## 1.

## Introduction

Like most measurements, the astigmatic compensation of a patient’s vision has indeterminate numbers estimated for it. Bounds in the vicinity of this measurement and intervals are believed to contain the patient’s “true” or “exact” demand. A theoretical concept like uncertainty is made tangible and substantial by well-known, visible, plane figures from coordinate geometry that allow us to identify extreme values for bounds of antistigmatic coordinates, and are the best way to analyze or process intervals. The figures beautifully reveal a clinical process for compensation of astigmatism in calculation friendly quantities.

An error cell is a set of powers in the vicinity about a prescription that images within an estimated diopter range of the retina. This condition defines the shape and size of the cell.^{1} Clinical powers are transformed to calculation friendly quantities by equations that have an elementary geometric interpretation. The error cells around nonzero purely cylindrical powers become cells in symmetric dioptric power space.

Recent works^{2, 3} have challenged the accepted view of how subjective refraction is performed, and offer a radically different routine in a plane. A unique point in power space represents every discrete symmetric power (the ordinary astigmatic power familiar to optometry). To determine the antistigmatic component of the refractive compensation, the routine needs Jackson cross-cylinders only, that is, lenses in a range of purely antistigmatic powers.

Powers in error cells in terms of cylinder power
${F}_{C}$
and axis
$A$
are converted to be antistigmatic powers in unique cells in a plane of symmetric dioptric power space. The plane, where the coordinates plotted along the
${F}_{J}$
and
${F}_{K}$
axes have identical units, houses those powers where dioptric power matrices have zero trace, and is perpendicular to planes previously considered.^{1} The
${F}_{J}$
axis contains all cross-cylinder powers whose principal meridians are vertical and horizontal. The
${F}_{K}$
axis represents cross-cylinder powers whose principal meridians are at 45 and
$135\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{deg}$
. The powers have zero spherical equivalent or are Jackson cross-cylinders.

A unique error cell with radial and tangential dimensions in an antistigmatic plane is the image of a pair of rectangular clinical error cells. Bounds of the individual antistigmatic coordinates of a power matrix and intervals are obtained for discrete powers of cylinder lenses and their axes. The bounds give the extreme positions of the principal meridians of a cross-cylinder lens and the extreme values of its principal powers. The patient’s exact compensation is believed to be between these extremes. We model the Jackson cross-cylinder procedure for the unambiguous powers in an error cell, and thus include the uncertainty that accompanies the measurements. Bounds of powers and axes of cylindrical lenses and intervals around nonzero power as spherocylindrical powers in symmetric power space are examined independently.

It is important in research to include error and its effect as well as account for patterns in measurement data^{4, 5} that are not the result of transformations. Cylindrical lenses of zero power produce different intervals around powers and axes and are not discussed.

It is verified^{1} that error cells plotted with sphere and cylinder powers and axis in positive cylinder form are not the same as cells where powers are transposed to negative cylinder form. This noninvariance of cells does not carry across to the new cells when they are transformed to symmetric dioptric power space. Invariance under spherocylindrical transposition is a necessary requirement of all meaningful ophthalmic parameters. Thus the bounds and intervals in symmetric dioptric power space are truly meaningful. Hence, for quantitative analyses, the traditional clinical spherocylindrical representation of power must be replaced by the invariant symmetric dioptric power space. In fact, the invariance one observes in symmetric power space is a feature of dioptric power space itself and is independent of the noninvariance from the world of spherocylindrical power.

In symmetric dioptric power space, the axes of the cylinders distinguish the planes containing the axis of scalar powers from each other. The invariance exists for all axes, and thus for all planes and the entire symmetric dioptric power space. Lattice points subdivide the cylinder-sphere plane and any plane containing the axis of scalar powers in symmetric power space into error cells. The area of the surface of an error cell in a plane of the axis of scalar powers is half of the area of the cell about the same power in the cylinder-sphere plane, valid for both spherical and astigmatic powers.

