Open Access
11 January 2019 Noninvasive evaluation of hemodynamics and light scattering property during two-stage mouse cutaneous carcinogenesis based on multispectral diffuse reflectance images at isosbestic wavelengths of hemoglobin
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
We investigate a multispectral imaging method to evaluate spatiotemporal changes in both cutaneous hemoglobin concentration and light scattering parameter in mouse skin through diffuse reflectance spectroscopy using the reflectance images acquired at isosbestic wavelengths of hemoglobin (420, 450, 500, and 585 nm). In the proposed approach, Monte Carlo simulation-based empirical formulas are introduced to extract the scattering power b representing the wavelength dependence of light scattering spectrum of skin tissue, as well as the total hemoglobin concentration Cth in dermal vasculatures. The use of isosbestic wavelengths of hemoglobin enables the values of Cth and b to be estimated independently of the oxygenation of hemoglobin. Experiments using in vivo mice two-stage chemical carcinogenesis model are performed to confirm the feasibility of the proposed method for evaluating the changes in cutaneous vasculatures and tissue morphology during tumor initiation, promotion, and progression processes. The experimental results reveal that the changes in scattering power b of back skin are significantly reduced and followed by the increase in total hemoglobin concentration Cth in the carcinogenesis mice group, which indicates morphological changes in skin tissue such as edema and cell swelling caused by tumor promotion and successive angiogenesis along with tumor progression. The results suggest that the potential of the present method to detect cutaneous carcinogenesis in an early stage and monitor physiological changes during promotion and progression process of nonmelanoma tumors.

1.

Introduction

Skin is the largest and most extended organ of the body and its weight goes up to about 15% of the total bodyweight.1 It has many functions including protecting the body against infections and the electromagnetic radiations.2 During its action, skin, sometimes, is affected by the heavy dose of carcinogen such as ultraviolet light from the sun, using sunlamps and sunbeds or a chemical such as 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA) that causes cancer. Uncontrolled proliferation of skin structures, both cellular and acellular, which have no designated functions, is called skin cancer. Of all human cancerous growth, more than 90% emerges from the epithelia that are bound by the basement-membrane zone and invading of this border is the main cause of conversion of the epithelial cancers to malignancy.3 In this study, we focused on the nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) as it is the most common type of cancer affecting mainly the light-skinned individuals.4 Among NMSC, basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma are the two most common subtypes. In fact, BCC is the most common cancer in many countries of the world5 accounting 75% of all NMSC.6

The incidence of NMSC varies widely in worldwide cases with the highest rates in Australia, >1000/100,000 person-years for the BCC, and the lowest rates in parts of Africa, <1/100,000 for BCC.4 Unfortunately, the rate of incidence is increasing in many countries of the world, which soared up critically in the past few decades.4,710 Putting this in consideration, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines referred to the need to establish the actual nature of the epidemiology of BCC.11 The prevalence of skin cancer is also affected by the ethnic background and geographical location such as very low incidence was observed in the close to the equator countries such as Singapore.12 Previous surveys and reports suggest that the male is higher in risk than their female counterparts1315 because of higher outdoor activities that results in higher exposure to the radiation and affiliation with some radiologically hazardous position. Though the mortality rate is low,16 NMSC causes significant economic burden to medical service and accelerate morbidity as NMSCs mostly occur in visible areas of the skin.4 That is why control and prevention of NMSC are highly important and are assisted by the precise diagnosis considering the forms, structure, and nature of the skin.

Structurally skin is enriched with the long cylindrical fibrous structures as well as the chromophores such as oxygenated hemoglobin, deoxygenated hemoglobin, and melanin.1 In case of carcinogenesis, there are significant changes in those structures those can be treated as the landmarks. The most important point to promote the recovery process or to escalate the survival of patients is the identification of inception of the disease at the earliest possible time and doing it precisely.1719 In the course of carcinogenesis, the blood supply to the carcinogen-exposed area becomes increased, which is called field carcinogenesis. Following that, hyperemia starts as a result of angiogenesis relatively earlier than expression of any external changes.2022 It is also characterized by the multifocal or nonhomogenous hyperplastic changes.22 It contributes to the hemodynamic changes. Also the skin cancer diagnostic is commonly associated to a change in the skin rigidity with respect to its surrounding area that can be checked through palpation. This rigidity change is expressed by a change in the skin’s Young’s modulus of the affected area, a feature that can be retrieved with optical nondestructive techniques.

Conventionally, carcinogenicity as well as other cutaneous disorders is diagnosed mainly based on the gross morphological parameters such as the ABCD rule23 and the 7-point check list.24 Lack of equality or equivalence between parts or aspects of the prospective part of organ or body, i.e., asymmetry, irregular border of that parts, color variation within the particular mass of the tissue, increasing the diameter in relation to time, and evolvement over time are the basic visible features. As those are not confirmatory, the equivocal lesions are recommended for the further examination so-called “gold standard” through biopsy or surgery along with the histopathological test25 for the confirmation.4 Though it is the most common practice, the pain or discomfort of the patient, chance of secondary infection, cumbersome, and time-consuming process degrades the feasibility of application. Skin carcinogenesis is characterized by the exophytic growth26 of the layers of the skin, which forms papilloma in most of the cases. Unfortunately, these appear at the advanced stage of the carcinogenicity when the treatment is cumbersome and most critical is recovery rate is not satisfactory. Actually, the changes in the molecular level start following the tissue faces carcinogenic agents. So early diagnosis can be done and it is mandatory for effective treatment and soon and as completely as possible recovery that brings physical and mental well-being.

There are several protocols applied to measure the skin cancer. Identifying the biomarker molecules by the biosensors is one of the important advanced measures where antigen plays a vital role but, high expense of antibody, complicated assembling of sensors, unexpected characteristics at nanoscale, and low stability in storage are the limiting factors.27 More recently, dermoscopy has been implemented for clinical diagnosis28 such as MoleMax HD,29 SIAscope,30 SolarScan,31 and MelaFind32 are important among them. But none of these targets on enhancing the contrast of structures and morphologies with low visibility in the dermoscopic image.25

The randomly inhomogeneously distribution of chromophores and heterogeneously fibrous structures by the collagen bundle and lamellae characterize the optical properties of skin tissues and thus they make skin tissues suitable for the application of the optical techniques.33 Light absorption by the chromophore such as hemoglobin, lipid, water, and light scattering by the cutaneous long cylindrical structures such as collagen fiber, reticular fiber, elastic fiber or by the other cellular or subcellular structures represent the physiological and morphological condition of the biological tissues. The primary changes in the optical properties are because of either scattering or absorption or both by the tissues.34 The spectral information of the absorption coefficient μa(λ) indicates the probability of photon absorption per unit infinitesimal path length whereas the reduced scattering coefficient μs(λ) refers to photon scattering per unit infinitesimal path length. They can be readily assessed from the reflectance spectrum by different mathematical models.35 The reduced scattering coefficient μs(λ) is the combination of all kinds of scattering by the cellular and subcellular structures of different sizes36 and is dependent on the scattering amplitude and scattering power, which reflect the geometrical properties such as scattering power density37 and the size of the biological molecule,38 respectively. Also increase or decrease in the scattering power shows the inverse relation with the scatterer size.38 The alternations in scattering during the carcinogenesis are thought to be result of the variation in the size of cellular and subcellular structures and engorgement of cutaneous tissue by the long cylindrical fibrous structure that is why it is necessary to monitor scattering power to assess the pathophysiological condition of the skin. Also the fluctuation in the chromophore such as hemoglobin is directly proportional to the optical absorption.

