Translator Disclaimer
1 May 2010 Characteristics of calcium signaling in astrocytes induced by photostimulation with femtosecond laser
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Astrocytes have been identified to actively contribute to brain functions through Ca2+ signaling, serving as a bridge to communicate with neurons and other brain cells. However, conventional stimulation techniques are hard to apply to delicate investigations on astrocytes. Our group previously reported photostimulation with a femtosecond laser to evoke astrocytic calcium (Ca2+) waves, providing a noninvasive and efficient approach with highly precise targeting. In this work, detailed characteristics of astrocytic Ca2+ signaling induced by photostimulation are presented. In a purified astrocytic culture, after the illumination of a femtosecond laser onto one cell, a Ca2+ wave throughout the network with reduced speed is induced, and intracellular Ca2+ oscillations are observed. The intercellular propagation is pharmacologically confirmed to be mainly mediated by ATP through P2Y receptors. Different patterns of Ca2+ elevations with increased amplitude in the stimulated astrocyte are discovered by varying the femtosecond laser power, which is correspondingly followed by broader intercellular waves. These indicate that the strength of photogenerated Ca2+ signaling in astrocytes has a positive relationship with the stimulating laser power. Therefore, distinct Ca2+ signaling is feasibly available for specific studies on astrocytes by employing precisely controlled photostimulation.

1.

Introduction

The astrocyte is a large non-neuronal population in the brain. During the last two decades, an understanding of these cells has been promoted by numerous evidences that they participate in brain functions through Ca2+ signaling. They have intimate contact with neurons and the cerebrovascular system, stretching their processes onto synapses and blood vessel cells to form the so-called structure of endfeet.1 Within these microdomains, astrocytes respond to synaptic transmitters with intracellular Ca2+ elevation, and in turn, release various gliotransmitters acting on the neurons and blood vessels.2, 3 While bidirectional communications between astrocytes and neurons and the bridge role in neurovascular coupling4, 5, 6 help us to recognize the essential functions of astrocytes in brain physiology, delicate investigations have been constrained due to the lack of a noninvasive, efficient stimulation with spatial specificity and precision.

There are already several conventional ways to provoke Ca2+ increase in astrocytes. However, special devices are required to provide mechanical or electrical stimulus, and agents are introduced for uncaging or pharmacological applications. These methods are complex to carry out and make it hard to achieve site-specific stimulation. Comparatively, we have previously introduced a NIR femtosecond laser to precisely activate astrocytes and developed photostimulation.7 The femtosecond laser with ultrashort pulse width and high peak intensity has been increasingly utilized for delicate manipulations on cells. Due to nonlinear effects, the interaction between femtosecond lasers and biological substances is highly localized, facilitating selective nanosurgery on subcellular structures.8, 9, 10, 11, 12 This noninvasive optical tool has thus opened new doors for various artificial nanoprocessing in living cells, and even in vivo.13, 14, 15, 16, 17

Accordingly, for photostimulation of astrocytes,7 an 800-nm femtosecond laser was focused onto the upper membrane of one cell. During the short (milliseconds) illuminating time, multiphoton effects including photochemistry were expected to occur, resulting in a transient photoporation on the membrane, which was verified by the fluorescence of FM 1-43, a membrane-biding dye, and entry of a membrane-impermeable dye PI. The Ca2+ ion then flew over into the cytoplasm through photoporation due to the much higher extracellular concentration. This intracellular signal would soon be magnified by the process of Ca2+ -induced Ca2+ release (CICR), leading to remarkable Ca2+ elevation and intercellular Ca2+ wave. We have also shown that photogenerated astrocytic Ca2+ signaling could be reproduced by repetitive stimulation. With the highly localized nanodissection of the femtosecond laser, noncontact photostimulation was verified to be compatible with cell viability.

As photostimulation of astrocytes provides a noncontact, nondisruptive, and reproducible way for high targeting precision to activate astrocytes, the purpose of this work is to further characterize photogenerated astrocytic Ca2+ signaling.

2.

Materials and Methods

2.1.

Cell Cultures

Preparation of purified astrocytes was described before.7 Briefly, cells were extracted from the cortex of postnatal 1-to3-day -old Wistar rats, and cultured in Dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal calf serum.

2.2.

Solution and Drugs

The experimental solution, termed Hepes-buffered solution (HBS), contained (mM): 145 NaCl, 3 KCl, 10 HEPES, 3 CaCl22H2O , 2 MgCl26H2O , and 8 glucose.

