Translator Disclaimer
Open Access
14 June 2021 Aberration correction in stimulated emission depletion microscopy to increase imaging depth in living brain tissue
Stéphane Bancelin, Luc Mercier, Emanuele Murana, U. Valentin Nägerl
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Significance: Stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy enables nanoscale imaging of live samples, but it requires a specific spatial beam shaping that is highly sensitive to optical aberrations, limiting its depth penetration. Therefore, there is a need for methods to reduce optical aberrations and improve the spatial resolution of STED microscopy inside thick biological tissue.

Aim: The aim of our work was to develop and validate a method based on adaptive optics to achieve an a priori correction of spherical aberrations as a function of imaging depth.

Approach: We first measured the aberrations in a phantom sample of gold and fluorescent nanoparticles suspended in an agarose gel with a refractive index closely matching living brain tissue. We then used a spatial light modulator to apply corrective phase shifts and validate this calibration approach by imaging neurons in living brain slices.

Results: After quantifying the spatial resolution in depth in phantom samples, we demonstrated that the corrections can substantially increase image quality in living brain slices. Specifically, we could measure structures as small as 80 nm at a depth of 90  μm inside the biological tissue and obtain a 60% signal increase after correction.

Conclusion: We propose a simple and robust approach to calibrate and compensate the distortions of the STED beam profile introduced by spherical aberrations with increasing imaging depth and demonstrated that this method offers significant improvements in microscopy performance for nanoscale cellular imaging in live tissue.

1.

Introduction

The advent of super-resolution microscopy, breaking the diffraction barrier of optical microscopy, has opened up tremendous opportunities for nanoscale imaging of live cells.1,2 In particular, stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy has made it possible to reconcile nanoscale resolution with imaging in live brain tissue preparations, setting new standards for visualizing the dynamic morphology of neurons.35

STED microscopy relies on the use of two co-propagating laser beams: a Gaussian beam to excite fluorescent molecules within a diffraction-limited focal spot and a depletion beam to de-excite the fluorescence of the peripheral molecules via stimulated emission. This joint action increases the spatial resolution by up to an order of magnitude.6 Using appropriate beam shaping, STED microscopy can be operated either in 2D or 3D mode, typically using so-called donut or bottle beams. Applied in combination, these two modes allow for optimizing lateral as well as axial resolution at the same time.79

STED microscopy depends crucially on the quality of the point-spread function (PSF) of the depletion beam. However, maintaining the STED PSF deep inside thick brain tissue preparations remains challenging. Indeed, optical aberrations, stemming from the optics and the specimen, induce distortions on the laser wavefront that can severely degrade the quality of the STED PSF (especially its symmetry and the null in the center).1012 Although system aberrations tend to be static and can be compensated using appropriate optics, the sample-induced aberrations are more problematic and usually limit the ability to image much beyond the surface of the sample. However, in the last few years, several studies have addressed this challenge in various ways, e.g., combining STED with 2P excitation,13,14 objective lenses with correction collar,4 Bessel beams,15 optical clearing/index matching,16 or adaptive optics (AO).11

The use of AO, which makes it possible to predistort the wavefront and thus cancel both system and sample aberrations,17 is a promising way to preserve a high-quality PSF deep inside scattering tissue.18 Spatial light modulators (SLM) offer a versatile solution not only to generate the focal STED donut19,20 but also to implement aberration correction measures.7,8,11,21,22 However, most of these techniques operate in closed loop,11 which necessitates numerous iterations to achieve appreciable correction. This imposes long exposure times to laser light on the sample, inducing a significant amount of photobleaching and toxicity. However, in the past years, several strategies have been proposed to reduce these problems.23,24 Although an iterative approach is very effective in settings where bleaching is very low or absent, as in the case of super-resolution shadow imaging,25 it is impractical when imaging positively labelled structures, which tend to bleach rapidly.

