12 July 2018 Unleashing the potential of molecular beam epitaxy grown AlGaN-based ultraviolet-spectrum nanowires devices
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
There have been recent research advances in AlGaN-based self-assembled nanowires (NWs) as building blocks for ultraviolet (UV) optoelectronics grown by plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy. We review the basic growth kinetics on various foundry-compatible-metal/silicon-based substrates and the epistructure design for UV devices. We highlight the use of diffusion-barrier-metal thin film on silicon substrate as a solution to enhance device performance. NWs offer the opportunity to mitigate the detrimental quantum-confined Stark effect (QCSE), which lowers the recombination rate thereby reducing the device efficiency. On the other hand, the polarization-induced doping from the graded composition along NWs can be advantageous for eluding the inefficient doping in AlGaN-based UV devices. Sidewall surface states and the associate passivation treatment, as well as the use of ultrafast electron-microscopy characterization, are crucial investigations in shedding light on device performance under the influence of surface dangling bonds. For investigating the electrical performance of individual NWs and NWs light-emitting diode as a single entity, recent reports based on conductive atomic force microscopy measurements provide fast-prototyping in-process pass-fail evaluation and a means of improving growth for high-performance devices. Stress tests of NWs devices, crucial for reliable operation, are also discussed. Beyond applications in LEDs, an AlGaN-based NWs solar-blind photodetector demonstrated leveraging on the dislocation-free active region, reduced QCSE, enhanced light absorption, and tunable-composition features. The review opens pathways and offers insights for practical realization of AlGaN-based axial NWs devices on scalable and low-cost silicon substrates.

1.

Introduction

Group-III nitride compound semiconductors are regarded as the third-generation semiconductors for electronic and optoelectronic device applications.12.3 The nitride alloys and their heterostructures offer the widest tunable bandgap, spanning from the ultraviolet (UV) (6.2  eV) to near-infrared (0.7  eV) spectrum.45.6 In particular, their ternary AlGaN and quaternary Al(In)GaN alloys are attractive candidates for UV device applications ranging between 6.2 eV (AlN) and 3.4 eV (GaN). There are a number of immediate applications, such as UV curing, medical diagnosis and sterilization, water/air purification, gas sensing, and surface inspections within this wavelength range.78.9.10 Owing to the compactness and low-power consumption, AlGaN-based solid-state lighting systems are widely used in the UV-A (315 to 400 nm) and UV-B ranges (280 to 315 nm). A remarkable advantage of AlGaN UV devices is that they can replace conventional toxic and bulky mercury lamps covering the UV-C range (200 to 280 nm).

AlGaN-based UV devices exhibited a less than satisfactory performance and lifetime compared with InGaN visible devices due to the poor electrical injection, which originates from difficulty in preparing p-type AlGaN material and high threading dislocation density (TDD).11,12 To mitigate the high-activation energy issue in using Mg as a p-type dopant in AlGaN, efforts were made in accomplishing the polarization-induced doping using composition grading in AlGaN alloys.1314.15 On the other hand, the high TDD stems from the lack of economical and commercially available native substrates, which limits their use for the planar epitaxial platform. Foreign substrates, such as sapphire, Si, and SiC, typically result in screw-type and edge-type TDDs as high as 108 to 1010/cm2.16 To reduce TDDs by up to 107/cm2, many attempts have been made to introduce low-temperature GaN or AlN buffer layers,1718.19 strain-compensated buffer layers,20 pendeo-epitaxy,21 and epitaxial lateral overgrowth22 using advanced growth techniques, such as metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD), hydride vapor phase epitaxy, and molecular beam epitaxy (MBE).2324.25.26 Despite the current progress in the epitaxy growth, TDDs in group-III nitrides are higher than GaAs material systems having TDDs typically <102 to 104/cm2. As a result, AlGaN-based UV light-emitting diodes (UV-LEDs) and laser diodes suffer in terms of efficiency, steady operations, and lifetime.

On the other hand, nanowires (NWs)-based epitaxial technology has distinct advantages compared with the planar platform, such as dislocation-free and reduced lattice strain, as well as lower piezoelectric polarization field and the associated smaller Stark effect in quantum-confined double heterostructures. Group-III nitride NWs, grown by plasma-assisted MBE (PA-MBE), offer the desired uniformity, density (>1010/cm2), and axial growth on various heterogeneous substrates. PA-MBE growth mechanisms are solely governed by kinetics, adatom adsorption/desorption, and diffusion, which lead to self-assembled, catalyst-free NWs. In addition to PA-MBE, MOCVD is another important tool for nitride growth of both thin film and low-dimensional nanostructures.27 The growth of device quality AlGaN epilayers using MOCVD requires high growth temperatures of 1200°C compared with PA-MBE. This led to several disadvantages such as oxygen and aluminum contaminants, memory effect of the chamber, and limited choices of substrates for epitaxial growth. On the other hand, PA-MBE growth of AlGaN requires much lower temperatures (below 600°C to 900°C), beneficial for p-type doping, and enables the use of various UV-transparent substrates, such as quartz and fused silica. In addition, due to different growth kinetics, NWs growth is self-assembled in a PA-MBE chamber without the need for an external catalyst or prepatterned substrate surface, while masks and selective area epitaxy are typically used in MOCVD growth of AlGaN NWs.

In this review, we focus on the PA-MBE grown AlGaN-based NWs platform for realizing UV devices on silicon or metal template/silicon as substrates, covering basic growth kinetics, polarization-induced doping, surface treatment, nanodevice characterization, and UV photodetection. For completeness, Table 1 lists the recent work on electrically injected AlGaN-based UV NWs light-emitting diode (NWs-LEDs) along with the figures of merit.

Table 1

Recent achievement in AlGaN-based UV NWs-LEDs.

Institution (year)Axial top structure (features)Power/power densityEQEEL λ (nm)SubstrateTurn-on voltage (V)
Sophia Univ. (2008)28Coalesced p-GaN354n-Si4
Ohio Univ. (2012)29Graded p-AlGaN25  μW5 m%336n-Si4.5
McGill Univ. (2013)30Axial p-GaN340n-Si5.7
Ohio Univ. (2014)31Graded n-AlGaN0.09  μW (400 mA DC)2  μ%250 to 290p-Si6
0.22  μW (400 mA pulsed)
Ohio Univ. (2015)32Graded n-AlGaN (tunnel junction)100  μW (800 mA)4 to 6 m%310p-Si6
McGill Univ. (2015)33Axial p-AlGaN207n-Si5.5
McGill Univ. (2015)34Axial p-AlGaN210n-Si6
Ohio Univ. (2015)35Graded n-AlGaN (on Mo metal layer)385Mo/Si7.2
McGill Univ. (2016)36Axial n-GaN (tunnel junction)62  μW (400 mA DC)12 m%242n-Si8.5
370  μW (800 mA pulsed)
McGill Univ. (2016)37Axial p-GaN236 to 280n-Si>5
McGill Univ. (2016)38Coalesced p-AlGaN (selective area)15  W/cm2340GaN template3.3
Ohio Univ. (2016)39Graded n-AlGaN (tunnel junction)350Ta foil5
KAUST (2017)40Coalesced p-GaN303n-Si9
KAUST (2017)41Axial p-GaN (on Ti metal layer)337Ti/n-Si5.5
KAUST (2017)42Axial p-AlGaN (on Ti metal layer)1.9  μW DC325Ti/TaN/Si8
McGill & Michigan Univ. (2017)43Axial p-AlGaN (selective area)0.93  W/cm2279GaN template4.4
Michigan Univ. (2017)44Axial n-GaN (tunnel junction)8 mW pulsed0.4%275Si>5
Michigan Univ. (2017)45Axial p-GaN (selective area/nanowall)0.07  μW214GaN template7
Michigan Univ. (2017)46Axial h-BN0.05  μW210n-Si5.5
KAUST (2017)47Axial p-GaN (on Ti metal layer)3.2  μW332Ti/n-Si5.0
KAUST (2018)48Axial p-GaN1.8  μW/cm2335n-Si9

In Secs. 2 and 3, we present the basic growth principles of diffusion-induced self-assembled group-III nitride NWs using the PA-MBE technique. The surface morphology of a substrate is of utmost importance for ensuring a homogenous, reliable, and reproducible growth. Silicon has been widely adapted due to low-cost, abundance in supply, scalability, good thermal conductivity, and excellent crystal quality. Moreover, it is applicable to industry-related processes, thereby potentially favoring industry uptake. However, the growth of group-III nitride NWs on silicon substrates suffers from the spontaneous formation of the insulating ultrathin SixNy layer during nitrogen plasma exposure in MBE. This is detrimental to device operation in reducing the level of current injection and heat dissipation. In Sec. 3, an overview of the recent GaN-based growth advances on metal/silicon templates, along with the insights into solving the fundamental challenges that have been faced by the group-III nitride NWs/silicon community, is presented. To this end, the growth of high-quality NWs on bulk metal substrates lays the foundation for the realization of high-power LEDs, and the use of metal foil promises roll-to-roll fabrication for eventual cost effectiveness. In this regard, we solve previously uncharted research problems by introducing a Ti/TaN preorienting layer/diffusion barrier to improve the overall band alignment and hence the carrier injection across metal/silicon, while successfully addressing the associated interface interdiffusion. The choice of TaN as a diffusion barrier, normally used for Cu interconnects by the dual-Damascene technique, offers the practicality of eventual implementation in Si foundry-compatible processes. Related to consumer electronics, an effort in developing high-resolution micro-LED technology based on group-III nitride was recently reported by Aledia49 for display and headset-projection applications. To this end, the NWs community may consider single-chip integration of the NWs pixel array with multicolor emission as the ultimate light source for high-resolution projection and flexible display by individually controlling each NW or each group of NWs pixel.50,51 With production techniques reaching maturity, it is then envisaged that the economical and large-scale fabrication of reliable UV light emitters based on the NWs pixel array will be feasible for eventual industrial implementation and practical applications.

Sections 4 and 5 describe the fundamental problems such as piezoelectric and spontaneous polarization fields in group-III nitrides, which highly affect the device efficiency and performance of planar structures. Here, we present using strain-free nanostructures, such as NWs, to mitigate the quantum-confined Stark effect (QCSE). An overview on the recent findings in NWs that hold promises in overcoming the issues encountered by the planar counterpart is presented. Moreover, the polarization-induced doping in AlGaN-based materials is introduced. This is of high significance as it circumvents the inefficient doping issue in both n- and p-types AlGaN due to high-dopant ionization energy.

Section 6 introduces the importance of the surface treatment techniques for eliminating the sidewall surface states that act as nonradiative recombination centers, thus affecting the device efficiency. This is especially important for NWs, where the surface-to-volume ratio is prominent. Passivation treatment of the surface ensures the realization of efficient and reliable devices. This effort has yet to receive the appropriate attention. We first provide a historical account of the methods employed and then introduce a highly advanced four-dimensional scanning ultrafast electron microscopy (4-D S-UEM) method to study the NWs surface carrier dynamics directly. At the same time, we elaborate and share our insights on the efficient NWs passivation techniques using both chemicals and direct-shell growth to promote carrier confinement, to reduce surface recombination velocity and improve overall optoelectronic performance.

The subsequent section focuses on the application and characterization of group-III nitride UV NWs. We view conductive atomic force microscopy (cAFM) as a powerful electrical characterization technique to enable rapid investigation cycles. The routine implementation of this technique is expected to provide immediate statistical feedback of the nanoscale and macroscopic electrical properties of the grown samples prior to the full device fabrication round. The high potential of these structures not only encompasses the material-related advantages with respect to the planar counterpart, but it allows the device miniaturization as well as enhancement in light absorption due to the nanostructure light-trapping properties. The review then ends with the report on the first UV-spectrum AlGaN-based NWs near solar-blind photodetector grown on metal template/silicon substrates.

2.

PA-MBE Growth of Self-Assembled Nanowires

Since the first demonstrations of GaN columnar structures on sapphire and silicon substrate by PA-MBE, researchers have attempted to use the one-dimensional (1-D) columnar structures for device applications.52,53 The self-assembled GaN NW shares common N-rich (N-stable) growth conditions, which typically occur at the higher growth temperature and lower III/V flux ratio compared with planar layer growth.5455.56 To keep things in perspective, we discuss the growth-regime diagram suggested by Heying et al. in Fig. 1(a). It consists of three regions defined as a function of Ga flux and substrate temperatures at a constant nitrogen flux of 15.2  nm/min. It should be noted that the underlying substrate is MOCVD-grown 1.5-μm-thick GaN on a c-plane sapphire substrate (GaN template). At low temperatures with high Ga fluxes of the “Ga-stable” regime, atomically flat and uniform GaN epilayers were grown on a GaN template in the presence of Ga droplets. With intermediate Ga fluxes at high growth temperatures, the “intermediate” regime produces GaN epilayers without the formation of Ga droplets on the surface. In an “N-stable” regime, in situ reflection high-energy electron diffraction observation revealed the characteristic spotty patterns, and this is observed for low Ga fluxes for all temperatures. Such growth conditions resulted in a columnar structure with a high density of stacking faults even when they are grown on a GaN template. In Fig. 1(b), Fernández-Garrido et al. also summarized a growth-regime diagram for GaN samples on an Si(111) substrate as a function of Ga flux and growth temperature at a fixed nitrogen flux of 6.0  nm/min. In this diagram, nanocolumns were grown at a high temperature with an N-rich condition, i.e., a flux ratio of ϕGa/ϕN<1. A Si(111) substrate can provide a long enough Ga adatom diffusion length for surface nucleation and three-dimensional (3-D) growth.55 The nucleation and NW growth mechanism follow the Volmer–Weber growth mode, which is induced by high lattice mismatch differences between GaN and substrate. Thus, there can be many combinations of possible substrates and buffer layers for the PA-MBE grown GaN NWs growth.

Fig. 1

(a) Surface structure diagram of GaN growth depicting the Ga flux (ϕGa) conditions plotted versus growth temperature for a constant N-flux (ϕN) of 15.2  nm/min. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 56. (b) Growth diagram showing the growth conditions-dependent surface morphology of GaN/Si(111) as a function of ϕGa and growth temperature for constant ϕN (6.0  nm/min). Reproduced with permission from Ref. 55.

JNP_12_4_043511_f001.png

3.

Unleashing the Potential of AlGaN-Based Nanowires on Silicon, Metal, and Metal/Silicon

In this section, we will discuss the choices of underlying substrates for AlGaN-based NWs devices and their characterizations.

3.1.

Nanowires Growth Driven by Diffusion-Induced Process

The self-assembled NWs growth relies mainly on the diffusion-induced process.57 Taking the example of GaN NWs growth on an Si substrate, Ga adatoms on the surface migrate/diffuse under high substrate temperature and low III/V flux ambient. After exceeding the nucleation time, each Ga adatom gathers to form clusters at random locations and within the adatom diffusion length ranges.58 Then NWs start growing along axial and lateral directions, during which lateral expansion of lattice and the resultant strain relief occur. In fact, the surface energy favors adatoms diffusion along the NWs sidewalls (m-planes) to selectively promote axial growth on the apex (c-plane), thereby forming high aspect ratio NWs.59 Regardless of the choice of materials in group-III nitride compounds, many researchers proved that the majority of diffusion-induced NWs have N-polar on various substrates.6061.62.63 In spite of their high density of up to 1011  cm2, NWs typically have excellent uniformity under optimum growth conditions with axially grown vertical segments for forming ternary alloys or p–i–n device structures. Thus, NWs devices can be fabricated in a manner similar to planar devices with meticulous process development using polymer filling and etch-back processes.64

However, ternary AlGaN NW growth properties are slightly different from GaN NW growth described above. Due to the stronger binding energy of Al-N compared with Ga-N, the diffusion length of Al adatoms is much shorter under the N-rich growth condition for AlGaN NWs.37 As a result, an Al-rich shell can easily form on the NWs sidewalls regardless of growth conditions.65

3.2.

Nanowires Growth on Silicon Substrate

The earth abundant source of silicon, as well as a matured silicon substrate and process technologies, can bring about cost advantages when coupled with scaling of substrate dimension. Low resistivity, single crystalline quality of both n- and p-type Sis are ideal candidates for the growth of self-assembled AlGaN NWs and AlGaN-based NWs devices over the entire composition ranges.66,67 On top of these achievements, several research groups have demonstrated PA-MBE grown AlGaN-based NWs-LEDs emitting in the UV-A to UV-C ranges as summarized in Table 1.

