Translator Disclaimer
26 September 2020 Characterization of retinal biomechanical properties using Brillouin microscopy
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Significance: The retina is critical for vision, and several diseases may alter its biomechanical properties. However, assessing the biomechanical properties of the retina nondestructively is a challenge due to its fragile nature and location within the eye globe. Advancements in Brillouin spectroscopy have provided the means for nondestructive investigations of retina biomechanical properties.

Aim: We assessed the biomechanical properties of mouse retinas using Brillouin microscopy noninvasively and showed the potential of Brillouin microscopy to differentiate the type and layers of retinas based on stiffness.

Approach: We used Brillouin microscopy to quantify stiffness of fresh and paraformaldehyde (PFA)-fixed retinas. As further proof-of-concept, we demonstrated a change in the stiffness of a retina with N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-induced damage, compared to an undamaged sample.

Results: We found that the retina layers with higher cell body density had higher Brillouin modulus compared to less cell-dense layers. We have also demonstrated that PFA-fixed retina samples were stiffer compared with fresh samples. Further, NMDA-induced neurotoxicity leads to retinal ganglion cell (RGC) death and reactive gliosis, increasing the stiffness of the RGC layer.

Conclusion: Brillouin microscopy can be used to characterize the stiffness distribution of the layers of the retina and can be used to differentiate tissue at different conditions based on biomechanical properties.

1.

Introduction

The neural retina is the thin, light-sensitive innermost layer of the eye and is essential for image formation. The retina is a part of the central nervous system and is composed of a single glial population as well as six neuronal cell types. Among these cells, retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) convey visual information, which is transmitted through the optic nerve to the visual cortex. Retinal diseases, such as glaucoma and retinal ischemia, are significant causes of blindness worldwide. In these conditions, RGCs die and vision is permanently lost since they cannot be replaced.1 Thus, to inform new and effective treatments for such diseases, there is a tremendous need to better understand the early pathophysiology leading to RGC cell death. Additionally, the development of noninvasive, early diagnostics would be tremendously beneficial for guiding clinical intervention before permanent RGC loss.

The retina constantly experiences static and dynamic forces2 because it is in contact with the vitreous humor, eye movements exert forces leading to stresses on the retina,3 and constant pumping of fluid from the retinal pigment epithelium to the choroid exerts negative pressure on the outer wall of the retina.4 This prolonged stress can damage the vasculature and neurons,5 which in turn can lead to blindness.6 Specifically, Müller glial cells are mechanosensitive7 and may be especially susceptible to mechanical damage,8 which may further exacerbate retinal damage via inflammatory signal cascades and loss of normal retinal homeostasis.9

Cell replacement therapies for retinal diseases have been developed and are underway in various stages of clinical trials.10 It is well known that the biomechanical properties of the surrounding environment have a profound effect on cellular physiology,11 including stem cell growth and the integration of new retinal neurons.12,13 Therefore, biomechanical characterization of the retina could improve disease detection and provide insight into disease etiology and guide new therapeutic interventions.

Compared with the choroid and sclera, the retina is softer and much more fragile, so assessing its biomechanical properties is a challenge. Early studies on retinal elasticity utilized conventional mechanical testing,14 but mechanical testing is generally destructive, which often results in tearing of the retina. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) has been utilized to characterize the biomechanical properties of the retina.15 For example, AFM showed that among other factors, cellular density is a source of mechanical heterogeneity in the retina16 and that the inner limiting membrane stiffness increases during embryonic development in chicks and mice.17 Although AFM is capable of nanoscale characterization of tissue stiffness, it requires contact and has lengthy imaging times. Thus, various noninvasive techniques for characterizing retinal biomechanical properties have been proposed. Traditional elastography techniques, such as magnetic resonance elastography18 and ultrasound elastography,19 generally lack the resolution for precise characterization of the retina, particularly the layers of the retina. Optical coherence elastography (OCE)20 has shown promise for characterizing the biomechanical properties of the retinal layers, but it is semiquantitative and mechanical excitation safety concerns need to be addressed.21

