Significance: An increasing interest in the area of biological effects at exposure of tissues and cells to the terahertz (THz) radiation is driven by a rapid progress in THz biophotonics, observed during the past decades. Despite the attractiveness of THz technology for medical diagnosis and therapy, there is still quite limited knowledge about safe limits of THz exposure. Different modes of THz exposure of tissues and cells, including continuous-wave versus pulsed radiation, various powers, and number and duration of exposure cycles, ought to be systematically studied.
Aim: We provide an overview of recent research results in the area of biological effects at exposure of tissues and cells to THz waves.
Approach: We start with a brief overview of general features of the THz-wave–tissue interactions, as well as modern THz emitters, with an emphasis on those that are reliable for studying the biological effects of THz waves. Then, we consider three levels of biological system organization, at which the exposure effects are considered: (i) solutions of biological molecules; (ii) cultures of cells, individual cells, and cell structures; and (iii) entire organs or organisms; special attention is devoted to the cellular level. We distinguish thermal and nonthermal mechanisms of THz-wave–cell interactions and discuss a problem of adequate estimation of the THz biological effects’ specificity. The problem of experimental data reproducibility, caused by rareness of the THz experimental setups and an absence of unitary protocols, is also considered.
Results: The summarized data demonstrate the current stage of the research activity and knowledge about the THz exposure on living objects.
Conclusions: This review helps the biomedical optics community to summarize up-to-date knowledge in the area of cell exposure to THz radiation, and paves the ways for the development of THz safety standards and THz therapeutic applications.
An increasing interest in biomedical applications of terahertz (THz) radiation, featuring the frequencies of 0.1 to 3.0 THz, the free-space wavelengths of to , or the quantum energies of to 10 meV (see Fig. 1), has been observed during the past few decades,1–5 driven by rapid progress in THz technology.6,7 Numerous research papers demonstrate the potential of THz technology in label-free early noninvasive, least-invasive, and intraoperative diagnosis of malignant and benign neoplasms with different nosologies and localizations,3,4,8–18 sensing of glycated tissues and blood in the context of diabetes diagnosis,1,19–21 determining the degree of traumatic injuries,22–25 hydration levels,26–29 and viability30 of tissues. Along with the diagnostic applications, THz technology holds strong potential in therapeutics,31,32 for example, in nonthermal regulation in expression of genes associated with cancer and inflammatory diseases.33 Nevertheless, THz therapy is still at the initial stage of its development.
Despite the attractiveness of THz technology for medical diagnostics and therapy, currently, the accumulated data on the safe limits of its effects on tissues and its harmlessness to the human body are rather limited.34–37 The existing recommendations of THz-radiation safety limits were developed relying on extrapolation of the data from the neighboring millimeter-wave (MMW) and infrared (IR) ranges.38–42 Therefore, THz-wave biological effects require thorough investigation for defining the safety limits in THz biomedical diagnostics and determining the optimal dose for THz therapeutics. In Fig. 2, an annually increasing number of research items according to Scopus and Web of Science is shown, illustrating a growing interest in the considered issues. To objectively uncover benefits and weaknesses of THz medical diagnosis and therapy and to define safe limits of tissue exposure to THz waves, appropriate modes of continuous-wave (CW) and pulsed THz exposure (average power, duration, and number of exposure cycles) ought to be systematically studied and analyzed.
In this review, we begin with the technical aspects of the effect of THz waves on biological objects. Next, we discuss and compare modern THz emitters and their applicability for studying biological effects. We then describe the three levels of organization of biological systems, at which the effects of exposure to radiation are usually studied:
We perform an in-depth analysis of cell exposure to CW and pulsed THz radiation, considering different types of cells (such as blood, skin, neuronal, epithelial, and stem cells) and distinguishing two distinct mechanisms of the THz-wave–cell interactions:
Original contributions of the authors to the described research areas are discussed, including studies of THz biological effects on neurons and fibroblasts, and evaluation of biological objects’ heating by pulsed and CW THz radiation. Finally, this review addresses the problem of adequate estimation of the THz biological effects’ specificity, as well as the problem of reproducibility of experimental data, originating from both rareness and uniqueness of the THz systems and absence of unitary irradiation protocols, which sometimes leads to contradictions of the results obtained by different research groups.35 Thereby, this review summarizes up-to-date knowledge in the area of cell exposure to THz radiation and poses important problems that hinder further developments in THz safety standards and in diagnostic and therapeutic applications.
Before proceeding to biological effects of THz waves, we should briefly overview some general principles of THz-wave–tissue interactions, which together with the rapid development of THz components and instruments6,7 cause significant interest to different THz applications.2,34,46,47 The following remarkable features of these interactions attract special attention:
High water content is a general feature of all living organisms, which is of crucial importance for their interaction with THz waves. Indeed, water constitutes up to (by weight) of the adult human body; and its content is in tissue of the brain and heart, in the lungs, in the skin, in the muscle tissues and kidney, and in the bones. Blood constitutes 7% to 8% of the human body, which is as much as 4.5 to 6.0 l for adults. In Fig. 3, structure and effective optical properties of the skin are illustrated in form of the frequency-dependent refractive index , absorption coefficient (by field), and penetration depth (by field). The given data are calculated based on the double-Debye model of the tissues dielectric response at THz frequencies, introduced in Ref. 48. As it is shown in Fig. 3(b), the penetration depth decreases with increasing frequency , whereas it is smaller than 0.3 mm in the considered spectral range.
The above-mentioned features of the THz waves open wide capabilities of their use in different branches of biology and medicine, which are discussed later with an emphasis on THz exposure effects.
Dimensions of Tissue Components Versus the THz Wavelengths
Depending on the ratio between the dimensions of tissue structural elements and the free-space electromagnetic wavelength , one can expect distinct regimes of the electromagnetic wave–tissue interactions, which are governed by different physical regularities.49 When the tissue components are small in the wavelength scale (), the Rayleigh scattering regime takes place and tissues are assumed to be homogeneous. In such case, one can use the effective medium theory2 for describing the electromagnetic-wave–tissue interactions, which is widely applied in the MMW range, that bounds the THz gap from its low-frequency side.50 Otherwise, when the tissue structural elements have mesoscale dimensions (), or even appear to be large (), the Mie scattering effects occur and the radiation transfer theory should be applied to describe the interactions. This theory is widely used in the ultraviolet, visible, and IR bands;51 the latter is adjacent to the THz range at its high-frequency side.
In Fig. 4, dimensions of the typical tissue structural elements, such as microfibrils, separate cells, and cell organelles,52 are compared with the characteristic free-space THz wavelength of (). Here, a vertical red solid line points out the Abbe diffraction limit of spatial resolution of lens- or mirror-based optical systems. On the one side, the majority of the tissue structural components are much smaller as compared with the defined THz wavelength, which allows using the effective medium theory for describing the THz-wave interaction with tissues comprised of such components.2 On the other side, numerous structural components of tissues are characterized by dimensions that are comparable to the THz wavelengths and, thus, become a source of the Mie scattering.
Despite the effective medium theory is more usual in THz biophotonics,2,3 an intermediate position of the THz waves between the IR waves (with their strong Mie scattering in tissues) and the MMW waves (almost insensitive to the tissue structural inhomogeneities) poses a challenging problem of selecting appropriate models of the THz-wave–tissue interactions.
Effective Medium Theory in the THz Range
The effective medium theory assumes tissues to be homogeneous at the THz-wavelength scale and describes the THz-wave–tissue interactions using models of their effective dielectric response.2,3 Such models define simultaneously frequency-dependent real and imaginary parts of a complex dielectric permittivity
THz waves strongly interact with polar water molecules in liquid water (either free or bound), aqueous solutions, and tissue water.2,3,53 Therefore, content and state of water play dominant roles in the formation of the THz dielectric response of hydrated tissues.21 Similarly to the THz dielectric response of liquid water, aqueous solutions, and biological liquids,2,3 the THz-wave losses in tissues, which are defined by or , possess no resonant features. In the THz range, complex dielectric permittivity of water and hydrated media is usually described by the relaxation models, among which the double-Debye model should be emphasised as the most widely applied in THz biophotonics48,54–602 and 3, one can find parameters of the double-Debye model that are summarized for liquid water, as well as for different healthy and pathologically altered tissues ex vivo and in vivo.
In Figs. 5(a) and 5(b), real and imaginary parts of the complex dielectric permittivity are plotted for the liquid water and epidermis of the skin ex vivo based on the double-Debye model parameters from Ref. 48, respectively, for liquid water: , , , , and ; for epidermis: , , , , and . For both water and epidermis, -curve is formed by the two broad absorption peaks, where one of them is attributed to the “slow” Debye relaxation and centered far below the THz range [at the inverse relaxation time ], whereas another one represents the “fast” Debye relaxation and centered at the high-frequency edge of the THz range [at the frequency of ]. In turn, -curve decays with increasing frequency, with some pronounced changes near the inverse relaxation times and .
In Eq. (3), for free bulk water, the “slow” Debye relaxation describes cooperative reorganization of water molecules connected by hydrogen bonds, whereas the “fast” Debye relaxation represents vibrational motions of water molecules that are free from hydrogen bounds.61 Hydration of biological molecules in aqueous solutions and tissue might lead to more complex dielectric response.62,63 Electric charges of biological molecules create the electric field, which orients surrounding water molecules and leads to formation of hydrated water layers (shells) 64 with their unique relaxation dynamics. Such hydration can either change the parameter of the double-Debye model65 or lead to appearance of additional relaxation or quasiresonant terms in the dielectric permittivity model.66 Furthermore, ionic conductivity and spectral fingerprints of hydrated ions might also contribute to the THz dielectric response of biological systems.67–69 However, an in-depth review of modern research works in the area of the THz dielectric spectroscopy of pure bulk water, aqueous solutions of biomolecules, segregated water, and tissues is far beyond the scope of the present review, but it can be found in Refs. 2 and 21.
Despite the fact that the discussed double-Debye model is generally accepted in THz biophotonics, physically it is not rigorous. Indeed, on the one hand, it implies fitting of the experimental data by the two broad absorption bands, centered either beyond or at the edges of the THz range (see Fig. 5). In other words, when using the double-Debye model, one deals with something similar to the experimental data extrapolation. However, in the case of taking appropriate initial conditions during the fitting procedure, the double-Debye model yields very convenient parametrization of the spectral curves by only five independent parameters: , , , , and . On the other hand, the Debye kernels in Eq. (3) do not fulfill the sum rule for the oscillator strength and, thus, predict infinite number of charge carriers/dipoles underlying the dielectric response of a medium:70
To mitigate this drawback, the double-overdamped oscillator model was applied to describe the THz dielectric response of tissues in Ref. 15. As compared with the double-Debye model, a pair of the overdamped oscillators provides almost equal dielectric curves and in the analyzed THz range but predicts considerably lower losses at high frequencies and, thus, satisfies the sum rule. Other semiempirical relaxation models of a complex dielectric permittivity exist and are sometimes applied for fitting the THz data, including the Cole–Cole,71,72 Davison–Cole,73 or Havriliak–Negami 74 models. They imply more parameters to take into account possible asymmetry of the discussed broad absorption peaks in the -curves.
Moreover, the aforementioned models of the tissue complex dielectric permittivity in the THz range have quite qualitative character. In fact, earlier, the two broad absorption peaks, predicted by these models, were observed experimentally mostly for the liquid water and aqueous solutions;53 at the same time, for biological tissues, they have not been observed experimentally yet involving broadband dielectric measurements, which is, probably, due to complexity of such experiment. Thus, these relaxation models are applied to describe the tissues response only intuitively. Moreover, structure, relaxation dynamics, and THz response of liquid water and, thus, water-containing biological systems can be more complex. Their dielectric permittivity model can comprise three or even more relaxation terms, each representing a particular fraction of free/bound or segregated water, with distinct electrodynamic characteristics, that can be predicted, for example, by numerical simulations using first principles.66,75 Detailed overview of picosecond dynamics of water and water-containing media, as well as their THz dielectric response, deserves separate in-depth review, being out of the scope of this paper.
Nevertheless, information about a tissue complex dielectric permittivity (or a complex refractive index) helps to model the THz-wave–tissue interaction within the framework of classical electrodynamics, which is of crucial importance in THz spectroscopy and imaging of tissues aimed at medical diagnosis of different pathological processes. These data can be also useful in THz exposure of tissues since they provide an information about the penetration depth of THz waves into the tissues or the volume of the exposed tissue , where is the THz beam spot diameter.
