Translator Disclaimer
1 May 2009 Effect of low-level laser treatment of tissue-engineered skin substitutes: contraction of collagen lattices
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Fibroblast-populated collagen lattices (FPCL) are widely used in tissue-engineered artificial skin substitutes, but their main drawback is that interaction of fibroblasts and matrix causes contraction of the lattice, reducing it to about 20% of its original area. The effect of low-level laser treatment (LLLT) on the behavior of 3T3 fibroblasts seeded in collagen lattices containing 20% chondroitin-6-sulphate was investigated to determine whether LLLT could control the contraction of FPCL. A He-Ne laser was used at 632.8 nm to deliver a 5-mW continuous wave with fluences from 1 to 4 J/cm2. Laser treatment at 3 J/cm2 increased contraction of collagen lattices in the absence of cells but decreased contraction of cell seeded lattices over a 7-day period. The effect was energy dependent and was not observed at 1, 2, or 4 J/cm2. There was no alteration in fibroblast viability, morphology, or mitochondrial membrane potential after any laser treatments, but the distribution of actin fibers within the cells and collagen fibers in the matrices was disturbed at 3 J/cm2. These effects contribute to the decrease in contraction observed. LLLT may offer a means to control contraction of FPCL used as artificial skin substitutes.

1.

Introduction

Tissue-engineered constructs are designed, and used, to replace diseased or damaged tissues, particularly the load-bearing soft connective tissues, such as cartilage,1 tendon,2 ligament,3 blood vessels,4 heart valves,5 and skin,6, 7, 8 including tissue-engineered skin products approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Tissue-engineered structures replicate some aspects of tissue function, but the central aim is to allow the bioresorption of the construct and its replacement by natural body tissue.

Tissue-engineered skin substitutes generally consist of cells and extracellular matrix materials either alone or in combination. Epidermal keratinocytes facilitate the development of an epidermal layer on the surface of the skin substitute, and fibroblasts facilitate the development of a dermal layer. The extracellular matrix provides a three-dimensional (3-D) framework for the fibroblasts and provides biological support both for the fibroblasts and the overlying keratinocytes. Following the pioneering work of Burke,9 collagen has been widely used as a matrix material in the form of sponges, gels, or lattices.10 Naturally occurring glycosaminoglycans (GAG), such as chondroitin-6-sulphate (Ch6SO4) , and cross-linking agents may be added to matrix materials to improve their mechanical and biological properties.11, 12, 13

Fibroblast-populated collagen lattices (FPCL) have been extensively studied and used in tissue-engineered skin replacements, and fibroblasts cultured in a lattice mimic the in vivo situation in the dermis, displaying similar cell shape, mitotic activity, and collagen synthesis compared to human dermis.14 The main drawback of FPCL is that the interaction between fibroblasts and the matrix produces contraction of the lattice, which can lead to a reduction up to 20% of the initial area.15 The contraction of the skin substitute reduces the area available for skin replacement and risks exposing the wound to tissue inflammation, maceration, or desiccation and bacterial infection.16

FPCLs have been used as models of healing wounds, in which contraction may also occur. Mester 17 reported that 1to4Jcm2 low-level laser irradiation induced healing of chronic nonhealing soft tissue ulcers, and this formed the genesis of clinical low-level laser treatment (LLLT). Other studies18 produced equivocal results because of the variability of clinical wounds and patient status, and other poorly controlled variables, such as patient mobility. In vitro studies, however, show that LLLT can modulate a variety of biological processes within cells.19 We investigated the use of LLLT in vitro to determine whether it represented a means of modifying the contraction of FPCLs. In this context, we used FPCL following the compositions recommended by Yannas and coworkers,20 which led to the collagen-chondroitin sulphate dermal regeneration template known as Integra. Contraction of the lattices was measured at a density of fibroblasts previously observed to accomplish a reduction in area of greater than 50% in 7days in a model of wound healing.12

2.

Materials and Methods

2.1.