In this work, we propose a simple and robust approach to improve resolution in depth by using an a priori estimation of aberrations as a function of imaging depth, focusing on spherical aberrations, which are the main type of aberration induced by biological specimens. To that end, we measured the aberrations as a function of depth in an agarose gel containing gold and fluorescent beads and with a refractive index closely adjusted to the one of living brain tissue. We then show that these calibrated values can be used to preprogram an SLM at specified depths to correct the aberrations and to improve image quality, facilitating the depth penetration for nanoscale imaging of neuronal morphology in living brain tissue.

2.

Materials and Methods

2.1.

STED Microscope

Imaging was performed using a custom-built upright STED microscope based on pulsed excitation at 900 nm and pulsed depletion at 592 nm [Fig. 1(a)]. Briefly, two-photon excitation (2P) is achieved using a femtosecond mode-locked titanium:sapphire laser (Tsunami, Spectra Physics) delivering 100  fs pulses at a 80-MHz repetition rate. Laser power was adjusted using a Pockels cell (302 RM, Conoptics). The STED beam was provided by a pulsed laser (Katana 06 HP, NKT Photonics) delivering 400-ps pulses at 80 MHz. Laser power was adjusted using a combination of a half-wave plate and a beam splitting polarizer. Both lasers were synchronized using “lock-to-clock” electronics (Model 3930 and 3931, Spectra Physics).

Fig. 1

(a) Schematic of the setup used for 2P-STED microscopy. P, polarizer; PMF, polarization maintaining fiber; SLM, spatial light modulator; λ/2 and λ/4, half and quarter wave plates; DM, dichroic mirror; SL and TL, tube and scan lens; EOM, electro-optic modulator; and APD, avalanche photodiode. (b) 2P and STED beam PSFs obtained by imaging gold beads. (c) Lateral and axial view of the effective PSFs assessed on 170-nm fluorescent beads. Image size: 3×3  μm2.

NPH_8_3_035001_f001.png

The STED beam was spectrally cleaned up using a band-pass filter (593/40, Semrock) and appropriately shaped using a “3D module” (Aberrior Instruments), controlled through Imspector software, based on an SLM to generate a collinear mix of donut and bottle beams following the scheme described by Lenz et al.7 In this configuration, the SLM served two purposes: shaping the donut and bottle beams and correcting for optical aberrations. Half and quarter-wave plates (λ/2 and λ/4) were used to adjust the polarization to left-handed circular. The 2P and STED laser beams were combined using a long-pass dichroic mirror (DCSPXRUV-T700, AHF). Appropriate lens combinations were used to conjugate the SLM on a telecentric scanner (Yanus IV, TILL Photonics), which projected both scan axes on the back focal plane of the objective lens (UPLanSAPO, 60×, Silicone Oil immersion, NA1.3 Olympus) mounted on a z-focusing piezoactuator (Pifoc 725.2CD, Physik Instrumente). The epi-fluorescence signal was descanned separated from incident beams using a long-pass dichroic mirror (580 DCXRUV, AHF) and detected by an avalanche photodiode (SPCM-AQRH-14-FC, Excelitas) with appropriate notch (594S-25, Semrock) and bandpass filters (680SP-25, 520-50, Semrock) along the emission path. Signal detection and hardware control were performed with the Imspector scanning software (Abberior Instruments) via a data acquisition card (PCIe-6259, National Instruments).

To assess donut or bottle beam quality, a pellicle beam splitter (BP145B1, Thorlabs) was flipped into the beam path to detect the signal reflected on gold beads (150-nm gold nanospheres, Sigma Aldrich) on a photomultiplier tube (MD963, Excelitas). The STED profile was changed from donut to bottle by rotating the half-wave plate placed before the SLM. In the following, 2D-STED, z-STED, and 3D-STED will refer to images acquired using a pure donut, pure bottle, or a combination of donut and bottle beams, respectively [Fig. 1(b)]. Optical resolution was assessed by imaging fluorescent beads (yellow-green fluorescent beads, 40 or 170 nm in diameter, Invitrogen) immobilized on glass slides [Fig. 1(c)].

2.2.