However, the drawback of growing directly on silicon substrate remains. The highly reactive nitrogen plasma species typically used for PA-MBE growth result in nitridation of bare silicon at the NW/substrate interfaces as shown in Fig. 2. The formation of SixNy can be a potential barrier for carrier injection with increasing resistance.68 Moreover, the laterally discontinuous NWs-LED on Si aggravates issues with the heat dissipation problem because of a high-injection current density along the NWs.63

Fig. 2

Cross-sectional view of high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of GaN NWs on Si(111) showing the formation of the interfacial amorphous SixNy interlayer. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 69.

JNP_12_4_043511_f002.png

3.3.

Nanowires Growth on Metal Substrates

To circumvent the above fundamental drawbacks related to growth of group-III nitride on an Si substrate, many researchers started growing NWs on metal. Zhao et al.63,70 demonstrated high-power InGaN/GaN LEDs on titanium (Ti)-coated bulk molybdenum (Mo) metal substrate. This scheme eliminated the formation of an SixNy layer, while the nitrided Ti (TiN) conveniently functioned as a partial reflecting layer, and along with the thick molybdenum substrate, the TiN/Ti/Mo readily worked as a heat sink. The formation of TiN ohmic contact with n-GaN exhibited low turn-on voltage for InGaN/GaN NWs-LEDs. Figure 3 shows the growth evolution of GaN NWs morphology on Ti/Mo as well as the size and density of NWs achieved by varying the substrate temperature and Ga fluxes during growth. Under optimized growth condition, high-density NWs with ordered structures were achieved. The crystalline quality and crystal structure of NWs on TiN/Ti/Mo were further confirmed in the [0002] X-ray diffraction rocking curve, while a small full-width at half-maximum value of 396 arc sec indicated that superior crystalline quality and highly ordered GaN NWs were grown on TiN/Ti/Mo.63

Fig. 3

(a)–(e) Plan-view SEM images for GaN NWs on Ti(500 nm)/Mo substrate with varying growth temperatures and (f)–(i) Ga fluxes at 640°C. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 63.

JNP_12_4_043511_f003.png

3.3.1.

Metal preorienting interlayer (metal thin film) on various substrates

While the growth of group-III nitride NWs-LEDs on metal has advanced the community into higher performance devices compared with the commonly used Si substrate, bulk metals in the order of millimeters and hundreds of micrometers are considered a relatively expensive solution, despite the great prospect for the realization of high-injection and high-power conversion efficiency devices. As a preorienting layer, transition metals (Ti, Hf, Mo, Ta, etc.) can provide the preferred orientation of c-plane growth along the surface normal on any substrates.71,72 Moreover, the thin film deposited substrates emerge as a less expensive approach, especially for the eventual fabrication of NWs-LEDs (Table 2).

Table 2

Metal preorienting layers used for group-III nitride NWs growth.

Material systemLayer thickness (nm)DeviceDevice structureCentral λ (nm)Ref.
Ti on Al2O310 to 30GaN357 (UV-A)73
TiN/Ti on Si1000 (Ti)GaN357 (UV-A)74
TiN/Ti on Al2O31300 (Ti)GaN72
TiN on Si50GaN362 (UV-A)75
ZrB2 on Si400GaN362 (UV-A)75
Ti on Si50GaN363 (UV-A)35
Mo on Si50UV LEDGaN QW385 (UV-A)35
Ti on Si100UV LED10× AlGaN/AlGaN QWs/QBs337 (UV-A)41
Ti/TaN on Si80 (Ti)/20 (TaN)UV LED10× AlGaN/AlGaN QWs/QBs325 (UV-A)42

The growth of GaN NWs on these nanostructured metal layers was first reported by Rozhavskaya et al.73 A 10- to 30-nm continuous Ti layer was deposited on a sapphire substrate, and GaN NWs were then grown using the MOCVD technique, thus achieving a high growth rate of 10  μm/min. PA-MBE growth of GaN on a thin TiN layer on a sapphire substrate [Fig. 4(a)] was also demonstrated to prevent the chemical reaction at the materials’ interface, while simultaneously achieving high conductivity and forming ohmic contact with GaN.74 The TiN was grown due to the nitridation of the Ti layer during GaN growth using nitrogen plasma, and δ-TiN was attained as confirmed using diffraction analysis. The surface, however, was irregular with trenches and bumps across the sample. Similarly, Fig. 4(b) shows the growth of >1  μm-long GaN NWs on TiN thin film. Despite the uncoalesced NWs achievement, a rough surface was also obtained.72 This affects the orientation and height homogeneity, which can be detrimental to subsequent device fabrication. Serban et al.75 demonstrated a large variety of nanostructured layers, such as TiN, ZrB2, Mo, and Ti thin film [Fig. 4(c)] for subsequent growth of GaN NWs, using magnetron sputtering. For devices, Sarwar et al.35 reported the first AlGaN-based UV NWs-LEDs on various nanostructured metal thin films (Ti and Mo) on an Si substrate and feature of GaN NWs on Ti thin layer is shown in Fig. 4(d). Compared with a bulk Mo metal substrate, Ti and Mo thin film deposited on a 3-in. diameter Si substrate can leverage on scalability for cost reduction. Furthermore, LEDs were fabricated on Mo thin film for better electrical contact with p-GaN compared with Ti, while the low vapor pressure of refractory metal allowed for prolonged NW growth in an MBE growth chamber at a high substrate temperature. An electroluminescence peak at 385 nm was also obtained with comparable electrical performance to devices grown on an Si substrate. However, the metal thin film was found to delaminate from the Si substrates, causing rough surface and misoriented NWs. The main causes are believed to be related to the large thermal expansion coefficient mismatch between metal and silicon, as well as indirectly by oxide desorption during NWs growth. Even at lower growth temperatures for InGaN NWs, Ti layers could still delaminate. Figures 4(e)4(i) show scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of tilted- and cross-sectional view of n-InGaN/GaN NWs on various thicknesses of Ti layers on a 3-in. diameter Si substrate. Tilted SEM images revealed that the high density of InGaN/GaN NWs was uniformly grown on a Ti layer. An SEM cross-sectional view of each interface also confirmed that, as the Ti layer thickness increased, the effects of delamination and thickness variation were aggravated. This is especially true for the sample with a Ti layer thickness above 500 nm as shown in the inset of Fig. 4(i) in which microscale cracks were observed on the surface.

Fig. 4

GaN NWs grown on metal layer. (a) TiN thin layer. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 74. (b) SEM tilted- and top-view of GaN NWs on TiN. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 72. (c) SEM tilted-view of GaN NWs grown on Ti, Mo, SiC, and ZrB/SiC. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 75. (d) SEM tilted-view of GaN NWs grown on Ti. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 35. SEM images of tilted- and cross-sectional view of InGaN/GaN NWs of Ti thickness (e) 100 nm, (f) 200 nm, (g) 300 nm, (h) 400 nm, and (i) above 500 nm, respectively. The inset shows the optical microscopy image of the top view of NWs on Ti with a layer thickness above 500 nm.

JNP_12_4_043511_f004.png

This can be more severe for AlGaN NWs growth because of its higher sample growth temperatures. Compared with transition metals (Mo, 4.8×106  K1; Hf, 5.9×106  K1; Ta, 6.3×106  K1; and Ti, 8.6×106  K1), the thermal expansion coefficient of silicon (Si, 2.6 to 3.3×106  K1) is much lower.35,76 Eventually, a metal thin film on thick Si substrate can be partially delaminated or detached during temperature ramp up/down cycles. However, the thickness of the Ti layer was optimized to be around 20 nm to avoid delamination, despite that the limited conductivity at this thickness of Ti caused a higher turn-on resistance during device operation.77 The comparative study of device results as a function of Ti layer thickness allowed us to optimize the Ti thickness, which was found to be in the range of 100 to 300 nm.78 Along this direction, Janjua et al.41 demonstrated droop-free AlGaN-based UV NWs LEDs emitting at 337 nm on 100-nm-thick Ti thin film. Such a metal layer enabled the formation of TiN during nitrogen plasma exposure, hence eliminating the spontaneous formation of the SixNy insulating layer at the NWs/substrate interface. Moreover, the reflectivity of TiN/Ti in the UV-A region (>35%) still carries the benefit of enhanced light extraction. The external quantum efficiency (EQE) curve shows a droop-free behavior of up to 120  A/cm2 due to the high carrier confinement in the quantum-disks and the role of the TiN/Ti thin film for enhanced reflection and current injection. Similar issues, however, were encountered regarding the possible partial delamination from the Si substrate and subsequent NWs misorientation. The UV NWs-LED characteristics are summarized in Fig. 5. With further TEM experimentation, we recently reported that the elevated growth temperature during MBE growth is sufficient to cause silicon to diffuse into the Ti thin film, converting 80% of the metal to TiSix.42 This apparent solution was to insert a 20-nm TaN metal interlayer between Si and Ti as shown in Fig. 6. The root-mean-square roughness was significantly reduced by 95% from 24 to 1.6 nm, and improved NWs height uniformity was attained. With the TaN insertion, we demonstrated AlGaN-based NWs-LED emitting at 325 nm with an output power of 0.76  mW/cm2 [Fig. 5(f)] and a 1000× improvement in EQE compared with the sample grown on Ti/Si.79 The electrical conductivity was found to increase, while the sheet resistance reduced with the improved interface. Thus the integration of the metal diffusion barrier into the MBE growth process is critical to the heterogeneous growth of group-III nitride on metal/silicon. The findings, along with growth optimization and layer structure design, surface treatment and passivation, and investigations into uniform injection among all NWs, could open a research pathway toward reliable process integration and device implementation for enhanced efficiencies, low cost, and scalable wide-bandgap axial-NWs light emitters.

Fig. 5

UV NWs device performance. (a) Current density versus voltage characteristics of GaN NWs on Mo and (b) electroluminescence spectra at different injection currents. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 35. (c) Current density versus voltage characteristics of the AlGaN NWs-LED on Ti/TaN/Si and (d) electroluminescence spectra with the inset showing the device under test. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 42. (e) EQE versus current of the AlGaN NWs-LED on Ti/Si presenting droop-free behavior of up to 120  A/cm2. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 41. (f) Power density versus voltage comparison between AlGaN-based NWs-LEDs on Ti/Si and Ti/TaN/Si.

JNP_12_4_043511_f005.png

Fig. 6

(a) and (b) SEM images showing the NWs/substrate interface roughness comparison between the sample on Ti/Si and Ti/TaN/Si. (c)–(g) Dark-field cross-sectional TEM images and EDX elemental mapping of the sample on Ti/TaN/Si substrate. (h) Electron energy loss spectroscopy mapping of the sample on Ti/Si showing the interdiffusion and TiSix formation, leading to the rough surface. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 42.

JNP_12_4_043511_f006.png

3.3.2.

Selective area growth on patterned Ti metal mask

The NWs can be grown in a periodic manner by means of prepatterned thin (10  nm) titanium to form a nanohole mask.80 Therefore, the randomness of NWs morphology can be suppressed by selective area growth (SAG) of the Ti mask layer because the size and location can be controlled by titanium mask patterns as shown in Figs. 7(a) and 7(b). The key factor in SAG is the diffusion-induced process and its GaN NW growth Gemperature (900°C).81 Sufficiently high temperature can provide longer diffusion length of Ga adatoms on the TiN mask, before the adatoms are trapped into the mask nanoholes. Liu et al.43 have controlled the Al composition in the whole composition range to realize UV-C wavelength by SAG. Well-defined mask pattern shape, size, and spacing provided a narrower spectral line width of 11  nm after fabrication of AlGaN-based NW UV-C LED.

Fig. 7

(a) Tilted-view of SEM and emission images from SAG InGaN/GaN NWs as a function of different nanohole diameters. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 82. (b) Tilted-view of SEM images from InGaN/GaN single NW having various diameters. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 50.

JNP_12_4_043511_f007.png

3.3.3.

Growth on metal foil

As an alternative to the rigid substrate, recently, Calabrese et al.83 reported GaN NWs on flexible Ti foils. The NW density and morphologies were similar to the samples grown on an Si substrate. From low-temperature photoluminescence measurements, the results indicated that the GaN NWs on Ti foil exhibited a higher density of stacking faults due to a lower growth temperature [Fig. 8(a)]. However, a reduced density of inversion domain boundaries was also suggested. All in all, the study reveals that the flexible metal foil is also a promising candidate for optoelectronic device applications. In parallel, Myers’s group succeeded in realizing AlGaN-based UV-A NWs-LEDs on flexible Ta foils as shown in Fig. 8(b).39 It was suggested that large-sized roll-to-roll process could be implemented using these flexible foil substrates, which can sustain the high growth temperatures.

Fig. 8

(a) Low-temperature photoluminescence spectra of GaN NWs grown on Ti foil. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 83. (b) Electroluminescence spectra from AlGaN-based UV NWs-LEDs on flexible Ta foil; inset shows current–voltage characteristics of LEDs on Ta foil (red) and Si substrate (black). Reproduced with permission from Ref. 39.

JNP_12_4_043511_f008.png

3.4.

p-Contact Layer Design for Device Structures

Mg-doped p-GaN suffers from low hole concentration of around 1×1018  cm3 due to a large dopant ionization energy of 200 meV.84 This can be more severe for the larger bandgap materials, such as high Al content AlxGa1xN ternary alloys (630 meV for Mg-doped p-AlN).85 When using p-AlGaN as a contact layer, high resistivity can cause severe problems related to low hole injection efficiency at high-voltage operation.86 Therefore, we discuss the various top contact layer scheme with optimized thickness as well as the recent report on coalescent p-contact layer or pendeo-epitaxy contact layer.

3.4.1.

p-contact layer for axial nanowire

Similar to planar platforms, either p-AlGaN or p-GaN axial top contacts can be used for AlGaN-based UV NWs-LEDs. The larger bandgap energy of a p-AlGaN contact offers a lower absorbance in the UV region leading to enhanced light extraction efficiency.33,42 However, due to the higher resistivity of p-AlGaN, the choice of such a p-type contact layer has its pros and cons. Janjua et al.48 optimized UV-A device structures with varying axial p-GaN top contact thicknesses by means of simulation and experimental verification. The optimized device structure with thinner p-GaN (20 nm) top contact layer showed 10× improvements in output power compared with the thicker one. Mi’s group also optimized the p-GaN axial contact in conjunction with low nitrogen flow rate of around 0.4 sccm. During PA-MBE AlGaN growth, low nitrogen flow can enhance the surface migration of Al adatom, thus resulting in a significantly improved Al/Ga composition.37 In this manner, a thin (3 nm) high-crystalline p-GaN contact was used for AlGaN and AlN axial NWs for UV-C LEDs.37,45

Even for a very thin p-AlGaN contact, it is not completely free from the absorption of deep UV photons.87 In this regard, finding another material with a higher bandgap and better p-type conductivity is important for improving the efficiency of UV light emitters. Hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) is one of the promising candidates for the realization of UV-C LEDs because of its ultralarge bandgap (6  eV),88,89 with 10 times higher mobility12 and 10 orders of magnitude larger free hole concentration than that of AlN.12,90 Mi’s group succeeded in demonstrating Mg-free AlN-based UV-C NWs-LEDs with h-BN top contact.46 Using a separate PA-MBE chamber, the h-BN top contact layer was epitaxially grown using an in situ electron-beam evaporation source under the N-rich growth condition. With the presence of intrinsic B vacancies, the undoped h-BN exhibited a strong p-type conductivity, whereas the h-BN embedded AlN-based UV NWs UV-LED exhibited a strong emission at 210  nm.

3.4.2.