Optical protocols have been proven as more potential tool for assessing tissue condition promptly and much accurately that assists in medical diagnosis.39,40 It provides excellent soft-tissue contras, excellent functions, fast data acquisition, as well as low-cost applicability.41 Light scattering and absorption properties of the biological tissues can be evaluated by various optical techniques, such as time-resolved measurements,42 a frequency-domain method,43 optical coherence method,44 a pulsed photodermal radiometry method,45 and spatially resolved measurements.4649 Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy is a promising technique to measure the macroscopic optical properties such as light scattering and absorption parameters.50,51 Some of the previous reports have been published on skin chromophore and morphology study based on the optical fiber probe,5154 integrating sphere,55,56 and multispectral imaging5759 for data collection.

In this study, we investigated a multispectral imaging method based on the algorithm developed previously54 for evaluating spatiotemporal changes in both cutaneous hemoglobin concentration and tissue morphology of mice during a two-stage chemical carcinogenesis. Multispectral diffuse reflectance images at isosbestic wavelengths of hemoglobin (420, 450, 500, and 585 nm) were acquired using a simple white light emitting diode (LED), a monochromatic charged coupled device (CCD) camera, and the narrow band optical filters. The Monte Carlo simulation (MCS)-based empirical formulas are introduced to specify the scattering power b of skin tissue as well as the concentration of total blood Cth.

2.

Principle

The diffuse reflectance spectrum R(λ) of the skin is dependent on the light scattering properties originating from the long cylindrical fibrous structures as well as some other shorter cellular structures. This scattering is dominated by both of the Rayleigh scattering from the comparatively smaller structures and the Mie scattering by the comparatively larger structures of the skin tissue. The spectrum of the reduced scattering coefficient of skin tissue μs(λ) can be approximated by the following power low function:60,61

Eq. (1)

μs(λ)=aλb,
where λ is the wavelength of light. The coefficient a and the exponent b are called the scattering amplitude and the scattering power, which are related to geometrical properties such as scatterer density37 and size,38 respectively. An increase or decrease in scattering power b reportedly produces a decrease or increase in scatterer size, respectively.61 Therefore, quantifying b is useful to evaluate morphological changes such as swelling or shrinkage of cellular and subcellular structures in skin tissue. On the other hand, R(λ) depends on the concentration of melanin Cm and that of hemoglobin Cth in epidermis and hemoglobin in the cutaneous circulation. To evaluate the scattering power b and the total hemoglobin concentration Cth, the following empirical formulas derived from the results of the MCS for light transport in skin tissue are considered:54

Eq. (2)

b=α0+α1A(420)+α2A(450)+α3A(500)+α4A(585),

Eq. (3)

Cth=β0+β1A(420)+β2A(450)+β3A(500)+β4A(585).

In those equations, the absorbance spectrum A(λ) is calculated as

Eq. (4)

A(λ)=log10R(λ).

The coefficients αi and βi (i=0, 1, 2, 3, and 4) in Eqs. (2) and (3) can be determined statistically through multiple regression analysis (MRA). In this MRA, b and Cth are regarded as dependent variables, and A(420), A(450), A(500), and A(585) are regarded as the independent variables. We used the MCS algorithm developed by Wang et al.,62 to derive the diffuse reflectance at the four isosbestic wavelengths for determining reliable values of αi and βi. The simulation model treated herein consists of epidermis and dermis, where μa(λ) and μs(λ) are homogeneously distributed in each volume. The absorption spectrum of epidermis μa,e(λ) and that of dermis μa,d(λ) were calculated based on the concentration of melanin Cm and the total hemoglobin concentration Cth, respectively. We assumed that the values of μs(λ) for both the epidermis and the dermis are identical. The reduced scattering spectrum μs(λ) was deduced based on the scattering amplitude a and the scattering power b. The thicknesses of the epidermis and dermis were assumed to be 0.06 and 4.94 mm, respectively. Then the spectra of μa(λ) and μs(λ) were given as inputs for the MCS, whereas the diffuse reflectance at 420, 450, 500, and 585 nm was derived as the outputs. The input values of Cth and b, and the resultant values of A(420), A(450), A(500), and A(585) are useful as the data set in statistically determining the values of αi and βi for determining the absolute values of b and Cth. The five different values, namely, 5.3×109, 5.8×109, 6.3×109, 6.8×109, and 7.3×109, were calculated by multiplying the typical value63 of a by 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2. In the same way, the five values of 2.90, 2.95, 3.00, 3.05, and 3.10 were obtained by multiplying the typical value64 of b by 0.97, 0.985, 1.0, 1.015, and 1.03, respectively. Twenty-five spectra of reduced scattering coefficients μs(λ) for skin tissues were calculated using Eq. (1). The absorption coefficients of the epidermis were derived for 10 different concentrations of Cm=1 to 10 vol. % at intervals of 1%, whereas those of the dermis were derived for five different concentrations of Cth=0.2 to 1.0 vol. % at intervals of 0.2 vol. %. In total, 1250 diffuse reflectance spectra were derived using every possible combination of Cm, Cth, a, and b. The use of isosbestic wavelengths of hemoglobin makes it possible to eliminate the effects of the variations in hemoglobin oxygen saturation on the estimated values of Cth and b. Once we determine the empirical formulas for total hemoglobin concentration Cth and the scattering parameter b, the images of Cth and b can be reconstructed by applying the empirical formulas to each pixel of the measured spectral diffuse reflectance images, without the MCSs. In other words, the MCS is time-consuming for preparing data sets of diffuse reflectance spectra but does not significantly increase the imaging processing time for Cth and b. The uniqueness of the proposed method compared to the other spectral imaging techniques for skin measurements is the use of diffuse reflectance images acquired at the isosbestic wavelengths of hemoglobin, which make it possible to visualize spatial maps of the total hemoglobin concentration Cth and the scattering parameter b simultaneously, independent of the oxygenation.

3.

Materials and Methods

3.1.

