2 November 2017 Combined high contrast and wide field of view in the scanning laser ophthalmoscope through dual detection of light paths
Author Affiliations +
J. of Biomedical Optics, 22(11), 116002 (2017). doi:10.1117/1.JBO.22.11.116002
We demonstrate a multimode detection system in a scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO) that enables simultaneous operation in confocal, indirect, and direct modes to permit an agile trade between image contrast and optical sensitivity across the retinal field of view to optimize the overall imaging performance, enabling increased contrast in very wide-field operation. We demonstrate the method on a wide-field SLO employing a hybrid pinhole at its image plane, to yield a twofold increase in vasculature contrast in the central retina compared to its conventional direct mode while retaining high-quality imaging across a wide field of the retina, of up to 200 deg and 20    μ m on-axis resolution.
Carles, Muyo, van Hemert, and Harvey: Combined high contrast and wide field of view in the scanning laser ophthalmoscope through dual detection of light paths



Since the invention of the ophthalmoscope by von Helmholtz1 enabled the first transformative drawings of the retina, the development of retinal fundus photography includes few fundamental advances. The principles of indirect ophthalmoscopy2 and the Gullstrand principle of spatially separating illumination and imaging ray paths in the pupil3 underpin modern fundus camera design.4,5 The incorporation of digital technology has enhanced overall functionality, but a fundamental advance is certainly the invention of the scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO).

The principle behind the SLO is to scan a focused illumination spot across the retina while recording the intensity of the backscattered light transmitted through the pupil. Importantly, this enables the inversion of the Gullstrand principle, employing a small part of the pupil for the illumination and dedicating the remainder of the pupil for capturing the light scattered by the retina. This allows a large pupil area to be dedicated to light detection,6 which is of great benefit given the low reflectivity of the retina and the limited illumination intensity that may safely illuminate the retina.1213.14 An important distinction of the SLO from the conventional retinal fundus camera, which employs simultaneous en face illumination and imaging of the whole retina, is that the SLO involves illumination and detection of light for only a small area in the retina at any instant, and this enables better control of stray light and consequently higher image contrast but at the expense of reduced optical efficiency. We report here a modification of the SLO that yields images that combine high contrast and high optical efficiency in a single instrument.

The retina exhibits a large, spatially variant and wavelength-dependent tissue point-spread function (PSF) that, at red wavelengths, can be two orders-of-magnitude larger than the optical PSF, reducing the contrast of retinal images recorded by both the SLO and the fundus camera. An important development of the SLO is the incorporation of a confocal aperture located in the image plane to spatially filter the light transmitted to the photodetector.8,10 Only light scattered from a small, axially elongated volume close to the focus of the illumination is then detected and light from the extended tissue PSF, consisting principally of multiply scattered light, is rejected. Images recorded by confocal SLOs are, therefore, typified by lower levels of optical scattering and increased image contrast but lower optical efficiency than a conventional SLO. Although the increase in contrast can be approximately understood in terms of an extended tissue PSF introducing increased blurring, for imaging of the vasculature it is more useful and accurate to employ a physical model involving multiple light paths of near-ballistic photons propagating through three-dimensional (3-D) retinal structures:15,16 images of the retinal vasculature recorded by a confocal SLO are formed by light that is transmitted twice through the retinal vessels while for a nonconfocal SLO, the dominant optical component is transmitted just once through a vessel followed by backscattering from an extended tissue volume around the vessel that is imaged onto the detector. Vasculature in images recorded with a confocal SLO consequently exhibit up to twice the contrast of images recorded with a conventional SLO.

However, the confocal SLO requires the imaging return path to be well-corrected for all imaging fields, accounting for the combined effect of ocular and instrument optical aberrations, such that the width of the system optical PSF does not exceed the size of the confocal aperture; not meeting this condition yields a substantial reduction in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast. For this reason, SLOs typically require adaptive optics to enable tight degrees of confocality. An alternative to the confocal mode is to operate the SLO with a larger (nonconfocal) aperture to provide a sufficient SNR albeit with a reduction in image contrast, which is referred to as relaxed-confocal or direct mode.6,11 Note that the aperture (direct or confocal to an even greater extent) also enhances image quality as it blocks some reflections that occur at ocular and instrument surfaces. Finally, an annular aperture offers the complementary function of recording only the scattered light, rejecting the direct back-reflection contribution; this mode of operation is called indirect, scatter, dark-field, or Tyndall-mode.8,10,11,13,1718.19.20

Several researchers have reported on the benefit provided by the use of different pinhole apertures as spatial filters,13,1718.19,2122.23 including multichannel imaging,20,23,24 however, confocal imaging with small pinholes is limited to relatively small fields of view of <30  deg or an order-of-magnitude less than this for diffraction-limited imaging achievable with adaptive-optics correction.2526.27.28 The effect of optical aberrations on the image of the retina is much more severe than for the illuminating beam since image formation uses the whole pupil, so the numerical aperture for the imaging return path is typically 10 times greater than for the illuminating beam yielding commensurately higher levels of aberration. Consequently for field angles greater than about 30 deg, the effective imaging PSF, including the effects of an extended retinal-tissue PSF, exceeds the dimensions of the imaged pinhole preventing confocal operation. Adaptive-optic correction of these field-dependent aberrations is not practical since the scan speeds exceed the bandwidth of available adaptive-optic systems. Therefore, for wide-field imaging, exceeding 100 deg, high-quality SLOs are able to maintain a reasonably low aberration, low numerical aperture spot for the illumination path; but the high contrast typical of confocal operation has not been previously possible for wide-field imaging.

