10 October 2017 Second harmonic generation for collagen I characterization in rectal cancer patients with and without preoperative radiotherapy
Author Affiliations +
J. of Biomedical Optics, 22(10), 106006 (2017). doi:10.1117/1.JBO.22.10.106006
Rectal cancer is treated with preoperative radiotherapy (RT) to downstage the tumor, reduce local recurrence, and improve patient survival. Still, the treatment outcome varies significantly and new biomarkers are desired. Collagen I (Col-I) is a potential biomarker, which can be visualized label-free by second harmonic generation (SHG). Here, we used SHG to identify Col-I changes induced by RT in surgical tissue, with the aim to evaluate the clinical significance of RT-induced Col-I changes. First, we established a procedure for quantitative evaluation of Col-I by SHG in CDX2-stained tissue sections. Next, we evaluated Col-I properties in material from 31 non-RT and 29 RT rectal cancer patients. We discovered that the Col-I intensity and anisotropy were higher in the tumor invasive margin than in the inner tumor and normal mucosa, and RT increased and decreased the intensity in inner tumor and normal mucosa, respectively. Furthermore, higher Col-I intensity in the inner tumor was related to increased distant recurrence in the non-RT group but to longer survival in the RT group. In conclusion, we present a new application of SHG for quantitative analysis of Col-I in surgical material, and the first data suggest Col-I intensity as a putative prognostic biomarker in rectal cancer.
Blockhuys, Agarwal, Hildesjö, Jarlsfelt, Wittung-Stafshede, and Sun: Second harmonic generation for collagen I characterization in rectal cancer patients with and without preoperative radiotherapy



Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide with around 1.36 million new incidences reported in 2012. About 700,000 estimated deaths from CRC make it the fourth most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide accounting for about 8.5%. The incidence rate for rectal cancer is about 30% from all CRC cases, and today’s 5-year survival rate for rectal cancer is around 63%.1,2 Surgery is the mainstay of curative treatments for rectal cancer patients.3 Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) is now commonly used to downstage the tumor, reduce the risk of local recurrence, and improve the overall survival in rectal cancer patients.4,5 Although the 5-year survival rate for rectal cancer has increased around 20% during the last three decades due to earlier diagnosis and improved treatments, less than half of the patients achieve a complete pathological response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy.6 Therefore, it is essential to find new molecular markers to give a better prognosis after treatment and to achieve better treatment outcome.

The tumor is spatially heterogeneous,7,8 whereby the tumor extracellular matrix (ECM) has an emerging role in cancer progression and treatment response.9,10 Hereby, the most abundant ECM protein, collagen I (Col-I), is recognized as a dynamic and active substrate that may not only block but also stimulate cancer cell invasion and metastasis, which is the main reason for cancer deaths.11 During cancer progression, Col-I progressively thickens, stiffens, and linearizes. Hereby, linearized cross-linked collagen bundles stimulate cell migration, whereas a dense network of cross-linked matrix fibers blocks migration.12 Furthermore, the signature of thicker and radial aligned Col-I fibers was assigned as a prognostic factor for reduced survival in breast cancer.13 Fibrosis is a side-effect of RT, which involves increased collagen deposition and remodeling, mediated by direct and indirect interactions between the tumor’s cellular component and the collagen matrix.14,15 RT may stimulate cancer metastasis via multiple mechanisms, which imply responses by both the tumor cells and tumor stroma.16,17 Earlier, we reported that RT stimulates colon cancer cells to remodel the Col-I matrix into straps, i.e., aligned Col-I fibers, associated with an increased cell migration potential.18 Still, detailed information on the RT-induced changes in the Col-I matrix and their clinical significance remain unclear.