Animal Preparation

In experimental cases, mice tissue serves as a productive model for human cancer and facilitates production of cancers induced both by carcinogens and defined genetic elements.64 Mouse skin has a faster epidermal turnover and is easier to transform using carcinogen, which is the most important mutagenic driver of skin cancer.65 Animal care and experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Research Committee of Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology (Approval No. 28-50, July 13, 2016). Fifteen hairless male albino mice, 6-week old (Hos:HR-1, Hoshino Laboratory Animals Inc., Ibaraki, Japan), were housed in a controlled environment (24°C, 12-h light/dark cycle) with food and water ad libitum. Hairless mice strains proved as more effective for skin cancer study66 and it has no extra burden of managing hair. All mice were anesthetized and maintained with 1.0% isoflurane in the experiments. Mice were divided into three groups.

According to the cancer pathogenesis, we intend to induce two-stage chemical carcinogenesis in the back skin of mice as shown in Fig. 1. All mice were anesthetized and maintained with 1.0% isoflurane in the experiments. Mice were divided into three groups. Skin cancer was initiated with 100  μg of DMBA in 100  μl acetone in the first group of 5 mice. Mice skin shows greater percutaneous absorption and decreased barrier function67 so it is readily absorbed by the skin. Typically, the chemical binds with the DNA and causes mutation in Ha-ras gene,68 it is called initiation. One week later, all mice in the first group were treated with 1  μg of 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) in 100  μl of acetone was applied twice in a week for the promotion and progression of carcinogenesis for up to 26 weeks (DMBA-TPA group). TPA leads to the clonal expansion of the initiated cell that turns the initiated cells into multiple benign papillomas.68 Some additional genetic changes such as elevated expression of genes encoding Ha-ras and cyclin D1 and loss of p53 lead to conversion of benign papilloma to malignant carcinoma.68 This two-stage chemical carcinogenesis can cause skin tumors as early as 6 weeks with malignant conversion at 18 weeks.69 On the other hand, the second group of 5 mice was treated with 100  μl of acetone at first and then 1  μg of TPA in 100  μl of acetone was applied twice in a week up to 26 weeks (TPA group). The third group of 5 mice was treated with only 100  μl of acetone twice in a week up to 26 weeks (control group).

Fig. 1

Schematic illustration of two-step carcinogenesis model induced by DMBA and TPA.

JBO_24_3_031020_f001.png

Microscopically, the epidermal thickness for DMBA-TPA group is supposed to be increased.7072 The cancer cells should be increased in number72 and size73,74 and rounder in shape as cancerous cells belong lower amount of adhesive materials, such as E-cadherin, to closely bind or attach with the adjacent cells or extracellular matrix.75 Also the cancer cells are cytomorphologically different from the normal cell such as higher amount of nuclear materials, varied in cell size, abnormal DNA molecules as a result of mutation by the DMBA solution.76 TPA group should have little increase in skin thickness as a result of hyperplasia caused by the inflammation posed by the application of TPA solution.77 On the other hand, the control group should not have any alteration in the skin morphology.72

3.2.

Imaging System

To monitor progress of carcinogenesis along with changes in the total hemoglobin concentration Cth and the scattering power b, a target area on the back skin of each mouse was measured by a multispectral imaging system once in a week. Figure 2 shows a schematic diagram of the imaging system. A white-LED (LA-HDF158A, Hayashi Watch Works Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) illuminated the back skin of mouse via a light guide and a ring-shaped illuminator with a primary polarization plate (polarizer). The white-LED is an inexpensive broad band light source and could be useful in clinical practice. A filter wheel was placed to filter light at isosbestic wavelengths of hemoglobin, 420, 450, 500, and 585 nm. The diffusely reflected light from the sample was captured by an 8-bit monochromatic CCD camera (DMK-21BU618.H, Imaging Source LLC, Charlotte, North Carolina) through a secondary polarization plate (analyzer) and a filter wheel installed with the four narrow band interference filters. We used the four interference filters with the central wavelength±bandwidth of 450±10  nm (F10-420.0-4-1.00, CVI laser LLC, Albuquerque, New Mexico), 450±10  nm (F10-450.0-4-25.0M, CVI Melles Griot, Albuquerque, New Mexico), 500±10  nm (F10-500.0-4-25.0M, CVI Melles Griot, Albuquerque, New Mexico), and 585±10  nm (F10-585.0-4-1.00, CVI laser LLC, Albuquerque, New Mexico). The image size of the camera was 640×480  pixels. The polarizer and the analyzer were placed in a crossed-Nicols alignment to reduce specular reflection from the skin surface. The spectrum of diffusely reflected light intensity from a standard white diffuser (SRS-99-020, Labsphere Incorporated, North Sutton, New Hampshire) Iw(λ) was used to normalize the spectrum of diffusely reflected light intensity from the skin tissue Is(λ). The normalized spectrum was treated as the diffuse reflectance spectrum of the skin tissue R(λ). The diffuse reflectance images were stored in a personal computer and analyzed. The images of scattering power b and total hemoglobin concentration Cth were estimated by applying the empirical formulas described in Sec. 2 to each pixel of the diffuse reflectance images at 420, 450, 500, and 585 nm.

Fig. 2

Schematic diagram of the imaging system.

JBO_24_3_031020_f002.png

To monitor the changes in total hemoglobin concentration Cth and scattering power b induced by application of DMBA, TPA, and/or acetone, the relative changes in Cth and b were calculated based on the time course data. The values of Cth and b before treating with the chemical agents were used as control values, Cth,c and bc, respectively. The value of Cth,c or bc was subtracted from each of the subsequent value of Cth or b in the time course, respectively. Each subtracted value demonstrated the change in Cth or b, CthCth,c or bbc, over time, was normalized by dividing CthCth,c by Cth,c, or bbc by bc. The relative changes in Cth and b were expressed as ΔCth%=[(CthCth,c)/Cth,c]×100 and Δb%=[(bbc)/bc]×100. Those calculations were applied to the time courses of Cth and b for all mice in each group.

3.3.

Phantom Experiment

To confirm the validity of the method, we performed experiments using an agarose-based phantom that mimics the optical properties of biological tissue. The phantom consists of an epidermis layer and a dermis layer. Detailed explanations of the protocol for making the phantom have been described elsewhere.78 We prepared agar solution by diluting agarose powder (Fast Gene AG01, NIPPON Genetics EUROPE GmbH, Düren, NRW, Germany) with saline at a weight ratio of 1.0%. To simulate the scattering condition, Intralipid 10% solution (Fresenius Kabi AB, Uppsala, Sweden) was added to the agarose solution. The resultant solution was used as the base material. The volume concentration of Intralipid 10% solution ranged from 10% to 15%. An epidermis phantom layer was made by adding a coffee solution to the base materials. The volume concentration of coffee solution was 5%. A dermis phantom layer was made by adding a small amount of fully oxygenated horse blood with Hct=44% to the base material. All phantoms were hardened in molds having the required thickness and size by being cooled at 5°C for 20 min. These phantom layers were then piled to be a two-layered phantom, which was put between two slide glasses. The slide glass on the epidermis layer was naturally coupled to the phantom by a drop of saline. We made 12 optical phantoms with different combinations of Cth and b.