Further,^{6} symmetric intervals estimated for powers in sphere, cylinder, and axis lead to parallelepipedal error cells. Every power on or in the cell is transformed into a typical power on or in cells in symmetric power space. Coordinates of the power matrix are obtained using transformations for discrete powers. The error cell surrounding sphere and cylinder powers and axis is converted to a cell about scalar, orthogonal, and oblique antistigmatic powers. In turn, the cells are converted to cells around entries of the dioptric power matrix, principal powers, and principal meridians.

The error cells are projected onto the planes of cylinder and sphere and cylinder and axis. Error cells in the cylinder-axis plane image onto an antistigmatic plane in symmetric dioptric power space. The powers give rise to a family of arcs centered at the origin and a family of lines through the origin.

When restricted to thin systems with perpendicularly crossed toric faces, the representation^{7, 8} reduces to something similar to that of Thibos, Wheeler, and Horner;^{9} matrix
${F}_{J}\mathbf{J}$
corresponds to their scalar
${J}_{0}$
and matrix
${F}_{K}\mathbf{K}$
to their scalar
${J}_{45}$
. Matrix notation holds for the power of all systems, thin or with obliquely crossed toric faces, thick and with perpendicularly crossed toric faces, so that it better reflects the true character of dioptric power, that of a matrix. Furthermore, it is not confined to power but holds also for all the fundamental properties and many derived properties of linear optics.

## 2.

## Constructing Bounds and Intervals

Suppose a reported power of, for example,
$1.25\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$
of a cylindrical lens follows from a bracketing and optimization process that converges with the patient’s responses to “which is better, 1 or 2, or are they the same?” and the practitioner’s judgement. The practitioner brings bounds as close together as possible. The reported power was obtained by the methods of classical texts.^{10, 11} The bounds (1 and 2) seldom coincide, so that some small region remains after the new compensation has been dispensed to the patient. In our example some hypothesized “true” figure or patient’s “exact” demand has been rounded to the power
$1.25\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$
^{12} that a supplier typically has on the shelf or that a measuring instrument or routine is capable of reporting. An interval must be an indeterminate quantity, or an “uncertainty,” for if one knew what the bounds were precisely, the “true” or “exact” patient demands could be adjusted for, and estimates for bounds and mathematics would be unnecessary.

A pure thin cylindrical lens like any spherocylindrical lens has two principal powers. The cylinder lens brings incident rays parallel to the line of diopters to focus in a line parallel to the axis of the cylinder at this nonzero power. To complete the picture, imagine the other principal power at zero to focus on a line of diopters at zero perpendicular to the focal line of the nonzero lens. These focal positions define the length of an interval in diopter that is the power of the cylinder lens.

Let us estimate that the hypothetical power of a cylinder lens lies within
$0.125\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$
of the rounded value. Thus 0 D power is between
$-0.125$
and 0.125 D, and similarly, 1.25 D cylinder power is between 1.125 and
$1.375\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$
(see Fig. 1
) as the conjugate nature of principal foci of spherocylindrical lenses demand.^{1} Then the true value of the cylinder lens power, reported as
$1.25\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$
, is estimated to be between 1.00 and
$1.50\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$
(1 and 2), as shown in Fig. 1. Similarly the “true” or “exact” axis angle of the lens is estimated to be in an interval. The error in the principal powers is
$0.125\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$
and the error in the power of the cylinder lens is
$0.25\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$
. Thus principal powers are
$0\pm 0.125\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$
and
$1.25\pm 0.125\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$
, and the power of the cylinder lens is
$1.25\pm 0.25\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$
. An experienced researcher has the ability to understand, quantify, and communicate uncertainty in measurements. A measurement that does not contain the likely interval of possible errors has limited information. The true value differs surely from the one that is reported, and therefore one has no idea of the possible size of this difference.

