24 August 2016 Review of recent progress in unassisted photoelectrochemical water splitting: from material modification to configuration design
Author Affiliations +
J. of Photonics for Energy, 7(1), 012006 (2016). doi:10.1117/1.JPE.7.012006
Photoelectrochemical (PEC) energy conversion systems have been considered as a highly potential strategy for clean solar fuel production, simultaneously addressing the energy and environment challenges we are facing. Tremendous research efforts have been made to design and develop feasible unassisted PEC systems that can efficiently split water into hydrogen (H2) and oxygen with only the energy input of sunlight. A fundamental understanding of the concepts involved in PEC water splitting and energy conversion efficiency enhancement for solar fuel production is important for better system design. This review gives a concise overview of the unassisted PEC devices with some state-of-the-art progress toward efficient PEC devices for future sustainable solar energy utilization.
Peerakiatkhajohn, Yun, Wang, and Wang: Review of recent progress in unassisted photoelectrochemical water splitting: from material modification to configuration design



With the increasing energy consumption and the depletion of fossil fuels, it is urgent to develop clean, earth-abundant, and renewable energy resources to effectively address energy issues. Photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting has been found to be a promising approach for directly converting solar energy into sustainable and environmentally friendly hydrogen fuel. Over the past four decades, even though great achievements have been obtained, the solar-to-hydrogen (STH) efficiency is still too low for practical applications.6 The key challenge for efficient solar hydrogen generation is to explore suitable photoelectrode materials that meet the following criteria: (1) broad range of solar spectrum absorption, (2) high photochemical stability, (3) efficient use of photogenerated electrons and holes, (4) suitable band edge positions, (5) low overpotential, and (6) low cost.78.9.10 Typically, a single semiconductor is difficult for achieving all of the above requirements. For example, TiO2 is stable in aqueous electrolytes under light illumination, but its large bandgap (3.0 eV) limits its light utilization to the UV region that accounts for only 4% of the solar energy on earth, resulting in low STH efficiency.11,12 On the other hand, although multijunction silicon or heterojunction III–V semiconductors as photoelectrodes considerably increase the visible light conversion efficiency, they increase the cost while shortening the lifetime of the whole devices due to their photocorrosion in aqueous electrolytes.1314.15 Therefore, the number of reliable and reproducible semiconductors for solar water splitting is limited. Combining the advantages of different semiconductors to form heterojunction systems or integrating state-of-the-art semiconductors with photovoltaic (PV) devices to form tandem cells may open up more opportunities, which have been extensively investigated during the past decade.1617.18.19.20 Especially, self-driven monolithic and PEC tandem systems have attracted great attention due to the low cost when compared to the use of only PV devices for water splitting.2122. Nevertheless, the obtained STH and stability for the reported systems are still too low for the 10% target toward practical applications, even though many unique and novel material configurations have been revealed in recent years.2728.

In this review, we concisely summarize the recent progress and challenges in the unassisted PEC water splitting system, which has been considered as the ultimate solar water splitting process, compared to many reported PEC systems, which still rely on the applied external bias. We pay particular attention to nanostructure engineering of the photoelectrodes and the concepts of PEC configuration design for efficient water splitting. The review will start with some basic principles of unassisted PEC water splitting, followed by the design of photoelectrode materials based on nanostructure engineering and surface modifications. Then, the recent progress of PEC system configurations will be summarized. Finally, a brief overview including the challenges and perspectives of this research field will be given. We believe that this comprehensive review would not only provide important information about the recent progress of unassisted PEC water splitting systems but also could inspire readers to apply the discussed strategies to further improve the PEC solar fuel production performance.


Principles of Unassisted Photoelectrochemical Systems

Figure 1(a) presents the basic principle of a conventional PEC water splitting system. Under light illumination, electrons (e) will be excited from the valence band (VB) to the conduction band (CB), where holes (h+) are left in the VB of the working electrode. Then, the electrons transport to the counter electrode and participate in the hydrogen-evolution half-reaction (HER). Meanwhile the holes transfer to the surface of the working electrode and are involved in the oxygen-evolution half-reaction (OER).34,35 Typically, overall water splitting can be achieved by applying an external bias if the semiconductor itself in the working electrode is suitable only for OER or HER. For example, some metal oxides, such as Fe2O3, WO3, and BiVO4, can be used as working electrodes for water splitting with a proper bias, even though their CB positions are unable to reduce water themselves.3637.38.39.40

Fig. 1

(a) A schematic illustration of the photoelectrochemical water splitting process, charge transfer in a heterojunction PEC system with (b) p-n junction type, and (c) Z-scheme configuration.


According to the general mechanism in PEC H2 production, the selection of light absorbers and device configurations is important in driving effective water splitting reactions. A Z-scheme concept has been developed through a two-step excitation mechanism induced by coupling two different light absorbers, which is inspired by natural photosynthesis in green plants.4142.43.44 The charge transfer in a Z-scheme system is different from that in the general p-n heterojunction configuration. For p-n heterojunctions, photogenerated electrons in photosystem II (PS II) with higher CB are transferred to photosystem I (PS I) with lower CB to be involved in HER, while holes are transferred to the opposite direction for OER due to the built-in electrical potential in the interfaces [Fig. 1(b)]. By contrast, photogenerated holes in the VB of PS I are promoted in OER, while electrons in the CB of PS II are used for HER in the Z-scheme configuration [Fig. 1(c)]. Thus, the Z-scheme system demonstrates the strong oxidized ability of PS I and the strong reduced ability of PS II. The advantage of the Z-scheme water splitting system is to utilize a wider range of visible light because the energy required to activate each photocatalyst can be reduced as compared to the one-step water splitting system.4546.47 Successful overall water splitting via two-step photoexcitation under visible light illumination has been reported by combining several semiconductors.4849.50.51 Especially, the artificial photosynthesis (AP) concept has emerged as an attractive approach to mimic the natural photosynthesis process by utilizing suitable semiconductors to efficiently drive the thermodynamically uphill water splitting reaction under sunlight illumination.5253.54.55


Recent Progress and Challenges of Unassisted Photoelectrochemical Devices

In this section, recent efforts on the development of novel nanostructured design concepts and surface modification strategies for an unassisted PEC water splitting system will be briefly presented and discussed in terms of the improvement of performance.


Nanostructured Semiconductor Design

In general, PEC performance of the devices depends on the efficient light utilization, photogenerated carrier transport/separation, and stability in the PEC system. Nanostructured semiconductors have been revealed to be promising for PEC water splitting due to their large surface area and size-dependent properties (e.g., tuned bandgap energy, shortened carrier collection pathways, and efficient charge transfer).56 Therefore, the selection of a suitable semiconductor with excellent nanoarchitecture is of importance for PEC system construction. n-type semiconductors (e.g., WO3, Fe2O3, TiO2, and BiVO4) are commonly developed as photoanodes or top absorbers in tandem devices due to their low VB energy positions with more positive VB potential for water oxidation reaction.5758.59.60.61 However, when these semiconductors are used as photoelectrodes, the randomly oriented bulk nanoparticles (NPs) in photoelectrodes might decrease the PEC performance with a high charge recombination rate due to a large number of charge trap sites. To overcome this issue, well oriented one-dimensional (1-D),6263. two-dimensional (2-D),6970.71.72.73 and three-dimensional (3-D)7475.76 nanostructures have been developed in recent years. The 1-D nanostructures including nanowires,7778.79 nanorods,8081.82 and nanotubes8384.85.86 provide both efficient light harvesting and superior charge transport for PEC water splitting. Meanwhile, 2-D nanostructures have also shown interesting properties in various photochemical fields.8788.89 In particular, metal oxide and chalcogenide 2-D nanosheets are unique nanostructures with high-specific surface area and excellent crystallinity, which is beneficial for efficient charge separation and migration in water splitting.9091.92.93.94 More recently, researchers have integrated different functional materials of 1-D or 2-D structures to construct 3-D hierarchical nanostructures in order to increase large surface areas for light harvesting without inhibiting charge transfer and separation.9596.97.98.99 Hence, it is a promising nanostructure model for efficient water splitting due to broader light absorption, rapid charge migration and separation.

On the other hand, p-type semiconductors such as boron-doped Si,100 Cu2O,101 CuInS2,102 and GaInP214 exhibit small bandgaps, thereby a significant proportion of visible light can be harvested. However, when p-type materials are employed to PEC water splitting, severe challenges such as large overpotential, instability, and low absorption coefficient have been observed.103 Thus, recent strategies have been focused on improving the photostability through loading suitable protective layers or coupling with n-type semiconductors to form heterojunctions.104 For example, n-TiO2 has been reported as an effective protective layer for enhancing the photostability and photoactivity of p-type photoelectrodes.105106.107 Such a heterojunction concept by coupling different photoanode and photocathode layers would be a promising approach for unassisted PEC water splitting systems. For designing such systems, the nanostructured morphology and crystallinity of semiconductors with suitable CB and VB positions for water splitting and the interfacial properties in the heterojunction should be carefully considered. Moreover, the fabrication process of the photoelectrodes in a PEC system should be optimized by exploring simple, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly techniques. Figure 2 represents the engineering strategies that are critical to meet all requirements for efficient PEC water splitting. The recent reported PEC systems, which have been developed based on these strategies, will be further presented and discussed in Sec. 3.3.

