Ongoing hearing research efforts12.3.4.–5 to understand the mechanics of the human hearing process are mainly focused on the response of the ear to tonal acoustic stimulation. However, studying the transient response of the human ear, and of the human tympanic membrane (TM) in particular,1 could expand the understanding of the processes by which acoustical energy is transformed to mechanical energy and transmitted to the ossicular chain.1
Measurements of transient phenomena on the surface of the TM and the quantification of corresponding motion parameters, such as traveling wave speeds,4 standing wave ratios,1,4 acoustic absorbance and immittance,6 damping,7 stiffness, and modal frequencies, could help, for instance, validate and improve physical models,4,5 identify and diagnose pathologies, and improve the design of hearing aids.
Current state-of-the-art methods to measure the acousto-mechanical response of the TM rely on averaged acoustic6 information or a local displacement response (at 1 to 50 points on the membrane) using single-point or scanning laser Doppler vibrometry8,9 and/or capacitive probes.10 The average or sparsely sampled points are not sufficient for the full description of the complex patterns unfolding across the full surface of the TM. Therefore, there is a need for a full-field high-speed measurement method that can quantify the spatiotemporal complexity of the acoustically induced transient displacement of the TM.
Current state-of-the-art holographic methods for full-field measurements of transient events use phase sampling methods that constrain the maximum sampling speed11 or require complex experimental setups,12,13 such as custom apertures14 or spatial filters,12 that further increase the required illumination source power and/or cost of the system. Recent developments of hybrid spatiotemporal phase sampling methods15,16 allow for single frame measurements of the deformation state of the object without any hardware modifications or resolution constraints on the camera.11
In this paper, we report on the development and implementation of a novel full-field high-speed holographic system (HHS) that utilizes an optimized hybrid frame local correlation (LC) phase sampling method.17 HHS utilizes the temporal resolution of a high-speed camera [high-speed camera (HSC)] without imposing constraints on its spatial resolution11 and without the need of specialized optical setups.1213.–14 Automatic execution and synchronization of high-speed measurements is achieved by a modular control system. The high temporal () and spatial ( data points) measuring resolutions of the HHS enable the investigation of the complex spatiotemporal behavior of the TM at a sufficient level of detail to expand our knowledge of TM function and hearing mechanics.
Design Constraints for Transient Acquisition
The human ear is most sensitive to sounds of frequencies between 0.2 and 8 kHz.18,19 To allow sufficient temporal resolution for the measurement of the instantaneous magnitude and phase2,3 of the acoustically induced motion of the TM as well as its total harmonic distortion,20 the acquisition system needs to capture at least 5 to 10 samples per cycle.5 Thus, a sampling rate of 40 kHz is required to capture the motion produced by sounds with frequencies at the high end of this sensitive range.
If acoustic energy is propagated across the surface of the TM, such a propagation depends on wave speed and direction. Existing methods5,21 based on steady-state measurements estimate a surface wave speed in the 5 to range, resulting in acoustic delays across the 8-mm-diameter membrane of 110 to . In order to reliably quantify the speed and direction of acoustic energy propagation across the surface of the TM, an acquisition method should allow the capture of at least three instances22 of the spatiotemporal evolution of the surface waves within the duration of the acoustical delay. Considering a more conservative estimate for acoustic delay (i.e., ), capturing three instances of the propagation of the surface waves would require interframe time resulting in minimal sampling rate of 30 kHz.
The typical duration of an acoustical click response of the human TM is .23 At a minimal sampling rate of 30 kHz, the full duration of the transient will be represented within frames. The duration of the click response defines a minimal frequency resolution of for a single measurement. The frequency resolution of the acquisition method could be further improved by longer sampling or by capturing several consecutive click responses of the TM.
