Open Access
1 January 2006 Morphological effects of nanosecond- and femtosecond-pulsed laser ablation on human middle ear ossicles
Justus F. R. Ilgner M.D., Martin M. Wehner, Johann Lorenzen, Manfred Bovi, Martin Westhofen M.D.
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
We evaluate the feasibility of nanosecond-pulsed and femtosecond-pulsed lasers for otologic surgery. The outcome parameters are cutting precision (in micrometers), ablation rate (in micrometers per second), scanning speed (in millimeters per second), and morphological effects on human middle ear ossicles. We examine single-spot ablations by a nanosecond-pulsed, frequency-tripled Nd:YAG laser (355 nm, beam diameter 10µm, pulse rate 2 kHz, power 250 mW) on isolated human mallei. A similar system (355 nm, beam diameter 20µm, pulse rate 10 kHz, power 160–1500 mW) and a femtosecond-pulsed CrLi:SAF-Laser (850 nm, pulse duration 100 fs, pulse energy 40 µJ, beam diameter 36 µm, pulse rate 1 kHz) are coupled to a scanner to perform bone surface ablation over a defined area. In our setups 1 and 2, marginal carbonization is visible in all single-spot ablations of 1-s exposures and longer: With an exposure time of 0.5 s, precise cutting margins without carbonization are observed. Cooling with saline solution result is in no carbonization at 1500 mW and a scan speed of 500 mm/s. Our third setup shows no carbonization but greater cutting precision, although the ablation volume is lower. Nanosecond- and femtosecond-pulsed laser systems bear the potential to increase cutting precision in otologic surgery.

1.

Introduction

Microscopic surgery of middle ear structures requires minimal trauma to the tissue involved to preserve hearing and to avoid damage to the vestibular organ and the facial nerve. In otosclerosis, a condition in which the annular ligament suspending the stapes footplate in the oval niche is fixed, stapedotomy is performed to replace the stapes with a prosthesis joined to the incus, while the distal end is coupled to the inner ear by fenestrating the stapes footplate. This requires precise perforation of the stapes footplate, which is best accomplished by a no-touch technique. Thus, lasers have been introduced to stapes surgery at an early stage. First experimental results with an Nd:YAG laser were published in 1967 by Sataloff.1 The first clinical use of an Argon laser for stapedotomy was published by Palva2 and by Perkins.3 Since then, various lasers, such as the Argon, 4, 5, 6, 7 the CO2 (Refs. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12), the KTP (Refs. 7, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18), and the Erbium:YAG (Refs. 19, 23) have been used in in vitro and in vivo settings, while the Er:YSGG (Refs. 24, 25), Holmium:YAG (Refs. 24, 26), the Xe:Cl (excimer) (Ref. 24), and the diode laser27 have been evaluated in vitro only. The variety of laser systems in use reflects the fact that many of the present systems are suitable but none possesses ideal properties for middle ear applications. In particular, the fact that laser energy in the visible light range, as emitted by the Argon (518nm) and KTP (532nm) , is absorbed only very little by clear fluid has raised concerns on heating of inner ear structures, such as the perilymph,12, 18, 28 the facial nerve, or unwanted irradiation of the saccular macula, a part of the vestibular organ that is situated in direct line about 1.7 to 2.1mm behind the stapes footplate.29 On the other hand, as CO2 laser energy is readily absorbed by fluids, the amount of temperature rise of the perilymph itself and its impact on inner ear function has been subject to further investigations.16, 28, 30 While CO2 lasers operated in cw mode were shown to perform stapedotomy procedures safely, there has been an issue with CO2 lasers operating in the so-called superpulse mode, as this entails pressure transients that are potentially harmful to the sensory compound action potential of the outer and inner hair cells.30, 31, 32 Photoablative systems such as the Er:YAG laser cause little thermal effects and are able to ablate bone in a precise and bloodless manner, but create pressure transients which could result in acoustic trauma.19, 20, 31 However, even with a great number of pitfalls, laser surgery of the stapes footplate has been proven to be beneficial in terms of hearing outcome compared to mechanical drilling11, 32 in primary surgery and even more in revision surgery, as the diseased ear is even more vulnerable to mechanical stress induced by conventional surgery.17, 33 In some cases, revision surgery has been made possible only with a laser that otherwise would have been contraindicated.17 As the dilemma between thermal load and mechanical stress remains unsolved, the safety of laser surgery for the middle ear has been accomplished by (1) meticulous choice of laser parameters,32, 34 (2) surgical techniques which aim to spare structures at risk (e.g., avoiding irradiation of the open vestibule,18, 34 and (3) development of purpose-built instruments that help surgeons to handle the laser beam more precisely 5, 32, 35, 36 ( Endo-OtoprobeTM , scanning devices, etc.).

