Translator Disclaimer
1 January 2010 Application of intravital microscopy in studies of tumor microcirculation
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
To grow and progress, solid tumors develop a vascular network through co-option and angiogenesis that is characterized by multiple structural and functional abnormalities, which negatively influence therapeutic outcome through direct and indirect mechanisms. As such, the morphology and function of tumor blood vessels, plus their response to different treatments, are a vital and active area of biological research. Intravital microscopy (IVM) has played a key role in studies of tumor angiogenesis, and ongoing developments in molecular probes, imaging techniques, and postimage analysis methods have ensured its continued and widespread use. In this review we discuss some of the primary advantages and disadvantages of IVM approaches and describe recent technological advances in optical microscopy (e.g., confocal microscopy, multiphoton microscopy, hyperspectral imaging, and optical coherence tomography) with examples of their application to studies of tumor angiogenesis.

1.

Biological Significance of Tumor Microcirculation

It is a well-established concept that the continued growth and progression of a tumor is dependent on the development of a vascular network to supply oxygen and nutrients.1 Tumors develop a vascular network through co-option of the surrounding normal vasculature and/or angiogenesis—the development of neovasculature from preexisting vessels.2, 3 The blood vessels formed by these processes are characterized by multiple structural and functional abnormalities, including tortuous vascular networks, neovascular shunts, blind ends, plasma channels, and temporally as well as spatially heterogeneous blood flow.4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 These abnormalities result in tumor regions with poor delivery of oxygen and nutrients, resulting in hypoxia and low pH, as well as high vascular permeability and microvessel resistance, which contribute to elevated tumor interstitial fluid pressure (IFP).10, 11 Tumor hypoxia, acidity, and IFP have been related to disease progression and adverse therapeutic outcome.12, 13 In addition to the clinical impact of these indirect features of tumor vascular abnormalities, tumor vessel density has been directly related to a poor prognosis in multiple studies.14, 15, 16, 17 The key requirement for tumor angiogenesis in tumor progression, coupled with its clinical significance, highlight the tumor vasculature as a potential biomarker of disease status and exploitable therapeutic target. Thus, to take full advantage of the tumor vasculature as a target, it is necessary to understand the processes involved in tumor vascularization, the structural and functional abnormalities that characterize tumor vessels, and their response to therapy. A large part of what is known to date from in vivo studies has been uncovered using optical imaging, more specifically intravital microscopy (IVM). We discuss some of the different IVM approaches—what has been shown to date, and current and future applications of optical imaging in tumor angiogenesis.

2.

Optical Imaging and Intravital Microscopy

Optical imaging describes the use of the visible spectrum extended to include ultraviolet and near infrared (300to1300nm) light imaging. Macroscopic bioluminescence and fluorescence techniques are becoming common-place in cancer research for in vivo studies of the tumor microenvironment, particularly induction of and changes in hypoxia and tumor cell metastasis/invasion.18, 19, 20 However, microscopic optical imaging of tumors in vivo (intravital microscopy or IVM) enables high resolution studies at a cellular/subcellular level in real time, with applications in clinical as well as experimental animal research, via technological advances such as microendoscopy.21, 22 Recent advances in fluorescent/bioluminescent probes, microscopes and associated filters, image acquisition, and analysis technology have ensured continued development of IVM as a valuable research tool in the field of tumor angiogenesis and microcirculation, permitting the study of tumor cell interactions with stroma/blood vessels,23, 24 gene expression and vascular function25, 26 – blood supply27, 28 and vascular permeability,29, 30 among others.

3.

Fluorescent Probes for Bioimaging

Many different types of probes are available for optical imaging and IVM31, 32 from fluorescent dyes33, 34, 35 to photoactivatable and photoswitchable fluorescent proteins32, 36, 37 (see Fig. 1 ).

Fig. 1

Fluorescent probes. (a) Multiphoton image of FITC-dextran labeled blood vessels in a murine fibrosarcoma growing in the dorsal skin fold window chamber (DSFC). (b) A neonatal Kaede transgenic mouse (reprinted with kind permission from Tomura 141) before (upper) and after (lower) photoconversion on exposure to ultraviolet light for 30, 60, or 90sec . (c) Fluorescent image of human prostate carcinoma (PC3) tumor constitutively expressing mCherry growing in the DSFC of a transgenic Tie2-GFP mouse. Tumor cells are red, and GFP expression is visible in the blood vessel walls. (d) Multiphoton image depicting the use of quantum dots (reprinted with kind permission from Stroh 42) in vascular imaging of a MCaIV mammary tumor growing in the DSFC of a VEGF-GFP transgenic mouse. The figure shows concurrent imaging of quantum dot labeled blood vessels (QD470, blue) and VEGF-driven GFP expression in perivascular cells. Concurrent imaging at 850nm was possible due to the broad excitation spectrum of the quantum dots (scale bar, 50μm ).

011113_1_010001jbo1.jpg

Fluorescein isothyocyanate (FITC) is an organic fluorescent dye that continues to be widely used after several decades.33, 38 It has excitation and emission maxima at 488 and 520nm , respectively, and demonstrates high fluorescence intensity, but like many fluorophores, particularly organic ones, is prone to photobleaching. This has led to the development of synthetic dyes such as the Alexa-fluor dyes (Alexa-fluor 350, 488, 555, etc.) that demonstrate improved photostability alongside high intensity. FITC can be conjugated to different molecules. For instance, dextrans are polysaccharides composed of glucose chains of varying lengths; consequently, multiple molecular weight versions of FITC-dextran exist, and can be used to provide valuable information on vascular permeability through analysis of vascular leak.38

In addition, there are chemically sensitive derivatives of FITC, such as the pH sensitive fluorochrome 2 , 7 -bis-(2-carboxyethyl)-5,6-carboxyfluorescein (BCECF). BCECF excitation occurs in a pH-dependent manner at wavelengths between 440 and 500nm , and has been used to generate spatial and qualitative data on tumor pH.39 The fluorescence spectra of porphyrins are also pH sensitive, and phosphorescence lifetime is oxygen sensitive, enabling elegant studies of the tumor microenvironment.40

Although useful, organic dyes have several limitations. In addition to photobleaching, they generally exhibit broad emission spectra, which limit their capacity as dual markers of different events/structures because of cross talk between the dyes. Quantum dots represent a class of fluorescent nanocrystals synthesized to have broad excitation peaks and sharp emission peaks to overcome these limitations.35, 41 They exist in a range of colors, and generate bright fluorescence with improved photostability, making them less prone to photobleaching, an important and desirable property for live imaging studies that might involve prolonged and repeated exposure times. Stroh 42 exploited the broad excitation peak of quantum dots to image MCaIV murine mammary tumor vasculature (following IV injection of quantum dots) and perivascular cells simultaneously [VEGF-GFP transgenic mice expressing VEGF-driven green fluorescent protein (GFP)] using the same wavelength [see Fig. 1].

In recent years, fluorescent probes have been developed to exploit a process known as Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET). If two different fluorophores are located within the Förster radius (typically 10nm ) of each other and one has a peak emission wavelength that is broadly the same as the peak excitation wavelength of the other (i.e., significant emission-excitation spectral overlap), a nonradiating energy transfer can occur (FRET). The emission energy will transfer from the first fluorophore to the second non-radiatively. For example, on exposure to indigo/blue light, a cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) molecule (the donor) in close proximity to a yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) molecule (the acceptor) will cause the YFP to emit yellow light without having been exposed to the green light normally required to excite its fluorescence. This technique is used to demonstrate molecular interaction and colocalization, and has been used primarily for studies of cells in vitro. However, Zhou 43 recently described in vivo use of a FRET probe molecule consisting of eCFP linked to Venus (a yellow fluorescent protein variant, see discussion later on), with a sequence containing a caspase-3 cleavage site. They used this probe to monitor the dynamics of caspase-3 activation induced by the action of the drug cisplatin and photodynamic therapy in tumors using FRET IVM. On caspase-3 activation, the molecular link between the eCFP and Venus is broken and the FRET signal is lost. Similar FRET probes have been used, in mouse tumor models in vivo, to investigate the activity and therapeutic targeting of matrix metalloproteinases, enzymes intimately involved in angiogenesis.44

The discovery of green fluorescent protein (GFP) in 1962,45, 46 and the plethora of fluorescent proteins that have been uncovered, refined, and synthesized since, has revolutionized in vivo optical imaging. The literature available on the use of GFP and other fluorescent proteins (BFP, CFP, YFP, RFP)32 is vast. The main use of these proteins is to fuse them to genes of interest that in turn regulate their expression, so that fluorescence is used as a reporter of gene expression in vivo, at multiple time points. IVM studies of tumors using GFP and similar proteins have primarily focused on tumor cells transfected with the corresponding gene, under the control of a constitutively expressed viral promoter. This allows microscopic tracking of tumor cell proliferation and migration patterns.47 Fluorescence of GFP does not require specific cofactors but does depend on oxygen concentration,48 such that data need to be interpreted with caution. The potential for such large proteins to modify cell behavior is also a concern, although several studies have demonstrated minimal effects of GFP in tumor cells on such properties as tumor progression and metastasis.49 Several fruit fluorescent proteins have been developed more recently, which are mutants of a monomeric mutant form of dsRed (mRFP1). These proteins (e.g., mCherry and TdTomato) are potentially less disruptive than GFP, and also provide a range of colors from yellow-orange to red-orange, with improved quantum efficiency and stability.50 To date these proteins have not been used in IVM studies of tumors; however, their suitability for in vitro live cell imaging studies has recently been explored,51 and it is likely that newer gene expression vectors will be synthesized to exploit their advantages.

Proteins demonstrating reversible and irreversible changes to their spectral properties on exposure to specific optical wavelengths have now been discovered and developed through modification and refinement of existing fluorescent proteins. These are referred to as photoactivatable (photoactivated shift from low to high fluorescent intensity) or photoswitchable (photoactivated shift in fluorescent color) fluorescent proteins (PAFP).37, 52

The first natural PAFP to be discovered was Kaede in 2002,53 which initially fluoresces green, but on exposure to UV light undergoes an irreversible conversion to a red-fluorescent form. In the same year, a photoactivatable mutant version of GFP was synthesized, PA-GFP, exhibiting a wavelength-specific conversion to an enhanced fluorescent form.52, 54 Dronpa and KFP1 exemplify reversible PAFPs.55, 56 Dronpa, which fluoresces green, has the capacity for reversible wavelength-specific bleaching,55 whereas KFP1 exhibits both reversible and irreversible changes in fluorescent expression—exposure to specific wavelengths can be used to induce relatively short-lived bright red fluorescence that can be quenched, or the exposure times or intensity can be increased to stimulate irreversible “kindling” of red fluorescence that cannot be quenched and does not fade.56 Although the potential of these proteins has yet to be fully explored, they represent novel and highly useful tools. For example, the idea of inducing an irreversible photoconversion in a cell population of interest and then tracking that population, relative to new incoming cells that have not undergone photoconversion, is an attractive one. Care needs to be taken because new cells produced on cell division will express the fluorescent protein in its original form (e.g., Kaede), thus diluting the population of interest. Nonetheless, with careful planning there is a wide scope for use of these proteins.

4.