Fingerprints of the Mie Scattering in the THz Range
Despite the aforementioned effective medium theory is widely applied in THz biophotonics, a lot of biological objects and tissues possess structural inhomogeneities with the dimensions comparable to the THz wavelengths; see Fig. 4. For such objects, the Mie scattering effects should be taken into account.51
For example, in Refs. 3 and 76, considerable structural inhomogeneities of fibrous connective tissues of the breast were studied both experimentally, using the -resolution THz solid immersion microscopy,77 and theoretically, using analytical methods of the Mie scattering theory. THz optical properties of separate fat cells and their agglomerates were found to differ from that of the surrounding fibrous connective tissues of the human breast ex vivo. Such cells form sources of the Mie scattering at THz frequencies. The calculated parameters of such scatterers (i.e., their scattering phase function, differential and integral cross sections, and scattering anistoropy factor) considerably differ from those inherent to the Rayleigh scattering regime. In Refs. 17 and 29, THz solid immersion microscopy revealed structural heterogeneities of intact brain tissues and glioma model 101.8 from rats ex vivo, as well as heterogeneous character of decellularized bovine pericardium collagen matrices. Finally, in Refs. 7879.–80, polarization-sensitive THz imaging provided useful information for the differentiation between healthy and pathologically altered tissues, which also indirectly justified the Mie-like character of the THz-wave scattering in tissues. Namely, in this imaging modality, one observes changes in polarization of the THz wave interacting with tissues, which could not be described in the framework of the above-mentioned effective medium theory. All these experimental findings stimulate further research and development of approaches for describing the THz-wave–tissue interactions that simultaneously account for the dispersion and absorption properties of tissue components, as well as geometry and organization of scatterers in tissues.
This approach could rely on the radiation transfer theory, applied for describing the electromagnetic-wave–tissue interactions in the ultraviolet, visible, and IR ranges.51 The basis of the radiation transfer theory is a radiation transfer equation,49 which defines a radiance at a point in the direction :
Studying the scattering effects in tissues seems to be important for the THz diagnosis, where they can either complicate differentiation of tissues or become a source of additional useful information. In THz exposure of tissues, scattering effects can play an important role due to the effects of electromagnetic field confinements at the shadow side of mesoscale dielectric obstacles that can considerably (by few orders of magnitude) enhance local irradiance of tissues by THz waves and, thus, increase efficiency of tissue exposure to THz waves.
Modern THz-Wave Emitters
Currently, tremendous efforts are still paid to boost the development of THz emitters. The THz spectral range and, particularly, the exposure technologies attract increasing interest owing to the appearance of solutions for THz-wave generation.6,7 Such emitters working either in CW or pulsed mode allow generation of the output power ranging from the nanowatts to kilowatts. Here, we briefly overview the recent progress in this area with an emphasis on the practically important devices that are capable of solving modern research and engineering problems of tissue exposure to THz waves.
Despite a wide variety of existing THz-wave emitters with their rich diversity of operation principles and regimes, output frequencies, and powers, this review focuses only on widespread systems that went beyond the research work of a physical laboratory and, in our opinion, can be applied for studying biological effects of THz waves or even for therapeutic applications of THz technology. Thus, in Tables 1 and 2, we summarize only the typical technical characteristics of the discussed principles and devices. However, we should stress that unique THz systems developed for experiments in a physical laboratory can provide somewhat higher performance, i.e., broader spectral range, higher power, and wider tunability. In fact, in Tables 1 and 2, we deliberately underestimate the spectral operation ranges of some THz emitters. We consider only those parts of the spectral operation ranges, where THz emitters provide reliable output power, and neglect, at the same time, much less-intense side lobes and tails of the emitted THz spectra.
Typical CW THz emitters.
Typical pulsed THz emitters.
CW or Quasi-CW THz Sources
Backward wave oscillator
In terms of the CW sources, backward wave oscillator (BWO)81 is one of the well-known methods to generate intense THz radiation. Nanosecond pulse with a maximum output power in kW level is also achievable by this method.82 In BWO, the THz radiation is generated based on the interaction between an electron beam and an electromagnetic wave traveling in the opposite direction. An electron beam is emitted from a heated cathode and collimated by magnetic field. A modulation device, such as metal grating or corrugated rectangular waveguide, is carefully arranged to modulate the electron beam and give rise to a surface electromagnetic wave. The frequency of the electromagnetic wave could be tuned by adjusting the velocity of electron beam, thus, obtaining the THz radiation.83 Mineo et al. demonstrated a BWO featuring a 20% tuning bandwidth at the central frequency of 1.0 THz with the output power of .84 In 2015, a plasma wave-assisted BWO was employed to radiate THz waves in the range of 186 to 202 GHz with the maximum power of 20 W by adopting a pseudospark-sourced electron beam.85 Recently, oversized BWOs operated in the frequency ranges of 260 to 340 GHz and 310 to 390 GHz were studied theoretically and experimentally. Two BWO types were designed and tested, and the detected peak power of a few hundred of mW was obtained by adopting the optimal structures.86
BWOs are capable of operation in a pure CW regime81 with the monochromatic spectral output, quite wide spectral tunability, the spectral line-width of down to , and the average output power of to . Note that the output power decreases with increasing operation frequency . Such CW BWOs are widely applied in the THz dielectric measurements.81
Difference frequency generation and parametric generation
The principles of difference frequency generation (DFG) and parametric generation (PG) are all based on nonlinear optical process.6
For DFG, two optical beams featuring narrow bandwidth and slightly different frequencies colinearly propagate into a nonlinear crystal, leading to a THz radiation generated by the second-order nonlinear polarization at the difference frequency of the two optical beams.87 So far, various nonlinear crystals, for example, GaSe88 and GaP,89 were utilized to generate radiation up to 5.0 THz based on DFG. The output THz power of DFG was also improved from the mW to kW level. In 2014, by stacking four GaP plates reversely, the highest output power of 2.73 kW was achieved at around 2.7 THz and the conversion efficiency was demonstrated to be . It was also proved that the reversed GaP plates demonstrate stronger photon conversion than aligned GaP plates.90
For PG, only one optical pump beam is used to stimulate two photons, one is commonly named as “idler,” whereas another is the THz one.91 The THz wave could obtain dramatic amplification when a phase-matching condition is satisfied. The tuning of the THz frequency is continuously achievable by controlling the relative angle between the idler and pump beam.92,93 Kawase et al. developed a widely tunable THz wave parametric generator in the range of 0.7 to 2.4 THz using injection seeding. The maximum peak output THz power exceeded 200 mW.94 The performance of injection-seeding-based parametric generator was further improved through utilizing the laser light scattering from a nonlinear crystal by the same group. It helped to achieve the THz radiation in the range between 0.7 and 3.0 THz and improve the maximum output power from the mW to kW level.91 Afterward, the maximum output power was increased to by Minamide et al.95 and Hayashi et al.,96 respectively, with or without using the microchip laser.
Optically pumped gas laser
Optically pumped gas laser (OPGL) features the capability of generating THz waves with narrow linewidth.6 The basic principle of OPGL is based on population inversion in the gas molecules. This population inversion occurs when the gas molecules, possessing lower vibrational mode, are optically pumped. Since the gas molecules feature permanent dipole moments, the induced rotational transitions between high and low vibrational modes can be directly coupled to electromagnetic radiation, thus, generating THz wave.97
Various molecular gases have been demonstrated for generating THz wave in the range of 0.1 to 8 THz, such as , , , and .98,99 Recently, Chevalier et al. proposed a research on widely tunable THz gas laser, in which over 37 laser lines were observed from 0.25 to 0.96 THz using optically pumped nitrous oxide () laser. The possibility of achieving electromagnetic waves with frequencies above 1.0 THz with a mW-level output power based on QCL pumped gas laser was predicted by theoretical analysis.100 Wienold et al.101 presented a gas laser based on QCL pumped molecules; several laser lines with the output power of up to were obtained around 4.5 THz by exploiting the molecular symmetry and employing an alternative resonator. Liu et al.102 proposed a tunable optically pumped gas laser with a germanium ealton serving as spectrum splitter, four THz laser lines corresponding to a conversion efficiency of were observed in the range of 0.5 to 1.7 THz by tuning the incident angles and pump wavelengths.
Diode-based frequency multiplier
Diode-based frequency multiplier is a solid-state THz source, which implements microwave multiplication from IMPATT (IMPact ionization Avalanche Transit-Time), Gunn, tunnel, and other diodes. By making appropriate operations, the negative resistance devices could be built based on the aforementioned diodes. A resonator coupled with the negative resistance devices is used to generate an AC signal intended for CW microwave radiation. In this process, the zero-attenuation oscillator is a crucial element for the microwave radiation, which is obtained through adjusting the magnitude of the negative resistance devices. Consequently, the THz wave can be received after the microwave passing through a series of frequency multiplier chains, where the Schottky diodes are commonly used as a nonlinear media for harmonic generation of microwave.6
The diode-based THz sources are usually compact and operate at room temperatures, which is convenient for practical application. The average output power reaches the mW level and can be improved by cooling. For example, in 2002, Maiwald et al.103 demonstrated a peak output power of (at 1.178 THz) at room temperatures and an improved peak output power of (at 1.183 THz) by cooling down to 113 K. Most of the reported multipliers feature the output power of 1 to at the frequencies of .104–109
Photomixing, also known as optical heterodyne generation, is one of the solid-state CW THz generation technique, capable of making narrow band signals with exceptional tunability.110 Two CW laser beams with identical polarization and slightly different frequencies are utilized to generate a THz beat, which illuminates a photomixer, resulting in a modulated photocurrent. The induced photocurrent oscillations adjusted by tuning the frequency difference between the applied lasers determine the desired parameters of THz radiation.111 The main well-known disadvantage of this technique is the relatively low output power due to the requirement of CW optical excitation and shortage of semiconductor materials with high thermal conductivities.
Low-temperature-grown GaAs has been employed as the photomixer material in the last few years to generate THz radiation with the frequencies up to 3.0 THz.112 The typical optical-to-THz conversion efficiency for the photomixing method is to , which limits the output power in the order of mWs.113 Despite tremendous efforts have been put in the enhancement of photomixer performance, the output CW power is still limited by the mW level. Recently, Ironside et al.114 proposed a metamaterial-enhanced photomixer by employing a metal–semiconductor–metal cavity; such photomixer is characterized by the conversion efficiency of and is capable of generating THz radiation in the mW range.
Quantum cascade laser
Quantum ascade laser (QCL) is undisputedly the only solid-state source that can generate THz radiation above 1.0 THz with an average output power at W level.115 The QCL realization is generally based on electrons cascading in intersubband transitions. Driven by electric field, the electrons are injected through a semiconductor heterostructure possessing multiple quantum wells, during which the electrons transit from a state with higher valence band energy to a lower state, thus, generating radiative emission. The efficient laser emission can be obtained, when a large population inversion condition is satisfied.6 The QCL tunability is mainly based on the structure of the semiconductor that offers superior bandwidth as compared with the diode-based sources.
