Translator Disclaimer
Open Access
20 October 2021 Enhanced medical diagnosis for dOCTors: a perspective of optical coherence tomography
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Significance: After three decades, more than 75,000 publications, tens of companies being involved in its commercialization, and a global market perspective of about USD 1.5 billion in 2023, optical coherence tomography (OCT) has become one of the fastest successfully translated imaging techniques with substantial clinical and economic impacts and acceptance.

Aim: Our perspective focuses on disruptive forward-looking innovations and key technologies to further boost OCT performance and therefore enable significantly enhanced medical diagnosis.

Approach: A comprehensive review of state-of-the-art accomplishments in OCT has been performed.

Results: The most disruptive future OCT innovations include imaging resolution and speed (single-beam raster scanning versus parallelization) improvement, new implementations for dual modality or even multimodality systems, and using endogenous or exogenous contrast in these hybrid OCT systems targeting molecular and metabolic imaging. Aside from OCT angiography, no other functional or contrast enhancing OCT extension has accomplished comparable clinical and commercial impacts. Some more recently developed extensions, e.g., optical coherence elastography, dynamic contrast OCT, optoretinography, and artificial intelligence enhanced OCT are also considered with high potential for the future. In addition, OCT miniaturization for portable, compact, handheld, and/or cost-effective capsule-based OCT applications, home-OCT, and self-OCT systems based on micro-optic assemblies or photonic integrated circuits will revolutionize new applications and availability in the near future. Finally, clinical translation of OCT including medical device regulatory challenges will continue to be absolutely essential.

Conclusions: With its exquisite non-invasive, micrometer resolution depth sectioning capability, OCT has especially revolutionized ophthalmic diagnosis and hence is the fastest adopted imaging technology in the history of ophthalmology. Nonetheless, OCT has not been completely exploited and has substantial growth potential—in academics as well as in industry. This applies not only to the ophthalmic application field, but also especially to the original motivation of OCT to enable optical biopsy, i.e., the in situ imaging of tissue microstructure with a resolution approaching that of histology but without the need for tissue excision.

1.

Introduction

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is one of the most innovative and successfully translated imaging techniques with substantial clinical and economic impacts and acceptance.1,2 OCT is a non-invasive optical analog to ultrasound (US) with significantly higher resolution (<1  μm) enabling three- and four-dimensional high-speed (>millions of A-scans/s) imaging with tissue penetration of up to 2 mm, closely matching that of conventional histopathology. The year 2021 marks not only the 30th birthday of OCT (assuming its initiation with the Science paper by Huang et al.3 in 1991) but also the 35th birthday of low-coherence interferometry and optical ranging in biological systems.4,5 In the last three decades, more than 75,000 OCT related papers have been published (about two thirds in ophthalmology) with continuous yearly increases of published articles.6 Breaking through the 1000 publications/year barrier was initiated in 2005/2006 with the introduction of spectral domain OCT (SD OCT). In 2020, the OCT-related scientific output was more than 7800 papers, resulting in nearly one paper every single hour on every single day of the year. Extrapolating this publishing performance, a saturation of yearly publication output at about 9500 can be expected around 2030. After 30 years, it is interesting and important to benchmark this performance with other medical imaging techniques:6 multiphoton microscopy (MPM) [including second harmonic generation (SHG) and third harmonic generation (THG)], developed about three decades before OCT,7,8 has about 50,000 publications so far; photoacoustic imaging (PAI), established in the 1970s,9,10 has about 15,000 papers; and confocal microscopy, developed in the 1940s,11,12 has about 145,000. Developed in the 1940s,13 US imaging has contributed to about 160,000 papers; positron emission tomography (PET), initiated in the 1970s,14,15 has about 175,000; computed tomography (CT), developed in the 1930s,16 has about 750,000; and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), developed in the late 1940s,17 has close to 1,000,000 publications. This dominance in publications of radiology and nuclear medicine imaging technologies is also one of the reasons why medical imaging is, in general, associated with MRI, CT, PET, or US. It is important to note, though, that from a medical imaging market perspective, optical imaging technologies dominate with 66% versus 34% for radiology and nuclear medicine imaging technologies. In addition, in the United States alone, about 450,000 physicians use primarily optical imaging techniques; 60,000 use primarily radiologic imaging; and about 130,000 use both.18

In the last three decades, OCT has revolutionized ophthalmic diagnosis, therapy monitoring, and guidance. Every second, a human gets a retinal OCT scan; therefore it is the fastest adopted imaging technology in the history of ophthalmology. This is mainly due to the ease of optical accessibility of the human eye, OCT’s exquisite depth sectioning performance at the micrometer level, and a significantly better performance compared with the previous gold standard in this field, ultrasonography. Furthermore, it is also due to the fact that the human retina cannot be biopsied and finally to the continuous clinically relevant improvements of this technology, due to an exquisite ecosystem between industry and academia in terms of resolution, speed, wide-field imaging, and longer wavelength for choroidal imaging. Motion contrast-based angiography, cellular level retinal visualization, visible light OCT for oximetry and unprecedented retinal layer detection, functional and contrast enhanced extensions, and artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced performance also contributed to this success. Most of these superb technological developments can be directly translated to the original motivation and idea of OCT: to enable optical biopsy, i.e., the in situ imaging of tissue microstructure with a resolution approaching that of histology but without the need for tissue excision and preparation, allowing for quasi-instantaneous diagnostic feedback for physicians, and thereby reducing healthcare costs. There is no doubt that outside ophthalmology, OCT faces significantly bigger challenges with extremely well performing, long-established diagnostic techniques. Hence, OCT has successfully penetrated into different medical fields outside of ophthalmology, but in the last 30 years, it has not been as successful as in ophthalmic diagnosis. Despite the unprecedented success of this imaging technique in ophthalmology so far, there are still numerous remaining challenges in this field to be addressed (e.g., 4D intrasurgical OCT, portable, handheld OCT, and OCT-based digital adaptive optics) but one of the biggest perspectives for OCT is to further push performance frontiers of all involved technologies to converge to the original motivation of OCT, which is to enable in situ optical biopsy, especially for early cancer diagnosis and for a better understanding of oncogenesis.

Consequently, this perspective will focus on the following areas that will pave the way for enabling even further enhanced medical diagnosis using OCT in the future. Imaging speed is absolutely essential in medical diagnosis: on the one hand, to minimize the exam time for the patient, but foremost to enable motion artifact free, properly sampled data sets. The speed of today’s systems already supports three- and even four-dimensional imaging as well as wide fields of view and functional extensions of OCT, such as OCT angiography. In the future, different technologies will enable increased OCT imaging speed with one of the fundamental decisions being at which scanning speed single-beam raster scanning will be abandoned and scanning beam parallelization will be used. Further challenges of OCT’s unmatched axial and transverse resolution will also be discussed. Similar to combining different radiology and nuclear medicine imaging technologies in current clinical diagnosis, multimodal optical imaging not only enables the “best of both/all worlds” but also compensates for the deficits of OCT (metabolic, molecular sensitivity, penetration depth, and limited contrast). Multimodal imaging applications combining techniques complementary to OCT will more and more be transferred from significantly improved microscopy setups—acting as fast quasi-histological optical biopsies next to the operating room—to the miniaturized endoscopic level with OCT acting like a global positioning system (GPS) by prescreening the tissue at a wider field of view (FOV) with microscopic resolution. Aside from OCTA, no other functional or contrast enhancing OCT extension has accomplished comparable clinical impact in the last three decades. Some more recently developed ones that might accomplish this challenging task, including quantitative OCTA (especially in neuro-ophthalmology), optical coherence elastography (OCE), dynamic contrast OCT, oximetry using visible light OCT, optophysiology—also referred to optoretinography—and AI-enhanced OCT, will be covered in this perspective. In addition, OCT miniaturization for portable, compact, handheld OCT applications, as well as for home-OCT and self-OCT, will be discussed. Finally, industrial translation of OCT, including medical device regulatory challenges, will be reviewed.

2.

Key-Technological OCT Performance Specifications: Speed and Resolution

2.1.

Measurement Speed

The acquisition speed of OCT, typically measured in A-scans per second or voxels per second, has been increasing since its inception. This steady increase in speed has supported the continuous expansion of OCT capabilities and applications. Initially, OCT’s predecessors low-coherence interferometry and optical time domain reflectometry had been used to measure distances along the sample beam or along an optical fiber.19,20 Early time domain OCT systems for ophthalmic diagnostics then recorded B-scans with an A-scan rate of several hundred hertz.21,22 The introduction of Fourier domain OCT (FD-OCT), however, had the biggest impact on speed as well as clinical usability. It increased the A-scan rate to tens of thousands of A-scans per second. With such rates, volume capture scans and high definition scans, i.e., an averaged B-scan calculated from up to 100 B-scans, replaced individual B-scans in ophthalmic diagnostics. More recently, technological improvements of line scan cameras, tunable light sources, digitizers, and data transfer interfaces pushed the speed further to hundreds of kHz and even MHz A-scan rates.2326 Such speeds now permit the observation of dynamic processes with live volumetric OCT scans, called 4D OCT, in which the fourth dimension is time.27

In theory, both FD-OCT implementations, SD-OCT and swept-source OCT (SS-OCT), have similar sensitivity and should thereby reach similar acquisition speeds. However, in practice, SS-OCT has lower losses in the detection and does not suffer from a depth dependent sensitivity roll-off in the case of long coherence length sources such as vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers (VCSELs) or akinetic swept sources, introduced by the limited modulation transfer function of the spectrometer. At imaging depths of several millimeters, SS-OCT may therefore exhibit >10  dB higher sensitivity than its spectrometer-based counterpart. In consequence, the highest speed confocal point scanning OCT systems so far have been SS-OCT systems. The fastest reported SSOCT systems so far use dispersive stretching of ultrashort pulses propagating through a fiber.2830 These OCT systems are currently limited by missing fast enough data acquisition boards to sample the stretched ultrashort pulses running at up to 100 MHz. The highest voxel rates are reported for SS OCT systems employing a so-called circular ranging technique, which uses a frequency comb spectrum leading after Fourier transform to degenerate depth ranges sampled in parallel.31 The most convincing performance for in vivo imaging so far has been demonstrated with systems powered by Fourier domain mode locked lasers,26 although vertically VCSEL-based systems are gradually closing in concerning speed and bandwidth performance.32

Such high speeds, however, come at the price of decreased sensitivity, at least when imaging light sensitive samples in which the illumination power cannot be arbitrarily increased, such as the human eye. Ophthalmic OCT systems therefore rely on fast safety circuits, which monitor the motion of the scanning beam and the illumination power to quickly shut off the laser in case of a failure. This permits treating the scanned beam as an extended source and thereby higher permissible light exposure than with a stationary beam. However, because it takes time to detect an unintended slowdown of the scanners, the maximum applicable power with confocal point scanning systems will soon be reached.

Another factor limiting the speed of point scanning devices is the requirement for fast scanners. To minimize strain of the scanners and maximize scan speed, sinusoidal or spiral scan patterns may be applied; however, this introduces the need for a resampling step in postprocessing.33

To continue the trend of ever-increasing imaging speed, we see a shift from single-beam confocal point scanning systems toward parallel systems.3436 These include systems that illuminate the sample with multiple confocal beams in parallel, often referred to as multibeam OCT systems, and systems that illuminate a line or an area on the sample, called line field and full-field OCT (FFOCT) systems, respectively (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

MHz OCT systems: (a) equivalent A-scan rates; for parallel systems, this is the number of parallel channels times the A-scan rate; shown are published systems with rates 1  MHz. (b) Data rates in gigasamples/s; only systems with sufficient data available have been included; fastest A-scan rates are achieved by stretched pulse laser OCT; fastest data rates were demonstrated by circular ranging OCT systems. In both categories, full field swept source OCT is a key player (PS, point scanning; TD, time domain; SS, swept source; and SD, spectral domain).

JBO_26_10_100601_f001.png

2.1.1.

Multibeam OCT

Using a parallel interferometer and multiple confocal illumination spots, one can multiply the acquisition speed of an OCT system by the number of spots. In fiber-optic implementations, this requires multiple interferometers, detectors, and data acquisition channels, as well as a powerful light source.34 Although it seems to be a straightforward approach at first glance, the implementation of such systems is not trivial. The coherence gate of the different interferometers ideally should overlap in the sample plane with high precision to image the same depth in all channels. This can be achieved using a variable delay in each interferometer, which however adds significant cost and complexity. In bulk optic interferometers, the multiple beams may share a common interferometer and hence may have inherently matched pathlengths. Implementations based on photonic integrated circuits (PIC) can rely on the high precision of the lithographic manufacturing processes to control pathlength differences. PICs in general are very attractive for multibeam systems because multiplying the interferometer only costs wafer space, which is cheaper than additional fiber interferometers.

From a laser safety perspective, for ophthalmic OCT systems, one can argue that each beam is illuminating a different location on the retina. However, in the anterior segment, the beams are stationary and overlapping. Depending on the combined energy in this “hot spot,” damaging the iris or lens may become a concern.

Another challenge with multibeam systems is merging the acquired multichannel data in postprecessing. In particular, when montaging not only 2D images, i.e, en face or B-scans, but also the full volumetric data sets.

2.1.2.

Line-field OCT

Line-field OCT (LFOCT) comes at all flavors of OCT: TD-OCT, spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT) and swept source OCT (SS-OCT) implementations have been demonstrated.35,3740 Its line illumination has a major advantage: because an entire B-scan is captured at once, only one scanner is required to acquire a volume scan. In most cases, this scanner can even have a lower performance than typical galvanometric scanners used in point scanning systems as the scan in the orthogonal direction relative to the B-scan is typically relatively slow. Further, a line illumination maintains confocality in one dimension and never focuses to a spot. This is beneficial for the suppression of multiply scattered photons and permits high illumination powers when imaging the human retina. TD LFOCT particularly allows for keeping the confocal gate aligned with the coherence gate. Using a high-resolution system with tight coherence gating, such confocal LFOCT, has enabled the production of impressive images of human skin that efficiently suppress scattering41 [Fig. 2(b)].

Fig. 2

Examples for FF and LF OCT. (a) High-resolution large FOV retinal FFOCT. Panels 1 to 4 visualize the cone photoreceptor mosaic at different eccentricities as shown in panel S2 (scale bar 100  μm). Reproduced from Ref. 42., © 2020 Optical Society of America (OSA). (b) TD LF OCT of human skin, using dynamically aligned confocal and coherence gating (K, keratinocytes; DEJ, dermal–epidermal junction; SD, sweat duct; H, hair; CF, collagen fibers; BV, blood vessels. Scale bars: 200  μm). Reproduced from Ref. 41, © 2018 OSA. (c) Retinal imaging with LF SS OCT at 600 kHz equivalent A-scan rate. Reproduced from Ref. 39, © 2015 OSA. (d) Computational adaptive optics for in vivo high-resolution retinal imaging (left: uncorrected enface slice from photoreceptor layer; center: reconstructed wavefront error; and right: corrected enface slice by phase conjugation of the wavefront error to the pupil plane phase; error bars 100  μm). Adapted from Ref. 43. (e) Advantage of FFOCT phase stability for functional OCT assessment of photoreceptor response (upper row: enface plane at OS photoreceptor layer of recorded volume together with tomogram; lower row: response measured as phase change over time after light stimulus onset; inlay shows the actual stimulus mask). Adapted from Ref. 44.

JBO_26_10_100601_f002.png

In SD-OCT configurations, B-scan rates of several kHz can be achieved by employing standard off-the-shelf 2D cameras.43,45 Such high B-scan rates make LFOCT attractive for functional extensions that require fast repeated scans, such as elastography, OCTA, or Doppler OCT (see Sec. 4). However, high acquisition speed in general is beneficial for achieving high phase stability, making LFOCT also a candidate for phase sensitive extensions, such as computational adaptive optics43,46 [Fig. 2(d)], dynamic OCT, or functional OCT47 (see Sec. 4).

SS-OCT implementations require very fast line scan cameras. The fastest suitable off-the-shelf line scan cameras reach line rates of 300  kHz. Assuming 1000 spectral sampling points, this results in a B-scan rate of 300 Hz. The number of sampling points can be reduced using an holographic off-axis approach, resulting in full range imaging with up to a 1 kHz B-scan rate39 [Fig. 2(c)]. Yet, the lower axial sampling poses limitations on its practical use for clinical imaging. Although the B-scan rate is comparable to state-of-the-art commercial point scanning OCT systems, the low spectral sampling rate may pose problems in the case of fast sample motion. It introduces a phase shift across the spectral interferogram, which results in a point spread function broadening, similar to a dispersion mismatch between reference and sample arm. For example, for retinal line-field imaging, using B-scan rates of several kHz43 has been recommended to avoid axial blurring. Recently, a high-speed CMOS camera has been applied for fast line field sensing to overcome the motion limitation, but at increased costs for the sensor.47,48

The advantages of LFOCT and its technical feasibility using readily available components make it the most promising candidate for parallel OCT embodiments and put it closest to market translation.

2.1.3.

Full-field OCT

FFOCT permits very simple system designs.49 Without the need for scanning devices, a 2D array camera records the backscattered light from the sample as well as from the reference arm. Additional mechanisms however are necessary for extracting the coherently depth gated cross correlation signal between sample and reference light, comprising the OCT signal. TD-FFOCT is equivalent to holography with a broadband source.50,51 The OCT signal retrieval is achieved either by phase-shifting techniques in an in-line configuration or by off-axis using spatial filtering in postprocessing. The in-line approach has the advantage of exploiting the full sampling provided by the 2D array pixels, but comes with the drawback that several phase-shifted image copies are needed for OCT reconstruction. Although the focal plane can be locked to the coherence gate in TD-FFOCT, this advantage is lost in FD-FFOCT. Another advantage of time domain implementation is that it can be cheap, using readily available area cameras.52 The advantage of the Fourier domain version on the other hand is its speed,53 but it requires high-speed cameras, capable of several hundred kHz frame rate, which are still very expensive.

An important advantage of FFOCT is its intrinsic phase stability across the full en face FOV. This makes it especially interesting for phase sensitive extensions of OCT, in which fluctuations in the phase or complex signal are measured over time across repeated en face images or volume acquisitions. These include dynamic OCT,54 which provides a cell type specific contrast by detecting small oscillations of subcellular components (see Sec. 4.4), functional OCT,44 in which changes in the optical length of neural cells in the retina are measured in response to light stimuli [Fig. 2(e)] (see Sec. 4.2), or computational adaptive optics,55 in which the phase slope of the wavefront is extracted to measure and correct aberrations (see Sec. 2.2).

In particular, TD-FFOCT implementations often use spatially incoherent light sources that provide intrinsically aberration free imaging over the full FOV56 [Fig. 2(a)]. They further suppress cross-talk present in systems using spatially coherent sources, which is beneficial for imaging highly scattering samples, such as brain tissue. To overcome the missing confocal gating mechanism in FD-FFOCT and suppress multiply scattered light, it has been demonstrated to be advantageous to deteriorating the spatial coherence.36,57,58 This can be achieved using rotating scattering discs, spatial light modulators, or multimode fiber mode scramblers.

Although FFOCT systems typically illuminate a large area on the sample and thereby enable a substantial increase in illumination power when imaging light sensitive tissue, special attention must be paid when the sample is the human retina. To illuminate a large area on the retina, a focus forms in the anterior segment. Critical energy densities are reached in this hot spot soon before the maximum permissible exposure for the retina can be reached. This severely limits the benefit of FFOCT’s large degree of parallelism relative to an LFOCT system when imaging the human retina.

2.2.

Lateral Resolution in OCT

The lateral resolution of OCT systems is given by the numerical aperture (NA) of the imaging optics. In contrast to, for example, confocal microscopy, it is decoupled from its axial resolution (see Sec. 2.3).59 Most FD-OCT systems are therefore designed with a comparably low NA to create a large depth of focus and thereby enable an instantaneous imaging depth of several millimeters.

Diffraction limited resolution can be achieved when the sample itself does not introduce wavefront aberrations. However, especially when imaging the human retina, the imperfect optics of the eye introduces large wavefront errors that prevent diffraction limited resolution when making use of their full NA. It has been shown that the diffraction limited resolution can be recovered by the use of adaptive optics,60 using deformable mirrors, or computationally by using the interferometric phase that different approaches have reported, ranging from algorithms from diffraction tomography61 to iterative62 and non-iterative approaches63 to extract and manipulate the wavefront shape. This enables the resolution of individual cells in some retinal layers, i.e., photoreceptors and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells. Although other retinal cells, in theory, are large enough to be resolved even by standard OCT systems, such as ganglion cells, they often remain hidden due to limited contrast. However, it has been shown that averaging a large number of acquisitions or applying dynamic contrast methods helps to reveal them even in the living human eye.64

In confocal systems, hardware-based adaptive optics has the advantage of correcting the wavefront optically before the light is coupled back into a single-mode fiber, thereby maximizing the signal. Deformable mirrors, especially ones with a large number of elements, are costly, which so far has prevented their use in commercial OCT systems and makes computational approaches more attractive. To overcome the prohibitive cost of hardware-based adaptive optics OCT on the one hand and the limited collection efficiency of confocal computational adaptive optics OCT systems on the other hand, more basic deformable mirrors may be used to correct low-order aberrations optically and higher orders numerically.

The detection of an aberrated wavefront is not a concern in FFOCT, as long as the detector has sufficient resolution to resolve the wavefront’s phase slope. Because computational wavefront correction algorithms can propagate the focal plane to any depth, they can realize a depth invariant lateral resolution, whereas high NA hardware-based adaptive optics OCT systems are limited to a depth of focus of only a few micrometers.

Cellular and subcellular resolution is the field of optical coherence microscopy (OCM). TD OCT is a natural candidate for OCM since the tight confocal gate can be dynamically aligned with the coherence gate during depth scanning.65 For FD OCT configurations with a fixed reference arm, other means are needed to extend the FOV beyond the tight confocal gate. Again, computational methods have shown their merit for OCM by extending the focus depth.66,67 These include hardware-based methods used depth fusion approaches,68 Bessel beams,69 structured illumination,70 or employed metalenses.71

2.3.