Preparation of Collagen Lattices

The test specimens were collagen lattices containing 0.3% (w/v) collagen supplemented with 20% w/v GAG. Lattices were formed by mixing 4.29mgml type I collagen solution acid extracted from rat tail tendon,21 a mixture of 10×Dulbecco ’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) and 0.4M NaOH (2:1), and the GAG, CH6SO4 , prepared at 3mgml in 1×serum -free DMEM, at a ratio of 7:1:2. The pH was adjusted to 8 to 8.5 by dropwise addition of 1M NaOH.

Five ml aliquots of the collagen lattice solution were pipetted into a polycarbonate (Stockline Plastics Ltd., Glasgow, UK) cell chamber measuring 24×60×11mm with an outer diameter of 100mm . In order to have a hydrophobic cell chamber to inhibit cell attachment, the cell chamber was siliconized for 24h in a fume cupboard using Sigmacote. Before cell seeding, the collagen lattices were washed twice by incubating them in complete DMEM containing 10% v/v fetal calf serum, 50unitsml penicillin/ 50μgml streptomycin, and nonessential amino acids. 3T3 mouse fibroblasts were seeded onto the set collagen lattice at a density of 104cellscm2 in 7ml of complete DMEM and incubated for 4h at 37°C (Heraeus Electronics, Hanau, Germany) in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air to allow cell attachment. After this time period, the FPCLs were detached from the walls of the cell chamber and floated freely in the culture medium. Laser treatment was carried out after this 4-h attachment period. Thereafter, cells were cultured for up to 7days with a daily change of 2ml of the 7ml culture medium. Collagen lattices were also cultured in the absence of cells and laser treated by following the same protocol as described earlier, but omitting the cells.

2.2.

Laser Irradiation

Lattices were irradiated using a 5-mW continuous wave, linearly polarized He-Ne laser (3225H-PC, Hughes Aircraft Co.) operating at 632.8nm with a beam profile at TEM00 mode delivering a laser beam with a spot size of 1.5mm . The output power was measured using Molectron MAX 5200 and Metrologic power meters calibrated at 632.8nm . The body of the laser was attached to a scanner, which was controlled by two linear actuator stepper motors. A host personal computer with a Pentium II processor running on LabVIEW 6.0 (Laboratory Virtual Instrument Engineering Workbench, National Instruments Corp.) and a development environment based on the graphical programming language G were used to control the scanning speed of both motors, V (cm/s), which determined the laser fluence or energy density, ρ (Jcm2) , the relation being:

V=(S*Pw)(ρ*A),
where S (cm) is the total distance travelled by the laser beam, Pw (W) is the output power, and A (cm2) is the area of treatment.

The laser, delivering an output power of 3.5mW , was positioned 20mm above the surface of the specimen. A holder specially fabricated to accommodate the cell chamber was attached to the top of the angular table together with a linkage connecting the linear micrometer with the x-y table, and an alignment rail enabled precise positioning of the fibroblast-populated collagen lattices (FPCL) for LLLT treatment (Fig. 1 ). The entire computer-assisted experimental setup was housed in a controlled environment of 37°C .

Fig. 1

The laser scanning system.

034002_1_073902jbo1.jpg

2.3.

Analysis of Cell Viability, Morphology, Mitochondrial Membrane Depolarization, and Collagen Fiber Content of the Matrix

