Translator Disclaimer
1 November 2009 Quantitative characterization of optical and physiological parameters in normal breasts using time-resolved spectroscopy: in vivo results of 19 Singapore women
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
We report the quantitative measurements of optical and physiological parameters of normal breasts from 19 Singapore women by using time-resolved diffuse optical spectroscopy. Intrinsic absorption coefficient (μa) and reduced scattering coefficients (μs) of breasts were calculated from the time-resolved photon migration data. Physiology of breasts was characterized using the concentrations of oxyhemoglobin, deoxyhemoglobin, total hemoglobin (THC), and oxygenation saturation. On average, the experiment results showed that the μa of young women (below 40 years old) was 36 to 38% greater than that of older women (above 40 years old) and that parameter THC was approximately 42% greater. Results also showed that the THC of premenopausal women was 24.3 μMol/L, which was approximately 69% larger than that of postmenopausal women at 14.1 μMol/L. Meanwhile, the µa of premenopausal women was approximately 60% larger than that of postmenopausal women. Correlation analysis further showed that the optical and physiological parameters of breasts were strongly influenced by changes in the women's age, menopausal states, and body mass index. These in vivo experiment results will contribute to the breast tissue diagnosis between healthy and diseased breast tissues.

1.

Introduction

Near-infrared (NIR) diffuse optical spectroscopy (DOS) have been proven in the last decades as a viable noninvasive optical instrument for human breast tissue examination.1, 2, 3, 4 In comparison to conventional breast cancer diagnostic modalities such as x-ray mammography,5 breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI),6 and breast ultrasonography,7, 8 DOS differentiates normal and diseased breast tissues by quantifying the temporal or spatial changes of tissue intrinsic properties.9 This unique feature makes DOS a useful supplementary tool to the conventional diagnosis modalities. Other system merits, such as noninvasiveness, nonionization hazard, and noncompression of breast are also favorable for routine clinical breast examination.4, 10 Women with high breast cancer risk or dense breast tissue who may not suitable for conventional diagnostic modalities can benefit from DOS in breast tissue abnormalities examination.3, 11

One promising DOS instrument currently under development is the time-resolved DOS, which has shown advantages on high temporal resolution, high temporal linearity, and full-spectrum information.12 Complete spectroscopy characterization can be achieved by analyzing the time-resolved photon migration data, known as the temporal point spread functions (TPSF).13 For system implementation, spread spectrum correlation technique is an attractive approach because it offers faster data acquisition speed as well as lightweight system structure compared to the classic time-resolved techniques, which normally involve ultrashort pulse laser and time-correlated photon count (TCSPC) devices.13, 14, 15

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among Singapore women. Early detection of breast cancer is crucial to reduce mortality rates. This research aims to explore the applicability of time-resolved spectroscopy for breast tissue characterization. In this article, we report the quantitative measurements of breast optical properties and physiological parameters from 19 healthy Singapore women. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first characterization of human breasts in vivo in this demographic population. The time-resolved DOS instrument is developed using the pseudorandom bit sequence (PRBS) correlation technique, which can acquire TPSF signals in a fast speed. Two types of information are obtained from the time-resolved measurements. The first type is optical properties, specifically the absorption coefficient (μa) and the reduced scattering coefficient (μs) . The second type is physiological parameters, specifically, the concentrations of oxyhemoglobin (HbO) and deoxyhemoglobin (Hb), the total hemoglobin concentration (THC) , and the oxygenation saturation (SO) . This study examines the parameter characterization in association with the menopausal states and ages. We found that the value of breast optical properties (especially the μa ) and physiological parameters ( THC and SO ) varied significantly between premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Meanwhile, we observed a conspicuous contrast in optical and physiological parameters between young (below 40years old) and older women (above 40years old). Quantitative analysis showed a high correlation between these optical/physiological parameters and the age, body mass index (BMI), and menopausal states of women.

2.

Materials and Methods

2.1.