Axial Resolution in OCT

The axial resolution of OCT is given by the center wavelength and spectral bandwidth of the illumination.59 The most prominent wavelength band of OCT systems lies at 840 nm. This is a result of OCT’s success in ophthalmology. The near-infrared light permits good penetration through the water-like filled eye to the retina, while not blinding the patient and still maintaining good detection efficiency with silicon cameras. Most OCT in this wavelength band are SD-OCT systems using super-luminescence diodes or Titanium:sapphire lasers. With full-width half-maximum bandwidths of up to 180 nm, an axial resolution down to 1  μm in tissue can be achieved.72 However, commercial ophthalmic SD-OCT systems typically employ sources with a much narrower spectrum, realizing an axial resolution of 5  μm in tissue. If an axial resolution below 1  μm in tissue is desired, super-continuum sources with spectral bandwidths of several hundred nanometers that stretch far into the visible spectrum can be used (see Sec. 4.3).

Most SS-OCT systems operate at longer center wavelengths, 1060 nm for imaging the posterior segment of the human eye, and 1310 and 1550 nm for imaging more strongly scattering samples, such as skin or brain tissue. The achievable resolution at 1060 nm is typically set by the water absorption window, which limits the useful bandwidth to 100  nm, resulting in a typical axial resolution of 7  μm in tissue. At 1310 and 1550 nm swept-sources with a broader tuning range are available; however, the achievable axial resolution is similar due to the higher central wavelength.

3.

Multimodal Optical Coherence Tomography

Multimodal imaging or multiplexed/hybrid imaging refers to the assessment of signals of more than one imaging technique. In multimodal imaging, one of the driving motivations is to combine morpho-functional information—enabling the “best of both/all worlds.” This can be accomplished by either acquiring images at different times (asynchronous) and fusing them through digital image manipulation techniques or simultaneously acquiring images (synchronous) and merging them automatically. Main goals of multimodal or multiplexed imaging are to improve early detection and localization of cancer and better understanding of cancerogenesis. Furthermore, multimodal imaging enables examining more than one molecule or molecular and morphologic information at a time, so cellular events may be examined simultaneously or the progression of these events can be followed in real time.

Clinical optical multimodal imaging has so far been successfully applied in ophthalmic diagnosis including color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence, OCT, en face OCT, OCT-angiography, B-scan ultrasonography, fluorescein angiography, and indocyanine green angiography.73 In cardiology, morphological features of NIR spectroscopy-detected lipid-rich plaques using OCT and intravascular US are performed in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for treatment of an acute coronary syndrome.74

Multimodal optical imaging in this perspective not only combines OCT with complementary optical imaging methods but also compensates for the deficits of OCT (metabolic, molecular sensitivity, penetration depth, and limited contrast). In this context, OCT will act (in contrast to other microscopy imaging techniques) like a GPS by prescreening the tissue at a wide FOV with microscopic resolution and then other techniques will zoom in at the subcellular or molecular level to enable obtaining morpho-molecular or morpho-metabolic tissue information.

3.1.

Non-linear Optical Microscopy and Spectroscopy: Subcellular, Biochemical, and Metabolic

Detection of structural information at the cellular level expands the understanding of tissue environment for in vivo studies, but the lack of molecular specificity hampers differentiation between pathologic and healthy tissues with comparable scattering or structural properties. Structural alterations in tissues and cells usually take place only after carcinogenic biochemical changes. OCT contrast can be improved by various implementations. However, molecular specificity including metabolic information at the cellular level is still not easily accessible. Therefore, despite the power of OCT, the sensitivity and specificity to detect pathologic tissue are limited.

This weakness limits the ongoing success of this technology. One solution to overcome this limitation and to address current needs in the life sciences and in the clinical practice is to combine OCT with other non-invasive molecular specific modalities. Label-free spectroscopic and microscopic optical imaging technologies such as Raman spectroscopy (RS)75 and MPM76,77 that complement OCT1 have been established and extensively applied over the past years. These modalities present comparable contrast to standard histopathological methods,78 but no single modality can play the role alone.

Indeed, integrated multimodal imaging provides the possibility of fusing morphological information with metabolic-molecular information in a label-free way, complementing basic observation with multiple specific contrast mechanisms to gain a complete picture of disease, but it is still challenging due to different optics and hardware requirements.79 MPM has become an essential instrument for biological and medical research with inherent 3D sectioning capability, subcellular resolution, high sensitivity, molecular and metabolic specificity, and deep tissue penetration compared with confocal microscopy, but compared with OCT achievable FOVs, penetration depths and acquisition speeds are restricted. This weakness can be overcome with novel high-speed MPM approaches achieving kilohertz frame rates by implementing pulse-modulated, rapidly wavelength-swept lasers, and inertia-free beam steering via angular dispersion.80 In the future, this could help to match the different needs of OCT and MPM, thus facilitating the combination of these complementary techniques in a single co-registered platform.

Usually, the key technologies to add molecular sensitivity to OCT are RS81 and coherent Raman spectroscopy. RS allows for full molecular fingerprinting of tissue offers high specificity. Several variants including non-linear vibrational imaging82 with different sophisticated laser sources83,84 and single-laser source approaches8587 have been proposed, but the main deficit is that real-world applications are often missing due to special treatment of the sample—thin slices of transparent samples with high Raman cross sections to be investigated in transmission or reflection mode. Coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering efficiently provides images with label-free molecular information from DNA, lipids, proteins, and collagen. Recently, stimulated Raman scattering-spectroscopic OCT was introduced to leverage the spatial and spectral multiplexing capabilities of OCT with the molecular specificity and sensitivity of SRS for label-free fast 3D molecular imaging with a single laser on a single platform.88 Two-photon excitation fluorescence (TPEF) microscopy8994 is another powerful OCT add-on that can intrinsically be merged with SHG91,9597 or fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM),98100 showing augmented contrasts with the same FOV and resolution for all modalities. TPEF microscopy can bring unique additional insight into the mechanisms underlying immune system dynamics and function as cellular motility within the native environment in vivo. TPEF microscopy and FLIM achieve ultrahigh isotropic subcellular resolution, enhance chromophore contrast via excitation of fluorescent biomolecules, improve sectioning compared with conventional one photon fluorescence, and metabolic information by imaging endogenous metabolites such as nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide and hydrogen/flavin adenine dinucleotide. Pleomorphism (cell nuclei versus cell size ratio) can be detected with subcellular resolution imaging, and grade classification can be performed. Co-registered OCT and TPEF microscopy has the ability to link specific cellular phenotypes and functions as revealed by TPEF to tissue morphology, thus paving the way between basic research knowledge and clinical observations.101

SHG provides contrast from non-centrosymmetric molecules such as collagen, which mainly appears in the extracellular matrix as distinct morphological feature. The supramolecular organization can be revealed. In vivo skin imaging on a cellular level proves the potential for dermatology.102104 THG microscopy provides cellular morphological information in real-time with acceptable penetration depth and ultrahigh isotropic subcellular resolution, but reduced penetration depth and remarkable smaller FOV compared with OCT (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3

(a) Integrated approach using cross-polarization OCT, multiphoton tomography, and FLIM in skin equivalent preclinical research. Adapted from Ref. 99. (b) 3D reconstructed image in the popliteal lymph node of a CX3CR1:eGFP mouse: OCT (magenta) in the whole lymph node, SHG (blue) of collagen in the lymph node capsule, GFP fluorescence of CX3CR1+ cells (green), and rhodamine dextran signal in blood vessels in the whole lymph node and phagocytes, especially in the subcapsular sinus (red). Adapted from Ref. 101. Scale  200  μm.

JBO_26_10_100601_f003.png

The problems with these multimodal optical imaging approaches with MPM are the need for very high-photon concentration in space and time and subsequent requirement of extremely high near infrared (NIR) laser intensities. Ultra-short laser pulses provide high-peak powers necessary to achieve appropriate excitation powers for MPM signal generation with moderate time-averaged illumination doses. Ultra-broadband Titanium:sapphire lasers, which are proven and well-established light sources for MPM, are a challenge in the commercialization of such combined platform since they introduced high costs and complexity.105109 Alternative stable and cost-effective light sources are required.110 Direct diode-pumping of mode-locked Titanium:sapphire lasers111 and scaling up of the achievable output power112 could pave the way toward more widespread application of this technology beyond scientific research.113 Recently, advancements in soliton-based photonic integrated frequency comb soliton microcombs have accelerated the development of broadband and low-noise chip scale frequency comb sources with the potential for high-resolution OCT deep tissue imaging at 1300 nm.114 Combining OCT with MPM at these longer wavelengths or even at 1700 nm can enhance tissue penetration. The key enabling elements to improve the imaging penetration depth, depth of focus, and spatial resolution simultaneously are the laser wavelengths and pulse energy, beam shaping concepts, detection schemes, and real-time AI algorithms. First, deploying longer wavelengths, e.g., 1700 nm for OCT, TPEF, SHG, and THG, the penetration depth for imaging is significantly improved, facilitated by the novel ultrafast laser wavelength agility. Second, novel beam shaping allows for propagating invariant light fields that achieve increased depth, thereby improving penetration and retaining high resolution. Third, to compensate for attenuation intrinsically present in tissue, absorption correction is applied, and, more importantly, dynamic changes from the strong optical scattering are compensated for by so-called computational adaptive optics. The latter relies on OCT motility contrast as a measure of the wavefront for correcting the input and real-time data processing. Penetration depth could be even further improved using light sources at longer wavelengths. Recently mid-infrared OCT could be demonstrated with an axial resolution of 8.6  μm.115 Detection could be performed with a standard CCD camera upon implementation of an upconversion module.

One major consideration for future development of the multimodal morpho-molecular metabolic imaging platforms lies in the capability of performing fast OCT and successive simultaneous MPM in the backward propagation direction without affecting one modality to interfere with the others, thus compromising image quality. Hence, one solution in multimodal diagnostic imaging is the combination of a wide-field high-resolution imaging platform including OCT and advanced microspectroscopic imaging techniques and an automated software to extract and classify the morpho-molecular metabolic patterns with the aim to see what can be seen in immunohistochemistry from the macroscopic level to the highly specific microscopic level. With deep learning, automatized full tissue characterization on a multiparametric level can reveal the early onset of disease and improve understanding.

However, deep optical imaging, such as deep brain imaging in vivo, at high resolution still poses a great challenge beyond the light source development. Adaptive optics based on direct wavefront sensing can recover diffraction-limited resolution corrupted when achieving deep optical imaging. Successful implementation of adaptive optics in any optical system is always an engineering challenge and often makes the overall system complex and economically expensive. The subaperture correlation-based computational adaptive optics method, which is the computational equivalent of the Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor (SHWS), can achieve near diffraction-limited performance in FF-SS OCT.116 The advantage of this method is that, unlike other optimization-based techniques, it is non-iterative in nature and it does not require a priori knowledge of any system parameters such as wavelength, focal length, NA, or detector pixel size. This method can be also extended to region of interest (ROI)-based aberration correction to achieve diffraction-limited lateral resolution beyond the isoplanatic patch in high-resolution point scanning OCT with high NA. A computational sensorless adaptive optics strategy including OCT could play a critical role in correcting aberrations over large volumes and enabling rapid random-access multiplane imaging without highly sophisticated precompensation, SHWS, or electron-multiplying charge-coupled device.

AI-supported denoising and deconvolution of images to increase sharpness, resolution, or brightness are currently implemented at some microscopy platforms. However, it is often limited to a single modality and leaves the user patching different AI systems together for various use scenarios. At the moment, each imaging method needs a specific deep learning architecture with little similarities between each architecture. Moreover, to achieve a good level of validity, one needs a high number of training data to train an AI. One main problem for achieving the needed quality for detection and pixel-based quantification through deep learning lies in the lack of quality in ground truth data and the lack of a ground truth management system. By invoking a novel ground truth management system, an efficient AI system can be trained using only a few training data sets. Once the AI has been trained for one modality, the gained “experience” can be used to significantly speed up the training for other modalities through new transfer learning techniques, i.e., passing on experience. Active learning and knowledge transfer can improve learning speed and accuracy. This will apply to resolution enhancement as well as automatic annotations for ROIs. Therefore, in a unified approach in which the AI system supports OCT and MPM, radically improved learning speed and accuracy can be provided to establish novel multiparametric biomarkers. By developing and deploying novel beam shaping concepts, supported by advanced AI algorithms in combination with real-time data processing, critical parameters for the imaging performance in terms of penetration depth, acquisition speed, and spatial resolution are vastly improved, which could pave the way toward a compact multimodal biophotonics platform for advanced real-time 3D intrasurgical morphological, metabolic, and molecular imaging platform with increased sensitivity and specificity.

3.2.

Photoacoustic Microscopy and Tomography: Absorption, Molecular Contrast, and Seeing Deeper

OCT as an optical imaging modality that relies on the optical scattering properties of samples has its inherent limitations in terms of contrast generation. The strong scattering of many biological tissues further restricts the penetration depth of OCT due to its dependence on ballistic photon detection. To alleviate these problems, combining OCT with PAI has been explored by various groups over the past decade. Our previous review paper covered this topic for scientific works up to 2014.117 This perspective focuses on an update on dual modality OCT/PAI system configurations published recently as well as an outlook focusing on their application in molecular imaging.

3.2.1.

System configurations for dual modality OCT-PAI

Combining OCT and PAI can be categorized into three major implementation schemes: OCT with photoacoustic microscopy (OC-PAM), OCT with photoacoustic tomography (OC-PAT), and OCT with photoacoustic endoscopy (OC-PAE). Each of these schemes is briefly discussed below.

In terms of OC-PAM, ever since the first realization of this technique,118 piezoelectric transducers have been the go-to solution for photoacoustic signal detection. Over the past few years, we can still see the piezoelectric transducers being used in OC-PAM configurations. Among these piezoelectric transducers, needle transducers are most commonly used. So far, OC-PAM using needle transducers has been applied in choroidal and retinal imaging119127 extensively. Some technical advancements of needle-transducer-based OC-PAM systems have also been reported such as for dynamic focusing128,129 and for incorporating additional imaging modalities.130 However, due to the opaque nature of the needle transducer and knowing that these needle transducers are normally unfocused, alternatives for OC-PAM implementation have been explored. One direct approach is to make the transducer transparent, which was recently demonstrated in an OC-PAM system and applied in different disease or pathological models.131 Another approach would be to use optical detection for the photoacoustic waves. Using Michelson interferometry, OC-PAM was achieved and characterized.132 Using the principle of Fabry–Perot interferometry, an akinetic photoacoustic sensor was demonstrated133 and henceforth applied in OC-PAM imaging.134,135

For OC-PAT, the implementation is still based on a system using a polymer film sensor.136 After the successful application of this system in chick embryo imaging137 and human skin imaging,138 the functional extension of OCTA was added139 and demonstrated in clinical settings.140142 The current development is to increase the speed of acquisition to match the two modalities’ acquisition time.143 Other photoacoustic pulse sensing methods, such as a microring resonator, were also explored to be incorporated into OC-PAT systems.144 As for OC-PAE, after the first published configuration using a transducer,145 an improved version of the probe was introduced as a proof-of-concept design.146 Using all optical detection, an OC-PAE probe for intravascular imaging was demonstrated.147 A more detailed review on dual-modality imaging using OCT and PAI was recently published.148

3.2.2.

Contrast agents in OCT and PAI

Endogenous contrast is not sufficient for fully exploiting PAI’s great potential for the visualization of physiology and pathology at the molecular level. Therefore, the development of imaging probes became an utterly important field for research. The use of specific multimodal OCT-PAI probes is often not necessary since PAI’s molecular imaging capabilities nicely complement OCT’s superiority in morphological imaging.

Signal compounds for PAI can be divided into three broad classes: small-molecule dyes, inorganic, and organic nanostructures.149 Organic nanostructures and especially semiconducting polymer nanoparticles gained elevated interest since they can be easily functionalized and are of relatively low cost and potentially biosafe.150,151 In addition, they possess excellent photostability and a high mass absorption coefficient.152

PAI probes can be used to image deeper into tissue to, e.g., allow for whole body mouse, rat, and human organ imaging,153,154,154160 to enhance the signal-to-background ratio,161 for phototherapy and photoactivation,151,162 and for molecularly targeted imaging.149,152,158

Molecular targeting can involve the qualitative or quantitative detection of potential biomarkers such as reactive oxygen species,163,164 pH,165,166 Ca2+,167171 matrix metalloproteinases,172 and granzyme B.173 Biomarker imaging has mainly been demonstrated in animal models for various types of cancer, sentinel lymph nodes, liver dysfunction, and PAI of T lymphocytes, whereas intraoperative multimodal pancreatic cancer detection was already performed in humans.174

The combination of OCT with molecular PAI is still in its infancy, but it can offer new insights into pathophysiological processes. Targeting drug tolerant persister cells with signaling compounds in animal models and organoids might be a promising application for a combination of PAI and OCT for both tomography and ultrahigh-resolution imaging to aid cancer therapy.134,144,175,176

Molecular PAI can be exploited to investigate a recently discovered fluid drainage pathway in the eye.177,178 Monitoring of the ocular drainage rate into the lymphatic system can potentially be used as a measure for the effectiveness of existing and novel glaucoma treatments,179,180 and a combination with OCT and retinal blood flow measurements could promote our understanding of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.

3.2.3.

Outlook of OCT-PAI

A major technological limitation of current OCT-PAI systems is the imaging speed mismatch between the two modalities.1,148 Although modern OCT technology permits video rate imaging, PAI systems, especially when PAT is applied, are much slower. Recent advances in high-speed PAI have pointed the way for novel real-time OCT-PAT systems. First, as the speed of PAI has been largely confined by the limited repetition rate of current pulsed laser sources, high repetition rate light sources such as pulsed laser diodes181 and light emitting diodes182,183 have been applied for in vivo PAI. However, the low fluence from these alternative sources has resulted in imaging results with a poor contrast, which could be potentially improved by emerging methods such as deep learning184,185 (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4

Real time PAI: (a) cross-sectional images of the lower thoracic cavity, (b) two lobes of the liver, (c) upper abdominal cavity, and (d) lower abdominal cavity of a nude mouse at a frame rate of 50 Hz. AA, abdominal aorta; BM, backbone muscles; CM, caecum; IN, intestines; IVC, inferior vena cava; LK, left kidney; LL, left lung; LLV, left lobe of liver; LV, liver; PV, portal vein; RK, right kidney; RLV, right lobe of liver; SC, spinal cord; SP, spleen; SV, splenic vein; TA, thoracic aorta; and VE, vertebra. Reproduced from Ref. 154 with permission from Springer Nature. Time-lapse 3D images of a freely swimming zebrafish recorded at an imaging rate of 100  volumes/s. The shown sequences correspond to two portions of the movie having (e) smooth and (f) abrupt movements. Scale bar is 1 mm. Adapted from Ref. 188 with permission. Wide-field imaging of mouse brain hemoglobin responses to front paw stimulations at 2 kHz frame rate using a single transducer and an ergodic acoustic relay. (g) Calibration image of mouse brain vasculature through an intact skull. (h) Wide-field image. Fractional changes in signal amplitude (shown in red) in response to (i) right paw stimulation and (j) left paw stimulation superimposed on the calibration image. Norm., normalized and r.m.s., root mean square. Adapted from Ref. 186 with permission from Springer Nature.

JBO_26_10_100601_f004.png

Another way toward real-time OCT-PAI systems is applying multiple transducers and parallel data acquisition for PAI, which has demonstrated 2D PAI for large objects154,187 and 3D PAI for a smaller FOV.188 However, currently most photoacoustic detectors are conventional piezoelectric transducers, which are opaque to OCT detection beams. Therefore, all optical US detectors, due to their optical transparency, are especially interesting for OCT-PAI systems. Using a planar Fabry–Perot etalon, a multibeam scanner for simultaneous interrogation of multiple points was demonstrated.189 This parallel detection reduces the 3D PAI time to a few seconds. Increasing photoacoustic interrogation beams will further increase imaging speed.

However, the parallel detection also greatly increases system costs. A new trend in high-speed PAI is to reduce acoustic detection points and adopt novel algorithms for image reconstruction using the obtained sparse data. These methods can be classified as iterative reconstruction algorithms190193 and deep learning methods.194 For the former, prior knowledge of photoacoustic images, such as smoothness, sparsity, or total variation constraints, are added in the iterative algorithms. For the latter, a priori training is necessary to reconstruct high-quality images from sparse data.

Furthermore, in the latest breakthrough to speed up PAI, the number of required transducers for a large area 3D imaging was reduced to one single detector.186 To do this, an acoustic relay cavity is placed between the imaged object and the detector. The propagation of photoacoustic waves in this cavity creates unique stretched acoustic pulse signatures for each point in the FOV. Therefore, upon full field illumination, the signal of the single detector is the combination of stretched pulses from the whole FOV; thus the optical absorption at each point can be unmixed based on the acoustic pulse signature. Although more research is needed for this method, together with all progress in achieving high-speed PAI, these breakthroughs have paved the way to future real-time OCT-PAI technologies.

3.3.

Multimodal Endoscopic OCT: More Comprehensive Access to Internal Body Organs

In addition to its success story in ophthalmology, OCT can also provide exquisite cross-sectional morphological information of organs that are not easily accessible, such as coronary arteries, intestines, or the brain. OCT imaging penetration suffers from light attenuation in tissue, especially due to high scattering at the near-infrared wavelengths (800 to 1300 nm). Penetration depths of 0.5 to 2 mm prevent OCT from acting as a full-body imaging modality but enable tissue information up to comparable depths of those accomplished with conventional biopsies. In the past 30 years, research and industry have focused on the development of optical probes to endoscopically access internal organs with OCT. Two major approaches have been realized: sideward and forward imaging devices.195 Luminal organs, such as vessels, airways, or the esophagus, can be imaged by sideward viewing probes, realized with scanning mechanisms based on micromotor-based distal rotation of a reflector196 or proximal scanning of rotary joints.197 Larger hollow organs, such as the urinary bladder, stomach, or cervix, are accessible via a forward viewing probe placed in front of the ROI. Beam scanning is achieved using microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), such as piezoelectric actuators198,199 or mirrors.200,201 Also other forward scanning schemes have been reported on paired GRIN lenses202 or optical fiber bundles,203 although fiber bundles have not yet shown sufficient OCT performance and reduce probe bending flexibility for proper clinical applications.