Brillouin microscopy is a noninvasive, high-resolution, optical elastography technique that has shown promising applications in determining tissue elasticity.22 Brillouin microscopy has the benefits of requiring no external excitation and, thus, is an all-optical elastography technique that is capable of subcellular resolution23 at safe energy levels for cells and tissues.24

This study demonstrates the layer-by-layer biomechanical characterization of retinal tissue stiffness. Brillouin microscopy was used to measure the change in the Brillouin modulus between fresh and paraformaldehyde (PFA)-fixed retinal explants. We also performed biomechanical characterization of a mouse retina with N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-induced damage. By mimicking the action of the neurotransmitter glutamate and promoting overactivation of the NMDA receptor, intraocular injection of NMDA results in excitotoxicity leading to RGC death.25 In response to this damage, Müller cells and astrocytes within the retina activate a protective event called reactive gliosis, where they attempt to safeguard the retinal structure and immune privilege. As part of this process, these cells upregulate the production of intermediate filament proteins, such as glial fibrillary acidic protein and vimentin, and become rigid, forming a glial scar.26 Here, we demonstrate that Brillouin microscopy can detect local changes in retinal stiffness that coincide with RGC loss and reactive gliosis.

2.

Materials and Methods

1.1.

Sample Preparation

All procedures were approved by the Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Adult C57/BL6J mice were euthanized by CO2 inhalation and decapitation. Eyeballs were enucleated and kept in 0.1 M phosphate buffered saline (PBS) on ice. Retinas were dissected out and separated into experimental groups (N=2 fixed and N=3 fresh). For fixation, the samples were immersed in 4% PFA at 4°C for 1 h and then washed with 1× PBS. Once the samples were fixed, they were transferred to a 4°C 1× PBS bath. The retinas were mounted flat on a microscope slide, as shown in Fig. 1(a). A well was created on the slide with double-sided tape to maintain sample hydration using 0.1 M PBS at room temperature throughout the experiment. The experiments were performed within 6 h postdissection. Before Brillouin imaging, the thickness of the retina was first determined by an OCT system.

Fig. 1

(a) Retinal flat-mount preparation and imaging paradigm. (b) Schematic of the Brillouin microscopy system. PBS, polarization beam splitter; QWP, quarter-wave plate; and spectrometer, two-stage VIPA spectrometer.

JBO_25_9_090502_f001.png

Four-week-old C57/BL6J mice were injected intravitreally with 2 μL of 100 mM NMDA. The mouse was euthanized 48 h postinjection, and the eye-globes were enucleated. Then, the retinas were dissected and mounted fresh on a glass slide as described earlier.

2.2.

Brillouin Microscopy

Imaging was performed with a home-built Brillouin microscopy system based on a two-stage virtually imaged phased array (VIPA) spectrometer.27 The Brillouin system utilized a single-mode 660-nm laser (Torus, Laser Quantum Inc., Fremont, CA, USA) with incident power on the sample of 11  mW. The camera exposure time was 0.1 or 0.2 s during measurements depending on the signal quality. The Brillouin microscope utilized a 20× microscopic objective with a 0.42 numerical aperture to focus the laser beam onto the sample. The lateral resolution was 1.8  μm and the axial resolution, as defined by Rayleigh range, was 10  μm as measured using a beam viewer (LaserCam-HR II, Coherent Inc., CA, USA). Standard materials (water, acetone, and methanol) were used for system calibration before every measurement. The backscattered light from the sample was sent into the VIPA-based spectrometer and detected with an electron-multiplying charged coupled device camera (iXon Andor, Belfast, UK). The sample was scanned in two dimensions using a motorized 3D stage. The Brillouin modulus was mapped along the axial direction of the retinas over 300  μm with 2  μm steps and laterally over 100  μm also with 2  μm steps. The Brillouin frequency shift observed at each location within the mouse retina was converted to longitudinal elastic modulus, called Brillouin modulus, M, by28

Eq. (1)

M=ρλ2ω24η2sin2(θ2),
where ρ is the density of the sample (ρ=1.033  g/cm3 for retina), η is the refractive index (η=1.33),29 λ=660  nm is the wavelength of the laser source, ω is the detected Brillouin frequency shift, and θ=180  deg is the light scattering angle. Although the retina does have heterogeneous refractive indices and densities, we assumed a uniform refractive index and density for simplification. Because the refractive index and density are linearly related in tissues, the small variations in each of these do not significantly affect the Brillouin modulus estimation even in the presence of large individual variations as shown in ocular tissues30 and by varying the osmotic pressure of cells.23 Segmentation of retinal layers was performed manually.

