Translator Disclaimer
14 February 2020 Improving performance of photovoltaic panel by reconfigurability in partial shading condition
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

A photovoltaic (PV) panel operating in partial shading condition results in lowering its power efficiency. In a worst-case scenario, it can create a hotspot that can eventually cause a fire hazard. To address this issue, bypass diodes are connected across a group of PV cells having series-parallel (SP) configuration. Owing to the placement bypass diodes in the PV panel, it can circumvent unshaded PV cells. Hence, topologies such as total cross-tied (TCT), bridge link (BL), and honeycomb (HC) for PV panels are proposed besides SP to reduce the effect of partial shading. Each configuration demonstrated advantages over SP topology. However, many of these configurations lack a mechanism to isolate PV cells that are affected due to the hotspot. Recently developed complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS)-embedded PV panel has been shown to offer many other benefits besides effectively dealing with shading conditions. We are comparing the performance of CMOS-embedded PV panel under various partial shading conditions with PV panel with fixed configuration topologies, such as SP, TCT, BL, and HC. SPICE-based equivalent PV modeling technique is used in this research to compare the maximum power generated in different topologies under changing partial shading conditions. Results show that CMOS-embedded PV panels are more efficient in coping with partial shading conditions compared to any other contemporary fixed topologies.

1.

Introduction

Power is an undisputed lifeline in today’s high-tech world. Mass awareness drives have created significant cognizance toward sustainable and green technologies in the past quarter-century in response to the depletion of fossil fuels and volatility of energy prices. Photovoltaics (PV)-based, sustainable, and green-technology-based power sources are in high demand due to their ability to meet industrial, commercial, and residential demands. Government incentives available to consumers for PV-based renewable energy systems have further fueled their acceptance. Due to the consistently increasing popularity of PV-based energy, many advancements have happened that enable improving its performance and reducing its cost. Recent advancements in silicon processing have increased the efficiency of single-crystalline silicon-based PV cells by 28%.1 Also, many advanced maximum power point tracking algorithms are now available that enable harvesting higher amounts of energy from a PV panel.2 Despite these improvements in solar energy harvesting, PV modules still use series-parallel (SP)-based fixed topology. As a result, a PV module remains vulnerable to such issues as partial shading,3,4 irradiance fluctuation,58 mismatch,911 and faulty conditions,1215 which are known to severely affect its power efficiency and performance. In response, most of the PV modules are equipped with a bypass diode to minimize the effects of such issues.1517

Besides the typical SP topology, topologies such as total cross-tied (TCT),1820 bridge link (BL),21 and honeycomb (HC)22 are being considered and analyzed in different partial shading conditions.2231 Performance of each topology varies under different shading patterns, and their performance has proven to be better than the regular SP topology. However, each topology has advantages and disadvantages under different conditions.1831

A PV module embedded with complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) switches has recently been proposed as an alternative to the SP-based PV module with bypass diode.3239 Studies have shown that PV modules embedded with switches have better capability for dealing with partial shading, mismatch issues, and faulty conditions.32,33,35,37 Additionally, such PV modules reconfigure in real-time (i.e., an number of PV cells connected in series × number of cells connected in parallel change), which enables creating a power island.36 Among all switches, CMOS-based switches are ideal for creating a reconfigurable PV module, since they can be easily integrated with PV cells in a single die, i.e., monolithic CMOS-on-PV.36,39 However, unlike all other contemporary topologies, the reconfigurable PV module requires a controller, a computing device, and an algorithm for partial shading or fault detection. Therefore, a comparative study between the reconfigurable PV modules with these newer topologies is required to better understand the effectiveness of switches in alleviating the limitations in the PV module.

In this paper, we are presenting a comparative analysis between reconfigurable PV modules and traditional PV configurations, namely SP, TCT, BL, and HC, operating under different shading patterns. Such a comparison between fixed topologies and reconfigurable PV modules has not been done in any previous studies. Only fixed topologies are compared among themselves in different partial shading conditions, as shown in Table 1. This research effort is vital to weigh-in, adding complexity in a PV module for improving the performance during partial shading conditions. In addition, through this paper, we build upon the previous research conducted in this area40 and add to the existing body of knowledge by including a bypass diode in our study, which was not included in previous studies. Having a bypass diode in PV systems is an industry norm, and hence this analysis will help in understanding how each configuration responds to various partial shading conditions. This research determines the best alternative to SP topology-based PV module with bypass diode, to create a futuristic smarter PV module. Simulation and performance analysis of the PV array is done using SPICE,41 which was used to evaluate the performance of SP, TCT, BL, and HC in Refs. 2328 and 31. It is envisioned that this research will lay the foundation for future research and help the PV industry excel.