As preparatory measurements, we first determined the absorption coefficients μa and reduced scattering coefficient of μs each phantom at 420, 450, 500, and 585 nm, because they are necessary for the MCS to deduce the empirical formula for Cth and b. The spectra of the absorption coefficient μa(λ) and reduced scattering coefficients μs(λ) are also required to calculate the given values for Cth and b. For this purpose, we measured the diffuse reflectance and total transmittance spectra of each phantom individually. A 150-W halogen-lamp light source (LA-150SAE, Hayashi Watch Works Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) illuminated the phantom via a light guide (LGC1-5L1000; Hayashi Watch Works Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and lens with a spot diameter of 2.0 mm. The diameter and focal length of the lens are 50 and 100 mm, respectively. The thickness of each phantom in the preparatory measurements was 1.0 mm, whereas the area of each phantom was 26×45  mm2. The phantom was placed between two glass slides having a thickness of 1.0 mm and fixed at the sample holder of an integrating sphere (RT-060-SF, Labsphere Incorporated, North Sutton, New Hampshire). The detected area of the phantom was circular with a diameter of 22 mm. Light diffusely reflected from the detected area was received at the input face of an optical fiber probe having a diameter of 400  μm, which was placed at the detector port of the sphere. The fiber transmits the received light into a multichannel spectrometer (USB2000, Ocean Optics Inc., Dunedin, Florida), which measured reflectance or transmittance spectra in the visible to near-infrared wavelength region under the control of a personal computer. To determine μa(λ) and μs(λ) from the measured diffuse reflectance and total transmittance spectra, we utilized the inverse Monte Carlo (IMC) method.78 In the IMC, the MCS of the reflectance and transmittance spectra were iterated for different values of μa(λ) and μs(λ) until the difference between the simulated and measured spectral values decreased below a predetermined threshold. The values used in the last step of the iteration were adopted as the final results. This process was carried out at 420, 450, 500, and 585 nm, and wavelength-dependent properties of μa(λ) and μs(λ) were obtained for each phantom. In these calculations, the refractive index was assumed to be 1.33 for all phantoms in the whole wavelength range. The concentration of total hemoglobin Cth in each phantom was calculated based on the estimated μa at 585 nm and the known value of extinction coefficient of hemoglobin. The scattering parameter b for each phantom was calculated from the estimated μs(λ) based on Eq. (1). Those values of Cth and b obtained by IMC are used as the given values to evaluate the validity of the proposed method experimentally. We also need to have the empirical formulas for the phantoms used in this study. We generated diffuse reflectance spectra at 420, 450, 500, and 585 nm using the MCS with the conditions of the phantoms. For this simulation, the values of μa(λ) and μs(λ) at 420, 450, 500, and 585 nm were set to be the same as those estimated by IMC. We derived the empirical formulas for estimating Cth and b.

4.

Results and Discussion

Figure 3 shows the comparisons between the estimated and given values for (a) total hemoglobin Cth and (b) scattering parameter b, obtained from the phantom experiments. In Figs. 3(a) and 3(b), the estimated values are well correlated with the given values. Correlation coefficients between the estimated and given values are 0.85 (P<0.001) and 0.92 (P<0.0001) for Cth and b, respectively. These results indicate the validity of the proposed method for estimating the total hemoglobin Cth and scattering parameter b.

Fig. 3

Comparisons between the estimated and given values for: (a) total hemoglobin Cth and (b) scattering parameter b, obtained from the phantom experiments.

JBO_24_3_031020_f003.png

Figure 4 shows the typical results of reflected light intensity images at 450 nm obtained from (a) DMBA-TPA group, (b) TPA group, and (c) control group at the specific time points. There were no remarkable changes in reflected light intensity and textural pattern in the images of skin for control group as shown in Fig. 4(c). On the other hand, several small dark spots [white arrows in Fig. 4(a)] can be observed on the back skin area in the image obtained from DMBA-TPA group at sixth week. Reductions in reflected light intensity around the dark spots imply an increase in absorption of light by hemoglobin due to angiogenesis in tumor growth or a decrease in a scattering intensity of light due to changes in tissue morphology.

Fig. 4

Typical results of reflected light intensity images at 450 nm obtained from: (a) DMBA-TPA group, (b) TPA group, and (c) control group at the specific time points.

JBO_24_3_031020_f004.png

In the next step, we visualized two parameters, the total hemoglobin concentration Cth and the scattering power b for assessing hemodynamic changes in cutaneous vasculatures and morphological changes in skin tissue under the specific experimental conditions, respectively. Actually, it might be related to the fact that a specific tissue condition reflects the particular pathologies.69

Figure 5 shows the typical resultant images of total hemoglobin concentration Cth obtained from (a) DMBA-TPA group, (b) TPA group, and (c) control group at the specific time points. Figure 6 shows the time courses of relative change in total hemoglobin concentration ΔCth averaged over the five regions of interest (ROIs) for all five mice in each group. The ROIs for DMBA-TPA group covered roughly the same dark spot regions in each mouse over time. The ROIs for TPA group and control group were randomly selected and covered roughly the same skin regions in each mouse. The value of ΔCth for DMBA-TPA group was started to increase on sixth week, which indicates angiogenesis causing enrichment of skin with enormous supply of blood vessels that lodge blood. Lowering of ΔCth for both control group and TPA group might be the fact that the effect of light absorption by hemoglobin in dermal vasculatures on the diffuse reflectance spectrum becomes lower, accompanied with skin thickening over the period as mice growing older.

Fig. 5

Typical resultant images of total hemoglobin concentration Cth obtained from: (a) DMBA-TPA group, (b) TPA group, and (c) control group at the specific time points.

JBO_24_3_031020_f005.png

Fig. 6

Time courses of relative change in total hemoglobin concentration ΔCth averaged over the five ROIs for all five mice in each group.

JBO_24_3_031020_f006.png

We found pinkish discoloration of the target area of the skin in the initial days of the cancer induction that gradually turned into the reddish, which is prominently found in the exophytic growth area called papilloma. This is supposed to be skin carcinogenesis. The findings are backed up by some other previous researches with different protocols.25,26,7981 At the advanced stage, we found the blackish discoloration of the skin in the tip of the papilloma when it experienced necrosis. There is a report that describes the measurement of melanin content as a diagnostic tool for cutaneous melanoma.82 We recommend extending the measurement up to the study of a light scattering property in addition to the evaluation of total hemoglobin concentration.