Thus, the quality of laser surgery in terms of precision and limitation of possible side effects is largely dependent on the surgeon’s skills, as the dilemma between unwanted thermal effects and pressure transients in laser surgery for the ear remains unsolved. Pulsed laser systems working within the nanosecond to femtosecond range seem to show a way out of this dilemma, as they provide pulses that do not induce high-pressure transients in the perilymphatic fluid and that cause little thermal effects.37, 38, 39 This is a major advantage over earlier, e.g., CO2 pulsed laser systems, whose so-called “ultrapulse” mode (Refs. 30, 31, 32) is entirely different from the ultrashort pulsed systems that are now available. Since the required energy for ablation or photodisruption decreases with pulse length,40, 41 side effects such as excess heating of surrounding tissue and disruption by pressure waves can be reduced markedly. The ultrashort pulses emitted by femtosecond lasers result in multiphoton absorption, which creates a plasma field around the target site whose free electrons absorb most of the laser energy. As linear energy absorption by the target tissue itself plays only a minor role, the ablation process depends only weakly on tissue characteristics. Earlier studies performed by Neev on human nail tissue37 demonstrated a better cutting precision of a Ti:sapphire system compared to Er:YAG, Ho:YSGG, and Xe:CL (excimer) lasers, though ablation rates were inferior. Armstrong 38 were the first to use a Ti:sapphire system for ablation of ossicular tissue in human cadaveric bone and obtained an ablation rate of 1.26μmpulse at a repetition rate of 10Hz . Schwab 39 reported an ablation rate of their Ti:sapphire laser system in relation to varying pulse energy values with a minimal ablation of 20nm at 22μJ . Increased precision is beneficial in stapes surgery, as an exact fit of the prosthesis to the perforation helps to avoid leakage of perilymph from the inner ear. Furthermore, with precise bone ablation it is possible to create microstructures in the ossicular chain, which can accommodate bioactive nanolayers, e.g., for the modulation of cell growth around the prosthesis.

We examined the feasibility of a frequency-tripled Nd:YAG laser system at 355nm working with nanosecond pulses and compared it to an equally experimental setup of a CrLiSAF laser emitting femtosecond pulses at 850nm . As a reference, a conventional microscope-coupled single-pulsed Er:YAG laser emitting at 2940nm was used.

The first hypothesis for our considerations is that the optical complexity—and therefore the manufacturing effort—of frequency-tripled Nd:YAG lasers is low compared to ultrafast or femtosecond lasers and a 20-μm resolution can be achieved with relatively simple transmissive optical elements, which, if compared to more complex femtosecond setups, makes such systems attractive for cost-effective microscope-laser units in middle ear microsurgery. The second hypothesis is that both the nanosecond-pulsed, frequency-tripled Nd:YAG laser, and the femtosecond-pulsed CrLiSAF laser, both in conjunction with a scanning system, provide a better ablative precision at little thermal stress and a lower risk of acoustic trauma compared to a manually steered Er:YAG laser system.

2.

Material and Methods

We harvested two human mallei, three inci, and one stapes from two postmortem individuals via an intraauricular approach, exposing the middle ear ossicles while leaving the tympanic membrane intact. In both cases, no sign of chronic inflammation or malformation was found. These ossicles were immersed in 3.5% formaldehyde solution for storage.

Principal outcome parameters for each experiment were cutting precision (in micrometers), ablation rate (in micrometers per second), scanning speed (in millimeters per second), and morphological effects on the human ossicular chain. For qualitative evaluation concerning carbonization and denaturation of adjacent bone, light microscopic photographs were taken. The light microscopic focus was used to measure ablation depth in the scanning experiments with an error of ±2μm , while the focusing error was approximately ±5μm . In addition, quantitative assessment of carbonization margins in a series of singular pulses as well as in all scanning experiments was performed via environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) in gaseous secondary electron emission (GSE) mode (model XL 30 ESEM FEG, FEI/Philips, Eindhoven, Netherlands).

