Open Access
22 April 2015 Raman microspectroscopy of nanodiamond-induced structural changes in albumin
Anastasiya S. Svetlakova, Nikolay N. Brandt, Alexander V. Priezzhev, Andrey Y. Chikishev
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Nanodiamonds (NDs) are promising agents for theranostic applications due to reported low toxicity and high biocompatibility, which is still being extensively tested on cellular, tissue, and organism levels. It is presumed that for experimental and future clinical applications, NDs will be administered into the organism via the blood circulation system. In this regard, the interaction of NDs with blood components needs to be thoroughly studied. We studied the interaction of carboxylated NDs (cNDs) with albumin, one of the major proteins of blood plasma. After 2-h long in vitro incubation in an aqueous solution of the protein, 100-nm cNDs were dried and the dry samples were studied with the aid of Raman microspectroscopy. The spectroscopic data indicate significant conformational changes that can be due to cND–protein interaction. A possible decrease in the functional activity of albumin related to the conformational changes must be taken into account in the in vivo applications.

1.

Introduction

Nanoparticles are promising for applications in biotechnology and theranostics since they can be used for addressed drug delivery and visualization of various processes in living organisms. Nanoparticles and their conjugates with drugs can be administered and spread via the blood circulation system. In this regard, it is expedient to study the interaction of nanoparticles with tissues and blood components within the framework of the problems of nanotoxicology and nanosafety. It is known that the nanoparticles are sometimes able to induce dramatic effects on protein interactions.1 The general use of nanoparticles in nanomedicine has been reviewed in multiple works (see, e.g., Refs. 23.4).

Diamond nanoparticles, nanodiamonds (NDs), exhibit high biocompatibility and relatively low toxicity,5 their properties can be characterized using fluorescence and Raman spectroscopy,6 and the corresponding signals can be used for ND visualization.79 The bioconjugation can be facilitated with the aid of functionalization of the ND surface (e.g., by means of carboxylation).1012 The absence of toxicity of carboxylated NDs (cNDs) has been demonstrated in Refs. 8 and 13 for in vitro interaction with various cells of human organisms. However, several experiments with in vivo and in vitro incubations have shown that NDs are accumulated in internal organs of laboratory animals (rats)14 and can stick to the membranes and penetrate into erythrocytes.15 In the tested range of particle concentrations, such an interaction did not cause hemolysis of the cells but potentially it may affect their microrheologic properties (reversible aggregation and deformability).15

It is known that the proteins of blood plasma are adsorbed on the ND surface.1618 FTIR data show that the interaction of human serum albumin (HSA) and cNDs with linear sizes of 5 and 100 nm leads to the changes of the amide I band shape and variations in the relative intensities of amide I–III bands, which indicate variations in the protein secondary structure.19

The results of Ref. 20 show a minor increase in the relative contents of random coils and β-sheets upon the dominant contribution of α-helices to the secondary structure of bovine serum albumin (BSA) that forms a complex with 5-nm cNDs. In addition, the complex formation leads to a minor blue shift of the UV-VIS absorption band of the protein and significant quenching of the protein fluorescence.

Lysozyme binding with 100-nm cND results in the splitting and low-frequency shifting of the band at 3250cm1 (N─H stretching) in the FTIR spectra.21,22 In this case, the enzymatic activity remains almost unchanged. The interaction with 5-nm cNDs also leads to the low-frequency shifting and splitting of the band into three narrow bands. The FTIR spectra of lysozyme19,23 show a high-frequency shift of the amide I band due to complex formation with cNDs. The shifts for 5- and 50-nm cNDs are greater than the shift for the 100-nm cNDs. The relative contents of random coils and β-sheets slightly increase in the predominantly α-helical protein. The enzymatic activity of lysozyme decreases by 80%, 80%, 25%, and 40% in complexes with 5-, 50-, 100-, and 500-nm cNDs, respectively.

However, the results of Ref. 24 show that the adsorption of blood plasma on NDs does not lead to variations in the secondary structure of the blood-plasma proteins and that incubation with NDs does not affect the dynamics of blood coagulation.

Thus, the existing data indicate the interaction of blood-plasma proteins and NDs; however, the nature and result of such interaction remain unclear and a conclusion on variations in the protein structure due to adsorption on ND surface is not commonly accepted. Biofunctionalization of nanoparticles involves the functional activity of protein molecules bound to the surface of a nanoparticle. Hence, it is expedient to learn more about the effects of the interaction with ND on the structure and function of proteins.

