|
1.IntroductionOsteoporosis is a systemic disorder that affects both men and women but is very common in postmenopausal women.1,2 A fall in estrogen (E2) production leads to an increase in the release of cytokines that induce osteoclastogenesis, a key characteristic of osteoporosis.3,4 These changes in bone metabolism result in reduced bone mass and alterations in structural microarchitecture, increasing the risk of fractures.5,6 One feature of E2 deficiency-induced osteoporosis is the increased rate of bone remodeling, where bone resorption predominates bone formation, leading to an imbalance in bone microarchitecture, increased risk of fracture, and decreased bone density.3–6 During osteoporosis, the rate of bone turnover is accelerated, resulting in increased bone resorption without compensation by the formation of new bone tissue.7,8 By conducting bone density assessments using computed tomography (CT) scans and radiography, clinical studies have shown that maxillary bones are also affected by osteoporosis, resulting in a loss of bone density.9–11 However, data supporting this assertion and explaining how the systemic disorder affects alveolar bones are lacking in the literature. Several therapeutic agents are used to treat osteoporosis, including estrogen replacement therapy,12,13 calcitonin,14,15 the bisphosphonates alendronate sodium and risedronate,16 and the selective estrogen receptor modulator raloxifene (RG).17–19 Randomized clinical trials have shown that these agents have significant efficacy in postmenopausal osteoporosis, increasing the density of mineralized bone and reducing the risk of vertebral fractures.19–23 One concern regarding the use of these drugs in osteoporosis patients, particularly alendronate sodium, is the potential risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw,24 leading to postexodontia complications25 and the failure of dental implants.26,27 Moreover, alterations to alveolar bone turnover in these patients remain unknown. Thus, it is critical to determine whether osteoporosis treatments alter bone turnover in these tissues and promote a balance between bone formation and resorption. In this study, we conducted histometric analysis of epifluorescence to evaluate alveolar bone turnover in rats with osteoporosis induced by bilateral ovariectomy and a calcium- and phosphate-deficient diet. Further, we evaluated the effect of alendronate sodium and RG treatment in these rats. We hypothesized that drug therapy would improve the rate of bone remodeling in the mature bones of osteoporotic animals. 2.Materials and Methods2.1.Experimental DesignThe study was approved by the Ethics Committee for the Use of Animals (2010/003045) of the Aracatuba Dental School, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP). A total of thirty-two 50- to 60-day-old female adult rats (Rattus norvegicus albinus, Wistar) weighing approximately 200 g were used. The animals were maintained in cages and were fed with balanced chow (NUVILAB, Curitiba PR, Brazil) containing 1.4% calcium () and 0.8% phosphate (). The animals received water ad libitum for 10 days during acclimatization and after the start of the experiment. The animals were divided into four groups () according to the induction of osteoporosis and the drug treatment received. Twenty-four rats underwent bilateral ovariectomy and were divided into the following groups: ovariectomized rats fed a low (0.1%) and (0.5%) diet (RHOSTER Ind. Com., Vargem Grande Paulista, SP, Brazil) without drug treatment (OG, negative control) and ovariectomized rats fed a low and P diet and treated with raloxifene (RG, test 1) or alendronate sodium (AG, test 2). Eight rats underwent a sham surgery, exposing the ovaries such that the rats underwent the same surgical stress as the other groups. The animals in this group were fed a balanced diet containing 1.4% and 0.8% (SG; positive control; NUVILAB, Curitiba PR, Brazil). The chronological sequence of events in this study is detailed in Fig. 1. Before ovariectomy, the rats were subjected to estrous cycle analysis for more than three regular cycles. After ovariectomy, animals in the RG and AG groups were fed with a low and diet. The remaining groups were fed a balanced standard diet. On the 8th day after ovariectomy, drug treatments were initiated by gavage with RG8,28 or with alendronate sodium (AG).29 On the 52nd day after ovariectomy or sham surgery, calcein (Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, Missouri) was intramuscularly administered, and on the 80th day, alizarin red (Sigma Chemical Company) was administered. Fluorochromes were diluted to 1.5 mL in deionized water with a magnetic stirrer (Max Labor, Presidente Prudente, SP, Brazil). The animals were euthanized 18 days after the application of alizarin red by overdose of the inhaled anesthetic, halothane (Tanohalo, Cristália, Cristal Pharma, Contagem, MG, Brazil). 