1 November 2009 In vivo harmonic generation biopsy of human skin
Author Affiliations +
J. of Biomedical Optics, 14(6), 060505 (2009). doi:10.1117/1.3269676
The ability to in vivo image deep tissues noninvasively with a high resolution is strongly required for optical virtual biopsy. Higher harmonic generation microscopy, combined with second- and third-harmonic generation microscopies, is applied to 17 Asian volunteers' forearm skin. After continuous observation for 30 min, no visible damage was found. Our study proves that harmonic generation biopsy (HGB) is able to satisfy the safety requirement and to provide high penetrability (~300 μm) and submicron resolution all at the same time and is a promising tool for future virtual biopsy of skin diseases. In contrast to a previous study on fixed human skin specimens, a much improved penetrability and much reduced resolution-degradation versus depth are found in this in vivo examination.
Chen, Wu, and Sun: In vivo harmonic generation biopsy of human skin

To diagnose skin conditions and diseases, the pathohistological microscopic analysis of excised tissues is most commonly used today. However, the processing-procedure-induced artifacts lead to misdiagnosis, and a painful biopsy process is needed with side effects. A least-invasive tool that can perform high-resolution virtual biopsy is thus desired to assist or replace the physical biopsy for diseases diagnoses, including skin diseases. For early diagnoses of skin cancers and minor skin diseases, virtual skin biopsy is more appropriate. Since the early pathological changes may occur in the dermis layer, an optical virtual biopsy tool that can perform least-invasive imaging deep inside the skin with a submicron resolution is strongly required for pathohistological diagnoses. Recently, optical imaging techniques such as confocal microscopy,1, 2 two-photon fluorescence (2PF) microscopy,3 and second-harmonic generation (SHG) microscopy4 have been applied for in vivo skin imaging. However, these techniques are limited by photodamage, lower penetrability, or lower resolution. It is thus highly desired to apply 1230-nm Cr:forsterite (Cr:F) laser-based higher harmonic generation (HHG) microscopy for least-invasive virtual skin biopsy. Since no electron transition is required in the HHG processes,5 light attenuation in human skin reaches a minimum value within 1200to1300-nm due to reduced scattering and pigment absorption.6 With the same 40-mW excitation power, Cr:F-based SHG microscopy has higher penetrability than Ti:sapphire (Ti:S)–based SHG microscopy.7 Through the viability test of mammalian embryo,8 a high tolerance of > 140mW ( > 29J ) can be allowed under Cr:F excitation, while live cells irradiated with 730to800-nm beams of > 1mW (0.2J) were found to inhibit cloning efficiency.9 In previous in vivo Cr:F-based HHG studies, zebrafish embryos with 20-h continuous observation ( 100to140mW , > 7KJ ) can develop normally into the larva stages.10 Hamster oral mucosa with 3-h continuous observation in the same area ( 150mW , 1620J ) were excised immediately for pathological examination, while no evidence of photodamage appeared.11 This much-improved viability versus Ti:S-based ( 800nm ; 1.55eV ) systems could be attributed to much-reduced multiphoton absorption with a lower photon energy ( 1230nm ; 1.01eV ).12

In this paper, real-time in vivo HHG imaging of Asian skin combined with epi-SHG and epi–third-harmonic generation (epi-THG) modalities is reported. To the best of our knowledge, this is also the first report on the clinical trial of THG imaging. In this study, a Cr:F laser is used, and a syringe-pump objective is designed to diminish the image blurring due to breathing and heart beating. Even with the image blurring, the submicron spatial resolution was preserved within the whole imaging depth (> 300μm) for all volunteers. The safety issue has also been preliminarily confirmed through a standard damage evaluation protocol for clinical trials. By measuring the Cr:F-excited spectra of live human skin (not shown), 2PF was found to be greatly diminished due to the low photon energy of the Cr:F excitation;13 while no three-photon fluorescence (3PF) can be observed, since the probability of the fifth-order nonlinear 3PF is several orders lower than that of the third-order nonlinear THG. In contrast to previous HHG imaging of fixed human skin,14, 15 a higher penetrability with much reduced resolution-degradation versus depth was found. In addition, real-time dynamic information like blood flow can be provided. In this study, HHG imaging is found to satisfy the clinical safety requirement and to provide high penetrability and submicron resolution all at the same time and is an ideal virtual biopsy tool for assisting, minimizing, or even potentially replacing physical biopsy.

