23 December 2013 Design of fiber coupled Er3+:chalcogenide microsphere amplifier via particle swarm optimization algorithm
Author Affiliations +
Optical Engineering, 53(7), 071805 (2013). doi:10.1117/1.OE.53.7.071805
Abstract
A mid-IR amplifier consisting of a tapered chalcogenide fiber coupled to an Er3+-doped chalcogenide microsphere has been optimized via a particle swarm optimization (PSO) approach. More precisely, a dedicated three-dimensional numerical model, based on the coupled mode theory and solving the rate equations, has been integrated with the PSO procedure. The rate equations have included the main transitions among the erbium energy levels, the amplified spontaneous emission, and the most important secondary transitions pertaining to the ion-ion interactions. The PSO has allowed the optimal choice of the microsphere and fiber radius, taper angle, and fiber-microsphere gap in order to maximize the amplifier gain. The taper angle and the fiber-microsphere gap have been optimized to efficiently inject into the microsphere both the pump and the signal beams and to improve their spatial overlapping with the rare-earth-doped region. The employment of the PSO approach shows different attractive features, especially when many parameters have to be optimized. The numerical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach for the design of amplifying systems. The PSO-based optimization approach has allowed the design of a microsphere-based amplifying system more efficient than a similar device designed by using a deterministic optimization method. In fact, the amplifier designed via the PSO exhibits a simulated gain G=33.7  dB , which is higher than the gain G=6.9  dB of the amplifier designed via the deterministic method.
Palma, Bia, Mescia, Yano, Nazabal, Taguchi, Moréac, and Prudenzano: Design of fiber coupled Er3+:chalcogenide microsphere amplifier via particle swarm optimization algorithm

1.

Introduction

Optical microresonators are key elements for fabrication of a great variety of photonic devices applied in both linear and nonlinear optics. Generally, the mode resonance is obtained by utilizing two or more mirrors or gratings. Multiple recirculation of light in optical microresonators enables laser oscillation and increases the effective path length, providing a great potential in spectroscopic and interferometric measurements. However, conventional Fabry–Perot resonators have some drawbacks, such as high cost, low compactness, and mechanical instability.1

Dielectric spherical microresonators, i.e., dielectric microspheres, allow light confinement in circular orbits by means of repeated total internal reflections occurring at the spherical boundary between the dielectric surface and the surrounding medium. Their surprising properties are related to the resonance of the well-known whispering gallery modes (WGMs), exhibiting high quality factors Q(105÷109) and small mode volumes.

WGMs in fused-silica microspheres have been excited using evanescent field provided by a prism,2 polished optical fiber coupler,3,4 and tapered optical fiber.5 WGM resonances in dielectric microspheres have been investigated and experimented for many applications, e.g., the polarization transmission, coupled-resonator-induced transparency, biosensing, nonlinear optics, quantum electrodynamics, and quantum information processing.67.8 Moreover, they enable novel functionalities for planar lightwave circuits, such as wavelength selectivity, energy storage and dispersion control, and resonant filtering.9

Microspheres doped with rare-earth ions can operate as microcavity amplifiers or lasers. Rare-earth-doped microspheres based on silica, phosphate, tellurite, and ZBLAN (ZrF4-BaF2-LaF3-AlF3-NaF) glass host materials have been fabricated, obtaining low threshold lasing and very narrow emission linewidth.8,1011.12.13 As an example, WGMs were excited in Nd3+-doped fluoride glass microsphere by using a Ti:Al2O3 laser tuned to 800 nm.14 The laser pump thresholds were found to be 5 and 60 mW for the 1051 and 1334 nm wavelength emissions, respectively.

Chalcogenide glasses exhibit peculiar optical properties, such as a high refractive index, extremely high nonlinearity, photosensitivity, and low phonon energy. WGMs in chalcogenide microspheres have low modal volume. In addition, due to the high refractive index, high absorption and emission cross-sections are measured in these kinds of glasses.15 However, the low phonon energy induces large radiative decay rates and high quantum efficiency and allows radiative transitions, which are quenched by the multiphonon decay in silica glasses. Moreover, the high rare-earth solubility facilitates the fabrication of efficient lasers and amplifiers. The feasibility of a chalcogenide microsphere has been demonstrated in a variety of works.15,1617.18 As an example, in Ref. 16, the fabrication of chalcogenide microspheres heated by contact with a temperature-controlled ceramic surface has been demonstrated; WGM resonances excited by using tapered silica glass fiber have been observed and a Q factor >105 was measured close to the wavelength λ=1.55μm. In Ref. 9, with packaged chalcogenide As2S3 microspheres using a low refractive index, UV-curable polymer have been fabricated; high-Q modes have been excited at wavelengths close to 1.55 μm in a 110-μm-diameter chalcogenide microsphere via evanescent coupling from a 2-μm-diameter tapered silica fiber.

