Translator Disclaimer
1 March 2009 Silicon nanoparticles produced by femtosecond laser ablation in water as novel contamination-free photosensitizers
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
We report the synthesis of novel inorganic contamination-free photosensitizers based on colloidal silicon nanoparticles prepared by laser ablation in pure deionized water. We show that such nanoparticles are capable of generating singlet oxygen (1O2) under laser irradiation with a yield estimated at 10% of that of photofrin, which makes them a potential candidate for therapeutics, antiseptics, or disinfectants. We also discuss a model of 1O2 generation and the possibility for optimizing its release. Potential advantages of such novel inorganic photosensitizers include stable and nonphotobleaching 1O2 release, easy removal, and low dark toxicity.

1.

Introduction

Suppression of pathogenic flora is one of the strategic goals in contemporary patient care in dermatology, dentistry, gastroenterology, and other areas of conservative and surgical therapy. A wide use of antibiotics in the second half of the twentieth century has led to the crisis of antibiotic and chemical resistance among pathogenic bacteria and viruses. Thus, bacterial isolates cultured from patients with skin wounds show an alarming trend toward antibiotic resistance even within four years of observation (between 1992 and 1996).1 Intensive efforts are now placed on the advancement of alternative antimicrobial therapeutics, to which bacteria are not able to easily develop resistance. One of these may be a modality recently termed photodynamic inactivation (PDI),2 photodynamic disinfection,3 or photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (PACT).4 The most frequently used term is PACT and will be used here. PACT is based on a combination of photosensitizer (PS) chromophores and light, promoting a phototoxic effect on the treated microorganisms, in general via oxidative damage, known as photodynamic therapy.5 Its use has been reported to treat localized infections in vitro, animal models, and patients, including dental6 and periodontal disinfection,7, 8 antimicrobial therapy against Helicobacter pylori in the stomach,9 pathogen inactivation in blood products,10 wound healing and cosmetology,11 acne treatment,12 abdominal surgery,13 and pulmonology.14

The primary morbidity of PACT is the potential phototoxicity of normal light-exposed mammalian cells persisting after the treatment for days or even weeks. An ideal photosensitizer should be removable from tissue surfaces or solutions once the PACT session(s) is completed. Another significant handicap of PACT is the photobleaching of the PS. This effect is present for most organic PS, preventing the application of high treatment doses. Recent advances in the field of nanotechnology and the appearance of new classes of inorganic photosensitizers gave a promise for the solution of these problems.15 Reducing the particles from micron-to nanosize scale leads to a greater specific surface area, potentially releasing more reactive oxygen species during PACT. For example, significant attention has been given to II-VI semiconductor-based nanoparticles such as CdSe and CdS, but the success was very modest, since these materials provide a relatively low quantum yield (QY) of singlet oxygen (O21) generation16 and may release of Cd2+ ions yielding to a major intrinsic biotoxicity. Exempt of natural toxicity, nanoparticles of group IV semiconductors look much more promising for these tasks. A few recent studies reported the generation of O21 by porous silicon structures, fabricated by anodical etching of bulk silicon in hydrofluoric (HF) acid solutions followed by mechanical scratching to produce randomly size- and shape-dispersed elements.17, 18, 19 Although the mechanism of O21 generation is not yet completely understood, the efficiency of its release was sufficient to cause a destruction of cancer cells.19 Despite these first promising results, in vivo application prospects of such porous silicon-based photosensitizers look hardly realistic. Indeed, mechanical or other milling of porous silicon skeleton inevitably leads to a wide dispersion of both size and shape of formed elements, with the mean size reaching several μm (Ref. 19). In general, such structural characteristics are not consistent with tasks of photosensitizer delivery in vivo, as a plurality of uptake mechanisms may become involved due to different particulate sizes and shapes. Another potential problem consists in the contamination of Si surface with by-products (e.g., HF derivatives) during the anodical etching procedure, which can result in a secondary toxicity of Si-based photosensitizers. Moreover, attempts to solve the toxicity problem by applying alternative purely chemical methods do not look very promising, since these methods normally also employ undesirable nonbiocompatible surfactants or generate toxic by-products.20, 21