To examine the viability of the fibroblasts in the FPCL, ethidium bromide (EB) and 5-carboxyfluorescein diacetate (CFDA) staining was used.22 CFDA stains the viable 3T3 fibroblasts green, and EB stains the nuclei of cells with damaged membranes red. The lattices were washed twice with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and then 2ml of 0.1% (w/v) EB in PBS was added. The lattices were kept in the dark at room temperature for 6min before washing them again three times with PBS. Three ml of 25μM CFDA in PBS was then added, and the lattices were kept in the dark at 4°C . After 15min , the lattices were again washed three times with PBS and viewed under the confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica CLSM). For the detection of cytoskeletal damage, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled phalloidin was used to stain the actin, as described by Wulf 23 The lattices were fixed by immersing them in PBS containing 4% formaldehyde for 20min at room temperature. Fixed samples were then washed three times with PBS and incubated with 1:500 dilution of FITC-phalloidin for 1h in the dark at room temperature, washed again three times with PBS, and examined by CLSM. To visualize the collagen fibers in the collagen-GAG lattices, both the LLLT-treated and control lattices were immersed for 5min at room temperature in 0.1% (w/v) acriflavine, a mixture of 3,6-diamino-10-methylacridinium (acriflavine) and 3,6-diaminoacridine (proflavine). Samples were washed three times with PBS to remove excess stain before viewing on the CLSM. Examination by CLSM for CFDA/EB, FITC-phalloidin, and acriflavine stained samples used 488-nm excitation with a 510-nm dichroic beamsplitter in place. Data from the two channels were collected, using a barrier filter of 590nm in channel 1 and a bandpass filter of 530nm in channel 2. The objective lens was a 25×water immersion lens (NA 0.75).

To determine the mitochondrial membrane potential, accumulation of the fluorescent potentiometric dye tetramethylrhodamine ethyl ester (TMRE) was measured in the control and LLLT-treated 3T3 cells. For this method, the cells were cultured on polystyrene 60-mm Petri dishes and not in collagen lattices. Cells were seeded at 104cellscm2 in 7ml complete DMEM and treated with the laser after allowing 4h for attachment as with the FPCL samples. As a positive control, cultured cells were also incubated with 100μM carbonyl cyanide p-trifluoromethoxy-phenylhydrazone (FCCP) for 1h at 37°C to disrupt the mitochrondrial membrane potential. Cultures of control, LLLT-treated, and FCCP-treated cells were incubated with 100nM TMRE in complete DMEM for 20min , after which they were washed three times with PBS and imaged by z -sectioning. Each section was 2μm , and a total of 18 sections were imaged. The images were collected using Lasersharp 2000 software (Bio-Rad Laboratories) running OS/2. Images were recorded using an MRC 1024 CLSM (Bio-Rad) coupled to a Nikon E600FN upright microscope using a 60×FLUOR water dipping lens (NA=10) . TMRE was excited at 568nm using a Krypton/Argon laser. A 580-nm LP filter (Chrom, Inc.) was used to collect emission of light greater than 580nm . Time-dependent TMRE fluorescent changes were measured in frame scan mode. Projections of the image sections were created using a “maximum” alogarithm in the Bio-Rad Lasersharp 2000 software. Subsequently, the intensity of the cells was quantified in Scion Image.

2.4.

Measurement of Contraction

The area of the lattices in all the experiments was measured daily using a light box over which the cell chambers were placed on a standard millimeter grid. The area of the specimen was then calculated using digital planimetry and imaging software (Scion Image, www.scioncorp.com).

Using Scion Image, the file containing the digitized image of the collagen lattices was opened, the perimeter of the cell chamber outlined, and the original area calculated. The areas of the contracted lattices were measured in a similar way by first plotting the outline of the contracted lattices using a freehand selection tool in Scion Image and then instructing the program to measure the outlined area. The contracted area of the lattices was expressed as a percentage of the original area.

3.

Results

3.1.

Lattice Contraction

Both the unseeded collagen lattices and the fibroblast populated lattices contracted, but the magnitude and time scale of the contraction were markedly different.

Seeded lattices showed progressive contraction over the 7days for which it was monitored (Figs. 2 and 3 ). The rate of contraction was greatest initially, during the first day of monitoring, and then it decreased nonlinearly. The maximum contraction occurred on day 7, the last day of monitoring, and this value was used to characterize the contraction of the FPCL. Collagen lattices in the absence of cells reached a maximum contraction on the second day and remained constant thereafter (Figs. 2 and 3).

