Open Access
1 July 2005 Nonlinear optical Fourier filtering technique for medical image processing
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Real-time nonlinear optical Fourier filtering for medical image processing is demonstrated, exploiting light modulating characteristics of thin films of the biophotonic material bacteriorhodopsin (bR). The nonlinear transmission of bR films for a 442 nm probe beam with a 568 nm control beam and vice versa is experimentally studied in detail. The spatial frequency information carried by the blue probe beam is selectively manipulated in the bR film by changing the position and intensity of the yellow control beam. The feasibility of the technique is first established with different shapes and sizes of phantom objects. The technique is applied to filter out low spatial frequencies corresponding to soft dense breast tissue and displaying only high spatial frequencies corresponding to microcalcifications in clinical screen film mammograms. With the aid of an electrically addressed spatial light modulator (SLM), we successfully adapt the technique for processing digital phantoms and digital mammograms. Unlike conventional optical spatial filtering techniques that use masks, the technique proposed can easily accommodate the changes in size and shape of details in a mammogram.

1.

Introduction

Breast cancer is still one of the leading causes of mortality in women.1 Early detection of the cancer is extremely important for successful treatment. However, it is not an easy task for radiologists to quickly and accurately diagnose abnormal pathological changes buried in surrounding dense tissue in a mammogram. These abnormal changes consist of wide spectrum of breast lesions associated with microcalcifications, ranging from benign (fibrocystic changes, vascular changes, fat necrosis) to malignant.2 Therefore, it is important to explore techniques to enhance desired components and filter out undesired components in medical images to aid the radiologist in making a diagnosis and prescribe treatment.

The optical Fourier transform is a powerful tool in optical computing and image processing systems with unique features of parallel processing at the speed of light.3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Organic and biological molecules, photorefractive polymers, and liquid crystals are currently popular as nonlinear media for the implementation of optical computing and Fourier transform systems.8, 9, 10, 11 In particular, the biological molecule bacteriorhodopsin (bR), shows many intrinsic physical and optical properties—photochroism, third-order nonlinearity, and photoinduced anisotropy—to implement applications such as image addition and subtraction,12 spatial filtering,13 optical logic gates,14 interferometry, holographic correlation, and image transmission with phase conjugation.15 Contemporary studies in bR also involve the tailoring of molecular properties by the use of biomolecular engineering and synthetic chemistry for different applications.11 The spatial filtering scheme of Thoma et al.13 involves a control beam that precisely manipulates spatial frequencies at the Fourier plane. With components like lenses, filters, spatial light modulators (SLM), mirrors, and a diode laser, portable systems can be fabricated for medical image processing.

To enhance the pathological changes in medical images such as microcalcifications in mammograms, one needs to locate their frequency region in the focal plane of the Fourier transform and then transmit only the useful frequency components.16 Through an inverse Fourier transform with another Fourier lens, the processed frequencies can be reconstructed as image information in which the undesired components in medical images are filtered out, displaying only the desired components. Liu et al. proposed a hybrid of optical and digital architecture for processing mammograms.17 Microcalcifications are tiny calcium deposits in human breast. Because of their small size and diffuse nature, they correspond to high spatial frequencies and occur at the edges in the Fourier spectrum with low intensity. It is therefore important to separate spatial frequency components corresponding to microcaclfications and soft dense tissue, and then filter out the undesired soft dense breast tissue. Joseph et al. demonstrated experimentally a self-adaptive optical Fourier processing system using photoinduced dichroic characteristics of bR film with applications in noise reduction, edge enhancement, and bandpass filtering.18 The filtering technique is based on a mechanism that encodes different spatial frequency components of an input image to different polarization states in bR films using the intensity features of spatial frequency components. The desired components can be selected by an analyzer. This all-optical analog interactive technique is applied for identification of clusters of microcalcifications in mammograms.19

We apply a nonlinear optical filtering technique that exploits photocontrolled light modulating characteristics of bR films for early detection of microcalcifications in analog (screen film) as well as digital mammograms. Information carried on one wavelength (blue) is spatially modulated during its passage through the bR film by a second wavelength control (yellow) beam. This allows us to perform a wide variety of complex filtering operations in real time. As no interference of optical beams is involved in the technique, vibration isolation is not required. As such it is possible to develop a portable device.

