20 March 2013 Imaging and quantifying Brownian motion of micro- and nanoparticles using phase-resolved Doppler variance optical coherence tomography
Author Affiliations +
Different types and sizes of micro- and nanoparticles have been synthesized and developed for numerous applications. It is crucial to characterize the particle sizes. Traditional dynamic light scattering, a predominant method used to characterize particle size, is unable to provide depth resolved information or imaging functions. Doppler variance optical coherence tomography (OCT) measures the spectral bandwidth of the Doppler frequency shift due to the Brownian motion of the particles utilizing the phase-resolved approach and can provide quantitative information about particle size. Spectral bandwidths of Doppler frequency shifts for various sized particles were quantified and were demonstrated to be inversely proportional to the diameter of the particles. The study demonstrates the phase-resolved Doppler variance spectral domain OCT technique has the potential to be used to investigate the properties of particles in highly scattering media.

Various types of micro- and nanoparticles in different sizes have recently been employed in optical, electronic, and magnetic devices. Nanoparticles, which are in the same size range as biological macromolecules, proteins, and nucleic acids, have attracted much attention in biological and biomedical applications.8 Nanoparticles have been used for biosensing, cellular and in situ hybridization labeling, cell tagging and sorting, point-of-care diagnostics, kinetic and binding studies, imaging enhancement, and drug delivery.9 The physical and chemical properties of these particles have a strong correlation with the particle size.7 Currently, dynamic light scattering (DLS), which utilizes the intensity correlation function of scattered light, has been predominantly used to determine the size of micro- and nanoparticles.10 Recently, DLS has been further developed to extend its application to strongly scattering media.1112.13.14.15 However, traditional DLS cannot provide imaging functions.10 Low coherence interferometry (LCI) assisted DLS has been developed based on slow time domain and spectral analyzing method, providing limited depth range with stationary11 or limited reference path length delay.1213.14 Optical coherence tomography (OCT), a noninvasive and high resolution imaging modality, has been used to detect scattering signals from samples in real time utilizing Michelson’s interferometer principle.1617.18 Differences in diffusion with micro- and nanoparticles were demonstrated by employing not only time domain-OCT but also spectral domain-OCT (SD-OCT) that is based on the power spectrum of the temporal fluctuations of the OCT magnitude.19 Phase-resolved Doppler OCT (PR-D-OCT) has been developed by combining OCT with Doppler velocimetry for blood flow imaging.20 We have further developed PR-D-OCT into phase-resolved Doppler variance OCT (PR-DV-OCT) and reported the applications of PR-DV-OCT for mapping vasculature as well as for quantifying transverse flow velocity.21 Interestingly, the Doppler variance method is not sensitive to bulk-motion, and the Doppler variance method can be used without correcting the bulk-motion, making it possible for in vivo imaging.22 Since the Brownian motion will broaden the spectral bandwidth of the Doppler frequency shift (Doppler bandwidth), PR-DV-OCT, which measures the Doppler bandwidth, will be affected by the Brownian motion and has a strong correlation with particle size.23 In this study, we report on quantification of particle size with a phase-resolved Doppler variance SD-OCT system. Spectral bandwidths of Doppler frequency shift for micro- and nanoparticles in various sizes were demonstrated to be inversely proportional to the diameter of the particles. This technique will be a testbed to explore the potential phase-resolved Doppler variance SD-OCT applications to study the properties of particles in highly scattering media.

Brownian movement is not due to external forces but results from the bombardment of the dispersed particles. The diffusion coefficient can be determined from the Einstein-Stokes equation and is represented by


where KB is Boltzmann’s constant (1.38×1023m2kgs2K1), T is absolute temperature, η is viscosity, and r is the radius of the spherical particle.24 The spectral bandwidth (Bd) of the scattered light from particles has a Lorentz distribution with a half-width at half maximum (FWHM) of the spectrum25


The q is defined in terms of the scattering geometry as


where n is the refractive index, λ is the wavelength of the incident radiation in vacuum, and θ is the scattering angle. For a Gaussian optical beam, the full width at 1/e of maximum spectrum amplitude Doppler bandwidth (B1/e) can be calculated as the inverse of the transit time by the particles passing through the focusing area:26


where V is the flow velocity and w is the effective waist diameter of the probe beam in the focal area, which represents the transit length of moving Brownian motion of particles.