The need to assemble chalcogenide microsphere via evanescent coupling from tapered silica fiber on feasible planar geometry to be suitably packaged has led the authors to fabricate preliminary microsphere prototypes of chalcogenide glass with the composition of Ga5Ge20Sb10S65 and doped with erbium. Partly truncated spheres, called superspheres, working as a WGM resonator around its equatorial plane, have been lately fabricated via surface-tension mold (StM) technique.19 The characterization of these prototypes has strongly encouraged the numerical modeling illustrated in this paper.

During the past decades, a large literature has reported experiments on rare-earth-doped microspheres, but only a few papers have addressed simulation models for lasing in microspheres.2021.22 However, accurate numerical modeling is needed for microsphere design and refinement.

In conventional numerical procedures,2021.22 the solution of the rate and power propagation equations is performed by optimizing, one by one, each design parameter. However, the nonlinearity of the equations makes algorithms based on these approaches computationally expensive. Global and stochastic optimization methods are efficient tools to investigate these kinds of problems. As an example, particle swarm optimization (PSO) approaches have been developed for the optimization and characterization of rare-earth-doped photonic crystal fiber amplifiers.2324.25

In this paper, an amplifying system operating close to 2.7 μm and based on Er3+-doped chalcogenide microsphere coupled to a tapered fiber has been optimized via a PSO approach. An accurate three-dimensional mathematical model for Er3+-doped chalcogenide microspheres26,27 is employed for calculating the fitness function of the PSO procedure.2324.25 The core of the developed numerical code is based on the coupled mode theory and the rate equations model. In particular, it includes the modal distribution of the optical waves in both tapered fiber and microsphere, and takes into account the most relevant active phenomena in Er3+-doped chalcogenide glasses, such as the absorption rates at both pump and signal wavelengths, the stimulated emission rate at signal wavelength, the amplified spontaneous emission noise, the lifetime and branching ratios of the considered energy levels, the ion-ion energy transfers, and the excited state absorption. The design is realistically performed on the basis of the optical and spectroscopic parameters measured on chalcogenide glass2627.28 and by considering the coupling of the microsphere with a tapered fiber.

The PSO approach has given good results, allowing a global optimization of the microsphere amplifier by varying simultaneously a number of design parameters. As a result, an improvement of the simulated gain of the microsphere amplifier from G=6.9dB, found with the deterministic approach (DA)26 for a very similar device, to G=33.7dB found in this paper with PSO, has been obtained. The numerical results underline that due to the high number of design parameters to be optimized, a deterministic solution searching strategy does not allow an efficient design in these kinds of problems.

2.

Theory

The amplifying system consists of a tapered optical fiber placed close to the equator of an Er3+-doped chalcogenide microsphere. Figure 1 illustrates a sketch of the amplifying system. A detailed description of the model (without PSO) is reported by the authors in Ref. 26.

Fig. 1

Layout sketch of the chalcogenide fiber taper coupled to the Er3+-doped chalcogenide microsphere.

OE_53_7_071805_f001.png

The azimuthal, polar, and radial distributions of WGMs are given by the complex exponential functions, Hermite polynomials, and spherical Bessel functions, respectively. Each WGM can be identified by three integers n, l, and m. WGMs with higher spatial overlap with the fiber taper have their power bounded near the equatorial plane (m=l and n=1). The coupling of the optical power between the tapered fiber and the undoped microsphere is modeled by using the coupled mode theory.2930.31 The time domain evolution of the amplitude A of the internal cavity electromagnetic field at the pump p and the signal s wavelength can be obtained by solving the following differential equations:26,3031.32.33.34.35

(1)

dAl,m,npdt=12(1τext+1τ0gl,m,np2iΔω)Al,m,np+i1τextτAin,l,m,npdAl,m,nsdt=12(1τext+1τ0gl,m,ns2iΔω)Al,m,ns+c2neffqNjqσji(ν˜)Γl,m,nq,sA0+i1τextτAin,l,m,ns,
with

(2)

gl,m,na=cneff[qNjqσji(ν˜)Γl,m,nq,aqNiqσij(ν˜)Γl,m,nq,a]witha=p,s.

The gain G for the amplifier is related to the objective function to be maximized via PSO.

(3)

G=|Aout,l,m,naAin,l,m,na|2=|1ττext+iττextAl,m,naAin,l,m,na|witha=p,s.

