahbandeh, “Palm oil usage worldwide 2019/2020|Statista,” (2021). https://www.statista.com/statistics/274127/world-palm-oil-usage-distribution/ Google Scholar

6. 

Y. Xu et al., “Annual oil palm plantation maps in Malaysia and Indonesia from 2001 to 2016,” Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., 3467071 (Oct.), 1 –35 (2019). https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2019-137 Google Scholar

7. 

S. Darmawan et al., “The potential scattering model for oil palm phenology based on spaceborne X-, C-, and L-band polarimetric SAR imaging,” J. Sens., 2021 16625774 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6625774 Google Scholar

8. 

, “Sawit dan Kebijakan Industrialisasi Sawit Menuju 2050 3,” (2020) https://gapki.id Google Scholar

9. 

E. Suprianto, M. Arrasyid and H. Siregar, “Kelapa Sawit Era Kolonial dan Pasca Kemerdekaan,” (2016) https://www.iopri.org/kelapa-sawit-era-kolonial/ Google Scholar

10. 

J. McMorrow, “Linear regression modelling for the estimation of oil palm age from Landsat TM,” Int. J. Remote Sens., 22 (12), 2243 –2264 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160117188 IJSEDK 0143-1161 Google Scholar

11. 

K. L. Chong et al., “A review of remote sensing applications for oil palm studies,” Geo-Spatial Inf. Sci., 20 (2), 184 –200 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2017.1337317 Google Scholar

12. 

K. P. Tan, K. D. Kanniah and A. P. Cracknell, “A review of remote sensing based productivity models and their suitability for studying oil palm productivity in tropical regions,” Prog. Phys. Geogr., 36 (5), 655 –679 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133312452187 PPGEEC Google Scholar

13. 

A. U. Lubis, Kelapa sawit (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) di Indonesia, Pusat Penelitian Kelapa Sawit, Medan (2008). Google Scholar

14. 

S. Sujadi, N. Supena and I. Pradiko, “Mengenal Fenologi Bunga dan Buah Kelapa Sawit dengan Software FENOLOGI v1.9,” in PPKS Note (Desember 2020), 1 (2020). Google Scholar

15. 

, “Indonesia oil palm - global yield gap Atlas,” (2018) https://www.yieldgap.org/indonesia-oil-palm Google Scholar

16. 

R. Corley and P. B. H. Tinker, The Oil Palm, 5th ed.Wiley Blackwell, Oxford (2016). Google Scholar

17. 

O. T. Faulkner and J. R. Mackie, “The oil palm,” West African Agriculture, 93 –104 5th ed.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013). Google Scholar

18. 

J. C. Combres et al., “Simulation of inflorescence dynamics in oil palm and estimation of environment-sensitive phenological phases: a model based analysis,” Funct. Plant Biol., 40 (3), 263 –279 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1071/FP12133 Google Scholar

19. 

J. M. McMorrow, “Relation of oil palm spectral response to stand age,” Int. J. Remote Sens., 16 (16), 3203 –3209 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1080/01431169508954624 IJSEDK 0143-1161 Google Scholar

20. 

B. Okarda et al., “Mapping of smallholder oil palm plantation and development of a growth model,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 169 (1), 012074 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/169/1/012074 Google Scholar

21. 

I. Carolita et al., “Comparison of optic Landsat-8 and SAR Sentinel-1 in oil palm monitoring, case study: Asahan, North Sumatera, Indonesia,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 280 (1), 012015 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/280/1/012015 Google Scholar

22. 

S. Pahlevan-Sharif, P. Mura and S. N. R. Wijesinghe, “A systematic review of systematic reviews in tourism,” J. Hosp. Tour. Manage., 39 (November 2018), 158 –165 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.04.001 Google Scholar

23. 

M. Petticrew, H. Roberts, Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom (2006). Google Scholar

24. 

S. Darmawan et al., “State of the art remote sensing technology for oil palm management in Indonesia,” in Proc. Asian Conf. Remote Sens. (ACRS) 2018, 830 –834 (2018). Google Scholar

25. 

T. M. Lillesand, W. R. Kiefer and J. W. Chipman, “Remote sensing and image interpretation,” NASPA J., 42 (4), 1 (2005). Google Scholar

26. 

A. M. Melesse et al., “Remote sensing sensors and applications in environmental resources mapping and modelling,” Sensors, 7 (12), 3209 –3241 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3390/s7123209 SNSRES 0746-9462 Google Scholar

27. 

