Distributed force probe bending model of critical dimension atomic force microscopy bias

Vladimir A. Ukraintsev; Ndubuisi G. Orji; Theodore V. Vorburger; Ronald G. Dixson; Joseph Fu; Richard M. Silver

doi:10.1117/1.JMM.12.2.023009

4 June 2013 Distributed force probe bending model of critical dimension atomic force microscopy bias

Vladimir A. Ukraintsev, Ndubuisi G. Orji, Theodore V. Vorburger, Ronald G. Dixson, Joseph Fu, Richard M. Silver

Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS, Vol. 12, Issue 2, 023009 (June 2013). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMM.12.2.023009

Abstract

Critical dimension atomic force microscopy (CD-AFM) is a widely used reference metrology technique. To characterize modern semiconductor devices, small and flexible probes, often 15 to 20 nm in diameter, are used. Recent studies have reported uncontrolled and significant probe-to-probe bias variation during linewidth and sidewall angle measurements. To understand the source of these variations, tip-sample interactions between high aspect ratio features and small flexible probes, and their influence on measurement bias, should be carefully studied. Using theoretical and experimental procedures, one-dimensional (1-D) and two-dimensional (2-D) models of cylindrical probe bending relevant to carbon nanotube (CNT) AFM probes were developed and tested. An earlier 1-D bending model was refined, and a new 2-D distributed force (DF) model was developed. Contributions from several factors were considered, including: probe misalignment, CNT tip apex diameter variation, probe bending before snapping, and distributed van der Waals-London force. A method for extracting Hamaker probe-surface interaction energy from experimental probe-bending data was developed. Comparison of the new 2-D model with 1-D single point force (SPF) model revealed a difference of about 28% in probe bending. A simple linear relation between biases predicted by the 1-D SPF and 2-D DF models was found. The results suggest that probe bending can be on the order of several nanometers and can partially explain the observed CD-AFM probe-to-probe variation. New 2-D and three-dimensional CD-AFM data analysis software is needed to take full advantage of the new bias correction modeling capabilities.

Citation Download Citation

Vladimir A. Ukraintsev, Ndubuisi G. Orji, Theodore V. Vorburger, Ronald G. Dixson, Joseph Fu, and Richard M. Silver "Distributed force probe bending model of critical dimension atomic force microscopy bias," Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS 12(2), 023009 (4 June 2013). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMM.12.2.023009

Published: 4 June 2013

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available