Fig. 2

Contraction of control and LLLT-treated unseeded collagen lattices and FPCL at 2Jcm2 . Results are expressed as percentages of the original area of the collagen lattices and are the mean values±standard deviation (SD) of five repeated experiments. Diamonds indicate control (FPCL); triangles indicate control (collagen lattices); squares indicate LLLT at 2Jcm2 (FPCL); and circles indicate LLLT at 2Jcm2 (collagen lattices).

034002_1_073902jbo2.jpg

Fig. 3

Contraction of control and LLLT-treated unseeded collagen lattices and FPCL at 3Jcm2 . Results are expressed as percentages of the original area of the collagen lattices and are the mean±SD , n=5 . p*<0.05 , comparing values from the LLLT-treated lattices with and without cells with those from untreated seeded and unseeded collagen lattices, respectively, by two-tailed Student’s t -test. Diamonds indicate control (FPCL); triangles indicate control (collagen lattices); squares indicate LLLT at 3Jcm2 (FPCL); and circles indicate LLLT at 3Jcm2 (collagen lattices).

034002_1_073902jbo3.jpg

The values of the parameters used to characterize the contraction of the lattices in control and LLLT-treated samples are shown in Table 1 . Comparison of the values for control and laser-treated specimens using two-tailed Student’s t -test showed that irradiation at fluences of 1, 2, and 4Jcm2 had no statistically significant effect. The effect of 2Jcm2 is shown on Fig. 3. Irradiation at 3Jcm2 produced significantly greater contraction of the unseeded lattices and reduced contraction of FPCL compared with values from the control unseeded collagen lattices and FPCL, respectively (p<0.05) . The increase in contraction of the unseeded lattices was significant for all days after day 1, but the decrease in contraction of FPCL was significant for only the last 3days of the monitoring period (Fig. 3).

Table 1

Contraction of FPCL and unseeded collagen lattices. Results are expressed as a percentage of the original area of the collagen lattice and represent the values after 7days in culture. Values are means of five experiments, with the standard deviation in parentheses.  * Denotes that the differences between laser-treated and control values are statistically significant, by two-tailed Student’s t -test.

Fluence, J∕cm2 Unseeded, mean (%) contractionFPCL, mean (%) contraction
Laser treatedControlLaser treatedControl
16.5 (2.2)6.6 (3.6)82.6 (5.0)76.3 (3.1)
213.2 (4.4)11.0 (2.6)79.3 (8.2)76.9 (4.3)
319.0 (4.0)* 8.3 (1.7)73.5 (3.1)* 82.7 (2.1)
412.0 (6.8)9.2 (4.8)80.0 (2.1)81.9 (5.5)

Using CLSM, no significant visual difference was observed in the morphology and viability of the cells using CFDA and EB between the control and LLLT-treated FPCL [Figs. 4a and 4b ]. Elongated fibroblastic morphology was maintained for up to 7days after treatment, with typical alignment of cells in one direction. There was no discernable alteration in the number of nonviable cells after LLLT treatment.

Fig. 4

CLSM images of the control FPCL (a) and the LLLT-treated FPCL (b) at 3Jcm2 , on day 7.

034002_1_073902jbo4.jpg

3.2.

Actin Filaments

Figure 5 shows the staining with FITC-labeled phalloidin after treatment with 2 and 3Jcm2 . Intracellular actin filaments are less pronounced in cells treated with 3Jcm2 than in either the controls or the cells treated with 2Jcm2 . There are few prominent fibers crossing the interior of the cells, and actin staining appears to be mainly around the cell perimeter. Figure 6 shows that LLLT treatment has no significant effect on the accumulation of TMRE within cells, indicating that it does not alter the mitochondrial membrane potential. In contrast, FCCP treatment markedly decreased TMRE accumulation.

Fig. 5

CLSM images of actin stained with FITC-phalloidin in control and LLLT-treated FPCL. (a) and (c) are control untreated FPCL; (b) and (d) were treated with 2 and 3Jcm2 , respectively.

034002_1_073902jbo5.jpg

Fig. 6

TMRE fluorescence intensity of control and LLLT-treated (3Jcm2) 3T3 fibroblasts cultured on Petri dishes. Results are means ± SD, n=3 experiments. p*<0.05 , comparing FCCP-treated cells with controls, by two-tailed Student’s t -test.