Fig. 2

The important engineering strategies to achieve efficient PEC water splitting.



Surface Modification of Photoelectrodes

In addition to nanostructure engineering, the surface modification of photoelectrodes is also important for achieving high PEC performance. As the surfaces of the photoelectrode materials are active sites for redox reaction, the surface states are closely related to photon energy absorption properties and surface charge transfer ability of the semiconductors. Doping is one common strategy to improve the conductivity of semiconductors and extend the lifetime of charge carriers by reducing recombination of the photogenerated electron–hole pairs.108109. In addition, loading HER or OER cocatalysts on the surface of the semiconductor is also an efficient approach to reduce the charge recombination at a lower applied potential and increase the charge transfer for the water splitting process.117 Cocatalysts should be optimized to offer highly active sites to separate the photogenerated charges for HER or OER half reactions, avoiding the photogenerated electrons and holes with high redox ability to react with the semiconductor itself, which improves the stability. Noble metals (e.g., Pt) and noble metal oxides (e.g., IrO2, RuO2) are usually used as effective HER and OER cocatalysts, respectively.118,119 Nevertheless, it is not favorable to scale up their utilization in PEC devices due to their cost and rarity. Thus, noble metal-free cocatalysts, such as cobalt compounds,120121. nickel-based materials,127,128 and chalcogenides129130.131.132 for photoelectrode surface modification, have been developed.

In addition, plasmonic NP coupling is another strategy to utilize the optical properties of nanometals for better light harvesting.133134.135 Typically, plasmonic metal NPs can be employed to capture light and transfer the excitation energy through the localized surface plasmon to a combined semiconductor with large bandgap. In general, when plasmonic metal nanostructures are contacted with semiconductors, they should be able to alleviate charge recombination and enhance light absorption, resulting in higher PEC performance than their pure semiconductor counterparts.136137. For instance, Zhang et al.97 studied PEC performance of Au NPs deposited on the TiO2 bilayered structure photoanode and reported a STH efficiency of 0.71% achieved, around which is one of the highest values reported in Au/TiO2-based photoanodes. The excellent PEC water splitting activity in visible light can be ascribed to the generated energetic hot e/h+ of Au NPs that were injected into the CB of TiO2 through the excitation and decay of surface plasmons. In another study, the utilization of a plasmonic Au nanohole array combined with Fe2O3 nanorod array photoanode led to significant enhancement of the photocurrent density147 and a plasmon-induced resonant energy transfer (PIRET) effect was proposed to explain this phenomenon. In addition to photoanodes, CuO nanowires decorated with Ag NPs as photocathodes were also studied in which the surface plasmon energy transfer from Ag NPs contributed to enhanced photocurrent with a STH efficiency of 2.16% achieved.148 The use of plasmonic Ag NPs deposited on TiO2 photoanodes can also further improve the photocurrent density by LSPR property of Ag NPs.149,150

Recent works on nanostructure engineering and surface modification for innovative PEC system design are summarized in Table 1. It is apparent that many efforts have focused on controlling nanostructures, doping with suitable elements, and loading cocatalysts in heterojunction photoelectrodes. However, the high photocurrent and STH efficiency achievements in most of the systems are limited and external bias is generally required for overall water splitting. Notably, multilayered PEC devices composed of nanostructured metal oxide semiconductors, perovskite solar cells (PSCs), and Si photoelectrodes can exhibit high STH up to 10%, whereas such PEC devices are expensive, complicated, and unstable in aqueous electrolyte under light illumination. In order to overcome these drawbacks, the selection of excellent crystalline photoelectrode materials and suitable electrolytes is essentially important, and the overall PEC system should be considered by designing the configuration of multilayered photoelectrodes with protective layers. Such conditions would be the key factors in developing unassisted PEC systems for overall water splitting.

Table 1

PEC devices for solar water splitting.

Photoelectrode systemCocatalystsPhotocurrent (mA cm−2)Light sourceSTH/IPCE (%)References
p-GaInP2(Pt)/TJ/GaAsPt120 at 0.15  V11 suns, 1.19±0.05  Wcm2STH=12.4%Ref. 24
3jn-a-SiOER: Co–Bi, HER: NiMoZn3 at 0  VRHE1 sun, AM 1.5 GSTH=2.5% (wireless) and 4.7% (wired)Ref. 151
Si pillarsMo3S49 at 0  VRHEλ>620  nm, 28.3  mWcm2STH=10%Ref. 130
p-Si/SiO2/TiPt20 at 0  VRHE1 sun, AM 1.5 GSTH=2.9%Ref. 152
n+p-Si/TiO2Pt22 at 0.3  VRHEλ>635  nm, AM 1.5 GIPCE=90%Ref. 153
AlGaAs/SiRuO2/Pt black20.1, unassisted135  mWcm2STH=18.3%Ref. 154
W-doped BiVO4/SiCo-Pi4 at 1.23  VRHE1 sun, AM 1.5 GSTH=4.9%Ref. 155
BiVO4 on 1D ZnO nanorodsCo-Pi3 at 1.2  VRHEλ>420  nm, AM 1.5 GSTH=0.88%Ref. 68
Ba-Ta3N5 nanorodIrO26.7 at 1.23  VRHE1 sun, AM 1.5 GSTH=1.5%Ref. 156
WSe2Pt/Ru15 at 0  VRHE100  mWcm2ηc=7.0%Ref. 157
Si/TiO2 nanotreeHER: Pt OER: IrOx150  mWcm2STH=0.12%Ref. 79
p-Si/Fe2O3−AuNPsAu2.6 at 0  VPt60  mWcm2STH=6%Ref. 158
DSSC/WO3(n)Pt1.56 at 0  VRHE100  mWcm2STH=1.9%Ref. 22
WO3/C3N4CoOx5.76 at 2.1  VRHEAM 1.5 GIPCE=37.5% at 400 nm and 1.6  VRHERef. 95
Pt-doped Fe2O3Co-Pi4.32 at 1.23  VRHE1 sun, AM 1.5 GIPCE=50% at 400 nm and 1.23  VRHERef. 159
Cu2O/(ZnO,Al2O3)/TiO2Pt7.6 at 0  VRHEAM 1.5 GIPCE=40% between 350 and 480 nm, 0  VRHERef. 160
Cu2O/(ZnO,Al2O3)/TiO2MoS2+x5.7 at 0  VRHEAM 1.5 GSTH=7%Ref. 131
Cu2O/BiVO4HER: RuOx OER: Co-Pi1, unassisted100  mWcm2STH=0.5%Ref. 161
Au at TiO2/Al2O3/Cu2O4.34 at 0  VRHEAM 1.5 GIPCE=78% at 340 nmRef. 43
C/Cu2O/Cu3.95 at 0  VRHEAM 1.5 GSTH=0.56% at 0.21  VRHERef. 162
CdS/CuGaSe2Pt19 at 0  VRHE300 W Xe lampSTH=0.83% at 0.2  VRHERef. 163
CdS/AgxCu1xGaSe2Pt8.1 at 0  VRHEAM 1.5 GIPCE50% at 500 nm and 0  VRHERef. 164
CH3NH3PbI3 with NiFe DLH/Ni foamNiFe DLH10, unassistedAM 1.5 GSTH=12.3%Ref. 165
CH3NH3PbI3Ni12 at 0  VAg/AgCl1 sun, AM 1.5 GRef. 166


Artificial Photosynthesis Photoelectrochemical System Design


Tandem cell configuration

Tandem cell configuration is a promising approach to address the issues of single or heterojunction PEC devices for unassisted solar water splitting. In the early stage, tandem PEC devices consisting of a semiconductor and a dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC) were applied for water splitting. For instance, Kim et al.167 revealed a tandem cell composed of a WO3/Pt photoelectrode connected with a DSSC for unassisted water splitting where the maximum STH efficiency of 0.35% was obtained. Subsequently, a Fe2O3 and WO3 photoanode with a DSSC in tandem configuration was developed, as illustrated in Fig. 3.168 Without external bias, the achieved STH efficiencies were 3.10% and 1.17% for the WO3/DSSC and Fe2O3/DSSC tandem systems, respectively. The low STH efficiency in this tandem configuration is due to the mismatched band energy configuration and interfacial charge recombination between photoelectrodes and the combined DSSCs. Especially, charge recombination occurred between the injected electrons from the semiconductors and the oxidized dye (I3), inhibiting the efficient redox reaction with water in the system.

Fig. 3

Schematic and band energy diagrams represent (a) WO3, (b) Fe2O3 photoanodes combined with a DSSC using D4 dye in tandem cell design. Red dotted lines indicate the reduction and oxidation potentials of water and (c) Faradaic efficiency measurement of a tandem cell with inset shows a net measured photocurrent within 9 h. Green and orange circled plots correspond to H2 and O2 evolved gases, respectively. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 168. Copyright 2011 Nature Publishing Group.