2.2.Laboratory ProceduresThe right jaws of the rats were removed and fixed in 10% paraformaldehyde solution. After 48 h, the specimens were washed in running water for 24 h and dehydrated in increasing concentrations of alcohol. The bones were then embedded and infiltrated in a solution of acetone and methyl methacrylate slow (MMAL) (Clássico, Artigos Odontológicos Clássico, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) at a ratio of . This was followed by three MMAL baths. Benzoyl peroxide catalyst (1%, Riedel—de Haën AG, Seelze—Hannover, Germany) was added to the last bath. The specimens were placed in glass jars covered with a lid and were maintained in an oven at 37°C for 5 days until the resin polymerized. After polymerization, the blocks containing the specimens were reduced with a “Maxcut” drill mounted on a Kota countertop motor (Strong 210, São Paulo, SP, Brazil), parallel to the long axis of the jaw (sagittal plane). The specimens were then subjected to progressive manual wear with a polishing machine (ECOMET 250PRO/AUTOMET 250, Buehler, Lake Bluff, Illinois) with sandpaper (granulation of 120, 300, 400, 600, 800, and 1200; Carbimet 2, Buehler, Lake Bluff, Illinois) under fluorescent light, until a thickness of was reached, as measured by a digital caliper (Mitutoyo, Pompeia, SP, Brazil). The histological sections were mounted on slides with mineral oil (Petrolato Líquido, Mantecor, Taquara, RJ, Brazil) and fixed with coverslips and enamel to prevent oil leakage and section drying. 2.3.Scanning Confocal Laser MicroscopyLongitudinal scans of the right jaw of the alveolar bone adjacent to the apical third of the maxillary central incisor were obtained by a Leica CTR 4000 CS SPE microscope (Leica Microsystems, Heidelberg, Germany), using a objective () (Fig. 2). The area was chosen considering the reference of the bone close to the upper right incisor. Therefore, the tooth was taken as the reference, and then the area of the bone around this tooth was evaluated in each sample. The images that were obtained from different sections were compressed in order to obtain the best fit. After the selection of the section thickness, all of the slices were obtained and the software performed the z-stack that allowed achieving the best fit of images that represented the section from each animal of the experimental groups. The images started from the beginning of the fluorescence thus representing, in our methodological approach, the beginning of calcification or bone formation (calcium precipitation in the collagen organic matrix). These images had a dimension of and corresponded to optical sections of . Sections () were scanned over 2.5 min. Therefore, 28 sections were obtained for each slide. The barrier filters used were BP and 590 LP, combined with activation of double dichroic , and the photomultiplier was set to 534 for calcein and 357 for alizarin. The codes 534 and 357 nm represent the filters that allow the visualization of the fluorochromes. They are located in the microscope and when the light that comes from the mercury lamp passes through these filters and reaches the sample in the slice, it is possible to visualize the colors of the fluorochromes. One of the filters enables visualization of calcein (blue filter) and the other, alizarin (green filter). The images obtained by confocal microscopy were reconstructed through the stack of the software that is installed to manipulate the confocal microscope (Leica CTR 4000 CS SPE, Leica Microsystems, Heidelberg, Germany); the alveolar bone showed two overlapping fluorochromes (calcein and alizarin; Fig. 3). The overlap represents the superposition of calcium that was precipitated in both periods, thereby showing the conversion of old bone to new bone. These images were saved in TIFF format and transported to the ImageJ software (Processing Software and Image Analysis, Ontario, Canada). Using the “color threshold” tool, each image was standardized according to hue, saturation, and brightness to reveal the fluorochromes. First, the calcein was highlighted, and the “measure” tool was used to provide the corresponding area in . The same procedure was performed for the alizarin, obtaining data related to the dynamics of the alveolar bone