STED Beam Quality and Aberration Correction

In the context of thick biological samples imaging, optical aberrations are defined as the deviation of the wavefront from its perfect shape, which is commonly expressed as a series of Zernike polynomials:

Eq. (1)

Ψ(ρ,θ)=n,mCnmZnm(ρ,θ),
where Ψ is the aberration function, Cnm and Znm are the Zernike coefficients and polynomials, respectively (Table 1). Zernike polynomials are widely used to model aberrations because they are orthogonal and each polynomial function corresponds to an optical aberration, such as astigmatism, coma, or spherical, in the paraxial approximation.11,26

Table 1

First Zernike polynomials

nmFormulaAberration type
001Piston
112ρcos(θ)Tip
1−12ρsin(θ)Tilt
203(2ρ21)Defocus
226ρ2cos(2θ)Astigmatism
2−26ρ2sin(2θ)Astigmatism
3122(3ρ32ρ)cos(θ)Coma
3−122(3ρ32ρ)sin(θ)Coma
3322ρ3cos(3θ)Trefoil
3−322ρ3sin(3θ)Trefoil
405(6ρ46ρ2+1)Spherical

Figure 2 shows the effect of these first-order aberrations on the STED beam profile. Notably, each aberration presents a specific effect that can be easily identified by looking at the STED beam distortion. Importantly, when using a high NA objective, as in STED microscopy, the paraxial approximation is not valid anymore, which leads to an appreciable coupling between the modes. For example, in Fig. 2, the spherical aberration is accompanied by a shift in the center of the donut beam, which reflects the effect of classical tip (Z11).

Fig. 2

Effect of typical aberrations (astigmatism C22, coma C31, trefoil C33, and spherical C40) on the donut and bottle beam profile. Aberrations were introduced using adapted phase masks on the SLM and images were recorded using gold beads. Image size: 3×3  μm2.

NPH_8_3_035001_f002.png

Although aberrations compromise excitation and STED beams as well as the signal in the emission path, it has been shown that microscope performance is mainly affected by the STED beam, whose central null is particularly sensitive to optical aberrations.10,11,18 Hence, we decided not to correct excitation and emission wavefronts but focus on the STED aberrations.

2.3.

Phantom Sample Preparation

Phantom samples were prepared by mixing gold beads (150-nm gold nanospheres, 742058, Sigma Aldrich) and fluorescent beads (yellow-green fluospheres, 40- or 170-nm diameter, F8771 and P7220, Invitrogen) at 1:4 volume ratio in an 2% agarose gel sample. We used low-melting point agarose (Invitrogen 16520) and adjusted its refractive index to 1.38, which is close to the value for mouse brain,27 by adding glycerol and using a refractometer for checking the value (Atago 3851). In order to produce a phantom sample of homogeneous thickness, 100  μl of melting agarose mixture were poured into a cold 1-mm high cylindrical reservoir. Then a coverslip (Thermo Scientific 3312) was placed on top of the slightly overfilled reservoir to prevent air spaces from forming between the agarose gel and the coverslip.

2.4.

Acute Brain Slice Preparation

We used the transgenic mouse line Thy1-Htg/+,28 where a subset of pyramidal neurons in the hippocampus, as well as in cortical layer 4/5, expresses cytosolic YFP. Heterozygous mice were used to obtain a sparser labeling. All procedures were in accordance with the Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and approved by the Ethics Committee of Bordeaux.

Acutely prepared hippocampal slices were obtained from 21 to 40 day-old mice of both sexes. Mice were anesthetized with isoflurane prior to decapitation and their brains were quickly removed and placed in ice-cold, oxygenated (95% O2 and 5% CO2) NMDG/HEPES-based artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) containing (in mM): 2.5 KCl, 7.5 MgSO4, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 0.5 CaCl2, 2.5 MgCl2, 5 Na-Ascorbate, 3 Na-Pyruvate, 25 glucose, 30 NaHCO3, 93 NMDG (N-methyl-D-glucamine), 93 HCl, and 20 HEPES (pH 7.4, osmolarity 315  mOsm/L). Transverse 300-μm-thick slices were cut using a vibratome (VT1200, Leica) and incubated for 15 min at 33°C in NMDG/HEPES-based solution. Subsequently, slices were transferred into normal ACSF containing (in mM) 125 NaCl, 3 KCl, 26 NaHCO3, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 10 glucose, 2 CaCl2, and 1 MgCl2 (pH 7.4, osmolarity 305  mOsm/L), bubbled with carbogen, and allowed to recover at room temperature for at least 1 h. Slices were maintained and used for a maximum of 4 h after preparation. They were placed on a coverslip with an electrophysiology harp placed on top. The harp was weakly glued to the coverslip with an inert biocompatible silicon (E43) so that the coverslip could be flipped to be imaged in an upright configuration. The flipped coverslip was then transferred over a recording chamber filled and continuously perfused (2  mL/min) with carbogenated ACSF at room temperature.