More recently, an efficient wireless monolithic tandem device consisting of a bipolar configuration with a highly transparent BiVO4-sensitised mesoporous WO3/Pt film and a porphyrin-dye-based photoelectrode was reported.169 An extraordinarily high STH efficiency of 5.7% and H2/O2 evolutions were revealed without any applied bias. The porphyrin-dye-sensitized photoanode with a cobalt electrolyte generated sufficient bias to drive the water splitting reaction forward in this monolithic tandem configuration. Although the efficient design for AP is controversial, the combination of abundant metal oxide-based photoelectrodes with DSSCs has been explored as a promising PEC device configuration for unassisted solar water splitting. Nevertheless, the DSSC component generates low voltages that are not sufficient for water splitting, and more attention has been paid to recently developed PSCs due to their much higher Voc (0.9 to 1.5 V).170 For instance, a dual artificial-leaf-type tandem PEC device composed of a robust cobalt carbonate (Co-Ci)-catalyzed Mo-doped BiVO4 photoanode and a CH3NH3PbI3-based PSCs (Fig. 4) can deliver a photocurrent density of 5  mAcm2 at 1.23 V versus RHE for the unique and stable photoanode and a STH efficiency of 3.0% for the wireless device.171 Gratzel et al. reported a novel PSCs-assisted PEC water splitting system composed of organohalide CH3NH3PbI3-based PSCs as the external power supply and NiFe-layered double hydroxides as the catalytic electrodes, which achieved a photocurrent density of 10  mAcm2 with a STH efficiency of 12.3%.165 Although this device configuration exhibited a high efficiency for PEC water splitting, the electrodes were not directly settled in photoreactions. Consequently, the hydrogen generation occurred by a water electrolysis process that power was generated through the externally wired two PSCs in series. Meanwhile, a monolithic tandem design with only one CH3NH3PbI3 PSC/Ni layer without an external wire connection was developed and a high photocurrent density of 12  mAcm2 was achieved (Fig. 5).166 Overall, the device complexity and stability issue of the dye and organohalide perovskite materials in the DSSCs and PSCs, and efficient photon utilization should be considered in these design concepts.

Fig. 4

Schematic diagrams of (a) wireless dual light absorber tandem PEC device, (b) energy band diagram and charge transfer in artificial water splitting, (c) photocurrent density and H2/O2 gases evolutions of Co-Ci/H, 3%Mo:BiVO4 PSC tandem device, and (d) evolved H2/O2 gases and calculated STH in unassisted solar water splitting. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 171. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.


Fig. 5

(a) Schematic diagrams of CH3NH3PbI3 with Ni surface layer tandem cell configuration and (b) photocurrent densities in unassisted hydrogen production at 1 sun illumination. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 166. Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society.


On the other hand, coupling a PEC device with a PV cell in tandem was developed to extend the light absorption range and improve the photocurrent density in unassisted solar water splitting. Ding et al.172 achieved a STH efficiency up to 2.5% in an unassisted water splitting system using an earth-abundant photoanode and a Si-solar-cell-based photocathode (Fig. 6). The parallel irradiation mode exhibited higher efficiency than the tandem illumination one because the former system offered sufficient driving force for water splitting. More recently, an overall STH efficiency of 0.91% was achieved on a system composed of a Fe2O3 photoanode and a Si photocathode with NiFeOx and TiO2/Pt as cocatalysts (Fig. 7).173

Fig. 6

(a) Schematic diagram of FeOOH/Mo/BiVO4 photoanode with the Ni/Si-solar-cell-based photocathode under parallel and tandem light illumination for direct water splitting and (b) IV curves and obtained values of photoelectrodes measured in 0.5M Na2SO4 electrolyte and two electrode configurations under AM 1.5G light illumination. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 172. Copyright 2014, Royal Society of Chemistry.


Fig. 7

(a) Schematic diagrams of Fe2O3 photoanode and amorphous Si photocathode tandem device for overall unassisted water splitting, (b) SEM image of a tandem photoelectrode, (c) current–potential (JV) curves of various photoelectrodes, and (d) net photocurrent of NiFeOx-modified second regrowth treatment (rgH II) with TiO2/Pt loaded amorphous silicon photocathode over 10 h in 0.5M phosphate solution in a unassisted two-electrode system. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 173. Copyright 2015 Nature Publishing Group.



Monolithic design

Despite continuing efforts on searching various photoanode materials to combine with solar cells, the high current densities are accompanied with the challenges of photocorrosion or chemical instability under oxidative conditions. A stand-alone unassisted PEC device would be an ultimate consideration for H2/O2 evolutions in water splitting. Accordingly, simpler concepts using dual-absorber tandem devices have been explored with acceptable STH efficiencies. For example, a p-n junction photoelectrode comprising p-type Cu-Ti-O and n-type TiO2 nanotube arrays with efficient spectral photoresponse (380 to 885 nm) and antiphotocorrosion properties can result in a significantly enhanced photocurrent density of 0.25  mAcm2 and a photoconversion efficiency of 0.30% under global AM 1.5 G illumination (Fig. 8).174 Similarly, a Mn-oxide–TiO2 coated triple junction-amorphous-Si (Tj-a-Si) was used for monolithic self-driven water splitting with a high STH efficiency of 3.25% and good long-term stability under solar-simulated light illumination.175

Fig. 8

(a) Schematic illustration of the n-type TiO2/p-type Cu-Ti-O nanotube arrays in tandem with a salt bridge and immersed in hybrid electrolyte containing 1 M KOH and 0.1 M Na2HPO4 and (b) Self-biased photocurrent density of the n-type TiO2/p-type Cu-Ti-O nanotube arrays in tandem under global AM 1.5 G illumination. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 174. Copyright 2008 American Chemical Society.


In a parallel study, Reece et al.151 reported a Tj-a-Si system modified with cocatalysts for water splitting. The wireless configuration of a Tj-a-Si with Co-oxygen-evolving complex and NiMoZn as OER and HER cocatalysts presented a high STH efficiency of 4.7% under AM 1.5 G simulated sunlight illumination. It has been confirmed that this design can generate electrons and holes with enough energy to split water (VOC>1.23  V) in a simply engineered configuration. However, the high cost of the photoelectrode materials and the complexity of the fabrication process would be critical limiting factors in commercializing this water splitting system.


Heterojunction components of photoelectrochemical device design

Most studies have been focused on improving the performance of individual semiconductors to achieve the targeted STH efficiency. However, the performance of the whole PEC system and the interaction between the individual components for solar energy conversion should also be explored. Liu et al.79 reported a fully integrated nanotree PEC system consisting of cocatalysts loaded Si and TiO2 nanowires for direct solar water splitting (Fig. 9). An STH efficiency of 0.12% was achieved in this unassisted PEC water splitting system. However, this nanotree PEC system still needs to improve the current density and maximize the STH efficiency via excellent interfacial engineering and surface modifications. More recently, a tandem PEC system consisting of a n-p homojunction of Si microwire arrays coated with TiO2 thin films presented a current density of 0.32  mAcm2 and a STH efficiency of 0.6% without external bias (Fig. 10).176 It is well known that the use of Si photoelectrodes in a PEC water splitting system reduces the cost competitiveness, thus novel systems with low cost materials have continuously been explored.

Fig. 9

(a) SEM image of the Si/TiO2 heterostructure nanotree arrays photoelectrodes, (b, c) Schematic illustrations of the light absorption and charge transfer of Si/TiO2 photoelectrodes in unassisted water splitting reaction, and (d) the evolution of H2 and O2 with 2:1 stoichiometry under simulated sunlight (1.5 suns) Reprinted with permission from Ref. 79. Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society.


Fig. 10

SEM images of (a) n-p homojunction of Si microwire array (inset shows a zoomed-in image of the SiO2 microwires), (b) FTO-coated n-p homojunction of Si microwire array, and (c) cross-section of TiO2-coated n-p Si/FTO microwire array. (d) Current density versus potential curves of p+-Si/FTO/TiO2 and n-p Si/FTO/TiO2 microwire array photoelectrodes and (e) amperometric curves of n-p Si/FTO/TiO2 microwire array photoelectrodes at 0 V versus RHE under the dark and 1 sun light illumination conditions. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 176. Copyright 2016, The Electrochemical Society.


Another promising concept for unassisted PEC water splitting systems is a standalone Z-scheme configuration. To obtain high performance, we need to consider the main factors, in particular, the design of the fully integrated system, the functions of the individual materials, and the optimization of the interfaces between the individual components.177 One typical example is the design of W/Mo-doped BiVO4 and ZnxCd1xSe dual n-type photoelectrode system with the presence of redox mediators (I/IO3 or S2/Sn2),178 which highlights the challenging nature of designing redox mediator-free Z-scheme systems via metal doping and surface modification for efficient water splitting. Likewise, Yang et al.179 studied the surface modification with different catalysts in order to improve the overall water splitting efficiency and stability of the system (Fig. 11). They designed a system comprising a CdS QD/TiO2 nanorod photoanode and a ZnS/CdSe QD/NiOx nanosheet photocathode for self-driven PEC water splitting, which delivered a maximum STH efficiency of 0.17%, comparable to natural photosynthesis. Later, a system composed of dual nanowire photoelectrodes of p-InGaN/Si-InGaN was developed, where a STH efficiency of 2% at 0.6 V versus RHE and a high open circuit potential were achieved under AM 1.5 G 1 sun illumination (Fig. 12).180 Nevertheless, this design requires expensive and rare cocatalysts to drive the solar water splitting reaction. Therefore, other active and cheaper semiconductors and cocatalysts for overall water splitting should be explored in future studies.

