Translator Disclaimer
1 March 2010 Transverse flow imaging based on photoacoustic Doppler bandwidth broadening
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
We propose a new method to measure transverse flow velocity based on photoacoustic Doppler bandwidth broadening, which is determined by the geometry of the probe-beam and the velocity of the transverse flow. By exploiting pulsed laser excitation and raster motor scanning, three-dimensional structure and flow velocity can be imaged simultaneously. In addition, the flow direction can be determined with bidirectional scanning. In a flowing suspension of red-dyed microspheres (diameter: 6 μm), transverse flow speeds ranging from 0 to 2.5 mm/s as well as flow direction were measured. A cross-sectional flow image was also obtained with the tube laid in a zigzag pattern.

1.

Introduction

Combining the spatial resolution of ultrasound (US) imaging with the contrast of optical absorption in deep biological tissues, photoacoustic (PA) imaging has been widely used in high-sensitivity structural and functional imaging with micrometer-scale spatial resolution.1, 2, 3, 4 It has also shown the potential for measuring blood flow.5, 6, 7 Previously, PA Doppler (PAD) shift was observed from flowing particles illuminated by an intensity-modulated continuous-wave (CW) laser beam.5, 6 This physical phenomenon provides a basis for PAD flowmetry in optically scattering media.5 The PAD frequency shift is composed of two parts. The first part is the frequency shift of the photon density wave, which describes the propagation of light intensity in scattering media, “seen” by the particle as a moving receiver; the second part is the frequency shift of the resultant PA wave seen by the ultrasonic transducer, where the particle works as a moving source. Usually only the second part is detectable because the wavelength of the photon density wave is much longer than that of the PA wave.5 For a Gaussian laser pulse with full width of half maximum of 7ns , the wavelength of the photon density wave is 60cm in biological tissue,8 while the wavelength of the PA wave detected by a ultrasonic transducer with central frequency of 75MHz is only 30μm . Compared to other scattering-based Doppler flowmetries, such as optical Doppler tomography9 and US Doppler,10 PAD-based flowmetry benefits from less background noise.5, 6 Moreover, PAD is independent of the illumination angle5 and free of speckles.11 In the previous works,5, 6 Doppler frequency shift was computed using the fast Fourier transformation (FFT). However, the sensitivity of this method depends mainly on the FFT time window, which limited the three-dimensional imaging speed.12 Furthermore, because a CW excitation source was used without frequency chirping, depth could not be resolved. Like the other flowmetries based on the Doppler frequency shift,12, 13, 14, 15 PAD flowmetry was sensitive to the Doppler flow angle. In PA imaging of microvascular networks, the imaging depth is shallow and the transverse component of the flow is sometimes dominant.2 When the Doppler angle approaches 90deg , the PAD frequency shift almost vanishes. Previous works in the fields of optical coherence tomography and US imaging have demonstrated the feasibility of using the Doppler bandwidth broadening to provide quantitative information on transverse flow.9, 10, 16 However, in those works the flow direction could not be determined due to the symmetry of the optical objective or ultrasonic transducer. In the current work, we propose a method to measure both the transverse flow speed based on PAD bandwidth broadening and the flow direction based on bidirectional scanning.

2.

Method and Material

2.1.

Experimental Setup

The optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy (OR-PAM) system used in this work has been described in detail previously [Fig. 1 ].2 Briefly, a dye laser (CBR-D, Sirah) pumped by a Nd:YLF laser (INNOSAB, Edgewave, 523nm ) was used as the irradiation source with a repetition rate of 1724Hz . The laser energy delivered to the sample surface was 100nJ . Ultrasonic detection was achieved through a spherically focused ultrasonic transducer (V2012-BC, Panametrics-NDT, focal spot size: 27μm ) with a center frequency of 75MHz and a round-trip 6-dB bandwidth of 80%, placed confocally with the optical objective. A volumetric image was generated by recording the time-resolved PA signal (A-line) at each horizontal location of the two-dimensional raster scan driven by a high-resolution motor at a speed of 1.1mms .