Ain,l,m,n and Aout,l,m,n are the amplitudes of mode electric field at the input and at the output fiber section and coupled with the l,m, n WGM mode of the microsphere; τ=2πR0neff/c is the circulation time inside the microsphere, neff is the WGM effective refractive index, c is the speed of light in vacuum; Δω=ωinωWGM is the frequency detuning of the fiber input signal from the WGM resonance frequency; τ0=1/κ02=Q0/ωWGM is the coupling lifetime, where Q0 is the intrinsic quality factor and κ0 is the intrinsic cavity decay rate; τext=mπ/(ωκ2) is the coupling lifetime, κ is the cavity decay rate or coupling coefficient; ν˜=νl,m,n is the WGM resonant frequency; σi,j(ν˜) is the erbium cross-section at frequency ν˜; Al,m,na is the slowly varying amplitude scaling the normalized electric field El,m,na on the rθ plane; Γl,m,nq,a with a=p, s is the overlap factor of each WGM with the rare-earth profile in the q’th sector (the microsphere doped area is divided in q sector in the rθ plane); and Niq i=1,2,6 is the ion population concentration of i’th energy level in the q’th sector.26

Design and optimization of rare-earth-doped glass amplifiers are typically based on the deterministic optimization methods. The optimal amplifier length, the rare-earth concentration, the waveguide transversal section, and all the other design parameters are identified one at a time. The up-conversion and cross-relaxation phenomena induce nonlinearities in rare-earth-doped glass amplifier model. As a result, the optimization problem is difficult to be performed, especially in a rare-earth-doped microsphere amplifier, where a number of geometrical parameters have to be finely optimized. Moreover, deterministic algorithms can exhibit stagnation problems in local maxima/minima during the global optimization search of the objective functions (e.g., gain, bandwidth, output power, signal-to-noise ratio). The stochastic nature of the PSO algorithm allows a high efficiency in optimization of a large number of parameters for its ability to avoid local maxima/minima and operate in discontinuous solution domains.

The PSO algorithm is inspired by the behavior of a swarm (populations) of M individuals of bees (trial solutions or particles), which fly in a field (N-dimensional search space) to search for food, i.e., high density of flowers (to maximize/minimize a fitness function). A flow chart of the PSO algorithm is illustrated in Fig. 2. Each particle pi is characterized by a position xi constituting a trial solution. The trial solution goodness is evaluated by means of the fitness function.36,37 The bee positions (solutions) are updated by applying the operator vi, called velocity, which is dynamically adjusted according to the historical behaviors of the particle fly in order to maximize/minimize the suitable fitness function. At first, each bee (particle) has a random position and a random velocity; then its trajectory is modified by keeping track of its location in the solution space and by taking into account both the previous location giving the best fitness value experimented by the single particle (personal best, Pbest) and highest fitness location discovered by the entire swarm (global best, Gbest). In this way, the entire swarm moves toward positions characterized by maximized/minimized values of a fitness function.

Fig. 2

Flow chart of the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm.

OE_53_7_071805_f002.png

More precisely, the position xi and the velocity vi vectors of the particles at each iteration are updated by means of the following set of equations:36,37

(4)

vi(n+1)=w×vi(n)+c1×r1×[xbi(n)xi(n)]+c2×r2×[xg(n)xi(t)],

(5)

xi(n+1)=xi(n)+vi(n+1),
where xbi(n) is the best previous position of the i’th particle, xg(n) is the best position among all the particles in the population, w is the inertia weight, c1 and c2 are positive constants, called cognitive and social parameters, and r1 and r2 are positive numbers randomly generated between 0 and 1 to inject a stochastic behavior in the searching procedure.2324.25

3.

Design and Synthesis of Er3+:Ga5Ge20Sb10S65 Chalcogenide Microsphere Amplifier

In this section, PSO numerical modeling, aimed to identify the optimal fiber taper coupled Er3+:Ga5Ge20Sb10S65 chalcogenide microsphere amplifier, operating in the mid-IR wavelength range is illustrated. The motivation is related to the good experimental results obtained by applying StM technique to fabricate the aforesaid erbium-doped chalcogenide glass microsphere.19 The bulk glass sample was prepared by a conventional melting and quenching method in a silica glass ampoule.38 The fabricated glass was crushed into a powder of <200μm. The crushed glass powders were classified using sieves in the range of 20 to 40 μm and 40 to 80 μm, washed by iso-propanol under ultrasonic wave, and finally, dried in air for a day. These powders were put on a polished glassy carbon substrate and heated at 515°C for 5 min on the electric furnace settled in a glove box filled with dry Ar gas or in a furnace with a flux of Ar and H2S gas.