Fig. 11

(a) SEM images of CdS QD/TiO2 nanorod photoanode (top) and CdSe QD/NiO nanosheet (bottom) photocathode (scale bar: 500 nm), (b) schematic representation of PEC device configuration, (c) band diagram and charge transfer in heterojunction photoelectrodes, (d) amperometric curves of CdS QD/TiO2 nanorod photoanode and CdSe QD/NiO nanosheet in 0.5 M Na2SO4 electrolyte, (e) JV curve of CdS QD/TiO2 nanorod photoanode and CdSe QD/NiO nanosheet photocathode in unbiased water splitting, and (f) hydrogen and oxygen gases evolutions and inset presents stability of the photocurrent under 90-min light illuminations. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 179. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.


Fig. 12

(a) STEM-HAADF image of a single Pt-InGaN nanowire and schematic of the p-InGaN nanowire photocathode and n-Si substrate, in which connected directly in tunnel junction, (b) the solar conversion efficiency of the dual-photoelectrodes as a function of applied bias under AM1.5G 1 sun illumination, IV curve of the dual-photoelectrode device with the (c) photoanode and (d) photocathode under chopped illumination. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 180. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.



Summary and Perspectives

In this review article, we provided an overview of a library of PEC system designs toward unassisted solar water splitting. It is clear that the design of efficient unassisted PEC devices relies not only on material design but also the integration of PEC configuration. In particular, the development of semiconductors via novel nanostructure engineering, surface modification with exotic element doping or cocatalyst loading, and innovative system design based on heterojunction configurations are important strategies for improving light harvesting, charge separation, and surface reaction kinetics. This brief review would deliver useful information for further construction and development of efficient unassisted PEC water splitting systems with high STH efficiency, long-term stability, and low cost. For example, the stability and poor kinetics of water splitting issues in the wireless integrated tandem system with dual light absorber configuration should be addressed by employing earth abundant materials, protective layers, and morphology engineering techniques. On the other hand, novel strategies to inhibit photocorrosion of the photocathode materials are urgently needed for efficient water splitting in a long-term period. Additionally, the tandem system combining semiconductors with a PV device has a conflict in terms of instability in aqueous electrolyte, high cost and complexity. Using DSSCs or PSCs in tandem systems for unassisted water splitting demonstrates low cost and comparable STH efficiencies, but the efficient light absorption and stable organic dyes for DSSCs and the stability of perovskites should be considered when equipped in a PEC system.

Although numerous achievements have been obtained in recent years, it is still highly challenging to develop an efficient unassisted PEC water splitting system for practical applications. Currently, the tentative STH goal for practical applications of the unassisted PEC water splitting device is 10%. It is expected that some novel concepts of fully integrated PEC devices put forward the breakthrough in solar hydrogen energy conversion and long-term stability. Notably, the Z-scheme concept for unassisted PEC water splitting systems is promising for effective photon utilization and efficient solar water splitting. However, there still remains significant room for the improvement of this system for practical applications. It is also important to explore new active and low cost cocatalysts that can efficiently promote the forward reactions for water splitting. To this end, in-depth understanding of the mechanisms of unassisted PEC water splitting and the strategies to boost charge transfer and separation for redox reaction is critically important to develop an efficient solar water splitting system for more sustainable solar energy utilization.


The authors would like to acknowledge financial support from the Australian Research Council through its DP and FF programs. P.P. acknowledges support from the University of Queensland for International Scholarships (UQI). S.W. acknowledges support from IPRS and UQ Centennial Scholarships.


1. R. Abe, “Recent progress on photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical water splitting under visible light irradiation,” J. Photochem. Photobiol. C 11, 179–209 (2010).IJHEDX0360-3199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2011.02.0031389-5567 Google Scholar

2. M. Gratzel, “Photoelectrochemical cells,” Nature 414, 338–344 (2001). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35104607 Google Scholar

3. A. Fujishima and K. Honda, “Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode,” Nature 238, 37–38 (1972). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/238037a0 Google Scholar

4. C. Zhen et al., “Tantalum (oxy)nitride based photoanodes for solar-driven water oxidation,” J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 2783–2800 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5TA07057K Google Scholar

5. X. Zong and L. Z. Wang, “Ion-exchangeable semiconductor materials for visible light-induced photocatalysis,” J. Photochem. Photobiol. C 18, 32–49 (2014).1389-5567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2013.10.001 Google Scholar

6. Q. Wang et al., “Scalable water splitting on particulate photocatalyst sheets with a solar-to-hydrogen energy conversion efficiency exceeding 1%,” Nat. Mater. 15, 611–615 (2016).NMAACR1476-1122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat4589 Google Scholar

7. T. Hisatomi et al., “Enhancement in the performance of ultrathin hematite photoanode for water splitting by an oxide underlayer,” Adv. Mater. 24, 2699–2702 (2012).ADVMEW0935-9648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.v24.20 Google Scholar

8. Y. Li and J. Z. Zhang, “Hydrogen generation from photoelectrochemical water splitting based on nanomaterials,” Laser Photonics Rev. 4, 517–528 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1863-8899 Google Scholar

9. A. Kudo and Y. Miseki, “Heterogeneous photocatalyst materials for water splitting,” Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 253–278 (2009).CSRVBR0306-0012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B800489G Google Scholar

10. M. G. Walter et al., “Solar water splitting cells,” Chem. Rev 110, 6446–6473 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr1002326 Google Scholar

11. G. Liu et al., “Enhanced photoactivity of oxygen-deficient anatase TiO2 sheets with dominant {001} facets,” J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 21784–21788 (2009).JPCCCK1932-7447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp907749r Google Scholar

12. G. Liu et al., “Titania-based photocatalysts—crystal growth, doping and heterostructuring,” J. Mater. Chem. 20, 831–843 (2010).JMACEP0959-9428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B909930A Google Scholar

13. L. Xing et al., “Pt modified TiO2 nanotubes electrode: preparation and electrocatalytic application for methanol oxidation,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 35, 12169–12173 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.07.162 Google Scholar

14. J. Gu et al., “Water reduction by a p-GaInP2 photoelectrode stabilized by an amorphous TiO2 coating and a molecular cobalt catalyst,” Nat. Mater. 15, 456–460 (2016).ESLEF61099-0062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat4511NMAACR1476-1122 Google Scholar

15. S. Y. Noh et al., “Branched TiO2/Si nanostructures for enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting,” Nano Energy 2, 351–360 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2012.10.010 Google Scholar

16. N. Srinivasan, E. Sakai and M. Miyauchi, “Balanced excitation between two semiconductors in bulk heterojunction Z-scheme system for overall water splitting,” ACS Catal. 6, 2197–2200 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.6b00267 Google Scholar

17. Y. H. Lai, D. W. Palm and E. Reisner, “Multifunctional coatings from scalable single source precursor chemistry in tandem photoelectrochemical water splitting,” Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1501668 (2015).ADEMBC1614-6840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201501668 Google Scholar

18. F. Jiang et al., “Pt/In2S3/CdS/Cu2ZnSnS4 thin film as an efficient and stable photocathode for water reduction under sunlight radiation,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 13691–13697 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b09015 Google Scholar

19. F. F. Abdi et al., “Efficient solar water splitting by enhanced charge separation in a bismuth vanadate-silicon tandem photoelectrode,” Nat. Commun. 4, 2195 (2013).NCAOBW2041-1723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3195 Google Scholar

20. J. Brillet et al., “Highly efficient water splitting by a dual-absorber tandem cell,” Nat. Photonics 6, 824–828 (2012).NPAHBY1749-4885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2012.265 Google Scholar

21. H. S. Jeon et al., “A monolithic and standalone solar-fuel device having comparable efficiency to photosynthesis in nature,” J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 5835–5842 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4TA06495J Google Scholar

22. J. H. Park and A. J. Bard, “Photoelectrochemical tandem cell with bipolar dye-sensitized electrodes for vectorial electron transfer for water splitting,” Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 9, E5–E8 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1149/1.2140497 Google Scholar

23. E. L. Miller, R. E. Rocheleau and S. Khan, “A hybrid multijunction photoelectrode for hydrogen production fabricated with amorphous silicon/germanium and iron oxide thin films,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 29, 907–914 (2004).ADEMBC1614-6840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2003.01.003IJHEDX0360-3199 Google Scholar

24. O. Khaselev and J. A. Turner, “A monolithic photovoltaic-photoelectrochemical device for hydrogen production via water splitting,” Science 280, 425–427 (1998).SCIEAS0036-8075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5362.425 Google Scholar

25. R. E. Rocheleau, E. L. Miller and A. Misra, “High-efficiency photoelectrochemical hydrogen production using multijunction amorphous silicon photoelectrodes,” Energy Fuels 12, 3–10 (1998). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ef9701347 Google Scholar

26. E. Verlage et al., “A monolithically integrated, intrinsically safe, 10% efficient, solar-driven water-splitting system based on active, stable earth-abundant electrocatalysts in conjunction with tandem III-V light absorbers protected by amorphous TiO2 films,” Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 3166–3172 (2015).EESNBY1754-5692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5EE01786F Google Scholar