In this work, we employed Raman microspectroscopy to study the conformational changes of albumin that were induced by the interaction with NDs. Raman microspectroscopy is an efficient tool in the study of the structure of various biological objects.2528 Raman spectra of proteins exhibit several conformation-sensitive bands: amide I (1640cm1), amide III (1270cm1), tyrosine doublet (830 and 855cm1), bands of the disulfide bridges (510, 525, and 540cm1), and several bands assigned to the vibrations of tryptophan residues (e.g., 1361cm1).29

2.

Samples and Methods

In the experiments, we used BSA from MP Biomedicals (CAS #9048-46-8) (MBSA66.3kD), HSA from Sigma Aldrich (CAS #70024-90-7) (MHSA66.2kD), and NDs from Kay Industrial Diamond. The NDs with a characteristic size of about 100 nm were carboxylated using a mixture of sulfuric and nitric acids (31). The characteristic size of a single ND is approximately 20 times greater than the characteristic linear size of an HSA molecule.

To prepare a buffer solution, we sequentially dissolved sodium chloride (4 g), potassium chloride (0.72 g), orthophosphoric acid (0.72 g), and potassium dihydrogen phosphate (0.12 g) in deionized distilled water (500 ml). The buffer pH (7.4) was equal to the mean pH of human blood. The buffer was sterilized and stored at a temperature of 4°С. Carboxylated NDs (cNDs) were added to the HSA solution in buffer: the concentrations were 2 and 20mg/ml, respectively. Ultrasonic processing was used to destroy cND aggregates, and the resulting suspension was stored in a shaker over 2 h. Then the following procedure was repeated three times: the suspension (1 mL) was centrifuged at 11,000g during 10 min to provide precipitation of cNDs with adsorbed protein molecules, the supernatant fluid (950μL) was removed, and the buffer (1 mL) was added. In each cycle, the absorption spectrum of the supernatant fluid was measured. At the last stage, the buffer was not added. The resulting cND-HSA samples (20μL) were deposited on a silicon substrate and dried at room temperature.

A reference buffer solution of HSA with a concentration of 20mg/mL was processed using a similar procedure and dried at room temperature on a silicon substrate.

Tris-2-carboxyethyl phosphine (TCEP) was used as a chemical agent that provides the cleavage of disulfide bonds.30 To prepare the TCEP-HSA sample, we used an aqueous (Milli-Q) solution of HSA (7.6mg/mL) and TCEP (0.55mg/ml) in which the TCEP-to-protein molar ratio was 171. The solution was processed in an ultrasonic bath over 30 min and stored at room temperature over 2 h. Then the sample was lyophilized. A reference HSA sample was prepared using the same procedure.

For the Raman measurements, we used a Thermo Scientific DXR Raman confocal microscope. The excitation wavelength was 532 nm, the mean power at the sample was no greater than 10 mW, and the spectral resolution was 5cm1 (the dispersion was about 1cm1/pixel). The diameters of the focal spots on the sample and the confocal resolution were 0.6 and 4μm, respectively (100× objective and 25-μm pinhole). Raman bands were assigned using the results of Refs. 29 and 3132.33.

3.

Results and Discussion

Optical microscopy shows that the cND-HSA samples under study consist of irregularly shaped microstructures. Figure 1(a) presents a typical microphotograph of a dried cND-HSA sample. It is clearly seen that the sample consists of microstructures that apparently represent the aggregates of protein molecules and cNDs. To estimate the characteristic size of the microstructures, we used ImageJ software. Figure 1(b) shows the resulting size distribution with a mean linear size of about 3μm. Note that most microstructures on the surface of the samples are in close contact with each other, and the thickness of the sample exceeds the size of the microstructures. Therefore, obtaining the real size distribution of microstructures is not feasible.

Fig. 1

(a) Microphotograph of a surface fragment of cND-HSA sample dried on silicon substrate and (b) distribution of microstructures with respect to their size.

JBO_20_4_047004_f001.png

We measured the Raman spectra at 100 randomly located microstructures to assess their identity. Based on the spectral data, we conclude that most microstructures predominantly consist of cNDs [Fig. 2(a)]: an intense narrow band at 1332cm1 is assigned to diamond (vibrations of carbon in sp3 hybridization), overlapped broadbands at 1410 and 1560cm1 are assigned to defect and ordered graphites, respectively (D and G graphite bands), and the band at 3130cm1 corresponds to the C─H stretching mode.6 Note the absence of Raman signatures of proteins in these spectra, which, however, does not exclude the presence of small amounts of protein molecules.