3.

Results

Figures 2(a) and 2(b) show a section of a typical Brillouin frequency map for a fresh mouse retina alongside a typical histological image of a mouse retina with the different layers: nerve fiber layer (NFL), RGC, inner plexiform layer (IPL), inner nuclear layer (INL), outer plexiform layer (OPL), outer nuclear layer (ONL), outer limiting membrane, photoreceptor inner segment, and photoreceptor outer segment. OCT imaging showed that the thickness of the retina was 250 to 300  μm. The longitudinal Brillouin moduli of NFL/RGC (n=1950, where n is the number of points in Brillouin scan), IPL (n=1800), INL (n=1900), OPL (n=1650), and ONL (n=2100) were 2.51±0.02  GPa, 2.49±0.01  GPa, 2.53±0.02  GPa, 2.48±0.02  GPa, and 2.53±0.02  GPa, respectively, for the fresh retina sample shown in Fig. 2(a). Next, we compared the longitudinal Brillouin modulus of fresh (N=3) and fixed (N=2) murine retina samples. The Brillouin modulus was first averaged pointwise for each sample and then averaged for each sample type. The results in Fig. 2(c) show that the fixed mouse retinas were significantly stiffer compared with the fresh samples. The average Brillouin modulus over the entire depth of all of the fixed samples was 2.73±0.09  GPa, and for the fresh samples, it was was 2.48±0.06  GPa. A t-test showed that the Brillouin modulus was significantly different (p<0.0001).

Fig. 2

(a) Brillouin frequency-shift map of the mouse retina, (b) histology of mouse retina (for reference only), (c) average Brillouin modulus of fresh (n=3) and fixed (n=2) mouse retina samples (averaged pointwise per sample and then sample-wise per type of sample), and (d) Brillouin modulus depth profile of an NMDA-induced damaged retina and its contralateral control. Arrow indicates the RGC layer.

JBO_25_9_090502_f002.png

To demonstrate a proof-of-concept for detecting retinal damage with Brillouin microscopy, we characterized the biomechanical properties of NMDA-induced damage to the mouse retina. The dissected retinas were kept on a glass slide where the top layer was the NFL/RGC, and the photoreceptor side was at the bottom. Figure 2(d) shows that the NMDA-damaged retina had a very high Brillouin modulus at the RGC layer as compared with the contralateral control retina sample. A greater Brillouin modulus can be the characteristics of dead cells as they are stiffer than live cells,31 so the prominent spike in the RGC layer may indicate the loss of cells in this layer by NMDA-induced toxicity. The stiffness change may also reflect reactive astrocytes within the NFL.32

4.

Discussion

In this work, we demonstrated all-optical noninvasive elastography of fresh murine retinal tissue using Brillouin microscopy. The retina is a layered heterogeneous tissue, and each layer has different characteristic biomechanical properties, which are demonstrated by our results. The stiffness of the layers is highly dependent on cell body density.15,16 For example, the nuclear layers have the highest cell body density, so they were stiffer compared with the plexiform layers, which are primarily composed of axons and dendrites. Previous work has shown that the nucleus has a greater Brillouin modulus compared with the other parts of the cell, so it can be inferred that more nuclei would increase the overall stiffness of the corresponding layer.23

In the second part of this work, we compared the biomechanical properties of PFA-fixed and fresh mouse retinas. PFA is a cross-linking fixative that covalently bonds proteins within tissue, thereby conferring rigidity.33 As expected, the PFA-fixed samples showed a higher overall Brillouin modulus compared with the fresh samples.34 However, changes in the hydration state can be a confounding variable in the Brillouin modulus.35,36 Although the VIPA-based spectrometer is sensitive enough to remove the effects of hydration,37 validation by another technique, such as AFM, will be the next step of our work.