Dorsal Skin Fold Window Chamber

The dorsal skin fold window chamber model (DSFC) (see Fig. 2 ) is an invaluable tool for IVM of tumor angiogenesis.57 It was originally developed in the rabbit ear in 192458 and adapted for use in mice in 1943.59 The DSFC model in mouse involves the surgical removal of a skin flap and associated connective tissue and fat from the dorsum to provide optical clarity. A metal chamber (usually aluminium or titanium) holds the skin away from the mouse body, exposing the vascularized layer of muscle and skin on the opposing side of the flap or “window.” A tumor piece or tumor cells (often as a spheroid or cell conglomerate) are placed onto, or injected into, the exposed fascial plane and covered with a glass coverslip. This process is described in detail by Koehl, Gaumann, and Geissler.57 It should be noted that for larger animals (e.g., rat) that have thicker skin, the skin layers from both opposing sides of the flap are removed, thereby facilitating an improved optical path.60

Fig. 2

Dorsal skin fold window chamber (DSFC). (a) A photograph is shown of a DSFC preparation on the rear dorsum of a SCID mouse. The exposed blood vessels on the fascial surface can be clearly seen. (b) A full view of a DSFC window 1-day postimplantation with a tumor cell aggregate (circled; murine fibrosarcoma). (c) The same tumor shown 6days later, nearly filling the window.

011113_1_010001jbo2.jpg

The DSFC model enables repeated acquisition of spatial and temporal data from a growing tumor over periods of days to weeks. Although there are also several disadvantages (tumors are essentially subcutaneous and there are size restrictions due to the width and diameter of the chamber window, which exert high tissue pressures), the model is widely applicable and has been used extensively in a range of different rodent models, enabling the use of syngeneic rodent tumor lines in immunocompetent strains, as well as human xenograft lines using immunocompromised strains such as nude and severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice.

It should be noted that although the DSFC model is the most extensively used, there are alternative preparations suitable for IVM, the most similar of which is the cranial window, used to expose the brain34 and mammary window.61 Other models often require externalization of an organ and thus sacrifice of the animal immediately on completion of image acquisition. Examples include the lung,62, 63 pancreas,64 mammary fat pad,65 and mesentery.66

5.

Intravital Microscope

There are several technical problems to overcome and welfare issues to address when using live animals for microscopy, i.e., positioning and restraint of the mouse, physiological status of the mouse, objective lens properties (sufficient magnification, working distance, and numerical aperture), detector specification, analysis software capabilities, and so on. A standard microscope stage cannot be used, but needs to be specially modified to enable positioning of the mouse such that the window is locked in place. This generally involves the use of a specialized jig that restrains the mouse, with the window in the correct position to be bolted securely to the stage. Further, depending on the time frame of image acquisition, physiological parameters such as body temperature and blood pressure need to be monitored and maintained, necessitating the use of a heating blanket and/or heat lamp and temperature/blood pressure probes and recording equipment for anesthetized animals. Both general anesthesia and physical restraint can confound data interpretation due to alterations in blood pressure and vasoactivity. Isofluorane is commonly considered the most appropriate general anesthetic for small rodents,67 although constant infusion of a short-lived IV injectable anesthetic such as Propofol can also maintain a suitable anesthetic depth for restraint.

Most IVM studies have to work around movement in the specimen during data acquisition due to pulse, respiration, peristalsis, muscle contraction etc. Without doubt the simplest and most widely used solution to this problem is real-time (video rate) data acquisition with a digital video (DV) camera and images recorded onto tape or other storage media. The major drawback with this approach is that DV cameras do not normally have sufficient sensitivity for use with many fluorescence applications although they are well-suited to transmitted light microscopy. Wide-field fluorescence and Nipkow disk-based confocal microscopes are normally used with cooled charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras, which are more sensitive. Recent further development of these has seen the introduction of back-illuminated (also called back-thinned) CCD cameras that have much higher quantum efficiency and wider spectral response. When coupled to electron multiplication (EM) technology, these detectors (EMCCD) can achieve 90% quantum efficiency coupled with short-noise-limited at video rate (25to30framess) .68 Point scanning laser confocal and multiphoton microscopes usually have photomultiplier tube (PMT) detectors. Although these microscopes are generally slow scanning and the detectors have lower quantum efficiencies than cooled CCDs, nonetheless these systems produce higher resolution images with better contrast than wide-field systems provided that the specimen can be kept still. Multiphoton microscopes do not require pinholes, so can benefit from the increased sensitivity of gallium arsenide phosphide (GAsP) detectors in a nondescanned (NDD) configuration. There are several recent reviews on CCD sensors,69, 70, 71, 72 and the books by Sluder and Wolf73, 74 present a good introduction to cameras for microscopy.

6.

Conventional Wide-Field Light Microscopy

6.1.

Background

Early IVM studies were confined to conventional wide-field light microscopy using transillumination (light transmitted from the condenser through the tissue sample to the objective) or epi-illumination (light reflected/emitted by the tissue sample through the objective). Basic fluorescent microscopy uses mercury or xenon arc lamps in conjunction with specific excitation and emission filters and a dichroic mirror, which splits the emission and excitation beams. Following exposure to light of an appropriate wavelength, a single photon absorbed by a fluorophore, either intrinsic or an extrinsic fluorescent dye/probe, enters an excited state. While excited, some energy is dissipated so when, after a few nanoseconds, the fluorescent molecule returns to its ground state, a photon of lower energy (and therefore longer wavelength) is emitted. The difference between the excitation and emission wavelength maxima is called the Stokes shift.

Conventional microscopy has been the mainstay of IVM, providing morphological information on the tumor vasculature [see Fig. 3 ] such as vessel length, diameter, and branching patterns, and qualitative information on the leakiness of blood vessels (hemorrhage), as well as video recordings of flowing blood (contrast provided by red cells under transillumination) and of vascular leak of exogenous fluorescent markers (epi-illumination). Some of the earlier observations made using IVM to study tumors growing in chamber models demonstrated notable architectural and blood flow aberrations that are now widely accepted to characterize tumor vasculature,75, 76 e.g., inconsistency in microvessel size, commonly with larger vessels located at the tumor periphery and smaller, more chaotic vessels toward the center. Dilated capillary diameters varying along the length of abnormally long capillaries were recorded, as well as intermittent or regurgitant flow and temporary or permanent microvessel occlusion by red cells.75, 76 These observations have been strengthened by subsequent refinements and application of modern image analysis techniques.27, 38, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82

Fig. 3

Images acquired using different microscopy techniques. (a) Transillumination images of murine fibrosarcomas expressing single VEGF isoforms (left is VEGF 120, and right is VEGF 188) growing in the DSFC of SCID mice. Obvious differences in the vascular architecture are apparent. (b) Multiphoton image of murine fibrosarcomas expressing single VEGF isoforms (left is VEGF 120, and right is VEGF 188) following IV administration of FITC-dextran. Second harmonic generation imaging shows collagen fibers (blue) between the vessels (green) in the VEGF 120 tumors. (c) Multiphoton 3-D images of a P22 rat sarcoma growing in the DSFC of BDIX rats following IV administration of FITC-dextran. Four sequential images are shown. The time postinjection is indicated next to each figure, demonstrating vascular leak over time. (d) Transillumination vascular image (left), with adjacent oxyhemaglobin saturation overlay derived from hyperspectral imaging (right) of vasculature in a nontumor-bearing DSFC of a SCID mouse (scale bar, 1mm ). The right-hand axis depicts oxygen saturation from 0 to 100%.

011113_1_010001jbo3.jpg

6.2.

Blood Flow and Vascular Permeability

Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of tumor blood flow are key contributory factors in the development of the pathophysiolgical tumor microenvironment. Measurement of red cell velocity within individual tumor microvessels can be obtained relatively easily in IVM by modern tracking algorithms.27 However, this measure is not directly related to tumor blood flow rate (volume of blood delivered to the capillary network per unit volume of tissue per minute), which dictates oxygen and nutrient delivery to tissue. To estimate tissue blood flow rate, a common approach is to inject a contrast agent into the blood stream and measure its concentration time course in arterial blood (input function) and in the tissue of interest (tissue response function). Blood flow rate is then estimated from a mathematical model relating the tissue response function to the input function.83 Radiotracers are often used as contrast agents, where measures of concentration are easily obtainable. However, in optical imaging, where contrast is obtained from fluorescent agents, quantification of fluorescence intensity (to obtain relative measures of concentration) is a nontrivial exercise. This is because measured fluorescence intensity is highly dependent on several factors that contribute to background and noise, in addition to concentration of the fluorophore. These factors arise from the specimen itself, e.g., stability of fluorescence; the microscope, e.g., spherical aberration; or the detector, e.g., low dynamic range.84 For these reasons, obtaining accurate estimates of tumor blood flow rate by IVM is difficult. Nevertheless, temporal alterations in tumor blood supply have been measured85 using an elegant first-pass imaging technique first described by Oye 28 This technique is based on the movement of high molecular weight TRITC-dextran (155KDa) from the main tumor supplying artery through the tumor vascular network to the main tumor draining vein, visualized using fluorescence IVM to acquire high-frame-rate videos of the fluorescent marker postinjection. A semiquantitative measurement of tumor blood flow was then obtained through examination of fluorescence intensity versus time curves plotted for multiple regions of interest (representing multiple tumor vessels).28 Repetition of this process over 20-min time intervals within the same tumors demonstrated substantial heterogeneity in blood supply over time in A-07 human melanoma tumors.85

Vascular permeability of tumor blood vessels has been widely studied using IVM. This is because the vascular wall represents a barrier to delivery of high molecular weight anticancer agents86; an increase in tumor vascular permeability is an early indicator of vascular damage induced by tumor vascular damaging agents87; and high vascular permeability is an important characteristic of tumors, with established links to tumor angiogenesis, progression, and poor therapeutic outcome.12, 13, 86 The classic methodology for examining tumor microvascular permeability is to analyze the clearance kinetics of a fluorescently labeled molecule (usually BSA or dextran) from the blood vessels to the interstitium following intravenous injection.34, 88, 89 The high spatial resolution of IVM allows fluorescence intensity to be measured within and immediately outside individual microvessels, which is an advantage over radiotracer methods for estimating vascular permeability but with the same limitations for quantification of fluorescence intensity, as described before. High molecular weight labeled molecules are chosen to mimic leak of plasma proteins and to provide a relatively low leakage rate, as most calculations of vascular permeability use mathematical models that are based on unidirectional transport across the vascular wall.29 Elevated tumor vascular permeability has been demonstrated in multiple tumor models using this approach, although methods of analysis have varied.90, 91, 92 Furthermore, more specific features of vascular permeability, such as the inherent variability between different tumor models34 and increased vascular pore sizes,88, 93 have been shown through similar methods. 3-D imaging of fluorescence, especially using multiphoton fluorescence techniques, has significantly aided quantification of fluorescence intensity. Although they are not currently suitable for tracking fast kinetics (e.g., blood flow), these techniques have been applied to estimation of vascular permeability, as described in Sec. 8.29

6.3.

