Photon upconversion based on triplet–triplet annihilation (TTA-UC) has attracted much attention for its potential applications in renewable energy production technologies.1–10 In the typical TTA-UC process, (1) a triplet excited state of the donor is formed by intersystem crossing (ISC) from a photoexcited singlet state, (2) acceptor triplet excited states are populated by triplet energy transfer (TET) from the donor triplets, and (3) annihilation between two acceptor triplets (TTA) generates an acceptor singlet excited state, from which upconverted delayed fluorescence is emitted [Fig. 1(a)]. One of the advantages of TTA-UC is its occurrence at lower excitation intensity compared with the other UC mechanisms due to the large absorption coefficient of the donor chromophores and the long triplet lifetime of acceptor molecules.
To achieve efficient TTA-UC under weak incident light sources, diffusion of triplet species should be high enough to enable annihilation within their lifetimes. Consequently, the majority of TTA-UC systems have been studied in solution8,11–15 or soft polymer matrices,16–20 in which the TET and TTA processes are mediated by molecular diffusion and collision. Meanwhile, it is desirable for device applications that TTA-UC processes occur in the solid state without molecular diffusion. In this perspective, it is natural to develop triplet energy migration-based photon upconversion (TEM-UC),10 in which triplet excitons effectively diffuse in densely organized molecular assemblies without molecular diffusion.21–32 Among various assembly systems, molecular crystals with ordered chromophore arrangements should be promising for achieving fast TEM. However, the crystalline systems have suffered from the aggregation of donor molecules and their segregation in acceptor crystals, which caused poor TET efficiency.4 Despite efforts to solve this problem,28,29,32–34 the development of a simple and rational strategy to molecularly accommodate donor molecules in acceptor crystals is still anticipated.
Here, we describe a kinetically controlled crystal growth approach that improves the dispersibility of donors in acceptor crystals and, consequently, increased the efficiency of TEM-UC. We employed the donor–acceptor pair of Pt(II) octaethylporphyrin (PtOEP) and 9,10-diphenylanthracene (DPA), which has been widely used as a benchmark. Due to their inherent structural mismatch, PtOEP and DPA do not mix homogeneously in crystals and tend to phase segregate.4 Meanwhile, miscibility of molecules coexisting in multicomponent assemblies has been kinetically controlled for organic molecular crystals35 and peptide assemblies.36,37 We apply this kinetic control concept to improve the miscibility of donor PtOEP and acceptor DPA in nanocrystals. For this, we adopted a colloid chemistry approach; tetrahydrofuran (THF) solutions of DPA–PtOEP were injected into aqueous cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB).38–40 Upon the diffusion of injected THF into the aqueous phase, the nucleation of water-insoluble aromatic crystals occurs. Adsorption of CTAB molecules on the growing crystal surfaces would reduce their interfacial energy, thus enhancing the dispersion stability of these crystals.38–40 Significantly, it was found that the increase in the concentration of DPA–PtOEP caused faster crystallization of DPA, which allowed PtOEP molecules to be kinetically trapped with improved dispersibility in DPA crystals [Fig. 1(b)].
Materials and Methods
All the solvents were used as received without further purification. DPA was purchased from Aldrich and purified by sublimation in order to minimize the amount of impurities, which may act as quencher in the solid system. PtOEP and CTAB were purchased from Aldrich and Wako chemical and used as received.
UV–visible absorption spectra were recorded on a JASCO V-670 spectrophotometer. Fluorescence spectra were measured by using a PerkinElmer LS 55 fluorescence spectrometer. Powder x-ray diffraction (PXRD) analyses were conducted on a BRUKER D2 PHASER with a Cu source (). Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images were obtained by using a Hitachi S-5000. For SEM measurements, samples were collected by suction filtration using membrane filters with pore size of . These filters were directly used for SEM measurements after platinum sputtering with the thickness of ca. 2 nm. Time-resolved photoluminescence lifetime measurements were carried out by using a time-correlated single photon counting lifetime spectroscopy system, Hamamatsu Quantaurus-Tau C11567-01. Dynamic light scattering measurements were carried out by using Malvern Nano-ZS ZEN3600.