We report here the first demonstration of a hybrid pinhole technique, where a ultrawide-field SLO operates simultaneously in direct, indirect, and confocal modes to provide the ability to optimally combine the high resolution and contrast of confocal imaging with the high sensitivity and aberration tolerance of direct imaging. The proposed solution directs the direct and confocal light components to independent detectors to enable a spatially optimized reconstruction of the retina that retains a wide field of view while increasing image contrast. We demonstrate experimentally, using a commercial SLO, a doubling of contrast in the central retina macula region while retaining the native ultrawide-field, of up to 200 deg, and high SNR of the conventional SLO.


Contrast Increase

The objective of our hybrid pinhole technique is to employ confocality to increase the contrast of images recorded by an SLO with direct-mode operation, in particular, in ultrawide-field imaging, in which optical aberrations restrict the field of view of the confocal mode. Increased contrast and control of light paths is important to enable accurate chemical sensing such as in vascular oximetry measurements at the retina where it promises reduced sensitivity to pigmentation, specular reflections, and variations in vessel diameter. In this section, we describe the assessment of the contrast increase by: (a) simulation using Monte-Carlo modeling of the retinal light paths involved in imaging and (b) validation measurements of the contrast of in vitro images of blood-filled capillaries located at the retinal plane of an artificial eye (as a realistic and well-controlled target). These experiments were conducted for a range of aperture diameters.

We used an approach of optically modeling the complete optical system including the optical instrument and light propagation through the retina using commercial optical ray-trace software. We implemented our model using OpticStudio from Zemax LLC, although the principles are applicable with other commercial ray tracers. The technique exploits the near equivalence of the deterministic ray tracing employed in commercial optical design programs such as Zemax and the statistical ray tracing employed in Monte-Carlo modeling to enable a very efficient means of performing Monte-Carlo simulation of the complete image-formation process,29 integrating polarization-sensitive ray tracing of the SLO and ocular optics with Monte-Carlo modeling of light propagation in the retinal layers within a single holistic model. We employed a simplified and generic model of an SLO rather than the specific optical design of the commercial SLO in this simulation; however, this has no significant impact on the results presented. The model of the human ocular optics includes the anterior segment with cornea, anterior chamber, iris aperture, and lens; we modeled the eye fundus with the following retinal layers:30,31 retina, retinal pigment epithelium, choroid, and sclera; and several cylindrical blood vessels (filled with fully oxygenated blood) were embedded at a depth of 60  μm within the retina. The thickness of the retina varies with field angle and from subject to subject,3233.34 as does the thickness of the choroid.3536.37 For the purpose of this investigation, we assumed thicknesses of 200 and 250  μm, respectively, as reasonable and typical values for a Monte-Carlo simulation as have been used elsewhere.30,31 For pupil diameters in the range 2 to 6 mm, the form of modeled and recorded images is dominated by optical scattering within tissue, rather than diffraction or optical aberrations, and so we have found no significantly effect of pupil size on modeled images. However, the higher number of rays captured by a larger pupil yields a higher SNR for a given computation time and so we have assumed a pupil diameter of 6 mm. The simulation experiment is done with a complete optical model that includes 3-D crystalline lens, cornea, and retinal components such as blood vessels, etc. The layout of the modeled system and eye are depicted in Fig. 1, and parameters used for the simulation are summarized in Table 1. The scanning illumination beam at the retina was modeled as an injected beam of photons with a Gaussian transverse spatial profile with a half width (1/e2 intensity) of w=20  μm at the retina. A total of 5×105 photons were launched, traced, and scattered through the system, and a 50-mm focal-length lens was placed in front of the eye to focus the backscattered photons emerging from the eye pupil onto the detector. The simulation was repeated for each scanning angle to render an image. A generic pinhole aperture was implemented as a pixelated detector and spatial integration of the incident light enabled simulation of a range of aperture dimensions.

Fig. 1

3-D model of the SLO and human eye used for Monte-Carlo simulation. (a) The illumination beam, the scanning system, the eye, the collector lens, and the photodetector. Illumination rays are drawn in blue and scattered rays that reach the detector are drawn in green. (b) A two-dimensional section of the model of the eye including the anterior segment (cornea, anterior chamber, iris, and lens) and retina. The purple-framed close-up shows the retinal layers and the sections of the 3-D cylindrical vessels embedded into the retina.


Table 1

Properties of the retinal layers used for simulation; thickness T, anisotropy factor g, scattering parameter μs, and absorption parameter μa are shown for wavelengths λ=532  nm and λ=633  nm. Parameters were taken from previously published data30,38–41 except for choroid at λ=633, in which blood (vessel) properties were assumed.

