You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
1 November 2008Proximal watershed validation of a remote sensing-based streamflow estimation model
Remotely sensed time series of landscape biophysical states and radar estimates of precipitation are assessed in a statistical streamflow estimation model in four regionally proximate south-central Texas watersheds. Sandies Creek watershed (1420 km2) served as calibration of a streamflow estimation model based on 8-day composited time series of land surface (radiant) temperature (LST) and a vegetation moisture stress index (MSI) from MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) satellite imagery products. These time series were hypothesized to serve as proxies for soil moisture condition antecedent to streamflow-generating precipitation events as estimated by NEXRAD (Next Generation Weather Radar) precipitation products. A linear multiple regression statistical model yielding estimation equation for observed flows at Sandies Creek was validated in 3 additional proximal watersheds of varying spatial dimension (860 km2 - 2940 km2), soils, land cover, and climatology. The validation yielded encouraging results as assessed with Pearson's r, Nash-Sutcliffe's E, and relative volume error or bias. Equivalent performance of the calibrated model was seen in the watershed mostly adjacent to Sandies Creek, the mostly similar one in terms of size, land cover, precipitation, and soils. Performance of the model diminished slightly in the more distal, and climatologically-environmentally dissimilar watersheds. The estimation model was re-calibrated for all three validation watersheds, with positive results. The contribution of LST uncertainty and NEXRAD precipitation bias to model discrepancies were evaluated along with discussion of known sources of model error.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Blake P. Weissling, Hongjie Xie, "Proximal watershed validation of a remote sensing-based streamflow estimation model," J. Appl. Rem. Sens. 2(1) 023549 (1 November 2008) https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3043664