Interstitial Transport

A fluorophore may go through many excitation-emission cycles, but eventually it will lose the ability to respond. This is a key problem associated with fluorescence microscopy, in that exposure to high intensity light may quite quickly destroy the fluorophore in a process known as photobleaching, particularly problematic if trying to image the same region over time as is often the case when examining tumor vasculature using IVM. Although photobleaching is a complication, it may be exploited through fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP).94, 95, 96 This technique is particularly useful in studying diffusion or movement of specific molecules through tissue, and involves the application of intense light to bleach a small region of interest, i.e., loss of fluorescent signal within the selected region. The rate of diffusion/active transport of fluorescently labeled molecules into this region can then be measured through increasing levels of fluorescence intensity; for example, Chary and Jain96 used FRAP to measure tumor (VX2 carcinoma in rabbit ear chamber) interstitial fluid velocity and diffusion following the intravenous administration of FITC conjugated bovine serum albumin (BSA). In addition to providing pertinent information on these parameters in a pathological microenvironment, they were able to observe the direction and velocity of interstitial fluid flow relative to microvascular flow, showing that sudden changes in the direction of RBC flow did impact interstitial flow, although there was a lag in response time.96

6.4.

pH and Oxygenation

Helmlinger 40 used the organic dyes BCECF and porphyrin to examine pH and oxygenation (pO2) levels of tumor tissue (LS174T, human colon adenocarcinoma) in relation to the tumor vasculature. They found that the majority of the tumor vessels exhibited a higher pH proximally, which decreased moving away from the vessels, although there was little or no pH gradient in some cases. In contrast, pO2 gradients, which did not correlate with pH, were much more variable, although values were consistently low in avascular areas and at distances greater than 150μm from the supporting vasculature. However, there are confounding factors in interpreting pO2 values in tumors growing in the window chamber, as demonstrated in a study using the rat mammary adenocarcinoma (R3230AC) model.97 As these tumors were grown in DSFCs in rats, both skin layers were removed, permitting imaging of both the fascial and tumor surfaces. Similar to Helmlinger, 40 pO2 was examined using phosphorescence lifetime imaging of porphyrin. Furthermore, blue and green excitation wavelengths were used due to their differences in tissue penetration (approximately 50 and 200μm , respectively). This study neatly illustrated a longitudinal gradient in pO2 values from the fascial through to the tumor surface, a consequence of vascular co-option from the fascial arterioles on tumor implantation.

6.5.

Regulation of Angiogenesis

Fluorescence IVM studies have broadened our understanding of the onset of angiogenesis and the molecular processes involved in its regulation.77 Molecular probes have played a key role in these studies, particularly GFP. A seminal study by Li 23 examined the onset of tumor angiogenesis in the DSFC model from a minimal number (20 to 50) of mammary tumor cells (R3230Ac and 4T1). This was possible due to the generation of tumor cells stably expressing GFP, enabling visualization of individual cells using fluorescence microscopy. Tumor growth and angiogenesis were tracked over a 4-week period, showing evidence for early angiogenesis in the form of microvessel dilation and tortuosity within 6days (60 to 80 tumor cells) of implantation, functional microvessels within 8days (300 to 400 tumor cells), and an established vascular network by 20days ( 4to7mm diameter). Furthermore, tumor cells were found to migrate to, and align themselves alongside, the existing host vasculature in the early stages of angiogenesis, and the vascular network was seen to branch out from the host vasculature in the established tumor. The same study went on to show that the simultaneous introduction of an antiangiogenic truncated version of the VEGF receptor alongside the tumor cells severely repressed tumor angiogenesis and subsequent tumor growth, thereby providing information on the molecular processes involved in early response and supporting evidence for the importance of angiogenesis in tumor development.23 Similar studies have examined other proangiogenic proteins and their potential for therapeutic inhibition.80

Cao 98 examined the role of hypoxia in tumor angiogenesis using fluorescence IVM. Colon (HCT116) and mammary (4T1) carcinoma cells were engineered to stably express RFP as well as GFP under control of a hypoxia responsive element (HRE), making GFP expression dependent on the presence of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1). When grown in the DSFC, early vessel sprouting was apparent prior to expression of GFP, suggesting that, in this model, the onset of angiogenesis was not dependent on hypoxic conditions. However, the expression of HIF-1 was found to correlate with increased angiogenesis, measured quantitatively through microvessel length/density. Furthermore, microvessels were found to grow toward regions of hypoxia.98

6.6.

Response to Therapy

Both transmitted light and fluorescence microscopy techniques have been widely applied to preclinical studies of vascular targeted therapeutics. Therapeutic approaches using antiangiogenic and vascular disrupting agents (VDAs) have been extensively studied, either as a single agent or in combination regimens, as a result of the direct and indirect impact of tumor vasculature on treatment efficacy. IVM has proved to be a useful tool in examining the vascular effects of these agents. For example, fluorescence microscopy was used to show a reduction in the overall microvessel density of GFP expressing pancreatic adenocarcinoma (Panc-02-HO) and colonic carcinoma (CT-26) tumor models following treatment with the antiangiogenic agent TNP-470.99 Tozer 38, 79 demonstrated that treatment with the VDA combretastatin-A-4-phosphate (CA-4-P) induced a rapid and comprehensive reduction in blood vessel length and density as well as red blood cell velocity using both light and fluorescent IVM approaches. Further, the use of single VEGF isoform expressing murine fibrosarcoma tumors with diverse levels of vascular maturity provided novel data on the impact of vascular maturity on CA-4-P efficacy; the more mature tumor line (VEGF 188 expressing) was found to be significantly less responsive to CA-4-P.38

Combination therapy approaches are complicated by how changes wrought by one agent on the tumor vasculature or tumor microenvironment as a whole might influence the efficacy of the second agent. For example, the antivascular effects of vascular targeted therapeutics might be expected to hinder delivery of a secondary drug. However, Czabanaka 100 found that delivery of the chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin was not impaired when administered sequentially to the multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib. Using a human glioma model (SF126), they showed that although sunitinib significantly reduced both total and functional vessel density, the remaining vessels demonstrated improved blood flow. Consequently, the subsequent administration of doxorubicin via the carotid artery resulted in improved interstitial uptake in perivascular regions, and thus a comparable uptake to that seen in tumors that did not receive sunitinib. These data suggest that conventional chemotherapy might be used effectively with vascular targeted therapy. Subsequently, this vascular normalization phenomenon has been demonstrated for other vascular targeted drugs101 (see Sec. 8 on multiphoton microscopy).

In addition to chemotherapy, vascular targeted therapy is likely to be combined with radiotherapy. One study used conventional light IVM to show that a broad VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor AZD2171 significantly reduced microvessel density in a human lung carcinoma model (Calu-6), and further, that this effect was ameliorated on pretreatment of the tumor with radiation therapy.102

7.

Confocal Microscopy

Despite the continued utility of conventional wide-field transmitted light and fluorescence microscopy in IVM, there are several problems contingent on these methods; even in a DSFC preparation, tumor growth results in an increasing depth of tissue through which light has to penetrate (several 100μm ). Out-of-focus light scattered by the tissue interferes with and degrades the image at the focal point, severely limiting the depth of tissue that can be examined and confounding intensity measurements and interpretation of the acquired images.30, 103 Furthermore, it is only possible to examine the vasculature in 2-D using these approaches, which introduces errors in quantitative measures of vascular morphology and function. Traditionally, the only method of examining the tumor vascular network in 3-D was through reconstruction of a 3-D image following 2-D analysis of serial immunohistochemical sections, or through vascular casting.104

To visualize a single optical section within the tissue, confocal laser scanning microscopy uses mirrors to scan a beam of laser light of the required fluorescence excitation wavelength point by point across the specimen. The emitted fluorescence signal is then “descanned” through a pinhole, preventing light from outside the focal plane degrading the image, thereby improving image resolution, signal-to-noise ratio, and allowing increased depth discrimination. As the microscope is focused through the specimen, a 3-D composite image is constructed.105, 106 However, the high light intensity of the beam, coupled with the need to repeatedly scan the specimen (either during the acquisition of a z-stack or time-lapse sequence), results in increased sample photobleaching and other light-induced tissue damage, which limits the usefulness of confocal fluorescence microscopy for IVM applications. Its use has been restricted primarily to postexcision analyses of fixed samples.107, 108 The ability of tumors to induce expression of VEGF in host stromal cells with fibroblast-like morphology was demonstrated using IVM confocal microscopy of murine mammary adenocarcinoma tumors (MCaIV) growing in VEGF-EGFP transgenic mice.109 However, further analyses to determine spatial relationships was carried out using multiphoton microscopy techniques (see Sec. 8). One recent study utilized confocal reflected light microscopy in conjunction with multiphoton microscopy to develop a method of repeatedly and reproducibly locating the same region within a DSFC window.110 Reflected light confocal microscopy can be used to image microparticles, in this case latex polystyrene microspheres positioned in the DSFC preparation.

Basic confocal fluorescence microscopy can take considerable time, which makes it unsuitable for studies that require high spatial and temporal resolution, for example with a moving specimen. Spinning disk confocal microscopy uses a rotating Nipkow disk (with multiple pinholes each containing a microlens) to scan multiple beams of light across the specimen at the same time. The Nipkow disk can rotate as many as 1800 to 5000 times per minute, and a cooled CCD camera is normally used that allows the acquisition of up to approximately 1000 whole optical sections (frames or fields) per second,111 thereby making it possible to view rapidly occurring events in real time.68 The application of multiple lower intensity beams reduces photobleaching relative to confocal laser scanning microscopy; however, the Nipkow disks have pinholes of a fixed size and are therefore only optimized for use with one objective lens. The sensitivity and cost of the camera are other limiting factors. Nonetheless, this technique could prove invaluable in studies examining the movement of different cells and molecules during the dynamic process of tumor angiogenesis.

Another approach to real-time confocal IVM is video rate confocal laser scanning microscopy (VRCLSM), which has been applied to in vivo studies of kidney function.112, 113 VRCLSMs usually employ an acousto-optical deflector to scan the laser beam at high speed across the specimen. Early applications of this technique usually produced video signals which could be recorded to tape, although more recent VRCLSM systems tend to be modules that are added to conventional CLSM.

8.