2.

Experimental Setup and Results

2.1.

Transmission Dependence of bR on Intensity of Control Beam

We first study the photocontrolled transmission characteristics of bR films, and in subsequent sections we exploit this study for real-time nonlinear optical processing of phantoms and mammograms. Our experiments utilize the dynamics of the B and M states in the bR photocycle shown in Fig. 1 . For all practical purposes we can neglect the remaining short-lived intermediate states of the photocycle. The stable initial B state of a bR molecule absorbs a yellow photon within the broad bR absorption band with maximum at 570 nm, transforms to intermediate states, and then decays to the relatively stable M state within about 50μs . The M state can revert to the initial state via a slow thermal process or by a fast photochemical process on excitation with blue light, as the M state has an absorption band at 412 nm. The photochemical stability of the films and high forward- and reverse-quantum yields20 make it possible to use relatively low powers of milliwatts to switch between BM states. The lifetime of the M state depends on the reprotonation process and can be varied from a few milliseconds to tens of seconds or even longer using chemical or bioengineering techniques.

Fig. 1

Photoinduced cycle of bR with the two intermediate states of importance for the study. The B state absorbs a yellow photon within the broad bR absorption band with a maximum at 570 nm. This transforms into intermediate states (not shown) and then decays to the relatively stable M state within 50μs . The M state is thermally transformed into the initial B state; the lifetime of this transition depends on the pH of the bR film. The M state can also be converted into the bR state within 200 ns by absorption of a blue photon.

044028_1_002504jbo1.jpg

Thoma et al. theoretically studied light controlled modulation of the transmittance of a bR film at 568 nm exposed to red or blue light at the same time.13 They also studied transmission of a 413 nm beam when simultaneously exposed to yellow light. The absorption α(λi,Ij) of a light of wavelength λi with intensity Ij is given by Eq. 1 as superimposition of the absorption coefficients εB(λi),εM(λi) , and the populations of B(Ij) and M(Ij) states,

Eq. 1

α(λi,Ij)={εM(λi)+[εB(λi)εM(λi)]Brel(Ij)}B0,
where B0 represents the total concentration of bR and is equal to M+B ; i.e., the total number of molecules in the BM cycle is constant. Brel(Ij)=B(Ij)B0 is the relative population distribution in the steady state. The intensities transmitted through the bR film of thickness d , sliced into N slices each with thickness Δz=dN , can be recursively calculated from the following equation with n running from 0 to N1 and Ii,N=Ii,T ;

Eq. 2

Ii,n+1=Ii,nexp2.3026α(λi,Ij)Δz,
which gives the intensity-dependent transmission as Ti(Ij)=IiTIi0 . By simulating Eqs. 1, 2 for the intensity-dependent transmission, they showed that the local transmittance of a bR film depends on the ratio between the forward (BM) and backward (MB) photoreactions, and that bR films can be used as light controlled absorptive spatial light modulators. The transmittance for a yellow information-carrying wave of 568 nm can be increased with red light (BM) , e.g., 633 nm, and can be decreased with blue light (MB) , e.g., 413 nm. When the information is carried on a blue wave of 413 nm, the transmittance for this wave can be controlled with yellow light of 568 nm.

