1 September 2007 Confocal laser scanning microscopy of retinal rod outer segment intact disks: new labeling technique
Author Affiliations +
J. of Biomedical Optics, 12(5), 050501 (2007). doi:10.1117/1.2790919
Vertebrate retinal rod outer segment disks house the proteins involved in the phototransduction cascade that converts light into neuronal signal. We develop a technique for the immunofluorescent labeling of osmotically intact isolated rod outer segment disks for confocal laser scanning microscopy imaging. Osmotically intact Ficoll-flotation isolated bovine disks are directly labeled with antibodies in solution. For the first time, osmotically intact single disks can be visualized. Thus, imaging of purified disks, based on advanced optical techniques, may serve as a powerful complement to other methods in studies on phototransduction. In fact, even though much is known about the rod outer segment photoresponse, some unanswered questions remain, particularly about ATP supply, light adaptation, and morphogenesis.
Ravera, Calzia, Bianchini, Diaspro, and Panfoli: Confocal laser scanning microscopy of retinal rod outer segment intact disks: new labeling technique

Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) is a valuable tool for obtaining high-resolution images and 3-D reconstructions.1 Vertebrate rod photoreceptors, the neurons responsible for visual phototransduction, mediate vision at low-light intensities using a modified cilium (called the outer segment) for the detection of light. The rod outer segment (rod OS) is packed with hundreds of membrane sacs, called disks, on the surface of which the initial biochemical reactions of visual transduction take place.2, 3 The disks, with dimensions of about 1μmdiam ,4, 5 are regularly stacked on top of each other with a repeat distance of 300Å .4 The visual pigment rhodopsin (Rh), an integral membrane protein, accounts for about 90%6 of total disk protein content. Photoreceptor disks are continuously renewed through formation of new disks at the base of the outer segment, displaced distally along the length of the outer segment, and eventual detachment and phagocytosis occurs by adjacent pigment epithelial cells.7

Several microscopy techniques have been used to analyze the morphological organization of rods and to identify the membrane proteins in rod OS. For example, measurements of the ellipsoid mitochondria density, sizes, and shapes of inner segments were conducted by electron microscopy and Nomads differential interference contrast (NDIC) imaging.8 Studies on the stability of Rh in native membranes were done by single-molecule force spectroscopy.9 Moreover, a recent progress in modeling the native conformation of Rh was based on topography of the disk membranes recorded by an atomic force microscope (AFM).9 CLSM was only used on whole retina or rod OS to observe the protein distribution in the disk incisures.10 Therefore, even though rod imaging has been achieved in many ways, to the best of our knowledge, until now no study has been reported regarding the application of immunofluorescence for confocal optical imaging of isolated intact disks. In fact, even though fluorescent optical imaging is among the most widely used approach for studying cells in vivo, it is not easily applicable for subcellular fractions. Apart from the classic inclusion methods, it is difficult to isolate and image a single subcellular fraction. A significant limitation in this case is the attachment to glasses. We verified that isolated disk populations do not adhere to plastic or glass. Use of either scarified glasses or synthetic molecules, like poly-D-Lysine, as a coating to enhance cell attachment was not effective to obtain an effective binding of disks to the glass surface. The novelty of our technique lays in the preparation of the sample for immunofluorescence confocal analysis. Namely, disks are incubated with primary and secondary antibodies directly in solution, in Eppendorf tubes. Only at the end of the procedure is the sample put on the glasses and sealed.

Osmotically intact disks were obtained from intact rod OS. Rod OSs were isolated under dim red light from 20 bovine retinas (from a local slaughterhouse), by sucrose gradient centrifugation11 in the presence of a protease inhibitor cocktail, under sterile conditions. After bursting isolated rod OS for 3h in 5% Ficoll (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, Missouri) solution in distilled water with 5-mM DTT and 70-μgml leupeptin, osmotically intact disks were collected on the Ficoll solution surface after centrifuging for 2h at 25,000rpm in a Beckman FW-27 rotor.12 Ampicillin (100μgml) was added to all solutions. Protein concentration was determined by the Bradford method.13 The disk suspensions (0.06mgml) were characterized: Rh concentration was 0.8mM . A280A500 ratio was 1.8±0.2 (average±SD) , as determined spectrophotometrically14 by measuring the difference in 500-nm absorption between spectra recorded before and after exhaustive bleaching.