tissue. Bone turnover, in this methodological approach, is represented by the difference between old bone (green) and new bone (red). Fluorochromes are chemical compounds that have the property of binding to calcium in the moment of the precipitation on the organic bone matrix. Therefore, the extent of fluorochrome labeling represents the quantity of calcium precipitation, thereby enabling the measurement of the bone formation event. Another aspect to be considered is the period when the fluorochromes were injected; as the first one was calcein (green), the bone filled with the green fluorochrome represents the old bone. The last fluorochrome injected was alizarin; therefore, the bone filled with the red fluorochrome represents the new bone. Considering these points, it can be said that the different colors represent the different ages of the formed bone.30,31 Bone tissue dynamics is represented by the bone turnover that is observed through the renewal bone represented by the red fluorochrome. The greater the prevalence of the red fluorescence the greater the formation of new bone while the green fluorescence represents the old bone. The dynamics make it possible to observe the two situations in the same slice, i.e., to observe what is new and what is old.30,31 2.4.Statistical AnalysisSigma Plot 12.3 (San Jose, California) software was used for statistical analysis. The Shapiro–Wilk test () was conducted to determine the homoscedasticity, i.e., whether the results were homogeneous. Data were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA; experimental groups: four levels; fluorochromes: two levels). Significant results were statistically evaluated with Tukey’s post-hoc test. For all tests, a -value less than 5% was considered significant. 3.ResultsThe administration of fluorochromes established fluorescent lines formed by the precipitation of calcium in the organic matrix next to calcein (injected 52 days after ovariectomy) and by precipitation of calcium next to alizarin (injected 80 days after ovariectomy). Importantly, the green line (calcein) marks the older bone, whereas the alizarin marked the new bone. Concomitant observation of the images showed the amount of old bone versus new bone (Fig. 4). The number of the bone represents the quantity of bone that was formed after the precipitation of calcium into the collagen bone matrix. The fluorochromes have the property of binding to calcium in the moment that it is going to precipitate into the matrix, and because of this direct relation, the quantity of fluorescence represents the quantity of the bone formed.30,31 Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA to compare the differences between the experimental groups (OG, SG, AG, and RG) and fluorochromes (calcein and alizarin); the interaction between groups and fluorochromes was statistically significant (). In the comparison of bone turnover in the induced osteoporosis groups, no differences were observed between the RG and SG groups (Tukey, ) and the AG and OG groups (Tukey, ). All other comparisons showed significant results (Tukey, ; Fig. 5). The intragroup analysis of bone tissue dynamics using the enhanced color ratio showed significant changes between the fluorochromes injected 52 days (calcein) and 80 days (alizarin) after ovariectomy (Tukey test ). Higher bone turnover was observed in the SG and RG groups, showing a larger alizarin red area (in ) than calcein area. In the other groups (OG and AG), these proportions were reversed, with a larger calcein-stained area than alizarin red-stained area (Fig. 6). 4.DiscussionIn this study, the hypothesis that drug treatments would improve the rate of bone remodeling in the mature bones of osteoporotic rats as opposed to in the mature bones of the untreated animals was partially supported. Bone turnover in the osteoporotic rats treated with RG was statistically higher than that in the untreated osteoporotic rats (). No difference was observed between the RG-treated rats and healthy rats (GS; ). However, considering the statistical similarity to the osteoporotic rat group, treatment with AG did not improve the rate of bone remodeling (OG; ). AG can inhibit the antiresorptive activity of osteoclasts given the significant increase in calcein labeling. However, turnover is low, as evidenced by the weak alizarin staining (Figs. 5 and 6). In view of the marked use of this drug in the treatment and prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis,32–34 future studies should investigate the action of this drug in peri-implant bone healing. The effect of