Translator Disclaimer
1 March 2009 Effects of Er:YAG laser irradiation and manipulation treatments on dentin components, part 2: energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry study
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
The effects of laser etching, decontamination, and storage treatments on dentin components were studied by energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (EDXRF). Thirty bovine incisors were prepared to expose the dentin surface and then divided into two main groups based upon the decontamination process and storage procedure: autoclaved (group A, n=15) or stored in aqueous thymol solution (group B, n=15). The surfaces of the dentin slices were schematically divided into four areas, with each one corresponding to a treatment subgroup. The specimens were either etched with phosphoric acid (control subgroup) or irradiated with erbium-doped yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser (subgroups: I-80 mJ, II-120 mJ, and III-180 mJ). Samples were analyzed by micro-EDXRF, yielding three spectra for each area (before and after treatment). Surface mappings covering an area of 80×60 points with steps of 20 μm were also performed on selected specimens. The amount of Ca and P in group A specimens decreased significantly (P<0.05) after the acid etching and the Ca/P ratio increased (P<0.001). Er:YAG laser-etching using lower laser energies did not produce significant changes in dentin components. The mapping data support the hypothesis that acid etching on dentin produced a more chemically homogeneous surface and thus a more favorable surface for the diffusion of adhesive monomers.

1.

Introduction

Etching is one of the most fundamental steps in the restoration of teeth by adhesion of composite resin. Acid etching on dentin with phosphoric acid is effective for removing the smear layer and also for enlarging the dentin tubules or decalcifying the superficial intertubular dentin.1 The smear layer is the accumulated layer of mechanically polished debris. Etching is utilized as a pretreatment before adhesion of composite resin for removal of the smear layer. The technique exposes fresh tooth surfaces and facilitates direct contact of the adhesive and hydrogen bonding. Etching also enhances mechanical bonding through an interlocking effect in the roughened interface between the resin and the tooth.2

With the development of new adhesive materials, alternatives for dental structure conditioning have appeared as well. One of these innovations for substrate surface treatment is the use of erbium-doped yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser irradiation.3 Laser irradiation on dental hard tissue causes morphological and chemical changes. The extent of these changes is affected by the absorption characteristics of the tissues, so that the changes vary according to the type of laser and dental tissue.4

Dentists have yet to reach consensus regarding the correct parameters for Er:YAG laser use. The benefits of dentin laser etching prior to adhesive procedures are still controversial and the results of several studies are conflicting.5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Some studies report that the adhesion strength of laser-irradiated dentin is lower than that of nonirradiated dentin10, 11, 12 due to the weaker mechanical properties of dentin after laser irradiation.12 Some authors have also discussed the possible denaturation of collagen fibrils.3, 12 We modified the laser-irradiation parameters used in a previous investigation3 to determine whether it was possible to etch dentin without causing significant damage on inorganic and organic dentin components.

For the in vitro study, the chemical characteristics of teeth following specimen preparation must be carefully considered. An important factor that could affect the chemical content of teeth is the disinfection/sterilization method used to prepare the extracted teeth specimens.13, 14 Several studies have evaluated the effects of sterilization methods on tooth tissues. As steam autoclaving is available in dental clinics; it is the easiest sterilization method.15 Despite its damage to collagen,13 autoclaving sterilization is still used in some studies.16 In other studies the methods used for tooth decontamination and storage treatment are not mentioned.6

The influence of tooth sterilization methods has been evaluated by analytical tools such as Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR),17 bond strength study,18 and Raman spectroscopy.14 However, there are no previous reports of X-ray fluorescence microanalysis used to analyze sterilization effects on dentin components.