Instrument

In our previous studies, we reported a viable time-domain diffuse optical tomography (DOT) system using PRBS correlation technique.16 To obtain time-resolved DOS functionality, the DOT system was reconfigured and optimized. Figure 1 shows the schematic of the time-resolved DOS instrument. Briefly, two NIR laser beams at 785nm and 808nm alternatively went through a Mach-Zehnder modulator (MZM), in which their intensities were modulated by a train of 2.488-Gbps PRBS signal. An optical switch multiplexed the modulated light into nine source fibers. A handheld probe, which mounted all of these source fibers along with an additional four detection fiber bundles, was placed on the breast surface for probing. The optical power of 785nm and 808nm at the tips of the source fibers were approximately 1mW . The source fibers sequentially delivered the excited light into the tissue and the optical reflectance from the breast was fiber-coupled to four avalanche photodiodes (APDs) through four fiber bundles. The optoelectronic conversion signals were amplified and eventually correlated with the reference PRBS signals at the mixer. The TPSF signals were extracted from the down-conversion and acquired by computer via analog-to-digital converters (ADCs). Figure 2 shows the handheld probe, which mounts nine source fibers and four fiber bundles in a centrosymmetric pattern. The source-to-detector separations range from 1.5cmto4.33cm . In order to acquire system impulse response functions (IRFs) for each source–detector pair, a diffuse white paper was placed at 18cm in front of the probe. The optical reflectance acquired by each source–detector pair was regarded as the IRFs. To figure out the fiber-coupling coefficients between fiber bundles and the corresponding APDs, phantom-based experiments were conducted to calibrate the system. The procedures for system IRF acquisition, system calibration and data accuracy assessments of TPSF have been described in detail in the previous studies.16, 17

Fig. 1

Block diagram of time-resolved DOS, including two NIR laser diodes ( LD1 and LD2 ), nine source fibers, and four detection fiber bundles. Amp=amplifiers . LPF=low -pass filter.

064004_1_004906jbo1.jpg

Fig. 2

Handheld probe in a reflective mode. Source fibers (small red spots) and detection fiber bundles (large blue spots) are arranged in a centrosymmetric pattern. (Color online only.)

064004_1_004906jbo2.jpg

2.2.

Models and Assumptions

For in vivo breast tissue probing, the diffusion equation is valid for modeling photon migration behaviors in the breast tissues.18, 19 Using Green’s function as the analytical solution to the diffusion equation, we need to consider the boundary conditions.20 In this study, the probe works in a reflective mode. Hence the semi-infinite boundary condition should be taken into account. The time-resolved TPSF measurements from the breast can be approximated using the difference between the Green’s functions respectively induced by an interpolated real light source and an extrapolated image light source.18, 19, 20 To calculate the optical properties ( μa and μs ) from the TPSF measurements, the fitting procedure starts with a reasonable initial estimate p0λ1,λ2=μa0λ1,λ2,μs0λ1,λ2=[0.03cm1,8.0cm1] for wavelength λ1=785nm and λ2=808nm (Ref. 4). The TPSF prediction Rpre was computed from these given estimates. Meanwhile, the TPSF measurements Rm were acquired from the breast tissue. A merit function, defined by ri2=(RmRpre)2 , is iteratively computed until it meets the convergence criteria |ri2ri12|ri12<Tconv , where Tconv is a predefined convergence threshold, and i is the iteration number. The initial estimate p0λ1,λ2 was iteratively updated in a step of piλ1,λ2=pi1λ1,λ2+CΔr(i,i1)2 , where C is a step size, and Δr(i,i1)2 is the difference between two consecutive iterations.