Figure 7 shows the typical resultant images of scattering power b obtained from (a) DMBA-TPA group, (b) TPA group, and (c) control group at the specific time points. Figure 8 shows the time courses of relative change in scattering power Δb averaged over the five ROIs for all five mice in each group. There was no significant change in Δb for control group over time. TPA group showed lower value of Δb than control group, which is indicative of a slight increase in skin thickness as a result of hyperplasia caused by the repeated inflammatory reactions to the TPA applications77 as described in Sec. 3.1. On the other hand, the value of Δb for DMBA-TPA group was started to decrease rapidly on the fifth week of the experiment, which implies the increase in size of cancer cells73,74 as described in Sec. 3.1. Interestingly, the rapid drop in Δb is one to two week earlier than the significant increase in ΔCth, which might be due to the engorgement of skin with long, cylindrical fibrous structures such as collagen fiber, reticular fiber, and elastic fiber, indicating the potential of light scattering to detect cutaneous carcinogenesis in an early stage. The significant decrease in Δb observed after the seventh week indicates morphological changes in skin tissue such as edema and cell swelling caused by promotion of tumors. Macroscopically, by means of palpation, we found that the thickness and rigidity of the skin has significantly increased. This cutaneous hyperplasia further confirms the outcomes of previous research.7072 The results by palpation and the proposed optical approach are consistent with each other and supported by the other research, in which cutaneous carcinogenesis increases higher concentration of densely packed collagen fibers.65 The use of both scattering power b and total hemoglobin concentration may be useful for earlier and more reliable diagnosis of skin cancers. The results of light scattering change and dermal hemodynamics indicate the potential of the present method to monitor nonmelanoma skin cancer promotion and progression.

Fig. 7

Typical resultant images of scattering power b obtained from: (a) DMBA-TPA group, (b) TPA group, and (c) control group at the specific time points.

JBO_24_3_031020_f007.png

Fig. 8

Time courses of relative change in scattering power Δb averaged over the five ROIs for all five mice in each group.

JBO_24_3_031020_f008.png

We assumed that the thicknesses for the epidermis and dermis are 0.06 and 4.94 mm, respectively, in the MCS model. Changes in epidermis and dermis will affect the regression model. To investigate the effect of variation in the thicknesses of the epidermis and dermis on the estimated values of Cth and b, we performed numerical estimation for diffuse reflectance samples generated by the MCS when the thicknesses of the epidermis and dermis have some variations. For test samples, the thicknesses of epidermis were set to be 0.005, 0.01, 0.03, and 0.06 mm, whereas those of dermis were set to be 3.5, 4, 4.5, and 4.94 mm. The values of Cm, Cth, a, and b were set with 1.0 vol. %, 0.4 vol. %, 6.3×109  cm1, and 3.00, respectively. Figures 9(a) and 9(b) show the relative errors with respect to the given value of Cth for four different thicknesses of epidermis and those for dermis, respectively. The relative error in the estimated Cth decreases as the thickness of epidermis decreases, while there is no significant coupling of the estimated Cth and the thickness of dermis. Absorption of light by melanin in epidermis decreases as the thickness of epidermis is decreased. This will cause the decrease in baseline of A(λ) of skin tissue. As a consequence, the total hemoglobin concentration will be underestimated. Figures 10(a) and 10(b) show the relative errors with respect to the given value of b for four different thicknesses of epidermis and those for dermis, respectively. The relative error in the estimated b increases as the thickness of epidermis decreases, while there is no significant dependence of the estimated b on the thickness of dermis. The estimated value of b is less sensitive to the variation in epidermis thickness than that of Cth. This is probably due to that the scattering parameter b represents the wavelength dependence of scattering spectrum and suffers little influence of baseline drift in A(λ) of skin tissue.

Fig. 9

Plots of relative errors with respect to the given value of Cth for four different thicknesses of: (a) epidermis and (b) dermis.

JBO_24_3_031020_f009.png

Fig. 10

Plots of relative errors with respect to the given value of b for four different thicknesses of: (a) epidermis and (b) dermis.

JBO_24_3_031020_f010.png

The dorsal skin surface of mouse is obviously not very flat as shown in Fig. 4. It is easy to let undesired shading into the diffuse reflectance images through the imaging system. This nonuniformity can degrade the resultant images. The total hemoglobin concentration Cth and the scattering parameter b were overestimated due to the shading as shown in Figs. 5 and 7. The errors in Cth and b due to the shading might be reduced using the ratios A(420)/A(450), A(420)/A(500), and A(420)/A(585) as the variables in Eqs. (2) and (3). This issue should be performed in future works.

In the late stage, the tumors are big and spherical. Therefore, the tumors and the surrounding skin are not at the same distance from the imaging system. This causes the variations in the depth of field and the working distance between tumors and the surrounding skin. When the imaging is focused on the surrounding skin surface, the spatial resolutions and the accuracies for both images of total hemoglobin concentration and scattering parameter could be degraded. We used the four narrow band interference filters with the center wavelengths of 420, 450, 500, and 585 nm to acquire the diffuse reflectance images at the isosbestic wavelength of hemoglobin. Therefore, the bandwidths for the four interference filters can affect the accuracies of total hemoglobin concentration and scattering parameter.

In this study, the measurements of multispectral diffuse reflectance images for all mice in each group were conducted once in a week. Measurements at shorter time intervals should be performed to evaluate more detailed changes in b and Cth in early stage of carcinogenesis. We exclude the effect of variation in hemoglobin oxygen saturation on the estimated values of b and Cth using isosbestic wavelengths of hemoglobin. On the other hand, abnormal vasculatures and functions in tumor tissue lead to impaired oxygen delivery compared with normal tissue. Moreover, oxygen consumption by tumor tissue is increased by a high tissue metabolic rate due to tumor cell proliferation. As a consequence, oxygen consumption increases by tumor tissue. The decreased oxygen supply and increased oxygen demand keep tumor tissue in hypoxic condition. Therefore, both angiogenesis and hypoxia are critical for tumor study. In this study, we mainly targeted hemoglobin and scattering qualification to evaluate on angiogenesis and carcinogenesis. The proposed method could be expanded for oxygen saturation imaging by adding the diffuse reflectance image acquired at the other wavelengths than isosbestic wavelengths of hemoglobin into the analysis. The diffuse reflectance image at 560 nm can be potentially used for this purpose.

5.

Conclusion

In summary, a method for imaging light scattering parameter and total hemoglobin concentration of in vivo skin tissue based on a set of diffuse reflectance images acquired at the four isosbestic wavelengths of hemoglobin (420, 450, 500, and 585 nm) was demonstrated in this study. In vivo experiments using mice two-stage chemical carcinogenesis model confirmed the feasibility of the proposed imaging method for evaluating the changes in cutaneous vasculatures and tissue morphology. The results from this study indicate the potential of the present method to monitor the changes in physiology and tissue morphology in skin tissue in nonmelanoma skin cancer promotion and progression. To the best of my knowledge, this is the first example of long-term observation of changes in light scattering parameter and total hemoglobin concentration during two-stage cutaneous carcinogenesis of in vivo mouse skin using a multispectral imaging technique. The results of animal experiments shown in this study have novelty and significance in the field of biomedical optics. The present algorithm can consider the empirical formulas for not only the scattering power b and total hemoglobin concentration Cth but also the melanin concentration.54 We intend to extend the imaging method to evaluate melanoma skin cancer in future works.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This manuscript is a revised version of a report previously published in an SPIE conference proceedings Volume 10711, 107110W (2018).

References

1. 