2.5.

Image Processing and Analysis

All images were acquired with a pixel size of 19.5 nm (512×512  pixels, 10×10  μm2) and a pixel dwell time of 20  μs, which amounts to about 5 s acquisition time per image. Imaging depth into the slice was set by the piezo z-focus, where the fluorescence signal on top of the slice defined the zero level. Image analysis was done on raw data using ImageJ.29 Images presented in the figures were filtered by a 1-pixel median filter to reduce noise. We measured 2-pixel line profiles across the beads and fitted them with a Lorentzian function, whose full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) served as a measure of the spatial resolution. For morphometric analysis of dendritic spines, we used the ImageJ plugin SpineJ, which is based on wavelet filtering and skeletonisation and designed for analyzing super-resolution images of dendritic spines.30 Unless stated otherwise, error bars represent the standard error of the mean.

3.

Results and Discussion

3.1.

Calibration of Spherical Aberration in Depth

Using phantom samples, we quantified the spherical aberration as a function of depth. To that end, we used the specific distortions of the donut and bottle beams, observable on the image of gold beads in the agarose gel, as a readout and manually adjusted the Zernike coefficients to retrieve high-quality donut and bottle images. Note that this strategy, based on evaluating the shape of the PSF, is particularly efficient for complex patterns, such as donut- or bottle-shaped beams, which are much more sensitive to the effects of aberration than simple Gaussian beams.

Figure 3(a) displays the schematic of our experiments. The STED beam profile was first optimized, similarly as in Fig. 1(b), looking at gold beads placed at the surface of the gel. This allowed correcting for optical aberrations due to imperfections of the microscope. Figure 3(b) highlights the distortions of the STED beam profile at 80-μm depth without correction (top panel). At this depth, the donut profile was similar to the one observed in Fig. 2(a), especially the side lobes (marked by white arrows), indicating that the main aberration is spherical. Therefore, adjusting the phase mask on the SLM by changing only the spherical Zernike coefficient (C40) could recover a high-quality STED profile (bottom panel), particularly improving the null (blue arrows). This procedure allowed us to determine the amount of spherical aberration as a function of depth in the phantom sample [Fig. 3(c)], which exhibits an almost perfect linear behavior as expected for a homogeneous medium.31,32 Note that beyond this linear dependancy, this approach allows to extract the actual experimental parameters that allows to properly estimate the aberration at a specific depth.

Fig. 3

(a) Schematic of the phantom sample imaging. (b) Donut (left panels) and bottle (right panels) beams side view, visualized using gold beads at 80  μm depth without and with correction. Image size: 3×5  μm2. (c) Calibration of the spherical aberration as a function of depth in the phantom sample. Averaged from five different gels.

NPH_8_3_035001_f003.png

It should be noted that this correction is not sufficient to perfectly reshape the STED beam. For example, in Fig. 3(b), after correction the donut still exhibits a small distortion typically associated with coma. Although we could use a similar approach to quantify coma and astigmatism as a function of depth, these aberrations are more sensitive to sample placement and thus less reproducible. Nevertheless, since spherical aberration is by far the dominant one, our working hypothesis was that its correction would lead to a significant increase in image quality.

3.2.