During the development process of such probes, general optical and mechanical requirements have to be met: overall mechanical diameter, taking safety measures into account for electrical isolation, electromagnetic shielding, bending protection, and sealing; the necessary rigid distal length of the probe to fit clinical instrumentation, which has often insertion angles on the proximal end; or a careful micro-optical design to reach best optical performance. For the lateral resolution, approaches have been proposed to access development parameters already in the biomarker identification phase using microscope setups.204 Additional obligatory clinical requirements regarding sterilizability or biocompatibility must be taken into account. Furthermore, orientation is key for performing biopsies at a location identified with endoscopic OCT for proofing diagnosis or resecting identified malignant lesions. A proposed approach in esophageal endoscopic OCT is using laser landmarks.205,206

Not only is the change toward a combined diagnostic and therapeutic tool of high interest, but also new approaches in probe design and development have been fostered recently. Concepts based on diffractive lenses were reported by Xi et al.207 Although the construction size is still considerably large, diffractive lenses are overcoming the compromised optical performance if OCT is implemented in endoscopic probes. Improved image performance was demonstrated by Pahlevaninezhad et al. in 2018 using metalenses for developing nano-optic endoscopes. These specially designed metalenses were shown to precisely control the light phase, thus reducing spherical aberrations and astigmatism. Therefore, increased depth of focus in parallel to high resolving power is achieved. This technique could furthermore be beneficial for other endoscopic imaging modalities.71 As 3D printing currently is available for metal and glass material, the development and research are going toward 3D printed glass surfaces with optical quality. This enables freeform optics manufacturing of optical components and even multilens objectives.15 Implementing this technology in optical endoscopic probes allows for direct printing on optical fiber facets with freeform optical elements, such as a freeform total internal reflection mirror for sideward imaging endoscopic OCT.208 In addition, microstructuring concepts will most likely lead to implemented anti-reflection behavior of the optical elements and tailored optical properties using different photoresists to customize optical properties at a micrometer scale (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5

Representative steps toward the development of fast data acquisition, 3D printed optical free-forms and representation easy to follow in clinical routine processes. (I) Zhang et al.32 reported on sideward imaging e-OCT and OCTA of a swine esophagus at an A-scan rate of 2.4 MHz. The distance covered by pullback was 14 mm, and a B-scan rate of 600 Hz was achieved. Arrows in (a) indicate blood vessels in OCT enface image, dashed lines in (b) indicate the depth of (c)–(f). This remarkable performance of OCT and OCTA at MHz speed is paving the way toward multi-megahertz endoscopically acquired data of OCT and OCTA. Adapted from Ref. 32. (II) Li et al.208 have realized 3D-printed free-form optic directly spliced on a light delivering fiber for improving optical performance (TIR, total internal reflection). Not only are very thin optical assemblies possible with this technique, but also the combination of various complementary techniques might be enabled with tailored optical properties to achieve outstanding imaging quality. Adapted from Ref. 208. (III) Alfonso-Garcia et al.209 introduced an augmented visualization of FLIM delineating brain tissue from prenecrotic and necrotic tissue. Left: Magnetic resonance image with indications of planes 1 and 2 of the FLIM maps on the right. Extrapolating this approach toward information feedback to clinicians, the color-coded maps, based on one single or multiple imaging techniques, could be easily interpreted and used by clinicians for immediate medical intervention. Adapted from Ref. 209.

JBO_26_10_100601_f005.png

Endoscopic OCT on its own has great potential in providing cross-sectional morphological information. Nevertheless, it lacks molecular or metabolic tissue contrast. Intramodal multimodal imaging using Doppler OCT, polarization sensitive OCT (PS-OCT), OCE, or spectroscopic OCT may provide additional contrast, but its clinical impact is still unclear.210 As an additional extension, endoscopic OCTA for perfusion and angiogenetic contrast is of increasing interest as well. First realized in sideward viewing probes,211 forward endoscopic OCTA has recently been successfully applied,212,213 demonstrating promising advantages compared with narrow band imaging with respect to 3D visualization and increased depth.214 Increasing clinical endoscopic OCTA usability will require even further stabilization, robust acquisition modes, and image co-registration.215217 Imaging speed is certainly an important factor for its easy adaption. MHz OCT was reported for intravascular imaging to overcome heartbeat artifacts during imaging.218 Multi-MHz OCT/OCTA was reported recently and enables video rate OCT/OCTA at impressive imaging performance.32,218 In the near future, multimodal endoscopic OCT will demonstrate significant potential to unleash the full capability of accessing complementary morpho-functional and/or morpho-molecular tissue information needed for improved clinical diagnosis and therapy monitoring. For example, reports on a probe combining OCT and fluorescence imaging219 providing additional molecular contrast and on a probe combining OCT, PAI, and US220 have been published. There are still challenges to be solved for a multimodal endoscopic OCT combination: the optic design needs to combine and find the best solution to fulfill the various optical requirements coming from the different image technologies in the scope of limited physical space within an endoscope. The acquisition times for the different modalities differ and are limited by biological constraints such as peristaltic movement, heartbeat, or breathing. Co-registered information is critical to retrieving the correct clinical information, especially if FOVs of the combined techniques are different. Research has been conducted toward the full cross-link of OCT and RS, despite remaining challenges.221 To investigate clinical validity, large clinical studies, preferably multicentral studies, are absolutely necessary. Toward real-time displaying of the relevant information, the complementary techniques should be processed and visualized in a way to permit in situ clinical understanding and finally diagnostic decision. Therefore, each single modality needs to be optimized for detecting/characterizing the disease.222 Data analysis speed and robustness have to be optimized, enabled by the full capacity of classification algorithms dealing with multivariant analysis. In the near future, computer science involvement will be the major topic for bringing endoscopic OCT (with or without other imaging technologies) to the patient bedside and into daily clinical practice. Techniques such as unsupervised classification for biomarker identification may be promising approaches. Morpho-molecular augmented painting, as presented by Alfonso-Garcia et al.,209 with autofluorescence lifetime imaging during neurosurgery, would be an intuitive real-time information display for guiding clinicians to detect the malignant tissue. Finally, this technique would lead to an augmented map for resecting malignant tissue inside human organs based on morphological, molecular, and functional contrast.

From a clinical point of view, the use of the described imaging devices—capable of multimodal endoscopic OCT—should preferably be applicable in an outpatient department setting, where typically no stationary stay of the patient is required, no general anesthesia is necessary, and immediate diagnostic information is needed. To achieve this, further miniaturization and increased usability with minimum patient discomfort are key. A quantum leap in diagnostic imaging of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, for instance, may be swallowable low-cost imaging units transmitting reports of the GI tract to the patient’s cell phone or even to a centralized data analysis facility. Further development may go toward personalized medicine available at home to everybody for various internal organ diagnostics.

4.

Extensions of Optical Coherence Tomography

Alike in other (especially microscopic) imaging technologies, numerous functional and contrast enhancing OCT extensions have been developed in the last 30 years immediately after its invention. In the case of OCT, these additional functional and contrast enhanced tissue information come with OCT’s exquisite micrometer depth axial resolution as opposed to an integration over the entire depth penetration. In academia, several successful functional and contrast enhancing OCT extensions have been initiated, but aside from OCTA, a label-free motion-contrast-based functional OCT extension providing perfusion and hence angiogenetic information, no other functional or contrast enhancing OCT extension has accomplished comparable clinical and industrial impacts. One of the first OCT extensions enhancing tissue contrast by collecting light resolved by polarization and thus revealing tissue birefringence is PS-OCT. In 1992, Hee et al.223 demonstrated a polarization-sensitive low-coherence reflectometer and characterized the birefringence of a wave plate and ex vivo calf coronary artery tissue. More than 500 publications in this field6 by numerous academic groups demonstrated the great potential of this OCT extension especially in the eye and the skin,1,224227 but so far it has not been successfully translated to a commercial system or proven its diagnostic impact. Catheter, endoscopy, and needle-based PS-OCT might, in the near future, turn out to be an extremely interesting clinical application for this contrast enhancing OCT extension.228230

Before OCTA, Doppler optical coherence tomography (DOCT) was the first231233 and most extensively used functional OCT extension determining the speed of moving particles in the tissue by measuring the frequency shift imparted on light scattered by the particles and already setting out to produce three-dimensional maps of tissue perfusion.1,234 The classic example of Doppler shifts is the increase in frequency of an approaching train whistle followed by the decrease in frequency as it passes and departs. Higher sensitivity was achieved by phase sensitive Doppler OCT,235 which in combination with higher speed of FD OCT ultimately allowed for measurement of blood flow in a large range of retinal vessels with high sensitivity.236 As with other laser Doppler flow measurement techniques, DOCT has several challenges, the most critical being that the accurate measurement of velocity requires knowledge of the angle between the OCT beam and the direction of the velocity in the sample. The first paper introducing the notion of optical coherence angiography applied known methods of DOCT to produce retinal angiographic maps.237 Later work established the intuitive notion of OCTA for perfusion mapping. With the persistent split of pure structural angiographic mapping as OCTA from the originally overarching notion of DOCT, DOCT’s scientific output (more than 4000 for OCTA and about 450 for DOCT6) and hence commercialization [Thorlabs (Newton, New Jersey) and Optovue, Inc. (Fremont, California)] was consequently reduced.

4.1.

Optical Coherence Angiography

OCTA is a label-free non-invasive OCT extension that uses blood cell motion contrast for high-resolution imaging of volumetric blood flow information generating angiographic images—hence providing both structural and functional (i.e., blood flow/perfusion) tissue information. Such angiographic maps in 3D have already been demonstrated by FD OCT-based Doppler OCT by several groups.234 However, the visibility of small capillary vessels was critically improved by comparing signals of adjacent B-scans rather than A-scans.238 Instead of quantifying the correlation between signals, OCTA compares the decorrelation signal between sequential OCT B-scans taken at the same cross-sectional location to construct a map of blood flow. Emerging from Doppler OCT, between 2004 and 2012, at least 10 different research groups published different versions of OCTA, the majority of them claiming its invention and producing new acronyms for OCTA.237,239,240 The majority of the 4000 publications are in the field of ophthalmic diagnosis.241243 However, OCTA has also been successfully demonstrated for detecting angiogenetic biomarkers in cancer diagnosis and therapy monitoring as well as in endoscopic applications.244,245 The success in ophthalmic applications and in clinical translation of this technique lies in its technological simplicity, moderate additional engineering as compared with conventional OCT systems, and extremely significant clinical impact—slowly replacing fluorescein angiography and indocyanine green angiography in clinical routine. To eliminate patient or organ movement induced artifacts, OCTA requires higher imaging speeds than most currently available OCT systems. It is noteworthy that OCTA provides 3D qualitative flow information at a fixed point in time. Therefore, vessel leakage is not detectable by OCTA. Furthermore, exact automated segmentation of all diagnostically important intraretinal layers is of essence to avoid artifacts in the OCT angiograms of the respective layers. Consequently, exact segmentation necessitates sufficient system sensitivity, axial resolution, and contrast. Retinal blood flow on OCTA can be obscured by hemorrhage as this decreases the ability of light to penetrate into the deeper layers of the eye. Despite the rapid, tremendous commercial and clinical success of OCTA, some (at least relative) blood flow quantification will be needed in the near future.246249 Improved and reproducible quantitative OCTA is definitely also of significant clinical interest as is the correct visualization and quantification of choriocapillaris247,250,251 (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6

(a) Wide-field OCTA of the human retina: posterior pole montage of 12×12  mm (about 40 deg) swept source OCTA. Adapted from Ref. 252. (b) Averaged OCTA image of the choriocapillaris. Adapted from Ref. 253. (c) OCTA VISTA image: red indicates faster blood flow speeds and blue indicates slower speeds. Enlargements to the right, with two different mean projection times of 1.5 and 3 ms as well as the OCTA VISTA version, respectively. Notice that the capillary loops, which likely correspond to microaneurysms, are associated with slower blood flow speeds. Adapted from Ref. 254.

JBO_26_10_100601_f006.png

Another important future clinical role enabled by ultrahigh speed swept sources will be wide-field OCTA for the detection of neovascularization of the disc and elsewhere, microaneurysms, changes of the foveal avascular zone, intraretinal microvascular abnormalities, and capillary non-perfusion.255,256 This advancement of OCTA technology in clinical research will ultimately lead to enhancement of individualized management of diabetic retinopathy and prevention of visual impairment in patients with diabetes.

Using the eye and especially the retina as a part of the central nervous system diagnostically as a window to the brain started in the late 1970s, and about 400 papers since then have covered diagnostic methods in the posterior pole of the eye for early diagnosis of brain diseases. An important prerequisite for successful OCTA-based diagnosis in neurodegenerative diseases and other clinical applications will be accurate and reproducible quantitative OCTA. Quantitative analysis of OCTA is essential to standardize objective interpretations of clinical outcomes.257 Indeed, a concerted effort has been put forth to understand how Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology may manifest in the retina as a means to assess the state of the AD brain.258260 OCTA has also been successfully evaluated as a tool to assess retinal changes in Parkinson’s disease261 and both schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.262

4.2.

Optophysiology/Optoretinography: Non-Invasive Detection of Intrinsic Optical Signals

Modern medical diagnosis significantly benefits from extracting functional tissue information from structural imaging data (“structure–function correlation”). This is especially important in organs that cannot be biopsied, like the human retina. Retinal function has long been studied with psychophysical methods in humans, e.g., with electrophysiology and electroretinograms.263 Non-contact, depth-resolved, optical probing of retinal response to visual stimulation was introduced as optophysiology—an optical analog to electrophysiology. This method takes advantage of the fact that physiological changes in dark-adapted retinas caused by light stimulation can result in local variation of the tissue reflectivity.264 At that time, optophysiology could only be demonstrated in isolated rabbit retinas. Ophthalmic OCT technology back then was not sufficiently fast at longer wavelengths performing at sufficiently high sensitivity and resolution to be successfully applied in living animals or humans.265 A decade later, light-driven signals of photoreceptors in vivo could be measured. Visible light stimulation over a 200-fold intensity range caused correlated rod outer segment (OS) elongation and increased light scattering in wild-type mice, but not in mice lacking the rod G-protein alpha subunit, transducin (Gα(t)), revealing these responses to be triggered by phototransduction.266 The diurnal variation in rod OS length in mice was measured using optophysiology, being consistent with prior histological investigations demonstrating that rodent rod discs are phagocytosed by the RPE maximally over several hours around the time of normal light onset. The rate of recovery of rod OSs to baseline length before normal light onset was consistent with the hypothesis that disc membrane synthesis is fairly constant over the diurnal cycle267 (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7

(a) Illumination pattern (three bars) drawn to scale over the LSO image. The spatial map of OPL change between the ISOS and COST (b) before and (c) after stimulus measured at 20 Hz volume rate. (d) Rectangles over an LSO image represent the areas over which averages were obtained to plot the ORGs: 0.27°2 (yellow), 0.20°2 (gray), 0.14°2 (red), and 0.07°2 encompassing 10 cones (violet). (e) Repeatability of the response: single ORGs (gray dashed) and their mean (solid black) for six repeat trials, in which phase responses were averaged over 0.27°2 for 17.9% bleach. (f) Spatial averaging: ORGs over different areas color-coded according to the rectangles in (d). (g) Maximum intensity projection at COST layer with AO-OCT reveals individual cone photoreceptors. (h) ORGs for a subset of single cones in (g) demonstrating the response in each cone for 0.3% S-cone bleach and 29.7% average L- and M-cone bleach. The magnified view near stimulus onset shows a negligible early response in putative S-cones (blue) compared with L/M cones (orange). (i) ORG early and late response amplitudes for each cone in (g). (j) Histogram of the ORG early and late response magnitude, computed as the Euclidean distance from origin of each data point in (i). The two-component Gaussian mixture model (black dotted line) and its component Gaussians are used to distinguish S-cones (blue fit) from L/M cones (orange fit). The vertical dotted line marks t=0 in (e), (f), and (h) indicating the rising edge of stimulus onset. (a)–(f) are obtained without AO, with 4-mm imaging pupil, at 120-Hz volume rate. (g), (h) are obtained with AO, for 6-mm imaging pupil, at 162-Hz volume rate. The stimulus wavelength for all plots is 528±20  nm. (a)–(j) Adapted from Ref. 268.

JBO_26_10_100601_f007.png

Fast intrinsic optical signal (IOS), which arises before light-evoked pupillary response, promises to be a unique biomarker for photoreceptor physiology for objective optoretinography with high resolution. In another study, depth-resolved optophysiology verified OS as the anatomic origin of fast photoreceptor-IOS. Dynamic IOS changes were primarily confined at OS boundaries connected with inner segment and RPE, supporting transient OS shrinkage due to phototransduction process as the mechanism of the fast photoreceptor-IOS response.269 Non-invasive, objective measurement of light-evoked, functional responses of human rods and cones, measured non-invasively using a synchronized adaptive optics OCT and scanning light ophthalmoscopy system have also been reported recently.270 Another recent study revealed that the onset of phototransduction is accompanied by a rapid (<5  ms), nanometer-scale electromechanical deformation in individual human cone photoreceptors. Characterizing this biophysical phenomenon associated with phototransduction in vivo was enabled by high-speed phase-resolved optical LFOCT that allowed for sufficient spatiotemporal resolution to visualize the nanometer/millisecond-scale light-induced shape change in photoreceptors.268

4.3.

Visible Light OCT: Unprecedented Axial Resolution and Enhanced OCT Access to Absorption

OCT in the visible wavelength range with unprecedented submicrometer axial resolution achieved by employing a photonic crystal fiber in combination with a sub-15 fs Titanium:sapphire laser was first demonstrated in the beginning of this millennium.271,272 Visible light OCT theoretically provides higher axial resolution than NIR OCT for a given wavelength and bandwidth. To realize this potential in the human retina in vivo, the unique technical challenges of visible light OCT must be addressed: incorporating a grating light valve spatial light modulator spectral shaping stage to modify the source spectrum; developing a novel, Fourier transform-free, software axial motion tracking algorithm with fast, magnetically actuated stage to maintain near-optimal axial resolution and sensitivity in the presence of eye motion; and implementing spatially dependent numerical dispersion compensation for the first time in the human eye in vivo. Wavelength-dependent images of the outer retina suggest that, beyond merely improving the axial resolution, shorter wavelength visible light may also provide unique advantages for visualizing Bruch’s membrane (BM).273 Furthermore, it seems that shorter visible wavelengths improve the visualization of BM in pigmented eyes, where it is located behind a highly scattering layer of melanosomes in the RPE. Monte Carlo simulations of radiative transport suggest that, while absorption and scattering are higher at shorter wavelengths, detected multiply scattered light from the RPE is preferentially attenuated relative to detected backscattered light from BM.274

Using visible light OCT, accurate and robust non-invasive measurement of retinal oxygen metabolic rate (rMRO2) in rat eyes was demonstrated. Both oxygen delivery and rMRO2 increased from the highly regulated retinal circulation under hypoxia. The increased oxygen extraction compensated for the deficient oxygen supply from the poorly regulated choroidal circulation. These results have the potential to reveal the fundamental role of oxygen metabolism in various retinal diseases such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy, and glaucoma.275 Oximetry saturation sO2 measurements were also recently extended to capillaries and investigated in all three retinal vascular plexuses by amplifying and extracting the spectroscopic signal from each capillary segment under the guidance of OCTA. Using this approach, capillary sO2 in the retinal circulation in rats was measured.276

In vivo depth resolved human imaging of oxygenation in retinal capillaries was recently demonstrated.277 In addition, first visible light OCTA with a 100-kHz A-line rate for human retinal imaging was also demonstrated recently, enabling accurate localization of microvasculature down to the capillary level and thus enabling oximetry at vessels <100  μm in diameter. Microvascular hemoglobin oxygen saturation (sO2) at the feeding and draining vessels at the perifoveal region was demonstrated, allowing for future studies on the role of microvascular oxygen in various retinal pathologies278 (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8

(a)–(b) In vivo human retinal visible light OCT; (b) inset from (a). Adapted from Ref. 274. (c) B-scan image of a brown Norway rat retina using visible-light OCT. NFL, nerve fibre layer; GCL, ganglion cell layer; IPL, inner plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer; and BM, Bruch’s membrane. (d)–(f) En face images of vascular/capillary plexuses. SVP projected in the NFL and GCL slabs. ICP projected in the slab containing the inner border of the INL. DCP projected in the slab containing the outer border of the INL. (g) En face structural image projected from the ILM to BM, overlaid with measured oxygen saturation (sO2) values in major vessels to differentiate arteries from veins in an animal breathing 100% O2. Interplexus capillaries (white arrows) appear as dark spots due to greater light absorption than neighbouring capillaries. (h) Overlaid en face angiograms of three vascular/capillary plexuses to demonstrate the detailed organization of the retinal circulation. Examples of interplexus capillaries (indicated by white arrows in the enlarged images) were validated by observing their presence in corresponding locations. (i) En face projection of the NFL slab. The SVP was found to run anterior to the nerve fibre bundles (bright radial striations), which appear posterior to the vessels. The interplexus capillaries (black arrows) penetrate between NFL bundles and connect the SVP to the ICP and DCP. (c)–(i) Adapted from Ref. 276.