034002_1_073902jbo6.jpg

3.3.

Collagen Fibers

The effect of LLLT treatment on the collagen fibers was investigated in cell-free matrices in order to distinguish the effect of laser irradiation from cell-induced changes. CLSM images of acriflavine stained collagen fibers at a depth of 20μm into the collagen-GAG matrices are shown in fig. 7 . The images show that there are fewer collagen fibers in the matrices treated with 3Jcm2 than in either controls or in samples treated with 2Jcm2 . This was observed in three separate experiments, and Fig. 8 illustrates the mean fluorescent intensities measured in all experiments. After treatment with 3Jcm2 , there was a significant decrease in fluorescent intensities measured at a depth of 20μm in the matrices.

Fig. 7

Distribution of collagen fibers at a depth of 20μm in control [(a) and (c)] and LLLT-treated [(b) is 2Jcm2 and (d) is 3Jcm2 ] collagen-GAG lattices.

034002_1_073902jbo7.jpg

Fig. 8

Acriflavine fluorescent intensity of control and LLLT-treated collagen—GAG lattices at a depth of 20μm using laser fluences of 2 and 3Jcm2 . Results are mean±SD , n=3 . p*<0.05 , comparing differences between control and LLLT-treated lattices using two-tailed Student’s t -test.

034002_1_073902jbo8.jpg

4.

Discussion

The greatest rate of contraction of the FPCL was measured within the first day following cell attachment, and this is thought to be due to the forces generated during cell elongation.24 Freyman and coworkers also reported that the contractile force developed by fibroblasts bending or buckling collagen fibrils in the matrix during elongation reached a maximum in the first few hours of culture.24, 25

Laser irradiation modifies the extent of the contraction of unseeded and suspension fibroblast seeded collagen lattices, but only at an energy density of 3Jcm2 . The occurrence of significant photobiostimulation at 3Jcm2 , which was not observed at other fluencies, could be explained by Karu,26, 27 who reported that the fluence versus response curve was bell-shaped with a threshold, maximum, and phase of decline. Recent studies of the enhancement of porcine skin graft adherence using a light-activated process,28 the effect of pulsed radiation on HeLa cell attachment to extracellular matrix,29 and the effect of a He-Ne laser on the cloning efficiency of Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO) and human skin fibroblasts (HSF)30 further endorse a nonlinear fluence-response relationship.

The reduction in contraction in FPCL produced by laser irradiation at 3Jcm2 is statistically significant but is too small to be of great practical significance. Laser irradiation does, however, represent a simple applicable method of modifying contraction; it may be possible to further reduce contraction of FPCL by optimizing the procedure. Unfortunately, the mechanisms of the laser effect and contraction are not well understood. Nevertheless, both mechanisms must involve the fibroblast cell, the collagen substrate, or both.

Investigations of the influence of low-level irradiation of 3T3 mouse fibroblasts cultured on collagen-GAG substrates previously showed that postattachment cells showed no difference in proliferation rates, evaluated by 5-carboxyflourescein diacetate, nor in cell viability, assessed using the 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay.8 CLSM studies using CFDA and EB showed that LLLT treatment did not alter the fibroblasts, viability, morphology, or ability to align in culture. There was some indication of an alteration in the distribution of actin with the cells after treatment with 3Jcm2 , and this may be related to their ability to contract in FPCL. The contractile activity of chondrocytes seeded in collagen-GAG matrices has been shown previously to parallel expression of smooth muscle actin,31, 32 and treatment that depleted actin fibers reduced the ability of the cells to contract. Accumulation of actin around the perimeter of a cell has been associated with early apoptosis.33 However, there was no evidence of an alteration in mitochondrial membrane potential after treatment with 3Jcm2 . Loss of the mitochondrial membrane potential is associated with the early stages of apoptosis and coincides with the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pores, allowing passage of ions and small molecules, resulting ultimately in release of cytochrome c into the cytosol.34 There is no evidence from the data shown that the redistribution of actin inside cells treated with 3Jcm2 is accompanied by apopotic events.