The Doppler bandwidth can also be represented by the spectral bandwidth:21


For a Gaussian optical beam, standard deviation (σ) and Doppler bandwidth have the following relationship:


By combining Eqs. (2), (5), and (6), σ can be represented by


The Doppler bandwidth can be represented by


Therefore, the Doppler bandwidth is linearly proportional to 1/r for the constant viscosity and temperature in a colloidal solution.

The schematic diagram of the SD-OCT system is shown in Fig. 1. The light source is a super luminescent diode (Superlum D890-HP, Russia) with a center wavelength of 890 nm and a FWHM of 150 nm. The laser output is split by an 80/20 coupler with 80% of the power directed to the reference arm and 20% to the sample arm. The interference signal was detected by a homemade high performance spectrometer with the CCD line scan camera operating at 20 kHz. The measured system sensitivity was 100 dB at zero imaging depth and dropped to 91 dB at 2 mm with the integration time of the CCD camera set at 50 μs. The axial and lateral resolutions of the system were 3.5 and 15 μm, respectively. The phase stability of the system was measured to be 0.48 milliradians. Two-dimensional and 3D images were achieved by using a 3D galvo scanner. DV-OCT imaging for each particle sample was acquired under the same conditions.

Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of spectrometer-based Fourier domain optical coherence tomography system.


Polystyrene particles in various sizes (81, 202, 350, 485, and 752 nm in diameter) at an approximately 2.6% solid (w/v) in deionized (DI) water concentration (Polyscience, Inc., Warrington, Pennsylvania) were used without further modification. Gold nanoparticles (Au NPs) in different sizes (18, 33, 52, and 126 nm in diameter) were synthesized by following the published protocol with slight modifications.15,27 The mean diameter of Au NPs was characterized by using a DLS particle analyzer (Zetasizer Nano series- ZEN 3600, Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK). The mean size of each particle sample was obtained from at least 10 repeated measurements and further compared with the observed morphology under a transmission electron microscopy. Concentrations of Au NPs in different sizes were calculated using the UV/vis spectroscopic method as reported previously.28 The concentrated Au NPs in sizes of 18, 33, 52, and 126 nm in diameter, respectively, by 30 min centrifugation at 13,200, 9,000, 8,000, and 4,000 rpm in room temperature were resuspended in DI water at a concentration of 175μg/mL. Before the OCT imaging, all particles were sonicated for at least 20 s to be homogeneous. Then, one hundred microliters of colloidal solution of Au NPs and polystyrene particles were dropped in a 96 well plate and incubated at room temperature for 3 h to equilibrate the temperature to minimize the fluctuation of Brownian motion by temperature. Spectrometer-based Fourier domain OCT was used for DV-OCT imaging. Raw data was processed and quantified within a 200 by 50 pixels area under the vertex of the colloidal particle surface for 5 consecutive images and averaged with nonzero data containing pixels.

The amplitude of the DV-OCT signal per averaged pixels shown in Fig. 2 increased as the size of the particles decreased due to the faster Brownian motion for polystyrene particles, which is in good agreement with Eq. (8). The penetration depth decreased as the size of the polystyrene particle increased because of stronger scattering from larger particles. Au NPs of small sizes showed low frequency of pixel numbers in DV-OCT images because the scattering signal was much weaker for Au NPs of smaller sizes. However, each nonzero pixel of DV-OCT images of Au NPs showed a higher Doppler bandwidth in Au NPs of smaller sizes due to faster Brownian motion. The DV-OCT images of polystyrene and Au NPs were quantified by the averaged standard deviation of phase differences over 5 consecutive images. For each image, the standard deviation was calculated by averaging three distinct areas covering 200 by 50 nonzero data containing pixels. Interestingly, Fig. 3 shows that the Doppler bandwidth is inversely proportional to the particle diameter due to the size-dependent Brownian motion of particles at a constant temperature regardless of micro- and nanoparticles.