JBO_26_10_100601_f008.png

Another technique enabling OCT access to absorption is photothermal OCT, which monitors changes in the optical path length caused by the photothermal effect. Like in PAI in the photothermal effect, photons are absorbed by chromophores within a sample, causing a localized rise in temperature. Thermoelastic expansion caused by the photothermal effect generates isolated variations in the refractive index, which in turn generates a variation in the optical path length. The optical path length variations typically generated by the photothermal effect, often nanometer in scale, can be resolved with phase-sensitive OCT.279 This approach might be extremely attractive for non-destructive 3D molecular imaging deep (2  mm) within biological samples with a sensitivity of 14 parts per million (weight/weight) nanoparticles in the sample.280 In addition, photothermal OCT could quantify changes in pigmentation that occur in retinal diseases.281,282 In vivo photothermal OCT was also demonstrated for cross-sectional in human skin measurement with endogenous absorption agents.283 Recently, a swept source dual-wavelength photothermal OCT system was demonstrated for quantitative imaging of microvasculature oxygen saturation and measuring of microvasculature sO2 levels in phantom blood vessels with a range of blood flow speeds (0 to 17  mm/s).284

4.4.

Dynamic Contrast OCT

Recently, an extremely powerful new contrast enhancing OCT extension was introduced. It employs a new endogenous approach to reveal subcellular metabolic contrast in fresh ex vivo tissues, taking advantage of the time dependence of FF OCT interferometric signals. This method reveals signals linked with local activity of the endogenous scattering elements that can reveal cells where other OCT-based techniques fail or need exogenous contrast agents. Using high-transverse resolution to image intracellular features, the time dependence to identify different dynamics at the millisecond scale on a wide range of organs in normal or pathological conditions is used.285 Dynamic contrast OCT has also been applied in freshly excised human esophageal and cervical biopsy samples. Depth-resolved dynamic contrast OCT images of intact tissue show that intracellular dynamics provides a new contrast mechanism that highlights subcellular morphology and activity in epithelial surface maturation patterns286 (Fig. 9).

Fig. 9

(a) LightCT en face OCT image of murine liver. (b) LightCT dynamic OCT en face image with corresponding regions. (c) Averaged mOCT en face image, which was acquired in the same region. (d) In the corresponding dynamic mOCT image, hepatocytes become visible with nuclei. (e) Cropped volume representation; size: 270285135  μm (xyz); scale bar, 100  μm. (a)–(e) Adapted from Ref. 287. (f) 3D reconstruction of a D-FFOCT image stack in explanted macaque retina over a 120×120  μm FOV. Note that FFOCT signal is damped with increasing penetration depth, so upper retinal layers are more clearly visible than lower ones. En face images of (g) inner nuclear layer, (h) outer nuclear layer, and (i) photoreceptor layer presenting a similar appearance to two-photon fluorescence imaging; (j) reconstructed cross section at the location represented by the red dotted line in (f). The cross section in (j) was linearly interpolated to obtain a unitary pixel size ratio. (f) D-FFOCT image of a porcine retinal pigment epithelium cell culture. (g) Overlay of colored D-FFOCT and FFOCT at the interface between the layers of the nerve fibers (white arrows point to nerve bundles that are very bright in static mode and invisible in dynamic mode), ganglion cells (blue and green cells, visible in dynamic mode) and inner plexiform (fibrous network, bottom left, visible in static mode). (f)–(l) Adapted from Ref. 288. (m) HE stained histology of the imaged sample at a different location: (I) cornified layer, (II) granular and spinous layers, (III) basal layer, (IV) lamina propria, (V) muscle, and (VI) glass plate. (n) OCT image of mouse tongue; lamina propria (IV) can be identified by brighter contrast. (o) Corresponding dynamic contrast mOCT image with a focus in the basal cell layer; (I)–(V) and even cell nuclei (*) are visible. (p) Dynamic contrast mOCT image with a focus in the lamina propria; the image size is 380500  μm (zx); scale bar is 100  μm. (m)–(p) Adapted from Ref. 287.

JBO_26_10_100601_f009.png

This technique has also been used to combine static, dynamic, and fluorescence contrasts to achieve label-free high-resolution imaging of the living retina and anterior eye with temporal resolution from milliseconds to several hours, allowing for probing biological activity at subcellular scales inside 3D bulk tissue.288 By evaluating signal fluctuations, a significant contrast enhancement was demonstrated using TD FFOCT, which makes cellular and subcellular structures visible. The putative cause of the dynamic OCT signal is the site-dependent active motion of cellular structures in the submicrometer range, which provides histology-like contrast.287 In vivo dynamic contrast OCT was used to quantify layer-resolved microvascular blood flow and volume across the full depth of the mouse neocortex.289

Finally, speckle variations induced by intracellular motion in the urothelium were used as a dynamic contrast to segment the urothelium with only two sequential OCT images. This new method opens the possibility of tracking the distribution of the urothelial cells to identify the microinvasion of bladder tumors. This contrast may provide a new mechanism for OCT to diagnose the invasion of urothelial cancerous cells for the better staging of bladder cancer.290

Another interesting contrast enhancing OCT extension that gained a lot of attention recently is using the extraction of the optical attenuation coefficient, an important tissue parameter that measures how quickly incident light is attenuated when passing through a medium. Successful extraction of this parameter would facilitate tissue differentiation and enhance the diagnostic value of OCT. With current studies showing attenuation coefficient analysis as a promising technique, further efforts in the development of methods to accurately extract the attenuation coefficient and to explore its potential use for more extensive clinical applications are desired.291

4.5.

Optical Coherence Elastography: Depth Resolved Optical Palpation

An extremely promising extension of OCT is OCE. The original idea of elastography is not only to exploit the stiffness changes within soft tissue for diagnosis, much like a physician would during palpation, but also to exactly localize and quantify them. The capability of OCT to give 3D insight into tissue is used to visualize the reaction of a sample to a mechanical force. Multiple methods for deriving this reaction from the OCT data have been presented, e.g., image cross correlation,292 feature293 or speckle tracking,294 optical flow,295 combinations296 thereof, and phase difference analysis.297 From this reaction, the underlying mechanical tissue parameters can be obtained and used for diagnosis. The technology first emerged in US imaging, where systems capable of elastography have been commercially available since the 2000s. Elastography in general is a relative straight forward add-on to OCT, enabling biomechanical contrast at a slightly increased imaging time and data processing complexity. Although a lot of promising approaches and methods utilizing OCE have been published, two major applications are at the moment competing for clinical in vivo diagnosis (Fig. 10).

Fig. 10

(a) Strain in untreated cornea induced by the heartbeat (orange: compression, blue: relaxation). Adapted from Ref. 307. (b) Qualitative OCE image of invasive ductal carcinoma. Adapted from Ref. 298 with permission from AACR. (c) Automated stiffness-based segmentation of mouse breast cancer in vivo. Adapted from Ref. 299.

JBO_26_10_100601_f010.png

In this sense, the ophthalmic application of OCE is the most advanced, likely because it could build upon decades of OCT experience in this field, which already addressed issues like motion correction and speed. The only novel aspect from an engineering perspective is mechanical loading, which has to be performed cautiously and preferably contactless. Proposed solutions rage from contact shaker excitation,300 over microscale301 air-pulses,302 and acoustic radiation pulses303,304 to heartbeat driven tissue deformation.301,305 De Stefano et al.306 demonstrated the feasibility of OCE for identification of keratoconic corneas in humans in vivo using a dynamic compressional approach with intensity-based speckle tracking. Since the compression is applied via a motorized stage, direct contact to the cornea is needed, but quantitative analysis also is enabled. In May 2020, Lan et al.302 quantified the effects of respiration and heartbeat on patient eye motion as a source of perturbation for OCE in vivo and mentioned the idea that this perturbation could also be used as a passive loading method. Only a month later, Nair et al.305 gave another indication for the feasibility of non-contact heartbeat ophthalmic OCE in an ex vivo porcine eye model with controlled intraocular pressure changes. In January 2021, Nair et al.307 achieved heartbeat OCE in an in vivo rabbit model, but the method was not completely non-contact as a glass imaging window was used to minimize bulk motion. The heart pulse compressed the corneal tissue against this imaging window, resulting in the desired displacement. OCE data were acquired as multiple 2D B-scans at the same position, which were synchronized with the rabbit’s heartbeat later in postprocessing. The resulting 2D strain maps clearly show the difference between compression and relaxation induced by the pulse. In addition, they were able to differentiate between an untreated cornea and a cornea stiffened via the Dresden protocol.

Although these are already very promising first results, some challenges for clinical in vivo patient imaging still remain to be addressed. Since pulse waves travel at a limited speed, they affect different regions in the FOV at different points in time, which can lead to underestimation of the resulting strain and is a challenge for synchronization. For clinical diagnosis, en face images and 3D stiffness maps are much more useful than single B-scans. 3D imaging would not only highly increase imaging time but also make the synchronization even more complicated. One also has to be aware that, without the possibility of quantifying the pressure perceived by the investigated tissue, only qualitative OCE results can be expected and quantifying the pressure excited by a heartbeat at every point in the FOV seems impossible at this point in time. However, the potential of ophthalmic OCE for clinical application is huge. The feasibility for diagnosing keratoconus has been shown in the examples above, but also corneal dystrophy or corneal ectasia due to surgical complications are obvious topics in which OCE can deliver fast and uncomplicated diagnosis, as well as in the diagnosis of AMD in which early diagnosis is especially important, as presented by Qian et al.300

When it comes to the field of cancer detection and diagnosis, current literature focuses on biopsy images as proof of concept. Not only is cancer often accompanied by significant changes in stiffness, but also the shape of the outlines of cancer has diagnostic potential.308 A good example is given by Kennedy et al.,298 who showed that cancer margin detection with OCE yields a 24% higher sensitivity than with OCT only. Multiple tumor types have been investigated, and OCE proved to be an accurate predictor of malignancy for all of them. A phase-sensitive, quasi-static compression OCE system was used.309

The future of OCE lies in intraoperative in vivo imaging for determining tumor margins of cancerous tissue to be removed, requiring not only high-speed OCT imaging to minimize the influence of motion artifacts but also high-speed processing to enable real-time view. Depending on the chosen biomechanical model and processing approach, this task requires expensive hardware and well-versed software implementation. Another challenge to keep in mind is OCE’s vulnerability to laser and system instabilities, which are even more difficult to control in a surgical environment.

Nonetheless, surgical applications of OCE are close. Plekhanov et al.299 presented a phase-sensitive, quasi-static compressional OCE method that is capable of segmenting cancerous regions in a mouse model in vivo. They were able to differentiate between viable, dystrophic, and necrotic tumor cells as well as edema zones and validated their findings via comparison with histological results. A 9-day study, comparing the effect of two different chemotherapeutics with untreated control, was performed as well. In a similar study,310 the combination of OCE with OCTA was shown to be an easy way to add functional information, improving the quality of chemotherapeutic treatment efficiency studies.

As can be seen in the aforementioned examples, quasi-static compression OCE, mostly phase-sensitive with some sort of compliance layer as stress sensor, is currently the most advanced OCE method. In the last few years, other approaches rose to the horizon of feasibility, e.g., vibrational OCE,311,312 which uses OCT to record the reaction of a sample to a variation of vibration frequencies. With this, a 3D resonant frequency map of the sample can be generated and viscoelastic behavior can be investigated. Another proposed application, although more focused on usage in studies than for clinical diagnosis, is in intravascular OCE.313,314 Since atherosclerosis is the leading cause of human death worldwide, continued effort is put into understanding the generation, buildup, and rupture of intravascular plaques.

Overall OCE has come far, and routine clinical usage especially in the ophthalmic field is to be expected in the next few years. The next steps to this goal are achieving faster imaging and data processing and even better motion correction. Although some OCE experts and clinicians argue that there is no need for quantifying tissue stiffness, as long as there is qualitative biomechanical contrast, in the long term it might make a lot of clinical sense to find a quantitative stiffness atlas, which allows for diagnostic guidance.

5.

OCT and Deep Learning, Neural Networks, and Artificial Intelligence

Since its introduction in 1959, AI technology has evolved rapidly and helped benefit research, industry, and medicine. The simultaneous maturation of multiple digital and telecommunications technologies in 2020 has created an unprecedented opportunity for ophthalmology to adapt to new models of care using telehealth supported by digital innovations. These digital innovations include AI, 5th generation (5G) telecommunication networks, and the Internet of Things (IoT), which create an interdependent ecosystem offering opportunities to develop new models of eye care addressing the challenges of COVID-19 and beyond. Deep learning, as a process of AI, is used in radiology, ophthalmology, and in increasingly more other medical fields for data analysis, segmentation, automated diagnosis, and possible prognosis. The association of deep learning and OCT technologies has proven reliable, and about 400 papers have been published in this field, with more than half of them published in the last 3 years.

Ophthalmology has thrived in some of these areas partly due to its many image-based investigations. Telehealth and AI provide synchronous solutions to challenges faced by ophthalmologists and healthcare providers worldwide. AI definitely has potential and will be part of the decision-making progress regarding the scientific investigation, diagnosis, and therapeutic management. Hence, AI-enhanced OCT has recently been used for the detection of retinal diseases and improving the diagnostic performance of the eye’s posterior segment diseases315318 (Fig. 11).

Fig. 11

(a) A CNN model was used to predict TD values in the central 10 deg of the visual field (corresponding to HFA 10-2 test data). The mean TD values within the central 6 deg at each quadrant (36 and 4 test points for the HFA 10-2 and HFA 24-2 tests, respectively) were calculated. The corresponding test grids in the inferonasal quadrant are shown. The differences between these values were calculated, and the predicted TD values were adjusted as per the calculated differences in each sector. CNN, convolutional neural network; GCC, ganglion cell complex; HFA, Humphrey field analyzer; OS, outer segment; RNFL, retinal nerve fiber layer; RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; and TD, total deviation. The relationship between the actual TD values and the predicted TD values using the ResNet model adjusted with the measured TD values corresponding to the innermost four points of the HFA 24-2 test. HFA, Humphrey field analyzer and TD, total deviation. Adapted from Ref. 319. (b) Occlusion testing maps showing most significant regions for detecting retinal diseases. In these images, golden regions indicate a large impact on model predictions while orange and red regions indicate a very limited impact on predictions. The heat map was created after prediction by assigning the softmax probability of the correct label to each occluded area. The occlusion map was generated by superimposing the heat map on the input image. CNV, choroidal neovascularization and DME, diabetic macular edema. Adapted from Ref. 318.

JBO_26_10_100601_f011.png

In addition to AI-enhanced OCT application enabling improved OCT image quality or enhancing OCT segmentation, functional prediction of organs from morphological OCT data will be of significant future clinical interest.319

Several recent studies have reported high-diagnostic performances of AI models. However, significant methodological challenges still exist in applying these models in real-world clinical practice. Lack of large image datasets from multiple OCT devices, non-standardized imaging or postprocessing protocols between devices, limited graphics processing unit capabilities for exploiting 3D features, and inconsistency in the reporting metrics are major hurdles in enabling AI for OCT analyses.320,321 Furthermore, machine learning and AI for health must be reproducible to ensure reliable clinical use. Recent evaluations found that machine learning for health fared poorly compared with other areas regarding reproducibility metrics, such as dataset and code accessibility.322,323

6.

Miniaturized, Cost-Effective, and Portable OCT: OCT on a Chip, Home-OCT, and Self-OCT

Most commercial OCT devices currently have a footprint of 12  m and cost up to USD 180.000, which usually inhibits its widespread availability and limits usage of OCT to clinics or large ophthalmic practices.324

In a typical diagnostic ophthalmic OCT setting, the patient has to remain in an upright position with his head placed on a chin rest and fixating on a target. Certain retinal diseases such as AMD, glaucoma, or diabetic retinopathy require a regular screening to monitor the disease and schedule or monitor therapy. These diseases normally affect elderly immobile or even bedridden patients for whom going to the hospital or practices for OCT diagnosis is challenging. For diagnosis of retinopathy of prematurity, a disease affecting newborn premature infants as well as for younger children in general, current commercial OCT devices are also not suitable. The same holds for space-related neuro-ocular syndrome describing ocular pathological changes that occur during space flight and exposure to microgravity, respectively.325 Commercially available ophthalmic OCT technology has been used in the past, but it is too bulky and time-consuming to be used in outer space.

Hence, light weighted, cost-effective, and compact (ideally handheld) OCT devices would be required for early diagnosis and proper therapy management of all of the abovementioned retinal diseases. It is noteworthy that recent market reports predict (for the first time in such reports) separate compound annual growth rates for handheld and integrated OCT systems. Interestingly, compound annual growth rates (CAGR) is 8.9% for the next 7 years despite COVID-19 and for OCT in ophthalmology globally about 5% to 7% depending on the region.326 In addition, “home-OCT” or “self-OCT” are terms that have evolved to describe the need for a compact, easy to use, and cost-effective OCT device that could be used unsupervised by patients at home or astronauts in space. The term “miniaturized OCT” therefore describes more than solely the reduction of size but also a reduction of costs. An increase of flexibility of OCT devices is ultimately a highly desirable goal for extending the application and availability of OCT and exploring potential new markets for OCT. Point-of-care diagnostics, home-based disease monitoring, extension of medical care in third-world countries and low-recourse settings, and even extra-terrestrial health care are application fields that would benefit from a compact, cost-effective, mobile, handheld, and even patient operated OCT system (Fig. 12).

Fig. 12

Overview of most promising future OCT technologies: (a) schematic of a programmable PIC with several functional layers: a programmable mesh of photonic gates, phase modulators, and detectors packaged with electronic AD drivers that are connected to a computer with which the user can manipulate and access the photonic functionality. Reprinted from Ref. 327 with permission from Springer Nature. (b) Three-dimensional model of a swept laser and robotic placement of microcomponents using micro-optics in a 14-pin butterfly package. Reprinted from Ref. 328 (c) First in vivo human retinal imaging using an on-chip grating (arrayed waveguide grating, AWG)-based SD-OCT. Two AWGs are shown in the used PIC, which measures only 2×2  cm. Adapted from Ref. 329.

JBO_26_10_100601_f012.png

Beyond ophthalmologic care, there is a strong need for flexible and compact OCT devices as well. Dermatologic care, oral cavity, or inner ear imaging are only a few examples of OCT applications that require at least a flexible (handheld) probe. As a broad screening device, a general practitioner might benefit from an OCT device that is capable of imaging several areas of the human body. This could be achieved by exchangeable sample arm adapters as recently proposed,330 a system capable of imaging ophthalmic, inner ear, and other tissues by exchangeable sample arm adapters.

Currently, there are three promising approaches to miniaturizing OCT.

  • 1. The development of flexible handheld probes for OCT, being motivated by immobile patients or simply the anatomical nature of the sample location. To date, they come with a mobile cart with a footprint of 1  m2.

  • 2. The use of already available off-the-shelf micro-optical components to miniaturize OCT systems by smart and compact packaging.

  • 3. Finally, PIC as a platform that has its origin in telecommunications. Using the same fabrication plants as those for CMOS electronics to grow these chips, PICs guide and manipulate light just as commonly used fiber-based systems but can be produced at a significant smaller size as well as costs in addition to be maintenance free.

The need for a mobile OCT device has been partly met by industry as devices are equipped with mobile carts, which permit mobility within the clinics. Some companies offer handheld probe solutions for more flexibility in terms of bringing the scanning probe to the patient.331333 However, these systems are still rather bulky, the handheld probes are fairly heavy (1.5 to 2.2 kg), and the weight of these systems (30  kg) challenge easy mobility but especially portability.

Demonstrations of (partly) miniaturized OCT systems in research have been accomplished in ophthalmic care using handheld probes,330,334343 off-the-shelf micro-optical components52,334,344 or PICs329,345,346 for dermatologic care using handheld probes,347353 compact packaging of off-the-shelf components,354 PICs,353,355357 and handheld probes for oral358 and for inner ear359362 imaging. The usage of off-the-shelf microcomponents seems to be the most mature technique for miniaturized OCT at the moment. Very compact and mobile OCT systems with acceptable imaging performance have been accomplished.334,344,354

Historically, many medical applications have benefited from the development of components for telecom and entertainment applications, respectively. The miniaturization of OCT has benefited from these developments as well. MEMS mirrors were originally developed in smart phones and CCDs that were produced for multimedia, smartphones, and entertainment; they are components that are produced at scale and can be adapted to the needs of OCT applications. Likewise, the telecom-driven development of PICs supports the miniaturization of OCT. With the increasing need for more powerful telecom and entertainment devices, the industry invested in alternatives for electronical data transfer and manipulation. This technology is still in its infancy, and the first in vivo human retinal imaging was shown in Fig. 12(c).329 Another example is a battery driven, tablet-like OCT system for dermatologic application that has been commercialized.355 These are promising results for the future of miniaturized OCT using PICs.

In addition to its small form factor, multiple functional photonic building blocks can be printed on a single chip, which opens up new and/or easier realizable possibilities for OCT system designs, such as multichannel sample arm configuration/parallelized imaging as proposed recently.363 Several sample arm paths could scan the sample in parallel, which would increase the effective A-scan rate without sacrificing imaging performance.

Detection and postprocessing electronics can be co-integrated on the same chip, retaining a small form factor of the full OCT engine. Optical FPGAs, i.e., programmable PICs [Fig. 12(a)], are an exciting research field that could establish a universal OCT engine, programmable to specific needs of an OCT system.327

With the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020 and the need to reduce social interaction, non-urgent medical appointments were cancelled and postponed. To counteract the reduced medical care, the use of telemedicine was rapidly incorporated, which reduced costs and was more effective and therefore has the potential to become the “new normal.”316,364 Miniaturized, low-cost, mobile, and automated OCT will play a significant role in the successful adaption toward increased use and acceptance of telemedicine.

However, there are many aspects that need to be considered and solved, regardless of the technique used to miniaturize OCT. Weight and size have to be light and small enough for a patient to transport. The device needs to be simple and easy to use, comfortable for the patient, effectively performing, and secure. A secure data transfer has to be ensured and a timely diagnosis/feedback to the patient has to be guaranteed for optimum willingness to use the device. Audio instructions, automated sample alignment, and optimized ergonomic design can help increase the patient compliance. AI365,366 and cloud-based computing367 are promising platforms to increase regular monitoring and simultaneously reduce the need for computationally intensive and expensive equipment. At the same time, these might relax power consumption of the device, which could enable battery driven devices, which in turn increases flexibility and mobility even further.