Table 1

Comparison between the performances of fixed topology PV module in different shading conditions.

ReferenceSeries-parallelTotal cross-tiedBridge linkHoneycomb
18, 23, and 27
19, 20, and 28
21, 22, 24, 25, and 30
31

2.

Preliminary

2.1.

Different Topologies in PV Modules

In this section, SP, BL, HC, and CMOS-embedded PV configurations are presented to explain the difference in their internal connections. We also discussed the SPICE-based PV modeling technique as it is used for comparison in this research.

2.1.1.

Series and parallel

SP configuration is a traditionally used configuration, where each PV cell is connected in series to increase the voltage. These series connected PV cells are then connected in parallel to increase the current in the panel. Therefore, the output voltage of the PV module is proportional to the number of PV cells in series connection, and the output current of the PV array is proportional to the total number of parallelly connected series of PV cells. The fact that this configuration is economical, easy to build, and requires no additional components has elevated it as an industry standard.26 However, the average efficiency of power and decreasing current under unfavorable circumstances have paved the way for inventing more efficient and cost-effective configurations. An SP topology with four series connected in parallel wherein each series consists of eight PV cells is shown in Fig. 1(a). We are assuming a bypass diode is connected across each PV cell present in the PV module, as shown in Fig. 1(a).

Fig. 1

Fixed configuration of PV module with 32 PV cells: (a) SP PV module integrated with bypass diode connected across each PV cell in module (b) TCT, (c) HC, and (d) BL.

JPE_10_4_042004_f001.png

2.1.2.

Total cross-tied

The TCT topology is similar to the SP configuration. Each PV cell in a row of parallelly connected PV cells is tied to the neighboring cells.29 This ensures that voltage across the PV cells tied together remains the same. Hence, the total voltage across a PV panel in TCT topology is equal to the summation of voltage across each cross-tied PV cell in the panel. The total number of bypass diodes used in TCT topology is much less compared to SP topology owing to the cross-tied connection between PV cells. Hence, due to its simplicity, similar to the SP topology, TCT can also be used for the mass production of PV panels. A PV panel consisting of 32 PV cells that are using TCT topology is shown in Fig. 1(b).

2.1.3.

Bridge link

BL configuration is a type of cross-tied topology that is interconnected in a bridge-rectifier way. In this configuration, two or more series of PV modules are connected in parallel with two parallel strings that create a tie between the series giving an appearance like a bridge.26 The number of parallel connections between the series of PV modules is less than that of the TCT configuration but more than that of the SP configuration.

The disadvantage of BL configuration to the SP configuration is that the structure of BL configuration is complex to build, and a higher number of switching devices are required. However, these drawbacks are overlooked as the performance of BL is comparatively higher than that of the SP configuration under shaded conditions.14,26

2.1.4.

Honeycomb

Just like the BL configuration, honeycomb (HC) configuration is a type of TCT configuration. It is connected in a hexagonal pattern that replicates a honeycomb structure, and hence the name “honeycomb” is used.29 The series connections between the PV modules is comparatively less than that of the traditional SP configuration. This decrease in the series connection will help to improve the mismatching power loss that usually occurs in the PV module. The interconnection for the 32 PV cells-based PV panel using HC topology is shown in Fig. 1(d).

2.1.5.

Photovoltaics embedded with CMOS switches

A typical reconfigurable PV module consists of three key components: reconfigurable PV module, embedded computing system, and an algorithm. The block diagram of a complete system-level reconfigurable PV module is shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Block diagram of reconfigurable PV module controlled by an embedded computing system.

JPE_10_4_042004_f002.png

Reconfigurable PV module embedded with CMOS switches

Figure 3(a) shows a PV panel where each PV cell is embedded with CMOS-based addressable programmable switches (APS). The CMOS-based APS switches are shown in Fig. 3(b).

Fig. 3

(a) PV module embedded with CMOS-based APS (b) 9-bit APS.