Hence, quantitative and morphological characterization of the Col-I matrix at the microscale becomes important in the evaluation of prognosis and treatment outcome. This information can be obtained by second harmonic generation (SHG): a nonlinear microscopy (NLM) technique.19 NLM can provide label-free information by two- or multiphoton processes in the interaction of short-pulsed laser with molecules and their vibrations. Low absorption and scattering of near-infrared (NIR) excitation light by the tissue allows deep imaging into tissue sections (0.4 to 1 mm depending on tissue structure). SHG arises from the laser field suffering a conserved nonlinear, second-order, polarization when passing through noncentrosymmetric structures. Col-I is such a noncentrosymmetric protein detected by SHG using an excitation wavelength of 800 to 860 nm and an emission wavelength that is half the excitation wavelength.20

Although Col-I properties have been associated with CRC progression,2122.23 the effects of RT on the Col-I matrix in rectal cancers and their clinical relevance remain unknown. In this study, we characterized the Col-I matrix by SHG in CDX2-stained surgical tissue sections from 60 patients that participated in a Swedish rectal cancer clinical trial of preoperative RT, and we examined the relationship of the collected Col-I properties in different subtumor regions with the clinical outcome. This information is particularly interesting considering the application of SHG-coupled colonoscopy in the evaluation of treatment outcome of rectal cancer patients.


Materials and Methods


Patient Material

The patients were from the South-East Swedish Health Care region and participated in the randomized Swedish clinical trial of preoperative RT during 1987 to 1990.24 Each participant signed the informed consent. The patient cohort included 60 primary rectal adenocarcinomas, among them, 31 patients underwent surgery only and 29 patients underwent RT before surgery. RT was administered with 25 Gy in five fractions during a median of 7 days (range, 4 to 8 days). Surgery was then performed within a median of 4 days (range, 1 to 8 days) after RT. None of the patients received adjuvant chemotherapy before or after surgery. The mean age of the patients was 68 years (range, 39 to 79 years), and the median follow-up was 79 months (range, 0 to 301 months). Other patient and tumor characteristics are presented in Table 1.

Table 1

Patient and tumor characteristics.

CharacteristicsNon-RT (%)RT (%)
Male20 (65)19 (66)
Female11 (35)10 (34)
Age (years)
6912 (39)14 (48)
>6919 (61)15 (52)
Tumor stage
I11 (35)9 (31)
II8 (26)9 (31)
III12 (39)11 (38)
IV0 (0)0 (0)
Well3 (10)2 (7)
Moderate22 (71)17 (59)
Poor6 (19)8 (27)
Unknown02 (7)
Surgical type
Rectal amputation17 (55)10 (34)
Abdominoperineal resection15 (45)19 (66)
Resection margin
Tumor free28 (90)28 (96)
Tumor positive3 (10)1 (4)
To anal verge (cm)


CDX2 Immunohistochemical Staining

Four micrometer thin sections from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) surgical tissue were baked in 65°C for 2 h, followed by deparaffinization in Aqua de Par 10× Ancillary reagent (ADP1002 M, Biocare Medical1) for 20 min. The sections were then submitted to Borg Decloaker RTU antigen retrieval solution1 (BD1000) for heat-induced epitope retrieval using a pressure cooker Decloaking Chamber NxGen1 programmed in a temperature cycle to reach a maximum of 110°C for 5 min. After cooling down, the slides were rinsed in tap water prior to washing in tris-buffered saline (TBS) wash buffer. After blocking endogenous peroxidase by incubation in peroxidazed 11 for 5 min, the slides were washed in TBS wash buffer and incubated with the monoclonal primary antibody to CDX2 [Clone DAK-CDX2 (Agilent, GA080)] for 30 min at room temperature (RT) followed by incubation with secondary antibody MACH4 Universal horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-Probe and tertiary antibody MACH4 Universal HRP-Polymer1 (BRR 4012) for 10 min each at RT. After HRP detection, the tissue section was rinsed in TBS wash buffer. For visualization, one drop (32  μl) of diaminobenzidine (DAB) chromogen per 1.0 ml of DAB substrate buffer1 was applied to the tissue sections followed by incubation for 5 min at RT. After rinsing in deionized water, the sections were counterstained with Mayers hematoxylin staining solution (Histolab Products AB2) and mounted with Pertex mounting media.2