27. J. W. Ager et al., “Experimental demonstrations of spontaneous, solar-driven photoelectrochemical water splitting,” Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 2811–2824 (2015).EESNBY1754-5692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5EE00457H Google Scholar

28. D. Kim et al., “Artificial photosynthesis for sustainable fuel and chemical production,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 3259–3266 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201409116 Google Scholar

29. Y. Tachibana, L. Vayssieres and J. R. Durrant, “Artificial photosynthesis for solar water-splitting,” Nat. Photonics 6, 511–518 (2012).NPAHBY1749-4885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2012.175 Google Scholar

30. T. Faunce et al., “Artificial photosynthesis as a frontier technology for energy sustainability,” Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 1074 (2013).EESNBY1754-5692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3ee40534f Google Scholar

31. A. J. Bard and M. A. Fox, “Artificial photosynthesis: solar splitting of water to hydrogen and oxygen,” Acc. Chem. Res. 28, 141–145 (1995).ACHRE40001-4842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ar00051a007 Google Scholar

32. S. S. Mao and S. Shen, “Hydrogen production: catalysing artificial photosynthesis,” Nat. Photonics 7, 944–946 (2013).NPAHBY1749-4885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.326 Google Scholar

33. I. McConnell, G. Li and G. W. Brudvig, “Energy conversion in natural and artificial photosynthesis,” Chem. Biol. 17, 434–447 (2010).CBOLE21074-5521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.05.005 Google Scholar

34. S. Shen and S. S. Mao, “Nanostructure designs for effective solar-to-hydrogen conversion,” Nanophotonics 1, 31–50 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2012-0010 Google Scholar

35. H. Chen and L. Wang, “Nanostructure sensitization of transition metal oxides for visible-light photocatalysis,” Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 5, 696–710 (2014).BJNEAH2190-4286 http://dx.doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.5.82 Google Scholar

36. S. Wang et al., “Synergistic crystal facet engineering and structural control of WO3 films exhibiting unprecedented photoelectrochemical performance,” Nano Energy 24, 94–102 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.04.010 Google Scholar

37. P. Peerakiatkhajohn et al., “Stable hematite nanosheet photoanodes for enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting,” Adv. Mater. 28, 6405–6410 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.201601525 Google Scholar

38. Y. Kuang et al., “A front-illuminated nanostructured transparent BiVO4 photoanode for >2% efficient water splitting,” Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1501645 (2016).ADEMBC1614-6840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201501645 Google Scholar

39. B. J. Trześniewski and W. A. Smith, “Photocharged BiVO4 photoanodes for improved solar water splitting,” J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 2919–2926 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5TA04716A Google Scholar

40. X. Zong et al., “A scalable colloidal approach to prepare hematite films for efficient solar water splitting,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys 15, 12314–12321 (2013).PPCPFQ1463-9076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3cp52153b Google Scholar

41. P. Zhou, J. Yu and M. Jaroniec, “All-solid-state Z-scheme photocatalytic systems,” Adv. Mater. 26, 4920–4935 (2014).ADVMEW0935-9648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.201400288 Google Scholar

42. W. Wang et al., “Si:WO3 heterostructure for Z-scheme water splitting: an AB initio study,” J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 1078–1085 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C2TA00441K Google Scholar

43. P. Peerakiatkhajohn et al., “A hybrid photoelectrode with plasmonic Au at TiO2 nanoparticles for enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting,” J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 20127–20133 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5TA04137F Google Scholar

44. T. Kothe et al., “Combination of A photosystem 1-based photocathode and a photosystem 2-based photoanode to a Z-scheme mimic for biophotovoltaic applications,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 14233–14236 (2013). Google Scholar

45. R. M. Navarro, F. del Valle and J. L. G. Fierro, “Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from CdS-ZnO–CdO systems under visible light irradiation: effect of thermal treatment and presence of Pt and Ru cocatalysts,” Inter. J. Hydrogen Energy 33, 4265–4273 (2008).IJHEDX0360-3199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.05.048 Google Scholar

46. K. Maeda, “Z-scheme water splitting using two different semiconductor photocatalysts,” ACS Catal. 3, 1486–1503 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cs4002089 Google Scholar

47. Q. Wang et al., “Core/shell structured La- and Rh-codoped SrTiO3 as a hydrogen evolution photocatalyst in Z-scheme overall water splitting under visible light irradiation,” Chem. Mater. 26, 4144–4150 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cm5011983 Google Scholar

48. S. Chen et al., “Efficient visible-light-driven Z-scheme overall water splitting using a MgTa2O(6-x)N(y)/TaON heterostructure photocatalyst for H2 evolution,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 8498–8501 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201502686 Google Scholar

49. Y. Sasaki, H. Kato and A. Kudo, “[Co(bpy)3](3+/2+) and [Co(phen)3](3+/2+) electron mediators for overall water splitting under sunlight irradiation using Z-scheme photocatalyst system,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 5441–5449 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja400238r Google Scholar

50. X. Wang et al., “ZnO-CdS at Cd heterostructure for effective photocatalytic hydrogen generation,” Adv. Energy Mater. 2, 42–46 (2012).ADEMBC1614-6840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201100528 Google Scholar

51. X. Wang et al., “Enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution by prolonging the lifetime of carriers in ZnO/CdS heterostructures,” Chem. Commun. (23), 3452–3454 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b904668b Google Scholar

52. K. S. Joya et al., “Water-splitting catalysis and solar fuel devices: artificial leaves on the move,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 10426–10437 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201300136 Google Scholar

53. D. G. Nocera, “The artificial leaf,” Acc. Chem. Res. 45, 767–776 (2012).ACHRE40001-4842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ar2003013 Google Scholar

54. H. Zhou et al., “Artificial inorganic leafs for efficient photochemical hydrogen production inspired by natural photosynthesis,” Adv. Mater. 22, 951–956 (2010).ADVMEW0935-9648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.200902039 Google Scholar

55. Y. Tachibana, L. Vayssieres and J. R. Durrant, “Artificial photosynthesis for solar water-splitting,” Nat. Photonics 6, 511–518 (2012).NPAHBY1749-4885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2012.175 Google Scholar

56. F. E. Osterloh, “Inorganic nanostructures for photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic water splitting,” Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 2294–2320 (2013).CSRVBR0306-0012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C2CS35266D Google Scholar

57. V. Antonucci, E. Passalacqua and N. Giordano, “TiO2-based photoelectrodes in photoelectrochemical cells: performance and mechanism of O2 evolution,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 12, 305–313 (1987).IJHEDX0360-3199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0360-3199(87)90055-3 Google Scholar

58. T.-T. Duong et al., “Enhanced photoelectrochemical activity of the TiO2/ITO nanocomposites grown onto single-walled carbon nanotubes at a low temperature by nanocluster deposition,” Adv. Mater. 23, 5557–5562 (2011).ADVMEW0935-9648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.v23.46 Google Scholar

59. S. Higashimoto, M. Sakiyama and M. Azuma, “Photoelectrochemical properties of hybrid WO3/TiO2 electrode. Effect of structures of WO3 on charge separation behavior,” Thin Solid Films 503, 201–206 (2006).THSFAP0040-6090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2005.11.110 Google Scholar

60. B. D. Alexander et al., “Metal oxide photoanodes for solar hydrogen production,” J. Mater. Chem. 18, 2298–2303 (2008).JMACEP0959-9428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b718644d Google Scholar

61. J. Brillet et al., “Examining architectures of photoanode-photovoltaic tandem cells for solar water splitting,” J. Mater. Res. 25, 17–24 (2010).JMREEE0884-2914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2010.0009 Google Scholar

62. R. P. Antony et al., “Efficient photocatalytic hydrogen generation by Pt modified TiO2 nanotubes fabricated by rapid breakdown anodization,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37, 8268–8276 (2012).IJHEDX0360-3199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.02.089 Google Scholar

63. B.-R. Kim et al., “Effect of TiO2 supporting layer on Fe2O3 photoanode for efficient water splitting,” Progr. Org. Coat. 76, 1869–1873 (2013).POGCAT http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2013.05.031 Google Scholar

64. C. W. Lai and S. Sreekantan, “Preparation of hybrid WO3-TiO2 nanotube photoelectrodes using anodization and wet impregnation: improved water-splitting hydrogen generation performance,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 38, 2156–2166 (2013).IJHEDX0360-3199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.12.025 Google Scholar

65. V. K. Mahajan, S. K. Mohapatra and M. Misra, “Stability of TiO2 nanotube arrays in photoelectrochemical studies,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 33, 5369–5374 (2008).IJHEDX0360-3199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.06.074 Google Scholar

66. J. A. Seabold et al., “Photoelectrochemical properties of heterojunction CdTe/TiO2 electrodes constructed using highly ordered TiO2 nanotube arrays,” Chem. Mater. 20, 5266–5273 (2008).CMATEX0897-4756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cm8010666 Google Scholar

67. J. Su et al., “Nanostructured WO3/BiVO4 heterojunction films for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting,” Nano. Lett. 11, 1928–1933 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl2000743 Google Scholar