JPE_10_4_042004_f003.png

The total number of APS in a PV panel is one less than the total number of PV cells present in the panel. Each APS switch will have its own 6-bit digital reference address. These APS switches are connected to a common clock, data, and reset signals. The data packet that is sent serially through the data signal is of 9 bits. The least significant 6 bits consist of a digital address, whereas the 3 most significant bits are for turning-on or turning-off switches SW1, SW2, and SW3, as shown in Fig. 3(b). The switch SW1 enables connecting a PV cell to the negative terminal, and switch SW3 lets the PV cell connect to the positive terminal. The switch SW2 enables connecting two PV cells in series. Compared to the switch-embedded PV module embedded with switches presented in Refs. 32, 33, and 37, the CMOS-embedded PV module shown in Fig. 3 is three times faster.38 The increased speed is a result of APS turning ON/OFF three switches (SW1, SW2, and SW3) simultaneously compared to one serial line controlling only one switch at a time.

Consider a CMOS-embedded PV panel consists of 32 PV cells. This will require 31 APS, as shown in Fig. 3(a). Assuming the CMOS-embedded PV panel is in 4×8 configuration, representing the number of PV cells in parallel × the number of PV cells in series. Consider that the user wants to change the configuration from 4×8 to 4×7 configuration. For changing the configuration, the APS switches required to be modified are identified by the user. Later, the data packet for those APS switches is generated and sent serially through the data line. Consider that each APS switch has the address shown in Fig. 3(a). Among the several ways of changing, the configuring from 4×8 to 4×7 data packets in the following order must be sent to the PV array.

  • i. Initially, a 9-bit data packet of “1000100010” is sent serially to the PV array.

  • ii. The 3-bit most significant bit, “100”, will turn off switch SW2 and SW3 for the APS with the digital address of “0100010.”

  • iii. The switch SW1 in APS with a digital reference address of “0100010” will be turned on. Since other APS have separate digital reference address; therefore, the received data packet will not affect them.

Embedded computing system

The role of the embedded computing system is to measure the output power delivered to the load, process it, and then generate appropriate output signals to change the configuration of the reconfigurable PV module. Depending on the discrepancy between the measured power and computing power, the algorithm will generate data packets to change the configuration of the reconfigurable PV module. This data packet is then sent through the serial data line to each APS switch in the reconfigurable PV module as shown in Fig. 2. Besides that, the embedded computing system will also generate and send the reset and clock signal to all APS switches present in the reconfigurable PV module. Over the years, many different kinds of embedded systems are used, such as computers,32,33,37 field programmable gate array,38,39 and Raspberry PI.42

Algorithm

The algorithm for a reconfigurable PV module is presented in Refs. 32, 33, and 3738.39. The algorithms developed and implemented for the reconfigurable PV module adhere to the following steps.

  • i. The embedded computing system will compute the expected power generated that is presented as PExpected in Fig. 4.

  • ii. The PExpected will be compared with the measured powered, PMeasured recorded by the embedded computing system.

  • iii. If the PMeasured and PExpected are equal, there exists no shading condition. On the contrary, if they are not equal that means shaded PV cells are present in the module as shown in Fig. 4.

  • iv. Once the presence of the shaded PV cells is detected then the goal of the algorithm is to detect the exact location of the shaded PV cells in the panel. Various techniques for shaded PV cell detection are presented in Refs. 32, 33, and 3738.39. In Refs. 32 and 39, first row and then column is scanned one after another to identify the location of shaded PV cells.

However, this technique is tedious and time consuming. Later, a dynamic programming-based shaded PV cell detection was presented in Ref. 33. After identifying the location of the shaded PV cells, the algorithm’s goal is to determine the optimal configuration of the PV module to maximizing power generation.

Fig. 4

Flowchart explaining the algorithm for shaded PV cells detection and mitigation.

JPE_10_4_042004_f004.png

2.2.

Modeling of PV Cells and Module

For modeling the PV cells, two-diode-based equivalent circuit from Ref. 41 will be used, as shown in Fig. 5. The parameter Iph shown in Fig. 5 is photon current. The photon current is dependent on the area of the PV cell and solar irradiation. The photon current, Iph, across a PV cell is computed by Eq. (1), where JSC is the short circuit current density in A/cm2, and APV is the area of the PV cells in cm2. The Id1 and Id2 are the diode current across the two diodes, respectively. The diode current is computed using Eq. (3), where Is is the saturation current of the diode (Table 2).

Eq. (1)

Iph=Jsc×APV×GGSTC,

Eq. (2)

IPV=IphId1Id2(vPV+iPV·RSRP),

Eq. (3)

Id=IS[e(VPVIPV·RSA·Vt)1].

IPV in Fig. 5 is the current generated by the PV cells that can be calculated by Eq. (2).

Fig. 5

Double diode-based equivalent PV cell modeling.