Fig. 2

Raman spectrum of cND sample (dotted line). Solid lines show Raman spectra of cND-HSA sample measured at several sites on its surface that are classified as the spectra of (a) diamond and (b) protein. The dashed lines show the positions of the Raman bands at 1332, 1410, 1560, and 3130cm1 (see text for details).

JBO_20_4_047004_f002.png

The measurements at two microstructures of 100 yielded the spectra that can be identified as the Raman spectra of protein with a contribution of the diamond band at 1332cm1. The spectra were measured at five sites on each microstructure. In these 10 almost identical spectra [Fig. 2(b) shows three of them], we observe the protein bands at about 540cm1 (vibrations of disulfide bridges), 830 and 850cm1 (tyrosine doublet), 1006cm1 (breathing mode of phenylalanine ring), and 1640cm1 (amide I). The bands assigned to the C─H and N─H stretching modes are observed at 2900 and 3300cm1, respectively.

Below, we consider the Raman spectrum of one of the cND-HSA samples that results from averaging the above 10 measurements.

Figure 3 shows the Raman spectra of the reference HSA and cND-HSA samples. Background signals were subtracted using the method described elsewhere,34 and the resulting spectra were normalized by the intensity of the band at 2930cm1 (C─H stretching mode).

Fig. 3

Raman spectra of reference HSA sample (solid line) and cND-HSA sample (dashed line). The inset shows Raman spectra of lyophilized HSA (solid line) and TCEP-HSA samples (dashed line).

JBO_20_4_047004_f003.png

It is seen that the intensities of the bands at 510 and 670cm1 are significantly lower in the spectrum of the cND-HSA sample. The bands in the interval 500 to 550cm1 are assigned to S─S stretching vibrations. C─S stretching vibrations are manifested at 660 to 670 and 700cm1 in C─S─S─C and C─S─C configurations, respectively.31 The Protein Data Bank (PDB) data for HSA show that the protein structure contains 17 disulfide bridges, 34 C─S bonds in C─S─S─C configuration, 6 C─S bonds in C─S─C configuration, and 1 C─S bond in C─S─H configuration. Thus, a decrease in the intensities of the bands at 510 and 675cm1 can be due to the cleavage of disulfide bonds and the corresponding decrease in the number of C─S bonds in  C─S─S─C configuration. To prove such an interpretation, we additionally studied the mixture of HSA with TCEP. The inset to Fig. 3 compares the Raman spectra of lyophilized HSA and TCEP-HSA samples and shows that the cleavage of disulfide bonds leads to a decrease in the intensities of the bands at 510 and 670cm1. Such spectral changes are similar to the spectral changes for cND-HSA samples.

For cND-HSA samples, we also observe an increase in the intensity ratio of tyrosine doublet R=I850/I830, which characterizes the H-bonding of tyrosine residues, from R=1.4 for HSA to R=2.1 for cND-HSA. Based on the existing data, we conclude that OH groups of tyrosine residues become stronger acceptors in H-bonds.

We additionally measured the Raman spectra of cND-protein samples in which BSA was used instead of HSA. The spectra of 100 microstructures were measured. The protein spectrum was observed for only one microstructure. The measurements at 10 points at this microstructure yielded a decrease in the intensities of the bands at 510 and 670cm1 and a variation in R-ratio as well as the measurements with HSA did.

To compare the shapes of amide I bands, we preliminary subtracted linear backgrounds and normalized the resulting spectra by the integrals over the spectral interval 1640 to 1720cm1 (curves 1 and 2, Fig. 4). We also used the double differentiation of the spectra (curves 1′ and 2′, Fig. 4). Note an increase in the intensity at 1650cm1 and a decrease in the intensity at 1660 to 1670cm1 in the spectrum of the cND-HSA sample. In accordance with PDB data, the relative contents of the main elements of the secondary structure (alpha-helix, beta-sheet, and random coil) are 78%, 0%, and 22%, respectively.35 Alpha-helices and random coils predominantly contribute to the spectral intensities in the intervals 1650 to 1657 and 1660 to 1665cm1, respectively.29,3638 Therefore, the experimental results show that the relative content of alpha-helices (random coils) increases (decreases) in the cND-HSA samples.

Fig. 4

Raman spectra of reference HSA (1) and cND-HSA samples (2) and second derivatives of the corresponding spectra (1′) and (2′).