68. S. J. Moniz et al., “1D Co-Pi modified BiVO4/ZnO junction cascade for efficient photoelectrochemical water cleavage,” Adv. Energy Mater. 4, 1301590 (2014).ADEMBC1614-6840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201301590 Google Scholar

69. L. Liang et al., “High-performance flexible electrochromic device based on facile semiconductor-to-metal transition realized by WO3·2H2O ultrathin nanosheets,” Sci. Rep. 3, 1936 (2013).SRCEC32045-2322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep01936 Google Scholar

70. J. Liu et al., “Highly oriented Ge-doped hematite nanosheet arrays for photoelectrochemical water oxidation,” Nano Energy 9, 282–290 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.08.005 Google Scholar

71. M. Ji et al., “Controlled growth of ferrihydrite branched nanosheet arrays and their transformation to hematite nanosheet arrays for photoelectrochemical water splitting,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 3651–3660 (2016).AAMICK1944-8244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b08116 Google Scholar

72. I. Y. Kim et al., “Unique advantages of exfoliated 2D nanosheets for tailoring the functionalities of nanocomposites,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 4149–4161 (2014).JPCLCD1948-7185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jz502038g Google Scholar

73. B. Seger et al., “An n-type to p-type switchable photoelectrode assembled from alternating exfoliated titania nanosheets and polyaniline layers,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 6400–6403 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201302062 Google Scholar

74. K. Sun et al., “3D branched nanowire heterojunction photoelectrodes for high-efficiency solar water splitting and H2 generation,” Nanoscale 4, 1515–1521 (2012).NANOHL2040-3364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2nr11952h Google Scholar

75. J. Shen et al., “3D hierarchical ZnIn2S4: the preparation and photocatalytic properties on water splitting,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37, 16986–16993 (2012).IJHEDX0360-3199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.08.038 Google Scholar

76. Z. Zheng et al., “CdS sensitized 3D hierarchical TiO2/ZnO heterostructure for efficient solar energy conversion,” Sci. Rep. 4, 5721 (2014).SRCEC32045-2322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep05721 Google Scholar

77. V. Chakrapani, J. Thangala and M. K. Sunkara, “WO3 and W2N nanowire arrays for photoelectrochemical hydrogen production,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 34, 9050–9059 (2009).IJHEDX0360-3199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.09.031 Google Scholar

78. M. Frites, Y. A. Shaban and S. U. Khan, “Iron oxide (n-Fe2O3) nanowire films and carbon modified (CM)-n-Fe2O3 thin films for hydrogen production by photosplitting of water,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 35, 4944–4948 (2010).IJHEDX0360-3199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.08.070 Google Scholar

79. C. Liu et al., “A fully integrated nanosystem of semiconductor nanowires for direct solar water splitting,” Nano Lett. 13, 2989–2992 (2013).NALEFD1530-6984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl401615t Google Scholar

80. H.-J. Ahn et al., “Nanoporous hematite structures to overcome short diffusion lengths in water splitting,” J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 19999–20003 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4TA04890C Google Scholar

81. X. Guo, L. Wang and Y. Tan, “Hematite nanorods Co-doped with Ru cations with different valence states as high performance photoanodes for water splitting,” Nano Energy 16, 320–328 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.07.005 Google Scholar

82. Z. Su et al., “Hydrothermal growth of highly oriented single crystalline Ta2O5 nanorod arrays and their conversion to Ta3N5 for efficient solar driven water splitting,” Chem. Commun. 50, 15561–15564 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4CC05673F Google Scholar

83. H. Dang et al., “TiO2 nanotubes coupled with nano-Cu(OH)2 for highly efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 38, 2126–2135 (2013).IJHEDX0360-3199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.11.135 Google Scholar

84. A. Ghicov et al., “TiO2-Nb2O5 nanotubes with electrochemically tunable morphologies,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 6993–6996 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1521-3773 Google Scholar

85. Y. Liu et al., “Highly stable CdS-modified short TiO2 nanotube array electrode for efficient visible-light hydrogen generation,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 36, 167–174 (2011).IJHEDX0360-3199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.09.089 Google Scholar

86. Y. Lai, J. Gong and C. Lin, “Self-organized TiO2 nanotube arrays with uniform platinum nanoparticles for highly efficient water splitting,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37, 6438–6446 (2012).IJHEDX0360-3199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.01.078 Google Scholar

87. L. Wang and T. Sasaki, “Titanium oxide nanosheets: graphene analogues with versatile functionalities,” Chem. Rev. 114, 9455–9486 (2014).CHREAY0009-2665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr400627u Google Scholar

88. B. Luo, G. Liu and L. Wang, “Recent advances in 2D materials for photocatalysis,” Nanoscale 8, 6904–6920 (2016).NANOHL2040-3364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C6NR00546B Google Scholar

89. M. Zhou, X. W. Lou and Y. Xie, “Two-dimensional nanosheets for photoelectrochemical water splitting: possibilities and opportunities,” Nano Today 8(6), 598–618 (2013).NTAOCG1748-0132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2013.12.002 Google Scholar

90. S. Yamada, A. Y. Nosaka and Y. Nosaka, “Fabrication of CdS photoelectrodes coated with titania nanosheets for water splitting with visible light,” J. Electroanal. Chem. 585, 105–112 (2005).JECHES0022-0728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2005.07.025 Google Scholar

91. J. Zhu et al., “Hierarchical hollow spheres composed of ultrathin Fe2O3 nanosheets for lithium storage and photocatalytic water oxidation,” Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 987–993 (2013).EESNBY1754-5692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2ee24148j Google Scholar

92. Y. Sun et al., “All-surface-atomic-metal chalcogenide sheets for high-efficiency visible-light photoelectrochemical water splitting,” Adv. Energy Mater. 4, 1300611 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07370652.2012.725237 Google Scholar

93. Y. Sun et al., “Freestanding tin disulfide single-layers realizing efficient visible-light water splitting,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 8727–8731 (2012).JESOAN0013-4651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.v51.35 Google Scholar

94. Y. Sun et al., “Fabrication of flexible and freestanding zinc chalcogenide single layers,” Nat. Commun. 3, 1057 (2012).NCAOBW2041-1723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2066 Google Scholar

95. Y. Hou et al., “Branched WO3 nanosheet array with layered C3N4 heterojunctions and CoOx nanoparticles as a flexible photoanode for efficient photoelectrochemical water oxidation,” Adv. Mater. 26, 5043–5049 (2014).ADVMEW0935-9648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.201401032 Google Scholar

96. F. Su et al., “Dendritic Au/TiO2 nanorod arrays for visible-light driven photoelectrochemical water splitting,” Nanoscale 5, 9001–9009 (2013).NANOHL2040-3364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3nr02766j Google Scholar

97. X. Zhang et al., “Coupling surface plasmon resonance of gold nanoparticles with slow-photon-effect of TiO2 photonic crystals for synergistically enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting,” Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 1409–1419 (2014).EESNBY1754-5692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3ee43278e Google Scholar

98. A. G. Tamirat et al., “Efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting using three dimensional urchin-like hematite nanostructure modified with reduced graphene oxide,” J. Power Sources 287, 119–128 (2015).JPSODZ0378-7753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.04.042 Google Scholar

99. Z. Li et al., “A three-dimensional interconnected hierarchical FeOOH/TiO2/ZnO nanostructural photoanode for enhancing the performance of photoelectrochemical water oxidation,” Nanoscale 7, 19178–19183 (2015).NANOHL2040-3364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5NR06212H Google Scholar

100. S. W. Boettcher et al., “Photoelectrochemical hydrogen evolution using Si microwire arrays,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 1216–1219 (2011).JACSAT0002-7863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja108801m Google Scholar

101. J. Luo et al., “Cu2O nanowire photocathodes for efficient and durable solar water splitting,” Nano Lett. 16, 1848–1857 (2016).NALEFD1530-6984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04929 Google Scholar

102. J. Luo et al., “Solution transformation of CuO into CuInS2 for solar water splitting,” Nano Lett. 15, 1395–1402 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl504746b Google Scholar

103. Y.-L. Lee, C.-F. Chi and S.-Y. Liau, “CdS/CdSe Co-sensitized TiO2 photoelectrode for efficient hydrogen generation in a photoelectrochemical cell,” Chem. Mater. 22, 922–927 (2009).CMATEX0897-4756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cm901762h Google Scholar

104. Z. M. Xia et al., “Protection strategy for improved catalytic stability of silicon photoanodes for water oxidation,” Sci. Bull. 60, 1395–1402 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11434-015-0857-1 Google Scholar

105. W. Siripala et al., “A Cu2O/TiO2 heterojunction thin film cathode for photoelectrocatalysis,” Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells. 77, 229–237 (2003).SEMCEQ0927-0248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0927-0248(02)00343-4 Google Scholar

106. A. Paracchino et al., “Ultrathin films on copper(i) oxide water splitting photocathodes: a study on performance and stability,” Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 8673–8681 (2012).EESNBY1754-5692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2ee22063f Google Scholar

107. L. Yang et al., “High efficient photocatalytic degradation of p-nitrophenol on a unique Cu2O/TiO2 p-n heterojunction network catalyst,” Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 7641–7646 (2010).ESTHAG0013-936X http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es101711k Google Scholar

