Translator Disclaimer
1 July 2008 Monkey brain cortex imaging by photoacoustic tomography
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Photoacoustic tomography (PAT) is applied to image the brain cortex of a monkey through the intact scalp and skull ex vivo. The reconstructed PAT image shows the major blood vessels on the monkey brain cortex. For comparison, the brain cortex is imaged without the scalp, and then imaged again without the scalp and skull. Ultrasound attenuation through the skull is also measured at various incidence angles. This study demonstrates that PAT of the brain cortex is capable of surviving the ultrasound signal attenuation and distortion caused by a relatively thick skull.

1.

Introduction

High-resolution human brain imaging modalities currently used in clinics include X-ray computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, both CT and MRI are expensive. Furthermore, X-ray CT involves exposure to ionizing radiation. In certain cases, ultrasound brain imaging is employed.1 Ultrasound imaging is an established pediatric brain imaging modality2 for use before the fontanelles are closed. After the closure of the fontanelles, the image quality degrades significantly because the skull severely attenuates and scatters ultrasonic waves. Transcranial ultrasonic brain imaging of adults is also limited by the inhomogeneous aberrating effect of the skull bone. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 The skull bone induces both phase and amplitude distortions. Such distortions can be potentially corrected by various methods, such as adaptive focusing,10 time reversal,11 dynamic focusing,12 and spatiotemporal inverse filter (STIF).13 However, transcranial ultrasound imaging still suffers from poor resolution and poor contrast.

Photoacoustic tomography (PAT) is a hybrid, non-ionizing imaging modality, which combines the resolution of ultrasound imaging with the contrast of optical imaging.14, 15, 16, 17, 18 In PAT, pulsed laser energy is delivered into biological tissue. The subsequent ultrasound signal generated by the photoacoustic (PA) effect is detected to form an image through a reconstruction algorithm. Compared with pure ultrasound imaging, the contrast in PAT is optically based. PAT is particularly suitable for imaging blood vessels because of the high optical contrast between blood and surrounding biological tissue. In addition, PAT detects ultrasound signals through one-way propagation. Therefore, PAT suffers less distortion by the skull than ultrasound imaging.

Brain cortex imaging by PAT, including structural, functional, and molecular imaging, has been successfully conducted in small animals.19, 20 However, brain cortex imaging with PAT in large animals has not been studied. Our group has reported monkey brain imaging using thermoacoustic tomography (TAT).21 Compared with TAT, whose contrast is determined by the water content and ion concentration of biological tissues, PAT provides dominantly hemoglobin contrast and is more suitable for vascular imaging.

We extend the application of PAT to large animal brain cortex imaging in this study. One monkey head sample was imaged with our PAT system. Although the skull of the monkey head was as thick as 2mm , the main structures of the monkey brain cortex were identified by PAT. This promising result shows the feasibility of large animal brain cortex imaging using PAT.

2.

Methods and Materials

The experimental setup for this study is shown in Fig. 1 . A Q-switched Nd:YAG laser (pulse width: <15ns ) (LS-2137/2, Symphotic TII Co., Camarillo, CA), operating at 1064nm with a pulse repetition rate of 10Hz , was employed as the irradiation source. A monkey head sample was irradiated from the top, and PA signals were detected on the orthogonal plane by an ultrasound transducer and then amplified by a 50-dB amplifier (5072 PR, Panametrics, Waltham, MA). Next, the signals were directed to a digital oscilloscope (TDS5054, Tektronix, Beaverton, OR) and collected through a PC.

Fig. 1

Diagram of experimental setup.

044009_1_056804jbo1.jpg

The early work by Fry22 showed that ultrasound signals propagating through a skull suffer from less distortion at lower frequencies (0.51MHz) . Therefore, an unfocused ultrasonic transducer (V303, Panametrics, Waltham, MA) with a center frequency of 1MHz and 60% bandwidth was used in our experiment. The active element size of the transducer is 12mm .

A fresh head sample of a 20-month -old rhesus monkey was obtained from the California Primate Research Center. The head sample was immersed in a 10% formalin solution immediately after the head was harvested. The first PAT experiment was performed on the fifth day after the animal was sacrificed. Before the experiment, the hairs on the head were shaved off to reduce the potential attenuation of optical and acoustic waves. The dimensions of the head in the axial view are about 9×7cm , and the measured skull thickness is 2mm .

Before the experiment, the ultrasound transducer was aligned to point to the scanning center. The head sample was then held in a water tank and immersed in water. The location of the water tank was adjusted so that the sample was at the central scanning region. During the data acquisition, the ultrasound detector scanned the sample circularly for 240 steps, with a scanning radius of 10cm . A backprojection algorithm23 was employed to reconstruct an image. The laser wavelength used in all experiments was 1064nm .