JPE_10_4_042004_f005.png

Table 2

Parameters for PV cell equivalent circuit model.

SymbolDescriptionValue and units
VPVOutput voltage across PV cellVoltage
IPVOutput current from PV cellAmperes
VOVOpen load voltage0.55 V
IPhPhoton current2.17 A
RPInternal shunt resistor1×103  Ω
RSInternal series resistor100  kΩ
APVArea of PV cell126.6  cm2
JSCShort-circuit current density34.3  mA/cm2
VTThermal voltage26 mV
ADiode ideality constant
ISDiode saturation currentIS1=1.27  nA and IS2=127  nA
GSolar irradiation data1000  W/m2
GSCShaded solar irradiation data500  W/m2

3.

Experimental Setup

The shading pattern used for the experiment is shown in Fig. 6. For comparing the performance of each type of topology, we are considering a PV module consisting of 32 PV cells in 8×4 configuration. The PV cells arranged in each PV panel will be similar, except the topology by which they are connected with each other is different.

Fig. 6

Shading pattern used for the experiment: (a) 10% of shaded PV cells, (b) 25% of shaded PV cells, (c) 50% of shaded PV cells, and (d) 75% of shaded PV cells.

JPE_10_4_042004_f006.png

Also, for simplicity, all the PV cells in the PV panel are assumed to be homogeneous, with no mismatch between them. The solar irradiance of unshaded and shaded PV cells is equal to 1000 and 500  W/m2, respectively. The current versus voltage (IV) and power versus voltage (PV) characteristics of the PV module configured in various topologies (SP, TCT, BL, and HC) are simulated using PSpice. During the IV and PV characteristics, the PV panel is assumed to be operating at a constant temperature of 25°C. The IV and PV characteristics for PV panel in SP topology with 32 PV cells for no shading and the shading pattern is presented in Fig. 7. This characteristic is shown in Fig. 7, which is obtained by SPICE simulation using two-diode-based equivalent circuit.41

Fig. 7

(a) IV characteristics of SP PV panel with 32 PV cells; (b) PV characteristics of SP PV panel with 32 PV cells. The total number of PV cells in series is equal to 8, whereas the total number of PV cells connected in parallel is equal to 4.

JPE_10_4_042004_f007.png

The open-circuit output voltage of the PV panel, with 32 PV cells connected in 8×4, is equal to 4.54 V. The short circuit current for the same configuration is equal to 17.4 A.

4.

Results

Since the total power generated by the PV panel is essential in determining the power efficiency, we evaluated the PV characteristics for different topologies under 10%, 25%, 50%, and 75% partial shading conditions. The CMOS-embedded reconfigurable PV module can change its configuration by altering the number of PV cells in series and parallel. Therefore, unlike fixed topologies, SP, TCT, BL, and HC, their performance is tested for the entire possible configuration that gives out maximum power efficiency. The PV characteristics of each case are shown in Fig. 8. As shown in Figs. 8(a)8(c) for 10%, 25%, and 50% shading conditions, the TCT topology generates maximum power. However, for a 75% shading condition, maximum power is obtained with BL topology, as presented in Fig. 8(d).

Fig. 8

The PV characteristics of 32 PV cells-based PV panel for different shading patterns. (a) 10% of shaded PV cells, (b) 25% shaded PV cells, (c) 50 % of shaded PV cells, and (d) 75% of shaded PV cells.

JPE_10_4_042004_f008.png

It is clear from PV characteristics shown in Fig. 8 that, among all the topologies, CMOS-embedded PV panel demonstrated a better capability of dealing with shading conditions. This is evident from the peaks of the curves in all the configurations we tested and shown in Fig. 8. It is apparent from Fig. 8 that CMOS-embedded PV panels generated maximum power when in 2×16 configuration. The maximum possible power generated by all the topologies for different partial shading pattern is shown in Fig. 9. It is evident from all four partial shading conditions that the most efficient way of dealing with partial shading is by reducing the total number of PV cells connected in series, since the current driving capacity of a series connected PV cells is determined by the least efficient PV cell in the row. The CMOS-embedded PV panels can smartly reconfigure the PV panel in real-time and reduce the impact of power loss due to shaded PV cells in series with unshaded PV cells.

Fig. 9

Maximum power generated under various partial shading conditions was simulated using SPICE simulation. The reconfigurable PV panel is in 2×16 configurations, where 2 is the number of PV cells in series and 16 is the total of PV cells in parallel.