As shown in Fig. 3, the StM technique realizes the formation of a superspherical shape because the contact angle of 2S2G glass is θ>90deg, as a glassy carbon is a favorable substrate to induce low wettability of the molten chalcogenide glass. Quitea high Q factor can be realized in a truly spherical particle made of the extremely transparent material without scattering inclusion and contaminant on and/or inside the sphere. Therefore, when we desire the preparation of a superspherical optical resonator of Ga5Ge20Sb10S65 glass by the StM technique, we have to pay attention to the factors of shape (curvature of sphere) and the surface scattering. The percentage of prepared superspheres with high sphericity and/or circularity at the equatorial plane was 10%, and their deviation to circularity was <3%. These values are good enough to use them for an optical resonator. The glass transition temperature of Ga5Ge20Sb10S65 glass is sensitive to the atomic ratio of sulfur to the metals. Lower sulfur content increases the glass transition temperature and could decrease the thermal stability of glass against crystallization. The precipitation of crystal is energetically easy on the heterogeneous interface like glass surface. A Raman spectroscopy investigation of the sulfide glass supersphere was done and the above hypothesis was confirmed. Once α-GeS2 crystallites appear on the surface of the molten glass droplet, it corrupts the balance of the surface tension in the particle and produces a distorted supersphere. In order to make a good spherical surface and improve its Q factor, the surface crystallization has to be suppressed well. Therefore, strict control of sulfur content of the Ga5Ge20Sb10S65 glass is requisite for the preparation of optical resonator made of glass by the StM technique. The results were significantly improved when a mixture of H2S/Ar gas was employed during the StM heat treatment; this is an essential way of reducing the crystal surface formation. Thanks to the optimized StM process enabling superspherical microsphere fabrication in the diameter range of 5 to 50 μm, WGMs were observed for these microspheres concerning their luminescence around 650 nm using the Raman spectrophotometer, and a luminescence centered at 2775nm corresponding to the I411/2I413/2 transition was also experimentally observed from Er3+:Ga5Ge20Sb10S65 glass pumped at 980 nm (Fig. 4). These experimental observations augur well to obtain lasing demonstration in microspheres made of Er3+:Ga5Ge20Sb10S65 and have encouraged us to develop the PSO modeling to consider an effective evanescent wave coupling of the Er3+:Ga5Ge20Sb10S65 microsphere, allowing laser emission in the mid-IR spectral range.

Fig. 3

Optical microscope and SEM image of Er3+:Ga5Ge20Sb10S65 micrometer microsphere coated with Au/Pd conductive layer at the surface for SEM imaging.

OE_53_7_071805_f003.png

Fig. 4

Feasibilty investigation: (a) Raman and fluorescence spectra for 633 nm excitation in the center and border of an equatorial plane of the Er3+:Ga5Ge20Sb10S65 microsphere. (b) Fluorescence spectrum of Er3+:Ga5Ge20Sb10S65 glass excited at 980 nm.

OE_53_7_071805_f004.png

In the PSO modeling, the pump wavelength is close to λp=980nm and the signal wavelength is close to λs=2770nm. The size of the fiber taper has to be designed to ensure the fundamental mode propagation and a suitable evanescent field in the fiber-microsphere gap. In order to carry out a realistic optimization and, therefore, an actual evaluation of the device feasibility, the simulations have been performed by taking into account the refractive index wavelength dispersion by means of the Sellmeier equation 26,28 and the measured spectroscopic parameter summarized in Table 1.28

Table 1

Spectroscopic parameters of the Er3+-doped chalcogenide glass.27

Energy level transitionsWavelength (nm)Lifetime (ms)Branching ratio (%)
I413/2→I415/21531.7τ2=1.83β21=100
I411/2→I415/2986.4τ3=1.37β31=86.28
I411/2→I413/22770.7τ3=1.37β32=13.72
I49/2→I415/2810.0τ4=1.08β41=80.38
I49/2→I413/21719.1τ4=1.08β42=18.82
I49/2→I411/24529.4τ4=1.08β43=0.80
F49/2→I415/2662.7τ5=0.13β51=91.99
F49/2→I413/21168.1τ5=0.13β52=4.32
F49/2→I411/22019.4τ5=0.13β53=3.34
F49/2→I49/23623.1τ5=0.13β54=0.35

The absorption and emission cross-sections affect the competition among a number of different resonant WGMs. As an example, the absorption cross-section at the pump wavelength λ=986nm is close to 1.32×1024m2, while the emission cross-section at the signal wavelength λ=2770nm is close to 1.4×1024m2. Different emission and absorption cross-section values are considered for the different WGM resonance frequencies. The thickness of the erbium-doped region (near the microsphere surface) and the erbium concentration are s=3μm and NEr=0.5w%, respectively. The input pump power is Pp=100mW and the input signal power Ps=50dBm.

The approach based on swarm intelligence is employed in the design to obtain values of parameters maximizing the optical gain. In particular, the PSO is applied to optimize microsphere radius R0, taper waist radius a, taper angle δ, and taper-microsphere gap g. Therefore, the algorithm described in Sec. 2 is written by defining a swarm composed of N=32 particles. The position vector of the i’th particle is xi=[Roi,ai,δi,gi]T, with i=1,2,,N. The fitness function is:

F(xi)=10logG(xi).

The PSO parameters have been tuned heuristically by evaluating the solution space characteristic. On the basis of previous working experiences, the limits of the considered parameters have been roughly fixed such that the maximum gain is expected to lie in suitable ranges. The parameters used in PSO algorithm and the solution space limits are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2

Parameters and solution space limits used in particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm.