Multiphoton Fluorescence Microscopy

Since 1990 when its potential as a biological imaging tool was clearly established,114 multiphoton microscopy has been growing in strength and has played a key role in many biological studies examining tumor angiogenesis.29, 38, 115 Multiphoton microscopy uses short pulses (approximately 100femtoseconds ) of high intensity infrared (IR) or near-infrared (NIR) light to induce multiple photon excitation.105, 114, 116 For fluorescence to occur, a fluorophore must first absorb a photon of light that has energy appropriate to induce an excited state. This usually happens with the arrival of a single photon, but can also occur if two photons with half the energy (or three with one third…etc.) are absorbed almost simultaneously. Since it is extremely unlikely that a significant number of lower energy (longer wavelength) photons will arrive almost simultaneously by chance, excitation of the fluorophore will only ever occur in the presence of an extremely high density of photons, found only when the beam of a powerful laser is at its most concentrated, right at the point of focus. The beam is scanned over the specimen as before but, unlike a confocal laser scanning microscope, no pinhole is required to exclude out-of-focus light, since there is no excitation of the fluorophore and therefore no photobleaching above and below the plane of focus.30, 105

Multiphoton microscopy offers several advantages over confocal microscopy for live-tissue imaging. The low linear absorption of IR and NIR light by most tissue samples increases the depth penetration possible from the approximately 40to100μm achievable using confocal microscopy to several hundred micrometers (absolute depth is dependent on the tissue properties, wavelengths used, and working distance of the objective lens). Further, as fluorophore excitation occurs exclusively within the focal plane, extensive photobleaching and tissue phototoxicity are avoided. 30, 105, 114, 117, 118

Multiphoton fluorescence microscopy allows the excitation and visualization of fluorescent molecules, therefore unlabeled tissues are only visible when they exhibit autofluorescence (which is generally less in evidence than with single photon imaging techniques). To see weak fluorescence, a low autofluorescence background is desirable, but it can then be difficult to localize and understand the relationship between the fluorescently labeled and unlabeled tissues. It is often not possible or worthwhile to use transmitted light because of the depth of penetration in tissue or opacity of the specimen under examination, so reflection microscopy must be employed. In addition to conventional reflected light imaging, a process called second harmonic generation [SHG; see Fig. 3] can be used to view noncentrosymmetric structures such as collagen.118, 119 SHG is the result of multiple photons interacting with structures such as collagen, and, as there is no loss, the energy of two photons is combined to emit twice the energy and thus half the wavelength.118 Put simply, two photons are reflected as one photon with half the wavelength. Although not widely applied to IVM studies for examining tumor angiogenesis, SHG has been used in combination with multiphoton imaging of fluorescently labeled molecules to provide 3-D data on the spatial distribution of vessels and collagen in human melanoma tumors (Mu89),119 and there is scope for its broader use.

Multiphoton microscopy is widely applicable to tumor angiogenesis studies using IVM and has been used to build on and improve existing knowledge. Multiphoton microscopy analyses of murine mammary and human colon adenocarcinoma tumors (MCaIV and LS174T, respectively) treated with a neutralizing antibody against VEGFR2 (DC101) clearly demonstrated therapy-induced normalization of the tumor vasculature.101 This phenomenon was first documented using conventional fluorescence microscopy in hormone-dependent tumors.120 Brown 109 used multiphoton fluorescence microscopy to expand on a previous study demonstrating tumor cell driven expression of VEGF in host stromal cells,121 and showed that these cells were located both at the tumor-host stroma boundary and also deep in the tumor tissue (200μm) , where they were often associated with tumor blood vessels. Accurate details on individual cell expression and spatial distribution relative to other cells and structures have only been made possible through the development of multiphoton microscopy techniques. The same study went on to demonstrate specific gene expression mediated tumor cell homing ( Hif1 mutant cells homed to hypoxic regions) to track delivery of a therapeutic agent, characterize tumor vascular architecture in 3-D, and examine functional features such as blood flow velocity and permeability.109

Multiphoton microscopy is also useful for techniques requiring quantification of fluorescence intensity, since it overcomes some limitations of conventional fluorescence microscopy such as fluorescence scatter from outside the focal plane, for example in estimation of tumor vascular permeability [see Fig. 3]. Using multiphoton microscopy, the VDA, CA-4-P was found to rapidly increase vascular permeability to a 40-kD dextran in the P22 rat sarcoma tumor model,29 and a high molecular weight isoform of VEGF (VEGF188) was found to be associated with development of tumor blood vessels with improved barrier function compared with lower molecular weight isoforms (VEGF164 and 120).38 Further data on the possible molecular mechanisms behind tumor vascular maturity, and subsequent impact on treatment, was provided in a study using a wild-type human glioblastoma model (U87MG) and a variant stably transfected to overexpress PDGF-C.115 Multiphoton microscopy was used to examine vascular architecture and permeability (as a measure of function). PDGF-C was found to play an important role in glioblastoma vascular maturation, with the PDGF-C overexpressing tumors demonstrating a more normalized vascular morphology concurrent with decreased vascular leakiness. Consistent with improved vascular maturity, the PDGF-C overexpressing tumors also demonstrated resistance to treatment with DC101.115

9.

Hyperspectral Imaging

Hyperspectral imaging is a technique based on the absorbance of light across a spectrum of wavelengths by different tissues.122 The technique may be used with either transmitted light if the specimen is thin enough or reflected light. The primary application of this technique for in vivo imaging of tumor vasculature is to examine metabolic data, or more specifically vascular oxygen saturation. Oxy- and deoxyhemoglobin demonstrate differences in light absorption (both visual and NIR light can be used) in proportion with the level of oxygen saturation.122, 123, 124 Consequently, oxygen saturation within tumor vessels can be measured [see Fig. 3] in real time through the use of IVM in conjunction with an appropriate optical filtering system, such as an acousto-optic or liquid crystal tunable filter, which is fitted in front of the camera.123, 125 The potential of this technique to study oxygenation in tumor blood vessels has been clearly demonstrated in a study using the 4T1 mammary carcinoma tumor model. The tumor model was engineered to express GFP under the control of a HRE, as well as to constitutively express RFP. Thus, tumor growth and the onset of hypoxia could be monitored using fluorescent IVM. Through the simultaneous application of hyperspectral imaging, filtering the absorption bandwidth within the appropriate hyperspectral range, oxygen saturation “maps” showing the spatial distribution of oxyhemoglobin were produced.125 Using this method, the same group has recently related fluctuations in tumor microvascular oxygenation to the location of arteriovenous shunts, a common anomaly in tumor vascular networks.8

10.

Optical Coherence Tomography

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a noninvasive optical imaging technique that can be used to generate high resolution 3-D images, at depth, alongside additional information on blood flow.126, 127, 128, 129 It shares several similarities to ultrasound imaging but is based on measuring the intensity and time delay of light, rather than sound, back-scattered by tissue. The use of a weakly focused optical beam is used to generate sectioned images over an axial range of several millimeters. Generation of the image is based on a fiber optic Michelson interferometer and low-coherence wavelength light source.130 Briefly, light from a broad-band, single-mode source (e.g., a superluminescent diode) is sent through a beamsplitter; one beam, a reference path, is reflected from a mirror or optical delay, while the other passes down a fiber optic probe and is focused on the target specimen. Light reflected back down the reference and specimen paths is recombined, and when the distance traveled by both paths is within the coherence length of the light, interference fringes are produced. These fringes can then be analyzed to reveal changes in the intensity and back-scattered (echo) time delay produced by structures within the tissue, and a map of the tissue structure can be generated.130 The use of light scatter to generate image contrast as opposed to fluorescence emission (e.g., confocal or multiphoton microscopy) or molecular absorption (e.g., hyperspectral microscopy) permits the use of much longer wavelengths. OCT typically operates between 800 and 1300nm , where tissue scattering and absorption are minimized; hence, depth penetration can exceed 1mm .

OCT is often used in conjunction with Doppler (DOCT) to examine microvascular blood flow, thereby generating high resolution images of the vascular network overlain with blood flow information.130 OCT can provide useful information on the microstructure of the tumor vasculature without the need for fluorescent probes. Further, the application of DOCT and the generation of image analysis techniques such as speckle variance analysis127 permits the acquisition of blood flow data that may be spatially attributed to the vascular map.

So far, OCT/DOCT-based technology has been applied primarily to normal tissues.130 For instance, it has been used to observe photodynamic therapy (PDT)-induced vascular shut-down of normal blood vessels using IVM in the DSFC.127 However, tumor studies are beginning to emerge. In 2008, Standish 131 used interstitial DOCT, where a DOCT probe was inserted into rat prostate tumors (Mat-Ly-Lu) growing subcutaneously to quantify tumor vascular response to PDT. In 2009, Vakoc 132 used a modified DOCT technique, optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI)133, 134 for IVM-based high-resolution, deep tissue imaging studies of tumor vascular networks and their response to targeted therapeutics. This extensive study examined mophological features of multiple tumor blood and lymphatic vascular networks at depths beyond 1mm (as opposed to the approximately 400-μm depth possible using multiphoton microscopy), extracting quantitative data pertaining to the structure and extent of the vascular networks through the postimaging application of an in-house automated 3-D vascular tracing and analysis algorithm. In addition to generating anatomical data on the vascular networks, which was found to correlate well with previously extracted multiphoton data, the technique was applied to tumor-bearing mice (murine mammary adenocarcinoma, MCaIV) treated with the VEGFR2 neutralizing antibody DC101, providing data on blood and lymphatic vascular changes in response to therapy. The data obtained were, again, complementary to previously acquired data using multiphoton microscopy; however, additional data were provided through the ability to image frequently ( 2-h time points over a 48-h period) without the use of exogenous markers. Thus, the authors were able to acquire vascular networks at depths over a wide tumor volume at multiple time points without any confounding factors such as leak or photobleaching of fluorescent dyes. The ability to generate temporal and spatial data of the lymphatic vascular network, simultaneous to acquisition of blood vessel networks, was particularly novel.132

Thus, there is the potential for future tumor-based IVM studies using DOCT-based technologies to examine the vascular effects of various therapeutic approaches. Further, as has already been done in normal blood vessels, it could be used in combination with other optical imaging approaches such as hyperspectral imaging to examine multiple tumor vascular parameters.135

11.

Image Analysis

Quantifying IVM data is an on-going challenge that needs to be undertaken to fully interpret the vast amounts of imaging data that can now be acquired. In addition to expensive commercial software packages, freeware such as ImageJ are available to researchers for this purpose. Alternatively, researchers often employ programming tools such as Matlab, Mathematica, and the similar freeware options Scilab and Octave, to develop their own algorithms for specialized analytical purposes. A common necessity for studies of tumor microcirculation is accurate identification of the vascular networks in software, so that morphological parameters can be measured, for example, or other features of the tumor microenvironment can be spatially related to the microvasculature. Barber 78 proposed a semiautomatic tracing algorithm for tumor blood vessels based on a compact Hough transform and radial maps, where plasma was fluorescently labeled with intravenously administered FITC-dextran to highlight vessels under two-photon excitation. The software requires a high degree of manual tracing, but finds vessel centers and calculates vessel diameters automatically. An adaptive irregular cylinder was used to model vessels in the automated methodology proposed by Abdul-Karim, 81 again using fluorescent dextran to provide contrast in SCID mice bearing a murine mammary adenocarcinoma. An automatic seeding sequence was used to localize the cylinder model, which found the center as the maximum intensity and fitted the diameter with a median calculation. Another automated methodology to trace vessels identified by fluorescent dextran is presented in Tyrrell, 82 where the spatial drop in intensity of the vessels is modeled as super-Gaussian functions. The modeling was similar to Abdul-Karim, 81 but instead of a cylinder, the shape model was generalized to a super-Gaussian function of the intensity, which benefits from stronger fitting in the presence of noise. Another approach, developed for computed tomography but with clear application to IVM, is based on the intensity spatial variation found through the derivatives in the directions of rows and columns (the eigenvalues of the Hessian matrix) for the discrimination of structures that resemble vessels; the diameters are then calculated from the maximum direction of change of intensity near the vessels.136

Data from the different optical imaging acquisition technologies described are acquired in the same format; an intensity value i (which is dependent on the number of photons detected, which in turn depends on the presence of a certain structure or concentration of a certain substance on the sample) is assigned to each element of a 5-D matrix or a subset of it. The matrix i(x,y,z,λ,t) describes the intensity as a function of the x,y,z spatial coordinates, λ is the wavelength or frequency and time is t . The spectral decomposition can be obtained with a multispectral camera or simply with a color camera with filters for the red, green, and blue channels.