JPE_10_4_042004_f009.png

Based on the results presented in Figs. 8 and 9, it can be concluded that a CMOS-embedded PV panel can deal with partial shading conditions by reducing the total number of PV cells connected in series. Therefore, every time a partial shading condition is detected, a reconfigurable PV panel will change to a configuration with a minimum number of PV cells in series. However, this reduction of PV cells connected in series can diminish the effectiveness of the reconfigurable PV array when the partial shading condition is changing in quick succession.

To address this concern, we measured the maximum power generated under 10%, 25%, 50%, and 75% for all topologies. Later, Pmax is computed using Eq. (4) and is compared with the power generated by CMOS-embedded PV panel for various configurations under different partial shading conditions.

Eq. (4)

Pmax=max(PSP,PTCT,PBL,PHC).

In Fig. 10, Pmax is the maximum power generated among fixed topologies for four different shading conditions. It is clear from Fig. 10 that a reconfigurable PV panel gives out many local maxima points that are better than other fixed (SP, TCT, BL, and HC) topologies. Hence, a reconfigurable PV panel is not required to reduce the total of PV cells connected in series to the minimum for outperforming the fixed topology PV panel under partial shading condition. From Fig. 10, for all four cases, the reconfigurable PV module generated maximum power when it is in 2×16 configuration. The schematic arrangement of reconfigurable PV module in 2×16 for all four shading conditions is shown in Fig. 11.

Fig. 10

Maximum power generated under various configuration (number of PV cells in series X number of PV cells in parallel) for different shading patterns by CMOS-embedded reconfigurable PV panel. Pmax is the maximum power generated in fixed topology.

JPE_10_4_042004_f010.png

Fig. 11

The PV module embedded with CMOS-based APS switches is programmed to be in 2×16 configurations when (a) 10% of PV cells are shaded, (b) 25% of PV cells are shaded, (c) 50% of PV cells are shaded, and (d) 75% of PV cells are shaded.

JPE_10_4_042004_f011.png

Thus far, for all the cases, we assumed the MOSFET transistors to be resistorless. However, that is not the case. These MOSFET transistors offer some resistance, which is called ON-resistance. Mostly, the ON-resistance can be reduced by increasing the aspect ratio (width per length) of each MOSFET transistor. Still, the contact resistance of two-terminals of the MOSFET transistor plays an essential role in determining its ON-resistance. Therefore, a realistic comparison between the reconfigurable PV module with other fixed topologies is shown in Fig. 12. The ON-resistance of each MOSFET switch is equal to 11  mΩ.

Fig. 12

Maximum power generated by reconfigurable PV module under various configurations for different shading conditions. The ON resistance of each MOSFET switches is equal to 11  mΩ.

JPE_10_4_042004_f012.png

In Fig. 12, it is seen that for all the four shading conditions, the reconfigurable PV module performance is still better than that of the fixed topology. However, compared to Fig. 10, the performance of the PV module in Fig. 12 is reduced due to the ON-resistance of the MOSFET transistor. Hence, for the reconfigurable module to be effective during partial shading conditions, the ON-resistance of the MOSFET transistors has to be minimal. The minimization of ON-resistance in a reconfigurable PV module can be achieved by creating monolithic CMOS-on-PV, as presented in Ref. 36. Besides offering lower resistance, a monolithic CMOS-on-PV module offers many advantages that are discussed in Refs. 36 and 39.

5.

Discussion and Future Works

The traditional power grid is moving toward a smart grid, where there will be two-way communication between the customers and utility companies. This is envisioned to be achieved through IoT and 5G technology.43 A smart grid will integrate renewable energy with the conventional power grid. Since the CMOS-embedded PV panels are integrable with IoT and 5G technologies, these have the qualities to eventually become part of smart grid systems. Also, when such a reconfigurable PV panel is deployed citywide and statewide, the combined power improvement by this smart panel will be quite significant. These reconfigurable PV panels can be ideal for the location where the area of installation is limited. Since this CMOS-embedded PV panel using the spatial and temporal tuning in the configuration can dynamically improve the overall power efficiency under changing irradiation conditions. Moreover, due to its ability to change the configuration according to the change in the solar irradiation. Hence, they are ideal to be deployed in places that are near to the northern hemisphere. Also, the increase in power production through CMOS-embedded PV systems will eventually reduce carbon emission and other related issues. As a result, this research is a good fit with the National Climate Assessment (NCA) report recommendations calling for researching adaptation and mitigation strategies to counter climate change.44

One of the critical components of the CMOS-embedded PV module is the algorithm.32,33,3739 The algorithm first detects the presence of partial shading conditions and then, based on the presence of shaded PV cells, determines the configuration that minimizes the effects of partial shading conditions.