After the initial experiment, the skull was opened and the monkey brain was exposed. We found that the brain tissue still looked fresh when the skull was opened, because it is hard for formalin to penetrate the skull. We also found that fluid blood still remained in the major blood vessels, which provided optical contrast.

Before imaging the exposed brain, the skull bone was put back on the monkey brain to keep the brain in its original shape. Then the head sample was immersed in the 10% formalin solution. After the brain was fixed by formalin, the skull bone could be removed without altering the shape of the brain. The formalin solution also helped to solidify the blood in the blood vessels so that blood would not diffuse into water when the brain was immersed.

Next, we imaged the exposed brain with the skull on but with the scalp and dura mater removed. The relative location between the skull and blood vessels might have changed slightly and may have had an effect on the incident angle of the PA signals. After this process, the skull was removed and the exposed brain was imaged again.

To understand the effect of the skull bone on PA signals, we characterized the acoustic properties of the skull bone using PA signals. A 50-μm -diameter, 1-cm -long human hair was used as the PA target, and the hair was oriented parallel to a transducer surface in the detection plane. At the beginning of the measurement, the transducer was used to detect the PA signal from the hair directly. Then the skull bone was placed between the transducer and the hair, and PA signals were detected again. Since the skull bone is not flat, its curvature may introduce uncertainties in the incident angles at which the PA pulses strike the skull. To minimize this effect, we oriented the central part of the skull, which is relatively flat, to be parallel to the transducer surface and in the direct path of wave propagation from the PA source to the transducer. During the experiment, the skull was rotated to different angles to provide different incident angles to the PA pulses. The two ultrasound transducers used in detecting PA signals had center frequencies at 1MHz (V303, Panametrics, Waltham, MA) and 2.25MHz (V323, Panametrics, Waltham, MA), respectively. The monkey skull thickness in the central part was also measured with a caliper and found to vary from 1.45mm to 2.46mm , with an average value of 1.95mm .

In all the above PAT experiments, we estimated that the fluence delivered by each laser pulse was 50mJcm2 at 1064nm , which complies with the ANSI safety standard.24

3.

Results

The reconstructed PAT images and a photograph of the exposed brain cortex for the rhesus monkey are shown in Fig. 2 . Fig. 2a shows a PAT image of the monkey brain cortex with the intact scalp and skull. Fig. 2b shows an image with the skull only, and Fig. 2c shows an image of the exposed brain. Fig. 2d is a photograph of the exposed monkey brain. Note that the shape of the brain in Fig. 2d had changed slightly since there was no support by the skull bone, and the dura mater had also been removed to expose the brain.

Fig. 2

(a) PAT image of a rhesus monkey brain with intact scalp and skull bone; (b) PAT image of the monkey brain with the skull bone only; (c) PAT image of the exposed monkey brain; (d) photograph of the exposed monkey brain. The blood vessels that can be identified from the PAT image have matching numbers.

044009_1_056804jbo2.jpg

In Fig. 2a, through the intact scalp and skull, six vascular structures can be identified from the PAT image. With the skull only, Fig. 2b shows many more details of the monkey brain cortex than Fig. 2a. Fig. 2c shows the brain cortex with even greater clarity than Fig. 2b, due to the lack of the skull effect. Note that since the monkey brain has a curved surface, but our PAT scan in this implementation is two-dimensional, Figs. 2a, 2b, 2c look quite different than Fig. 2d. However, we can still associate the corresponding blood vessels between them. We labeled the blood vessels using the same numbers in Figs. 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d. The field of view in the PAT image is also smaller than that of the photograph because of the limited laser beam size. Compared with Fig. 2c, Fig. 2a shows similar main vascular structures, which have been labeled with the numbers 1–6 on the monkey brain cortex, except that structures 7–10 are not clearly visible in Fig. 2a. However, the blood vessels shown in Fig. 2a are thicker than those in Fig. 2c, which is probably due to optical attenuation in the scalp and dura mater. Again, compared with Fig. 2c, Fig. 2b shows the brain cortex with a slightly reduced contrast due to the skull bone. To further quantify the similarity between Figs. 2b and 2c, we calculated the two-dimensional correlation of these two images. The calculated correlation coefficient is 0.7. This result indicates that Fig. 2b exhibits most of the structures that have been shown in Fig. 2c, even though the brain was covered by the skull bone. Therefore, the effect of the skull bone on PAT is not significant. In fact, the degradation of the image quality due to the scalp is stronger. Quantitative correlation between Figs. 2c and 2a is not applicable since the shape of the brain changed after the skull removal.