Carbenoxolone (100μM) , octanol (500μM) , suramin (100μM) , pyridoxalphosphate-6-azophenyl- 2,4 -disulphonic acid (PPADS) (30μM) , and Reactive Blue 2 (RB-2) (2μM) were all diluted in HBS.

2.3.

Calcium Imaging and Photostimulation

Before the experiments, cells were loaded with a Ca2+ -sensitive dye Fluo-3/AM, diluted in HBS, to reach a final concentration of 4μM , at 37°C for 30min . The confocal laser scanning system, FluoView1000 (Olympus, Japan), for Ca2+ imaging and photostimulation has been described in detail.7 In brief, fluorescence of Fluo-3 was relayed into a photomultiplier tube (PMT) before and after photostimulation with a femtosecond laser, which was generated by a Ti:sapphire laser (Mai Tai, Spectra-Physics, Newport Corporation, Santa Clara, California). Generally, the femtosecond laser beam ( 800nm , 90fs , 80MHz ) was exposed onto the cell membrane for a duration of 1to4ms and with a laser power of 15to60mW after a 20× (NA 0.75) objective. Images were acquired at 1frames by FluoView 1.5 software (Olympus) on a PC. Normalized fluorescence (ΔFF) inside the cell was calculated as the Ca2+ increase in Image-Pro Plus 5.0 (Media Cybernetics, Bethesda, Maryland).

3.

Results

3.1.

Intercellular Propagation and Intracellular Oscillations in Astrocytes

In the astrocyte network, the femtosecond laser was targeted to one cell. After illumination for 2ms , intracellular Ca2+ elevations indicated by increased Fluo-3 fluorescence was observed in the cells successively away from the stimulating point, forming a radial intercellular propagation as called a Ca2+ wave [Fig. 1 ]. This wave would gradually slow down along with the spreading time [Fig. 1], and finally fade away, going more than 200μm in radius. Normalized fluorescence in some cells [indicated by the circles in Fig. 1] including the stimulated one (cell 1, marked by an arrowhead) and some others (cells 2 through 5) were calculated, as presented in Fig. 1. The changes in cells 2 through 5 all showed several more peaks after the initial Ca2+ increase. These Ca2+ oscillations were actually often (n=2846) observed in most cells involved in the spreading wave, lasting for 142.8±14.1s , but rarely (n=746) in the stimulated one (see also Video 1 ).

Fig. 1

Intercellular Ca2+ wave and intracellular Ca2+ oscillations in astrocytes induced by photostimulation. (a) Propagation of Ca2+ elevations after photostimulation of an astrocyte, indicated by arrowheads. The color bar represents pseudocolor of normalized fluorescence (ΔFF) . Scale bar, 100μm . (b) Time courses of fluorescence change in the five cells marked by the circles in (a). The arrow indicates the onset of photostimulation. (c) Velocity ( mean±SEM , n=10 ) of the Ca2+ wave against spreading time. (Color online only.)

035001_1_050003jbo1.jpg

Video 1

Intercellular Ca2+ wave and intracellular Ca2+ oscillations in astrocytes induced by photostimulation. The femtosecond laser target is indicated by a white arrow. Scale bar, 100μm (MPEG, 5.0MB ). .

035001_1_050003jbov1.jpg
10.1117/1.3454390.1

3.2.

Mechanism of Photogenerated Calcium Wave

Two main mediators in the astrocytic Ca2+ wave have previously been confirmed: intracellular diffusion of inositol trisphosphate (IP3) through gap junctions, and release of extracellular messenger ATP.5, 18, 19 We next pharmacologically testified the underlying mechanisms of photogenerated intercellular Ca2+ waves in astrocytes.

As shown in Fig. 2 , carbenoxolone (carben) and octanol, both blockers of gap junctions, had modest effects (p> 0.05) on the spreading. Comparatively, the propagation was dramatically reduced ( 81.3±2.9% , p<0.001 ) by suramin, a nonselective antagonist of purinergic receptors (P2Rs) . This depression indicated the involvement of ATP, which is known to activate both ionotropic receptors (P2XRs) and metabotropic receptors (P2YRs) . The contribution of these two types of receptors in the wave was then examined by application of their antagonists, PPADS and RB-2, respectively. The results showed that the Ca2+ wave continued normally (100.8±15.9%) in the presence of PPADS, but diminished greatly ( 73.4±1.4% , p<0.001 ) in RB-2. Therefore, astrocytic Ca2+ waves induced by a femtosecond laser were suggested to be predominantly mediated by ATP through the activation of P2YRs .