In order to establish a suitable exposure time to capture the transient response of the human TM, we use an analogy with previous stroboscopic holographic acquisition methods,12.–3 where the illumination duty cycle relative to a steady-state excitation frequency defines the effective exposure time per cycle. Using this analogy, for frequencies within the range of highest sensitivity of human hearing18 (i.e., up to 8 kHz), a typical stroboscopic duty cycle12.–3 of 5 to 10% would correspond to an equivalent single frame exposure time of to .
Table 1 summarizes the human hearing characteristics and the corresponding sampling parameters implemented in the HHS to achieve temporal resolutions at a sampling rates and a measurement duration of 5 ms to provide a frequency resolution of 200 Hz.
Identification of the high-speed holographic system sampling parameters to investigate the transient behavior of the human tympanic membrane (TM).
|Human hearing parameters||Value||Acquisition design constraints||Value|
|Frequency range||0.2 to 8 kHz18||Sampling rate||1 to 40 kHza|
|Exposure time||<6 to 12 μs (Refs. 1 to 3)a|
|TM’s acoustical delay||40 μs (Ref. 21) to 1.3 ms (Ref. 5)||Minimum sampling rate||>30 kHz|
|Click response duration||<5 ms settling time23||Number of samples||∼150 frames at 30 kHz|
|Frequency resolution||200 Hz|
With five samples per cycle and 5 to 10% duty cycle.
Phase Sampling Based on Frame Local Correlation
The frame LC phase sampling method17 is based on hybrid spatiotemporal phase sampling methods15,16 that quantify changes in the state of deformation of an object throughout the duration of a transient event. In the LC method, two sets of frames are acquired. The first set consists of two temporally phase shifted reference frames gathered just before object deformation and the second set consists of a series of rapidly acquired frames gathered during object deformation. The method quantifies the double-exposure phase change at each instance by correlating the deformed and reference states. The correlation of individual frames relies on the assumption that the object is sufficiently stable during the acquisition of the two phase shifted reference frames, which we will demonstrate is the case in our measurements.
Consider two individually recorded camera frames at a reference,, and at a deformed, , state with intensities24 1) and (2) to yield an equation equivalent to Eq. (3): 2) leads to
By assuming a constant beam ratio, , the phase change of interest, , in space, , corresponding to the deformation of the object at a specific time instance,, can be computed by the combination of Eqs. (4) and (6) as
The computational process to recover , schematically illustrated in Fig. 1, utilizes data sets from two phase shifted reference images, and , recorded at times and before object excitation and from deformed images, , at time instances, , during and after object excitation. A temporally estimated DC is subtracted from the intensity values of , , and . The DC-compensated frames and are then used for the evaluation of the correlation coefficient, , at every measurement point on the frame. The numerical calculation of is implemented based on a computationally efficient Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient method17,25 that uses sets of intensity values from spatial kernels (e.g., ) around each measurement point of frames and . An analogous procedure is applied to the evaluation of the Pearson correlation coefficient for . By computing and for each postdeformation measured time point using Eq. (7), is computed for modulus , which requires further processing to obtain a continuous phase distribution by application of spatiotemporal phase unwrapping algorithms.2,26
The pointwise evaluation of the correlation coefficients assumes that varies slower in space than all of the other parameters in Eqs. (1) and (2) and is sufficiently constant within a spatial kernel16 (i.e., small spatial neighborhood of measurement points). This assumption is adequate for the acoustically induced response of the human TM under typical loading conditions since the resulting fringe density within the hologram is small () compared to the spatial resolution () of a typical HSC.25
The use of a spatial kernel to represent each measurement point in the LC method is equivalent to applying a spatial band-pass filter. In addition, the intensity values within the kernel can be individually weighted to obtain the frequency response of specific spatial filters, such as mean or Gaussian.16 Variation of the size of the spatial kernel also allows for control of the spatial frequency range of filtration.
The LC algorithm we describe is independently executed at every measurement point, which allows for the simultaneous evaluation of at all measurement points across each deformed frame, , in parallel. By using this computational parallelism, we have developed multithreaded and GPU accelerated software that improves computational speed and efficiency.