LayerT (μm)λ=532  nmλ=633  nm
gμs (mm−1)μa (mm−1)gμs (mm−1)μa (mm−1)

Simulated images of blood vessels generated by Monte-Carlo modeling, together with quantitative assessments extracted from such images are shown in Fig. 2. The left column corresponds to λ=532  nm, in which the absorption by hemoglobin has low sensitivity to oxygenation, and the right column corresponds to λ=633  nm, in which absorption decreases with increasing oxygenation. Images in (a) and (b) and (c) and (d) are the simulation of the scans for direct mode and confocal mode, respectively, employing a relaxed-confocal aperture size of 140  μm and a more confocal aperture of 25  μm (diameters of the apertures projected onto the retina). The images include four cylindrical vessels, as shown in Fig. 1, with diameters of 20, 40, 60, and 100  μm, corresponding to retinal vessels ranging from retinal capillaries to the larger arterioles and venules. Normalized intensity profiles (averaged along the vertical direction) of the vessels are plotted in (e) and (f) for a range of vessel diameters and aperture diameters. It can be readily appreciated that contrast is increased by reducing the pinhole aperture diameter (calculated by integrating signal from a smaller detector circular area) at the expense of reducing signal. The variations in calculated contrast C as a function of the pinhole size are shown in the lower graphs (g) and (h)


where Ibg is the image intensity of the background and Iv is the intensity at the center of the capillary/vessel. Iv was assigned to be the minimum value and Ibg was assigned the mean value after masking out the vessel region. The increase in contrast is less pronounced for the higher diameter vessels at 532 nm because the high absorption of the blood column already provides high contrast in direct mode, and confocality does not change the relative contribution of the light paths significantly (backscattering within the vessel is the dominant contribution); this is not the case for the smaller diameter vessels or at 633 nm, in which the reduction of the pinhole aperture increases the relative contribution of the double-pass light paths and the contrast is increased.

Fig. 2

(Color online) Results of the Monte-Carlo simulation, see Fig. 1. Left column corresponds to λ=532  nm and right column to λ=633  nm. (a) and (b) The recorded scans with a 140-μm pinhole size. (c) and (d) The recorded scans with a 25-μm pinhole size. (e) and (f) Plots of normalized intensity profiles across the vessels [cases marked with (**) and (*) correspond to images at (a) and (b) and (c) and (d), respectively]. (g) and (h) Plots of measured contrast for each vessel as a function of the pinhole size.


We now describe the enhancement of contrast for in vitro imaging of blood-filled capillaries within an artificial eye imaged using a modified ultrawide-field SLO (Optos 200Tx). The phantom eye, shown in Fig. 3(a), consists of a lens and an artificial retinal plane separated by one focal length immersed in an index-matching medium (water was used in this case). The retinal plane is composed of Spectralon, which simulates the combined volume-scattering nature of the retinal layers (as an approximation to the layered structure of the retina). A quartz capillary with 150-μm inner diameter and 250-μm outer diameter is located in front of the Spectralon surface (with center at 250  μm from the surface), simulating the geometry of a retinal vessel.42 The capillary was filled with fully oxygenated horse blood.

Fig. 3

(Color online) Set up to assess contrast as a function of the SLO aperture size: (a) an artificial eye with a blood-filled capillary in front of a scattering surface at the retinal plane is used to measure contrast; (b) an example image acquired with an aperture of 1500-μm in diameter at wavelength of 532 nm; (c) normalized intensity profiles are plotted for various aperture sizes showing a consistent change in contrast; and (d) the measured contrast is plotted against the strength of the signal for each aperture size (signal strength is normalized by the value at 1500  μm).


An image of this phantom vasculature recorded using the SLO with illumination light at wavelength of 532 nm is shown in Fig. 3(b), and intensity profiles across the vasculature are shown in Fig. 3(c) for diameters of pinhole aperture varying between 50 and 1500  μm. The intensity profiles were normalized to the measured background intensity of light scattered by the Spectralon. The trade between vascular contrast and optical sensitivity is clear from Fig. 3(d), which summarizes the calculated contrast against signal strength for various sizes of the pinhole aperture. Signal strength values are normalized with respect to the largest pinhole, which corresponds to direct mode, in which the illuminating light scattered into an extended volume within the Spectralon is imaged onto the pinhole aperture. The main contrast mechanism is then single-pass transmission of light through the capillary prior to incidence upon the Spectralon yielding a lower contrast. As the diameter of the pinhole is reduced, confocality is increased and the scattered light transmitted by the aperture is increasingly dominated by double-pass light transmission through the capillary, and an increase in contrast15 is observed that is accompanied by a 12-dB reduction in signal transmitted through the pinhole. This well-controlled in vitro experiment, mimicking the in vivo imaging of retinal blood vessels, confirms the increase in contrast with increased confocality.

In addition to the reduced signal associated with confocality, the confocal signal is suppressed at large field angles as increasing optical aberrations on the return path increase the PSF, thus limiting the field of view of the confocal SLO. In Sec. 3, we present a method to increase contrast at the central retina while maintaining wide-field imaging and report experimental validation for imaging of human retinas.