Fig. 2

DV-OCT images for different sizes of polystyrene particles and gold nanoparticles (Au NPs); σ is the standard deviation of the Doppler spectrum.


Fig. 3

PR-DV-OCT quantification with micro- and nanoparticles. The trend line shows a uniform linear correlation between the broadening spectral bandwidth of the Doppler frequency shift of particles and 1/D with R2=0.99295.


In conclusion, various sizes of polystyrene and Au NPs were imaged with PR-DV-OCT, and the images were quantified in terms of Doppler bandwidth. The broadening spectral bandwidth of the Doppler frequency shift of particles is inversely proportional to the particle diameter. While the data presented is in the context of colloidal solution, the relationship between the bandwidth broadening of Doppler frequency and particle sizes can potentially serve as a framework to image and quantify micro- and nanoparticle-based optical contrast agents in highly scattering, biologically relevant media.


This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01EB-10090, R01HL-105215, R01EY-021519, R01HL-103764, K25HL-102055, and P41EB-015890), Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-10-1-0538), World Class University program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, South Korea (R31-2008-000-20004-0), and the Beckman Laser Institute Endowment. Dr. Chen has a financial interest in OCT Medical Imaging Inc., which, however, did not support this work.


1. J. M. Petroskiet al., “Kinetically controlled growth and shape formation mechanism of platinum nanoparticles,” J. Phys. Chem. B. 102(18), 3316–3320 (1998).JPCBFK1520-6106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp981030f Google Scholar

2. J. C. HulteenC. R. J. Martin, “A general template-based method for the preparation of nanomaterials,” J. Mater. Chem. 7(7), 1075–1087 (1997).JMACEP0959-9428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/a700027h Google Scholar

3. Y. Yuet al., “Gold nanorods: electrochemical synthesis and optical properties,” J. Phys. Chem. B 101(34), 6661–6664 (1997).JPCBFK1520-6106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp971656q Google Scholar

4. B. M. I. van der Zandeet al., “Aqueous gold sols of rod-shaped particles,” J. Phys. Chem. B 101(6), 852–854 (1997).JPCBFK1520-6106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp963348i Google Scholar

5. I. LisieckiF. BilloudetM. P. Pileni, “Control of the shape and the size of copper metallic particles,” J. Phys. Chem. 100(10), 4160–4166 (1996).JPCHAX0022-3654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp9523837 Google Scholar

6. T. S. Ahmadiet al., “Shape-controlled synthesis of colloidal platinum nanoparticles,” Science 272(5270), 1924–1925 (1996).SCIEAS0036-8075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.272.5270.1924 Google Scholar

7. A. Henglein, “Physicochemical properties of small metal particles in solution: “microelectrode” reactions, chemisorption, composite metal particles, and the atom-to-metal transition,” J. Phys. Chem. 97(21), 5457–5471 (1993).JPCHAX0022-3654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/j100123a004 Google Scholar

8. G. Schmid, Clusters and Colloids: from Theory to Applications, 1st ed., pp. 469–473, VCH, Weinheim, Germany (1994). Google Scholar

9. D. A. Stuartet al., “Biological applications of localised surface plasmonic phenomenae,” IEE Proc. Nanobiotechnol. 152(1), 13–32 (2005).IPNEAY1478-1581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ip-nbt:20045012 Google Scholar

10. B. J. BerneR. Pecora, Dynamic Light Scattering, 1st ed., pp. 105–109, A Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York (1976). Google Scholar

11. G. PopescuA. Gogariu, “Dynamic light scattering in localized coherence volumes,” Opt. Express 26(8), 551–553 (2001).OPEXFF1094-4087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.26.000551 Google Scholar

12. K. K. BizhevaA. M. SiegelD. A. Boas, “Path-length-resolved dynamic light scattering in highly scattering random media: the transition to diffusing wave spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. E 58(6), 7664–7667 (1998).PLEEE81063-651X http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.58.7664 Google Scholar