The optical properties of human breast tissues are governed by its constituents such as lipid, water, as well as the significant chromophores, HbO and Hb. In this study, we assumed the wavelength-dependent absorption coefficients of the bulky breast tissue were solely contributed by these four types of chromophores: water, lipid, HbO, and Hb. Then, we have

Eq. 1

(μa785μa808)=2.303[(εHb785εHbO785εHb808εHbO808)(CHbCHbO)+(εH2O785εH2O808)CH2O+(εLipid785εLipid808)CLipid],
where μa785 and μa808 are absorption coefficients of overall breast tissue at wavelength 785nm and 808nm , respectively. εHb785 εHb808 , εHbO785 , and εHbO808 are molar extinction coefficients of Hb and HbO at 785nm and 808nm . εH2O785 and εH2O808 are molar extinction coefficients of water at 785nm and 808nm . εLipid785 and εLipid808 are molar extinction coefficients of lipid at 785nm and 808nm . Their values can be found in the literature.21 CHb and CHbO stand for the unknown concentrations of Hb and HbO, respectively. CH2O and CLipid stand for the concentrations of water and lipid, respectively. In this study, we assumed and maintained typical values for the relative concentration of lipid (56%) and the water concentrations of postmenopausal (11%) and premenopausal women (26%).4, 11 Given the time-resolved TPSF measurements at 785nm and 808nm , values of μa785 and μa808 can be resolved by curve-fitting processing. The physiological parameters CHb and CHbO can be resolved simultaneously by inverting Eq. 1. Value of total hemoglobin concentration (THC) can be obtained by11, 22

Eq. 2

THC=CHbO+CHb,
and value of blood oxygenation saturation (SO) can be obtained by

Eq. 3

SO=CHbOTHC×100%=CHbOCHbO+CHb×100%.

Parameter THC has a unit of micromole per liter (μMolL) . It can be interpreted as the blood volume in the breast tissue, from which one can assess the tissue’s blood supply. Parameter SO can be interpreted as the degree of oxygen consumption by the breast tissue. Cancerous tissue normally requires much more blood and oxygen supply, which significantly alters the positional optical properties and the physiological parameters of breast tissue. Thus, positional inhomogeneities of μa , μs , THC , and SO may indicate the presence of breast tissue abnormities.

2.3.

Measurement Protocol

The in vivo breast tissue measurements using the time-resolved DOS instrument have been approved by the Institute Review Board of National University of Singapore. Consent from all volunteer subjects was obtained. Subjects were measured in a sitting posture without any compressions on the breast. The handheld probe was placed on the left and right breasts, respectively, and the positions on each breast are at 3, 6, 9, and 12 o’clock, as shown in Fig. 3 . For each wavelength at each position, 36 TPSF measurements were acquired by scanning nine source fibers and four detectors. Each scan took approximately 5s . In this period, the volunteer was asked to hold her breath. To minimize measurement error caused by heart beating effects of subjects, scanning at each position was repeated 5 times. Thus for each subject, the time-resolved measurements contained 2×8×5×36=2880 TPSFs, which can be obtained in 10to15min .

Fig. 3

Probing positions on the left (L) and the right (R) breasts (front view).

064004_1_004906jbo3.jpg

2.4.

Subjects

A total number of 19 Singapore women were recruited for this spectroscopy research. All subjects were healthy without known breast diseases. They were divided into groups according to their menopausal states and age because both aging and menopause states are strongly associated with the replacement of glandular tissue with fatty tissue. The ages of 3 postmenopausal (Post) women were 44, 48, and 50years . The ages of the remaining 16 premenopausal (Pre) women ranged from 25to50years five women were younger than 40years , and the remaining 14 women were older than 40years . The youngest and oldest women subjects were 23 and 50years old, respectively. Table 1 summarizes the statistics of women subjects by ages and menopausal states. The averaged (Mean) age of all subjects was 41.7years , and the standard deviation (SD) was 11.1years .

Table 1

Statistics of 19 volunteer women subjects.

AgeMenopausal states
Young (<40) Older (⩾40) Pre-Post-
Number ofsubjects514163
Mean (years)24.247.940.847.0
SD (years)1.62.811.42.6
Mean of all (years)41.7
SD of all (years)11.1

3.

Results and Discussions

The TPSFs obtained from source-to-detector separation of 2.35cm were selected to calculate the optical properties ( μa and μs ), because this separation allows the incident photons to reach as deep as centimeters into the breast tissue.11 The calculation of μa , μs , THC , and SO were conducted in MATLAB. For each subject, the optical and physiological results at 8 probing positions R(i)=[μa(i),μs(i),THC(i),SO(i)] (i=1,,8) were averaged to minimize the interposition variations. Results were expressed by (mean value±standard deviations). The mean values of μa , μs , THC , and SO were regarded as the representative parameters of the entire breast, and the standard deviations were regarded as the interposition variations.