Second Harmonic Generation Microscopy

The 532-nm (frequency doubled) beam of the Nd:YVO4 pump laser (picoTRAIN, HighQ GmbH) is used to pump the optical parametric oscillator (OPO), (Levante Emerald OPO, APE GmbH) to provide an output of 817 nm. The pump beam has a pulse length of 7 ps and repetition rate of 76 MHz. The 817-nm beam is coupled into the scanning head unit (Nikon C1) of the Nikon Eclipse TE2000-E microscope. The beam was focused on the sample using a high NA oil objective (Nikon Plan Fluor 40×/1.30). SHG signal was collected in transmission with a high NA lens into a single-photon counting photomultiplier tube (HPM-100-40, Becker & Hickl GmbH). SHG signals were collected at 408.5 nm with bandpass filters 405/10. Single acquisitions were taken in 83 s with a size of 1024 pixels for a 318.3  μm field-of-view.

SHG signals were calibrated every time before a measurement. The calibration was carried out using a sugar crystal preserved for all measurements. The counts were recorded for 1 s collection time on the same region chosen on the crystal ranged from 25 to 30.


Collagen-I Characterization

Col-I was characterized for the global properties Col-I intensity and anisotropy and for the local individualistic properties Col-I fiber number, length, and width. Col-I intensity and anisotropy were analyzed using ImageJ software. Col-I intensity was calculated by dividing the sum of all intensities by the total number of pixels. The Col-I anisotropy was measured using the ImageJ plugin, FibrilTool.25 Col-I fiber number, length, and width were analyzed using CT-FIRE software.26 CT-FIRE analysis was applied to raw SHG images with parameter values thresh_im2=0, number of selected scales=4, and the rest of the parameters having default values. The Col-I fiber number data were corrected for the percentages of surface covered by ECM, quantified by applying ImageJ software to the phase-contrast images of the regions of interest (RoIs), i.e., the tissue regions selected for SHG imaging.



The student’s t-test was applied to determine the statistical significance of the difference in Col-I properties results in surgical samples from non-RT versus RT treated rectal cancer patients. All Col-I properties results are presented as mean±standard error. For clinical analysis, the raw Col-I data were categorized into low (median) and high (>median) values. The Chi-square test was applied to examine the relationships of the Col-I properties with clinicopathological variables. Log-rank test was used to examine the relationships of the Col-I properties with the relative risk for (local or distant) recurrence and the patient (overall or disease-free) survival. Stratified log rank test was used for examining independency of the Col-I properties from treatment (non-RT versus RT) in the disease recurrence and patient survival. Survival curves were computed according to the Kaplan–Meier method. The tests were two-sided and P-values of <0.05 were considered as significant (SPSS Statistics version 22.0).


Results and Discussion


Experimental Setup for Col-I Characterization by SHG in Surgical Tissue

We established a new experimental setup for the evaluation of Col-I in surgical tissue from Swedish rectal cancer clinical trial of preoperative RT during 1987 to 1990. Col-I was visualized label-free by SHG microscopy in CDX2-stained tissue sections. SHG images were acquired in different regions of the tissue, namely adjacent normal mucosa, inner tumor, and invasive margin. For each tissue region, three separate SHG images were taken [Fig. 1(a)]. A phase-contrast scan of the CDX2-stained tissue section was used to preselect the RoIs and to relocate the RoIs by bright field view before SHG image acquisition [Fig. 1(b)].

Fig. 1

Visualization of Col-I in CDX2-stained rectal surgical sections by SHG. (a) Phase-contrast scan of a CDX2-stained tissue section with indication of the regions of interest in adjacent normal mucosa (N; blue squares), inner tumor (I; green squares), and tumor invasive margin (M; red squares). Scale bar=1  mm. (b) Phase-contrast (upper panels) and SHG (lower panels) images from a RoI in normal mucosa (left panels), inner tumor (middle panels), and invasive margin (right panels) regions of a CDX2-stained rectal surgical section. Scale bars=50  μm.