Finally, we performed a pilot study on the effects of NMDA-induced retinal damage on the stiffness of the retina in a mouse model. The tissue was assessed 48-h post-NMDA injection in a young mouse. The results showed a very drastic increase in the Brillouin modulus of the RGC layer and/or NFL in the damaged retina as compared with its contralateral control. NMDA can induce damage to retinal blood vessels,38 but histology, immunostaining, electron microscopy, and OCT have shown that NMDA also results in RGC death and a consequential increase in reactive gliosis.25,39 Our results showed an increase in the Brillouin modulus in only the RGC layer, whereas retinal blood vessels are present in many layers, indicating that the change in stiffness that we detected was most likely NMDA-induced RGC death and possibly the gliotic response. We also observed an increase in the INL Brillouin modulus [130  μm in Fig. 2(d)]. While the majority of research has been focused on NMDA-induced RGC death, our results show that the INL may also be damaged and will be an avenue of our future research.

OCT is used routinely for live imaging of retinal damage, but biomechanical assessments of retinal tissue are generally qualitative only, rely heavily on other factors such as geometry,21 and have mechanical resolutions a few orders of magnitude greater than the optical resolution. Other high-resolution imaging modalities, such as histology, immunostaining, and electron microscopy, are not suitable for live imaging or the biomechanical assessment of the retina. Although a relatively high power was used for Brillouin imaging, confocal imaging analysis showed no difference in Brillouin imaged and unimaged retinas, and previous research has shown no damage to cells until a much higher incident power.40

One major limitation of this work is that Brillouin microscopy can only provide measurements of the tissue bulk modulus instead of the quantitative measurement of elasticity. We have previously demonstrated quantitative measurements of crystalline lens elasticity by combining Brillouin microscopy with OCE.41 Performing such measurements on the retina is the next step of our work for truly quantitative measurements of retinal elasticity as well as co-registered structural and biomechanical maps of the retina.

5.

Conclusion

We noninvasively characterized retinal tissue stiffness using Brillouin microscopy on freshly harvested mouse retinas. The results show that Brillouin microscopy can map the mechanical properties of the different retinal layers. The stiffness of the layers correlated with the cellular density, and fixing the retinas in PFA also increased the stiffness. Furthermore, we demonstrated an increase in the stiffness of the RGC and/or NFL layer due to NMDA-induced damage in a mouse model. This work was a preliminary study to demonstrate noninvasive biomechanical characterization of retinal tissue using Brillouin microscopy. Our future work is focused on in vivo studies of the long-term effects of NMDA-induced retinal damage in a mouse model and combining Brillouin microscopy with OCT for noninvasive and all-optical co-registered structural and biomechanical maps of the retina.

Disclosures

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest related to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health under Grant Nos. R01EY022362 (K.L.) and R01EY030448 (R.P.). The authors would like to acknowledge Jitao Zhang, Alexander Schill, Achuth Nair, and Behzad Khajavi for the technical help.

References

1. 

M. Almasieh et al., “The molecular basis of retinal ganglion cell death in glaucoma,” Prog. Retinal Eye Res., 31 (2), 152 –181 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2011.11.002 PRTRES 1350-9462 Google Scholar

2. 

C. R. Ethier, M. Johnson and J. Ruberti, “Ocular biomechanics and biotransport,” Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 6 249 –273 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bioeng.6.040803.140055 ARBEF7 1523-9829 Google Scholar

3. 

A. V. Levin, “Ophthalmology of shaken baby syndrome,” Neurosurg. Clin. North Am., 13 (2), 201 –211 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1042-3680(02)00004-9 Google Scholar

4. 

V. L. Bonilha et al., “The retinal pigment epithelium apical microvilli and retinal function,” Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 572 519 –524 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-32442-9_72 AEMBAP 0065-2598 Google Scholar

5. 