108. R. Marschall and L. Wang, “Non-metal doping of transition metal oxides for visible-light photocatalysis,” Catal. Today 225, 111–135 (2014).CATTEA0920-5861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2013.10.088 Google Scholar

109. J.-W. Shi et al., “Carbon-doped titania hollow spheres with tunable hierarchical macroporous channels and enhanced visible light-induced photocatalytic activity,” Chem. Catal. Chem. 4, 488–491 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201200019 Google Scholar

110. J.-W. Shi et al., “Facile one-pot synthesis of Eu, N-codoped mesoporous titania microspheres with yolk-shell structure and high visible-light induced photocatalytic performance,” Appl. Catal. A 435–436, 86–92 (2012).ACAGE40926-860X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2012.05.044 Google Scholar

111. X. Zong et al., “Photocatalytic water oxidation on F, N co-doped TiO2 with dominant exposed {001} facets under visible light,” Chem. Commun. 47, 11742–11744 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c1cc14453g Google Scholar

112. X. Zong et al., “Nitrogen doping in ion-exchangeable layered tantalate towards visible-light induced water oxidation,” Chem. Commun. 47, 6293–6295 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c0cc05440b Google Scholar

113. A. Mukherji et al., “Photocatalytic hydrogen production from water using N-doped Ba5Ta4O15 under solar irradiation,” J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 15674–15678 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp202783t Google Scholar

114. A. Mukherji et al., “Nitrogen doped Sr2Ta2O7 coupled with graphene sheets as photocatalysts for increased photocatalytic hydrogen production,” ACS Nano 5, 3483–3492 (2011).ANCAC31936-0851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nn102469e Google Scholar

115. A. Mukherji et al., “N-Doped CsTaWO6 as a new photocatalyst for hydrogen production from water splitting under solar irradiation,” Adv. Funct. Mater. 21, 126–132 (2011).AFMDC61616-301X http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201000591 Google Scholar

116. R. Marschall et al., “Preparation of new sulfur-doped and sulfur/nitrogen co-doped CsTaWO6 photocatalysts for hydrogen production from water under visible light,” J. Mater. Chem. 21, 8871–8879 (2011).JMACEP0959-9428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c0jm02549f Google Scholar

117. J. Wang et al., “Recent progress in cobalt-based heterogeneous catalysts for electrochemical water splitting,” Adv. Mater. 28, 215–230 (2016).ADVMEW0935-9648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.v28.2 Google Scholar

118. L. Chen et al., “Enhanced visible photocatalytic activity of hybrid Pt/α-Fe2O3 nanorods,” RSC Adv. 2, 10057–10063 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2ra21897f Google Scholar

119. Z. Li et al., “Triphenylamine-functionalized graphene decorated with Pt nanoparticles and its application in photocatalytic hydrogen production,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37, 4880–4888 (2012).IJHEDX0360-3199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.12.045 Google Scholar

120. S. K. Pilli et al., “Light induced water oxidation on cobalt-phosphate (Co-Pi) catalyst modified semi-transparent, porous SiO2-BiVO4 electrodes,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 7032–7039 (2012).PPCPFQ1463-9076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2cp40673j Google Scholar

121. D. K. Zhong et al., “Photo-assisted electrodeposition of cobalt-phosphate (Co-Pi) catalyst on hematite photoanodes for solar water oxidation,” Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 1759–1764 (2011).EESNBY1754-5692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c1ee01034d Google Scholar

122. J. Y. Zheng et al., “Preparation of α-Fe2O3 films by electrodeposition and photodeposition of Co-Pi on them to enhance their photoelectrochemical properties,” RSC Adv. 5, 36307–36314 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5RA03029C Google Scholar

123. A. J. Esswein et al., “Highly active cobalt phosphate and borate based oxygen evolving catalysts operating in neutral and natural waters,” Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 499–504 (2011).EESNBY1754-5692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C0EE00518E Google Scholar

124. Y. Surendranath, M. Dinca and D. G. Nocera, “Electrolyte-dependent electrosynthesis and activity of cobalt-based water oxidation catalysts,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 2615–2620 (2009).JACSAT0002-7863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja807769r Google Scholar

125. M. W. Kanan, Y. Surendranath and D. G. Nocera, “Cobalt-phosphate oxygen-evolving compound,” Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 109–114 (2009).CSRVBR0306-0012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B802885K Google Scholar

126. M. W. Kanan and D. G. Nocera, “In situ formation of an oxygen-evolving catalyst in neutral water containing phosphate and Co2+,” Science 321, 1072–1075 (2008).SCIEAS0036-8075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1162018 Google Scholar

127. A. Indra et al., “Nickel as a co-catalyst for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution on graphitic-carbon nitride (sg-CN): what is the nature of the active species,” Chem. Commun. 52, 104–107 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5CC07936E Google Scholar

128. Y. Xu and R. Xu, “Nickel-based cocatalysts for photocatalytic hydrogen production,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 351, 779–793 (2015).ASUSEE0169-4332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.171 Google Scholar

129. M. Shen et al., “MoS2 nanosheet/TiO2 nanowire hybrid nanostructures for enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activities,” Chem. Commun. 50, 15447–15449 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4CC07351G Google Scholar

130. Y. Hou et al., “Bioinspired molecular co-catalysts bonded to a silicon photocathode for solar hydrogen evolution,” Nat. Mater. 10, 434–438 (2011).NMAACR1476-1122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat3008 Google Scholar

131. X. Morales et al., “Hydrogen evolution from a copper(I) oxide photocathode coated with an amorphous molybdenum sulphide catalyst,” Nat. Commun. 5, 3059 (2014).NCAOBW2041-1723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4059 Google Scholar

132. X. Zong et al., “Enhancement of photocatalytic H2 evolution on CdS by loading MoS2 as cocatalyst under visible light irradiation,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 7176–7177 (2008).JACSAT0002-7863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja8007825 Google Scholar

133. R. Jiang et al., “Metal/semiconductor hybrid nanostructures for plasmon-enhanced applications,” Adv. Mater. 26, 5274–5309 (2014).ADVMEW0935-9648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.201400203 Google Scholar

134. X. Zhang et al., “Plasmonic photocatalysis,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 76, 046401 (2013).RPPHAG0034-4885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/76/4/046401 Google Scholar

135. S. C. Warren and E. Thimsen, “Plasmonic solar water splitting,” Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 5133–5146 (2012).EESNBY1754-5692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C1EE02875H Google Scholar

136. C. G. Silva et al., “Influence of excitation wavelength (UV or visible light) on the photocatalytic activity of titania containing gold nanoparticles for the generation of hydrogen or oxygen from water,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 595–602 (2011).JACSAT0002-7863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja1086358 Google Scholar

137. M. K. Kumar et al., “Field effects in plasmonic photocatalyst by precise SiO2 thickness control using atomic layer deposition,” ACS Catal. 1, 300–308 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cs100117v Google Scholar

138. W. Zhai et al., “Plasmon‐driven selective oxidation of aromatic alcohols to aldehydes in water with recyclable Pt/TiO2 nanocomposites,” Chem. Catal. Chem. 3, 127–130 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201000303 Google Scholar

139. D. B. Ingram and S. Linic, “Water splitting on composite plasmonic-metal/semiconductor photoelectrodes: evidence for selective plasmon-induced formation of charge carriers near the semiconductor surface,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133(14), 5202–5205 (2011).JACSAT0002-7863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja200086g Google Scholar

140. J. J. Chen et al., “Plasmonic photocatalyst for H2 evolution in photocatalytic water splitting,” J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 210–216 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp1074048 Google Scholar

141. Z. Liu et al., “Plasmon resonant enhancement of photocatalytic water splitting under visible illumination,” Nano Lett. 11, 1111–1116 (2011).NALEFD1530-6984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl104005n Google Scholar

142. S. Linic, P. Christopher and D. B. Ingram, “Plasmonic-metal nanostructures for efficient conversion of solar to chemical energy,” Nat. Mater. 10, 911–921 (2011).NMAACR1476-1122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat3151 Google Scholar

143. T. Butburee et al., “Step-wise controlled growth of metal at TiO2 core-shells with plasmonic hot spots and their photocatalytic properties,” J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 12776–12784 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4TA01120A Google Scholar

144. K. Cheng et al., “Plasmon-enhanced photocurrent generation in quantum dots-sensitized solar cells by coupling of gold nanocrystals,” Sci. Bull. 60, 541–548 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11434-015-0743-x Google Scholar

145. H. Chen, G. Liu and L. Wang, “Switched photocurrent direction in Au/TiO2 bilayer thin films,” Sci. Rep. 5, 10852 (2015).SRCEC32045-2322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep10852 Google Scholar

146. J. Xiong et al., “Facile synthesis of highly efficient one-dimensional plasmonic photocatalysts through Ag at Cu2O core-shell heteronanowires,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 15716–15725 (2014).AAMICK1944-8244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/am502516s Google Scholar

147. J. Li et al., “Plasmon-induced photonic and energy-transfer enhancement of solar water splitting by a hematite nanorod array,” Nat. Commun. 4, 2651 (2013).NCAOBW2041-1723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3651 Google Scholar