Coalesced p-contact layer by pendeo-epitaxy

The challenges in fabricating self-assembled NWs arose from the in-plane and out-of-plane tilt of crystal orientation, irregular height uniformity, and rough surface morphology. Hence, polymer-based materials have been used for planarization fabrication steps to make ohmic contact with the top semiconductor.40 However, light absorption through polymer can be severe, and the polymer does not ease heat dissipation from the already poor thermal conductivity in high Al content UV-LEDs. In this regard, mutually coalesced p-type contact layers atop the NWs were investigated. Kishino’s group first reported the coalescence of top GaN NWs on a silicon substrate.91,92 They found that Be- or Mg-doping of GaN can remarkably enhance the lateral growth and eventually obtain a smooth and continuous layer with increasing Mg doping concentration. A similar approach was also applied to AlGaN-based UV-A NWs-LED in which the coalesced p-GaN contact layer was successfully demonstrated with the advantage of eliminating the polymer-filling planarization step, thus simplifying fabrication.28

Janjua et al.40 also demonstrated spontaneous coalescence of p-GaN in dislocation-free AlGaN-based UV-B NWs-LEDs on bare Si(100) substrate. Previously, the majority of AlGaN-based UV NWs-LED studies have been based on either polarization-induced graded-AlGaN structures or conventional double-heterostructure. However, there are limited studies on UV NWs-LEDs with an AlxGa1xN/AlyGa1yN quantum-confined active region that should bring about superior carrier confinement. Having optimized PA-MBE growth for high-density NWs, spontaneously coalesced AlGaN NWs of c-plane orientation with a filling factor above 95% were achieved as shown in Fig. 9(a). In Fig. 9(b), 15 pairs of AlxGa1xN/AlyGa1yN quantum-confined double-heterojunction occupying half of the volume of NWs were implemented for higher probability of recombination among the injected electrons and holes in the active regions. Furthermore, the fabrication process excluded the polymer planarization step as p-contact metal can be directly deposited on the coalesced p-GaN contact layer, thus achieving the self-planarization process. As the pendeo-epitaxy process for self-planarization was only applied to the p-GaN layer, the AlGaN NWs for the remaining LED structures still possess the intrinsic properties of single-crystal NWs, such as high crystalline quality, reduced polarization field, and improved electron–hole wavefunction overlap in the active regions.

Fig. 9

(a) Top-view of SEM image and tilted-view (inset) of NWs-LED. (b) Cross-sectional high angle annual dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) scan showing p–i–n AlGaN NWs with coalesced p-GaN contact layer and 15 pairs of Al0.3Ga0.7N/Al0.5Ga0.5N quantum disks/quantum barriers (left) along with a schematic representation of the layer structure (right). Reproduced with permission from Ref. 48.

JNP_12_4_043511_f009.png

Mi’s group also fabricated AlGaN-based NWs UV-A and UV-C LEDs with coalesced top AlGaN layers.38,43 Initially, mask patterns were prepared by the electron beam lithography method to produce small holes on a thin titanium layer/GaN template for growing NW arrays, thus forming the SAG template. Hexagonal openings were arranged precisely to minimize the angle of each grain boundary, while the dislocations in the coalesced top AlGaN layer were remarkably suppressed. On top of that geometry, defect-free p-AlGaN coalescent layers were grown by the SAG technique, and the Hall measurement showed free hole concentration of 7.4×1018  cm3 with the corresponding mobility of 8.85  cm2V1s1 at room temperature.

3.5.

Tunnel Junction and Inverted p–i–n Structures

The first tunnel diode was invented by Esaki93 in 1958 with a high-doped, extremely narrow Ge p–n junction. Under reverse-bias, the tunnel diode showed ohmic characteristics and formed a low-resistive current path through thin n- to p-type layers.86 The property of tunnel junction makes it possible to realize multiple-stacks of various optoelectronic device structures, such as combining two active regions for dual-wavelength LED,94 or high-efficiency multijunction or tandem solar cells.95 Another advantage of tunnel-junction-embedded structures is being able to convert a typical structure into n–p–n LEDs in such a way that the top resistive p-type AlGaN contact is a substitute for n-type AlGaN.86 In this regards, Myers’s group realized n+ graded-AlGaN/AlGaN-quantum-disks/p+ garded-AlGaN with a bottom p-GaN/InGaN/n-GaN tunnel junction embedded on top of an n-type silicon, whereas the graded-AlGaN structures are used for inducing the respective polarization-induced doping.32 The interband tunneling at the tunnel junction allows the electron injection into the n-GaN layer and holes into the graded p-AlGaN layer. As a result, tunnel junction LED showed reduced operating voltage and increased injection current. With 6  V reduction of turn-on voltage, the tunnel-junction AlGaN-based NWs-LEDs showed increased light output with wall plug efficiency comparable with a conventional AlGaN-based NWs-LED.

In additon, Mi’s group integrated epitaxial Al metal tunnel junctions for AlGaN-based NWs,36,44 as well as incorporated the spontaneously formed AlGaN shells on the sidewall for suppressing the nonradiative recombination and improving the carrier confinement. Compared with the conventional structures without tunnel junction, the Al tunnel junction embedded in NWs showed significant reduction in device resistance, with higher output power (>8  mW) and EQE (0.4%).44

4.

Quantum-Confined Stark Effect and Strain Issues

The group-III nitride semiconductors have been researched for light emitters over the whole UV-to-near IR spectrum (AlN-InN), which subsequently led to the commercialization of the UV-visible devices. However, the significant lattice mismatch of the wurtzite structures with the different group-III nitride binary compounds grown along the polar axis leads to the formation of piezoelectric fields. This along with the spontaneous polarization fields can be of several MV/cm, thus increasing the carrier separation and QCSE, while reducing the radiative recombination (Fig. 10).

Fig. 10

The electronic band structure of the quantum well (a) without and (b) with QCSE. Effective-bandgap narrowing and spatial separation of electron and hole wavefunctions are depicted.

JNP_12_4_043511_f010.png

The QCSE was first reported by Miller et al.96 in the context of GaAs-AlGaAs quantum well structures with an electric field applied perpendicular to the layers. Though researchers achieved high-efficiency NWs-based LEDs,97,98 avoiding the strain and polarization-induced internal electric fields, QCSE at the interface of quantum disk/dot and barrier, remains challenging.99,100 In group-III nitride-based quantum wells, the internal piezoelectric fields of 1.2  MV/cm decrease the overlap of electron and hole wavefunctions [Figs. 10(a)] and [10(b)].101,102 The resultant QCSE has been widely reported for III–V metal-polar quantum well-based devices96,101,103104.105.106 grown along the c-direction. This effect can be moderately mitigated in the NW geometry as a result of lateral strain relief during growth. Several efforts already have been made to understand the QCSE for GaN/InGaN-based LEDs,96,99,101,103104.105.106.107 but there were limited related studies on GaN/AlN or GaN/AlGaN-based UV LEDs.108,109 In this regards, Leroux et al. reported an internal electric field strength of 0.45  MV/cm in AlGaN/GaN structures by varying the well thickness. As the GaN well is unstrained, they attributed the origin of the field to the spontaneous polarization difference between the well and barrier, the latter being mostly affected by the piezoelectric field.103 Similarly, Lefebvre et al.110 studied the well and barrier thickness-dependent excitonic recombination dynamic and found it to be dependent on the built-in electric field.

The Al composition is known to play a crucial role in the internal electric field. Figures 11(a)11(c) show the linear relation between the Al content and the electric field in AlGaN/GaN quantum barrier/wells. From low-temperature photoluminescence studies, fields in the range of 1  MV/cm were reported for 25% Al.111,112 A higher electric field of 5 to 8  MV/cm was calculated by Ng et al. for an AlGaN/GaN with Al composition of 80%, with an associated large photoluminescence red shift.113 Time-resolved photoluminescence measurements were performed in two types of GaN/AlxGa1xN quantum wells. With low Al content in the barriers, an increase in the biexciton binding energy was observed with increasing quantum confinement. On the other hand, for the case of low-quantum confinement values, the biexciton binding energy value was found to be less than that of the bulk GaN for GaN/Al0.05Ga0.95N quantum well. This evidenced the presence of the strong QCSE.114 Other than simple quantum well/quantum barrier studies, the piezoelectric effects on AlGaN/GaN laser structures were also analyzed by means of simulation. The piezoelectric effects affect the device performance (C1-HH1 and C1-LH1 gain transitions) at a relatively low carrier density (<10×1019  cm3), implying that the free carrier screening effect is not prominent. However, above this threshold, a flat-band configuration was obtained.115 To suppress the QCSE, AlGaN/GaN structures were grown on semipolar and nonpolar substrates, i.e., with a growth axis at an angle perpendicular to the (0001) substrate axis. Improved photoluminescence was achieved comparing structures grown on (0001) and (112¯0) with a 20 to 30 times enhancement for the latter, signifying the reduction of the internal field.116 Strong red shift and reduced photoluminescence intensity were obtained for AlGaN/GaN structures grown on c-plane sapphire, compared with m-plane GaN substrates with internal electric fields as high as 1.23  MV/cm for the former.117

Fig. 11

(a) Built-in electric field as a function of Al composition in AlGaN/GaN quantum well structure. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 111. (b) Calculated binding energy in AlGaN/GaN structure versus GaN well thickness at different electric fields. (c) The electric field as a function of barrier thickness for the same structure as Fig. 11(b). Reproduced with permission from Ref. 112.

JNP_12_4_043511_f011.png

To understand the role of the internal piezoelectric field induced QCSE on photoluminescence peak position of quantum disk embedded in NWs, one must determine the direction of the electric field, which is related to the strain-induced polarization. From the elastic theory of wurtzite materials, the relation between strain and the piezoelectric polarization expressed in the following is used to determine the direction of polarization101

Pc=2d31(C11+C122C132C33)ϵa,
where Pc is the polarization along c-direction, d31 is the piezoelectric modulus, C11, C12, C13, and C33 are the elastic constant, and ϵa is the in-plane compressive strain (<0). Hence, for an AlGaN (quantum disk)/AlN (quantum barrier) system, strain-induced polarization is positive (Pc>0) pointing along [0001]. Consequently, the direction of the piezoelectric field in the N-polar (metal-polar) devices directs along [0001¯] ([0001]). Thereby, for AlGaN-based UV devices, the direction of the internal electric field induced by the piezopolarization points from the substrate to the surface for N-polar, whereas it points from the surface to the substrate for metal-polar. Therefore, the QCSE has deleterious effects on the device performance by reducing the rate of recombination, whereas it has less of an impact on cubic and nonpolar wurtzite devices.118,119 In terms of nanostructures, Renard et al.100 demonstrated the existence of the QCSE for the polar GaN/AlN axial heterostructures in NWs using temperature-dependent photoluminescence and single-photon correlation measurements. They reported that the magnitude of QCSE was observed to be small compared with that of two-dimensional (2-D) structures, which were ascribed to the reduction in piezoelectric polarization accompanied by the elastic relaxation. Songmuang et al.109 reported the photoluminescence transition energy as a function of both the quantum dot height and the Al mole fraction in the barriers, as well as the evolution of the decay time as a function of the quantum dot height; thereby, they found that a built-in electric field is remarkably smaller than the value expected from the spontaneous polarization. On the other hand, Wang et al.120 observed the suppression of QCSE for nanorod-based device structures formed by a top–down approach. Later, the coexistence of QCSE along with localized states for InGaN/GaN NW heterostructure having the emission centered at around 2.5 eV has been demonstrated.99

Müßener et al.121 reported the direct analysis of polarization-induced internal electric fields in single GaN/Al0.3Ga0.7N quantum-disks embedded in GaN/AlN NW heterostructures. Superposition of an external electric field with different polarities results in compensation or enhancement of the QCSE in the quantum disks. As shown in Fig. 12(a), a blue shift (red shift) in PL emission energy and an increase (decrease) in PL intensity were observed for positive (negative) bias, i.e., for compensation (enhancement) of the polarization-induced internal electric field and the resulting QCSE. The results revealed the NW heterostructures crystal polarity (N-face) and allowed determination of the strength of the internal electric fields of 1.5  MV/cm. By field-dependent analysis of the low-temperature photoluminescence energy and intensity, we proved the [0001¯]-polarity of the NW and determined the internal electric field strength of 1.5  MV/cm. Recently, Tangi et al.62 reported the bias-dependent photoluminescence exhibiting opposite shifts in contrast to that of the planar quantum well structures, which were attributed to the change in the direction of the piezoelectric field for N-polar NWs [Fig. 12(b)]. Furthermore, the blue shift of photoluminescence with increasing excitation power reveals the suppression of QCSE resulting from the photogenerated carriers. Thus the NWs ensemble LED device results are in good agreement with the single NW device in terms of the bias controlled photoluminescence shifts and variation of the intensity. Carnevale et al.29 observed electroluminescence peaks at various wavelengths from 250 nm in Al0.8Ga0.2N quantum disk LEDs to 360 nm in GaN quantum disk LEDs. The conductivity and electroluminescence showed slight variation with temperature, verifying that the electrons and holes are polarization induced, rather than thermally ionized from impurities. Since polarization charge is built into the unit cell, the NW doping profile in the devices, in the absence of impurity doping, is uniform unlike impurity-doped NWs.

Fig. 12

(a) Photoluminescence spectra under the influence of an external bias focusing on the energy range above the GaN near band edge emission. The shifting and fixed (strained GaN related) spectral features are labeled 1 and 2, respectively. The spectra are normalized to the quantum-disks emission and vertically shifted for clarity. The inset shows the schematic representation of a single NW excited with a laser line. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 121. (b) The direction of internal piezo and external electric field with respect to the [0001¯] direction of N-polar wurtzite crystal structure. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 62.

JNP_12_4_043511_f012.png

5.

Doping in AlGaN Nanowires

The noncentrosymmetric wurtzite crystal structure of group-III nitride compound semiconductors leads to the spontaneous and piezoelectric polarization, which accumulates the net charge at surfaces and interfaces.14 Utilizing the polarization-induced charge, researchers observed that a graded heterojunction of AlGaN establishes a 3-D slab of bound charge that can provide either an n- or p-type conducting layer depending on the sign of the Al concentration gradient and the polarity of the material. Jena et al.13 demonstrated the realization of polarization-induced bulk electron doping in III–V nitride semiconductors by grading the AlGaN/GaN heterojunction over a distance of 100  nm. The polarization-induced bulk charge (3-D electron gas), mimicking a local donor with zero activation energy, overcomes the localized optical transitions associated with the defect centers of donor atoms. Such carriers do not freeze out at low temperature, unlike the shallow donor-doped bulk carriers, and thus exhibit high mobilities due to the absence of ionized impurity scattering. Figures 13(a) and 13(b) show the temperature-dependent mobility and carrier sheet densities for the Si-doped GaN samples, 100-nm linearly graded (0% to 30% Al) AlGaN and 20-nm Al0.20Ga0.80N/GaN. The carrier in the 0% to 30% graded AlGaN sample mimics the transport characteristics of modulation-doped 2-D electron gas (2DEG) and 3-D electron slab (3DES) characterized by a lack of activation energy, leading to a temperature-independent carrier density. Carriers in the bulk donor-doped sample show the characteristic freeze-out associated with the hydrogenic shallow donor nature of Si in bulk GaN. A theoretical dopant activation fitting yielded an activation energy of 20 meV with a doping density fixed by the Si flux in MBE (1018/cm3). The wide slabs of high-density mobile electrons were created without introducing shallow donors. Transport measurements revealed the superior properties of the polarization-doped electron distributions over the comparable shallow donor-doped structures, especially at low temperatures due to the removal of ionized impurity scattering. Thus this clearly demonstrated the improvement in the conductivity of polarization-doped layers over comparable donor-doped layers.13 Later, the polarization-induced doping method was utilized in the case of NWs for obtaining sufficient doping levels.

Fig. 13

The temperature-dependent (a) mobility and (b) carrier sheet densities for a polarization-doped sample of 3DES, donor-doped sample, and a 2DEG sample structures. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 13.

JNP_12_4_043511_f013.png

Later, Simon et al.14 showed the high-efficiency p-type doping by ionizing acceptor dopants (Mg) by employing the built-in electronic polarization in bulk uniaxial wide-bandgap wurtzite-semiconductors. The holes created by this method are field-ionized and are strong enough to withstand the thermal freeze-out effects, which results in superior p-type electrical conductivity. This doping scheme helped to improve the optical emission efficiency in UV-LED structures. Thus the polarization-induced doping renders a solution to both p- and n-type doping issues in wide-bandgap AlGaN semiconductors. The doping scheme can be used to obtain the desired hole or electron concentrations in spite of poor ionization efficiencies of impurity dopants in any semiconductor crystals that possess sufficiently strong spontaneous and piezoelectric polarization.

Recently, Myers’s group reported the tuning of polarization-induced hole density in the NWs graded from GaN to AlN using capacitance–voltage (CV) measurements. Figure 14(a) shows the schematic of NW heterostructure on p-type Si (top), energy band diagram, and carrier concentration profile (bottom) along the axis of the NW heterostructure. Figure 14(b) shows the STEM images of graded NW heterojunctions. Figure 14(c) shows the calculated capacitance from a simple 1-D circuit model (triangles predicted with hole concentration, h=NApol) and assuming full depletion (circles predicted with h=0). The top horizontal axis corresponds to the negative bound spontaneous polarization charge density calculated from the measured concentration gradient. The squares are the extracted 1-D NW measured capacitance. Their experiments revealed that the negative polarization-induced bound charge is partially compensated for by both free holes and deep donors available near the valence band for concentration gradients of <1.30%  Al/nm. On the other hand, for gradients 1.30%  Al/nm, the deep donor concentration is negligible and free hole concentrations roughly equal to the bound polarization charge density of up to 1.6×1019  cm3 for a concentration gradient of 4.95%  Al/nm.15

Fig. 14

(a) Schematic of NW heterostructure on (top) p-type Si and (bottom) energy band diagram and carrier concentration profile along the axis of the NW heterostructure considering spontaneous and strain-induced polarization charge. (b) STEM images of graded NW heterojunctions. (c) The calculated capacitance from a single 1-D circuit model (triangles predicted with h=NApol) and assuming full depletion (circles predicted with h=0) are shown. The top horizontal axis corresponds to the negative bound spontaneous polarization charge density calculated from the measured concentration gradient. The square symbols represent the extracted 1-D NW capacitance from measured capacitance. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 15.

