Translator Disclaimer
1 July 2010 Dark-field light scattering imaging of living cancer cell component from birth through division using bioconjugated gold nanoprobes
Author Affiliations +
Novel methods and technologies that could extend and complement the capabilities of the prevailing fluorescence microscope in following the cell cycle under different perturbations are highly desirable in the area of biological and biomedical imaging. We report a newly designed instrument for long-term light scattering live cell imaging based on integrating a homebuilt environmental cell incubation minichamber and an angled dark-field illumination system into a conventional inverted light microscope. Peptide-conjugated gold nanoparticles that are selectively delivered to either the cytoplasmic or nuclear region of the cell are used as light scattering contrast agents. The new system enables us to carry out continuous and intermittence-free dark-field live cell imaging over several tens of hours. A variety of applications of this imaging system are demonstrated, such as monitoring the nuclear uptake of peptide-conjugated gold nanoparticles, tracking the full cycle of cancer cells from birth to division, following the chromosome dynamics during cell mitosis, and observing the intracellular distribution of gold nanoparticles after cell division. We also discuss the overall effect of nuclear targeting gold nanoparticles on the cell viability of parent and daughter cells.



Optical imaging has been widely used in biology and medicine for noninvasive visualization of cellular and molecular features and processes in vitro and in vivo.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 One of the classic optical techniques is fluorescence imaging, which has the capability of tracking individually labeled molecules with high spatial and temporal resolution.8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 It has thus played important roles in interrogating many biological processes such as the mitotic dynamics of chromosomes, centrosomes, and spindles;14, 15, 16, 17 protein folding and migration of membrane proteins;18, 19, 20 cell signaling;10 and virus trafficking.21, 22 Multiplex imaging can be performed by using fluorescent probes with different emission wavelengths. However, fluorescence has intrinsic disadvantages of photobleaching and blinking,23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 so it is not useful for long-term (several tens of minutes to hours) imaging studies. To image cellular processes over a long period of time without phototoxicity, light scattering imaging based on the detection of elastic scattered light from investigated species has become a very promising option. The use of light scattering contrast agents not only enables investigation of cellular structures or processes of specific interest, but also significantly enhances the imaging sensitivity.

The strongly enhanced light scattering property of gold nanoparticles (Au NPs) owing to the localized surface plasmon resonance, together with their excellent photostability and biocompatibility, makes them powerful contrast agents in light scattering imaging.29, 30 Using an angled dark-field illuminator coupled with a conventional microscope, Yguerabide demonstrated that resonance light scattering Au NPs can be used as ultrasensitive labels for analyte detection in immuoassays, cells, and tissues.31 The studies by Sokolov show that Au-NP-labeled cervical cancer cells and tissues can be well resolved from normal ones on illumination with single wavelength laser light either from a simple laser pen or the excitation laser light from a confocal microscope.32 Later, true-color Au-NP-enhanced cancer cell imaging was achieved with commercial dark-field microscopy.33 Because of the advantages of simplicity, low cost, and availability, this resonance light scattering imaging of Au NPs with commercial dark-field microscopy has gained intense attention in biological and biomedical research.34, 35, 36, 37 Recently, several groups have applied this technology to monitor the dynamic interactions between biomolecules in live cells in real time.38, 39, 40, 41 In their studies, commercially available flow chambers containing cells and culture media were used for live cell imaging. The flow chambers were placed into the narrow space between an oil-immersion dark-field condenser with a high numerical aperture (NA) and the high-magnification objective. Although live cell imaging could be recorded, the shortcomings of this setup were apparent. First, the cells in the flow chamber are exposed to nonuniform shear stress due to fluid flows. Shear stress affects physiological and biochemical processes in the cells. Thus, the cells under investigation are no longer the same as the original cells. This could render experimental artifacts. Second, the regular flow chambers require a large cell culture volume and thus massive amounts of Au NP bioconjugates.

In this paper, we report a newly designed instrumental system that provides the ability of light scattering imaging of live cells for two full cell cycles. By combining a conventional inverted microscope, an angled white light illuminator, and a homebuilt environmental cell incubation minichamber, the new instrument enables us to carry out continuous, intermittence-free and long-term (as long as 30h ) dark-field live cell imaging enhanced by resonant light scattering Au NPs. We also show several applications of this real-time imaging system including monitoring the nuclear uptake of bioconjugated Au NPs, tracking the full cycle of cancer cells from birth to division, following the nuclear dynamics during cell mitosis, observing the intracellular distribution of Au NPs, and visualizing the effect of Au NPs on cell viability. Cancer cells were selected for this study not only because we could selectively deliver Au NPs into the cell nuclear region using RGD (arginine-glycine-aspartic acid) and nuclear location sequence (NLS) peptides or the cytoplasm region using RGD alone, but also because of the importance of cancer research, as cancer remains as one of the leading causes of death in the United States and many other parts of the world.


Materials and Methods


Synthesis and Peptide Conjugation of Au NPs

Au NPs were synthesized according to the well-established citrate-reduction method.42, 43 Briefly, 50mL of a 0.01% (by weight) auric acid (Sigma-Aldrich) aqueous solution was heated to boiling while stirring in a 100-mL beaker. Next, 350μL of a 1% (by weight) trisodium citrate (Sigma-Aldrich) aqueous solution was quickly added. The solution changed color within several minutes from yellow to black and then to red, indicating NP formation. The absorption spectrum of the NPs measured by a UV-Vis spectrometer (Ocean Optics) shows the surface plasmon resonance wavelength at around 526nm . Transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL 100CX II) and dynamic light scattering (DLS, ZetaSizer Nano ZS90) show the size of the NPs at about 30nm in diameter.