Fig. 1

(a) Schematic of the OR-PAM setup and (b) probe-beam geometry for the transverse flow measurement.

021304_1_008002jbo1.jpg

2.2.

Method

Sources of broadening include geometry, transit time, Brownian motion, velocity gradient, and turbulence.5, 9 The contribution of Brownian motion to the overall broadening has been shown to be small and consequently neglected.17 The contributions of the velocity gradient and turbulence can be minimized if the spatial resolution is high enough. The contributions of transit time and geometry are equivalent within the focal region18, 19 and can be derived either from diffraction theory or beam-to-flow ray theory.10 In most PA imaging systems, the acoustic focus is much smaller than the optical focus. Because the bandwidth broadening caused by illumination is negligible, the Doppler bandwidth is determined by the two extreme PA rays emanating from a particle moving through the focal point and received by the edges of the transducer, as shown in Fig. 1.

The Doppler bandwidth, Bd , is given by9

Eq. 1

Bd=fL2fL1=2f0vcsinθsinφf0vcWFsinθ,
where v is the flow velocity, c is the speed of sound, θ is the Doppler angle, φ is the aperture angle of the acoustic lens, and f0 , W , and F are the center frequency, the diameter, and the focus length of the ultrasonic transducer, respectively. The Doppler bandwidth is proportional to the transverse flow and is maximized when the Doppler angle is 90deg . The derivation of Eq. 1 is illustrated in Fig. 1. The projections of the transverse flow velocity on lines L1 and L2 contribute to the Doppler shift in opposite signs, which results in bandwidth broadening.

Because the resultant PA wave induced by pulse-laser excitation was wideband, we used the standard deviation of the sequential A-line scans to estimate the Doppler bandwidth broadening (Fig. 2 ).20, 21 The digitized PA signal p(t) was first passed through a digital bandpass filter (center frequency: 75 MHz; 3-dB bandwidth: 1 MHz) to increase the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The complex function p̃(t) was determined by the Hilbert transformation from p(t) . The Doppler bandwidth broadening is given by22

Eq. 2

Bd=kT(1|j=1np̃jp̃j+1*|j=1np̃jp̃j*)12,
where T is the time interval between sequential A-scans, n is the number of sequential scans used to compute the standard deviation, and k is an experimentally determined constant scale factor associated with the special confocal configuration of the OR-PAM system, where the optical focus is smaller than the acoustic focus.20, 21 Four A-scans were used in our study. The structural information was provided by the envelope amplitude of each A-scan, and the flow information was provided by the Doppler bandwidth broadening computed from sequential A-scans.

Fig. 2

Sequential A-scans used to calculate the Doppler bandwidth broadening.

021304_1_008002jbo2.jpg

In the current imaging system, the sample was translated by the scanning motor. Hence, the Doppler bandwidth broadening was actually determined by the combination of the flow velocity and the motor scanning velocity (Fig. 3 ). Therefore, a bidirectional scanning was used to determine the flow direction. The motor first scanned with velocity vm+ , and then switched to velocity vmvm has the same value as vm+ but in the opposite direction. The measured flow speeds under the two scanning directions are given by the combination speeds of the flow and the motor as follows:

3.

vf_m+=(vf2+vm2+2vfvmcosϕ)12
vf_m=(vf2+vm22vfvmcosϕ)12,
where vf_m+ and vf_m are the measured speeds with motor-scanning velocities vm+ and vm , respectively; vm is the motor scanning speed; ϕ is the angle between vm+ and the flow velocity vf , and |cosϕ| can be provided by structural PA imaging. Solving for the flow speed gives

Eq. 4

vf=22(vf_m+2+vf_m22vm2)12.
If vf_m+> vf_m , we get ϕ<90deg and vice versa. Therefore, the flow direction can be determined. In case that vf_m+=vf_m , which means that the flow is perpendicular to the motor-scanning direction, the flow direction can be determined at other positions, because the flow path is usually nonlinear.