Based on the previous epi-HHG microscope,14 some modifications were made for the in vivo harmonic generation biopsy (HGB) system. The in vivo HGB of human skin was performed on the ventral forearm skin of 17 volunteers (9 female and 8 male; 21to56years ). This clinical trial was approved by IRB of National Taiwan University Hospital. Before, during, and after the HGB, the tested site—ulnar, ventral, upper 13 forearm skin—of the volunteers was recorded by photographing. A medical doctor kept checking volunteers’ status during HGB. In this trial, the following protocols were applied: (1) the total exposure time was limited to 30mins in the same area; and (2) two scanning modes were used: a slow mode ( 90mW ; 0.37Hz ) and a fast mode ( 120mW ; 2Hz ). The accumulated photon energy was around 180to200J in one area. The tested area was evaluated by a dermatologist immediately, several hours, 24hours , 3days , and 1week after HGB. During HGB, only one volunteer reported a possible stinging sensation for <1s , which was claimed to be uncertain. There were no inflammatory symptoms, no skin color change, no pigmentation, no wound, no blister formation, and no ulceration reported. The procedure was comfortable according to volunteers’ opinions, indicating the feasibility of the HGB for virtual skin biopsy.

Figure 1 shows the lateral SHG and THG images out of a stack of HGB sections from the stratum corneum (SC) to reticular dermis (RD). The depth of the imaging was adjusted by moving the objective in the z direction. Throughout whole imaging depth, the photomultiplier tube (PMT) voltages were sometimes lowered at the stratum basale (SB) due to the excessive THG signals and we can repeatedly achieve > 300μm penetrability in all volunteers. In this in vivo study, THG imaging contrasts were found to be dominated by the interfaces5 between lipid and corneocytes and the cytoplasmic organelles.8 In epidermis, the cellular morphology can be clearly distinguished by THG microscopy, while the THG contrasts can also be found in dermis to show fibroblasts, erythrocytes, collagen fiber bundles, and elastin fibers.16 In dermis, collagen-sensitive SHG5 revealed the diverse collagenous structures in the papillary dermis (PD) and RD. To extend the imaging depth to be much more than 300μm , contrast adjustment with higher PMT voltage is needed and was not performed in our protocol. As shown in Fig. 1a, the multilayer SC structure can be highly resolved through THG, while the nuclei of keratinocytes appeared dark in contrast to the bright cytoplasm due to the efficient THG from cytoplasmic organelles. Figures 1b and 1c show the squamous-shaped stratum granulosum (SG) cells at different depths. At the bumpy epidermis–dermis junction (EDJ), the stratum spinosum (SS) and SB cells were found [Figs. 1d and 1e] in the same section, and the collagen fibers in the dermal papilla were revealed by SHG. In Figs. 1b, 1c, 1d, the average nuclear diameter (ND) of the keratinocytes at different depths can be analyzed to be 6.8, 5.5, and 4.9μm , while the average internuclear distance (IND) was analyzed to be 19.9, 10.2, and 8.4μm , respectively. Analyzing the IND versus depth, an exponential decreasing of the IND with increasing depth can be observed [Fig. 2a ], and this progressive change of the IND agrees with the histological results,17 indicating the normal keratinization process. This in vivo cytological information has its diagnostic significance for skin diseases with loss of normal keratinization. In dermis, Fig. 1f shows the loose areolar collagen fibers in the PD, while Figs. 1g and 1h show the dense reticular collagen fibers in the RD. Due to the THG contrast from oxyhemoglobin18 and cytoplasmic organelles, the erythrocytes and the fibroblasts can all be revealed by THG.19 By fixing the imaging depth for a real-time continuous monitoring ( Videos 1 ), the erythrocytes can be easily identified due to their movement, size, and shapes. The contrast of the fibroblast was confirmed by a comparison between HGB images and histological images of surgical specimens. Compared with confocal microscopy,20 the erythrocytes and the fibroblast can be distinguished from the collagen fibers more easily under HGB due to the simultaneous SHG contrast. Right at the surface of the skin, the lateral resolution of THG microscopy can be analyzed from the multilayer structure of the SC [arrow in Fig. 2b] to be 0.45±0.05μm , while in the dermis, the lateral resolution of SHG microscopy can be analyzed from collagen fibrils [arrow in Fig. 2c; at 200μm deep] to be 0.92±0.12μm , with corresponding THG resolution of 0.75±0.1μm . Figure 2d shows this analyzed lateral resolution of THG microscopy versus depth, averaged with data of six volunteers (20to30years) . Compared with the previous analysis in fixed human skin,15 our in vivo study shows a much reduced resolution degradation versus depth, indicating much reduced point-spread function aberration21 of the 1230-nm excitation light in the live tissues versus fixed tissues.