X-ray fluorescence is a nondestructive analytical technique based on the atomic emission of a given material’s components when irradiated. The most common irradiation method utilizes an electron beam coupled with a scanning electron microscope (SEM).19, 20 The interaction of the electron beam with the sample surface causes X-rays to be emitted by the atoms and ions in the top few micrometers of the sample surface. An electron is ejected from an inner shell of the atom; when an outer shell electron takes the place of the missing electron, energy is emitted in the form of X-ray radiation.21

Compositional changes due to laser irradiation were evaluated by atomic analytical studies in previous reports. Rohanizadeh showed through X-ray fluorescence analysis of dentin that Nd:YAG laser irradiation reduced the calcium/phosphorus (CaP) ratio in comparison to nonirradiated specimens.4 Lin 19 used SEM-energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) to evaluate Nd:YAG laser irradiation of dentin at a range from 150mJ /pulse, 10pps , 4s , to 150mJ /pulse, 30pps , 4s . The authors verified that the CaP ratio of the irradiated area increased proportionally with the elevation in irradiation energy.

This analytical tool has also been used to study the chemical composition of dentin after Er:YAG laser irradiation.20, 22 Hossain 20 showed through atomic analysis by SEM-EDX that the quantities of Ca and P (weight percent) were increased in cavity floors prepared by the erbium, chromim doped yttrium, scandium, gallium, garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser. However, in these studies, the laser parameters employed to prepare the cavities used higher energies than those used to etch the dentin. Analysis was conducted using a combination of SEM and X-ray fluorescence. Therefore, to the best of our knowledge, X-ray fluorescence microanalysis and chemical mapping of the dentin surface after etching have not yet been completed.

The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate, using energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (EDXRF), the effects of Er:YAG laser irradiation on dentin components. The effects of decontamination and storage processes on dentin components were also evaluated.

2.

Materials and Methods

2.1.

Specimen Preparation

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Vale do Paraíba (A073/CEP/2007). Thirty bovine incisor teeth were obtained from bovine jaws. All specimens were stored in saline solution (Aster Produtos Médicos LTDA, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil) at 9°C prior to use. After extraction, the remaining soft tissue was removed from the tooth surface with a dental scaler ( 78 ; Duflex, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil). The teeth were polished with a paste of pumice (S. S. White, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil) and water using a Robinson brush (Viking–KG Sorensen, Barureri, SP, Brazil) in a low-speed hand-piece (KaVo do Brasil SA, Joinvile, SC, Brazil).3, 14

After the cleaning procedure, teeth were divided into two major groups according to the manipulation treatment (sterilization or storage). Group A consisted of fifteen teeth which were autoclaved at 121°C for 15min (Biodont–Alpax, Brazil) in a flask filled with sterile saline (Farmavale & Cia–LBS Laborasa Ind. Farm., Ltd., Brazil), closed tightly and stored at 9°C .14 Group B was comprised of fifteen teeth stored in 0.1% thymol aqueous solution at 9°C for one week. To prepare the dentin specimens, the teeth were washed for 24h with filtered water to eliminate thymol residues.3, 14

The buccal enamel surface was removed by means of a water-cooled low-speed diamond disk at 250rpm with a 100-g load. The surface was ground for 1min with wet 600-grit silicon carbide paper at 150rpm to expose the dentin layer and to produce a smooth surface.3, 14 Ultrasonic cleaning (Maxiclean 1450, Merse, Campinas, SP, Brazil) with distilled water was performed for 5min in order to remove excess debris and the smear layer. The specimens were then stored in saline solution in a refrigerator at 9°C for one week.

2.2.

Surface Treatment

A reference point was created with a diamond disk in the proximal enamel of the samples with a low-speed hand-piece (KaVo do Brasil SA, Joinvile, SC, Brazil). The specimens’ surfaces were schematically divided into four areas and each area of the sample received a different treatment, generating four subgroups as described in Table 1 .

Table 1

Description of group treatments.