JNP_12_4_043511_f014.png

The traditional impurity-induced doping of AlGaN suffers from the large activation energy of Mg and high dislocation density of AlGaN thin film. Compared with the planar counterpart, the Mg incorporation in AlGaN NW is more efficient because of the lower formation energy.122,123 Moreover, the hole hopping conduction in Mg impurity bands leads to the smaller activation energy in AlGaN NWs compared with thin film.45 Based on this, Myers’s group and Mi’s group demonstrated AlGaN-based UV LEDs.124,125 Moreover, Mi’s group reported low-threshold UV random lasers on Si by combining the Anderson localization of light and high-quality AlGaN NWs array.126 In addition to demonstrating UV emitters, we have also quantified the hole concentration in AlGaN NWs using photoelectrochemical measurements. The optimized doping for AlGaN-based UV NWs-LEDs favors low turn-on voltage and low self-heating.127

6.

Surface Treatment

One of the main challenges of GaN-based devices is the high concentration of growth-related defects that affect the optimum device performance. These defects act as nonradiative recombination centers, trapping the carriers and preventing the direct recombination process from happening, thus hampering the quantum efficiency, threshold current, radiative lifetime, and reliability. It is then of fundamental importance to understand the deep level incorporation for the growth of high-quality materials. Deep level transient spectroscopy (DLTS) and deep level optical spectroscopy (DLOS) are the essential techniques for analyzing the deep level defects within group-III nitride semiconductors. AlGaN/GaN heterostructures were studied, and bandgap states at Ec3.85  eV for AlGaN and Ec2.64  eV and Ec3.30  eV for GaN were observed.128 Moreover, the defects in ammonia-based and N-plasma-based MBE growth of GaN have been studied. An increase in the concentration for the energy levels at Ec3.28  eV, Ec2.6  eV, and Ec0.60  eV was observed, while similar main defect species of C and Ga vacancies were observed in both techniques of MBE growth.129 Mg-doped GaN planar layers were also analyzed by DLOS. Deep levels at Ev+3.05  eV, Ev+3.22  eV, and Ev+3.26  eV were attributed to deep donor–acceptor pair luminescence band and CGa, respectively.130 m-plane and c-plane GaN were also compared, revealing significant differences in both energy level or defect states and defect concentration. 10× to 50× higher defect concentration was measured using both DLTS and DLOS for the m-plane GaN sample.131

GaN NW surface is dominated by the effects of Ga dangling bonds and N vacancies, and treatment of this defective surface has been thoroughly studied in optoelectronic devices. SiOx and SixNy are frequently used as contact isolation layers to reduce leakage current, avoiding the contact with air and reduce GaN surface band bending.132,133 Among other uses, SiOx has also been used to selectively block the threading dislocation in epitaxially grown LED structures to increase the quantum efficiency134 and contribute to increasing the output power of LED with an optimized refractive index gradient.135 Al2O3 is another passivation material for improving the blue LED brightness136 and reducing the leakage current.137 Double layer Al2O3/SiOx demonstrated the higher power output by simultaneously passivating the GaN surface and increasing the critical angle of the light escape cone.138

For III–V semiconductors, other than thin dielectric film protection, the surface state treatment on thin film GaAs mostly involved sulfur-based compounds, such as ammonium sulfide and sodium sulfide.139 Moreover, prior Ga-O removal allows the effective passivation of dangling bonds using sulfur-based compounds by creating σ bond between S and Ga, thus reducing the net charge accumulation on the surface.140 Sulfur passivation covalently satisfies all Ga and As dangling bonds to shift the energy bands of the surface states toward the conduction band to reduce charge traps.

The sidewalls of group-III nitride NWs possess a large specific surface with a high density of surface states due to Ga dangling bonds, nitrogen vacancies, and/or surface oxides.143,144 This results in surface Fermi level pinning and the subsequent energy band bending on the NW surface, which increases the Shockley–Read–Hall (SRH) nonradiative recombination. The excited carriers may pass through an intermediate energy state induced by the localized defects,64 and other nonradiative recombination sites, thereby resulting in a reduction in the light-emitter performances.107 To solve this problem, we have recently demonstrated that the use of long-carbon chained octadecanethiol (ODT) surface treatment of group-III nitride NWs-LED improves the light emission intensity due to a reduction in the SRH recombination and an increase in carrier lifetime.64 InGaN/GaN NWs were soaked in a mix of ODT, ethanol, and NH4OH and kept at 60°C. Raman spectroscopy measurement showed the blue shift of the SO mode for the ODT-passivated sample, compared with the unpassivated one, confirming the alteration of the surface dynamic charge and the effectiveness of the surface treatment. As a result, there was a 4× enhancement in PL intensity as well as a 1.5× increase in EQE. Figures 15(a) and 15(b) show the photoluminescence and EQE comparison of the passivated and unpassivated samples.

Fig. 15

ODT surface passivation of InGaN/GaN NWs showing enhanced (a) photoluminescence and (b) EQE. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 64. (c) Schematic of 4D S-UEM set-up schematic and (d) SE intensity improvement for the ODT-passivated InGaN NWs. The inset shows the SEM image of carbon deposition at the NW sidewall. Reproduced with permission from Refs. 141 and 142.

JNP_12_4_043511_f015.png

Although photoluminescence and EQE enhancement provide qualitative information on the passivation effects, the direct visualization of the surface carrier dynamics is necessary and can be achieved by employing a 4-D S-UEM technique. The time-resolved technique is the only technique for direct visualization of the material surface dynamics at high spatial and temporal resolution. Figure 15(c) shows the 4-D S-UEM schematic used for analyzing the above-mentioned NWs after surface treatment. A femtosecond laser and electron pulses are synchronized to generate photoelectron wave packets that initiate the NWs carrier dynamics. Collecting the emitted secondary electrons (SEs), we analyzed the time regimes between the electron and the optical pulses and were able to directly visualize the surface recombination processes.

Figure 15(d) shows the kinetics of the time-resolved SE intensities of the InGaN NWs. As-grown NWs showed a faster recovery of the SE intensity, signifying that the SE are less interfered with by the generated excess carrier, which easily recombines through the additional sidewall leakage path.142 Once the sidewalls are passivated using ODT, the absence of the additional leakage path led to a slower recovery of SE.

Similarly, attaining a quantitative understanding for AlGaN nanostructures, particularly on the recombination mechanisms and surface states, is required. Therefore, research opportunities still exist in extending the above-mentioned techniques (4D S-UEM, DLOS, and DLTS) for AlGaN-NWs devices or even other ultrawide-bandgap materials and nanostructures. Similar to ODT, 1,2-ethanedithiol, a shorter carbon-chain organic-thiol compound, has been used to treat group-III nitride semiconductors for improved characteristics, such as in the treatment of InGaN NW surfaces for improved photoelectrochemical water splitting performance.145,146

Other instances of semiconductor surface-treatment studies are summarized in the following. Mi’s group used ammonium sulfide to increase the quantum efficiency of the InGaN-based white-light NWs-LEDs in an effort to reduce the nonradiative recombination centers.147 The surface states’ passivation in NWs has also been reported in GaAs,148 InAs,149 and InP150 as it replaces the surface oxide while creating an In-S bond, hence reducing the mid-gap states. Also, by treating AlGaN-based UV NWs-LED using a KOH solution over a 40-s period, we observed an improvement in PL intensity by 80% compared with an untreated sample. In this case, it is very likely that the improvement is associated with both the etching of the p-GaN contact layer and the top-surface oxide removal. A fabricated device after such treatment showed improvement in the turn-on voltage, reduction in contact resistivity, and 50% enhancement in output power.47

Other than passivating the surface states by employing chemical treatments or depositing dielectric materials, researchers achieved in situ passivation by spontaneously growing shell layers around semiconductor NWs, in general. For example, AlGaAs shells were intentionally grown around GaAs NWs to prevent subsequent oxidation upon exposure to the atmosphere, without which recombination velocities would increase and PL emission would reduce.151 Similarly, AlInP core–shells were grown to protect and passivate GaAs NWs. Further device studies by fitting and modeling the current–voltage characteristics showed improvement in surface recombination velocity and reduction in surface charge trap density.152 In group-III nitride materials, such as AlGaN, due to the short diffusion length of Al compared with Ga, Al adatoms have a strong tendency to accumulate at the NW sidewalls, thus resulting in the formation of an Al-rich AlGaN shell.67,153 This leads to strong carrier confinement at the surface of the NW, reducing the nonradiative recombination processes and increasing the overall device performance in LEDs30,154 and lasers.126 When comparing GaN and AlGaN/GaN core–shell NWs using DLOS, a deep level in GaN NWs at Ev+2.6  eV was measured, and this was ascribed to the surface state as it was not observed in the AlGaN/GaN core–shell NWs.143 Nguyen et al.155 demonstrated an 10× photoluminescence intensity improvement in AlGaN core–shell NWs as well as an increase in carrier lifetime, suggesting the reduced nonradiative recombination rate as shown in Fig. 16(a). Jiang et al.156 also demonstrated the improvement of the minority carrier lifetime by increasing the AlGaN core–shell thickness. A detailed HAADF-STEM image of the AlGaN shell is also shown in Fig. 16(b), and it clearly indicates that the NWs were surrounded by AlGaN shells. At high magnification, the shell layer around the active region was found to consist of multiple-stacks of shells as shown in Fig. 16(c).

Fig. 16

(a) InGaN/GaN growth schematic with AlGaN core–shell layer and output power enhancement. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 155. (b) HAADF-STEM of AlGaN-based p–i–n NW structures on Ti (500 nm)/Mo substrate. (c) Active region showing multiple AlGaN shells surrounding 15 stacks of uniform quantum disks/quantum barriers.

JNP_12_4_043511_f016.png

7.

UV-Spectrum Nanowires-LED Characterization by cAFM and Reliability Test, and Solar-Blind Photodetector

This section discusses several important characterization techniques that are closely relevant to eventual light emitter implementation. Further, the use of NW for solar-blind photodetection is presented.

7.1.

Nanoscale Electrical Characterization by cAFM

Due to the statistical nature of self-assembled NWs growth and partly related to variation in growth parameters, the morphology and structural properties of NWs require dedicated optical and electrical characterization. For instance, Brandt et al.157 established a method to characterize the degree of coalescence of GaN NWs by applying an area-perimeter relationship of cross-sectional shape. This is primarily a study of the surface morphology of the NWs using SEM at an acceleration voltage of 5 kV and a magnification of 20,000×. Several hundreds of NWs were measured over a 30-μm2 area and then individually analyzed for quantitative determination of the degree of coalescence. By this means, a method to perform the nanoscale structural characterization was established to determine the dominant coalescence mechanism of NWs ensemble. Moreover, as growth proceeds, the eventual nucleation of dislocations at the NWs coalescence boundaries forms the nonradiative recombination centers that affect the ultimate device performance. On the other hand, Pfüller et al.158 carried out nanoscale optical characterization by studying the low-temperature photoluminescence spectrum of an individual NW over an area of 200×200  μm2 and reported a large variation in luminescence between single NWs.

Limbach et al.159 analyzed the electroluminescence emission from InGaN NWs-LEDs and observed that only a few NWs achieve enough current injection for light emission. This was attributed to the spatial inhomogeneity in the NWs and the fluctuation in series resistance. Jahangir et al.160 further examined the effect of NWs coalescence with fabricated InGaN-based NWs-LEDs. They revealed that, due to the coalescence of NWs, defects are produced at the boundaries and a significant fraction of the NWs was not illuminating under current injection. Apparently, such observation calls for further nanoscale electrical characterization, and this is well offered by the cAFM technique.

The cAFM technique is a powerful technique that enables the simultaneous batch characterization of individual NWs for their surface topography and current distribution at the nanometer level. It can be considered a potential step for rapid inspection of the electrical properties before a full-fledge device fabrication. The conductive tip, being smaller than the NWs diameter, enables high-resolution measurement of individual NWs and large area statistical mapping. The technique has previously been explored in NWs solar cells,161,162 in nanogenerators,163164.165.166 and only recently on group-III nitride AlGaN-based UV NWs-LEDs.

Myers’s group reported the nonuniformity study of a graded AlGaN single NW and an area of NWs both with tunnel junction incorporated.167 Their studies showed the improved electrical injection and reduced turn-on voltage compared with devices without the tunnel junction. At the nanoscale level (single NW), such tunnel junction integration enables an increase in current injection through the single NW. Approximately 100 individual NWs and 20  NWs-devices with an area of 300×300  μm2 were tested. Figure 17(a) shows the current–voltage curves of both single and full NWs device, whereas Figs. 17(b)17(d) compare the nanoscale and microscale turn-on or threshold voltages (Vth_nano or Vth_macro), differential conductance (Gnano or Gmacro), and leakage current (Ileak_nano or Ileak_macro). The same group further analyzed the current spreading on NWs-LEDs and the mechanism that reduces the electroluminescence emission also by employing cAFM.168 Due to the presence of electrical shorts (low-resistance NWs) where most of the current passes through, uniform current distribution was not possible. Taking this into account, the ensemble NWs-LED were intentionally overloaded with relatively high voltage to render them as open circuit paths, thereby allowing uniform distribution of current across the whole device. This leads to 33% enhancement of peak electroluminescence and reduction in leakage current. Thus cAFM measurement results clearly revealed a way for quantifying nonuniform current injection in NWs for a rapid nanoscale electrical characterization prior to fabrication of NWs-based devices.

Fig. 17

cAFM measurement for graded AlGaN NWs: (a) current versus voltage curves, (b) comparison of nanoscale and macroscale turn-on or threshold voltages (Vth_nano or Vth_macro), (c) comparison of nanoscale and macroscale differential conductance (Gnano or Gmacro), and (d) leakage current at 1  V (Ileak_nano or Ileak_macro). Reproduced with permission from Ref. 167.

JNP_12_4_043511_f017.png

7.2.

Reliability of AlGaN Nanowires-LEDs

Over the past years, the efficiency of group-III nitride AlGaN-based LEDs has improved tremendously. As mentioned in the previous Secs. 3 and 6, AlGaN materials are robust and chemically inert and possess a relatively long lifetime. These properties make them suitable for substituting mercury lamps that degrade after the effective working lifetime. Despite GaN-based LEDs having commercially proven lifetimes in the order of 105  h, the possible degradation mechanism includes the increase in nonradiative recombination centers in the active region, the increase in junction temperature at elevated current injection, the increase in resistivity due to the modification of the metal contacts, the formation of hydrogen complexes, and the degradation of the package epoxy and plastic material. All of these degradation mechanisms have been thoroughly covered in InGaN/GaN visible LEDs and lasers,169170.171.172.173.174.175.176.177 and detailed reviews have been published elsewhere.178179.180

As for UV devices, the lifetime is still limited due to the high dislocation density, high-dopant ionization efficiency, and high Joule heating. To date, there are only a few reports on planar AlGaN-based device stability and degradation mechanisms.181,182 Meneghini et al.183 analyzed AlGaN planar LEDs emitting at a 280- and 295-nm stress test under DC bias, and they attributed the device degradation to the generation of nonradiative recombination centers, especially at low-injection current. Moreover, tunneling effects and charge distribution in the active region contributed to the overall optical power degradation. Monti et al.184 reported a UV-B Al(In)GaN-based LED stability test at a high-injection current of 350  A/cm2. They noticed a decrease in the emission peak intensity after 50 h of stress that was related to the escape of carries from the wells and the diffusion of point defects in the active region, respectively. UV-C AlGaN-based LEDs degradation was also tested by Glaab et al.185 and showed a reduction in optical power by 40% after 250 h of operation with a decrease in the overall device capacitance. While the former is mainly attributed to the generation of acceptor-like defects, the latter was attributed to the reduced charges in the space-charge regions. A calculation showed that this region increased by 10 nm after stress.