T. W. Mittag et al., “Retinal damage after 3 to 4 months of elevated intraocular pressure in a rat glaucoma model,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 41 (11), 3451 –3459 (2000). IOVSDA 0146-0404 Google Scholar

6. 

M. Berry et al., “Regeneration of axons in the visual system,” Restor. Neurol. Neurosci., 26 (2–3), 147 –174 (2008). Google Scholar

7. 

B. Fortune, “Pulling and tugging on the retina: mechanical impact of glaucoma beyond the optic nerve head,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 60 (1), 26 –35 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.18-25837 IOVSDA 0146-0404 Google Scholar

8. 

Y. B. Lu et al., “Biomechanical properties of retinal glial cells: comparative and developmental data,” Exp. Eye Res., 113 60 –65 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2013.05.012 EXERA6 0014-4835 Google Scholar

9. 

R. Seitz, A. Ohlmann and E. R. Tamm, “The role of Muller glia and microglia in glaucoma,” Cell Tissue Res., 353 (2), 339 –345 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-013-1666-y Google Scholar

10. 

E. M. Rueda et al., “The hippo pathway blocks mammalian retinal Muller glial cell reprogramming,” Cell Rep., 27 (6), 1637 –1649.e6 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.04.047 Google Scholar

11. 

J. L. Young, A. W. Holle and J. P. Spatz, “Nanoscale and mechanical properties of the physiological cell-ECM microenvironment,” Exp. Cell Res., 343 (1), 3 –6 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.10.037 ECREAL 0014-4827 Google Scholar

12. 

A. J. Engler et al., “Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification,” Cell, 126 (4), 677 –689 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044 CELLB5 0092-8674 Google Scholar

13. 

W. J. Hadden et al., “Stem cell migration and mechanotransduction on linear stiffness gradient hydrogels,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 114 (22), 5647 –5652 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618239114 Google Scholar

14. 

G. Wollensak and E. Spoerl, “Biomechanical characteristics of retina,” Retina, 24 (6), 967 –970 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1097/00006982-200412000-00021 RETIDX 0275-004X Google Scholar

15. 

J. A. Last et al., “The applications of atomic force microscopy to vision science,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 51 (12), 6083 –6094 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.10-5470 IOVSDA 0146-0404 Google Scholar

16. 

I. P. Weber et al., “The role of cell body density in ruminant retina mechanics assessed by atomic force and Brillouin microscopy,” Phys. Biol., 14 (6), 065006 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1478-3975/aa6d18 1478-3975 Google Scholar

17. 

J. Candiello et al., “Biomechanical properties of native basement membranes,” FEBS J., 274 (11), 2897 –2908 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.05823.x 1742-464X Google Scholar

18. 

R. Muthupillai et al., “Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves,” Science, 269 (5232), 1854 –1857 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7569924 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar

19. 

J. Ophir et al., “Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues,” Ultrason. Imaging, 13 (2), 111 –134 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1177/016173469101300201 ULIMD4 0161-7346 Google Scholar

20. 

K. V. Larin and D. D. Sampson, “Optical coherence elastography—OCT at work in tissue biomechanics [Invited],” Biomed. Opt. Express, 8 (2), 1172 –1202 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.8.001172 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

21. 

Y. Qu et al., “Quantified elasticity mapping of retinal layers using synchronized acoustic radiation force optical coherence elastography,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 9 (9), 4054 –4063 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.9.004054 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

22. 

G. Scarcelli and S. H. Yun, “Confocal Brillouin microscopy for three-dimensional mechanical imaging,” Nat. Photonics, 2 (1), 39 –43 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2007.250 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

23. 

G. Scarcelli et al., “Noncontact three-dimensional mapping of intracellular hydromechanical properties by Brillouin microscopy,” Nat. Methods, 12 (12), 1132 –1134 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3616 1548-7091 Google Scholar

24. 

G. Scarcelli et al., “In vivo biomechanical mapping of normal and keratoconus corneas,” JAMA Ophthalmol., 133 (4), 480 –482 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.5641 Google Scholar

25. 