GroupsManipulation process
Group AAutoclaving 121°C ( 15min , with pressure of 1.1 kgfcm2 )
Group B0.1% aqueous thymol solution (one week)
SubgroupsSurface treatments
Control group (CG)37% phosphoric acid (15s)
Group I (GI)Er:YAG laser ( 80mJ , 3Hz , 12J , 153pulses )
Group II (GII)Er:YAG laser ( 120mJ , 3Hz , 12J , 103pulses )
Group III (GIII)Er:YAG laser ( 180mJ , 3Hz , 12J , 70pulses )

Specimens were removed from the saline solution. Laser irradiation was performed in noncontact mode by an Er:YAG laser (KaVo Key Laser II, Germany, λ=2.94μm , beam diameter=1mm ) with the no. 2051 hand-piece at a focal distance of 12mm , with cooling water spray (20mLmin) and a total energy value of 12J . Irradiation of the control group quadrant was avoided and a visual distance was maintained between the sides of each group. After the irradiation procedure, acid etching was performed in the control group area using 37% phosphoric acid gel (FGM, Brazil) for 15s . The etched surface was then rinsed with an air–water spray for 15s .

2.3.

EDXRF Measurements

Semiquantitative elemental analyses of calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P) were carried out by an energy-dispersive micro X-ray fluorescence spectrometer, model μ -EDX 1300, Shimadzu (Kyoto, Japan), equipped with a rhodium X-ray tube and a Si(Li) detector cooled by liquid nitrogen (N2) . The spectrometer was coupled to a computer system for data acquisition and processing. The voltage in the tube was set at 50kV , with automatic adjustment of the current and incident beam diameter of 50μm .

Three spectra from each area subgroup were collected before and after the treatments. Three points within the same line were selected so that the first point was located in the center of the irradiated area and two other points were selected 1mm from the center. The measurements were performed with a count rate of 100s per point (live time) and a dead time of 25%. The energy range of scans was 0.040.0eV . The equipment was calibrated and adjusted using certified commercial stoichiometric hydroxyapatite (Aldrich, synthetic Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2 , grade 99.999%, lot 10818HA) as a reference. The measurements were collected using classic parameters for Ca and P X-ray emission. The elements oxygen (O) and hydrogen (H) were used as a chemical balance. Energy calibration was performed using equipment-specific internal standards.

2.3.1.

EDXRF mapping

Elemental distribution maps were performed for one specimen from each group (A and B) in order to determine the surface distribution of the elements Ca and P after treatment. For each subgroup, the maps were scanned using 50kV in real-time scanning acquisition ( 1s per point), covering an area of 80×60 points with steps of 20μm and scan time of 320min per area per group. The elemental mapping parameters were set similarly to those used for scanning measurements by points.

2.4.

Statistical Analysis

The measurements of Ca, P, and the CaP ratio obtained by X-ray fluorescence were analyzed using Instat software (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical analyses were performed using the difference between normal and treated values yielded by the X-ray fluorescence results. Comparisons between decontamination and storage treatment groups subjected to the same type of surface etching were also performed. Those comparisons were performed using the Mann–Whitney U test. Comparisons among surface treatments in the same decontamination/storage treatment groups were performed using the one-way ANOVA test at a 95% confidence level and the Tukey–Kramer multiple comparisons test.

3.

Results and Discussion

All experimental samples showed lower CaP weight ratios than those of stoichiometric hydroxyapatite, which is calculated as 2.15. This observation indicates that the dental hydroxyapatite (as biological hard tissue) is nonstoichiometric, as reported in the literature.23 Statistical comparisons of Ca and P content as well as CaP weight ratio were performed for normal and treated specimens in all experimental groups (Table 2, horizontal comparisons). Statistical analysis showed that the amounts of Ca (Ca weight %) and P (P weight %) decreased significantly in the autoclaved specimens and in those treated with phosphoric acid (A̱CG), as compared with the autoclaved untreated specimens (Table 3, rows 1 and 2). Therefore, for this group the weight ratio (CaP) increased significantly (Table 3, row 4). However, no significant differences were found between the quantities of Ca and P, in gram atom percentage, before and after treatments in the specimens stored in thymol and treated with phosphoric acid (ḆCG) (P> 0.05) .