Acriflavine staining showed a decrease in the number of collagen fibers in the cell-free collagen-GAG matrices that had been treated with 3Jcm2 . When fibroblasts contact with fibrils of collagen in the matrix, they attach to them, and compact them by drawing the fibrils toward themselves, thereby causing contraction of the matrix. With fewer fibrils to attach to, the cell-mediated contraction of the irradiated matrices is decreased. There may, however, be an unwanted side effect. The stiffness and strength of collagen lattices are correlated with fibril density,35 and fewer fibers may compromise the mechanical properties of FPCL.

The contraction of the unseeded collagen substrate was significantly increased by laser irradiation at 3Jcm2 . The mechanism responsible for this increase in the absence of cells is unclear. There may be physical cross-linking or laser-induced photobiostimulatory effects on the collagen fibers causing an increase in the volume of water expressed from the lattice, resulting in increased contraction.

It appears that the altered contraction of the FPCL caused by LLLT may be due to effects of the laser on both the collagen fibers of the matrix and the actin fibers inside the cell. Further study of the mechanical affects of laser irradiation of cell-free matrix may provide an explanation of the effect of irradiation and a route to the reduction of the contraction of FPCL.

5.

Conclusions

Laser irradiation at an energy density of 3Jcm2 altered the contraction of FPCL over a subsequent period of 7days . The contraction of FPCL was significantly less than control unirradiated specimens on the last three days of monitoring. Energy density was a significant factor—1, 2, and 4Jcm2 produced no alteration in the magnitude of contraction. The effect of irradiation was accompanied by altered distribution of actin fibers intracellularly and collagen fibers in the matrix. This resulted in altered interaction between the two proteins, which contributed to the decrease in contraction.

Acknowledgments

G.H. received an Overseas Research Scholarship (ORS), a University of Strathclyde Studentship, the Kenedi Bursary from the Bioengineering Unit, and support from the Agency for Science, Technology, and Research, Singapore.

References

1. 

L. Galios, A. M. Freyria, L. Grossin, P. Hubert, D. Mainard, D. Herbage, J. F. Stolz, P. Netter, E. Dellacherie, and E. Payan, “Cartilage repair: surgical techniques and tissue engineering using polysaccharide- and collagen-based biomaterials,” Biorheology, 41 433 –443 (2004). 0006-355X Google Scholar

2. 

J. Garvin, J. Qi, M. Maoloney, and A. J. Banes, “Novel system for engineering bioartificial tendons and application of mechanical load,” Tissue Eng., 9 967 –979 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1089/107632703322495619 1076-3279 Google Scholar

3. 

E. Gentleman, A. N. Lay, D. A. Dickerson, E. A. Nauman, G. A. Livesay, and K. C. Dee, “Mechanical characterization of collagen fibers and scaffolds for tissue engineering,” Biomaterials, 24 3805 –3813 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00206-0 0142-9612 Google Scholar

4. 

M. Rothenburger, W. Volker, J. P. Vischer, E. Berendes, B. Glasmacher, H. H. Scheld, and M. Deiwick, “Tissue engineering of heart valves: formation of a three-dimensional tissue using porcine heart valve cells,” ASAIO J., 48 586 –591 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1097/00002480-200211000-00003 1058-2916 Google Scholar

5. 

L. T. Jensen and N. B. Host, “Collagen: scaffold for repair or execution,” Cardiovasc. Res., 33 535 –539 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6363(96)00247-7 0008-6363 Google Scholar

6. 

B. Pomahac, T. Svensjo, and F. Yao, “Tissue engineered skin,” Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med., 9 333 –344 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1177/10454411980090030601 1045-4411 Google Scholar

7. 

W. H. Eaglstein and V. Falanga, “Tissue engineering for skin: an update,” Adv. Chem. Ser., 39 1007 –1019 (1998). 0065-2393 Google Scholar

8. 