Fig. 2

Pharmacological effects on photogenerated Ca2+ wave (carben: carbenoxolone). Data were presented as mean±SEM . Bracketed numbers indicate the numbers of experiments for each drug. Student’s t-test: *** , p<0.001 .

035001_1_050003jbo2.jpg

3.3.

Femtosecond Laser Intensity-Dependent Astrocytic Calcium Signaling

Actually, photogenerated Ca2+ responses in the astrocytic network were related to the femtosecond laser intensity. Different patterns of Ca2+ elevation in the stimulated cell were discovered by varying the femtosecond laser power, and correspondingly affecting the consequent Ca2+ wave.

Repetitive photostimulations with increasing laser power on an astrocyte were carried out, if only intracellular Ca2+ concentration in the field of view turned to basal level. Several trials (n=16) showed that the Ca2+ response patterns in the stimulated cell were classified into three groups, as illustrated in Fig. 3 , in which the femtosecond laser power was 18, 21, and 24mW , respectively: 1. LS-type, with a modest Ca2+ elevation (amplitude=49.4%±7.6%) ; 2. S-type, with a significant Ca2+ spike (amplitude=224.8%±35.9%) and rapid recovery; and 3 H-type, also with a remarkable Ca2+ elevation (amplitude=250.2%±41.9%) , but a slow decaying phase, which could not fully recover within 4min . The statistical result [Fig. 4 ] showed increased normalized amplitude of Ca2+ elevations for these three patterns as to the one for H-type. For S- and H-types, the duration of Ca2+ elevations was 81.8±10.0s and 163.6±24.6s , respectively, which was calculated as the time between photostimulation and when ΔFF was decreased to 1/e of the peak value.

Fig. 3

Potentiated astrocytic Ca2+ signaling by repetitive photostimulation with increased femtosecond laser power: 18, 21, and 24mW . (a) Three different Ca2+ elevation patterns in the stimulated cell (from top to bottom): LS-, S-, and H-type. (b) Widened Ca2+ waves following the corresponding patterns of Ca2+ elevations in (a). Scale bar, 100μm .

035001_1_050003jbo3.jpg

Fig. 4

Statistical results (n=16) of astrocytic responses under the LS-, S-, and H-type of Ca2+ elevations in the stimulated cell. (a) Normalized amplitude to the one for H-type. (b) Ca2+ wave area.

035001_1_050003jbo4.jpg

Moreover, following the responses of the three patterns in the stimulated astrocyte, the intercellular Ca2+ wave covered distinct ranges, respectively [Figs. 3 and 4]. While there was little propagation elicited by the LS-type response, the S-type evoked a wave just spreading to the neighborhood ( 70.6±27.1μm in radius), and the wave area following H-type was dominantly the largest, reaching 231.7±126.9μm in radius.

In brief, photogenerated Ca2+ signaling in astrocytes, both the Ca2+ elevation in the stimulated cell and the spreading across others, was demonstrated to have a positive relationship with the femtosecond laser intensity.

4.

Discussions and Conclusion

Since photostimulation with a NIR femtosecond laser has previously been proposed to be a novel effective way to evoke Ca2+ signaling in astrocytes, here, the characteristics of photogenerated Ca2+ signaling were revealed in detail.

After the femtosecond laser was targeted onto one astrocyte, intracellular Ca2+ elevation was immediately elicited and then succeeded in other cells, forming a concentric propagation [Fig. 1]. Furthermore, Ca2+ oscillations in nonstimulated cells were observed in 60.9% of the waves (n=46) , but less likely (15.2%) in the stimulated one [Fig. 1 and Video 1]. Regarding this, it was interesting to discover that in HeLa cells irradiated by a femtosecond laser, hyperpolarization following the initial depolarization of membrane potential was observed.20 As astrocytes can have varying resting membrane potentials,21 hyperpolarization might also be involved in this work, resulting in the depression of further Ca2+ excitability in the stimulated astrocyte, which requires further validation. This difference in Ca2+ oscillations in the stimulated and nonstimulated astrocytes has also been reported in a study employing mechanical stimulation and suggesting the distinct causes of intracellular and intercellular signaling.22 We have previously demonstrated that the photogenerated Ca2+ elevation in the stimulated cell resulted from photoporation on the membrane, which allowed extracellular Ca2+ influx and triggered release of intracellular Ca2+ stores.7 Hence, the mechanism of intercellular propagation should be figured out.