The central idea of this study is that silicon nanoparticles prepared by laser ablation in liquids are able to act as photosensitizers producing O21 and resulting in microbe cell killing, opening potential antiseptics or disinfectant therapies. As a demonstration of the validity of this idea, we present preliminary results of photodynamic activity and generation of O21 using silicon nanoparticles in solution. Nanoparticles were produced by ultrashort laser ablation in liquids, which was originally introduced for the fabrication of plasmonic (noble metal) nanoparticles.22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 The femtosecond laser ablation regime offers several key advantages over conventional nanosecond or microsecond ablations, enabling a fine control of nanocluster parameters even in the absence of chemical surfactants during the ablation process.22 However, the main advantage of this approach consists in the possibility of working in a clean, contamination-free environment, which eliminates the toxicity problem and provides complete sterilization of the resulting product.28 The future steps of this study will include modification of nanoparticle design to improve photodynamic performance, enhancing both the quantum yield of the O21 generation and the increase of the desired spectral absorption.

2.

Materials and Methods

Synthesis of the colloidal silicon nanoparticles was carried out using a pulsed Ti:sapphire laser (Hurricane, Spectra Physics Lasers) operating at 800nm , with a pulse width of 120fs , 1-mJ max pulse energy, and 1-kHz repetition rate. An n-type ⟨100⟩ silicon wafer target was placed at the bottom of a glass vessel filled with 5mL of deionized water (18.2MΩcm) or D2O (CDN Isotopes) and was irradiated for up to 30min . Various pulse energies from 0.1to1.0mJ were used, and the beam was focused onto a spot-size diameter of about 1mm on the target using a lens with a focal length of 75mm . The target was constantly moved in the focusing plane to obtain identical surface conditions for each ablation pulse.

To examine the generation of O21 , we used two systems, which were equipped with different pumping lasers ( 523nm and 266nm ). Emission from the nanoparticle suspension placed in a quartz cuvette was collected at 90deg to the excitation beam with a photomultiplier tube (PMT) in order to trace the time-resolved signal of the emission at different wavelengths. The 523-nm system, previously described in detail by Jarvi 29 and Niedre,30 is composed of a 10-ns Nd:YLF frequency-doubled (Crystalaser QG-523-500) excitation laser. Emission from the sample is measured time resolved at five different wavelengths using filters centered at 1212nm , 1240nm , 1272nm , 1304nm , and 1332nm ( 20nm full width at half maximum). The detector is a liquid nitrogen–cooled PMT (Hamamatsu R5509-42) with an extended spectral range from 300to1400nm . This system was used for the singlet oxygen quantum yield estimations. The second system is composed of a 266-nm Nd:YAG laser (Surelite) for excitation. Emission from the sample is collected using a monochromator (Spectral Products) and fed into a in NIR-enhanced PMT module (Hamamatsu H10330-75).

3.

Results and Discussion

The exposure of the Si target to femtosecond radiation led to the ablation of the material and its release into the solution. The original clear solution became red-brown several seconds after exposure onset. The resulting colloidal solutions were very stable, and nanoparticles did not precipitate for several months after the preparation. To determine size characteristics of produced nanopartcles, we dropped a droplet of the solution on a carbon-coated copper grid of a transmission electron microscope (TEM) and dried it at room temperature. The grid was then placed into a TEM (Jeol JEM-2100F) to directly visualize the nanoparticles. Figure 1 shows a typical TEM image of Si nanoparticles (inset) produced by laser ablation at near-threshold conditions and a corresponding size distribution. One can see that the nanoparticles had a mean size around 2.4nm . The increase of laser fluence led to an increase of nanoparticle size up to few tens of nm, with an increase of size dispersion. The nanoparticles exhibited the characteristic 3.14Å lattice spacing of the ⟨111⟩ atomic plane associated with a crystalline state, although amorphous nanoparticles were also observed. The lattice structure was determined by measuring the distance between the atom rows visible on some of the particles in the TEM images. The atom rows are not visible in the TEM image from Fig. 1 because those particles are very small and probably completely amorphous.