Before peptide conjugation, Au NPs were modified with thiolated poly(ethylene) glycol (PEG). This was done by mixing 0.8nM citrate capped Au NPs (calculated concentration using εabs=3.0×109M1cm1 determined by Hurst 44) with 2μM methoxy-PEG-thiol (mPEG-SH, molecular weight 5000, Laysan Bio, Inc.) for 2h at room temperature. The PEGylated Au NPs were centrifuged at 14,000rpm for 20min and redispersed in PBS (phosphate-buffered saline) buffer to a final optical density of 2.0. The NLS (CGGGPKKKRKVGG), originating from the SV-40 large T antigen45, 46, 47 and αvβ3 integrin targeting arginine-glycine-aspartate containing peptide (RGDRGDRGDRGDPGC) were bound to Au NPs via Au-S bonds at the cysteine residues. This was done by mixing 50μM RGD alone (for cytoplasmic delivery) or both 50μM RGD and 50μM NLS (for nuclear delivery) with 1nM PEGylated Au NPs. The mixtures were allowed to react overnight. The peptide-conjugated Au NPs were purified by centrifugation at 14,000rpm for 20min and then redispersed in PBS buffer. The surface modification at each step was monitored by changes in the absorption spectra, size, and zeta potential.


Cell Culture and Au NP treatment

Human oral squamous cell carcinoma (HSC-3) cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modification of Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Cellgro) plus 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gem Cell) at 37°C under 5% CO2 . The cells were first placed in a 35-mm glass-bottomed tissue culture dish and allowed to grow for 2days . Then a given volume of Au NPs with an optical density of 2.0 was added to the medium to a final concentration of 0.05to0.4nM . The cells were incubated with the NP-containing medium for 24h . Then, the cells were washed with 1× PBS, immersed in fresh medium, and put in the cell incubation minichamber on the microscope for real-time dark-field live cell imaging. For the particle-tracking experiments, the cell dish was put into the minichamber for imaging immediately after Au NP addition.


Real-Time Dark-Field Light Scattering Imaging

Figure 1 shows the instrumental setup of the real-time dark-field light scattering imaging system. This system is a combination of a commercial inverted Olympus IX70 microscope, an angled white light illumination system, and a homebuilt environmental cell culture minichamber. In the conventional dark-field microscope, a high-NA condenser is used to deliver a narrow beam of white light onto the top of the sample. In our study, the dark-field illumination system was angled with respect to the sample plane, similar to the setup described by Yguerabide 30 This side-illumination arrangement enabled for the location of a homebuilt environmental cell culture minichamber on the microscope stage. The side illumination system was composed of a Fiber-Lite MI-150 white light illuminator (Dolan-Jenner Industries), an optical fiber delivering the light closer to the sample, and a condenser lens focusing the light onto the sample. Using a sample of dried Au NPs on a microscope cover glass, the illumination angle and the focus were optimized so that there was no uneven illumination and the transmission light did not enter the objective ( 40× iris, U Plan FL, NA 0.6, WD2.7). At the sample position, the light beam was about 2mm in diameter.

Fig. 1

Imaging setup and particle targeting strategy. (a) Schematic setup of real-time light scattering imaging system for live cell studies. A dark-field light scattering imaging microscope with a side-illumination arrangement is combined with a homebuilt environmental cell incubation chamber for long-time study of live cells. (b) Absorption spectra of Au NPs before and after surface modification. Surface modification with mPEG-SH molecules induces an 3-nm red shift of the localized surface plasmon resonance wavelength of the Au NPs. Additional binding of RGD/NLS or RGD leads to a further 2-to3-nm red shift of the plasmon wavelength maximum of the nanoparticles. (c) Typical images of HSC-3 cancer cells after incubation with 0.1nM PEG conjugated (left), RGD/NLS/PEG conjugated (middle) and RGD/PEG conjugated (right) Au NPs for overnight in cell culture medium at 37°C . While the PEG conjugated Au NPs do not bind to the cells, RGD/NLS/PEG conjugated ones were accumulated in cell nuclear region and the RGD/PEG conjugated ones were accumulated in cytoplasm. Scale bar: 10μm . (Color online only.)


The environmental chamber, which was made of a double wall of organic glass and a copper bottom with a hole in the middle for light transmission, was connected with a heated/refrigerated circulator (VWR) and with a gas tank containing 5% CO2 in air. A temperature of 57°C of the water in the circulator tank gave a temperature of 37°C of the medium in the cell culture dish in the chamber. The opened water channel in the wall of the chamber served as a humidity reservoir as well to prevent culture from desiccation (humidity: > 95% ). The CO2 flow rate was monitored by a solid acrylic flow meter (Davis Instruments) and adjusted to around 2 scfh (standard cubic feet per hour) to maintain cell culture medium pH. This environmental cell culture system enabled live cell studies in real time over 30h . The images were taken using a Nikon D200 digital camera. A blank microscope cover glass was used to perform a manual white balance of the camera.


