Errata: Effect of face separation in corner-cube reflectors

Rohit Nair; Keith W. Goossen

doi:10.1117/1.3314260

1 February 2010 Errata: Effect of face separation in corner-cube reflectors

Rohit Nair, Keith W. Goossen

Author Affiliations +

Optical Engineering, Vol. 49, Issue 2, 029801 (February 2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3314260

This article [Opt. Eng. 48(12), 123003 (December 2009)] was originally published on 22 December 2009 with a few minor errors.

1. In the caption to Fig. 1:
- a. The word “retroreflected” was misspelled as “retroreected”.
- b. ${\hat{n}}_{i}$ , which is a unit vector, was missing the hat symbol (it was incorrectly written as $n_{i}$ ).
- c. Finally, there should be a space between the word “simply” and “ $- {\hat{n}}_{i}$ ”.
  For clarity, the complete correct caption to Fig. 1 is “Fig. 1 Schematic of a retroreflector (a) without and (b) with gaps between the faces. The angles θ and ϕ denote the direction, ${\hat{n}}_{i}$ , of incidence of the interrogating ray and the v-axis in the optical coordinate system. The direction of the retroreflected ray, ${\hat{n}}_{o}$ , is simply $- {\hat{n}}_{i}$ . The three vectors ${\hat{n}}_{i}$ , ${\hat{n}}_{o}$ , and $\hat{v}$ are parallel to each other.”
2. In the caption to Fig. 2, the variable $A_{RR | eff}$ was incorrectly written as $A_{PR, eff}$ .
3. In the caption to Fig. 7, the variable $A_{RR | {eff}_{o}}$ was incorrectly written as $A_{RR, eff}$ .

All versions of the article were corrected on 31 December 2009 and the article appears correctly in print.

©(2010) Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)

Citation Download Citation

Rohit Nair and Keith W. Goossen "Errata: Effect of face separation in corner-cube reflectors," Optical Engineering 49(2), 029801 (1 February 2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3314260

Published: 1 February 2010

Access the abstract

JOURNAL ERRATUM
1 PAGES

DOWNLOAD PAPER SAVE TO MY LIBRARY