Much evidence has proven the contribution of both gap junction and ATP to astrocytic Ca2+ waves.5, 18, 19 In our study, suramin and RB-2 both significantly depressed the photogenerated intercellular propagation in astrocytes, proving that ATP be mainly involved through the activation of P2YRs (Fig. 2). Note that the spreading was not fully blocked by the two ATP receptor antagonists (suramin, 81.3%; RB-2, 73.4%). This incomplete inhibition has also been observed in another study performing photostimulation on HeLa cells,23 and other papers employing conventional stimulations on astrocytes.18, 24, 25 We thus considered this was related to the competitive property of these drugs, but not an artifact attributable to photostimulation on astrocytes. Additionally, the gap junction blockers also affected the Ca2+ wave, though slightly, indicating that gap junction might partially play a role. Actually, several studies found that the contribution of gap junction in intercellular propagation might be facilitating ATP release, and connexin-deficient cells released 5- to 15-fold more ATP after expressing connexin proteins.24, 25 It was even reported that ATP released from gap junction channels in astrocytes should serve as one of the intercellular signaling pathways.26 Taken together, our results suggested that the photogenerated astrocytic Ca2+ wave was predominantly mediated by the extracellular messenger ATP, in partial collaboration with gap junctions.

Photogenerated Ca2+ signaling, including Ca2+ elevation in the stimulated astrocyte and Ca2+ wave, was shown to be potentiated with increased femtosecond laser power (Figs. 3 and 4). Three patterns of intracellular Ca2+ elevations with increased amplitude in the stimulated cell were defined, which corresponded to distinct extents of intercellular waves. With regard to the former, it was suggested that a femtosecond laser with greater power should result in larger or longer poration on the membrane, leading to more Ca2+ influx and release from stores. As a result, the total fluorescence increase inside the cell would be stronger. However, the fluorescence change in the stimulated cell would finally reach the maximum and could not be enhanced any more, even if the laser power was further increased (data not shown). This was probably because of the saturation of intracellular Ca2+ capacity or Ca2+ binding capacity of Fluo-3. And in this condition, the Ca2+ response in the stimulated cell was biphasic with an initial increase and a long-lasting plateau (data not shown). This sustained high level of intracellular Ca2+ concentration could hardly recover to baseline in the end, which might indicate that the cell had suffered from laser-induced injury. Indeed, if the femtosecond laser intensity was even higher, cell bubbling and cell death would be induced,7 which, as well as the long-lasting Ca2+ plateau, should be avoided in our experiments.

On the other hand, it is known that an important regulated response to Ca2+ signaling in astrocytes is Ca2+ -dependent release of transmitters, including ATP.27, 28, 29 It was found that there was a threshold of intracellular Ca2+ concentration for ATP release from the astrocytes.30 Therefore, it was suggested that LS-type was not able to induce an intercellular wave due to its inefficiency in triggering ATP release from the stimulated astrocyte. And comparatively, during the high intracellular Ca2+ level for S- and H-types, abundant ATP was released from the stimulated cell to act on others, leading to a Ca2+ wave. As ATP release in the intercellular signaling of astrocytes was reported to be restricted to a point source, i.e., in a nonregenerative model,31 the propagation was dependent on the diffusion of ATP derived from the stimulated cell. Thus, the spreading would eventually vanish until there was little ATP to act on distant cells. Notably, with larger femtosecond laser power, broader intercellular propagation was supposed to be related to more and longer ATP release from the stimulated cell, in which the intracellular Ca2+ elevation level was enhanced (Figs. 3 and 4). Accordingly, these results suggested that the quantity of ATP release from astrocytes was dependent on the intracellular Ca2+ level.

As before, physiological activities of astrocytes and the range of recruited cells could be well controlled by varying the femtosecond laser intensity. For instance, low stimulating laser power is only recommended to provoke Ca2+ elevation of LS-type when signaling in a single astrocyte is explored; studies on communications among neighboring astrocytes require limited Ca2+ waves; and while the function of the astrocytic network is exploited, large femtosecond laser power is demanded to evoke widespread signaling. Therefore, as photostimulation is efficient to activate astrocytes with high feasibility and target precision, the finely controlled femtosecond laser could provide Ca2+ signaling in an intensity-dependent manner for various specific studies on astrocytes.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 30700215, 30800339), National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (grant number 30925013), and the 111 project.

References

1. 

M. Nedergaard, B. Ransom, and S. A. Goldman, “New roles for astrocytes: redefining the functional architecture of the brain,” Trends Neurosci., 26 (10), 523 –530 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2003.08.008 0166-2236 Google Scholar

2. 