Fig. 1

(a) to (h) In vivo lateral epi-SHG and epi-THG images of human forearm skin (obtained with slow mode) at different depths inward from outside. In epidermis, THG can reveal the (a) multilayer structure of the SC (arrow); (b) and (c) the SG cells at upper and deeper layers; and (d) and (e) the SS and SB cells at the epidermis–dermis junction. The collagen fibers in the tip of the papilla can be revealed by SHG microscopy [arrow in (e)]. (f) The loose areolar connective tissue in the PD; (g) and (h) the dense irregular connective tissue in the RD can be shown and distinguished by SHG, while the erythrocytes [arrowheads in (e), (f), and (h)] and fibroblasts [arrow in (g)] can be observed through THG. THG and SHG are represented by the magenta and green pseudo-colors. Scale bar: 50μm . (Color online only.)


Fig. 2

(a) Internuclear distances (INDs) versus depth analyzed from in vivo epi-THG images. The lateral resolution of THG microscopy right at skin surface can be analyzed from (b) multilayer stratum corneum (arrow), while the lateral resolution of SHG microscopy can be analyzed from (c) collagen fibrils (arrow; 200μm deep). (d) The lateral resolution of THG microscopy versus depth. THG and SHG are represented by the magenta and green pseudo-colors. Scale bar: 50μm .


Video 1

In vivo movie of erythrocytes flowing in dermal capillaries. The movie is recorded by continuous real-time imaging with a fast scanning mode (frame rate: 2Hz ) at a fixed depth. Image size: 80×80μm2 (QuickTime, 4.3MB ).


In conclusion, in vivo real-time HGB of human skin has been demonstrated. Even with the image blurring resulting from vibrations, a submicron lateral resolution of THG microscopy was preserved at a depth of 300μm , achieved without increasing the PMT voltage. In contrast to the previous fixed skin imaging, the in vivo HGB of human skin showed much reduced resolution-degradation versus depth while providing real-time dynamic information in the live tissues. Through the damage evaluation, the noninvasiveness of this imaging tool has been preliminarily proved. Combined with the high spatial resolution, high penetrability, and various imaging capabilities, IR-based HHG imaging will be a promising tool for future noninvasive virtual biopsy of skin diseases.


We acknowledge assistance from Dr. Yi-Hua Liao and Dr. Wen-Jeng Lee of NTUH. This research is sponsored by the National Health Research Institute of Taiwan (NHRI-EX98-9201EI), NTU Research Center for Medical Excellence, and NTU Grant No. 98R0036-01.


1.  B. R. Masters and P. T. C. So, “Confocal microscopy and multi-photon excitation microscopy of human skin in vivo,” Opt. Express1094-4087 8, 2–10 (2001). 10.1364/OE.8.000002 Google Scholar

2.  K. S. Nehal, D. Gareau, and M. Rajadhyaksha, “Skin imaging with reflectance confocal microscopy,” Semin Cutan Med. Surg.1085-5629 27, 37–43 (2008). 10.1016/j.sder.2008.01.006 Google Scholar

3.  B. R. Masters, P. T. C. So, and E. Gratton, “Multiphoton excitation fluorescence microscopy and spectroscopy of in vivo human skin,” Biophys. J.0006-3495 72, 2405–2412 (1997). 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78886-6 Google Scholar

4.  M. J. Koehler, K. Konig, P. Elsner, R. Buckle, and M. Kaatz, “In vivo assessment of human skin aging by multiphoton laser scanning tomography,” Opt. Lett.0146-9592 31, 2879–2881 (2006). 10.1364/OL.31.002879 Google Scholar

5.  C.-K. Sun, “Higher harmonic generation microscopy,” Adv. Biochem. Eng./Biotechnol.0724-6145 95, 17–56 (2005). Google Scholar

6.  R. R. Anderson and J. A. Parish, “The optics of human skin,” J. Invest. Dermatol.0022-202X 77, 13–19 (1981). 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12479191 Google Scholar

7.  T. Yasui, Y. Takahashi, M. Ito, S. Fukushima, and T. Araki, “Ex vivo and in vivo second-harmonic-generation imaging of dermal collagen fiber in skin: comparison of imaging characteristics between mode-locked Cr:forsterite and Ti:sapphire lasers,” Appl. Opt.0003-6935 48, D88–D95 (2009). 10.1364/AO.48.000D88 Google Scholar

8.  C.-S. Hsieh, S.-U. Chen, Y.-W. Lee, Y.-S. Yang, and C.-K. Sun, “Higher harmonic generation microscopy of in vitro cultured mammal oocytes and embryos,” Opt. Express1094-4087 16, 11574–11588 (2008). Google Scholar

9.  K. Konig, P. T. C. So, W. W. Mantulin, and E. Gratton, “Cellular response to near-infrared femtosecond laser pulses in two-photon microscopes,” Opt. Lett.0146-9592 22, 135–136 (1997). 10.1364/OL.22.000135 Google Scholar