For TTA-UC measurements, the samples were sealed between quartz plates by using hot-melt adhesive in an Ar-filled glove box (). For TTA-UC emission spectra, a diode laser (532 nm, 200 mW, RGB Photonics) was used as an excitation source. The laser power was controlled by combining a software (Ltune) and a variable neutral density filter and measured using a PD300-UV photodiode sensor (OPHIR Photonics). The laser beam was focused on a sample using a lens. The diameter of the laser beam () was measured at the sample position using a CCD beam profiler SP620 (OPHIR Photonics). The typical area of laser irradiation spot estimated from the diameter was . The emitted light was collimated by an achromatic lens, the excitation light was removed using a notch filter (532 nm), and the emitted light was again focused by an achromatic lens to an optical fiber connected to a multichannel detector MCPD-9800, which was supplied and calibrated by Otsuka Electronics and equipped with a CCD sensor for the detection of whole visible range with high sensitivity.
TTA-UC and donor phosphorescence quantum yields were measured by using an absolute quantum yield measurement system. The sample was held in an integration sphere and excited by the laser excitation source (532 nm, 200 mW, RGB Photonics). The scattered excitation light was removed using a 532 nm notch filter, and emitted light was monitored with a multichannel detector C10027-01 (Hamamatsu Photonics). The spectrometer was calibrated including the integration sphere and notch filter by Hamamatsu Photonics.22
DPA and PtOEP were dissolved in THF at three different concentrations. As a moderately diluted condition, DPA (2 mM)–PtOEP() in THF was employed (condition 1). Separately, saturated solutions of DPA (140 mM) with two different PtOEP concentrations (140 and ) were prepared for the rapid crystallization (conditions 2A and 2B). All the experiments of crystal growth and collection were carried out at room temperature (around 20°C). No preformed crystals in the 140 mM DPA solution were detected from dynamic light scattering measurements. 0.5 mL of DPA–PtOEP mixed THF solutions were rapidly injected into the aqueous CTAB (0.5 mM, 5 mL) at room temperature under 1000 rpm stirring. These mixtures were kept stirring for 3 min and then left to stand for 2 h. After the incubation for 2 h, the crystals were collected by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 5 min, washed with water for three times, and dried under vacuum at room temperature.
Results and Discussions
Characterization of the Crystals
When the THF solution of DPA (2 mM)–PtOEP () was injected into the aqueous CTAB (condition 1) under stirring, the immediately formed suspension turned into a uniform dispersion within 3 min of stirring. This specimen was then incubated for 2 h, during which crystalline particles were gradually formed. On the other hand, precipitates were immediately formed upon injection of the saturated DPA solutions into aqueous CTAB (, and , conditions 2A and 2B), which showed almost no changes during the standing for 2 h.
The composition of the obtained crystals was determined by dissolving the crystals in THF and measuring their absorption spectra. The DPA–PtOEP molar ratios were , , and for those obtained under the conditions 1, 2A, and 2B, respectively. The content of PtOEP in the obtained crystals was lower than the initial mixing ratio in THF for condition 1 (), whereas it was higher than those for conditions 2A () and 2B (). The enhanced accumulation of PtOEP in DPA crystals under conditions 2A and 2B suggests that the rapid growth of DPA microcrystals facilitate kinetic entrapment of PtOEP molecules in the interior.
The crystallinity of obtained samples was confirmed by using PXRD measurements (Fig. 2). The diffraction patterns of the crystals formed under these conditions showed good agreements with the PXRD pattern of bulk DPA. On the other hand, the diffraction peaks of bulk PtOEP, for example, the peak at , were hardly observed from those of the composite crystals, which would be due to the high dispersibility of the donor molecules or the too small amount of PtOEP for detection. It is confirmed that the basic arrangement of DPA molecules is almost independent of the crystallization conditions.
To get insights into the crystal growth processes, the crystals were collected by suction filtration before and after the 2 h of incubation, and their morphology was observed by scanning electron microscopy. In the case of the condition 1 sample, partly aggregated irregular nanorods were observed before incubation. After standing for 2 h, a few -sized rods and a few tens of -sized sheets appeared [Fig. 3(a)]. The observed morphological changes suggest that the ordered crystals gradually grew in the course of incubation. On the other hand, samples obtained under the conditions 2A and 2B gave larger spherical microstructures with similar size before and after the incubation process [Figs. 3(b) and 3(c)]. It is to be noted that the morphology of crystals differs considerably depending on the preparative conditions, i.e., kinetic parameters determine both of the nucleation and growth processes. When the same preparation procedure was carried out for PtOEP without DPA, only a few tens of nm-sized nanocrystals were observed, and thus the above-mentioned -sized objects cannot be the crystals consisting of pure PtOEP.