The first laser system consisted of a nanosecond-pulsed, frequency-tripled Nd:YAG laser operating at a 355-nm wavelength (Lambda Physik “Starline,” Göttingen, Germany), with a pulse duration of 10ns full width half maximum (FWHM), a pulse repetition rate of 2kHz , and pulse energy of 0.125mJ , resulting in an output power of 250mW . The beam was focused by a fixed beam-steering system and a microscope objective to a spot of approximately 10μm diameter. Hence the peak fluence in the center of the spot approached 320Jcm2 . An x-y translation stage was used to move the mallei into an appropriate position. In a first experiment, ablation characteristics of the bony malleus surface in single spots were examined. In the following, this setup is referred to as “THG-1.”

In the second experiment, a frequency-tripled Nd:YAG laser with slightly longer pulse duration of 40ns FWHM was used (model 210S-355-5000, ILX Lightwave, Bozeman, Montana, USA) and the laser was coupled to a scanner, irradiating four malleus areas of 1×1mm2 in meandering courses with a repetition rate of 10kHz (Fig. 1 ). Each site was treated by 28 subsequent courses covering the whole area. The beam diameter in each case was 20μm . This setup will be referred to as THG-2. The parameters for the different scans are listed in Table 1 .

Fig. 1

Scanning course as performed in experiments THG-2, fs 2, and fs 4.

014004_1_026601jbo1.jpg

Table 1

Laser parameters for the scanning series performed with setup THG 2.

Scan No.Power (W)Pulse Energy (mJ)Fluence (J∕cm2) Velocity (mm/s)Scan Time (s)
10,80,085120020
20,160,01610.220020
31,50,1595,45008
41,50,1595,45008

Both lasers emit in transverse electromagnetic mode (TEM00)(M2<1.2) with Gaussian intensity distribution and, for convenience, the peak fluence in the center of the spot is taken as a characteristic.

For the third experiment, we chose human inci whose structure is comparable to those of the mallei used in experiment THG-1 and THG-2. In this case, a femtosecond-pulsed laser system, consisting of a CrLiSAF oscillator and a Colquerite amplifier, emitting at λ=850nm with a bandwidth of 26nm FWHM was used. The laser spot was focused to a beam diameter of 36μm . Pulse duration was 100fs at a repetition rate of 1kHz and pulse energy of 40μJ . In that case, the femtosecond-pulsed laser was coupled into a microscope equipped with a motorized stage, which was programmed to irradiate the bony incus surface along the same course as in THG-2 (Fig. 1). The inci were referred to as “fs 2” and “fs 4.” Both were exposed to scanning courses with a beam velocity of 2mms in parallel tracks with a mean distance of 10μm for a 0.4-×0.4-mm2 surface, which resulted in an ablation depth of approximately 40μm and a scanning time of 40 s/course. The first incus, referred to as fs 2 was exposed to one and three courses respectively, while 10 courses were applied to the incus labeled fs 4.

As a reference, a human stapes was exposed to single pulses of a conventional Er:YAG laser, which was coupled to an operating microscope (Zeiss Opmi ORL E, Zeiss Company, Oberkochen, Germany). The Er:YAG laser operates at a wavelength of λ=2940nm with a beam diameter of 380μm at a fixed microscope focus of 300mm , while the pulse duration varies between 50 and 500μs , depending on the pulse energy. Exposures were performed as follows: 1 pulse at 10mJ , 1 pulse at 25mJ , and a series of 49 singular pulses of 15mJ each with a total energy of 735mJ to obtain a perforation of 400μm in diameter, which would be required to insert the stapes prosthesis.

3.

Results

First, setup and parameter settings THG-1 were used to study the effect of single-spot irradiation when various exposure times were applied to the long malleus process (Fig. 2 ). With a constant beam diameter of 10μm , we could observe zones of carbonization, whose width increased with the total exposure time. As there was no coolant applied during these experiments, the findings suggest that excessive heating results in thermal damage, depending on the total energy applied. Prolonging exposure time from 1 to 10s , the overall crater diameter increased from about 30 to 60μm , which is considerably wider than the original beam diameter of 10μm . The carbonization margin increased from less than 10μm width in the 1-s exposure to about 30μm in the 10-s exposure. In the 10-s exposure, the full thickness of the malleus process (900μm) was penetrated. When an exposure time of 0.5s was chosen (Fig. 3 ), the ablation diameter was reduced to 20μm with a superficial conical crater of 80μm diameter. With these parameters, a margin of superficial debris with a width of 10μm or less was observed. Between adjoining ablation margins, fibrous structures on the surface appeared morphologically intact.