Fig. 1

Typical size distribution of Si nanoparticles produced by laser ablation at low, near-threshold fluences (0.05Jcm2) and (b) corresponding TEM image.

021010_1_010902jbo1.jpg

The nanoparticle-based solution was then placed into a quartz cuvette and installed into optical systems for examining O21 release. Surprisingly, our experiments detected strong and stable O21 signal, which was monitored by the appearance of a phosphorescence peak at 1270nm . An example of O21 signal under illumination of the samples with the 266-nm system is shown in Fig. 2a . Similar O21 -related phosphorescence signals were observed with the 523-nm system. Since the lifetime of O21 is much longer in D2O compared to water ( 55μs compared to less than 4μs ),31 the O21 experiments were mainly performed for nanoparticles produced in deuterated water (D2O) . Time-resolved decay of the signals, shown in Fig. 2b, yields a O21 lifetime of 28μs , which is lower than the expected 55μs . This is probably due to the quenching mechanism, which lowers the decay time and will be the subject of further investigation in future papers. We did not measure directly the O21 quantum yield of the nanoparticles, but rather the ratio of their quantum yield at 1270nm in water with that of commercially available photosensitizer Photofrin estimated in the same irradiation conditions (wavelength of 523nm , mean power density of 110mWcm2 , same fluence rate and fluence absorbed). Photofrin (2.5μgml) was irradiated for 90minutes prior to singlet oxygen measurements, destroying potential aggregates and leaving Photofrin monomers.32, 33 Compared to Photofrin in the monomeric active form, the O21 production rate of the Si nanoparticles was estimated as 10% of the rate provided by Photofrin, which is an encouraging result taking into account that no optimization of the fabrication procedure was performed at this stage. Furthermore, Si nanoparticles subjected to a 532-nm pulsed laser irradiation for 1h at 200mWcm2 average intensity (for a total of total of 720Jcm2 ) did not show signs of O21 signal decay indicative for photobleaching, providing a decisive advantage over conventional organic photosensitizers.

Fig. 2

Singlet oxygen phosphorescence spectrum and (b) time-resolved signal collected at 1270nm upon excitation of the nanoparticles at 266nm .

021010_1_010902jbo2.jpg

Let us consider one properties and mechanism of O21 generation. Photosensitizing molecules are normally optically excited into an active singlet state, and after the intersystem crossing process, they accumulate in the long-lived triplet state. Interaction of this excited triplet state with the O2 triplet ground state results in energy and spin exchanges followed by a relaxation of the PS to the ground state, while O2 is raised to an activated singlet state. High efficiency of energy transfer requires (1) a longer lifetime of the excited triplet state of the PS compared with the energy-transfer time, (2) matching of allowed energies of the PS and the singlet states of O2 ; and (3) small spatial separation between O2 and the PS. Kovalev17, 18 showed that all these requirements can be fulfilled in the case of porous silicon, which is a surface-supported nanoporous structure composed of nanocrystal-based skeleton. In his model, Kovalev considers exchange interaction between electrons and holes that have a certain mutual spin orientation. When the size of the crystallite approaches the bulk exciton Bohr radius, the upper and lower exciton states are assumed to be an optically active spin singlet (S=0) and an optically passive spin triplet (S=1) , respectively. Kovalev also showed that at room temperature, 75% of the excitons are permanently in the triplet state, while the exciton decay time is controlled by the indirect singlet exciton lifetime, which is several microseconds to several hundreds of microseconds long, depending on the size of the Si nanocrystals. Such a long exciton lifetime makes porous silicon assemblies suitable for energy—or charges-transfer interactions. The transfer of energy from excitons confined in Si nanocrystals to oxygen molecules is indicated by the characteristic phosphorescence emission at 1270nm (Refs. 17, 18). The model also implies the most efficient excitation of O21 under the H passivation of dangling bonds, whereas the presence of oxide layer in the nanocrystal composition is considered as a detrimental process decreasing O21 release.