Table 2 summarizes the optical properties and physiological parameters of 19 subjects. The mean μa of 19 subjects was found to be 0.0503cm1 , with a standard deviation of 0.0151cm1 when a laser wavelength of 785nm was used while that was (0.0518±0.0153)cm1 at 808nm . The reduced scattering coefficient showed similarly close results between two different laser wavelengths, with 785nm showing (10.53±1.19)cm1 and 808nm showing (10.49±1.17)cm1 . The blood oxygenation saturation (SO) of 19 subjects was found to be (64.8±10.3)% , while the total hemoglobin concentration (THC) was (22.3±7.5)μMolL .

Table 2

Optical properties and physiological parameters of 19 healthy subjects.

Wavelength(nm)785808
μa (cm1) 0.0503±0.0151 0.0518±0.0153
μs (cm1) 10.53±1.20 10.49±1.19
SO (%) 64.8±10.3
THC (μMolL) 22.3±7.5

In order to investigate the relationship between menopausal states and the optical/physiological parameter, 3 postmenopausal (Post) women and the 16 premenopausal (Pre) women were examined sequentially. Figure 4 shows a scatter plot of μs versus μa of 16 premenopausal women (solid blue circles for 785nm and open blue circles for 808nm ) and 3 postmenopausal women (solid red squares for 785nm and open red squares for 808nm ) at two wavelengths. The 2-D error bars show the standard deviations of two optical parameters. It was found that μs and μa of postmenopausal women are generally smaller than that of premenopausal women, which agreed with the observations in the literature.22 Statistical results in Table 3 show that the averaged μa of premenopausal women was (0.0541±0.0141)cm1 at 785nm —approximately 60% larger than that of premenopausal women at (0.0338±0.0044)cm1 . At 808nm , μa shows a similar trend of being larger in premenopausal women at (0.0557±0.0141)cm1 —and approximately 61% higher than that of postmenopausal women, which was found to be (0.0347±0.0041)cm1 . The difference of μs between 785nm and 808nm is not significant. At 785nm , the μs of premenopausal women was found to be (10.75±1.17)cm1 on average, which was approximately 12% larger than that of postmenopausal women at (9.6±0.83)cm1 . At 808nm , the contrast is similar. The μs of premenopausal women is about 12% larger than that of postmenopausal women.

Fig. 4

μs vs μa for 19 subjects at two wavelengths. Solid and open red squares represent the results of postmenopausal women subjects at 785 and 808nm , respectively. Solid and open blue circles represent the results of premenopausal women subjects at 785nm and 808nm , respectively. 2-D error bars represent the standard deviation among eight probing positions of each subject. (Color online only.)

064004_1_004906jbo4.jpg

Table 3

Statistics of optical properties and physiological parameters of postmenopausal women and premenopausal women.

PostmenopausalPremenopausal
MeanStandarddeviationMeanStandarddeviation
μa at 785nm (cm1) 0.03380.00440.05410.0141
μa at 808nm (cm1) 0.03470.00410.05570.0141
μs at 785nm (cm1) 9.600.8310.751.17
μs at 808nm (cm1) 9.540.8110.701.14
SO (%)61.69.865.110.3
THC (μMolL) 14.32.324.17.1

Figure 5 shows a scatter plot of THC versus SO , which was derived from μa according to Eq. 2 and Eq. 3. It is also clear that the THC of premenopausal women, in general, is higher than that of postmenopausal women. Table 3 shows that the THC of premenopausal women is (24.1±7.1)μMolL , which is approximately 69% larger than that of postmenopausal women, which is (14.3±2.3)μMolL . The SO difference between the postmenopausal women and premenopausal women is not significant.