R. Bamler, “Principles of synthetic aperture radar,” Surv. Geophys., 21 (2–3), 147 –157 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006790026612 SUGEEC 0169-3298 Google Scholar

28. 

C. Elachi, J. Van Zyl, Introduction to the Physics and Techniques of Remote Sensing, 3rd ed.John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ (2021). Google Scholar

29. 

A. I. Flores-Anderson et al., “The SAR handbook: comprehensive methodologies for forest,” (2019) https://doi.org/10.25966/nr2c-s697 Google Scholar

30. 

T. Sarzynski et al., “Combining radar and optical imagery to map oil palm plantations in Sumatra, Indonesia, using the Google Earth Engine,” Remote Sens., 12 (7), 1220 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12071220 Google Scholar

31. 

W. Li et al., “Large-scale oil palm tree detection from high-resolution satellite images using two-stage convolutional neural networks,” Remote Sens., 11 (1), 11 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11010011 Google Scholar

32. 

S. U. Okoro et al., “A novel approach in monitoring land-cover change in the tropics: oil palm cultivation in the Niger Delta, Nigeria,” Erde, 147 (1), 40 –52 (2016). https://doi.org/10.12854/erde-147-3 Google Scholar

33. 

J. S. H. Lee et al., “Detecting industrial oil palm plantations on Landsat images with Google Earth Engine,” Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ., 4 (May 2019), 219 –224 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2016.11.003 Google Scholar

34. 

P. Srestasathiern and P. Rakwatin, “Oil palm tree detection with high resolution multi-spectral satellite imagery,” Remote Sens., 6 (10), 9749 –9774 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6109749 Google Scholar

35. 

Y. Cheng et al., “Towards global oil palm plantation mapping using remote-sensing data,” Int. J. Remote Sens., 39 (18), 5891 –5906 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.1492182 IJSEDK 0143-1161 Google Scholar

36. 

L. Li et al., “Mapping oil palm plantations in Cameroon using PALSAR 50-m orthorectified mosaic images,” Remote Sens., 7 (2), 1206 –1224 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70201206 Google Scholar

37. 

J. Miettinen et al., “Historical analysis and projection of oil palm plantation expansion on peatland in Southeast Asia,” Indirect Eff. Biofuel Prod., 17 1 –49 (2012). Google Scholar

38. 

W. Li et al., “Deep learning based oil palm tree detection and counting for high-resolution remote sensing images,” Remote Sens., 9 (1), 22 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9010022 Google Scholar

39. 

E. M. Ordway et al., “Oil palm expansion and deforestation in Southwest Cameroon associated with proliferation of informal mills,” Nat. Commun., 10 (1), 114 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07915-2 NCAOBW 2041-1723 Google Scholar

40. 

N. A. Mubin et al., “Young and mature oil palm tree detection and counting using convolutional neural network deep learning method,” Int. J. Remote Sens., 40 (19), 7500 –7515 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2019.1569282 IJSEDK 0143-1161 Google Scholar

41. 

S. Agustin et al., “Oil palm age classification on satellite imagery using fractal-based combination,” J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol., 89 (1), 18 –26 (2016). Google Scholar

42. 

N. M. Yusoff, F. M. Muharam and S. Khairunniza-Bejo, “Towards the use of remote-sensing data for monitoring of abandoned oil palm lands in Malaysia: a semi-automatic approach,” Int. J. Remote Sens., 38 (2), 432 –449 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2016.1266111 IJSEDK 0143-1161 Google Scholar

43. 

S. Darmawan, I. Carolita and E. Ananta, “Identification of oil palm plantation on multiscatter and resolution of SAR data using variety of classifications algorithm (case study: Asahan District, North Sumatera Province),” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 500 (1), 012075 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/500/1/012075 Google Scholar

44. 

Y. W. Kee et al., “Application of SAR data for oil palm tree discrimination,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 169 (1), 012065 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/169/1/012065 Google Scholar

45. 

H. M. Rizeei et al., “Oil palm counting and age estimation from WorldView-3 imagery and LiDAR data using an integrated OBIA height model and regression analysis,” J. Sens., 2018 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2536327 Google Scholar

46. 