T. T. Lam et al., “N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-induced apoptosis in rat retina,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 40 (10), 2391 –2397 (1999). IOVSDA 0146-0404 Google Scholar

26. 

Y. B. Lu et al., “Reactive glial cells: increased stiffness correlates with increased intermediate filament expression,” FASEB J., 25 (2), 624 –631 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.10-163790 FAJOEC 0892-6638 Google Scholar

27. 

G. Scarcelli and S. H. Yun, “Multistage VIPA etalons for high-extinction parallel Brillouin spectroscopy,” Opt. Express, 19 (11), 10913 –10922 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.010913 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

28. 

J. G. Dil, “Brillouin scattering in condensed matter,” Rep Prog Phys., 45 (3), 285 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/45/3/002 Google Scholar

29. 

G. Bawa et al., “Variational analysis of the mouse and rat eye optical parameters,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 4 (11), 2585 –2595 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.4.002585 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

30. 

G. Scarcelli, R. Pineda and S. H. Yun, “Brillouin optical microscopy for corneal biomechanics,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 53 (1), 185 –190 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-8281 IOVSDA 0146-0404 Google Scholar

31. 

M. Islam et al., “Microfluidic sorting of cells by viability based on differences in cell stiffness,” Sci. Rep., 7 (1), 1997 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01807-z SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

32. 

D. Sun et al., “The morphology and spatial arrangement of astrocytes in the optic nerve head of the mouse,” J. Comp. Neurol., 516 (1), 1 –19 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.22058 JCNEAM 0021-9967 Google Scholar

33. 

S. O. Kim et al., “Mechanical properties of paraformaldehyde-treated individual cells investigated by atomic force microscopy and scanning ion conductance microscopy,” Nano Converg., 4 (1), 5 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40580-017-0099-9 Google Scholar

34. 

F. Pérez-Cota et al., “High resolution 3D imaging of living cells with sub-optical wavelength phonons,” Sci. Rep., 6 (1), 1 –11 (2016). SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

35. 

P. Shao et al., “Effects of corneal hydration on Brillouin microscopy in vivo,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 59 (7), 3020 –3027 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.18-24228 IOVSDA 0146-0404 Google Scholar

36. 

P. J. Wu et al., “Water content, not stiffness, dominates Brillouin spectroscopy measurements in hydrated materials,” Nat. Methods, 15 (8), 561 –562 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-018-0076-1 1548-7091 Google Scholar

37. 

G. Scarcelli and S. H. Yun, “Reply to ‘Water content, not stiffness, dominates Brillouin spectroscopy measurements in hydrated materials’,” Nat. Methods, 15 (8), 562 –563 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-018-0075-2 1548-7091 Google Scholar

38. 

K. Ueda et al., “Retinal blood vessels are damaged in a rat model of NMDA-induced retinal degeneration,” Neurosci. Lett., 485 (1), 55 –59 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2010.08.061 NELED5 0304-3940 Google Scholar

39. 

J. Kinoshita et al., “Outer retinal involvement in N-methyl-D-aspartate-induced inner retinal injury in rabbits assessed by optical coherence tomography,” J. Toxicol. Sci., 45 (5), 261 –269 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.45.261 Google Scholar

40. 

M. Nikolić and G. Scarcelli, “Long-term Brillouin imaging of live cells with reduced absorption-mediated damage at 660 nm wavelength,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 10 (4), 1567 –1580 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.10.001567 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

41. 

Y. S. Ambekar et al., “Multimodal quantitative optical elastography of the crystalline lens with optical coherence elastography and Brillouin microscopy,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 11 (4), 2041 –2051 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.387361 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar
© The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Yogeshwari S. Ambekar, Manmohan Singh, Giuliano Scarcelli, Elda M. Rueda, Benjamin M. Hall, Ross A. Poché, and Kirill V. Larin "Characterization of retinal biomechanical properties using Brillouin microscopy," Journal of Biomedical Optics 25(9), 090502 (26 September 2020). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.25.9.090502
Received: 2 July 2020; Accepted: 4 September 2020; Published: 26 September 2020
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back to Top