IVM is being developed in parallel with a number of other sophisticated imaging technologies such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET). Therefore, an immediate challenge is to correlate data that are derived from an individual subject with different acquisition modalities [generating separate matrices i*(x,y,z,t,) ] to provide a detailed and spatially resolved profile of vascular parameters, drug distributions, etc. DSFCs have been modified to be used with a MRI scanner137 to compare parameters such as tumor area, vascular area fraction, and length of large vessels with initial extraction fraction and perfusion per unit tumor volume of the MRI contrast agent gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA). In Sefcik, 138 IVM, microcomputed tomography, and histology were used to assess microvascular remodeling and associated bone healing in vivo in response to the release of the bioactive phospholipid sphingosine 1-phosphate. The potential that may be achieved by combining IVM with genome-wide “-omic” approaches is discussed in Megason and Fraser.139 The matrix i(x,y,z,t,g) is presented as the description of hypothetical subcellular localization patterns for all proteins in the genome, at all developmental times and places, in 3-D within an organism.

While images from IVM can be acquired with high resolutions in a short time, other techniques may require longer times for lower resolutions; therefore it is important to consider the spatiotemporal differences of the datasets while correlating and interpreting them. Another important issue arises from the actual size of the datasets. 5-D sets can easily become too large and complex to be stored, transported, and processed with the current computational resources. A final challenge will be to feed the data extracted from IVM into the mathematical models of tumor angiogenesis that have been developed recently.140 The assumptions and parameter settings that make up these models need to be tested with experimental data before the models can be used to test hypotheses for therapeutically targeting the tumor microcirculation.

12.

Summary

It is clear that IVM approaches have played, and continue to play, a vital role in studies designed to enhance our understanding of tumor vasculature—the molecular mechanisms involved in its development, the multiple structural and functional anomalies that define, it and the changes wrought by various therapeutic approaches. However, there is still much to learn, particularly with regard to molecular control of angiogenesis and acquisition of fully quantifiable data on vascular function, with sufficient spatial and numerical accuracy to allow detection of subtle changes with therapy. To address these gaps in our knowledge, it is necessary to both fully exploit and continue to build on the multiple and fast-moving technological advances in the field of optical imaging, from image and video capture to data analysis. For instance, the full potential of the more recently developed molecular probes has not been realized in IVM studies of tumor vasculature. The expense of modern microscope systems, such as multiphoton fluorescence, has also limited their application in this field. Nevertheless, the availability of these novel tools, combined with the availability of powerful computers for data analysis and storage, guarantees a place for IVM in future investigations of tumor microcirculation. These studies will not be confined to the preclinical arena. Deep-seated human tumors will be accessible to IVM via microendoscopy, and simultaneous application of IVM with other imaging modalities in clinical use, such as MRI and PET, provides an opportunity to maximize the advantages and overcome the disadvantages of each modality. In conclusion, we expect that IVM will continue to play a valuable role in research into tumor microcirculation and make a valuable contribution to the development of cancer treatments designed to target tumor vasculature.

References

1. 

J. Folkman, “Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications,” N. Engl. J. Med., 285 (21), 1182 –1186 (1971). 0028-4793 Google Scholar

2. 

J. Folkman, “Angiogenesis-dependent diseases,” Semin. Oncol., 28 (6), 536 –542 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-7754(01)90021-1 0093-7754 Google Scholar

3. 

J. Folkman, “Role of angiogenesis in tumor growth and metastasis,” Semin. Oncol., 29 (6), 15 –18 (2002). 0093-7754 Google Scholar

4. 

P. Baluk, S. Morikawa, A. Haskell, M. Mancuso, and D. M. McDonald, “Abnormalities of basement membrane on blood vessels and endothelial sprouts in tumors,” Am. J. Pathol., 163 (5), 1801 –1815 (2003). 0002-9440 Google Scholar

5. 

H. F. Dvorak, J. A. Nagy, and A. M. Dvorak, “Structure of solid tumors and their vasculature: implications for therapy with monoclonal antibodies,” Cancer Cells, 3 (3), 77 –85 (1991). 1042-2196 Google Scholar

6. 

H. F. Dvorak, J. A. Nagy, J. T. Dvorak, and A. M. Dvorak, “Identification and characterization of the blood vessels of solid tumors that are leaky to circulating macromolecules,” Am. J. Pathol., 133 (1), 95 –109 (1988). 0002-9440 Google Scholar

7. 

A. Eberhard, S. Kahlert, V. Goede, B. Hemmerlein, K. H. Plate, and H. G. Augustin, “Heterogeneity of angiogenesis and blood vessel maturation in human tumors: implications for antiangiogenic tumor therapies,” Cancer Res., 60 (5), 1388 –1393 (2000). 0008-5472 Google Scholar

8. 

B. S. Sorg, M. E. Hardee, N. Agarwal, B. J. Moeller, and M. W. Dewhirst, “Spectral imaging facilitates visualization and measurements of unstable and abnormal microvascular oxygen transport in tumors,” J. Biomed. Opt., 13 (1), 014026 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2837439 1083-3668 Google Scholar

9. 

D. Fukumura, H. A. Salehi, B. Witwer, R. F. Tuma, R. J. Melder, and R. K. Jain, “Tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced leukocyte adhesion in normal and tumor vessels: effect of tumor type, transplantation site, and host strain,” Cancer Res., 55 (21), 4824 –4829 (1995). 0008-5472 Google Scholar

10. 

M. W. Dewhirst, “Concepts of oxygen transport at the microcirculatory level,” Semin. Radiat. Oncol., 8 143 –150 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4296(98)80040-4 1053-4296 Google Scholar

11. 

L. Baxter and R. Jain, “Transport of fluid and macromolecules in tumors I. Role of interstitial pressure and convection,” Microvasc. Res., 37 77 –104 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-2862(89)90074-5 0026-2862 Google Scholar

12. 

S. J. Lunt, N. Chaudary, and R. P. Hill, “The tumor microenvironment and metastatic disease,” Clin. Exp. Metastasis, 26 (1), 19 –34 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-008-9182-2 0262-0898 Google Scholar

13. 

S. J. Lunt, A. Fyles, R. P. Hill, and M. Milosevic, “Interstitial fluid pressure in tumors: therapeutic barrier and biomarker of angiogenesis,” Future Oncol., 4 (6), 793 –802 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2217/14796694.4.6.793 Google Scholar

14. 

R. A. Cooper, C. M. West, D. P. Wilks, J. P. Logue, S. E. Davidson, S. A. Roberts, and R. D. Hunter, “Tumour vascularity is a significant prognostic factor for cervix carcinoma treated with radiotherapy: independence from tumour radiosensitivity,” Br. J. Cancer, 81 (2), 354 –358 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690700 0007-0920 Google Scholar

15. 

R. A. Cooper, D. P. Wilks, J. P. Logue, S. E. Davidson, R. D. Hunter, S. A. Roberts, and C. M. West, “High tumor angiogenesis is associated with poorer survival in carcinoma of the cervix treated with radiotherapy,” Clin. Cancer Res., 4 (11), 2795 –2800 (1998). 1078-0432 Google Scholar

16. 

G. Bognar, G. Ledniczky, K. E. Toth, P. Ondrejka, and R. Tamas, “Prognostic role of vascularisation and proliferation in rectal cancer with liver metastasis,” Hepatogastroenterol., 56 (90), 367 –371 (2009). Google Scholar

17. 

S. Bosari, A. K. Lee, R. A. DeLellis, B. D. Wiley, G. J. Heatley, and M. L. Silverman, “Microvessel quantitation and prognosis in invasive breast carcinoma,” Hum. Pathol., 23 (7), 755 –761 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0046-8177(92)90344-3 0046-8177 Google Scholar

18. 

E. L. Kaijzel, G. van der Pluijm, and C. W. Lowik, “Whole-body optical imaging in animal models to assess cancer development and progression,” Clin. Cancer Res., 13 (12), 3490 –3497 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0402 1078-0432 Google Scholar

19. 

R. Weissleder and M. J. Pittet, “Imaging in the era of molecular oncology,” Nature (London), 452 (7187), 580 –589 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06917 0028-0836 Google Scholar

20. 

R. J. Viola, J. M. Provenzale, F. Li, C. Y. Li, H. Yuan, J. Tashjian, and M. W. Dewhirst, “In vivo bioluminescence imaging monitoring of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha, a promoter that protects cells, in response to chemotherapy,” AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol., 191 (6), 1779 –1784 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.4060 0361-803X Google Scholar

21. 

T. P. Thomas, J. Y. Ye, Y. C. Chang, A. Kotlyar, Z. Cao, I. J. Majoros, T. B. Norris, and J. R. Baker, “Investigation of tumor cell targeting of a dendrimer nanoparticle using a double-clad optical fiber probe,” J. Biomed. Opt., 13 (1), 014024 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2870105 1083-3668 Google Scholar

22. 

P. Kim, M. Puoris"haag, D. Cote, C. P. Lin, and S. H. Yun, “In vivo confocal and multiphoton microendoscopy,” J. Biomed. Opt., 13 (1), 010501 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2839043 1083-3668 Google Scholar

23. 

C. Y. Li, S. Shan, Q. Huang, R. D. Braun, J. Lanzen, K. Hu, P. Lin, and M. W. Dewhirst, “Initial stages of tumor cell-induced angiogenesis: evaluation via skin window chambers in rodent models,” J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 92 (2), 143 –147 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/92.2.143 0027-8874 Google Scholar

24. 

S. Alexander, G. E. Koehl, M. Hirschberg, E. K. Geissler, and P. Friedl, “Dynamic imaging of cancer growth and invasion: a modified skin-fold chamber model,” Histochem. Cell Biol., 130 (6), 1147 –1154 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-008-0529-1 0948-6143 Google Scholar

25. 

D. Fukumura, L. Xu, Y. Chen, T. Gohongi, B. Seed, and R. K. Jain, “Hypoxia and acidosis independently up-regulate vascular endothelial growth factor transcription in brain tumors in vivo,” Cancer Res., 61 (16), 6020 –6024 (2001). 0008-5472 Google Scholar

26. 

M. W. Dewhirst, Y. Cao, C. Y. Li, and B. Moeller, “Exploring the role of HIF-1 in early angiogenesis and response to radiotherapy,” Radiother. Oncol., 83 (3), 249 –255 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2007.05.016 0167-8140 Google Scholar

27. 

C. C. Reyes-Aldasoro, S. Akerman, and G. M. Tozer, “Measuring the velocity of fluorescently labelled red blood cells with a keyhole tracking algorithm,” J. Microsc., 229 162 –173 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2007.01877.x 0022-2720 Google Scholar

28. 

K. S. Oye, G. Gulati, B. A. Graff, J. V. Gaustad, K. G. Brurberg, and E. K. Rofstad, “A novel method for mapping the heterogeneity in blood supply to normal and malignant tissues in the mouse dorsal window chamber,” Microvasc. Res., 75 (2), 179 –187 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mvr.2007.06.009 0026-2862 Google Scholar

29. 

