5 June 2018 Performance of differential synthetic aperture ladar versus phase-gradient autofocus at large phase errors and low return levels
Minglei Li, Jin Wu, Tao Bai, Lei Wan, Danyang Li, Zhilong Zhao
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
The performance of differential synthetic aperture ladar (DSAL) processing versus phase-gradient autofocus (PGA) technique in SAL image formation is demonstrated experimentally using phase history data (PHD) with large random phase errors and various target returns generated from a laboratory DSAL setup operating at 1550-nm wavelength. Results show that at strong return levels, both DSAL and PGA are very robust in focusing high-resolution images from the PHD; whereas, as target returns become weak and PHD is dominated by noise, the iterative PGA performs less effectively than the DSAL does. It is concluded that, on the whole, the DSAL technique is possibly more robust than PGA in both effectiveness and efficiencies.
© 2018 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) 0091-3286/2018/$25.00 © 2018 SPIE
Minglei Li, Jin Wu, Tao Bai, Lei Wan, Danyang Li, and Zhilong Zhao "Performance of differential synthetic aperture ladar versus phase-gradient autofocus at large phase errors and low return levels," Optical Engineering 57(6), 063103 (5 June 2018). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.57.6.063103
Received: 27 February 2018; Accepted: 18 May 2018; Published: 5 June 2018
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 2 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Image processing

LIDAR

Image acquisition

Image quality standards

Error analysis

Lithium

Image quality

RELATED CONTENT


Back to Top