Although laser-synthesized silicon nanoparticles present a rather different object in terms of morphology, composition, and surface passivation, we believe that the emission of O21 can be attributed to the same mechanism. It should be noted that even without a detailed study of Si-based properties and optimization of the fabrication procedure, our nanoparticles manifested very promising photosensitizer characteristics. In future, we expect to substantially increase O21 release by optimizing the laser synthesis procedure. In particular, we anticipate that the efficiency of O21 generation must depend on the size of nanocrystals, their composition, and passivation. In contrast to the porous silicon fabrication procedure, laser synthesis offers an unprecedented flexibility for the manipulation of both the size of nanoparticles and the ambient chemistry. In particular, size characteristics can be tuned by changing the laser fluence during the experiments, while the surface chemistry and passivation of nanoparticles can be controlled by both the minimization of oxygen content (e.g., by pumping nitrogen or argon in the solvent prior to ablation) and the addition of some reactive chemical components during the fabrication procedure. In the latter case, we plan not only to engineer the surface composition and passivation in a desirable way, but also to functionalize the surface for some particular applications (e.g., for tumor targeting). We also expect to engineer the absorption band toward the infrared (IR) range, which is not forbidden for semiconductor-based quantum dots,17 by optimizing synthesis procedure. In particular, such engineering can be done by a proper size and surface chemistry selection, as well as by the creation of complex structures such as alloys (e.g., Si-Ge alloy). The shift of the absorption band toward the NIR range will significantly simplify in vivo cancer therapy applications, since mammalian tissues become more transparent within the 0.8 to 1.1 micron band.34

4.

Conclusion

We show that colloidal silicon nanoparticles of well-defined dimension can be produced by femtosecond laser ablation in a clean, contamination-free environment (water), which eliminates the toxicity problem of alternative fabrication techniques and provides complete sterilization of the resulting product. The Si nanoparticles exhibit O21 release upon excitation at various wavelengths and present no photobleaching, which makes them very interesting as potential photosensitizers for therapeutics, antiseptics, or disinfectants tasks. Further experiments optimizing the quantum yield of O21 generation by the nanoparticles and their uptake in various cells are on the way.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Professor J. C. Scaiano, M. Frenette, and M. Grenier of the University of Ottawa for their assistance in collecting singlet oxygen measurements. The authors acknowledge the financial contribution from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the Canadian Institute on Health Research, and the Canada Research Chairs on Laser Micro/Nano-Engineering of Materials.

References

1. 

A. S. Colsky, R. S. Kirsner, and F. A. Kerdel, “Analysis of antibiotic susceptibilities of skin wound flora in hospitalized dermatology patients: the crisis of antibiotic resistance has come to the surface,” Arch. Dermatol., 134 1006 –1009 (1998). 0003-987X Google Scholar

2. 

F. Gad, T. Zahra, T. Hasan, and M. Hamblin, “Effects of growth phase and extracellular slime on photodynamic inactivation of gram-positive pathogenic bacteria,” Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 48 2173 –2178 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.48.6.2173-2178.2004 0066-4804 Google Scholar

3. 

R. Andersen, N. Loebel, D. Hammond, and M. Wilson, “Treatment of periodontal disease by photodisinfection compared to scaling and root planing,” J. Clin. Dent., 18 (2), 34 –38 (2007). 0895-8831 Google Scholar

4. 

D. Wainwright, “Photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (PACT),” J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 42 (1), 13 –28 (1998). 0305-7453 Google Scholar

5. 

B. C. Wilson and M. S. Patterson, “The physics, biophysics, and technology of photodynamic therapy,” Phys. Med. Biol., 53 R61 –R109 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/9/R01 0031-9155 Google Scholar

6. 

J. Vlacic, I. A. Meyers, and L. J. Walsh, “Combined CPP-ACP and photoactivated disinfection (PAD) therapy in arresting root surface caries: a case report,” Br. Dent. J., 203 (8), 457 –459 (2007). 0007-0610 Google Scholar

7. 