Disks were stained with a mouse monoclonal antibody (Ab) raised against bovine Rh and a Cy3-conjugated secondary antimouse Ab. Treatments on intact disks were conducted in solution in Eppendorf vials at room temperature. Disks ( 60-μg protein in 50μl ) were washed with 10-mM phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.3 plus 150-mM NaCl , and collected by centrifugation at 6000rpm for 2min in an Eppendorf centrifuge (Eppendorf, Fremont, California). This step was performed after each treatment. After fixation in 3% paraformaldehyde (20min) , disks were resuspended and incubated with 30-mM NH4Cl (10min) . Then disks were incubated with mouse monoclonal Ab against bovine Rh diluted 1:500 in PBS (20min) . To eliminate unbound primary antibodies, samples were washed two times with PBS. Disks were then incubated with the secondary antibody (goat antimouse IgG Ab conjugated with Cy3 fluorochrome, Molecular Probes), diluted 1:800 in PBS (20min) . After PBS washings to eliminate unbound secondary Ab, the disk pellet was resuspended in 10μl of Milli-Q water. This volume was put onto glass slides, covered, and sealed with MOVIOL resin at 30°C in a dry place. In controls, disks were treated with the secondary Cy3-conjugated Ab only.

In this study, immunofluorescence CLSM imaging was performed on an inverted Leica TCS SP5 AOBS confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica Microsystems CMS, Mannheim, Germany) equipped with a set of lasers covering the 458-, 476-, 488-, 496-, 514-, 543-, and 633-nm lines. Confocal fluorescence imaging was done on these samples at 23°C . Images were collected using a Leica 63×PL APO NA 1.40 oil immersion objective (Leica Microsystems CMS, Mannheim, Germany). Images were obtained using the 543-nm line of a He-Ne ion laser (laser power 20%, 0.015mW ). Under this imaging configuration, typical confocal resolution is of the order of 150nm in the lateral and 500nm in the axial direction. To detect the presence/absence of the red dye (CY3), the images were collected in the spectral region 550 to 650nm accordingly to reported emission spectra.1 To verify that the signal acquired is really due to CY3, we performed spectral analysis by exciting the red dye at 543nm and acquiring the fluorescence spectrum from 550 to 650nm with a band width of 5nm .

Figures 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d show the protein stained by indirect immunocytochemistry (in red). These show that Rh is uniformly distributed on the surface of disks. The technique revealed that freshly prepared disks (1.2mgml) are mostly aggregated [Fig. 1a]. The disk aggregates are in numbers of 2 to 4 disks, as judged by their mean diameter. Larger aggregates may not be found either, because they do not form or because they may not flotate up to the Ficoll surface during disk purification. To eliminate the larger disk aggregates, disks (1.2mgml) were subjected to 15 passages through a needle (25 gauge) during each resuspension [Fig. 1b]. Such shearing of disks adds negative charges to the disks membrane, causing repulsion between the organelles.

Fig. 1

Confocal fluorescence imaging of rhodopsin on disks. Confocal fluorescence image of intact disks stained with a Cy3-labeled secondary antibody (Ab) bound to a primary Ab against rhodopsin (1:500). (a) Freshly prepared aggregated disks are shown. (b) Smaller aggregates were represented. (c) An overview of a single disk. In (d), the object is an enlarged single disk, observed in the xy , yz , and xz planes. Its dimensions are estimated to be about 1μm . The images were acquired with the Leica confocal software (LCS) (color online only).


Fig. 2

Spectral analysis of the red Cy3 dye. The figure shows the spectral analysis, elaborated from several spectral acquisitions within the 560- to 660-nm range, with a wavelength resolution of 5nm , of the fluorescence intensity of the red Cy3 dye (exc. 543.5/em. 578nm ) (color online only).


However, a lower protein concentration is necessary for better disaggregating of the aggregates. When protein concentration in the sample was lowered to 0.4mgml , intact single disks were observed after shearing, as shown in Fig. 1c. The technique described is an improvement of a protocol that we utilized to demonstrate the presence of ryanodine receptors (RyRs) on the rod disk.15 In the cited paper large aggregates were present. The object shown in the orthogonal projection [Fig. 1d] is an isolated osmotically intact disk, of approximately 1μmdiam , as expected for bovine rods.16 Moreover, recent studies on murine rod OS show that the disks’ diameter is about 1.1μm ,4 similar to the dimensions of the object visualized in Fig. 1d, considering the similarity among all mammalian retinas.17 The technique reveals that the method of Smith and Litman12 isolates only those disks that are osmotically active, as judged by their swollen round shape [Fig. 1d]. As shown by the spectral analysis (plotted graph in Fig. 2 ), the fluorescence intensity of the sample is only due to the red fluorochrome Cy3 (exc. 543nmem . peak 578nm ). Incubation of disks with the secondary Ab only yielded negligible immunoreactivity, confirming the specificity of the interaction of the antibody with Rh on the surface of disks (data not shown). No differences are observed in rhodopsin imaging when samples are prepared either in dim red or in room light. However, as the technique can be applied to observe proteins embedded or the peripheral of the disk surface, a protein that can be modified by light exposure might be looked for.