Multimode Aperture: Hybrid Pinhole

We describe now the hybrid pinhole configuration that enables imaging in confocal, direct, and indirect modes simultaneously. The hybrid pinhole consists of a reflective chrome-on-glass annulus: light transmitted through the annulus, which is the confocal light, is imaged onto the confocal detector while the reflected indirect light by the chrome is imaged onto a second indirect detector. The acquisition is simultaneous, so images from the confocal and indirect channels are inherently registered and the pixel-wise addition of these images corresponds to the direct mode. This multimode aperture enables the benefits of high-contrast imaging for a confocal SLO to be combined with the increased SNR and wide field of the direct-mode SLO.

A comparative illustration of the three modes of operation is shown in Fig. 4(a). The SLO with a single aperture can operate only in a single mode: either direct, indirect, or confocal depending on whether the aperture is large, annular, or small. It is also shown in Fig. 4(a) how the larger aperture collects light that is scattered within an extended volume at the retina, a small aperture transmits only a confocal, predominantly backscattered component, and an annular aperture transmits only the indirect light scattered away from the focused spot in the retina. The hybrid pinhole is shown in Fig. 4(b) where the confocal light is transmitted through the annulus for the confocal channel and the scattered light is reflected by the annulus for the indirect channel. The reconstructed image from the hybrid pinhole configuration is an agile, spatially variant weighted sum of the signal from the confocal, and indirect channels to enable spatial optimization of contrast and optical sensitivity. The tilted confocal chrome-on-glass pinhole was slightly elliptical so as to appear circular to the incoming beam. Absorptive, black felt with a rounded hole was adhered to the glass substrate to implement the outer aperture of the annulus as shown in Fig. 4(c). The diameters of the outer and inner apertures were selected to be 1500 and 400  μm, respectively, (50 and 13 times the size of the illumination spot projected at the pinhole plane); the former, corresponding to the direct-mode native aperture of the SLO, and the latter is a compromise between optical sensitivity and contrast, as highlighted in Fig. 3(d). Reducing the size of the pinhole to achieve greater confocality yields only modest increases in contrast of the vasculature: from 91% to 99% but with the penalty of an 8-dB reduction in signal strength. The slow degradation in contrast of the vasculature with reduced confocality is associated with the extended nature of the vasculature yielding a slow transition from double pass of light through the vasculature for confocal mode to single pass for direct mode.

Fig. 4

(a) Schematic view of the conventional SLO with a single aperture: in direct mode, a large aperture transmits both the confocal and multiply scattered light from an extended area of the retina; in confocal mode, a small aperture transmits only the confocal signal; in the indirect mode, an annular aperture transmits only multiply scattered light, rejecting the confocal light. (b) SLO with a hybrid pinhole composed of an annular mirror, (SLO scanner omitted for clarity) showing the transmitted confocal light and reflected indirect light. (c) Photograph of the experimental implementation of the hybrid pinhole using chrome-on-glass and adhesive felt; the outer and inner diameters of the annulus define the apertures for the direct and confocal modes, respectively.




The hybrid pinhole described in Sec. 3 was implemented in a direct-mode, wide-field SLO (Optos 200Tx), and retinal images were recorded to experimentally demonstrate the simultaneous increase in image contrast and ultrawide view. The SLO attains an on-axis resolution of 20  μm, and the time for a complete retinal scan is 360  ms. The instrument is designed to be nonmydriatic, and therefore, no pupil dilation was used. The illumination of the retina is unchanged from the conventional clinical instrument, safety mechanisms were left in place, and so the safety standards of the unmodified instrument were maintained. Although the device was modified only in the imaging return optical path, we followed the procedure described by the manufacturer to verify that all safety mechanisms of the device, which is Conformité Européenne approved for clinical use, were functioning normally. Therefore, the device was guaranteed to remain eye safe during our experiments. All participants who volunteered for examination were informed on all aspects of the study and provided informed consent. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the College of Science and Engineering at the University of Glasgow.

We synergistically combine the confocal and indirect images to generate the multimode image