To date, the high-power QCLs, operating in the frequency range of 1.0 to 6.0 THz, were demonstrated, with a few-W output power in pulsed mode and up to hundreds of mW in CW.115–117 In Ref. 118, Li et al. proposed a surface-plasmon waveguide embedded with an active region featuring a bound-to-continuum transition, based on which a THz QCL with the peak-pulsed output power of from the single facet at 3.4 THz was demonstrated. Williams et al.119 proposed CW QCL, with the power of 138 mW and the frequency of 4.4 THz, that employs a semiinsulating surface-plasmon waveguide and a resonant-phonon depopulation scheme. With 10 years of development, Wang et al.120 significantly improved the CW QCL output power to 230 mW by adopting a hybrid bound-to-continuum transition and resonant phonon extraction. One of the main challenges for QCL technology is the operation at room temperatures since the output power of QCLs decreases drastically as the temperature increases. The highest-reported operation temperature for QCLs without magnetic field assistance is close to 200 and 130 K for the pulsed and CW modes, correspondingly.121
Pulsed THz Sources
The initial exploration of pulsed broadband THz wave generation using photoconductive antenna (PCA) could be traced back to 1970s to 1980s.122–125 The PCA generation principle is based on the free charge carries (electron and hole) excited in a biased semiconductor gap with femtosecond laser pulses.126–128 These free charge carries are accelerated by the applied static or alternating electric field that gives rise to a transient photocurrent. Simultaneously, the density of charge carries goes down due to the their trapping and recombination. The pulsed THz radiation is generated during the acceleration and trapping of these free charge carries. The decay time of the charge carries, which influence the duration and spectral bandwidth of thus generated THz pulse, is defined by the lifetime and mobility of carriers in a photoconductor. Therefore, photoconductors with shorter carrier lifetime are preferred to generate THz pulses with a broader frequency-domain bandwidth.126,129
To date, tremendous studies have been done to improve the performance of PCAs. Berry et al.130 demonstrated a plasmonic photoconductive THz source with enhanced output power by employing two-dimensional plasmonic contact electrodes. An average output power of , which is 20 times higher than conventional PCAs, was achieved in the frequency range of up to 1.5 THz. In Ref. 131, Yang et al. reported a photoconductive emitter with the optical-to-THz power conversion efficiency as high as 7.5% using three-dimensional (3D) plasmonic contact electrodes. A broadband THz wave in the 0.1 to 2.0 THz range with the output power higher than 0.1 mW was experimentally observed at a 1.4-mW optical pump. Thereby, as compared with conventional PCA-based THz sources, the above-mentioned hybrid PCAs offer higher optical-to-THz conversion efficiency.130,132–135
Optical rectification (OR) is one of the most commonly used methods to generate pulsed THz radiation, which is based on second-order nonlinear optical effect. In the OR process, an ultrafast optical pulse is normally employed to illuminate a nonlinear optical crystal. The pulsed THz radiation is then generated by the time-varying nonlinear polarization.136 The bandwidth of the pulsed THz wave is roughly inversely proportional to the duration of the ultrafast optical pulse. The intensity of generated THz wave can be optimized by aligning the polarization of the incident optical beam.6
Schneider et al.137 and Venkatesh et al.138 demonstrated broadband THz radiations in the ranges of 0.4 to 6.7 THz and 0.1 to 3.0 THz, respectively, using a nonlinear organic salt. A near single-cycle THz pulses with the average power of were demonstrated by the lithium niobite crystal () pumping with femtosecond optical laser pulses. The maximum energy of up to was detected at the frequency of 0.5 THz, which corresponds to the optical-to-THz energy conversion efficiency of .139 The maximum energy of pulsed THz wave radiated from crystal was improved to by Jang et al.140 The highest average THz power of about 66 mW in the 0.1 to 4.0 THz range has been obtained with a few-cycle ultrafast laser-driven THz source by Meyer et al.141 through optimizing pump spot size and pump pulse duration. Both studies achieved a conversion efficiency on the order of . In Refs. 142 and 143, by satisfying the phase-matching condition, the conversion efficiency was dramatically improved to , pulsed THz generation with the pulse energies of 20 and and the frequency ranges of 0.1 to 5.0 THz and 0.1 to 6.0 THz was demonstrated.
In Ref. 144, Tripathi et al. demonstrated high-power THz-wave generation via OR of femtosecond pulses in 4-dimethylamino-N-methyl-4-stilbazolium tosylate crystal using a fiber-based laser pump, which paths the way for creating ergonomic high-power THz emitters. In Refs. 145146.147.–148, THz-wave generation was demonstrated in to 10.0 THz range, using OR of near-IR femtosecond laser pulses (a Cr:forsterite laser system with a TW peak power) in a nonlinear organic crystal, with the output pulse duration and energy of to 0.7 ps and , respectively. An experimental system for studying the THz-wave biological effects was developed relying on these unique THz setups.149,150
Gyrotron is one of the most powerful THz-wave sources in both CW and pulsed mode. Therefore, it is increasingly contributing to many application fields, such as nuclear magnetic resonance with signal enhancement using dynamic nuclear polarization, electron cyclotron resonance heating of fusion plasma, electron spin resonance spectroscopy, and x-ray detected magnetic resonance.151,152
The operation principle of gyrotron is based on the electron cyclotron resonance maser instability. The azimuthal and axial bunching of the helically moving beam electrons occurs due to the electromagnetic field stimulation, resulting in a proper synchronism between the electron beam and the electromagnetic wave excited in the resonant cavity, during which the transverse energy of the gyrating beam electrons can be transferred via coherent bremsstrahlung radiation for enhancing the excited electromagnetic wave.153 Due to the above principle, gyrotron generally operates at a fixed frequency close to the resonance frequency, and there are two ways that are commonly adopted for the frequency tunability in gyrotrons: tuning the magnetic field intensity or harmonic number of the cyclotron resonance. Nowadays, the highest frequency that can be achieved with the gyrotrons has already exceeded 1.0 THz for both CW and pulsed mode.
A CW gyrotron that is based on a 20-T superconducting pulsed magnet achieved for the first time a breakthrough of 1.0 THz.154 Its operation frequency and the output power were as high as 1.08 THz and to 200 W, respectively. Nevertheless, majority of the reported CW gyrotrons possess an output power at W-level and sub-THz operation frequencies,155–157 whereas a few can obtain kW-level output power. For example, in Ref. 158, a continuously tunable CW gyrotron with the maximum output power of was demonstrated at the vicinity of , with the corresponding maximum energy conversion efficiency of 4.3%. Another CW gyrotron, which was developed for the high frequency material processing, features the output power and operation frequency of and 0.3 THz, respectively, operates in the magnetic field of up to 12 T, and provides the maximum power efficiency of .159,160
For pulsed gyrotrons, the output power is even higher, which is generally at the level of kW and up to MW.152,156,161 For example, the MW-level gyrotrons with the output frequencies of 110 and 170 GHz were developed based on the depressed collector and the low-loss synthetic diamond window for efficiency improvement and high power Gaussian beam output.162 For these systems, the maximum efficiency of was obtained at a 1.1-MW short pulse operation. The generation frequency of the pulsed gyrotron was significantly increased over 1.0 THz by the research group from IAP RAS through the use of intense magnetic fields. In Ref. 163, the radiation power and energy of and 75 mJ, respectively, in a single shot regime were observed at the frequency of 1.022 THz with the magnetic field of . Afterward, a pulsed gyrotron was reported to operate at even higher frequency in the fundamental cyclotron resonance with a magnetic field strength of .164 The highest generation frequency of 1.3 THz was achieved, whereas the average output power was .
Terahertz Exposure of Biological Objects with Different Levels of Organization
Rapid progress in THz technology, together with appearance of effective THz optoelectronic components and THz-wave generation principles, forces a translation of the THz technology into everyday practice, as well as increase an effect of THz radiation on humans. This rises the questions about the safety limits of biological systems’ exposure to THz waves. Defining the permissible exposure doses is impossible without a knowledge of the mechanisms of the THz-radiation–biological objects interactions during the THz exposure.37 Two distinct mechanisms of such interactions are usually distinguished.
Thermal Mechanism of THz Exposure
In the thermal mechanism, THz radiation causes heating of the irradiated object due to the strong THz-wave absorption by water.34,41,165,166 Such mechanism is predominantly observed when using CW THz emitters. Mathematical modeling of THz-radiation interactions with different biological tissues167,168 shows that even quite low duration of THz exposure (such as few milliseconds) can cause notable increase in the tissue temperature.168,169 An increase in the cornea temperature of up to 70°C was shown when it was exposed to a CW 1.0 THz radiation with the irradiance of ; see Fig. 6. At the same time, experiments on THz exposure effects are often performed under thermostatically controlled conditions at physiological temperatures of , which prevents general heating of an exposed object.42,170–172
Several research groups reported the presence of microthermal effects of THz exposure that are difficult to detect during the experiments.34,173 However, significance of such effects still remains unexplored. The THz radiation is not perceived by the living systems as a thermal agent. This can be illustrated by special biological tests, such as studying the expression of genes associated with heat shock proteins. Their expression increases while the temperature rises by only several degrees from its optimal value. For example, the expression increases considerably at 41°C for humans.34,171
Nonthermal Mechanism of THz Exposure
To explain the nonthermal effects of THz exposure, theories of the Fröhlich long-range coherent oscillations,174 the Davydov molecular solitons,175 and the coherent acoustoelectric waves176 are commonly applied. Namely, Fröhlich postulated the presence of collective oscillations of electric dipoles in biological macromolecules and membranes,173,177 which can interact with low-energy quanta, including that from the THz range. These dipole coherent oscillations are due to the nonlinear interaction between modes, as well as to the energy flow into the lowest-frequency mode. Cell metabolism serves as a source of energy, whereas the nonlinearity is caused by a strong static electric field on the cell membranes.178 Modern experimental data provide confirmation of this hypothesis. For example, consider the first experimental observation of the Fröhlich condensation in a protein structure, reported few years ago in Ref. 179. Theoretical studies are carried out aimed at describing the Fröhlich condensates.180–182 This effect was analyzed in the semiclassical 181 and quantum frameworks,182 whereas the full-quantum statistical theory relies on the nonequilibrium Fröhlich condensate motion equations.
The theoretical calculations revealed that, under certain conditions, a resonant (linear or nonlinear) interaction between the THz wave and DNA is possible.183,184 Such an interaction significantly changes the molecular dynamics and leads to the local breaks of hydrogen bonds in DNA chains, which induces changes in gene expression. Based on a simple nonlinear model of DNA dynamics, it was demonstrated that THz radiation can influence both the vibrational excitations and proton motion in DNA hydrogen bonds. When the radiation frequency matches the vibrational mode, localized excitations in the form of dissipative solitons are generated.185 The low-amplitude collective breathing of the DNA modes can serve as precursors of generation of the transcription bubbles and other large-scale conformation changes.
Resonant interactions can be observed when using high-power pulsed THz sources.43,186,187 Indeed, while the average power of picosecond THz pulses is usually quite low (on the order of or mW), their peak powers can be as high as 1 to 30 GW.145,146,188 Such powerful THz waves can pass the cytoplasmic and nuclear membranes.45,189
Nonthermal effects of THz waves can occur for other structural components of living cell, such as proteins179 and membranes.165 An important role in THz-radiation–biological system interactions is played by water molecules, which are associated with biomolecules and impact their long-range interactions, collective vibrations, and transitions. Since THz radiation is strongly absorbed by water, the latter is involved into interaction with rapidly alternating electromagnetic fields.32,190 Molecular dynamics simulations revealed an enhanced permutation (by order of magnitude) of confined water molecules across a water membrane channel, which is caused by a 1.39-THz radiation with a limited thermal effect; see Fig. 7. The underlying mechanism is due to a combination of the strength matching and frequency resonance between a relatively weak stimulus and the hydrogen bond network of confined water, rather than the bulk water outside. Such combination causes an anomalously structural phase transition of only the confined water while efficiently limiting the thermal effect of bulk water.191
Dosimetry in the THz Range
Currently, no comprehensive safety standards exist that consider both thermal and nonthermal THz-wave effects and regulate applications of the 0.1 to 10.0 THz radiation for general population and occupational exposure.37 On the one hand, exposure to radiation with the frequencies of is governed by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP).40 It considers the frequency range of 100 KHz to 300 GHz and was updated in 2020.192 On the other hand, exposure to radiation with the frequencies of is regulated by the ICNIRP standard 2013.193 This standard defines exposure to laser radiation with the 180 nm to 1 mm wavelengths, and it is based on the proven thermal effects. However, there is a significant discrepancy between these two guidelines, namely, the standard allows for the 20 to 100 times higher exposure intensity, as compared with the one.
For the exposure duration of and the frequencies , the maximum power density is limited by . Whereas for the frequencies , the general public exposure limit is two orders of magnitude lower, i.e., . Such a discrepancy between the two standards is due to different rules of the exposure threshold selection. The first standard192 defines the safety limits based on the increase in the body core temperature by only 1°C, i.e., from 37°C to 38°C. Such a small deviation of the body temperature can not cause any considerable hazard to an organism. In turn, the second standard193 is based on the 45°C temperature threshold of the skin injury. At the same time, both standards do not account the nonthermal effects of the THz waves.194 Meanwhile, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) of the World Health Organization (WHO) classified radiofrequency radiation in the 30 kHz to 300 GHz range as a human carcinogen, group 1.195
From a health risk perspective, ICNIRP are generally interested in the fraction of electromagnetic-wave power, which is absorbed by biological tissues and leads to their heating. This is typically described as a function of a relevant dosimetric quantity.40,192 For the frequencies , where electromagnetic waves penetrate deeper into tissue, specific energy absorption rate (SAR) in W/kg is introduced denoting the radiation power absorbed by unit mass. Oppositely, in the 6 to 300 GHz range, electromagnetic waves are strongly absorbed by tissue water and, thus, penetrate only the superficial tissues. Therefore, tissue irradiance in (i.e., incident power density per unit area of tissue surface) is used to define the exposure conditions. Considering these two dosimetric quantities, basic limitations of biological object’s exposure to electromagnetic waves192 are summarized in Table 3.