The region around power
$0\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$
could equally be around a spherical lens. Although the exact hypothetical power is regarded as cylindrical, in most cases the power does contain some sphere, and therefore, is actually astigmatic. It is known that during refraction, changes in cylinder power give rise to adaptations in sphere power to keep the circle of least confusion on the retina. In symmetric dioptric power space, this preserves the independence of the scalar power from an antistigmatic power in the determination of the power of cross-cylinder compensation. Then the trace of the dioptric power matrix remains invariant.^{1} In Fig. 1 the arrows
$1.00\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$
and
$1.50\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$
represent positive powers of cylinder lenses. By reversing the arrows, the cylinder lens power is estimated to be between
$-1.50\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$
and
$-1.00\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$
. Let a line of axes similar to that of Fig. 1 illustrate bounds in axis angles.

Previous work^{6} shows that no common independent variables exist among proper values and vectors of the power matrices for spherocylindrical powers, so that proper values and vectors of the dioptric power matrix are functionally independent. Thus an interval of cylinder powers does not determine an interval of corresponding cylinder axes or vice versa.

The best way to represent axes and corresponding powers of the cylinder lens is in the plane with a rectangular set of axes.^{6} Any hypothetical cylindrical component within the interval of the rounded power has a corresponding hypothetical axis located anywhere within the axis interval. Intervals of axis angles and corresponding cylinder power intervals combine to form error cells around each reported cylinder power.

## 3.

## Illustrating Examples

For the reported cylindrical powers $1.25\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$ and $-1.25\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$ whose axes are at 0 and $90\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{deg}$ , as shown in Fig. 2, powers at the corners of the error cells are listed in Table 1 . The axes are estimated to range from $-2.5\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\text{to}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}2.5\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{deg}$ and $87.5\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\text{to}92.5\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{deg}$ .

The cylinder powers ${F}_{C}=\pm 1.25\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$ with corresponding axis at $A=0$ are the points Q and P plotted on the axis of cylinder powers ${F}_{C}$ in Fig. 2. The cell about Q (with positive power) images on the cell about P and both straddle the cylinder axis at $A=0$ .

The error cell about $-1.25\times 90$ is the spherocylindrical transpose of the cell about $1.25\times 0$ ; similarly, the cell about $1.25\times 90$ is the transpose of the lower cell about $-1.25\times 0$ . Because of the invariance under transposition, every vertical error cell pair related as shown in Fig. 2 forms the single diametrically opposite cell pair shown in Fig. 3a . An error cell about the power and axis at Q is on the left in Fig. 3a.

By transforming reported powers^{8} of cylinder
$1.25\times 0$
and
$-1.25\times 0$
(at Q and P in Fig. 2), the rectangular antistigmatic coordinates
${F}_{J}$
and
${F}_{K}$
of the dioptric power matrix are obtained as follows:

## Eq. 1

$\left(\begin{array}{c}{F}_{J}\\ {F}_{K}\end{array}\right)=-\frac{-1.25}{2}\left(\begin{array}{c}\mathrm{cos}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}2\left(0\right)\\ \mathrm{sin}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}2\left(0\right)\end{array}\right)=\frac{5}{8}\left(\begin{array}{c}1\\ 0\end{array}\right)\mathrm{D},$The antistigmatic coordinates for each of the cylinder powers $1.25\times 90$ (transpose at P) and $-1.25\times 90$ (transpose at Q) are

A line emanating from the page in the vicinity of O in Fig. 3 may be regarded as the line of sight of a patient’s eye. All of the error cells from Fig. 2 are imaged without a superposed cross-cylinder lens in Fig. 3a and with a superposed cross-cylinder lens in Fig. 3b. In Fig. 3b the cross-cylinder meridian OQ of positive power is aligned with OQ in Fig. 3a. The letter O and the line ${\mathrm{OE}}_{6}$ of the cross-cylinder on the left in Fig. 3c must be brought into coincidence with those in Fig. 3a. Similarly, the cross-cylinders on the right in Fig. 3c have ${\mathrm{OE}}_{2}$ coincide with that of Fig. 3a. The largest and smallest radii of arcs of a family of concentric circles in an antistigmatic plane in Fig. 3a represent powers of cross-cylinder lenses ranging from $-0.75\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\text{to}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}-0.50\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$ on one side of the origin and $0.50\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\text{to}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}0.75\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$ on the opposite side.