Results and Discussion


Monitoring Nuclear Uptake of Peptide-Conjugated Au NPs

Nuclear targeting of NPs is a topic of great importance not only for understanding fundamental gene functions but also for developing gene delivery technology. Nuclear delivery is largely dependent on the use of nuclear localization signals, amino acid sequences that viruses generally use for nuclear entry via interaction with the nuclear pore complex.48, 49 The nuclear localization of Au NPs modified with an NLS peptide from the SV-large T antigen was reported by Xie using TEM and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy50 and by Ryan using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) and nuclear fractionation techniques.51 In our previous study, we observed the nuclear localization of NLS-conjugated Au nanorods using a dark-field microscope and confirmed it with surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy.47 In this work, we modified NLS-conjugated Au NPs by adding a linear RGD peptide to facilitate nuclear targeting of cancer cells, taking advantage of the specific binding of RGD peptides to αvβ3 integin receptors overexpressed on many types of cancer cells and tumor vasculature.52, 53, 54 To overcome NP aggregation by the peptide molecules, we stabilized the NPs with a minimal amount of PEG in advance. Subsequent addition of both RGD and NLS produces Au NPs capped with a mixed monolayer of RGD, NLS, and PEG molecules. Surface modification with mPEG-SH molecules induces about a 3-nm red shift of the NP-localized surface plasmon resonance wavelength [Fig. 1] and a 10-nm increase on the hydrodynamic diameter. The zeta potential dramatically dropped from 40to10mV after PEGylation (Table 1 ). Additional binding of RGD/NLS leads to a further 2to3-nm plasmon wavelength shift and a 5-nm hydrodynamic size change due to the conformational change of PEG molecules after adding peptides. Comparatively, for cytoplasmic NP delivery, the NPs were conjugated with PEG and RGD only. Surface characterization with an absorption spectrum and DLS shows similar changes for dual functionalization. The difference in zeta potential is due to the positive charge contributed by the NLS peptides. Figure 1 shows that PEG-conjugated Au NPs do not bind to the HSC-3 cancer cells. The RGD/PEG-conjugated Au NPs were found in the cytoplasm only. The addition of the NLS peptide leads to a predominantly nuclear accumulation of NPs. Our recent study55 shows that the NLS/RGD/PEG-conjugated Au NPs, at a high concentration, cause DNA damage in cancer cells, but the RGD/PEG-conjugated Au NPs do not. This confirms the success of nuclear targeting by the dual functional Au NPs.

Table 1

Physicochemical properties of plain and surface modified Au NPs with PEG, NLS/RGD/PEG, and RGD/PEG molecules.

Hydrodynamic size (nm) 30±1 41±2 46±2 46±2
Zeta potential (mV) 40±3 10±2 4±2 15±2

Using the real-time light scattering imaging system, we could continuously observe, over hours, how the NPs enter into cells and how they accumulate in the nuclear region. The transport of NLS/RGD/PEG-conjugated Au NPs into single cells within 15h is shown in Fig. 2 . Consecutive dark-field light scattering images show the full process of the nuclear localization of NPs in the presence of 0.05nM NLS/RGD/PEG-conjugated Au NPs [Fig. 2], which shows that NPs are found in nuclear region within 3h . Massive nuclear accumulation takes about 13h , which is consistent with results reported by the literature using a commercial incubator.50 This confirms that our homebuilt minichamber used for imaging live cells does provide a growth environment very similar to that offered by the commercial incubator.

Fig. 2

Real-time tracking of the nuclear uptake of RGD- and NLS-conjugated Au NPs in HSC-3 cancer cells. (a) Time-dependent nuclear uptake of RGD/NLS/PEG-conjugated Au NPs (also see supplementary information in Video 1). (b) Changes of color of Au NPs in the three representative stages of nuclear localization, the color of the Au NPs changes from cyan at low density to yellow at higher density after they transport from the cytoplasm (left) to a smaller volume nucleus (right). For both (a) and (b), the cells were immersed in cell culture medium at 37°C overnight in the presence of 0.05-nM RGD/NLS/PEG-conjugated Au NPs. Scale bar: 10μm . (Color online only.)


The observed nuclear localization indicates that the NPs do escape from the endosome by a yet unknown mechanism and are able to gain access to the nucleus. From Fig. 2, we can see that the Au NPs are first distributed in the cytoplasm ( 1-h image). Then Au NPs penetrate the nuclear membrane and accumulate in the nucleus over time. Finally, the NPs were found to be localized predominately inside the nuclear region after 7h (Video 1 ). The nuclear internalization is possibly via the following steps. First, the NPs must enter into the cytoplasm, most probably by receptor-mediated endocytosis because the RGD on the NPs binds to the integrin receptors on the cancer cell surface. Then the NPs escape from the endosome and transport to the nuclear region. Finally, the NPs transpass nuclear membrane and are accumulated in the nuclear region. There is an alternative way for the RGD/NLS/PEG-conjugated Au NPs to accumulate in the nuclear region after long-term internalization. First, the NPs enter into the cell via the endocytic pathway, probably via receptor-mediated endocytosis. Second, the NPs move toward the Golgi apparatus and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) via retrograde transport and late endosomes to the Golgi apparatus pathway. Third, once at the ER via retrograde transport, the NPs have access to the nucleus envelope and finally to the nuclear region.

Video 1

Real-time observation of nucleus internalization of NLS Au NPs into cancer cell nucleus (QuickTime, 6 MB).


It is possible that the Au NPs inside the nuclear region bind to macromolecules, such as DNA, RNA, or proteins. As a matter of fact, molecular signatures from DNA and proteins in the nucleus were reported by our group47 and other researchers50 using Raman spectroscopy enhanced by the nuclear targeting Au NPs. Note that although we show here a 15-h tracking experiment, this imaging technique can be used for real-time studies up to at least 30h . This gives us the opportunities to study the full cycle of a single live cell, as well as the division of second-generation cells as shown in the following section.