P. Lewis and J. McMorrow, “3D model simulation of polarimetric radar backscatter and texture of an oil-palm plantation,” in Int. Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp., 3 Aug. 1998), 1502 –1504 (1998). Google Scholar

47. 

S. Darmawan et al., “An investigation of age and yield of fresh fruit bunches of oil palm based on ALOS PALSAR 2,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 37 (1), 012037 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/37/1/012037 Google Scholar

48. 

S. Balasundram et al., “Relationship between oil palm yield and soil fertility as affected by topography in an Indonesian plantation,” Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 37 (9–10), 1321 –1337 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620600626817 CSOSA2 0010-3624 Google Scholar

49. 

K. P. Tan, K. D. Kanniah and A. P. Cracknell, “Use of UK-DMC 2 and ALOS PALSAR for studying the age of oil palm trees in southern peninsular Malaysia,” Int. J. Remote Sens., 34 (20), 7424 –7446 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2013.822601 IJSEDK 0143-1161 Google Scholar

50. 

T. N. Carlson and D. A. Ripley, “On the relation between NDVI, fractional vegetation cover, and leaf area index,” Remote Sens. Environ., 62 (3), 241 –252 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00104-1 Google Scholar

51. 

H. T. Chuah, S. W. Kam and Y. H. Chye, “Microwave dielectric properties of rubber and oil palm leaf samples: measurement and modelling,” Int. J. Remote Sens., 18 (12), 2623 –2639 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1080/014311697217503 IJSEDK 0143-1161 Google Scholar

52. 

K. M. Carlson et al., “Carbon emissions from forest conversion by Kalimantan oil palm plantations,” Nat. Clim. Change, 3 (3), 283 –287 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1702 CLCHDX 0165-0009 Google Scholar

53. 

C. Pohl et al., “Multisensor approach to oil palm plantation monitoring using data fusion and GIS,” in ACRS 2015 - 36th Asian Conf. Remote Sens. Foster. Resilient Growth Asia, Proc. (January 2016), (2015). Google Scholar

54. 

H. Aholoukpè et al., “Estimating aboveground biomass of oil palm: allometric equations for estimating frond biomass,” For. Ecol. Manage., 292 (2013), 122 –129 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.11.027 FECMDW 0378-1127 Google Scholar

55. 

P. S. S. Thenkabail et al., “Biomass estimations and carbon stock calculations in the oil palm plantations of African derived savannas using IKONOS data,” Int. J. Remote Sens., 25 (23), 5447 –5472 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160412331291279 IJSEDK 0143-1161 Google Scholar

56. 

P. Migolet et al., “Estimation of aboveground oil palm biomass in a mature plantation in the Congo Basin,” Forests, 11 (5), 544 –23 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/f11050544 FOPEA4 Google Scholar

57. 

R. Lucas et al., “An evaluation of the ALOS PALSAR L-band backscatter—above ground biomass relationship Queensland, Australia: impacts of surface moisture condition and vegetation structure,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens., 3 (4), 576 –593 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2010.2086436 Google Scholar

58. 

N. Asari, M. N. Suratman and J. Jaafar, “Modelling and mapping of above ground biomass (AGB) of oil palm plantations in Malaysia using remotely-sensed data,” Int. J. Remote Sens., 38 (16), 4741 –4764 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2017.1325533 IJSEDK 0143-1161 Google Scholar

59. 

V. Shashikant et al., “Estimation of above ground biomass of oil palm trees by PALSAR,” in CHUSER 2012-2012 IEEE Colloq. Humanit. Sci. Eng. Res. (May 2014), 838 –841 (2012). Google Scholar

60. 

H. Khalid, Z. Zin and J. M. Anderson, “Quantification of oil palm biomass and nutrient value in a mature plantation. I. Above-ground biomass,” J. Oil Palm Res., 11 (1), 23 –32 (1999). JWAPAS Google Scholar

61. 

A. C. Morel et al., “Estimating aboveground biomass in forest and oil palm plantation in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo using ALOS PALSAR data,” For. Ecol. Manage., 262 (9), 1786 –1798 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.07.008 FECMDW 0378-1127 Google Scholar

62. 

A. C. Morel, J. B. Fisher and Y. Malhi, “Evaluating the potential to monitor aboveground biomass in forest and oil palm in Sabah, Malaysia, for 2000-2008 with Landsat ETM+ and ALOS-PALSAR,” Int. J. Remote Sens., 33 (11), 3614 –3639 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2011.631949 IJSEDK 0143-1161 Google Scholar

63. 