Basic restrictions for the tissue exposure to the electromagnetic waves.
In Ref. 196, different energy quantities that measure safety guidelines to protect humans from thermal effects of the MMW and sub-MMW exposure were analyzed. The power density inside tissues correlates with the surface temperature elevations. Since different tissues possess distinct effective dielectric response in the THz range, their complex dielectric permittivity [Eq. (1)] or complex refractive index [Eq. (2)] should be taken into account during estimations of SAR. Methods for the SAR analysis at THz frequencies were developed by several research groups.42,197,198 In Ref. 199, simulations of a 0.45-THz-wave absorption by the skin revealed that the electromagnetic-wave energy is mostly absorbed in the upper stratum spinosum, whereas the maximal temperature rise is observed in the lower stratum spinosum. The authors showed that the skin temperature can rise beyond the skin injury threshold of 45°C, when the skin is already under the initial heat stress or when a number of radiation sources are applied simultaneously, each within the ICNIRP guidelines.
For obtaining the reproducible THz-wave effects and adequate dosimetry, the following important conditions should be satisfied during experiments:
All studies of the nonthermal THz-wave effects can be divided into two main categories:
When overviewing consistently different THz exposure experiments below, we consider both the temperature conditions of the experiments and the results of heat shock testing only for those experiments, which belong to the second category.
An important point in studying the biological effects of THz waves concerns selection and sustaining the time intervals between the beginning/end of the THz exposure and the analysis. Response of a living organism to any external factor, including the THz radiation, is developed in several stages, including a compensatory stage. The complexity of these stages in each specific case is still impossible to trace since any radiation-induced processes can begin later or finish earlier than some particular features are analyzed. Therefore, such parameter as the time intervals between the beginning/end of the THz exposure and analysis varied to a large extent in different studies. They can range from several minutes to several days or (in some cases) can be not indicated at all. While surveying the research results below, the experiment metrology and these time intervals are not considered comprehensively.
Effects of THz Radiation on the Structural Components of Cells
Considerable amount of data have been accumulated on the THz dielectric spectra of molecular components of cells, such as amino acids,200,201 proteins,202–204 nucleic bases,205,206 and acids,207 as well as sugars.32,66 At the same time, very limited knowledge about the nonthermal THz-wave effects on such important molecular components of a living cell exist nowadays.
The effect of CW THz radiation on the fluorescence of the tryptophan (Trp) amino acid and proteins was studied in Ref. 208. A remarkable feature of these experiments is a combination of the THz exposure and the fluorescence spectroscopy in a unitary experimental setup. Such favorable combination allows for observing the THz exposure effects either in situ or immediately after the exposure. The experimental setup and related fluorescence spectra are shown in Fig. 9. During the THz exposure, changes in the sample temperature were monitored using a microbolometric camera209,210 and a thermocouple. A 90-s-long exposure of the Trp sample to the CW 2.55 THz radiation, with the irradiance of , caused a decrease in the fluorescence signal by .208 This drop of the fluorescence signal depends linearly on the THz-radiation intensity, and it closely follows the changes in the sample absorptivity. This points out at the resonant character of the THz-wave–Trp interaction.208 For the whey proteins, similar THz exposure leads to the drop of the fluorescence signal by and at the frequencies of 0.2 and 2.55 THz, correspondingly. This exposure simultaneously leads to an increase in the sample temperature by . The control experiments with a simple sample heating confirmed that the observed THz-wave-induced changes are nonthermal in nature, as well as that such nonthermal effects dominate at the lower THz frequencies.
THz exposure of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) demonstrated an opposite dynamics of the fluorescence quenching at 0.2 THz, as well as the fluorescence enhancement by at 2.55 THz while the irradiance was .208 Possible mechanism of such a frequency-selective response can be associated with the vibrational resonant coupling between the THz radiation and the protein structure, as explained in the framework of the Fröhlich’s theory.174 In Ref. 179, THz exposure of a hen-egg white lysozyme was combined with a highly sensitive x-ray crystallography to visualize low-frequency vibrational modes in the protein structure. It was found that CW 0.4 THz radiation induces a local increase in the electron density in a long -helix motif consistent with a subtle longitudinal compression of the lysozyme helix. The observed electron density changes can only be explained by a collective excitation of dipole oscillators in the protein, as envisaged by Fröhlich.174
In Ref. 211, bovine serum albumin (BSA) was exposed, for 60 min, to the CW 3.67 THz waves with the irradiation of . As the result, changes in the UV and circular dichroism (CD) spectra of the irradiated protein were observed. They were attributed to modifications in the BSA conformation, as was further confirmed by an increase in the Trp fluorescence of BSA212 and a twofold decrease in the progesterone binding constant.211,212 In Ref. 213, BSA was exposed, for 60 min, to the pulsed THz radiation with the 0.2- to 1.5-THz spectral bandwidth and the peak irradiance of (or the average irradiance of ), whereas the sample was in the form of thin films on a crystalline substrate. Then, BSA was dissolved in water and brought into interaction with some adsorbates with high biological relevance, i.e., oxygen, ozone, and nitric oxide. It was found that THz waves caused evident changes in such interactions. Interaction between BSA and oxygen was studied by means of in situ spin probing technique. A spin probe was formed directly in solution through the interaction of a diamagnetic dinitrone compound with the reaction sites of BSA, on which oxygen molecules were adsorbed. Quantitative electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy demonstrated that the number of reaction sites of the BSA molecule increased by a factor of as a result of THz exposure. THz irradiation excites definite collective rotational motions, which partially eliminate steric hindrance for the adsorption of molecular oxygen on the functional groups of BSA.213
In other studies, THz exposure of several proteins resulted in the following effects:
In Ref. 217, modulation of actin polymerization and change in the stability of its filaments, as a result of exposure to intense THz radiation of a free electron laser, were demonstrated; see Fig. 10. At the same time, when actin polymerization was performed under the exposure to the 0.46 THz waves of a gyrotron, the number of actin filaments was increased by a factor of 3.5. In Ref. 218, a change in the conformation (i.e., a decrease in the number of -sheets and an increase in -helices) was shown in a five-residue peptide with the amino acid sequence of the calcitonin hormone fragment. In Ref. 216, a reduction in the disordered structure due to an increase of the -helices and -sheets was observed as a results of BSA exposure to pulsed THz radiation with the frequency of 3.3 THz and the doses of 1.2 and 3.0 J.
In Ref. 215, THz-wave induced structural changes were also demonstrated for such model systems, as short (tens of bases long) single-stranded DNA with the specified nucleotide sequences. As a result of their exposure to the broadband pulsed THz radiation with the 0.1 to 3.0 THz spectral range, dissembling or interruption of assembling of deterministic secondary thermodynamic DNA structures in an aqueous solution was observed. Such effects were identified by analysis of fluorescent labels and electrophoresis. In turn, for such relatively large molecules as plasmids, there were practically no effects of THz waves on the molecular structure.
In Refs. 186 and 219, THz radiation was found to cause the DNA demethylation. It was shown that molecules of 5-methylcytidine have three major resonance peaks at the frequencies of 1.29, 1.74, and 2.14 THz at a room temperature, whereas molecules of 2’-deoxycytidine did not show any distinct resonances in the 0.4 to 2.5 THz range.220 The authors assumed that these THz molecular resonances of 5-methylcytidine are the fingerprints of methylation that are observed at the nucleoside level and can appear at the DNA level.220 Then, the frozen aqueous solutions of the normal cellular DNA (293 T cells), the corresponding methylated DNA (methylated 293 T), and the cancer DNA from five types of human cancer cell lines were studied by THz pulsed spectroscopy at the temperature of 253 K. A judiciously design procedure for the THz absorption spectra fitting allowed for isolating the broad absorption peak at , which was similar to the 1.74 THz absorption peak of 5-methylcytidine with slightly shifted central frequency due to an impact of water molecules.220,221 In this way, the authors suggested that THz waves might cause resonant effect on global demethylation and, then, proceeded to the experimental confirmation of this hypothesis.186,219
In Fig. 11, a schematic of the THz-wave-induced demethylation of the methylated DNA is shown. High-power THz emitter was equipped with a bandpass filter, featuring the central frequency of 1.5 THz and the bandwidth of 0.42 THz, aimed at matching the methylated DNA resonance. Magnitude of the resonance peaks observed by the THz pulsed spectrometer decreased after the high-power THz exposure.186,219 For the artificially methylated DNA samples from the human embryonic kidney cells (HEK293T line), demethylation was up to the level of normal values. For the hypermethylated DNA isolated from leukocytes of different cancer lines, it was up to . Moreover, for the DNA from HEK293T cells, it was found that the demethylation in genes is observed mainly in the so-called CpG islands, i.e., regions with a high density of the cytosine-guanine dinucleotide sequences.219
It is worth noting that, in further studies, Tao et al.222 did not observe a 1.6-THz resonance absorption peak of the methylated nucleoside 5-methylcytidine in frozen aqueous solutions. This queries the above-mentioned results of studying the resonant effects of the THz DNA demethylation. In our opinion, this research direction deserves special attention and criticism, whereas further research efforts are necessary for the objective disclosure of THz capabilities to demethylation of DNA.
Parameters of the discussed experiments with exposure of biological molecules to THz waves and their main results are summarized in Tables 4Table 5–6. Thus, described experimental studies of the protein and DNA samples show that the main THz-induced effects are associated with changes in the conformation and biological activity of biopolymers. These effects might underlie more complex responses of living systems to THz waves, which are described below.
Exposure of some biological molecules to THz waves in the CW mode.
Exposure of some biological molecules to THz waves in the pulsed mode.
Exposure of some biological molecules to THz waves in the complex mode.
Effects of THz Radiation on Cells and Cell Cultures
Next, we overview the THz-wave effects on the separate cells and different cell cultures. For this aim, different types of cells are analyzed separately, with an emphasis on the blood, skin, cornea, nerve, and stem cells.
Considerable amount of data on the THz optical properties of blood and its components was accumulated up-to-date.2,223–225 THz-pulsed spectroscopy measurements, with the typical range of 0.1 to 3.2 THz, the average beam power of to , and the measurement duration of 1 to 5 min, did not lead to any changes in the spectral and morphological properties of blood cells.226 Such low-power THz-pulsed radiation satisfies the discussed ICNIRP guidelines and is reportedly harmless for biological systems.41
At the same time, a number of research groups demonstrated considerable effects of THz waves on blood cells. In Ref. 227, exposure, for 3 h, of human red blood cells (RBC) to the CW radiation of BWO, with the frequencies of 0.18 to 0.33 THz and the irradiance of , decreases their osmotic resistance, which was attributed to the release of hemoglobin from erythrocytes. In Ref. 228, when human RBCs were exposed, for 1 h, to the CW THz radiation with the frequency of 3.68 THz and the irradiance of , the hemoglobin release from erythrocytes with an addition of water in the ratio of 1:2 increased by seven times, as compared with the nonirradiated erythrocytes. From Ref. 46, it follows that viability of rat RBCs exposed, for 1 h, to pulse THz radiation, with the spectral range of 0.1 to 1.75 THz, the pulse repetition rate of 76 MHz, the pulse duration of 1 ps, and the peak pulse power of 8.5 mW, decreases to a greater extent than in control samples when erythrocytes are placed in the 0.54% to 0.48% NaCl solutions. The cell viability was assessed using trypan blue dye, which penetrates into cells when its membrane is broken.
In Ref. 229, human RBC were exposed, for 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 s, to the Novosibirsk free electron laser radiation, with the spectral range of 2.05 to 2.31 THz, the pulse repetition rate of 5.6 MHz, the pulse duration of 120 ps, the peak pulse power of , and the average irradiance of 8 to . A 5-s-long THz exposure did not lead to pronounced changes in the morphology of cells and did not reduce their aggregation. In turn, increase of the exposure time to 10 to 15 s changed the cell morphology (spherocytosis) and decreased the number of erythrocytes in the aggregates (as a linear function of the exposure duration). A 25-s-long exposure led to the destruction of cell membranes and the lysis of erythrocytes. The observed effects were attributed to the passage of powerful ultrasonic waves that were induced by the THz pulses at the laser pulse repetition rate of 5.6 MHz, through the irradiated medium. As a control, heating of erythrocytes to body temperature and their exposure to ultrasound were used, where such effect was not observed. These results indicated a THz-wave-induced change in the cell membrane permeability.