C. C. Reyes-Aldasoro, I. Wilson, V. E. Prise, P. R. Barber, M. Ameer-Beg, B. Vojnovic, V. J. Cunningham, and G. M. Tozer, “Estimation of apparent tumor vascular permeability from multiphoton fluorescence microscopic images of P22 rat sarcomas in vivo,” Microcirculation (Philadelphia), 15 (1), 65 –79 (2008). 1073-9688 Google Scholar

30. 

G. M. Tozer, S. M. Ameer-Beg, J. Baker, P. R. Barber, S. A. Hill, R. J. Hodgkiss, R. Locke, V. E. Prise, I. Wilson, and B. Vojnovic, “Intravital imaging of tumour vascular networks using multi-photon fluorescence microscopy,” Adv. Drug Delivery Rev., 57 (1), 135 –152 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2004.07.015 0169-409X Google Scholar

31. 

B. N. Giepmans, S. R. Adams, M. H. Ellisman, and R. Y. Tsien, “The fluorescent toolbox for assessing protein location and function,” Science, 312 (5771), 217 –224 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1124618 0036-8075 Google Scholar

32. 

N. C. Shaner, G. H. Patterson, and M. W. Davidson, “Advances in fluorescent protein technology,” J. Cell. Sci., 120 4247 –4260 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.005801 0021-9533 Google Scholar

33. 

L. J. Nugent and R. K. Jain, “Extravascular diffusion in normal and neoplastic tissues,” Cancer Res., 44 (1), 238 –244 (1984). 0008-5472 Google Scholar

34. 

F. Yuan, H. A. Salehi, Y. Boucher, U. S. Vasthare, R. F. Tuma, and R. K. Jain, “Vascular permeability and microcirculation of gliomas and mammary carcinomas transplanted in rat and mouse cranial windows,” Cancer Res., 54 (17), 4564 –4568 (1994). 0008-5472 Google Scholar

35. 

P. Sharma, S. Brown, G. Walter, S. Santra, and B. Moudgil, “Nanoparticles for bioimaging,” Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 123–126 471 –485 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2006.05.026 0001-8686 Google Scholar

36. 

J. Zhang, R. E. Campbell, A. Y. Ting, and R. Y. Tsien, “Creating new fluorescent probes for cell biology,” Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 3 (12), 906 –918 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm976 1471-0072 Google Scholar

37. 

M. Andresen, A. C. Stiel, J. Folling, D. Wenzel, A. Schonle, A. Egner, C. Eggeling, S. W. Hell, and S. Jakobs, “Photoswitchable fluorescent proteins enable monochromatic multilabel imaging and dual color fluorescence nanoscopy,” Nat. Biotechnol., 26 (9), 1035 –1040 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1493 1087-0156 Google Scholar

38. 

G. M. Tozer, S. Akerman, N. A. Cross, P. R. Barber, M. A. Bjorndahl, O. Greco, S. Harris, S. A. Hill, D. J. Honess, C. R. Ireson, K. L. Pettyjohn, V. E. Prise, C. C. Reyes-Aldasoro, C. Ruhrberg, D. T. Shima, and C. Kanthou, “Blood vessel maturation and response to vascular-disrupting therapy in single vascular endothelial growth factor-A isoform-producing tumors,” Cancer Res., 68 (7), 2301 –2311 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2011 0008-5472 Google Scholar

39. 

G. R. Martin and R. K. Jain, “Fluorescence ratio imaging measurement of pH gradients: calibration and application in normal and tumor tissues,” Microvasc. Res., 46 (2), 216 –230 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1006/mvre.1993.1048 0026-2862 Google Scholar

40. 

G. Helmlinger, F. Yuan, M. Dellian, and R. K. Jain, “Interstitial pH and pO2 gradients in solid tumors in vivo: high-resolution measurements reveal a lack of correlation,” Nat. Med., 3 (2), 177 –182 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0297-177 1078-8956 Google Scholar

41. 

X. Michalet, F. F. Pinaud, L. A. Bentolila, J. M. Tsay, S. Doose, J. J. Li, G. Sundaresan, A. M. Wu, S. S. Gambhir, and S. Weiss, “Quantum dots for live cells, in vivo imaging, and diagnostics,” Science, 307 (5709), 538 –544 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1104274 0036-8075 Google Scholar

42. 

M. Stroh, J. P. Zimmer, D. G. Duda, T. S. Levchenko, K. S. Cohen, E. B. Brown, D. T. Scadden, V. P. Torchilin, M. G. Bawendi, D. Fukumura, and R. K. Jain, “Quantum dots spectrally distinguish multiple species within the tumor milieu in vivo,” Nat. Med., 11 (6), 678 –682 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1247 1078-8956 Google Scholar

43. 

F. Zhou, D. Xing, S. Wu, and W. R. Chen, “Intravital imaging of tumor apoptosis with FRET probes during tumor therapy,” Mol. Imaging Biol., 12 (1), 63 –70 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-009-0235-y 1536-1632 Google Scholar

44. 

J. O. McIntyre and L. M. Matrisian, “Optical proteolytic beacons for in vivo detection of matrix metalloproteinase activity,” Methods Mol. Biol., 539 155 –174 (2009). 1064-3745 Google Scholar

45. 

O. Shimomura, F. H. Johnson, and Y. Saiga, “Extraction, purification and properties of aequorin, a bioluminescent protein from the luminous hydromedusan, Aequorea,” J. Cell. Comp. Physiol., 59 223 –239 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.1030590302 0095-9898 Google Scholar

46. 

O. Shimomura, “Discovery of green fluorescent protein (GFP) (Nobel lecture),” Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 48 (31), 5590 –5602 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200902240 0570-0833 Google Scholar

47. 

J. S. Condeelis, J. Wyckoff, and J. E. Segall, “Imaging of cancer invasion and metastasis using green fluorescent protein,” Eur. J. Cancer, 36 (13), 1671 –1680 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(00)00155-6 0959-8049 Google Scholar

48. 

C. Coralli, M. Cemazar, C. Kanthou, G. M. Tozer, and G. U. Dachs, “Limitations of the reporter green fluorescent protein under simulated tumor conditions,” Cancer Res., 61 (12), 4784 –4790 (2001). 0008-5472 Google Scholar

49. 

J. Condeelis and J. E. Segall, “Intravital imaging of cell movement in tumours,” Nat. Rev. Cancer, 3 (12), 921 –930 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1231 1474-175X Google Scholar

50. 

N. C. Shaner, R. E. Campbell, P. A. Steinbach, B. N. Giepmans, A. E. Palmer, and R. Y. Tsien, “Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein,” Nat. Biotechnol., 22 (12), 1567 –1572 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1037 1087-0156 Google Scholar

51. 

S. Graewe, S. Retzlaff, N. Struck, C. J. Janse, and V. T. Heussler, “Going live: a comparative analysis of the suitability of the RFP derivatives RedStar, mCherry and tdTomato for intravital and in vitro live imaging of plasmodium parasites,” Biotechnol. J., 4 (6), 895 –902 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.200900035 Google Scholar

52. 

K. A. Lukyanov, D. M. Chudakov, S. Lukyanov, and V. V. Verkhusha, “Innovation: photoactivatable fluorescent proteins,” Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 6 (11), 885 –891 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1741 1471-0072 Google Scholar

53. 

R. Ando, H. Hama, M. Yamamoto-Hino, H. Mizuno, and A. Miyawaki, “An optical marker based on the UV-induced green-to-red photoconversion of a fluorescent protein,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 99 (20), 12651 –12656 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.202320599 0027-8424 Google Scholar

54. 

G. H. Patterson and J. Lippincott-Schwartz, “A photoactivatable GFP for selective photolabeling of proteins and cells,” Science, 297 (5588), 1873 –1877 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1074952 0036-8075 Google Scholar

55. 

R. Ando, H. Mizuno, and A. Miyawaki, “Regulated fast nucleocytoplasmic shuttling observed by reversible protein highlighting,” Science, 306 (5700), 1370 –1373 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1102506 0036-8075 Google Scholar

56. 

D. M. Chudakov, V. V. Belousov, A. G. Zaraisky, V. V. Novoselov, D. B. Staroverov, D. B. Zorov, S. Lukyanov, and K. A. Lukyanov, “Kindling fluorescent proteins for precise in vivo photolabeling,” Nat. Biotechnol., 21 (2), 191 –194 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt778 1087-0156 Google Scholar

57. 

G. E. Koehl, A. Gaumann, and E. K. Geissler, “Intravital microscopy of tumor angiogenesis and regression in the dorsal skin fold chamber: mechanistic insights and preclinical testing of therapeutic strategies,” Clin. Exp. Metastasis, 26 (4), 329 –344 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-008-9234-7 0262-0898 Google Scholar

58. 

J. Sandison, “A new method for the microscopic study of living growing tissues by the introduction of a transparent chamber in the rabbit’s ear,” Anat. Rec., 28 281 –287 (1924). https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1090280403 0003-276X Google Scholar

59. 

G. Algire, “An adaptation of the transparent chamber technique to the mouse,” J. Natl. Cancer Inst. (1940-1978), 4 1 –11 (1943). 0027-8874 Google Scholar

60. 

M. W. Dewhirst, C. Gustafson, J. F. Gross, and C. Y. Tso, “Temporal effects of 5.0Gy radiation in healing subcutaneous microvasculature of a dorsal flap window chamber,” Radiat. Res., 112 (3), 581 –591 (1987). https://doi.org/10.2307/3577110 0033-7587 Google Scholar

61. 

S. Shan, B. Sorg, and M. W. Dewhirst, “A novel rodent mammary window of orthotopic breast cancer for intravital microscopy,” Microvasc. Res., 65 (2), 109 –117 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-2862(02)00017-1 0026-2862 Google Scholar

62. 

H. Hatakawa, N. Funakoshi, M. Onizuka, K. Yanagi, N. Ohshima, Y. Satoh, T. Yamamoto, and S. Ishikawa, “Blood flow does not correlate with the size of metastasis in our new intravital observation model of Lewis lung cancer,” Microvasc. Res., 64 (1), 32 –37 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1006/mvre.2002.2396 0026-2862 Google Scholar

63. 

N. Funakoshi, M. Onizuka, K. Yanagi, N. Ohshima, M. Tomoyasu, Y. Sato, T. Yamamoto, S. Ishikawa, and T. Mitsui, “A new model of lung metastasis for intravital studies,” Microvasc. Res., 59 (3), 361 –367 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1006/mvre.2000.2238 0026-2862 Google Scholar

64. 

Y. Tsuzuki, C. Mouta Carreira, M. Bockhorn, L. Xu, R. K. Jain, and D. Fukumura, “Pancreas microenvironment promotes VEGF expression and tumor growth: novel window models for pancreatic tumor angiogenesis and microcirculation,” Lab. Invest., 81 (10), 1439 –1451 (2001). 0023-6837 Google Scholar

65. 

W. L. Monsky, C. Mouta Carreira, Y. Tsuzuki, T. Gohongi, D. Fukumura, and R. K. Jain, “Role of host microenvironment in angiogenesis and microvascular functions in human breast cancer xenografts: mammary fat pad versus cranial tumors,” Clin. Cancer Res., 8 (4), 1008 –1013 (2002). 1078-0432 Google Scholar

66. 

K. Norrby, A. Jakobsson, and J. Sorbo, “Quantitative angiogenesis in spreads of intact rat mesenteric windows,” Microvasc. Res., 39 (3), 341 –348 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-2862(90)90047-U 0026-2862 Google Scholar

67. 