13. A. L. PetoukhovaW. SteenbergenF. F. de Mul, “Path-length distribution and path-length-resolved Doppler measurements of multiply scattered photons by use of low-coherence interferometry,” Opt. Lett. 26(19), 1492–1494 (2001).OPLEDP0146-9592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.26.001492 Google Scholar

14. D. A. BoasK. K. BizhevaA. M. Siegel, “Using dynamic low-coherence interferometry to image Brownian motion within highly scattering media,” Opt. Lett. 23(5), 319–321 (1998).OPLEDP0146-9592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.23.000319 Google Scholar

15. Y. Parket al., “Light scattering of human red blood cells during metabolic remodeling of the membrane,” J. Biomed. Opt. 16(1), 011013 (2011).JBOPFO1083-3668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.3524509 Google Scholar

16. C. S. Kimet al., “Enhanced detection of early-stage oral cancer in vivo by optical coherence tomography using multimodal delivery of gold nanoparticles,” J. Biomed. Opt. 14(3), 034008 (2009).JBOPFO1083-3668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.3130323 Google Scholar

17. Z. Dinget al., “High-resolution optical coherence tomography over a large depth range with an axicon lens,” Opt. Lett. 27(4), 243–245 (2002).OPLEDP0146-9592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.27.000243 Google Scholar

18. W. Drexler, “Ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography,” J. Biomed. Opt. 9(1), 47–74 (2004).JBOPFO1083-3668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.1629679 Google Scholar

19. J. KalkmanR. SprikT. G. van Leeuwen, “Path-length-resolved diffusive particle dynamics in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105(19), 198302 (2010).PRLTAO0031-9007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.198302 Google Scholar

20. Y. Zhaoet al., “Phase resolved optical coherence tomography and optical Doppler tomography for imaging blood flow in human skin with fast-scanning speed and high velocity sensitivity,” Opt. Lett. 25(2), 114–116 (2000).OPLEDP0146-9592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.25.000114 Google Scholar

21. H. Renet al., “Imaging and quantifying transverse flow velocity with the Doppler bandwidth in a phase-resolved functional optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett. 27(6), 409–411 (2002).OPLEDP0146-9592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.27.000409 Google Scholar

22. G. Liuet al., “Real-time bulk-motion-correction free Doppler variance optical coherence tomography for choroidal capillary vasculature imaging,” Opt. Express 19(4), 3657–3666 (2011).OPEXFF1094-4087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.003657 Google Scholar

23. A. Waxet al., “Path-length-resolved dynamic light scattering: modeling the transition from single to diffusive scattering,” Appl. Opt. 40(24), 4222–4227 (2001).APOPAI0003-6935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.40.004222 Google Scholar

24. H. B. Weiser, Inorganic Colloid Chemistry, 1st ed., pp. 60–65, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York (1933). Google Scholar

25. B. N. Brockhouse, “Diffusive motions in liquids and neutron scattering,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 2(7), 287–289 (1959).PRLTAO0031-9007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.2.287 Google Scholar

26. J. Menget al., “Transit-time analysis based on delay-encoded beam shape for velocity vector quantification by spectral-domain Doppler optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Express 18(2), 1261–1270 (2010).OPEXFF1094-4087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.001261 Google Scholar

27. G. Frens, “Controlled nucletion for the regulation of the particle size in monodiperse gold suspensions,” Nature (London) Phys. Sci. 241, 20–22 (1973).NATUAS0028-0836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/physci241020a0 Google Scholar

28. W. Haisset al., “Determination of size and concentration of gold nanoparticles from UV-vis spectra,” Anal. Chem. 79(11), 4215–4221 (2007).ANCHAM0003-2700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac0702084 Google Scholar

© The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Chang Soo Kim, Chang Soo Kim, Wenjuan Qi, Wenjuan Qi, Jun Zhang, Jun Zhang, Young Jik Kwon, Young Jik Kwon, Zhongping Chen, Zhongping Chen, } "Imaging and quantifying Brownian motion of micro- and nanoparticles using phase-resolved Doppler variance optical coherence tomography," Journal of Biomedical Optics 18(3), 030504 (20 March 2013). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.18.3.030504 . Submission:

Back to Top