Dr. Gary A. Rosenberg Profile

Dr. Gary A. Rosenberg

at Univ. of New Mexico Health Sciences Ctr.

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Publications (1)

Proceedings Article | 28 February 2020 Presentation + Paper

Identification of dementia subtypes based on a diffusion MRI multi-model approach

Rajikha Raja, Arvind Caprihan, Gary Rosenberg, Vince Calhoun

Proceedings Volume 11317, 1131709 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2549279

KEYWORDS: Dementia, Diffusion tensor imaging, Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging, Brain, Magnetic resonance imaging, Independent component analysis, Alzheimer's disease

Read Abstract +

Dementia refers to symptoms associated with cognitive decline which is widespread in aging population. Among the various subtypes of dementia, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) are the two most prevalent types. The main aim of this study is to identify biomarkers which could accurately distinguish between the two dementia subtypes, AD and VCI, in order to aid the physician in planning disease specific treatments. Diffusion weighted MRI (DW-MRI) studies have been widely reported in neuroimaging research as an efficient biomarker in identifying the pathologies associated with dementia. Generally, these studies utilize the metrics estimated from a specific DW-MRI model. For the first time, we attempted to use diffusion derived metrics from more than a single model through fusion technique. In this study, the metrics from two well known DW-MRI models such as diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) are fused using a multiset canonical correlation analysis combined with joint independent component analysis (mCCA+jICA) fusion framework to investigate the potential differences between AD and VCI groups. The participants include 35 healthy controls, 24 AD subjects and 23 VCI subjects. DWMRI data acquired with maximum b-value greater than or equal to 2000 s/mm² which is suitable for DKI fitting. DTI derived metrics such as mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA), axial diffusivity (AxD) and radial diffusivity (RD) and DKI metrics such as mean kurtosis (MK), axial kurtosis (AK) and radial kurtosis (RK) are the diffusion features fused to obtain 8 independent components for each feature along with corresponding mixing coefficients. Performance of the proposed multi-model fusion framework is evaluated by comparing the group level testing carried out on features from individual diffusion models with the fused features from proposed method. Results showed that fusion methodology outperformed conventional unimodel approach in terms of distinguishing between subject groups. Diffusion features from individual models successfully distinguished between HC and disease groups (HC Vs AD and HC Vs VCI) with a minimum p-value of 0.00123 but failed to differentiate AD and VCI. On the other hand, the group differences between mixing coefficients obtained from fusion, showed differences between all pairs of subject groups (HC Vs AD, HC Vs VCI and AD Vs VCI). The significant p-value between AD and VCI obtained was 0.000897. The independent spatial components corresponding to mixing coefficient of minimum p-value was overlapped on MNI white matter (WM) tract atlas to identify the prominent WM tracts which showed a significant difference between AD and VCI. The WM tracts thus identified were superior longitudinal fasciculus, anterior thalamic radiation, optic radiation, cingulum and arcuate fasciculus. ROC analysis showed increased area under curve for fused features (average AUC=0.913) as compared to that of unimodel features (average AUC=0.77) which shows the increased sensitivity of proposed method.

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years