Resolution Improvement in Depth

Having determined an effective lateral STED resolution of 68±9  nm using 40-nm fluorescent beads immobilized on a glass slide, we move onto 170-nm diameter fluorescent beads embedded in the agarose phantom sample. Although these beads are too large to measure the actual lateral resolution of the STED, we used them because they are very bright and photostable, which allowed us to perform reliable repeated measurements. This makes them particularly suitable for the z-scan used to determine the axial resolution. Figures 4(a) and 4(b) display lateral and axial views of the PSFs measured both in 2P and STED mode at the surface and in depth, illustrating the gain in resolution. Although the quality of the STED image appears strongly decreased at a depth of 80  μm, applying the calibrated correction of the spherical aberration allowed us to significantly improve image brightness. This is depicted in Figs. 4(c) and 4(d), showing the depth dependence of the lateral and axial resolution, respectively. Although the effective STED PSF quickly becomes wider in depth (red circles), the resolution remains essentially constant after correction (blue triangles). Notably, the z resolution is more affected than the lateral one, which results from the fact that the bottle beam is more sensitive to aberrations than the donut beam. In contrast, the 2P resolution (black squares) is almost constant, as expected, since the depth range we probed is relatively modest for 2P microscopy.

Fig. 4

Lateral and axial views of the effective PSFs measured on 170-nm fluorescent beads at (a) the surface of the ghost sample and (b) at 80-μm depth. Image size: 3×3  μm2. Evolution of the (c) lateral resolution, (d) axial resolution, measured as the FWHM, and (e) maximum emission signal with depth. Averaged from five beads at each depth from three different gels. Dashed lines in (c) and (d) indicate the inaccessible region of the curve due to the actual bead size.

NPH_8_3_035001_f004.png

Figure 4(e) displays the evolution of the emitted signal as a function of depth and shows that the correction of spherical aberration leads to an increase of 63% in signal strength at 80  μm. Since the 2P intensity is almost constant in this depth range, the loss in signal is mainly due to the decrease in the STED null quality, spuriously de-exciting the fluorescence. It is worth noting that the error bars of the uncorrected STED resolution in Figs. 4(c) and 4(d) quickly increase in depth. This is due to the strong decrease in signal as illustrated in Fig. 4(e), resulting in a poor signal-to-noise ratio. Finally, after correction the bead seems shifted up, as can been seen in Fig. 4(b). This is due to the fact that we only corrected for the spherical aberration and not the axial shift introduced by the change in refractive index. Instead, we used the SLM placed in the 2P excitation path [Fig. 1(a)] to slightly defocus the excitation beam to make it overlap with the STED focus.

3.3.

Brain Slice Imaging

Having calibrated the spherical aberration in depth in phantom samples, we investigated if this could be translated into the context of thick biological sample preparations. To that end, we imaged YFP-labeled pyramidal neurons in acute hippocampal mouse brain slices, focusing on dendritic spines. These fine protrusions in the postsynaptic membrane of neurons mediate the vast majority of excitatory synaptic transmission in the brain and their structural and functional plasticity is an important substrate of information processing that underlie sensory perception, motor behavior, and memory, while spine dysfunction is closely linked to brain disorders, such as autism and Alzheimer’s disease.33 Spines have a characteristic anatomical structure, typically featuring a bulbous head attached to the dendrite via an elongated neck, whose diameter ranges well below 200 nm.34,35 As a consequence, resolving spine necks requires the use of super-resolution microscopy,36 and imaging them in depth in live settings remains an important challenge.4,37

Figure 5(a) shows images of dendritic spines at different depths acquired in 2P, uncorrected, and corrected STED mode, illustrating the gain both in resolution and signal strength obtained with the correction. As all structures on the surface of acute slices inevitably get cut off by the slicing procedure, it is next to impossible to find healthy dendrites within the first 20  μm of the slice. The cellular debris also makes it hard to define the zero level of the tissue surface. To account for this uncertainty, we binned the imaging data into 10  μm depth bins.

Fig. 5

(a) Images of dendritic segments of YFP-labelled pyramidal neurons in hippocampal acute slices at various depth; (b) average spine neck diameter measured in 2P, uncorrected and corrected STED mode; and (c) average STED intensity detected on the spine heads normalized to the 2P intensity. Measurements were done on 172 spines from 4 different acute slices. In panel (c), error bars represent the uncertainty calculated from the standard error deviation of the STED and 2P intensity distributions.

