One important way to obtain information about an object is to measure the light scattered or transmitted by the object. However, the basic question about these techniques is what information about the 3-D structure of the object can be, in principle, obtainable. Wolf answered this question in 1969.^{1} He showed that within the first Born approximation, when the object is illuminated by a plane monochromatic light, incident in all possible directions, and the complex amplitude of the scattered light is measured in the far zone of the scatterer in all possible directions, only those 3-D Fourier components of the scattering potential, for which the spatial periods
$\Delta x$
,
$\Delta y$
, and
$\Delta z$
, satisfy the inequality

## Eq. 1

$$\frac{1}{{\left(\Delta x\right)}^{2}}+\frac{1}{{\left(\Delta y\right)}^{2}}+\frac{1}{{\left(\Delta z\right)}^{2}}\u2a7d{\left(\frac{2}{\lambda}\right)}^{2},$$In practice, such as in biological tissue imaging, the tissue under test is usually illuminated and the scattered (or reflected) light is detected within a limited range of incident angles, which is determined by the numerical aperture (NA) of the lens. When the NA of the lens is small, both the illuminated and reflected light can be approximated by a parallel beam. It is then desirable to evaluate at what level the 3-D structure information of biological tissue is accessible in these cases, especially in high resolution microscopy. In a recent paper, a necessary and sufficient condition for a beam to retain its beamlike form after being scattered on a stochastic medium was reported.^{2} In this work, we employ this result to analyze the possible Fourier components of the scattering potential of the object that can be obtained with a practical optical imaging system in biological study.

Tissue is a complex system in which light is scattered in propagation due to the spatial fluctuation of its refractive index, which can be written as a sum of its mean
$\u27e8n\left(\stackrel{\mathrm{\u20d7}}{\mathbf{r}}\right)\u27e9$
and a varying part
$\delta n\left(\stackrel{\mathrm{\u20d7}}{\mathbf{r}}\right)$
,
$n\left(\stackrel{\mathrm{\u20d7}}{\mathbf{r}}\right)=\u27e8n\left(\stackrel{\mathrm{\u20d7}}{\mathbf{r}}\right)\u27e9+\delta n\left(\stackrel{\mathrm{\u20d7}}{\mathbf{r}}\right)$
, where
$\stackrel{\mathrm{\u20d7}}{\mathbf{r}}$
denotes the position within the tissue. It has been shown that within the first Born approximation, the spatial distribution of the scattering field is determined by the scattering potential of the tissue, which can be expressed as^{1, 2}

## Eq. 2

$$F(\stackrel{\mathrm{\u20d7}}{\mathbf{r}},\omega )=\frac{1}{4\pi}{\left(\frac{\omega}{c}\right)}^{2}[{n}^{2}(\stackrel{\mathrm{\u20d7}}{\mathbf{r}},\omega )-1]=\frac{1}{4\pi}{\left(\frac{\omega}{c}\right)}^{2}[{\u27e8n(\stackrel{\mathrm{\u20d7}}{\mathbf{r}},\omega )\u27e9}^{2}+2\u27e8n(\stackrel{\mathrm{\u20d7}}{\mathbf{r}},\omega )\u27e9\delta n(\stackrel{\mathrm{\u20d7}}{\mathbf{r}},\omega )-1],$$^{3}The spatial correlation function of the scattering potential can then be expressed as

^{4}

## Eq. 3

$${C}_{F}({\stackrel{\mathrm{\u20d7}}{\mathbf{r}}}_{1},{\stackrel{\mathrm{\u20d7}}{\mathbf{r}}}_{2},\omega )=\u27e8{F}^{*}({\stackrel{\mathrm{\u20d7}}{\mathbf{r}}}_{1},\omega )F({\stackrel{\mathrm{\u20d7}}{\mathbf{r}}}_{2},\omega )\u27e9=\frac{1}{16{\pi}^{2}}{\left(\frac{\omega}{c}\right)}^{4}[{\u27e8n\u27e9}^{4}-2{\u27e8n\u27e9}^{2}+1+4{\u27e8n\u27e9}^{2}\u27e8\delta n({\stackrel{\mathrm{\u20d7}}{\mathbf{r}}}_{1},\omega )\delta n({\stackrel{\mathrm{\u20d7}}{\mathbf{r}}}_{2},\omega )\u27e9],$$^{3, 5}

## Eq. 4

$$\Phi \left(K\right)=\frac{\u27e8\delta {n}^{2}\u27e9{L}_{0}^{3}\Gamma \left(m\right)}{{\pi}^{3\u22152}\left|\Gamma [m-(3\u22152)]\right|{(1+{K}^{2}{L}_{0}^{2})}^{m}},$$^{3, 5}and $\u27e8\delta {n}^{2}\u27e9$ is the variance of the tissue refractive index fluctuation. Hence the Fourier transform of Eq. 3 is

## Eq. 5

$${\stackrel{\u0303}{C}}_{F}(K,\omega )={\left(\frac{\omega}{c}\right)}^{4}\frac{{\u27e8n\u27e9}^{2}\u27e8\delta {n}^{2}\u27e9{L}_{0}^{3}\Gamma \left(m\right)}{4{\pi}^{7\u22152}\left|\Gamma [m-(3\u22152)]\right|{(1+{K}^{2}{L}_{0}^{2})}^{m}}.$$## Eq. 7

$$N\left(\omega \right)={\left(\frac{\omega}{c}\right)}^{4}\frac{{\u27e8n\u27e9}^{2}\u27e8\delta {n}^{2}\u27e9{L}_{0}^{3}\Gamma \left(m\right)}{4{\pi}^{7\u22152}\left|\Gamma [m-(3\u22152)]\right|}.$$^{2}