High-Speed Frame Acquisition
To measure the transient deformations of the TM, a high-speed frame acquisition approach based on the frame LC phase sampling method has been developed and implemented. In this approach, two reference frames, and , and consecutive frames, , are recorded before and throughout the evolution of an event.
Figure 2 shows the timing diagrams of the events that occur during the high-speed acquisition, including camera exposure, acoustic excitation, phase shifting, and the TM’s response. According to this diagram, the two reference frames, and , are recorded with a temporal separation that is longer than the piezoelectric transducer (PZT) settling time after the introduction of the initial phase shift.27
For efficient acquisition of frames, the PZT is kept at its final position after phase shifting, which leads to the frames containing a constant phase offset expressed as . Therefore, the optical phase, , within any frame, and corresponding to the deformation of the TM at a specific instance, can be determined from Eq. (7) with
All deformed frames, , before and throughout the evolution of the transient response of the TM, are relative to the same reference frames, and , before acoustic excitation.
The camera continuously records frames during the full duration of the measurement, including during the settling time of the PZT, with the maximum sampling rate of acquisition constrained by the frame rate of the camera. During a typical acquisition, multiple frames (i.e., frames at 42 k fps) at each reference position are captured and temporally averaged in order to compensate for potential external disturbances. In addition, and by confirmation with laser Doppler vibrometer (LDV) measurements, 1.5 ms are allocated for the settling time of the PZT and the frames recorded over this time are discarded.
Hardware and Software Implementation of the Acquisition
The hardware implementation of the high-speed acquisition involves the synchronization of the procedures for acoustic excitation of the sample, temporal phase shifting, and frame acquisition. This is achieved by the development and implementation of a control architecture that consists of four major hardware modules, which include electronic I/O control (I/O), sound presentation and measurement (SP), phase shifter (PS), and HSC, as shown in Fig. 3.17,25,26 Hardware modules are managed by a unified control software with a user interface for setting and customizing acquisition and synchronization parameters.28
To perform high-speed transient measurements of a TM sample, the user is required to specify the following parameters:
• Frame acquisition: starting time, frame rate, spatial resolution, exposure time, and number of frames to be acquired.
• Temporal phase shifting: starting time.
• Acoustic excitation: starting time, transient excitation type (i.e., click, chirp, sine), duration, and signal input level.
During a measurement, the control software utilizes the digital output component of the I/O module to automatically trigger the execution of all procedures through correlated timing signals with a temporal accuracy . The applied sound pressure level (SPL) and frequency content of the acoustic excitation is automatically quantified with a calibrated microphone within the SP module interfaced to an analog input port of the I/O module.5,29
Validation of the Measurement System
In order to reliably use the HHS for the characterization of TM samples, its measuring capabilities are validated using other methodologies that include LDV and holographic methods based on temporal phase shifting. In particular, we quantify the performance characteristics of the developed phase sampling and acquisition system using different test metrics.
• frame LC phase sampling
• High-speed acquisition
• Phase stepping at high speed—quantification of the time constant and settling time of the response of the PS during the phase stepping procedure as described in Sec. 3.3.
• Temporal accuracy—comparison of HHS and LDV measurements of displacement and velocity time-waveforms in a latex membrane sample excited by an acoustic click.
The components of the different modules of the HHS are shown in Fig. 4. The sound presentation module consists of a calibrated microphone (Etymotic Research ER-7C, Elk Grove Village, Illinois) and a speaker (SB Acoustics SB29RDC-C000-4, Brookfield, Wisconsin).29 The laser delivery module includes a continuous wave laser (Oxxius SLIM-532, 50 mW, Lannion, France), variable ratio beam splitter, and a PZT PS. The HSC module is a Photron SA5 1000k (Tokyo, Japan) (42 K fps at ). For validation of the transient measurement capabilities of the HHS, an LDV is incorporated within the HHS experimental setup.