Fig. 2

Single spots with irradiation times of 1s , 2×1s , 3×1s , and 10s . (Setup THG-1).

014004_1_026601jbo2.jpg

Fig. 3

Single-spot series with exposure times of 0.5s each. Besides a zone of approx. 10μm width, suggesting debris, tissue structures appear unchanged (arrow). (Setup THG-1).

014004_1_026601jbo3.jpg

Larger areas of approximately 1-×1-mm2 size were treated by performing scanning experiments according to setup THG-2. Here, we could observe a debris zone of less than 100μm width (Fig. 4 ) adjacent to the ablation crater. Otherwise, scanning electron microscopy revealed no sign of further protein or bone denaturation beyond the debris margin. The crater margins showed a consistent width over all ablated tissue layers. Furthermore, there was mild carbonization at the bottom of the ablated region. Another scan, which was performed at 20% of the power and energy rating of the first, showed no carbonization or collagen denaturation on the bony surface at all, while ablation margins were equally sharp-edged. However, ablation depth was limited while the crater bottom was irregularly shaped. No cooling was used in both experiments.

Fig. 4

Scanning series, scan no. 1 (left) and no. 2 (right). From scan no. 1 a zone of denaturated fibrous tissue with a maximum width of 100μm was observed. Scan No. 2 did not produce any discernible debris. (Setup THG-2).

014004_1_026601jbo4.jpg

In contrast, scanning experiment no. 4 was performed under superficial application of 0.9% saline solution (Fig. 5 ). A drop of saline solution had been applied to the bone and after diffuse moistening of the surface the scanning started. Although power rating was twice as high as in scan no. 1, there was no sign of thermal damage, only a 50-μm margin of fibrous tissue layer detached form the malleus process. The ablation depth extended to 900μm , which eventually resulted in a full thickness cut through the malleus process. The cutting margin revealed intact Haversian canals with no further signs of bone damage.

Fig. 5

Through-cut after damping (scanning series no. 4). Lateral aspect of the cutting surface. Detached layer of fibrous tissue (arrow). (Setup THG-2).

014004_1_026601jbo5.jpg

With the femtosecond-pulsed CrLiSAF Laser scans, a singular scan with an ablation depth of 40μm (Fig. 6 , right) did not produce any visible debris. In contrast to the low-powered scan no. 2 performed with the frequency-tripled Nd:YAG laser, the base of the ablated area showed a more regular shape. This was also the case with three consecutive scans (Fig. 6, left), while the ablation margins showed some conical shape. However, next to the margins there was a debris zone with a maximum width of 80μm . In the series of 10 consecutive scans performed with fs-4 (Fig. 7 ), this debris also had a maximum width of 80μm , suggesting that it consists of layers of loose material following photoablation rather than a coagulation zone which would be expected to have an increasing width with longer exposure. Cooling was not performed during any of the femtosecond scans.

Fig. 6

Areas of 400×400μm scanned with the femtosecond-pulsed CrLiSAF laser (fs-2). Three consecutive scan courses resulted in an ablation depth of 110μm (left), while one course created a shallow excavation of 40μm depth (right).

014004_1_026601jbo6.jpg

Fig. 7

Same setup as in Fig. 6; 10 courses resulting in an ablation depth of approx. 300 to 360μm (fs-4).

014004_1_026601jbo7.jpg

As expected with the oligothermic ablation properties of the Er:YAG laser, ESEM revealed no visible coagulation in the reference experiment concerning the stapes footplate, while a coagulation zone of very few micrometers cannot be avoided even under optimum ablation conditions. However, given the relatively large beam diameter of 350μm , ablation took place in shallow excavations of bony material, as seen with the singular pulses of 10 and 25mJ (Fig. 8 ). Although saline solution was applied to the stapes footplate at the beginning of the perforation in ablation no. 3, the ablation margins were considerably larger than the actual perforation, which is partially due to the manual steering by means of the micromanipulator, but is also due to a dehydration of the tissue during the laser ablation process, which in turn resulted in a reduced ablation efficiency.

Fig. 8

Comparison of single pulse ablations at 10mJ (1), 25mJ (2), and a group of 49 pulses at 15mJ (3), which created a hole of 400μm in diameter into a human stapes footplate.

014004_1_026601jbo8.jpg

Table 2

Comparison of laser parameters and results between Armstrong 38 Schwab 39 our study.