Table 2

Mean and standard deviations (n=15) of calcium and phosphorus percentages and Ca∕P weight ratios obtained by X-ray fluorescence, before (normal) and after (treated) dentin surface treatment.  *

GroupCalcium (wt%)Phosphorus (wt%) Ca∕P
NormalTreatedNormalTreatedNormalTreated
A̱CG23.19(4.06)19.43(3.78)A11.71(1.84)8.88(2.30) A1.98(0.08)2.25(0.28) A
A̱GI24.04(3.54)22.40(4.22)12.28(1.42)11.63(1.87) B1.95(0.07)1.90(0.12) B
A̱GII24.00(3.83)25.61(5.15) B12.25(1.63)12.80(2.16) B1.95(0.07)1.98(0.13) B
A̱GIII23.69(3.87)24.01(5.87)12.07(1.59)12.10(2.82) B1.96(0.08)1.96(0.17) B
ḆCG23.05(2.75)21.49(2.50)11.71(1.16)10.80(1.46)1.97(0.07)2.00(0.10)
ḆGI22.95(2.55)23.07(5.61)11.68(1.11)11.94(2.74)1.96(0.07)1.93(0.14)
ḆGII23.88(3.04)24.77(6.52)12.24(1.25)12.41(2.86)1.95(0.06)1.97(0.20)
ḆGIII24.69(4.18)23.73(7.43)12.05(1.67)12.15(3.41)1.96(0.07)1.95(0.26)
 * Tukey test showed a difference for values indicated with letters (P<0.05) .

Table 3

Results of Mann–Whitney unpaired-sample test.

ContentGroup comparisonP-value
CalciumA̱CG normal versus A̱CG treated0.0145
PhosphorusA̱CG normal versus A̱CG treated0.0012
A̱CG treated versus ḆCG treated0.0145
CaP ratioA̱CG normal versus A̱CG treated0.0005
A̱CG treated versus ḆCG treated0.0012

Lower quantities of phosphorus were found in the acid-etched specimens that had been autoclaved than in those treated with thymol (Table 3, row 3). The CaP weight ratio increased significantly for the acid-etched specimens that had previously been autoclaved as compared to those treated with thymol (Table 3, row 5).

Differences among etching treatments were found only in the autoclaved specimens, as shown by the Tukey–Kramer test. Calcium levels were lower in the acid-etched specimens than in those subjected to laser irradiation of 120mJ (P<0.01) (Table 2, column 3). Phosphorus levels were lower in the acid-etched specimens than in those subjected to laser irradiation of 80mJ (P<0.05) , 120mJ (P<0.001) , and 180mJ (P<0.01) (Table 2, column 5). The CaP weight ratio was higher in the acid-etched specimens than in those that were laser-irradiated (P<0.01) (Table 2, column 7).

The results of the elemental analysis in the present study showed that the amounts of calcium (Ca weight %) and phosphorus (P weight %) were reduced in the autoclaved specimens treated with 37% phosphoric acid (15s) . The calcium-to-phosphorus weight ratio also increased significantly. Acid etching dissolved peritubular and intertubular dentin, significantly removing chemical compounds containing Ca and P. Heat and pressure effects ( 121°C and pressure of 1.1kgfcm2 ) likely explain the intense effect observed in autoclaved specimens as opposed to those treated with thymol. For this group (A̱CG), the results are in agreement with previous studies obtained by dispersive Raman spectroscopy.14 White 17 used FTIR spectroscopy to investigate the sterilization effects of steam autoclaving on whole tooth roots. They found that this treatment induced a loss of mineral and collagen components (as shown by reduction in amine and phosphate peaks) from the sample surface. Notably, dentin tissue releases its organic material at temperatures ranging from 100to400°C and begins to lose carbonate at 100°C .24