Group-III nitride UV NWs technology is very much at its infancy compared with the planar counterpart, and therefore, lower efficiencies were often reported, as discussed in the Secs. 1 and 6. However, to advance the research into eventual practical applications, understanding the degradation mechanisms is of particular importance. In this regard, we recently reported the soft-stress analysis of AlGaN/GaN quantum-confined NWs-LED emitting at 340  nm, under DC bias. Figure 18(a) shows the output power and voltage versus stress time at 16  A/cm2.48 Despite a drop in voltage after 5 h, likely due to a rise in junction temperature, the power remains relatively stable. However, in-depth analysis and curves fitting by employing the LED rate equation resulted in showing degradation in the active region.

Fig. 18

AlGaN/GaN NWs-LED reliability test. (a) Power (Y-axis) and voltage (alternate Y-axis) versus time plot at low-injection current. (b) Power–current characteristic of the device after stress test showing the low- and high-injection current regimes. (c) Semilog plot of power versus current comparing characteristics of NWs and planar devices. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 48.

JNP_12_4_043511_f018.png

Moreover, we studied the low- and high-injection current regimes before and after the stress test to yield the corresponding slopes. Figure 18(b) shows the quadratic and linear behavior regimes of the optical power after a 5 h soft stress test. When comparing the curves before and after the stress test, we noticed a change at low-injection currents. To explain this, we extracted the slopes of the semilog power–current curves [Fig. 18(c)]. At a high-injection current, the sample before the stress test shows a slope (PHI) of 0.93, whereas after stress, a value of 0.95 was obtained. The value of 1 confirms the dominance of the radiative recombination rates as indicated by the LED rate equation simplified for high-injection currents.48 On the other hand, at low-injection currents, the slopes of the sample before and after the stress test (PLI) are 1.09 and 2.23, respectively. We can then deduce that the nonradiative recombination processes dominated in the sample after stress (slope2), implying that degradation has occurred. It can be concluded that nonradiative processes dominate after stressing the device in both regimes, although it is more prominent at low injections. In fact, at high current, the number of nonradiative recombination centers tends to saturate, leading to a reduced impact on the optical power output, as previously reported in AlGaN planar LED.186 We then compared our results with the GaN-based planar UV LEDs.174 Figure 18(c) shows a larger slope of 1.51 (GaN-based planar UV LED) compared with 1.09 for the NWs-device before stress. This suggests larger nonradiative recombination at low-injection current for the planar UV device, hence confirming the higher crystal quality of the as-grown NWs. However, after the stress test, the NWs-device shows a slope of 2.23, larger than the one of the GaN-based planar UV LED (1.81), meaning that the former is affected by higher nonradiative recombination centers that induce a faster device degradation.

As mentioned above, junction temperature affects the device reliability. In particular, for AlGaN materials, where the thermal heating is more prominent, the optical power and the efficiency are highly affected by the junction temperature. UV GaN and AlGaN planar LEDs junction temperatures have been reported,187,188 but, to date, there are no such reports for UV NWs-LEDs.

7.3.

Solar-Blind AlGaN-Based Nanowires-Photodetectors

The fast development in UV semiconductors has attracted attention for devices beyond LEDs development. Astronomy, fire detection, solar light monitoring, communication, and missiles detection are some applications for UV photodetectors. The main devices employed for UV detection are the photomultiplier tubes (PMTs), thermal detectors, charge-coupled devices (CCDs), and semiconductor photodetectors. However, PMTs have a large volume and high fragility, while thermal detectors and CCDs show low speed and wavelength-independent response. Contrariwise, semiconductor photodiodes are small and low-cost devices with good linearity and sensitivity for high-speed application. Although the most common UV photodetectors are silicon-based, these small-bandgap devices suffer from high-energy radiation degradation problems, high sensitivity to visible and IR radiation, low directivity, and costly optical filters necessary for wavelength selectivity. AlGaN-based photodetectors can overcome these problems as they have better spectral selectivity due to the direct bandgap and capability of tuning the cut-off wavelength by varying the composition of the ternary alloys.189

Since the first demonstration of GaN-based UV photodetectors by Khan et al.,190 the GaN and AlGaN photodetectors have shown responsivity and EQE of 0.1 and 0.8  A·W1 as well as 30 to 40 and 25% (depending on the wavelength), respectively.191 A dark current of 8.2×1011  A/cm2 (Ref. 192) and breakdown voltage of up to 200 V have also been reported for deep-UV AlGaN-based devices.193 However, the current planar AlGaN-based photodetector devices still suffer from low crystal quality caused by the lack of lattice-matched substrates, high-dopant activation energy, and the polarization field. Unlike InGaN/GaN structures, where the built-in electric field is mainly caused by the difference in piezoelectric polarizations of the materials, in AlGaN/GaN structures, both piezoelectric and spontaneous polarizations play a crucial role. In fact, the latter is dependent on both wells and barrier width. Lefebvre et al. reported a systematic study on AlGaN/GaN thickness-dependent wells and barriers. In general, the thinner the well, the less pronounced the internal field, hence lower band bending. They proved that, for the barrier as thin as 5 nm, carriers tend to escape (in the form of nonradiative recombination processes) from thinner wells to thicker wells.110 An internal field as high as 0.73  MV/cm was estimated by Deguchi et al.194 on an AlGaN/GaN/AlGaN single quantum well structure, showing low-emission efficiency. Such fields can be screened by high-free-carrier concentration that can be introduced either by injection current or by doping, the latter being advantageous when utilizing NWs.

In this regard, NWs photodetectors have been studied and demonstrated with remarkable results. Other than improved material properties, NWs allow device miniaturization due to their small diameter and increased light trapping for enhanced light absorption. In fact, enhanced absorptance was studied for optical modes parallel to the NWs axis, exceeding that of planar structures.195 The refractive index contrast also plays a crucial role in the modal resonance absorption, causing the optical absorption to be higher than thin film structures.196 Moreover, NW photodetectors showed superior sensitivity compared with the planar devices, due to the high surface-to-volume ratio that leads to larger photoconductive gain.197 Among the wide-bandgap materials, ZnO NWs with a room temperature bandgap of 3.37 eV have been widely studied for UV photodetectors and have shown high-photoconductive responses upon exposure to UV radiation.198199.200.201 Responsivity as high as 103  A/W has been reported on n–i–p ZnO NWs grown on a GaN template.202 Single ZnO NW photodetectors have also been demonstrated. The high-photoconductive gain of 108 was achieved and an issue related to oxygen surface states was addressed, which increases the photocurrent lifetime and the short transit time that results from the low dimensionality of the NWs s structure.203 Despite the achievement, ZnO-based materials showed an uncontrollable emission wavelength as a result of unstable p-type ZnO as well as the lack of carrier confinement.

GaN-based NWs-photodetectors have emerged as a stable device with visible- and solar-blind properties. Compared with Si-based and carbon nanotubes, III–V NW semiconductors have a larger carrier concentration and mobility that are fundamental for high-speed devices and a cut-off wavelength that can be adjusted from 365 to 210 nm. A single GaN NW photodetector was reported showing large UV-to-visible responsivity ratio204,205 [Figs. 19(a)19(c)] and high responsivity of 104  A/W along with fast response speed.206 Figure 19(d) shows the GaN NWs ensemble device with responsibility peak of 25  A/W at 357 nm.207 MOCVD-grown solar-blind AlGaN-based UV-C NWs-photodetectors showed responsivity peaks as high as 0.115  A/W208 and 0.72  A/W for AlGaN nanoflowers [Figs. 19(e) and 19(f)].209

Fig. 19

(a) Photocurrent in single GaN/AlN/GaN NW and (b) schematic of the NW structure. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 205. (c) SEM image of the single GaN NW and contact pads. The inset shows the schematic of the device. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 204. (d) The responsivity of UV GaN NW. The inset shows the schematic and IV characteristics under dark and illumination condition. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 207. (e) The responsivity of AlGaN nanorods and the respective inset shows device schematic. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 208. (f) The responsivity of AlGaN nanoflowers, nanorods, and NWs with an inset showing a device schematic. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 209.

JNP_12_4_043511_f019.png

To this end, AlGaN-based NWs-photodetectors were grown on metal thin film42 and measured using the responsivity measurement setup shown in Fig. 20(a). The UV light was generated by a xenon–mercury arc lamp, filtered by Newport monochromator, and focused on the sample stage with the illumination area of 3.5  mm×5.5  mm. The wavelength of incident light can be tuned from 240 nm to the visible spectrum. The dark current and photogenerated current are collected by the Keithley 4200 semiconductor characterization system. The sample structure of the AlGaN-based NWs having embedded multiple quantum disk (AlGaN MQdisks) is also shown in Fig. 20(b). The photocurrent versus voltage plot of the NWs-photodetector as a function of excitation wavelength is shown in Fig. 20(c). It can be noticed that the dark current (in black) is relatively small, especially at increased voltage values, reaching 5×109  A at 4  V. The photocurrent is measured at different excitation wavelengths at 0.5  mW/cm2, and larger values are obtained at a shorter excitation wavelength of 265 nm. As the AlGaN-based NWs-device shows an electroluminescence peak at 325 nm when forward biased [Fig. 20(c)], the IV curves above bandgap (at 330 and 400 nm) show negligible photocurrent. The inset shows the reverse and forward bias IV curves of the NWs-device.

Fig. 20

(a) The setup for responsivity measurement. (b) The structure of AlGaN-based NWs grown on Ti/TaN/Si. (c) Reverse bias current versus voltage curves at the different excitation wavelengths. The inset shows the forward bias current versus voltage curve. (d) Responsivity spectra with 0.5  mW/cm2 lamp excitation and photoluminescence spectra.

JNP_12_4_043511_f020.png

The performance of a photodetector is mainly compared by measuring the responsivity R that can be expressed as

(2)

R=IphPinc,
where Iph is the photocurrent and Pinc is the incident optical power. The AlGaN-based NWs-photodetector responsivity versus wavelength at different biases is presented in Fig. 20(d). The main peak at 286 nm is ascribed to the absorption at the high Al composition barrier. In fact, the photoluminescence spectra at 10 and 300 K show a similar peak. The other longer wavelength peaks at 320 and 360  nm are attributed to the quantum disks and GaN nucleation layer emissions, respectively. The sensitivity of the device is calculated as210

(3)

S=IphIdark,
where Iph and Idark are the photocurrent and the dark current, respectively. At 4  V, S has a value of 3.81×102.

The responsivity value, however, is still lower than previously reported AlGaN nanostructures208,209 and AlGaN thin film photodetectors.193,211 We emphasize that the device optimization has not been conducted and a relatively lower voltage was applied compared with that of AlGaN-based planar photodetectors. Therefore, there is still room for large improvement, given the technology infancy of AlGaN-based NWs-photodetectors. In fact, such nanostructures show the dislocation-free active region that not only allows improved photocurrent but enables the NWs growth on low-cost and large size silicon substrates. Moreover, as described in Sec. 6, the spontaneous AlGaN passivation at the NW sidewalls is believed to reduce the SRH nonradiative recombination, hence lowering the device leakage current for improved photodetection efficiency. Therefore, the demonstration of NWs-devices beyond LEDs development, such as photodetectors, constitutes an important step for advancing UV-spectrum semiconductor research toward self-assembled NWs for solar-blind photodetectors.

8.

Conclusions

This paper provides an outlook on the current development of PA-MBE grown UV AlGaN-based NWs growth, nanoscale characterization, and devices implementation. Specifically, we showcase several key enabling techniques for the self-assembled NWs technology, which offer insights on the prospects of the PA-MBE technology moving forward. A key highlight of the report was on the importance of growing these nanostructures on diffusion-barrier-metal/silicon template substrates for large current handling and heat management, which are issues faced by the group-III nitride NWs community when growing NWs on bare silicon substrates. Moreover, the use of foundry-compatible Ti/TaN thin film on scalable Si substrate demonstrates the practicality of our approach. We further emphasize the significant advantage of employing nanostructure as a niche solution to mitigate the effects of piezoelectric polarization fields and lattice matching requirements for eventual high-performance light-emitting devices. Furthermore, the need to effectively treat the NWs surface states and develop surface treatment solutions were highlighted, along with the use of 4D S-UEM technique to directly monitor the surface carrier dynamics before and after surface treatment. We further identified a recently employed cAFM technique as a critical step for in-process probing at nano- and macroscale prior to device fabrication. Finally, we analyzed the degradation mechanism of AlGaN-based UV NWs LED by means of a direct-current stress test and demonstrate a UV-spectrum AlGaN-based NWs-photodetector. Indeed, the research opportunities for these nanostructures are still boundless.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the financial support from the King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST) under Grant No. KACST TIC R2-FP-008. This work was partially supported by the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) baseline funding No. BAS/1/1614-01-01 and MBE equipment funding No. C/M-20000-12-001-77.

References

1. T. Mukai et al., “High-power UV InGaN/AlGaN double-heterostructure LEDs,” J. Cryst. Growth 15(189–190), 778–781 (1998).SCIEAS0036-8075 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0248(98)00292-9JCRGAE0022-0248 Google Scholar

2. S. Nakamura, “The roles of structural imperfections in InGaN-based blue light-emitting diodes and laser diodes,” Science 281(5379), 956–961 (1998).SCIEAS0036-8075 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5379.956 Google Scholar

3. Y. Sun et al., “Room-temperature continuous-wave electrically injected InGaN-based laser directly grown on Si,” Nat. Photonics 10(9), 595–599 (2016).NPAHBY1749-4885 https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2016.158 Google Scholar

4. V. Adivarahan et al., “Robust 290 nm emission light emitting diodes over pulsed laterally overgrown AlN,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 46(36) L877–L879 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.46.L877 Google Scholar

5. V. Y. Davydov et al., “Absorption and emission of hexagonal InN. Evidence of narrow fundamental band gap,” Phys. Status Solidi Basic Res. 229(3), R1–R3 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1521-3951 Google Scholar

6. J. Kuyyalil et al., “Effect of interfacial lattice mismatch on bulk carrier concentration and band gap of InN,” J. Appl. Phys. 112, 083521 (2012).JAPIAU0021-8979 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4759449 Google Scholar

7. S. Hwang et al., “276 nm substrate-free flip-chip AlGaN light-emitting diodes,” Appl. Phys. Express 4(3), 032102 (2011).APEPC41882-0778 https://doi.org/10.1143/APEX.4.032102 Google Scholar

8. H. Hirayama et al., “222–282 nm AlGaN and InAlGaN-based deep-UV LEDs fabricated on high-quality AlN on sapphire,” Phys. Status Solidi Appl. Mater. Sci. 206(6), 1176–1182 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.v206:6 Google Scholar

9. S. Vilhunen et al., “Ultraviolet light-emitting diodes in water disinfection,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 16(4), 439–442 (2009).ESPLEC0944-1344 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-009-0103-y Google Scholar

10. M. Kneissl et al., “Advances in group III-nitride-based deep UV light-emitting diode technology,” Semicond. Sci. Technol. 26(1), 014036 (2011).SSTEET0268-1242 https://doi.org/10.1088/0268-1242/26/1/014036 Google Scholar

11. T. Kolbe et al., “(In)AlGaN deep ultraviolet light emitting diodes with optimized quantum well width,” Phys. Status Solidi Appl. Mater. Sci. 207(9), 2198–2200 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.201026046 Google Scholar

12. Y. H. Liang et al., “Progress in efficient doping of high aluminum-containing group III-nitrides,” Appl. Phys. Rev. 5(1), 011107 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5009349 Google Scholar

13. D. Jena et al., “Realization of wide electron slabs by polarization bulk doping in graded III–V nitride semiconductor alloys,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 81(23), 4395–4397 (2002).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1526161 Google Scholar

14. J. Simon et al., “Polarization-induced hole doping in semiconductor heterostructures,” Science 327(5961), 60–64 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183226 Google Scholar

15. A. T. M. Golam Sarwar et al., “Tuning the polarization-induced free hole density in nanowires graded from GaN to AlN,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 106(3), 032102 (2015).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4906449 Google Scholar

16. J. Edmond et al., “High efficiency GaN-based LEDs and lasers on SiC,” J. Cryst. Growth 272(1–4), 242–250 (2004).JCRGAE0022-0248 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.08.056 Google Scholar

17. H. Amano et al., “Metalorganic vapor phase epitaxial growth of a high quality GaN film using an AlN buffer layer,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 48(5), 353–355 (1986).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.96549 Google Scholar

18. T. D. Moustakas, T. Lei and R. J. Molnar, “Growth of GaN by ECR-assisted MBE,” Physica B 185(1–4), 36–49 (1993).PHYBE30921-4526 https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-4526(93)90213-P Google Scholar