VariableValue
Social parameter1.494
Cognitive parameter1.494
Inertia weightLinearly spaced vector from 0.9 to 0.4
Iteration limit32
Number of particles32
[pmin,pmax] for Ro (μm)10÷50
[pmin,pmax] for a (nm)500÷800
[pmin,pmax] for δ (rad)0.001÷0.04
[pmin,pmax] for g (nm)500÷1000

The PSO simulations have been performed by considering many WGMs in the wavelength band from 2740 to 2820 nm. The PSO has allowed the identification of the maximum gain (global best) for the WGM1,217,217 with the following optimal parameters: microsphere radius R0=45μm, taper waist radius a=517nm, taper angle δ=0.03rad, and taper-microsphere gap g=512nm. By simulations, slight variations (tens of nanometers) of taper waist radius and taper-microsphere gap induce low gain changes (1dB). By varying the parameter n from 1 to 3, 18 different resonant WGMs were simulated. The parameters n, l, and m, the WGM resonance wavelengths, the output powers, and the optical gains are reported in Table 3.

Table 3

PSO optimized amplifier. Parameters l=m and n of whispering gallery mode, resonance wavelength, output power, and optical gain.

l=m valuesn valuesWGM resonance wavelength (nm)Pout (dBm)Optical gain G (dB)
21312813.4−37.277812.7222
21412801.7−35.106314.8937
21512788.0−33.583916.4161
21612776.5−27.075322.9247
21712763.1−16.284633.7154
21812750.8−33.508916.4911
20522808.4−46.81263.1874
20622795.5−46.48063.5194
20722782.8−46.10963.8904
20822770.1−45.21904.7810
20922757.7−45.40784.5922
21022745.5−46.68803.3120
19832810.3−49.01980.9802
19932797.3−48.93771.0623
20032784.4−48.86231.1377
20132771.7−48.67471.3253
20232759.1−48.65561.3444
20332746.6−48.98111.0189

For each WGM, the proper resonance frequency is taken into account in order to evaluate all the spectroscopic and physical parameters (refractive index, emission cross-section, absorption cross-section, etc.) affecting the competition with the other WGMs. The modes with n=1, 2, 3 and m=l have been considered in the simulation. WGMs with different values of l and m have not been considered because they exhibited a low overlapping factor Γl,m,nq,s. Table 4 reports the comparison among the parameter values calculated by the proposed PSO algorithm and those obtained with the deterministic DA one illustrated in Ref. 26. The use of a deterministic method requires a suitable discretization for R0, a, δ, g and thus the investigation of an extremely high number of different cases with a very large time consumption.

Table 4

Comparison between deterministic approach (DA) and PSO: gain, microsphere radius Ro, taper waist radius a, taper angle δ, and taper-microsphere gap.

VariableDA valuePSO value
DA maximum gain/fitness global best (dB)6.933.7
Microsphere radius (μm)2545
Taper waist radius (nm)700517
Taper angle (rad)0.030.02
Taper-microsphere gap (nm)560512

Table 5 reports the characteristics of the PSO optimized amplifier. A low intrinsic signal lifetime τ0, resulting in low losses, is calculated. The results reported in Tables 3 to 5 show that the proposed PSO approach finds solutions more efficiently than the deterministic one.26

Table 5

Characteristics of the PSO optimized amplifier.

VariableValue
Signal WGMs moden=1, l=m=217
Signal wavelength λs (nm)2763.1
Signal refractive index of microsphere ns and taper nf2.2253
Pump WGMs moden=1, l=m=641
Pump wavelength λp (nm)979.9
Intrinsic signal lifetime τ0 (μs)0.1357
Coupling signal lifetime τext (ns)0.2248
Optical gain (dB)33.7

A high number of PSO launches have been performed. In almost all cases, 18 iterations were required for convergence, obtaining a global best close to 33.7 dB.

The discrepancy in the calculated maximum gain observed between the DA, G=6.9dB, and the PSO, G=33.7dB, is due to the higher efficiency of global optimization approach, allowing a better design to parity of calculation time consumption. In fact, PSO can optimize simultaneously a high number of parameters through an automated global solution search. On the contrary, in DA, to avoid an extremely large time consumption, a parameter at a time is varied, by fixing all the others which are supposed to be optimized (local search). A global search could be performed with a DA, but a very high number of simulation cases are required. The DA simulation number is related to the calculation accuracy (parameter quantization/discretization) and to the number of parameters to be optimized. When the designer chooses the most promising DA simulation cases, some particular configurations can be neglected, thus losing the best configuration. Therefore, in this paper, PSO has allowed the identification of a specific amplifier configuration not included in the deterministic investigation illustrated in Ref. 26.