When acid-etching treatment with phosphoric acid was compared to Er:YAG laser irradiation in specimens that had previously been autoclaved, it was observed that the acid removed more calcium than laser treatment with 120mJ (P<0.01) . Acid removed more phosphorus than laser irradiation with 80mJ (P<0.05) , 120mJ (P<0.001) , and 180mJ (P<0.01) . The CaP weight ratio also increased significantly in the acid-treated specimens, as compared to those that were laser-treated. This trend was not observed for the thymol-treated specimens, further demonstrating the impact of high-temperature autoclave treatment. Our study also showed that the amounts of Ca and P (weight %) increased in dentin irradiated with an Er:YAG laser. This result probably stems from the evaporation of organic components.4, 20

With regard to Ca and P content, the mapping of treated dentin showed an elemental uniformity in the control group (CG) specimens, when comparing groups A and B [Figs. 1a and 2a (Ca) and 3a and 4a (P)]. Isolated regions with blue spots in the GI and GII areas were observed for both decontamination treatments (groups A and B). This is shown in Figs. 1b, 2b, 1c, 2c (Ca) and 3b, 4b, 3c, 4c, (P) and indicates lower calcium and phosphorus concentration than that found in the CG area. A significant demineralization (dark blue areas), as shown in Figs. 1d (Ca) and 3d (P), was found in the GIII̱A area when compared to the GIII̱B area, as shown in Figs. 2d (Ca) and 4d (P).

Fig. 1

Calcium mapping results obtained by X-ray fluorescence of specimens in group A with each subgroup of treatment: (a) CG, (b) GI, (c) GII, and (d) GIII.

024002_1_027902jbo1.jpg

Fig. 2

Calcium mapping results obtained by X-ray fluorescence of specimens in group B with each subgroup of treatment: (a) CG, (b) GI, (c) GII, and (d) GIII.

024002_1_027902jbo2.jpg

Fig. 3

Phosphorus mapping results obtained by X-ray fluorescence of specimens in group A with each subgroup of treatment: (a) CG, (b) GI, (c) GII, and (d) GIII.

024002_1_027902jbo3.jpg

Fig. 4

Phosphorus mapping results obtained by X-ray fluorescence of specimens in group B with each subgroup of treatment: (a) CG, (b) GI, (c) GII, and (d) GIII.

024002_1_027902jbo4.jpg

Elemental mapping by EDXRF showed that the autoclaving treatment caused greater demineralization after acid etching and laser irradiation than treatment with thymol solution. Acid etching produced demineralization that was chemically homogeneous compared to that induced by laser treatment, as shown by the yellow areas in the mapping. Surface distributions of calcium and phosphorus were more homogeneous in the acid-treated specimens of the group decontaminated with thymol than in the autoclaved samples. Laser treatment produced irregular patterns of Ca and P distribution throughout the dentin surface; 180mJ of laser energy produced higher demineralization in autoclaved specimens compared to lower laser energies and compared to the specimens treated with thymol. Previous reports of Er:YAG laser etching on dentin, subjected to SEM analysis, showed a scaly, flaky surface of highly irregular shape with partially opened dentin tubules. In contrast, acid-etched dentin retained a smoother surface with opened dentin tubules.3, 5, 8, 9 Our results are in agreement with those previous reports; we found irregular patterns of elemental chemical distribution throughout the dentin surface after Er:YAG laser irradiation.

The surface produced by laser etching is also acid-resistant. According to Secilmis,25 laser irradiation of dental hard tissues modifies the CaP ratio and leads to the formation of a more stable and less acid-soluble structure. The alterations in chemical composition may affect the permeability and solubility characteristics of dentin, as well as the adhesion of dental materials to dentin.

In summary, EDXRF analysis proved an adequate research tool to study the changes that occurred in dentin following decontamination or storage and laser or chemical etching. Sample preparation is fairly simple, since it does not require a specific tooth size or dehydration procedure. The measurements can be performed under normal atmospheric conditions, without the need for high vacuum. Finally, because this technique is nondestructive, samples can be used in multiple analyses.

4.