Fig. 3

Bidirectional scanning to determine the flow direction.

021304_1_008002jbo3.jpg

A straight capillary tube (inner diameter: 260μm ; Dow corning, Midland, Michigan) and a 0.1% solution of red-dyed particles (mean diameter: 6.0μm ; diameter standard deviation: 0.6μm ; peak absorption wavelength: 512nm ; Polysciences, Warrington, Pennsylvania) were used to study the dependence of the Doppler bandwidth on the flow velocity. The flow with speeds for 02.5mms was controlled by a 1-mL syringe driven by a syringe pump and illuminated at 570nm . The relatively low speeds used here are limited by the laser repetition rate. Although the scan angle can be generalized, in this instance, the bidirectional scanning was along the tube (ϕ=0deg) . The flow direction was the same as vm+ . The red-dyed particle is chosen here because its absorption spectrum can be covered by the current laser system. For real biomedical applications, contrast agents that have peak absorption within the near-infrared range should be used to decrease the background signal from blood.

A tube laid in a zigzag pattern was used to get the structural and flow information, simultaneously. The flow speed was set to be 1.3mms , and the flow direction varied from segment to segment. Three adjacent segments of the tube, denoted as S1 , S2 , and S3 in Fig. 4 , were imaged. The bidirectional scanning was along the longitudinal axis of these segments. The flow directions in S1 and S3 were the same as vm+ while the flow direction in S2 was the same as vm .

Fig. 4

(a) Doppler bandwidth as a function of flow velocity with a bidirectional motor scanning speed of 1.1mms and Doppler angle of 90deg . The motor scanning direction was either the same as the flow direction ( vm+ , square) or opposite to the flow direction ( vm , triangle). Solid curves, theoretical predictions fitted with Eq. 2. Error bar, standard error. (b) Doppler bandwidth flow profiles at flow velocities of 2.3mms (circle) and 1.6mms (square), after subtraction of the contribution of the motor scanning. Solid curves, fitted parabolic flow profiles.

021304_1_008002jbo4.jpg

3.

Results

In the first experiment, we extracted the data from the center of the capillary (Fig. 5 , θ90deg ). When the flow velocity was zero, the bandwidth broadening was caused only by the motor scanning, no matter the scanning direction. When the scanning was in the same direction as the flow ( vm+ , square), the bandwidth increased as the flow speed increased. When the scanning was opposite to the flow ( vm , triangle), the bandwidth first decreased as the flow speed increased. However, when the flow speed exceeded the scanning speed, the bandwidth began to increase. The turning point indicated the motor-scanning speed vm . After subtraction of the contribution of the motor scanning, the bandwidth profiles at the speeds of 2.3mms (circle) and 1.6mms (square) are shown in Fig. 5. A parabolic flow model was used to fit the experimental results (solid curves). Data points on the bottom half of the capillary tube (right side of the plot) were fewer than on the upper half, because light penetration was limited.

Fig. 5

(a) A transmission optical microscopy image of three adjacent segments of a tube laid in a zigzag pattern. The flow directions in S1 and S3 were the same as vm+ , and the flow direction in S2 was the same as vm . (b) A cross section of the structural image. The approximate position of the cross section is indicated by the dashed line in (a). The scale bar for (b)–(e) is shown in (b). (c) The Doppler bandwidth image when the motor scanned in vm+ . (d) The Doppler bandwidth image when the motor scanned in vm . (e) The Doppler bandwidth image after subtraction of the contribution of the motor scanning. The positive flow (with the same direction as vm+ ) is shown in red, and the negative flow (with the same direction as vm ) is shown in blue. (f) The speed profile indicated by the dashed line in (e). (Color online only.)