Z. Lin, Y. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Ding, H. Chen, X. Zhu, J. Wang, S. Lee, J. Kim, and Y. Li, “Clinical efficacy of a new photodynamic treatment for periodontal diseases,” J. Dent. Res., 86 1196 (2007). 0022-0345 Google Scholar

8. 

Y. Chan and C. H. Lai, “Bactericidal effects of different laser wavelengths on periodontopathic germs in photodynamic therapy,” Lasers Med. Sci., 18 51 –55 (2003). 0268-8921 Google Scholar

9. 

M. R. Hamblin, J. Viveiros, C. Yang, A. Ahmadi, R. A. Ganz, M. Tolkoff, and M. Joshua, “Helicobacter pylori accumulates photoactive porphyrins and is killed by visible light,” Chemotherapy (Basel, Switz.), 49 2822 –2827 (2005). 0009-3157 Google Scholar

10. 

M. C. Wainwright, “Pathogen inactivation in blood products,” Curr. Med. Chem., 9 (1), 127 –143 (2002). 0929-8673 Google Scholar

11. 

V. Albrecht, D. Castro, and W. Neuberger, “Photodynamic cosmetic procedure and healing method,” (2007) Google Scholar

12. 

B. Kjeldstad and A. Johnsson, “An action spectrum for blue and near ultraviolet in activation of propionibacterium acnes with emphasis on possible porphyrin photosensitization,” Photochem. Photobiol., 43 67 –70 (1986). 0031-8655 Google Scholar

13. 

L. Giroldo, M. Felipe, M. de Oliveira, E. Munin, L. Alves, and M. Costa, “Photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (PACT) with methylene blue increases membrane permeability in Candida albicans,” Lasers Med. Sci., 24 109 –112 (2007). 0268-8921 Google Scholar

14. 

R. Donnelly, P. McCarron, C. Cassidy, J. Elborn, and M. Tunney, “Delivery of photosensitizers and light through mucus: investigations into the potential use of photodynamic therapy for treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cystic fibrosis pulmonary infection,” J. Controlled Release, 117 217 –226 (2007). 0168-3659 Google Scholar

15. 

I. Yacoby and I. Benhar, “Antibacterial nanomedicine,” Nanomedicine, 3 (3), 329 –341 (2008). 1743-5889 Google Scholar

16. 

A. Samia, X. Chen, and C. Burda, “Semiconductor quantum dots for photodynamic therapy,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 125 (51), 15736 –15737 (2003). 0002-7863 Google Scholar

17. 

D. Kovalev, E. Gross, N. Künzner, F. Koch, V. Y. Timoshenko, and M. Fujii, “Resonant electronic energy transfer from excitons confined in silicon nanocrystals to oxygen molecules,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 89 (13), 137401 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.137401 0031-9007 Google Scholar

18. 

D. Kovalev and M. Fujii, “Silicon nanocrystals: photosensitizers for oxygen molecules,” Adv. Mater. Res., 17 2531 –2544 (2005). 1022-6680 Google Scholar

19. 

V. Y. Timoshenko, A. A. Kudryavtsev, L. A. Osminkina, A. S. Vorontsov, Y. V. Ryabchikov, I. A. Belogorkhov, D. Kovalev, and P. K. Kashkarov, “Singlet oxygen generation in aqueous suspensions of silicon nanocrystals for biomedical applications,” JETP Lett., 83 423 –426 (2006). 0021-3640 Google Scholar

20. 

G. Belomoin, J. Therrien, A. Smith, S. Rao, R. Twesten, S. Chaieb, M. H. Nayfeh, L. Wagner, and L. Mitas, “Effects of surface termination on the band gap of ultrabright Si29 nanoparticles: experiments and computational models,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 80 841 –843 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1435802 0003-6951 Google Scholar

21. 

D. S. English, L. E. Pell, Z. Yu, P. F. Barbara, and B. A. Korgel, “Size tunable visible luminescence from individual organic monolayer stabilized silicon nanocrystal quantum dots,” Nano Lett., 2 681 –685 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl025538c 1530-6984 Google Scholar

22. 