P. A. J. Kolarsick, M. A. Kolarsick and C. Goodwin, “Anatomy and physiology of the skin,” J. Dermatol. Nurses Assoc., 3 (4), 203 –213 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1097/JDN.0b013e3182274a98 Google Scholar

2. 

J. Kanitakis, “Anatomy, histology and immunohistochemistry of normal human skin,” Eur. J. Dermatol., 12 (4), 390 –401 (2002). Google Scholar

3. 

P. Friedl and K. Wolf, “Tumour-cell invasion and migration: diversity and escape mechanisms,” Nature Rev. Cancer, 3 362 –374 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1075 NRCAC4 1474-175X Google Scholar

4. 

A. Lomas, J. Leonardi-Bee and F. Bath-Hextall, “A systematic review of worldwide incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer,” Br. J. Dermatol., 166 1069 –1080 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10830.x BJDEAZ 0007-0963 Google Scholar

5. 

R. Lucas et al., Solar Ultraviolet Radiation: Global Burden of Disease from Solar Ultraviolet Radiation, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland (2006). Google Scholar

6. 

P. T. Ting, R. Kasper and J. P. Arlette, “Metastatic basal cell carcinoma: report of two cases and literature review,” J. Cutan. Med. Surg., 9 (1), 10 –15 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/120347540500900104 Google Scholar

7. 

E. Battistini, S. Battistini and P. Barachini, “Epidemiology of melanoma and non melanoma skin cancer in the provinces of Pisa and Massa-Carrara from 1997 to 2002,” G. Ital. Dermatol. Venereol., 140 (1), 33 –44 (2005). GIDVDZ 0392-0488 Google Scholar

8. 

A. A. Demers et al., “Trends of nonmelanoma skin cancer from 1960 through 2000 in a Canadian population,” J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 53 (2), 320 –328 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2005.03.043 JAADDB 0190-9622 Google Scholar

9. 

S. A. Holme, K. Malinovszky and D. L. Roberts, “Changing trends in nonmelanoma skin cancer in South Wales, 1988–98,” Br. J. Dermatol., 143 (6), 1224 –1229 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03892.x BJDEAZ 0007-0963 Google Scholar

10. 

M. P. Staples et al., “Non-melanoma skin cancer in Australia: the 2002 national survey and trends since 1985,” Med. J. Aust., 184 (1), 6 –10 (2006). MJAUAJ 0025-729X Google Scholar

11. 

Improving Outcomes for People with Skin Tumours including Melanoma (update): the Management of Low-risk Basal Cell Carcinomas in the Community, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London (2010). Google Scholar

12. 

J. Sng et al., “Skin cancer trends among Asians living in Singapore from 1968 to 2006,” J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 61 (3), 426 –432 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2009.03.031 JAADDB 0190-9622 Google Scholar

13. 

A. Hannuksela-Svahn, E. Pukkala and J. Karvonen, “Basal cell skin carcinoma and other nonmelanoma skin cancers in Finland from 1956 through 1995,” Arch. Dermatol., 135 (7), 781 –786 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.135.7.781 Google Scholar

14. 

R. B. Harris, K. Griffith and T. E. Moon, “Trends in the incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer in southeastern Arizona, 1985–1986,” J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 45 (4), 528 –536 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2001.114742 JAADDB 0190-9622 Google Scholar

15. 

D. Koh et al., “Basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma of the skin: analysis of the Singapore Cancer Registry data 1968-97,” Br. J. Dermatol., 148 (6), 1161 –1166 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05223.x BJDEAZ 0007-0963 Google Scholar

16. 

K. G. Lewis and M. A. Weinstock, “Nonmelanoma skin cancer mortality (1988–2000): the Rhode Island follow-back study,” Arch. Dermatol., 140 (7), 837 –842 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.140.7.837 Google Scholar

17. 

Q. Zhou, H.-G. Hu and L. Hou, “Discover, develop and validate-advance and prospect of tumor biomarkers,” Clin. Lab., 61 (11), 1589 –1599 (2015). Google Scholar

18. 

K. M. Tripathi et al., “Recent advances in engineered graphene and composites for detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and non-invasive diseases diagnosis,” Carbon, 110 97 –129 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.08.040 CRBNAH 0008-6223 Google Scholar

19. 

S. Campuzano, P. Yanez-Sedeno and J. M. Pingarron, “Electromechanical genosensing of circulating biomarkers,” Sensors, 17 (4), 866 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/s17040866 SNSRES 0746-9462 Google Scholar

20. 

D. P. Slaughter, H. W. Southwick and W. Smejkal, “Field cancerization in oral stratified squamous epithelium; clinical implications of multicentric origin,” Cancer, 6 (5), 963 –968 (1953). https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(195309)6:5<963::AID-CNCR2820060515>3.0.CO;2-Q CANCAR 0008-543X Google Scholar

21. 

A. K. Tiwari et al., “Neo-angiogenesis and the premalignant mircro-circulatory augmentation of the early colon carcinogenesis,” Cancer Lett., 306 (2), 205 –213 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2011.03.008 CALEDQ 0304-3835 Google Scholar

22. 

D. Hanahan and J. Folkman, “Patterns and emerging mechanisms of the angiogenic switch during tumerogenesis,” Cell, 86 (3), 353 –364 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80108-7 CELLB5 0092-8674 Google Scholar

23. 

F. Nachbar et al., “The ABCD rule of dermatoscopy. High prospective value in the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions,” J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 30 (4), 551 –559 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-9622(94)70061-3 JAADDB 0190-9622 Google Scholar

24. 

G. Argenziano et al., “Epiluminescence microscopy for the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions. Comparison of the ABCD rule of dermatoscopy and a new 7-point checklist based on pattern analysis,” Arch. Dermatol., 134 (12), 1563 –1570 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.134.12.1563 Google Scholar

25. 

D. Kapsokalyvas et al., “Spectral morphological analysis of skin lesions with a polarization multispectral dermoscope,” Opt. Express, 21 (4), 4826 –4840 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.004826 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

26. 

R. L. Konger et al., “Spatiotemporal assessments of dermal hyperemia enable accurate prediction of experimental cutaneous carcinogenesis as well as chemopreventive activity,” Cancer Res., 73 (1), 150 –159 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2670 Google Scholar

27. 

T. Pasinszki et al., “Carbon nano-material based biosensors for non-invasive detection of cancer and disease biomarkers for clinical diagnosis,” Sensors, 17 (8), E1919 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/s17081919 SNSRES 0746-9462 Google Scholar

28. 

T. N. Liebman et al., “Effect of dermoscopy education on the ability of medical students to detect skin cancer,” Arch. Dermatol., 148 (9), 1016 –1022 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1001/archdermatol.2012.509 Google Scholar

29. 

Derma Medical Systems, Handels und Entwicklungs GmbH, “MoleMax HD,” (2012) http://www.dermamedicalsystems.com/products_systems.htm#molemax_hd October 2018). Google Scholar

30. 