A schematic of the 10-mm-diameter circular latex membrane used for transient measurements is shown in Fig. 4(b). Retroreflective markers were applied at several predefined points on the surface of the sample in order to improve the signal quality for LDV measurements. Five markers were distributed equidistantly to allow for even coverage of the latex surface (points 1 to 5), as shown in Fig. 4(b). In order to monitor any rigid body motion, a sixth marker was placed at the top on the locking ring that clamped the latex membrane to its cylindrical support (point 6).
Acoustic excitation for all dynamic measurements was based on a acoustic click produced by the signal generator in the I/O module and introduced to the sample by the speaker in the SP module. The time waveform and power spectrum of an average of 20 clicks produced by the speaker are recorded by the calibrated microphone and are shown in Figs. 4(c) to 4(d).
Validation of the Frame LC Phase Sampling Method
The noise floor and accuracy of the frame LC phase sampling method were quantified independent of the high-speed acquisition method through a set of experiments performed in static conditions.
In order to quantify the noise floor of the frame LC phase sampling method, we measured the displacement of a solid object (i.e., 12.7-mm-thick aluminum plate) under static conditions and no external excitation. We assumed that the changes of the sample during the measurements are insignificant and any detected deformations were associated with the noise floor of the phase sampling method. During the noise floor measurements, all optical and sampling conditions were kept identical to ones used with the high-speed acquisition. The spatial distribution of the noise floor, as shown in Fig. 5, indicates a standard deviation (STD) of 8.7 nm or .
To assess the accuracy of the frame LC phase sampling method, we compared the displacement measurements of a statically deformed sample against a four-frame temporal phase sampling method.2,3 In order to maintain identical conditions for both phase sampling methods, we used two phase shifted references and one of the deformed frames of the four-frame data set and applied it to the frame LC phase sampling method. Because of the static loading conditions and the longer () measurement time of the four-frame acquisition method, the camera’s sampling rate was reduced to 60 Hz (the minimum for Photron SA5).
The sample was a 12-mm-diameter aluminum membrane under static loading with a constant force applied normal to the back surface. Aside from the sampling rate, the optical setup and illumination conditions for the accuracy measurements were identical to the high-speed acquisition settings.
The comparison of the modulation and phase maps of the four-frame double exposure and frame LC phase sampling methods is shown in Fig. 6. Based on the phase maps, the corresponding object displacements are calculated and their differences are shown in Figs. 6(e) and 6(f). The STD of the displacement differences, which can be used to assess the accuracy of the LC method, is within 11 nm or .
Validation of the High-Speed Acquisition
Phase stepping at high speed
In order to optimize the timing of the high-speed acquisition method, we characterized the dynamic response of the PS (measured at the center of the mirror) by measuring its velocity time waveform with an LDV, as shown in Fig. 7. Analysis of the data indicates a 0.5 ms time constant, with settling time with 6% residual fluctuations, and a noise floor of of the maximum response.
We characterized the temporal accuracy of the high-speed acquisition method relative to an LDV by correlating coincident LDV and HHS measurements of controlled transient acoustic stimulation of the latex sample. The LDV sampled the motion at the six locations described in Sec. 4.1. In order to characterize the accuracy in position and velocity, and due to the HHS and LDV measuring domains, time waveforms were either differentiated or integrated.
The HHS was set at a sampling rate of 42 kHz (corresponding to interframe time) with exposure time (corresponding to a shutter speed of 151 kHz), in order to be consistent with the sampling parameters specified in Table 1. With these settings, the HSC has a spatial resolution of corresponding to a spatial resolution of at the object plane. The LDV was sampled at 84 kHz through a 16-bit analog input at the I/O module. Representative HHS and LDV displacement and velocity results, depicted in Fig. 8, show the time waveforms at two of the discrete locations of the sample, as identified in Sec. 4.1, which correspond to points with the minimum (point 5) and maximum responses (point 1). The acoustical excitation was a click with a peak SPL of 104 dB.