021304_1_008002jbo5.jpg

For the flow imaging experiment, one cross section of the PA structural image is shown in Fig. 4, and the approximate position of the cross section is indicated by the dashed line in Fig. 4. The measured Doppler bandwidths when the motor scanned in vm+ and vm were quantified, as shown in Figs. 4 and 4, respectively. Because the flow directions in S1 and S3 were the same as vm+ , and the flow direction in S2 was opposite to vm+ , the measured Doppler bandwidth in S1 and S3 was greater than that in S2 when the motor scanned in vm+ [Fig. 4]. For the same reason, the measured Doppler bandwidth in S1 and S3 was smaller than that in S2 when the motor scanned in vm [Fig. 4]. After subtraction of the contribution of the motor scanning, the Doppler bandwidth in all three segments became similar [Fig. 4], which means that the flow speed within the tube was consistent. The positive flow (with the same direction as vm+ ) is shown in red, and the negative flow (with the same direction as vm ) is shown in blue. The negative bandwidth is only used to indicate the flow direction. The calculated flow profile indicated by the dashed line in Fig. 4 is shown in Fig. 4. At the boundary of the tube, the particle density and the flow speed were relatively low, which resulted in instability in the calculation (see the corresponding volumetric rendering in Video 1 ). The signal from the tube wall also contributed to the calculation error.

Video 1

A volumetric visualization of the Doppler bandwidth image of the tube. (QuickTime 8.54 MB).

021304_1_008002jbov1.jpg
10.1117/1.3339953.1

4.

Discussion

Transverse flow velocity measured by the Doppler bandwidth method is related to the M-mode method, because both methods deal with the transit time of particles.7 One difference is that the M-mode method has to “see” the entire trace of the particle movement, but the bandwidth method does not. Another difference is that the M-mode method is sensitive to the particle size, but the Doppler bandwidth method is not. This is because the M-mode method is based on the amplitude modulation when the particle passes through the light focus. The Doppler bandwidth method in this paper is based on the signal phase shift caused by the particle movement. The particle size will not affect the phase information. In any case, the bandwidth method does not have to resolve single particles, because the fluctuation caused by the particles’ movement is of relevance.

In OR-PAM, the focal zone of the optical objective is smaller than that of the acoustic lens. When the moving particles pass through the optical focal zone, the excitation profile provides an amplitude modulation to the resultant PA wave, which also contributes to the ultimate bandwidth broadening. However, this contribution can be covered by the constant factor k in Eq. 2, because it is also proportional to the transverse flow.

Our technology is applicable to a given range of velocity. On the one hand, the minimum measureable velocity, which represents the velocity sensitivity of the system, is limited by the SNR. Increasing the number of sequential A-line scans used for the calculation can improve the SNR. On the other hand, the maximum measurable velocity is determined by the aliasing phenomenon described by Bd<fs for a given A-line scanning frequency fs . Under the current experimental configuration, the minimum and maximum are 100μms and 12mms , respectively. In real biomedical applications, the accuracy of the flow measurement is expected to be compromised caused by the lower SNR in tissue and the turbulence of flow, which can be improved by calibration of phantom study.

Blood flow is closely related to tumor growth,23 angiogenesis,24 and neuron-vascular-coupling.25 Compared to other PA flow measurement methods,26, 27, 28, 29 the method proposed here has the potential to retain the methods for measuring volumetric structure and oxygen saturation in the same system, which will provide a promising tool to measure the oxygen metabolism rate.30

In summary, Doppler bandwidth can be used to measure flow velocity that is transverse to the probing beam. The linear dependence of the Doppler bandwidth on the flow velocity permits accurate flow measurement. Structural and flow information can be obtained simultaneously, and the flow direction can be determined by bidirectional scanning.

Acknowledgments

We thank Konstantin Maslov, Christopher Favazza, Song Hu, and Arie Krumholz for helpful discussion. This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health Grants No. R01 EB000712, No. R01 NS46214, No. R01 EB008085, and No. U54 CA136398. L.W. has a financial interest in Microphotoacoustics, Inc. and Endra, Inc., which, however, did not support this work.

References

1. 

M. H. Xu and L. H. V. Wang, “Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicine,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 77 (4), 041101 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2195024 0034-6748 Google Scholar

2. 