JBO_20_4_047004_f004.png

The absence of Raman signatures of protein in the spectra of most microstructures is an unexpected result. Estimations based on the initial concentrations of cNDs and HSA and the concentrations of protein in supernatant fluids after centrifuging (results of spectrophotometric measurements) show that about 10,000 protein molecules are bound to a single cND. The resulting sample under study must contain a significant amount of bounded protein molecules (the protein mass in the sample is estimated to be 1.5 mg). In a test experiment, we measured the Raman spectra of lyophilized HSA pressed in a tablet with a mass of 1.5 mg and an area of about 20mm2. The measurements at several points on such a sample yielded identical signal levels that were no less than the signal levels at the points where the protein was detected in the experiments with cND-HSA samples. Thus, the fact that the Raman signal of protein is difficult to detect in cND-HSA samples disagrees with a relatively high amount of protein in the sample under study. We may assume that cNDs form microstructures with encapsulated protein molecules, so that the latter becomes undetectable in Raman measurements. A minor part of such microstructures can be destroyed in the course of the sample preparation. Protein molecules at such locations are liberated and exposed to laser excitation, therefore, the Raman spectrum of protein can be measured. This speculation needs to be verified in additional experiments.

4.

Conclusion

The cND-HSA dried samples are structurally nonuniform and consist of microstructures. Few areas with relatively high concentrations of protein molecules are detected although the estimations show that the total amount of protein molecules in the sample under study is sufficient for reliable detection at any point of the sample under the conditions for uniform distribution.

The spectral data indicate the following conformational changes of protein molecules induced by the interaction with cNDs: cleavage of disulfide bridges, modifications of H-bonds of tyrosine residues, and a minor increase (decrease) in the relative content of α-helices (random coils).

Such significant conformational changes of HSA in the cND-HSA complex may lead to a decrease in the functional activity of protein molecules bound to the surface of cNDs. In respect to the effect of the alteration of the functional activity of HSA on the biofunctionalization of cND for drug delivery, it should be noted that the altered structure and functional activity of albumin may impede the functionalization needed for attaching the drug to the nanoparticle. Thus, the addressed drug delivery with the aid of cNDs that are biofunctionalized using HSA molecules may be inefficient. However, the system under study was obtained under conditions that substantially differ from in vivo conditions. In native medium, the cND-HSA interaction can be different, so this interaction in aqueous medium should be additionally studied in more detail.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to IR Laboratory of National Dong Hwa University, Taiwan for providing cNDs. This work was supported in part by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Grant Nos. 12-02-92008, 13-02-01177, and 15-02-06512) and Lomonosov Moscow State University Development Program.

References

1. 

I. Lynch and K. A. Dawson, “Protein-nanoparticle interactions,” Nanotoday, 3 40 –47 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1748-0132(08)70014-8 NTAOCG 1748-0132 Google Scholar

2. 

M. L. Etheridge et al., “The big picture on nanomedicine: the state of investigational and approved nanomedicine products,” Nanomedicine, 9 1 –14 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2012.05.013 1743-5889 Google Scholar

3. 

Y. Xing and L. Dai, “Nanodiamonds for nanomedicine,” Nanomedicine, 4 207 –218 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/17435889.4.2.207 1743-5889 Google Scholar

4. 

D. Ho, Nanodiamonds: Applications in Biology and Medicine, Springer-Verlag, USA (2010). Google Scholar

5. 

S. J. Yu et al., “Bright fluorescent nanodiamonds: no photobleaching and low cytotoxicity,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 127 (50), 17604 –17605 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja0567081 JACSAT 0002-7863 Google Scholar

6. 

V. N. Mochalin et al., “The properties and applications of nanodiamonds,” Nat. Nanotechnol., 7 11 –23 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.209 1748-3387 Google Scholar

7. 

T. C. Hsu et al., “Labeling of neuronal differentiation and neuron cells with biocompatible fluorescent nanodiamonds,” Sci. Rep., 4 5004 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep05004 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

8. 

K. K. Liu et al., “Biocompatible and detectable carboxylated nanodiamond on human cell,” Nanotechnology, 18 325102 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/18/32/325102 NNOTER 0957-4484 Google Scholar

9. 

C.-Y. Cheng et al., “Direct and in vitro observation of growth hormone receptor molecules in A549 human lung epithelial cells by nanodiamond labeling,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 90 (16), 163903 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2727557 APPLAB 0003-6951 Google Scholar

10. 