D. A. Novresiandi and R. Nagasawa, “C-band dual-polarization synthetic aperture radar application for peat depth classification: a case study in Siak Regency, Riau Province, Indonesia,” Prog. Electromagn. Res. M, 61 (Sept), 29 –41 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2528/PIERM17062903 Google Scholar

64. 

L. P. Koh et al., “Remotely sensed evidence of tropical peatland conversion to oil palm,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 108 (12), 5127 –5132 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1018776108 Google Scholar

65. 

J. Lucey et al., “Change in carbon stocks arising from land-use conversion to oil palm plantations: a science-for-policy paper for the Oil palm Research-Policy Partnership Network,” 23 (2014) http://www.sensorproject.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Change-in-carbon-stocks-arising-from-land-FINAL.pdf Google Scholar

66. 

L. S. Woittiez et al., “Yield gaps in oil palm: a quantitative review of contributing factors,” Eur. J. Agron., 83 (February), 57 –77 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2016.11.002 EJAGET Google Scholar

67. 

P. Hashemvand Khiabani and W. Takeuchi, “Assessment of oil palm yield and biophysical suitability in Indonesia and Malaysia,” Int. J. Remote Sens., 41 (22), 8520 –8546 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2020.1782503 IJSEDK 0143-1161 Google Scholar

68. 

C. Pohl, “Mapping palm oil expansion using SAR to study the impact on the CO2 cycle,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 20 (1), 012012 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/20/1/012012 Google Scholar

69. 

V. H. Gutiérrez-Vélez and R. DeFries, “Annual multi-resolution detection of land cover conversion to oil palm in the Peruvian Amazon,” Remote Sens. Environ., 129 154 –167 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.10.033 Google Scholar

70. 

J. Sitoms, P. Bidang and P. Daia, “Pengembangan Model Estimasiumur Tanaman Sawit Dengan Menggunakan Data Landsat-Tm,” J. Penginderaan Jauh dan Pengolah. Data Citra Digit., 1 (1), 14 –19 (2004). Google Scholar

71. 

C. Santos and J. P. Messina, “Multi-sensor data fusion for modeling African palm in the Ecuadorian Amazon,” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 74 (6), 711 –723 (2008). https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.74.6.711 Google Scholar

72. 

S. Vadivelu, A. Ahmad and Y. H. Choo, “Remote sensing techniques for oil palm age classification using Landsat-5 Tm satellite,” Sci. Int. (Lahore), 26 (4), 1547 –1551 (2014). Google Scholar

73. 

A. C. Fitrianto et al., “Determining oil palm stands age using multi temporal images analysis 3,” (2018) https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201810.0187.v1 Google Scholar

74. 

O. Danylo et al., “Satellite reveals age and extent of oil palm plantations in Southeast Asia,” (2020) http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.07163 Google Scholar

75. 

N. S. N. Shaharum et al., “Oil palm mapping over Peninsular Malaysia using Google Earth Engine and machine learning algorithms,” Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ., 17 (October 2019), 100287 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100287 Google Scholar

76. 

L. Nordin, A. Shahruddin and H. Mariamni, “Application of AIRSAR data to oil palm tree characterization,” in 23rd Asian Conf. Remote Sens., (2002). Google Scholar

77. 

L. F. Yayusman and R. Nagasawa, “ALOS-sensor data integration for the detection of smallholder’s oil palm plantation in Southern Sumatra, Indonesia,” J. Jpn. Agric. Syst. Soc., 31 (2), 27 –40 (2015). https://doi.org/10.14962/jass.31.2_27 Google Scholar

78. 

R. Avtar et al., “Efficiency of multi-frequency, multi-polarized SAR data to monitor growth stages of oil palm plants in Sarawak, Malaysia,” in Int. Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp., 2137 –2140 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2013.6723236 Google Scholar

79. 

K. Y. Lee and T. Bretschneider, “POLSAR speckle filtering with structural feature and scattering property preservation,” in Int. Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp., 1 (April), 332 –335 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2005.1526175 Google Scholar

80. 

O. Danylo et al., “A map of the extent and year of detection of oil palm plantations in Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand,” Sci. Data, 8 (1), 4 –11 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00867-1 Google Scholar

81. 