We performed a simple experiment, with the arrangement shown in Fig. 2 , to demonstrate intensity-dependent transmission characteristics of a bR film at 442 nm with a 568 nm control beam and vice versa. He-Cd laser is used for a 442 nm source, while an Ar-Kr laser is used for 568 nm. Neutral density filters ( NDF1 and NDF2 ) are placed in the path of both the laser beams to control the intensity. The two laser beams are spatially overlapped on the bR film. The wild-type bR film is purchased from Munich Innovative Biomaterials GmbH (Munich, Germany). It has optical density of about 5 at 570 nm with a thickness of 100μm . The required power measurements to demonstrate the intensity-dependent transmission characteristics were carried out using Newport power∕energy meter model 1825C. The results displayed in Fig. 3 show the transmission of bR film at 442 nm decreases with an increase in 568 nm control beam intensity. Similarly, the results displayed in Fig. 4 show that the transmission of the film at 568 nm probe beam decreases with increase in 442 nm control beam intensity. The experimental results shown in Figs. 3, 4 are in agreement with the simulated results of intensity-dependent transmission of bR films given by Thoma 13 In the bR photocycle, the molecules in the initial B state absorb 568 nm light and undergo photoisomerization to M state, which has the absorption band in the blue region. The M state molecules can isomerize back to the initial B state on excitation with blue light. The experimental results indicate that the relative population of the two states can be controlled by simultaneous illumination of the film with 442 nm and 568 nm beams. The ratio of the B and M state population depends on the relative intensities of the two beams. With increase in the 568 nm intensity, more M state molecules are produced, shifting the absorption to the blue region. On the other hand, with increase in intensity of the 442 nm beam, while keeping the 568 nm light at constant intensity, the molecules in the B state dominate with the absorption band shifting to the yellow region.

Fig. 2

Experimental setup used to study the transmission dependence of bR on control beam intensity. NBF: narrow band filter to block the stray yellow light; NDF1 and NDF2 are neutral density filters to control the intensity of the beams.

044028_1_002504jbo2.jpg

Fig. 3

Transmission of bR films at 442 nm probe as a function of intensity of 568 nm control beam.

044028_1_002504jbo3.jpg

Fig. 4

Transmission of bR films at 568 nm probe as a function of intensity of 442 nm control beam.

044028_1_002504jbo4.jpg

Our results shown in Figs. 3, 4 demonstrate an important feature—that the probe transmission of one wavelength can be significantly reduced by the control beam of a different wavelength in the high intensity region. Based on these results, we designed a scheme of spatial filtering for image processing. For example, if the information-bearing blue beam (442 nm) is Fourier transformed to the bR plane, the desired spatial frequencies can be selectively blocked by illuminating the film with a 568 nm control beam. Since different spatial frequency components are spatially separated in the Fourier plane, the location of the control beam on the bR film determines the components blocked. If we desire to block only low frequency components, the control beam can be simply focused to the center of the Fourier spectrum.

2.2.

Processing of Phantom Objects and Clinical Film Mammograms

Figure 5 shows the experimental setup for edge enhancement of phantoms and mammograms based on this mechanism of photoisomerization process of bR molecules using two wavelengths, 442 and 568 nm. A spatially filtered and well-collimated 442 nm beam from a He-Cd laser illuminates the object, either a phantom or a clinical mammogram. A 12.5-cm focal length lens (L1) is used to obtain the Fourier spectrum of the object. The bR film is placed at the Fourier plane of the blue beam. The inverse Fourier transformation is obtained using 10.5-cm focal length lens (L2) and the object is imaged onto the CCD detector placed at the back focal plane of the second lens.

Fig. 5

Experimental setup for processing film mammograms using nonlinear optical filtering in bR films with two wavelengths; L1,L2 , and L3 are converging lens, fB and fY are focal lengths of L1 and L2 , respectively, and NBF is a narrow band filter to block 568 nm at the CCD plane. The spatial overlap of two beams at the bR film plane (which is normal to the optic axis of the blue laser beam) is shown in the plane of the paper in the inlet. CL1 and CL2 are the collimation lenses. NDF1 and NDF2 are neutral density filters to control the intensity of the beams.

044028_1_002504jbo5.jpg

A second collimated 568 nm control beam from an Ar-Kr laser is tightly focused on to the bR film using converging lens (L3) of focal length 10.5 cm. For blocking low spatial frequency components of the object, the zero orders of both the wavelengths (focal spots sizes) are spatially overlapped on the film, as shown in the inlet of Fig. 5. This is achieved by proper scaling of focal spot sizes of lenses L1 and L2 such that their focal lengths fB and fY satisfy the following relation:

Eq. 3

λBDBfB=λYDYfY,
where DB and DY are the diameters of blue and yellow beams, respectively. While the diameter DB of the blue light is the size of region of interest (ROI) in the mammogram illuminated by the blue light, the diameter of yellow light DY is adjustable using the aperture of the collimation lens CL2 . Neutral density filters are used such that the intensity ratios of the two beams and the corresponding population densities in B and M states of bR lead to the local weakening of the transmitted zero order in the blue beam. The inverse Fourier transformation by L2 gives a near perfect edge enhancement of the object in the CCD.