A family of diameters in Fig. 3a sloping from the angle at $-5\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\text{to}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}5\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{deg}$ represents the principal meridians of cross-cylinder lens powers. The diameters with extreme slopes intersect the circles with extreme radii and locate error cells between line segments and arcs of circles. The mathematics that give rise to Fig. 3a depict 1. the clockwise rotation of the cross-cylinder handles of the lenses through $10\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{deg}$ in the Fig. 3c, and 2. the flipping of the lenses so that positive meridians in Fig. 3c are replaced by negative meridians in Fig. 3d or vice versa. Although we usually work with cylinder lenses as compensation and a cross-cylinder lens as a probe, this method uses the cross-cylinder lens as both probe and compensation. The cross-cylinder options in Figs. 3c and 3d, intermediate handle positions, and an interval of principal powers are contained in the geometry of Fig. 3a in an antistigmatic plane.

Similar cross-cylinder figures where handles rotate, lenses flip, and powers change emanate from Fig. 4 . Flipping the lens takes one across the circle diameter; turning the lens takes one around the circle.

In the intervals
$[-0.75,-0.50]\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$
and
$[0.50,0.75]\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$
, we identify radii of concentric arcs on opposite sides of the origin. Examples are seen in Fig. 3a. The radii of the arcs represent cross-cylinder powers with alternate signs. The powers are presented to the patient as the handle is flipped to counteract cross-cylinder powers of the ametropia. In particular, the points P and Q at the radii
$-5\u22158\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$
and
$5\u22158\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$
in Fig. 3b represent the potential power of the opposite sign presented to neutralize^{2, 3} this cross-cylinder component of the ametropia.

In Fig. 3a the powers at P and Q and their location on the ${F}_{J}$ axis are now known. From Fig. 3a the magnitude of ${F}_{K}$ at ${\mathrm{E}}_{2}$ and ${\mathrm{E}}_{6}$ is (0.75 sin 5) D. The “true” value of ${F}_{K}$ about $0\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{deg}$ is in the symmetric interval $(-0.75\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mathrm{sin}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}5,\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}0.75\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mathrm{sin}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}5)\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$ . The length of this interval is $\delta {F}_{K}=1.50\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mathrm{sin}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}5\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$ . The lower bound for ${F}_{J}$ occurs where the arcs ${\mathrm{E}}_{2}{\mathrm{E}}_{6}$ intersect the axis, namely, $-0.75\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$ . The upper bound is the ${F}_{J}$ value at ${\mathrm{E}}_{3}$ (or ${\mathrm{E}}_{7}$ ). The asymmetric interval for the cell about ${F}_{J}=-0.625\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$ at Q [see Eqs. 1] is $(-0.75,\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}-0.50\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mathrm{cos}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}5)$ . The length of this interval is $\delta {F}_{J}=(0.75,\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\u20130.50\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mathrm{cos}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}5)\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$ .

Sphere, cylinder, and axis cannot be optimized or suitably processed. However, in the example the antistigmatic coordinates of an error cell are optimized under the estimated constraint.

The error cells in Fig. 3a contain all hypothetical powers that would be rounded to the transposed cylinder powers $1.25\times 0$ and $-1.25\times 90$ (as well as $-1.25\times 0$ and $1.25\times 90$ ) that keep the circle of least confusion on the retina.

Let points Q and P in Fig. 2 move to the right to vertical lines at
$22.5\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{deg}$
. The powers of cylinder
$1.25\times 22.5$
and
$-1.25\times 22.5\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$
are transformed to the rectangular antistigmatic coordinates
${F}_{J}$
and
${F}_{K}$
^{8} of the dioptric power matrix via

## Eq. 2

$\left(\begin{array}{c}{F}_{J}\\ {F}_{K}\end{array}\right)=-\frac{-1.25}{2}\left(\begin{array}{c}\mathrm{cos}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}2\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\left(22.5\right)\\ \mathrm{sin}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}2\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\left(22.5\right)\end{array}\right)=\frac{5}{8\sqrt{2}}\left(\begin{array}{c}1\\ 1\end{array}\right)D.$## Table 1

Rectangular coordinates of the corner points of the error cell for the reported cylindrical powers 1.25D and −1.25D , whose axes are at 0 and 90deg , as shown in Fig. 2.