NPH_8_3_035001_f005.png

We quantified signal intensity as well as the diameter dendritic spine necks using a custom-written ImageJ plugin (SpineJ) recently developed for semiautomatic morphometric analysis of nanoscale neural structures.30 Figure 5(b) shows that while the uncorrected STED resolution quickly decreased with depth, becoming even worse than 2P beyond 70  μm, the corrected STED allowed us to measure an average spine neck width of 160±15  nm, consistent with what has been reported in the literature34,36,38 and almost invariant in this depth range. In addition, the relatively small error bars are testament to the reproducibility of the measurement across the different brain slices despite their variability. This highlights the fact that, while not offering optimal aberration correction, mimicking brain optical properties as a bulk medium is sufficient to significantly improve the STED resolution [Fig. 5(d)]. The smallest neck widths measurable at 90  μm depth was 81±4  nm, well below the diffraction limit, giving an upper bound of the effective STED resolution at this depth after correction. Note that it was impossible to measure the same neck in the STED image acquired without correction due to poor signal-to-noise ratio, which illustrates the difficulty associated with iterative approach. Also other morphological parameters, such as head area, spine length, and neck length, which are nominally larger than the resolution, were not significantly different from 2P, uncorrected, and corrected STED (data not shown). In parallel, Fig. 5(c) displays the comparison of the corrected and uncorrected STED signal normalized to the 2P intensity. It shows that while the uncorrected STED signal was reduced up to 75% at 90-μm depth, the corrected STED image appeared only slightly dimmer (up to 20%) than the 2P image.

Since the mean free path for photons with a wavelength of 600 nm is around λbrain90  μm,39,40 a significant fraction of STED laser photons will scatter into the central area of the donut when trying to image deeper in the tissue, inevitably leading to a decrease of STED performance.

4.

Conclusion

We have shown, using a phantom sample with adjusted refractive index, that it is possible to calibrate and compensate the distortions of the STED beam profile introduced by spherical aberrations with increasing depth. We then demonstrated that this calibration can be translated into the more complex environment of a living biological sample without any further iterations. This simple approach provides a significant improvement in image quality in depth, offering nanoscale resolution in 3D up to 90  μm inside acute brain slices. Importantly, this approach is not limited to brain samples but could be adapted to other tissues with known and relatively homogeneous refractive indices and could be applied to other preparations, even potentially in vivo, where approaches based on optical clearing to increase depth penetration cannot be used.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This project received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant, Agreement No. 794492; ANR (No. ANR-17-CE37-0011); Era-net NEURON (No. ANR-17-NEU3-0005-01); and FRM (No. DEQ20160334901). We thank Misa Arizono for comments on the manuscript.

References

1. 

S. W. Hell, “Far-field optical nanoscopy,” Science, 316 1153 –1158 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137395 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar

2. 

H. Blom and J. Widengren, “Stimulated emission depletion microscopy,” Chem. Rev., 117 (11), 7377 –7427 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00653 CHREAY 0009-2665 Google Scholar

3. 

J. B. Ding, K. T. Takasaki and B. L. Sabatini, “Supraresolution imaging in brain slices using stimulated emission depletion two-photon laser scanning microscopy,” Neuron, 63 (4), 429 –437 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.07.011 NERNET 0896-6273 Google Scholar

4. 

N. T. Urban et al., “STED nanoscopy of actin dynamics in synapses deep inside brain slices,” Biophys. J., 101 (5), 1277 –1284 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2011.07.027 BIOJAU 0006-3495 Google Scholar

5. 

S. Berning et al., “Nanoscopy in a living mouse brain,” Science, 335 (6068), 551 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215369 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar

6. 

C. V. Middendorff et al., “Isotropic 3D nanoscopy based on single emitter switching,” Opt. Express, 16 20774 –20788 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.16.020774 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

7. 

M. O. Lenz et al., “3‐D stimulated emission depletion microscopy with programmable aberration correction,” J. Biophotonics, 7 29 –36 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201300041 Google Scholar

8. 