Another interesting finding is the change in the color of Au NPs during the process of nuclear internalization. As shown in Fig. 2, the image on the left shows Au NPs in the cytoplasm. The image in the middle shows that some NPs penetrate the nuclear membrane and accumulate inside the nuclear region. The image on the right shows the majority of NPs initially in the cytoplasm is now localized in the nucleus. From these results, it can be seen that the color of the Au NPs change from cyan to yellow after transport from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. The red shift of the light scattering wavelength is attributed to the NP plasmonic coupling.56, 57, 58 As the plasmonic fields overlap on aggregation, the color shifts from blue to red.

Using the dark-field imaging system, we demonstrated that the behavior of light scattering Au NPs in living cells as well as that of the cells themselves can be monitored in real time over a long-time duration. However, like all other technologies, our current imaging system has some disadvantages. One of these disadvantages is the uneven illumination. Traditional dark-field microscopy setups are designed to provide even illumination from all sides. In our case, the cells were illuminated from one side. This uneven illumination could induce color artifacts in the images, as indicated by the blue shadows in Fig. 2. To eliminate such effects to a large extent, dried Au NPs on a microscope cover glass was used as a standard sample to optimize the illumination angle and the focus. The focus was made as sharp as possible and the transmission light does not enter the objective. In addition to the uneven illumination, there are other limitations, such as low spatial resolution in the direction perpendicular to the image plane and inability to performing multiplex imaging. Therefore, intensive research efforts are still required in the future to address these limitations.


Tracking the Full Cycle of Cancer Cells from Birth to Division

Knowledge about the complex processes of the cell cycle is indispensable in understanding cancer formation and progression, and the signaling pathways responsible for human tumorigenesis. It is undoubted that the most straightforward method to investigate the cell cycle is imaging. For mammalian cells, it is a great challenge because of the very long period of the cell cycle (about 24h ) and we could not rely on fluorescence microscopy. Our technique of real-time light scattering imaging enables continuous, intermittence-free, and long-time imaging, providing an approach for dealing with this challenge. Figure 3 shows that consecutive dark-field light scattering images of a living cancer cell in a full cycle from birth to division. Although the G1, S, and G2 phases cannot be clearly resolved, the M phase can be seen occurring between 13 and 15h . The morphological changes of the cell at these phases can also be observed in real time. While the whole cycle takes as long as over 16h , the division takes only about 2h . Note that the NPs remain in the nuclear region after division. This demonstrates that the instrument developed here is capable of real-time cell cycle studies at the single-cell level. This is helpful for investigating the dynamics of a single cell at different phases in a cell cycle.

Fig. 3

Real-time tracking of a full cycle of a HSC-3 cancer cell with Au NPs localized in the nuclear region from birth to division. The cells were incubated with 0.1nM RGD/NLS/PEG-conjugated Au NPs in cell culture medium at 37°C overnight before the tracking experiment. Using the enhanced real-time light scattering imaging technique, we were able to track the full cycle of a cell from birth to division and monitor the distribution of the nanoparticles in single cells in real time. Labels on the images indicate the time lapse. Scale bar: 10μm .



Following Nuclear Dynamics during Cell Mitosis

Using the imaging technique and Au NPs as contrast agents, we followed especially the mitosis process at a higher time resolution (Fig. 4 ). The mitosis of eukaryotic cells is a complex process involving chromosome condensation, nuclear envelope and lamina disassembly, spindle formation, and movement of varied nuclear proteins.59, 60, 61 Although fluorescence live-cell imaging techniques facilitate the detection of chromosomes and various cellular proteins, the study of dynamical properties of centrosomes and kinetochores, and gain us insights on the molecular mechanisms of tubulin,14, 15, 16, 17 the disadvantages of photobleaching and phototoxicity limit the applications in long-term imaging. The light scattering imaging technique assisted by Au NP contrast agents could be a potential alternative for imaging the complicated process of mitosis in real time. As shown in Fig. 4, subphases from prophase to cytokinesis during the course of mitosis can be well resolved by the light scattering Au NP contrast agents.

Fig. 4

Real-time tracking of the mitosis process of a HSC-3 cancer cell with Au NPs localized in the nuclear region. The motion of the chromosome at different stage of mitosis is resolved by the light scattering imaging of RGD/NLS/PEG-conjugated Au NPs in the nuclear region (also see supplementary information in Video 2). The cells were incubated with 0.1nM RGD/NLS/PEG-conjugated Au NPs in a cell culture medium at 37°C overnight before the tracking experiment. The time lapse shown in each image is as hour:minute. Scale bar: 10μm .


Binding of NLS-conjugated Au NPs to chromosomes were previously confirmed by the detection of surface enhanced Raman signals from DNA in single cells,47, 50 so it is not surprising that the RGD/NLS/PEG-modified Au NPs in our study might bind to the chromosomes and enable us to track the chromosome dynamics. It is well known that the configuration of the chromosome keeps changing during mitosis, and the characteristic chromosome pattern is used to identify the different stages of mitosis. From Fig. 4, it is obvious that the evolution of the pattern of Au NP distribution inside of the nucleus exactly follows that of the chromosomes, indicating the binding of Au NPs to the chromosomes. In agreement with results in Fig. 3, it is found that Au NPs, initially inside the nucleus of the parent cell, remain in the nucleus of the daughter cells. Another interesting phenomenon is that Au NPs do not seem to divide equally between the two daughter cells (see Video 2 ). The capability of resolving every stage of the mitosis process at a single-cell level based on light scattering from peptide-conjugated Au NPs implicates that this new technology has great potential to provide us with new insights in understanding mitosis, a very important cellular process.