where w(x,y) is a spatially variant weighting function, Ic(x,y) is the confocal-mode image, and Ii(x,y) is the indirect-mode image. The weighting function w(x,y) is selected so that it increases with the strength of the confocal signal so that Im(x,y) is mainly confocal when Ic(x,y) is strong and for parts of the image where Ic(x,y) is weaker, due to higher optical aberrations, for example, w(x,y) is smaller and Im(x,y) tends toward a conventional nonconfocal image with a higher SNR but a compromised contrast. That is, we seek to trade contrast against SNR across the image. As a proxy for the strength of the confocal signal, we employ a w(x,y) that is a low-pass filter of Ic(x,y). We have found that with a Gaussian blur kernel with σ=100  pixels sufficiently smoothes image texture and provides a suitable weighting function. We, however, incorporated in our calculation the fact that aberrations in the scanning mechanism in the employed SLO vary primarily with the vertical scan and are low and almost invariant across the horizontal scan. This arises because the scanning mechanism of the SLO is based on an elliptical mirror that induces such aberrations mainly in the vertical direction, which are less important for the default direct-imaging mode but are significant at higher degrees of confocality. The weighting function becomes approximately independent of x, that is we use w˜(x,y)=w˜(y)=w(x,y)dx. In Fig. 5, we show images Ic(x,y) and Ii(x,y) in (a) and (b). The calculated weighting function w˜(x,y) is shown in (c) and the multimode image Im(x,y) is shown in (d). The strong corneal-reflex artifact apparent in the center of Fig. 5(b) occurs due to the absence of the optical spatial-filter on this channel. The SLO incorporates a corneal reflex blocker that, in its direct-mode imaging, suppresses the reflection, but it was not required to replicate this blocking function in the indirect channel of the modified SLO since it is strongly attenuated by w˜(x,y), that is the reflection only occurs where the confocal signal is strong and this reflection has little effect on the final reconstruction as is appreciated in Fig. 5(d). Nevertheless, the area where this reflection is strong was detected by thresholding the image from the indirect channel, and w˜(x,y) was set to unity in this region, resulting in a central disc that can be discerned in the example weighting function depicted in Fig. 5(c). Note that for the larger vertical field angles, in which higher optical aberrations increase the size of the optical PSF, the confocal signal is reduced in magnitude and the indirect channel resembles direct-mode operation, as is apparent from the higher intensity in the peripheral regions in Fig. 5(b). In this paper, we, therefore, compare results for multimode operation using the hybrid pinhole with direct-mode operation using a conventional direct-mode pinhole; that is, we compare the modified SLO with the unmodified direct-mode SLO.

Fig. 5

Intermediate images employed for multimode image reconstruction: (a) confocal-mode channel image, (b) indirect-mode channel image, (c) weighting function w(x,y) calculated from (a), and (d) reconstructed multimode image.


Representative conventional and multimode images of a single retina are shown in the upper and lower rows, respectively, of Figs. 6(a) and 6(b). Figure 6 shows images recorded at a wavelength of (a) 532 nm and (b) 633 nm. The highlighted areas in the left-most images are shown in a larger scale on the right. It is apparent that the multimode images exhibit greater contrast and are sharper at both wavelengths due to the increased confocality. Note also that in the 633-nm images, arterioles that run from the center of the magnified images toward the bottom right (highlighted with an arrow) are visible in the multimode image, but not in the conventional image. This is mainly due to the increased contrast arising from the double-pass transmission associated with confocal operation.

Fig. 6

(a) and (b) Images acquired with (upper) direct mode and (lower) multimode. Right images are a closed-up of the rectangle. Illumination wavelength is 532 nm in (a) and 633 nm in (b). Contrast increase is apparent, specially for 633, in which some vessels are only visible through multimode, such as the arteriole highlighted by the arrow.


Representative examples of intensity profiles across arterioles and venules from these images are plotted in Fig. 7, showing a clear increase in the vascular contrast by use of the hybrid pinhole. Note for instance that the cross-sectional intensity profile for the vessel highlighted by the arrow in Fig. 6(b) corresponds with vessel labeled #1 in Fig. 7(b), which is a clear example of the benefit provided by the higher degree of confocality. The parameters C within the plots are the calculated contrast for the direct-mode (red plots) and multimodal images (blue plots). Using the approximation of the Beer–Lambert law (that is, assuming near ballistic photons and neglecting scattering), one might expect a doubling in effective path length associated with confocality to double the optical density of the vasculature, which for typical direct-mode vascular contrast of <20% corresponds to an approximate doubling in contrast. We observe an average increase in the contrast of a factor of 1.9±0.5 for the larger-caliber veins and arteries by use of the hybrid pinhole (mean and standard deviation from various profiles at both 532 and 633 nm wavelength), in reasonable agreement with this expectation.

Fig. 7

(Color online) (a) and (b) Normalized intensity profiles (right graphs) across blood vessels from images in Fig. 6, which are replicated at the left for reference with the vessels labeled. Intensity profiles (and label lines in the images) in red correspond to direct mode, and those in blue correspond to multimode. For each vessel, the contrast for direct and multimode, Cd and Cm, respectively, is indicated in each graph. Vessels #1 and #2 are arterioles, whereas vessels #3 and #4 are venules. Illumination wavelength is 532 nm in (a) and 633 nm in (b).


Intensity profiles from images of the Monte-Carlo simulation and in vitro imaging of blood-filled capillaries shown in Figs. 2 and 3 were averaged vertically to reduce noise (as vessels or capillaries are oriented vertically). In order to provide an equivalent assessment, the intensity profiles shown in Fig. 7 were calculated by the following procedure. First, a region, in which the vessel showed no curvature, was manually segmented (50  pixels along the vessel depending on its geometry). Forty different intensity profiles were then extracted perpendicular to the vessel direction, at equispaced intervals along the length of the vessel segment. The profiles were ultimately averaged to enhance SNR and smooth retinal texture.



The contrast of the vasculature varies with wavelength and blood oxygenation: at 532 nm, the absorption coefficient of blood shows only a small dependence on oxygenation, and so the contrast of veins and arteries of similar caliber are quite similar, whereas at 633 nm, the extinction coefficient of highly oxygenated arterial blood is much lower than for the partially deoxygenated venous blood and so the contrast of retinal arterioles is much lower.43 In consequence, for vessels #1 and #2 in Fig. 7 (arterioles), the contrast is insufficient to be observed reliably at 633 nm in the direct-mode SLO, but with the multimode SLO, the contrast is sufficiently increased to enable reliable manual tracking.