R. Avtar et al., “Assessing the influence of UAV altitude on extracted biophysical parameters of young oil palm,” Remote Sens., 12 (18), 3030 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12183030 Google Scholar

82. 

Y. Fan et al., “A sub-canopy structure for simulating oil palm in the Community Land Model (CLM-Palm): phenology, allocation and yield,” Geosci. Model Dev., 8 (11), 3785 –3800 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3785-2015 Google Scholar

83. 

A. Shelestov et al., “Biophysical parameters mapping within the SPOT-5 take 5 initiative,” Eur. J. Remote Sens., 50 (1), 300 –309 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2017.1324743 Google Scholar

84. 

A. D. Amirruddin et al., “Nitrogen effects on growth and spectral characteristics of immature and mature oil palms,” Asian J. Plant Sci., 16 (4), 200 –210 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2017.200.210 ASCIEU Google Scholar

85. 

R. H. V. Corley and P. B. H. Tinker, The Oil Palm, 26 –54 4th ed.Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ (2008). Google Scholar

86. 

T. Mette, “Forest biomass estimation from polarimetric SAR interferometry,” 1 –164 (2007). Google Scholar

87. 

A. Khamis et al., “Nonlinear growth models for modeling oil palm yield growth,” J. Math. Stat., 1 (3), 225 –232 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3844/jmssp.2005.225.232 JAMADS 0334-3316 Google Scholar

88. 

M. Lazecky et al., “Application of Sentinel-1 satellite to identify oil palm plantations in Balikpapan Bay,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 169 (1), 012064 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/169/1/012064 Google Scholar

89. 

S. Shetty, “Analysis of machine learning classifiers for LULC classification on Google Earth engine,” 1 –65 (2019). Google Scholar

90. 

S. S. Nath et al., “A survey of image classification methods and techniques,” in Int. Conf. Control. Instrum., Commun. Comput. Technol. ICCICCT 2014, 554 –557 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCICCT.2014.6993023 Google Scholar

91. 

M. Awad and R. Khanna, Efficient Learning Machines: Theories, Concepts, and Applications for Engineers and System Designers, 1 –248 Springer US, New York (2015). Google Scholar

92. 

S. M. Razali et al., “Capability of integrated MODIS imagery and ALOS for oil palm, rubber and forest areas mapping in tropical forest regions,” Sensors (Switzerland), 14 (5), 8259 –8282 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3390/s140508259 Google Scholar

93. 

T. Blaschke, “Object based image analysis for remote sensing,” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 65 (1), 2 –16 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.06.004 IRSEE9 0924-2716 Google Scholar

94. 

A. E. Maxwell, T. A. Warner and F. Fang, “Implementation of machine-learning classification in remote sensing: an applied review,” Int. J. Remote Sens., 39 (9), 2784 –2817 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.1433343 IJSEDK 0143-1161 Google Scholar

95. 

M. Rashid et al., “A comprehensive review of crop yield prediction using machine learning approaches with special emphasis on palm oil yield prediction,” IEEE Access, 9 (April), 63406 –63439 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3075159 Google Scholar

96. 

A. Descals et al., “Oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) mapping with details: smallholder versus industrial plantations and their extent in Riau, Sumatra,” Remote Sens., 11 (21), 2590 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11212590 Google Scholar

97. 

J. D. T. De Alban et al., “Combined Landsat and L-band SAR data improves land cover classification and change detection in dynamic tropical landscapes,” Remote Sens., 10 (2), 306 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10020306 Google Scholar

98. 

J. R. Jensen, Remote Sensing of the Environment: An Earth Resource Perspective, 1 2nd ed.Pearson Education Limited, Harlow (2014). Google Scholar

99. 

I. Carolita et al., “Growth Profile analysis of oil palm by using spot 6 the case of North Sumatra,” Int. J. Remote Sens. Earth Sci., 12 (1), 21 –26 (2015). https://doi.org/10.30536/j.ijreses.2015.v12.a2669 Google Scholar

100. 

T. Balz et al., Advances in SAR: Sensors, Methodologies, and Applications, MDPI, Basel, Switzerland (2018). Google Scholar

101. 

N. E. Tsendbazar, S. de Bruin and M. Herold, “Assessing global land cover reference datasets for different user communities,” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 103 93 –114 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.02.008 IRSEE9 0924-2716 Google Scholar

102. 