G. Ho, M. H. Grant, J. C. Barbenel, and C. J. Henderson, “Low-level laser therapy on tissue-engineered skin substitutes: effect on the proliferation rate of 3T3 mouse fibroblast cells,” Proc. SPIE, 5610 1469 –1475 (2004). 0277-786X Google Scholar

9. 

J. F. Burke, I. V. Yannas, W. C. Quinby Jr., C. C. Bondoc, and W. K. Jung, “Successful use of physiologically acceptable artificial skin in the treatment of extensive burn injury,” Ann. Surg., 194 413 –428 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198110000-00005 0003-4932 Google Scholar

10. 

R. S. Kirsner, V. Falanga, and W. H. Eaglstein, “The development of bioengineered skin,” TIBTECH, 16 246 –249 (1998). Google Scholar

11. 

Y. S. Pek, M. Spector, I. V. Yannas, and L. J. Gibson, “Degradation of a collagen-chondroitin-6-sulfate matrix by collagenase and chondroitinase,” Biomaterials, 25 473 –482 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00541-6 0142-9612 Google Scholar

12. 

C. S. Osborne, W. H. Reid, and M. H. Grant, “Investigation into the biological stability of collagen/chondroitin-6-sulphate gels and their contraction by fibroblasts and keratinocytes: the effect of crosslinking agents and diamines,” Biomaterials, 20 283 –290 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00179-3 0142-9612 Google Scholar

13. 

C. S. Osborne, J. C. Barbenel, D. Smith, M. Savakis, and M. H. Grant, “Investigation into the tensile properties of collagen/chondroitin-6-sulphate gels: the effect of crosslinking agents and diamines,” Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 36 129 –134 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02522870 0140-0118 Google Scholar

14. 

F. Berthod and F. A. Auger, Skin Substitute Production by Tissue Engineering, 211 –237 Springler-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany (1997). Google Scholar

15. 

F. Berthod, D. Hayek, O. Damour, and C. Collombel, “Collagen synthesis by fibroblasts—cultured within a collagen sponge,” Biomaterials, 14 749 –754 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(93)90039-5 0142-9612 Google Scholar

16. 

E. Bell, B. Ivarsson, and C. Merrill, “Production of a tissue-like structure by contraction of collagen lattices by human fibroblasts of different proliferative potential in vitro,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 6 1272 –1278 (1979). 0027-8424 Google Scholar

17. 

E. Mester, T. Spiry, B. Szende, and J. Tota, “Effect of laser rays on wound healing,” Am. J. Surg., 122 523 –535 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(71)90482-X 0002-9610 Google Scholar

18. 

C. Lucas, L. J. Criens-Poublon, C. T. Cockrell, and R. J. de Haan, “Wound healing in cell studies and animal model experiments by low level laser therapy; were clinical studies justified? A systematic review,” Lasers Med. Sci., 17 110 –134 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s101030200018 0268-8921 Google Scholar

19. 

T. Karu, “Effects of visible radiation on cultured cells,” Photochem. Photobiol., 52 1089 –1098 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1990.tb08450.x 0031-8655 Google Scholar

20. 

I. V. Yannas, J. F. Burke, P. L. Gordon, C. Huang, and R. H. Rubenstein, “Design of an artificial skin. II. Control of chemical composition,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 14 107 –131 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820140203 0021-9304 Google Scholar

21. 

T. Elsdale and J. Bard, “Collagen substrata for studies on cell behavior,” J. Cell Biol., 54 626 –637 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.54.3.626 0021-9525 Google Scholar

22. 

G. C. McKay, C. Henderson, E. Goldie, G. Connel, C. Westmoreland, and M. H. Grant, “Cryopreservation of rat hepatocyte monolayers: cell viability and cytochrome P450 content in post-thaw cultures,” Toxicol. In Vitro, 16 71 –79 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-2333(01)00096-0 0887-2333 Google Scholar

23. 