10.  S.-Y. Chen, C.-S. Hsieh, and S.-W. Chu, “Noninvasive harmonics optical microscopy for long-term observation of embryonic nervous system development in vivo,” J. Biomed. Opt.1083-3668 11, 054022 (2006). 10.1117/1.2363369 Google Scholar

11.  S.-P. Tai, W.-J. Lee, D.-B. Shieh, P.-C. Wu, H.-Y. Huang, C.-H. Yu, and C.-K. Sun, “In vivo optical biopsy of hamster oral cavity with epi-third-harmonic-generation microscopy,” Opt. Express1094-4087 14, 6178–6187 (2006). 10.1364/OE.14.006178 Google Scholar

12.  I.-H. Chen, S.-W. Chu, C.-K. Sun, P.-C. Cheng, and B.-L. Lin, “Wavelength dependent damage in biological multiphoton confocal microscopy: a micro-spectroscopic comparison between femtosecond Ti:sapphire and Cr:forsterite laser sources,” Opt. Quantum Electron.0306-8919 34, 1251–1266 (2002). 10.1023/A:1021303426482 Google Scholar

13.  J.-H. Lee, S.-Y. Chen, S.-W. Chu, L.-F. Wang, C.-K. Sun, and B.-L. Chiang, “Noninvasive in vivo assessment of epidermal hyperkeratosis and dermal fibrosis in atopic dermatitis,” J. Biomed. Opt.1083-3668 14, 014008 (2009). 10.1117/1.3077182 Google Scholar

14.  S.-P. Tai, T.-H. Tsai, W.-J. Lee, D.-B. Shieh, Y.-H. Liao, H.-Y. Huang, K. Zhang, H.-L. Liu, and C.-K. Sun, “Optical biopsy of fixed human skin with backward collected optical harmonics signals,” Opt. Express1094-4087 13, 8231–8242 (2005). 10.1364/OPEX.13.008231 Google Scholar

15.  T.-H. Tsai, S.-P. Tai, W.-J. Lee, H.-Y. Huang, Y.-H. Liao, and C.-K. Sun, “Optical signal degradation study in fixed human skin using confocal microscopy and higher-harmonic optical microscopy,” Opt. Express1094-4087 14, 749–758 (2006). 10.1364/OPEX.14.000749 Google Scholar

16.  C.-H. Yu, S.-P. Tai, C.-T. Kung, I.-J. Wang, H.-C. Yu, H.-J. Huang, W.-J. Lee, Y.-F. Chan, and C.-K. Sun, “In vivo and ex vivo imaging of intra-tissue elastic fibers using third-harmonic-generation microscopy,” Opt. Express1094-4087 15, 11167–11177 (2007). 10.1364/OE.15.011167 Google Scholar

17.  R. R. Wickett and M. O. Visscher, “Structure and function of the epidermal barrier,” Am. J. Infect. Control0196-6553 34, S98–S110 (2006). 10.1016/j.ajic.2006.05.295 Google Scholar

18.  S.-Y. Chen, S.-P. Tai, C.-S. Hsieh, C.-Y. Chen, C.-H. Yu, Y.-W. Lee, W.-J. Lee, S.-U. Chen, F.-H. Chang, and C.-K. Sun, “Least invasive in vivo imaging using harmonic generation microscopy,” Proc. SPIE0277-786X 6860, 686002-11 (2008). 10.1117/12.760560 Google Scholar

19.  J. A. Palero, H. S. de Bruijn, A. V. van den Heuvel, H. J. C. M. Sterenborg, and H. C. Gerritsen, “Spectrally resolved multiphoton imaging of in vivo and excised mouse skin tissues,” Biophys. J.0006-3495 93, 992–1007 (2007). 10.1529/biophysj.106.099457 Google Scholar

20.  J. Seylaz, R. Charbonne, K. Nanri, D. Von Euw, J. Borredon, K. Kacem, P. Meric, and E. Pinard, “Dynamic in vivo measurement of erythrocyte velocity and flow in capillaries and of microvessel diameter in the rat brain by confocal laser microscopy,” J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.0271-678X 19, 863–870 (1999). 10.1097/00004647-199908000-00005 Google Scholar

21.  M. Gu, X. Gan, A. Kisteman, and M.-G. Xu, “Comparison of penetration depth between two-photon excitation and single-photon excitation in imaging through turbid tissue media,” Appl. Phys. Lett.0003-6951 77, 1551–1553 (2000). 10.1063/1.1308059 Google Scholar

Szu-Yu Chen, Hai-Yin Wu, Chi-Kuang Sun, "In vivo harmonic generation biopsy of human skin," Journal of Biomedical Optics 14(6), 060505 (1 November 2009). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3269676

Back to Top