An important aspect of studying living organisms under the THz exposure is an evaluation of the antioxidant status of cells, particularly, of erythrocytes. In Ref. 230, RBCs were exposed to the CW THz radiation, with the frequency of 0.263 THz and the irradiance of 0.5 to , for 1 and 15 min, and to the pulsed THz radiation, with the pulse repetition rate of 2.5 Hz, the pulse duration of 200 ms, and the average irradiance of 0.1 to , for 1 min. As a result of the THz exposure, the intensity of lipid peroxidation (malondialdehyde concentration) in erythrocytes increased as compared with the nonirradiated control sample, whereas the observed effect depends on the exposure duration. In both regimes, a nonlinearity of the effect was observed, as shown in Fig. 12. At the irradiances of 0.5 to , oxidation was more pronounced than at 5 to . Such effects may indicate both induction of the oxidative stress upon THz irradiation and activation of the response of the cell antioxidant systems.230 Other parameters were also altered after such an exposure. The electrophoretic mobility of cells decreased after the CW THz exposure and, conversely, increased after the pulsed one, regardless of the irradiance value. In turn, the metabolic parameters, such as ATP and 2, 3 diphosphoglycerate concentrations, depended on both the exposure regime and irradiance.230
In Ref. 231, safety limits of blood leukocytes exposure to THz waves were studied, using several pulsed THz emitters and the method of DNA comets.232 The picosecond pulsed THz radiation, with the spectral range of 0.1 to 6.5 THz, the average irradiance of up to , and the exposure duration of 20 min, did not induce any DNA damage in blood leukocytes while heating of thus exposed sample did not exceed 1°C. In Refs. 233234.–235, no effects of the human white blood cell exposure, for 20 min, to the pulsed THz radiation, with the central frequencies of 0.12 and 0.13 THz, the pulse repetition rates of 21.1 and 73.7 kHz, the pulse duration of 50 ps, and the average irradiance of 30 to , were observed, including the absence of the direct DNA damage, the chromosome apparatus changes, and the alteration of cell cycle kinetics. However, in Ref. 235, under certain conditions of cells’ exposure in a THz resonant cavity, some signs of direct DNA damage appeared.
In Ref. 228, exposure, for 30 and 90 min, of the human total blood lymphocytes to the CW THz radiation, with the frequency of 3.68 THz and the irradiance of , led to a decrease in the number of viable cells, which was more pronounced at high exposure time. It is worth noting that such THz exposure causes an increased proliferative activity of the surviving cells. In Ref. 236, similar cells were exposed, for 1, 2, and 24 h, to the CW THz radiation, with the frequency of 0.1 THz and the irradiance of , which was followed by studying four chromosomes (1, 10, 11, and 17) in cells during division. The observed results revealed an increase in aneuploidy of two chromosomes at 2- and 24-h exposure and changes in centromere replication of three and all four chromosomes at 2- and 24-h exposure, respectively. Thus, such a long-term () THz exposure induces significant genomic instability.
In Ref. 237, human T-lymphocytes (Jurkat cell line) were exposed, for 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 min, to the CW THz radiation with the frequency of 2.52 THz and the irradiance of . As a result, almost no changes in the lymphocytes survival were observed in the case of a short-term exposures (). In turn, an exponential increase of the lymphocytes’ death was observed for the long-term THz exposure () due to both apoptosis and necrosis of cells. Finally, for the 40-min-long THz exposure, up to 80% of cells died.
Studies of the global gene expression profile remain the most representative in the THz exposure technologies. For example, in Refs. 238239.–240, human T-lymphocytes (Jurkat cell line) were exposed to the 2.52-THz CW radiation with the irradiance of for 30, 40, and 50 min, accompanied by an increase in the sample temperature from 37°C to 44°C. Thus, irradiated cells were then compared with the control group heated to the same temperatures. Pilot measurements revealed that a 40-min-long exposure to THz waves causes a change in the expression of 628 genes, whereas the 40-min-long bulk heating changes expression of 556 genes.238 Further measurements appeared to be even more illustrative, demonstrating a change in expression of 597 and 725 genes, respectively, with an overlap of only 61 genes. Completely different signaling and metabolic pathways were identified for the THz exposure and heating. There were 30 and 16 pathways for the THz exposure and heating, respectively.172,240 Quite interesting nonlinear effects were observed, i.e., some genes of the potassium and calcium channel proteins showed increased activity when exposed for 40 min, as compared with the 30- and 50-min-long exposures.238 An additional analysis of individual genes indicated that, although stress genes are activated during the THz exposure, this is not typical for all studied genes and is less pronounced as compared with a simple heating.239
Overall, studies of blood cell exposure to THz waves revealed the following biotropic effects:
In some reactions, fingerprints of the compensatory mechanisms were found. Further extensive studies of the global gene expression profiling that captures many aspects of cellular life deserve special attention. THz effects are often highly constructive and sometimes nonlinear in relation to changes of the THz exposure parameters. The discussed effects of blood cell exposure to THz waves in different regimes are summarized in Table 7. Notice that no effects are observed at low exposure intensity (bottom six lines of the table); whereas various effects occur with the increased exposure (top 12 lines of the table).
Exposure of blood cells to THz waves in the different modes.
Skin and cornea cells
In 2015, the Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks published an opinion on the potential health effects of electromagnetic exposure. Given the expected increase in the use of THz technologies, it was recommended to pay special attention to studying the THz-wave effects on the skin, with an emphasis on the long-term low-intense exposure, and on the cornea, with an emphasis on the short-term high-intense exposure.241 Therefore, fibroblasts and keratinocytes of the skin, as well as epithelial cells of the cornea, are the most extensively studied cell types in the THz exposure technologies.
In Refs. 242 and 243, human dermal fibroblasts (HDF cell line) were exposed, for 5, 10, 20, 40, and 80 min, to the CW THz radiation with the frequency of 2.52 THz and the irradiance of . This exposure was accompanied by heating of a samples from 37°C to 40°C, therefore, the control sample was heated to 40°C and studied as a reference. Additional genotoxic control samples were exposed, for 3 min, to the CW UV radiation, with the wavelength of 254 nm and the average power of 38 W. A 5- to 20-min-long THz exposure did not lead to a decrease in the number of living cells, whereas longer exposure slightly reduced it. At the same time, some increase in the cell proliferation was observed. As a results of the THz exposure, an increase in expression was noted for genes of the heat shock proteins, however, it was almost equal to that of conventional heating. No enhancement in the expression of DNA sensing and repair genes, which was observed under the UV irradiation, was found after the THz exposure. Overall, no considerable changes at a cellular and molecular level were identified.242,243 At a more intense exposure of the same cells to the THz-wave source with the irradiance of and the duration varying from few seconds to 2 min, the death of fibroblasts was observed after only the 12-s-long exposure. Finally, as a result of 1- and 2-min-long THz exposure, activation of the genes of some inflammatory cytokines was revealed.242
In Refs. 244 and 245, when human skin fibroblasts (HFFF2 and HDF cell lines) were exposed, for 20 min, to the broadband pulse THz radiation, with the frequency of 0.1 to 0.15 THz, the pulse repetition rate of 21.1 to 26.3 kHz, the pulse duration of 50 ps, and the average irradiance of , authors observed aneuploidy effects, such as an increase in actin polymerization, chromosomal malsegregation, and micronucleus induction. Meanwhile, no signs of the DNA damage, such as expression of the corresponding proteins, phosphorylation of H2AX histone, and repair telomere length modulation, were noticed. Also, no THz-wave effects on the cell growth and survival, including changes in the prosurvival signaling proteins, were revealed. Thus, there was a clear aneugenic rather than clastogenic effect of THz radiation.244,245
In Ref. 246, HDFs were exposed, for 20 min, to the CW THz radiation, with the frequency of 0.14 THz and the irradiance of 35 to . Such parameters as proliferative activity, wound closure percentage, and the level of nitric oxide production in the irradiated cells were estimated. No tangible changes in the examined parameters were revealed. Therefore, low-frequency THz radiation does not affect the functional activity of the HDFs.246
In Ref. 247, human skin fibroblasts (NB1RGB cell line) and human corneal epithelial cells (HCE-T cell line) were exposed, for 3, 70, and 94 h, to the CW THz radiation, with the tunable output frequency in the range of 0.07 to 0.3 THz and the irradiance of 0.4 to . THz exposure at different frequencies did not reveal any changes in proliferation, morphology, and cell activity, as well as no signs of cytotoxicity.247 Exposure of the same cells, for 3, 70, and 94 h, at separate frequencies in the range of 0.3 to 0.6 THz with the irradiance of also did not cause any effects on proliferation, survival, and cell morphology of both cell types.248
In Ref. 249, human corneal epithelial cells (HCE-T cell line) and human retinal pigment epithelial cells (ARPE-19 cell line) were exposed to the broadband pulsed THz radiation of synchrotron with a cut-off frequency, a 1 kHz pulse repetition rate, a 2-ps pulse duration, and a peak irradiance (or a average irradiance), and different exposure terms in the range of 140 to 230 min were examined. Results showed no signs of cytotoxicity, as well as no changes in the cell morphology and proliferation. It was suggested that cells, cultured and maintained under ideal standard conditions, are capable of compensating the THz-wave effects even in the case of such high exposure intensities.249 Negative data were also obtained on the HCE-T cells, exposed to the 0.12-THz CW waves with the irradiance of , and the exposure duration of 24 h. There was no statistically significant increase in genotoxicity, morphological changes, and alterations in the heat shock protein expression.171
In Ref. 250, human keratinocytes (NHK cell line) and human corneal epithelial cells (HCE-T cell line) were exposed to the pulsed THz radiation, with the central frequency of 0.14 THz, the pulse repetition rate of 50 kHz, the pulse duration of 80 ns, the peak irradiance of 24 to (the average irradiance of 0.1 to ), for the different exposure durations ranging from 10 min to 24 h. The effects of such THz exposure were then compared with those of the UVA (the 315 to 400 nm wavelenths) and UVB (280 to 315 nm) exposures, as well as the 43°C heat shock treatment. No considerable changes in cell activity (viability and proliferation) and differentiation were detected in cases of a single THz exposure (with the duration of up to 24 h) and a double one (with the 48-h-long time interval between the 24-h-long exposure cycles). THz waves did not induce a stress response, such as changes in the glutathione and the heat shock protein 70 levels. At the same time, all studied parameters of cells were sensitive to the UVB exposure and the heat shock.250
In Ref. 251, human skin fibroblasts (HDF cell line) and keratinocytes (HaCaT cell line) were exposed, for 2, 8, and 24 h, to the CW THz radiation, with the frequency of 0.106 THz and the irradiance of 0.04 to . Although the authors considered THz irradiance of cells either below or above the aforementioned safety limits, they did not find any changes in proliferation rate and abnormalities in the genetic apparatus, such as increased micronucleus formation, formation of strand breaks, or alkali-labile sites in DNA.251 Similar negative results were obtained in Ref. 252, using the same cells, but another THz emitters with the output frequencies of 0.38 and 2.52 THz and the irradiance in the range of 0.03 to , whereas the exposure durations were 2 and 8 h.252
The authors of Ref. 253 irradiated human epidermal keratinocytes (HEK001 cell line), for 20 min, by the CW THz radiation with the three distinct frequencies of 1.4, 2.52, and 3.11 THz and the irradiance of . Viability of cells and expression of hyperthermic genes were not altered at such exposure conditions. Analysis of the total gene expression revealed 451, 448, and 583 differently expressed genes under exposure to the 1.4, 2.52, and 3.11 THz waves, respectively. More than 50% of these genes in each group were unique, whereas in one group appeared to be common for all three regimes of the THz exposure. Bioinformatic analysis revealed activation of 6, 17, and 12 canonical metabolic and signaling pathways for the 1.4, 2.52, and 3.11 THz exposure, respectively. These pathways were also unique for the considered exposure conditions, except for the extracellular signal regulated kinase 5, as shown in Fig. 13.