For making the reconfigurable PV panel much smarter, the algorithm used by them should be sensitive enough to detect the presence of shaded PV cells in the panel. Also, the algorithm should have finality in determining the total presence of unshaded PV cells. Moreover, the algorithms should be fast enough to correctly determine the optimal configuration that can minimize the inefficiency created while changing from one configuration to the other. Therefore, the role of the algorithm is critical for the overall performance of CMOS-based smart PV systems; else the improvement in performance due to the reconfigurability will not be realized. Hence, more research work in improving the algorithm of the reconfigurable PV will make it even more revolutionary in powering technologies of the future.

6.

Conclusion

In this paper, the effectiveness of fixed topology and reconfigurable PV panel under partial shading condition is compared. For a fixed topology, an SP with bypass diode, TCT, BL, and HC are used. For reconfigurable topology, a CMOS-embedded PV panel is used. The performance of each topology is analyzed and compared using SPICE modeling for four different partial shading conditions. Based on the PV characteristics of each topology, the CMOS-embedded PV panels outperform other fixed topology-based PV panels. Reconfigurable PV panels provide a smart solution that can dynamically adjust to different configurations to outperform other fixed topologies in partial shading conditions.

References

1. 

M. Yamaguchi et al., “Analysis for efficiency potential of crystalline Si solar cells,” J. Mater. Res., 33 (17), 2621 –2626 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2018.262 JMREEE 0884-2914 Google Scholar

2. 

M. A. G. de Brito et al., “Evaluation of the main MPPT techniques for photovoltaic applications,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 60 (3), 1156 –1167 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2012.2198036 Google Scholar

3. 

H. Patel and V. Agarwal, “MATLAB-based modeling to study the effects of partial shading on PV array characteristics,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 23 (1), 302 –310 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.2007.914308 ITCNE4 0885-8969 Google Scholar

4. 

I. R. Balasubramanian, S. I. Ganesan and N. Chilakapati, “Impact of partial shading on the output power of PV systems under partial shading conditions,” IET Power Electron., 7 (3), 657 –666 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-pel.2013.0143 Google Scholar

5. 

S. Chen et al., “The impact of irradiance time behaviors on inverter sizing and design,” in IEEE 12th Workshop Control and Modeling Power Electron., 1 –5 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPEL.2010.5562387 Google Scholar

6. 

E. C. Kern and M. C. Russell, “Spatial and temporal irradiance variations over large array fields,” in Conf. Rec. Twentieth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conf., 1043 –1050 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.1988.105864 Google Scholar

7. 

E. C. Kern, E. M. Gulachenski and G. A. Kern, “Cloud effects on distributed photovoltaic generation: slow transients at the Gardner, Massachusetts photovoltaic experiment,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 4 (2), 184 –190 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1109/60.17910 ITCNE4 0885-8969 Google Scholar

8. 

F. Giraud and Z. M. Salameh, “Analysis of the effects of a passing cloud on a grid-interactive photovoltaic system with battery storage using neural networks,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 14 (4), 1572 –1577 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1109/60.815107 ITCNE4 0885-8969 Google Scholar

9. 

J. W. Bishop, “Computer simulation of the effects of electrical mismatches in photovoltaic cell interconnection circuits,” Sol. Cells, 25 (1), 73 –89 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-6787(88)90059-2 SOCLD4 0379-6787 Google Scholar

10. 

V. Di Dio et al., “A mathematical model to determine the electrical energy production in photovoltaic fields under mismatch effect,” in Int. Conf. Clean Electr. Power, 46 –51 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCEP.2009.5212083 Google Scholar

11. 

A. Chouder and S. Silvestre, “Analysis model of mismatch power losses in PV systems,” J. Sol. Energy Eng., 131 (2), 024504 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3097275 Google Scholar

12. 

K. A. K. Niazi, Y. Yang and D. Sera, “Review of mismatch mitigation techniques for PV modules,” IET Renew. Power Gener., 13 (12), 2035 –2050 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg.2019.0153 Google Scholar

13. 

P. Manganiello, M. Balato and M. Vitelli, “A survey on mismatching and aging of PV modules: the closed loop,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 62 (11), 7276 –7286 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2015.2418731 Google Scholar

14. 