Photophysical Properties of the Crystals
To investigate the dispersed state of PtOEP molecules in acceptor DPA crystals, UV–vis absorption spectra of PtOEP were measured (Fig. 4). A THF solution of PtOEP ) showed a band at 534 nm, whereas this band is red-shifted to 552 nm in the cast solid sample due to aggregation.41 Interestingly, absorption spectra obtained for PtOEP in DPA–PtOEP composite crystals showed blue shifts compared to that of the neat cast solid. Notably, the peaks of the condition 2A (537 nm) and 2B (536 nm) samples are more blue shifted compared to that of the crystals obtained under condition 1 (541 nm). It is to note that the main peak of the condition 2B sample is close to that observed for the diluted THF solution, with a suppressed shoulder component at around 547 nm. This shoulder component reflects the presence of interchromophore interactions among PtOEP molecules. Apparently, the sample prepared under the condition 2B showed the spectrum revealing the most isolated PtOEP chromophores, showing the highest dispersibility of PtOEP is achieved under the rapid crystal growth condition with the high DPA:PtOEP molar ratio. We confirmed that the DPA–PtOEP crystals prepared in the absence of CTAB showed a pronounced aggregate-shoulder peak, indicating that CTAB significantly influenced the crystallization kinetics in the aqueous mixtures.
The fluorescence quantum yields with direct excitation of DPA (, ) were 42%, 28%, and 54% for powdery samples obtained under conditions 1, 2A, and 2B, respectively. Since the higher values were observed for crystals with lower PtOEP contents, it is possible that the DPA-to-PtOEP singlet–singlet energy transfer and/or the reabsorption of the DPA fluorescence by the donor molecules takes place.
The TTA-UC characteristics of each composite crystals were then evaluated. Under excitation with a 532-nm laser, upconverted emission was clearly observed for each sample with the maximum intensity at around 440 nm (Fig. 5). It is to be noted that these TTA-UC behaviors observed for the present DPA–PtOEP crystals prepared by the CTAB-assisted colloid technique is significantly improved as compared to that previously reported for the DPA single crystal doped with PtOEP.4
The donor phosphorescence at 650 nm was much weaker than the UC emission, and the phosphorescence quantum yields of all the three samples were less than 0.1%. These results suggest that the triplet energy of the donor molecules is efficiently transferred to the surrounding acceptor molecules or thermally dissipated in the donor aggregates.41
TTA-UC quantum yields for samples obtained under each condition were determined by the absolute method using the integrating sphere and the laser excitation source, to avoid inaccuracy that could arise from the strong light scattering of the crystals. In general, the quantum yield is defined as the ratio of absorbed photons to emitted photons, and thus the maximum yield () of the bimolecular TTA-UC process is 50%. However, many reports multiply this value by 2 to set the maximum quantum yield at 100%. To avoid the confusion between these different definitions, the UC quantum yield is written as () when the maximum efficiency is normalized to 100%. The value detemined for the condition 1 sample was as low as (Fig. 6). On the other hand, much higher values were observed for crystals prepared under the conditions 2A () and 2B ().
To understand the observed difference, factors affecting to the value need to be considered. is represented by the following equation:4,8 The parameter is the statistical probability for obtaining a singlet excited state after the annihilation of two triplet states. Considering that of the condition 2A sample was smaller (28%) than that of the condition 1 sample (42%), the higher value of the condition 2A sample as compared to the condition 1 sample should be originated from the other parameters. The value and can be assumed to be the same for the identical donor–acceptor pair with the similar crystal structure as confirmed by PXRD. It is then suggested that the better dispersibility of donor molecules in condition 2A sample, as evidenced by the absorption spectra (Fig. 4), improved the net value and consequently afforded the better . As described above, the condition 2B sample showed the highest donor dispersibility among all the samples prepared in this study (Fig. 4). It is reasonable that the condition 2B sample showed higher than the condition 2A sample, which was also benefitted from the smaller content of the donor that allowed to maintain higher (54%). The UC quantum yields remain low () at the solar irradiance ( at , air mass 1.5), requiring future efforts to decrease the needed excitation intensity.