Video 2

Following the nuclear dynamics using Au NPs during cell mitosis (QuickTime, 5 MB).



Observing Intracellular Distribution of Au NPs during Cell Division

To futher understand the behavior of Au NPs during cell mitosis, we tracked the distribution of Au NPs before and after cell division. By selectively conjugating Au NPs with specific molecules (NLS/RGD or RGD alone), we were able to deliver them either into the nucleus or into the cytoplasm. It is obvious that the final distribution of the Au NPs in daughter cells depends on their initial location in the parent cell (Fig. 5 ). Both NLS- and RGD-conjugated Au NPs, initially localized in the nucleus of the mother cell, are found in the nucleus of the daughter cells after division (see Video 3 ). This is consistent with the images shown in the Figs. 3 and 4. RGD-conjugated Au NPs initially localized in the cytoplasm of the mother cell, are found only in the cytoplasm of the daughter cells (see Video 4 ). It is well known that in mitosis, the nuclear envelope disintegrates during prophase and reforms in telophase. This implies that during the period of metaphase and anaphase, the environment of the nucleus and the cytoplasm completely mix with one another. However, Au NPs remain either in the nuclear or cytoplasmic regions after cell division. As explained previously, the preservation of Au NPs in the nuclear region is possibly due to the binding of the NPs to the chromosomes. The preservation in the cytoplasmic region is probably due to NP encapsulation in endosomes, which keep them inside the cytoplasm duiring mitosis.

Fig. 5

Motion and distributon of Au NPs during cell mitosis. When the particles are localized in the nuclear region of mother cells, they remain in the nuclear region of daughter cells. When they are localized in the cytopalsm of mother cells, they remain in the cytoplasm of daughter cells (also see Video 3 and 4). The cells were incubated with 0.1nM RGD/NLS/PEG (top) and RGD/PEG (bottom) conjugated Au NPs in cell culture medium at 37°C overnight before the tracking experiment. Scale bar: 10μm . The time is shown as hour:minute.


Video 3

Movement and distributon of Au NPs initially inside the nucleus during cell mitosis (QuickTime, 1.79 MB).


Video 4

Movement and distributon of Au NPs initially inside the cytoplasm during cell mitosis (QuickTime, 2.09 MB).



Visualizing the Effects of Au NPs on Cell Viability

Another application of this imaging technique is the observation of the effects of Au NPs on the viability of daughter cells. In our experiments, we found that Au NPs did not induce any effect on the cell growth or division, nor on the growth of daughter cells until the dose of RGD/NLS/PEG-conjugated Au NPs added to the culture medium was increased above 0.4nM . In the specific case shown in Fig. 6 , we found that Au NPs were not equally divided between the two daughter cells, and the daughter cell with more Au NPs in the nucleus did not survive (see Video 5 ). Therefore, although Au NPs at a concentration of 0.4nM do not have obvious effects on the parent cell (which remained alive until division), they could cause the death of the daughter cell in the later stages of cell division. This indicates the potential of developing Au NPs as anticancer drugs. Currently, we do not know much about the mechanism, but we have confirmed that the death of the daughter cell is a consequence of the DNA damage induced by the presence of the high density of Au NPs inside the cell nucleus.55 Further investigation of the interaction between Au NPs and chromosomes will help us to develop Au NPs as drug for cancer therapy.

Fig. 6

Genotoxicity of high-dose Au NPs. In this case, the concentration of RGD/NLS/PEG-conjugated Au NPs is 0.4nM . It is obvious that Au NPs are not equally divided among the two daughter cells and the daughter cell with more Au NPs in nucleus does not survive, as indicated by arrow (also see Video 5). The time is shown as hour:minute and the scale bar is 10μm .


Video 5

Effects of bioconjugated Au NPs on the viability of daughter cells under a high dose (QuickTime, 1.5 MB).




We showed the possibility of using plasmonic nanotechnology for live cell imaging and the study of various cellular processes that occurring inside the cytoplasm or, especially, the nuclear region over a long period of time (up to two cell cycles). The nuclear dynamics during cell mitosis was observed in real time in living cells. We showed that Au NPs inside the nuclear region could provide robust light scattering contrast agents to identify and study various stages of mitosis with the real-time dark-field light scattering imaging system we have developed. The final distribution of the Au NPs in the daughter cells depends on the initial location of the NPs in the parent cell. At the high concentration of 0.4nM , while the NPs do not have an effect on parent cells, they induce death in the daughter cells. Dark-field imaging utilizing the enhanced light scattering signal from plasmonic NPs is a new emerging technology that extends and/or complements current mainstream fluorescence techniques. It is certain that further technological developments in this area will increase our understanding of cellular processes and functions and provide us with new strategies for disease diagnosis and therapy.


We wish to thank the Department of Energy (Grant No. DE-FG02-97 ER 14799) for supporting this research. X. Huang would like to thank the distinguished CCNE postdoctoral fellowship at Emory-Georgia Tech Cancer Center for Nanotechnology Excellence. We thank Megan Mackey for her assistance in revising this manuscript.