In conclusion, the technology of miniaturized OCT is still young and foreshadows an exciting future of more widespread, mainstream, automated, intelligent, and smart point-of-care devices for early detection of pathological changes.

7.

Clinical Translation of Optical Coherence Tomography

OCT has revolutionized ophthalmology over the past two to three decades. Its unique ability to resolve the retina’s layered structure was a gamechanger for diagnosing many retinal diseases and monitoring their treatment. Although clinical benefit could also be demonstrated early on in other medical fields such as cardiology, dermatology, and endoscopy, its widespread adoption in these fields is still lacking. This is mostly due to OCT’s lower benefit/cost ratio in these fields and competition with other, often much cheaper, imaging modalities. With OCT becoming cheaper over time, enabled by technological advancements like photonic integration and the availability of cheaper swept-source lasers, we expect OCT also to become more prevalent in the clinical routine in many fields outside ophthalmology and outside the traditional clinical setting. AI algorithms for image quality enhancements, self-alignment, and clinical decision support will enable a new level of usability, much more comparable to consumer electronic devices than sophisticated imaging devices that required expert operators. This will pave the way for OCT systems out of medical specialist’s offices to general practitioners, pharmacies, and even patients’ homes. This trend has the potential to lower health care costs in developed countries but is foremost going to have a huge impact on the quality of life of immobile patients, patients in rural regions, or low-resource countries.

At the same time, we expect OCT’s performance and application to continue to expand at a rapid rate. OCTA was most likely only the first functional extension that boosted the clinical value of OCT. MEMS tunable VCSELs are going to enable commercial OCT systems at hundreds of kHz to MHz A-scan rates. Such speeds favor additional functional methods in vivo, such as, for example, the non-invasive, objective measurement of retinal function. MHz speeds are further going to enable the live observation of dynamic processes, making it a great visualization tool for ophthalmic surgery. Such a comprehensive live 3D view of the surgical scene will help in developing robot assisted surgery and will eventually even make autonomous robotic surgery a reality.

Once the “speed-limitations” of single-point scanning OCT are reached, we expect a shift to parallel OCT configurations. LFOCT has the potential to become the implementation of choice due to its advantages with respect to laser safety, ability to suppress multiply scattered light, and availability of components.

Endoscopic OCT may be another area that will greatly benefit from the miniaturization of OCT. It will eventually allow for movement away from traditional endoscopes to self-contained capsular devices that will be swallowed by the patient and collect and transmit data to external devices autonomously. On the other hand, the combination of OCT with other imaging modalities still has to prove its clinical added value to justify the increased complexity and cost. Closest to clinical translation might be the combination of OCT with complementary spectroscopy methods such as infrared spectroscopy used in intravascular probes or RS.

Fast translation of new developments to their commercial exploitation and ultimately to the benefit of patients critically depends on the regulatory ecosystem.

7.1.

Medical Device Regulations

Europe currently sees the transition from the medical device directives to the medical device regulation as a need to be implemented as national law by each member state. They provide a tight framework not only for medical device industries but also for academic institutions, affecting research and development of new technologies already at its very roots. Clearly, regulatory approval is essentially needed for safe applications on human beings. Academic entities are therefore now challenged to allocate sufficient resources and to build supporting structures to enable internationally competitive research to harmonize the high flexibility needed at early research stages with regulatory demands. Novel technologies need to be convincing enough for industry to pick them up for further development, which needs already substantive validation in a clinical setting with all of the required regulatory hurdles. Only with proper support can a widening of the “valley of depth” be avoided.

7.2.

Standardization

A translation of promising OCT technologies to market standardization is an important topic as discussed by Waterhouse et al.368 For example, the question of appropriate laser power levels for internal organ tissue is not yet covered by laser safety standards. The current assumption is that all internal organs respond similar to the laser exposure. However, already the tissue texture leaves the impression of major differences between the tissue types. With a general standardization on given performance parameters, for instance, the relation to an appropriate standard would be possible at an early stage of translational research. This aims furthermore at the repeatability and reproducibility within multicentral clinical trials. Assessment of performance parameters at an early development stage is difficult because little or no validated ex vivo models are present to benchmark performances of a newly developed device. Most of these arguments merge into the argument of cost-effectiveness during research and development. Having standardized benchmarking steps and milestones alongside the development processes in academia or industry may save resources. Translational research actually is facing more than one “valley of death:” the first one arises from translating laboratory systems and findings to the patient bedside and the second one occurs during the attempt to bring the gained knowledge into clinical practice and health decision-making procedures.369 With clear standards for benchmarking, there might be a higher chance for seeding product development and streamlining translational research to finally appear next to the patient.

8.

Conclusion

OCT has existed for 30 years and is definitely here to stay, to keep scientists and engineers busy, and to significantly support clinicians and life scientists in their daily routine work. It is absolutely noteworthy that OCT has not been completely exploited and has considerable growth potential. This is especially important for younger scientists choosing their scientific topic and academic or industrial career field. From a scientific point of view, the last three decades have shown a continuous increase of scientific output. With novel disruptive technologies on the horizon perfectly matching those needed by OCT, it is very unlikely that this will change in the near future. Extrapolating publishing performance of the last 20 years, a saturation of yearly publication output at very high level of about 9500 can be expected in around 10 years from now—if ever. From an industrial point of view, recent market reports indicate a global market perspective of about USD 1.5 billion in 2023.370 It is noteworthy that these recent market reports predict (for the first time in such reports) separate compound annual growth rates for handheld and integrated OCT system. Interestingly, CAGR is 8.9% for the next 7 years despite COVID-19 and for OCT in ophthalmology globally about 5% to 7% depending on the region.326 As of now, miniaturized OCT is one of the most prominent OCT market trends picking up pace in global industry. Rising interest in miniature, low-cost portable OCT indicates the huge opportunity in the years to come, with miniaturization and improvements in device designing and packaging currently being the key focus areas. As a result, it is expected that the handheld OCT devices segment can make significant progress in the years ahead, entering new larger unexploited markets for OCT.

Another important key-technological prerequisite for not only miniaturized, portable OCT but also for nearly all other OCT applications is imaging speed. Cost-effective swept source laser technology and/or efficient parallelized scanning schemes (multiple single beams, line-field, and full-field) will enable OCT A-scan rates beyond 1 MHz in the very near future as a standard OCT specification. This will be especially essential for handheld OCT to avoid motion artifacts, will enable large FOVs (e.g., wide-field OCT and OCTA, high-speed catheters/capsules), will permit the detection of fast signals (e.g., IOSs), and will foster 4D OCT for intraoperative, surgical guidance or high-speed imaging in life sciences. It will also enable proper sampling, especially with increasing FOVs and improved transverse OCT resolution. With the recent successful initiation of visible light OCT, the future will not reveal significantly new additional wavelength regions for OCT. The UV and MID-IR regions are theoretically interesting in terms of resolution and absorption but are inherently challenging in terms of light sources, optics, and detection and hence may not be widely translated to (bio)medical and clinical applications.

The momentary successful trend in clinical imaging to combine complementary imaging modalities to get “the best of both/all worlds” will—regarding multimodal OCT setups—continue and significantly increase—not only at the microscopy level but also at the endoscopy/optical needle level. Multimodal optical imaging incorporating OCT will especially compensate for the deficits of OCT (metabolism, molecular sensitivity, penetration depth, and loss of contrast). OCT will act like a GPS by prescreening the tissue at a wide FOV with microscopic resolution and then other techniques will zoom in at the subcellular or molecular level for enabling morpho-molecular or morpho-metabolic tissue information. OCT’s top (bio)medical application will stay in ophthalmology with cardiology following. Oncologic diagnosis in different organs (e.g., skin, GI tract, and others) will increase due to multimodal imaging approaches. The future will also see improved microscopic OCT performance due to speed, multimodality, and enhanced contrast. This improved microscopic OCT performance will also foster intraoperative OCT guidance—especially in ophthalmology and neurosurgery. On the other hand, a lack of favorable medical reimbursement schemes and limited clinical data are top deterrents in the global market for OCT.

From a technological perspective, SD OCT will, for the near future, stay dominant mainly in the 800-nm wavelength region (in addition to the visible light OCT segment) because of the availability of mature cost-effective light source and detector technology—enabling high resolution with moderate optical bandwidths and good contrast. From a perspective point of view SS OCT should be the dominant choice for years. This will only take place if easy to use, cost-effective swept sources that do not shift complexity into detection will be available.

Functional technologies are always much more challenging than pure morphology-based techniques. Successful future contrast enhancing OCT extensions must be technologically simple and easy to interpret and must have significant realistic clinical impact. OCTA is an exquisite example of providing label-free perfusion information acting as a non-invasive angiography technique. Manual palpation is one of the first diagnostic techniques in mankind—hence OCE might be successful in the near future as an optical analog. When it comes to correlated tissue structure and function optophysiology/optoretinography has huge diagnostic potential due to the retina being easily optically accessible, performing non-invasive detection of IOSs, and providing access to the brain. The future might also enable the establishment of new diagnostic biomarkers empowered by depth resolved tissue contrast due to dynamic contrast OCT or quantification of tissue attenuation.

With either, the future of OCT and in general of biophotonics is bright due to numerous upcoming disruptive cost-effective technologies that will enable industry and academia to continuously improve the performance and hence diagnostic capability of existing optical techniques or to establish new ones.

Disclosures

W. D. and R. L. received financial support from and authored patents with Carl Zeiss Meditec; R. L. received in-kind support from Exalos AG; W. D. received financial support from Insight Photonic Solutions Inc.; and T. S. is an employee of Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by H2020-ICT-2015 (OCTCHIP, ID: 688173); H2020-MSCA-ITN-2016 (FBI, ID: 721766); H2020-ICT-2016-1 (ESOTRAC, ID: 732720); H2020-ICT-2016-1 (MOON; ID: 732969); H2020-MSCA-ITN-2019 (PHAST, ID: 860185); H2020-ICT-2019-2 (HandheldOCT, ID: 871312); H2020-PHC-2015-two-stage (MIB, ID: 667933); H2020-ICT-2019 (PROSCOPE, ID: 871212); H2020-ICT-2020-2 (REAP, ID: 101016964); H2020-MSCA-IF-2019 (SkinOptima, ID: 894325); H2020-FETOPEN-2018-2019-2020-01 (SWIMMOT, ID: 899612); FFG COHESION (No. 848588); ESA (ID: 4000132651/20); FWF (ERA-NET, MultiFib: API04166FW); and FWF (SFB-F68, Special Research Program SFB F68: “Tomography Across the Scales”).

References

1. 

W. Drexler and J. G. Fujimoto, Optical Coherence Tomography: Technology and Applications, 2nd ed.Springer Publishing, Switzerland (2015). Google Scholar

2. 

M. A. Windsor et al., “Estimating public and patient savings from basic research: a study of optical coherence tomography in managing antiangiogenic therapy,” Am. J. Ophthalmol., 185 115 –122 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2017.09.027 AJOPAA 0002-9394 Google Scholar

3. 

D. Huang et al., “Optical coherence tomography,” Science, 254 (5035), 1178 –1181 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1957169 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar

4. 

Ophthalmic Laser Interferometer, 1986). Google Scholar

5. 

J. G. Fujimoto et al., “Femtosecond optical ranging in biological systems,” Opt. Lett., 11 150 –152 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.11.000150 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

6. 

(2021). Google Scholar

7. 

M. Göppert-Mayer, “Über Elementarakte mit zwei Quantensprüngen,” Ann. Phys., 401 (3), 273 –294 (1931). Google Scholar

8. 

W. Denk, J. H. Strickler and W. W. Webb, “Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy,” Science, 248 (4951), 73 –76 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2321027 Google Scholar

9. 

K. C. Wang et al., “A transmitter for diagnostic imaging,” Proc. SPIE, 0090 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.955044 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

10. 

V. W. Wang, G. Burns and S. Elliott, “Opto-acoustic transducers for potentially sensitive ultrasonic imaging,” Opt. Eng., 16 (5), 165432 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.7972112 Google Scholar

11. 

H. Goldmann, “Spaltlampenphotographie und photometrie,” Ophthalmologica, 98 (6), (1939). OPHTAD 0030-3755 Google Scholar

12. 

Z. Koana, J. Illumin. Eng. Inst., 26 371 (1943). SHGSAR Google Scholar

13. 

S. Singh and A. Goyal, “The origin of echocardiography,” Texas Heart Inst. J., 34 (4), 431 –438 (2007). THIJDO 0730-2347 Google Scholar

14. 

M. M. Ter-Pogossian et al., “A positron-emission transaxial tomograph for nuclear imaging (PETT),” Radiology, 114 (1), 89 –98 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1148/114.1.89 RADLAX 0033-8419 Google Scholar

15. 

M. E. Phelps et al., “Application of annihilation coincidence detection to transaxial reconstruction tomography,” J. Nucl. Med., 16 (3), 210 –224 (1975). JNMEAQ 0161-5505 Google Scholar

16. 

C. Borck, (2005). Google Scholar

17. 

P. A. Rinck, “A short history of magnetic resonance imaging,” Spectrosc. Eur., 20 (1), 7 –9 (2008). SPEUEF 0966-0941 Google Scholar

18. 

B. W. Pogue, Optics of Medical Imaging, SPIE, London (2018). Google Scholar

19. 

A. F. Fercher and E. Roth, “Ophthalmic laser interferometry,” Proc. SPIE, 0658 48 –51 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.938523 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

20. 

A. F. Fercher, K. Mengedoht and W. Werner, “Eye-length measurement by interferometry with partially coherent light,” Opt. Lett., 13 (3), 186 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.13.000186 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

21. 

K. F. Kwong et al., “400-Hz mechanical scanning optical delay line,” Opt. Lett., 18 (7), 558 –560 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.18.000558 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

22. 

L. A. Paunescu et al., “Reproducibility of nerve fiber thickness, macular thickness, and optic nerve head measurements using StratusOCT,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 45 (6), 1716 –1724 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.03-0514 IOVSDA 0146-0404 Google Scholar

23. 

B. Potsaid et al., “Ultrahigh speed spectral/Fourier domain OCT ophthalmic imaging at 70,000 to 312,500 axial scans per second,” Opt. Express, 16 (19), 15149 –15169 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.16.015149 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

24. 

O. P. Kocaoglu et al., “Adaptive optics optical coherence tomography at 1 MHz,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 5 (12), 4186 –4200 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.5.004186 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

25. 

T. Klein et al., “Megahertz OCT for ultrawide-field retinal imaging with a 1050 nm Fourier domain mode-locked laser,” Opt. Express, 19 (4), 3044 –3062 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.003044 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

26. 

T. Klein et al., “Multi-MHz retinal OCT,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 4 (10), 1890 –1908 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.4.001890 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

27. 

O. M. Carrasco-Zevallos et al., “Live volumetric (4D) visualization and guidance of in vivo human ophthalmic surgery with intraoperative optical coherence tomography,” Sci. Rep., 6 31689 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31689 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

28. 

S. Moon and D. Y. Kim, “Ultra-high-speed optical coherence tomography with a stretched pulse supercontinuum source,” Opt. Express, 14 (24), 11575 –11584 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.14.011575 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

29. 

D. Huang et al., “400 MHz ultrafast optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett., 45 (24), 6675 –6678 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.409607 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

30. 

J. Kang et al., “102-nm, 44.5-MHz inertial-free swept source by mode-locked fiber laser and time stretch technique for optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Express, 26 (4), 4370 –4381 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.004370 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

31. 

M. Siddiqui et al., “High-speed optical coherence tomography by circular interferometric ranging,” Nat. Photonics, 12 (2), 111 –116 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-017-0088-x NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

32. 

J. Zhang et al., “Multi-MHz MEMS-VCSEL swept-source optical coherence tomography for endoscopic structural and angiographic imaging with miniaturized brushless motor probes,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 12 (4), 2384 –2403 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.420394 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

33. 

O. M. Carrasco-Zevallos et al., “Constant linear velocity spiral scanning for near video rate 4D OCT ophthalmic and surgical imaging with isotropic transverse sampling,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 9 (10), 5052 –5070 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.9.005052 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

34. 

W. Wieser et al., “Multi-megahertz OCT: high quality 3D imaging at 20 million A-scans and 4.5 GVoxels per second,” Opt. Express, 18 (14), 14685 –14704 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.014685 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

35. 

B. Grajciar et al., “Parallel Fourier domain optical coherence tomography for in vivo measurement of the human eye,” Opt. Express, 13 (4), 1131 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPEX.13.001131 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

36. 

B. Považay et al., “Full-field time-encoded frequency-domain optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Express, 14 (17), 7661 –7669 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.14.007661 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

37. 

L. Ginner et al., “Holographic line field en-face OCT with digital adaptive optics in the retina in vivo,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 9 (2), 472 –485 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.9.000472 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

38. 

S.-W. Lee and B.-M. Kim, “Line-field optical coherence tomography using frequency-sweeping source,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 14 (1), 50 –55 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2007.914046 IJSQEN 1077-260X Google Scholar

39. 

D. J. Fechtig et al., “Line-field parallel swept source MHz OCT for structural and functional retinal imaging,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 6 (3), 716 –735 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.6.000716 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

40. 

C.-H. Liu et al., “Ultra-fast line-field low coherence holographic elastography using spatial phase shifting,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 8 (2), 993 –1004 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.8.000993 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

41. 

A. Dubois et al., “Line-field confocal time-domain optical coherence tomography with dynamic focusing,” Opt. Express, 26 (26), 33534 –33542 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.033534 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

42. 

P. Mecê et al., “Coherence gate shaping for wide field high-resolution in vivo retinal imaging with full-field OCT,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 11 (9), 4928 –4941 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.400522 Google Scholar

43. 

L. Ginner et al., “Noniterative digital aberration correction for cellular resolution retinal optical coherence tomography in vivo,” Optica, 4 (8), 924 –931 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.4.000924 Google Scholar

44. 

D. Hillmann et al., “In vivo optical imaging of physiological responses to photostimulation in human photoreceptors,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 113 (46), 13138 –13143 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606428113 Google Scholar

45. 

J. Barrick et al., “High-speed and high-sensitivity parallel spectral-domain optical coherence tomography using a supercontinuum light source,” Opt. Lett., 41 (24), 5620 –5623 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.41.005620 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

46. 

D. J. Fechtig et al., “Full range line-field parallel swept source imaging utilizing digital refocusing,” J. Mod. Opt., 62 1801 –1807 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340.2014.990938 JMOPEW 0950-0340 Google Scholar

47. 

V. P. Pandiyan et al., “High-speed adaptive optics line-scan OCT for cellular-resolution optoretinography,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 11 (9), 5274 –5296 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.399034 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

48. 

Z. Al-Qazwini et al., “Ultrahigh-speed line-scan SD-OCT for four-dimensional in vivo imaging of small animal models,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 9 (3), 1216 –1228 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.9.001216 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

49. 

D. Hillmann et al., “Holoscopy—holographic optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett., 36 (13), 2390 –2392 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.36.002390 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

50. 

A. Dubois et al., “High-resolution full-field optical coherence tomography with a Linnik microscope,” Appl. Opt., 41 (4), 805 –812 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.41.000805 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

51. 

D. Hillmann et al., “Off-axis reference beam for full-field swept-source OCT and holoscopy,” Opt. Express, 25 (22), 27770 –27784 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.027770 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

52. 

H. Sudkamp et al., “In-vivo retinal imaging with off-axis full-field time-domain optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett., 41 (21), 4987 –4990 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.41.004987 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

53. 

T. Bonin et al., “In vivo Fourier-domain full-field OCT of the human retina with 1.5 million a-lines/s,” Opt. Lett., 35 (20), 3432 –3434 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.35.003432 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

54. 

J. Scholler et al., “Dynamic full-field optical coherence tomography: 3D live-imaging of retinal organoids,” Light: Sci. Appl., 9 (1), 140 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-020-00375-8 Google Scholar

55. 

A. Kumar, W. Drexler and R. A. Leitgeb, “Numerical focusing methods for full field OCT: a comparison based on a common signal model,” Opt. Express, 22 (13), 16061 –16078 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.016061 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

56. 

O. Thouvenin et al., “En face coherence microscopy [Invited],” Biomed. Opt. Express, 8 (2), 622 –639 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.8.000622 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

57. 

A.-H. Dhalla, J. V. Migacz and J. A. Izatt, “Crosstalk rejection in parallel optical coherence tomography using spatially incoherent illumination with partially coherent sources,” Opt. Lett., 35 (13), 2305 –2307 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.35.002305 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

58. 

E. Auksorius, D. Borycki and M. Wojtkowski, “Crosstalk-free volumetric in vivo imaging of a human retina with Fourier-domain full-field optical coherence tomography,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 10 (12), 6390 –6407 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.10.006390 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

59. 

A. F. Fercher et al., “Optical coherence tomography: principles and applications,” Rep. Prog. Phys., 66 (2), 239 –303 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/66/2/204 RPPHAG 0034-4885 Google Scholar

60. 

E. J. Fernandez et al., “Three-dimensional adaptive optics ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography using a liquid crystal spatial light modulator,” Vision Res., 45 (28), 3432 –3444 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2005.08.028 VISRAM 0042-6989 Google Scholar

61. 

S. G. Adie et al., “Computational adaptive optics for broadband optical interferometric tomography of biological tissue,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 109 (19), 7175 –7180 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1121193109 Google Scholar

62. 

D. Hillmann et al., “Aberration-free volumetric high-speed imaging of in vivo retina,” Sci. Rep., 6 (1), 35209 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35209 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

63. 

A. Kumar, W. Drexler and R. A. Leitgeb, “Subaperture correlation based digital adaptive optics for full field optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Express, 21 (9), 10850 –10866 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.010850 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

64. 

Z. Liu et al., “Imaging and quantifying ganglion cells and other transparent neurons in the living human retina,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 114 12803 –12808 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1711734114 Google Scholar

65. 

J. A. Izatt et al., “Optical coherence microscopy in scattering media,” Opt. Lett., 19 (8), 590 –592 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.19.000590 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

66. 

S. Adie et al., “Computational adaptive optics for broadband optical interferometric tomography of biological tissue,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 109 (19), 7175 –7180 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1121193109 Google Scholar

67. 