J. T. Paci et al., “Understanding the surfaces of nanodiamonds,” J. Phys. Chem., 117 17256 –17267 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp404311a JPCHAX 0022-3654 Google Scholar

11. 

K.-K. Liu et al., “Biocompatible and detectable carboxylated nanodiamond on human cell,” Nanotechnology, 18 1 –11 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/18/32/325102 NNOTER 0957-4484 Google Scholar

12. 

V. Paget et al., “Carboxylated nanodiamonds are neither cytotoxic nor genotoxic on liver, kidney, intestine and lung human cell lines,” Nanotoxicology, 8 46 –56 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2013.855828 1743-5390 Google Scholar

13. 

V. Paget et al., “Carboxylated nanodiamonds are neither cytotoxic nor genotoxic on liver, kidney, intestine and lung human cell lines,” Nanotoxicology, 8 (S1), 46 –56 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2013.855828 1743-5390 Google Scholar

14. 

Y. Yuan et al., “Biodistribution and fate of nanodiamonds in vivo,” Diamond Relat. Mater., 18 95 –100 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2008.10.031 DRMTE3 0925-9635 Google Scholar

15. 

Y.-C. Lin et al., “The influence of nanodiamond on the oxygenation states and micro rheological properties of human red blood cells in vitro,” J. Biomed. Opt., 17 (10), 1015121 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.17.10.101512 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

16. 

X. L. Kong et al., “High-affinity capture of proteins by diamond nanoparticles for mass spectrometric analysis,” Anal. Chem., 77 (1), 259 –265 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac048971a ANCHAM 0003-2700 Google Scholar

17. 

L.-C. L. Huang and H.-C. Chang, “Adsorption and immobilization of cytochrome c on nanodiamonds,” Langmuir, 20 (14), 5879 –5884 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la0495736 LANGD5 0743-7463 Google Scholar

18. 

V. S. Bondar, I. O. Pozdnyakova and A. P. Puzyr, “Applications of nanodiamonds for separation and purification of proteins,” Phys. Solid State, 46 (4), 758 –760 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/1.1711468 PSOSED 1063-7834 Google Scholar

19. 

E. V. Perevedentseva et al., “Laser-optical investigation of the effect of diamond nanoparticles on the structure and functional properties of proteins,” Quantum Electron., 40 (12), 1089 –1093 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1070/QE2010v040n12ABEH014507 QUELEZ 1063-7818 Google Scholar

20. 

H. D. Wang et al., “Study on protein conformation and adsorption behaviors in nanodiamond particle-protein complexes,” Nanotechnology, 22 145703 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/22/14/145703 NNOTER 0957-4484 Google Scholar

21. 

E. V. Perevedentseva et al., “The interaction of protein-modified nanodiamond with bacterial cells,” Nanotechnology, 2 440 –443 (2006). NNOTER 0957-4484 Google Scholar

22. 

P.-H. Chung et al., “Spectroscopic study of bio-functionalized nanodiamonds,” Diamond Relat. Mater., 15 622 –625 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2005.11.019 DRMTE3 0925-9635 Google Scholar

23. 

E. V. Perevedentseva et al., “Characterizing protein activities on the lysozyme and nanodiamond complex prepared for bio applications,” Langmuir, 27 (3), 1085 –1091 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la103155c LANGD5 0743-7463 Google Scholar

24. 

J. Mona et al., “Adsorption of human blood plasma on nanodiamond and its influence on activated partial thromboplastin time,” Diamond Relat. Mater., 39 73 –77 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2013.08.001 DRMTE3 0925-9635 Google Scholar

25. 

Q. Tu and C. Chang, “Diagnostic applications of Raman spectroscopy,” Nanomedicine, 8 545 –558 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2011.09.013 1743-5889 Google Scholar

26. 

J. Popp, C. Krafft and T. Mayerhofer, “Modern Raman spectroscopy for biomedical applications,” Opt. Photonik, 6 (4), 24 –28 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/opph.201190383 OPPHAH 1863-1460 Google Scholar

27. 

H. U. Gremlich and B. Yan, Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy of Biological Materials, Marcel-Dekker, New York (2001). Google Scholar

28. 

E. B. Hanlon et al., “Prospects for in vivo Raman spectroscopy,” Phys. Med. Biol., 45 R1 –R59 (2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/45/2/201 PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar

29. 

I. N. Serdyuk, N. R. Zaccai and J. Zaccai, Methods in Molecular Biophysics: Structure, Dynamics, Function, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York/Melbourne (2007). Google Scholar

30. 