Axis (deg) | Axis (deg) | +Cyl (D) | −Cyl (D) | |
---|---|---|---|---|

${\mathrm{E}}_{2}$ | $-2.5$ | $87.5$ | $1.50$ | $-1.50$ |

${\mathrm{E}}_{3}$ | $-2.5$ | $87.5$ | $1.00$ | $-1.00$ |

${\mathrm{E}}_{2}$ | $2.5$ | $92.5$ | $1.50$ | $-1.50$ |

${\mathrm{E}}_{3}$ | $2.5$ | $92.5$ | $1.00$ | $-1.00$ |

The diameter QP in Fig. 3a has rotated through $45\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{deg}$ for the same circle as in Eqs. 2, and is illustrated in Figs. 4 and 5. The polar coordinates of Q are then $(-5\u22158;45)=(5\u22158;225)$ . A circle with diameter QP as in Fig. 5 has the same equation as an analogous circle in Fig. 3a, $F_{J}{}^{2}+F_{K}{}^{2}={(5\u22158)}^{2}$ , but the diameter, determined by the axis, has the equation ${F}_{K}={F}_{J}$ .

The coordinates for each of the transposed cylinder powers have invariant antistigmatic powers under transposition.

As the cross-cylinder handle along a line at
$45\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{deg}$
to diameter QP is flipped, P and Q at the radii
$-5\u22158\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$
and
$5\u22158\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{D}$
represent the potential cross-cylinder power of the opposite sign presented to the patient^{2, 3} for this component of the ametropia.

Let the error cells in Fig. 2 move to the right to straddle lines at 22.5 and $112.5\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{deg}$ . Then the cells in Fig. 3a rotate to where cells straddle a line at $45\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{deg}$ in Fig. 4. For each of these error cells, the extreme values of the rectangular coordinates ${F}_{J}$ and ${F}_{K}$ differ from those of Fig. 3a. Thus the intervals and lengths need to be calculated anew. Error cells contain a set of points defined by a discrete power, where cross-cylinder lens meridians and their powers intersect. Let the handle of the cross-cylinder be along a line at $45\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{deg}$ to PQ and the other diameters in Fig. 4. As the practitioner flips the handle powers of cross-cylinders from diametrically opposite error cells, signs and meridians are presented to the patient.

Assume that all of the many pure cylindrical powers and their axes in the error cells in Fig. 2 around the single powers at P and Q and their transposes are translated to symmetric dioptric power space. Then a family of diameters intersects its family of concentric circles so that concentric arcs and diameters define error cells. Diameters and concentric arcs or circles are patterns with cylindrical symmetry that are expected in such data. Any other patterns in a plane provide characteristics deemed worthy of further investigation. In an antistigmatic plane, error cells are of the form and shape seen in Figs. 3a and 4. We have demonstrated that the orientation of the cells changes for different cylinder axes.

Error cells in Fig. 2 are at 0 and $90\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{deg}$ , and in Fig. 3a their images straddle the ${F}_{J}$ axis. Suppose the cells in Fig. 2 straddle lines about 45 and $135\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{deg}$ , respectively. Then, in an antistigmatic plane, an error cell straddles the ${F}_{K}$ axis instead of the ${F}_{J}$ axis. Although the discussion for ${F}_{J}$ and $\delta {F}_{J}$ may then be interchanged with the aforementioned for ${F}_{K}$ and $\delta {F}_{K}$ and vice versa, in general, cells need to be treated individually for angles, since a treatment of a single cell in the sample that covers all cases adequately does not exist. We have considered a representative sample of error cells at positions in an antistigmatic plane.