A. Kumar et al., “Anisotropic aberration correction using region of interest based digital adaptive optics in Fourier domain OCT,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 6 (4), 1124 –1134 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.6.001124 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

68. 

J. P. Rolland et al., “Gabor-based fusion technique for optical coherence microscopy,” Opt. Express, 18 (4), 3632 –3642 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.003632 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

69. 

R. A. Leitgeb et al., “Extended focus depth for Fourier domain optical coherence microscopy,” Opt. Lett., 31 (16), 2450 –2452 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.31.002450 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

70. 

A. A. Grebenyuk, L. Ginner and R. A. Leitgeb, “Numerically focused full-field swept-source optical coherence microscopy with structured illumination,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 26 (26), 33772 –33782 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.033772 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

71. 

H. Pahlevaninezhad et al., “Nano-optic endoscope for high-resolution optical coherence tomography in vivo,” Nat. Photonics, 12 (9), 540 –547 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-018-0224-2 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

72. 

V. Aranha dos Santos et al., “In vivo tear film thickness measurement and tear film dynamics visualization using spectral domain optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Express, 23 (16), 21043 –21063 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.021043 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

73. 

B. Gallo et al., “Choroidal macrovessels: multimodal imaging findings and review of the literature,” Br. J. Ophthalmol., 1 –8 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318095 BJOPAL 0007-1161 Google Scholar

74. 

C. Zanchin et al., “In vivo relationship between near-infrared spectroscopy-detected lipid-rich plaques and morphological plaque characteristics by optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound: a multimodality intravascular imaging study,” Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging, 22 824 –834 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jez318 Google Scholar

75. 

M. J. Baker et al., “Clinical applications of infrared and Raman spectroscopy: state of play and future challenges,” Analyst, 143 (8), 1735 –1757 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7AN01871A ANLYAG 0365-4885 Google Scholar

76. 

K. Konig, “Multiphoton microscopy in life sciences,” J. Microsc., 200 (2), 83 –104 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2818.2000.00738.x JMICAR 0022-2720 Google Scholar

77. 

H. Tu et al., “Stain-free histopathology by programmable supercontinuum pulses,” Nat. Photonics, 10 534 –540 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2016.94 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

78. 

M. Titford, “The long history of hematoxylin,” Biotech. Histochem., 80 (2), 73 –78 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/10520290500138372 BIHIEU 1052-0295 Google Scholar

79. 

M. Andreana et al., “Depth resolved label-free multimodal optical imaging platform to study morpho-molecular composition of tissue,” Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 18 (5), 997 –1008 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8PP00410B PPSHCB 1474-905X Google Scholar

80. 

S. Karpf et al., “Spectro-temporal encoded multiphoton microscopy and fluorescence lifetime imaging at kilohertz frame-rates,” Nat. Commun., 11 (1), 2062 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15618-w NCAOBW 2041-1723 Google Scholar

81. 

D. Bovenkamp et al., “Combination of high-resolution optical coherence tomography and Raman spectroscopy for improved staging and grading in bladder cancer,” Appl. Sci.-Basel, 8 (12), 2371 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/app8122371 Google Scholar

82. 

D. L. Marks and S. A. Boppart, “Nonlinear interferometric vibrational imaging,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 92 (12), 123905 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.123905 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

83. 

C. Vinegoni et al., “Nonlinear optical contrast enhancement for optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Express, 12 (2), 331 –341 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPEX.12.000331 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

84. 

J. S. Bredfeldt et al., “Molecularly sensitive optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett., 30 (5), 495 –497 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.30.000495 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

85. 

T. Kamali et al., “Hybrid single-source online Fourier transform coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering/optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett., 39 (19), 5709 –5712 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.39.005709 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

86. 

S. Kumar et al., “Single-pulse CARS based multimodal nonlinear optical microscope for bioimaging,” Opt. Express, 23 (10), 13082 –13098 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.013082 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

87. 

M. Andreana et al., “Epi-detecting label-free multimodal imaging platform using a compact diode-pumped femtosecond solid-state laser,” J. Biomed. Opt., 22 (9), 091517 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.22.9.091517 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

88. 

F. E. Robles et al., “Stimulated Raman scattering spectroscopic optical coherence tomography,” Optica, 4 (2), 243 –246 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.4.000243 Google Scholar

89. 

E. Beaurepaire et al., “Combined scanning optical coherence and two-photon-excited fluorescence microscopy,” Opt. Lett., 24 (14), 969 –971 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.24.000969 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

90. 

S. Tang et al., “Combined multiphoton microscopy and optical coherence tomography using a 12-fs broadband source,” J. Biomed. Opt., 11 (2), 020502 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2193428 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

91. 

C. Vinegoni et al., “Integrated structural and functional optical imaging combining spectral-domain optical coherence and multiphoton microscopy,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 88 (5), 053901 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2171477 APPLAB 0003-6951 Google Scholar

92. 

S. Yuan and Y. Chen, “Combining optical coherence tomography with fluorescence imaging,” Advances in Lasers and Electro Optics, IntechOpen(2010). Google Scholar

93. 

B. W. Graf and S. A. Boppart, “Multimodal in vivo skin imaging with integrated optical coherence and multiphoton microscopy,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 18 (4), 1280 –1286 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2011.2166377 IJSQEN 1077-260X Google Scholar

94. 

J. Xi et al., “Integrated multimodal endomicroscopy platform for simultaneous en face optical coherence and two-photon fluorescence imaging,” Opt. Lett., 37 (3), 362 –364 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.37.000362 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

95. 

S. Yazdanfar et al., “Multifunctional imaging of endogenous contrast by simultaneous nonlinear and optical coherence microscopy of thick tissues,” Microsc. Res. Tech., 70 (7), 628 –633 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.20447 MRTEEO 1059-910X Google Scholar

96. 

Q. Wu, B. E. Applegate and A. T. Yeh, “Cornea microstructure and mechanical responses measured with nonlinear optical and optical coherence microscopy using sub-10-fs pulses,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 2 (5), 1135 –1146 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.2.001135 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

97. 

S. P. Chong et al., “Tri-modal microscopy with multiphoton and optical coherence microscopy/tomography for multi-scale and multi-contrast imaging,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 4 (9), 1584 –1594 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.4.001584 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

98. 

Y. Zhao et al., “Integrated multimodal optical microscopy for structural and functional imaging of engineered and natural skin,” J. Biophotonics, 5 (5–6), 437 –448 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201200003 Google Scholar

99. 

A. V. Meleshina et al., “Multimodal label-free imaging of living dermal equivalents including dermal papilla cells,” Stem Cell Res. Ther., 9 (1), 84 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-018-0838-9 Google Scholar

100. 

M. T. Erkkilä et al., “Widefield fluorescence lifetime imaging of protoporphyrin IX for fluorescence-guided neurosurgery: an ex vivo feasibility study,” J. Biophotonics, 12 e201800378 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201800378 Google Scholar

101. 

A. Rakhymzhan et al., “Coregistered spectral optical coherence tomography and two-photon microscopy for multimodal near-instantaneous deep-tissue imaging,” Cytometry Part A, 97 (5), 515 –527 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.24012 1552-4922 Google Scholar

102. 

K. König et al., “Clinical optical coherence tomography combined with multiphoton tomography of patients with skin diseases,” J. Biophotonics, 2 (6–7), 389 –397 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.200910013 Google Scholar

103. 

K. Koenig, “Hybrid multiphoton multimodal tomography of in vivo human skin,” IntraVital, 1 (1), 11 –26 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4161/intv.21938 Google Scholar

104. 

A. Alex et al., “Three-dimensional multiphoton/optical coherence tomography for diagnostic applications in dermatology,” J. Biophotonics, 6 (4), 352 –362 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201200085 Google Scholar

105. 

W. R. Zipfel et al., “Live tissue intrinsic emission microscopy using multiphoton-excited native fluorescence and second harmonic generation,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 100 (12), 7075 –7080 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0832308100 Google Scholar

106. 

J. Sun et al., “In vivo multimodal nonlinear optical imaging of mucosal tissue,” Opt. Express, 12 (11), 2478 –2486 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPEX.12.002478 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

107. 

C. P. Pfeffer et al., “Multimodal nonlinear optical imaging of collagen arrays,” J. Struct. Biol., 164 (1), 140 –145 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2008.07.002 JSBIEM 1047-8477 Google Scholar

108. 

H. Chen et al., “A multimodal platform for nonlinear optical microscopy and microspectroscopy,” Opt. Express, 17 (3), 1282 –1290 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.001282 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

109. 

J. Rehbinder et al., “Multimodal nonlinear optical microscopy with shaped 10 fs pulses,” Opt. Express, 22 (23), 28790 –28797 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.028790 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

110. 

A. Unterhuber et al., “Compact, low-cost Ti:Al2O3 laser for in vivo ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett., 28 (11), 905 –907 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.28.000905 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

111. 

P. W. Roth et al., “Direct diode-laser pumping of a mode-locked Ti: sapphire laser,” Opt. Lett., 36 (2), 304 –306 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.36.000304 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

112. 

R. Sawada et al., “Wavelength-multiplexed pumping with 478-and 520-nm indium gallium nitride laser diodes for Ti:sapphire laser,” Appl. Opt., 56 (6), 1654 –1661 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.56.001654 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

113. 

M. Andreana et al., “Molecular multicolor multiphoton in vivo bioimaging based on a direct diode pumped Ti:sapphire oscillator,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 27 (4), 1 –9 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2021.3060289 IJSQEN 1077-260X Google Scholar

114. 

P. J. Marchand et al., “Soliton microcomb based spectral domain optical coherence tomography,” Nat. Commun., 12 (1), 427 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20404-9 NCAOBW 2041-1723 Google Scholar

115. 

N. M. Israelsen et al., “Real-time high-resolution mid-infrared optical coherence tomography,” Light: Sci. Appl., 8 (1), 1 –13 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-019-0122-5 Google Scholar

116. 

A. Kumar et al., “In-vivo digital wavefront sensing using swept source OCT,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 8 (7), 3369 –3382 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.8.003369 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

117. 

W. Drexler et al., “Optical coherence tomography today: speed, contrast, and multimodality,” J. Biomed. Opt., 19 (7), 071412 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.19.7.071412 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

118. 

S. Jiao et al., “Simultaneous multimodal imaging with integrated photoacoustic microscopy and optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett., 34 (19), 2961 –2963 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.34.002961 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

119. 

W. Zhang et al., “Simultaneous photoacoustic microscopy, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, and fluorescein microscopy multi-modality retinal imaging,” Photoacoustics, 20 100194 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2020.100194 Google Scholar

120. 

V. P. Nguyen et al., “Contrast agent enhanced multimodal photoacoustic microscopy and optical coherence tomography for imaging of rabbit choroidal and retinal vessels in vivo,” Sci. Rep., 9 (1), 5945 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42324-5 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

121. 

V.-P. Nguyen et al., “Plasmonic gold nanostar-enhanced multimodal photoacoustic microscopy and optical coherence tomography molecular imaging to evaluate choroidal neovascularization,” ACS Sens., 5 (10), 3070 –3081 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.0c00908 Google Scholar

122. 

V. P. Nguyen et al., “High-resolution multimodal photoacoustic microscopy and optical coherence tomography image-guided laser induced branch retinal vein occlusion in living rabbits,” Sci. Rep., 9 (1), 10560 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47062-2 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

123. 

W. Zhang et al., “High-resolution, in vivo multimodal photoacoustic microscopy, optical coherence tomography, and fluorescence microscopy imaging of rabbit retinal neovascularization,” Light: Sci. Appl., 7 (1), 103 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-018-0093-y Google Scholar

124. 

V. P. Nguyen et al., “Multi-wavelength, en-face photoacoustic microscopy and optical coherence tomography imaging for early and selective detection of laser induced retinal vein occlusion,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 9 (12), 5915 –5938 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.9.005915 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

125. 

V. P. Nguyen et al., “In vivo 3D imaging of retinal neovascularization using multimodal photoacoustic microscopy and optical coherence tomography imaging,” J. Imaging, 4 (12), 150 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging4120150 Google Scholar

126. 

C. Tian et al., “Noninvasive chorioretinal imaging in living rabbits using integrated photoacoustic microscopy and optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Express, 25 (14), 15947 –15955 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.015947 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

127. 

X. Liu et al., “Optical coherence photoacoustic microscopy for in vivo multimodal retinal imaging,” Opt. Lett., 40 (7), 1370 –1373 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.40.001370 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

128. 

A. Dadkhah and S. Jiao, “Optical coherence tomography-guided dynamic focusing for combined optical and mechanical scanning multimodal photoacoustic microscopy,” J. Biomed. Opt., 24 (12), 121906 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.24.12.121906 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

129. 

A. Dadkhah et al., “Integrated multimodal photoacoustic microscopy with OCT- guided dynamic focusing,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 10 (1), 137 –150 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.10.000137 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

130. 

A. Dadkhah and S. Jiao, “Integrating photoacoustic microscopy, optical coherence tomography, OCT angiography, and fluorescence microscopy for multimodal imaging,” Exp. Biol. Med., 245 (4), 342 –347 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1535370219897584 EXBMAA 0071-3384 Google Scholar

131. 

J. Park et al., “Quadruple ultrasound, photoacoustic, optical coherence, and fluorescence fusion imaging with a transparent ultrasound transducer,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 118 (11), e1920879118 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920879118 Google Scholar

132. 

Z. Ma et al., “Assessment of microvasculature flow state with a high speed all-optic dual-modal system of optical coherence tomography and photoacoustic imaging,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 9 (12), 6103 –6115 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.9.006103 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

133. 

S. Preisser et al., “All-optical highly sensitive akinetic sensor for ultrasound detection and photoacoustic imaging,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 7 (10), 4171 –4186 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.7.004171 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

134. 

R. Haindl et al., “Functional optical coherence tomography and photoacoustic microscopy imaging for zebrafish larvae,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 11 (4), 2137 –2151 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.390410 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

135. 

R. Haindl et al., “Dual modality reflection mode optical coherence and photoacoustic microscopy using an akinetic sensor,” Opt. Lett., 42 (21), 4319 –4322 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.42.004319 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

136. 

E. Z. Zhang et al., “Multimodal photoacoustic and optical coherence tomography scanner using an all optical detection scheme for 3D morphological skin imaging,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 2 (8), 2202 –2215 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.2.002202 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

137. 

M. Liu et al., “Dual modality optical coherence and whole-body photoacoustic tomography imaging of chick embryos in multiple development stages,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 5 (9), 3150 –3159 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.5.003150 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

138. 

B. Zabihian et al., “In vivo dual-modality photoacoustic and optical coherence tomography imaging of human dermatological pathologies,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 6 (9), 3163 –3178 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.6.003163 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

139. 

B. Zabihian et al., “Comprehensive vascular imaging using optical coherence tomography based angiography and photoacoustic tomography,” J. Biomed. Opt., 21 (9), 096001 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.21.9.096011 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

140. 

M. Liu et al., “Combined multi-modal photoacoustic tomography, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography system with an articulated probe for in vivo human skin structure and vasculature imaging,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 7 (9), 3390 –3402 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.7.003390 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

141. 

M. Liu and W. Drexler, “Optical coherence tomography angiography and photoacoustic imaging in dermatology,” Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 18 (5), 945 –962 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8PP00471D PPSHCB 1474-905X Google Scholar

142. 

Z. Chen et al., “Non-invasive multimodal optical coherence and photoacoustic tomography for human skin imaging,” Sci. Rep., 7 (1), 17975 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18331-9 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

143. 

J. Schmid et al., “Nonequispaced grid sampling in photoacoustics with a nonuniform fast Fourier transform,” J. Biomed. Opt., 21 (1), 015005 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.21.1.015005 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

144. 

M. Liu et al., “REAP: revealing drug tolerant persister cells in cancer using contrast enhanced optical coherence and photoacoustic tomography,” J. Phys. Photonics, 3 021001 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7647/abf02f Google Scholar

145. 

L. Xi et al., “Miniature probe combining optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy and optical coherence tomography for in vivo microcirculation study,” Appl. Opt., 52 (9), 1928 –1931 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.52.001928 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

146. 

X. Dai et al., “Miniature probe integrating optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy, optical coherence tomography, and ultrasound imaging: proof-of-concept,” Opt. Lett., 40 (12), 2921 –2924 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.40.002921 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

147. 

S. J. Mathews et al., “All-optical dual photoacoustic and optical coherence tomography intravascular probe,” Photoacoustics, 11 65 –70 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2018.07.002 Google Scholar

148. 

Z. Hosseinaee, J. A. Tummon Simmons and P. H. Reza, “Dual-modal photoacoustic imaging and optical coherence tomography [Review],” Front. Phys., 8 (635), 616618 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.616618 Google Scholar

149. 

J. Weber, P. C. Beard and S. E. Bohndiek, “Contrast agents for molecular photoacoustic imaging,” Nat. Methods, 13 639 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3929 1548-7091 Google Scholar

150. 

Y. Dai et al., “Nanoparticle design strategies for enhanced anticancer therapy by exploiting the tumour microenvironment,” Chem. Soc. Rev., 46 (12), 3830 –3852 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CS00592F CSRVBR 0306-0012 Google Scholar

151. 

Y. Jiang and K. Pu, “Multimodal biophotonics of semiconducting polymer nanoparticles,” Acc. Chem. Res., 51 (8), 1840 –1849 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00242 ACHRE4 0001-4842 Google Scholar

152. 

P. K. Upputuri and M. Pramanik, “Recent advances in photoacoustic contrast agents for in vivo imaging,” Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol., 12 (4), e1618 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.1618 Google Scholar

153. 

D. Wang et al., “Deep tissue photoacoustic computed tomography with a fast and compact laser system,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 8 (1), 112 –123 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.8.000112 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

154. 

L. Li et al., “Single-impulse panoramic photoacoustic computed tomography of small-animal whole-body dynamics at high spatiotemporal resolution,” Nat. Biomed. Eng., 1 (5), 0071 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-017-0071 Google Scholar

155. 

L. Lin et al., “Single-breath-hold photoacoustic computed tomography of the breast,” Nat. Commun., 9 (1), 2352 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04576-z NCAOBW 2041-1723 Google Scholar

156. 

P. Wray et al., “Photoacoustic computed tomography of human extremities,” J. Biomed. Opt., 24 (2), 026003 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.24.2.026003 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

157. 

A. L. Antaris et al., “A small-molecule dye for NIR-II imaging,” Nat. Mater., 15 (2), 235 –242 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4476 NMAACR 1476-1122 Google Scholar

158. 

Y. Jiang and K. Pu, “Molecular fluorescence and photoacoustic imaging in the second near-infrared optical window using organic contrast agents,” Adv. Biosyst., 2 (5), 1700262 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/adbi.201700262 Google Scholar

159. 

Y. D. Kenry and B. Liu, “Recent advances of optical imaging in the second near-infrared window,” Adv. Mater., 30 (47), 1802394 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201802394 ADVMEW 0935-9648 Google Scholar

160. 

P. K. Upputuri and M. Pramanik, “Photoacoustic imaging in the second near-infrared window: a review,” J. Biomed. Opt., 24 (4), 040901 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.24.4.040901 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

161. 

D. Cui et al., “Thermoresponsive semiconducting polymer nanoparticles for contrast-enhanced photoacoustic imaging,” Adv. Funct. Mater., 29 (38), 1903461 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201903461 AFMDC6 1616-301X Google Scholar

162. 

Z. Wang et al., “Redox-activatable and acid-enhanced nanotheranostics for second near-infrared photoacoustic tomography and combined photothermal tumor therapy,” ACS Nano, 13 (5), 5816 –5825 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b01411 ANCAC3 1936-0851 Google Scholar

163. 

K. Pu et al., “Semiconducting polymer nanoparticles as photoacoustic molecular imaging probes in living mice,” Nat. Nanotechnol., 9 (3), 233 –239 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.302 NNAABX 1748-3387 Google Scholar

164. 

Z. Wang et al., “NIR nanoprobe-facilitated cross-referencing manifestation of local disease biology for dynamic therapeutic response assessment,” Chem. Sci., 11 (3), 803 –811 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/C9SC04909F 1478-6524 Google Scholar

165. 

Q. Miao et al., “Semiconducting oligomer nanoparticles as an activatable photoacoustic probe with amplified brightness for in vivo imaging of pH,” Adv. Mater., 28 (19), 3662 –3668 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201505681 ADVMEW 0935-9648 Google Scholar

166. 

Z. Wang et al., “pH-sensitive and biodegradable charge-transfer nanocomplex for second near-infrared photoacoustic tumor imaging,” Nano Res., 12 (1), 49 –55 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-018-2175-9 1998-0124 Google Scholar

167. 

W.-W. Liu, S.-H. Chen and P.-C. Li, “Functional photoacoustic calcium imaging using chlorophosphonazo III in a 3D tumor cell culture,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 12 (2), 1154 –1166 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.414602 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

168. 

N. Dana et al., “In vitrophotoacoustic sensing of calcium dynamics with arsenazo III,” Laser Phys. Lett., 13 (7), 075603 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1612-2011/13/7/075603 1612-2011 Google Scholar

169. 

A. Mishra et al., “Near-Infrared photoacoustic imaging probe responsive to calcium,” Anal. Chem., 88 (22), 10785 –10789 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03039 ANCHAM 0003-2700 Google Scholar

170. 

S. Roberts et al., “Calcium sensor for photoacoustic imaging,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 140 (8), 2718 –2721 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b03064 JACSAT 0002-7863 Google Scholar

171. 

C. Cui et al., “Targeting calcium signaling in cancer therapy,” Acta Pharm. Sin. B, 7 (1), 3 –17 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2016.11.001 Google Scholar

172. 

K. Yang et al., “Visualization of protease activity in vivo using an activatable photo-acoustic imaging probe based on CuS nanoparticles,” Theranostics, 4 (2), 134 –141 (2014). https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.7217 Google Scholar

173. 