T. A. Fiacco and K. D. McCarthy, “Astrocyte calcium elevations: properties, propagation, and effects on brain signaling,” Glia, 54 (7), 676 –690 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.20396 0894-1491 Google Scholar

3. 

E. Scemes and C. Giaume, “Astrocyte calcium waves: what they are and what they do,” Glia, 54 (7), 716 –725 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.20374 0894-1491 Google Scholar

4. 

P. G. Haydon and G. Carmignoto, “Astrocyte control of synaptic transmission and neurovascular coupling,” Physiol. Rev., 86 1009 –1031 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00049.2005 0031-9333 Google Scholar

5. 

A. Volterra and J. Meldolesi, “Astrocytes, from brain glue to communication elements: the revolution continues,” Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 6 (8), 626 –640 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1722 1471-003X Google Scholar

6. 

G. Carmignoto, “Reciprocal communication systems between astrocytes and neurones,” Prog. Neurobiol., 62 561 –581 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0082(00)00029-0 0301-0082 Google Scholar

7. 

Y. Zhao, Y. Zhang, X. Liu, X. Lv, W. Zhou, Q. Luo, and S. Zeng, “Photostimulation of astrocytes with femtosecond laser pulses,” Opt. Express, 17 (3), 1291 –1298 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.001291 1094-4087 Google Scholar

8. 

W. Wantanabe, N. Arakawa, S. Matsunaga, T. Higashi, K. Fukui, K. Isobe, and K. Itoh, “Femtosecond laser disruption of subcellular organelles in a living cell,” Opt. Express, 12 (18), 4203 –4213 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPEX.12.004203 1094-4087 Google Scholar

9. 

U. K. Tirlapur and K. König, “Femtosecond near-infrared laser pulses as a versatile non-invasive tool for intra-tissue nanoprocessing in plants without compromising viability,” Plant J., 31 (3), 365 –374 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01346.x 0960-7412 Google Scholar

10. 

N. I. Smith, K. Fujita, T. Kaneko, K. Katoh, O. Nakamura, S. Kawata, and T. Takamatsu, “Generation of calcium waves in living cells by pulsed-laser-induced photodisruption,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 79 (8), 1208 –1210 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1397255 0003-6951 Google Scholar

11. 

L. Sacconi, R. P. O’Connor, A. Jasaitis, A. Masi, M. Buffelli, and F. S. Pavone, “In vivo multiphoton nanosurgery on cortical neurons,” J. Biomed. Opt., 12 (5), 050502 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2798723 1083-3668 Google Scholar

12. 

K. König, I. Riemann, and W. Fritzsche, “Nanodissection of human chromosomes with near-infrared femtosecond laser pulses,” Opt. Lett., 26 (11), 819 –821 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.26.000819 0146-9592 Google Scholar

13. 

N. I. Smith, Y. Kumamoto, S. Iwanaga, J. Ando, K. Fujita, and S. Kawata, “A femtosecond laser pacemaker for heart muscle cells,” Opt. Express, 16 (12), 8604 –8616 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.16.008604 1094-4087 Google Scholar

14. 

M. F. Yanik, H. Cinar, H. N. Cinar, A. D. Chisholm, Y. Jin, and A. Ben-Yakar, “Functional regeneration after laser axotomy,” Nature, 432 (7019), 822 –822 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/432822a 0028-0836 Google Scholar

15. 

X. Liu, X. Lv, S. Zeng, W. Zhou, and Q. Luo, “Noncontact and nondestructive identification of neural circuits with a femtosecond laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 94 (6), 061113 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3080218 0003-6951 Google Scholar

16. 

N. Nishimura, C. B. Schaffer, B. Friedman, P. S. Tsai, P. D. Lyden, and D. Kleinfeld, “Targeted insult to subsurface cortical blood vessels using ultrashort laser pulses: three models of stroke,” Nat. Methods, 3 (2), 99 –108 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth844 1548-7091 Google Scholar

17. 

U. K. Tirlapur and K. König, “Targeted transfection by femtosecond laser,” Nature, 418 (6895), 290 –291 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/418290a 0028-0836 Google Scholar

18. 

P. B. Guthrie, J. Knapenberger, M. Segal, M. V. L. Bennett, A. C. Charles, and S. B. Kater, “ATP released from astrocytes mediates glial calcium waves,” J. Neurosci., 19 (2), 520 –528 (1999). 0270-6474 Google Scholar

19. 