R. Ramaprabha and B. L. Mathur, “A comprehensive review and analysis of solar photovoltaic array configurations under partial shaded conditions,” Int. J. Photoenergy, 2012 1 –16 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/120214 Google Scholar

15. 

L. Gao et al., “Parallel-connected solar PV system to address partial and rapidly fluctuating shadow conditions,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 56 (5), 1548 –1556 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2008.2011296 Google Scholar

16. 

S. Silvestre, A. Boronat and A. Chouder, “Study of bypass diodes configuration on PV modules,” Appl. Energy, 86 (9), 1632 –1640 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.01.020 Google Scholar

17. 

W. Herrmann, W. Wiesner and W. Vaassen, “Hot spot investigations on PV modules—new concepts for a test standard and consequences for module design with respect to bypass diodes,” in Conf. Rec. Twenty Sixth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conf., 1129 –1132 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.1997.654287 Google Scholar

18. 

S. Mohammadnejad, A. Khalafi and S. M. Ahmadi, “Mathematical analysis of total-cross-tied photovoltaic array under partial shading condition and its comparison with other configurations,” Sol. Energy, 133 501 –511 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.03.058 Google Scholar

19. 

C. A. Ramos-Paja et al., “Mathematical model of total cross-tied photovoltaic arrays in mismatching conditions,” in IEEE 4th Colombian Workshop Circuits and Syst., 1 –6 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/CWCAS.2012.6404068 Google Scholar

20. 

R. Darussalam, R. I. Pramana and A. Rajani, “Experimental investigation of serial parallel and total-cross-tied configuration photovoltaic under partial shading conditions,” in Int. Conf. Sustainable Energy Eng. and Appl., 140 –144 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSEEA.2017.8267699 Google Scholar

21. 

N. D. Kaushika and N. K. Gautam, “Energy yield simulations of interconnected solar PV arrays,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 18 (1), 127 –134 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.2002.805204 ITCNE4 0885-8969 Google Scholar

22. 

W. Jaideaw, A. Suksri and T. Wongwuttanasatian, “Simulation of photovoltaic module configuration for different shaded patterns,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 113 012204 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/113/1/012204 Google Scholar

23. 

S. R. Pendem and S. Mikkili, “Modelling and performance assessment of PV array topologies under partial shading conditions to mitigate the mismatching power losses,” Sol. Energy, 160 303 –321 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.12.010 Google Scholar

24. 

G. N. Tiwari and S. Dubey, Fundamentals of Photovoltaic Modules and Their Applications, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge (2010). Google Scholar

25. 

C. Tubniyom et al., “Effect of partial shading patterns and degrees of shading on total cross-tied (TCT) photovoltaic array configuration,” Energy Procedia, 153 35 –41 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.10.028 1876-6102 Google Scholar

26. 

M. Jazayeri, S. Uysal and K. Jazayeri, “A comparative study on different photovoltaic array topologies under partial shading conditions,” in IEEE PES T D Conf. and Exposition, 1 –5 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TDC.2014.6863384 Google Scholar

27. 

D. Gonzalez Montoya et al., “A procedure for modeling photovoltaic arrays under any configuration and shading conditions,” Energies, 11 (4), 767 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/en11040767 NRGSDB 0165-2117 Google Scholar

28. 

N. S. Shah and H. H. Patel, “Maximizing power output of a partially shaded total-cross-tied photovoltaic array,” Trans. Environ. Electr. Eng., 2 (1), 10 –18 (2017). https://doi.org/10.22149/teee.v2i1.83 Google Scholar

29. 

A. M. Eltamaly and A. Y. Abdelaziz, Modern Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques for Photovoltaic Energy Systems, Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland (2019). Google Scholar

30. 

M. Z. Shams El-Dein, M. Kazerani and M. M. A. Salama, “Optimal photovoltaic array reconfiguration to reduce partial shading losses,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 4 (1), 145 –153 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2012.2208128 Google Scholar

31. 

S. R. Pendem and S. Mikkili, “Modeling, simulation and performance analysis of solar PV array configurations (series, series–parallel and honey-comb) to extract maximum power under partial shading conditions,” Energy Rep., 4 274 –287 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2018.03.003 Google Scholar

32. 

X. Lin et al., “Designing fault-tolerant photovoltaic systems,” IEEE Des. Test, 31 (3), 76 –84 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/MDAT.2013.2288252 IDTCEC Google Scholar

33. 

Y. Wang et al., “Dynamic reconfiguration of photovoltaic energy harvesting system in hybrid electric vehicles,” in Proc. ACM/IEEE Int. Symp. Low Power Electron. and Des., 109 –114 (2012). Google Scholar

34. 