In Ref. 254, human skin keratinocytes from donors were exposed, for 10, 20, and 30 min, to the radiation of the two broadband pulse THz emitters. The first one operated in the frequency range of 0.2 to 3.0 THz, possessed the pulse repetition rate of 80 MHz and the pulse duration of 20 to 30 ps, and provided the average irradiance of . The second one features the following set of characteristics: 0.1 to 2.7 THz, 250 kHz, 250 fs, and . As a result of these experiments at both low and high intensities, THz radiation did not affect the cell activity (in general) and did not inhibit their capacity to differentiate, even despite the expected variability in the activity of the primary cells isolated from different donors.254
As shown in Fig. 14, HDFs and epidermal keratinocytes of the full thickness artificial human skin tissues model were exposed, for 10 min, to the broadband pulsed THz radiation with the frequencies of 0.1 to 2.0 THz, the pulse repetition rate of 1 kHz, the pulse duration of 1.7 ps, and the average irradiances of 5.7 and .33,255 As a control, these cells were also exposed, for 2 min, to the pulse UVA radiation with the pulse repetition rate of 1 kHz, the pulse duration of 50 fs, the central wavelengths of 400 nm, and the pulse energy of . Total gene expression analysis revealed a change in the expression of 397 and 442 genes, as a result of the low- and high-intense THz exposures, respectively, against 293 genes, as a result of the UV exposure. THz radiation selectively reduced the expression of genes associated with apoptosis and skin diseases, such as psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. With regard to the potential risk of carcinogenesis, a dual effect was observed since both anticancer and cancer-promoting genes were activated. Activity of the same genes, under the UV exposure, has a different dynamics than THz. THz exposure showed signs of DNA damage, along with an activation of the DNA damage repair mechanisms, such as histone H2AX phosphorylation and increase in the levels of some proteins. In general, the cellular response to THz radiation is significantly different from the UV-induced one.33,255
When similar object was exposed, for 10 min, to broadband pulsed radiation with quite close parameters (the frequency range of 0.1 to 3.0 THz, the pulse repetition rate of 1 kHz, the pulse duration of 1 ps, the peak irradiance of , or the average irradiance of ) in Refs. 256257.–258, 1681 genes changed their expression, among which 1088 and 593 genes were down- and upregulated, respectively. Bioinformatic analysis showed that through the observed changes in the activity of many of these genes, the processes of initiation, maintenance, and progression of a cancer are suppressed; suppression of the glioma pathway is especially well indicated. Despite the fact that these predictions are based on observations in the skin tissue models, the gene-level mechanisms responsible for the negative perturbation are genes that encode for proteins involved in the calcium and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling; these are ubiquitous and well-conserved across many different cell types, including skin and neural cells.258 Moreover, the authors observed explicit activation of an inflammatory response and suppression of a promitotic signaling, including the suppression of cellular functions, such as cell division, differentiation, motility, and apoptosis. Existence of an energy threshold for the observed effects is quite important: namely, at lower THz radiation intensities (the pulse energy of or the electric field strength of ), no significant changes were observed, as compared with the intense THz exposure ( and ), that caused the genetic changes.256–258 Among the observed genomic response, special attention was paid to the THz-wave effect on calcium signaling pathway due to its general significance in biological regulation. An additional study of the differential gene expression profiles, in the case of the five different THz exposure irradiances in the range of 0.6 to , revealed suppression of this pathway by THz radiation and enhancement of this effect with the exposure intensity.259
In Ref. 260, mouse keratinocytes of dorsal skin were exposed in vivo, for 1 h, to the broadband pulsed THz radiation, with a 0.1- to 2.5-THz spectral range, a 1-kHz pulse repetition rate, a 310-fs pulse duration, and a average irradiance. Analysis of the genome-wide expression profile showed a change in the activity of 149 genes involved in the processes of tissue growth and healing, organogenesis, and cell migration. Further bioinformatic analysis indicated a difference in the pattern of gene expression, as a result of the THz exposure, as compared to the UV and neutron ones. Relying on additional studies of individual genes, the authors concluded that general expression gene pattern, induced by THz radiation, is analogous to that by wound stimulus.260 In Ref. 261, mouse ear skin in vivo was exposed, for 30 min, to the pulsed radiation with a 2.7-THz central frequency, a 3-Hz pulse repetition rate, a pulse duration, and a average irradiance. Schematic of this exposure is shown in Fig. 15. The observed results indicated an acute inflammatory response in the skin (the infiltration of neutrophils), whereas IR camera detected no notable THz-wave-induced change in the skin temperature.261 The results showed that such an acute inflammatory response can be initiated without structural disruption of the skin by THz radiation. THz exposure of living tissue in the in vivo conditions can possibly trigger various unexpected dynamic responses, which can not be mimicked appropriately in the simplified in vitro conditions.261
Thereby, the overviewed research demonstrated the main reaction of the skin and cornea cells on THz exposure. These cells act in multicellular organisms as the primary barrier that perceives THz waves as a factor of the external environment and protects against it. THz-wave-driven changes at cellular and molecular levels were revealed, both clearly negative, such as the DNA damage and aneuploidy effects, and relatively harmless, such as the increased cell proliferation. Many results of the THz exposure, including the ones observed in terms of geno- and cytotoxic effects, turned out to be negative, emphasizing that the considered regimes of THz exposure were lower than biologically significant thresholds. A comparison of the observed THz effects with other factors, such as the UV exposure and temperature stress, and with the whole-genome gene expression profiling aided by the bioinformatics, confirmed variability and specificity of the cellular response to THz waves.
Tables 8 and 9 show some remarkable results, both positive and negative, of the skin and cornea cells exposure to THz radiation. One should notice that CW exposure overall causes no damage when using the considered small-to-moderate THz exposure intensities. In turn, due to much higher peak power, pulsed THz exposure can cause DNA damage and changes in gene expression. Thus, considerable attention should be paid to determine safe limits of such pulsed exposure to skin and cornea, with an observed rapid developments of THz technology and, particularly, THz wireless communications.
Effects of CW THz radiation on the skin and cornea cells.
Effects of pulse THz radiation on the skin and cornea cells.
In Ref. 262, effects of the CW laser THz waves on the isolated neurons of the supraesophageal galglion of the Lymnea stagnalis were investigated at 0.71, 1.63, 2.45, 2.56, 3.68, and 4.28 THz, whereas the irradiance and the exposure duration were 2 to and 1 h. At 0.71 THz, the adhesive characteristics of membranes were altered, and the contacts between the nerve cells and a substrate were disturbed. At 3.68 THz, the structural changes occurred in the somatic membrane, axons, and growth cone. The effects were delayed and manifested themselves only 40 to 50 h after the exposure. During this period, redistribution of pigment granules occurred, and the membrane cytocortical layer became heterogeneous. Then, anomalous outgrowth-like structures with the arbitrary orientation grew, whereas classical neurites did not form.262 In the same experiment, the response of cell membrane to the THz exposure was not identical at the different stages of the neural network formation. The aforementioned effects occurred at the initial stage of the neural network regeneration, i.e., before formation of the neuron outgrowths. Other phenomena were observed in neurons (with the outgrowths already formed) at the stage of the neuron network formation, namely, the disturbance in the neurites’ growth zone and the cessation of their further growth, which caused disorders in the interneuron links’ formation,262,263 as shown in Fig. 16.
In Ref. 263, the same biological object, namely, the isolated neurons of the Lymnea stagnalis, was exposed, for 1 min, to the pulsed THz radiation with the central frequencies of 2.1 and 2.3 THz, the pulse repetition rate of 5.6 to 11.2 MHz, the pulse duration of 30 to 100 ps, and the average irradiance of 0.3 to . Exposure at 2.3 THz and caused a gradual decrease in the membrane potential, accompanied by the morphological disorders of membrane and intracellular structures, as well as by the cell death within 2 h after the exposure. At , cell death occurred within 3 h after the exposure; whereas at , part of cells remained vital, and the number of vital cells stabilized within 2 h after the exposure. However, when resorting to 2.1 THz, even with the minimal irradiance of , no viable cells were detected in 1 h after the exposure.263
In Refs. 263 and 264, barrier properties of the neuron membrane were studied after the exposure to THz radiation of a free electron laser possessing the frequency of 2.3 THz and irradiance in the range of 0.5 to (see Fig. 17). Such exposure causes a dose-dependent nonspecific permeability of the cell membrane that was uncovered by studying the vital dye trypan blue transmission through the membrane into the cytoplasm. The dye was distributed nonuniformly in cytoplasm, being localized in separate regions. This effect is reportedly due to the THz-wave-induced formation of hydrophilic pores in the cell membrane. It is reversible, because the membrane potential and functional reactions of cells return to the normal values within 1 day after the exposure.263,264 Exposure of cells to the 2.0-THz THz waves with similar parameters did not cause significant changes in the majority of cells. Only sole neurons were colored uniformly, and their membrane potential was decreased or equal to zero, whereas their amount did not differ from the reference values.264 The control of membrane recovery after the disturbance was carried out using the BCECF-AM dye (7′-bis(2-carboxyethyl)-5(6)-carboxyfluorescein acetoxymethyl ester). This dye can penetrate through the undamaged plasmatic membrane, and it is transformed by the intracellular esterases of living neurons into its fluorescent form BCECF. Fluorescence of noncolored cells and some cells that captured tripan blue was discovered. Membrane of such cells can be recovered after disturbance, and they can retain fluorescence probes inside.263
To test the assumption concerning the THz-wave-induced formation of hydrophilic lipid pores and to reveal the underlying mechanisms before the THz exposure, antioxidants were introduced into the salt solution surrounding neurons, along with a dye (lucifer yellow) that does not penetrate through the intact membranes. It was found that phenol antioxidant histochrom significantly reduces the penetration of the dye into the cell. This may indicate that hydrophilic pores are formed in the cell membrane due to the free radical processes that can be blocked by antioxidants.265 Thus, THz radiation may cause reversible disturbance of the membrane barrier properties, serving as an inductor of the biologically active compounds’ delivery into cells. In turn, antioxidants may be applied to manage this process, providing protection from unfavorable THz-wave effects.265
In Ref. 266, a dose-dependent cytotoxic effect was demonstrated during exposure for 1 to 5 min of the rat glial cells (C6 cell line) to the CW THz radiation of BWO, with the output frequencies in the range of 0.12 to 0.18 THz and the irradiance of . A relative number of apoptotic cells increased while sample heating did not exceed 0.1°C. This study posed a problem of possible biological harm caused by such common CW THz-wave sources as BWOs.266
Reference 267 demonstrated an impact of the broadband pulsed THz radiation, with the frequencies in the range of 0.05 to 2.0 THz, the irradiances of 0.5, 5, and , and the exposure duration of 3 min, on the neurite growth in the sensory ganglia of 10- to 12-day chicken embryos. An increase in the stimulating effect by 24% was observed at the lowest power density of . At the same time, at higher intensities of 5 and , no notable changes were found. These observations highlighted nonlinear THz-wave effects in relation to the electromagnetic-beam power.
In Ref. 268, the neuron-like pheochromocytoma (PC12) cells were exposed, for 10 min, to the 0.3- to 19.5-THz radiation of a synchrotron. During such exposure, the average temperature of the sample was . High-resolution scanning electron microscopy confirmed permeabilization of the cell membrane. For this aim, translocation of silica nanoparticles into the PC12 cells was visualized. Analysis of the microscopy data revealed formation of atypically large (up to ) blebs on the surface of PC12 cells exposed to THz waves, as shown in Fig. 18. Significant differences between the metabolic activity of the THz-wave-treated PC12 cells and of the control ones were not found. However, a higher population of the THz-treated PC12 cells responded to the nerve growth factor by extending longer neurites as compared with the untreated PC12 cells.268
Exposure to the 0.06-THz CW radiation of the pyramidal rat neurons was studied in Ref. 269. For 1-min-long THz exposure at low irradiances (40 to ), considerable changes in the neuronal firing rate and plasma membrane properties were notable. After resorting to higher irradiances (100 to ), dose-dependent increase in the plasma membrane permeability of the intact segmental ganglia of the adult leech (particularly, in the studied Retzius neurons) was observed.270 In Ref. 271, THz exposure, for 1 min, of individual neurons in the leech midbody ganglia at even higher irradiances (1 to ) revealed different effects of THz waves and equivalent thermal heating on narrowing of the action potential half-width and the firing rate. Possible explanation of this effect is the interaction between the THz wave and the neuronal plasma membrane. In Ref. 272, Romanenko et al. extended their studies by examining the direct effect of 0.06 THz radiation with higher power density (80 to ) on sensory neurons from the leech, namely, the thermosensitive nociceptor. Both experiments and simulations showed a notable decrease in the voltage threshold of the action potential formation, as compared with the thermal heating. This effect was attributed to the sensitization of the transient potential of the vanilloid 1-like receptor in the leech nociceptor.