AuthorsYearLaser SystemLaser System ParametersAblation Characteristics
Armstrong 382002Ti:sapphire 1053nm Pulse energy 2.5mJ Beam diameter 0.5mm Fluence 3.2Jcm2 (peak) Repetition rate 10Hz Pulse duration 350fs Experimental design Ablation rate (estimate): 1.26μm per pulse at 1Jcm2 (at 1kHz repetition rate1mms ablation speed) (Er:YAG 20 to 30μmpulse at 10Jcm2 ) (Ho:YAG <0.5 to > 2.0 μmpulse ) (excimer 2 to 7 μmpulse )
Schwab 392004Ti:SAF 780nm Pulse energy 1μJ to 1mJ Fluence 0.7Jcm2 at 130fs Beam diameter 60μm Repetition rate 1.04kHz Pulse duration 130fs to 1ps Ablation rate 130nmpulse at 40-μJ pulse energy and 180fs pulse duration
Ilgner Wehner 2005Frequency- tripled Nd:YAG 355nm Power 0.16W Pulse energy 16nJ Fluence 10.2Jcm2 Velocity 200mms Scan time 20s
Ilgner Wehner 2005Frequency- tripled Nd:YAG 355nm Power 1.5W Pulse energy 150nJ Fluence 95.4Jcm2 Velocity 500mms Scan time 8s
Ilgner Wehner 2005 CrLiSAF+Colquerite amplifier 850nm ±26nm FWHMPulse energy 40μJ Fluence 3.9Jcm2 Beam diameter 36μm Repetitionrate 1kHz Pulse duration 100fs 10 courses at 2mms dz=2μmscan Ablation depth 300μm 1 course at 2mms dz=2μmscan ablation depth 40μm 3 courses at 2mms dz=40μmscan Ablation depth 110μm Duration 40scourse 10 courses at 2mms dz=40μmscan Ablationdepth 300μm Strong debris

4.

Discussion

Regarding the morphological findings in these series, it must be taken into account that all ossicles were immersed in 3.5% formaldehyde solution, which results in some alteration in the fibrous tissue layers. As the material had to be stored before setting up the laser experiments, preference was given to fixed material rather than native ossicles. The data suggest that nanosecond-pulsed tissue ablation at a wavelength of 355nm does result in mild molecular interaction in terms of protein denaturation or photocoagulation. However, this effect is strongly dependent on the exposure time and relatively minor compared to ablation depth in a single spot which exceeds at least 900μm in a 10-s exposure. A marginal carbonization zone of 30μm width seems tolerable for microsurgical applications. Coagulation can be further reduced with superficial cooling. In the femtosecond-pulsed laser experiments performed by Armstrong 38 pulses of less than 10ps generated photoablation without linear absorption by the target tissue, which is largely due to the shorter exposure time and the characteristics of multiphoton absorption. With respect to ablation speed, Armstrong used a comparatively low pulse rate of 10Hz . If the pulse rate were raised to 1kHz , an ablation volume per second of 1.6mm3s can be obtained. In our experiment we used a pulse repetition rate of 1kHz while the beam diameter was 36μm resulting in an ablation volume of 0.16mm3s . Although the ablated volume was much smaller, the scanner beam course was not adapted to the specific ablation process and must be optimized further. The findings of the femtosecond ablation series in our study suggest that there is a debris zone, which is most likely due to deposition of bony material following photoablation (Table 2 ). However, the coagulation effects in our nanosecond-pulsed experiments are less than those observed in cw laser systems that emit in the visible light range, i.e., the KTP at 532nm and the Argon at 488nm or 514nm (Refs. 4, 5, 7, 8, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18). Although pressure transients have not been measured as part of this study, the short duration and low energy of pulses could contribute to avoid acoustic trauma to the outer and inner hair cells. Pfander42 reported that the likelihood of acoustic trauma is not only dependent on the magnitude of mechanical impact as expressed in decibels, but also on its duration. The absolute limit of tolerable sound pressure level, irrespective of its duration, is estimated at 160dB(A) . As Pratisto 19 pointed out, Erbium:YAG lasers create pulses in the 200-μs range, with superposed peaks of 2-μs duration. Although his group as well as Lippert 21 could not demonstrate any detrimental effect on hearing in their experimental and clinical setting, Häusler 20 warned that a temporary hearing threshold shift of 10 and 33dB on average did occur 2h postoperatively in patients who had undergone Erbium:YAG laser stapedotomy. Häusler concluded that single pulses of 20 to 40mJ , corresponding to fluences of 14 to 28Jcm2 could lead to a temporary threshold shift (TTS) of hearing level and recommended to keep fluences in the range of 10 to 17Jcm2 . Later studies performed by Keck, 22, 23 which followed these recommendations, did not observe any persistent postoperative sensorineural hearing loss.