F. Cadena et al., “Embedded reconfiguration of panels to obtain the maximum power of a PV array,” in IEEE 16th Int. Conf. Environ. and Electr. Eng., 1 –5 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/EEEIC.2016.7555720 Google Scholar

35. 

R. Mahto, P. Zarkesh-Ha and O. Lavrova, “Reconfigurable photovoltaic integrated with CMOS for a fault tolerant system,” in IEEE 43rd Photovoltaic Specialists Conf., 2578 –2581 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2016.7750114 Google Scholar

36. 

J. West et al., “Reconfigurable power management using novel monolithically integrated CMOS-on-PV switch,” in IEEE 40th Photovoltaic Specialist Conf., 1389 –1392 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2014.6925177 Google Scholar

37. 

N. Chang et al., Nano Devices and Circuit Techniques for Low-Energy Applications and Energy Harvesting, 181 –209 Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht (2016). Google Scholar

38. 

R. Mahto, “Fault resilient and reconfigurable power management using photovoltaic integrated with CMOS switches,” (2016). Google Scholar

39. 

R. Mahto, P. Zarkesh-Ha and O. Lavrova, “Reconfigurable power management for monolithic CMOS-on-photovoltaic under partial and complete shading,” in IEEE Int. Reliab. Phys. Symp., 3C-4-1 –3C-4–7 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/IRPS.2016.7574525 Google Scholar

40. 

D. Xavier and R. Mahto, “Performance analysis of reconfigurable PV module under partial shading condition with different topologies,” in 6th Annu. IEEE Conf. Technol. Sustainability, (2018). Google Scholar

41. 

L. Castañer and S. Silvestre, Modelling Photovoltaic Systems Using PSpice, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, England (2002). Google Scholar

42. 

R. Mahto, S. Revankar and K. Velumani, “Improved modelling technique for reconfigurable photovoltaics with embedded CMOS,” in IEEE 7th World Conf. Photovoltaic Energy Convers, 1215 –1218 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2018.8547277 Google Scholar

43. 

K. Valtanen, J. Backman and S. Yrjölä, “Blockchain-powered value creation in the 5G and smart grid use cases,” IEEE Access, 7 25690 –25707 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2900514 Google Scholar

44. 

D. Liverman et al., “Research needs for climate and global change assessments,” (2014). Google Scholar

Biography

Rakeshkumar V. Mahto is an assistant professor in the Computer Engineering Program, California State University, Fullerton, California, USA. He received his BE degree in electrical engineering from Veer Narmad South Gujarat University, Surat, India, in 2005, and his MS degree in electrical engineering from California State University, Fullerton, California, USA, in 2009. He received his PhD in computer engineering from the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, in 2016. His research interests include photovoltaics, design application of FPGAs, low power design, mixed-signal system design, hardware security, and RF electronics. He is a member of SPIE and IEEE.

Deepak K. Sharma is an assistant professor at the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at California State University Fullerton (CSUF). He has been involved in several research projects involving artificial intelligence (AI) applications to heavy equipment, optimizing solar energy systems, risk quantification using social media data, project delivery selection using AI and data envelopment analysis, and public private partnerships. He is the member of the American Society of Civil Engineers and friend of two research committees at the Transportation Research Board.

Dinosha X. Xavier is currently a software developer at Andwell LLC. She received her MS degree in computer engineering from CSUF. She was a research assistant at CSUF, and her interest included development of photovoltaic modules, performance analysis of semiconductor switches, and designing of web applications.

Raksha N. Raghavan received her BS degree in computer engineering with a minor in physics from California State University, Fullerton, in May 2019. Her research work on optimization of reconfigurable photovoltaic modules with embedded addressable programmable switches received the first-place award at the annual IEEE Sustainable Technology Conference. She is a recipient of an outstanding graduate student award for scholarly and creative work by the College of Engineering and Computer Science at California State University, Fullerton, California, USA.

© The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Rakeshkumar V. Mahto, Deepak K. Sharma, Dinosha X. Xavier, and Raksha Raghavan "Improving performance of photovoltaic panel by reconfigurability in partial shading condition," Journal of Photonics for Energy 10(4), 042004 (14 February 2020). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JPE.10.042004
Received: 1 November 2019; Accepted: 30 January 2020; Published: 14 February 2020
JOURNAL ARTICLE
15 PAGES


SHARE
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back to Top