The protein bR, an optically switchable bistable material, is used to process the Fourier spectrum of the mammogram containing information about the microcalcifications (high spatial frequencies) and background of soft tissue (low spatial frequencies). In the absence of any control yellow beam, the entire information carried by the blue light is passed through bR without any processing, as blue photons are not absorbed by the bR, which is in its stable state B . In actual experiments, lens L3 focuses the control beam such that its focal spot size precisely overlaps the focal center spot size of blue light. This leads to the local reduction of transmission of low spatial frequencies in the blue pattern, as the bR molecules absorb the yellow control beam and undergo photoisomerization from B to M state, for which the absorption peak is located in the blue region. Hence the transmitted pattern in the blue light captured by the CCD is predominantly of high frequencies corresponding to microcalcifications. Moreover, an edge enhanced version of the mammogram is observed on the TV monitor. When the object mammogram is changed, the center of the low spatial frequencies remains at the same focal spot, but their spatial extent changes. In conventional optical filtering techniques, one has to first properly scale the size of the high pass filter and then position it properly at the Fourier plane. But the scheme proposed here has the advantage of not requiring the tight specifications of size and location of the spatial filter at the Fourier plane. One can change the filter size with ease just by moving the lens or by controlling the yellow light intensity using a neutral density filter.

As mammograms consist of wide spectra of breast lesions that have various structural distortions, the feasibility of the technique is established initially with different shapes and sizes of phantom objects, as shown in Figs. 6(a), 6(c), 6(e) . Different shapes of objects give rise to different types of spatial frequency spectra at the Fourier plane where bR is placed, and it is important to demonstrate that the technique works for processing any complex frequency spectrum. For example, the image in Fig. 6(a), the letter E, consists of only horizontal and vertical edges and therefore its high spatial frequency spectrum at the Fourier plane lies only in vertical and horizontal directions, respectively. However, the image in Fig. 6(b) is circular in shape and has circular edges, therefore its high spatial frequency components at the Fourier plane are also distributed in a circular manner without any preferential direction. The image in Fig. 6(e) has an arc-shaped edge in addition to horizontal and vertical edges, therefore its high spatial frequency components at the Fourier plane are distributed in circular, vertical, and horizontal directions. The clinical mammogram is a complex image and consists of many such circular, horizontal, vertical, or combination edges related to microcalcifications and other architectural distortions in the human breast, and their spatial frequency distribution at the Fourier plane is complex.

Figure 6 shows the results of phantom objects processed using the technique. Unprocessed images in Figs. 6(a), 6(c), 6(e) are captured by the CCD camera. The phantom objects used in the experiment include the transparent letter E with little artificial distortions (pointed by the arrows), a transparency with concentric white and black circles, and an arrow. Besides the edges of letter E, these narrow artificial distortions also contribute to the high spatial frequencies in the Fourier spectrum of the image. Now in the presence of tight focusing of the control beam, the yellow light locally weakens the low spatial frequencies carried by the blue beam, and allows only high spatial frequencies to pass through bR. Thus the reconstructed image captured by the CCD camera, as shown in Fig. 6(b), is edge enhanced, clearly showing the artificial distortions in addition to the edges of the E. Similarly, the reconstructed image for concentric bright circles is also edge enhanced, as shown in Fig. 6(d), clearly showing the bright edges at the crossing between the dark and bright concentric circles. The edge enhanced image of an arrow in Fig. 6(e) is shown in Fig. 6(f). The results demonstrate the enhancement of high spatial frequency components for different shapes and sizes of object, establishing the feasibility of the technique for enhancement of microcalcifications and other abnormalities in mammograms.