Fig. 3 shows the attenuation effect of the skull on PA signals. The normalized amplitude of the detected PA signals is shown as a function of the incident angle. For both 1-MHz and 2.25-MHz transducers, as the incident angle increases, the received signal amplitude decreases. Beyond 35° , the received signal amplitude increases again. This effect may be explained by the generation of shear waves,25 which we will discuss in detail next. Of the two transducers, the 1-MHz transducer received stronger signals.

Fig. 3

PA signal amplitude of a human hair detected by a 1-MHz transducer (thick solid line) and a 2.25-MHz transducer (thin dashed line) after the signal propagates through a skull bone at different incident angles. All of the amplitudes were normalized by the signal amplitude detected when the skull was absent. The error bars shown on the curve are the standard deviations of 10 measurements.

044009_1_056804jbo3.jpg

At a normal incident angle for 1MHz , the total PA signal loss due to the presence of the skull bone is 50dBcm . In the above calculations, we used an average sound speed of 2900ms and a density of 1900kgm3 for the skull bone, a sound speed of 1500ms , a density of 998kgm3 for water, and a skull thickness of 1.95mm . If we remove the loss due to reflection, the insertion loss is 33dBcm , a value about 3 times that of a human skull.26 Therefore, the 2-mm -thick monkey skull has as much insertion loss as a 6-mm -thick human skull. Since the thickness of a human skull ranges from 4mmto9mm ,27 PAT may be able to image the human brain cortex as long as enough laser energy can penetrate the human scalp and skull.

4.

Discussion

We showed that PAT can be applied through a relatively thick skull bone and that promising images can be obtained. In fact, due to their attenuations to both ultrasound and light, the scalp and the dura mater seem to have a larger effect than the skull on the image quality. We also expect that once the skull gets thicker, the distortion by the skull may become more severe, necessitating corrections for the distortion.

Besides the skull bone, the scalp and dura mater contribute to the degradation in image quality in Figs. 2c and 2a. We do not expect the scalp and dura mater to have significant effects on ultrasound signals, but the presence of the scalp and dura mater might severely reduce the laser penetration, and then reduce the image’s SNR. As a result, the effective photoacoustic bandwidth with sufficient SNR is reduced, leading to poorer spatial resolution. Fourier transformation of the experimental data indicates that the effective photoacoustic bandwidths at SNR=2 are 0.34MHz , 0.70MHz , and 0.77MHz for Figs. 2a, 2b, 2c, respectively. In addition, the scalp and dura mater also generate PA signals, which can clutter the brain cortex images.

The propagation of ultrasound signals through the monkey skull needs further comment. Since the sound speed in the skull bone is approximately twice as fast as that in soft tissue,26 the longitudinal wave has a critical incident angle of 30° when sound propagates from soft tissue to the skull. In other words, once the incident angle is larger than 30°, the longitudinal wave will be totally reflected on the skull surface. In our PAT detection system, we detect PA signals on the horizontal plane of the monkey brain. At this detection location, signals from the blood vessels on the brain cortex are likely to have incident angles larger than 30° when they propagate toward the skull. Therefore, these signals would be totally reflected at the inner surface of the skull. However, we can still receive ultrasound signals generated from the blood vessels on the brain cortex. The signals we detected are probably from longitudinal–shear–longitudinal wave conversion. It is well known that at a boundary, the refracted waves consist of both longitudinal waves and shear waves. If the incident angle is beyond the critical angle for longitudinal waves, shear waves can still propagate beyond the boundary while longitudinal waves cannot. If the boundary is part of a layered material, the shear waves will convert back to longitudinal waves at the other boundary. Through this mechanism, we can still receive signals from blood vessels beyond the critical angle.

By the longitudinal–shear–longitudinal wave conversion, the wave propagation through a skull can avoid severe wavefront distortions caused by inhomogeneous sound speed,25 which usually occurs when ultrasound signals pass through a skull bone. The longitudinal wave speed in soft tissue is 1500ms , and the shear wave speed in skull is 1450ms . The similar propagation speeds of these two waves help to keep the wavefront from distorting severely when ultrasound signals pass through the skull.