K. Maslov, H. F. Zhang, S. Hu, and L. V. Wang, “Optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy for in vivo imaging of single capillaries,” Opt. Lett., 33 (9), 929 –931 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.33.000929 0146-9592 Google Scholar

3. 

H. F. Zhang, K. Maslov, G. Stoica, and L. H. V. Wang, “Functional photoacoustic microscopy for high-resolution and noninvasive in vivo imaging,” Nat. Biotechnol., 24 (7), 848 –851 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1220 1087-0156 Google Scholar

4. 

X. D. Wang, Y. J. Pang, G. Ku, X. Y. Xie, G. Stoica, and L. H. V. Wang, “Noninvasive laser-induced photoacoustic tomography for structural and functional in vivo imaging of the brain,” Nat. Biotechnol., 21 (7), 803 –806 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt839 1087-0156 Google Scholar

5. 

H. Fang, K. Maslov, and L. V. Wang, “Photoacoustic doppler effect from flowing small light-absorbing particles,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 99 (18), 184501 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.184501 0031-9007 Google Scholar

6. 

H. Fang, K. Maslov, and L. V. Wang, “Photoacoustic doppler flow measurement in optically scattering media,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 91 (26), 264103 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2825569 0003-6951 Google Scholar

7. 

H. Fang and L. H. V. Wang, “M-mode photoacoustic particle flow imaging,” Opt. Lett., 34 (5), 671 –673 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.34.000671 0146-9592 Google Scholar

8. 

L. V. Wang and H.-I. Wu, Biomedical Optics: Principles and Imaging, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ (2007). Google Scholar

9. 

H. W. Ren, K. M. Brecke, Z. H. Ding, Y. H. Zhao, J. S. Nelson, and Z. P. Chen, “Imaging and quantifying transverse flow velocity with the doppler bandwidth in a phase-resolved functional optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett., 27 (6), 409 –411 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.27.000409 0146-9592 Google Scholar

10. 

V. L. Newhouse, D. Censor, T. Vontz, J. A. Cisneros, and B. B. Goldberg, “Ultrasound doppler probing of flows transverse with respect to beam axis,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 34 (10), 779 –789 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.1987.325920 0018-9294 Google Scholar

11. 

L. V. Wang, “Prospects of photoacoustic tomography,” Med. Phys., 35 (12), 5758 –5767 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3013698 0094-2405 Google Scholar

12. 

Y. H. Zhao, Z. P. Chen, C. Saxer, S. H. Xiang, J. F. de Boer, and J. S. Nelson, “Phase-resolved optical coherence tomography and optical doppler tomography for imaging blood flow in human skin with fast scanning speed and high velocity sensitivity,” Opt. Lett., 25 (2), 114 –116 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.25.000114 0146-9592 Google Scholar

13. 

J. A. Rooney and R. C. Heyser, “Integrated ultrasonic pulsed doppler system for measurement of blood-flow,” Aviat., Space Environ. Med., 56 (5), 493 –493 (1985). 0095-6562 Google Scholar

14. 

D. W. Watkins, “Laser doppler measurement of cutaneous blood flow,” J. Investig. Dermatol. Symp. Proc., 69 (3), 306 –309 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12507665 1087-0024 Google Scholar

15. 

D. W. Baker, “Pulsed ultrasonic doppler blood-flow sensing,” IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrason., 17 (3), 170 –184 (1970). 0018-9537 Google Scholar

16. 

K. W. W. Yeung, “Angle-insensitive flow measurement using doppler bandwidth,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 45 (3), 574 –580 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1109/58.677602 0885-3010 Google Scholar

17. 

S. Kogan, Electronic Noise and Fluctuations in Solids, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England (2008). Google Scholar

18. 

S. A. Jones, “Fundamental sources of error and spectral broadening in doppler ultrasound signals,” Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 21 (5), 399 –483 (1993). 0278-940X Google Scholar

19. 