Fig. 5

THC vs SO for all 19 subjects. Red squares represent the results of postmenopausal women subjects. Blue circles represent the results of premenopausal women subjects. 2-D error bars represent standard deviation among eight probing positions of each subject. (Color online only.)

064004_1_004906jbo5.jpg

The age of all 19 subjects in this study was (41.7±11.1)years old. To analyze the relationship between age and optical/physiological alterations, subjects are divided into two groups by age over or below 40 (see Table 1). The young women group has 5 women subjects, with ages of (24.2±1.6)years old. The older women group has 14 women subjects, with ages of (47.9±2.8)years old.

Table 4 summarizes the averaged optical properties and physiological parameters in terms of age. Significant contrast between two groups can be found in absorption coefficient (μa) and total hemoglobin concentration (THC) . The μa of the young women group at 785nm was found to be (0.0617±0.0143)cm1 , which is approximately 38% larger than the older women group, in which the averaged μa was found to be (0.0447±0.0122)cm1 . At 808nm , the μa of the young women group is (0.0631±0.1392)cm1 , which is approximately 36% larger than that of the older women group at (0.0462±0.1261)cm1 . The higher μa values associated with the young women group may be explained by the greater content of fibroglandular tissue in the mammographically dense breasts. Similar difference can also be found in the physiological parameter THC . The young women group shows THC at (27.9±7.0)μMolL , while the older women group shows THC at (19.6±6.1)μMolL . The former is approximately 42% larger than the latter. The difference of reduced scattering coefficients μs between the two groups is not significant. The young women group shows an average μs of (11.307±1.010)cm1 at 785nm and (11.268±0.987)cm1 at 808nm . Both are approximately 11% larger than that of the older women group. The parameter of SO between the young women group and older women group is (63.8±7.6)% versus (64.7±11.4)% . Values are almost same. Figure 6 shows a scatter plot of μa among young and older women groups. Figure 7 shows a scatter plot of THC among young and older women. For easy comparison, data of the young women group are shown in red squares, and data of the older women group are plotted as blue circles. The error bar shows the standard deviation on corresponding parameters.

Fig. 6

Scatter plot of μa vs ages among all 19 subjects. Red squares represent data of young women, while blue circles represent data of older women groups. Error bars represent the standard deviation of μa . (Color online only.)

064004_1_004906jbo6.jpg

Fig. 7

Scatter plot of parameter THC vs ages among all 19 subjects. Red squares represent data of young women, while blue circles represent data of older women groups. Error bars represent the standard deviation of THC . (Color online only.)

064004_1_004906jbo7.jpg

Table 4

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of optical properties and physiological parameters of 19 subjects. The parameters are compared by age above 40 and below 40years old.

Older (age⩾40) Young (age<40)
MeanSDMeanSD
μa at 785nm (cm1) 0.04470.01220.06170.0143
μa at 808nm (cm1) 0.04620.12610.06310.1392
μs at 785nm (cm1) 10.1541.10311.3071.010
μs at 808nm (cm1) 10.1081.07711.2680.987
SO (%)64.711.463.87.6
THC (μMolL) 19.66.127.97.0

In order to examine the correlation between the optical and physiological parameters and women’s age, menopausal states, and BMI, correlation analysis using Pearson’s correlation coefficients and the Student’s t -test was conducted. The results in Table 5 show that there is a high and significant correlation between the optical properties of μa and μs and women’s age, BMI, and menopausal states in a sequence from high to low. The physiological parameter THC also shows close relationship with women’s age, BMI, and menopausal state as well. The correlation between age, BMI, and menopausal states and the parameter SO is low and not significant.

Table 5

Pearson’s correlation coefficient between optical and physiological parameters and subject characteristics.

μa μs′ SO THC
Age 0.6245 1 0.6590 10.06093 0.6294 1
BMI 0.5059 2 0.5245 20.24273 0.5097 2
Menopausal states* 0.4883 2 0.3836 3 0.1485 3 0.4720 2
 * 0 for premenopausal women; 1 for postmenopausal women.

a p<0.005 ;

b p<0.05 ;

c p<0.1 .