With this setup, label-free and quantitative evaluation of the Col-I matrix in FFPE surgical tissue material was obtained. SHG in comparison to more classic Col-I staining approaches, e.g., Masson’s trichrome or sirius red staining, provides information about not only the amount but also the architecture of the Col-I matrix.19,27 Others have analyzed the Col-I matrix using SHG in normal mucosa and tumor tissue,21,22 but we, for the first time, evaluated the Col-I matrix in adjacent normal mucosa, inner tumor, and invasive margin regions in the samples, thereby analyzing region-specific aspects of tumor development. The CDX2 staining is important as it allows for specific visualization of the rectal epithelial cells,28 whereas the hematoxylin and eosin staining, used by others to correlate the SHG signal to the tumor epithelium, visualizes the nuclei of all cell types.13,22 Our setup may be used for the investigation of the direct interplay between the Col-I matrix and epithelial cells upon combining SHG with two-photon emission fluorescence microscopy, which allows for colocalization of Col-I and epithelial cells in the tissue.


Col-I Characterization in Surgical Tissue from non-RT and RT Treated Patients

We determined Col-I intensity and Col-I anisotropy in the normal mucosa, inner tumor, and invasive margin of CDX2-stained surgical tissue sections from 31 non-RT and 29 RT rectal cancer patients [Fig. 2(a)]. While inner tumor and invasive margin were present in all 60 tissues (31 non-RT and 29 RT), the adjacent normal mucosa was only found in 24 of the 60 tissues (12 non-RT and 12 RT). For the non-RT group, we observed no difference between normal mucosa and inner tumor, but higher intensity and anisotropy in the invasive margin versus normal mucosa and inner tumor (p<0.001). Analysis of the effect of RT on the Col-I properties in the different tissue regions showed that RT is related to a decreased (p=0.006) and increased (p=0.044) intensity in the normal mucosa and inner tumor, respectively. Furthermore, RT did not affect the intensity in the invasive margin or the anisotropy in any of the tissue regions. We also quantified other Col-I fiber properties, such as number, length, and width in the different tissue regions under non-RT and RT conditions [Fig. 2(b)]. Comparison of the different tissue regions showed higher fiber number, length, and width in invasive margin versus normal mucosa and inner tumor (p<0.001 for all). RT was related to a decreased fiber number (p=0.005) in the normal mucosa and decreased fiber width in the invasive margin (p=0.022), respectively.

Fig. 2

Col-I characteristics in the different regions, namely adjacent normal mucosa (N), inner tumor (I), and invasive margin (M), of CDX2-stained surgical sections from non-RT and RT treated rectal cancer patients. (a) Col-I intensity and anisotropy. (b) Col-I fiber number, length, and width. Statistical significance of the differences between different tissue regions in non-RT condition, and between non-RT and RT conditions for each tissue region is represented with the p-value calculated using the two-tailed t-test. Error bar indicates the standard error of the mean.


Several studies have reported a pivotal role of collagen in colon cancer progression.2122.23 Birk et al.21 described an increased amount and alignment of Col-I in malignant versus normal colonic mucosa. However, we found no difference for these two Col-I properties between inner tumor and normal mucosa. Kalluri and Zeisberg29 report that the invasive margin has a different cellular microenvironment with more fibroblasts that produce and reorganize the Col-I matrix, which may be a possible explanation for our observation of an increased Col-I amount and alignment in the invasive margin. Because our study is the first report on preoperative RT-induced Col-I changes in patient tumor material, detailed comparisons to others’ data are not possible. Other findings have indicated differences in matrix metalloproteinases production with matrix degradation30 and fibroblast activity with matrix production,14 which may explain the decreased Col-I amount in the normal mucosa and increased Col-I amount in the inner tumor, respectively. The discovered differences in RT effect between Col-I amount and fiber number for inner tumor and normal mucosa regions suggest an increased amount per Col-I fiber, indicating a higher ordered structure of the Col-I fibrils.19,31 The latter observation exemplifies the strength of using SHG for a detailed study of Col-I microscopic properties in tissue material.