Correlation between the time waveforms is, on average, for both displacements and velocities at all points (1 to 5) on the surface of the sample, as specified in Sec. 4.1. The average differences between the time waveforms are relative to the p-p response of the sample. Differences between temporal locations of the local maxima and minima in the time waveforms of the HHS and LDV are within .
Having validated the phase sampling and the high-speed acquisition methods, we utilized HHS to quantify the transient response of the surface of a human TM sample excited by click-like acoustic stimuli. We present preliminary results on the quantification of several temporal acousto-mechanical properties as well as their spatial dependency.
The human TM sample used in our measurements is part of a temporal bone from a 46-year-old female donor. The sample was prepared in accordance with previously established procedures.1,5 The surface of the TM was coated with a solution of ZnO to improve the surface reflectivity and reduce required camera exposure times, resulting in better temporal resolutions, while having minimal change5 () in the acoustic response (volume displacement) of the TM. Complimentary to each HHS measurement, we conducted LDV measurements of the TM sample at the approximate center of the membrane near the umbo (a connection point between the TM and the inferior tip of the malleus—the most lateral ossicle) and in the anterior half of the TM. In order to monitor the rigid body motions of the temporal bone, a third marker was placed on the temporal bone close to the boundary of the TM. Retroreflective markers were placed at each LDV measurement location in order to improve the signal quality of the LDV measurement.
The HHS experimental setup was identical to the one used for the latex membrane measurements described in Sec. 4.1. The speaker used for acoustic click stimuli was positioned away from the sample, resulting in a acoustical transmission delay between the speaker and the TM surface. Because of that, the beginnings of all time axes in this section are referenced to the estimated time of arrival of the sound pressure front to the sample surface. The acoustic excitation used for all human TM measurements was a click with a peak SPL of 115 dB.
LDV measurements of the TM at retroreflective markers at the umbo (Fig. 10) and on the anterior TM, indicate a total duration of the transient event of . Frequency analysis of the response indicates significant frequency content up to 11 kHz. The delay between the acoustical excitation and the response of the sample was within the estimated transmission delay between the sample and the speaker, as indicated in Sec. 4.1. The LDV was sampled as described in Sec. 4.3.2.
In order to adequately sample the full-field transient response of the human TM, we adjusted the HHS camera’s sampling rate, exposure time, and recording duration in accordance with acquisition design constraints, specified in Sec. 2, as well as with the preliminary LDV measurements. The HHS was set at a sampling rate of 42 kHz (corresponding to interframe time) with a exposure time (corresponding to a shutter speed of 151 kHz), in order to be consistent with the sampling parameters specified in Table 1. The duration of every measurement was set to 1000 frames corresponding to a period from to relative to the beginning of the acoustic excitation. While the settling time of the human TM is , as described in Table 1, more frames are collected after the settling of the sample to allow for better DC estimation, as described in Sec. 3.1. The frames acquired before the acoustic excitation account for the effects of external disturbances on the reference images (Sec. 3.2) and the PZT settling time (Sec. 4.3.1).
Full-Field-of-View Transient Displacement of the Human TM
The HHS provides high temporal () and spatial ( data points) resolutions that enable the simultaneous measurements of the spatial distribution and the temporal and frequency domain of the displacement of transient response of the human TM. Representative measurements of the spatial, temporal, and frequency measurement capabilities of the HHS, based on the acoustically induced transient response of a human TM, are shown in Fig. 9. Displacement time waveforms of the response of the umbo, as shown in Fig. 9(a), indicate correlation between the HHS and LDV measurements above the noise floor () of the HHS. The average correlation of the time waveforms of the HHS and LDV at points (1 and 2) on the TM’s surface was . According to Figs. 8 and 9(a), it is observed that the magnitude of the correlation coefficient is related to the magnitude of the response. Lower correlation levels (i.e., ) are associated with displacement measurements closer to the noise floor () of the HHS, as shown in the waveform corresponding to the minimum response of the human TM in Fig. 9(b).