In Ref. 273, the cultured primary hippocampal neurons were exposed, for 20 min, to the CW source (Terasense Group Inc.), with the frequency of 0.1 THz and the irradiance of . The cells were cultured in the 37°C constant temperature incubator and, then, irradiated from the bottom side of the culture dish. RNA-sequencing was performed to identify the expression of 29 genes, as a result of the THz exposure. No considerable difference in the temperature between the culture medium of the sham group and the radiated group was observed. The expression levels of several heat shock proteins genes were not significantly upregulated by the THz exposure. The neuron cells did not undergo serious apoptosis response as well. The authors concluded that THz waves can affect various biomolecule interactions, such as binding of GTPase, phospholipid, tropomyosin, BMP receptor, and long-chain fatty acid, as well as regulate the synapse function and calcium signaling pathway. The upregulation of free intracellular calcium, observed ex vivo, along with the correlated morphological changes in the leech ganglia neuron were also demonstrated at 0.06 THz with the power of 100 mW.274
The discussed effects of the neuron cells’ exposure to THz waves in CW mode are summarized in Tables 10 and 11. Cytotoxicity effects were observed during a number of experiments on exposure of cells and cell models to THz waves with different parameters. THz-wave-induced changes in the structure and functions of the cytoplasmic membrane, including the distortions of the membrane potential, are evident. The processes of nerve tissue regeneration act as an additional factor that modulates the THz-wave effects. In general, THz exposure of nerve cells paves the ways to the development of methods aimed at the noninvasive and selective action on the molecular and cellular regulatory mechanisms.
Effects of CW THz radiation on the neurons cells.
Effects of pulsed THz radiation on the neurons cells.
Stem cells are extremely sensitive to the environmental stimuli. Therefore, they can be considered as a favorable model for studying the effects of biological system exposure to weak electromagnetic fields including the THz waves. Pluripotency is a unique attribute of stem cells. Thus, a maintenance of the pluripotent state or, vice versa, an increase in the rate of spontaneous or induced differentiation are important features to be investigated, from the point of view of both their high sensitivity and their practical significance.
In Ref. 275, human embryonic stem cells (hESM01 cell line) were exposed, for 1 h, to the pulsed THz radiation, with the central frequency of 2.3 THz, the peak irradiance of (the average irradiance of ). The whole genome analysis revealed the altered expression of 73 genes, whereas only 1 of those genes (namely, PRDM14, which suppresses differentiation) was specific to the pluripotent state. In total, 74% of the THz-sensitive protein-coding genes belong to the class of ubiquitously expressed genes. Bioinformatic analysis of the affected genes revealed 15 functional classes that were mostly related to mitochondria. Additional studies did not demonstrate signs of genotoxicity (structural chromosomal aberrations and phosphorylation of histone H2AX), morphological signs of spontaneous differentiation, and any effect on the mitotic index. In Ref. 249, similar human embryonic stem cells (hES07 cell line) were exposed to the broadband pulsed THz radiation, with the cut-off frequency of , the pulse repetition rate of 1 kHz, the pulse duration of 2 ps, the peak irradiances in the range of (the average irradiance of 0.21 to ). The exposure duration varied in the range of 120 to 375 min. The authors observed no changes in the cell morphology, attachment, differentiation, and proliferation.
In Ref. 188, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells were exposed, for 25 min, to the 0.1- to 4.5-THz pulsed THz radiation with a pulse energy and a field strength. Cell viability analysis was carried out 24 h after the exposure, for which the fluorescent staining with propidium iodide and Hoechst dyes was applied. This study did not reveal any increase in the number of dead cells, as compared with the control group.
Human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) were exposed to the pulsed THz radiation with the central frequency of 0.8 THz and the electric field of in Ref. 276. The estimated temperature rise was only 0.3 mK, which could not trigger to the expression of heat shock proteins. The genes, strongly affected by THz irradiation, were regulated by zinc-finger proteins. The authors supposed that gene expression was induced nonthermally by the electric field of the THz pulse, which might be caused by the movement of zinc ions within the cell compartments.
Mouse mesenchymal stem cells (MSC cell line) were studied in Ref. 277. Cells were preliminarily induced to differentiate toward adipocytes. They were exposed, for 2, 4, 6, and 9 h, to the broadband pulsed THz waves with the frequency range of 1 to 30 THz (the maximal intensity is centered at ), the pulse repetition rate of 1 kHz, the pulse duration of 35 fs, the peak power of , and the average irradiance of . Analysis of the genome-wide expression profile showed a clearly visible change in the profile only after a 9-h exposure; namely, 2204 genes changed their activity. Additional analysis of individual genes and visually increased accumulation of the lipid-like droplets in the cellular cytoplasm justified acceleration of the cells’ differentiation into adipocytes under prolonged irradiation. Further studies that involved a 12-h-long THz exposure of cells to the radiation of the same source as well as their 2-h-long THz exposure to the CW radiation (the frequency of 2.52 THz and the power of ) revealed changes in the activity of 381, 122, and 236 genes at 12-h broadband pulsed, 2-h broadband pulsed, and 2-h CW exposure regimes, respectively. Finally, it was found that a 2-h-long THz exposure (regardless of the applied THz sources) affects genes transcriptionally active in pluripotent stem cells.278,279 The authors note that the transcriptional response to THz irradiation indirectly indicates manifestation of gene-specific intrinsic double-stranded DNA breathing dynamics, and the THz-field effects are most likely at the level of DNA transcription.277–279
There is still a quite small amount of investigation in the area of stem cell exposure to THz waves. The observed effects, both at the cellular and genetic levels, can be divided into two categories: general and stem-cell-specific. Effects from the first category, such as cyto- and genotoxicity, have not yet been found against the background of changes in the expression of many genes. Among the effects from the second category, available data allow us to consider THz radiation as a potential tool for noncontact control of gene expression and modulation of cell differentiation.
Effects of THz Waves on Fluorescent Cellular Biosensors
Fluorescent cellular biosensors, described in this section, generally have a form of cells with artificial genetic constructs, which include a promoter of a sensor gene (it reacts to the effect of one or another chemical or physical factor) and a reporter gene of fluorescence protein (its activity is regulated by the promoter of the sensor gene).280 The development of such biosensors includes assembly of the hybrid genetic constructs and their introduction into bacterial cells, as shown in Fig. 19.
When exposed to the investigated factor, the promoter of a sensor gene activates the reporter gene and, accordingly, the production of the fluorescence protein, thus, leading to a well-detectable fluorescent signal. The biosensory approach to study THz bioeffects makes it possible to trace the THz response of a gene, the promoter of which was used in the assembly of the genetic construct.
E. coli biosensor cells with the promoter of a sensor gene of catalase (katG gene) were exposed, for 5, 10, and 15 min, to pulse THz irradiation, with the central frequencies of 1.50, 2.00, and 2.31 THz, the pulse repetition rate of 2.8 to 11.2 MHz, the pulse duration of 50 ps, the peak power of 1 MW, or the average irradiance of . THz radiation was intense enough to heat the samples up to 33°C to 37°C; therefore, the control samples were subjected to the bulk heating at 37°C. In addition, a positive control was applied; namely, exposure to the hydrogen peroxide (a typical inductor for the katG gene) and two additional controls: heat (42°C for 5 min) and cold (30°C for 15 min) shock. As a result, it was shown that THz radiation activates this biosensor (i.e., the catalase gene in the E. coli genome) at all studied THz frequencies, and the effect appears to be dose-dependent. There was no activation at 5-min-long exposure as well as after the heat/cold shock. At the same time, activation was observed in some experiments at 10-min-long exposure and in all experiments at 15-min-long exposure. Figure 20 shows that the effect of THz waves turned out to be more pronounced than that of a positive control; it persisted for more than 4 h after the exposure, which is equal to about eight life cycles of E. coli.
At the same time, radiation did not affect cell survival.281 Later, the activity of E. coli biosensors with the promoter of a sensor gene copA (involved in the homeostasis of copper ions) and the promoter of a sensor gene emrR (involved in multidrug resistance) was studied using the same THz source with the central frequency of 2.31 THz and exposure duration of 15 min. The similar temperature conditions were applied. There were also corresponding positive controls that involved exposure to copper (II) sulfate and salicylic acid. As a result, the emrR promoter was not activated during the THz exposure, but there was a prolonged activation (by analogy with katG) of the copA promoter, but in less extent in comparison with the positive control; heat shock had no effect.282 Long-term THz-dependent responses of E. coli stress systems associated with oxidative stress and copper ion metabolism were demonstrated. The absence of a reaction of the antibiotic resistance system emphasizes the specificity of the cellular response.281–283
Recently, similar E. coli biosensor technology was applied to study the activities of promoters that regulate the production of transcription factors MatA, YdeO, ChbR, and TdcR.284,285 Being exposed, for 15 and 30 min, to the intense-pulsed THz radiation, with the frequency of 2.31 THz, the pulse repetition rate of 5.6 MHz, the pulse duration of 100 ps, and the average irradiance of , the samples were heated up to the temperatures of 35°C to 37°C, and all four biosensors were activated, as compared with the bulk heating at 37°C. However, when exposed, for 15 and 30 min, to the low-intensity 0.14-THz CW radiation with the irradiance of , the samples were heated up to (which is above an ambient room temperature), and only three biosensors were activated, displaying the biosynthesis of YdeO, ChbR, and TdcR. In almost all of these cases, a dose-dependent effect was observed, i.e., the activation was more pronounced (or was only observed) at 30-min-long exposure, as compared to the 15-min-long one. In addition, as an example of THz-dependent activation of the tdcR gene, the significant influence of the type of vessel for irradiation and the composition of the nutrient medium was shown. Chemical exposure (five different toxins separately) or heat shock (heating up to 42°C) did not cause the activation. Thus, four THz-sensitive biosensors were obtained, which serve as indicators of various cellular functions: biofilm development (MatA), response to various stress (YdeO), uptake and metabolism of chitobiose (ChbR), and transport and metabolism of threonine and serine (TdcR).
Thereby, the described research results justify that nowadays biosensors are considered as a promising platform for research and monitoring of the THz anthropogenic factors.
Evidently, during the last few decades, large amounts of data have been accumulated regarding biological effects of THz waves. Sometimes, we observed contradicting results of the THz exposure, which poses important problems of adequate designing, planning, and performing of the THz exposure experiments. As described earlier, only a combination of accurate knowledge about the exposure parameters, a number of control measurements (tests), and maintenance of the suitable ambient environment can lead to reproducible and verified experimental data.
Despite a considerable interest paid to the biological effects of THz waves, further research is required for the development of safe limits of THz waves. Obviously, such safe limits should account for not only the thermal THz-wave effects (as the common ICNIRP standards do)40,192,193 but also for the nonthermal. Development of the THz dosimetry is of crucial importance for biomedical applications of THz technology in such demanding branches as label-free diagnosis of malignant and benign neoplasms,3,4,8–16 sensing of glycated tissues and blood in context of diabetes diagnosis,1,19–21 determining the degree of traumatic injuries22 and viability30 of tissues, and even emerging methods of single cells, microorganisms, bacteria, and viruses sensing.286–291 Also, THz dosimetry is of crucial importance for the rapidly developing 6G wireless communications that will reportedly span sub-THz and THz frequencies.292 There is no doubt that such a wide range of THz technology applications, which involve interaction between THz waves and different biological systems, would stimulate the development of THz safe limits in the nearest future.
Studies of the THz-wave biological effects involving modern methods of cytology, genetics, and molecular biology can uncover THz therapeutic avenue. As mentioned above, THz waves are capable of regulating the gene expression, changing the membrane permeability, and DNA demethylation. Being adequately studied and regulated, such a versatile impact of THz waves on living cell opens a variety of THz technology applications in medical therapy of cancers, inflammatory, and neurodegenerative deceases. Finally, we notice that development of such THz therapeutic applications would require further progress in THz components, including highly efficient uncooled CW and pulsed THz emitters,6,7,126–128,130,132–135 elements of bulk (open space) and fiber/waveguide optics293–299 aimed at the THz-wave delivery to the hardly accessible tissues and internal organs. Such elements are still to be developed.
Recent research results in the area of THz-wave effects on biological systems of the different organization levels, such as biomolecules, cells, and organism, were discussed. Despite the considerable data accumulated in this demanding research direction, we still possess quite limited knowledge about biological effects of THz waves. Further research and engineering efforts are required to develop adequate safe limits of THz-wave exposure and to objectively uncover strengths and weaknesses of THz technology in different branches of medial therapy. Thus, this review summarizes up-to-date knowledge in the area of cell exposure to THz radiation and paves the ways to the THz dosimetry and therapeutic avenues.
This work was financed by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation in the framework of state support for the creation and development of world-class research centers, “Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare” (# 075–15–2020–926).