AG on bone quality should be evaluated for use in oral rehabilitation of patients with osseointegrated implants. One promising result of this study was that RG could treat osteoporosis. The antiresorptive action of RG, through its selective binding to estrogen receptors, reduced the expression of calcein and increased the expression of alizarin (Figs. 5 and 6). Therefore, we observed higher alveolar bone dynamics, evidenced by the balance between lower resorption and higher bone formation. Previous studies8,28,35 revealed that postexodontia alveolar repair in ovariectomized rats treated with hormone replacement (E2) or RG showed greater bone formation and intense immunostaining with osteocalcin, confirming their inhibitory effect on osteoclastogenesis. Our results, although representing the dynamics of the incisors of ovariectomized rats fed a low-calcium and phosphate diet, corroborate the findings of these previous studies. With regard to osseointegrated implants, we hypothesize that RG will improve peri-implant repair. Therefore, clinical studies should be conducted to determine whether this statement is true in order to establish a well-defined protocol for treating patients with osteoporosis. The bone mass reduction caused by osteoporosis decreases the quality of the bone tissue, and the ability to reverse this situation is potentially mediated by bone turnover, represented by resorption and renewal.3,6 In this study, superior bone dynamics were observed in the RG group, as compared to the AG and OG groups, similar to the rats with no change in bone metabolism (SG). This may be due to the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway,36–38 which triggers cell turnover in bone and cartilage.36 In a clinical study with women treated with antiresorptive drugs (E2 or RG), Pineda et al.37 observed a strong inhibition of bone resorption in both groups. The administration of RG inhibited the action of Dickkopf Homolog 1 (DKK1), an inhibitor of Wnt/β-catenin, and this increased the levels of osteoprotegerin, an inhibitor of osteoclastogenesis. This mechanism confirms the theory that RG is a superior drug for the treatment of osteoporosis. Moreover, it reinforces the role of osteoblasts as the main regulators of bone tissue turnover, releasing factors that activate and inhibit bone resorption. Further analysis should be performed to characterize the bone tissue tested under these conditions, with regard to the quality of the bone tissue as well as the expression of proteins involved in bone dynamics, such as osteocalcin, RANK, and RANKL by means of immunohistochemistry and real-time polymerase chain reaction. AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank Sao Paulo State Research Foundation (FAPESP) (2010/13971-6 and 2012/15912-2) for providing the required financial support; the Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, especially Professor Marcelo Coelho Goiato and Wirley Gonçalves Assunção, Aracatuba Dental School—Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), or contributions in the processing of the parts included in resin through the provision of equipment for this purpose; and the Integrated Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry of Bauru—USP, especially Marcia Sirlene Zardin Graeff for facilitating confocal microscopy. ReferencesM. Stevenson et al.,
“A systematic review and economic evaluation of alendronate, etidronate, risedronate, raloxifene and teriparatide for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis,”
Health Technol. Assess., 9
(22), 1
–160
(2005). HTARET Google Scholar
G. Akbaba et al.,
“Comparison of alendronate and raloxifene for the management of primary hyperparathyroidism,”
J. Endocrinol. Invest., 36
(11), 1076
–1082
(2013). JEIND7 0391-4097 Google Scholar
J. E. Aubin and E. Bonnelye,
“Osteoprotegerin and its ligand: a new paradigm for regulation of osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption,”
Medscape Women’s Health, 5
(2), 5
–11
(2000). Google Scholar
J. E. Aubin and E. Bonnelye,
“Osteoprotegerin and its ligand: a new paradigm for regulation of osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption,”
Osteoporosis Int., 11
(11), 905
–913
(2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001980070028 OSINEP 1433-2965 Google Scholar
“NIH consensus development panel on osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy, March 7–29, 2000: highlights of the conference,”
South. Med. J., 94
(6), 569
–573
(2001). SMJOAV 0038-4348 Google Scholar
“Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy,”