M. Moncrieff et al., “Spectrophotometric intracutaneous analysis: a new techniquefor imaging pigmented skin lesions,” Br. J. Dermatol., 146 (3), 448 –457 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.2002.04569.x BJDEAZ 0007-0963 Google Scholar

31. 

S. W. Menzies et al., “The performance of SolarScan: an automated dermoscopy image analysis instrument for the diagnosis of primary melanoma,” Arch. Dermatol., 141 (11), 1388 –1396 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.141.11.1388 Google Scholar

32. 

M. Elbaum et al., “Automatic differentiation of melanoma from melanocytic nevi with multispectral digital dermoscopy: a feasibility study,” J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 44 (2), 207 –218 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2001.110395 JAADDB 0190-9622 Google Scholar

33. 

A. N. Bashkatov, E. A. Genina, V. V. Tuchin, “Tissue optical properties,” Handbook of Biomedical Optics, 67 –100 CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Florida (2011). Google Scholar

34. 

S. Akter et al., “Evaluation of light scattering and absorption properties of in vivo rat liver using a single-reflectance fiber probe during preischemia, ischemia-reperfusion, and postmortem,” J. Biomed. Opt., 20 (7), 076010 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.20.7.076010 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

35. 

T. M. Bydlon et al., “Chromophore based analyses of steady-state diffuse reflectance spectroscopy: current status and perspectivesfor clinical adoption,” J. Biophotonics, 8 (1–2), 9 –24 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201300198 Google Scholar

36. 

V. Tuchin, Tissue Optics: Light scattering Methods and Instruments for Medical Diagnosis, 2nd edn.SPIE Press, Bellingham, Washington (2007). Google Scholar

37. 

X. Wang et al., “Approximation of Mie scattering parameters in near-infrared tomography of normal breast tissue in vivo,” J. Biomed. Opt., 10 (5), 051704 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2098607 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

38. 

J. R. Mourant et al., “Predictions and measurements of scattering and absorption over broad wavelength ranges in tissue phantoms,” Appl. Opt., 36 (4), 949 –957 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.36.000949 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

39. 

J. B. Dawson et al., “A theoretical and experimental study of light absorption and scattering by in vivo skin,” Phys. Med. Biol., 25 (4), 695 –709 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/25/4/008 PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar

40. 

I. Nishidate et al., “Noninvasive spectral imaging of skin chromophores based on multiple regression analysis aided by Monte Carlo simulation,” Opt. Lett., 36 (16), 3239 –3241 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.36.003239 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

41. 

L. V. Wang and H. Wu, Biomedical Optics; Principles and Imaging, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey (2007). Google Scholar

42. 

M. S. Patterson, B. Chance and B. C. Wilson, “Time resolved reflectance and transmittance for the noninvasive measurement of tissue optical properties,” Appl. Opt., 28 (12), 2331 –2336 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.28.002331 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

43. 

J. B. Fishkin et al., “Frequency-domain photon migration measurements of normal and malignant tissue optical properties in a human subject,” Appl. Opt., 36 (1), 10 –20 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.36.000010 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

44. 

G. Yoon, D. N. G. Roy and R. C. Straight, “Coherent backscattering in biological media: measurement and estimation of optical properties,” Appl. Opt., 32 (4), 580 –585 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.32.000580 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

45. 

S. A. Prahl and I. A. Vitkin, “Determination of optical properties of turbid media using pulsed photothermal radiometry,” Phys. Med. Biol., 37 (6), 1203 –1217 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/37/6/001 PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar

46. 

T. J. Farrell, M. S. Patterson and B. Wilson, “A diffusion theory model of spatially resolved, steady-state diffuse reflectance for the noninvasive determination of tissue optical properties in vivo,” Med. Phys., 19 (4), 879 –888 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.596777 MPHYA6 0094-2405 Google Scholar

47. 

L. Wang and S. L. Jacques, “Use of a laser beam with an oblique angle on incidence to measure the reduced scattering coefficient of a turbid medium,” Appl. Opt., 34 (13), 2362 –2366 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.002362 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

48. 

A. Kienle et al., “Spatially resolved absolute diffuse reflectance measurements for noninvasive determination of the optical scattering and absorption coefficients of biological tissue,” Appl. Opt., 35 (13), 2304 –2314 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.35.002304 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

49. 

S.-P. Lin et al., “Measurement of tissue optical properties by the use of oblique-incidence optical fiber reflectometry,” Appl. Opt., 36 (1), 136 –143 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.36.000136 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

50. 

S. H. Tseng et al., “Noninvasive evaluation of collagen and hemoglobin contents and scattering property of in vivo keloid scars and normal skin using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy: pilot study,” J. Biomed. Opt., 17 (7), 077005 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.17.7.077005 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

51. 

D. Fabila et al., “In vivo assessment of liver fibrosis using diffuse reflectance and fluorescence spectroscopy: a proof of concept,” Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther., 9 (4), 376 –382 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2012.05.002 Google Scholar

52. 

B. W. Murphy et al., “Toward the discrimination of early melanoma from common and dysplastic nevus using fiber optic diffuse reflectance spectroscopy,” J. Biomed. Opt., 10 (6), 064020 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2135799 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

53. 

V. P. Wallace et al., “Spectrophotometric assessment of pigmented skin lesions: methods and feature selection for evaluation of diagnostic performance,” Phys. Med. Biol., 45 (3), 735 –751 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/45/3/312 PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar

54. 

T. Yokokawa and I. Nishidate, “Evaluation of light scattering properties and chromophore concentrations in skin tissue based on diffuse reflectance signals at isosbestic wavelengths of hemoglobin,” Opt. Rev., 23 (2), 332 –339 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10043-015-0177-3 1340-6000 Google Scholar

55. 

I. Nishidate, Y. Aizu and H. Mishina, “Estimation of melanin and hemoglobin in skin tissue using multiple regression analysis aided by Monte Carlo simulation,” J. Biomed. Opt., 9 (4), 700 –710 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1756918 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

56. 

R. Marchesini et al., “In vivo spectrophotometric evaluation of neoplastic and nonneoplastic skin pigmented lesions—I reflectance measurements,” Photochem. Photobiol., 53 (1), 77 –84 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1991.tb08470.x PHCBAP 0031-8655 Google Scholar

57. 

B. N. Kanakaraj and U. S. Narayanan, “Model-based quantitative optical biopsy in multilayer in vitro soft tissue models for whole field assessment of nonmelanoma skin cancer,” J. Med. Imaging, 5 (1), 014506 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.5.1.014506 JMEIET 0920-5497 Google Scholar

58. 

A. Nkengne et al., “‘SpectraCam®: a new polarized hyperspectral imaging system for repeatable and reproducible in vivo skin quantification of melanin, total hemoglobin, and oxygen saturation,” Skin Res. Technol., 24 (1), 99 –107 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12396 Google Scholar

59. 

S. F. Bish et al., “Handheld diffuse reflectance spectral imaging (DRSi) for in-vivo characterization of skin,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 5 (2), 573 –586 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.5.000573 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

60. 