Col-I Characteristics in Relation to Clinicopathological Variables

We evaluated the clinical relevance of the Col-I properties intensity and anisotropy by determining their relationships with different clinicopathological variables, including tumor stage, the grade of differentiation, recurrence, and survival. In the non-RT group, we found that the Col-I intensity in the inner tumor was positively related to both the grade of differentiation (p=0.018) and distant recurrence [p=0.003; Fig. 3(a)]. Furthermore, we discovered a trend toward higher overall survival for non-RT patients with higher intensity in the invasive margin [p=0.064; Fig. 3(b)]. In the RT group, we observed a trend of higher overall survival for RT patients with higher intensity in the inner tumor [p=0.077; Fig. 3(c)]. Besides, there were no significant correlations between the Col-I properties and other clinicopathological variables. Further evaluation of the correlation between the Col-I fiber length and width, and the stage and differentiation grade of the disease indicated a positive relation between Col-I fiber width in tumor margin and the tumor differentiation grade in the non-RT group (p=0.010), and between Col-I fiber length in the tumor margin and the tumor stage in the RT group (p=0.014).

Fig. 3

Clinical relevance of Col-I intensity in surgical tissue of non-RT and RT rectal cancer patients. (a) Non-RT, but not RT, patients with high Col-I intensity in the inner tumor had an increased risk for developing distant recurrence (DR) (p=0.003). (b) Non-RT, but not RT, patients with high Col-I intensity in the invasive margin had a higher overall survival rate (p=0.064). (C) RT, but not non-RT, patients with high Col-I intensity in the inner tumor had a higher overall survival rate (p=0.077). The patient numbers are presented in parentheses.


Our findings for the non-RT patients correspond with the study reported by Nyström et al.,23 where Col-I amount in stroma of CRC is positively related to the high grade of differentiation and the risk for metastatic lesions. We speculate that the contrasting clinical outcome for increased Col-I amount in the inner tumor region of non-RT and RT patients may be due to a different structure of the Col-I matrix. More highly ordered Col-I fibers may promote cancer cell invasion and thus metastasis.12,32



Our study demonstrates the strength of SHG microscopy for characterization of the Col-I matrix in surgical rectal tumor tissue. Several Col-I properties (including amount, anisotropy, fiber number, width, and length) could be defined by SHG. Under non-RT conditions, the Col-I amount and alignment were increased in the invasive margin versus the inner tumor. After RT, the Col-I amount was decreased in the normal mucosa while increased in the inner tumor. Further clinicopathological evaluation indicated that under non-RT condition, a higher Col-I amount in the inner tumor region is related to more distant recurrence, whereas after RT (followed by surgery), a higher Col-I amount in the inner tumor region predicts a longer patient survival. In the future, we will investigate the predictive value of various Col-I properties, that can be resolved by SHG, by comparing biopsy and surgical samples before and after RT, respectively.


The authors declare no conflict of interest.


The study was supported by grants from the Swedish Cancer Foundation, the Research Council of South East Sweden, and Liu Cancer; the Trygger Foundation; and, the Swedish Research Council and Knut och Alice Wallenberg Foundation. We thank Annika Enejder for giving us access to the nonlinear microscope and Juris Kiskis for his help with the CT-FIRE analysis of SHG images at the Department of Biology and Biological Engineering at Chalmers University of Technology.


1. J. Ferlay et al., “Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012,” Int. J. Cancer 136(5), E359–E386 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29210 Google Scholar

2. A. Jemal et al., “Global cancer statistics,” CA: Cancer J. Clin. 61(2), 69–90 (2011).CAMCAM0007-9235 http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.v61:2 Google Scholar

3. L. Påhlman, “Indications for neoadjuvant long-term radiotherapy,” in Recent Results in Cancer Research, and M. W. Büchler et al., Eds., Vol. 165, pp. 212–220, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2005). Google Scholar

4. Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial, “Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer,” N. Engl. J. Med. 336(14), 980–987 (1997).NEJMAG0028-4793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199704033361402 Google Scholar

5. E. Kapiteijn et al., “Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer,” N. Engl. J. Med. 345(9), 638–646 (2001).NEJMAG0028-4793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa010580 Google Scholar

6. S. Huerta, X. Gao and D. Saha, “Mechanisms of resistance to ionizing radiation in rectal cancer,” Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 9(5), 469–480 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/erm.09.26 Google Scholar

7. V. H. Koelzer and A. Lugli, “The tumor border configuration of colorectal cancer as a histomorphological prognostic indicator,” Front. Oncol. 18(4), 29 (2014).FRTOA70071-9676 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2014.00029 Google Scholar