The in vivo optical spectroscopy on bulk breast tissues has been investigated worldwide. However, there are subtle differences between results reported from each research group. The differences can be ascribed to the constitutional difference of women subjects (ages, menopausal states, races, and so on), different methodologies and apparatus, and different laser wavelengths used. Table 6 compiles some recent research results on healthy breast tissue using different spectroscopy techniques.23 All data are rounded properly for comparison. For example, for examinations on Caucasian women, Durduran 4 reported the μa of (0.04±0.03)cm1 and μs of (9±2)cm1 at 780nm from in vivo experiments on 52 healthy women. Results reported by Pogue 24 showed a slight difference. The averaged μa and μs were (0.05±0.04)cm1 and (10±2)cm1 , respectively. Besides the difference in optical parameters, the physiological parameter results between each group are also slightly different. The average value of SO ranges from 61% to 77% and the THC ranges from 16μMolLto34μMolL . For the study on Asian women, few reports have been published so far. Suzuki25 reported that the average μa from 30 Japanese women was (0.05±0.01)cm1 and the average μs was (9±2)cm1 . In our study, only Southeast Asian women were examined, and the mean values of the optical properties and physiological parameters, as shown in Table 6, showed a good agreement with the data of Caucasian women as well as other regional Asian women.

Table 6

Comparison of optical/physiological parameters from this study and recent literatures. N refers to the number of subjects involved in different studies, while μs′ and μa are rounded properly for consistency.

N μs′ (cm−1) μa (cm−1) SO (%) THC (μMol∕L)
Durduran (Ref. 4)52 9±2 0.04±0.03 68±8 34±9
Grosenick (Ref. 24)28 10±2 0.04±0.01 74±3 17±8
Tomas (Ref. 26)36 8±2 0.04±0.02 77±8 17±10
Spinelli (Ref. 27) > 50 11±2 0.04±0.01 66±9 16±5
Taroni (Ref. 28)101 11±1 0.05±0.01 71±8 20±7
Pogue (29)46 10±2 0.05±0.04 61±1 22±7
Poplack (Ref. 30)23 12±2 0.05±0.02 69±9 24±12
Suzuki (Ref. 25)130 9±1 0.05±0.01
This study19 10±1 0.05±0.02 65±10 22±8

aData was obtained using wavelength at 753nm .

4.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we investigated the range of the optical properties and physiological parameters of breast tissues from 19 healthy Singapore women for the first time. The experiments results show a high correlation between the optical properties ( μa and μs ), physiological parameters (THC) , and the ages, menopausal states, and BMI of women. The results can serve as a benchmark for diseased breast tissue study in near future.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Office of Life Science (R397-000-615-712), National University of Singapore, and research funding support from A*STARSERC (P-052 101 0098), Singapore.

References

1. 

B. Chance, S. Nioka, J. Kent, K. McCully, M. Fountain, R. Greenfeld, and G. Holtom, “Time-resolved spectroscopy of hemoglobin and myoglobin in resting and ischemic muscle,” Anal. Biochem., 174 (2), 698 –707 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(88)90076-0 0003-2697 Google Scholar

2. 

B. J. Tromberg, N. Shah, R. Lanning, A. Cerussi, J. Espinoza, T. Pham, L. Svaasand, and J. Butler, “Non-invasive in vivo characterization of breast tumors using photon migration spectroscopy,” Neoplasia, 2 26 –40 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.neo.7900082 1522-8002 Google Scholar

3. 

A. Cerussi, N. Shah, D. Hsiang, A. Durkin, J. Butler, and B. J. Tromberg, “In vivo absorption, scattering, and physiologic properties of 58 malignant breast tumors determined by broadband diffuse optical spectroscopy,” J. Biomed. Opt., 11 (4), 044005 –044016 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2337546 1083-3668 Google Scholar

4. 

T. Durduran, R. Choe, J. Culver, L. Zubkov, M. Holboke, J. Giammarco, B. Chance, and A. Yodh, “Bulk optical properties of healthy female breast tissue,” Phys. Med. Biol., 47 2847 –2861 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/47/16/302 0031-9155 Google Scholar

5. 