W. Rudolph and M. Kempe, “Trends in optical biomedical imaging,” J. Mod. Opt., 44 (9), 1617 –1642 (1997). 0950-0340 Google Scholar


C. Bremer, V. Ntziachristos, and R. Weissleder, “Optical-based molecular imaging: contrast agents and potential medical applications,” Eur. Radiol., 13 (2), 231 –243 (2003). 0938-7994 Google Scholar


R. Parthasarathy and J. T. Groves, “Optical techniques for imaging membrane topography,” Cell Biochem. Biophys., 41 (3), 391 –414 (2004). 1085-9195 Google Scholar


S. A. Boppart A. L. Oldenburg, C. Y. Xu, and D. L. Marks, “Optical probes and techniques for molecular contrast enhancement in coherence imaging,” J. Biomed. Opt., 10 (4), 041208 (2005). 1083-3668 Google Scholar


N. Thekkek and R. Richards-Kortum, “Optical imaging for cervical cancer detection: solutions for a continuing global problem,” Nat. Rev. Cancer, 8 (9), 725 –731 (2008). 1474-175X Google Scholar


C. Balas, “Review of biomedical optical imaging—a powerful, non-invasive, non-ionizing technology for improving in vivo diagnosis,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 20 104020 (2009). 0957-0233 Google Scholar


G. Wang, A. S. Stender, W. Sun, and N. Fang, “Optical imaging of non-fluorescent nanoparticle probes in live cells,” Analyst, 135 (2), 215 –221 (2010). Google Scholar


M. Dahan, S. Levi, C. Luccardini, P. Rostaing, B. Riveau, and A. Triller, “Diffusion dynamics of glycine receptors revealed by single-quantum dot tracking,” Science, 302 (5644), 442 –445 (2003). 0036-8075 Google Scholar


J. K. Jaiswal, H. Mattoussi, J. M. Mauro, and S. M. Simon, “Long-term multiple color imaging of live cells using quantum dot bioconjugates,” Nat. Biotechnol., 21 (1), 47 –51 (2003). 1087-0156 Google Scholar


C. J. Weijer, “Visualizing signals moving in cells,” Science, 300 (5616), 96 –100 (2003). 0036-8075 Google Scholar


X. Michalet, F. F. Pinaud, L. A. Bentolila, J. M. Tsay, S. Doose, J. J. Li, G. Sundaresan, A. M. Wu, S. S. Gambhir, and S. Weiss, “Quantum dots for live cells, in vivo imaging, and diagnostics,” Science, 307 (5709), 538 –544 (2005). 0036-8075 Google Scholar


K. I. Willig, S. O. Rizzoli, V. Westphal, R. Jahn, and S. W. Hell, “STED microscopy reveals that synaptotagmin remains clustered after synaptic vesicle exocytosis,” Nature, 440 (7086), 935 –939 (2006). 0028-0836 Google Scholar


B. Huang, W. Q. Wang, M. Bates, and X. W. Zhuang, “Three-dimensional superresolution imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy,” Science, 319 (5864), 810 –813 (2008). 0036-8075 Google Scholar


M. J. Kallio, V. A. Beardmore, J. Weinstein, and G. J. Gorbsky, “Rapid microtubule-independent dynamics of Cdc20 at kinetochores and centrosomes in mammalian cells,” J. Cell Biol., 158 (5), 841 –847 (2002). 0021-9525 Google Scholar


G. H. Patterson and J. Lippincott-Schwartz, “A photoactivatable GFP for selective photolabeling of proteins and cells,” Science, 297 (5588), 1873 –1877 (2002). 0036-8075 Google Scholar


P. Kalab, K. Weis, and R. Heald, “Visualization of a Ran-GTP gradient in interphase and mitotic Xenopus egg extracts,” Science, 295 (5564), 2452 –2456 (2002). 0036-8075 Google Scholar


J. Lippincott-Schwartz and G. H. Patterson, “Development and use of fluorescent protein markers in living cells,” Science, 300 (5616), 87 –91 (2003). 0036-8075 Google Scholar


M. J. Saxton and K. Jacobson, “Single-particle tracking: applications to membrane dynamics,” Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct., 26 373 –399 (1997). 1056-8700 Google Scholar


B. Schuler, E. A. Lipman, and W. A. Eaton, “Probing the free-energy surface for protein folding with single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy,” Nature, 419 (6908), 743 –747 (2002). 0028-0836 Google Scholar


Y. Ohsugi, K. Saito, M. Tamura, and M. Kinjo, “Lateral mobility of membrane-binding proteins in living cells measured by total internal reflection fluorescence correlation spectroscopy,” Biophys. J., 91 (9), 3456 –3464 (2006). 0006-3495 Google Scholar


H. P. Babcock, C. Chen, and X. W. Zhuang, “Using single-particle tracking to study nuclear trafficking of viral genes,” Biophys. J., 87 (4), 2749 –2758 (2004). 0006-3495 Google Scholar


B. Brandenburg and X. W. Zhuang, “Virus trafficking—learning from single-virus tracking,” Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 5 (3), 197 –208 (2007). 1740-1526 Google Scholar


C. H. Foyer, P. Descourvieres, and K. J. Kunert, “Protection against oxygen radicals—an important defense-mechanism studied in transgenic plants,” Plant, Cell Environ., 17 (5), 507 –523 (1994). 0140-7791 Google Scholar


L. L. Song, C. A. G. O. Varma, J. W. Verhoeven, and H. J. Tanke, “Influence of the triplet excited state on the photobleaching kinetics of fluorescein in microscopy,” Biophys. J., 70 (6), 2959 –2968 (1996). 0006-3495 Google Scholar