Conclusions

The results of EDXRF measurements showed that the amounts of Ca (Ca weight percent) and P (P weight percent) decreased significantly in the specimens that were autoclaved and treated with phosphoric acid (A̱CG). The results suggest that thymol storage treatment is advised for in vitro studies. Er:YAG laser etching at lower laser energies did not produce significant changes in dentin components. The EDXRF mapping data support the hypothesis that the acid etching on dentin produced a more chemically homogeneous surface, yielding a more favorable surface for the diffusion of adhesive monomers. These findings elucidate the chemical structure of dentin after laser etching, facilitating the development of effective guidelines for laser use.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by FAPESP (05/50811-9) and CNPq (Grant No. 302393/2003-0).

References

1. 

J.-T. Cheng, K. Itoh, M. Kusunoki, T. Hasegawa, S. Wakumoto, and H. Hisamitsu, “Effect of dentine conditioners on the bonding efficacy of one-bottle adhesives,” J. Oral Rehabil., 32 28 –33 (2005). 0305-182X Google Scholar

2. 

F. Watari, “In situ quantitative analysis of etching process of human teeth by atomic force microscopy,” J. Electron Microsc., 54 299 –308 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/jmicro/dfi056 0022-0744 Google Scholar

3. 

L. E. S. Soares, E. B. P. S. Resende, A. Brugnera Junior, F. A. A. Zanin, and A. A. Martin, “Combined FT-Raman and SEM studies of the effects of Er:YAG laser irradiation on dentin,” Photomed. Laser Surg., 25 239 –244 (2007). 1549-5418 Google Scholar

4. 

R. Rohanizadeh, R. Z. LeGeros, D. Fan, A. Jean, and G. Daculsi, “Ultrastructural properties of laser-irradiated and heat-treated dentin,” J. Dent. Res., 78 1829 –1835 (1999). 0022-0345 Google Scholar

5. 

A. Martinez-Insua, L. D. Dominguez, F. G. Rivera, and U. A. Santana-Penin, “Differences in bonding to acid-etched or Er:YAG-laser-treated enamel and dentin surfaces,” J. Prosthet. Dent., 84 280 –288 (2000). 0022-3913 Google Scholar

6. 

L. Ceballos, M. Toledano, R. Osorio, F. R. Tay, and G. W. Marshall, “Bonding to Er-YAG-laser-treated dentin,” J. Dent. Res., 81 119 –122 (2002). 0022-0345 Google Scholar

7. 

A. Kameyama, E. Kawada, T. Amagai, M. Takizawa, Y. Oda, and Y. Hirai, “Effect of HEMA on bonding of Er:YAG laser-irradiated bovine dentine and 4-META/MMA-TBB resin,” J. Oral Rehabil., 29 749 –755 (2002). 0305-182X Google Scholar

8. 

A. E. Souza, S. A. M. Corona, R. G. P. Dibb, M. C. Borsatto, and J. D. Pécora, “Influence of Er:YAG laser on tensile bond strength of a self-etching system and a flowable resin in different dentin depths,” J. Dent., 32 269 –275 (2004). 0300-5712 Google Scholar

9. 

W. J. Dunn, J. T. Davis, and D. A. Bush, “Shear bond strength and SEM evaluation of composite bonded to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin and enamel,” Dent. Mater., 21 616 –624 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.11.003 0109-5641 Google Scholar

10. 

Y. Sakakibara, K. Ishimaru, and M. Takamizu, “A study on bond strength to dentin irradiated by erbium:YAG laser,” Jpn. J. Conserv. Dent., 41 207 –219 (1998). Google Scholar

11. 

A. Kameyama, E. Kawada, M. Takizawa, Y. Oda, and Y. Hirai, “Influence of different acid conditioners on the tensile bond strength of 4-META/MMA-TBB resin to Er:YAG laser-irradiated bovine dentin,” J. Adhes. Dent., 2 297 –204 (2000). Google Scholar

12. 

T. Harima, “Adhesive properties of resinous materials to laser-irradiated dentin,” Hiroshima University School of Dentistry, (2001). Google Scholar

13. 