G. Szczesny, A. Veihelmann, S. Massberg, D. Nolte, and K. Messmer, “Long-term anaesthesia using inhalatory isoflurane in different strains of mice-the haemodynamic effects,” Lab Anim., 38 (1), 64 –69 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1258/00236770460734416 0023-6772 Google Scholar

68. 

H. Tada, H. Higuchi, T. M. Wanatabe, and N. Ohuchi, “In vivo real-time tracking of single quantum dots conjugated with monoclonal anti-HER2 antibody in tumors of mice,” Cancer Res., 67 (3), 1138 –1144 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1185 0008-5472 Google Scholar

69. 

Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy, 251 –256 3rd ed.Springer, New York (2006). Google Scholar

70. 

P. Falus, M. A. Borthwick, and S. G. J. Mochrie, “Fast CCD camera for x-ray photon correlation spectroscopy and time-resolved x-ray scattering and imaging,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 75 (11), 4383 –4400 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1808913 0034-6748 Google Scholar

71. 

J. T. Bosiers, I. M. Peters, C. Draijer, and A. Theuwissen, “Technical challenges and recent progress in CCD imagers,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 565 (1), 148 –156 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2006.05.033 0168-9002 Google Scholar

72. 

M. Bigas, E. Cabruja, J. Forest, and J. Salvi, “Review oif CMOS image sensors,” Microelectron. J., 37 433 –451 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mejo.2005.07.002 0026-2692 Google Scholar

73. 

G. Sluder and D. E. Wolf, “Digital microscopy,” Methods in Cell Biology, 72 2nd ed.Academic Press, San Diego, CA (2003). Google Scholar

74. 

G. Sluder and D. E. Wolf, Video Microscopy, 334 1st ed.Academic Press, San Diego, CA (1998). Google Scholar

75. 

K. Asaishi, B. Endrich, A. Gotz, and K. Messmer, “Quantitative analysis of microvascular structure and function in the amelanotic melanoma A-Mel-3,” Cancer Res., 41 (5), 1898 –1904 (1981). 0008-5472 Google Scholar

76. 

B. Endrich, M. Intaglietta, H. S. Reinhold, and J. F. Gross, “Hemodynamic characteristics in microcirculatory blood channels during early tumor growth,” Cancer Res., 39 (1), 17 –23 (1979). 0008-5472 Google Scholar

77. 

Angiogenesis: An Integrative Approach From Science to Medicine, 601 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, Berlin (2008). Google Scholar

78. 

P. R. Barber, B. Vojnovic, S. M. Ameer-Beg, R. J. Hodgkiss, G. M. Tozer, and J. Wilson, “Semi-automated software for the three-dimensional delineation of complex vascular networks,” J. Microsc., 211 54 –62 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2818.2003.01205.x 0022-2720 Google Scholar

79. 

G. M. Tozer, V. E. Prise, J. Wilson, M. Cemazar, S. Shan, M. W. Dewhirst, P. R. Barber, B. Vojnovic, and D. J. Chaplin, “Mechanisms associated with tumor vascular shut-down induced by combretastatin A-4 phosphate: intravital microscopy and measurement of vascular permeability,” Cancer Res., 61 (17), 6413 –6422 (2001). 0008-5472 Google Scholar

80. 

M. E. Hardee, Y. Cao, P. Fu, X. Jiang, Y. Zhao, Z. N. Rabbani, Z. Vujaskovic, M. W. Dewhirst, and M. O. Arcasoy, “Erythropoietin blockade inhibits the induction of tumor angiogenesis and progression,” PLoS ONE, 2 (6), e549 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000549 1932-6203 Google Scholar

81. 

M. A. Abdul-Karim, K. Al-Kofahi, E. B. Brown, R. K. Jain, and B. Roysam, “Automated tracing and change analysis of angiogenic vasculature from in vivo multiphoton confocal image time series,” Microvasc. Res., 66 (2), 113 –125 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-2862(03)00039-6 0026-2862 Google Scholar

82. 

J. A. Tyrrell, V. Mahadevan, R. T. Tong, E. B. Brown, R. K. Jain, and B. Roysam, “A 2-D/3-D model-based method to quantify the complexity of microvasculature imaged by in vivo multiphoton microscopy,” Microvasc. Res., 70 (3), 165 –178 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mvr.2005.08.005 0026-2862 Google Scholar

83. 

G. M. Tozer, V. E. Prise, and V. J. Cunningham, “Quantitative estimation of tissue blood flow rate,” Methods Mol. Biol., 467 271 –286 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-241-0_16 1064-3745 Google Scholar

84. 

J. C. Waters, “Accuracy and precision in quantitative fluorescence microscopy,” J. Cell Biol., 185 (7), 1135 –1148 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200903097 0021-9525 Google Scholar

85. 

K. G. Brurberg, J. V. Gaustad, C. S. Mollatt, and E. K. Rofstad, “Temporal heterogeneity in blood supply in human tumor xenografts,” Neoplasia, 10 (7), 727 –735 (2008). 1522-8002 Google Scholar

86. 

R. K. Jain, “Delivery of novel therapeutic agents in tumors: physiological barriers and strategies,” J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 81 (8), 570 –576 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/81.8.570 0027-8874 Google Scholar

87. 

G. M. Tozer, C. Kanthou, and B. C. Baguley, “Disrupting tumour blood vessels,” Nat. Rev. Cancer, 5 (6), 423 –435 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1628 1474-175X Google Scholar

88. 

F. Yuan, M. Dellian, D. Fukumura, M. Leunig, D. A. Berk, V. P. Torchilin, and R. K. Jain, “Vascular permeability in a human tumor xenograft: molecular size dependence and cutoff size,” Cancer Res., 55 (17), 3752 –3756 (1995). 0008-5472 Google Scholar

89. 

L. E. Gerlowski and R. K. Jain, “Microvascular permeability of normal and neoplastic tissues,” Microvasc. Res., 31 (3), 288 –305 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-2862(86)90018-X 0026-2862 Google Scholar

90. 

N. Z. Wu, B. Klitzman, G. Rosner, D. Needham, and M. W. Dewhirst, “Measurement of material extravasation in microvascular networks using fluorescence video-microscopy,” Microvasc. Res., 46 (2), 231 –253 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1006/mvre.1993.1049 0026-2862 Google Scholar

91. 

H. C. Lichtenbeld, F. Yuan, C. C. Michel, and R. K. Jain, “Perfusion of single tumor microvessels: application to vascular permeability measurement,” Microcirculation (Philadelphia), 3 (4), 349 –357 (1996). 1073-9688 Google Scholar

92. 

M. R. Dreher, W. Liu, C. R. Michelich, M. W. Dewhirst, F. Yuan, and A. Chilkoti, “Tumor vascular permeability, accumulation, and penetration of macromolecular drug carriers,” J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 98 (5), 335 –344 (2006). 0027-8874 Google Scholar

93. 

S. K. Hobbs, W. L. Monsky, F. Yuan, W. G. Roberts, L. Griffith, V. P. Torchilin, and R. K. Jain, “Regulation of transport pathways in tumor vessels: role of tumor type and microenvironment,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 95 (8), 4607 –4612 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.8.4607 0027-8424 Google Scholar

94. 

K. Jacobson, Z. Derzko, E. S. Wu, Y. Hou, and G. Poste, “Measurement of the lateral mobility of cell surface components in single, living cells by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching,” J. Supramol Struct., 5 (4), 565(417) –576(428) (1976). https://doi.org/10.1002/jss.400050411 0091-7419 Google Scholar

95. 

V. P. Chauhan, R. M. Lanning, B. Diop-Frimpong, W. Mok, E. B. Brown, T. P. Padera, Y. Boucher, and R. K. Jain, “Multiscale measurements distinguish cellular and interstitial hindrances to diffusion in vivo,” Biophys. J., 97 (1), 330 –336 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2009.03.064 0006-3495 Google Scholar

96. 

S. R. Chary and R. K. Jain, “Direct measurement of interstitial convection and diffusion of albumin in normal and neoplastic tissues by fluorescence photobleaching,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 86 (14), 5385 –5389 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.86.14.5385 0027-8424 Google Scholar

97. 

M. W. Dewhirst, E. T. Ong, R. D. Braun, B. Smith, B. Klitzman, S. M. Evans, and D. Wilson, “Quantification of longitudinal tissue pO2 gradients in window chamber tumours: impact on tumour hypoxia,” Br. J. Cancer, 79 (11–12), 1717 –1722 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690273 0007-0920 Google Scholar

98. 

Y. Cao, C. Y. Li, B. J. Moeller, D. Yu, Y. Zhao, M. R. Dreher, S. Shan, and M. W. Dewhirst, “Observation of incipient tumor angiogenesis that is independent of hypoxia and hypoxia inducible factor-1 activation,” Cancer Res., 65 (13), 5498 –5505 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4553 0008-5472 Google Scholar

99. 

G. Cernaianu, S. Frank, K. Erbstosser, S. Leonhardt, M. Cross, Z. McIvor, G. Scholz, T. Dansranjavin, I. Celik, A. Tannapfel, C. Wittekind, R. B. Troebs, K. Rothe, J. Bennek, J. Hauss, and H. Witzigmann, “TNP-470 fails to block the onset of angiogenesis and early tumor establishment in an intravital minimal disease model,” Int. J. Colorectal Dis., 21 (2), 143 –154 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-005-0751-4 0179-1958 Google Scholar

100. 

M. Czabanka, M. Vinci, F. Heppner, A. Ullrich, and P. Vajkoczy, “Effects of sunitinib on tumor hemodynamics and delivery of chemotherapy,” Inhaled Part, 124 (6), 1293 –1300 (2009). 0301-1577 Google Scholar

101. 

R. T. Tong, Y. Boucher, S. V. Kozin, F. Winkler, D. J. Hicklin, and R. K. Jain, “Vascular normalization by vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 blockade induces a pressure gradient across the vasculature and improves drug penetration in tumors,” Cancer Res., 64 (11), 3731 –3736 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0074 0008-5472 Google Scholar

102. 

K. J. Williams, B. A. Telfer, A. M. Shannon, M. Babur, I. J. Stratford, and S. R. Wedge, “Combining radiotherapy with AZD2171, a potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor signaling: pathophysiologic effects and therapeutic benefit,” Mol. Cancer Ther., 6 (2), 599 –606 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0508 Google Scholar

103. 

D. Fukumura and R. K. Jain, “Imaging angiogenesis and the microenvironment,” APMIS, 116 (7–8), 695 –715 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0463.2008.01148.x 0903-4641 Google Scholar

104. 

D. M. McDonald and P. L. Choyke, “Imaging of angiogenesis: from microscope to clinic,” Nat. Med., 9 (6), 713 –725 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0603-713 1078-8956 Google Scholar

105. 

K. Norman, “Techniques: Intravital microscopy—a method for investigating disseminated intravascular coagulation?,” Trends Pharmacol. Sci., 26 (6), 327 –332 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2005.04.002 0165-6147 Google Scholar

106. 

V. Prasad, D. Semwogerere, and E. R. Weeks, “Confocal microscopy of colloids,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 19 (11), 113102 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/19/11/113102 0953-8984 Google Scholar

107. 