We would like to call attention to the complexity of the condensed systems when the donor distribution is not homogeneous in acceptor crystals. Generally, TTA-UC emission intensity shows a quadratic dependence with the incident light intensity at low excitation intensity, where the thermal deactivation of the triplet states is governed by the main deactivation pathway. The quadratic-to-linear transition occurs by increasing the excitation intensity, and the transition point gives a threshold excitation intensity ().42–44 Above , the TTA becomes the main deactivation channel for the acceptor triplets. The quadratic-to-linear transitions were observed for all the three conditions (Fig. 7). Despite the considerable difference in the UC quantum yield (Fig. 6), these three samples showed rather similar values in the range of 326 to .
This discrepancy might be explained by the following hypothesis. In the condition 1 sample, not all donor molecules form aggregates and some donor molecules well dispersed in acceptor crystals contribute to the excitation intensity dependence with value similar to the condition 2B sample. However, as we described above, most of the donor molecules are present as aggregates in the condition 1 sample, which hinder the donor-to-acceptor TET and resulted in the observed low UC quantum yield. It is therefore essential to characterize the UC characteristics in a comprehensive manner, and the determination of UC quantum yields is prerequisite for the evaluation of solid upconverters.
Conclusions and Future Remarks
We show the promising potential of kinetically controlled crystal growth to improve the dispersibility of donor molecules in acceptor crystals and to achieve efficient TEM-UC in the solid state. By simply increasing the concentration of the donor and acceptor in the surfactant-assisted reprecipitation process, the kinetic entrapment of the donor in acceptor crystals is facilitated with the enhanced dispersibility. Consequently, the UC quantum yield was dramatically enhanced. The concept of kinetically controlled crystal growth is successfully demonstrated for the benchmark TTA-UC pair, DPA and PtOEP, which has been known to undergo severe phase segregation. The present kinetically controlled crystallization concept for improving donor dispersibility in acceptor crystals would be widely applicable to a variety of chromophore combinations, including the recently developed precious metal-free systems25,45,46 and NIR-to-visible UC systems.12–15,47,48 For further improvement of the current method, we consider that the key is to suppress the formation of defect sites that deactivate the triplet excitons.28 The development of approaches to circumvent this issue is under way in our laboratory.
This work was partly supported by the JSPS KAKENHI Grant Nos. JP25220805, JP17H04799, JP16H06513 (Coordination Asymmetry), JP16H00844 (Soft Molecular Systems), PRESTO program on “Molecular Technology and Creation of New Functions” from JST (JPMJPR14KE), and the Asahi Glass Foundation.
Taku Ogawa received his MS degree in engineering from Kyushu University in 2015. He is currently a PhD candidate under the supervision of Prof. N. Kimizuka and Dr. N. Yanai in the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry. His current research focuses on triplet energy dynamics in self-assembled materials.
Nobuhiro Yanai received his PhD from Kyoto University in 2011 with Prof. Susumu Kitagawa and Dr. Takashi Uemura on polymer properties in MOFs. He was a postdoctoral researcher with Prof. Steve Granick at the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, working on self-assembly of MOF colloids. In 2012, he became an assistant professor at Kyushu University, where he has been an associate professor since 2015. His current research interests are in materials chemistry for photon upconversion.
Hironori Kouno received his MS degree in engineering from Kyushu University in 2017. He is currently a PhD candidate under the supervision of Prof. N. Kimizuka and Dr. N. Yanai in the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry. His current research focuses on establishment of aqueous photon upconversion molecular system. His research interests also include development of functional materials for energy-related and biological applications.
Nobuo Kimizuka received his PhD from Kyushu University in 1990 with Prof. Toyoki Kunitake on the excitonic chromophore interactions in molecular membranes. After working as a postdoctoral researcher with Prof. Helmut Ringsdorf at Mainz University, he was promoted to an associate professor in 1992 and a full professor in 2000. His work encompasses the synthesis and functions of molecular self-assemblies and nanomaterials with recent focus on photon energy conversion in organized molecular systems.