## 4.

## Discussion and Conclusion

The shape of error cells has been tailored to include powers that are well defined with respect to the circle of least confusion and the patient’s retina. Error cells are a set of probable compensatory powers about a discrete power that one may use to assess *just-noticeable differences* for refractive compensation and plan which powers to include in the research project. Error cells could contain *over-refractions* for patients with newly implanted *intraocular lenses*. The power of the over-refraction in air is at the center of the cell. Other possible over-refractions that keep the circle of least confusion near enough to the retina are located in the cell. Once one eye has been refracted and the order of the compensation is known, measurements for the other eye may be adjusted accordingly before the implant lens is ordered. Error cells give a fairly complete picture of potential compensations.

An interval of cross-cylinder lens powers and an interval of their axis positions have been modeled in an antistigmatic plane by coordinate geometry and properties of the dioptric power matrix. The point of departure was a set of possible lens compensations about discrete and corresponding powers of lenses in a trial frame. Intervals conveyed to data in symmetric power space influence their accuracy and the confidence one may place in them. Bounds were analyzed and optimized, and powers obtained by calculation were ranked. Optimization with the usual calculus routines produced no extreme values in multivariate power matrix coordinates. This work showed via geometry how bounds postcomputation allow intervals of individual antistigmatic coordinates of the power matrix to be obtained for thin cylinder lens powers and their axes.

For reported cylinder powers at specific axes, the cylinder axis and power were considered as the coordinates in Table 1 in the plane of Fig. 2. The plane was subdivided into a mesh of cells with a clinical measurement at the center. Rectangular cells with the same shape, size, form, and orientation were chosen and drawn for positive and negative cylinder powers. Coordinates of the centers and corners of such cells were determined. Every cylinder axis and power value on or in an error cell in an axis-cylinder plane was imaged onto cells in an antistigmatic plane. The lines that were perpendicular premapping became perpendicular lines and arcs postmapping. It is interesting to note the number of cells halved after mapping as a result of invariance of cells under spherocylindrical transposition.^{1, 6} Numerical examples illustrate how to determine upper and lower bounds. Bounds and intervals of zero cylinder powers at all axis angles complement bounds and intervals about nonzero cylinder powers in an antistigmatic plane.

## Acknowledgments

We thank colleagues for helpful discussions. The University of the Witwatersrand is gratefully acknowledged for providing computing and library facilities.

## References

**,” Optom. Vision Sci., 84 443 –451 (2007). 1040-5488 Google Scholar**

*Isomorphism and possible invariance of error cells under spherocylindrical transposition***,” S. Afr. Optom., 66 41 –55 (2007). Google Scholar**

*The Jackson cross-cylinder. part 1: properties***,” Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt., 27 594 –602 (2007). 0275-5408 Google Scholar**

*Subjective refraction: the mechanism underlying the routine***,” S. Afr. Optom., 60 77 –84 (2001). Google Scholar**

*Clinical measurement of refraction, vector $\mathbf{h}$ and exact analysis of errors***,” Optom. Vision Sci., 78 839 –845 (2001). 1040-5488 Google Scholar**

*Clinical measurement, artefact, and data analysis in dioptric power space***,” Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt., 27 490 –499 (2007). 0275-5408 Google Scholar**

*Mapping of error cells in clinical measure to symmetric power space***,” Optom. Vision Sci., 84 1060 –1063 (2007). 1040-5488 Google Scholar**

*Power vectors versus power matrices, and the mathematical nature of dioptric power***,” Optom. Vision Sci., 74 349 –366 (1997). 1040-5488 Google Scholar**

*Dioptric power: its nature and its representation in three- and four-dimensional space***,” Optom. Vision Sci., 74 367 –375 (1997). 1040-5488 Google Scholar**

*Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error***,” Optometry, 111 –139 Butterworths, London, UK (1988). Google Scholar**

*Subjective refraction***,” Clinical Refraction, 702 –723 Saunders, Philadelphia (1998). Google Scholar**

*Additional dials, techniques, methods***,” Optom. Vision Sci., 82 633 –636 (2005). 1040-5488 Google Scholar**

*Error cells for spherical powers in symmetric dioptric power space*