Based on the frequency domain of the HHS and the calibrated microphone measurements of the displacement and acoustical pressure time waveforms, respectively, the transfer function (TF) of each point across the surface of the TM can be calculated,5 and the frequencies of maximum motion associated with the modal frequencies can be identified by automatic quantification of the local maxima of the TF, as shown in Fig. 9(b). Due to the short duration of the transient event (i.e., ), frequency components (i.e., period) are disregarded and are not considered in the modal frequencies’ identification. The detected modal frequencies at the umbo, shown in Fig. 9(b), based on the HHS and LDV differ by . The difference between magnitude of the TF measured with HHS and LDV in the frequency range of 1 to 8 kHz is within 5 dB. Based on measurements on a latex membrane, described in Sec. 4.3.2, the noise floor of the TF was estimated as below the average signal level for frequencies . The difference between the HHS and LDV at could be associated with the acoustical properties of the experimental setup as well as the response of the speaker used. In particular, the speaker could have band gaps in its response, which could result in local higher noise floor (lower signal-to-noise ratio) for the HHS, while the LDV data have been averaged over multiple runs (i.e., ) and exhibit fewer effects from that phenomenon. Future work will be focused on specifying an acoustic source with a flatter click response.
Based on the spatiotemporal evolution of the HHS displacement measurements, as shown in Fig. 9(c), it can be seen that the transient response of the human TM undergoes two distinct stages—global initiation of the surface motion and local surface wave propagation. The first 30 to of the initial stages of the transient displacement of the human TM, shown in Fig. 10, indicate motion that is approximately in-phase across the full surface of the visible TM. It can be seen that there is delay between the arrival of the acoustic pressure front at the surface of the TM and the beginning of its transient response. This delay can be contributed to the temporal resolution of the HSS system ( interframe time) and the reaction time of the speaker.
The further spatiotemporal evolution of the transient response of the TM indicates circumferentially traveling surface waves propagating symmetrically relative to the manubrium and radially from the inferior to the superior parts of the TM, as shown in Fig. 11. The local phase velocity of the surface waves can be estimated by automatically identifying the shift of the spatial location of the local minima and maxima of the displacement maps between successive frames. Preliminary surface wave speed estimations indicate , which is in agreement with previous research.5,21
Acoustic Delay and Dominant Modal Frequency Maps
The HHS provides the time waveforms of the transient response of all points across the surface of the human TM sample, allowing for estimation of the spatial dependence of motion parameters, such as acoustic delays and dominant modal frequencies, as shown in Fig. 12.
The acoustical delay map, as shown in Fig. 12(a), is calculated by automatically identifying the peak time of the first local extrema of the time waveform of every point across the surface of the TM and referencing it to the peak time of the umbo, indicated with in Fig. 12(a). This quantifies the spatial distribution of the delay of the time-domain response of each point relative to the umbo. The range of the measured acoustical delays across the surface of the human TM, as shown in Fig. 12(b), is within previously reported data.5,21
The acoustic delay map and histogram indicate that the peak motion response of of the surface is within of the peak motion of the umbo, which supports the observations of predominantly in-phase motion during the initial response of the surface of the TM, as shown in Fig. 10. The acoustic delay data, shown in Fig. 12(a), also indicate that the surface of the TM at the interior and posterior boundary moves with a acoustical delay relative to the umbo. This suggests that the acousto-mechanical response of the TM reaches its first extrema in the region between the TM boundary and the umbo, which agrees with theories of acousto-mechanical energy transfer from the TM periphery to the umbo.4 However, since our measure of delay depends on the time to the first temporal extrema, it includes the time associated with responses to different natural frequencies.
