Silicon-on-insulator (SOI) waveguides have attracted considerable attention recently because they can be used for making inexpensive, monolithically integrated optical devices.^{1, 2, 3, 4} The most notable features of silicon waveguides are that silicon exhibits significant third-order nonlinearity and provides a tight mode confinement. These features make it possible to realize a variety of optical functions at relatively low power level. Recently, the formation of optical solitons inside a short silicon waveguide is reported.^{5} Solitons have been observed inside silica fibers for a long time and found a multitude of applications ranging from optical switching to supercontinuum generation.^{6} In this letter, we propose, for the first time to our knowledge, a novel design of a silicon waveguide-based nonlinear directional coupler (NLDC), which can be used as a soliton self-switching device. After the pioneering work of Jensen^{7} and Trillo ^{8} silica based nonlinear directional couplers have been studied quite extensively^{9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21} in the context of soliton switching. Jensen^{7} showed that one can switch a continuous signal from one core to the other by varying the input power of the signal. The idea when applied to pulse switching led to pulse distortion and breakup, resulting in inefficient switching. Because the nonlinear phase modulation is proportional to the instantaneous intensity, different portions of the pulse envelope switch differently (i.e., not simultaneously), leading to pulse distortion and pulse breakup. The pulse breakup during switching is undesirable because it results in inefficient switching and causes cross talk of the signals. Trillo ^{8} showed that pulse breakup could be avoided if one used a soliton pulse as a signal. The physics behind it can be understood from the fact that the nonlinear phase modulation is constant across the entire soliton pulse, owing to which the pulse switches as a whole (i.e., as a single unit and no pulse breakup takes place). However, because of silica’s weak nonlinearity, extremely high power is needed for soliton switching in silica-based NLDC. This difficulty in experimental realization has left the silica-based NLDC as only a device of theoretical interest. On the other hand, silicon waveguide-based NLDC should not have this drawback because the nonlinearity parameter in the SOI waveguide can be larger by a factor of 10,000 or more.^{5} We expect that our proposed design for a silicon waveguide-based NLDC would draw the attention of the experimentalists working in this field. It should be noted that soliton self-switching can also be achieved by applying a different scheme in which the switching is controlled by copropagating a controlling pulse along with the signal pulse, for a detailed discussion the readers are referred to Refs. 20, 21.

It is well known that the formation of fundamental soliton requires
${L}_{\mathrm{D}}={L}_{\mathrm{N}}$
where
${L}_{\mathrm{D}}={T}_{0}^{2}\u2215\mid {\beta}_{2}\mid $
, the dispersion length, and
${L}_{\mathrm{N}}=1\u2215{\gamma}_{0}{P}_{0}$
, the nonlinear length. It has been shown that because of high nonlinearity and tight mode confinement in SOI waveguides both
${\gamma}_{0}$
and
${\beta}_{2}$
are sufficiently large to support optical solitons. Figure 1 shows our proposed NLDC. Here, two identical silicon waveguides are placed close to each other. The individual waveguides have the same dimensions as that of Zhang ’s (i.e., of
$860\times 400\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}{\mathrm{nm}}^{2}$
).^{5} The core-to-core separation distance is
$2.4\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mu \mathrm{m}$
. The coupling coefficient can be calculated by following the prescription in Ref. 22. For our proposed NLDC, it is calculated to be
$2.38\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$
. The core-to-core distance is extremely crucial in deciding the coupling coefficient of the coupler. It will be seen shortly that the coupling coefficient plays the most significant role in soliton switching in an NLDC. The switching characteristics of the coupler are described by the generalized coupled nonlinear Schrodinger equation in the anomalous dispersion regime (i.e.,
${\beta}_{2}<0$
), which can be derived in the framework of the coupled mode formalism, using the standard slowly varying envelope approximation,^{6}

## Eq. 1

$$\frac{\partial {A}_{1}}{\partial z}+\frac{\alpha}{2}{A}_{1}+\frac{i}{2}{\beta}_{2}\frac{{\partial}^{2}{A}_{1}}{\partial {T}^{2}}-i\gamma {\mid {A}_{1}\mid}^{2}{A}_{1}+{C}_{0}{A}_{2}=0,$$## Eq. 2

$$\frac{\partial {A}_{2}}{\partial z}+\frac{\alpha}{2}{A}_{2}+\frac{i}{2}{\beta}_{2}\frac{{\partial}^{2}{A}_{2}}{\partial {T}^{2}}-i\gamma {\mid {A}_{2}\mid}^{2}{A}_{2}+{C}_{0}{A}_{1}=0.$$## Eq. 3

$$T=\frac{{\int}_{-\infty}^{\infty}{\mid {u}_{1}(\xi ,\tau )\mid}^{2}d\tau}{{\int}_{-\infty}^{\infty}[{\mid {u}_{1}(\xi ,\tau )\mid}^{2}+{\mid {u}_{2}(\xi ,\tau )\mid}^{2}]d\tau}.$$## 4.