148. X. Zhao et al., “Ag nanoparticles decorated CuO nanowire arrays for efficient plasmon enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 609, 59–64 (2014).CHPLBC0009-2614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2014.06.045 Google Scholar

149. W. Fan et al., “In situ deposition of Ag-Ag2S hybrid nanoparticles onto TiO2 nanotube arrays towards fabrication of photoelectrodes with high visible light photoelectrochemical properties,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 676–680 (2014).PPCPFQ1463-9076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C3CP54098G Google Scholar

150. K. Chen et al., “Effect of Ag nanoparticle size on the photoelectrochemical properties of Ag decorated TiO2 nanotube arrays,” J. Alloys Compd. 554, 72–79 (2013).JALCEU0925-8388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.11.126 Google Scholar

151. S. Y. Reece et al., “Wireless solar water splitting using silicon-based semiconductors and earth-abundant catalysts,” Science 334, 645–648 (2011).SCIEAS0036-8075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1209816 Google Scholar

152. D. V. Esposito et al., “H2 evolution at Si-based metal-insulator–semiconductor photoelectrodes enhanced by inversion channel charge collection and H spillover,” Nat. Mater. 12, 562–568 (2013).NMAACR1476-1122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat3626 Google Scholar

153. B. Seger et al., “Using TiO2 as a conductive protective layer for photocathodic H2 evolution,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 1057–1064 (2013).JACSAT0002-7863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja309523t Google Scholar

154. S. Licht et al., “Efficient solar water splitting, exemplified by RuO2-catalyzed AlGaAs/Si photoelectrolysis,” J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 8920–8924 (2000).JPCBFK1520-6106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp002083b Google Scholar

155. F. F. Abdi et al., “Efficient solar water splitting by enhanced charge separation in a bismuth vanadate-silicon tandem photoelectrode,” Nat. Commun. 4, 2195 (2013).NCAOBW2041-1723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3195 Google Scholar

156. Y. Li et al., “Cobalt phosphate-modified barium-doped tantalum nitride nanorod photoanode with 1.5% solar energy conversion efficiency,” Nat. Commun. 4, 2566 (2013).NCAOBW2041-1723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3566 Google Scholar

157. “Hydrogen evolution from Pt/Ru-coated p-type WSe2 photocathodes,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 223–231 (2013).JACSAT0002-7863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja308581g Google Scholar

158. X. Wang et al., “Silicon/hematite core/shell nanowire array decorated with gold nanoparticles for unbiased solar water oxidation,” Nano Lett. 14, 18–23 (2014).NALEFD1530-6984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl402205f Google Scholar

159. J. Y. Kim et al., “Single-crystalline, wormlike hematite photoanodes for efficient solar water splitting,” Sci. Rep. 3, 2681 (2013).SRCEC32045-2322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep02681 Google Scholar

160. A. Paracchino et al., “Highly active oxide photocathode for photoelectrochemical water reduction,” Nat. Mater. 10, 456–461 (2011).NMAACR1476-1122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat3017 Google Scholar

161. P. Bornoz et al., “A bismuth vanadate-cuprous oxide tandem cell for overall solar water splitting,” J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 16959–16966 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp500441h Google Scholar

162. Z. Zhang et al., “Carbon-layer-protected cuprous oxide nanowire arrays for efficient water reduction,” ACS Nano 7, 1709–1717 (2013).ANCAC31936-0851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nn3057092 Google Scholar

163. M. Moriya et al., “Stable hydrogen evolution from CdS-modified CuGaSe2 photoelectrode under visible-light irradiation,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 3733–3735 (2013).JACSAT0002-7863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja312653y Google Scholar

164. L. Zhang et al., “Hydrogen evolution from water using AgxCu1xGaSe2 photocathodes under visible light,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 6167–6174 (2014).PPCPFQ1463-9076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3cp54590c Google Scholar

165. J. Luo et al., “Water photolysis at 12.3% efficiency via perovskite photovoltaics and Earth-abundant catalysts,” Science 345, 1593–1596 (2014).SCIEAS0036-8075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1258307 Google Scholar

166. P. Da et al., “High-performance perovskite photoanode enabled by Ni passivation and catalysis,” Nano Lett. 15, 3452–3457 (2015).NALEFD1530-6984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00788 Google Scholar

167. J. K. Kim et al., “Synthesis of transparent mesoporous tungsten trioxide films with enhanced photoelectrochemical response: application to unassisted solar water splitting,” Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 1465–1470 (2011).EESNBY1754-5692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c0ee00469c Google Scholar

168. J. Brillet et al., “Highly efficient water splitting by a dual-absorber tandem cell,” Nat. Photonics 6, 824–828 (2012).NPAHBY1749-4885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2012.265 Google Scholar

169. X. Shi et al., “Unassisted photoelectrochemical water splitting beyond 5.7% solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency by a wireless monolithic photoanode/dye-sensitised solar cell tandem device,” Nano Energy 13, 182–191 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.02.018 Google Scholar

170. S. Ryu et al., “Voltage output of efficient perovskite solar cells with high open-circuit voltage and fill factor,” Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 2614–2618 (2014).EESNBY1754-5692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4EE00762J Google Scholar

171. J. H. Kim et al., “Wireless solar water splitting device with robust cobalt-catalyzed, dual-doped BiVO4 photoanode and perovskite solar cell in tandem: a dual absorber artificial leaf,” ACS Nano 9, 11820–11829 (2015).ANCAC31936-0851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b03859 Google Scholar

172. C. Ding et al., “Solar-to-hydrogen efficiency exceeding 2.5% achieved for overall water splitting with an all earth-abundant dual-photoelectrode,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 15608–15614 (2014).PPCPFQ1463-9076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c4cp02391a Google Scholar

173. J.-W. Jang et al., “Enabling unassisted solar water splitting by iron oxide and silicon,” Nat. Commun. 6, 7447 (2015).NCAOBW2041-1723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8447 Google Scholar

174. G. K. Mor et al., “p-type Cu-Ti–O nanotube arrays and their use in self-biased heterojunction photoelectrochemical diodes for hydrogen generation,” Nano Lett. 8, 1906–1911 (2008).NALEFD1530-6984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl080572y Google Scholar

175. S. Khan, M. Frites and W. B. Ingler, “Single chip standalone water splitting photoelectrochemical cell,” J. Technol. Innovation Renewable Energy 3, 6–11 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.6000/1929-6002.2014.03.01.2 Google Scholar

176. M. R. Shaner et al., “Si/TiO2 tandem-junction microwire arrays for unassisted solar-driven water splitting,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 163, H261–H264 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1149/2.0141605jes Google Scholar

177. P. Yang and J. M. Tarascon, “Towards systems materials engineering,” Nat. Mater. 11, 560–563 (2012).NMAACR1476-1122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat3367 Google Scholar

178. H. S. Park et al., “Unbiased photoelectrochemical water splitting in Z-scheme device using W/Mo-doped BiVO4 and ZnxCd1xSe,” Chem. Phys. Chem. 14, 2277–2287 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201201044 Google Scholar

179. H. B. Yang et al., “Stable quantum dot photoelectrolysis cell for unassisted visible light solar water splitting,” ACS Nano 8, 10403–10413 (2014).ANCAC31936-0851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nn503751s Google Scholar

180. B. AlOtaibi et al., “A metal-nitride nanowire dual-photoelectrode device for unassisted solar-to-hydrogen conversion under parallel illumination,” Nano Lett. 15, 6821–6828 (2015).NALEFD1530-6984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02671 Google Scholar


Piangjai Peerakiatkhajohn received her MSc degree from the Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment (JGSEE), King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi in 2011. Currently, she is a PhD student under the supervision of Prof. Lianzhou Wang at School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland (UQ), Australia. Her research interest focuses on the design and development of novel photoelectrochemical system for efficient solar energy conversion.

Jung-Ho Yun received his PhD degree in chemical engineering from the University of New South Wales in 2012. Before his PhD, he worked at NANOPAC, Korea, for energy/environmental applications using functional nanomaterials between 2003 and 2007. Currently, he is working as a postdoctoral research fellow in Prof. Lianzhou Wang's Group, The University of Queensland. His research focuses on novel nanostructured photoelectrodes for photoelectrochemical system and solar cells.

Songcan Wang received his BEng. (2011) and MEng. (2014) from the Central South University (CSU), China. Currently, he is a PhD student under the supervision of Prof. Lianzhou Wang at School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland (UQ), Australia. His research interests are mainly focused on the design and development of high performance photoanodes for photoelectrochemical energy storage and conversion.

Lianzhou Wang is currently a professor in the School of Chemical Engineering and director of the Nanomaterials Centre, the University of Queensland (UQ), Australia. He received his PhD degree from Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, in 1999. Before joining UQ in 2004, he worked at two national institutes (NIMS and AIST) of Japan for 5 years. His research interests include the design and application of semiconducting nanomaterials in renewable energy conversion/storage systems, including photocatalysts and low-cost solar cells.

© 2016 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
Piangjai Peerakiatkhajohn, Jung-Ho Yun, Songcan Wang, Lianzhou Wang, "Review of recent progress in unassisted photoelectrochemical water splitting: from material modification to configuration design," Journal of Photonics for Energy 7(1), 012006 (24 August 2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JPE.7.012006

Back to Top