Y. Zhang et al., “Activatable polymeric nanoprobe for near-infrared fluorescence and photoacoustic imaging of T lymphocytes,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 60 (11), 5921 –5927 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202015116 Google Scholar

174. 

W. S. Tummers et al., “Intraoperative pancreatic cancer detection using tumor-specific multimodality molecular imaging,” Ann. Surg. Oncol., 25 (7), 1880 –1888 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6453-2 Google Scholar

175. 

R. Haindl et al., “Ultra-high-resolution SD-OCM imaging with a compact polarization-aligned 840 nm broadband combined-SLED source,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 11 (6), 3395 –3406 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.394229 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

176. 

A. J. Deloria et al., “Ultra-high-resolution 3D optical coherence tomography reveals inner structures of human placenta-derived trophoblast organoids,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 68 2368 –2376 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2020.3038466 IEBEAX 0018-9294 Google Scholar

177. 

Y. H. Yücel et al., “Identification of lymphatics in the ciliary body of the human eye: a novel “uveolymphatic” outflow pathway,” Exp. Eye Res., 89 (5), 810 –819 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2009.08.010 EXERA6 0014-4835 Google Scholar

178. 

A. L. C. Tam et al., “Latanoprost stimulates ocular lymphatic drainage: an in vivo nanotracer study,” Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol., 2 (5), 3 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.2.5.3 Google Scholar

179. 

K. Cardinell et al., “A novel photoacoustic-fluorescent contrast agent for quantitative imaging of lymphatic drainage,” Photoacoustics, 21 100239 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100239 Google Scholar

180. 

R. Haindl et al., “Total retinal blood flow measurement by three beam Doppler optical coherence tomography,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 7 (2), 287 –301 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.7.000287 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

181. 

P. K. Upputuri and M. Pramanik, “Fast photoacoustic imaging systems using pulsed laser diodes: a review,” Biomed. Eng. Lett., 8 (2), 167 –181 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-018-0060-9 Google Scholar

182. 

X. Dai, H. Yang and H. Jiang, “In vivo photoacoustic imaging of vasculature with a low-cost miniature light emitting diode excitation,” Opt. Lett., 42 (7), 1456 –1459 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.42.001456 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

183. 

A. Hariri et al., “Molecular imaging of oxidative stress using an LED-based photoacoustic imaging system,” Sci. Rep., 9 (1), 11378 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47599-2 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

184. 

A. Hariri et al., “Deep learning improves contrast in low-fluence photoacoustic imaging,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 11 (6), 3360 –3373 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.395683 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

185. 

H. Lan et al., “Y-Net: hybrid deep learning image reconstruction for photoacoustic tomography in vivo,” Photoacoustics, 20 100197 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2020.100197 Google Scholar

186. 

Y. Li et al., “Snapshot photoacoustic topography through an ergodic relay for high-throughput imaging of optical absorption,” Nat. Photonics, 14 (3), 164 –170 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-019-0576-2 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

187. 

A. Buehler et al., “Real-time handheld multispectral optoacoustic imaging,” Opt. Lett., 38 (9), 1404 –1406 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.38.001404 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

188. 

X. L. Deán-Ben, H. López-Schier and D. Razansky, “Optoacoustic micro-tomography at 100 volumes per second,” Sci. Rep., 7 (1), 6850 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06554-9 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

189. 

N. Huynh et al., “Photoacoustic imaging using an 8-beam Fabry–Perot scanner,” Proc. SPIE, 9708 97072L (2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2214334 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

190. 

Z. Guo et al., “Compressed sensing in photoacoustic tomography in vivo,” J. Biomed. Opt., 15 (2), 021311 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3381187 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

191. 

S. Arridge et al., “Accelerated high-resolution photoacoustic tomography via compressed sensing,” Phys. Med. Biol., 61 (24), 8908 –8940 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/61/24/8908 PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar

192. 

N. Huynh et al., Sub-Sampled Fabry-Perot Photoacoustic Scanner for Fast 3D Imaging, SPIE, London (2017). Google Scholar

193. 

J. Frikel and M. Haltmeier, “Efficient regularization with wavelet sparsity constraints in photoacoustic tomography,” Inverse Prob., 34 (2), 024006 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6420/aaa0ac INPEEY 0266-5611 Google Scholar

194. 

S. Antholzer, M. Haltmeier and J. Schwab, “Deep learning for photoacoustic tomography from sparse data,” Inverse Prob. Sci. Eng., 27 (7), 987 –1005 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/17415977.2018.1518444 Google Scholar

195. 

M. J. Gora et al., “Endoscopic optical coherence tomography: technologies and clinical applications [Invited],” Biomed. Opt. Express, 8 (5), 2405 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.8.002405 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

196. 

G. J. Tearney et al., “Scanning single-mode fiber optic catheter–endoscope for optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett., 21 (7), 543 –545 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.21.000543 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

197. 

A. M. Rollins et al., “Real-time in vivo imaging of human gastrointestinal ultrastructure by use of endoscopic optical coherence tomography with a novel efficient interferometer design,” Opt. Lett., 24 (19), 1358 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.24.001358 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

198. 

A. M. Sergeev et al., “In vivo endoscopic OCT imaging of precancer and cancer states of human mucosa,” Opt. Express, 1 (13), 432 –440 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.1.000432 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

199. 

S. A. Boppart et al., “Forward-imaging instruments for optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett., 22 (21), 1618 –1620 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.22.001618 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

200. 

Y. Pan, H. Xie and G. K. Fedder, “Endoscopic optical coherence tomography based on a microelectromechanical mirror,” Opt. Lett., 26 (24), 1966 –1968 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.26.001966 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

201. 

A. Jain et al., “A two-axis electrothermal micromirror for endoscopic optical coherence tomography,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 10 (3), 636 –642 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2004.829194 IJSQEN 1077-260X Google Scholar

202. 

J. Wu et al., “Paired-angle-rotation scanning optical coherence tomography forward-imaging probe,” Opt. Lett., 31 (9), 1265 –1267 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.31.001265 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

203. 

T. Xie et al., “Fiber-optic-bundle-based optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett., 30 (14), 1803 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.30.001803 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

204. 

F. Placzek et al., “Towards ultrahigh resolution OCT based endoscopical pituitary gland and adenoma screening: a performance parameter evaluation,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 11 (12), 7003 –7018 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.409987 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

205. 

M. J. Suter et al., “Image-guided biopsy in the esophagus through comprehensive optical frequency domain imaging and laser marking: a study in living swine,” Gastrointest. Endosc., 71 (2), 346 –353 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2009.07.007 Google Scholar

206. 

M. J. Suter et al., “Esophageal-guided biopsy with volumetric laser endomicroscopy and laser cautery marking: a pilot clinical study,” Gastrointest. Endosc., 79 (6), 886 –896 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2013.11.016 Google Scholar

207. 

J. Xi et al., “Diffractive catheter for ultrahigh-resolution spectral-domain volumetric OCT imaging,” Opt. Lett., 39 (7), 2016 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.39.002016 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

208. 

J. Li et al., “Ultrathin monolithic 3D printed optical coherence tomography endoscopy for preclinical and clinical use,” Light: Sci. Appl., 9 (1), 124 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-020-00365-w Google Scholar

209. 

A. Alfonso-Garcia et al., “Real-time augmented reality for delineation of surgical margins during neurosurgery using autofluorescence lifetime contrast,” J. Biophotonics, 13 (1), e201900108 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201900108 Google Scholar

210. 

R. A. Leitgeb, “Multimodal optical medical imaging concepts based on optical coherence tomography,” Front. Phys., 6 17 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2018.00114 Google Scholar

211. 

T.-H. Tsai et al., “Endoscopic optical coherence angiography enables 3-dimensional visualization of subsurface microvasculature,” Gastroenterology, 147 (6), 1219 –1221 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2014.08.034 GASTAB 0016-5085 Google Scholar

212. 

K. Liang et al., “Endoscopic forward-viewing optical coherence tomography and angiography with MHz swept source,” Opt. Lett., 42 (16), 3193 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.42.003193 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

213. 

L. M. Wurster et al., “Endoscopic optical coherence tomography angiography using a forward imaging piezoscanner probe,” J. Biophotonics, 12 (4), e201800382 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201800382 Google Scholar

214. 

L. M. Wurster et al., “Comparison of optical coherence tomography angiography and narrow-band imaging using a bimodal endoscope,” J. Biomed. Opt., 25 (3), 032003 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.25.3.032003 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

215. 

K. Liang et al., “Cycloid scanning for wide field optical coherence tomography endomicroscopy and angiography in vivo,” Optica, 5 (1), 36 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.5.000036 Google Scholar

216. 

Q. A. A. Tanguy et al., “Real-time Lissajous imaging with a low-voltage 2-axis MEMS scanner based on electrothermal actuation,” Opt. Express, 28 (6), 8512 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.380690 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

217. 

T. Wu et al., “Miniaturized precalibration-based Lissajous scanning fiber probe for high speed endoscopic optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett., 45 (8), 2470 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.389364 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

218. 

T. Wang et al., “Heartbeat OCT: in vivo intravascular megahertz-optical coherence tomography,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 6 (12), 5021 –5032 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.6.005021 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

219. 

L. Scolaro et al., “Molecular imaging needles: dual-modality optical coherence tomography and fluorescence imaging of labeled antibodies deep in tissue,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 6 (5), 1767 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.6.001767 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

220. 

J. Leng et al., “Multi-spectral intravascular photoacoustic/ultrasound/optical coherence tomography tri-modality system with a fully-integrated 09-mm full field-of-view catheter for plaque vulnerability imaging,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 12 (4), 1934 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.420724 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

221. 

I. W. Schie et al., “Morpho-molecular signal correlation between optical coherence tomography and Raman spectroscopy for superior image interpretation and clinical diagnosis,” Sci. Rep., 11 (1), 9951 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89188-2 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

222. 

Multimodal Optical Diagnostics of Cancer, Springer Nature, Switzerland (2020). Google Scholar

223. 

M. R. Hee et al., “Polarization-sensitive low-coherence reflectometer for birefringence characterization and ranging,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 9 (6), 903 –908 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.9.000903 JOBPDE 0740-3224 Google Scholar

224. 

J. F. de Boer et al., “Two-dimensional birefringence imaging in biological tissue by polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett., 22 (12), 934 –936 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.22.000934 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

225. 

J. De Boer et al., “Imaging thermally damaged tissue by polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Express, 3 (6), 212 –218 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.3.000212 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

226. 

J. F. de Boer and T. E. Milner, “Review of polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography and Stokes vector determination,” J. Biomed. Opt., 7 (3), 359 –371 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1483879 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

227. 

J. F. de Boer, C. K. Hitzenberger and Y. Yasuno, “Polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography: a review [Invited],” Biomed. Opt. Express, 8 (3), 1838 –1873 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.8.001838 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

228. 

M. Villiger et al., “Optic axis mapping with catheter-based polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography,” Optica, 5 (10), 1329 –1337 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.5.001329 Google Scholar

229. 

L. P. Hariri et al., “Distinguishing tumor from associated fibrosis to increase diagnostic biopsy yield with polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography,” Clin. Cancer Res., 25 (17), 5242 –5249 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0566 Google Scholar

230. 

M. Vaselli et al., “Polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography (PS-OCT) for bronchoscopic airway smooth muscle detection in bronchial thermoplasty treated asthma patients,” Chest, 160 (2), 432 –435 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2021.03.042 CHETBF 0012-3692 Google Scholar

231. 

Z. Chen et al., “Optical Doppler tomographic imaging of fluid flow velocity in highly scattering media,” Opt. Lett., 22 (1), 64 –66 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.22.000064 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

232. 

J. A. Izatt et al., “In vivo bidirectional color Doppler flow imaging of picoliter blood volumes using optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett., 22 (18), 1439 –1441 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.22.001439 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

233. 

J. Barton, A. Welch and J. Izatt, “Investigating pulsed dye laser-blood vessel interaction with color Doppler optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Express, 3 (6), 251 –256 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.3.000251 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

234. 

R. A. Leitgeb et al., “Doppler optical coherence tomography,” Prog. Retinal Eye Res., 41 26 –43 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2014.03.004 Google Scholar

235. 

Z. Ding et al., “Real-time phase-resolved optical coherence tomography and optical Doppler tomography,” Opt. Express, 10 (5), 236 –245 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.10.000236 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

236. 

R. A. Leitgeb et al., “Real-time assessment of retinal blood flow with ultrafast acquisition by color Doppler Fourier domain optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Express, 11 (23), 3116 –3121 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.11.003116 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

237. 

S. Makita et al., “Optical coherence angiography,” Opt. Express, 14 (17), 7821 –7840 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.14.007821 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

238. 

I. Grulkowski et al., “Scanning protocols dedicated to smart velocity ranging in spectral OCT,” Opt. Express, 17 (26), 23736 –23754 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.023736 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

239. 

L. Wang et al., “Frequency domain phase-resolved optical Doppler and Doppler variance tomography,” Opt. Commun., 242 (4–6), 345 –350 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2004.08.035 OPCOB8 0030-4018 Google Scholar

240. 

R. K. Wang et al., “Three dimensional optical angiography,” Opt. Express, 15 (7), 4083 –4097 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.15.004083 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

241. 

T. E. de Carlo et al., “A review of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA),” Int. J. Retina Vitreous, 1 5 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-015-0005-8 Google Scholar

242. 

E. Borrelli et al., “Pearls and pitfalls of optical coherence tomography angiography imaging: a review,” Ophthalmol. Ther., 8 (2), 215 –226 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-019-0178-6 Google Scholar

243. 

K. Y. Tey et al., “Optical coherence tomography angiography in diabetic retinopathy: a review of current applications,” Eye Vision, 6 37 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-019-0160-3 Google Scholar

244. 

B. J. Vakoc et al., “Three-dimensional microscopy of the tumor microenvironment in vivo using optical frequency domain imaging,” Nat. Med., 15 1219 –1223 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.1971 1078-8956 Google Scholar

245. 

T. H. Nguyen et al., “Correction of circumferential and longitudinal motion distortion in high-speed catheter/endoscope-based optical coherence tomography,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 12 (1), 226 –246 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.409074 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

246. 

W. Choi et al., “Ultrahigh-speed, swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography in nonexudative age-related macular degeneration with geographic atrophy,” Ophthalmology, 122 (12), 2532 –2544 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.08.029 OPANEW 0743-751X Google Scholar

247. 

E. M. Moult et al., “Swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography reveals choriocapillaris alterations in eyes with nascent geographic atrophy and drusen-associated geographic atrophy,” Retina, 36 (Suppl. 1), S2 –S11 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001287 RETIDX 0275-004X Google Scholar

248. 

C. B. Rebhun et al., “Analyzing relative blood flow speeds in choroidal neovascularization using variable interscan time analysis OCT angiography,” Ophthalmol. Retina, 2 (4), 306 –319 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2017.08.013 Google Scholar

249. 

T. H. Chen et al., “Effect of A-scan rate and interscan interval on optical coherence angiography,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 12 (2), 722 –736 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.409636 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

250. 

G. Ledesma-Gil, P. Fernandez-Avellaneda and R. F. Spaide, “Swept source optical coherence tomography angiography imaging of the choriocapillaris,” Retina, 41 (7), 1373 –1378 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000003109 Google Scholar

251. 

J. V. Migacz et al., “Megahertz-rate optical coherence tomography angiography improves the contrast of the choriocapillaris and choroid in human retinal imaging,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 10 (1), 50 –65 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.10.000050 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

252. 

J. F. Russell et al., “Longitudinal wide-field swept-source OCT angiography of neovascularization in proliferative diabetic retinopathy after panretinal photocoagulation,” Ophthalmol. Retina, 3 (4), 350 –361 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2018.11.008 Google Scholar

253. 

A. Uji et al., “Choriocapillaris imaging using multiple en face optical coherence tomography angiography image averaging,” JAMA Ophthalmol., 135 (11), 1197 –1204 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.3904 Google Scholar

254. 

S. B. Ploner et al., “Toward quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography: visualizing blood flow speeds in ocular pathology using variable interscan time analysis,” Retina, 36 S118 –S126 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001328 Google Scholar

255. 

M. Wang, I. Garg and J. B. Miller, “Wide field swept source optical coherence tomography angiography for the evaluation of proliferative diabetic retinopathy and associated lesions: a review,” Semin. Ophthalmol., 36 162 –167 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1887901 SEOPE7 Google Scholar

256. 

C. Blatter et al., “Ultrahigh-speed non-invasive widefield angiography,” J. Biomed. Opt., 17 (7), 070505 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.17.7.070505 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

257. 

X. Yao et al., “Quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography: a review,” Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood), 245 (4), 301 –312 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1535370219899893 Google Scholar

258. 

Y. Zhang et al., “Advances in retina imaging as potential biomarkers for early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease,” Transl. Neurodegener., 10 (1), 6 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40035-021-00230-9 Google Scholar

259. 

J. Ngolab, P. Honma and R. A. Rissman, “Reflections on the utility of the retina as a biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease: a literature review,” Neurol. Ther., 8 (Suppl 2), 57 –72 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-019-00173-4 NDTHEE 1058-7535 Google Scholar

260. 

A. Pujari et al., “Optical coherence tomography angiography in neuro-ophthalmology: current clinical role and future perspectives,” Surv. Ophthalmol., 66 (3), 471 –481 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.10.009 SUOPAD 0039-6257 Google Scholar

261. 

P. Mailankody, A. Lenka and P. K. Pal, “The role of optical coherence tomography in parkinsonism: a critical review,” J. Neurol. Sci., 403 67 –74 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2019.06.009 JNSCAG 0022-510X Google Scholar

262. 

M. P. García-Portilla et al., “Could structural changes in the retinal layers be a new biomarker of mental disorders? A systematic review and thematic synthesis,” Rev. Psiquiatr. Salud. Ment., 12 (2), 116 –129 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpsm.2018.12.001 Google Scholar

263. 

J. J. Hunter, W. H. Merigan and J. B. Schallek, “Imaging retinal activity in the living eye,” Annu. Rev. Vis. Sci., 5 15 –45 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-vision-091517-034239 Google Scholar

264. 

K. Bizheva et al., “Optophysiology: depth-resolved probing of retinal physiology with functional ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 103 (13), 5066 –5071 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506997103 Google Scholar

265. 

T. Schmoll, C. Kolbitsch and R. A. Leitgeb, “In vivo functional retinal optical coherence tomography,” J. Biomed. Opt., 15 (4), 041513 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3463008 Google Scholar

266. 

P. Zhang et al., “In vivo optophysiology reveals that G-protein activation triggers osmotic swelling and increased light scattering of rod photoreceptors,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 114 (14), E2937 –E2946 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1620572114 Google Scholar

267. 

P. Zhang et al., “Measurement of diurnal variation in rod outer segment length in vivo in mice with the OCT optoretinogram,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 61 (3), 9 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.61.3.9 IOVSDA 0146-0404 Google Scholar

268. 

V. P. Pandiyan et al., “The optoretinogram reveals the primary steps of phototransduction in the living human eye,” Sci. Adv., 6 (37), eabc1124 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc1124 STAMCV 1468-6996 Google Scholar

269. 

T. Son et al., “Functional intrinsic optical signal imaging for objective optoretinography of human photoreceptors,” Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood), 246 (6), 639 –643 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/1535370220978898 Google Scholar

270. 

M. Azimipour et al., “Optoretinogram: optical measurement of human cone and rod photoreceptor responses to light,” Opt. Lett., 45 (17), 4658 –4661 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.398868 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

271. 

B. Považay et al., “Visible light optical coherence tomography,” Proc. SPIE, 4619 90 –94 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.470466 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

272. 

B. Považay et al., “Submicrometer axial resolution optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett., 27 (20), 1800 –1802 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.27.001800 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

273. 

T. Zhang, A. M. Kho and V. J. Srinivasan, “Improving visible light OCT of the human retina with rapid spectral shaping and axial tracking,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 10 (6), 2918 –2931 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.10.002918 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

274. 

T. Zhang et al., “Visible light OCT improves imaging through a highly scattering retinal pigment epithelial wall,” Opt. Lett., 45 (21), 5945 –5948 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.405398 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

275. 

J. Yi et al., “Visible light optical coherence tomography measures retinal oxygen metabolic response to systemic oxygenation,” Light Sci. Appl., 4 (9), e334 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2015.107 Google Scholar

276. 

S. Pi et al., “Retinal capillary oximetry with visible light optical coherence tomography,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 117 (21), 11658 –11666 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1918546117 Google Scholar

277. 

V. J. Srinivasan and A. Moshiri, “Imaging oxygenation of retinal capillaries with depth resolution,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 117 (26), 14626 –14628 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008404117 Google Scholar

278. 

W. Song et al., “Visible light optical coherence tomography angiography (vis-OCTA) facilitates local microvascular oximetry in the human retina,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 11 (7), 4037 –4051 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.395843 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

279. 

S. A. Telenkov et al., “Differential phase optical coherence probe for depth-resolved detection of photothermal response in tissue,” Phys. Med. Biol., 49 (1), 111 –119 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/49/1/008 PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar

280. 

M. C. Skala et al., “Three-dimensional molecular imaging with photothermal optical coherence tomography,” Methods Mol. Biol., 1026 85 –92 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-468-5_7 Google Scholar

281. 

M. Lapierre-Landry et al., “Imaging melanin distribution in the zebrafish retina using photothermal optical coherence tomography,” Transl. Vision Sci. Technol., 7 (5), 4 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.7.5.4 Google Scholar

282. 

M. Lapierre-Landry et al., “Photothermal optical coherence tomography of indocyanine green in ex vivo eyes,” Opt. Lett., 43 (11), 2470 –2473 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.43.002470 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

283. 

S. Makita and Y. Yasuno, “In vivo photothermal optical coherence tomography for non-invasive imaging of endogenous absorption agents,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 6 (5), 1707 –1725 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.6.001707 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

284. 

B. Yin et al., “Dual-wavelength photothermal optical coherence tomography for imaging microvasculature blood oxygen saturation,” J. Biomed. Opt., 18 (5), 56005 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.18.5.056005 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

285. 