V. L. Newhouse, E. S. Furgason, G. F. Johnson, and D. A. Wolf, “The dependence of ultrasound doppler bandwidth on beam geometry,” IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrason., 27 (2), 50 –59 (1980). 0018-9537 Google Scholar

20. 

Y. H. Zhao, Z. P. Chen, C. Saxer, Q. M. Shen, S. H. Xiang, J. F. de Boer, and J. S. Nelson, “Doppler standard deviation imaging for clinical monitoring of in vivo human skin blood flow,” Opt. Lett., 25 (18), 1358 –1360 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.25.001358 0146-9592 Google Scholar

21. 

C. Kasai, “Real-time two-dimensional blood-flow imaging using an autocorrelation technique,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 33 (1), 94 –94 (1986). 0885-3010 Google Scholar

22. 

K. Chihiro, H. Akimitsu, and N. Kouroku, “Real-time blood-flow imaging system using ultrasonic doppler techniques,” Syst. Comput. Japan, 19 (11), 13 –24 (1988). 0882-1662 Google Scholar

23. 

P. Vaupel, F. Kallinowski, and P. Okunieff, “Blood-flow, oxygen and nutrient supply, and metabolic microenvironment of human-tumors—a review,” Cancer Res., 49 (23), 6449 –6465 (1989). 0008-5472 Google Scholar

24. 

A. Al-Khaldi, H. Al-Sabti, J. Galipeau, and K. Lachapelle, “Therapeutic angiogenesis using autologous bone marrow stromal cells: improved blood flow in a chronic limb ischemia model,” Ann. Thorac. Surg., 75 (1), 204 –209 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(02)04291-1 0003-4975 Google Scholar

25. 

A. N. Nielsen and M. Lauritzen, “Coupling and uncoupling of activity-dependent increases of neuronal activity and blood flow in rat somatosensory cortex,” J. Physiol. (London), 533 (3), 773 –785 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.00773.x 0022-3751 Google Scholar

26. 

V. P. Zharov, E. I. Galanzha, E. V. Shashkov, J. W. Kim, N. G. Khlebtsov, and V. V. Tuchin, “Photoacoustic flow cytometry: Principle and application for real-time detection of circulating single nanoparticles, pathogens, and contrast dyes in vivo,” J. Biomed. Opt., 12 (5), 051503 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2793746 1083-3668 Google Scholar

27. 

P. C. Li, S. W. Huang, C. W. Wei, Y. C. Chiou, C. D. Chen, and C. R. C. Wang, “Photoacoustic flow measurements by use of laser-induced shape transitions of gold nanorods,” Opt. Lett., 30 (24), 3341 –3343 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.30.003341 0146-9592 Google Scholar

28. 

E. I. Galanzha, E. V. Shashkov, V. V. Tuchin, and V. P. Zharov, “In vivo multispectral, multiparameter, photoacoustic lymph flow cytometry with natural cell focusing, label-free detection and multicolor nanoparticle probes,” Cytometry, Part A, 73 (10), 884 –894 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.20587 1552-4922 Google Scholar

29. 

V. P. Zharov, E. I. Galanzha, E. V. Shashkov, N. G. Khlebtsov, and V. V. Tuchin, “In vivo photoacoustic flow cytometry for monitoring of circulating single cancer cells and contrast agents,” Opt. Lett., 31 (24), 3623 –3625 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.31.003623 0146-9592 Google Scholar

30. 

D. A. Boas, G. Strangman, J. P. Culver, R. D. Hoge, G. Jasdzewski, R. A. Poldrack, B. R. Rosen, and J. B. Mandeville, “Can the cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen be estimated with near-infrared spectroscopy?,” Phys. Med. Biol., 48 (15), 2405 –2418 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/48/15/311 0031-9155 Google Scholar
©(2010) Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
Junjie Yao and Lihong V. Wang "Transverse flow imaging based on photoacoustic Doppler bandwidth broadening," Journal of Biomedical Optics 15(2), 021304 (1 March 2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3339953
Published: 1 March 2010
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES


SHARE
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back to Top