J. Heine et al., “Three dimensional live-cell STED microscopy at increased depth using a water immersion objective,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 89 (5), 053701 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5020249 RSINAK 0034-6748 Google Scholar

9. 

D. Wildanger et al., “A compact STED microscope providing 3D nanoscale resolution,” J. Microsc., 236 35 –43 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2009.03188.x JMICAR 0022-2720 Google Scholar

10. 

S. Deng et al., “Investigation of the influence of the aberration induced by a plane interface on STED microscopy,” Opt. Express, 17 (3), 1714 –1725 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.001714 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

11. 

T. J. Gould et al., “Adaptive optics enables 3D STED microscopy in aberrating. specimens,” Opt. Express, 20 20998 –21009 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.020998 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

12. 

B. R. Patton et al., “Is phase-mask alignment aberrating your STED microscope?,” Meth. Appl. Fluoresc., 3 024002 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/2050-6120/3/2/024002 Google Scholar

13. 

K. T. Takasaki, J. B. Ding and B. L. Sabatini, “Live-cell superresolution imaging by pulsed STED two-photon excitation microscopy,” Biophys. J., 104 (4), 770 –777 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2012.12.053 BIOJAU 0006-3495 Google Scholar

14. 

P. Bethge et al., “Two-photon excitation STED microscopy in two colors in acute brain slices,” Biophys. J., 104 (4), 778 –785 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2012.12.054 BIOJAU 0006-3495 Google Scholar

15. 

W. Yu et al., “Super-resolution deep imaging with hollow Bessel beam STED microscopy,” Laser Photonics Rev., 10 (1), 147 –152 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.201500151 Google Scholar

16. 

J. Angibaud et al., “A simple tissue clearing method for increasing the depth penetration of STED microscopy of fixed brain slices,” J. Phys. D Appl. Phys., 53 (18), 184001 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ab6f1b Google Scholar

17. 

M. J. Booth, “Aberrations and adaptive optics in super-resolution microscopy,” Microscopy, 64 251 –261 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/jmicro/dfv033 Google Scholar

18. 

M. J. Booth, “Adaptive optical microscopy: the ongoing quest for a perfect image,” Light Sci. Appl., 3 e165 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2014.46 Google Scholar

19. 

G. Donnert et al., “Macromolecular-scale resolution in biological fluorescence microscopy,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 103 11440 –11445 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0604965103 Google Scholar

20. 

E. Auksorius et al., “Stimulated emission depletion microscopy with a supercontinuum source and fluorescence lifetime imaging,” Opt. Lett., 33 (2), 113 –115 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.33.000113 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

21. 

B. R. Patton et al., “Three-dimensional STED microscopy of aberrating tissue using dual adaptive optics,” Opt. Express, 24 8862 –76 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.008862 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

22. 

P. Zdankowski, D. McGloin and J. R. Swedlow, “Full volume super-resolution imaging of thick mitotic spindle using 3D AO STED microscope,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 10 1999 –2009 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.10.001999 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

23. 

A. Barbotin et al., “Adaptive optics allows STED-FCS measurements in the cytoplasm of living cells,” Opt. Express, 27 23378 –23395 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.27.023378 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

24. 

L. Wang et al., “Aberration correction for improving the image quality in STED microscopy using the genetic algorithm,” Nanophotonics, 7 (12), 1971 –1980 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2018-0133 Google Scholar

25. 

J. Tønnesen, V. K. Inavalli and U. V. Nägerl, “Super-resolution imaging of the extracellular space in living brain tissue,” Cell, 172 (5), 1108 –1121.e15 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.007 CELLB5 0092-8674 Google Scholar

26. 

M. J. Booth, “Wave front sensor-less adaptive optics: a model-based approach using sphere packings,” Opt. Express, 14 1339 –1352 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.14.001339 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

27. 

J. Sun et al., “Refractive index measurement of acute rat brain tissue slices using optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Express, 20 (2), 1084 –1095 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.001084 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

28. 

G. Feng et al., “Imaging neuronal subsets in transgenic mice expressing multiple spectral variants of GFP,” Neuron, 28 41 –51 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00084-2 NERNET 0896-6273 Google Scholar

29. 