Fig. 6

(a), (c), and (e) represent original images of E, concentric bright circles and an arrow, respectively, captured by CCD camera in the absence of yellow light using the experimental setup shown in Fig. 5. (b), (d), and (f) represent respective processed images captured by CCD camera in the presence of yellow light.

044028_1_002504jbo6.jpg

Now we study analog screen film mammograms. Figures 7(a), 7(d) display scanned version of original film mammograms used in the experiment. Figures 7(b), 7(e) display the respective scanned versions of ROIs. The ROIs in the original film mammogram are illuminated by blue light, as shown in the experimental setup in Fig. 5. As discussed previously, the yellow control beam induces photoisomerization in bR film, thus reducing the transmission of low spatial frequency components. The background of soft dense breast tissue corresponding to low spatial frequencies in the Fourier spectrum is filtered out at the bR plane. On the other hand, the high spatial frequencies corresponding to microcalcifications are transmitted. Figures 7(c), 7(f) show the reconstructed image displaying only microcalcifications not visible to the naked eye in the original clinical mammogram on the TV monitor connected to the CCD.

Fig. 7

(a) and (d) represent a scanned version of film mammogram used in the experiment with ROI encircled; (b) and (e) are respective magnified ROI; (c) and (f) are the corresponding processed image of ROI in a film mammogram.

044028_1_002504jbo7.jpg

2.3.

Processing of Digital Phantoms and Digital Mammograms

Digital mammography is becoming popular for early detection of breast cancer, as it incorporates modern electronic and computer techniques. Once the images have been obtained by the digital machines, they can be electronically manipulated—the physician can zoom in, magnify, optimize contrast, and conveniently look at different regions of breast tissue on the monitor. Though digital mammography offers distinct advantages over conventional film, it also presents new challenges to the user in terms of image acquisition, storage, archiving, interpreting, and processing huge amounts of information.21, 22, 23 The nonlinear optical Fourier filtering technique proposed in this study for clinical mammograms is also useful for processing digital mammograms. An electrically addressed spatial light modulator (SLM) is incorporated into the experiment shown in Fig. 5 to facilitate the interface between a digitally stored mammogram in the computer and the optics used in the experiment. With state of art SLMs like Boulder Nonlinear Systems, a 512×512 multilevel∕analog liquid crystal spatial light modulator, commercially available with many features such as temporary image storage, programmed extraction, and enhancement of ROI, the technique can be adopted as hardware in digital machines for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.

The experimental setup shown in Fig. 8 is used to process digital phantoms and clinical mammograms; either one, stored in the computer, is displayed onto the electrically addressed SLM (EASLM, Kopin 320 Mono cyber display) using the SLM driver. The collimated He-Cd 442 nm laser beam illuminates the SLM, and the output of the SLM is a coherent optical signal bearing the image displayed on the SLM. The resulting optical image is then processed using the nonlinear optical filtering technique as discussed in Sec. 2.2 for film mammograms.

Fig. 8

Experimental setup for processing digital mammograms and phantoms using nonlinear optical filtering in bR films with two wavelengths; L1,L2 , and L3 are converging lenses, fB and fY are focal lengths of L1 and L2 , respectively, and NBF is a narrow band filter to block 568 nm at CCD plane. CL1 and CL2 are the collimation lenses. NDF1 and NDF2 are neutral density filters to control the intensity of the beams.

044028_1_002504jbo8.jpg

To demonstrate the feasibility of the technique for real clinical digital mammograms, initially we studied some digital phantoms shown in Figs. 9(a), 9(c) . Figure 9(a) shows the letter E, which consists of horizontal and vertical edges. This image is displayed onto the SLM from the computer. The output of the SLM, the coherent optical signal bearing the image of letter E, is now Fourier transformed using the biconvex lens L1 . The spatial frequency spectrum of this image is obtained at the back focal plane where bR film is placed. The lens L3 tightly focuses the yellow light such that the zero orders of both the wavelengths (focal spots sizes) are spatially overlapped on the bR film. This locally filters out the low spatial frequencies in the blue beam and allows only high spatial frequencies through the bR film. Thus the reconstructed image captured by the CCD camera, as shown in Fig. 9(b), is edge enhanced. Figure 9(c) shows a digital phantom containing white simulated microcalcifications buried in gray background. Contrast between white pixels used to simulate microcalcifications and surrounding gray pixels used to simulate background of soft dense breast tissue is so small that the microcalcifications are not visible to the naked eye. In the presence of yellow light, low spatial frequencies (gray background) are blocked, and Fig. 9(d) shows the reconstructed image with only high spatial frequencies corresponding to the simulated microcalcifications now visible to the naked eye.