M. Soszynski and G. Bartosz, “Decrease in accessible thiols as an index of oxidative damage to membrane proteins,” Free Radic Biol. Med., 23 (3), 463 –469 (1997). 0891-5849 Google Scholar


L. L. Song, R. P. M. van Gijlswijk, I. T. Young, and H. J. Tanke, “Influence of fluorochrome labeling density on the photobleaching kinetics of fluorescein in microscopy,” Cytometry, 27 (3), 213 –223 (1997).<213::AID-CYTO2>3.0.CO;2-F 0196-4763 Google Scholar


A. Wright, W. A. Bubb, C. L. Hawkins, and M. J. Davies, “Singlet oxygen-mediated protein oxidation: Evidence for the formation of reactive side chain peroxides on tyrosine residues,” Photochem. Photobiol., 76 (1), 35 –46 (2002).<0035:SOMPOE>2.0.CO;2 0031-8655 Google Scholar


T. Bernas, M. Zarebski, P. R. Cook, and J. W. Dobrucki, “Minimizing photobleaching during confocal microscopy of fluorescent probes bound to chromatin: role of anoxia and photon flux,” J. Micros. Oxford, 215 281 –295 (2004). Google Scholar


J. Yguerabide and E. E. Yguerabide, “Light-scattering submicroscopic particles as highly fluorescent analogs and their use as tracer labels in clinical and biological applications. I. Theory,” Anal. Biochem., 262 (2), 137 –156 (1998). 0003-2697 Google Scholar


J. Yguerabide and E. E. Yguerabide, “Light-scattering submicroscopic particles as highly fluorescent analogs and their use as tracer labels in clinical and biological applications. II. Experimental characterization,” Anal. Biochem., 262 (2), 157 –186 (1998). 0003-2697 Google Scholar


J. Yguerabide and E. E. Yguerabide, “Resonance light scattering particles as ultrasensitive labels for detection of analytes in a wide range of applications,” J. Cell Biochem. Suppl., 37 71 –81 (2001). 0733-1959 Google Scholar


K. Sokolov, M. Follen, J. Aaron, I. Pavlova, A. Malpica, R. Lotan, and R. Richartz-Kortum, “Real-time vital optical imaging of precancer using anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies conjugated to gold nanoparticles,” Cancer Res., 63 (9), 1999 –2004 (2003). 0008-5472 Google Scholar


I. H. El-Sayed, X. Huang, and M. A. El-Sayed, “Surface plasmon resonance scattering and absorption of anti-EGFR antibody conjugated gold nanoparticles in cancer diagnostics: applications in oral cancer,” Nano Lett., 5 (5), 829 –834 (2005). 1530-6984 Google Scholar


J. Aaron, N. Nitin, K. Travis, S. Kumar, T. Collier, S. Y. Park, M. Jose-Yacaman, L. Coghlan, M. Follen, R. Richards-Kortum, and K. Sokolov, “Plasmon resonance coupling of metal nanoparticles for molecular imaging of carcinogenesis in vivo,” J. Biomed. Opt., 12 (3), 034007 (2007). 1083-3668 Google Scholar


J. W. Stone, P. N. Sisco, E. C. Goldsmith, S. C. Baxter, and C. J. Murphy, “Using gold nanorods to probe cell-induced collagen deformation,” Nano Lett., 7 (1), 116 –119 (2007). 1530-6984 Google Scholar


C. J. Murphy, A. M. Gole, J. W. Stone, P. N. Sisco, A. M. Alkilany, E. C. Goldsmith, and S. C. Baxter, “Gold nanoparticles in biology: beyond toxicity to cellular imaging,” Acc. Chem. Res., 41 (12), 1721 –1730 (2008). 0001-4842 Google Scholar


Y. Hu, Q. Chen, Y. Ding, R. T. Li, X. Q. Jiang, and B. R. Liu, “Entering and Lighting Up Nuclei Using Hollow Chitosan-Gold Hybrid Nanospheres,” Adv. Mater., 21 (36), 3639 –3643 (2009). 0935-9648 Google Scholar


S. Kumar, N. Harrison, R. Richards-Kortum, and K. Sokolov, “Plasmonic nanosensors for imaging intracellular biomarkers in live cells,” Nano Lett., 7 (5), 1338 –1343 (2007). 1530-6984 Google Scholar


G. X. Rong, H. Y. Wang, L. R. Skewis, and B. M. Reinhard, “Resolving sub-diffraction limit encounters in nanoparticle tracking using live cell plasmon coupling microscopy,” Nano Lett., 8 (10), 3386 –3393 (2008). 1530-6984 Google Scholar


J. Aaron, K. Travis, N. Harrison, and K. Sokolov, “Dynamic imaging of molecular assemblies in live cells based on nanoparticle plasmon resonance coupling,” Nano Lett., 9 (10), 3612 –3618 (2009). 1530-6984 Google Scholar


Y. W. Jun, S. Sheikholeslami, D. R. Hostetter, C. Tajon, C. S. Craik, and A. P. Alivisatos, “Continuous imaging of plasmon rulers in live cells reveals early-stage caspase-3 activation at the single-molecule level,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 106 (42), 17735 –17740 (2009). 0027-8424 Google Scholar


J. Turkevich, P. C. Stvenson, and J. Hillier, “A study of the nucleation and growth processes in the synthesis of colloidal gold,” Discuss. Faraday Soc., 11 55 –75 (1951). 0014-7664 Google Scholar


G. Frens, “Controlled nucleation for the regulation of the particle size in monodisperse gold suspensions,” Nature (London), Phys. Sci., 241 (105), 20 –22 (1973). 0300-8746 Google Scholar