C. David, S. Foley and M. Enescu, “Protein S─S bridge reduction: a Raman and computational study of lysozyme interaction with TCEP,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 11 2532 –2542 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b815492a PPCPFQ 1463-9076 Google Scholar

31. 

R. C. Lord and N.-T. Yu, “Laser-excited Raman spectroscopy of biomolecules. I. Native lysozyme and its constituent amino acids,” J. Mol. Biol., 50 (2), 509 –524 (1970). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(70)90208-1 JMOBAK 0022-2836 Google Scholar

32. 

H. Li et al., “Determination of the pKa values of active-center cysteines, cysteines-32 and -35, in Escherichia coli thioredoxin by Raman spectroscopy,” Biochemistry, 32 (22), 5800 –5808 (1993). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi00073a012 BIORAK 0006-2979 Google Scholar

33. 

R. C. Lord and N.-T. Yu, “Laser-excited Raman spectroscopy of biomolecules II. Native ribonuclease and α-chymotrypsin,” J. Mol. Biol., 51 203 –213 (1970). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(70)90137-3 JMOBAK 0022-2836 Google Scholar

34. 

I. K. Mikhailyuk and A. P. Razzhivin, “Background subtraction in experimental data arrays illustrated by the example of Raman spectra and fluorescent gel electrophoresis patterns,” Instrum. Exp. Tech., 46 (6), 765 –769 (2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:INET.0000008930.87741.b9 INETAK 0020-4412 Google Scholar

35. 

S. Sugio et al., “Crystal structure of human serum albumin at 2.5 Å resolution,” Protein Eng., 12 (6), 439 –446 (1999). http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/protein/12.6.439 PRENE9 0269-2139 Google Scholar

36. 

X. Peng et al., “Study on the structural changes of bovine serum albumin with effects on polydatin binding by a multitechnique approach,” Spectrochim. Acta, Part A, 81 209 –214 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2011.06.003 SAMCAS 1386-1425 Google Scholar

37. 

A. I. Ivanov et al., “Infrared and Raman spectroscopic studies of the structure of human serum albumin under various ligand loads,” J. Appl. Spectrosc., 60 5 –6 (1994). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02606067 JASYAP 0021-9037 Google Scholar

38. 

C. Zhenhuan et al., “UV Resonance Raman-selective amide vibrational enhancement: quantitative methodology for determining protein secondary structure,” Biochemistry, 37 2854 –2864 (1998). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi971160z BIORAK 0006-2979 Google Scholar

Biography

Anastasiya S. Svetlakova graduated from the Faculty of Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State University in 2015. Her area of expertise is Raman spectroscopy of enzymes and nanoparticles.

Nikolay N. Brandt graduated and received his PhD degree from the Faculty of Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State University in 1998 and 2001, respectively. He is a participant of international research projects in Tokyo and Berlin. He is an associate professor at the Faculty of Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State University. His area of expertise is Raman, IR, and fluorescence spectroscopy of biological macromolecules aimed at the analysis of the relationship of conformational dynamics and functional activity.

Alexander V. Priezzhev graduated and received his PhD degree from the Faculty of Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State University in 1971 and 1975, respectively. He is a leader and participant of international research projects on medical physics and biomedical optics in USA, Germany, Finland, China, and Taiwan. He is head of the Laboratory of Laser Biomedical Photonics, Faculty of Physics and International Laser Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University. His areas of expertise include but is not limited by biomedical optics, light scattering diagnostics, physics and rheology of biological fluids.

Andrey Yu. Chikishev graduated and received his PhD and Dr.Sci. degrees from the Faculty of Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State University in 1982, 1986, and 2002, respectively. He is a leader and participant of international research projects on laser spectroscopy of biomolecules and organic molecules in the Netherlands, Germany, Japan, and Italy. He is head of the Laboratory of Laser Diagnostics of Biomolecules and Methods of Photonics in the Study of Objects of Cultural Heritage, International Laser Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University.

© 2015 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) 1083-3668/2015/$25.00 © 2015 SPIE
Anastasiya S. Svetlakova, Nikolay N. Brandt, Alexander V. Priezzhev, and Andrey Y. Chikishev "Raman microspectroscopy of nanodiamond-induced structural changes in albumin," Journal of Biomedical Optics 20(4), 047004 (22 April 2015). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.20.4.047004
Published: 22 April 2015
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 5 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Proteins

Raman spectroscopy

Neodymium

Molecules

Imaging spectroscopy

Blood

Nanoparticles

Back to Top