Fig. 9

(a) and (c) represent original images of E and phantom with simulated microcalcifications with white spots buried in the white background with little gray level difference; (b) and (d) represent corresponding processed images reconstructed with high spatial frequencies.

044028_1_002504jbo9.jpg

Figure 10 shows results for a clinical digital mammogram. Figure 10(a) is the original digital mammogram (with ROI encircled with black ink) displayed on the SLM from the computer monitor. The digital information is converted into coherent optical information and then processed as described earlier. Figure 10(b) shows the digitally magnified ROI and Fig. 10(c) shows the reconstructed image with high spatial frequencies captured by CCD clearly showing the microcalcifications with good contrast.

Fig. 10

(a) Digital film mammogram used in the experiment with ROI encircled; (b) magnified ROI; and (c) processed image of ROI of (a).

044028_1_002504jbo10.jpg

3.

Conclusion

We study light modulation characteristics of bR films using two wavelengths. The results of intensity dependent transmission demonstrate that the relative population of bR molecules in B and M states can be controlled using two different wavelengths. The spatial frequency information carried by a probe beam is selectively manipulated in bR film by changing the position and intensity of the control beam. Feasibility of the technique is established by processing different shapes and sizes of phantom objects that have complex spatial frequency distribution at the Fourier plane. The technique is applied to filter out low spatial frequencies corresponding to soft dense tissue displaying only microcalcifications corresponding to high spatial frequencies in clinical screen film mammograms. Since digital mammography is now becoming popular, we adapt the system using an electrically addressed SLM for processing digital phantoms and mammograms. Therefore the technique is hybrid in nature and can offer high speed as well as programmability advantages needed for an ideal clinical setting. As there is no need of vibration isolation in the experiment, it is possible to build a portable device. The technique has potential for optical implementation of wavelet transform and image subtraction that could be exploited for medical image processing application.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Cancer Institute, NIH grant 1R21CA89673-01A1. The high quality photographic images of the clinical mammograms were obtained from the University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester. We thank Carl D’orsi and Andrew Karellas for providing them. We also thank Paul Foster for providing phantom objects.

References

1. 

American Cancer Society, “Breast cancer facts and figures 2003-2004,” http:∕∕www.cancer.org∕downloads∕STT∕CAFF2003BrFPWSecured.pdf Google Scholar

2. 

S. C. Lester and R. S. Cortan, “The breast,” Robins Pathologic Basis of Diseases, 1093 –1117 6th ed.Saunders, Philadelphia, PA (1999). Google Scholar

3. 

J. W. Goodman, Opt. Photonics News, 2 11 (1991). 1047-6938 Google Scholar

4. 

J. F. Heanue, M. C. Bashaw, and L. Hesselink, “Volume holographic storage and retrieval of digital data,” Science, 265 749 –752 (1994). 0036-8075 Google Scholar

5. 

B. Javidi and J. L. Horner, Real-Time Optical Information Processing, Academic, Boston, MA (1994). Google Scholar

6. 

J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics, 141 –197 McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York (1968). Google Scholar

7. 

Y. Li, W. R. Chen, Y. Zhang, W. Qian, and H. Liu, “Comparison of analog and digital Fourier transforms in medical image analysis,” J. Biomed. Opt., 7 255 –261 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1462035 1083-3668 Google Scholar

8. 

K. Meerholz, B. L. Volodin, Sandalphon, B. Kippelen, and N. Peyghambarian, “A photorefractive polymer with high optical gain and diffraction efficiency near 100%,” Nature (London), 371 497 –499 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/371497a0 0028-0836 Google Scholar

9. 