S. J. Glick, “Breast CT,” Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 9 (1), 501 –526 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bioeng.9.060906.151924 1523-9829 Google Scholar

6. 

V. Ntziachristos, A. G. Yodh, M. D. Schnall, and B. Chance, “MRI-guided diffuse optical spectroscopy of malignant and benign breast lesions,” Neoplasia, 4 (4), 347 –354 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.neo.7900244 1522-8002 Google Scholar

7. 

Q. Zhu, N. Chen, and S. H. Kurtzman, “Imaging tumor angiogenesis by use of combined near-infrared diffusive light and ultrasound,” Opt. Lett., 28 (5), 337 –339 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.28.000337 0146-9592 Google Scholar

8. 

M. J. Holboke, B. J. Tromberg, X. Li, N. Shah, J. Fishkin, D. Kidney, J. Butler, B. Chance, and A. G. Yodh, “Three-dimensional diffuse optical mammography with ultrasound localization in a human subject,” J. Biomed. Opt., 5 (2), 237 –247 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.429992 1083-3668 Google Scholar

9. 

N. Ghosh, S. K. Mohanty, S. K. Majumder, and P. K. Gupta, “Measurement of optical transport properties of normal and malignant human breast tissue,” Appl. Opt., 40 (1), 176 –184 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.40.000176 0003-6935 Google Scholar

10. 

L. C. Enfield, A. P. Gibson, N. L. Everdell, D. T. Delpy, M. Schweiger, S. R. Arridge, C. Richardson, M. Keshtgar, M. Douek, and J. C. Hebden, “Three-dimensional time-resolved optical mammography of the uncompressed breast,” Appl. Opt., 46 (17), 3628 –3638 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.46.003628 0003-6935 Google Scholar

11. 

B. Tromberg, A. Cerussi, N. Shah, M. Compton, A. Durkin, D. Hsiang, J. Butler, and R. Mehta, “Diffuse optics in breast cancer: detecting tumors in pre-menopausal women and monitoring neoadjuvant chemotherapy,” Breast Cancer Res., 7 (6), 279 –285 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr1358 Google Scholar

12. 

F. Gao, H. Zhao, and Y. Yamada, “Improvement of image quality in diffuse optical tomography by use of full time-resolved data,” Appl. Opt., 41 (4), 778 –791 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.41.000778 0003-6935 Google Scholar

13. 

J. C. Hebden, S. R. Arridge, and A. P. Gibson, “Recent advances in diffuse optical imaging,” Phys. Med. Biol., 50 R1 –R43 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/50/11/E01 0031-9155 Google Scholar

14. 

F. E. W. Schmidt, M. E. Fry, E. M. C. Hillman, J. C. Hebden, and D. T. Delpy, “A 32-channel time-resolved instrument for medical optical tomography,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 71 (1), 256 –265 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1150191 0034-6748 Google Scholar

15. 

S. R. Arridge, J. C. Hebden, and T. D. David, “Optical imaging in medicine: I. Experimental techniques,” Phys. Med. Biol., 42 825 –840 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/42/5/007 0031-9155 Google Scholar

16. 

W. Mo and N. Chen, “Fast time-domain diffuse optical tomography using pseudorandom bit sequences,” Opt. Express, 16 (18), 13643 –13650 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.16.013643 1094-4087 Google Scholar

17. 

W. Mo and N. Chen, “Source stabilization for high quality time-domain diffuse optical tomography,” Proc. SPIE, 7170 71700N (2009). 0277-786X Google Scholar

18. 

R. C. Haskell, L. O. Svaasand, T. T. Tsay, T. C. Feng, M. S. McAdams, and B. J. Tromberg, “Boundary conditions for the diffusion equation in radiative transfer,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 11 (10), 2727 –2741 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.11.002727 0740-3232 Google Scholar

19. 

M. S. Patterson, B. Chance, and B. C. Wilson, “Time-resolved reflectance and transmittance for the noninvasive measurement of tissue optical properties,” Appl. Opt., 28 (12), 2331 –2336 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.28.002331 0003-6935 Google Scholar

20. 