E. A. Wulf, F. A. Deboben, H. Bautz, and T. H. Wieland, “Fluorescent phallotoxin, a tool for the visualization of cellular actin,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 76 4498 –4502 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.76.9.4498 0027-8424 Google Scholar

24. 

T. M. Freyman, I. V. Yannas, Y. S. Pek, R. Yokoo, and L. J. Gibson, “Micromechanics of fibroblast contraction of a collagen-GAG matrix,” Exp. Cell Res., 269 140 –153 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1006/excr.2001.5302 0014-4827 Google Scholar

25. 

T. M. Freyman, I. V. Yannas, R. Yokoo, and L. J. Gibson, “Fibroblast contraction of a collagen-GAG matrix,” Biomaterials, 22 2883 –2891 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00034-5 0142-9612 Google Scholar

26. 

T. I. Karu, O. Tiphlova, R. O. Esenaliev, and V. Letokhov, “Two different mechanisms of low-intensity laser photobiological effects on Escherichia coli,” J. Photochem. Photobiol., B, 24 155 –161 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/1011-1344(94)07016-4 1011-1344 Google Scholar

27. 

T. I. Karu, L. V. Pyatibrat, G. S. Kalendo, and R. O. Esenaliev, “Effects of monochromatic low-intensity light and laser irradiation on adhesion of HeLa cells in vitro,” Lasers Surg. Med., 18 171 –177 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1996)18:2<171::AID-LSM7>3.0.CO;2-P 0196-8092 Google Scholar

28. 

B. P. Chan, I. E. Kochevar, and R. W. Redmond, “Enhancement of porcine skin graft adherence using a light-activated process,” J. Surg. Res., 108 77 –84 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1006/jsre.2002.6516 0022-4804 Google Scholar

29. 

T. I. Karu, G. S. Kalendo, and V. S. Letokhov, “Control of RNA synthesis rate in tumor cells HeLa by action of low-intensity visible light of copper laser,” Lett. Nuovo Cimento, 32 55 –59 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02745112 0024-1318 Google Scholar

30. 

F. A. H. Al-Watban and B. L. Andres, “The effect of He-Ne laser (632.8nm) and Solcoseryl in vitro,” Lasers Med. Sci., 16 267 –275 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00011363 0268-8921 Google Scholar

31. 

J. M. Zaleskas, B. Kinner, T. M. Freyman, I. V. Yannas, L. J. Gibson, and M. Spector, “Contractile forces generated by articular chondrocytes in collagen-glycosaminoglycan matrices,” Biomaterials, 25 1299 –1308 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.005 0142-9612 Google Scholar

32. 

C. R. Lee, A. J. Grodzinsky, and M. Spector, “Modulation of the contractile and biosynthetic activity of chondrocytes seeded in collagen-glycosaminoglycan matrices,” Tissue Eng., 9 27 –36 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1089/107632703762687500 1076-3279 Google Scholar

33. 

M. Gunaratnam and M. H. Grant, “Damage to F-actin and cell death induced by chromium VI and nickel in primary monolayer cultures of rat hepatocytes,” Toxicol. In Vitro, 18 245 –253 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2003.08.014 0887-2333 Google Scholar

34. 

D. R. Green and J. C. Reed, “Mitochondria and apoptosis,” Science, 281 1309 –1312 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5381.1309 0036-8075 Google Scholar

35. 

B. A. Roeder, K. Kokini, J. E. Sturgis, J. P. Robinson, and S. L. Voytik-Harbin, “Tensile mechanical properties of three-dimensional type I collagen extracellular matrices with varied microstructure,” J. Biomech. Eng., 124 214 –222 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1449904 0148-0731 Google Scholar
©(2009) Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
Gideon Ho, Joseph C. Barbenel, and Mary Helen Grant "Effect of low-level laser treatment of tissue-engineered skin substitutes: contraction of collagen lattices," Journal of Biomedical Optics 14(3), 034002 (1 May 2009). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3127201
Published: 1 May 2009
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES


SHARE
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back to Top