Superficial cooling has been recognized as relevant for the ablation process, especially in exposure times longer than 0.5s , and if applied, denaturation of adjacent structure is reduced to 30μm or less. Although fluences in our study were set in the range between 10 and 320Jcm2 , the laser beam diameter and therefore the exposed areas are very small, thus, decreasing the pressure impact on the inner ear as a whole. In addition, the beam diameter of 10 to 20μm enhances spatial precision, so that the use of a scanning system is favorable, especially in contrast to ablation with commercially available Er:YAG laser systems for ear surgery, which produce a beam diameter that comes close to the required size of the perforation. Scanners for otologic laser procedures are already commercially available, and with greater precision for the drilling procedure, create a better fit of the stapes prosthesis in the stapes footplate and thus reduce the risk of postoperative perilymph leakage from the inner ear. As in our series, scan velocities of 200 to 500mms resulted in superficial to full thickness ablation of the malleus process (about 900μm ) within 20 and 8s , respectively, the total operation time at the open inner ear is much less than with manual application of single pulses in one circle (the so-called “rosette” technique).

Finally, frequency-tripled Nd:YAG lasers are less complex than ultrafast oscillator-amplifier lasers, easier to build, and require less complicated optical devices to shape laser pulses while preserving the pulse duration characteristics. The currently used laboratory models have a power capability of 10 times the required power and the footprint of the laser head is between 4×12×12 and 4×5×33 in. When downsizing to the required power level and with further miniaturization, an affordable and rugged operating theater laser unit can be built.

References

1. 

J. Sataloff, “Experimental use of laser in otosclerotic stapes,” Arch. Otolaryngol., 85 614 –616 (1967). 0003-9977 Google Scholar

2. 

T. Palva, “Argon laser in otosclerosis surgery,” Acta Oto-Laryngol., 104 153 –157 (1979). 0001-6489 Google Scholar

3. 

R. C. Perkins, “Laser stapedotomy for otosclerosis,” Laryngoscope, 90 228 –241 (1980). 0023-852X Google Scholar

4. 

T. M. McGee, “The Argon laser in surgery for chronic ear disease and otosclerosis,” Laryngoscope, 93 1177 –1182 (1983). 0023-852X Google Scholar

5. 

J. B. Causse, S. Gherini, and K. J. Horn, “Surgical treatment of stapes fixation by fiberoptic Argon laser stapedotomy with reconstruction of the annular ligament,” Otolaryngol. Clin. North Am., 26 (3), 395 –415 (1993). 0030-6665 Google Scholar

6. 

R. Häusler, A. Messerli, V. Romano, R. Burkhalter, H. P. Weber, and H. J. Altermatt, “Experimental and clinical results of fiberoptic Argon laser stapedotomy,” Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., 253 193 –200 (1996). 0937-4477 Google Scholar

7. 

S. G. Lesinski and A. Palmer, “Lasers for otosclerosis: CO2 vs. Argon and KTP-532,” Laryngoscope, 99 1 –8 (1989). 0023-852X Google Scholar

8. 

S. G. Lesinski and J. A. Stein, “Stapedectomy revision with the CO2 laser,” Laryngoscope, 99 13 –19 (1989). 0023-852X Google Scholar

9. 

S. Jovanovic, D. Anft, U. Schönfeld, A. Berghaus, and H. Scherer, “Animal experimental studies on CO2 laser stapedotomy,” Laryngol., Rhinol., Otol., 74 26 –32 (1995). 0340-1588 Google Scholar

10. 

E. Lescanne, S. Moriniere, C. Gohler, A. Manceau, P. Beutter, and A. Robier, “Retrospective case study of carbon dioxide laser stapedotomy with lens-based and mirror-based micromanipulators,” J. Laryngol. Otol., 117 256 –260 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1258/00222150360600832 0022-2151 Google Scholar

11. 

G. Motta and L. Moscillo, “Functional results in stapedotomy with and without CO2 laser,” ORL, 64 307 –310 (2002). 0301-1569 Google Scholar

12. 