J. B. de Jesus and T. M. Kuplich, “Applications of SAR data to estimate forest biophysical variables in Brazil,” Cerne, 26 (1), 88 –97 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1590/01047760202026012656 Google Scholar

103. 

M. R. Sheriza, M. F. Nurul and N. A. Ainuddin, “Application of remote sensing to assess the biophysical characteristics of palm oil trees for ecological study,” J. Landsc. Ecol. Republic), 13 (3), 63 –78 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2478/jlecol-2020-0017 Google Scholar

104. 

R. H. V. Corley and P. B. H. Tinker, The Oil Palm (World Agricultural Series), 5th ed.Wiley Blackwell, West Sussex (2016). Google Scholar

105. 

R. H. V Corley, Oil Palm Physiology: A Review, Incorporated Society of Planters(1973). Google Scholar

106. 

K. D. Kanniah, K. P. Tan and A. P. Cracknell, “Estimating primary productivity of tropical oil palm in Malaysia using remote sensing technique and ancillary data,” Proc. SPIE, 9239 92391K (2014). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2067012 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

107. 

B. Czernecki, J. Nowosad and K. Jabłońska, “Machine learning modeling of plant phenology based on coupling satellite and gridded meteorological dataset,” Int. J. Biometeorol., 62 (7), 1297 –1309 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-018-1534-2 IJBMAO 0020-7128 Google Scholar

108. 

J. Kitiphaisannon et al., “Expert classification for age class identification of oil palm plantation in Krabi Province, Thailand,” in Asian Assoc. on Remote Sens. - 26th Asian Conf. Remote Sens. and 2nd Asian Space Conf., ACRS 2005, 1681 –1691 (2005). Google Scholar

109. 

A. K. Egwu Kalu, Linear Regression, 1 –6 2nd ed.University of South Florida, South Florida (2008). Google Scholar

110. 

C. Pohl and C. K. K. Loong, “In-situ data collection for oil palm tree height determination using synthetic aperture radar,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 34 (1), 012027 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/34/1/012027 Google Scholar

111. 

J. Miettinen, S. C. Liew and L. K. Kwoh, “Usability of sentinel-1 dual polarization C-band data for plantation detection in Insular Southeast Asia,” in ACRS 2015 - 36th Asian Conf. Remote Sens. Foster. Resilient Growth Asia, Proc., (2015). Google Scholar

112. 

K. Jusoff, “Sustainable management of a matured oil palm plantation in UPM Campus, Malaysia using airborne remote sensing,” J. Sustain. Dev., 2 (3), 1 –6 (2009). https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v2n3p195 Google Scholar

113. 

K. D. Kanniah, “UK DMC-2 satellite data for deriving biophysical parameters of oil palm trees in,” (2014). Google Scholar

114. 

A. D. Amirruddin et al., “Hyperspectral remote sensing for assessment of chlorophyll sufficiency levels in mature oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) based on frond numbers: analysis of decision tree and random forest,” Comput. Electron. Agric., 169 (May 2019), 105221 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105221 CEAGE6 0168-1699 Google Scholar

115. 

N. Torbick et al., “Regional mapping of plantation extent using multisensor imagery,” Remote Sens., 8 (3), 236 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8030236 Google Scholar

116. 

I. Carolita et al., Informasi Spasial Tematik Klasifikasi Tanaman Sawit Berdasarkan Umur, 1st ed.Pusat Pemanfaatan Penginderaan Jauh, LAPAN, Jakarta (2019). Google Scholar

117. 

K. Xu et al., “A new machine learning approach in detecting the oil palm plantations using remote sensing data,” Remote Sens., 13 (2), 236 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13020236 Google Scholar

118. 

Izzawati, E. D. Wallington and I. H. Woodhouse, “Forest height retrieval from commercial X-band SAR products,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 44 (4), 863 –870 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2006.870828 IGRSD2 0196-2892 Google Scholar

119. 

C. Pohl, C. K. Loong and J. Van Genderen, “Multisensor approach to oil palm plantation monitoring using data fusion and GIS,” in ACRS 2015 - 36th Asian Conf. Remote Sens. Foster. Resilient Growth Asia, Proc.(January 2016), (2015). Google Scholar

120. 

T. D. Pham et al., “Remote sensing approaches for monitoring mangrove species, structure, and biomass: opportunities and challenges,” Remote Sens., 11 (3), 230 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11030230 Google Scholar

121. 

