20 July 2022 Dual monopole exposure strategy to improve extreme ultraviolet imaging
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Background: In extreme ultraviolet lithography, the printable feature density is limited by stochastic defectivity, which can be reduced by increasing the optical contrast. The photomask induces pole-specific aerial image offsets. Consequently, illumination settings with multiple poles lead to contrast loss and focus offsets between different features.

Aim: We aim to mitigate the contrast loss and best focus offsets between different features.

Approach: Illumination was decomposed into monopoles. Each monopole was exposed separately using a fraction of the total dose. Each exposure was shifted by its pole-specific image offset to mitigate 3D mask effects.

Results: Single monopoles mitigate contrast loss and best focus shifts, but in defocus, they suffer from aerial image shifts and distortions. Multiple aligned monopole exposures conserve these advantages but mitigate the problems in defocus. Because each monopole is exposed with only a fraction of the dose, the throughput penalty is limited to the scanner overhead.

Conclusions: A multiple monopole exposure scheme can increase contrast, align the best foci, and mitigate single monopole exposure constraints. Additionally, it offers an improved pattern placement control through dose control knobs.

© 2022 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
Joern-Holger Franke, Timothy A. Brunner, and Eric Hendrickx "Dual monopole exposure strategy to improve extreme ultraviolet imaging," Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning, Materials, and Metrology 21(3), 030501 (20 July 2022). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMM.21.3.030501
Received: 25 April 2022; Accepted: 1 July 2022; Published: 20 July 2022
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 3 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Photomasks

Extreme ultraviolet

Extreme ultraviolet lithography

Diffraction

Semiconducting wafers

3D image processing

Scanners

Back to Top