19. H. Okumura et al., “Polarity control in MBE growth of III-nitrides, and its device application,” Curr. Appl. Phys. 2(4), 305–310 (2002).1567-1739 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1567-1739(02)00114-1 Google Scholar

20. H. Ishikawa et al., “GaN on Si substrate with AlGaN/AlN intermediate layer,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 38(5 Part 2), L492–L494 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.38.L492 Google Scholar

21. O. H. Nam et al., “Lateral epitaxy of low defect density GaN layers via organometallic vapor phase epitaxy,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 71(18), 2638–2640 (1997).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.120164 Google Scholar

22. E. D. Le Boulbar et al., “Design and fabrication of enhanced lateral growth for dislocation reduction in GaN using nanodashes,” J. Cryst. Growth 466, 30–38 (2017).JCRGAE0022-0248 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2017.02.047 Google Scholar

23. C. I. H. Ashby et al., “Low-dislocation-density GaN from a single growth on a textured substrate,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 77(20), 3233–3235 (2000).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1325394 Google Scholar

24. H.-Y. Shin et al., “Reducing dislocation density in GaN films using a cone-shaped patterned sapphire substrate,” J. Cryst. Growth 311(17), 4167–4170 (2009).JCRGAE0022-0248 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2009.07.023 Google Scholar

25. H. Hartono et al., “Reduction of threading dislocation density in GaN grown on strain relaxed nanoporous GaN template,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 90(17), 171917 (2007).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2732826 Google Scholar

26. K. Pakuła et al., “Reduction of dislocation density in heteroepitaxial GaN: role of SiH4 treatment,” J. Cryst. Growth 267(1–2), 1–7 (2004).JCRGAE0022-0248 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.03.020 Google Scholar

27. M. H. Crawford, “Materials challenges of AlGaN-based UV optoelectronic devices,” Semicond. Semimetals 96, 3–44 (2017).SESEES0080-8784 https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.semsem.2016.11.001 Google Scholar

28. H. Sekiguchi et al., “Ultraviolet GaN-based nanocolumn light-emitting diodes grown on n-(111) Si substrates by RF-plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy,” Phys. Status Solidi Appl. Mater. Sci. 205(5), 1067–1069 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.v205:5 Google Scholar

29. S. D. Carnevale et al., “Graded nanowire ultraviolet LEDs by polarization engineering,” Proc. SPIE 8467, 84670L (2012).PSISDG0277-786X https://doi.org/10.1117/12.970450 Google Scholar

30. Q. Wang et al., “Highly efficient, spectrally pure 340 nm ultraviolet emission from AlxGa1xN nanowire based light emitting diodes,” Nanotechnology 24(34), 345201 (2013).NNOTER0957-4484 https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/24/34/345201 Google Scholar

31. T. F. Kent et al., “Deep ultraviolet emitting polarization induced nanowire light emitting diodes with AlxGa1xN active regions,” Nanotechnology 25(45), 455201 (2014).NNOTER0957-4484 https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/25/45/455201 Google Scholar

32. A. T. M. G. Sarwar et al., “Tunnel junction enhanced nanowire ultraviolet light emitting diodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 107(10), 101103 (2015).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4930593 Google Scholar

33. S. Zhao et al., “Surface emitting, high efficiency near-vacuum ultraviolet light source with aluminum nitride nanowires monolithically grown on silicon,” Nano Lett. 15(10), 7006–7009 (2015).NALEFD1530-6984 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03040 Google Scholar

34. S. Zhao et al., “Aluminum nitride nanowire light emitting diodes: breaking the fundamental bottleneck of deep ultraviolet light sources,” Sci. Rep. 5, 1–5 (2014).SRCEC32045-2322 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08332 Google Scholar

35. A. G. Sarwar et al., “Semiconductor nanowire light-emitting diodes grown on metal: a direction toward large-scale fabrication of nanowire devices,” Small 11(40), 5402–5408 (2015).SMALBC1613-6810 https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.v11.40 Google Scholar

36. S. Zhao et al., “Sub-milliwatt AlGaN nanowire tunnel junction deep ultraviolet light emitting diodes on silicon operating at 242 nm,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 109(20), 201106 (2016).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4967837 Google Scholar

37. S. Zhao et al., “Molecular beam epitaxy growth of Al-rich AlGaN nanowires for deep ultraviolet optoelectronics,” APL Mater. 4(8), 086115 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4961680 Google Scholar

38. B. H. Le et al., “Controlled coalescence of AlGaN nanowire arrays: an architecture for nearly dislocation-free planar ultraviolet photonic device applications,” Adv. Mater. 28, 8446–8454 (2016).ADVMEW0935-9648 https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.v28.38 Google Scholar

39. B. J. May et al., “Nanowire LEDs grown directly on flexible metal foil,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 108(14), 141103 (2016).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4945419 Google Scholar

40. B. Janjua et al., “Self-planarized quantum-disks-in-nanowires ultraviolet-B emitters utilizing pendeo-epitaxy,” Nanoscale 9(23), 7805–7813 (2017).NANOHL2040-3364 https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NR00006E Google Scholar

41. B. Janjua et al., “Droop-free AlxGa1xN/AlyGa1yN quantum-disks-in-nanowires ultraviolet LED emitting at 337 nm on metal/silicon substrates,” Opt. Express 25(2), 1381–1390 (2017).OPEXFF1094-4087 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.001381 Google Scholar

42. D. Priante et al., “Highly uniform ultraviolet-A quantum-confined AlGaN nanowire LEDs on metal/silicon with a TaN interlayer,” Opt. Mater. Express 7(12), 4214 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/OME.7.004214 Google Scholar

43. X. Liu et al., “Selective area epitaxy of AlGaN nanowire arrays across nearly the entire compositional range for deep ultraviolet photonics,” Opt. Express 25(24), 30494 (2017).OPEXFF1094-4087 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.030494 Google Scholar

44. S. M. Sadaf et al., “An AlGaN core–shell tunnel junction nanowire light-emitting diode operating in the ultraviolet-C band,” Nano Lett. 17(2), 1212–1218 (2017).NALEFD1530-6984 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05002 Google Scholar

45. X. Liu et al., “Molecular beam epitaxial growth and characterization of AlN nanowall deep UV light emitting diodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 111(101), 1–4 (2017).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4989551 Google Scholar

46. D. A. Laleyan et al., “AlN/h-BN heterostructures for Mg dopant-free deep ultraviolet photonics,” Nano Lett. 17(6), 3738–3743 (2017).NALEFD1530-6984 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01068 Google Scholar

47. H. Sun et al., “Surface-passivated AlGaN nanowires for enhanced luminescence of ultraviolet light emitting diodes,” ACS Photonics 5(3), 964–970 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.7b01235 Google Scholar

48. B. Janjua et al., “Ultraviolet-A LED based on quantum-disks-in-AlGaN-nanowires—optimization and device reliability,” IEEE Photonics J. 10(2), 1–11 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOT.2018.2814482 Google Scholar

49. F. Dapoigny, “Nanowire LED Innovator Aledia Announces €30 ($36M) Million Series-C Financing,” Intel Capital Joins Existing Investors to Commercialize Certain Nanowire-LED Technologies for Mobile Displays,  https://www.aledia.com/en/news/nanowire-led-innovator-aledia-announces-30-million-eurosseries-c-financing-10/ (29 January 2018). Google Scholar

50. Y. H. Ra et al., “Full-color single nanowire pixels for projection displays,” Nano Lett. 16(7), 4608–4615 (2016).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01929NALEFD1530-6984 Google Scholar

51. K. Chung et al., “Monolithic integration of individually addressable light-emitting diode color pixels,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 110(11), 111103 (2017).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4978554 Google Scholar

52. M. Yoshizawa et al., “Growth of self-organized GaN nanostructures on Al2O3(0001) by RF-radical source molecular beam epitaxy,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 36(Part 2, 4B), L459–L462 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.36.L459 Google Scholar

53. M. A. Sanchez-Garcia et al., “The effect of the III/V ratio and substrate temperature on the morphology and properties of GaN- and AlN-layers grown by molecular beam epitaxy on Si(111),” J. Cryst. Growth 183(1–2), 23–30 (1998).JCRGAE0022-0248 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0248(97)00386-2 Google Scholar

54. B. Heying et al., “Optimization of the surface morphologies and electron mobilities in GaN grown by plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 77(18), 2885–2887 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1322370 Google Scholar

55. S. Fernández-Garrido et al., “A growth diagram for plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy of GaN nanocolumns on Si(111),” J. Appl. Phys. 106(12), 126102 (2009).JAPIAU0021-8979 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3267151 Google Scholar

56. B. Heying et al., “Control of GaN surface morphologies using plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy,” J. Appl. Phys. 88(4), 1855–1860 (2000).JAPIAU0021-8979 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1305830 Google Scholar

57. R. K. Debnath et al., “Mechanism of molecular beam epitaxy growth of GaN nanowires on Si(111),” Appl. Phys. Lett. 90(12), 123117 (2007).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2715119 Google Scholar

58. J. Ristić et al., “On the mechanisms of spontaneous growth of III-nitride nanocolumns by plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy,” J. Cryst. Growth 310(18), 4035–4045 (2008).JCRGAE0022-0248 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.05.057 Google Scholar

59. R. Calarco et al., “Nucleation and growth of GaN nanowires on Si(111) performed by molecular beam epitaxy,” Nano Lett. 7(8), 2248–2251 (2007).NALEFD1530-6984 https://doi.org/10.1021/nl0707398 Google Scholar

60. S. D. Carnevale et al., “Mixed polarity in polarization-induced p-n junction nanowire light-emitting diodes,” Nano Lett. 13(7), 3029–3035 (2013).NALEFD1530-6984 https://doi.org/10.1021/nl400200g Google Scholar

61. M. Tangi et al., “Bandgap measurements and the peculiar splitting of E2H phonon modes of InxAl1xN nanowires grown by plasma assisted molecular beam epitaxy,” J. Appl. Phys. 120(4), 045701 (2016).JAPIAU0021-8979 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4959260 Google Scholar

62. M. Tangi et al., “Role of quantum-confined stark effect on bias dependent photoluminescence of N-polar GaN/InGaN multi-quantum disk amber light emitting diodes,” J. Appl. Phys. 123(10), 105702 (2018).JAPIAU0021-8979 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5021290 Google Scholar

63. C. Zhao et al., “Facile formation of high-quality InGaN/GaN quantum-disks-in-nanowires on bulk-metal substrates for high-power light-emitters,” Nano Lett. 16(2), 1056–1063 (2016).NALEFD1530-6984 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04190 Google Scholar

64. C. Zhao et al., “An enhanced surface passivation effect in InGaN/GaN disk-in-nanowire light emitting diodes for mitigating Shockley–Read–Hall recombination,” Nanoscale 7(40), 16658–16665 (2015).NANOHL2040-3364 https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR03448E Google Scholar

65. C. Himwas et al., “Alloy inhomogeneity and carrier localization in AlGaN sections and AlGaN/AlN nanodisks in nanowires with 240–350 nm emission,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 105(24), 241908 (2014).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4904989 Google Scholar

66. J. Ristić et al., “Characterization of GaN quantum discs embedded in AlxGa1xN nanocolumns grown by molecular beam epitaxy,” Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter 68(12), 1–5 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.68.125305 Google Scholar

67. A. Pierret et al., “Growth, structural and optical properties of AlGaN nanowires in the whole composition range,” Nanotechnology 24(11), 115704 (2013).NNOTER0957-4484 https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/24/11/115704 Google Scholar

68. B. Roul et al., “Binary group III-nitride based heterostructures: band offsets and transport properties,” J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 48, 423001 (2015).JPAPBE0022-3727 https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/48/42/423001 Google Scholar

69. V. Consonni et al., “Nucleation and coalescence effects on the density of self-induced GaN nanowires grown by molecular beam epitaxy,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 98(7), 071913 (2011).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3555450 Google Scholar

70. C. Zhao et al., “Droop-free, reliable, and high-power InGaN/GaN nanowire light-emitting diodes for monolithic metal-optoelectronics,” Nano Lett. 16(7), 4616–4623 (2016).NALEFD1530-6984 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01945 Google Scholar

71. S. Y. Bae et al., “Selective-area growth of vertically oriented GaN nanostructures with a hafnium pre-orienting layer,” J. Cryst. Growth 468, 110–113 (2017).JCRGAE0022-0248 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2016.10.032 Google Scholar

72. D. van Treeck et al., “Self-assembled formation of long, thin, and uncoalesced GaN nanowires on crystalline TiN films,” Nano Res. 11(1), 565–576 (2018).1998-0124 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-017-1717-x Google Scholar

73. M. M. Rozhavskaya et al., “Synthesis of GaN nano- and microwire crystals induced by a titanium nanolayer,” Tech. Phys. Lett. 40(5), 372–374 (2014).TPLEED1063-7850 https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063785014050125 Google Scholar

74. M. Wölz et al., “Epitaxial growth of GaN nanowires with high structural perfection on a metallic TiN film,” Nano Lett. 15(6), 3743–3747 (2015).NALEFD1530-6984 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00251 Google Scholar

75. E. A. Serban et al., “Magnetron sputter epitaxy of high-quality GaN nanorods on functional and cost-effective templates/substrates,” Energies 10(9), 1322 (2017).NRGSDB0165-2117 https://doi.org/10.3390/en10091322 Google Scholar

76. S. Y. Bae et al., “III-nitride core–shell nanorod array on quartz substrates,” Sci. Rep. 7, 45345 (2017).SRCEC32045-2322 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45345 Google Scholar

77. A. Prabaswara et al., “Direct growth of III-nitride nanowire-based yellow light-emitting diode on amorphous quartz using thin Ti interlayer,” Nanoscale Res. Lett. 13, 1–9 (2018).NRLAAD1556-276X https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-018-2453-1 Google Scholar

78. M. Ebaid et al., “Water splitting to hydrogen over epitaxially grown InGaN nanowires on a metallic titanium/silicon template: reduced interfacial transfer resistance and improved stability to hydrogen,” J. Mater. Chem. A 6, 6922–6930 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA11338B Google Scholar

79. D. Priante et al., “Ti/TaN bilayer for efficient injection and reliable AlGaN nanowires LEDs,” in Conf. on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO), Paper JTu2A.91 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/CLEO_AT.2018.JTu2A.91 Google Scholar

80. K. Kishino et al., “Selective-area growth of GaN nanocolumns on titanium-mask-patterned silicon (111) substrates by RF-plasma-assisted molecular-beam epitaxy,” Electron. Lett. 44(13), 819 (2008).ELLEAK0013-5194 https://doi.org/10.1049/el:20081323 Google Scholar

81. K. Kishino et al., “Improved Ti-mask selective-area growth (SAG) by rf-plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy demonstrating extremely uniform GaN nanocolumn arrays,” J. Cryst. Growth 311(7), 2063–2068 (2009).JCRGAE0022-0248 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.11.056 Google Scholar

82. H. Sekiguchi et al., “Emission color control from blue to red with nanocolumn diameter of InGaN/GaN nanocolumn arrays grown on same substrate,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96(23), 231104 (2010).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3443734 Google Scholar

83. G. Calabrese et al., “Molecular beam epitaxy of single-crystalline GaN nanowires on a flexible Ti foil,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 108, 202101 (2016).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4950707 Google Scholar

84. S. Fischer et al., “On p-type doping in GaN—acceptor binding energies,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 67(9), 1298–1300 (1995).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.114403 Google Scholar

85. A. T. M. G. Sarwar et al., “Ultrathin GaN quantum disk nanowire LEDs with sub-250 nm electroluminescence,” Nanoscale 8(15), 8024–8032 (2016).NANOHL2040-3364 https://doi.org/10.1039/C6NR00132G Google Scholar

86. M. Kaga et al., “GaInN-based tunnel junctions in n-p-n light emitting diodes,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 52(8s), 08JH06 (2013). https://doi.org/10.7567/JJAP.52.08JH06 Google Scholar

87. K. Balakrishnan et al., “Ultraviolet light-emitting diodes based on group three nitrides,” Nat. Photonics 2(2), 77–84 (2008).NPAHBY1749-4885 https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2007.293 Google Scholar

88. Y. Shi et al., “Synthesis of few-layer hexagonal boron nitride thin film by chemical vapor deposition,” Nano Lett. 10(10), 4134–4139 (2010).NALEFD1530-6984 https://doi.org/10.1021/nl1023707 Google Scholar