The performance of the PSO approach can be easily understood by the example of Fig. 5. It illustrates the PSO solution: (a) microsphere radius R0 and taper waist radius a; (b) taper angle δ and taper-microsphere gap g. The color represents the optical gain corresponding to each particle. It is worthwhile to note that many particles are located in a small region around the maximum gain value (global best).

Fig. 5

PSO optimized solutions: (a) Microsphere radius R0 and fiber taper radius a. (b) Gap g and taper angle δ.

OE_53_7_071805_f005.png

Figure 6 illustrates the fitness F(xi) corresponding to the global best (i.e., gain G in decibel, calculated for the global best of the swarm) versus iteration number. The best particle provides a gain very close to the maximum one after only 18 iterations. This confirms that the algorithm enables one to find solutions quickly.

Fig. 6

Fitness function corresponding to global best versus iterations.

OE_53_7_071805_f006.png

The simulation results indicate that the proposed Er3+-doped chalcogenide microsphere amplifier, evanescently coupled with a tapered optical fiber, seems very promising and could find interesting applications. Although good Ga5Ge20Sb10S65 have been fabricated and characterized, the amplifier construction is related to the nontrivial problem of drawing a suitable Ga5Ge20Sb10S65 fiber taper with very small radius. Therefore, further technological efforts will be dedicated in future to this aim. For instance, an integrated optical system can be envisaged to overcome the fragility of fiber taper for such dimensions.39

4.

Conclusions

In this paper, an accurate design of Er3+-doped chalcogenide microsphere amplifier evanescently coupled with a tapered optical fiber has been performed. The amplifying system has been optimized via a PSO procedure for operation close to 2770 nm. The PSO has provided surprising performance in terms of convergence and efficiency, allowing a global optimization of the microsphere amplifier. An improvement of the simulated gain of the microsphere amplifier from G=6.9dB, found using DA, to G=33.7dB, found in this paper using PSO, has been obtained. This demonstrates that a deterministic solution searching strategy does not allow an efficient design in these kinds of problems. Moreover, the simulation results indicate that the proposed Er3+-doped chalcogenide microsphere amplifier, evanescently coupled with a tapered optical fiber, is feasible after drawing a suitable Ga5Ge20Sb10S65 fiber taper with radius close to 517 nm.

References

1. A. B. MatskoV. S. Ilchenko, “Optical resonators with whispering-gallery modes—Part I: Basics,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Quantum Electron. 12(1), 3–13 (2006).IJSQEN1077-260X http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2005.862952 Google Scholar

2. M. L. GorodetskyV. V. Ilchenko, “High-Q optical whispering gallery microresonators: precession approach for spherical mode analysis and emission patterns with prism couplers,” Opt. Commun. 113(1–3), 133–143 (1994).OPCOB80030-4018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0030-4018(94)90603-3 Google Scholar

3. A. SerpenguzelS. ArnoldG. Griffel, “Excitation of resonances of microspheres on an optical fiber,” Opt. Lett. 20(7), 654–656 (1995).OPLEDP0146-9592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.20.000654 Google Scholar

4. F. Treussartet al., “Microlasers based on silica microspheres,” Ann. Telecommun. 52(11–12), 557–568 (1997).ANTEAU0003-4347 Google Scholar

5. J. C. Knightet al., “Phase-matched excitation of whispering gallery mode resonances using a fiber taper,” Opt. Lett. 22(15), 1129–1131 (1997).OPLEDP0146-9592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.22.001129 Google Scholar

6. H.-C. Renet al., “High-Q microsphere biosensor-analysis for adsorption of rodlike bacteria,” Opt. Express 15(25), 17410–17423 (2007).OPEXFF1094-4087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.15.017410 Google Scholar

7. F. VollomerA. Stephen, “Whispering-gallery-mode biosensing: label-free detection down to single molecules,” Nature Methods 5(7), 591–596 (2008).1548-7091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1221 Google Scholar

8. L. YangK. J. Vahala, “Gain functionalization of silica microresonators,” Opt. Lett. 28(8), 592–594 (2003).OPLEDP0146-9592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.28.000592 Google Scholar

9. P. Wanget al., “Packaged chalcogenide microsphere resonator with high Q-factor,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 102(13), 131110 (2013).APPLAB0003-6951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4801474 Google Scholar

10. G. S. Muruganet al., “Integrated Nd-doped borosilicate glass microsphere laser,” Opt. Lett. 36(1), 73–75 (2011).OPLEDP0146-9592 Google Scholar

11. S.Y. Chenet al., “Characteristics of Er and Er-Yb-Cr doped phosphate microsphere fibre lasers,” Opt. Commun. 282(18), 3765–3769 (2009).OPCOB80030-4018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2009.06.019 Google Scholar

12. P. Feron, “Whispering gallery mode lasers in erbium doped fluoride glasses,” Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie 29(1–2), 317–329 (2004). Google Scholar