Considering the similarities among mammalian retinas and disks in particular,17 the technique described here may also be applied to imaging of human disks, even though a great number of retinas would be necessary to obtain a sufficient quantity of disks. Moreover, the procedure would need to be adjusted in case of human specimens, as retinas must be extracted immediately after death to prepare the disks. We anticipate that this procedure, allowing us to observe isolated osmotically intact disks12 without prior embedding of the sample, may become an instrument to study the function and structure of OS disks.


We thank Isidoro M. Pepe and Alessandro Morelli (DIBIO, University of Genova, Italy) for their invaluable contribution.


1.  J. B. Pawley, Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy,” 3rd ed., Plenum Press-Springer, New York (2006). Google Scholar

2.  L. Stryer, “Vision: from photon to perception,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.0027-8424 10.1073/pnas.93.2.557 93, 557–559 (1996). Google Scholar

3.  K. D. Ridge, N. G. Abdulaev, M. Sousa, and K. Palczewski, “Photo transduction: crystal clear,” Trends Biochem. Sci.0167-7640 10.1016/S0968-0004(03)00172-5 28, 479–487 (2003). Google Scholar

4.  S. Nickell, P. S. Park, W. Baumeister, and K. Palczewski, “Three-dimensional architecture of murine rod outer segments determined by cryoelectron tomography,” J. Cell Biol.0021-9525 177, 917–925 (2007). Google Scholar

5.  A. E. Blaurock and M. H. Wilkins, “Structure of frog photoreceptor membranes,” Nature (London)0028-0836 10.1038/223906a0 223, 906–909 (1969). Google Scholar

6.  S. Filipek, R. E. Stenkamp, D. C. Teller, and K. Palczewski, “G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin: a prospectus,” Annu. Rev. Physiol.0066-4278 10.1146/annurev.physiol.65.092101.142611 65, 851–879 (2003). Google Scholar

7.  D. H. Anderson and S. K. Fisher, “Disk shedding in rodlike and conelike photoreceptors of tree squirrels,” Science0036-8075 10.1126/science.1145180 197, 953–955 (1975). Google Scholar

8.  Q. V. Hoang, R. A. Linssenmeier, C. K. Chung, and C. A. Curcio, “Photoreceptor inner segments in monkey and human retina: mitochondrial density, optics, and regional variation,” Visual Neurosci.0952-5238 10.1017/S0952523802194028 19, 395–407 (2002). Google Scholar

9.  D. Fotiadis, B. Jastrzebska, A. Philippsen, D. J. Muller, K. Palczewsky, and A. Engel, “Structure of the rhodopsin dimer: a working model for G-protein-coupled receptors,” Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.0959-440X 10.1016/j.sbi.2006.03.013 16, 252–259 (2006). Google Scholar

10.  B. M. Tam, O. L. Moritz, and D. S. Papermaster, “The C terminus of peripherin/rds participates in rod outer segment targeting and alignment of disk incisures,” Mol. Biol. Cell1059-1524 10.1091/mbc.E03-09-0650 15, 2027–2037 (2004). Google Scholar

11.  P. P. Schnetkamp and F. J. Daemen, “Isolation and characterization of osmotically sealed bovine rod outer segments,” Methods Enzymol.0076-6879 10.1016/S0076-6879(82)81019-7 81, 110–116 (1982). Google Scholar

12.  G. Smith and B. J. Litman, “Preparation of osmotically intact rod outer segment disks by Ficoll flotation,” Methods Enzymol.0076-6879 10.1016/S0076-6879(82)81012-4 81, 57–61 (1982). Google Scholar

13.  M. M. Bradford, “A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding,” Anal. Biochem.0003-2697 10.1006/abio.1976.9999 72, 248–256 (1976). Google Scholar

14.  G. Wald and P. K. Brown, “The molar extinction of rhodopsin,” J. Gen. Physiol.0022-1295 37, 189–200 (1953). Google Scholar

15.  I. Panfoli, S. Ravera, A. Fabiano, R. Magrassi, A. Diaspro, A. Morelli, and I. M. Pepe, “Localization of the cyclic ADP-ribose-dependent calcium signaling pathway in bovine rod outer segments,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci.0146-0404 48, 978–984 (2007). Google Scholar

16.  T. Norisuye, W. F. Hoffman, and H. Yu, “Intact photoreceptor membrane from bovine rod outer segment: size and shape in bleached state,” Biochemistry0006-2960 10.1021/bi00670a038 15, 5678–5682 (1976). Google Scholar

17.  H. Wassle and B. B. Boycott, “Functional architecture of the mammalian retina,” Physiol. Rev.0031-9333 71, 447–480 (1991). Google Scholar

Silvia Ravera, Daniela Calzia, Paolo Bianchini, Alberto Diaspro, Isabella Panfoli, "Confocal laser scanning microscopy of retinal rod outer segment intact disks: new labeling technique," Journal of Biomedical Optics 12(5), 050501 (1 September 2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.2790919


Image segmentation


Confocal laser scanning microscopy

Confocal microscopy



Back to Top