^{5}${\beta}_{2}=-2.15\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}{\mathrm{ps}}^{2}\u2215\mathrm{m}$ , ${n}_{2}=6\times {10}^{-5}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}{\mathrm{cm}}^{2}\u2215\mathrm{GW}$ , $\alpha =2.30\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$ , $r=0.1$ , ${\lambda}_{0}=1484\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{nm}$ , and ${T}_{0}=30\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{fs}$ .

Figure 2 depicts the transmission characteristics of the coupler as a function of the normalized peak power
${P}_{0}$
for three different values of the coupling coefficients:
${C}_{0}=2.38$
, 119, and
$238\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$
. These coupling coefficients can be achieved quite easily just by varying the core-to-core distance of the coupler. It can be seen from Fig. 2 that
${C}_{0}=2.38\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$
gives the best transmission. At
${P}_{0}\approx 2$
, we get nearly 80% transmissions. As the coupling coefficient or equivalently the core-to-core separation is increased soliton switching may not be realized in our proposed device. To get an idea about the behavior and stability of the soliton pulse inside the coupler in Fig. 3, we depict the spatiotemporal evolution of the soliton pulse inside the coupler. It can clearly be seen that the soliton is preserved during evolution inside core1, while at the output of core 2 we may get a negligibly small radiation, confirming that the soliton is getting completely switched to the bar state of the coupler. It is worthwhile to mention that the peak power of the soliton required for switching in our proposed device is calculated to be
$12\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{W}$
, which is clearly an improvement over that of the corresponding silica based NLDC where the switching power is generally in the range of kilowatts.^{14, 18}

## References

**,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 12 1678 –1687 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2006.883151 1077-260X Google Scholar**

*The past, present, and future of silicon photonics***,” Nature (London), 431 1081 –1084 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02921 0028-0836 Google Scholar**

*All-optical control of light on a silicon chip***,” Nature (London), 433 725 –728 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03346 0028-0836 Google Scholar**

*A continuous-wave Raman silicon laser***,” Nature (London), 441 960 –963 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04932 0028-0836 Google Scholar**

*Broad-band optical parametric gain on a silicon photonic chip***,” Opt. Express, 15 7682 –7688 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.15.007682 1094-4087 Google Scholar**

*Optical solitons in a silicon waveguide***,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 18 1580 –1583 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1109/JQE.1982.1071438 0018-9197 Google Scholar**

*Nonlinear coherent coupler***,” Opt. Lett., 13 672 –674 (1988). 0146-9592 Google Scholar**

*Soliton switching in fiber nonlinear directional couplers***,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 35 983 –989 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1109/3.766843 0018-9197 Google Scholar**

*All-optical pulse switching in twin-core fiber couplers with intermodal dispersion***,” Opt. Commun., 234 427 –432 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2004.02.031 0030-4018 Google Scholar**

*Soliton switching in a Kerr coupler with coupling constant dispersion: A variational analysis***,” Opt. Quantum Electron., 22 95 –98 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02189947 0306-8919 Google Scholar**

*All-optical waveguide switching***,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 56 2276 –2278 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.102938 0003-6951 Google Scholar**

*Spatial switching, instabilities, and chaos in a three-waveguide nonlinear directional coupler***,” J. Lightwave Technol., 24 1041 –1047 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2005.862445 0733-8724 Google Scholar**

*Study of ultrafast pulse coupling dynamics considering retarded nonlinear response and self-steepening effects***,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1, 44 8498 –8500 (2005). 0021-4922 Google Scholar**

*Femtosecond-soliton switching in a three-core coupler***,” Opt. Commun., 113 493 –497 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4018(94)00509-S 0030-4018 Google Scholar**

*Soliton switching in a variable nonlinear coupler***,” Opt. Commun., 162 340 –346 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-4018(99)00087-5 0030-4018 Google Scholar**

*Soliton interaction and switching in a coupler with third order dispersion and Raman effect***,” Opt. Commun., 139 247 –251 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-4018(97)00117-X 0030-4018 Google Scholar**

*Solitons in a nonlinear optical coupler in the presence of the Raman effect***,” Opt. Eng., 46 (11), 115005 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2802081 0091-3286 Google Scholar**

*Phase induced soliton switching in fiber nonlinear directional couplers***,” J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater., 11 558 –562 (2007). 1454-4164 Google Scholar**

*Soliton self-switching in an asymmetric nonlinear directional coupler***,” J. Lightwave Technol., 14 2793 –2798 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1109/50.545799 0733-8724 Google Scholar**

*All-optical routing switch using a fiber nonlinear directional coupler and controlling solitons***,” 345 –348 (1999). Google Scholar**

*Ultrafast all-optical switching using controlling solitons and nonlinear directional coupler*