C. Giaume and L. Venance, “Intercellular calcium signaling and gap junctional communication in astrocytes,” Glia, 24 (1), 50 –64 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(199809)24:1<50::AID-GLIA6>3.0.CO;2-4 0894-1491 Google Scholar

20. 

J. Ando, N. I. Smith, K. Fujita, and S. Kawata, “Photogeneration of membrane potential hyperpolarization and depolarization in non-excitable cells,” Eur. Biophys. J., 38 (2), 255 –262 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-008-0397-6 0175-7571 Google Scholar

21. 

G. M. McKhann II, R. D’Ambrosio, and D. Janigro, “Heterogeneity of astrocyte resting membrane potentials and intercellular coupling revealed by whole-cell and gramicidin-perforated patch recordings from cultured neocortical and hippocampal slice astrocytes,” J. Neurosci., 17 (18), 6850 –6863 (1997). 0270-6474 Google Scholar

22. 

A. C. Charles, J. E. Merrill, E. R. Dirksen, and M. J. Sanderson, “Intercellular signaling in glial cells: calcium waves and oscillations in response to mechanical stimulation and glutamate,” Neuron, 6 (6), 983 –992 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0896-6273(91)90238-U 0896-6273 Google Scholar

23. 

S. Iwanaga, T. Kaneko, K. Fujita, N. Smith, O. Nakamura, T. Takamatsu, and S. Kawata, “Location-dependent photogeneration of calcium waves in HeLa cells,” Cell Biochem. Biophys., 45 (2), 167 –176 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1385/CBB:45:2:167 1085-9195 Google Scholar

24. 

M. L. Cotrina, J. H. Lin, J. C. López-García, C. C. Naus, and M. Nedergaard, “ATP-mediated glia signaling,” J. Neurosci., 20 (8), 2835 –2844 (2000). 0270-6474 Google Scholar

25. 

M. L. Cotrina, J. H. Lin, A. Alves-Rodrigues, S. Liu, J. Li, H. Azmi-Ghadimi, J. Kang, C. C. Naus, and M. Nedergaard, “Connexins regulate calcium signaling by controlling ATP release,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 95 (26), 15735 –15740 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.26.15735 0027-8424 Google Scholar

26. 

C. E. Stout, J. L. Costantin, C. C. Naus, and A. C. Charles, “Intercellular calcium signaling in astrocytes via ATP release through connexin hemichannels,” J. Biol. Chem., 277 (12), 10482 –10488 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109902200 0021-9258 Google Scholar

27. 

A. Jeremic, K. Jeftinija, J. Stevanovic, A. Glavaski, and S. Jeftinija, “ATP stimulates calcium-dependent glutamate release from cultured astrocytes,” J. Neurochem., 77 (2), 664 –675 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00272.x 0022-3042 Google Scholar

28. 

T. Pangršič, M. Potokar, M. Stenovec, M. Kreft, E. Fabbretti, A. Nistri, E. Pryazhnikov, L. Khiroug, R. Giniatullin, and R. Zorec, “Exocytotic release of ATP from cultured astrocytes,” J. Biol. Chem., 282 (39), 28749 –28758 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M700290200 0021-9258 Google Scholar

29. 

Z. Zhang, G. Chen, W. Zhou, A. Song, T. Xu, Q. Luo, W. Wang, X. S. Gu, and S. Duan, “Regulated ATP release from astrocytes through lysosome exocytosis,” Nat. Cell Biol., 9 (8), 945 –953 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1620 1465-7392 Google Scholar

30. 

E. Pryazhnikov and L. Khiroug, “Sub-micromolar increase in [Ca2+]i triggers delayed exocytosis of ATP in cultured astrocytes,” Glia, 56 (1), 38 –49 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.20590 0894-1491 Google Scholar

31. 

G. Arcuino, J. H. Lin, T. Takano, C. Liu, L. Jiang, Q. Gao, J. Kang, and M. Nedergaard, “Intercellular calcium signaling mediated by point-source burst release of ATP,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 99 (15), 9840 –9845 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.152588599 0027-8424 Google Scholar
©(2010) Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
Yuan Zhao, Yuan Zhang, Wei Zhou, Xiuli Liu, Shaoqun Zeng, and Qingming Luo "Characteristics of calcium signaling in astrocytes induced by photostimulation with femtosecond laser," Journal of Biomedical Optics 15(3), 035001 (1 May 2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3454390
Published: 1 May 2010
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES


SHARE
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back to Top