13. G. N. Contiet al., “Spectroscopic and lasing properties of Er3+ doped glass microspheres,” Non Cryst. Solids 352(23–25), 2360–2363 (2006).JNCSBJ0022-3093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.01.089 Google Scholar

14. K. MiuraK. TanakaK. Hirao, “CW laser oscillation on both the 4F3/24I11/2 and 4F3/24I13/2 transitions of Nd3+ ions using a fluoride glass microsphere,” J. Non Cryst. Solids 213–214, 276–280 (1997).JNCSBJ0022-3093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3093(96)00671-0 Google Scholar

15. G. R. Elliotet al., “Chalcogenide glass microspheres; their production, characterization and potential,” Opt. Express 15(26), 17542–17553 (2007).OPEXFF1094-4087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.15.017542 Google Scholar

16. P. Wanget al., “Chalcogenide microsphere fabricated from fiber tapers using contact with a high-temperature ceramic surface,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 24(13), 1103–1105 (2012).IPTLEL1041-1135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2012.2195722 Google Scholar

17. C. Grilletet al., “Fiber taper coupling to chalcogenide microsphere modes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92(17), 171109–171111 (2008).APPLAB0003-6951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2918128 Google Scholar

18. D. H. Broadduset al., “Silicon-waveguide-coupled high-Q chalcogenide microspheres,” Opt. Express 17(8), 5998–6003 (2009).OPEXFF1094-4087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.005998 Google Scholar

19. T. YanoS. ShibataT. Kishi, “Fabrication of micrometer-size glass solid immersion lens,” J. Appl. Phys. B 83(2), 167–170 (2006).APBOEM0946-2171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00340-006-2178-1 Google Scholar

20. L. Mesciaet al., “Design of rare-Earth-doped microspheres,” IEEE Photon. Techonol. Lett. 22(6), 422–424 (2010).IPTLEL1041-1135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2009.2039932 Google Scholar

21. T. KoukiT. Makoto, “Optical microsphere amplification system,” Opt. Lett. 32(21), 3197–3199 (2007).OPLEDP0146-9592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.32.003197 Google Scholar

22. Y.G. BoucherP. Féron, “Generalized transfer function: a simple model applied to active single-mode microring resonators,” Opt. Commun. 282(19), 3940–3947 (2009).OPCOB80030-4018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2009.06.048 Google Scholar

23. A. Giaquintoet al., “Particle swarm optimization-based approach for accurate evaluation of upconversion parameters in Er3+-doped fibers,” Opt. Lett. 36(2), 142–144 (2011).OPLEDP0146-9592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.36.000142 Google Scholar

24. L. Mesciaet al., “Particle swarm optimization for the design and characterization of silica-based photonic crystal fiber amplifiers,” J. Non Cryst. Solids 357(8–9), 1851–1855 (2011).JNCSBJ0022-3093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.12.049 Google Scholar

25. S. Girardet al., “Design of radiation-hardened rare-Earth doped amplifiers through a coupled experiment/simulation approach,” J. Lightwave Technol. 31(8), 1247–1254 (2013).JLTEDG0733-8724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2013.2245304 Google Scholar

26. L. Mesciaet al., “Design of mid-infrared amplifiers based on fiber taper coupling to erbium-doped microspherical resonator,” Opt. Express 20(7), 7616–7629 (2012).OPEXFF1094-4087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.007616 Google Scholar

27. L. Mesciaet al., “Design of mid-IR Er3+-doped microsphere laser,” IEEE Photon. J. 5(4), 1501308 (2013).1943-0655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JPHOT.2013.2277052 Google Scholar

28. F. Prudenzanoet al., “Theoretical study of cascade laser in erbium-doped chalcogenide glass fibers,” Opt. Mater. 33(2), 241–245 (2010).OMATET0925-3467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2010.10.046 Google Scholar

29. B. E. LittleJ.-P. LaineH. A. Haus, “Analytic theory of coupling from tapered fibers and half-blocks into microsphere resonators,” J. Lightwave Technol. 17(4), 704–715 (1999).JLTEDG0733-8724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/50.754802 Google Scholar

30. M. L. GorodetskyV. S. Ilchenko, “Optical microsphere resonators: optimal coupling to high-Q whispering-gallery modes,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 16(1), 147–154 (1999).JOBPDE0740-3224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.16.000147 Google Scholar

31. C.-L. Zouet al., “Taper-microsphere coupling with numerical calculation of coupled-mode theory,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 25(11), 1895–1898 (2008).JOBPDE0740-3224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.25.001895 Google Scholar

32. H. A. Haus, Waves and Fields in Optoelectronics, Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey (1984). Google Scholar

33. M. J. F. Digonnet, Rare-Earth-Doper Fider Lasers and Amplifiers, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York (2001). Google Scholar