C. Apelian et al., “Dynamic full field optical coherence tomography: subcellular metabolic contrast revealed in tissues by interferometric signals temporal analysis,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 7 (4), 1511 –1524 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.7.001511 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

286. 

H. M. Leung et al., “Imaging intracellular motion with dynamic micro-optical coherence tomography,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 11 (5), 2768 –2778 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.390782 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

287. 

M. Münter et al., “Dynamic contrast in scanning microscopic OCT,” Opt. Lett., 45 (17), 4766 –4769 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.396134 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

288. 

J. Scholler et al., “Probing dynamic processes in the eye at multiple spatial and temporal scales with multimodal full field OCT,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 10 (2), 731 –746 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.10.000731 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

289. 

C. W. Merkle et al., “Dynamic contrast optical coherence tomography reveals laminar microvascular hemodynamics in the mouse neocortex in vivo,” Neuroimage, 202 116067 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116067 NEIMEF 1053-8119 Google Scholar

290. 

H. Wang, Z. Xu and H. Zhu, “Segmentation of the urothelium in optical coherence tomography images with dynamic contrast,” (2021). Google Scholar

291. 

S. Chang and A. K. Bowden, “Review of methods and applications of attenuation coefficient measurements with optical coherence tomography,” J. Biomed. Opt., 24 (9), 1 –17 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.24.9.090901 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

292. 

J. M. Schmitt, “Optical coherence tomography (OCT): a review,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 5 (4), 1205 –1215 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1109/2944.796348 IJSQEN 1077-260X Google Scholar

293. 

X. Liu, B. Hubbi and X. Zhou, “Spatial coordinate corrected motion tracking for optical coherence elastography,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 10 (12), 6160 –6171 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.10.006160 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

294. 

V. Y. Zaitsev et al., “Deformation-induced speckle-pattern evolution and feasibility of correlational speckle tracking in optical coherence elastography,” J. Biomed. Opt., 20 (7), 75006 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.20.7.075006 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

295. 

S. J. Kirkpatrick, R. K. Wang and D. D. Duncan, “OCT-based elastography for large and small deformations,” Opt. Express, 14 (24), 11585 –11597 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.14.011585 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

296. 

L. K. E. Sherina et al., “Displacement field estimation from OCT images utilizing speckle information with applications in quantitative elastography,” Inverse Prob., 36 (12), 124003 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6420/abaf65 INPEEY 0266-5611 Google Scholar

297. 

B. F. Kennedy et al., “Strain estimation in phase-sensitive optical coherence elastography,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 3 (8), 1865 –1879 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.3.001865 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

298. 

K. M. Kennedy et al., “Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative micro-elastography for margin assessment in breast-conserving surgery,” Cancer Res., 80 (8), 1773 –1783 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-1240 CNREA8 0008-5472 Google Scholar

299. 

A. A. Plekhanov et al., “Histological validation of in vivo assessment of cancer tissue inhomogeneity and automated morphological segmentation enabled by optical coherence elastography,” Sci. Rep., 10 (1), 11781 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68631-w SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

300. 

X. Qian et al., “In vivo evaluation of posterior eye elasticity using shaker-based optical coherence elastography,” Exp. Biol. Med., 245 (4), 282 –288 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1535370219897617 EXBMAA 0071-3384 Google Scholar

301. 

K. E. O’Hara et al., “Measuring pulse-induced natural relative motions within human ocular tissue in vivo using phase-sensitive optical coherence tomography,” J. Biomed. Opt., 18 (12), 121506 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.18.12.121506 Google Scholar

302. 

G. Lan et al., “Clinical corneal optical coherence elastography measurement precision: effect of heartbeat and respiration,” Transl. Vision Sci. Technol., 9 (5), 3 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.5.3 Google Scholar

303. 

Y. Qu et al., “In vivo elasticity mapping of posterior ocular layers using acoustic radiation force optical coherence elastography,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 59 (1), 455 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-22971 IOVSDA 0146-0404 Google Scholar

304. 

Y. Li et al., “Simultaneously imaging and quantifying in vivo mechanical properties of crystalline lens and cornea using optical coherence elastography with acoustic radiation force excitation,” APL Photonics, 4 (10), 106104 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5118258 Google Scholar

305. 

A. Nair et al., “Heartbeat OCE: corneal biomechanical response to simulated heartbeat pulsation measured by optical coherence elastography,” J. Biomed. Opt., 25 (5), 055001 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.25.5.055001 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

306. 

V. S. De Stefano et al., “Depth-dependent corneal biomechanical properties in normal and keratoconic subjects by optical coherence elastography,” Transl. Vision Sci. Technol., 9 (7), 4 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.7.4 Google Scholar

307. 

A. Nair et al., “Heartbeat optical coherence elastography: corneal biomechanics in vivo,” J. Biomed. Opt., 26 (2), 020502 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.2.020502 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

308. 

S. Huang and D. E. Ingber, “Cell tension, matrix mechanics, and cancer development,” Cancer Cell, 8 (3), 175 –176 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2005.08.009 Google Scholar

309. 

W. M. Allen et al., “Clinical feasibility of optical coherence micro-elastography for imaging tumor margins in breast-conserving surgery,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 9 (12), 6331 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.9.006331 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

310. 

M. A. Sirotkina et al., “In vivo assessment of functional and morphological alterations in tumors under treatment using OCT-angiography combined with OCT-elastography,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 11 (3), 1365 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.386419 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

311. 

D. Zhang et al., “Optimal stimulation frequency for vibrational optical coherence elastography,” J. Biophotonics, 13 (2), e201960066 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201960066 Google Scholar

312. 

F. H. Silver, N. Kelkar and T. Deshmukh, “Use of vibrational optical coherence tomography to measure viscoelastic properties of muscle and tendon: a new method to follow musculoskeletal injury and pathology in vivo,” J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 119 104479 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104479 Google Scholar

313. 

A. Y. Potlov et al., “High-precision evaluation of stress-related properties of blood vessel walls using intravascular optical coherence elastography with forward-view probe,” Proc. SPIE, 11457 114571P (2020). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2563849 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

314. 

A. Y. Potlov, S. G. Proskurin and S. V. Frolov, “Young’s modulus evaluation for the blood vessel walls using intravascular optical coherence tomography,” in Int. Conf. e-Health and Bioeng. (EHB), 1 –4 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/EHB50910.2020.9280242 Google Scholar

315. 

A. D. Moraru et al., “Artificial intelligence and deep learning in ophthalmology: present and future (Review),” Exp. Ther. Med., 20 (4), 3469 –3473 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9118 Google Scholar

316. 

J.-P. O. Li et al., “Digital technology, telemedicine and artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: a global perspective,” Prog. Retinal Eye Res., 82 100900 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100900 Google Scholar

317. 

A. R. Ran et al., “Deep learning in glaucoma with optical coherence tomography: a review,” Eye, 35 (1), 188 –201 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-01191-5 Google Scholar

318. 

F. Li et al., “Deep learning-based automated detection of retinal diseases using optical coherence tomography images,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 10 (12), 6204 –6226 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.10.006204 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

319. 

S. Asano et al., “Predicting the central 10 degrees visual field in glaucoma by applying a deep learning algorithm to optical coherence tomography images,” Sci. Rep., 11 (1), 2214 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79494-6 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

320. 

R. T. Yanagihara et al., “Methodological challenges of deep learning in optical coherence tomography for retinal diseases: a review,” Transl. Vision Sci. Technol., 9 (2), 11 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.2.11 Google Scholar

321. 

A. C. Thompson, A. A. Jammal and F. A. Medeiros, “A review of deep learning for screening, diagnosis, and detection of glaucoma progression,” Transl. Vision Sci. Technol., 9 (2), 42 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.2.42 Google Scholar

322. 

M. B. A. McDermott et al., “Reproducibility in machine learning for health research: still a ways to go,” Sci. Transl. Med., 13 (586), eabb1655 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.abb1655 STMCBQ 1946-6234 Google Scholar

323. 

A. L. Beam, A. K. Manrai and M. Ghassemi, “Challenges to the reproducibility of machine learning models in health care,” JAMA, 323 (4), 305 –306 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.20866 JAMAAP 0098-7484 Google Scholar

324. 

R. Chopra and P. Keane, “Optical coherence tomography: reinventing the eye examination,” Eye News, 23 (3), (2016). Google Scholar

325. 

A. G. Lee et al., “Spaceflight associated neuro-ocular syndrome (SANS) and the neuro-ophthalmologic effects of microgravity: a review and an update (vol 82, pg 931, 2020),” NPJ Microgravity, 6 (1), 7 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41526-020-0097-9 Google Scholar

326. 

G. I. Analysts, Global Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) for Ophthlamic Industry, 120 2020). Google Scholar

327. 

W. Bogaerts et al., “Programmable photonic circuits,” Nature, 586 (7828), 207 –216 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2764-0 Google Scholar

328. 

M. Duelk, K. Hsu, “SLEDs and swept source laser technology for OCT,” Optical Coherence Tomography, 527 –561 Springer, Cham (2015). Google Scholar

329. 

E. A. Rank et al., “Toward optical coherence tomography on a chip: in vivo three-dimensional human retinal imaging using photonic integrated circuit-based arrayed waveguide gratings,” Light: Sci. Appl., 10 (1), 6 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-020-00450-0 Google Scholar

330. 

R. L. Shelton et al., “Optical coherence tomography for advanced screening in the primary care office,” J. Biophotonics, 7 (7), 525 –533 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201200243 Google Scholar

331. 

M. Leica, “OCT for ophthalmology Envisu C-Class,” (2021). https://www.leica-microsystems.com/products/surgical-microscopes/p/envisu-c2300/ Google Scholar

333. 

I. Optovue, “iVue80 & iFusion80,” (2021). https://www.optovue.com/products/ivue-ifusion-80 Google Scholar

334. 

G. Song et al., “First clinical application of low-cost OCT,” Transl. Vision Sci. Technol., 8 (3), 61 –61 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.8.3.61 Google Scholar

335. 

D. M. Joseph et al., “Handheld spectrally encoded coherence tomography and reflectometry for motion-corrected ophthalmic optical coherence tomography and optical coherence tomography angiography,” Neurophotonics, 6 (4), 041102 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.6.4.041102 Google Scholar

336. 

F. LaRocca et al., “Handheld simultaneous scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and optical coherence tomography system,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 4 (11), 2307 –2321 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.4.002307 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

337. 

F. LaRocca et al., “True color scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and optical coherence tomography handheld probe,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 5 (9), 3204 –3216 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.5.003204 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

338. 

F. LaRocca et al., “In vivo cellular-resolution retinal imaging in infants and children using an ultracompact handheld probe,” Nat. Photonics, 10 (9), 580 –584 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2016.141 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

339. 

W. Jung et al., “Handheld optical coherence tomography scanner for primary care diagnostics,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 58 (3), 741 –744 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2010.2096816 IEBEAX 0018-9294 Google Scholar

340. 

C. D. Lu et al., “Handheld ultrahigh speed swept source optical coherence tomography instrument using a MEMS scanning mirror,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 5 (1), 293 –311 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.5.000293 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

341. 

D. Nankivil et al., “Handheld, rapidly switchable, anterior/posterior segment swept source optical coherence tomography probe,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 6 (11), 4516 –4528 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.6.004516 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

342. 

C. Viehland et al., “Ergonomic handheld OCT angiography probe optimized for pediatric and supine imaging,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 10 (5), 2623 –2638 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.10.002623 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

343. 

N. H. Cho et al., “Development of real-time dual-display handheld and bench-top hybrid-mode SD-OCTs,” Sensors, 14 (2), 2171 –2181 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3390/s140202171 SNSRES 0746-9462 Google Scholar

344. 

S. Kim et al., “Design and implementation of a low-cost, portable OCT system,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 9 (3), 1232 –1243 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.9.001232 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

345. 

B. I. Akca et al., “Miniature spectrometer and beam splitter for an optical coherence tomography on a silicon chip,” Opt. Express, 21 (14), 16648 –16656 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.016648 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

346. 

R. M. Ruis et al., “Decreasing the size of a spectral domain optical coherence tomography system with cascaded arrayed waveguide gratings in a photonic integrated circuit,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 25 (1), 6100109 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2018.2874074 IJSQEN 1077-260X Google Scholar

347. 

R. Cernat et al., “Dual instrument for in vivo and ex vivo OCT imaging in an ENT department,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 3 (12), 3346 –3356 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.3.003346 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

348. 

S. J. Erickson-Bhatt et al., “Real-time imaging of the resection bed using a handheld probe to reduce incidence of microscopic positive margins in cancer surgery,” Cancer Res., 75 (18), 3706 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-0464 CNREA8 0008-5472 Google Scholar

349. 

Q. He, T. Liu and R. K. Wang, “Handheld swept-source optical coherence tomography guided by smartphone-enabled wide-field autofluorescence photography for imaging facial sebaceous glands,” Opt. Lett., 45 (20), 5704 –5707 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.405765 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

350. 

Y. Huang et al., “MEMS-based handheld Fourier domain Doppler optical coherence tomography for intraoperative microvascular anastomosis imaging,” PLoS One, 9 (12), e114215 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114215 POLNCL 1932-6203 Google Scholar

351. 

I. Nicusor et al., “Handheld optical coherence tomography-reflectance confocal microscopy probe for detection of basal cell carcinoma and delineation of margins,” J. Biomed. Opt., 22 (7), 076006 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.22.7.076006 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

352. 

R. A. Leitgeb et al., “Complex ambiguity-free Fourier domain optical coherence tomography through transverse scanning,” Opt. Lett., 32 (23), 3453 –3455 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.32.003453 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

353. 

P. M. McNamara et al., “Development of a first-generation miniature multiple reference optical coherence tomography imaging device,” J. Biomed. Opt., 21 (12), 126020 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.21.12.126020 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

354. 

D. Roshan et al., “Economical and compact briefcase spectral-domain optical coherence tomography system for primary care and point-of-care applications,” J. Biomed. Opt., 23 (9), 096003 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.23.9.096003 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

355. 

J. Sancho-Durá et al., “Handheld multi-modal imaging for point-of-care skin diagnosis based on akinetic integrated optics optical coherence tomography,” J. Biophotonics, 11 (10), e201800193 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201800193 Google Scholar

356. 

M. S. Eggleston et al., “90-dB sensitivity in a chip-scale swept-source optical coherence tomography system,” in Conf. Laser Electr., (2018). Google Scholar

357. 

S. Schneider et al., “Optical coherence tomography system mass-producible on a silicon photonic chip,” Opt. Express, 24 (2), 1573 –1586 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.001573 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

358. 

D. Demian et al., “Design and testing of prototype handheld scanning probes for optical coherence tomography,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., H, 228 (8), 743 –753 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411914543963 Google Scholar

359. 

G. L. Monroy et al., “Noninvasive depth-resolved optical measurements of the tympanic membrane and middle ear for differentiating Otitis media,” Laryngoscope, 125 (8), E276 –E282 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25141 Google Scholar

360. 

P. Pande et al., “Low-cost hand-held probe for depth-resolved low-coherence interferometry,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 8 (1), 338 –348 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.8.000338 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

361. 

K. Park et al., “In vivo 3D imaging of the human tympanic membrane using a wide-field diagonal-scanning optical coherence tomography probe,” Appl. Opt., 56 (9), D115 –D119 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.56.00D115 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

362. 

J. Won et al., “Longitudinal optical coherence tomography to visualize the in vivo response of middle ear biofilms to antibiotic therapy,” Sci. Rep., 11 (1), 5176 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84543-9 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

363. 

S. Nevlacsil et al., “Multi-channel swept source optical coherence tomography concept based on photonic integrated circuits,” Opt. Express, 28 (22), 32468 –32482 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.404588 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

364. 

J. Portnoy, M. Waller and T. Elliott, “Telemedicine in the Era of COVID-19,” J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.: In Pract., 8 (5), 1489 –1491 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2020.03.008 Google Scholar

365. 

F. A. Medeiros, A. A. Jammal and A. C. Thompson, “From machine to machine: an OCT-trained deep learning algorithm for objective quantification of glaucomatous damage in fundus photographs,” Ophthalmology, 126 (4), 513 –521 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.12.033 OPANEW 0743-751X Google Scholar

366. 

L. Balyen and T. Peto, “Promising artificial intelligence-machine learning-deep learning algorithms in ophthalmology,” Asia-Pac. J. Ophthalmol., 8 (3), 264 –272 (2019). https://doi.org/10.22608/APO.2018479 Google Scholar

367. 

J. Wu et al., “Extending XNAT towards a cloud-based quality assessment platform for retinal optical coherence tomographies,” in 14th IEEE/ACM Int. Symp. Cluster, Cloud and Grid Comput., 764 –773 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/CCGrid.2014.103 Google Scholar

368. 

D. J. Waterhouse et al., “A roadmap for the clinical implementation of optical-imaging biomarkers,” Nat. Biomed. Eng., 3 (5), 339 –353 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-019-0392-5 Google Scholar

369. 

S. E. Reis, M. C. McDonald and S. J. Byers, “Crossing the research valleys of death: the University of Pittsburgh approach,” Clin. Transl. Sci., 1 (1), 9 –10 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-8062.2008.00021.x Google Scholar

370. 

“Optical coherence tomography market growth analysis, application and share by technology (SD-OCT, swept-source OCT), by application (cardiology, ophthalmology, dermatology, others) and by type of devices (handheld, tabletop, catheter-based OCT devices)—global forecast till 2027,” 85 (20182020). Google Scholar

Biography

Rainer Leitgeb received his PhD in theoretical physics from the TU Vienna, Austria. Since 2004, he has been an associate professor at the Medical University Vienna, where he is heading the Christian Doppler Laboratory on innovative optical imaging and its translation to medicine. He spent three years as a visiting professor and a project leader at EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland, and was honored as a fellow of SPIE and OSA for his pioneering contributions to OCT.

Fabian Placzek received his MSc degree in physics from the University of Hanover/Germany. Since 2017, he has been a PhD student at the Medical University of Vienna, Austria, as a Marie Skłodowska-Curie fellow in the project “Multimodal, Functional Bio-Photonic Imaging.” His research is mainly focuses on the development, testing, and translation of multimodal, endoscopic systems, and their application in various medical fields to detect and characterize tumors at an early stage.

Elisabet Rank received her MSc degree in biomedical engineering sciences from the University of Applied Sciences FH Technikum Wien, Vienna, Austria, and is currently pursuing her PhD at the Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering of the Medical University of Vienna in the field of miniaturizing optical coherence tomography.

Lisa Krainz received her BSc degree in technical physics and her MSc degree in biomedical engineering from the Technical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. She gained work experience in the fields of biosensors as well as quantum cryptography at the AIT, Seibersdorf, Austria. Currently, she investigates photoacoustic tomography and optical coherence tomography as tools for microscale elastography at the Center of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering of the Medical University of Vienna.

Richard Haindl received his PhD in medical physics in 2017 from the Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering at the Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria. Since then, he has been working as a postdoctoral researcher in this department. His main scientific interests are multifunctional optical imaging, photoacoustics, OCT-angiography, Doppler and polarization sensitive OCT, and in vivo/ex vivo clinical and preclinical studies.

Qian Li received his PhD in biomedical engineering from Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China, in 2018. Since then, he has been a postdoc researcher at the Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering of the Medical University of Vienna. His main research interests are developing optical imaging technologies, such as photoacoustic imaging and optical coherence tomography, for preclinical and clinical applications.

Mengyang Liu received his BE degree from the Harbin Institute of Technology in 2008, his MSc degree from the University of Delaware in 2011, and his PhD from the Medical University of Vienna in 2015. He currently works as an EU visiting scientist at the Medical University of Vienna. His research interests are in biophotonics with a focus on multimodal optical imaging.

Marco Andreana received his PhD from the University of Limoges in 2011 and the University of Brescia in 2012 in optoelectronics and electronic instrumentation, respectively. He worked for ten years on fiber and solid-state nonlinear optics, stabilization of laser systems for nonlinear microscopy, and coherent Raman technologies. His current research interests include nonlinear frequency conversion, nonlinear microscopy, and multimodal imaging for biomedical applications. Currently, he works as a university assistant at the Medical University of Vienna.

Angelika Unterhuber received her PhD from Vienna University of Technology and worked as an R&D engineer at different laser-related companies. She has 20 years of experience in ultrafast optics. Her current research interests include multimodal biomedical imaging including optical coherence tomography and nonlinear optical microscopy as well as Raman-based technologies with a special focus on lasers and their translation to biomedical applications. Currently, she works as an associate professor at the Medical University of Vienna.

Tilman Schmoll received his PhD from the Medical University of Vienna for his research on functional extensions of OCT in 2011. He is a principal scientist at ZEISS and the PI of the ZEISS Lab at the Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering of the Medical University of Vienna. At the ZEISS Lab, he is expanding the applications of OCT by pushing its performance envelope and making it more accessible at the same time.

Wolfgang Drexler is a full professor and head of the Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering at Medical University of Vienna, after having been a full professor of biomedical imaging at Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK, from 2006 to 2009. He also spent two years at MIT, Cambridge, USA, from 1998 to 1999, and received the Austrian START Award (2001) and the COGAN Award (2007). His h-index is 74 (Scopus), and his research grant income since 2000 is €17 million.

© The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Rainer A. Leitgeb, Fabian Placzek, Elisabet A. Rank, Lisa Krainz, Richard Haindl, Qian Li, Mengyang Liu, Mengyang Liu, Angelika Unterhuber, Tilman Schmoll, and Wolfgang Drexler "Enhanced medical diagnosis for dOCTors: a perspective of optical coherence tomography," Journal of Biomedical Optics 26(10), 100601 (20 October 2021). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.10.100601
Received: 2 June 2021; Accepted: 23 September 2021; Published: 20 October 2021
JOURNAL ARTICLE
47 PAGES


SHARE
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 6 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
KEYWORDS
Optical coherence tomography

Imaging systems

Tissue optics

Tissues

Medical diagnostics

Image resolution

In vivo imaging

Back to Top