J. Am. Med. Assoc., 285
(6), 785
–795
(2001). http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.6.785 JAMAAP 0098-7484 Google Scholar
S. C. Manolagas and R. L. Jilka,
“Bone marrow, cytokines, and bone remodeling. Emerging insights into the pathophysiology of osteoporosis,”
N. Engl. J. Med., 332
(5), 305
–311
(1995). http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199502023320506 NEJMAG 0028-4793 Google Scholar
E. R. Luvizuto et al.,
“Histomorphometric analysis and immunolocalization of RANKL and OPG during the alveolar healing process in female ovariectomized rats treated with oestrogen or raloxifene,”
Arch. Oral Biol., 55
(1), 52
–59
(2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2009.11.001 AOBIAR 0003-9969 Google Scholar
P. J. Kribbs,
“Comparison of mandibular bone in normal and osteoporotic women,”
J. Prosthet. Dent., 63
(2), 218
–222
(1990). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90108-O JPDEAT 0022-3913 Google Scholar
M. Bozic and N. Ihan Hren,
“A novel method of dental panoramic tomogram analysis: a perspective tool for a screening test for osteoporosis,”
J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg., 41
(8), 808
–815
(2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2013.01.033 JCMSET 1010-5182 Google Scholar
M. Bozic and N. Ihan Hren,
“Osteoporosis and mandibles,”
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., 35
(3), 178
–184
(2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/79749065 0250-832X Google Scholar
S. Wassertheil-Smoller et al.,
“Effect of estrogen plus progestin on stroke in postmenopausal women: the Women’s Health Initiative: a randomized trial,”
J. Am. Med. Assoc., 289
(20), 2673
–2684
(2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.20.2673 JAMAAP 0098-7484 Google Scholar
J. E. Manson et al.,
“Estrogen plus progestin and the risk of coronary heart disease,”
N. Engl. J. Med., 349
(6), 523
–534
(2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa030808 NEJMAG 0028-4793 Google Scholar
N. Binkley et al.,
“Efficacy and safety of oral recombinant calcitonin tablets in postmenopausal women with low bone mass and increased fracture risk: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial,”
Osteoporos. Int., 25
(11), 2649
–2656
(2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-2796-0 OSINEP 1433-2965 Google Scholar
Y. Zhang et al.,
“Effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker on bones in mice with type 1 diabetes induced by streptozotocin,”
J. Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst., 15
(3), 218
–227
(2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1470320312471229 1470-3203 Google Scholar
M. Munoz-Torres et al.,
“Serum cathepsin K as a marker of bone metabolism in postmenopausal women treated with alendronate,”
Maturitas, 64
(3), 188
–192
(2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.09.011 MATUDK 0378-5122 Google Scholar
A. Pressman et al.,
“Initiation of osteoporosis treatment after bone mineral density testing,”
Osteoporosis Int., 12
(5), 337
–342
(2001). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001980170099 OSINEP 1433-2965 Google Scholar
J. Kayser, B. Ettinger and A. Pressman,
“Postmenopausal hormonal support: discontinuation of raloxifene versus estrogen,”
Menopause, 8
(5), 328
–332
(2001). http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00042192-200109000-00006 1072-3714 Google Scholar
B. Ettinger et al.,
“Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple outcomes of raloxifene evaluation (MORE) investigators,”
J. Am. Med. Assoc., 282
(7), 637
–645
(1999). http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.7.637 JAMAAP 0098-7484 Google Scholar
D. M. Black et al.,
“Fracture risk reduction with alendronate in women with osteoporosis: the fracture intervention trial. FIT research group,”
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 85
(11), 4118
–4124
(2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jcem.85.11.6953 JEMOAR 1923-287X Google Scholar
J. Reginster et al.,
“Randomized trial of the effects of risedronate on vertebral fractures in women with established postmenopausal osteoporosis. Vertebral efficacy with risedronate therapy (VERT) study group,”
Osteoporos. Int., 11
(1), 83
–91
(2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001980050010 OSINEP 1433-2965 Google Scholar
C. C. JohnstonJr. et al.,
“Long-term effects of raloxifene on bone mineral density, bone turnover, and serum lipid levels in early postmenopausal women: three-year data from 2 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials,”
