This will count as one of your downloads.
You will have access to both the presentation and article (if available).
Different types of 3D sensors, such as LiDAR and RGB-D cameras, capture data with different resolution, range, and noise characteristics. It is often desired to merge these different types of data together into a coherent scene, but automatic alignment algorithms generally assume that the characteristics of each fragment are all similar. Our goal is to evaluate the performance of these algorithms on data with different characteristics to enable the integration of data from multiple types of sensors.
We use the Redwood dataset, which has high-resolution scans of several different environments captured using a stationary LiDAR scanner. We first develop a method to emulate the capture of these environments as viewed by different types of sensor by leveraging OpenGL and a mesh creation process. Next, we take fragments of these captures which represent scenarios in which each type of sensor would be used, using our scanning experience to inform the selection process. Finally, we attempt to merge the fragments together using several automatic algorithms and evaluate how the results compare with the original scenes. We evaluate based on transformation similarity to ground truth, algorithm speed and ease of use, and subjective quality assessments.
We have developed and used a variety of IQMs and VQMs related to the pilot’s ability to detect hazards in the scene and to maintain situational awareness. Some of these metrics can be made agnostic to sensor type. Not only are the metrics suitable for evaluating algorithm and sensor variation, they are also suitable for choosing the most cost effective solution to improve operating conditions in degraded visual environments.
This will count as one of your downloads.
You will have access to both the presentation and article (if available).
View contact details
No SPIE Account? Create one