## Eq. 8

$${\stackrel{\u0303}{C}}_{F}(K,\omega )\approx 0,\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\text{unless}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}{\left|\stackrel{\mathrm{\u20d7}}{\mathbf{K}}\right|}^{2}\u2aa1{k}^{2},$$Now consider a random polychromatic plane wave incident on a tissue surface in a direction specified by a real unit vector
${\stackrel{\mathrm{\u20d7}}{\mathbf{s}}}_{0}$
. The incident field may be represented by an ensemble
$\left\{{U}^{\left(i\right)}(\stackrel{\mathrm{\u20d7}}{\mathbf{r}},\omega )\right\}$
that is statistically stationary. Each realization of
$\left\{{U}^{\left(i\right)}(\stackrel{\mathrm{\u20d7}}{\mathbf{r}},\omega )\right\}$
can be regarded as the time-independent part of a monochromatic wave function, and can be expressed as
${U}^{\left(i\right)}(\stackrel{\mathrm{\u20d7}}{\mathbf{r}},\omega )=a\left(\omega \right)\mathrm{exp}(ik{\stackrel{\mathrm{\u20d7}}{\mathbf{s}}}_{0}\cdot \stackrel{\mathrm{\u20d7}}{\mathbf{r}})$
, where the (generally complex) amplitude factor
$a\left(\omega \right)$
is a frequency-dependent random variable, and
$k=\omega \u2215c$
is the wave number. The spectrum of the light is an important statistical characteristic of light and is given by
$S(\stackrel{\mathrm{\u20d7}}{\mathbf{r}},\omega )=\u27e8{U}^{*}(\stackrel{\mathrm{\u20d7}}{\mathbf{r}},\omega )U(\stackrel{\mathrm{\u20d7}}{\mathbf{r}},\omega )\u27e9$
. Under the first Born approximation, the spectrum of the scattered light in the far zone of the scatterer can be expressed as^{6}

## Eq. 10

$${S}^{\infty}(l\stackrel{\mathrm{\u20d7}}{\mathbf{s}},\omega )=V{l}^{-2}{\stackrel{\u0303}{C}}_{F}(K,\omega ){S}^{i}\left(\omega \right),$$## Eq. 11

$${S}^{\infty}(l\stackrel{\mathrm{\u20d7}}{\mathbf{s}},\omega )={N}^{\prime}(\omega ,l)(1-m{K}^{2}{L}_{0}^{2}){S}^{i}\left(\omega \right),$$## Eq. 12

$${K}^{2}=4{(\omega \u2215c)}^{2}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{\mathrm{sin}}^{2}(\theta \u22152)=4{k}^{2}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{\mathrm{sin}}^{2}(\theta \u22152),$$A similar result has been obtained in the scalar diffraction theory of monochromatic light in paraxial approximation.^{7} It can be shown that the light field distribution
$U(x,y,z)$
in a plane
$Z=z$
can be expressed as a superposition of plane waves
$\mathrm{exp}\left[j2\pi (\alpha x\u2215\lambda +\beta y\u2215\lambda )\right]$
with direction cosines
$\alpha =\lambda {f}_{x}$
,
$\beta =\lambda {f}_{y}$
, and
$\gamma ={[1-{\left(\lambda {f}_{x}\right)}^{2}-{\left(\lambda {f}_{y}\right)}^{2}]}^{1\u22152}$
, where
${f}_{x}$
and
${f}_{y}$
are the spatial frequencies of the Fourier component
$\mathrm{exp}\left[j2\pi ({f}_{x}x+{f}_{y}y)\right]$
. Hence when
$\left|\lambda {f}_{x}\right|\u2aa11$
and
$\left|\lambda {f}_{y}\right|\u2aa1<1$
, the wave vectors of the corresponding plane waves have small angles with respect to the
$z$
axis. This is known as the paraxial approximation.

However, there exist two differences between the diffracted monochromatic light field distribution around the propagation direction, and the spatial distribution of the scattered light around the incident direction. First of all, in monochromatic light illumination, the corresponding plane waves carry the spatial information of the field distribution. For scattered light from a random illuminated by a random polychromatic plane wave, the plane waves provide the structural information about the scattering potential of the medium. Second, for scattered light there exits a simple relationship between the spectrum of the scattered light in the far zone and the spatial frequencies $K$ . For the diffraction of monochromatic light there is no such simple relation.

In conclusion, it is found that in the transmitted illumination case, such as in inverted biological microscopes, there exists a very simple relationship between the spectrum of the scattered light and the spatial frequency component of the spatial correlation function of the scattering potential of the medium under investigation. This result can be useful in interpreting images obtained with microscopes in biological study or evaluating the performance of a microscopic imaging system.

## Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (60978069), the Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK2008412), the Research Foundation for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (200802880013), and the 333 Project Foundation of Jiangsu Province.

## References

**,” Opt. Commun., 1 153 –156 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4018(69)90052-2 0030-4018 Google Scholar**

*Three-dimensional structure determination of semi-transparent objects from holographic data***,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 26 2043 –2048 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.26.002043 0740-3232 Google Scholar**

*Beam condition for scattering on random media***,” Opt. Lett., 21 (16), 1310 –1312 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.21.001310 0146-9592 Google Scholar**

*Turbulent nature of refractive-index variations in biological tissue***,” Opt. Lett., 35 (6), 862 –864 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.35.000862 0146-9592 Google Scholar**

*Spectral changes of the light produced by scattering from tissue***,” Opt. Lett., 34 (12), 1891 –1893 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.34.001891 0146-9592 Google Scholar**

*Nonscalar elastic light scattering from continuous random media in the Born approximation***,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 6 1142 –1149 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.6.001142 0740-3232 Google Scholar**

*Frequency shifts of spectral lines produced by scattering from spatially random media*