S. J. Hurst, A. K. R. Lytton-Jean, and C. A. Mirkin, “Maximizing DNA loading on a range of gold nanoparticle sizes,” Anal. Chem., 78 (24), 8313 –8318 (2006). 0003-2700 Google Scholar


A. G. Tkachenko, H. Xie, D. Coleman, W. Glomm, J. Ryan, M. F. Anderson, S. Franzen, and D. L. Feldheim, “Multifunctional gold nanoparticle-peptide complexes for nuclear targeting,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 125 (16), 4700 –4701 (2003). 0002-7863 Google Scholar


A. G. Tkachenko, H. Xie, Y. Liu, D. Coleman, J. Ryan, W. R. Glomm, M. K. Shipton, S. Franzen, and D. L. Feldheim, “Cellular trajectories of peptide-modified gold particle complexes: comparison of nuclear localization signals and peptide transduction domains,” Bioconjugate Chem., 15 (3), 482 –490 (2004). 1043-1802 Google Scholar


A. K. Oyelere, B. Chen, X. Huang, I. H. El-Sayed, and M. A. El-Sayed, “Peptide conjugated gold nanorods for nuclear targeting,” Bioconjugate Chem., 18 (5), 1490 –1497 (2007). 1043-1802 Google Scholar


S. Nakielny and G. Dreyfuss, “Transport of proteins and RNAs in and out of the nucleus,” Cell, 99 (7), 677 –690 (1999). 0092-8674 Google Scholar


V. Escriou, M. Carrie‘re, D. Scherman, and P. Wils, “N LS bioconjugates for targeting therapeutic genes to the nucleus,” Adv. Drug Delivery Rev., 55 295 –306 (2003). 0169-409X Google Scholar


W. Xie, L. Wang, Y. Zhang, L. Su, A. Shen, J. Tan, and J. Hu, “Nuclear targeted nanoprobe for single living cell detection by surface-enhanced raman scattering,” Bioconjugate Chem., 20 (4), 768 –773 (2009). 1043-1802 Google Scholar


J. A. Ryan, K. W. Overton, M. E. Speight, C. N. Oldenburg, L. Loo, W. Robarge, S. Franzen, and D. L. Feldheim, “Cellular uptake of gold nanoparticles passivated with BSA-SV40 large T antigen conjugates,” Anal. Chem., 79 (23), 9150 –9159 (2007). 0003-2700 Google Scholar


W. Cai, D. M. Shin, K. Chen, O. Gheysens, Q. Cao, S. X. Wang, S. S. Gambhir, and X. Chen, “Peptide-labeled near-infrared quantum dots for imaging tumor vasculature in living subjects,” Nano Lett., 6 (4), 669 –676 (2006). 1530-6984 Google Scholar


W. Cai and X. Chen, “Preparation of peptide-conjugated quantum dots for tumor vasculature-targeted imaging,” Nat. Protoc., 3 89 –96 (2008). 1750-2799 Google Scholar


Z. Li, P. Huang, X. Zhang, J. Lin, S. Yang, B. Liu, F. Gao, P. Xi, Q. Ren, and D. Cui, “RGD-conjugated dendrimer-modified gold nanorods for in vivo tumor targeting and photothermal therapy,” Molec. Pharmaceut., 7 (1), 94 –104 (2010). Google Scholar


B. Kang, M. Mackey, and M. A. El-Sayed, “Nuclear targeting of gold nanoparticles in cancer cells induces DNA damage, causing cytokinesis arrest and apoptosis,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 132 (5), 1517 –1518 (2010). 0002-7863 Google Scholar


P. K. Jain, W. Huang, and M. A. El-Sayed, “On the universal scaling behavior of the distance decay of plasmon coupling in metal nanoparticle pairs: a plasmon ruler equation,” Nano Lett., 7 (7), 2080 –2088 (2007). 1530-6984 Google Scholar


P. K. Jain and M. A. El-Sayed, “Surface plasmon coupling and its universal size scaling in metal nanostructures of complex geometry: elongated particle pairs and nanosphere trimers,” J. Phys. Chem. C, 112 (13), 4954 –4960 (2008). 1932-7447 Google Scholar


C. Tabor, R. Murali, M. A. Mahmoud, and M. A. El-Sayed, “On the use of plasmonic nanoparticle pairs as a plasmon ruler: the dependence of the near-field dipole plasmon coupling on nanoparticle size and shape,” J. Phys. Chem. A, 113 (10), 1946 –1953 (2009). 1089-5639 Google Scholar


G. Ostergren, J. Molebajer, and A. Bajer, “An Interpretation of Transport Phenomena at Mitosis,” Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 90 (2), 381 –408 (1960). 0077-8923 Google Scholar


S. Inoue and H. Sato, “Cell motility by labile association of molecules—nature of mitotic spindle fibers and their role in chromosome movement,” Gen. Physiol., 50 (6), 259 –292 (1967). Google Scholar


S. Inoue, “Video image-processing greatly enhances contrast, quality, and speed in polarization-based microscopy,” J. Cell Biol., 89 (2), 346 –356 (1981). 0021-9525 Google Scholar
©(2010) Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
Wei Qian, Xiaohua Huang, Bin Kang, and Mostafa A. El-Sayed "Dark-field light scattering imaging of living cancer cell component from birth through division using bioconjugated gold nanoprobes," Journal of Biomedical Optics 15(4), 046025 (1 July 2010).
Published: 1 July 2010

Back to Top