N. G. Chen and J. Bai, “Monte Carlo approach to modeling of boundary conditions for the diffusion equation,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 80 5321 –5324 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5321 0031-9007 Google Scholar

21. 

S. Prahl, “Optical properties spectra,” (2001) http://omlc.ogi.edu/spectra/hemoglobin/index.html Google Scholar

22. 

N. Shah, A. Cerussi, C. Eker, J. Espinoza, J. Butler, J. Fishkin, R. Hornung, and B. Tromberg, “Noninvasive functional optical spectroscopy of human breast tissue,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 98 (8), 4420 –4425 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.071511098 0027-8424 Google Scholar

23. 

D. R. Leff, O. J. Warren, L. C. Enfield, A. Gibson, T. Athanasiou, D. K. Patten, J. Hebden, G. Z. Yang, and A. Darzi, “Diffuse optical imaging of the healthy and diseased breast: A systematic review,” Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 108 (1), 9 –22 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9582-z 0167-6806 Google Scholar

24. 

D. Grosenick, K. T. Moesta, H. Wabnitz, J. Mucke, C. Stroszczynski, R. Macdonald, P. M. Schlag, and H. Rinneberg, “Time-domain optical mammography: initial clinical results on detection and characterization of breast tumors,” Appl. Opt., 42 (16), 3170 –3186 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.42.003170 0003-6935 Google Scholar

25. 

K. Suzuki, Y. Yamashita, K. Ohta, M. Kaneko, M. Yoshida, and B. Chance, “Quantitative measurement of optical parameters in normal breasts using time-resolved spectroscopy: in vivo results of 30 Japanese women,” J. Biomed. Opt., 1 330 –334 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.239902 1083-3668 Google Scholar

26. 

S. Tomas, J. Swartling, P. Taroni, A. Torricelli, P. Lindblom, C. Ingvar, and S. A. Engels, “Characterization of normal breast tissue heterogeneity using time-resolved near-infrared spectroscopy,” Phys. Med. Biol., 50 2559 –2571 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/50/11/008 0031-9155 Google Scholar

27. 

L. Spinelli, A. Torricelli, A. Pifferi, P. Taroni, G. M. Danesini, and R. Cubeddu, “Bulk optical properties and tissue components in the female breast from multiwavelength time-resolved optical mammography,” J. Biomed. Opt., 9 1137 –1142 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1803546 1083-3668 Google Scholar

28. 

P. Taroni, G. Danesini, A. Torricelli, A. Pifferi, L. Spinelli, and R. Cubeddu, “Clinical trial of time-resolved scanning optical mammography at 4 wavelengths between 683 and 975nm,” J. Biomed. Opt., 9 (3), 464 –473 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1695561 1083-3668 Google Scholar

29. 

B. W. Pogue, S. Jiang, H. Dehghani, C. Kogel, S. Soho, S. Srinivasan, X. Song, T. D. Tosteson, S. P. Poplack, and K. D. Paulsen, “Characterization of hemoglobin, water, and NIR scattering in breast tissue: analysis of intersubject variability and menstrual cycle changes,” J. Biomed. Opt., 9 (3), 541 –552 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1691028 1083-3668 Google Scholar

30. 

S. P. Poplack, K. D. Paulsen, A. Hartov, P. M. Meaney, B. W. Pogue, T. D. Tosteson, M. R. Grove, S. K. Soho, and W. A. Wells, “Electromagnetic breast imaging: average tissue property values in women with negative clinical findings,” Radiology, 231 571 –580 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2312030606 0033-8419 Google Scholar
©(2009) Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
Weirong Mo, Tyrphena S. S. Chan, Ling Chen, and Nanguang Chen "Quantitative characterization of optical and physiological parameters in normal breasts using time-resolved spectroscopy: in vivo results of 19 Singapore women," Journal of Biomedical Optics 14(6), 064004 (1 November 2009). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3257251
Published: 1 November 2009
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back to Top