As illustrated by the examples shown in Fig. 6, the multimode operation provides imaging with increased contrast, which is particularly evident for blood vessels imaged at 633 nm, in which some arterioles are discernible only in the multimode images. The inner aperture of the hybrid pinhole provides a higher suppression of reflexions from both ocular and instrument surfaces, and this increases the contrast of the images, but the main the source of increased contrast is due to the rejection of light that has diffused into neighboring volumes from the illumination spot at the retina. The consequent approximate doubling in vessel contrast demonstrated here represents a suppression of the effects of retinal texture and an improvement in the quality of information recorded by the retinal scans.15

Multimode images are visually sharper than conventional direct-mode images because of the reduced light paths involved in image formation, but noise is higher because of two main factors: first, in the central region where the confocal counterpart is stronger, the multimode resembles a confocal image and unavoidably fewer photons are detected; second, the implementation of a hybrid pinhole using imperfect chrome-on-glass (55% reflectivity) patterned on a glass substrate (90% transmissivity) introduced a further 10% reduction of the confocal signal and a 45% reduction in the indirect signal. This is the reason why multimode images shown in Fig. 6 also have a reduced SNR in the periphery. While the SNR reduction for the confocal imaging can be deemed unavoidable for a direct-mode optimized instrument, optical losses at the hybrid pinhole can be readily mitigated with a more efficient implementation.

We have implemented a two-channel hybrid pinhole in order to combine confocal and relaxed-confocal signals. The concept can be readily extended to n-channel imaging, for example, by detecting light on n concentric rings at the pinhole plane. This would capture a 3-D data cube of the retina (for a single illumination wavelength) where the extra dimension corresponds to the size of the pinhole aperture. This is indeed the case for the Monte-Carlo simulation in Sec. 2. This would offer the possibility to adjust the compromise between contrast and SNR in postdetection. Previous research have reported the use of annular apertures for narrow field of view (<30  deg)13,1718.19,2122.23 or the combination of information from differently shaped apertures for very narrow field of view (<1  deg);20,23,24 our multimode implementation provides a wide-field capability (the native field of view of the SLO, of up to 200 deg) and high-contrast imaging simultaneously.



We report a hybrid imaging modality of a conventional SLO for simultaneous imaging in confocal and direct modes that enables recording of retinal images with increased contrast for the central field while retaining wide-field imaging with high sensitivity. We have validated the technique using Monte-Carlo modeling and demonstrated the technique experimentally for in vitro imaging and for imaging the retinas of volunteers using a wide-field SLO. The measured contrast of the vasculature over the macula was increased by typically a factor of two compared to the conventional direct mode.

The method is based on the simultaneous acquisition of two independent images, and different information are captured in these images. Multichannel detection schemes have been demonstrated before either as a two-channel or time-sequential multichannel in a very narrow field of view by using diffraction-limited adaptive-optics SLO to gain great insight into the retina structures.20,24 Our emphasis is here in the higher contrast achieved on vasculature and other retinal texture while in the ultrawide-view imaging regime, with potential for enhanced clinical detection of small features ranging from blood vessels, exudates, etc. In particular, since the method provides confocal imaging with increased control of light paths in the central fields of the images,15 it offers prospects for enhanced quantitative chemical sensing in the retina, including retinal oximetry with improved accuracy.


G. M. and J. H. are employees of Optos plc, who partially funded this work. The device used for demonstration is the 200Tx model from Optos plc. No patents have been filed on the reported technology. Authors declare no financial interest in the manuscript.


Authors would like to thank Dr. J. Fernandez Ramos for helpful input regarding optical parameters of the ocular tissues involved in the Monte-Carlo simulations. Authors are grateful for funding from Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) (No. EP/K503903/1), Innovation Centre for Sensor and Imaging Systems (CENSIS) (No. 69196), and Optos plc (No. 69222). G. C. thanks the Leverhulme Trust for the support.


1. H. von Helmholtz, “Beschreibung eines Augenspiegels zur Untersuchung der Netzhaut im lebenden Auge,” Transl. Arch. Ophthalmol. 46, 565 (1851). Google Scholar

2. C. G. T. Ruete, Der Augenspiegel und das Optometer für practische Aerzte, Verlag der Dieterischen Bhdlg, Göttingen (1852). Google Scholar

3. A. Gullstrand, “Neue Methoden der reflexlosen Ophthalmoskopie,” Ber. Dtsch. Ophthalmol. Gesellsch. 36, 75 (1910). Google Scholar

4. C. R. Keeler, “A brief history of the ophthalmoscope,” Optom. Pract. 4(2), 137–145 (2003).OVSCET1040-5488 Google Scholar

5. E. DeHoog and J. Schwiegerling, “Fundus camera systems: a comparative analysis,” Appl. Opt. 48(2), 221–228 (2009).APOPAI0003-6935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.48.000221 Google Scholar

6. F. J. Van de Velde, “The relaxed confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope,” Bull. Soc. Belge. Ophtalmol. 302, 25–35 (2006). Google Scholar