R. R. Birge, “Protein-based computers,” Sci. Am., 273 (3), 90 (1995). 0036-8733 Google Scholar

10. 

M. Y. Shih, A. Shishido, and I. C. Khoo, “All-optical image processing by means of photosensitive nonlinear liquid crystal film: edge enhancement and image addition∕subtraction,” Opt. Lett., 26 1140 –1142 (2001). 0146-9592 Google Scholar

11. 

A. Lewis, Y. Albeck, Z. Lange, J. Benchowski, and G. Weizman, “Optical computation with negative light intensity with a plastic bacteriorhodopsin film,” Science, 275 1462 –1464 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5305.1462 0036-8075 Google Scholar

12. 

D. Oesterhelt, C. Brauchle, and N. Hampp, “Bacteriorhodopsin: A biological material for information processing,” Q. Rev. Biophys., 24 425 (1991). 0033-5835 Google Scholar

13. 

R. Thoma, N. Hampp, C. Brauchle, and D. Oesterhelt, “Bacteriorhodopsin films as spatial light modulators for nonlinear-optical filtering,” Opt. Lett., 16 651 –653 (1991). 0146-9592 Google Scholar

14. 

D. V.G.L.N. Rao, F. J. Aranda, D. Narayana Rao, Z. Chen, J. A. Akkara, and M. Nakashima, “All-optical logic gates with bacteriorhodopsin films,” Opt. Commun., 127 193 –199 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4018(96)00180-0 0030-4018 Google Scholar

15. 

J. D. Downie, “Real-time holographic image correction using bacteriorhodopsin,” Appl. Opt., 33 4353 –4357 (1994). 0003-6935 Google Scholar

16. 

P. Wu and D. V.G.L.N. Rao, “Medical image processing with optical Fourier techniques,” 689 –694 (Sep. 2003). Google Scholar

17. 

H. Liu, J. Xu, L. L. Fajardo, S. Yin, and F. T.S. Yu, “Optical processing architecture and its potential application for digital and analog radiography,” Med. Phys., 26 648 –652 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598565 0094-2405 Google Scholar

18. 

J. Joseph, F. J. Aranda, D. V.G.L.N. Rao, J. A. Akkara, and M. Nakashima, “Optical Fourier processing using photoinduced dichroism in a bacteriorhodopsin film,” Opt. Lett., 21 1499 –1501 (1996). 0146-9592 Google Scholar

19. 

A. Panchangam, K. V.L.N. Sastry, D. V.G.L.N. Rao, B. S. DeCristofano, B. R. Kimball, and M. Nakashima, “Processing of medical images using real-time optical Fourier processing,” Med. Phys., 28 22 –27 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1328079 0094-2405 Google Scholar

20. 

R. R. Birge, “Protein-based optical computing and memories,” Computer, 25 56 –67 (1992). 0018-9162 Google Scholar

21. 

J. M. Lewin, R. E. Hendrick, C. J. D’Orsi, P. K. Isaacs, L. J. Moss, A. Karellas, G. A. Sisney, C. C. Kuni, and G. R. Cutter, “Comparison of full field digital mammography to screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4945 paired examinations,” Radiology, 218 873 –880 (2001). 0033-8419 Google Scholar

22. 

E. A. Berns, R. E. Hendrick, and G. A. Cutter, “Performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography in a clinical setting,” Med. Phys., 29 830 –834 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1472497 0094-2405 Google Scholar

23. 

H. S. Wong, L. Guan, and H. Kong, (1995). Google Scholar
©(2005) Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
Sri-Rajasekhar Kothapalli, Pengfei Wu, Chandra S. Yelleswarapu, and Devulapalli V. G. L. N. Rao "Nonlinear optical Fourier filtering technique for medical image processing," Journal of Biomedical Optics 10(4), 044028 (1 July 2005). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1953287
Published: 1 July 2005
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 10 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Mammography

Spatial frequencies

Image processing

Optical filters

Beam controllers

Nonlinear filtering

Image filtering

Back to Top