A. V. Kabashin and M. Meunier, “Synthesis of colloidal nanoparticles during femtosecond laser ablation of gold in water,” J. Appl. Phys., 94 7941 –7943 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1626793 0021-8979 Google Scholar

23. 

A. V. Kabashin and M. Meunier, “Laser ablation-based synthesis of functionalized colloidal nanomaterials in biocompatible solutions,” Photochem. Photobiol., 182 330 –334 (2006). 0031-8655 Google Scholar

24. 

A. Kabashin, M. Meunier, C. Kingston, and J. Luong, “Fabrication and characterization of gold nanoparticles by femtosecond laser ablation in an aqueous solution of cyclodextrins,” J. Phys. Chem. B, 107 4527 –4531 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp034345q 1089-5647 Google Scholar

25. 

J.-P. Sylvestre, A. V. Kabashin, E. Sacher, M. Meunier, and J. H. T. Luong, “Stabilization and size control of gold nanoparticles during laser ablation in aqueous cyclodextrins,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 126 7176 –7179 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja048678s 0002-7863 Google Scholar

26. 

S. Besner, A. V. Kabashin, and M. Meunier, “Fragmentation of colloidal nanoparticles by femtosecond laser-induced supercontinuum generation,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 89 233121 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2388890 0003-6951 Google Scholar

27. 

S. Besner, A. V. Kabashin, and M. Meunier, “Two-step femtosecond laser ablation-based method for the synthesis of stable and ultra-pure gold nanoparticles in water,” Appl. Phys. A, 88 269 –272 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-007-4001-1 0947-8396 Google Scholar

28. 

S. Besner, A. V. Kabashin, F. Winnik, and M. Meunier, “Ultrafast laser based ‘green’ synthesis of nontoxic nanoparticles in aqueous solutions,” Appl. Phys. A, 93 955 –959 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-008-4773-y 0947-8396 Google Scholar

29. 

M. T. Jarvi, M. J. Niedre, M. S. Patterson, and B. C. Wilson, “Singlet oxygen luminescence dosimetry (SOLD) for photodynamic therapy: current and future prospects,” Photochem. Photobiol., 82 1198 –1210 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1562/2006-05-03-IR-891 0031-8655 Google Scholar

30. 

M. J. Niedre, A. J. Secord, M. S. Patterson, and B. C. Wilson, “In vitro tests of the validity of singlet oxygen luminescence measurements as a dose metric in photodynamic therapy,” Cancer Res., 63 7986 –7994 (2003). 0008-5472 Google Scholar

31. 

F. Wilkinson, W. Helman, and A. Ross, “Rate constants for the decay and reactions of the lowest electronically excited singlet state of molecular oxygen in solution. An expanded and revised compilation,” Space Sci. Rev., 24 663 –1021 (1995). 0038-6308 Google Scholar

32. 

G. G. Streckyt’e and R. Rotomkis, “Phototransformation of porphyrins in aqueous and micellar media,” J. Photochem. Photobiol., B, 18 259 –263 (1993). 1011-1344 Google Scholar

33. 

P. F. C. Menezes, H. Imasato, J. Ferreira, V. S. Bagnato, C. H. Sibata, and J. R. Perussi, “Aggregation susceptibility on phototransformation of hematoporphyrin derivatives,” Laser Phys. Lett., 5 (3), 227 –235 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/lapl.200710111 1612-2011 Google Scholar

34. 

V. V. Tuchin, Tissue Optics: Light Scattering Methods and Instruments for Medical Diagnosis, SPIE Press, Bellingham, WA (2000). Google Scholar
©(2009) Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
David Rioux, Marie Laferrière, Alexandre Douplik, Duoaud Shah, Lothar D. Lilge, Andrei V. Kabashin, and Michel Meunier "Silicon nanoparticles produced by femtosecond laser ablation in water as novel contamination-free photosensitizers," Journal of Biomedical Optics 14(2), 021010 (1 March 2009). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3086608
Published: 1 March 2009
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES


SHARE
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back to Top