7. R. H. Webb, G. W. Hughes and O. Pomerantzeff, “Flying spot TV ophthalmoscope,” Appl. Opt. 19(17), 2991–2997 (1980).APOPAI0003-6935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.19.002991 Google Scholar

8. R. H. Webb, G. W. Hughes and F. C. Delori, “Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope,” Appl. Opt. 26(8), 1492–1499 (1987).APOPAI0003-6935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.26.001492 Google Scholar

9. A. Plesch, U. Klingbeil and J. Bille, “Digital laser scanning fundus camera,” Appl. Opt. 26(8), 1480–1486 (1987).APOPAI0003-6935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.26.001480 Google Scholar

10. A. Manivannan et al., “Digital fundus imaging using a scanning laser ophthalmoscope,” Physiol. Meas. 14(1), 43–56 (1993).PMEAE30967-3334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/14/1/006 Google Scholar

11. P. F. Sharp and A. Manivannan, “The scanning laser ophthalmoscope,” Phys. Med. Biol. 42(5), 951–966 (1997).PHMBA70031-9155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/42/5/014 Google Scholar

12. F. C. Delori and K. P. Pflibsen, “Spectral reflectance of the human ocular fundus,” Appl. Opt. 28(6), 1061–1077 (1989).APOPAI0003-6935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.28.001061 Google Scholar

13. A. E. Elsner et al., “Infrared imaging of sub-retinal structures in the human ocular fundus,” Vision Res. 36(1), 191–205 (1996).VISRAM0042-6989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(95)00100-E Google Scholar

14. D. Sliney et al., “Adjustment of guidelines for exposure of the eye to optical radiation from ocular instruments: statement from a task group of the international commission on non-ionizing radiation protection (ICNIRP),” Appl. Opt. 44(11), 2162–2176 (2005).APOPAI0003-6935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.44.002162 Google Scholar

15. M. H. Smith et al., “Effect of multiple light paths on retinal vessel oximetry,” Appl. Opt. 39(7), 1183–1193 (2000).APOPAI0003-6935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.39.001183 Google Scholar

16. P. I. Rodmell et al., “Light path-length distributions within the retina,” J. Biomed. Opt. 19(3), 036008 (2014).JBOPFO1083-3668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.19.3.036008 Google Scholar

17. A. Elsner et al., “Reflectometry with a scanning laser ophthalmoscope,” Appl. Opt. 31(19), 3697–3710 (1992).APOPAI0003-6935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.31.003697 Google Scholar

18. A. Elsner et al., “Scanning laser reflectometry of retinal and subretinal tissues,” Opt. Express 6(13), 243–250 (2000).OPEXFF1094-4087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.6.000243 Google Scholar

19. D. Scoles, Y. Sulai and A. Dubra, “In vivo dark-field imaging of the retinal pigment epithelium cellmosaic,” Biomed. Opt. Express 4(9), 1710–1723 (2013).BOEICL2156-7085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.4.001710 Google Scholar

20. D. Scoles et al., “In vivo imaging of human cone photoreceptor inner segments,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 55(7), 4244–4251 (2014).IOVSDA0146-0404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-14542 Google Scholar

21. T. Chui, D. van Nasdale and S. Burns, “The use of forward scatter to improve retinal vascular imaging with an adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope,” Biomed. Opt. Express 3(10), 2537–2549 (2012).BOEICL2156-7085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.3.002537 Google Scholar

22. Y. N. Sulai and A. Dubra, “Adaptive optics scanning ophthalmoscopy with annular pupils,” Biomed. Opt. Express 3(7), 1647–1661 (2012).BOEICL2156-7085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.3.001647 Google Scholar

23. Y. N. Sulai et al., “Visualization of retinal vascular structure and perfusion with a nonconfocal adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 31(3), 569–579 (2014).JOAOD60740-3232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.31.000569 Google Scholar

24. E. A. Rossi et al., “Imaging individual neurons in the retinal ganglion cell layer of the living eye,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 114(3), 586–591 (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1613445114 Google Scholar

25. C. Sheehy et al., “High-speed, image-based eye tracking with a scanning laser ophthalmoscope,” Biomed. Opt. Express 3(10), 2611–2622 (2012).BOEICL2156-7085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.3.002611 Google Scholar

26. S. A. Burns et al., “Large-field-of-view, modular, stabilized, adaptive-optics-based scanning laser ophthalmoscope,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24(5), 1313–1326 (2007).JOAOD60740-3232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.24.001313 Google Scholar

27. M. Mujat et al., “High resolution multimodal clinical ophthalmic imaging system,” Opt. Express 18(11), 11607–11621 (2010).OPEXFF1094-4087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.011607 Google Scholar

28. R. D. Ferguson et al., “Adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope with integrated wide-field retinal imaging and tracking,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 27(11), A265–A277 (2010).JOAOD60740-3232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.27.00A265 Google Scholar

29. G. Carles and A. R. Harvey, “Monte-Carlo simulation of imaging systems with turbid media through optical ray-trace,” in Imaging and Applied Optics 2016, OSA Technical Digest, paper MW2I.2, Optical Society of America (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/MATH.2016.MW2I.2 Google Scholar