J. R. Mourant et al., “Mechanisms of light scattering from biological cells relevant to noninvasive optical-tissue diagnostics,” Appl. Opt., 37 (16), 3586 –3593 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.37.003586 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

61. 

D. Abookasis et al., “Imaging cortical absorption, scattering, and hemodynamic response during ischemic stroke using spatially modulated near-infrared illumination,” J. Biomed. Opt., 14 (2), 024033 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3116709 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

62. 

L.-H. Wang, S. L. Jacques and L.-Q. Zheng, “MCML-Monte Carlo modeling of photon transport in multi-layered tissues,” Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., 47 (2), 131 –146 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2607(95)01640-F CMPBEK 0169-2607 Google Scholar

63. 

S. L. Jacques, “Origins of tissue optical properties in the UVA, Visible, and NIR regions,” OSA TOPS on Advances in Optical Imaging and photon Migration, 2 364 –369 Optical Society of America, Washington DC (1996). Google Scholar

64. 

P. A. Khavari, “Modelling cancer in human skin tissue,” Nature Rev. Cancer, 6 (4), 270 –280 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1838 NRCAC4 1474-175X Google Scholar

65. 

D. E. Brash, “Sunlight and the onset of skin cancer,” Trends Genet., 13 (10), 410 –414 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9525(97)01246-8 Google Scholar

66. 

F. Benavides et al., “The hairless mouse in skin research,” J. Dermatol. Sci., 53 (1), 10 –18 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdermsci.2008.08.012 JDSCEI 0923-1811 Google Scholar

67. 

G. K. Menon, “New insights into skin structures: scratching the surface,” Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 54 S3 –S17 (2002). Google Scholar

68. 

L. Pedranzini, A. Leitch and J. Bromberg, “Stat3 is required for the development of skin cancer,” J. Clin. Invest., 114 (5), 619 –622 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI22800 JCINAO 0021-9738 Google Scholar

69. 

J. DiGiovanni, “Multistage carcinogenesis in mouse skin,” Pharmacol. Ther., 54 (1), 63 –128 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-7258(92)90051-Z Google Scholar

70. 

S. Nagini, “Of humans and hamsters: the hamster buccal pouch carcinogenesis model as a paradigm for oral oncogenesis and chemoprevention,” Anticancer Agents Med. Chem., 9 (8), 843 –852 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2174/187152009789124619 Google Scholar

71. 

H. J. Thompson and M. Singh, “Rat models of premalignant breast disease,” J. Mammary Gland. Biol. Neoplasia, 5 (4), 409 –420 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009582012493 Google Scholar

72. 

G. Thomas et al., “Studying skin tumourigenesis and progression in immunocompetent hairless SKH1-hr mice using chronic 7, 12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene topical applications to develop a useful experimental skin cancer model,” Lab. Animals, 51 (1), 24 –35 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677216637305 LBANAX 0023-6772 Google Scholar

73. 

B. Shashni et al., “Size-based differentiation of cancer and normal cells by a particle size analyzer assisted by a cell-recognition PC software,” Biol. Pharm. Bull., 41 (4), 487 –503 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.b17-00776 BPBLEO 0918-6158 Google Scholar

74. 

F. Farace et al., “A direct comparison of CellSearch and ISET for circulating tumour-cell detection in patients with metastatic carcinomas,” Br. J. Cancer, 105 (6), 847 –853 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.294 BJCAAI 0007-0920 Google Scholar

75. 

G. M. Cooper, The Cell: A Molecular Approach, 2nd edn.Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts (2000). Google Scholar

76. 

S. Park et al., “Morphological differences between circulating tumor cells from prostate cancer patients and cultured prostate cancer cells,” PLoS One, 9 (1), e85264 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085264 POLNCL 1932-6203 Google Scholar

77. 

R. Garg, A. G. Ramchandani and G. B. Maru, “Curcumin decreases 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-induced protein kinase C translocation to modulate downstream targets in mouse skin,” Carcinogenesis, 29 (6), 1249 –1257 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgn114 CRNGDP 1460-2180 Google Scholar

78. 

A. Mustari et al., “Agarose-based tissue mimicking optical phantoms for diffuse reflectance spectroscopy,” J. Vis. Exp., (138), e57578 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3791/57578 Google Scholar

79. 

J. Malvehy et al., Handbook of Dermoscopy, Taylor and Francis, London (2006). Google Scholar

80. 

A. A. Marghoob, R. P. Braun and A. W. Kopf, Atlas of Dermoscopy, Taylor and Francis, London (2005). Google Scholar

81. 

G. Argenziano et al., “Vascular structures in skin tumors: a dermoscopy study,” Arch. Dermatol., 140 (12), 1485 –1489 (2004). Google Scholar

82. 

G. Zonios et al., “Melanin absorption spectroscopy: new method for noninvasive skin investigation and melanoma detection,” J. Biomed. Opt., 13 (1), 014017 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2844710 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

Biography

Md. Abdul Wares received his DVM and MS degrees in anatomy from Bangladesh Agricultural University in 2010 and 2012, respectively. He is a PhD student at Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology. His research interest is biomedical optics for disease diagnosis of human and animal being.

Naoki Tobita is an MS student in the Graduate School of Bio-Applications and Systems Engineering, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Japan.

Satoko Kawauchi completed her MS degree at Keio University and received her PhD in medicine from Kyorin University, Japan. She is a lecturer in the Division of Bio-Information and Therapeutic Systems, National Defense Medical College Research Institute, Japan. Her research interests encompass functional imaging of brain, photodynamic therapy, and diagnosing/imaging tissue viability using light scattering.

Shunichi Sato received his MS and PhD degrees from Keio University, Japan. He is a professor in the Division of Bio-Information and Therapeutic Systems, National Defense Medical College Research Institute, Japan. His research interests include photomechanical waves and their application to gene/drag delivery systems, photoacoustic imaging, photodynamic therapy, and diagnosing/imaging brain tissue viability.

Izumi Nishidate received his MS and PhD degrees from Muroran Institute of Technology, Japan. He is an associate professor in the Graduate School of Bio-Applications and Systems Engineering, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology. His research interests include diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, light transport in biological tissues, multispectral imaging, and functional imaging of skin and brain tissues.

CC BY: © The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Md. Abdul Wares, Naoki Tobita, Satoko Kawauchi, Shunichi Sato, and Izumi Nishidate "Noninvasive evaluation of hemodynamics and light scattering property during two-stage mouse cutaneous carcinogenesis based on multispectral diffuse reflectance images at isosbestic wavelengths of hemoglobin," Journal of Biomedical Optics 24(3), 031020 (11 January 2019). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.24.3.031020
Received: 2 July 2018; Accepted: 11 December 2018; Published: 11 January 2019
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 2 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
KEYWORDS
Skin

Scattering

Light scattering

Tissues

Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy

Skin cancer

Tumors

Back to Top