89. A. Sajid et al., “Defect states in hexagonal boron nitride: assignments of observed properties and prediction of properties relevant to quantum computation,” Phys. Rev. B 97(6), 064101 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.064101 Google Scholar

90. Y. Taniyasu et al., “An aluminium nitride light-emitting diode with a wavelength of 210 nanometres,” Nature 441(7091), 325–328 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04760 Google Scholar

91. H. Sekiguchi et al., “Effect of Be-doping on InGaN/GaN nanocolumn light-emitting diode structures by RF-plasma-assisted molecular-beam epitaxy,” Phys. Status Solidi Curr. Top. Solid State Phys. 5(9), 3069–3072 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssc.200779291 Google Scholar

92. A. Kikuchi et al., “InGaN/GaN multiple quantum disk nanocolumn light-emitting diodes grown on (111) Si substrate,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 43(12A), L1524–L1526 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.43.L1524 Google Scholar

93. L. Esaki, “New phenomenon in narrow germanium junctions,” Phys. Rev. 109(2), 603–604 (1958).PHRVAO0031-899X https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.109.603 Google Scholar

94. I. Ozden et al., “A dual-wavelength indium gallium nitride quantum well light emitting diode,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 79(16), 2532–2534 (2001).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1410345 Google Scholar

95. D. C. Law et al., “Future technology pathways of terrestrial III-V multijunction solar cells for concentrator photovoltaic systems,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 94(8), 1314–1318 (2010).SEMCEQ0927-0248 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2008.07.014 Google Scholar

96. D. A. B. Miller et al., “Band-edge electroabsorption in quantum well structures: the quantum-confined stark effect,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 53(22), 2173–2176 (1984).PRLTAO0031-9007 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.2173 Google Scholar

97. M. R. Philip et al., “High efficiency green/yellow and red InGaN/AlGaN nanowire light-emitting diodes grown by molecular beam epitaxy,” J. Sci. Adv. Mater. Devices 2(2), 150–155 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsamd.2017.05.009 Google Scholar

98. R. Wang et al., “High efficiency, full-color AlInGaN quaternary nanowire light emitting diodes with spontaneous core–shell structures on Si,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 106(26), 261104 (2015).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4923246 Google Scholar

99. J. Lähnemann et al., “Coexistence of quantum-confined Stark effect and localized states in an (In, Ga)N/GaN nanowire heterostructure,” Phys. Rev. B 84(15), 155303 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.155303 Google Scholar

100. J. Renard et al., “Evidence for quantum-confined Stark effect in GaN/AlN quantum dots in nanowires,” Phys. Rev. B 80(12), 2–5 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.121305 Google Scholar

101. J. H. Ryou et al., “Control of quantum-confined stark effect in InGaN-based quantum wells,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 15(4), 1080–1091 (2009).IJSQEN1077-260X https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2009.2014170 Google Scholar

102. T. Takeuchi et al., “Determination of piezoelectric fields in strained GaInN quantum wells using the quantum-confined Stark effect,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 73(12), 1691–1693 (1998).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.122247 Google Scholar

103. M. Leroux et al., “Quantum confined Stark effect due to built-in internal polarization fields in (Al, Ga)N/GaN quantum wells,” Phys. Rev. B 58(20), R13371–R13374 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.58.R13371 Google Scholar

104. T. Takeuchi et al., “Quantum-confined Stark effect due to piezoelectric fields in GaInN strained quantum wells,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 36(Part 2, No. 4A), L382–L385 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.36.L382 Google Scholar

105. H. Masui et al., “Quantum-confined Stark effect on photoluminescence and electroluminescence characteristics of InGaN-based light-emitting diodes,” J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 41(16), 165105 (2008).JPAPBE0022-3727 https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/41/16/165105 Google Scholar

106. N. G. Young et al., “Polarization field screening in thick (0001) InGaN/GaN single quantum well light-emitting diodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 108(6), 061105 (2016).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4941815 Google Scholar

107. J. Lähnemann et al., “Radial Stark effect in (In, Ga)N nanowires,” Nano Lett. 16(2), 917–925 (2016).NALEFD1530-6984 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03748 Google Scholar

108. J. Müßener et al., “Bias-controlled optical transitions in GaN/AlN nanowire heterostructures,” ACS Nano 11(9), 8758–8767 (2017).ANCAC31936-0851 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b02419 Google Scholar

109. R. Songmuang et al., “Strong suppression of internal electric field in GaN/AlGaN multi-layer quantum dots in nanowires,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 99(14), 141914 (2011).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3646389 Google Scholar

110. P. Lefebvre et al., “Quantum-confined stark effect and recombination dynamics of spatially indirect excitons in MBE-grown GaN-AlGaN\nquantum wells,” MRS Internet J. Nitride Semicond. Res. 4, 375–380 (1999).MIJNF71092-5783 https://doi.org/10.1557/S1092578300002751 Google Scholar

111. N. Grandjean et al., “Self-limitation of AlGaN/GaN quantum well energy by built-in polarization field,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 74(16), 2361–2363 (1999).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.123851 Google Scholar

112. N. Grandjean et al., “Built-in electric-field effects in wurtzite AlGaN/GaN quantum wells,” J. Appl. Phys. 86(7), 3714–3720 (1999).JAPIAU0021-8979 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.371241 Google Scholar

113. H. M. Ng et al., “The effect of built-in electric field in GaN/AlGaN quantum wells with high AIN mole fraction,” J. Electron. Mater. 30(3), 134–137 (2001).JECMA50361-5235 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-001-0006-2 Google Scholar

114. F. Stokker-Cheregi et al., “Impact of quantum confinement and quantum confined Stark effect on biexciton binding energy in GaN/AlGaN quantum wells,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 93(15), 152105 (2008).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2973897 Google Scholar

115. S. H. Park et al., “Piezoelectric effects on electrical and optical properties of wurtzite GaN/AlGaN quantum well lasers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 72(24), 3103–3105 (1998).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.121560 Google Scholar

116. H. M. Ng, “Molecular-beam epitaxy of GaN/AlxGa1xN multiple quantum wells on R-plane (101¯2) sapphire substrates,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 80(23), 4369–4371 (2002).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1484543 Google Scholar

117. E. Kuokstis et al., “Polarization effects in photoluminescence of C- and M-plane GaN/AlGaN multiple quantum wells,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 81(22), 4130–4132 (2002).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1524298 Google Scholar

118. Y. H. Ra et al., “Single nanowire light-emitting diodes using uniaxial and coaxial InGaN/GaN multiple quantum wells synthesized by metal-organic chemical vapor deposition,” Nano Lett. 14(3), 1537–1545 (2014).NALEFD1530-6984 https://doi.org/10.1021/nl404794v Google Scholar

119. S. Park et al., “Crystal-orientation effects on the piezoelectric field and electronic properties of strained wurtzite semiconductors,” Phys. Rev. B 59(7), 4725–4737 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.4725 Google Scholar

120. C.-Y. Wang et al., “GaN nanorod light emitting diode arrays with a nearly constant electroluminescent peak wavelength,” Opt. Express 16(14), 10549–10556 (2008).OPEXFF1094-4087 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.16.010549 Google Scholar

121. J. Müßener et al., “Probing the internal electric field in GaN/AlGaN nanowire heterostructures,” Nano Lett. 14(9), 5118–5122 (2014).NALEFD1530-6984 https://doi.org/10.1021/nl501845m Google Scholar

122. Z. Mi et al., “Molecular beam epitaxial growth and characterization of Al(Ga)N nanowire deep ultraviolet light emitting diodes and lasers,” J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 49(36), 364006 (2016).JPAPBE0022-3727 https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/49/36/364006 Google Scholar

123. S. Zhao et al., “p-type InN nanowires,” Nano Lett. 13, 2–5 (2013).NALEFD1530-6984 https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-8-2 Google Scholar

124. S. D. Carnevale et al., “Polarization-induced pn diodes in wide-band-gap nanowires with ultraviolet electroluminescence,” Nano Lett. 12(2), 915–920 (2012).NALEFD1530-6984 https://doi.org/10.1021/nl203982p Google Scholar

125. S. Zhao et al., “An electrically pumped 239 nm AlGaN nanowire laser operating at room temperature,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 109(19), 191106 (2016).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4967180 Google Scholar

126. K. H. Li et al., “Ultralow-threshold electrically injected AlGaN nanowire ultraviolet lasers on Si operating at low temperature,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 10(2), 140–144 (2015).NNAABX1748-3387 https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2014.308 Google Scholar

127. C. Zhao et al., “Quantified hole concentration in AlGaN nanowires for high-performance ultraviolet emitters,” Nanoscale, Advanced Article (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NR02615G Google Scholar

128. A. Armstrong et al., “Quantitative observation and discrimination of AlGaN-and GaN-related deep levels in AlGaN/GaN heterostructures using capacitance deep level optical spectroscopy,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89(26), 262116 (2006).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2424670 Google Scholar

129. A. R. Arehart et al., “Comparison of deep level incorporation in ammonia and rf-plasma assisted molecular beam epitaxy n-GaN films,” Phys. Status Solidi Curr. Top. Solid State Phys. 5(6), 1750–1752 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssc.200778622 Google Scholar

130. A. Armstrong et al., “Characterization of majority and minority carrier deep levels in p-type GaN:Mg grown by molecular beam epitaxy using deep level optical spectroscopy,” J. Appl. Phys. 103(6), 063722 (2008).JAPIAU0021-8979 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2891673 Google Scholar

131. Z. Zhang et al., “Deep traps in nonpolar m-plane GaN grown by ammonia-based molecular beam epitaxy,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 100(5), 152114 (2012).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3682528 Google Scholar

132. H. Kim et al., “Leakage current origins and passivation effect of GaN-based light emitting diodes fabricated with Ag p-contacts,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92(9), 092115 (2008).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2844887 Google Scholar

133. T. Hashizume et al., “Chemistry and electrical properties of surfaces of GaN and GaN/AlGaN heterostructures,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B Microelectron. Nanom. Struct. 19(4), 1675 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1116/1.1383078 Google Scholar

134. M.-H. Lo et al., “Defect selective passivation in GaN epitaxial growth and its application to light emitting diodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 95(21), 211103 (2009).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3266859 Google Scholar

135. X. Da et al., “The silicon oxynitride layer deposited at low temperature for high-brightness GaN-based light-emitting diodes,” Solid. State Electron. 50(3), 508–510 (2006).SSELA50038-1101 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sse.2006.02.005 Google Scholar

136. S. J. So et al., “Improvement of brightness with Al2O3 passivation layers on the surface of InGaN/GaN-based light-emitting diode chips,” Thin Solid Films 516(8), 2031–2034 (2008).THSFAP0040-6090 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2007.07.143 Google Scholar

137. H. Y. Liu et al., “Al2O3 passivation layer for InGaN/GaN LED deposited by ultrasonic spray pyrolysis,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 26(12), 1243–1246 (2014).IPTLEL1041-1135 https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2014.2319309 Google Scholar

138. C. M. Yang et al., “Improvement in electrical and optical performances of GaN-based LED with SiO2/Al2O3 double dielectric stack layer,” IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 33(4), 564–566 (2012).EDLEDZ0741-3106 https://doi.org/10.1109/LED.2012.2185675 Google Scholar

139. H. Sugahara et al., “Bonding states of chemisorbed sulfur atoms on GaAs,” Surf. Sci. 242(1–3), 335–340 (1991).SUSCAS0039-6028 https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028(91)90289-5 Google Scholar

140. X. Wang et al., “Structural model of sulfur on GaAs(100),” J. Appl. Phys. 75(5), 2715–2717 (1994).JAPIAU0021-8979 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.356203 Google Scholar

141. R. Bose et al., “Real-space visualization of energy loss and carrier diffusion in a semiconductor nanowire array using 4D electron microscopy,” Adv. Mater. 28(25), 5106–5111 (2016).ADVMEW0935-9648 https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201600202 Google Scholar

142. J. I. Khan et al., “Enhanced optoelectronic performance of a passivated nanowire-based device: key information from real-space imaging using 4D electron microscopy,” Small 12(17), 2313–2320 (2016).SMALBC1613-6810 https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201503651 Google Scholar

143. A. Armstrong et al., “GaN nanowire surface state observed using deep level optical spectroscopy,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96(16), 163106 (2010).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3404182 Google Scholar

144. R. Calarco et al., “Surface-induced effects in GaN nanowires,” J. Mater. Res. 26(17), 2157–2168 (2011).JMREEE0884-2914 https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2011.211 Google Scholar

145. P. Varadhan et al., “Surface passivation of GaN nanowires for enhanced photoelectrochemical water-splitting,” Nano Lett. 17(3), 1520–1528 (2017).NALEFD1530-6984 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04559 Google Scholar

146. M. Ebaid et al., “Unbiased photocatalytic hydrogen generation from pure water on stable Ir-treated In0.33Ga0.67N nanorods,” Nano Energy 37, 158–167 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.05.013 Google Scholar

147. H. P. T. Nguyen et al., “Nonradiative recombination mechanism in phosphor-free GaN-based nanowire white light emitting diodes and the effect of ammonium sulfide surface passivation,” ECS Trans. 53(2), 93–100 (2013).1938-5862 https://doi.org/10.1149/05302.0093ecst Google Scholar

148. N. Tajik et al., “Improved conductivity and long-term stability of sulfur-passivated n-GaAs nanowires,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 100(20), 203122 (2012).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4719675 Google Scholar

149. M. H. Sun et al., “Removal of surface states and recovery of band-edge emission in InAs nanowires through surface passivation,” Nano Lett. 12, 3378–3384 (2012).NALEFD1530-6984 https://doi.org/10.1021/nl300015w Google Scholar

150. N. Tajik et al., “Photoluminescence model of sulfur passivated p-InP nanowires,” Nanotechnology 23(31), 315703 (2012).NNOTER0957-4484 https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/23/31/315703 Google Scholar

151. D. Rudolph et al., “Spontaneous alloy composition ordering in GaAs-AlGaAs core–shell nanowires,” Nano Lett. 13(4), 1522–1527 (2013).NALEFD1530-6984 https://doi.org/10.1021/nl3046816 Google Scholar

152. A. C. E. Chia et al., “Electrical transport and optical model of GaAs-AlInP core–shell nanowires,” J. Appl. Phys. 111(9), 094319 (2012).JAPIAU0021-8979 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4716011 Google Scholar

153. Q. Wang et al., “High efficiency ultraviolet emission from AlxGa1xN core–shell nanowire heterostructures grown on Si (111) by molecular beam epitaxy,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 101(4), 043115 (2012).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4738983 Google Scholar

154. H. P. T. Nguyen et al., “Breaking the carrier injection bottleneck of phosphor-free nanowire white light-emitting diodes,” Nano Lett. 13(11), 5437–5442 (2013).NALEFD1530-6984 https://doi.org/10.1021/nl4030165 Google Scholar

155. H. P. T. Nguyen et al., “Engineering the carrier dynamics of InGaN nanowire white light-emitting diodes by distributed p-AlGaN electron blocking layers,” Sci. Rep. 5, 1–8 (2015).SRCEC32045-2322 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07744 Google Scholar

156. N. Jiang et al., “Enhanced minority carrier lifetimes in GaAs/AlGaAs core–shell nanowires through shell growth optimization,” Nano Lett. 13(11), 5135–5140 (2013).NALEFD1530-6984 https://doi.org/10.1021/nl4023385 Google Scholar

157. O. Brandt et al., “Statistical analysis of the shape of one-dimensional nanostructures: determining the coalescence degree of spontaneously formed GaN nanowires,” Cryst. Growth Des. 14(5), 2246–2253 (2014).CGDEFU1528-7483 https://doi.org/10.1021/cg401838q Google Scholar

158. C. Pfüller et al., “Statistical analysis of excitonic transitions in single, free-standing GaN nanowires: probing impurity incorporation in the Poissonian limit,” Nano Res. 3(12), 881–888 (2010).1998-0124 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-010-0061-1 Google Scholar

159. F. Limbach et al., “Current path in light emitting diodes based on nanowire ensembles,” Nanotechnology 23(46), 465301 (2012).NNOTER0957-4484 https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/23/46/465301 Google Scholar

160. S. Jahangir et al., “Red-emitting (λ=610  nm) In0.51Ga0.49N/GaN disk-in-nanowire light emitting diodes on silicon,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 50(7), 530–537 (2014).IEJQA70018-9197 https://doi.org/10.1109/JQE.2014.2323952 Google Scholar

161. D. Mikulik et al., “Conductive-probe atomic force microscopy as a characterization tool for nanowire-based solar cells,” Nano Energy 41, 566–572 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.10.016 Google Scholar