Arch. Intern. Med., 160
(22), 3444
–3450
(2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinte.160.22.3444 AIMDAP 0003-9926 Google Scholar
C. H. ChesnutIII et al.,
“A randomized trial of nasal spray salmon calcitonin in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis: the prevent recurrence of osteoporotic fractures study. PROOF study group,”
Am. J. Med., 109
(4), 267
–276
(2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9343(00)00490-3 AJMEAZ 0002-9343 Google Scholar
S. L. Ruggiero et al.,
“American association of oral and maxillofacial surgeons position paper on bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw—2009 update,”
Aust. Endod. J., 35
(3), 119
–130
(2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aej.2009.35.issue-3 1329-1947 Google Scholar
J. I. Aguirre et al.,
“Effects of alendronate on bone healing after tooth extraction in rats,”
Oral Dis., 16
(7), 674
–685
(2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2010.01677.x 1354-523X Google Scholar
V. C. Petropoulos et al.,
“Treatment of a patient with implant failure and jaw osteonecrosis: successful retreatment using implants,”
J. Oral Implantol.,
(2014). 0160-6972 Google Scholar
R. Gupta,
“Early dental implant failure in patient associated with oral bisphosphonates,”
Indian J. Dent. Res., 23
(2), 298
(2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.100471 0970-9290 Google Scholar
E. R. Luvizuto et al.,
“Osteocalcin immunolabeling during the alveolar healing process in ovariectomized rats treated with estrogen or raloxifene,”
Bone, 1021
–1029 Elsevier Inc., United States
(2010). Google Scholar
L. H. da Paz et al.,
“Effect of 17beta-estradiol or alendronate on the bone densitometry, bone histomorphometry and bone metabolism of ovariectomized rats,”
Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res., 34
(8), 1015
–1022
(2001). BJMRDK 0100-879X Google Scholar
N. Wang et al.,
“Prostate cancer cells preferentially home to osteoblast-rich areas in the early stages of bone metastasis: evidence from in vivo models,”
J. Bone Miner. Res., 29
(12), 2688
–2696
(2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2300 JBMREJ 0884-0431 Google Scholar
N. Hassler et al.,
“Sclerostin deficiency is linked to altered bone composition,”
J. Bone Miner. Res., 29
(10), 2144
–2151
(2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2259 JBMREJ 0884-0431 Google Scholar
C. Wang et al.,
“Genetic polymorphisms in the mevalonate pathway affect the therapeutic response to alendronate treatment in postmenopausal Chinese women with low bone mineral density,”
Pharmacogenomics J.,
(2014). Google Scholar
A. Khan et al.,
“Osteoporosis in menopause,”
J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can., 36
(9), 839
–840
(2014). 1701-2163 Google Scholar
P. Tienboon and N. Jaruwangsanti,
“A prospective analytical study of the effects and adverse events of alendronate (Aldren70) treatment in Thai postmenopausal women,”
J. Med. Assoc. Thai, 97
(6), 621
–628
(2014). JMTHBU Google Scholar
E. R. Luvizuto et al.,
“Raloxifene therapy inhibits osteoclastogenesis during the alveolar healing process in rats,”
Arch. Oral Biol., 56
(10), 984
–990
(2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.03.015 AOBIAR 0003-9969 Google Scholar
C. Galli et al.,
“The importance of WNT pathways for bone metabolism and their regulation by implant topography,”
Eur. Cell Mater., 24 46
–59
(2012). ECMUBB 1473-2262 Google Scholar
B. Pineda et al.,
“Effects of administration of hormone therapy or raloxifene on the immune system and on biochemical markers of bone remodeling,”
Menopause, 19
(3), 319
–327
(2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/gme.0b013e3182310a98 1072-3714 Google Scholar
P. S. Issack, D. L. Helfet and J. M. Lane,
“Role of Wnt signaling in bone remodeling and repair,”
HSS J., 4
(1), 66
–70
(2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11420-007-9072-1 1556-3316 Google Scholar
BiographyGabriel Ramalho-Ferreira has master’s and PhD degrees on oral and maxillofacial surgery for the Aracatuba Dental School–UNESP, Aracatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil. He is a surgeon at Hospital for Rehabilitation of craniofacial anomalies. Leonardo Perez Faverani is a master’s, PhD, and postdoctoral student on oral and maxillofacial surgery for the Aracatuba Dental School–UNESP, Aracatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Gustavo Augusto Grossi-Oliveira is a doctoral student on oral and maxillofacial surgery for the Aracatuba Dental School–UNESP, Aracatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil. |