S. G. Lesinski and R. Newrock, “Carbon dioxide lasers for otosclerosis,” Otolaryngol. Clin. North Am., 26 (3), 417 –441 (1993). 0030-6665 Google Scholar

13. 

H. Silverstein, S. Rosenberg, and R. Jones, “Small fenestra stapedotomies with and without KTP laser: a comparison,” Laryngoscope, 99 485 –488 (1989). 0023-852X Google Scholar

14. 

L. J. Bartels, “KTP laser stapedotomy: is it safe?,” Otolaryngol.-Head Neck Surg., 103 685 –692 (1990). 0194-5998 Google Scholar

15. 

E. M. Michaelides and J. M. Kartush, “Implications of sound levels generated by otologic devices,” Otolaryngol.-Head Neck Surg., 125 361 –363 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1067/mhn.2001.118956 0194-5998 Google Scholar

16. 

R. Mills, M. Szymanski, and E. Abel, “Delayed facial palsy following laser stapedectomy: in vitro study of facial nerve temperature,” Clin. Otolaryngol., 28 211 –214 (2003). 0307-7772 Google Scholar

17. 

S. G. Lesinski, “Revision stapedectomy,” Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg., 11 347 –354 (2003) Google Scholar

18. 

M. Szymanski, R. Mills, and E. Abel, “Transmission of heat to the vestibule during revision stapes surgery using a KTP laser: an in vitro study,” J. Laryngol. Otol., 117 349 –352 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1258/002221503321626375 0022-2151 Google Scholar

19. 

H. Pratisto, M. Frenz, M. Ith, V. Romano, M. Felix, R. Grossenbacher, H. J. Altermatt, and H. P. Weber, “Temperature and pressure effects during Erbium laser stapedotomy,” Lasers Surg. Med., 18 100 –108 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1996)18:1<100::AID-LSM14>3.0.CO;2-D 0196-8092 Google Scholar

20. 

R. Häusler, P. J. Schär, H. Pratisto, H. P. Weber, and M. Frenz, “Advantages and dangers of Erbium:YAG laser application in stapedotomy,” Acta Oto-Laryngol., 119 207 –213 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489950181684 0001-6489 Google Scholar

21. 

B. M. Lippert, S. Gottschlich, C. Külkens, B. J. Folz, H. Rudert, and J. A. Werner, “Experimental and clinical results of Er:YAG laser stapedotomy,” Lasers Surg. Med., 28 11 –17 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-9101(2001)28:1<11::AID-LSM1010>3.0.CO;2-M 0196-8092 Google Scholar

22. 

T. Keck, M. Wiebe, G. Rettinger, and H. Riechelmann, “Safety of the Erbium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser in stapes surgery in otosclerosis,” Otol. Neurotol., 23 21 –24 (2002). 1531-7129 Google Scholar

23. 

T. Keck, M. Wiebe, H. Riechelmann, and G. Rettinger, “Results after Erbium:YAG-laser stapedotomy,” Laryngol., Rhinol., Otol., 82 (3), 157 –161 (2003). 0340-1588 Google Scholar

24. 

S. Jovanovic, U. Schönfeld, V. Prapavat, A. Berghaus, R. Fischer, H. Scherer, and G. J. Müller, “Effects of pulsed laser systems on stapes footplate,” Lasers Surg. Med., 21 341 –350 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1997)21:4<341::AID-LSM5>3.0.CO;2-Q 0196-8092 Google Scholar

25. 

S. Jovanovic, Y. Jamali, D. Anft, U. Schönfeld, H. Scherer, and G. Müller, “Influence of pulsed laser irradiation on the morphology and function of the guinea pig cochlea,” Hear. Res., 144 97 –108 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5955(00)00058-7 0378-5955 Google Scholar

26. 

M. Kautzky, A. Trödhan, M. Susani, and P. Schenk, “Infrared laser stapedotomy,” Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., 248 449 –451 (1991). 0937-4477 Google Scholar

27. 

D. S. Poe, “Laser-assisted endoscopic stapedectomy: a prospective study,” Laryngoscope, 110 1 –37 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200005001-00001 0023-852X Google Scholar

28. 

B. J. F. Wong, J. Neev, and M. J. C. van Gemert, “Surface temperature distributions in carbon dioxide, Argon, and KTP (Nd:YAG) laser ablated otic capsule and calvarial bone,” Am. J. Otol., 18 766 –772 (1997). 0192-9763 Google Scholar

29. 