Based on automatic identification of the local maxima of the TF, shown in Fig. 9(b), at every point across the TM, we can determine the dominant modal frequency and its spatial distribution, as shown in Fig. 12(c). The dominant frequency map indicates noticeable differences (three- to fourfold) between the regions of the TM near the manubrium and the central region midway between the manubrium and the TM boundary. Assuming that the spatial distribution of the dominant frequency is representative of the local variations of stiffness and thickness of the TM, our observations can be related to previous studies indicating more than a threefold increase in the local thickness of the TM near the manubrium relative to the central region of the TM.30
In order to relate the data in Figs. 12(a) and 12(c), we assume that the initial displacement (i.e., ) of the click response of the TM, as shown in Fig. 10, exhibits a single tone decayed response based on a dominant frequency spatially varying across the TM as shown in Fig. 12(c). Based on this assumption and the approximately in-phase start of the motion of all points suggested by Fig. 10, the acoustical delay (i.e., the temporal location of the first local extrema) between any two points should be within a ¼ of the difference of the periods of oscillation of the points. Figure 12 indicates dominant frequencies of ( for ¼ cycle) at the umbo and an average of 3.5 kHz ( for ¼ cycle) across the central region midway between the manubrium and the TM boundary. This suggests of maximum acoustic delay that can be associated with the difference in the natural frequency of the response between the umbo and the region midway between the umbo and the rim. Such a delay is in agreement with the range of the measured delay to the first extrema ( to ) indicated in Fig. 12(b).
Conclusions and Future Work
In this paper, a new method is proposed to quantify the full-field transient dynamics of the TM using an HHS and a hybrid frame LC phase sampling algorithm that utilizes the temporal resolution of an HSC without imposing constraints on its spatial resolution. We have also developed a customizable modular control system for high-speed acquisition within the HSS.
The HHS provides simultaneous high-speed (i.e., ) measurement of the motion of data points on the surface of the TM allowing for a -fold decrease in measurement time compared to existing stroboscopic holographic measurement methods.2,3,5 This reduces the effects of the environmental variations on the acoustic response of the samples and allows for applications in vivo.17
Analysis of the transient response of every point across the surface of the TM in the time and frequency domains allows for observations of spatially dependent motion parameters, such as modal frequencies and acoustical delays. These observations can then be used to infer local material properties across the surface of the TM. The observations of the transient dynamics of TM surface motion from this study could further the understanding of the sound-receiving function of the TM and how it couples acousto-mechanical energy to the ossicular chain and inner ear. The HSS could provide a new tool for the investigation of the auditory system with applications in research, medical diagnosis and hearing aid design.
Future work should be focused on the analysis and interpretation of the measured transient displacement time waveform to extract medically meaningful information on the TM’s health condition. Further research is also needed to explain the initial transient dynamics of the TM and its relationship to the energy transfer into the middle-ear, as well as its connection to previous steady-state dynamics research. Improvements of the HHS should include optimization of the optical design and spatial resolution, as well as its packaging for in vivo applications and for medical research.
The authors would like to acknowledge the help of Michael Ravicz at the Eaton-Peabody Laboratory of the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (MEEI) and Ellery Harrington and Morteza Khaleghi at the Center for Holographic Studies and Laser Micro-MechaTronics at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. This work has been funded by the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, the National Institute of Health, MEEI, and the Mittal Fund. The authors also gratefully acknowledge the support of the NanoEngineering, Science, and Technology program at the Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Mechanical Engineering Department.
Ivo Dobrev received his PhD degree in mechanical engineering from Worcester Polytechnic Institute in 2014. He is currently a postdoctoral researcher at the Universitätsspital Zürich working on bone conduction and middle-ear mechanics. His work includes high-speed optical metrology in field environment and in-vivo, robotics and mechatronics, system design and integration.
Cosme Furlong is an associate professor of mechanical engineering, working in mechanics, optical metrology, and nanoengineering, science and technology.
Jeffrey T. Cheng is an instructor in otology and laryngology at Harvard Medical School, working on middle-ear mechanics and tissue biomechanics through measurements and modeling.