162. J.-S. Hwang et al., “Photocurrent mapping in high-efficiency radial p–n junction silicon nanowire solar cells using atomic force microscopy,” J. Phys. Chem. C 115(44), 21981–21986 (2011).JPCCCK1932-7447 https://doi.org/10.1021/jp205151d Google Scholar

163. N. J. Ku et al., “Energy harvesting from the obliquely aligned InN nanowire array with a surface electron-accumulation layer,” Adv. Mater. 25(6), 861–866 (2013).ADVMEW0935-9648 https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.v25.6 Google Scholar

164. C. H. Wang et al., “Effects of free carriers on piezoelectric nanogenerators and piezotronic devices made of GaN nanowire arrays,” Small 10(22), 4718–4725 (2014).SMALBC1613-6810 https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.v10.22 Google Scholar

165. G. Liu et al., “Nanogenerators based on vertically aligned InN nanowires,” Nanoscale 8(4), 2097–2106 (2016).NANOHL2040-3364 https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR06841J Google Scholar

166. N. J. Ku et al., “Crystal face-dependent nanopiezotronics of an obliquely aligned InN nanorod Array,” Nano Lett. 12(2), 562–568 (2012).NALEFD1530-6984 https://doi.org/10.1021/nl202782q Google Scholar

167. B. J. May et al., “Nanoscale current uniformity and injection efficiency of nanowire light emitting diodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 112(9), 093107 (2018).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5020734 Google Scholar

168. B. J. May et al., “Nanoscale electronic conditioning for improvement of nanowire LED efficiency,” ACS Nano 12(4), 3551–3556 (2018).ANCAC31936-0851 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b00538 Google Scholar

169. T. Yanagisawa et al., “Degradation of InGaN blue light-emitting diodes under continuous and low-speed pulse operations,” Microelectron. Reliab. 43(6), 977–980 (2003).MCRLAS0026-2714 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-2714(03)00093-3 Google Scholar

170. T. Yanagisawa, “Estimation of the degradation of InGaN/AlGaN blue light-emitting diodes,” Microelectron. Reliab. 37(8), 1239–1241 (1997).MCRLAS0026-2714 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-2714(96)00288-0 Google Scholar

171. Z. Z. Chen et al., “Study on the stability of the high-brightness white LED,” Phys. Status Solidi Basic Res. 241(12), 2664–2667 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1521-3951 Google Scholar

172. A. Uddin et al., “Study of degradation mechanism of blue light emitting diodes,” Thin Solid Films 483(1–2), 378–381 (2005).THSFAP0040-6090 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2005.01.018 Google Scholar

173. Z. L. Li et al., “Reliability study on green InGaN/GaN light emitting diodes,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 209, 012065 (2010).JPCSDZ1742-6588 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/209/1/012065 Google Scholar

174. M. Meneghini et al., “A review on the reliability of GaN-based LEDs,” IEEE Trans. Device Mater. Reliab. 8(2), 323–331 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/TDMR.2008.921527 Google Scholar

175. F. Rossi et al., “Influence of short-term low current dc aging on the electrical and optical properties of InGaN blue light-emitting diodes,” J. Appl. Phys. 99(5), 053104 (2006).JAPIAU0021-8979 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2178856 Google Scholar

176. X. A. Cao et al., “Defect generation in InGaN/GaN light-emitting diodes under forward and reverse electrical stresses,” Microelectron. Reliab. 43(12), 1987–1991 (2003).MCRLAS0026-2714 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microrel.2003.06.001 Google Scholar

177. N. Renso et al., “Understanding the degradation processes of GaN based LEDs submitted to extremely high current density,” Microelectron. Reliab. 76–77, 556–560 (2017).MCRLAS0026-2714 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microrel.2017.06.044 Google Scholar

178. M. Meneghini et al., “A review on the physical mechanisms that limit the reliability of GaN-based LEDs,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 57(1), 108–118 (2010).IETDAI0018-9383 https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2009.2033649 Google Scholar

179. N. Trivellin et al., “A review on the reliability of GaN-based laser diodes,” in IEEE Int. Reliability Physics Symp. Proc., pp. 1–6 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/IRPS.2010.5488866 Google Scholar

180. M. H. Chang et al., “Light emitting diodes reliability review,” Microelectron. Reliab. 52(5), 762–782 (2012).MCRLAS0026-2714 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microrel.2011.07.063 Google Scholar

181. C. G. Moe et al., “Current-induced degradation of high performance deep ultraviolet light emitting diodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96(21), 213512 (2010).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3435485 Google Scholar

182. M. Meneghini et al., “Analysis of the physical processes responsible for the degradation of deep-ultraviolet light emitting diodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97(14), 143506 (2010).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3497082 Google Scholar

183. M. Meneghini et al., “Reliability of deep-UV light-emitting diodes,” IEEE Trans. Device Mater. Reliab. 8(2), 248–254 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/TDMR.2008.919570 Google Scholar

184. D. Monti et al., “Defect-generation and diffusion in (In) AlGaN-based UV-B LEDs,” Proc. SPIE 10554, 1055410 (2018).PSISDG0277-786X https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2292202 Google Scholar

185. J. Glaab et al., “Degradation effects of the active region in UV-C light-emitting diodes,” J. Appl. Phys. 123(10), 104502 (2018).JAPIAU0021-8979 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5012608 Google Scholar

186. D. Monti et al., “Defect-related degradation of AlGaN-based UV-B LEDs,” IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 64(1), 200–205 (2017).IETDAI0018-9383 https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2016.2631720 Google Scholar

187. Y. Xi et al., “Junction and carrier temperature measurements in deep-ultraviolet light-emitting diodes using three different methods,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 86(3), 031907 (2005).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1849838 Google Scholar

188. Y. Xi et al., “Junction-temperature measurement in GaN ultraviolet light-emitting diodes using diode forward voltage method,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 85(12), 2163–2165 (2004).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1795351 Google Scholar

189. M. Tangi et al., “Type-I band alignment at MoS2/In0.15Al0.85N lattice matched heterojunction and realization of MoS2 quantum well,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 111(9), 092104 (2017).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995976 Google Scholar

190. M. A. Khan et al., “High-responsivity photoconductive ultraviolet sensors based on insulating single-crystal GaN epilayers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 60(23), 2917–2919 (1992).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.106819 Google Scholar

191. E. Monroy et al., “Wide-bandgap semiconductor ultraviolet photodetectors,” Semicond. Sci. Technol. 18(4), R33 (2003).SSTEET0268-1242 https://doi.org/10.1088/0268-1242/18/4/201 Google Scholar

192. R. McClintock et al., “High quantum efficiency AlGaN solar-blind p-i-n photodiodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 84(8), 1248–1250 (2004).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1650550 Google Scholar

193. T. Tut et al., “Solar-blind AlGaN-based p-i-n photodetectors with high breakdown voltage and detectivity,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92(10), 103502 (2008).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2895643 Google Scholar

194. T. Deguchi et al., “Quantum-confined stark effect in an AlGaN/GaN/AlGaN single quantum well structure,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 38(8B), L914–L916 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.38.L914 Google Scholar

195. K. M. Azizur-Rahman et al., “Wavelength-selective absorptance in GaAs, InP and InAs nanowire arrays,” Nanotechnology 26(29), 295202 (2015).NNOTER0957-4484 https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/26/29/295202 Google Scholar

196. R. R. Lapierre et al., “A review of III–V nanowire infrared photodetectors and sensors,” J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 50(12), 123001 (2017).JPAPBE0022-3727 https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aa5ab3 Google Scholar

197. L. Rigutti et al., “GaN nanowire-based ultraviolet photodetectors,” in Wide Band Gap Semiconductor Nanowires 2: Heterostructures and Optoelectronic Devices, , V. Consonni and G. Feuillet, Eds., pp. 179–202, ISTE Ltd and John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Great Britain (2014). Google Scholar

198. Z. Fan et al., “Electrical and photoconductive properties of vertical ZnO nanowires in high density arrays,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89(21), 213110 (2006).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2387868 Google Scholar

199. D. Park et al., “Photoconductivity of vertically aligned ZnO nanoneedle array,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B 26(6), 1933–1936 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1116/1.2998730 Google Scholar

200. J. S. Lee et al., “Photoresponses of ZnO nanobridge devices fabricated using a single-step thermal evaporation method,” Sens. Actuators, B 126(1), 73–77 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2006.10.042 Google Scholar

201. C. L. Hsu et al., “Ultraviolet photodetectors with low temperature synthesized vertical ZnO nanowires,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 416(1–3), 75–78 (2005).CHPLBC0009-2614 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2005.09.066 Google Scholar

202. C. H. Chen et al., “High detectivity mechanism of ZnO-based nanorod ultraviolet photodetectors,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 25(4), 348–351 (2013).IPTLEL1041-1135 https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2013.2238624 Google Scholar

203. C. Soci et al., “ZnO nanowire UV photodetectors with high internal gain,” Nano Lett. 7(4), 1003–1009 (2007).NALEFD1530-6984 https://doi.org/10.1021/nl070111x Google Scholar

204. F. González-Posada et al., “Responsivity and photocurrent dynamics in single GaN nanowires,” Phys. Status Solidi Curr. Top. Solid State Phys. 9(3–4), 642–645 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssc.201100382 Google Scholar

205. M. Den Hertog et al., “Single GaN-based nanowires for photodetection and sensing applications,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 52(11 Part 2), 1–6 (2013). https://doi.org/10.7567/JJAP.52.11NG01 Google Scholar

206. X. Wang et al., “Ultrafast, superhigh gain visible-blind UV detector and optical logic gates based on nonpolar a-axial GaN nanowire,” Nanoscale 6(20), 12009–12017 (2014).NANOHL2040-3364 https://doi.org/10.1039/C4NR03581J Google Scholar

207. A. V. Babichev et al., “GaN nanowire ultraviolet photodetector with a graphene transparent contact,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 103(20), 201103 (2013).APPLAB0003-6951 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4829756 Google Scholar

208. S. Kang et al., “Ultraviolet-C photodetector fabricated using Si-doped n-AlGaN nanorods grown by MOCVD,” ACS Photonics 4(10), 2595–2603 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.7b01047 Google Scholar

209. S. Kang et al., “Synthesis of n-AlGaN nanoflowers by MOCVD for high-performance ultraviolet-C photodetectors,” J. Mater. Chem. C 6(5), 1176–1186 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TC05182D Google Scholar

210. B. Yuan et al., “High photosensitivity and low dark current of photoconductive semiconductor switch based on ZnO single nanobelt,” Solid. State. Electron. 55(1), 49–53 (2011).SSELA50038-1101 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sse.2010.09.002 Google Scholar

211. N. Biyikli et al., “Solar-blind AlGaN-based p-i-n photodiodes with low dark current and high detectivity,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 16(7), 1718–1720 (2004).IPTLEL1041-1135 https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2004.829526 Google Scholar

Biography

Jung-Wook Min received his PhD in applied physics from GIST, Republic of Korea, in 2016. He joined Ooi-group at KAUST as a postdoctoral research fellow in 2017. His research mainly focuses on the PA-MBE growth on III-nitride nanowire arrays for UV light-emitting diodes and solar water-splitting.

Davide Priante received his BS degree in material science and engineering from Padua University, Italy, in 2013, and his master’s degree in electrical engineering from KAUST in 2015. He is currently pursuing his PhD in Photonics Lab under the supervision of Prof. Ooi with a research focus on III-nitride wide-bandgap optoelectronic semiconductor devices. He is a member of OSA and SPIE.

Malleswararao Tangi received his PhD in physics from Jawaharlal Nehru Center for Advanced Scientific Research, India, in 2015. He joined Ooi-group at KAUST as a postdoctoral research fellow in 2015. Currently, he is working on molecular beam epitaxy growth of III-N material and optoelectronic devices.

Guangyu Liu received her PhD in electrical engineering from Lehigh University, Pennsylvania, USA, in 2013 with the research focus on III-nitride semiconductors for solid-state lighting. Prior to KAUST, she worked as a process development engineer at Intel Corp., USA, from 2013 to 2016. She is currently a research scientist with Ooi-group at KAUST. Her current research area is III-nitride semiconductor-based integrated devices and systems for communication and sensing applications.

Chun Hong Kang received his BEng and MSc degrees in electrical and electronics engineering from the Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Malaysia, in 2014 and 2016, respectively. He joined Photonics Laboratory at KAUST under the supervision of Prof. Ooi in 2017.

Aditya Prabaswara received his bachelor’s degree in telecommunication engineering from the Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia, and his MS degree in electrical engineering from KAIST, Republic of Korea. He joined KAUST as a PhD candidate in 2014 under the supervision of Prof. Ooi. Currently, he is working on III-nitride nanowire-based optoelectronics.

Chao Zhao received his PhD in microelectronics and solid-state electronics from the Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2009. His PhD research focused on the MBE growth and characterization of InAs/GaAs and GaAs/AlGaAs nanostructures. He is currently working on molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) growth of III-N material and optoelectronic device at KAUST. He has authored, coauthored, and delivered more than 80 journal articles, invited talks, and conference articles. He is a senior member of IEEE and serves as a reviewer for various international journals, such as Optics Express, Scientific Reports, Langmuir, and Nanotechnology. He has also been the session chair for several international conferences.

Latifah Al-Maghrabi graduated with her BS degree in electrical engineering from Georgia Tech, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, in May 2018. In the Fall of 2018, she is looking forward to pursuing her master’s degree in electrical engineering at KAUST. In 2016, she was a summer intern at Aramco Services Company, Houston, Texas, USA, and she was a summer intern at KAUST in 2017. Her current interests include device physics, optoelectronics, and PCB design.

Yazeed Alaskar received his PhD in electrical engineering from the University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA). He is currently working as an assistant professor at the National Nanotechnology Research Center of KACST. He is also working as a principal investigator at the Center of Excellence for Green Nanotechnologies (CEGN) at UCLA. His research interests include epitaxial growth of III/V semiconductors, optoelectronic devices and lasers. In addition, he is interested in commercializing innovative technologies and transitioning them from the lab to market.

Abdulrahman M. Albadri received his PhD from Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. He is the manager of the National Center for Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials, KACST, Saudi Arabia. His current research activities include solar cells (GaAs solar cells and perovskite solar cells), GaN LED/laser devices, and basic research on oxide/nitride semiconductors.

Ahmed Y. Alyamani received his PhD in physics from the University of Sheffield, UK. He is currently the director of the Centre of Excellence for Solid State Lighting (CSSL) at KACST and a member of the Strategic Plan Committee of Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials Programs in Saudi Arabia. His current interests include growth, fabrication, and characterization of wide-bandgap semiconductors for LED, ferromagnetic, and photovoltaic applications.

Tien Khee Ng received his MEng degree and PhD in electrical and electronic engineering from Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, in 2001 and 2005, respectively. Currently, he is a senior research scientist in Ooi-Group at KAUST, Saudi Arabia, and the coprincipal-investigator responsible for molecular beam epitaxy thrust for the KACST Technology Innovation Center for Solid-State Lighting at KAUST. He is a senior member of IEEE, member of SPIE, and senior member of OSA.

Boon S. Ooi received his PhD in electronics and electrical engineering from the University of Glasgow. He is a professor of electrical engineering at KAUST. His research is concerned with the study of semiconductor lasers, LEDs, and photonic integrated circuits for applications in energy efficient lighting and visible light communications. He is an associate editor of Optics Express and Journal of Nanophotonics. He is a fellow of OSA, SPIE, and IoP (UK).

© The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Jung-Wook Min, Jung-Wook Min, Davide Priante, Davide Priante, Malleswararao Tangi, Malleswararao Tangi, Guangyu Liu, Guangyu Liu, Chun Hong Kang, Chun Hong Kang, Aditya Prabaswara, Aditya Prabaswara, Chao Zhao, Chao Zhao, Latifah Al-Maghrabi, Latifah Al-Maghrabi, Yazeed Alaskar, Yazeed Alaskar, Abdulrahman M. Albadri, Abdulrahman M. Albadri, Ahmed Y. Alyamani, Ahmed Y. Alyamani, Tien Khee Ng, Tien Khee Ng, Boon S. Ooi, Boon S. Ooi, "Unleashing the potential of molecular beam epitaxy grown AlGaN-based ultraviolet-spectrum nanowires devices," Journal of Nanophotonics 12(4), 043511 (12 July 2018). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JNP.12.043511 . Submission: Received: 15 April 2018; Accepted: 21 June 2018
Received: 15 April 2018; Accepted: 21 June 2018; Published: 12 July 2018
JOURNAL ARTICLE
38 PAGES


SHARE
Back to Top