C. L. Strunk and F. B. Quinn, “Stapedectomy surgery in residency: KTP-532 laser versus Argon laser,” Am. J. Otol., 14 113 –117 (1993). 0192-9763 Google Scholar

30. 

S. Jovanovic, D. Anft, U. Schönfeld, A. Berghaus, and H. Scherer, “Influence of CO2 laser application to the guinea pig cochlea on compound action potentials,” Am. J. Otol., 20 166 –173 (1999). 0192-9763 Google Scholar

31. 

E. K. Gardner, J. Dornhoffer, and S. Ferguson, “Photoacoustic effects of carbon dioxide lasers in stapes surgery: quantification in a temporal bone model,” Otol. Neurotol., 23 862 –865 (2002). 1531-7129 Google Scholar

32. 

P. Garin, S. van Prooyen-Keyser, and J. Jamart, “Hearing outcome following laser-assisted stapes surgery,” J. Otolaryngol., 31 31 –34 (2002). 0381-6605 Google Scholar

33. 

R. J. Wiet, D. C. Kubek, P. Lemberg, and A. T. Byskosh, “A meta-analysis review of revision stapes surgery with Argon laser: effectiveness and safety,” Am. J. Otol., 18 166 –171 (1997). 0192-9763 Google Scholar

34. 

C. A. Buchman, M. J. Fucci, J. B. Roberson, and A. De La Cruz, “Comparison of Argon and CO2 laser stapedotomy in primary otosclerosis surgery,” Am. J. Otol., 21 (4), 227 –230 (2000). 0192-9763 Google Scholar

35. 

S. G. Gherini, K. L. Horn, C. A. Bowman, and G. Griffin, “Small fenestra stapedotomy using a fiberoptic hand-held Argon laser in obliterative otosclerosis,” Laryngoscope, 100 1276 –1282 (1990). 0023-852X Google Scholar

36. 

S. G. Gherini, K. L. Horn, J. B. Causse, and G. R. McArthur, “Fiberoptic Argon laser stapedotomy: is it safe?,” Am. J. Otol., 14 (3), 283 –289 (1993). 0192-9763 Google Scholar

37. 

J. Neev, J. S. Nelson, M. Critelli, J. L. McCullough, E. Cheung, W. A. Carrasco, A. M. Rubenchik, L. B. Da Silva, M. D. Perry, and B. C. Stuart, “Ablation of human nail by pulsed lasers,” Lasers Surg. Med., 21 186 –192 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1997)21:2<186::AID-LSM10>3.0.CO;2-D 0196-8092 Google Scholar

38. 

W. B. Armstrong, J. A. Neev, L. B. Da Silva, A. M. Rubenchik, and B. C. Stuart, “Ultrashort pulse laser ossicular ablation and stapedotomy in cadaveric bone,” Lasers Surg. Med., 30 216 –220 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.10034 0196-8092 Google Scholar

39. 

B. Schwab, D. Hanger, W. Müller, H. Lubatschowski, T. Lenarz, and R. Heermann, “Bone ablation using ultrashort laser pulses. A new technique for middle ear surgery,” Laryngol., Rhinol., Otol., 83 219 –225 (2004). 0340-1588 Google Scholar

40. 

M. H. Niemz, “Threshold dependence of laser-induced optical breakdown on pulse duration,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 66 (10), 1181 –1183 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.113850 0003-6951 Google Scholar

41. 

J. Noack, D. X. Hammer, G. D. Noojin, B. A. Rockwell, and A. Vogel, “Influence of pulse duration on mechanical effects after laser-induced breakdown in water,” J. Appl. Phys., 83 (12), 7488 –7495 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.367512 0021-8979 Google Scholar

42. 

S. Pfander, Das Knalltrauma, 56 –80 (1975) Google Scholar
©(2006) Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
Justus F. R. Ilgner M.D., Martin M. Wehner, Johann Lorenzen, Manfred Bovi, and Martin Westhofen M.D. "Morphological effects of nanosecond- and femtosecond-pulsed laser ablation on human middle ear ossicles," Journal of Biomedical Optics 11(1), 014004 (1 January 2006). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2166432
Published: 1 January 2006
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 12 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Laser ablation

Laser therapeutics

Ear

Surgery

Laser systems engineering

Laser cutting

Nd:YAG lasers

Back to Top