To further understand the effect of longitudinal–shear–longitudinal wave conversion, we present the PA waveforms generated by the human hair in Fig. 4 . Fig. 4a shows the PA signals received by the 1-MHz transducer after the signals passed through the skull bone with incident angles of 0° and 50°. The received PA signal when the skull bone is absent is also presented. The “No Skull” case shows the strongest amplitude due to the lack of skull attenuation, whereas the other two are attenuated by the skull. Fig. 4b shows the same PA waveforms, but the signals are normalized by their own peak values to show the first arrival times more clearly. We estimated the arrival time of each pulse at the rising edge (falling edge in this case) when the amplitude reaches 10% of the peak amplitude, which is more than twice the noise level. The arrival time is 16.1μs for the “0° Incident Angle” case, 16.7μs for the “No Skull” case, and 16.8μs for the “50° Incident Angle” case. The measurement results of arrival times agree well with our earlier prediction. At the 50° incident angle, the photoacoustic signal passed through the skull by converting the longitudinal wave into a shear wave and then back into a longitudinal wave. Since the shear wave speed is similar to the sound speed in water, the “50° Incident Angle” case has a similar arrival time as the “No Skull” case. The “0° Incident Angle” case has a time lead because the signal passed through the skull as longitudinal waves, whereas the longitudinal wave speed in the skull is almost twice that in water.

Fig. 4

PA waveforms from a human hair detected by a 1-MHz transducer. (a) Original PA waveforms; (b) PA waveforms normalized by their own peak amplitudes; (c) Fourier transforms of three waveforms in (a).

044009_1_056804jbo4.jpg

Fig. 4c shows the Fourier transforms of the signals shown in Fig. 4a. Whereas the center frequency for the “No Skull” case maintains 1MHz , the center frequencies shift toward the lower frequencies for the “50° Incident Angle” and “0° Incident Angle” cases. The “50° Incident Angle” case shifts more than the “0° Incident Angle” case. This shift to lower frequencies is due to the strong attenuation of high-frequency components by the skull.

5.

Conclusion

We have shown that PAT can overcome the effect of a relatively thick skull bone and that PAT brain cortex imaging of a relatively large animal is feasible. With the help of contrast agents, PAT can potentially image through even thicker skull bones. This result suggests that PAT may have the potential for human brain cortex imaging in infants or even adults.

Acknowledgments

This project was sponsored in part by National Institutes of Health Grant nos. R01 NS46214 and R01 EB000712.

References

1. 

S. L. Schreiber, E. Stolz, and J. M. Valdueza, “Transcranial ultrasonography of cerebral veins and sinuses,” Eur. J. Ultrasound, 16 59 –72 (2002). 0929-8266 Google Scholar

2. 

G. Ancora, M. Lanari, T. Lazzarotto, V. Venturi, E. Tridapalli, F. Sandri, M. Menarini, E. Ferretti, and G. Faldella, “Cranial ultrasound scanning and prediction of outcome in newborns with congenital cytomegalovirus infection,” J. Pediatr. (St. Louis), 150 (2), 157 –162 (2007). 0022-3476 Google Scholar

3. 

F. Fry, N. Sanghvi, R. Morris, J. Clendenon, K. Dines, J. Patrick, and S. Goss, “Ultrasonic diagnostic system for interactive interrogation of adult brain through intact skull,” Invest. Radiol., 17 463 –469 (1982). 0020-9996 Google Scholar

4. 

K. Dines, F. Fry, J. Patrick, and R. Gilmor, “Computerized ultrasound tomography of the human head: Experimental results,” Ultrason. Imaging, 3 342 –351 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1016/0161-7346(81)90175-9 0161-7346 Google Scholar

5. 

J. Ylitalo, J. Koivukangas, and J. Oksman, “Ultrasonic reflection mode computed tomography through a skullbone,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 37 1059 –1066 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1109/10.61031 0018-9294 Google Scholar

6. 

D. N. White, J. M. Clark, J. N. Chesebrough, M. N. White, and J. K. Campbell, “Effect of skull in degrading the display of echoencephalographic B and C scans,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 44 1339 –1345 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1911266 0001-4966 Google Scholar

7. 

S. Daverson, D. H. Evans, and D. C. Bouch, “The effects of temporal bone on transcranial Doppler ultrasound beam shape,” Ultrasound Med. Biol., 26 (2), 239 –444 (2000). 0301-5629 Google Scholar

8. 

S. W. Smith, D. J. Phillips, O. T. von Ramm, and F. L. Thurstone, “Some advances in acoustic imaging through the skull,” Ultrasonic Tissue Characterization II, 209 –218 NBS Pub. #525, pp.1979). Google Scholar

9. 

S. W. Smith, K. Chu, S. F. Idriss, N. M. Ivancevich, E. D. Light, and P. D. Wolf, “Feasibility study: Real-time 3-D ultrasound imaging of the brain,” Ultrasound Med. Biol., 30 (10), 1365 –1371 (2004). 0301-5629 Google Scholar

10. 