8. J. Gao et al., “Stromal staining for PINCH is an independent prognostic indicator in colorectal cancer,” Neoplasia 6(6), 796–801 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1593/neo.04304 Google Scholar

9. H. Denys et al., “The extracellular matrix regulates cancer progression and therapy response: implications for prognosis and treatment,” Curr. Pharm. Des. 15(12), 1373–1384 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/138161209787846711 Google Scholar

10. P. Lu, V. M. Weaver and Z. Werb, “The extracellular matrix: a dynamic niche in cancer progression,” J. Cell Biol. 196(4), 395–406 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201102147 Google Scholar

11. M. Fang et al., “Collagen as a double-edged sword in tumor progression,” Tumor Biol. 35(4), 2871–2882 (2014).TUMBEA http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-1511-7 Google Scholar

12. P. P. Provenzano et al., “Collagen reorganization at the tumor-stromal interface facilitates local invasion,” BMC Med. 4(1), 38 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-4-38 Google Scholar

13. M. W. Conklin et al., “Aligned collagen is a prognostic signature for survival in human breast carcinoma,” Am. J. Pathol. 178(3), 1221–1232 (2011).AJPAA40002-9440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.11.076 Google Scholar

14. Y. Yarnold and M. C. Brotons, “Pathogenetic mechanisms in radiation fibrosis,” Radiother. Oncol. 97(1), 149–161 (2010).RAONDT0167-8140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2010.09.002 Google Scholar

15. M. O’Neil and I. Damjanov, “Histopathology of colorectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy,” Open Pathol. J. 3, 91–98 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874375700903020091 Google Scholar

16. C. F. Von Essen, “Radiation enhancement of metastasis: a review,” Clin. Exp. Metastasis 9(2), 77–104 (1991).CEXMD20262-0898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01756381 Google Scholar

17. C. Moncharmont et al., “Radiation-enhanced cell migration/invasion process: a review,” Crit. Rev. Oncol./Hematol. 92(2), 133–142 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2014.05.006 Google Scholar

18. S. Blockhuys et al., “X-radiation enhances the collagen type I strap formation and migration potentials of colon cancer cells,” Oncotarget 7(44), 71390–71399 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.12111 Google Scholar

19. R. Cicchi et al., “From molecular structure to tissue architecture: collagen organization probed by SHG microscopy,” J. Biophotonics 6(2), 129–142 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbio.v6.2 Google Scholar

20. V. E. Centonze and J. G. White, “Multiphoton excitation provides optical sections from deeper within scattering specimens than confocal imaging,” Biophys. J. 75(4), 2015–2024 (1998).BIOJAU0006-3495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77643-X Google Scholar

21. J. W. Birk et al., “Second harmonic generation imaging distinguishes both high-grade dysplasia and cancer from normal colonic mucosa,” Dig. Dis. Sci. 59(7), 1529–1534 (2014).DDSCDJ0163-2116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3121-7 Google Scholar

22. J. Adur et al., “Colon adenocarcinoma diagnosis in human samples by multicontrast nonlinear optical microscopy of hematoxylin and eosin stained histological sections,” J. Cancer Ther. 5(13), 1259–1269 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jct.2014.513127 Google Scholar

23. H. Nyström et al., “Liver-metastatic potential of colorectal cancer is related to the stromal composition of the tumour,” Anticancer Res. 32(12), 5183–5191 (2012).ANTRD40250-7005 Google Scholar

24. Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial, “Initial report from a Swedish multicenter study examining the role of preoperative irradiation in the treatment of patients with resectable rectal carcinoma,” Br. J. Surg. 80(10), 1333–1336 (1993). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1365-2168 Google Scholar

25. A. Boudaoud et al., “FibrilTool, an ImageJ plug-in to quantify fibrillar structures in raw microscopy images,” Nat. Protoc. 9(2), 457–463 (2014).1754-2189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2014.024 Google Scholar

26. J. S. Bredfeldt et al., “Computational segmentation of collagen fibers from second-harmonic generation images of breast cancer,” J. Biomed. Opt. 19(1), 016007 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.19.1.016007 Google Scholar