N. E. Mohd Najib et al., “Synergy of active and passive remote sensing data for effective mapping of oil palm plantation in Malaysia,” Forests, 11 (8), 858 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/f11080858 FOPEA4 Google Scholar

122. 

S. Batool et al., “Introduction to radar scattering application in remote sensing and diagnostics: review,” Atmosphere (Basel)., 11 (5), 517 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11050517 Google Scholar

123. 

L. Karthikeyan, I. Chawla and A. K. Mishra, “A review of remote sensing applications in agriculture for food security: crop growth and yield, irrigation, and crop losses,” J. Hydrol., 586 (March), 124905 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124905 JHYDA7 0022-1694 Google Scholar

124. 

S. Attarchi and R. Gloaguen, “Improving the estimation of above ground biomass using dual polarimetric PALSAR and ETM+ data in the Hyrcanian mountain forest (Iran),” Remote Sens., 6 (5), 3693 –3715 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6053693 Google Scholar

125. 

C. M. Toh et al., “A study on leaf area index and SAR image of oil palm with entropy decomposition and deep learning classification,” Prog. Electromagn. Res. Symp., 2017 (November), 271 –278 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/PIERS-FALL.2017.8293148 Google Scholar

126. 

I. Bonet et al., “Oil Palm detection via deep transfer learning,” in IEEE Congr. Evol. Comput. CEC 2020 - Conf. Proc., (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC48606.2020.9185838 Google Scholar

127. 

Y. Y. Hilal et al., “Neural networks method in predicting oil palm FFB yields for the Peninsular States of Malaysia,” J. Oil Palm Res., (2020). https://doi.org/10.21894/jopr.2020.0105 Google Scholar

128. 

J. Frost, Regression Analysis: An Intuitive Guide for Using and Interpreting Linear Models, Jim Publishing(2019). Google Scholar

129. 

H. K. Zhang et al., “A generalization of spatial and temporal fusion methods for remotely sensed surface parameters,” Int. J. Remote Sens., 36 (17), 4411 –4445 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2015.1083633 IJSEDK 0143-1161 Google Scholar

130. 

I. Ali et al., “Review of machine learning approaches for biomass and soil moisture retrievals from remote sensing data,” Remote Sens., 7 (12), 16398 –16421 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs71215841 Google Scholar

131. 

Y. Xin, L. Sun and M. C. Hansen, “Biophysical and socioeconomic drivers of oil palm expansion in Indonesia,” Environ. Res. Lett., 16 (3), 034048 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abce83 Google Scholar

132. 

K. Yarak et al., “Oil palm tree detection and health classification on high-resolution imagery using deep learning,” Agric., 11 (2), 183 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11020183 Google Scholar

133. 

A. Descals et al., “High-resolution global map of smallholder and industrial closed-canopy oil palm plantations,” Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13 (3), 1211 –1231 (2021). https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-1211-2021 Google Scholar

134. 

C. M. Toh et al., “Classification of oil palm growth status with L band microwave satellite imagery,” in Photonics Electromagn. Res. Symp. - Fall, PIERS - Fall 2019 - Proc., 1824 –1831 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/PIERS-Fall48861.2019.9021396 Google Scholar

135. 

R. Dong et al., “Oil palm plantation mapping from high-resolution remote sensing images using deep learning,” Int. J. Remote Sens., 41 (5), 2022 –2046 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2019.1681604 IJSEDK 0143-1161 Google Scholar

136. 

C. Herweijer et al., “Enabling a sustainable Fourth Industrial Revolution: how G20 countries can create the conditions for emerging technologies to benefit people and the planet,” 1 –17 (2018). Google Scholar

137. 

S. Talukdar et al., “Land-use land-cover classification by machine learning classifiers for satellite observations: a review,” Remote Sens., 12 (7), 1135 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12071135 Google Scholar

Biographies of the authors are not available.

© 2022 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) 1931-3195/2022/$28.00 © 2022 SPIE
Rika Hernawati, Ketut Wikantika, and Soni Darmawan "Modeling of oil palm phenology based on remote sensing data: opportunities and challenges," Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 16(2), 021501 (22 April 2022). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.16.021501
Received: 8 October 2021; Accepted: 28 March 2022; Published: 22 April 2022
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Data modeling

Remote sensing

Earth observing sensors

Landsat

Biological research

Machine learning

Active sensors

Back to Top