Y. S. Chang, E. di Tomaso, D. M. McDonald, R. Jones, R. K. Jain, and L. L. Munn, “Mosaic blood vessels in tumors: frequency of cancer cells in contact with flowing blood,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 97 (26), 14608 –14613 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.26.14608 0027-8424 Google Scholar

108. 

P. Vajkoczy, M. Farhadi, A. Gaumann, R. Heidenreich, R. Erber, A. Wunder, J. C. Tonn, M. D. Menger, and G. Breier, “Microtumor growth initiates angiogenic sprouting with simultaneous expression of VEGF, VEGF receptor-2, and angiopoietin-2,” J. Clin. Invest., 109 (6), 777 –785 (2002). 0021-9738 Google Scholar

109. 

E. B. Brown, R. B. Campbell, Y. Tsuzuki, L. Xu, P. Carmeliet, D. Fukumura, and R. K. Jain, “In vivo measurement of gene expression, angiogenesis and physiological function in tumors using multiphoton laser scanning microscopy,” Nat. Med., 7 (7), 864 –868 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/89997 1078-8956 Google Scholar

110. 

M. P. S. Dunphy, D. Entenberg, R. Toledo-Crow, and S. M. Larson, “In vivo microcartography and subcellular imaging of tumor angiogenesis: A novel platform for translational angiogenesis research,” Microvasc. Res., 78 (1), 51 –56 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mvr.2009.03.008 0026-2862 Google Scholar

111. 

A. Nakano, “Spinning-disk confocal microscopy—a cutting-edge tool for imaging of membrane traffic,” Cell Struct. Funct, 27 (5), 349 –355 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1247/csf.27.349 0386-7196 Google Scholar

112. 

A. Boyde, G. Capasso, and R. J. Unwin, “Conventional and confocal epi-reflection and fluorescence microscopy of the rat kidney in vivo,” Exp. Nephrol., 6 (5), 398 –408 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1159/000020548 1018-7782 Google Scholar

113. 

P. Kolman, A. Pica, N. Carvou, A. Boyde, S. Cockcroft, A. Loesch, A. Pizzey, M. Simeoni, G. Capasso, and R. J. Unwin, “Insulin uptake across the luminal membrane of the rat proximal tubule in vivo and in vitro,” Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol., 296 (5), F1227 –1237 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.90351.2008 Google Scholar

114. 

W. Denk, J. H. Strickler, and W. W. Webb, “Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy,” Science, 248 (4951), 73 –76 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2321027 0036-8075 Google Scholar

115. 

E. di Tomaso, N. London, D. Fuja, J. Logie, J. A. Tyrrell, W. Kamoun, L. L. Munn, and R. K. Jain, “PDGF-C induces maturation of blood vessels in a model of glioblastoma and attenuates the response to anti-VEGF treatment,” PLoS ONE, 4 (4), e5123 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005123 1932-6203 Google Scholar

116. 

B. R. Masters and P. T. So, “Antecedents of two-photon excitation laser scanning microscopy,” Microsc. Res. Tech., 63 (1), 3 –11 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.10418 1059-910X Google Scholar

117. 

W. Denk and K. Svoboda, “Photon upmanship: why multiphoton imaging is more than a gimmick,” Neuron, 18 (3), 351 –357 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81237-4 0896-6273 Google Scholar

118. 

R. M. Williams, W. R. Zipfel, and W. W. Webb, “Multiphoton microscopy in biological research,” Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 5 (5), 603 –608 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1367-5931(00)00241-6 1367-5931 Google Scholar

119. 

E. Brown, T. McKee, E. diTomaso, A. Pluen, B. Seed, Y. Boucher, and R. K. Jain, “Dynamic imaging of collagen and its modulation in tumors in vivo using second-harmonic generation,” Nat. Med., 9 (6), 796 –800 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm879 1078-8956 Google Scholar

120. 

R. K. Jain, N. Safabakhsh, A. Sckell, Y. Chen, P. Jiang, L. Benjamin, F. Yuan, and E. Keshet, “Endothelial cell death, angiogenesis, and microvascular function after castration in an androgen-dependent tumor: role of vascular endothelial growth factor,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 95 (18), 10820 –10825 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.18.10820 0027-8424 Google Scholar

121. 

D. Fukumura, R. Xavier, T. Sugiura, Y. Chen, E. C. Park, N. Lu, M. Selig, G. Nielsen, T. Taksir, R. K. Jain, and B. Seed, “Tumor induction of VEGF promoter activity in stromal cells,” Cell, 94 (6), 715 –725 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81731-6 0092-8674 Google Scholar

122. 

R. Gillies, J. E. Freeman, L. C. Cancio, D. Brand, M. Hopmeier, and J. R. Mansfield, “Systemic effects of shock and resuscitation monitored by visible hyperspectral imaging,” Diabetes Technol. Ther., 5 (5), 847 –855 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1089/152091503322527058 1520-9156 Google Scholar

123. 

R. D. Shonat, E. S. Wachman, W. Niu, A. P. Koretsky, and D. L. Farkas, “Near-simultaneous hemoglobin saturation and oxygen tension maps in mouse brain using an AOTF microscope,” Biophys. J., 73 (3), 1223 –1231 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78155-4 0006-3495 Google Scholar

124. 

S. P. Nighswander-Rempel, R. Anthony Shaw, J. R. Mansfield, M. Hewko, V. V. Kupriyanov, and H. H. Mantsch, “Regional variations in myocardial tissue oxygenation mapped by near-infrared spectroscopic imaging,” J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol., 34 (9), 1195 –1203 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1006/jmcc.2002.2058 0022-2828 Google Scholar

125. 

B. S. Sorg, B. J. Moeller, O. Donovan, Y. Cao, and M. W. Dewhirst, “Hyperspectral imaging of hemoglobin saturation in tumor microvasculature and tumor hypoxia development,” J. Biomed. Opt., 10 (4), 44004 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2003369 1083-3668 Google Scholar

126. 

J. Fingler, D. Schwartz, C. Yang, and S. E. Fraser, “Mobility and transverse flow visualization using phase variance contrast with spectral domain optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Express, 15 (20), 12636 –12653 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.15.012636 1094-4087 Google Scholar

127. 

A. Mariampillai, B. A. Standish, E. H. Moriyama, M. Khurana, N. R. Munce, M. K. Leung, J. Jiang, A. Cable, B. C. Wilson, I. A. Vitkin, and V. X. Yang, “Speckle variance detection of microvasculature using swept-source optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett., 33 (13), 1530 –1532 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.33.001530 0146-9592 Google Scholar

128. 

J. M. Schmitt, “Optical coherence tomography (OCT): a review,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 5 (4), 1205 –1215 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1109/2944.796348 1077-260X Google Scholar

129. 

A. F. Fercher, W. Drexler, C. K. Hitzenberger, and T. Lasser, “Optical coherence tomography—principles and applications,” Rep. Prog. Phys., 66 (2), 239 –303 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/66/2/204 0034-4885 Google Scholar

130. 

D. Huang, E. A. Swanson, C. P. Lin, J. S. Schuman, W. G. Stinson, W. Chang, M. R. Hee, T. Flotte, K. Gregory, C. A. Puliafito, and A. Et, “Optical coherence tomography,” Science, 254 (5035), 1178 –1181 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1957169 0036-8075 Google Scholar

131. 

B. A. Standish, K. K. Lee, X. Jin, A. Mariampillai, N. R. Munce, M. F. Wood, B. C. Wilson, I. A. Vitkin, and V. X. Yang, “Interstitial Doppler optical coherence tomography as a local tumor necrosis predictor in photodynamic therapy of prostatic carcinoma: an in vivo study,” Cancer Res., 68 (23), 9987 –9995 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1128 0008-5472 Google Scholar

132. 

B. J. Vakoc, R. M. Lanning, J. A. Tyrrell, T. P. Padera, L. A. Bartlett, T. Stylianopoulos, L. L. Munn, G. J. Tearney, D. Fukumura, R. K. Jain, and B. E. Bouma, “Three-dimensional microscopy of the tumor microenvironment in vivo using optical frequency domain imaging,” Nat. Med., 15 (10), 1219 –1223 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.1971 1078-8956 Google Scholar

133. 

S. Yun, G. Tearney, J. de Boer, N. Iftimia, and B. Bouma, “High-speed optical frequency-domain imaging,” Opt. Express, 11 (22), 2953 –2963 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.11.002953 1094-4087 Google Scholar

134. 

S. H. Yun, G. J. Tearney, B. J. Vakoc, M. Shishkov, W. Y. Oh, A. E. Desjardins, M. J. Suter, R. C. Chan, J. A. Evans, I. K. Jang, N. S. Nishioka, J. F. de Boer, and B. E. Bouma, “Comprehensive volumetric optical microscopy in vivo,” Nat. Med., 12 (12), 1429 –1433 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1450 1078-8956 Google Scholar

135. 

M. C. Skala, A. Fontanella, H. Hendargo, M. W. Dewhirst, and J. A. Izatt, “Combined hyperspectral and spectral domain optical coherence tomography microscope for noninvasive hemodynamic imaging,” Opt. Lett., 34 (3), 289 –291 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.34.000289 0146-9592 Google Scholar

136. 

K. Krissian, G. Malandain, N. Ayache, R. Vaillant, and Y. Trousset, “Model-based detection of tubular structures in 3D images,” Comput. Vis. Image Underst., 80 (2), 130 –171 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1006/cviu.2000.0866 1077-3142 Google Scholar

137. 

J. V. Gaustad, K. G. Brurberg, T. G. Simonsen, C. S. Mollatt, and E. K. Rofstad, “Tumor vascularity assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and intravital microscopy imaging,” Neoplasia, 10 (4), 354 –362 (2008). 1522-8002 Google Scholar

138. 

L. S. Sefcik, C. E. Petrie Aronin, K. A. Wieghaus, and E. A. Botchwey, “Sustained release of sphingosine 1-phosphate for therapeutic arteriogenesis and bone tissue engineering,” Biomaterials, 29 (19), 2869 –2877 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.017 0142-9612 Google Scholar

139. 

S. G. Megason and S. E. Fraser, “Imaging in systems biology,” Cell, 130 (5), 784 –795 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.031 0092-8674 Google Scholar

140. 

M. A. Chaplain, S. R. McDougall, and A. R. Anderson, “Mathematical modeling of tumor-induced angiogenesis,” Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 8 233 –257 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bioeng.8.061505.095807 1523-9829 Google Scholar

141. 

M. Tomura, N. Yoshida, J. Tanaka, S. Karasawa, Y. Miwa, A. Miyawaki, and O. Kanagawa, “Monitoring cellular movement in vivo with photoconvertible fluorescence protein “Kaede” transgenic mice,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 105 (31), 10871 –10876 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0802278105 0027-8424 Google Scholar
©(2010) Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
Sarah Jane Lunt, C. Gray, Constantino Carlos Reyes Aldasoro, Stephen J. Matcher, and Gillian M. Tozer "Application of intravital microscopy in studies of tumor microcirculation," Journal of Biomedical Optics 15(1), 011113 (1 January 2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3281674
Published: 1 January 2010
JOURNAL ARTICLE
14 PAGES


SHARE
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back to Top