30. W. Liu, S. Jiao and H. F. Zhang, “Accuracy of retinal oximetry: a Monte Carlo investigation,” J. Biomed. Opt. 18(6), 066003 (2013).JBOPFO1083-3668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.18.6.066003 Google Scholar

31. M. Hammer et al., “Light paths in retinal vessel oximetry,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 48(5), 592–598 (2001).IEBEAX0018-9294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/10.918598 Google Scholar

32. S. Grover et al., “Comparison of retinal thickness in normal eyes using stratus and spectralis optical coherence tomography,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 51(5), 2644–2647 (2010).IOVSDA0146-0404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-4774 Google Scholar

33. P. C. Wu et al., “Assessment of macular retinal thickness and volume in normal eyes and highly myopic eyes with third-generation optical coherence tomography,” Eye 22(4), 551–555 (2008).12ZYAS0950-222X http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702789 Google Scholar

34. M. Adhi et al., “Macular thickness by age and gender in healthy eyes using spectral domain optical coherence tomography,” PLoS One 7(5), e37638 (2012).POLNCL1932-6203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037638 Google Scholar

35. R. Margolis and R. F. Spaide, “A pilot study of enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of the choroid in normal eyes,” Am. J. Ophthalmol. 147(5), 811–815 (2009).AJOPAA0002-9394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2008.12.008 Google Scholar

36. V. Manjunath et al., “Choroidal thickness in normal eyes measured using cirrus-HD optical coherence tomography,” Am. J. Ophthalmol. 150(3), 325.e1–329.e1 (2010).AJOPAA0002-9394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2010.04.018 Google Scholar

37. M. Hirata et al., “Macular choroidal thickness and volume in normal subjects measured by swept-source optical coherence tomography,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 52(8), 4971–4978 (2011).IOVSDA0146-0404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-7729 Google Scholar

38. M. Hammer et al., “Optical properties of ocular fundus tissues—an in vitro study using the double-integrating-sphere technique and inverse Monte Carlo simulation,” Phys. Med. Biol. 40(6), 963–978 (1995).PHMBA70031-9155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/40/6/001 Google Scholar

39. M. Friebel et al., “Influence of oxygen saturation on the optical scattering properties of human red blood cells in the spectral range 250 to 2000 nm,” J. Biomed. Opt. 14(3) 034001 (2009).JBOPFO1083-3668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.3127200 Google Scholar

40. A. N. Bashkatov et al., “Optical properties of human sclera in spectral range 370–2500 nm,” Opt. Spectrosc. 109(2), 197–204 (2010).OPSUA30030-400X http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X10080084 Google Scholar

41. S. Prahl, “Optical absorption of hemoglobin,”  http://omlc.ogi.edu/spectra/hemoglobin/ (9 October 2017). Google Scholar

42. D. J. Mordant et al., “Validation of human whole blood oximetry using a hyperspectral fundus camera with a model eye,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 52(5), 2851–2859 (2011).IOVSDA0146-0404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.10-6217 Google Scholar

43. D. J. Mordant et al., “Spectral imaging of the retina,” Eye 25(3), 309–320 (2011).12ZYAS0950-222X http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/eye.2010.222 Google Scholar


Guillem Carles obtained a BSc and MSc degrees in physics from the University of Barcelona, MSc degree in computer vision and artificial intelligence from the University Autonomous of Barcelona, and PhD in physics on computational imaging from the University of Barcelona in 2011. He moved to University of Glasgow in 2012 and conducted postdoctoral research in computational imaging aspects including multiaperture optics, retinal imaging and 3-D microscopy. He is a Leverhulme Trust Early Career fellow.

Gonzalo Muyo: Biography is not available.

Jano van Hemert is the research director of Optos plc (a Nikon Company), a medical device company specialising in retinal imaging. He has an MSc and a PhD degrees from Leiden University. He is a senior member of IEEE, and honorary fellow of the University of Edinburgh. He has held research posts at the National Research Institute for Mathematics and Computer Science of the Netherlands, The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research and the Vienna University of Technology.

Andrew R. Harvey conducted PhD and postdoctoral research THz instrumentation at St Andrews University, United Kingdom, until 1995 when he moved to DRA in Malvern, United Kingdom to research advanced imaging techniques. He returned to academic research at Heriot–Watt University in 2001 to develop techniques in computational and spectral imaging and their applications in systemic biomedical and retinal imaging. He became full professor in 2007 and moved to Glasgow University in 2011, where he heads the Imaging Concepts Group.

© The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Guillem Carles, Gonzalo Muyo, Jano van Hemert, Andrew R. Harvey, "Combined high contrast and wide field of view in the scanning laser ophthalmoscope through dual detection of light paths," Journal of Biomedical Optics 22(11), 116002 (2 November 2017). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.22.11.116002 Submission: Received 29 June 2017; Accepted 11 October 2017
Submission: Received 29 June 2017; Accepted 11 October 2017

Scanning laser ophthalmoscopy

Confocal microscopy


Monte Carlo methods

Eye models

Light scattering



Back to Top