34. K. Vahala, Optical Microcavitie, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore (2004). Google Scholar

35. A.W. SnyderJ. D. Love, Optical Waveguide Theory, Chapman and Hall, London (1988). Google Scholar

36. J. RobinsonY. Rahmat-Samii, “Particle swarm optimization in electromagnetics,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 52(2), 397–407 (2004).IETPAK0018-926X http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2004.823969 Google Scholar

37. N. JinY. Rahmat-Samii, “Advances in particle swarm optimization for antenna designs: real-number, binary, single-objective and multiobjective implementations,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 55(3), 556–567 (2007).IETPAK0018-926X http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2007.891552 Google Scholar

38. V. Moizanet al., “Er3+-doped GeGaSbS glasses for mid-IR fibre laser application: synthesis and rare earth spectroscopy,” Opt. Mater. 31(1), 39–46 (2008).OMATET0925-3467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2008.01.005 Google Scholar

39. J. Charrieret al., “Sulphide GaxGe25-xSb10S65 (x=0, 5) sputtered films: elaboration and optical characterisation of planar and rib optical waveguides,” J. Appl. Phys. 104(7), 073110 (2008).JAPIAU0021-8979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2968248 Google Scholar

Biography

Giuseppe Palma received the degree in electronic engineering from the Politecnico di Bari in September 2013. He has received a scholarship for postgraduate research activity at the Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica e dell’Informazione of the Politecnico di Bari. His research activity regards the modeling of active microspheres and substrate integrated waveguides. He is a member of the Italian Society of Optics and Photonics (SIOF).

Pietro Bia received bachelor’s and master’s degrees in 2008 and 2010, respectively. During 2011 he received a scholarship for postgraduate research activities for the topic: “Design of innovative cladding-pumped fiber lasers, nonlinear effects induced by high optical power density and microsphere laser.” Since 2012 he has been a PhD student of Politecnico di Bari. He is a member of Italian Society of Optics and Photonics (SIOF-EOS) and Italian Society of Electromagnetism (SIEm).

Luciano Mescia received his PhD degree in electromagnetic fields in 2003. His research interests include the development of artificial neural networks, genetic algorithm, swarm intelligence applied to rare earth doped fiber lasers and amplifiers. He is performing studies regarding the design of innovative antenna array for energy harvesting applications, the analysis and synthesis of novel dielectric lens antennas operating in the microwave and millimeter frequency range, the development of novel FDTD schemes based on fractional calculus.

Tetsuji Yano is an associate professor at Tokyo Institute of Technology. He received his BS, MS, and doctor of engineering from Tokyo Institute of technology. His current research covers the glass materials processing and their application including optical functionalities of devices of glass.

Virginie Nazabal graduated from the Paris VI University and the Bordeaux University for PhD, in 1999. She joined the NIMS (Japan) for JSPS fellowship position for two years and the CNRS since 2001 (Glass & Ceramic team, ISCR, Rennes University). Her research interests concern vitreous materials for optics with nearly 100 publications. She received in 2010 a bronze medal of CNRS and a Pollutec-Ademe award in 2011 for innovative techniques for the environment.

Jun Taguchi was a PhD candidate at Tokyo Institute of Technology at the time when this research was in progress. He received BS, MS, and doctor of engineering from Tokyo Institute of Technology. At the present, he is a researcher at Corning Incorporated, Japan.

Alain Moréac received the PhD degree in physics (University Rennes 1—France) in 1995. In 1996, he joined DILOR (Lille, France), which became Jobin-Yvon Raman Division (today Horiba Scientific (Villeneuve d’Ascq, France): he was manager of the Raman Service & Quality Control Team. Since 2003, he belongs to the Institute of Physics of Rennes (University Rennes 1) as engineer for research. He is in charge of Raman spectroscopy, extended to the university’s Raman platform.

Francesco Prudenzano graduated in electronic engineering from the University of Bari in April 1990. Since 2003 he has been associate professor in electromagnetic fields at Politecnico di Bari. His research activity includes modeling and characterization of optical and microwave devices, substrate integrated waveguides, rare earth doped photonic crystal fibers, optical sensors, and nonlinear optics. He has co-authored over 320 publications, 240 published in journals and international conferences. He is involved in several national and international research projects and co-operations.

© The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Giuseppe Palma, Pietro Bia, Luciano Mescia, Tetsuji Yano, Virginie Nazabal, Jun Taguchi, Alain Moreac, Francesco Prudenzano, "Design of fiber coupled Er3+:chalcogenide microsphere amplifier via particle swarm optimization algorithm," Optical Engineering 53(7), 071805 (23 December 2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.53.7.071805
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES


SHARE
KEYWORDS
Particle swarm optimization

Erbium

Optical amplifiers

Chalcogenides

Fiber amplifiers

Glasses

Fiber couplers

Back to Top