Code, Data, and Materials Availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.04.008 TRBIDM 0167-7799 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pquantelec.2018.10.001 PQUEAH 0079-6727 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8986/ab4dc3 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.18287/JBPE20.06.020201 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8010022 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/AOP.10.000843 AOPAC7 1943-8206 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12013.x JIDEAE 0022-202X Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06129.x BJDEAZ 0007-0963 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4907350 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2392041315 RADLAX 0033-8419 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/56/14/008 PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.5.002837 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.24.2.027001 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.411025 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.412715 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.432758 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.4.043005 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-016-0490-5 OQELDI 0306-8919 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42124 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006297919140086 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.23.3.036015 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.006371 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.395432 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.381660 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.59.6.061617 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.4.043001 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.4.043010 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.433216 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.8.000460 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-018-0483-5 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0585 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02363 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-011-9794-5 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2011.574206 CRETEK 1064-3389 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0018151X18050127 HITEA4 0018-151X Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X20060041 OPSUA3 0030-400X Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.2351/1.1585079 JLAPEN 1042-346X Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2013.2293115 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09537-y Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1088/1478-3975/9/5/053001 1478-3975 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1070/QE2008v038n07ABEH013851 QUELEZ 1063-7818 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1688448 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1759078711000122 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.18287/JBPE-2015-1-1-3 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.26.00A113 JOBPDE 0740-3224 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2137667 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/49/10/002 PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/49/9/001 PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3592779 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099291 POLNCL 1932-6203 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2015.2485208 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2014.2364025 IEBEAX 0018-9294 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2009.08.024 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207617729534 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2013.01.009 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-018-0513-3 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-020-00684-4 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1468888 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1021/ja207929u JACSAT 0002-7863 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4918708 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1080/00150190490508909 FEROA8 0015-0193 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1750906 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1723677 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1139/v61-069 CJCHAG 0008-4042 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1002/polc.5070140111 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4896194 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5045480 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.415049 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201200111 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22552 LSMEDI 0196-8092 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.18287/JBPE17.03.010301 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2013.2255914 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2018.2805699 IETDAI 0018-9383 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.43.005637 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2010.2045678 IETDAI 0018-9383 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4932099 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2018.2796559 ITPSBD 0093-3813 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1143/APEX.1.042002 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.27.001454 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.30.001030 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.31.002696 JOBPDE 0740-3224 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/35/3/201 JPAPBE 0022-3727 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.115828 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.025964 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1429299 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-013-0041-0 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05045 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-017-9057-3 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay8683 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.395832 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-020-07486-5 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.459355 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.47.4375 JJAPA5 0021-4922 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2010.05.002 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1109/MWSYM.2004.1338884 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1109/LMWC.2004.828027 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1109/LMWC.2005.859989 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSICT.2014.7021179 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2014.2336537 IJSQEN 1077-260X Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3552291 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.115292 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.58.11.110901 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.27.009481 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2010.2049735 IJSQEN 1077-260X Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/90/11/118002 PHSTBO 0031-8949 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.4.000038 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1049/el.2013.4035 ELLEAK 0013-5194 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1049/el:20063921 ELLEAK 0013-5194 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4959195 AAIDBI 2158-3226 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2018-0093 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.95174 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1109/3.121 IEJQA7 0018-9197 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.100958 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.88079 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.56.1.010901 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6641/aaff31 SSTEET 0268-1242 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.59.6.061608 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcrysgrow.2020.100485 PCGMED 0960-8974 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2638 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2014.2342505 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.201600199 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5081119 AAIDBI 2158-3226 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X19050199 OPSUA3 0030-400X Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X20070103 OPSUA3 0030-400X Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.111922 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.23.001822 JOBPDE 0740-3224 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-016-0927-5 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2734374 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.44.005634 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.386305 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.004573 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3655331 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.7567/APEX.6.072703 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1787/1/012030 JPCSDZ 1742-6588 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1070/QEL16681 QUELEZ 1063-7818 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.085704 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.39.006632 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.59.6.061613 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0018151X20010174 HITEA4 0018-151X Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.3390/app10030980 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1109/IVEC.2011.5747105 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2016.01.015 IPTEEY 1350-4495 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMW.2008.4665652 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2017.2775678 ITPSBD 0093-3813 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-019-00631-y Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-014-0048-1 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-007-9291-z IJIWDO 0195-9271 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11141-007-0039-3 RPQEAC 0033-8443 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064226914080075 JTELEJ 1064-2269 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.015101 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.11906/TST.150-155.2009.12.16 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-009-9561-z Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.004727 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2015.2476962 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.11113/mjfas.v14n4.1074 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.3390/app9050917 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1667/RR2406.1 RAREAE 0033-7587 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13080793 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2015.2504782 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024801304083 IJIWDO 0195-9271 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.560020505 IJQCB2 0020-7608 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(73)90256-7 JTBIAP 0022-5193 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v28.i12.420 CRBEDR 0278-940X Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4931825 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4971963 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10867-017-9442-y Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.158101 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2009.12.077 PYLAAG 0375-9601 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.20910 JPBPEM 0887-6266 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42855-x Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2015.2453121 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1147/1/012060 JPCSDZ 1742-6588 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.2976/1.2976661 HJFOA5 1955-2068 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b03228 JPCLCD 1948-7185 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001210 HLTPAO 0017-9078 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0b013e3182983fd4 HLTPAO 0017-9078 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183406 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2020.1984 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab057a PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aa81fe PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aa81fc PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.377424 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2005.04.033 CMPHC2 0301-0104 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1080/10739149.2016.1270961 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11141-009-9152-9 RPQEAC 0033-8443 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/47/37/374009 JPAPBE 0022-3727 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4076 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/47/21/319 PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2017.02.037 SAMCAS 1386-1425 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(00)00227-X CHPLBC 0009-2614 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2565945 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2567077 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X09100063 OPSUA3 0030-400X Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.752431 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1134/S000635092003015X Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20466 BLCTDO 0197-8462 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b10355 JACSAT 0002-7863 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01883879 IJIWDO 0195-9271 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65955-5 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47011-z Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.10.004931 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37103 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.381529 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-021-00793-8 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201819510003 EWCPBI 2100-014X Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X16010069 OPSUA3 0030-400X Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X19060183 OPSUA3 0030-400X Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-017-0462-2 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.753111 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006350917060033 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1070/QE2014v044n03ABEH015337 QUELEZ 1063-7818 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006350911040087 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HP.0000251248.23991.35 HLTPAO 0017-9078 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024440708943 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2004.01.014 IPTEEY 1350-4495 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1667/RR0944.1 RAREAE 0033-7587 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.844917 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1109/irmmw-THz.2011.6104966 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1109/irmmw-THz.2011.6104967 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1109/IRMMW-THz.2014.6956140 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.21930 BLCTDO 0197-8462 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.844916 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20960 LSMEDI 0196-8092 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2015.06.003 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1002/em.22192 EMMUEG 0893-6692 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5098148 APCPCS 0094-243X Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrx075 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics6010033 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/58/2/373 PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1177/026119290803600610 AALADQ Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046397 POLNCL 1932-6203 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1667/RR3077.1 RAREAE 0033-7587 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2082542 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024492725782 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.4.000559 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1109/IRMMW-THz.2019.8874132 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.11906/TST.028-033.2018.03.03 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-018-0512-4 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7647/abf742 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02296 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.011465 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1109/SIBIRCON.2008.4602607 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1027451015050195 JSIXBV 1027-4510 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.8.000273 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.909350 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11020162 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/7/4/045003 1741-2560 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.875758 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00357.2014 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2019.04.021 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.426928 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1109/UkrMW49653.2020.9252579 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07749 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.402815 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015806 POLNCL 1932-6203 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.2.002679 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01184 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2005.11.065 ACACAM 0003-2670 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.21736 BLCTDO 0197-8462 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2016.2532344 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079059717080019 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.400432 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.412074 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.005344 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.3.002937 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04988 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201700398 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006350919030059 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA10605C Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2016.65 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201900236 2195-1071 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.389999 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202000307 2195-1071 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.401608 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/OME.402185 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcrysgrow.2021.100523 PCGMED 0960-8974 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.422637 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01010440 IJIWDO 0195-9271 Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28245-9 Google Scholar
Olga P. Cherkasova is a professor at Novosibirsk State Technical University and a head of the Laboratory of Biophysics at the Institute of Laser Physics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia. Her research interests include interaction between THz radiation and biological objects, as well as applications of THz technology for diagnosis of diabetes, malignant, and benign neoplasms with different nosologies and localizations.
Danil S. Serdyukov graduated from the Department of Natural Sciences of the Novosibirsk State University, Russia. He is a junior researcher at the Institute of Laser Physics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia. His research interests include development of the fluorescent cellular biosensors, as well as studies of their interactions with THz radiation.
Eugenia F. Nemova graduated from the Department of Physics of the Novosibirsk State University, Russia. She is a junior researcher at the Institute of Laser Physics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia. Her research interests include studies of the THz-radiation effects on conformations of biopolymers. Her research skills are supplemented by popular science communication and teaching science for children.
Alexander S. Ratushnyak, Dr. S., is a head of Biomedical Informatics Laboratory at the Institute of Computational Technologies of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. His research interests include interaction of THz radiation with neurons.
Anna S. Kucheryavenko is a junior researcher in the Laboratory of Shaped Crystals of the Institute of Solid State Physics of RAS, Chernogolovka, and in the Laboratory of Submillimeter Spectroscopy of the Prokhorov General Physics Institute of RAS, Moscow. Her current research interests include medical instruments and THz technologies in medical diagnosis and therapy. She is a member of SPIE.
Irina N. Dolganova is a research assistant in the Laboratory of Shaped Crystals of the Institute of Solid State Physics of RAS, Chernogolovka, and in the Institute for Regenerative Medicine of Sechenov University, Moscow. She received her PhD in 2017. Her current research interests include medical instruments and optical and THz technologies in medical diagnosis and treatment. She is a member of SPIE.
Guofu Xu received his BSc degree in optical information science and technology from the Army Engineering University of PLA, China, in 2012, and his MEng degree in electrical theory and advanced technology from Hefei University of Technology, China, in 2019. He is currently pursuing his PhD under the supervision of Prof. Maksim Skorobogatiy at Polytechnique Montréal, where he is involved in the development of optical waveguide components for THz applications.
Maksim Skorobogatiy, Dr., P. Eng., graduated from MIT in 2001 with a PhD in physics and from MIT with the MSc in electrical engineering in 2000. He is currently a full professor at Polytechnique Montréal, Canada, where he holds a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in ubiquitous THz photonics. In 2017, he was elevated to fellow of the Optical Society of America for his pioneering contributions to the development of microstructured and photonic crystal fibers.
Igor V. Reshetov is a member of the Russian Academy of Sciences. He holds a Doctor of Science degree in the medical sciences. He is currently a professor and head of the Cluster Oncology Department, as well as a practicing surgeon at Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia. His research interests include plastic and reconstructive microsurgery in oncology, head and neck tumors, including technologies for treatment, reconstruction, rehabilitation, and development of novel technologies for medical diagnosis of human body malignancies.
Peter S. Timashev graduated from Lomonosov Moscow State University of Fine Chemical Technologies, Moscow, Russia. He received his PhD from Karpov Institute of Physical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia, in 2004, and his DSc degree in 2016. He is the director of both Sechenov Biomedical Science and Technology Park and the Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia. He is an author of more than 200 publications and 11 patents and is a laureate of the Moscow Government Prize.
Igor E. Spektor received his PhD in engineering sciences at Moscow Technical Institute of Forestry in 1997 for his research work in the Space Research and Development Center, Korolev, Moscow region, Russia, where he studied the methods and instruments of the intense heat flow measurements. Since 1998, he has been with the A.M. Prokhorov General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (GPI RAS), Moscow, Russia. He is a head of the Department of Submillimeter Spectroscopy at GPI RAS. His research interests include components, instruments, and methods of BWO dielectric spectroscopy and imaging, as well as THz-pulsed spectroscopy.
Kirill I. Zaytsev holds a PhD in optics engineering. He is a head of the Laboratory of Broadband Dielectric Spectroscopy at Prokhorov General Physics Institute of RAS, an associate professor at Bauman Moscow State Technical University, and a senior researcher at Sechenov University. His research interests include applied physics, optics and biophotonics, terahertz science and technology, dielectric spectroscopy, inverse problems in optics, computational electrodynamics, and optical engineering. He is a member of SPIE.
Valery V. Tuchin is a corresponding member of the RAS, head of optics and biophotonics, director of Science Medical Center at Saratov State University. He is a fellow of SPIE and OSA, an honored scientist of the Russian Federation, an honored professor of Finland, and a recipient of the SPIE Joseph W. Goodman Book Writing Award (2016), the Michael S. Feld Biophotonics Award (2019), and the medals of D.S. Rozhdestvensky (2018), and A. M. Prokhorov (2021). His works have been cited over 32,000 times.