J. Schindelin et al., “Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis,” Nat. Methods, 9 (7), 676 –682 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019 1548-7091 Google Scholar

30. 

F. Levet et al., “SpineJ: a software tool for quantitative analysis of nanoscale spine morphology,” Methods, 174 49 –55 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.01.020 MTHDE9 1046-2023 Google Scholar

31. 

M. J. Booth, M. A Neil and T. Wilson, “Aberration correction for confocal imaging in refractive-index-mismatched media,” J. Microsc., 192 (2), 90 –98 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1998.99999.x JMICAR 0022-2720 Google Scholar

32. 

L. Sherman et al., “Adaptive correction of depth-induced aberrations in multiphoton scanning microscopy using a deformable mirror,” J. Microsc., 206 (1), 65 –71 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.01004.x JMICAR 0022-2720 Google Scholar

33. 

C. Sala and M. Segal, “Dendritic spines: the locus of structural and functional plasticity,” Physiol. Rev., 94 (1), 141 –188 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00012.2013 PHREA7 0031-9333 Google Scholar

34. 

K. M. Harris and J. K. Stevens, “Dendritic spines of CA 1 pyramidal cells in the rat hippocampus: serial electron microscopy with reference to their biophysical characteristics,” J. Neurosci., 9 (8), 2982 –2997 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-08-02982.1989 JNRSDS 0270-6474 Google Scholar

35. 

J. I. Arellano et al., “Ultrastructure of dendritic spines: correlation between synaptic and spine morphologies,” Front. Neurosci., 1 131 –143 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.01.1.1.010.2007 1662-453X Google Scholar

36. 

T. Pfeiffer et al., “Chronic 2P-STED imaging reveals high turnover of dendritic spines in the hippocampus in vivo,” eLife, 7 e34700 (2018). https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34700 Google Scholar

37. 

A. Attardo, J. E. Fitzgerald and M. Schnitzer, “Impermanence of dendritic spines in live adult CA1 hippocampus,” Nature, 523 592 –596 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14467 Google Scholar

38. 

J. Tønnesen et al., “Spine neck plasticity regulates compartmentalization of synapses,” Nat. Neurosci., 17 (5), 678 –685 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3682 NANEFN 1097-6256 Google Scholar

39. 

A. Taddeucci et al., “Optical properties of brain tissue,” J. Biomed. Opt., 1 (1), 117 –123 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.227816 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

40. 

N. Yaroslavsky et al., “Optical properties of selected native and coagulated human brain tissues in vitro in the visible and near infrared spectral range,” Phys. Med. Biol., 47 (12), 2059 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/47/12/305 PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar

Valentin Nägerl is a professor of neuroscience and bioimaging at the University of Bordeaux, where he leads a research group and is in charge of graduate-level teaching in bio-photonics. He studied physics and pre-clinical medicine in Göttingen, got his PhD in neuroscience from UCLA in 2000, and worked as a postdoc at the Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology. Supported by an “ERC Synergy Grant,” his lab is conducting frontier research in neurophotonics.

Stéphane Bancelin studied physics at the École Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay and received his PhD in 2013 from the École Polytechnique in Palaiseau, where he worked on SHG microscopy to image connective tissue. During his postdoc at the University of Quebec in Canada, he developed interferometric approaches in nonlinear microscopy. He is now a tenured CNRS researcher working with the Nägerl team in Bordeaux on super-resolution microscopy to study the cellular mechanisms of memory formation in vivo.

© The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Stéphane Bancelin, Luc Mercier, Emanuele Murana, and U. Valentin Nägerl "Aberration correction in stimulated emission depletion microscopy to increase imaging depth in living brain tissue," Neurophotonics 8(3), 035001 (14 June 2021). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.8.3.035001
Received: 25 January 2021; Accepted: 18 May 2021; Published: 14 June 2021
JOURNAL ARTICLE
11 PAGES


SHARE
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 6 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
KEYWORDS
Stimulated emission depletion microscopy

Brain

Monochromatic aberrations

Aberration correction

Neuroimaging

Tissues

Microscopy

Back to Top