J. P. DeWald, “The use of extracted teeth for in vitro bonding studies: a review of infection control considerations,” Dent. Mater., 13 74 –81 (1997). 0109-5641 Google Scholar

14. 

L. E. S. Soares, A. Brugnera Junior, F. A. A. Zanin, M. T. T. Pacheco, and A. A. Martin, “Effects of treatment for manipulation of teeth and Er:YAG laser irradiation on dentin: A Raman spectroscopy analysis,” Photomed. Laser Surg., 25 50 –57 (2007). 1549-5418 Google Scholar

15. 

M. J. Toro, L. L. Lukantsova, M. Williamson, R. Hinesley, G. J. Eckert, and A. J. Dunipace, “In vitro fluoride dose–response study of sterilized enamel lesions,” Caries Res., 34 246 –253 (2000). 0008-6568 Google Scholar

16. 

M. S. Cenci, S. E. Piva, F. Potrich, E. Formolo, F. F. Demarco, and J. M. Powers, “Microleakage in bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive materials,” Braz Dent. J., 15 13 –18 (2004). 0103-6440 Google Scholar

17. 

J. M. White, H. E. Goodis, S. J. Marshall, and G. W. Marshall, “Sterilization of teeth by gamma radiation,” J. Dent. Res., 73 1560 –1567 (1994). 0022-0345 Google Scholar

18. 

M. Sperandio, J. B. Souza, and D. T. Oliveira, “Effect of gamma radiation on dentin bond strength and morphology,” Braz Dent. J., 12 205 –208 (2001). 0103-6440 Google Scholar

19. 

C. P. Lin, B. S. Lee, F. H. Lin, S. H. Kok, and W. H. Lan, “Phase, compositional, and morphological changes of human dentin after Nd:YAG laser treatment,” J. Endod., 27 389 –393 (2001). 0099-2399 Google Scholar

20. 

M. Hossain, Y. Nakamura, Y. Tamaki, Y. Yamada, Y. Murakami, and K. Matsumoto, “Atomic analysis and knoop hardness measurement of the cavity floor prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation in vitro,” J. Oral Rehabil., 30 515 –521 (2003). 0305-182X Google Scholar

21. 

M. E. Barbour and J. S. Rees, “The laboratory assessment of enamel erosion: A review,” J. Dent., 32 591 –602 (2004). 0300-5712 Google Scholar

22. 

D. G. Yu, Y. Kimura, J. Kinoshita, and K. Matsumoto, “Morphological and atomic analytical studies on enamel and dentin irradiated by an erbium, chromium:YSGG laser,” J. Clin. Laser Med. Surg., 18 139 –143 (2000). 1044-5471 Google Scholar

23. 

F. O. Falla-Sotelo, M. A. Rizzutto, M. H. Tabacniks, N. Added, and M. D. L. Barbosa, “Analysis and discussion of trace elements in teeth of different animal species,” Braz. J. Phys., 35 761 –762 (2005). 0103-9733 Google Scholar

24. 

L. Bachmann, R. Diebolder, R. Hibst, and D. M. Zezell, “Changes in chemical composition and collagen structure of dentine tissue after erbium laser irradiation,” Spectrochim. Acta, Part A, 61 2634 –2639 (2005). 0584-8539 Google Scholar

25. 

A. Secilmis, S. Altintas, A. Usumez, and G. Berk, “Evaluation of mineral content of dentin prepared by erbium, chromium:yttrium scandium gallium garnet laser,” Lasers Med. Sci., 23 421 –425 (2008). 0268-8921 Google Scholar
©(2009) Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
Luís Eduardo Silva Soares, Ana Maria Do Espirito Santo, Aldo Brugnera Jr., Fátima Antonia Aparecida Zanin, and Airton Abrahao Martin "Effects of Er:YAG laser irradiation and manipulation treatments on dentin components, part 2: energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry study," Journal of Biomedical Optics 14(2), 024002 (1 March 2009). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3103287
Published: 1 March 2009
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back to Top