N. M. Ivancevich, J. J. Dahl, G. E. Trahey, and S. W. Smith, “Phase-aberration correction with a 3-D ultrasound scanner: Feasibility study,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 53 (8), 1432 –1439 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2006.1665100 0885-3010 Google Scholar

11. 

M. Tanter, J. L. Thomas, and M. Fink, “Focusing and steering through absorbing and aberrating layers: Application to ultrasonic propagation through the skull,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 103 2403 –2410 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.422759 0001-4966 Google Scholar

12. 

R. Seip, P. VanBaren, and E. Ebbini, “Dynamic focusing in ultrasound hyperthermia using implantable hydrophone arrays,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 41 (5), 706 –713 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1109/58.308507 0885-3010 Google Scholar

13. 

J. F. Aubry, M. Tanter, J. Gerber, J. L. Thomas, and M. Fink, “Optimal focusing by spatio-temporal inverse filter. II. Application to focusing through absorbing and reverberating media,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 110 (1), 48 –58 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1377052 0001-4966 Google Scholar

14. 

C. G. A. Hoelen, F. F. M. de Mul, R. Pongers, and A. Dekker, “Three dimensional photoacoustic imaging of blood vessels in tissue,” Opt. Lett., 23 648 –650 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.23.000648 0146-9592 Google Scholar

15. 

R. A. Kruger, D. R. Reinecke, and G. A. Kruger, “Thermoacoustic computed tomography—technical considerations,” Med. Phys., 26 1832 –1837 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598688 0094-2405 Google Scholar

16. 

R. O. Esenaliev, A. A. Karabutov, and A. A. Oraevsky, “Sensitivity of laser opto-acoustic imaging in detection of small deeply embedded tumors,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 5 981 –988 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1109/2944.796320 1077-260X Google Scholar

17. 

K. P. Köstli, D. Frauchiger, J. J. Niederhauser, G. Paltauf, H. P. Weber, and M. Frenz, “Optoacoustic imaging using a three-dimensional reconstruction algorithm,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 7 918 –923 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1109/2944.983294 1077-260X Google Scholar

18. 

M. Xu and L.-H. Wang, “Biomedical photoacoustics,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 77 (4), 041101 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2195024 0034-6748 Google Scholar

19. 

X. Wang, Y. Pang, G. Ku, X. Xie, G. Stoica, and L. V. Wang, “Noninvasive laser-induced photoacoustic tomography for structural and functional imaging of the brain in vivo,” Nat. Biotechnol., 21 803 –806 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt839 1087-0156 Google Scholar

20. 

M. Li, J. Oh, X. Xie, G. Ku, W. Wang, C. Li, G. Lungu, G. Stoica, and L. V. Wang, “Simultaneous molecular and hypoxia imaging of brain tumors in vivo using spectroscopic photoacoustic tomography,” Proc. IEEE, 96 (3), 481 –489 (2008). 0018-9219 Google Scholar

21. 

Y. Xu and L. V. Wang, “Rhesus monkey brain imaging through intact skull with thermoacoustic tomography,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 53 (3), 542 –548 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2006.1610562 0885-3010 Google Scholar

22. 

F. J. Fry, “Transskull transmission of an intense focused ultrasonic beam,” Ultrasound Med. Biol., 3 (2–3), 179 –184 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-5629(77)90069-2 0301-5629 Google Scholar

23. 

M. H. Xu, Y. Xu, and L. H. V. Wang, “Time-domain reconstruction algorithms and numerical simulations for thermoacoustic tomography in various geometries,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 50 1086 –1099 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2003.816081 0018-9294 Google Scholar

24. 

Laser Institute of America, American National Standard for Safe Use of Lasers ANSI Z136.1-2000, (2000) Google Scholar

25. 

G. T. Clement, P. J. White, and K. Hynynen, “Enhanced ultrasound transmission through the human skull using shear mode conversion,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 115 1356 –1364 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1645610 0001-4966 Google Scholar

26. 

F. Fry and J. Barger, “Acoustical properties of the human skull,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 63 1576 –1590 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381852 0001-4966 Google Scholar

27. 

A. Adeloye, K. R. Kattan, and F. N. Silverman, “Thickness of the normal skull in the American blacks and whites,” Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 43 23 –30 (1975). 0002-9483 Google Scholar
©(2008) Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
Xinmai Yang and Lihong V. Wang "Monkey brain cortex imaging by photoacoustic tomography," Journal of Biomedical Optics 13(4), 044009 (1 July 2008). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2967907
Published: 1 July 2008
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES


SHARE
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back to Top