Impact of prevalence and case distribution in lab-based diagnostic imaging studies

Brandon D. Gallas; Weijie Chen; Elodia Cole; Robert Ochs; Nicholas Petrick; Etta D. Pisano; Berkman Sahiner; Frank W. Samuelson; Kyle J. Myers

doi:10.1117/1.JMI.6.1.015501

21 January 2019 Impact of prevalence and case distribution in lab-based diagnostic imaging studies

Brandon D. Gallas, Weijie Chen, Elodia Cole, Robert Ochs, Nicholas Petrick, Etta D. Pisano, Berkman Sahiner, Frank W. Samuelson, Kyle J. Myers

Author Affiliations +

Journal of Medical Imaging, Vol. 6, Issue 1, 015501 (January 2019). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.6.1.015501

Abstract

We investigated effects of prevalence and case distribution on radiologist diagnostic performance as measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and sensitivity-specificity in lab-based reader studies evaluating imaging devices. Our retrospective reader studies compared full-field digital mammography (FFDM) to screen-film mammography (SFM) for women with dense breasts. Mammograms were acquired from the prospective Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial. We performed five reader studies that differed in terms of cancer prevalence and the distribution of noncancers. Twenty radiologists participated in each reader study. Using split-plot study designs, we collected recall decisions and multilevel scores from the radiologists for calculating sensitivity, specificity, and AUC. Differences in reader-averaged AUCs slightly favored SFM over FFDM (biggest AUC difference: 0.047, SE = 0.023, p = 0.047), where standard error accounts for reader and case variability. The differences were not significant at a level of 0.01 (0.05/5 reader studies). The differences in sensitivities and specificities were also indeterminate. Prevalence had little effect on AUC (largest difference: 0.02), whereas sensitivity increased and specificity decreased as prevalence increased. We found that AUC is robust to changes in prevalence, while radiologists were more aggressive with recall decisions as prevalence increased.

Citation Download Citation

Brandon D. Gallas, Weijie Chen, Elodia Cole, Robert Ochs, Nicholas Petrick, Etta D. Pisano, Berkman Sahiner, Frank W. Samuelson, and Kyle J. Myers "Impact of prevalence and case distribution in lab-based diagnostic imaging studies," Journal of Medical Imaging 6(1), 015501 (21 January 2019). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.6.1.015501

Received: 10 September 2018; Accepted: 17 December 2018; Published: 21 January 2019

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available