27. A. C. Chen et al., “Second harmonic generation and multiphoton microscopic detection of collagen without the need for species specific antibodies,” Burns 37(6), 1001–1009 (2011).BURND80305-4179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2011.03.013 Google Scholar

28. R. S. Saad et al., “CDX2 as a marker for intestinal differentiation: its utility and limitations,” World J. Gastrointest. Surg. 3(11), 159–166 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v3.i11.159 Google Scholar

29. R. Kalluri and M. Zeisberg, “Fibroblasts in cancer,” Nat. Rev. Cancer 6, 392–401 (2006).NRCAC41474-175X http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrc1877 Google Scholar

30. A. Kumar et al., “Increased type-IV collagenase (MMP-2 and MMP-9) activity following preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer,” Br. J. Cancer 82(4), 960–965 (2000).BJCAAI0007-0920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.1999.1025 Google Scholar

31. X. Chen et al., “Second harmonic generation microscopy for quantitative analysis of collagen fibrillar structure,” Nat. Protoc. 7(4), 654–669 (2012).1754-2189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2012.009 Google Scholar

32. J. B. Wyckoff et al., “Direct visualization of macrophage-assisted tumor cell intravasation in mammary tumors,” Cancer Res. 67(6), 2649–2656 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1823 Google Scholar


Stéphanie Blockhuys has been a postdoctoral researcher at Chalmers since 2015. She obtained her PhD in medical sciences in 2013 at Ghent University, Belgium. She moved to Sweden in 2013 for a first postdoc at Linköping University, followed by a second postdoc at Chalmers (her current position). She is an all-around cancer researcher with bench-to-bedside experience in breast and colorectal cancer, and she strives for a better fundamental understanding of cancer by application of novel technologies.

Nisha Rani Agarwal is a postdoctoral researcher at Biointerfaces Institute at McMaster University, Canada, working with colorimetric biosensing of paper-based POC devices. She received her PhD in materials engineering in 2013 at Politecnico di Milano for controlled synthesis of noble metal SERS substrates by pulsed laser deposition as biosensors. She pursued a postdoc at Chalmers University of Technology, specializing in microscopy techniques as CARS, SHG, AFM, SNOM, and TERS for biological and plasmonic applications.

Camilla Hildesjö obtained her title as medical biologist in 2008 (Med. Licentiate - Keratinocytes in tissue engineering, in-vitro and in-vivo studies). She is currently working for the Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Linköping University, and for the Department of Clinical Pathology, Diagnostikcentrum Region Östergötlands. She specializes in colorectal cancers, with focus on biomarkers for the prediction of therapy outcome and overall survival of patients with colorectal cancer.

Ingvar Jarlsfelt is medical director of clinical physiology, laboratory medicine and x-ray at Ryhov hospital in Jönköping.

Pernilla Wittung-Stafshede is a professor and division chair at Chalmers. She obtained her PhD in 1996. After a postdoc at California Institute of Technology, she became assistant professor at Tulane University, New Orleans, in 1999. She received tenure in 2002. In 2004, she moved to Rice University, Houston, as an associate professor with tenure. In 2008, she returned to Sweden and became professor at Umeå University. After seven years, she moved to her current position.

Xiao-Feng Sun has been a professor at Linköping University since 2005. She obtained her medical degree in 1982 and her PhD in 1993 and became project leader of colorectal cancer research at Linköping University in 1996 (until present).

© The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Stéphanie Blockhuys, Nisha Rani Agarwal, Camilla Hildesjö, Ingvar Jarlsfelt, Pernilla Wittung-Stafshede, Xiao-Feng Sun, "Second harmonic generation for collagen I characterization in rectal cancer patients with and without preoperative radiotherapy," Journal of Biomedical Optics 22(10), 106006 (10 October 2017). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.22.10.106006 Submission: Received 13 June 2017; Accepted 12 September 2017
Submission: Received 13 June 2017; Accepted 12 September 2017



Second-harmonic generation



Harmonic generation

Optical fibers

Back to Top